Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
128
Bacterial diseases are responsible for heavy mortality in wild and cultured fish. The
problems in the farms are usually tackled by preventing disease outbreaks or by
treating the actual disease with drugs or chemicals. The use of antimicrobial agents
has increased significantly in aquaculture practices (Alderman and Michel, 1992).
Antibiotics used in both human as well as veterinary medicines have been tried
experimentally to treat bacterial infections of fish. Problems including solubility,
palatability, toxicity, cost, delivery and governmental restrictions have limited the
available antibiotics to select few, especially in food fish culture. The indiscriminate
use of antimicrobials for disease control in animals increases the selective pressure
exerted on the microbial world and encourages the natural emergence of bacterial
resistance (Allsop, 1998; Verchuere et al., 2000). Decreased efficacy and resistance
of pathogens to antibiotics has necessitated development of new alternatives for
disease control in Aquaculture (Smith et al., 1994). Vaccination may be the most
effective method of controlling fish disease, even though disease caused by bacteria
like Aeromonas hydrophila has not been controlled by vaccination due to their
heterogeneity. It is therefore necessary to search for novel antibacterial compounds
with therapeutic potential for which the pathogens may not have resistance (Patil et
al., 2001). It is estimated that there are 250,000 to 500,000 species of plant on earth
(Borris, 1996). The effects of plant extracts on microbes have been studied by a very
large number of researchers in different parts of the world. For instance, water and
alcohol extracts of Ocimum sanctum and Ocimum gratissimum were highly toxic
against fungi after 15 days culture (Amadioha, 2000). Further extracts of garlic, onion
and green pepper have been reported to inhibit the growth of Escherichia coli,
Salmonella typhosa, Shigella dysenterae and Staphylococcus aureus (Johnson and
Vaughn, 1969; Sofowora, 1983; Arora and Kaur, 1999). Reports are also available
129
on the use of several plant by product which possess antimicrobial properties, on
several pathogenic bacteria and fungi (Rocio and Rion, 1989; Akobundu and
Agyakwa,1987; Almagboul et al., 1988; Deans and Svoboda, 1990; Diker et al.,
1991; Heisey and Gorham, 1992; Mishra et al., 1992; Oboh et al., 1992;
Hablemariam et al., 1993; De Pooter et al., 1995; Lis – Balchin and Deans, 1996;
Hilli et al., 1997; Oboh and Abula,1997; Reddy et al., 2001; Erdogrul, 2002; Atefl and
Erdogrul, 2003). In India much work has been done on ethno medicinal plants
(Maheswari et al., 1986, Rai, 1989; Negi et al., 1993). Interest in a large number of
traditional natural products has increased (Taylor et al., 1996). It has been
suggested that aqueous and ethanolic extracts from plants used in allopathic
medicine are potential sources of antiviral, antitumoral and antimicrobial agents
(Chung et al., 1995; Vlietinck et al., 1995). The selection of crude plant extracts for
screening programs has the potential of being more successful in initial steps than
the screening of pure compounds isolated from natural products (Kusumota et al.,
1995). The medicinal value of these plants lies in some chemical substances that
produce a definite physiological action on human body. The most important of these
bioactive constituents of plants are alkaloids, tannins, flavonoids and phenolic
compounds (Hill, 1952). Though literature speaks diverse studies of bioactivity of
plant extracts against human pathogens, our work on testing the antibacterial
efficacies of these on fish pathogens was comparatively a new concept and not
much attempt had been made earlier in this line. The three-selected medicinal flora
was screened for potential antibacterial activity against the pathogens isolated from
Labeo rohita affected by bacterial septicemia. This study also investigated the
fundamental scientific bases for the use of Azadirachta indica leaf extract, Piper
130
betle leaf extract and Allium sativum clove extract by defining the phytochemical
constituents present in these plants.
Materials and methods
Description of Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822)
Rohu is the natural inhabitant of river systems of India, Nepal, Pakistan, Bangladesh
and Burma (Plate 1). In recent years it has been transplanted to many countries of
the world including Sri Lanka, Mauritius, USSR, Japan, Philippines, Laos, Malaysia
and Thailand. Normally it occupies the column region of the aquatic ecosystem and
feeds mostly on vegetable matter including higher plants, detritus, etc. It naturally
breeds in rivers and under special conditions in bundhs. Except by hypophysation to
which it responds quickly, it never breeds in ponds. It attains sexual maturity during
the second year. However, certain percentages of pond reared specimens mature
within one year. Fecundity varies from 2, 26,000 to about 28, 00,000 depending
upon the size (Khan and Jhingran, 1975). Rohu spawns during the monsoon (April—
September). Seeds collected from rivers or produced by bundh breeding or induced
breeding are reared with ease in seasonal or perennial undrainable ponds. Under
pond culture conditions it grows up to 900 g within one year.
Plate.1 LABEO ROHITA
131
Taxonomy
Family : Cyprinidae
Order : Cypriniformes
Class : Actinopterygii
Genus : Labeo
Species : Rohita
DESCRIPTION OF TEST PLANTS
Azadirachta indica A. Juss.
Neem, Azadirachta indica is a fast growing sclerophyllous tree which is present in
the Indian subcontinent (National Research Council, 1992) and is now distributed
throughout Southeast- Asia, East and Sub-sahelian Africa, and some parts of
Central America (Schmutterer, 1990; Ascher, 1993). Azadirachta indica has been
used for centuries as the country store of developing nations. Earliest reference to it
is in Sanskrit writings that are over 4,000 years old (Larson, 1990). This broad-
leaved evergreen can reach heights of 30 meters with a trunk girth of 2.5 meters.
Neem matured at 3-5 years and fully reproductive at 10 years and live for over two
centuries. Its deep root system is well adapted to retrieving water and nutrients from
the soil profile, but this deep root system is very sensitive to water logging. The
neem tree thrives in hot, dry climates where shade temperatures often reach 50
degrees celsius and annual rainfall ranges from 400 to 1,200 millimeters. The tree
can withstand many environmental adversities including drought and infertile, stony,
shallow, or acidic soils (Verkerk and Wright, 1993). Neem has more than 100 unique
bio-active compounds, which have potential applications in agriculture, animal care,
public health, and for even regulating human fertility. The effective ingredients are
132
present in all parts of the tree but are highly concentrated in the seeds (National
Research Council, 1992).
There is evidence, but no scientific correlation, that trees grown in climates with
lower rainfall produce kernels with higher content of metabolites (Schmutterer,
1990).
Taxonomy
Phylum : Angiospermatae
Class : Dicotyledoneae
Order : Sapindales
Family : Meliaceae
Genus : Azadirachta
Species : Indica
Botanical description
Medium sized tree, up to 15 m tall, rarely 25 m, with short, straight bole and long
spreading branches, forming a dense, large, oval or rounded crown. Ever-green or,
under extreme heat and drought, deciduous. Old bark turning dark grey, thick and
furrowed. Leaves imparipinately compound with 7-17 pairs of leaflets, which are
ovate or lanceolate, falcate with uneven base and dentate margins, 6-8 cm long, 1-3
cm wide (Plate 2). Inflorescence, a 10-30 cm long panicle with many small white to
cream colored flowers (Plate 3). The neem produces ellipsoidal drupes (Plate 4) that
are about two centimeters in length, borne on axillary clusters. These fruits contain
kernels that have high concentrations of secondary metabolites (National Research
Council, 1992).
133
Plate 2. Azadirachta indica sapling
Plate 3. Azadirachta indica Plate 4. Azadirachta indica
inflorescence branch showing ellipsoidal drupes
134
Special features
Azadirachta indica is known to possess antiinflammatory, antipyretic, antimicrobial,
anti-diabetic and diverse pharmacological properties (Satyanarayana et al., 1978;
Okpanyi and Ezeukwu, 1981; Rochanakij et al., 1985; Chopra and Chopra, 1955)
The aqueous extract of neem bark and leaf also possesses anticomplement and
immunostimulant activity. Neem oil has been shown to possess activity by selectively
activating the cell-mediated immune mechanisms to elicit an enhanced response to
subsequent mitogenic or antigenic challenge.
More than 135 compounds have been isolated from different parts of neem and
several reviews have also been published on the chemistry and structural diversity of
these compounds. The compounds have been divided into two major classes:
isoprenoids (like diterpenoids and triterpenoids containing protomeliacins, limonoids,
azadirone and its derivatives, gedunin and its derivatives, vilasinin type of
compounds and C- secomeliacins such as nimbin, salanin and azadirachtin ) and
non-isoprenoids, which are proteins (amino acids) and carbohydrates
(polysaccharides), sulphurous compounds, polyphenolics such as flavonoids and
their glycosides, dihydrochalcone, coumarin and tannins, aliphatic compounds, etc.
(Schmutterer et al., 1995).
Piper betle Linn.
The Betel (Piper betle) is a spice whose leaves have medicinal properties. The plant
is evergreen and perennial, with glossy heart-shaped leaves and white catkins, and
grows to a height of about 1 metre. The Betel plant originated in Malaysia and now
grows in India, Indonesia and Sri Lanka. The best Betel leaf is the "Magahi" variety
(literally from the Magadha region) grown near Patna in Bihar, India.
135
The active ingredients of betel oil, which is obtained from the leaves, are betel-
phenol (or chavibetol or 3-hydroxy-4-methoxyalkylbenzene, which gives a smoky
aroma), chavicol and cadinene. The leaves are chewed together with mineral lime
(calcium oxide) and the areca nut.
Taxonomy
Phylum : Angiospermatae
Class : Dicotyledoneae
Order : Piperales
Family : Piperaceae
Genus : Piper
Species : Betle
Botanical description
The betel leaf plant is a branching vine that may climb as high as 10-15ft (Plate 5
and 6), although it often grows as an understory ground cover. The plant prefers
warm, humid conditions, but can tolerate some drought. It is generally too tender to
grow outside of the tropics. Plants are climbers and dioecious. Stems rooted at
nodes, 2.5-5 mm thick, slightly woody. Petiole 2-5 cm, very finely powdery
pubescent; prophylls ca. 1/3 as long as petioles; leaf blade ovate to ovate-oblong,
those at apex of stem sometimes elliptic, 7-15 × 5-11 cm, papery to ± leathery,
abaxially densely glandular with very finely powdery pubescent veins, adaxially
glabrous, base cordate, sometimes rounded in leaf blades toward apex of stem,
symmetric or nearly so, apex acuminate; veins 7, apical pair arising 0.7-2 cm above
base, usually opposite, others basal; reticulate veins conspicuous. Spikes leaf-
136
opposed. Male spikes nearly as long as leaf blades at anthesis; peduncle nearly as
long as petioles; rachis pubescent; bracts orbicular or suborbicular, rarely obovate,
1-1.3 mm wide, peltate, ± sessile. Stamens 2; filaments thick, ca. as long as anthers
or longer; anthers reniform. Female spikes 3-5 × ca. 1 cm, longer in fruit; rachis
fleshy, densely pubescent. Ovary partly immersed in and connate to rachis, apex
tomentose; stigmas usually 4 or 5, lanceolate, tomentose. Drupes fused to form
terete, fleshy, reddish, compound fruit, apices tomentose, prominent. Flower on May-
July (The Wealth of India, 1992)
Plate 5. Piper betle climbing on a twig Plate 6. Piper betle attached to a tree
Special features
P. betle is one such a plant of the several ingredients in a chew commonly known as
‘pan’. Usefulness of this plant against various dieases can be traced in the ancient
vedic literature Atharved as early as 3000 -2500 BC and its vedic name is Saptasira.
137
Betel leaves with strong pungent and aromatic flavour are widely consumed as a
mouth freshener. The leaves are credited with wound healing digestive and
pancreatic lipase stimulant activities in the traditonal medicine (Santhanam and
Nagarajan, 1990; Chatterjee and Pakrashi, 1995) which has also been proved with
experimental animals (Prabhu et al., 1995).
Leaf extracts were reported to possess antioxidant property (Majumdar et al., 2002;
Majumdar et al., 2003), antimicrobial (Ramji et al., 2002) antifungal and anti
inflammatory activity (Ambarta, 1986).
P. betle is an aromatic, carminative, stimulant and astringent used as a preventive
for worms and in snake bite (The Wealth of India, 1992). Juice of the leaves is
dropped into eyes in painful infection and night blindness. Essential oil from leaves of
this plant has been used for the treatment of respiratory catarrhs and as antiseptic
and the fruit is employed with honey as a remedy for cough (Chandra et al., 1987).
The leaves, known as Sirih in Malayan, provide an oil that contains a number of
phenolic substances, many of which are allylphenols. Chavicol (4-hydroxyallyl-
benzene) is a major component and is strongly antiseptic (Ueda and Sasaki., 1951).
Allium sativum Linn.
Garlic (Allium sativum), a member of the lily family, is a perennial plant that is
cultivated worldwide. The garlic bulb is composed of individual cloves enclosed in a
white skin. It is the bulb, either fresh or dehydrated, that is used as a spice or
medicinal herb.
138
Garlic contains 0.1-0.36% of a volatile oil composed of sulfur-containing compounds:
allicin, diallyl disulfide, diallyl trisulfide, ajoene and minor amounts of other di- and
polysulphides. These volatile compounds are generally considered to be responsible
for most of the pharmacological properties of garlic. Other constituents of garlic
include: alliin (S-allyl-L-cysteine sulfoxide), S-methyl- L-cysteine sulfoxide, protein
(16.8%, dry weight basis), high concentrations of trace minerals (particularly
selenium), vitamins, glucosinolates, and enzymes (alliinase, peroxidase, and
myrosinase) (Leung, 1980; Raj and Parmar, 1977).
Garlic is believed to stem from Central Asia, although no wild form is known. Of the
about 700 species of genus Allium, many are native to Central Asia, the center of
diversity ranging from the Himalayas to Turkestan.
Garlic has a very long history of use as a food and a medicine (Phillips and Foy,
1995). It was given to the Egyptian laborers when building the pyramids because it
was believed to confer strength and protect from disease, it was also widely used by
the Romans (Phillips and Foy, 1995).
Botanical description
The leaves are long, narrow and flat like grass (Plate 7). The bulb (the only part
eaten) is of a compound nature, consisting of numerous bulblets, known technically
as 'cloves,' grouped together between the membraneous scales and enclosed within
a whitish skin, which holds them as in a sac (Plate 8). The flowers are placed at the
end of a stalk rising direct from the bulb and are whitish, grouped together in a
139
globular head, or umbel, with an enclosing kind of leaf or spathae, and among them
are small bulbils.
1.
Plate 7. Young garlic plant Plate 8. Garlic bulb
Taxonomy
Phylum : Angiospermatae
Class : Monocotyledoneae
Order : Liliales
Family : Liliaceae
Genus : Allium
Species : Sativum
140
Special features
Garlic has a very long folk history of use in a wide range of ailments, particularly
ailments such as ringworm, Candida and vaginitis where its fungicidal, antiseptic,
tonic and parasiticidal properties have proved of benefit (Sharma, 1977; Amer et al.,
1980; Prasad and Sharma, 1980; Adetumbi and Lau, 1983; Hughes and Lawson,
1991). The fresh bulb is much more effective medicinally than stored bulbs;
extended storage greatly reduces the anti-bacterial action.
