Upload
missy
View
54
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Ontario’s Recreation Infrastructure Challenge. 2006 PARKS & RECREATION ONTARIO Educational Forum April 10, 2006 Presented by: John Frittenburg The JF Group. TODAY’S AGENDA. Sport and Recreation Facility Inventory project Why is infrastructure important Implications of aging inventory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Ontario’s Recreation Infrastructure Challenge
2006 PARKS & RECREATION ONTARIOEducational Forum
April 10, 2006
Presented by:
John FrittenburgThe JF Group
TODAY’S AGENDA
Sport and Recreation Facility Inventory project
Why is infrastructure important
Implications of aging inventory
Uses of the facility data
RELATED INFLUENCES
Facility time is at a premium
Designs have changed
Capital funding is limited
Consumer expectations are rising
Political resistance to decommissioning
ABOUT THE SPORT AND
RECREATION FACILITY INVENTORY
PROJECT
MULTIPLE PHASED PROJECT
Major municipal facilities Collect and analyze data Determine capital cost implications
Other municipal facilities Facilities in other sectors Operating and use trends
PROJECT ADVISORS
Steering Committee PRO, ORFA, OPA, OTC
Working Group MTR, YMCA, OFC, Private Sector
PROJECT SCOPE Major Facilities
arenas pools (indoor and outdoor) community centres
Other Facilities gymnasia splash pads curling rinks wading pools fitness centres golf courses outdoor rinks down hill skiing
RESPONSE RATE
96% - 409 of 428 municipalities
Non-respondents – mostly counties, townships and districts
Sample represents 99% of provincial population
ANALYSIS CATEGORIES
Location
Municipal population
Facility age
MAJOR MUNICIPAL FACILITIES
Community Centres 1,370
Arena 677
Indoor Pools 234
Outdoor Pools 279
LIFE CYCLE STATUS – ALL MAJOR FACILITIES
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
CommunityCentres
Arenas Indoor P ools OutdoorP ools
Facility Type
Chart 1Life Cycle Status of Major Facilities
1 - 10 years
11 - 24 years
25 - 49 years
50+ years
DEVELOPMENT TRENDS
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Proportion of Public Inventory
Single Pad
Twin Pads
Triples
Quads
Chart 2Arena Life Cycle Status
1 - 10 years
11 - 24 years
25 - 49 years
50 + years
COMMUNITY CENTRE LIFE CYCLE STATUS
Chart 3Community Centre Life Cycle Status
1 - 10 years14%
11 - 24 years22%
25 - 49 years45%
50 + years19%
ARENA CONFIGURATIONSChart 5
Proportion of Provincial Arena Inventory By Type
Quad (+)1% Twin
15%
Triple1%
Single83%
ARENA CONFIGURATION BY COMMUNITY SIZE
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Proportion of Arenas
Very Small
Small
Medium
Mid Range
Large
Largest
Chart 6Proportion of Arena Types By Community Size
Single
Twin
Triple/Quad
ARENA LIFE CYCLE STATUS
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Proportion of Public Inventory
Single Pad
Twin Pads
Triples
Quads
Chart 2Arena Life Cycle Status
1 - 10 years
11 - 24 years
25 - 49 years
50 + years
POOL LIFE CYCLE STATUSChart 8
Provincial Inventory Indoor Pool by Life Cycle Status
1 - 10 years20%
50 + years2%
11 - 24 years28%
25 - 49 years50%
POOL STATUS BY COMMUNITY SIZE
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Proportion of Pools
Very Small
Small
Medium
Mid Range
Large
Largest
Chart 9Indoor Pool Life Cycle Status By Community Size
1 - 10 years
11 - 24 years
25 - 49 years
50 + years
SUMMARY OF INVENTORY FINDINGS
Average Age
Pools 27 years Arenas 33 years Community Centres 32 years
30% - 50% of stock nearing end of life
Small communities have immediate crisis
APPROACH TO COST ESTIMATE
Establish facility parameters
Determine capital repair and replacement assumptions
Apply assumptions to facility data
COST THRESHOLDS (2005 $)
Arenas
single $7.5 M twin $13.2 M Quad $21 M
Pool $5.6 M Community Centre $1.5 M
FACILITY CAPITAL REPAIR FUNDING FORMULA
Age of Facility
Percentage of 2005 Capital Construction Cost
5% 40% 50% 130%
10 Years 25 Years 49 Years 50+ Years0 Years
OBSERVATIONS
Municipalities are significant facility providers
Inventories are critically old
Small communities have oldest arenas
Improvements needed beyond age related requirements
INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM SUGGESTIONS
Balance recreation, physical activity, leisure and sport facilities
Multi-year program
Consult with sector
Complement existing F/P – T programs
PROGRAM SHOULD RECOGNIZE:
Competing municipal capital priorities
Operating cost – part of local contribution
Assistance required for new and existing facilities
Life cycle maintenance program is required
APPLICATION TO CAPITAL PLANNING
Facility types by age
Estimated replacement cost
Repair cost factor
Capital repair strategy
Capital reserve contribution
FOR EXAMPLE: ASSUME YOU HAVE
1 Single pad arena 30 years old
1 Twin pad arena 15 years old
1 Pool 9 years old
2 community halls 12 years old
CAPITAL REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS
Arenas $9.03 M
Pool $280,000
Community Centres $1.2 M
CAPITAL RESERVE STRATEGIES
Respond to crisis
Building audits
Annual contribution formula
Funding program catalyst
RESERVE FUND FORMULA
Life Cycle Contribution Position
Year 1 – 10 1% +50%
Year 11 – 25 2% -25%
Year 26 – 50 2% Even
IMPLICATIONS OF WELL FUNDED RESERVE
Facilities constantly maintained
Lower operating costs
More cost certainty
Less bandages
Fewer major surprises
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS