320
FRESHWATER INFLOW EFFECTS ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER AND MYAKKAHATCHEE CREEK ESTUARIES E.B. Peebles 1 ; T.C. MacDonald 2 ; M.F.D. Greenwood 2 ; R.E. Matheson, Jr. 2 ; S.E. Burghart 1 , R.H. McMichael, Jr. 2 1 University of South Florida College of Marine Science 140 Seventh Avenue South St. Petersburg, Florida 33701-5016 2 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute 100 Eighth Avenue Southeast St. Petersburg, Florida 33701-5095 Prepared for The Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, Florida 34609-6899 July 2006

ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

FRESHWATER INFLOW EFFECTS ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES

IN THE MYAKKA RIVER ANDMYAKKAHATCHEE CREEK ESTUARIES

E.B. Peebles1; T.C. MacDonald2; M.F.D. Greenwood2; R.E. Matheson, Jr.2;S.E. Burghart1, R.H. McMichael, Jr.2

1University of South Florida College of Marine Science 140 Seventh Avenue South

St. Petersburg, Florida 33701-5016

2Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute

100 Eighth Avenue Southeast St. Petersburg, Florida 33701-5095

Prepared for

The Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street

Brooksville, Florida 34609-6899

July 2006

Page 2: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

-i-

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY ............................................................................. iv

LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................. xiii

LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................. xiv

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 1

1.1 Objectives ............................................................................. 3

2.0 METHODS ............................................................................. 4

2.1 Study Area ............................................................................. 4

2.2 Survey Design ............................................................................. 6

2.3 Plankton Net Specifications and Deployment .............................. 9

2.4 Seine and Trawl Specifications and Deployment......................... 9

2.5 Plankton Sample Processing ....................................................... 10

2.5.1 Staging Conventions........................................................ 11

2.6 Seine and Trawl Sample Processing ........................................... 16

2.7 Data Analysis ............................................................................. 17

2.7.1 Freshwater Inflow (F) ....................................................... 17

2.7.2 Organism-Weighted Salinity (SU) ..................................... 17

2.7.3 Center of CPUE (kmU) ..................................................... 18

2.7.4 Organism Number (N) and Relative Abundance (N̄ )....... 18

2.7.5 Inflow Response Regressions ......................................... 19

2.7.6 Data Limitations and Gear Biases ................................... 20

3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ............................................................... 22

3.1 Streamflow Status During Survey Years...................................... 22

3.2 Physico-chemical Conditions ....................................................... 22

Page 3: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

-ii-

3.3 Catch Composition ...................................................................... 28

3.3.1 Fishes ............................................................................. 28

3.3.1.1 Plankton net......................................................... 28

3.3.1.2 Seine ................................................................... 28

3.3.1.3 Trawl.................................................................... 28

3.3.2 Invertebrates.................................................................... 28

3.3.2.1 Plankton net......................................................... 28

3.3.2.2 Seine ................................................................... 29

3.3.2.3 Trawl.................................................................... 29

3.4 Use of Area as Spawning Habitat ................................................ 29

3.5 Use of Area as Nursery Habitat ................................................... 31

3.6 Seasonality ............................................................................. 33

3.6.1 Plankton Net .................................................................... 33

3.6.2 Seine and Trawl............................................................... 37

3.7 Distribution (kmu) Responses to Freshwater Inflow ..................... 41

3.7.1 Plankton Net .................................................................... 41

3.7.2 Seine and Trawl............................................................... 45

3.8 Abundance (N, N̄ ) Responses to Freshwater Inflow ................... 49

3.8.1 Plankton Net .................................................................... 49

3.8.2 Seine and Trawl............................................................... 53

4.0 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................. 61

4.1 Descriptive Observations ............................................................. 61

4.2 Responses to Freshwater Inflow.................................................. 64

5.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................. 69

Appendix A. Plankton data summary tables..................................................... A1-35

Appendix B. Seine and trawl summary tables .................................................. B1-21

Page 4: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

-iii-

Appendix C. Length-frequency plots for selected taxa ..................................... C1-40

Appendix D. Seine catch overview plots .......................................................... D1-39

Appendix E. Trawl catch overview plots ........................................................... E1-17

Appendix F. Plots of the plankton-net distribution responses in

Table 3.7.1.1 ............................................................................. F1-10

Appendix G. Plots of the seine and trawl distribution responses in

Table 3.7.2.1 ............................................................................. G1-23

Appendix H. Plots of the plankton-net abundance responses in

Table 3.8.1.1 ............................................................................. H1-13

Appendix I. Plots of the seine and trawl abundance responses in

Table 3.8.2.1 ............................................................................. I1-34

Page 5: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

-iv-

SUMMARY

Quantitative ecological criteria are needed to establish minimum flows and levels

for rivers and streams within the Southwest Florida Water Management District

(SWFWMD), as well as for the more general purpose of improving overall management

of aquatic ecosystems. As part of the approach to obtaining these criteria, the impacts

of managed freshwater inflows on downstream estuaries are being assessed. A 20-

month study of freshwater inflow effects on habitat use by estuarine organisms in the

Myakka River and Myakkahatchee Creek estuaries was undertaken from May 2003 to

December 2004.