Garlic has strong antioxidant properties and its role in preventing age-related
diseases like cardiovascular diseases, cancer, arthritis, cataract formation etc. had
been investigated for the past 10-15 years (Rahman, 2003).
Pharmacological research on garlic has shown for the thiosulfinates free radical
scavenging, inhibition of lipid peroxidation (Phelps and Harris, 1993; Harris et al.,
1995), inhibition of platelet aggregation (Barrie et al., 1987; Kiesewetter et al., 1993),
stimulation of fibrinolysis (Kiesewetter et al., 1990), and reduction of serum
cholesterol and lipid levels (Bordia, 1981; Brosche et al., 1990; Mader, 1990;
Rotzsch et al., 1992). In vitro and in vivo animal studies have also demonstrated
garlic's ability to inhibit tumor formation (Weisberger and Pensky, 1958; Belman,
1983) and reduce blood pressure (Elbl, 1991; Koch, 1992). Other in vitro studies
have concluded that garlic possesses direct anti-atherosclerosis effects and
inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis by allicin and ajoene. In vivo studies in animals
have concluded that garlic powder, fresh garlic, and garlic oil reduced experimentally
induced hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis (ESCOP, 1997).
141
Collection of plant material
Azadirachta indica leaf were collected from Sri Paramakalyani Centre for
Environmental Sciences Campus, Piper betle leaf were collected from a farm at Attur
and Allium sativum cloves were collected from local market. The plants were
identified and classified by Dr. M.Vishvanathan (Taxonomist), of Sri Paramakalyani
centre for Environmental Sciences, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University,
Alwarkurichi and the voucher specimens were deposited in the laboratory of Sri
Paramakalyani Centre for Environmental Sciences, Alwarkurichi.
Extraction
The extraction method used in this study was a modification of Ann (1985), Azoro
(2000), Nair et al. (2005) and Akinyemi et al. (2005). The plant materials were
washed several times in running water and allowed to air dry. This was done to
reduce the microbial load of the plant material due to handling and stress. The outer
covering of garlic was manually peeled and sliced into cutlets. These sliced cutlets
and leaves of Azadirachta indica and Piper betle having initial weight of 200g were
separately oven dried at temperature of 60ºC for 6 days. Using a milling the plant
material was pulverized into powder. The powder was weighed using electronic
weighing machine.
Weights of the powder
Azadirachta indica - 54.02g
Piper betle - 37.24g
Allium sativum - 63.48g
142
Aqueous extraction
5g of the Azadirachta indica leaf powder was dissolved in 250 ml conical flask using
200 ml distilled water and maintained at 60ºC for 3 hours. The mixture was filtered
through Whatman No.1 filter paper. The precipitate was discarded and the filtrate
was poured into pre weighed Petri plates; evaporated to dryness in rotary evaporator
and the dried extract was used for the experiment. The same procedure was
followed for the preparation of water extract of Piper betle leaf and Allium sativum
clove. After evaporation the extracts were recovered and weighed.
Ethanol extraction
5g of the Azadirachta indica leaf powder was dissolved in 250 ml conical flask using
200 ml 80% ethanol, plugged with cotton and kept on a rotary shaker at 190 -220
rpm for 24 hours. The mixture was filtered through Whatman No.1 filter paper. The
precipitate was discarded and the filtrate was poured into pre weighed Petri plates;
evaporated to dryness in rotary evaporator and the dried extract was used for the
experiment. The same procedure was followed for Piper betle leaf and Allium
sativum clove ethanol extract preparation. After evaporation the extracts were
recovered and weighed.
This process of extraction was repeated to recover larger quantity of the extracts and
they were stored in the refrigerator at 0ºC for further use of antimicrobial sensitivity
testing. The yields were recovered as percentage of the quantity of the initial plant
material (5g) used.
Yield in g × 100
--------------------- = Yield (%)
5
143
Bacterial species
All the highly virulent and moderately virulent strains of Aeromonas hydrophila and
Pseudomonas fluorescens isolated from Labeo rohita and stored in the laboratory
after pathogenicity study were retrieved for antibacterial study. The stock was
cultured onto TSA (Tryptic soy agar medium) incubated for 24 hours at 28ºC and
used for the study.
Antibacterial activity Assay
The antibacterial activity of the samples was assayed by the standard Nathan’s Agar
Well Diffusion (NAWD) technique (Nathan et al., 1978) against the test strains on
Tryptic soy agar (TSA) in Petri plates with drilled wells of 6 mm diameter. A constant
amount of 0.7g of extracts in 50 µl Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) was placed on to
each well. The well at the centre without the extract serves as control. After 22 -24
hour of incubation at room temperature, the susceptibility of the test organisms was
determined by measuring the diameter of the zone of inhibition around each well.
Oxytetracycline disc was used as positive control. The test was repeated three times
and the average of the zones was recorded in millimeters and results were reported
as mean ± standard deviation of treatment. The antibacterial spectra of the selected
plants against the test microorganisms were also reported as percentage, calculated
by taking positive control oxytetracycline as 100% inhibition. The data was analysed
by analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by serially diluting the
extracted fractions in DMSO so that concentrations of 100 µg, 125 µg, 150µg,
175µg, 200µg, 225µg, 250µg, 275µg and 300µg/50 µl DMSO were loaded into each
well for testing the susceptibility of the organisms. MIC is regarded as the
144
concentration giving the least inhibitory activity and below which there is no further
inhibition.
PHYTOCHEMICAL SCREENING
Chemical tests were carried out on the aqueous extract and on powdered specimens
using standard procedures to identify the constituents of the selected plant materials
as described by Harborne (1973); Trease and Evans (1989); Sofowara (1993).
Aqueous extract was prepared by soaking 100g of dried powdered samples in 200
ml of distilled water for 12 hours. The extracts were filtered using Whatman filter
paper No 42 (125mm) and the filtrate was used as aqueous extract.
Test for tannins
About 0.5g of the dried powdered samples of different plants were boiled in 20 ml of
water in a test tube and then filtered. To the filtrate a few drops of 0.1% ferric
chloride was added and observed for brownish green or a blue black colouration.
Test for saponin
About 2g of the powdered sample was boiled in 20 ml of distilled water in a water
bath and filtered. 10 ml of the filtrate was mixed with 5 ml of distilled water and
shaken vigorously for a stable persistent froth. The frothing was mixed with 3 drops
of olive oil and shaken vigorously, then observed for the formation of emulsion.
Test for flavonoids
Three methods were used to determine the presence of flavonoids in the plant
samples. 5 ml of dilute ammonia solution was added to a portion of the aqueous
filtrate of each plant extract followed by addition of concentrated H2SO4 . A yellow
colouration observed in each extract indicated the presence of flavonoids. The
yellow coloration disappears on standing.
145
Few drops of 1% aluminium solution were added to a portion of each filtrate. A
yellow coloration was observed indicating the presence of flavonoids.
A portion of the powdered plant sample was heated with 10 ml of ethyl acetate over
a steam bath for 3 min. The mixture was filtered and 4 ml of the filtrate was shaken
with 1 ml of dilute ammonia solution. A yellow colouration was observed indicating a
positive test for flavonoids.
Test for steroids
About 0.5g of the powdered sample is mixed with ethyl alcohol and added with two
ml of acetic anhydride and 2 ml H2SO4. The colour changed from violet to blue or
green in samples indicating the presence of steroids.
