Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Open Access, Data Management plans, the pitfalls and possibilities of sharing research data
Thomas Crouzier – 14th of June 2019
Who am I?
2019-06-14 2
Research Policy Innovation
The digital science wave
2019-06-14 3
The digital science wave
2019-06-14 4
Public support to build infrastructure
Open access and open data
Where to get informed?
2019-06-14 5
Library and your favorite Research Office!
Connected researcher (http://connectedresearchers.com)
LabWorm (http://labworm.com)
400+ Tools and innovations in scholarly communication
(http://bit.ly/innoscholcomm-list)
2019-06-14 6
Electronic lab notebook
A researcher’s sidekick
2019-06-14 7
Electronic lab notebook
A pocket guide to electronic laboratory notebooks in the academic life sciences - Ulrich Dirnagl
2019-06-14 8
Electronic lab notebook
Electronic lab notebook
2019-06-14 9
• Most of the original data obtained in laboratories worldwide
is already digital and can easily be integrated to ELN.
• ELNs foster collaboration, as protocols, data and concepts
can be shared within or between groups.
• Entries can be time stamped, changes are recorded, versions
controlled.
• Protocols used frequently can simply be integrated as
templates.
• Project progress can be easily monitored by project leaders.
• ELNs are searchable, archiving is simple
Electronic lab notebook
2019-06-14 10
• Hard to get people on board
• Can be expensive (15€/user/month for labfolder)
• Hard to get everyone to use it in the same way
• Hard to use it as communication platform
• Stop worrying too much about data loss over generations
• Easy to access the data from your students
• The search function!
2019-06-14 11
Electronic lab notebook
https://datamanagement.hms.harvard.edu/electronic-lab-notebooks
2019-06-14 12
Communication with instrumentation
2019-06-14 13
Integration with data analysis
Pre-prints
2019-06-14 14
Pre-prints
2019-06-14 15
What’s a preprint?
2019-06-14 16
“a complete written description of a body
of scientific work that has yet to be
published in a journal.”
Bourne PE, Polka JK, Vale RD, Kiley R. Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint
submission. PLoS Computational Biology. 2017;13(5):e1005473
History
2019-06-14 17
Physics and later, other disciplines,
including mathematics, computer
science, and quantitative biology)
Now over 1 million preprints published
on arXiv
ASAPbio meeting held in February
of 2016 (http://asapbio.org)
bioRxiv and PeerJ Preprints
BioRxiv
2019-06-14 18
Number of preprints posted to
bioRxiv is rising fast
1.1 million downloads last October
alone!
Publication after bioRxiv
2019-06-14 19
42% of all preprints have
been published in a peer-
review journal
Top 10 journals to which
the papers have gone:
Why pre-prints
2019-06-14 20
1. Speed up dissemination
2. Provide a record of priority
3. Does not lead to being scooped
4. Provide access to scholarly content that would
otherwise be lost
5. Does not imply low quality
6. Does not typically preclude publication
7. Can further inform grant review and academic
advancement
In our case…
2019-06-14 21
Pre-print route:
Our article submitted to BioArxiv in February 2019
More than 270 downloads since.
Traditional publishing route:
Nature Materials, Nature Communications, Advanced Materials,
Advanced Functional Materials
In re-review and still not published!
What we need @KTH
2019-06-14 22
ELN as an infrastructure.
Data managers as service in our division (close to home)
Encourage pre-print presence, integrate in recruitment and
promotion policies