Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record … 218726.pdf · 2015. 8. 4. · Intended Property Use Residential Certificate of Property Use Number No CPU Applicable

Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # 218726

Record of Site Condition

Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act

Summary

Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence

This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has

access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings

with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental

condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.

Contents of this Record of Site Condition

This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from

the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been

submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.

Record of Site Condition Number 218726Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2015/08/04Certification Date 2014/11/14Current Property Use CommercialIntended Property Use ResidentialCertificate of Property Use Number No CPUApplicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard,

with Non-potable Ground Water, CoarseTextured Soil, for Residential property use

Property Municipal Address 1316 PRINCESS STREET, KINGSTON, ON,K7M 3E2, 1318 PRINCESS STREET,KINGSTON, ON, K7M 3E2

1 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218726 on 2015/08/04

PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS

Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC

Owner Name THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KINGSTON

Authorized Person BRODIE RICHMOND

Mailing Address 216 ONTARIO STREET, KINGSTONONTARIO, CANADA

Postal Code K7L 2Z3

Phone (613) 546-4291

Fax (613) 546-6156

Email Address [email protected]

Information about the agent

Agent Name KEVIN SHIPLEY

Mailing Address 100, 4 CATARAQUI STREET, WOOLEN MILL, EAST WING, KINGSTONONTARIO, CANADA

Postal Code K7K 1Z7

Phone (613) 542-5888

Fax (613) 542-0844



RSC Property Location Information

Municipal Address(es) 1316 PRINCESS STREET, KINGSTON, ON K7M 3E2

1318 PRINCESS STREET, KINGSTON, ON K7M 3E2

Municipality Kingston

Legal Description See Attached Lawyer’s Letter

Assessment Roll Number(s)

1011060-09016000

1011060-09015300

Property Identifier Number(s)

36076-0027 (LT)

36076-0019 (LT)

RSC Property Geographical References

Coordinate System UTM

Datum NAD 83

Zone 18

Easting 378,056.00

Northing 4,900,510.00

RSC Property Use Information

The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.

Current Property Use Commercial

Intended Property Use Residential

Certificate of Property Use has been issued under section 168.6 of the EPA

No


Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC

The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank


PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON’S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONSQualified Person's Information

Name KEVIN SHIPLEY

Type of Licence Under Professional Engineers Act

Licence

Licence Number 90228529

QP Employer Name XCG CONSULTANTS LIMITED

Mailing Address 100, 4 CATARAQUI STREET, WOOLEN MILL, EAST WING, KINGSTONONTARIO, K7K 1Z7 CANADA

Phone (613) 542-5888

Fax (613) 542-0844


Municipal Information

Local or Single-Tier Municipality

Kingston

Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office

District Office Kingston District Office

District Office Address Box 22032, 1259 Gardiners Road, Kingston ON K7M 8S5


Phase One Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(YYYY/MM/DD)

2014-11-13

Type of Report

Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)

Author of Report

Name of ConsultingCompany

P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Assessment, 1316 and 1318 Princess Street, Kingston, Ontario

2015-03-11 Kevin Shipley, Alex Wing

XCG CONSULTANTS LIMITED

Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment


Author of Report


Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 1316 Princess Street, Kingston, Ontario

2012-01-01 Francois Pugh, Irina Klimento, Lee Stach

DST Consulting Engineers Incorporated


Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(YYYY/MM/DD)

2014-11-14

Type of Report


Author of Report


P2 ESA Supplemental Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment, 1316 and 1318 Princess Street, Kingston, Ontario

2015-03-11 Kevin Shipley, Alex Wing

XCG CONSULTING LIMITED

Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment

Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD).

Author of Report


Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, 1316 Princess Street, Kingston, Ontario

2012-04-01 Paul Hubley, Andrew Naoum


Supplemental Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Investigation, 1316 Princess Street, Kingston, Ontario

2012-05-01 Paul Hubley, Andrew Naoum


Environmental Investigation of 1318 Princess Street 2013-08-14 Devin Matheson

The Corporation of the City of Kingston

Environmental Investigation of 1316 Princess Street 2014-02-07 Devin Matheson

The Corporation of the City of Kingston

Groundwater Sampling and Report Review, 1316 and 1318 Princess Street, Kingston, Ontario

2014-06-25 Kevin Shipley XCG Consultants Limited


Environmental ConditionSection 41 applies? No

Section 43.1 applies? Yes

Site Condition InformationCertification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2014/11/14

Total area of RSC property (in hectares) 1.05000

Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property

Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property

Soil Texture Coarse

Assessment/Restoration Approach Full Depth Generic

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? Yes

Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04?

No

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under the property which is used in the RSC?

Yes

Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or sediment

PARACEL LABORATORIES LTD.

Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Non-potable

Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 7

Local or single-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2015/06/02


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil

ContaminantName

Maximum Concentration

Applicable Site Condition Standard

Unit of Measure

1 Polychlorinated Biphenyls < 0.05 0.35 µg/g

2 Bromodichloromethane < 0.05 13 µg/g

3 Bromoform < 0.05 0.27 µg/g

4 Dibromochloromethane < 0.05 9.4 µg/g

5 Benzene < 0.02 0.21 µg/g

6 Ethylbenzene < 0.05 2 µg/g

7 Toluene < 0.05 2.3 µg/g

8 Xylene Mixture < 0.05 3.1 µg/g

9 Chromium VI < 0.2 8 µg/g

10 Mercury < 0.05 0.27 µg/g

11 Antimony 0.34 7.5 µg/g

12 Arsenic 5.4 18 µg/g

13 Selenium < 0.5 2.4 µg/g

14 Acetone < 0.5 16 µg/g

15 Bromomethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

16 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

17 Chlorobenzene < 0.05 2.4 µg/g

18 Chloroform < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

19 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.05 3.4 µg/g



22 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.05 16 µg/g

23 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.05 3.5 µg/g

24 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

25 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

26 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.05 3.4 µg/g

27 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.05 0.084 µg/g

28 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

29 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

30 Ethylene dibromide < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

31 Hexane (n) < 0.05 2.8 µg/g

32 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 0.5 16 µg/g

33 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 0.5 1.7 µg/g

34 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.05 0.75 µg/g

35 Methylene Chloride < 0.05 0.1 µg/g

...Continued on next page




Continued from previous page....

ContaminantName



Unit of Measure

36 Styrene < 0.05 0.7 µg/g

37 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.05 0.058 µg/g

38 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

39 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.05 0.28 µg/g

40 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.05 0.38 µg/g

41 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

42 Trichloroethylene < 0.05 0.061 µg/g

43 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.05 4 µg/g

44 Vinyl Chloride < 0.02 0.02 µg/g

45 Acenaphthene < 0.05 7.9 µg/g

46 Acenaphthylene < 0.05 0.15 µg/g

47 Anthracene < 0.05 0.67 µg/g

48 Benz[a]anthracene 0.05 0.5 µg/g

49 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.12 0.3 µg/g

50 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.13 0.78 µg/g

51 Benzo[ghi]perylene 0.073 6.6 µg/g

52 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.78 µg/g

53 Chrysene 0.14 7 µg/g

54 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.05 0.1 µg/g

55 Fluoranthene 0.27 0.69 µg/g

56 Fluorene < 0.05 62 µg/g

57 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene 0.077 0.38 µg/g

58 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** 0.05 0.99 µg/g

59 Naphthalene < 0.05 0.6 µg/g

60 Phenanthrene 0.17 6.2 µg/g

61 Pyrene 0.22 78 µg/g

62 Barium 267 390 µg/g

63 Beryllium 1.1 4 µg/g

64 Boron (total) 14 120 µg/g

65 Cadmium 0.36 1.2 µg/g

66 Chromium Total 41 160 µg/g

67 Cobalt 14 22 µg/g

68 Copper 32 140 µg/g

69 Lead 61 120 µg/g

70 Molybdenum 1.1 6.9 µg/g






ContaminantName



Unit of Measure

71 Nickel 29 100 µg/g

72 Silver < 0.2 20 µg/g

73 Thallium < 0.4 1 µg/g

74 Uranium 0.9 23 µg/g

75 Vanadium 57 86 µg/g

76 Zinc 120 340 µg/g


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)