Test for terpenoids
Five ml of each extract was mixed in 2 ml of chloroform, and concentrated H2SO4 (3
ml) was carefully added to form a layer. A reddish brown coloration of the interface
was formed to show positive results for the presence of terpenoids.
Test for phenolic compounds
3 ml of the extract was treated with a few drops of neutral ferric chloride solution and
observed for blackish red colouration.
Test for sugar/glycoside
0.5g of the dried powdered sample in a watch glass was mixed thoroughly with 0.5
ml of anthrone. Two drops of concentrated H2SO4 was added and mixed well using a
glass rod. It was then heated over a steamed water bath. Formation of dark green
colour indicated the presence of sugar/glycoside.
146
Test for alkaloids
Two ml of acetic anhydride was added to 0.5 g of the dried powdered sample with 2
drops of Dragendroff’s reagent. Formation of reddish orange precipitate indicated the
presence of alkaloids.
Test for Quinone
About 3 ml of the extract was treated with a few drops of 0.5N alcoholic potassium
hydroxide solution. Dark coloration ranging from red to blue indicated the presence
of quinones.
Test for coumarin
About 0.5 g of the powdered dried sample in ethyl alcohol was treated with 0.5N
alcoholic NaOH and colour changes were recorded. Dark yellow colour formation
indicated positive for coumarin.
Test for carboxylic acid
About 3 ml of the sample was mixed with 3 ml of sodium bicarbonate solution.
Effervescence indicated the presence of carboxylic acid.
Detection of proteins and free amino acids
One ml of the extract was gently warmed with equal volume of 10% NaOH. After
cooling a drop of diluted CUSO4 solution was added to the mixture. Formation of
reddish violet colour indicated the presence of proteins.
One ml of the extract was added with few drops of ninhydrin solution. Formation of
purple colour indictated the presence of aminoacids
Detection of resins
One ml of the extract was treated with few drops of acetic anhydride solution
followed by one ml of concentrated H2SO4 solution. Coloration ranging from orange
to yellow indicated the presence of resins.
147
Detection of fixed oils and fats
Few drops of 0.5N alcoholic KOH was added to one ml of the extract with a few
drops of phenolphthalein and the mixture was heated for 1 -2 hours. Soap formation
showed the presence of fixed oils and fats.
Detection of xanthoproteins
About one ml of the extract was added with few drops of concentrated HNO3 and
ammonia solution. Formation of reddish orange precipitate indicated the presence of
xanthoprotein.
RESULTS
Effect of extraction methods on percentage yield
The yields of the extracts of Azadirachta indica, Piper betle and Allium sativum with
respects to solvents are shown in Table.1
Table.1 Yield of extracts of plants with respect to solvents
Plants Solvents Yield (g) Yield (%)
Azadirachta indica Aqueous 3.30 66.00
Ethanol 3.70 74.00
Piper betle Aqueous 3.50 70.00
Ethanol 3.90 78.00
Allium sativum Aquoeus 2.80 56.00
Ethanol 3.00 60.00
148
Plate 9. Aqueous extract of A. Piper betle, B. Allium sativum and C. Azadirachta indica
In all the cases it was found that the yield recorded for the selected plants in ethanol
extract was higher than the aqueous extract (Table 1). Among the three plants
ethanol extract of Piper betle recorded the highest yield (78%) followed by
Azadirachta indica (74%) and Allium sativum (60.0%). For water extracts also Piper
betle recorded the maximum yield (70%) followed by Azadirachta indica (66%) and
Allium sativum (56%).
Two –way ANOVA for the data on percentage yield as a function of difference between selected plants and deployed solvents
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Rows 66.66666667 1 66.66667 25 0.03775 18.51276
Columns 277.3333333 2 138.6667 52 0.018868 19.00003
Error 5.333333333 2 2.666667
Total 349.3333333 5
It could be noted from statistical analysis that there was a significant difference in
yield between the three plants and within the various solvents (p<0.05).
ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTS
The results of the antibacterial activity of the aqueous and ethanol extracts of
Azadirachta inidca against the Aeromonas hydrophila are given in Table 2.
A B C
149
Table 2. Zone of inhibition for various extracts of Azadirachta indica compared to
reference drug: activity against Aeromonas hydrophila. Each value is a mean of three
individual observations with standard deviation
Pathogen Zone of inhibition as mm Zone of inhibition as percentage
Oxytetra
cycline
Aqueous
Mean (mm)
Ethanol
Mean(mm)
Oxytetra
cycline
Aqueous
Mean(mm)
Ethanol
Mean(mm)
Aeromonas hydrophila (ref strain) 18.88±0.08 6.00±0.00 11.98±0.05 100 00 46.43
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-12) 18.9±0.07 6.00±0.00 11.98±0.05 100 00 46.36
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-13) 18.86±0.06 6.00±0.00 11.96±0.06 100 00 46.35
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-14) 18.92±0.08 6.00±0.00 11.92±0.05 100 00 45.82
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-9) 18.96±0.06 6.00±0.00 11.88±0.08 100 00 45.37
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-7) 18.84±0.06 6.00±0.00 11.92±0.08 100 00 46.11
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-8) 18.88±0.08 6.00±0.00 11.94±0.09 100 00 46.12
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-10) 18.86±0.06 6.00±0.00 11.8±0.07 100 00 45.10
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-11) 18.92±0.08 6.00±0.00 11.9±0.07 100 00 45.67
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-16) 18.94±0.06 6.00±0.00 11.96±0.06 100 00 46.06
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-17) 18.88±0.05 6.00±0.00 11.88±0.08 100 00 45.65
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-25) 18.84±0.06 6.00±0.00 11.86±0.08 100 00 45.64
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-26) 18.94±0.06 6.00±0.00 11.88±0.08 100 00 45.44
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-3) 18.92±0.05 6.00±0.00 11.84±0.06 100 00 45.20
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-15) 18.84±0.06 6.00±0.00 11.92±0.08 100 00 46.11
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-20) 18.92±0.08 6.00±0.00 11.88±0.08 100 00 45.51
Aeromonas hydrophila ( A-21) 18.88±0.08 6.00±0.00 11.88±0.08 100 00 45.65
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-22) 18.84±0.06 6.00±0.00 11.92±0.08 100 00 46.11
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-24) 18.9±0.1 6.00±0.00 11.86±0.09 100 00 45.43
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-27) 18.94±0.06 6.00±0.00 11.84±0.06 100 00 45.13
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-28) 18.84±0.06 6.00±0.00 11.88±0.08 100 00 45.79
F –Value 0.994 - 1.294 - - 3.809
Significance 0.488NS
- 0.235 NS
- - 0.0001 S
Mean: Mean value of diameter of inhibition zone with standard deviation As the diameter of well was 6 mm, 6mm diameter included in the table is indicative of no activity Percentage was calculated after subtracting disc diameter from all observations
Among the different extracts of Azadirachta indica tested, the ethanol crude extract
of Azadirachta indica showed good inhibitory activity against all the pathogenic
150
strains of Aeromonas hydrophila with zone diameter ranged between 11.80 ± 0.07
and 11.98 ± 0.05 (Plate 11). The reference strains recorded a zone diameter of
11.98 ± 0.05. Statistical analysis of the data revealed that the difference in inhibition
zone diameter between different Aeromonas hydrophila isolates for crude ethanol
extract of Azadiracta indica was not significant (p>0.05). None of the pathogens were
inhibited by crude aqueous extract of Azadirachta indica in the present study. On
the other hand oxytetracycline was able to produce a zone diameter ranged between
18.84± 0.06 and 18.96±0.06 mm (Plate 10). Statistically the difference in zone
diameter among the twenty selected Aeromonas hydrophila isolates against
oxytetracycline was not significant (P>0.05).
