Online supplement 6 – Forest plots Prevalence of physical aggression

Prevalence of verbal aggression

NOTE: Weights are from random effects analysis

Overall (I-squared = 100.0%, p = 0.000)

Jacob et al. (2013)

Lehmann, McCormick & Kizer (1999)

Kelly et al. (2017)

Study

Chen, Hwu & Wang (2009)

Pekurinen et al (2017)

llkiw-Lavalle & Grenyer (2003)

Schwartz & Park (1999)

Niu et al. (2019)

Sukhidolsky, Cardona & Martin (2005)

Ryan et al. (2004)

Kelly et al. (2016)

Raveendranathan & Chaturvedi (2012)

van den Bogaard et al. (2018)

Podubinski et al. (2017)

Danivas et al. (2016)

Daffern, Mayer & Martin (2006)

Bilici et al. (2016)

Wystanski (2000)

Amoo & Fatoye (2010)

Bostrom et al (2012)

0.43 (0.37, 0.49)

0.24 (0.23, 0.25)

0.35 (0.35, 0.35)

0.70 (0.69, 0.71)

ES (95% CI)

0.35 (0.34, 0.36)

0.35 (0.35, 0.35)

0.38 (0.36, 0.40)

0.36 (0.35, 0.37)

0.56 (0.55, 0.56)

0.52 (0.50, 0.54)

0.33 (0.32, 0.34)

0.70 (0.69, 0.71)

0.70 (0.68, 0.72)

0.32 (0.31, 0.33)

0.09 (0.09, 0.10)

0.44 (0.43, 0.45)

0.29 (0.28, 0.30)

0.93 (0.91, 0.94)

0.16 (0.16, 0.16)

0.37 (0.35, 0.39)

0.50 (0.49, 0.51)

100.00

5.00

5.01

5.00

Weight

5.00

%

5.01

4.99

5.01

5.00

4.99

5.00

5.00

4.99

5.00

5.01

5.00

5.01

4.99

5.01

4.98

4.99

0.43 (0.37, 0.49)

0.24 (0.23, 0.25)

0.35 (0.35, 0.35)

0.70 (0.69, 0.71)

ES (95% CI)

0.35 (0.34, 0.36)

0.35 (0.35, 0.35)

0.38 (0.36, 0.40)

0.36 (0.35, 0.37)

0.56 (0.55, 0.56)

0.52 (0.50, 0.54)

0.33 (0.32, 0.34)

0.70 (0.69, 0.71)

0.70 (0.68, 0.72)

0.32 (0.31, 0.33)

0.09 (0.09, 0.10)

0.44 (0.43, 0.45)

0.29 (0.28, 0.30)

0.93 (0.91, 0.94)

0.16 (0.16, 0.16)

0.37 (0.35, 0.39)

0.50 (0.49, 0.51)

100.00

5.00

5.01

5.00

Weight

5.00

%

5.01

4.99

5.01

5.00

4.99

5.00

5.00

4.99

5.00

5.01

5.00

5.01

4.99

5.01

4.98

4.99

00 .25 .5 .75 1

NOTE: Weights are from random effects analysis

Overall (I-squared = 100.0%, p = 0.000)

van den Bogaard et al. (2018)

Daffern, Ogloff & Howells (2003)

Lehmann, McCormick & Kizer (1999)

Ilkiw-Lavalle & Grenyer (2003)

Daffern, Mayer & Martin (2006)

study

Chen, Hwu & Wang (2009)

Schwartz & Park (1999)

Podubinski et al. (2017)

Danivas et al. (2016)

Niu et al. (2019)

0.57 (0.34, 0.81)

0.57 (0.56, 0.58)

0.62 (0.61, 0.63)

0.11 (0.11, 0.11)

0.58 (0.56, 0.60)

0.62 (0.61, 0.63)

ES (95% CI)

0.51 (0.50, 0.52)

0.73 (0.72, 0.74)

0.34 (0.33, 0.34)

0.87 (0.86, 0.89)

0.79 (0.78, 0.80)

100.00

10.00

10.00

10.00

9.99

10.00

Weight

10.00

10.00

10.00

10.00

10.00

%

0.57 (0.34, 0.81)

0.57 (0.56, 0.58)

0.62 (0.61, 0.63)

0.11 (0.11, 0.11)

0.58 (0.56, 0.60)

0.62 (0.61, 0.63)

ES (95% CI)

0.51 (0.50, 0.52)

0.73 (0.72, 0.74)

0.34 (0.33, 0.34)

0.87 (0.86, 0.89)

0.79 (0.78, 0.80)

100.00

10.00

10.00

10.00

9.99

10.00

Weight

10.00

10.00

10.00

10.00

10.00

%

00 .25 .5 .75 1

Supplementary material BMJ Open

doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030230:e030230. 9 2019;BMJ Open, et al. Thibaut B

Supplementary material BMJ Open

doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030230:e030230. 9 2019;BMJ Open, et al. Thibaut B