Open Letter To Andy Martin

8/7/2019 Open Letter To Andy Martin

1/5

AN OPEN LETTER TO ANDY MARTIN

byPixel Patriot

February 25 th, 2011 Andy MartinNational Campaign HeadquartersP. O. Box 1851New York, NY 10150-1851Telephone: (866) 706-ANDYE-mail: [email protected]

Dear Mr. Martin,

You have been very outspoken on the issue of Barack Obamas ineligibility which iscommendable. When interviewed by KITV4 News, you were asked:

If the child of an immigrant should not be the president of the United States? And your response was quite telling { Time: 1 min 57 sec: }

http://www.kitv.com/r/23328002/detail.html

If his parents didnt meet the natural born test when he was born,personally I would enforce the ConstitutionYes

You yourself recently announced your candidacy for the President of the UnitedStates. However, your own status as to being a natural born Citizen has beenquestioned several times recently and you dismissed it as a distraction from Obots.

The issue for the record is this: Were both of your parents citizens (naturalized by statute or by natural law)at the time of your birth?
http://www.kitv.com/r/23328002/detail.htmlhttp://www.kitv.com/r/23328002/detail.htmlhttp://www.kitv.com/r/23328002/detail.html


2/5

This document:

if genuine would indicate otherwise. Your father at birth, Ralph Bernard Martin-Trigona became a naturalized citizen on

September 5, 1950; after you were born in 1945. The moment of truth is upon us andcannot be denied. We the People demand to know with certainty the citizenship statusof both of your parents at the time of your birth. Unless you can document to the contrary,this Alien Registration card as evidenced in the photograph assigning the Alien Registrationnumber of 6266616 to your Father in U.S. District Court in Brooklyn New York is sufficient topreclude you from being a natural born Citizen and subsequently from having thenecessary qualifications for the job per Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.

Let it be shown, made manifest and retold for all those with ears to hear; this is your responsewhen asked by individuals who are not Obots and have no agenda other thantrying to verify the veracity of the underlying claims:

"Thanks for the inquiry. The questions you relate do indeed come from Obamabots as you correctly note. I have offered to release my birth certificate when Obama releases his. I don't see any of the other presidential candidates being asked to respond to similar challenges.Obama is, as usual, targeting only me with his tactics because I am the only opponent he fears in November, 2012. And, as usual, I am flattered by his/their attention. Again, thanks for asking, and thanks for your thoughts."

Respectfully Mr. Martin your response was woefully inadequate.

First of all, you were given a teachable moment and you failed miserably.

Secondly, as a presidential candidate your actions should demonstrate a natural ability to lead.It should be evident to the voters you are trying to win over, that you are a man of characterand honor in everything you do; not just when it is forced upon you. The leader for theseUnited States, not to mention of the Free World needs to comport a principled statesman-likedemeanor; a man or woman willing to do the right thing even during the hard times. Someonewho has proven over and over again they can be trusted to always put the interests andsecurity of the nation above all else.


3/5

Thirdly, in light of your efforts to compel transparency from Obama and the controllingauthorities complicit in allowing his treasonous usurpation to continue, you should actively beseeking to be a part of the solution, not exacerbating our nations distress in her hour of need.However, what conclusions are we to draw from your actions other than you are trying toperpetuate it? Your assertion that you don't see any of the other presidential candidatesbeing asked to respond to similar challenges is either recklessly naive or patently andabsurdly false.

An Illinois election expert explains the dilemma at the core of our Constitutional Crisis of whichno less than 32 candidates were challenged in the last election cycle:

According to Illinois Statute, candidates running for office self-certify that they are legally qualified for office. They sign and certify a Statement of Candidacy and submit it to the election authority, who then decides if the application to be on the ballot is in apparent conformity with the law.Election authorities in Illinois have independent authority to determine what is in apparent conformity with the law, thus these standards literally vary from election to election, AND from county to county. However, Illinois statutes do not require proof of citizenship or evidence of being constitutionally eligible to be produced. The election authority cannot ask for proof of citizenship for any measure of apparent conformity.The result is no candidate is screened for constitutional eligibility.They self certify without placing any proof in the public record.Note - Proof of all other measures of being legally qualified are part of the public record for the election. This effectively means that there is no public record from the election, verifying if anyone running for office is constitutionally eligible based on citizenship, or as in the case of President and Vice President - Natural Born Citizenship. Following the period to qualify for ballot position, the public can challenge

candidates who want to be on their ballot. This process is prohibitive because there is no public record proving the candidates self certifying affirmation of being legally qualified (i.e. U.S. Citizen). Thus, the public must challenge based on the lack of proof.

No one running for office has had their citizenship posted as part of the

public record for the election. Unless they post proof on their website, there is no place for the election authorities to store proof of something that they are not allowed to ask for.

Mr. Martin you say you are The Right Republican for President of the United States" however,two wrongs don't make a right. All candidates for President and Vice-President must be heldto the same standard which requires them to be a natural born Citizen. The eligibility issuehas always been about the electoral process which is an honor system and in 2008Obama/Soetoro and Pelosi dishonored that system. You have to understand that if you arechoosing to be secretive and obfuscatory as a means by which you will somehow makeObama look even more hypocritical than he already is, then that is your own personal battleyou are waging but "We the People" can't support you because it would put us in the untenableposition of discrediting ourselves as hypocrites. You may have some sort of strategy forpersonally bringing down Obama, but you can't throw out the baby with the bath water.


4/5


5/5

Even though it is a requirement that has been overlooked until now, We the People will bescrutinizing this step of the process with meticulous and unerring surety.

Pray tell Mr. Martin; please enlighten us as to who is on your shortlist for Attorney Generalto head up the Dept. of Justice? Your quandary belies all precedents. Should you stay thecourse as the self-proclaimed King of the Birthers in pursuit of justice against theUsurper-in-Chief, the moment you succeed; the very same law that brings down Obama

will uncloak the eyes of Lady Justice. On the other hand should you choose the path ofquid pro quo sealing Obamas fate satisfactory to yours thereby eluding the Constitutionalmandates, then Mr. Holder could probably be persuaded to stick around.

Nevermore, Mr. Martin, Nevermore! Respectfully,Concerned Citizen and Defender of the Truth

Documents

Open Letter To Andy Martin