1
ONE HOUR VERSUS TWO HOUR POST PRANDIAL BLOOD GLUCOSE MEASUREMENT IN WOMEN WITH GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUS; WHICH ONE SHOULD WE CHOOSE? A.Seval OZGU-ERDINC, Cantekin ISKENDER, Dilek UYGUR, Aysegul OKSUZOGLU, M.Ilkin YERAL, K.Doga SECKIN, Zeynep I. KALAYLIOGLU, A. Nuri DANISMAN Zekai Tahir Burak Women Health Care, Education and Research Hospital ANKARA, TURKEY Introduction The study aimed to compare the efficacy of 1 hour (PP1) and 2 hour (PP2) postprandial blood glucose test for the prediction of obstetric complications in patients with GDM. Our primary objective was to investigate whether PP1 and PP2 measurements have a correlation with adverse perinatal outcomes and if so the degree of correlation of PP1 and PP2 measurements differed from each other. Material and Methods This prospective study consisted of 259 women with GDM who were followed up at Zekai Tahir Burak Women Health Care, Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, between June 2010 and January 2013. During each antenatal visit serum HbA1c and fasting capillary glucose (FPG) as well as capillary glucose at postprandial 1-hour (PP1) and postprandial 2-hour (PP2) were analyzed. Patients were screened for delivery route and adverse perinatal outcomes such as preterm delivery, preeclampsia, polyhydramnios, fetal macrosomia, low 5-min Apgar score, neonatal intensive care unit admission, hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, fetal mortality and malformations. The patients were divided in two groups as diet and insulin therapy. There were 144 patients on insulin therapy and 115 patients on diet therapy. A total of 531 blood glucose measurements were obtained for different gestational weeks between 24-41 gestational weeks 1-8 calculations per patient. For association between each hour of glucose measurement and each primary outcome, the method developed by Li et al. for modeling cross sectional outcomes with longitudinal covariates is used. Results Unadjusted analyses showed that, in the insulin group, macrosomia was positively associated with the change in PP2 (P value=0.0008). In addition, in the insulin group, antenatal, intrapartum and neonatal complications were all positively associated with the change in Hb1Ac levels. In the diet group, the only association was present between neonatal complications and FPG (P value<0.0001). But on adjusted analysis FPG, PP1 and PP2 measurements did not predict any antenatal, labor and neonatal complications. Only HbA1c were able to predict fetal macrosomia on insulin therapy when controlled for confounding factors (P value=0.0032). Conclusion The findings of the study suggest that none of the four parameters were able to predict GDM related perinatal complications. Moreover, postprandial 1 hour and postprandial 2 hour serum glucose measurements were not superior to each other in predicting fetal macrosomia or perinatal complications. Based on our findings it can be concluded that both methods may be suitable for follow up as there are no clear advantages of one measurement over the other. REFERENCES 1. Group HSCR, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, Trimble ER, Chaovarindr U, Coustan DR, Hadden DR, McCance DR, Hod M, McIntyre HD, Oats JJ, Persson B, Rogers MS, Sacks DA: Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1991-2002. 2. Catalano PM, McIntyre HD, Cruickshank JK, McCance DR, Dyer AR, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Trimble ER, Coustan DR, Hadden DR, Persson B, Hod M, Oats JJ, Group HSCR: The hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome study: Associations of gdm and obesity with pregnancy outcomes. Diabetes Care 2012;35:780-786. 3. Yogev, Chen, Hod, Coustan, Oats, McIntyre, Metzger, Lowe, Dyer, Dooley, Trimble, McCance, Hadden, Persson, Rogers, Hyperglycemia, Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Study Cooperative Research G: Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome (hapo) study: Preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:255 e251-257. 4. Pedersen J: Weight and length at birth of infants of diabetic mothers. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1954;16:330-342. 5. International Association of D, Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus P, Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, Catalano PA, Damm P, Dyer AR, Leiva A, Hod M, Kitzmiler JL, Lowe LP, McIntyre HD, Oats JJ, Omori Y, Schmidt MI: International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010;33:676-682. 