Ground Water

ContaminantName



Unit of Measure

1 Polychlorinated Biphenyls < 0.05 0.2 µg/L

2 Bromodichloromethane < 0.5 67000 µg/L

3 Bromoform < 0.5 5 µg/L

4 Dibromochloromethane < 0.5 65000 µg/L

5 Benzene < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

6 Ethylbenzene < 0.5 54 µg/L

7 Toluene < 0.5 320 µg/L

8 Xylene Mixture < 0.5 72 µg/L

9 Sodium 1,055,000 1800000 µg/L

10 Chromium VI < 10 110 µg/L

11 Mercury < 0.1 0.1 µg/L

12 Antimony 1.4 16000 µg/L

13 Arsenic 3 1500 µg/L

14 Selenium 9 50 µg/L

15 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 25 420 µg/L

16 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 100 150 µg/L



19 Acetone < 5 100000 µg/L

20 Bromomethane < 0.5 0.89 µg/L

21 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.2 0.2 µg/L

22 Chlorobenzene < 0.5 140 µg/L

23 Chloroform < 0.5 2 µg/L

24 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.5 150 µg/L

25 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < 0.5 7600 µg/L

26 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

27 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 1 3500 µg/L

28 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.5 11 µg/L

29 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

30 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

31 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

32 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

33 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.5 0.58 µg/L

34 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

35 Ethylene dibromide < 0.2 0.2 µg/L




Ground Water


ContaminantName



Unit of Measure

36 Hexane (n) < 1 5 µg/L

37 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 5 21000 µg/L

38 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 5 5200 µg/L

39 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 2 15 µg/L

40 Methylene Chloride < 5 26 µg/L

41 Styrene < 0.5 43 µg/L

42 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.5 1.1 µg/L

43 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

44 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

45 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.5 23 µg/L

46 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

47 Trichloroethylene < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

48 Trichlorofluoromethane < 1 2000 µg/L

49 Vinyl Chloride < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

50 Acenaphthene < 0.05 17 µg/L

51 Acenaphthylene < 0.05 1 µg/L

52 Anthracene < 0.01 1 µg/L

53 Benz[a]anthracene < 0.01 1.8 µg/L

54 Benzo[a]pyrene < 0.01 0.81 µg/L

55 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.75 µg/L

56 Benzo[ghi]perylene < 0.05 0.2 µg/L

57 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.4 µg/L

58 Chrysene < 0.05 0.7 µg/L

59 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.05 0.4 µg/L

60 Fluoranthene < 0.01 44 µg/L

61 Fluorene < 0.05 290 µg/L

62 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < 0.05 0.2 µg/L

63 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < 0.1 1500 µg/L

64 Naphthalene < 0.05 7 µg/L

65 Phenanthrene < 0.05 380 µg/L

66 Pyrene < 0.01 5.7 µg/L

67 Barium 90 23000 µg/L

68 Beryllium < 0.5 53 µg/L

69 Boron (total) 4,140 36000 µg/L

70 Cadmium < 0.1 2.1 µg/L




Ground Water


ContaminantName



Unit of Measure

71 Chromium Total 9 640 µg/L

72 Cobalt 3.1 52 µg/L

73 Copper 9.2 69 µg/L

74 Lead 0.7 20 µg/L

75 Molybdenum 17.4 7300 µg/L

76 Nickel 10 390 µg/L

77 Silver < 0.1 1.2 µg/L

78 Thallium 0.2 400 µg/L

79 Uranium 2.3 330 µg/L

80 Vanadium 12.8 200 µg/L

81 Zinc 17 890 µg/L


Remedial Action and Mitigation

Remediated Soils

Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.

Soil Remediation Process Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³)

Description of Remediation

Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property.

Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned

Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³)

Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³)

Soil Brought to the Property

Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A.

Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property(in-ground volume in m³)


Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures

Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing.

Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date.

Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres)


Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures

Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

Monitoring or Maintenance

Soil Management Measures

Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

Ground Water Management Measures

Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary

Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation?

No


Qualified Person’s Statements and CertificationsAs the qualified person, I certify that:

A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.

As of 2014/11/14, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC.

Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition, given written notice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to the clerk of the local municipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tier municipality in which the property is located.

As of 2014/11/14, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 37 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment.

As of 2014/11/14, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards.

I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.

I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.

I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry.

The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.

I do not hold and have not held and my employer XCG CONSULTANTS LIMITEDdoes not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessmentor risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based

To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSCare true as of 2014/11/14.

By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.

By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, KEVIN SHIPLEY, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2015/07/15:

a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.

I Agree


Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or AgentThe following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Changeas part of the record of site condition

Authorization for Agent to submit RSC for filing

Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property

Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired

A Current plan of Survey

Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern

Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property

Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model

Owner or agent certification statements

6.1.2



Yellow outline: Phase one,

phase two and RSC property

TABLE 1: TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN

(Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04)

Area of Potential

Environmental Concern1

Location of Area of Potential

Environmental Concern on Phase One

Property Potentially Contaminating Activity2

Location of PCA (on‐site or off‐site) Contaminants of Potential Concern3

Media Potentially Impacted

(Ground water, soil and/or

sediment)

APEC1: Historical lumber

storage

The southern part Phase One Property

at 1316 Princess Street formerly

operated as a lumber yard, hardware

store, and door factory.

#59 Wood Treating and Preservative

Facility and Bulk Storage of Treated and

Preserved Wood Products

On‐Site and Off‐Site:

#59 ‐ Piles of lumber and a door factory were

formerly located on the southern part of the 1316

Princess Street property, extending off‐site towards

the south

‐ Metals

‐ PHCs (F1‐F4)

‐ VOCs

‐ PAHs

Soil and Groundwater

APEC2: Former boiler and coal

bin

A coal‐fired boiler and coal bin were

historically located south of the

southern boundary of the 1316 Princess

Street portion of the Phase One

Property

#8 Chemical Manufacturing, Processing

and Bulk Storage (this is the closest PCA

description that matches coal storage

and the burning of coal in a boiler)

Off‐Site:

#59 ‐ A boiler and coal bin were formerly located

about 25 metres south of the southern boundary of

the 1316 Princess Street property

‐ Metals

‐ PAHs


APEC3: Former underground

storage tank

An underground storage tank, likely

containing gasoline or another type of

fuel, was formerly located on the 1316

Princess Street portion of the Phase One

Property near its southwest corner

#28 Gasoline and Associated Products

Storage in Fixed Tanks

On‐Site:

#28 ‐ One underground storage tank was formerly

located on the west side of the 1316 Princess Street

property, near the southwest corner

‐ PHCs (F1‐F4)

‐ VOCs


APEC4: Former electrical

transformers

Several electrical transformers, possibly

containing PCBs, were formerly located

on the 1316 Princess Street portion of

the Phase One Property near the

eastern property boundary

#18 Electricity Generation,

Transformation and Power Stations

#55 Transformer Manufacturing,

Processing and Use

On‐Site:

#18 & #55 ‐ Four transformers were formerly

located south of the midway point along the eastern

property boundary

‐ PCBs

‐ PHCs (F1‐F4)


APEC5: Former painting and

decorating company

The portion of the Phase One Property

at 1318 Princess Street was formerly

occupied by a painting contractor

#39 Paints Manufacturing, Processing

and Bulk Storage

On‐Site:

#39 ‐ A painting contractor carried on operations on

the 1318 Princess Street portion of the property, but

no specific locations of paint and related products

storage were identified in the Phase One ESA

‐ Metals

‐ PAHs

‐ VOCs


APEC6: Former quarry The area to the southwest of the Phase

One Property formerly operated as a

quarry which has been graded and

redeveloped for residential use

#30 Importation of Fill Material of

Unknown Quality

Off‐Site:

#30 ‐ An old quarry was located on the adjacent

property to the southwest of the subject property,

and was subsequently filled in with fill of unknown

quality

‐ Metals

‐ VOCs

‐ PHCs (F1‐F4)

‐ PAHs


APEC7: Former glass

Warehouse

Historically there was a glass warehouse

southwest of the Phase One Property

#29 Glass Manufacturing Off‐Site:

#29 ‐ A glass warehouse was formerly located to the

west of 1316 Princess Street and to the south of

1318 Princess Street

‐ VOCs

‐ PHCs (F1‐F4)


TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY

(Refer to clause 16(2)(b), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04)

Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use Property Use1

Other Observations from from Aerial Photographs, Fire Insurance

Plans, Etc.

Prior to 1952 Crown Undeveloped agricultural land Agricultural The 1892, 1908, and 1947 Fire Insurance Plans (FIPs) show the

property as undeveloped agricultural land.

1952 to 1963 MacLachlan Lumber & Woodworking Co. Ltd. Lumber yard, door factory, and

hardware store

Commercial The city directories list MacLachlan Lumber & Woodworking Co. Ltd.

as occupying the property from 1953 to 1980. The chain of title

indicated MacLachlan Lumber and Woodworking Co. Ltd. owned the

property from 1964 to 1980. Aerial photographs and FIPs show the

Phase One Property as developed with several buildings, wood piles,

a lumber yard, door facotry and hardware store.

1963 to 1980 MacLachlan Lumber & Woodworking Co. Ltd./ William Earl

Painting & Decorating

Lumber yard, door factory, and

hardware store and painting

contractor

Commercial The 1963 FIP indicated the building located at 1318 Princess Street

on the Phase One Property was occupied by a painting contractor.

The city directories indicated William Earl Painting & Decorating was

located on the property from 1970 to 1993.

1980 to 1982 William Earl Painting & Decorating/ Homecare Building Centres

Ltd.

Painting contractor and building

centre

Commecial The chain of title indicated that Homecare Building Centres Ltd.

owned the property from September 5, 1980 until April 23, 1982.

1982 to 1983 William Earl Painting & Decorating/ Steenbakkers Lumber Ltd./

Valley Vu Realty (Ottawa) Ltd.

Painting contractor, lumber yard

and hardware store, and realty

office

Commerial The city directories list Steenbakkers Lumber Ltd. as occupying the

property from 1982 to 1985. The chain of title indicates Valley Vu

Realty (Ottawa) Ltd. owned the property from April 23, 1982 to July

15, 1983

1983 to 1985 William Earl Painting & Decorating/ Steenbakkers Lumber Ltd. Painting contractor and lumber

yard and hardware store

Commercial The chain of title no longer indicates that Valley Vu Realty (Ottawa)

Ltd. owns the property.

1986 to 1987 William Earl Painting & Decorating/ Kingston's Builders

Warehouse Corp.

Painting contractor and

warehouse

Commercial The city directories list Kingston’s Builders Warehouse Corp. as

occupying the property from 1986 to 1987.

1988 to 1989 William Earl Painting & Decorating/ Kingston's Builders

Warehouse Corp./ Kinalea Development Corp.

Painting contractor, warehouse,

and development corp

Commercial The city directories list Kingston’s Builders Warehouse Corp. and

Kinalea Development Corp. as occupying the property from 1988 to

1989.

1990 William Earl Painting & Decorating/ Kingston's Builders

Warehouse Corp./ John's Do‐It Center/ St. Lawrence Homes &

Cottages

Painting contractor, lumber yard

and hardware store, and

warehouse

Commercial The city directories list John's Do‐It Centre, St.Lawrence Homes &

Cottages, and Kingston's Builders Warehouse Corp. as occupying the

property in 1990.

1991 to 1993 William Earl Painting & Decorating/ John's Do‐It Center Painting contractor and lumber

yard and hardware store

Commerical The city directories list John’s Do‐It Centre as occupying the

property in 1991.

1993 to 1998 Samuel Springer & Sons Properties/ 1073664 Ontario Inc./ John

Stratuik o/a Central Heating and Air Conditioning

Commercial store (Goodwill

Clothing Store), and heating

contractor office (propane

cylinder refill centre)

Commercial The chain of title indicated that Samuel Springer & Sons Properties

Limited owned the property from 1993 to 2012. In an interview Mr.

