On My Radar: I Don’t Know How to Love Himcmgwealth.com/ri/8916-2/

July 15, 2016By Steve Blumenthal

I don’t know how to love him,What to do, how to move him.I’ve been changed, yes, really changed.In these past few days when I’ve seen myselfI seem like someone else…

Should I bring him down? Should I scream and shout?Should I speak of love – let my feelings out?I never thought I’d come to this – what’s it all about?

Don’t you think it’s rather funnyI should be in this position?I’m the one who’s always beenSo calm, so cool, no lover’s foolRunning every showHe scares me so.

– Andrew Lloyd Webber from Jesus Christ Superstar

We have four interns this summer and today I took them to lunch. One asked what I wrote about today. I said thetitle of the piece is, “I Don’t Know How to Love Him” and, of course, they gave me a funny look.

I asked them if they had ever heard of the Broadway musical, Jesus Christ Superstar . Unfortunately, the answerwas no. At the start of their internships, we required that they read “How the Economic Machine Works” by RayDalio. The paper discusses how central bankers have certain levers they can pull, such as raising and loweringinterest rates and other tools to speed up or slow down the economy.

I told them that I’m thrilled our fixed income strategies are doing well yet the unprecedented central bankexperiments have so distorted price discovery that I just don’t know if I should scream or shout. I’m concerned thatthe Fed has boxed itself into a Keynesian corner and, thus, the title of today’s piece.

Last week, we looked at valuations — probable 3, 7 and 10-year forward returns. I think you’ll find the followingchart from Research Affiliates, as I did, quite interesting. It shows their forecast for coming 10-year annualized realreturns (net after inflation) on various asset classes. RA adds confidence bands around their predictions (the redarrows are mine).

1/16

Well, holy cow! Not so good. U.S. Core bonds at less than 1%, U.S. large-cap equities at 1% and 60/40 at 1%. Iappreciate that Research Affiliates included confidence bands in the chart. The colored dots are the expected realreturns and the vertical line shows the high end and low end of the probable outcome ranges. Results could come ina bit higher or a bit lower from the dots marked by the red arrows (expected outcome).

If you missed it, click here for a link to last week’s OMR for more on current valuations and what they tell us aboutcoming returns (and risk). You’ll find that we pretty much get to the same place.

I also liked the next chart. It shows the starting yields as of June 30, 2016 for various investments. You’ll see thathigh-yield bonds look relatively attractive and to that end HY has had a great run.

2/16

Look at that high yield real yield percentage. I’ve been trading the trend in HY for over 23 years. We know highyield well. Don’t go “all in.” The chase for yield has flooded investor capital into HY bonds and funds. This hasenabled companies (I call them zombie companies) to receive funding that they otherwise would not have and atterms that should scare every investor. The next recession will wash them out.

I told the interns that HY credit quality has never been worse. There is little protection and high risk in that 6% yield. We are invested in HY today. A generational trading opportunity will present in the next recession. Think a 20%yield opportunity versus 6% today. I told them how important it is to not get run over on the way to that opportunity.Stay tactical.

I just can’t help finding myself thinking about the Fed and QE, the EU and QE, Japan and QE, ZIRP and NIRP andwondering how they are going to get out of the corner into which they have painted themselves. The lyrics “I don’tknow how to love you, I don’t know how to use you… He scares me so,” keep running through my head.

Former Fed President (Dallas) Richard Fisher appeared on CNBC this week. I like his candid way. You’ll find somebrief notes below and a link to his interview. Lacy Hunt is out with his quarterly letter. Always a great read. I sharea few highlights, a link to his letter and my thoughts below.

In the “what can you do with your fixed income exposure” category, I wrote a piece this week for ETF.com, “TheZweig Bond Model – How It Works.” I noted that Wall Street analysts missed the 22% gain in longer-dated Treasurybonds this year. They completely missed the rally in bonds in 2015.

In December 2014, the consensus (25 out of 25 Wall Street economists) predicted interest rates would rise from2.75% to 3.25% by the end of 2015. They missed. The 10-year Treasury note finished the year with a yield of2.25%. Can you imagine the trillions of dollars that followed those recommendations to shorten bond maturities?

3/16

No small miss. We touched 1.38% last week and sit near 1.50% today.

The trend-following Zweig Bond Model stayed invested, suggesting longer duration exposure over that time frame. It continues to signal positioning in longer dated high quality bond exposure.