6. Committee on Practice B-O: Practice bulletin no. 137: Gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:406-416. 7. Moses RG, Lucas EM, Knights S: Gestational diabetes mellitus. At what time should the postprandial glucose level be monitored? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;39:457-460. 8. Weisz B, Shrim A, Homko CJ, Schiff E, Epstein GS, Sivan E: One hour versus two hours postprandial glucose measurement in gestational diabetes: A prospective study. J Perinatol 2005;25:241-244. 9. Sivan E, Weisz B, Homko CJ, Reece EA, Schiff E: One or two hours postprandial glucose measurements: Are they the same? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:604-607. 10.Carpenter MW, Coustan DR: Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:768-773. 11.Beall MH, Spong C, McKay J, Ross MG: Objective definition of shoulder dystocia: A prospective evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:934-937. 12.Li E, Zhang D, Davidian M: Conditional estimation for generalized linear models when covariates are subject-specific parameters in a mixed model for longitudinal measurements. Biometrics 2004;60:1-7. 13.American Diabetes A: Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014. Diabetes Care 2014;37 Suppl 1:S14-80. 14.Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Chen R, Rosenn B, Hod M, Langer O: The postprandial glucose profile in the diabetic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:576-581. 15.Dandona P, Besterman HS, Freedman DB, Boag F, Taylor AM, Beckett AG: Macrosomia despite well-controlled diabetic pregnancy. Lancet 1984;1:737. 16.Hauth JC, Clifton RG, Roberts JM, Myatt L, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Varner MW, Wapner RJ, Thorp JM, Jr., Mercer BM, Peaceman AM, Ramin SM, Carpenter MW, Samuels P, Sciscione A, Tolosa JE, Saade G, Sorokin Y, Anderson GD, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child H, Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units N: Maternal insulin resistance and preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:327 e321-326. 17.Lurie S, Danon D: Life span of erythrocytes in late pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:123-126. 18.Mills JL, Jovanovic L, Knopp R, Aarons J, Conley M, Park E, Lee YJ, Holmes L, Simpson JL, Metzger B: Physiological reduction in fasting plasma glucose concentration in the first trimester of normal pregnancy: The diabetes in early pregnancy study. Metabolism 1998;47:1140-1144. 19.Shah BD, Cohen AW, May C, Gabbe SG: Comparison of glycohemoglobin determination and the one-hour oral glucose screen in the identification of gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:774-777. 20.Gandhi RA, Brown J, Simm A, Page RC, Idris I: Hba1c during pregnancy: Its relationship to meal related glycaemia and neonatal birth weight in patients with diabetes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;138:45-48. 21.Karcaaltincaba D, Yalvac S, Kandemir O, Altun S: Glycosylated hemoglobin level in the second trimester predicts birth weight and amniotic fluid volume in non-diabetic pregnancies with abnormal screening test. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010;23:1193-1199. 22.Yeral MI, Ozgu-Erdinc AS, Uygur D, Seckin KD, Karsli MF, Danisman AN: Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in the first trimester, comparison of fasting plasma glucose, two-step and one-step methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Endocrine 2013 MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS Insulin Diet LONGIT COVAR P VALUE LONGIT COVAR P VALUE Delivery Route FPG 0.748 FPG 0.895 PP1 0.431 PP1 0.991 PP2 0.114 PP2 0.559 HbA1C 0.158 HbA1C 0.244 Macrosomia FPG 0.349 FPG 0.674 PP1 0.752 PP1 0.895 PP2 0.681 PP2 0.827 HbA1C 0.0032 HbA1C 0.904 Intrapartum Complications FPG 0.611 FPG 0.053 PP1 0.973 PP1 0.841 PP2 0.698 PP2 0.279 HbA1C 0.419 HbA1C 0.685 Antenatal Complications FPG 0.613 FPG 0.593 PP1 0.958 PP1 0.798 PP2 0.466 PP2 0.514 HbA1C 0.569 HbA1C 0.184 Postnatal Complications FPG 0.515 FPG 0.946 PP1 0.948 PP1 0.973 PP2 0.306 PP2 0.931 HbA1C 0.976 HbA1C 0.898 Preterm Delivery FPG 0.648 FPG 0.666 PP1 0.951 PP1 0.092 PP2 0.993 PP2 0.533 HbA1C 0.981 HbA1C 0.386 NICU need FPG 0.190 FPG 0.884 PP1 0.673 PP1 0.949 PP2 0.986 PP2 0.989 HbA1C 0.442 HbA1C 0.483 Preeclampsia FPG 0.914 FPG 0.816 PP1 0.500 PP1 0.706 PP2 0.135 PP2 0.897 HbA1C 0.886 HbA1C 0.912 Polyhydramnios FPG 0.537 FPG 0.552 PP1 0.544 PP1 0.857 PP2 0.239 PP2 0.920 HbA1C 0.189 HbA1C 0.404