Devin Matheson stated that the property operated as a Goodwill

clothing store from 1993 to the date of a fire in 2001. The chain of

title indicated that 1073664 Ontario Inc. owned the property from

1993 to 1998. The city directories indicated the property was vacant

from 1994 to 2001. The 1996 Property Underwriters’ Report

indicated that Central Heating and Air Conditioning was located in

the building. The TSSA report indicated that a propane refill centre

was active on the property from 1995 to 2010.

1998 to 2001 Samuel Springer & Sons Properties/ 734373 Ontario Ltd. Commercial store (Goodwill

Clothing Store), and propane refill

centre

Commercial The chain of title indicated that 734373 Ontario Limited owned the

property from 1998 to 2001. The city directories indicated the

property was vacant from 1994 to 2001. The TSSA report indicated

that a propane refill centre was active on the property from 1995 to

2010.

2001 to 2010 Samuel Springer & Sons Properties (vacant)/ 1425701 Ontario Inc. Commercial store (vacant) and

propane refill centre

Commercial The chain of title indicated that 1425701 Ontario Inc. owned the

property from 2001 to 2013. The TSSA report indicated that a

propane refill centre was active on the property from 1995 to 2010.

2010 to 2012 Samuel Springer & Sons Properties (vacant)/ 1425701 Ontario Inc.

(vacant)

Commercial store (vacant) and

propane refill centre (vacant)

Commercial In an interview Mr. Devin Matheson stated that the property

remained vacant after a fire caused damage to the building in 2001.

2012 to 2013 1425701 Ontario Inc. (vacant)/ The Corporation of the City of

Kingston (vacant)

Commercial store (vacant) and

propane refill centre (vacant)

Commercial Property remains vacant after the fire in 2001.

2013 to Present The Corporation of the City of Kingston (vacant) Vacant Commercial The chain of title indicated that The Corporation of the City of

Kingston took ownership of the property in 2013 and still currently

owns the vacant property.

1316 and 1318 Princess Street, Kingston, Ontario

PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL

1-602-57-01/L16025701002 - rev2

PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL Details of the Phase Two Conceptual Site Models developed based on the previous investigations can be found in the following reports and sections:

“Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, 1316 Princess Street, Kingston, Ontario,” prepared by DST Consulting Engineers, dated April 2012: Section 5.9.

“Supplemental Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Investigation, 1316 Princess Street, Kingston, Ontario,” prepared by DST Consulting Engineers, dated May 2012: Section 5.9.

As discussed in Section 3.3, a CSM was prepared during the Phase One ESA and is included in Appendix C. The PCAs identified in the Phase One Study Area during the Phase One ESA are shown on Figure 3 in Appendix C. The APECs identified at the Phase Two Property during the Phase One ESA are shown on Figure 4 in Appendix C and presented in Table 1 at the end of text. The locations of the PCAs that gave rise to the identification of APECs are also shown on Figure 4 in Appendix C.

The APECs identified during the Phase One ESA were investigated in the Phase Two ESAs and subsurface investigations completed by the City of Kingston and XCG. The Phase Two ESAs and subsurface investigations covered the entire property as shown by the “Phase Two Property Boundary” indicated in Figure 1 at the end of text. The Phase Two results presented in this CSM cover the entire property.

During the Phase Two ESA activities, the stratigraphy at the Phase Two Property was determined to generally consist of sand and gravel fill underlain by silty clay and the south portion of the site consists of exposed bedrock. The shallow groundwater unit at the Phase Two ESA property is comprised of fractured limestone bedrock. The locations of the cross-sections A – A’ and B – B’ are shown on Figure 2 at the end of text, and the stratigraphy of the Phase Two Property is shown in the cross-sections included as Figures 5 and 6 at the end of text. The cross-sections also include the well construction details at the Phase Two Property, groundwater elevations, and the interpreted water table depth.

The average horizontal gradient for the shallow groundwater for March 4, 2014, was 0.134 m/m and for May 1, 2014, the average gradient was 0.287 m/m. The depth to groundwater was measured between 0.6 and 6.98 metres below ground surface (bgs) and varied between the two groundwater level measuring events. The interpreted groundwater elevations measured on March 4 and May 1, 2014, are shown on Figures 3 and 4 at the end of text. Based on the groundwater elevation contours, the general direction of groundwater flow is interpreted to be to the west northwest across the Phase Two Property.

Bedrock was encountered during the Phase Two ESAs and subsurface investigations at depths ranging from 0 to 2.1 metres bgs. No soil appeared to have been brought onto the site from another property, other than gravel that was likely brought on-site to construct the parking areas. Significant changes are proposed for the site including the construction of a multi-unit residential building. Construction of the building and associated facilities would possibly require the removal of some soil currently on site. As of the date of this report, no soil has been removed from the site.



