Upload
hoangtram
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ONE HOUR VERSUS TWO HOUR POST PRANDIAL BLOOD GLUCOSE MEASUREMENT IN WOMEN WITH GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUS;
WHICH ONE SHOULD WE CHOOSE? A.Seval OZGU-ERDINC, Cantekin ISKENDER, Dilek UYGUR, Aysegul OKSUZOGLU,
M.Ilkin YERAL, K.Doga SECKIN, Zeynep I. KALAYLIOGLU, A. Nuri DANISMAN Zekai Tahir Burak Women Health Care, Education and Research Hospital
ANKARA, TURKEY
Introduction The study aimed to compare the efficacy of 1 hour (PP1)
and 2 hour (PP2) postprandial blood glucose test for the prediction of obstetric complications in patients with GDM. Our primary objective was to investigate whether PP1 and PP2 measurements have a correlation with adverse perinatal outcomes and if so the degree of correlation of PP1 and PP2 measurements differed from each other.
Material and Methods This prospective study consisted of 259 women with GDM
who were followed up at Zekai Tahir Burak Women Health Care, Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, between June 2010 and January 2013. During each antenatal visit serum HbA1c and fasting capillary glucose (FPG) as well as capillary glucose at postprandial 1-hour (PP1) and postprandial 2-hour (PP2) were analyzed. Patients were screened for delivery route and adverse perinatal outcomes such as preterm delivery, preeclampsia, polyhydramnios, fetal macrosomia, low 5-min Apgar score, neonatal intensive care unit admission, hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, fetal mortality and malformations.
The patients were divided in two groups as diet and insulin therapy. There were 144 patients on insulin therapy and 115 patients on diet therapy. A total of 531 blood glucose measurements were obtained for different gestational weeks between 24-41 gestational weeks 1-8 calculations per patient. For association between each hour of glucose measurement and each primary outcome, the method developed by Li et al. for modeling cross sectional outcomes with longitudinal covariates is used.
Results Unadjusted analyses showed that, in the insulin group,
macrosomia was positively associated with the change in PP2 (P value=0.0008). In addition, in the insulin group, antenatal, intrapartum and neonatal complications were all positively associated with the change in Hb1Ac levels. In the diet group, the only association was present between neonatal complications and FPG (P value<0.0001).
But on adjusted analysis FPG, PP1 and PP2 measurements did not predict any antenatal, labor and neonatal complications. Only HbA1c were able to predict fetal macrosomia on insulin therapy when controlled for confounding factors (P value=0.0032).
Conclusion The findings of the study suggest that none of the four
parameters were able to predict GDM related perinatal complications. Moreover, postprandial 1 hour and postprandial 2 hour serum glucose measurements were not superior to each other in predicting fetal macrosomia or perinatal complications. Based on our findings it can be concluded that both methods may be suitable for follow up as there are no clear advantages of one measurement over the other.
REFERENCES 1. Group HSCR, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, Trimble ER, Chaovarindr U, Coustan DR, Hadden DR, McCance DR, Hod M, McIntyre HD, Oats JJ, Persson B, Rogers MS, Sacks DA: Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1991-2002. 2. Catalano PM, McIntyre HD, Cruickshank JK, McCance DR, Dyer AR, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Trimble ER, Coustan DR, Hadden DR, Persson B, Hod M, Oats JJ, Group HSCR: The hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome study: Associations of gdm and obesity with pregnancy outcomes. Diabetes Care 2012;35:780-786. 3. Yogev, Chen, Hod, Coustan, Oats, McIntyre, Metzger, Lowe, Dyer, Dooley, Trimble, McCance, Hadden, Persson, Rogers, Hyperglycemia, Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Study Cooperative Research G: Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome (hapo) study: Preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:255 e251-257. 4. Pedersen J: Weight and length at birth of infants of diabetic mothers. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1954;16:330-342. 5. International Association of D, Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus P, Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, Catalano PA, Damm P, Dyer AR, Leiva A, Hod M, Kitzmiler JL, Lowe LP, McIntyre HD, Oats JJ, Omori Y, Schmidt MI: International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010;33:676-682. 