Among the 20 isolates, maximum percentage inhibition was recorded for Aeromonas
hydrophila strain A-12 (46.36%) and the minimum was recorded for A-10 (45.10%).
Single factor ANOVA of the results obtained for antibacterial activity in terms of
percentage inhibition of different Aeromonas hydrophila isolates showed that there
was a significant difference in inhibition percentage recorded by Azadirachta indica
crude ethanol extract for different Aeromonas hydrophila isolates suggesting that the
antibacterial potential of crude ethanol extract of Azadirachta indica was different for
all the Aeromonas hydrophila isolates selected for the study.
151
Table.3 Zone of inhibition for various extracts of Azadirachta indica compared to
reference drug: activity against Pseudomonas fluorescens. Each value is a mean of
three individual observations with standard deviation
Pathogen Zone of inhibition as mm Zone of inhibition as percentage
Oxytetra
cycline
Aqueous
Mean (mm)
Ethanol
Mean(mm)
Oxytetra
cycline
Aqueous
Mean(mm)
Ethanol
Mean(mm)
Pseudomonas fluorescens ref strain 17.88±0.08 6.00±0.00 10.98±0.05 100 00 41.92
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-1) 17.9±0.07 6.00±0.00 10.98±0.05 100 00 41.85
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-7) 17.86±0.06 6.00±0.00 10.96±0.06 100 00 41.82
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-5) 17.92±0.08 6.00±0.00 10.92±0.05 100 00 41.28
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-4) 17.96±0.06 6.00±0.00 10.88±0.08 100 00 40.80
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-12) 17.84±0.06 6.00±0.00 10.92±0.08 100 00 41.55
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-13) 17.88±0.08 6.00±0.00 10.94±0.09 100 00 41.58
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-15) 17.86±0.06 6.00±0.00 10.8±0.07 100 00 40.47
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-16) 17.92±0.08 6.00±0.00 10.9±0.07 100 00 41.11
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-3) 17.94±0.06 6.00±0.00 10.96±0.06 100 00 41.54
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-23) 17.88±0.05 6.00±0.00 10.88±0.08 100 00 41.08
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-14) 17.84±0.06 6.00±0.00 10.86±0.08 100 00 41.05
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-17) 17.94±0.06 6.00±0.00 10.88±0.08 100 00 40.87
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-19) 17.92±0.05 6.00±0.00 10.84±0.06 100 00 40.60
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-22) 17.84±0.06 6.00±0.00 10.92±0.08 100 00 41.55
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-6) 17.92±0.08 6.00±0.00 10.88±0.08 100 00 40.94
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-10) 17.88±0.08 6.00±0.00 10.88±0.08 100 00 41.08
F –Value 1.077 - 1.45 - - 1.89
Significance 0.412NS
- 0.179 NS
- - 0.059 NS
Mean : Mean value of diameter of inhibition zone with standard deviation As the diameter of well was 6 mm, 6mm diameter included in the table is indicative of no activity Percentage was calculated after subtracting disc diameter from all observations
The crude ethanol extract of Azadirachta indica exhibited higher inhibition activity for
Pseudomonas fluorescens strains (Table 3) and the zone of inhibition ranged
between 10.80±0.07 and 10.98±0.05 mm (Plate 13). Statistical analysis of the data
showed that the difference in zone diameter for the selected Pseudomonas
152
fluorescens strains against crude ethanol extract of Azadirachta inidca was not
significant (P>0.05). The antibiotic Oxytetracycline was able to inhibit Pseudomonas
fluorescens strains with a maximum zone diameter of 17.96±0.06 mm and a
minimum of 17.84±0.06 mm respectively (Plate 12). The results of inhibition zone
diameter obtained for different isolates of Pseudomonas fluorescens for
oxytetracycline were also not significantly different even at 5% level.
Among the 16 isolates, maximum percentage inhibition was recorded for
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain P-1 (41.85%) and the minimum was recorded for
P-15 (40.47%). Single factor ANOVA of the results obtained for antibacterial activity
in terms of percentage inhibition of different Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates
showed that there was no significant difference in inhibition percentage recorded by
crude ethanol extract of Azadirachta indica for different Pseudomonas fluorescens
isolates suggesting that the antibacterial potential of crude ethanol extract of
Azadirachta indica was same for all the Pseuodomonas fluorescens isolates
selected for the study.
153
Table 4. Zone of inhibition for various extracts from Piper betle compared to reference
drug: activity against Aeromonas hydrophila. Each value is a mean of three individual
observations with standard deviation
Pathogen Zone of inhibition as mm Zone of inhibition as percentage
Oxytetra
cycline
Aqueous
Mean (mm)
Ethanol
Mean(mm)
Oxytetra
cycline
Aqueous
Mean(mm)
Ethanol
Mean(mm)
Aeromonas hydrophila (ref
strain)
18.84±0.06 6.00±0.00 12.9±0.07 100 00 53.74
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-12) 18.88±0.08 6.00±0.00 12.92±0.08 100 00 53.73
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-13) 18.86±0.06 6.00±0.00 12.88±0.08 100 00 53.50
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-14) 18.92±0.08 6.00±0.00 12.86±0.06 100 00 53.10
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-9) 18.96±0.06 6.00±0.00 12.94±0.06 100 00 53.55
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-7) 18.84±0.06 6.00±0.00 12.88±0.11 100 00 53.58
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-8) 18.88±0.08 6.00±0.00 12.9±0.10 100 00 53.57
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-10) 18.86±0.06 6.00±0.00 12.88±0.08 100 00 53.50
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-11) 18.92±0.08 6.00±0.00 12.86±0.09 100 00 53.10
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-16) 18.94±0.06 6.00±0.00 12.86±0.09 100 00 53.01
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-17) 18.88±0.05 6.00±0.00 12.88±0.13 100 00 53.42
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-25) 18.84±0.06 6.00±0.00 12.86±0.09 100 00 53.43
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-26) 18.94±0.06 6.00±0.00 12.94±0.09 100 00 53.63
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-3) 18.92±0.05 6.00±0.00 12.94±0.06 100 00 53.72
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-15) 18.84±0.06 6.00±0.00 12.86±0.06 100 00 53.43
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-20) 18.92±0.08 6.00±0.00 12.88±0.08 100 00 53.25
Aeromonas hydrophila ( A-21) 18.88±0.08 6.00±0.00 12.92±0.08 100 00 53.73
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-22) 18.9±0.07 6.00±0.00 12.92±0.08 100 00 53.64
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-24) 18.9±0.1 6.00±0.00 12.92±0.08 100 00 53.64
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-27) 18.94±0.06 6.00±0.00 12.88±0.08 100 00 53.17
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-28) 18.84±0.06 6.00±0.00 12.82±0.08 100 00 53.12
F –Value 0.994 - 0.452 - - 0.893
Significance 0.488NS
- 0.971 NS
- - 1.83 NS
Mean : Mean value of diameter of inhibition zone with standard deviation As the diameter of disc /well was 6 mm, 6mm diameter included in the table is indicative of no activity Percentage was calculated after subtracting disc diameter from all observations
154
Antibacterial activity of crude water and ethanol extracts of Piper betle were
tabulated in table 4. From the results obtained, it is found that crude water extract of
Piper betle was totally inactive against Aeromonas hydrophila and did not produce
zone in the lab trials for all the tested isolates (Plate 14). On the other hand ethanol
extract of Piper betle was having appreciable antibacterial activity against various
Aeromonas hydrophila isolates selected for the study (Plate 15). The maximum zone
diameter recorded was 12.94 ± 0.06 mm with the isolate A-3 and the minimum was
reported for A-28 which recorded a zone diameter of 12.82±0.08 mm. Single factor
ANOVA of the results on zone of inhibition by crude ethanol exract of Piper betle
against different Aeromonas hydrophila showed that the difference in zone diameter
within individual strains of Aeromonas hydrophila against crude ethanol extract of
Piper betle was not significant and hence it could be concluded that all the tested
isolates were inhibited uniformly by Piper betle crude ethanol extract. Percentage
inhibition potential of Piper betle crude ethanol extract for various Aeromonas
hydrophila isolates was also calculated. The results showed that the percentage
inhibition values of crude ethanol extract of Piper betle varied between 53.01 –
53.74%. Statistically these values were not differed significantly, suggesting that all
the Aeromonas hydrophila isolates were uniformly inhibited by crude ethanol extract
of Piper betle.