1-602-57-01/L16025701002 - rev2

Because the depth to bedrock is less than 2 metres over more than one-third of the area of the Phase Two Property, the site is considered to be a shallow soil property as defined in Section 43.1 of Ontario Regulation 153/04. As a result, the analytical results for the soil and groundwater samples collected during the Phase Two ESA were compared to the standards published by the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) in “Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act,” dated April 15, 2011 (MOECC Standard) for shallow soils (coarse-textured) in a non-potable groundwater setting (Table 7 Standards). The City of Kingston, where the Phase Two Property is located, is serviced by a municipal water distribution system with a surface water source, and the soil types at the site include sand and gravel fill, which is coarse-grained material. Based on the proposed land use of residential, the Table 7 Standards for Residential/Parkland/Institutional Property Use, applying to coarse textured soil, were used for evaluation of on-site soil and groundwater.

On a number of areas of the Phase Two Property there is very little soil present—the surface of the bedrock is at or very close to the ground surface. This is true over virtually the entire southern portion of the site. For this reason, there was insufficient soil available to collect samples in this southern area of the Phase Two Property. Consequently, because petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs) were only a contaminant of concern with respect to APECs on the southern part of the Phase Two Property, where no soil was available for sampling, no soil samples were collected and analyzed for PHCs. PHCs were addressed through groundwater sample collection and analyses.

Exceedances of chloroform were identified in groundwater from monitoring wells MW1 and MW2 reported in the Phase Two ESA conducted by DST Consulting Engineers in April 2012. Exceedances of chloroform and benzene were identified in groundwater from monitoring well MW7, and an exceedance of chloroform was identified in groundwater from monitoring well MW8 reported in the Supplemental Phase Two ESA Investigation conducted by DST in May 2012.

Several rounds of additional monitoring well development and groundwater sampling were completed by the City of Kingston at 1316 Princess Street following the Phase Two ESA work undertaken by DST on the subject property. After these additional rounds of groundwater sampling at 1316 Princess Street, PHCs in the F3 range were found to exceed the applicable MOECC standard for PHC (F3) in one or more of the following monitoring wells: MW2, MW3, MW5, and MW7. However, the additional sampling rounds did not show chloroform or benzene exceedances in any of the wells. Two rounds of groundwater samples were collected from the monitoring wells at 1316 and 1318 Princess Street in March and May, 2014, by XCG. The groundwater samples collected from 1316 Princess Street were submitted for analysis of PHCs (F1 – F4). The groundwater samples collected from 1318 Princess Street were submitted for analysis of PHCs (F1 – F4), VOCs, PAHs, metals, and pH. There were no exceedances of the MOECC Table 7 standards identified in the groundwater samples collected by XCG. Figure 7 at the end of text summarizes the groundwater quality findings.

Based on the results of the recent groundwater sampling, indicating that no contaminants exceeded the applicable standards in at least the two most recent rounds of sampling, it is XCG’s opinion that the previous exceedances identified in groundwater were not truly representative of the dissolved phase contaminants present in the groundwater. Because the sampling method used in the earlier sampling rounds involved collection of samples using



1-602-57-01/L16025701002 - rev2

Waterra inertial lift pumps, which can cause agitation of the water column and suspension of fine particulate (which is normally settled in a layer at the bottom of the well) in the water, false exceedances of certain contaminants are believed to have appeared in the groundwater results due to contaminants that were adsorbed to the fine suspended particulate matter rather than being actually dissolved in the groundwater itself. The recent results (March and May 2014) were collected using a low flow sampling technique that minimizes agitation of the water column and gives results that are more truly representative of what is actually dissolved in the groundwater. Therefore, the earlier groundwater exceedances are considered to have been false exceedances. No remediation was completed to address any contaminant exceedances at the site (i.e., no actions were taken to reduce contaminant concentrations to meet the standards), and therefore the post-remediation groundwater monitoring as detailed in Section 40(8)(i)(A) of Schedule E of Ontario Regulation 153/04 was not required.

Because the property is vacant, there are no utilities servicing the property at this time. However, utilities serviced the property in the past and subsurface utility trenches exist for water, sewer and natural gas services. If contamination were present on the property, the utility trenches could potentially influence contaminant migration and distribution. However, as discussed above, contaminants exceeding the MOECC Table 7 standards do not appear to be present on the Phase Two Property based on the investigations completed.

Section 41 of O. Reg.153/04 does not apply to the Phase Two Property as it is not located within, adjacent to, or near an area of natural significance; the soil pH on site is within 5 to 11 range for sub-surface soil; and the qualified person is not of the opinion that Section 41 applies to the subject site. Stratified site condition standards were not used to evaluate soil and groundwater quality at the site.

In the two most recent rounds of groundwater sampling conducted at the Phase Two Property, there were no exceedances of the MOECC Table 7 Standards for PHCs (F1 – F4), VOCs, PAHs and metals identified in groundwater. There were no exceedances of the MOECC Table 7 Standards identified in the soil at the Phase Two Property.

As summarized in Section 5 above, the initial Phase Two ESA activities identified chloroform and benzene as COCs in groundwater and later identified PHCs in the F3 range and 1,4-dichlorobenzene in groundwater at the Phase Two Property. Subsequent groundwater sampling activities at the Phase Two Property indicated concentrations of chloroform, benzene, PHCs in the F3 range, and 1,4-dichlorobenzene below the MOECC Table 7 Standards; therefore, eliminating these as COCs at the Phase Two Property.