Each week you can find the Zweig Bond Model in Trade Signals. It is a process you can do on your own. I suggestconsidering ETFs, such as longer-term dated ETFs on trend based buy signals and own shorter-term dated ETFssuch as “BIL” on sell signals. I’m not sure how else to navigate the period ahead given today’s ultra-low rates andcentral banker determination to inflate economies. You can click here for how the Zweig Bond Model works.

The mother of all bubbles is in the bond market. I believe we have to think differently about investing especially inregards to fixed income exposure. There are ways to navigate the path ahead. Nothing in this business hits 100%all the time. Period. However, trend following works! I share some insights with you today, along with links tofurther research.

The Fed and their global central banker friends want to manufacture inflation and ultimately they will win. Theproblem will be getting that inflation genie back in the bottle once she’s out. We need to think differently now morethan ever. If you are interested in learning more about trend following, see the section, Trend Following Works!, you’ll find a link below.

Finally, last week I promised a look at the latest recession watch data. You’ll find a few of my favorite “recessionwatch” charts when you click through to the full piece. In short, there is no sign of U.S. recession. I’m sticking withmy call for a recession to begin within the next 18 months.

Included in this week’s On My Radar:

CNBC – Richard Fisher

Lacy Hunt’s Quarterly Letter

Recession Watch Indicators

Trend Following Works!

Brexit and The Italian Banks

CNBC – Richard Fisher

“Listen to what they are saying. Watch carefully in what they are doing,” I told the interns. To this end, I believeRichard is the most candid and critical former Fed insider.

Following are a few select bullet points (his comments) from his interview on CNBC:

Lowest yield since the year of 1790 when Hamilton issued the first series of bonds

The Dutch 10-year traded at the lowest level in 500 years

Question, how long does this last? “That’s for you market na-bob’s to figure out.”

We’ve had a lot of QE and we are not sure if it works.

Former Chairman Ben Bernanke is in Japan and he is still talking about more helicopter money. They literallywrote checks to people over a certain age and it did not work.

4/16

There is this monetary experiment that has taken place. It is the anchor of the system. Weak economicgrowth remains, particularly in Europe. They (central bankers) are trying to spur those economies. We arethe beneficiaries over here because we see the money coming here. (SB here: I’ve been talking aboutcapital flows over the last number of months. Money will flow to where it is treated best. A coming SovereignDebt crisis in Europe will cause money to race to the U.S. On a relative basis, we are most attractive but likesimilar events of the late 1920’s, we are not detached from the global economy. Such an event will be goodin the short term, but painful longer term. Thus, own equities but hedged.)

Chairwoman Yellen says we can always lengthen the duration of the Fed’s portfolio to accomplish moreaccommodation. They have a huge portfolio, the Fed owns 20% of the federal debt. (SB: 20%! The Bank ofJapan owns 59% of Japanese stocks. Unusual, experimental… “should I scream or shout?”)

But still… You look at low rates everywhere, where do you go. You come here.

If you take interest rates to zero, it changes the way you discount future cash flows for anything else you aregoing to buy. And theoretically if you take things to zero the math on your discounted cash flows goes toinfinity.

We had purchased a trillion dollars in securities by February 2009, the market turned March 9, 2009. It iswhat we hoped to see happen…

The real question to me is, how do you un-do this at the right time? That is what the Fed is struggling with. Doing this without kicking the economy over.”

The Fed balance sheet is now north of $5 trillion. So I sing, “I don’t know how to love him.”

Here is the link to the short clip: CNBC Video – Fed’s biggest struggle? Interest rates: Richard Fisher

CNBC – Benefits of Brexit: Richard Fisher – If Brussels learns anything from Brexit it is “Back off on overregulating…” Great number that came out on Ireland GDP growth. 8% plus. “Who has the lowest tax rate? “I hope both the Brits and the Europeans take the positives from this, which is you have to attract job creatingbusinesses and bureaucracy stifles and overregulation stifles and kills growth.”

CNBC – Britain wins currency wars with one vote: Ex-Fed’s Fisher – “Britain comes out ahead.”

Lacy Hunt’s Quarterly Letter

Each quarter I look forward to Lacy and his team’s economic commentary. I am going to cut and paste what Mauldinshared in his weekly “Outside the Box” letter. You can sign up for John’s free letters here.