155
Table 5. Zone of inhibition for various extracts from Piper betle compared to reference
drug: activity against Pseudomonas fluorescens. Each value
is a mean of three individual observations with standard deviation
Pathogen Zone of inhibition as mm Zone of inhibition as percentage
Oxytetra
cycline
Aqueous
Mean (mm)
Ethanol
Mean(mm)
Oxytetra
cycline
Aqueous
Mean(mm)
Ethanol
Mean(mm)
Pseudomonas ref 17.88±0.08 6.00±0.00 6.00±0.00 100 00 00
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-1) 17.9±0.07 6.00±0.00 6.00±0.00 100 00 00
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-7) 17.86±0.06 6.00±0.00 6.00±0.00 100 00 00
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-5) 17.92±0.08 6.00±0.00 6.00±0.00 100 00 00
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-4) 17.96±0.06 6.00±0.00 6.00±0.00 100 00 00
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-12) 17.84±0.06 6.00±0.00 6.00±0.00 100 00 00
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-13) 17.88±0.08 6.00±0.00 6.00±0.00 100 00 00
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-15) 17.86±0.06 6.00±0.00 6.00±0.00 100 00 00
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-16) 17.92±0.08 6.00±0.00 6.00±0.00 100 00 00
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-3) 17.94±0.06 6.00±0.00 6.00±0.00 100 00 00
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-23) 17.88±0.05 6.00±0.00 6.00±0.00 100 00 00
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-14) 17.84±0.06 6.00±0.00 6.00±0.00 100 00 00
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-17) 17.94±0.06 6.00±0.00 6.00±0.00 100 00 00
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-19) 17.92±0.05 6.00±0.00 6.00±0.00 100 00 00
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-22) 17.84±0.06 6.00±0.00 6.00±0.00 100 00 00
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-6) 17.92±0.08 6.00±0.00 6.00±0.00 100 00 00
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-10) 17.88±0.08 6.00±0.00 6.00±0.00 100 00 00
F –Value 1.077 - - - - -
Significance 0.412NS
- - - - -
Mean : Mean value of diameter of inhibition zone with standard deviation As the diameter of well was 6 mm, 6mm diameter included in the table is indicative of no activity Percentage was calculated after subtracting disc diameter from all observations
From the results reported in table 5, it is found that either of the two extracts of Piper
betle tested in the study was not able to inhibit Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates.
156
All the Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates were resistance to both crude water and
ethanol extracts of Piper betle.
Table6. Zone of inhibition for various extracts from Allium sativum compared to
reference drug: activity against Aeromonas hydrophila. Each vale is a mean of three
individual observations with standard deviation
Pathogen Zone of inhibition as mm Zone of inhibition as percentage
Oxytetra
cycline
Aqueous
Mean (mm)
Ethanol
Mean(mm)
Oxytetrac
ycline
Aqueous
Mean(mm)
Ethanol
Mean(mm)
Aeromonas hydrophila (ref strain) 18.84±0.06 13.9±0.07 31.98±0.05 100 61.53 202.34
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-12) 18.88±0.08 13.88±0.08 31.98±0.05 100 61.18 201.71
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-13) 18.86±0.06 13.86±0.06 31.94±0.06 100 61.12 201.71
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-14) 18.92±0.08 13.92±0.08 31.92±0.08 100 61.30 200.62
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-9) 18.96±0.06 13.96±0.06 31.88±0.08 100 61.42 199.69
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-7) 18.84±0.06 13.84±0.06 31.9±0.071 100 61.06 201.71
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-8) 18.88±0.08 13.88±0.08 31.86±0.06 100 61.18 200.78
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-10) 18.86±0.06 13.86±0.06 31.84±0.06 100 61.12 200.93
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-11) 18.92±0.08 13.92±0.08 31.88±0.05 100 61.30 200.31
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-16) 18.94±0.06 13.94±0.06 31.92±0.05 100 61.36 200.31
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-17) 18.88±0.05 13.88±0.05 31.84±0.09 100 61.18 200.62
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-25) 18.84±0.06 13.84±0.06 31.88±0.08 100 61.06 201.56
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-26) 18.94±0.06 13.94±0.06 31.9±0.07 100 61.36 200.16
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-3) 18.92±0.05 13.92±0.05 31.94±0.06 100 61.30 200.77
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-15) 18.84±0.06 13.84±0.06 31.9±0.01 100 61.06 201.71
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-20) 18.92±0.08 13.92±0.08 31.88±0.08 100 61.30 200.31
Aeromonas hydrophila ( A-21) 18.88±0.08 13.88±0.08 31.94±0.06 100 61.18 201.41
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-22) 18.9±0.07 13.84±0.06 31.88±0.08 100 60.78 200.63
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-24) 18.9±0.1 13.9±0.1 31.92±0.11 100 61.24 200.93
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-27) 18.94±0.06 13.94±0.06 31.92±0.08 100 61.36 200.31
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-28) 18.84±0.06 13.84±0.06 31.88±0.08 100 61.06 201.56
F –Value 0.994 0.994 0.921 - 0.3295 2.557
Significance 0.488NS
0.488 NS
0.565 NS
- 0.995 NS
0.005 S
Mean : Mean value of diameter of inhibition zone with standard deviation As the diameter of well was 6 mm, 6mm diameter included in the table is indicative of no activity Percentage was calculated after subtracting disc diameter from all observations
157
The results on antibacterial activity of crude aqueous and ethanol extract of Allium
sativum against different Aeromonas hydrophila isolates were presented in Table 6.
Among the two extracts, ethanol extract of Allium sativum exhibited better
antibacterial activity with a maximum zone diameter of 31.98 ±0.05 mm which
recorded a percentage inhibition of 201.71%. Crude aqueous extract of Allium
sativum inhibited Aeromonas hydrophila isolates with zone diameter ranged between
13.84 ± 0.06 and 13.96 ± 0.06 mm. Statistically the variation in zone diameter
between various Aeromonas hydrophila strains was not significant even at 5% level.
Crude ethanol extract of Allium sativum was highly active against all the strains of
Aeromonas hydrophila selected for the study. Antibacterial activity in terms of zone
diameter varied between 31.84 ± 0.06 and 31.98±0.05 mm respectively (Plate 16).
The difference in zone diameter within strains of Aeromonas hydrophila was not
significantly different (p>0.05). Percentage inhibition of Aeromonas hydrophila
isolates by crude aqueous extract ranged between 60.78% and 61.42% and the
difference in percentage inhibition potential of various Aeromonas hydrophila isolates
were not significantly different (P>0.05). On the other hand, the variations in
percentage inhibition potential of ethanol extract of Allium sativum against different
Aeromonas hydrophila strains was highly significant (P<0.005).