The Phase Two ESA pictorial CSM is presented in Figure 8 at the end of text. Based on the findings of the Phase Two ESA, no COCs were identified at the Phase Two Property; therefore, all release and exposure pathways are incomplete at the Phase Two Property. Groundwater at the Phase Two Property is not used as a potable or industrial source of water.

TABLE 1: TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN

(Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04)

Area of Potential

Environmental Concern1

Location of Area of Potential

Environmental Concern on Phase One

Property Potentially Contaminating Activity2

Location of PCA (on‐site or off‐site) Contaminants of Potential Concern3

Media Potentially Impacted

(Ground water, soil and/or

sediment)

APEC1: Historical lumber

storage

The southern part Phase One Property

at 1316 Princess formerly operated as a

lumber yard, hardware store, and door

factory.




On‐Site and Off‐Site:

#59 ‐ Piles of lumber and a door factory were

formerly located on the southern part of the 1316

Princess Street property, extending off‐site towards

the south

‐ Metals

‐ PHCs (F1‐F4)

‐ VOCs

‐ PAHs


APEC2: Former boiler and coal

bin

A coal‐fired boiler and coal bin were

historically located south of the

southern boundary of the 1316 Princess

portion of the Phase One Property

#8 Chemical Manufacturing, Processing

and Bulk Storage (this is the closest PCA

description that matches coal storage

and the burning of coal in a boiler)

Off‐Site:

#59 ‐ A boiler and coal bin were formerly located

about 25 metres south of the southern boundary of

the 1316 Princess Street property

‐ Metals

‐ PAHs


APEC3: Former underground

storage tank

An underground storage tank, likely

containing gasoline or another type of

fuel, was formerly located on the 1316

Princess portion of the Phase One

Property near its southwest corner



On‐Site:

#28 ‐ One underground storage tank was formerly

located on the west side of the 1316 Princess Street

property, near the southwest corner

‐ PHCs (F1‐F4)

‐ VOCs


APEC4: Former electrical

transformers

Several electrical transformers, possibly

containing PCBs, were formerly located

on the 1316 Princess portion of the

Phase One Property near the eastern

property boundary

#18 Electricity Generation,

Transformation and Power Stations

#55 Transformer Manufacturing,

Processing and Use

On‐Site:

#18 & #55 ‐ Four transformers were formerly

located south of the midway point along the eastern

property boundary

‐ PCBs

‐ PHCs (F1‐F4)


APEC5: Former painting and

decorating company

The portion of the Phase One Property

at 1318 Princess Street was formerly

occupied by a painting contractor

28. Gasoline and associated products

storage in fixed tanks

On‐Site:

#28 ‐ A painting contractor carried on operations on

the 1318 Princess Street portion of the property, but

no specific locations of paint and related products

storage were identified in the Phase One ESA

‐ Metals

‐ PAHs

‐ VOCs


APEC6: Former quarry The area to the southwest of the Phase

One Property formerly operated as a

quarry which has been graded and

redeveloped for residential use

#30 Importation of Fill Material of

Unknown Quality

Off‐Site:

#30 ‐ An old quarry was located on the adjacent

property to the southwest of the subject property,

and was subsequently filled in with fill of unknown

quality

‐ Metals

‐ VOCs

‐ PHCs (F1‐F4)

‐ PAHs


APEC7: Former glass

Warehouse

Historically there was a glass warehouse

southwest of the Phase One Property

#29 Glass Manufacturing Off‐Site:

#29 ‐ A glass warehouse was formerly located to the

west of 1316 Princess Street and to the south of

1318 Princess Street

‐ VOCs

‐ PHCs (F1‐F4)


End of Text Figures

(96.051)

95.0

(96.051)

95.0

Appendix C

Phase One Conceptual Site Model


REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF INFORMATION

1-602-57-01/R16025701002 6-10

6.4 Phase One Conceptual Site Model The Phase One Study Area, including property boundaries and roadways, is shown on Figure 1. Potentially contaminating activities identified in the Phase One Study Area are shown on Figure 3. There are no water bodies located on the Phase One Property or within the Phase One Study Area. The Phase One Property is not designated as an area of natural significance, and there are no areas of natural significance within the Phase One Study Area. There are 11 monitoring wells and no potable water supply wells on the Phase One Property. There are no potable water supply wells within the Phase One Study Area.

The occupants and land use on the adjacent neighbouring properties are shown on Figure 2. It is possible that the sanitary and storm sewer lines on and in the vicinity of the Phase One Property may influence the migration of shallow contaminants. It is not anticipated that other buried utilities would influence contaminant distribution and migration.

The stratigraphy below the Phase One Property is primarily sand and gravel, and clay with some silt. The majority of the property at 1316 Princess Street is exposed bedrock. Based on a review of borings in the Phase One Study Area, the stratigraphy in the vicinity of the Phase One Property consists of sand, gravel and clay. Borehole logs included in historical Phase Two ESA reports indicated the depth to bedrock (limestone) between 0 and 2.0 metres on the Phase One Property. A pictorial conceptual site model (CSM) is presented in Figure 5.