6. Committee on Practice B-O: Practice bulletin no. 137: Gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:406-416. 7. Moses RG, Lucas EM, Knights S: Gestational diabetes mellitus. At what time should the postprandial glucose level be monitored? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;39:457-460. 8. Weisz B, Shrim A, Homko CJ, Schiff E, Epstein GS, Sivan E: One hour versus two hours postprandial glucose measurement in gestational diabetes: A prospective study. J Perinatol 2005;25:241-244. 9. Sivan E, Weisz B, Homko CJ, Reece EA, Schiff E: One or two hours postprandial glucose measurements: Are they the same? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:604-607. 10.Carpenter MW, Coustan DR: Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:768-773. 11.Beall MH, Spong C, McKay J, Ross MG: Objective definition of shoulder dystocia: A prospective evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:934-937. 12.Li E, Zhang D, Davidian M: Conditional estimation for generalized linear models when covariates are subject-specific parameters in a mixed model for longitudinal measurements. Biometrics 2004;60:1-7. 13.American Diabetes A: Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014. Diabetes Care 2014;37 Suppl 1:S14-80. 14.Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Chen R, Rosenn B, Hod M, Langer O: The postprandial glucose profile in the diabetic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:576-581. 15.Dandona P, Besterman HS, Freedman DB, Boag F, Taylor AM, Beckett AG: Macrosomia despite well-controlled diabetic pregnancy. Lancet 1984;1:737. 16.Hauth JC, Clifton RG, Roberts JM, Myatt L, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Varner MW, Wapner RJ, Thorp JM, Jr., Mercer BM, Peaceman AM, Ramin SM, Carpenter MW, Samuels P, Sciscione A, Tolosa JE, Saade G, Sorokin Y, Anderson GD, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child H, Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units N: Maternal insulin resistance and preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:327 e321-326. 17.Lurie S, Danon D: Life span of erythrocytes in late pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:123-126. 18.Mills JL, Jovanovic L, Knopp R, Aarons J, Conley M, Park E, Lee YJ, Holmes L, Simpson JL, Metzger B: Physiological reduction in fasting plasma glucose concentration in the first trimester of normal pregnancy: The diabetes in early pregnancy study. Metabolism 1998;47:1140-1144. 19.Shah BD, Cohen AW, May C, Gabbe SG: Comparison of glycohemoglobin determination and the one-hour oral glucose screen in the identification of gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:774-777. 20.Gandhi RA, Brown J, Simm A, Page RC, Idris I: Hba1c during pregnancy: Its relationship to meal related glycaemia and neonatal birth weight in patients with diabetes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;138:45-48. 21.Karcaaltincaba D, Yalvac S, Kandemir O, Altun S: Glycosylated hemoglobin level in the second trimester predicts birth weight and amniotic fluid volume in non-diabetic pregnancies with abnormal screening test. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010;23:1193-1199. 22.Yeral MI, Ozgu-Erdinc AS, Uygur D, Seckin KD, Karsli MF, Danisman AN: Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in the first trimester, comparison of fasting plasma glucose, two-step and one-step methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Endocrine 2013
MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS Insulin Diet
LONGIT COVAR P VALUE LONGIT COVAR P VALUE
Delivery
Route
FPG 0.748 FPG 0.895
PP1 0.431 PP1 0.991
PP2 0.114 PP2 0.559
HbA1C 0.158 HbA1C 0.244
Macrosomia FPG 0.349 FPG 0.674
PP1 0.752 PP1 0.895
PP2 0.681 PP2 0.827
HbA1C 0.0032 HbA1C 0.904
Intrapartum
Complications
FPG 0.611 FPG 0.053
PP1 0.973 PP1 0.841
PP2 0.698 PP2 0.279
HbA1C 0.419 HbA1C 0.685
Antenatal
Complications
FPG 0.613 FPG 0.593
PP1 0.958 PP1 0.798
PP2 0.466 PP2 0.514
HbA1C 0.569 HbA1C 0.184
Postnatal Complications FPG 0.515 FPG 0.946
PP1 0.948 PP1 0.973
PP2 0.306 PP2 0.931
HbA1C 0.976 HbA1C 0.898
Preterm
Delivery
FPG 0.648 FPG 0.666
PP1 0.951 PP1 0.092
PP2 0.993 PP2 0.533
HbA1C 0.981 HbA1C 0.386
NICU
need
FPG 0.190 FPG 0.884
PP1 0.673 PP1 0.949
PP2 0.986 PP2 0.989
HbA1C 0.442 HbA1C 0.483
Preeclampsia FPG 0.914 FPG 0.816
PP1 0.500 PP1 0.706
PP2 0.135 PP2 0.897
HbA1C 0.886 HbA1C 0.912
Polyhydramnios FPG 0.537 FPG 0.552
PP1 0.544 PP1 0.857
PP2 0.239 PP2 0.920
HbA1C 0.189 HbA1C 0.404