Hoisington Investment Management – Quarterly Review and Outlook, Second Quarter 2016

JOHN MAULDIN | July 13, 2016

It has come to be a near truism that high levels of government debt and deficit spending suppress economic growth,but how exactly does that happen? In today’s Outside the Box, Dr. Lacy Hunt and Van Hoisington of HoisingtonInvestment Management give us a very detailed explanation of the dynamics involved.

On the deficit spending front, the authors state that the best evidence suggests that the US government expendituremultiplier is -0.01, which means that each additional dollar of deficit spending reduces private GDP by $1.01,resulting in a one-cent decline in real GDP. Additionally, the authors say, the multiplier is likely to become drasticallymore negative over time since the mandatory components of government spending (Social Security, Medicare,veteran’s benefits and the Affordable Care Act, etc.) will represent an ever-increasing share of the federal budget.

With regard to government debt, the authors describe a 2012 study by Carmen Reinhardt, Vincent Reinhardt, andKenneth Rogoff (RR&R) that identified 26 major public debt overhang episodes in 22 advanced economies since theearly 1800s, characterized by public debt-to-GDP levels exceeding 90% for at least five years.

5/16

RR&R determined that these debt overhang episodes reduced the economic growth rate by slightly more than 33%,on average. As of last year, the US economy has met these criteria for reduced growth: government debt firstexceeded 90% of GDP in 2010 and surpassed 100% in each of the past five years.

It is very significant, too, say Hoisington and Hunt, that while debt begins reducing economic growth at relatively lowlevels of government debt-to-GDP, as the debt level rises the debilitating impact on growth speeds up. That is, theimpact increases nonlinearly.

The bottom line, say our authors, is that with global debt levels moving ever higher, we can expect that worldwidebusiness conditions will continue to be poor and that the slowdown ahead will cut the already weak trajectory ofnominal growth. We are at risk, they warn, of falling into a global “policy trap.”

Hoisington Investment Management Company (www.hoisington.com) is a registered investment advisor specializingin fixed-income portfolios for large institutional clients. Located in Austin, Texas, the firm has over $5 billion undermanagement and is the sub-adviser of the Wasatch-Hoisington US Treasury Fund (WHOSX).

Click here to read Hoisington’s Quarterly letter. Print it out and come back to it from time to time.

Recession Watch

Each month I look at a number of recession watch charts. Let’s take a look at my favorite two and also considerseveral other data points. In short summary, I see no immediate sign of U.S. recession but I believe there is a highprobability that much of the globe is in recession.

Global Recession Watch

While the trend has been moving in a favorable direction (red arrow upper right side of chart), the collective data stillshows a high recession risk globally.

6/16

U.S. Recession

When the S&P 500 Index rises above its five-month smoothing by 3.6%, economic expansion is signaled. When itfalls by 4.8% below its smoothing, economic contraction is signaled. Notice how well, as indicated by the up anddown arrows, periods of expansion and contraction have been signaled. 79% of the signals were correct datingback to the late 1940’s. No guarantees, of course, but keep an eye on this data. I’ll share it with you monthly.

7/16

Other data points:

Business Loan Delinquencies & Job Creation

Commercial and Industrial (C&I) loan delinquency rates have a strong historical correlation to net job creation. Thismakes sense: companies that can’t make their loan payments probably aren’t hiring new workers and may well beshedding them in layoffs.

Based on the historical correlation and the sharp growth in C&I loan delinquencies recently, it is conceivable thatemployment drops abruptly over the next six months.

8/16

Source: RCube Research via 720 Global

“The chart above shows the inverted C&I delinquency rate (orange) plotted against the monthly BLS employmentchange (blue). It shows how they moved together in the recessions of 1991, 2000 and 2009. Now the C&Idelinquency rate is moving again, but jobs haven’t yet followed. If history repeats itself, they will—and probably verysoon.”

– Patrick Watson, co-editor of Macro Growth & Income Alert

9/16

“Over the last 50 years, the U.S. was either in recession or just recovering from one every time three-month jobgrowth went negative (below zero on the graph). In fact, on average a recession began when the three-monthaverage of job growth was still well above zero at 104,000. Currently, the three-month average sits at 116,000. Ifnext month’s report shows fewer than 151,000 jobs created, the three-month average will fall below 104,000.”

10/16

“A monthly reading above 50 signifies that a majority of those surveyed believe employment conditions areimproving. A reading below 50 denotes the majority think employment conditions are worsening. The most recentreading was 49.7.