158
Table 7. Zone of inhibition for various extracts from Allium sativum compared
to reference drug: activity against Pseudomonas fluorescens Each value is a
mean of three individual observations with standard deviation
Pathogen Zone of inhibition as mm Zone of inhibition as percentage
Oxytetra
cycline
Aqueous
Mean (mm)
Ethanol
Mean(mm)
Oxytetra
cycline
Aqueous
Mean(mm)
Ethanol
Mean(mm)
Pseudomonas ref 17.84±0.06 9.9±0.07 22.92±0.08 100 32.94 142.91
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-1) 17.88±0.08 9.9±0.07 22.96±0.06 100 32.83 142.76
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-7) 17.86±0.06 9.92±0.08 22.88±0.05 100 33.05 142.33
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-5) 17.92±0.08 9.94±0.06 22.82±0.05 100 33.05 141.11
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-4) 17.96±0.06 9.88±0.05 22.94±0.06 100 32.44 141.64
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-12) 17.84±0.06 9.9±0.07 22.9±0.07 100 32.94 142.74
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-13) 17.88±0.08 9.86±0.06 22.84±0.09 100 32.49 141.75
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-15) 17.86±0.06 9.88±0.08 22.92±0.05 100 32.72 142.66
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-16) 17.92±0.08 9.88±0.08 22.9±0.07 100 32.55 141.78
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-3) 17.94±0.06 9.94±0.06 22.9±0.07 100 33.0 141.54
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-23) 17.88±0.05 9.88±0.11 22.88±0.08 100 32.66 142.09
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-14) 17.84±0.06 9.88±0.08 22.9±0.07 100 32.77 142.74
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-17) 17.94±0.06 9.9±0.07 22.92±0.05 100 32.66 141.71
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-19) 17.92±0.05 9.88±0.08 22.86±0.09 100 32.55 141.44
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-22) 17.9±0.07 9.92±0.08 22.96±0.06 100 32.94 142.52
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-6) 17.92±0.08 9.9±0.07 22.9±0.1 100 32.72 141.78
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-10) 17.88±0.08 9.9±0.07 22.9±0.1 100 32.83 142.26
F –Value 1.077 0.270 0.799 0.437 3.788
Significance 0.412NS
0.996 NS
0.677 NS
0.961 NS
0.0005 S
Mean : Mean value of diameter of inhibition zone with standard deviation As the diameter of well was 6 mm, 6mm diameter included in the table is indicative of no activity Percentage was calculated after subtracting disc diameter from all observations
The results on antibacterial activity of crude aqueous and ethanol extract of Allium
sativum against different Pseudomonas fluorescens strains were presented in Table
7. Among the two extracts ethanol extract of Allium sativum exhibited maximum
antibacterial activity with a higher zone diameter of 22.96 ± 0.06 mm (Plate 17)
which recorded a percentage inhibition of 142.76%. Crude aqueous extract of Allium
159
sativum inhibited Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates with zone diameter ranged
between 9.86 ± 0.06 and 9.94 ± 0.06 mm. Statistically the variation in zone diameter
between various Pseudomonas fluorescens strains was not significant even at 5%
level. Crude ethanol extract of Allium sativum was highly active against all the strains
of Pseudomonas fluorescens selected for the study. Antibacterial activity in terms of
zone diameter varied between 22.82 ± 0.05 and 22.96±0.06 mm respectively. The
difference in zone diameter within strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens was not
significantly different at 5% level Percentage inhibition of Pseudomonas fluorescens
isolates by crude aqueous extract ranged between 32.44% and 33.05% and the
difference in percentage inhibition potential of various Pseudomonas fluorescens
isolates were not statistically significant (P>0.05). On the other hand, the variation in
percentage inhibition potential of ethanol extract of Allium sativum against different
Pseudomonas fluorescens strains was highly significant (P<0.005), the values being
ranged between 141.11 and 142.76%.
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of crude water and ethanol extract of test
plants
As there was no statistical significance in zone diameter produced by different
strains of Aeromonas hydrophila and Pseudomonas fluorescens selected for the
study, highly virulent strains designated as Aeromonas hydrophila (A-10) and
Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-3) during phenotypic characterization of the isolates
were chosen for determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ethanol
extract of Azadirachta indica, Piper betle and water and ethanol extract of Allium
sativum.
160
Table 8. Values of Minimum inhibitory concentration of ethanol extract of Azadirachta
indica and Piper betle and water and ethanol extract of Allium sativum against
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-10) and Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-3). (Zone diameter
were expressed as values with excluded well diameter)
Concentrations
(µg/50µl)
Zone diameter (mm)
Aeromonas hydrophila (A-10) Pseudomonas fluorescens (P-3)
Az.Et Pi.Et Al.Wa Al.Et Az.Et Pi.Et Al.Wa Al.Et
300 5.5 6 7 24 4 - 3 15
275 5 5 6.5 23.5 3.5 - 2.5 14
250 4.5 4 6 23 3 - 2 13
225 4 3 5.5 22.5 2.5 - 1.5 12.5
200 3.5 2 5 22 2 - 1 11
175 3 1 4.5 21.5 1.5 - - 10.5
150 2 - 4 21 1 - - 9.5
125 1 - 3.5 20.5 - - - 9
100 - 3 20 - - - 8.5
75 - - 2 18.5 - - - 7.5
50 - - 1 17 - - - 6.5
25 - - - 15 - - - 6
2.5 - - - 8 - - - 2
2.0 - - - 7 - - - 1
1 - - - 5 - - - -
0.5 - - - 3 - - - -
0.3 - - - 2 - - - -
0.25 - - - 1 - - - -
Az.Et – Azadirachta indica ethanol extract, Pi.Et – Piper betle ethanol extract
Al.W – Allium sativum water extract, Al.Et – Allium sativum ethanol extract
Table 8 shows that the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the crude ethanol
extracts of Allium sativum was found to be lower for the pathogen Aeromonas
hydrophila (0.25µg) than that of Pseudomonas flurorescens (2µg). The MIC of
161
ethanol extract of Azadirachta indica against Aeromonas hydrophila was 125 µg and
that of Pseudomonas fluorescens was 150 µg. On the other hand, ethanol extract of
Piper betle recorded a MIC value of 175 µg for Aeromonas hydrophila and
completely inactive against Pseudomonas fluorescens. Water extract of Allium
sativum also recorded lower MIC value for Aeromonas hydrophila which was 50 µg,
whereas Pseudomonas fluorescens was found to be resistant and showed a MIC
value of 200 µg respectively.
Table 9. Pytochemical analysis of the medicinal plants, selected for the study
Constituents Azadirachta indica Piper betle Allium sativam
Triterpenoids + + -
Steroids + + +
Phenolic compounds + + +
Sugar + + +
Alkaloid + + -
Tannin + - -
Quinones - - -
Coumarin + - -
Flavanoid + + +
Carboxylic acid - - -
Fixed oils and fats + + +
Protein + + +
Free amino acids + + +
Resin + - +
Saponin + + +
Xanthoprotein + + -
The phytochemical characters of the selected plants were summarized in Table 9. All
the three plants were pytochemically differ from one another. The results on
phytochemical screening showed that the three plants exhibited positive reaction for
steroids, phenolic compounds, sugars, flavonoids, protein, free amino acid, fixed oils
162
and saponin. However tannin and coumarin were present only in Azadirachta indica
leaf. Xanthoprotein, alkaloids and triterpenoids were found in Azadirachta indica and
Piper betle leaf. None contained quinines and carboxylic acids. Resin was reported
for Azadirachta indica leaf and Allium sativum clove.
