Upload
terence-hardy
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Open Symposium on Strategic Collobations for eLearnin Gilbert PaquetteLORNET Scientific DirectorTélé-Université
Starting collaborations in Quebec
Major International Needs and LORNET
Strategic collaborations abroad
Conclusion
11
Priorities and orientations
22
33
44
• Huge demand towards Web-based resources for knowledge and skills acquisition
• Towards a new generation of the Internet: Tackle the exponential growth of available information.
• Flexible learning technologies, accessible anywhere, anytime, in a variety of context
• Knowledge extraction from documents for knowledge management.
• Software agents adaptable to users and their contexts to promote intelligent use of information.
• Maximal use of the capacity of broadband networks for advanced multimedia delivery.
• Seamless technology integration made simple by powerful and versatile assembly systems.
Major International Needs and LORNET11
International Consortia• US: Sakai and UPortal:
– 80 universities (including 4 canadian); Mellon Foundation (2,4
millions $) and 4 millions in-kind; english only • France:
– 4 consortias financed by Éducation Nationale, from 1,2 M euros to 4,5 millions euros.
• Claroline: – started at Université de Louvain, Belgium, 443 organizations in 63
countries; typical open source project; multilingual • Moodle:
– 50 000 individual users in 160 countries; multilingual
Strategic Collaborations abroad22
• Governance by a board of University representatives
• Technical joint development team• Open source orientation • Assembly of open source and proprietary
components• An Open Portal Approach instead of tranditinal
LMS and LKMS• Large interest in LORs and Standards• Intellectual Property: a question of recognition
more than retribution
Strategic Collaborations abroad22
• All 17 universities or superior schools use some platforms• 44 % of university students have used a platform at least
once étudiants ont interagi avec un ENA dans le cadre de leur formation.
• 9 institutions have developed their own platforms, TELUQ is the only instiutions that used no commercial platform
• Proprietary plaforms are still dominant , use a a few functionalities:– WebCT in 10 institutions
– Claroline (open source ) in 3 institutions
– Learning Space in 2 institutions
– First Class, QuickPlace, Sigal, Moodle each used in 1 institutions
Actual Situation in Quebec - A 2004 survey33
No more a marginal phenomena• 5 764 complete on-line courses • 12 000 courses use a platform for delivery• 7 929) professors and tutors have and access code to a
platform• 197 524 students have and access code to a platform
Few functionalities are used• Delivery of documents• Communication tools and forums• Little use for course design
New needs expressed: more flexibility in pedagogical models
Actual Situation in Quebec - A 2004 survey33
• Infrastructure for wired schools, CEGEP and Universities (RISQ)
• Ministry of Education Working Group on Norms and Standards
• LO Repository Project started in 9 universities• PROCENA : towards a common university portal
in Quebec• Concepta: 4 level portal base on DotNetNuke
integrating tools and modules from previous platforms (Explora, Adapweb, Sydife)
Starting Collaborations between universities in Quebec33
• Focus on real learning object repository projects• Build a multilingual eLearning Warehouse: tools,
documents, components, portal assembly tools• Support provincial collaboration projects • Support networking between provincial
networks of repositories and portals• Need of acoordinating body to fund long term
intiatives in Canada, in collaboration with the provinces
• Support the Globe Project• Dowplay for a while other international
collaboration till we have more to offer (They know what to do, we know what to do)
Priorities and orientations44
Open Symposium on Strategic Collobations for eLearnin Gilbert PaquetteLORNET Scientific DirectorTélé-Université