Employment index has yet to break below 50. Historically, each time it has dropped below 50, the U.S. was alreadyin a recession. That said, the three-month average of 51.0 is currently below the three-month average the last twotimes the U.S. economy entered a recession.” Source: 720Global.

Why my obsession with recessions? It is because the markets decline 30%, 40%, 50% or more during recessions.

Which leads me back to trend following. Use it to help navigate the period ahead. It works.

Trend Following Works!

A January 2016 investment study found that trend following is one of just a few investment factors that worksconsistently over time. Academics call it “time-series momentum,” but the investment approach is most commonlyknown as “trend following.”

In “The Enduring Effect of Time-Series Momentum on Stock Returns Over Nearly 100-Years ,” by Ian D’Souza,Voraphat Srichanachaichok, George Wang and Chelsea Yaqiong Yao, the authors found trend following to beconsistently profitable in different time periods. The research covered the period from 1927 through 2014. Theauthors concluded that trend following works in all markets, large and small, everywhere. They believe investorbehavioral tendencies to be the primary driver.

They analyzed 67 markets across four major asset classes – various commodities, equity indexes, bond marketsand currency combinations – from 1903 to 2013 and also documented that time-series momentum or trend followingwas a consistently profitable viable strategy.

11/16

Why does it work? It is believed that price trends exist in part due to behavioral biases exhibited by investors. Suchbiases include anchoring to most recent past performance and expecting it to continue and herding into or out of aninvestment. Recall the extreme selling that took place in late 2008 and early 2009 or the tech buying frenzy of thelate 1990s.

There are other causes as well, such as corporate hedging activity and central bank and government involvement(e.g., interest rate manipulation, QE asset purchases, etc.). However, investor behavior seems to be the significantdriver that creates trends.

Further, there are hundreds of academic papers that study various market factors. Here are a few additionalacademic studies on trend following:

In a 2014 paper, “A Century of Evidence on Trend-Following Investing ,” the authors, Hurst, Ooi andPedersen, sought to establish whether the strong performance of trend following is a statistical fluke of thelast few decades or a more robust phenomenon that exists over a wide range of economic conditions overmany years and differing market cycles.

“The Profitability of Momentum Strategies,” Chan, Lakonishok and Jegadeesh, Investment Policy andPortfolio Management (1999).

“Market Cycles and the Performance of Relative Strength Strategies,” Stivers and Sun, FinancialManagement (Summer 2013).

Moskowitz, Tobias J. and Ooi, Yao Hua and Pedersen, Lasse Heje, Time Series Momentum (September 1,2011). Chicago Booth Research Paper No. 12-21; Fama-Miller Working Paper.

“A Century of Evidence on Trend-Following,” Jurst, Ooi and Pedersen, AQR White Paper (2012).

“212 Years of Price Momentum,” by Dr. Christopher Geczy and Mikhail Samonov. One of the longest andmost extensive studies on price momentum.

Robert Shiller and Lars Peter Hansen won the 2013 Nobel Prize in Economics for their separate work onwhat drives asset prices.

Danial Kahneman and Amos Tversky won the Nobel Prize for their work on Prospect Theory: An Analysis ofDecision under Risk. (Econometrica, Vol. 47, No. 2 (March 1979)). They discovered that people react verydifferently to financial gains and losses. Identifying that investors are more than twice as sensitive to lossesas to gains. Kahneman later wrote that the concept of loss aversion was their most useful contribution to thestudy of decision making.

There is much more on the subject. It is not new. It is well tested. Seek flexible strategies to help you movethrough the challenges that lie ahead.

Brexit – Italian Banks

Let’s take a quick look at Brexit-related news this week. Think in terms of contagion. We are at the beginning of theBrexit-related issues and not the end. My personal view is that the single largest systemic risk we face is asovereign debt crisis stemming from Europe. But it could come from China or Japan or the EM. Debt is thecommon denominator. The globe is facing a long-term debt deleveraging cycle few of us alive have witnessed.

As you saw in the Lacy Hunt research, the debt problems are above the 90% debt-to-GDP level in most of thedeveloped world. We’ll get through this somehow, but as Yoda might say, “think differently we must.”

I read Art Cashin’s piece every morning. I love Art and his humble and direct way. The following is from his postthis morning:

12/16

“Could The Brexit Implementation Turn European Banks Into Tumbling Dominoes? – That’s a question that somevery bright people are beginning to ask.