The data for the Phase One Property and the Phase One Study Area was reviewed and uncertainties identified. The uncertainties that could affect the validity of the model are presented in Table 6-5.

Table 6-5 Summary of Phase One ESA Uncertainty

Uncertainty Description Affect

Depth to utilities (other than storm and sanitary sewers)

The depth to buried utilities, such as hydro, cable, gas, and fibreoptics are unknown.

These utilities are generally shallow; therefore these utilities are not expected to influence shallow contaminant distribution and migration.

Former operations Limited information on historical activities at the Phase One Property

It is unknown what the original uses of the Phase One Property were based on a review of the records. Potentially contaminating activities identified based on inferred property use (from the business name) are considered to be conservative.

KEY MAP

NOT TO SCALE

0 100 200m

1 : 4000

SUBJECT SITE

DATE JOB NO. FIGURE NO.

AUG. 2014 11-602-57-01

KINGSTON, ONTARIO

1316 - 1318 PRINCESS STREET

PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

SITE PLAN

(file: R16025701002.dwg)

KEY MAP

NOT TO SCALE

0 30 60m

1 : 1200

1

SUBJECT SITE

1 - 1318 PRINCESS STREET (COMMERCIAL)


AUG. 2014 21-602-57-01

KINGSTON, ONTARIO



SITE LAYOUT

(file: R16025701002.dwg)

KEY MAP

NOT TO SCALE

0 100 200m

1 : 4000

SUBJECT SITE

POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATING ACTIVITIES

ADDRESS CONTAMINATING ACTIVITY

1 - 1316 - Princess Street

#18 Electricity Generation, Transformation

and Power Stations

#28 Gasoline and Associated Products,


#55 Transformer Manufacturing, Processing

and Use




2 - 1318 Princess Street

#39 Paints Manufacturing, Processing and

Bulk Storage


#8 Chemical Manufacturing Processing and

Bulk Storage

#29 Glass Manufacturing

#30 Importation of Fill Material of Unknown

Quality






and Power Stations


#12 Concrete, Cement and Lime

Manufacturing






6 - 825 Portsmouth Avenue



#52 Storage, maintenance, fuelling and

repair of equipment, vehicles, and material

used to maintain transportation systems

7 - 833 Portsmouth Avenue

#1 Acid and Alkali Manufacturing,

Processing and Bulk Storage


and Power Stations

#39 Paints Manufacturing, Processing and

Bulk Storage




8 - 159 Florence Street



9 - 49 Hampstead Heath






11 - Portsmouth Avenue/ Princess Street

#55 Transformer Manufacturing, Processing

and Use




#40 Pesticides (including Herbicides,

Fungicides and Anti-Fouling Agents)

Manufacturing, Processing, Bulk Storage

and Large-Scale Applications

13 - 266 McMahon Avenue


and Power Stations






14 - 81 Indian Road (Strathcona Park)




#42 Pharmaceutical Manufacturing and

Processing (closest description matching

pathological waste generation)


AUG. 2014 31-602-57-01

KINGSTON, ONTARIO



POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATING ACTIVITIES

(file: R16025701002.dwg)

KEY MAP

NOT TO SCALE

0 30 60m

1 : 1200

1

(file: R16025701002.dwg)

SUBJECT SITE

1 - 1318 PRINCESS STREET (COMMERCIAL)


AUG. 2014 41-602-57-01

KINGSTON, ONTARIO



AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN

APEC1 The southern part of the Phase One Property at 1316

Princess Street formerly operated as a lumber yard,

hardware store, and door factory.

APEC2 A coal-fired boiler and coal bin were historically located

south of the southern boundary of the 1316 Princess

Street portion of the Phase One Property.

APEC3 An underground storage tank, likely containing

gasoline or another type of fuel, was formerly

located on the 1316 Princess Street portion of the

Phase One Property near its southwest corner.

APEC4 Several electrical transformers, possibly containing

PCBs, were formerly located on the 1316 Princess

Street portion of the Phase One Property near the

eastern property boundary.

APEC5 The portion of the Phase One Property at 1318

Princess Street was formerly occupied by a painting

contractor.

APEC6 The area to the southwest of the Phase One

Property formerly operated as a quarry which has

been graded and redeveloped for residential use.

APEC7 Historically there was a glass warehouse southwest

of the Phase One Property.

PHASE ONE PROPERTY

S-IA

LM

S-OA

S-I

S-D

S-PI

S-OA

GW-IA

LM LEACHING MODEL

GW-IA GROUNDWATER TO INDOOR AIR

S-OA SOIL TO OUTDOOR AIR

S-I SOIL INGESTION

S-D SOIL DERMAL CONTACT

S-PI SOIL PARTICULATE INHALATION


AUG. 2014 51-602-57-01

KINGSTON, ONTARIO



PHASE ONE CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL

(file: R16025701002.dwg)