ONE HOUR VERSUS TWO HOUR POST PRANDIAL BLOOD … · one hour versus two hour post prandial blood glucose measurement in women with gestational diabetes mellitus; which one ... group

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ONE HOUR VERSUS TWO HOUR POST PRANDIAL BLOOD … · one hour versus two hour post prandial blood glucose measurement in women with gestational diabetes mellitus; which one ... group

ONE HOUR VERSUS TWO HOUR POST PRANDIAL BLOOD GLUCOSE MEASUREMENT IN WOMEN WITH GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUS;

WHICH ONE SHOULD WE CHOOSE? A.Seval OZGU-ERDINC, Cantekin ISKENDER, Dilek UYGUR, Aysegul OKSUZOGLU,

M.Ilkin YERAL, K.Doga SECKIN, Zeynep I. KALAYLIOGLU, A. Nuri DANISMAN Zekai Tahir Burak Women Health Care, Education and Research Hospital

ANKARA, TURKEY

Introduction The study aimed to compare the efficacy of 1 hour (PP1)

and 2 hour (PP2) postprandial blood glucose test for the prediction of obstetric complications in patients with GDM. Our primary objective was to investigate whether PP1 and PP2 measurements have a correlation with adverse perinatal outcomes and if so the degree of correlation of PP1 and PP2 measurements differed from each other.

Material and Methods This prospective study consisted of 259 women with GDM

who were followed up at Zekai Tahir Burak Women Health Care, Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, between June 2010 and January 2013. During each antenatal visit serum HbA1c and fasting capillary glucose (FPG) as well as capillary glucose at postprandial 1-hour (PP1) and postprandial 2-hour (PP2) were analyzed. Patients were screened for delivery route and adverse perinatal outcomes such as preterm delivery, preeclampsia, polyhydramnios, fetal macrosomia, low 5-min Apgar score, neonatal intensive care unit admission, hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, fetal mortality and malformations.

The patients were divided in two groups as diet and insulin therapy. There were 144 patients on insulin therapy and 115 patients on diet therapy. A total of 531 blood glucose measurements were obtained for different gestational weeks between 24-41 gestational weeks 1-8 calculations per patient. For association between each hour of glucose measurement and each primary outcome, the method developed by Li et al. for modeling cross sectional outcomes with longitudinal covariates is used.

Results Unadjusted analyses showed that, in the insulin group,

macrosomia was positively associated with the change in PP2 (P value=0.0008). In addition, in the insulin group, antenatal, intrapartum and neonatal complications were all positively associated with the change in Hb1Ac levels. In the diet group, the only association was present between neonatal complications and FPG (P value<0.0001).

But on adjusted analysis FPG, PP1 and PP2 measurements did not predict any antenatal, labor and neonatal complications. Only HbA1c were able to predict fetal macrosomia on insulin therapy when controlled for confounding factors (P value=0.0032).

Conclusion The findings of the study suggest that none of the four

parameters were able to predict GDM related perinatal complications. Moreover, postprandial 1 hour and postprandial 2 hour serum glucose measurements were not superior to each other in predicting fetal macrosomia or perinatal complications. Based on our findings it can be concluded that both methods may be suitable for follow up as there are no clear advantages of one measurement over the other.