My eagle-eyed friend, Chris Whalen, and some of his savvy pals at Kroll Bond Rating Agency (KBRA) have put outan eye-opening discussion of the question in a new piece titled: “Italy Slowly Moves Toward Comprehensive BankRescue”.

Here’s their summary of the report:

For the past several years, the European Central Bank (ECB) under Governor Mario Draghi has carried theworld of banking in the European Union on its shoulders. Kroll Bond Rating Agency (KBRA) believes that thepolitical shock of the vote in the UK has forced the EU to begin moving towards some type of direct aid forbanks, but there remains enormous opposition from some EU member states.

KBRA believes that the core nations of the EU led by Germany must quickly put aside their reluctance tocommit resources to support a comprehensive bailout of Italy’s banking sector. Just as the U.S. learnedthrough bitter experience in the S&L crisis of the 1980s that delaying the clean-up of troubled banks greatlyincreased the ultimate cost of resolution, the EU’s political leaders seem unwilling to take the painful stepsneeded to avoid financial contagion.

One way or another, KBRA believes that the EU must collectively face the problem of bank solvency. Bydelaying the inevitable process of restructuring, the EU runs the risk of a “surprise” to the financial marketsthat could quickly metastasize into a larger political crisis. Indeed, precisely that scenario seems to beunfolding in the EU today.

Chris and his friends warn that the EU cannot afford to wait until Brexit is actually set in motion but must begin soonto avoid the domino effect from beginning. Therefore, we should see action very soon, if Europe is going to addressthe banking problem in time.”

The Central Banker – “I don’t know how to love him.”

Wishing you and your family a wonderful weekend!

If you find the “On My Radar” weekly research letter helpful, please tell a friend … they can sign up for the letter byclicking the “subscribe here” link that follows:

With kind regards,

Steve

Stephen B. BlumenthalChairman & CEOCMG Capital Management Group, Inc.

Stephen Blumenthal founded CMG Capital Management Group in 1992 and serves today as its Chairman andCEO. Steve authors a free weekly e-letter entitled, On My Radar. Steve shares his views on macroeconomicresearch, valuations, portfolio construction, asset allocation and risk management.

The objective of the letter is to provide our investment advisors clients and professional investment managers withunique and relevant information that can be incorporated into their investment process to enhance performance andclient communication.

A Note on Investment Process:

From an investment management perspective, I’ve followed, managed and written about trend following and

13/16

investor sentiment for many years. I find that reviewing various sentiment, trend and other historically valuablerules-based indicators each week helps me to stay balanced and disciplined in allocating to the various risk sets thatare included within a broadly diversified total portfolio solution.

My objective is to position in line with the equity and fixed income market’s primary trends. I believe riskmanagement is paramount in a long-term investment process. When to hedge, when to become more aggressive,etc.

Trade Signals History:

Trade Signals started after a colleague asked me if I could share my thoughts (Trade Signals) with him. A number ofyears ago, I found that putting pen to paper has really helped me in my investment management process and I hopethat this research is of value to you in your investment process.

Following are several links to learn more about the use of options:

For hedging, I favor a collared option approach (writing out-of-the-money covered calls and buying out-of-the-moneyput options) as a relatively inexpensive way to risk protect your long-term focused equity portfolio exposure. Also,consider buying deep out-of-the-money put options for risk protection.

Please note the comments at the bottom of Trade Signals discussing a collared option strategy to hedge equityexposure using investor sentiment extremes is a guide to entry and exit. Go to www.CBOE.com to learn more. Hirean experienced advisor to help you. Never write naked option positions. We do not offer options strategies at CMG.

Several other links:

http://www.theoptionsguide.com/the-collar-strategy.aspx

https://www.trademonster.com/marketing/upcomingWebinarEvents.action?src=TRADA2&PC=TRADA2&gclid=CKna3Puu6rwCFTRo7AodRiQAlw

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk. Therefore, it should not be assumed that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy(including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended and/or undertaken by CMG CapitalManagement Group, Inc. (or any of its related entities, together “CMG”) will be profitable, equal any historicalperformance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. No portion of thecontent should be construed as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. References tospecific securities, investment programs or funds are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, andshould not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities.

Certain portions of the content may contain a discussion of, and/or provide access to, opinions and/orrecommendations of CMG (and those of other investment and non-investment professionals) as of a specific priordate. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions, such discussion may no longer be reflective ofcurrent recommendations or opinions. Derivatives and options strategies are not suitable for every investor, mayinvolve a high degree of risk, and may be appropriate investments only for sophisticated investors who are capableof understanding and assuming the risks involved. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion orinformation contained herein serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice fromCMG or the professional advisors of your choosing. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding theapplicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consultwith the professional advisors of his/her choosing. CMG is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firmand no portion of the newsletter content should be construed as legal or accounting advice.