Discussion
The yield of all the three selected plant materials in aqueous solution was found to
be lesser than ethanol extraction suggesting the higher extractable capacity of
ethanol as reported by Ekwenye and Elegalam (2005) for Zingiber officinale and
Allium sativum. The present study was designed to obtain preliminary information on
the antimicrobial effect of three medicinal plants on fish pathogenic microorganisms.
The hole/well plate diffusion method was preferred to be used in this study since it
was found to be better for testing plant extracts than the disc diffusion method
(Essawi and Srour, 2000).
Ethanol extract of Azadirachta indcia was active against both Aeromonas hydrophila
and Pseudomonas fluorescens and the activity was higher for Aeromonas hydrophila
than Pseudomonas fluorescens (Table 2 and 3). On the other hand aqueous and
ethanol extract of Piper betle was inactive against Pseudomonas fluorescens. Both
water and ethanol extracts of Allium sativum were active against Aeromonas
hydrophila and Pseudomonas fluorescens. Among the two extracts, ethanol extracts
exerting stronger antibacterial activity than water extract. Among the two pathogens,
Pseudomonas fluorescens was found to be resistant to both water and ethanol
extract of Piper betle.
The broad antimicrobial action of the ethanol extract of all the tested plants could be
ascribed to aromatic or saturated compounds, such as tannin, phenolic compounds,
163
flavonoids, terpenoids, steroids and alkaloids present in the plant materials are better
liberated by ethanol extraction (Cowman, 1999). Aqueous extract of Azadirachta
indica and Piper betle was totally inactive against all the bacterial strains of
Aeromonas hydrophila and Pseudomonas fluorescens. The results are in agreement
with that of Satish et al. (1999), who reported aqueous leaf extract of Azadirachta
indica was totally inactive against phyto pathogenic bacterium Xanthomonas
campestris. Piper betle was reported to possess good antibacterial activity and
maintained a broad spectrum antibacterial activity against pathogens, such as
Ralstonia, Xanthomonas, and Erwinia. It was also revealed that the ethanol extract
of P. betle had more superior action than streptomycin (Ueda and Sasaki, 1951). But
in the present study the bacterial strains did not respond to Piper betle extract.
Sastry and Rao (1994) reported that some of the fish pathogens did not respond to
marine algae and mangroves extracts, whereas the purified fractions showed broad-
spectrum activity against multiple strains and suggested the masking of antibacterial
activity by the presence of some inhibitory compounds or factors in the extract as the
reason. Similar observations were made by Vlachos et al. (1997), who found that
fractionation of crude extracts tested enhanced their activity against both gram
negative as well as the resistant gram positive pathogens. Antibacterial activity of
Piper betle was due to allylpyrocatechol (APC) classically known as betel phenol.
Ramji et al. (2002) while fractioning methanol extract of Piper betle reported that all
the antibacterial activity was resided on the ether fraction. Moreover the variation of
antibacterial activity of our extracts might be due to distribution of antimicrobial
substances, which varied from species to species as suggested by Lustigman and
Brown (1991).
164
In the present study, the most promising antibacterial activity was recorded for
Allium sativum. Findings of this study are similar to those reported by Elnima et al.
(1983); Singh and Shukla (1984); Chowdhury et al. (1991); Perez (1993), Cellini et
al. (1996); Arora and Kaur (1999), Krishna and Banerjee (1999). The maximum zone
diameter of 32 mm and 23 mm against Aeromonas hydrophila and Pseudomonas
fluorescens obtained in the present study (Table 6 and 7) is comparable with the
zone diameter reported for 100% fresh juice of garlic against human pathogens
(Kivan and Kunduhoglu, 1997), which suggested the efficacy of ethanol on extraction
of potential antimicrobial compounds from the plant. The highest zone diameter of
30.67 mm has been recorded for Aeromonas hydrophila against Hasandede seed
extract of grapes at 10% concentration (Bayard et al., 2005). Singh and Shukla
(1984) reported that garlic was more effective than any of the test antibiotics
(penicillin, ampicillin, doxycycline, streptomycin and cephalexin) against clinical
strains of Staphylococcus, Escherichia, Proteus, Pseudomonas and Klebsiella
bacteria. In the present study ethanol extract of Allium sativum exert potential
antibacterial activity than the test antibiotic Oxytetracycline.
The antibacterial activity of garlic is reported to be due to the action of allicin or diallyl
thiosulphinic acid or diallyl disulphide (Avato et al., 2000). It is postulated that the
antibacterial and antifungal properties of garlic juice are due to the inhibition of
succinic dehydrogenase via the inactivation of thiol group. Our results revealed
differences in the sensitivity of different Aeromonas hydrophila strains to garlic
extract, suggesting the heterogeneity of the organism (Indhu et al., 2006).
The findings that Aeromonas hydrophila is susceptible to extracts obtained from the
three plants studied are also similar to the susceptibility of that microbe to different
165
plant extracts reported by several researchers (Turk et al., 2003; Mamtha et al.,
2004; Hori et al., 2006; Indhu et al., 2006). In all the cases Pseudomonas fluoresens
was found to be resistant to each of ethanolic and aqueous extracts of three
medicinal plants. The resistance attributed to Pseudomonas could be due to the
presence of capsule in those bacteria as noted by Morse et al. (1986) and
Padmakumar and Ayyakkannu (1997) in Pseudomonas aeruginosa against
Azadirachta indica stem bark extract and micro algae extracts.
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of garlic ethanol extract for Aeromonas
hydrophila was 5µg/ml, which was in parallel with the report of Chowdhury et al.
(1991) against Shigella dysenteriae, Sh.flexneri, Sh.sonnei and Escherichia coli.
The MIC value obtained for Aeromonas hydrophila by Allium sativum was found to
be very low when compared with the MIC of other plant extracts as reported by Turk
et al. (2003). The MIC value of ethanol extract of Cetraria aculeate for the bacteria
Aeromonas hydrophila was 607µg/ml. The MIC of ethanol extract of Azadirachta
indica against Aeromonas hydrophila and Pseudomonas fluorescens was 2500µg/ml
and 3000µg/ml, which was very high when compared to the MIC of ethanol extract of
neem leaves against Trichophyton rubrum and Microsporum nanum (250µg/ml) as
reported by Natarajan et al. (2003). Some extracts had discordant results with the
disc diffusion and microdilution methods. A good explanation for this variation would
be the difference in the technique used (tube dilution and cup diffusion). For
instance, extracts of X. caffra gave no inhibition zone for some organisms with the
disc diffusion whereas the microdilution method gave MICs of 6 mg/ml for the same
organisms. Similar results were obtained previously (Rios et al., 1988; Silva et al.,
1996). This might be due to the difference in solubility of possible active compounds.
In the disc diffusion method, the limited diffusion of the less polar active compounds
166
in solid media might explain the lack of inhibition zone around the disc, whereas in
the microdilution method the compounds in solution get easily in contact with the
organisms.
The results of pytochemical screening of three medicinal plants indicated the
presence of medically active substances such as flavanoids, phenolic compounds,
saponin, steroids etc. Azadirachta indica leaf extract showed the presence of large
number of medically active constituents followed by Piper betle and Allium sativum.
But antibacterial activity was pronounced for Allium sativum extract than the two
other plants tried hence it was suggested that Allium sativum crude extract can be
used as potential antibacterial against Aeromonas hydrophila and Pseudomonas
fluorescens strains whereas Azadirachta indica and Piper betle extracts required
fractioning for better results.