REFERENCES 1. Group HSCR, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, Trimble ER, Chaovarindr U, Coustan DR, Hadden DR, McCance DR, Hod M, McIntyre HD, Oats JJ, Persson B, Rogers MS, Sacks DA: Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1991-2002. 2. Catalano PM, McIntyre HD, Cruickshank JK, McCance DR, Dyer AR, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Trimble ER, Coustan DR, Hadden DR, Persson B, Hod M, Oats JJ, Group HSCR: The hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome study: Associations of gdm and obesity with pregnancy outcomes. Diabetes Care 2012;35:780-786. 3. Yogev, Chen, Hod, Coustan, Oats, McIntyre, Metzger, Lowe, Dyer, Dooley, Trimble, McCance, Hadden, Persson, Rogers, Hyperglycemia, Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Study Cooperative Research G: Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome (hapo) study: Preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:255 e251-257. 4. Pedersen J: Weight and length at birth of infants of diabetic mothers. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1954;16:330-342. 5. International Association of D, Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus P, Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, Catalano PA, Damm P, Dyer AR, Leiva A, Hod M, Kitzmiler JL, Lowe LP, McIntyre HD, Oats JJ, Omori Y, Schmidt MI: International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010;33:676-682. 6. Committee on Practice B-O: Practice bulletin no. 137: Gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:406-416. 7. Moses RG, Lucas EM, Knights S: Gestational diabetes mellitus. At what time should the postprandial glucose level be monitored? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;39:457-460. 8. Weisz B, Shrim A, Homko CJ, Schiff E, Epstein GS, Sivan E: One hour versus two hours postprandial glucose measurement in gestational diabetes: A prospective study. J Perinatol 2005;25:241-244. 9. Sivan E, Weisz B, Homko CJ, Reece EA, Schiff E: One or two hours postprandial glucose measurements: Are they the same? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:604-607. 10.Carpenter MW, Coustan DR: Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:768-773. 11.Beall MH, Spong C, McKay J, Ross MG: Objective definition of shoulder dystocia: A prospective evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:934-937. 12.Li E, Zhang D, Davidian M: Conditional estimation for generalized linear models when covariates are subject-specific parameters in a mixed model for longitudinal measurements. Biometrics 2004;60:1-7. 13.American Diabetes A: Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014. Diabetes Care 2014;37 Suppl 1:S14-80. 14.Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Chen R, Rosenn B, Hod M, Langer O: The postprandial glucose profile in the diabetic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:576-581. 15.Dandona P, Besterman HS, Freedman DB, Boag F, Taylor AM, Beckett AG: Macrosomia despite well-controlled diabetic pregnancy. Lancet 1984;1:737. 16.Hauth JC, Clifton RG, Roberts JM, Myatt L, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Varner MW, Wapner RJ, Thorp JM, Jr., Mercer BM, Peaceman AM, Ramin SM, Carpenter MW, Samuels P, Sciscione A, Tolosa JE, Saade G, Sorokin Y, Anderson GD, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child H, Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units N: Maternal insulin resistance and preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:327 e321-326. 17.Lurie S, Danon D: Life span of erythrocytes in late pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:123-126. 18.Mills JL, Jovanovic L, Knopp R, Aarons J, Conley M, Park E, Lee YJ, Holmes L, Simpson JL, Metzger B: Physiological reduction in fasting plasma glucose concentration in the first trimester of normal pregnancy: The diabetes in early pregnancy study. Metabolism 1998;47:1140-1144. 19.Shah BD, Cohen AW, May C, Gabbe SG: Comparison of glycohemoglobin determination and the one-hour oral glucose screen in the identification of gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:774-777. 20.Gandhi RA, Brown J, Simm A, Page RC, Idris I: Hba1c during pregnancy: Its relationship to meal related glycaemia and neonatal birth weight in patients with diabetes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;138:45-48. 21.Karcaaltincaba D, Yalvac S, Kandemir O, Altun S: Glycosylated hemoglobin level in the second trimester predicts birth weight and amniotic fluid volume in non-diabetic pregnancies with abnormal screening test. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010;23:1193-1199. 22.Yeral MI, Ozgu-Erdinc AS, Uygur D, Seckin KD, Karsli MF, Danisman AN: Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in the first trimester, comparison of fasting plasma glucose, two-step and one-step methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Endocrine 2013

MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS Insulin Diet

LONGIT COVAR P VALUE LONGIT COVAR P VALUE

Delivery

Route

FPG 0.748 FPG 0.895

PP1 0.431 PP1 0.991

PP2 0.114 PP2 0.559

HbA1C 0.158 HbA1C 0.244

Macrosomia FPG 0.349 FPG 0.674

PP1 0.752 PP1 0.895

PP2 0.681 PP2 0.827

HbA1C 0.0032 HbA1C 0.904

Intrapartum

Complications

FPG 0.611 FPG 0.053

PP1 0.973 PP1 0.841

PP2 0.698 PP2 0.279

HbA1C 0.419 HbA1C 0.685

Antenatal

Complications

FPG 0.613 FPG 0.593

PP1 0.958 PP1 0.798

PP2 0.466 PP2 0.514

HbA1C 0.569 HbA1C 0.184

Postnatal Complications FPG 0.515 FPG 0.946

PP1 0.948 PP1 0.973

PP2 0.306 PP2 0.931

HbA1C 0.976 HbA1C 0.898

Preterm

Delivery

FPG 0.648 FPG 0.666

PP1 0.951 PP1 0.092

PP2 0.993 PP2 0.533

HbA1C 0.981 HbA1C 0.386

NICU

need

FPG 0.190 FPG 0.884

PP1 0.673 PP1 0.949

PP2 0.986 PP2 0.989

HbA1C 0.442 HbA1C 0.483

Preeclampsia FPG 0.914 FPG 0.816

PP1 0.500 PP1 0.706

PP2 0.135 PP2 0.897

HbA1C 0.886 HbA1C 0.912

Polyhydramnios FPG 0.537 FPG 0.552

PP1 0.544 PP1 0.857

PP2 0.239 PP2 0.920

HbA1C 0.189 HbA1C 0.404