14/16

This presentation does not discuss, directly or indirectly, the amount of the profits or losses, realized or unrealized,by any CMG client from any specific funds or securities. Please note: In the event that CMG referencesperformance results for an actual CMG portfolio, the results are reported net of advisory fees and inclusive ofdividends. The performance referenced is that as determined and/or provided directly by the referenced fundsand/or publishers, have not been independently verified, and do not reflect the performance of any specific CMGclient. CMG clients may have experienced materially different performance based upon various factors during thecorresponding time periods. Mutual funds involve risk including possible loss of principal. An investor shouldconsider the fund’s investment objective, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before investing. This and otherinformation about the CMG Tactical All Asset Strategy FundTM, CMG Global Equity FundTM, CMG Tactical BondFundTM, CMG Global Macro Strategy FundTM and the CMG Long/Short FundTM is contained in each fund’sprospectus, which can be obtained by calling 1-866-CMG-9456 (1-866-264-9456). Please read the prospectuscarefully before investing. The CMG Tactical All Asset Strategy FundTM, CMG Global Equity FundTM, CMG TacticalBond FundTM, CMG Global Macro Strategy FundTM and the CMG Long/Short FundTM are distributed by NorthernLights Distributors, LLC, Member FINRA.

NOT FDIC INSURED. MAY LOSE VALUE. NO BANK GUARANTEE.

Hypothetical Presentations: To the extent that any portion of the content reflects hypothetical results that wereachieved by means of the retroactive application of a back-tested model, such results have inherent limitations,including: (1) the model results do not reflect the results of actual trading using client assets, but were achieved bymeans of the retroactive application of the referenced models, certain aspects of which may have been designedwith the benefit of hindsight; (2) back-tested performance may not reflect the impact that any material market oreconomic factors might have had on the adviser’s use of the model if the model had been used during the period toactually manage client assets; and (3) CMG’s clients may have experienced investment results during thecorresponding time periods that were materially different from those portrayed in the model. Please Also Note: Pastperformance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, no current or prospective client should assume thatfuture performance will be profitable, or equal to any corresponding historical index. (e.g., S&P 500® Total Return orDow Jones Wilshire U.S. 5000 Total Market Index) is also disclosed. For example, the S&P 500® Total ReturnIndex (the “S&P 500®”) is a market capitalization-weighted index of 500 widely held stocks often used as a proxy forthe stock market. S&P Dow Jones chooses the member companies for the S&P 500® based on market size,liquidity, and industry group representation. Included are the common stocks of industrial, financial, utility, andtransportation companies. The historical performance results of the S&P 500® (and those of or all indices) and themodel results do not reflect the deduction of transaction and custodial charges, nor the deduction of an investmentmanagement fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing indicated historical performanceresults. For example, the deduction combined annual advisory and transaction fees of 1.00% over a 10-year periodwould decrease a 10% gross return to an 8.9% net return. The S&P 500® is not an index into which an investor candirectly invest. The historical S&P 500® performance results (and those of all other indices) are provided exclusivelyfor comparison purposes only, so as to provide general comparative information to assist an individual indetermining whether the performance of a specific portfolio or model meets, or continues to meet, his/herinvestment objective(s). A corresponding description of the other comparative indices, are available from CMG uponrequest. It should not be assumed that any CMG holdings will correspond directly to any such comparative index. The model and indices performance results do not reflect the impact of taxes. CMG portfolios may be more or lessvolatile than the reflective indices and/or models.

In the event that there has been a change in an individual’s investment objective or financial situation, he/she isencouraged to consult with his/her investment professional.

Written Disclosure Statement. CMG is an SEC-registered investment adviser located in King of Prussia,Pennsylvania. Stephen B. Blumenthal is CMG’s founder and CEO. Please note: The above views are those of

15/16

CMG and its CEO, Stephen Blumenthal, and do not reflect those of any sub-advisor that CMG may engage tomanage any CMG strategy. A copy of CMG’s current written disclosure statement discussing advisory services andfees is available upon request or via CMG’s internet web site at www.cmgwealth.com/disclosures.

© 2016 All Rights Reserved

16/16