Upload
jescie-moore
View
22
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
OOMC and Local RPRS Settlement Alignment. January 2007 WMS Meeting Ino Gonzalez ERCOT Settlements. Objectives. Align Settlement of Local RPRS Deployments with that of OOMC. Reasons for Proposal. Potomac Economics Recommendation Both Services Utilized to Solve Local Constraints - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
OOMC and Local RPRSSettlement Alignment
January 2007WMS Meeting
Ino Gonzalez
ERCOT Settlements
Objectives
• Align Settlement of Local RPRS Deployments with that of OOMC
Reasons for Proposal
• Potomac Economics Recommendation– Both Services Utilized to Solve Local Constraints– Consistent Settlement Methodology– Include Start-Up Claw-Back– Include Claw-Back Three Hours After End of Deployment
• WMS Request for PRR proposal
Reasons for OOMCDeployments
6.5.10 Out of Merit Capacity and Out of Merit Energy Services
ERCOT will use OOMC and OOME Services to procure additional capacity and energy required to provide reliable ERCOT System operation, or to effectively manage Local Congestion as determined by ERCOT.
Reasons for Local RPRS Deployments
6.8.1.11 Local Congestion Replacement Reserve Payment to QSE
The QSE for a Resource selected to provide RPRS to resolve Local Congestion that actually reconnects to the ERCOT Transmission Grid and starts the unit in order to provide RPRS will be paid both the Resource Category Generic Startup Cost for starting the unit and the Resource Category Generic Minimum Energy Cost less the MCPE for operating at the Low Sustainable Limit (LSL) as set forth in the Resource Plan for that unit during the instructed interval (s). If the MCPE during the intervals of an hour in which ERCOT deploys a Resource for RPRS provides revenue in excess of the hourly cost to start and operates the unit at LSL, the QSE representing the Resource may retain any such excess revenue.
Settlement of OOMC Deployments
If RPRS Bid Price exists,Then:
PCOOM = (-1)*Min [(BPRP * COOMRP), (PS + PO)]Else:
PCOOM = -1 * (PS + PO)
Where:PCOOM = OOMC Payments ($)BPRP = Bid Price for Replacement Reserve ($/MW)COOMRP = OOMC Awarded Capacity (MW)PS = Start Up Price PO = Operating Price
Settlement of OOMC DeploymentsIf the unit is deemed to be on-line,
Then:PS = 0
PO = ∑ [(RCGMEC – MCPE) * MIN(LSL/4, MR) ]
Else:
PS = Max [ 0, ( RCGSC – { ∑ (MCPE * MR) }) ] / # of instructed hours
PO = ∑ [(RCGMEC – MCPE) * MIN(LSL/4, MR) ]
Where:RCGMEC = Resource Category Generic Minimum Energy Cost RCGSC = Resource Category Generic Startup Cost LSL = Resource Low Sustainable LimitMCPE = Balancing Energy Market Clearing MR = Actual Metered Output of the Resource
Clawback
Settlement of OOMC DeploymentsIf resource continues to remain online after the instructed intervals
Then:CRCGSC = ∑ (MCPE – RCGFC) * MR
If CRCGSC > 0 & Total PS>0
PS = Max(0,[ RCGSC – ∑ (MCPE * MR) - CRCGSC ]) / # hours
Else
PS = Max(0,[ RCGSC – ∑ (MCPE * MR) ]) / # hours
Where: CRCGSC = Charge Against the Resource Category Generic
Startup Cost
Clawback Clawback
Clawback
Settlement of Local RPRS Deployments
Current Methodology
LPC = -1 * Max(0, LPS + LPO)
If unit is deemed to be Off-line,
Then: LPS = RCGSC / N LPO = ∑ [(RCGMEC – MCPE) * MIN(LSL/4, MR) ]
Proposed Methodology
PS (LPS)= [ RCGSC – ∑ (MCPE * MR) - CRCGSC ] / # hours
PO (LPO) = ∑ [(RCGMEC – MCPE) * MIN(LSL/4, MR) ]
Where:LPC = PCOOM = Local RPRS Payments ($)LPS = PS = Price for starting the resourceLPO = PO = Price for operating the resourceN = Number of hours of procurement
Clawback
Conclusion and Recommendation
1. No significant difference between OOMC and Local RPRS Settlements
2. Elimination of significant manual process to identify multiple startup payments for same resource.
3. Align Settlements of OOMC and Local RPRS