The general objective of the present data analysis was to identify patterns of

estuarine habitat use and organism abundance under variable freshwater inflow

conditions and to evaluate responses. Systematic monitoring was performed to develop

a predictive capability for evaluating potential impacts of proposed freshwater

withdrawals and, in the process, to contribute to baseline data. The predictive aspect

involves development of regressions that describe variation in organism distribution and

abundance as a function of natural variation in inflows. These regressions can be

applied to any proposed alterations of freshwater inflows that fall within the range of

natural variation documented during the data collection period.

For sampling purposes, the tidal Myakka River and Myakkahatchee Creek were

divided into nine zones from which plankton net, seine net and trawl samples were

taken on a monthly basis. Salinity, water temperature, dissolved oxygen and pH

measurements were taken in association with each net deployment. Daily freshwater

inflow estimates for the Myakka River and Myakkahatchee Creek were derived from

gauged inflows. It should be noted that the relatively short duration of sampling (20

months), coupled with relatively high flows over the study period, demand cautious

interpretation of results, particularly with respect to low-flow conditions.

A large body of descriptive habitat-use information was generated and is

presented in accompanying appendices. In general, observed habitat-use patterns were

Page 6: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

-v-

consistent with findings from other tidal rivers on Florida’s west coast. The three gear

types documented the distributions of the egg, larval, juvenile and adult stages of

estuarine-dependent marine, estuarine-resident, and freshwater fishes.

The bay anchovy (Anchoa mitchilli), gobiosoma gobies (Gobiosoma bosc and G.

robustum), the clown goby (Microgobius gulosus) and the hogchoker (Trinectes

maculatus) comprised 91% of the larval, juvenile and adult fishes collected by the

plankton net. Juvenile eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) and larval silversides

(Menidia spp.) were also frequently collected. Juvenile brown hoplo catfish

(Hoplosternum littorale), an introduced freshwater exotic, were the fourth most abundant

juvenile fish in the plankton net catch. Decapod zoeae, cumaceans, gammaridean

amphipods, the mysid Americamysis almyra, the copepod Acartia tonsa, the

appendicularian Oikopleura dioica, and unidentified Amerimysis mysid juveniles

comprised 80% of the invertebrates collected by the plankton net. A. tonsa and O.

dioica are river-plume taxa that invaded the tidal river during low inflow periods,

whereas the abundances of all other dominant taxa were typically centered within the

tidal river proper.

Seine (shoreline) fish collections were dominated by bay anchovy (Anchoa

mitchilli), silversides (Menidia spp.), eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki), spot

(Leiostomus xanthurus), eucinostomus mojarras (Eucinostomus spp.), and hogchoker

(Trinectes maculatus). The trawl (channel) catch was dominated by bay anchovy,

hogchoker, sand seatrout (Cynoscion arenarius), spot, and southern kingfish

(Menticirrhus americanus). Invertebrates collected by seines were dominated by

daggerblade grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio) and brackish grass shrimp (P.

intermedius); invertebrate trawl catches primarily consisted of pink shrimp

(Farfantepenaeus duorarum) and blue crab (Callinectes sapidus).

Spawning within or near the survey area was indicated by the presence of either

eggs or newly hatched larvae. Eggs of the bay anchovy and striped anchovy were

directly identified in the samples, with bay anchovy eggs being much more abundant.

Larval distributions indicated that skilletfish (Gobiesox strumosus), silversides (Menidia

Page 7: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

-vi-

spp., Membras martinica), unspecified mojarras (gerreids), sand seatrout (Cynoscion

arenarius), kingfishes (Menticirrhus spp.), blennies (blenniids), gobies (gobiids) and the

hogchoker (Trinectes maculatus) spawned within or near the survey area. Most

spawning took place near the mouth of the Myakka River. Live-bearing species such as

the eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki), gulf pipefish (Syngnathus scovelli),

chain pipefish (S. louisianae) and lined seahorse (Hippocampus erectus) probably

underwent parturition within the area.

Estuarine-dependent taxa are spawned at seaward locations and generally

migrate into tidal rivers during the late larval or early juvenile stage, whereas estuarine-

resident taxa are often present within tidal rivers throughout their life cycles. Estuarine-

dependent taxa that use the tidal river as a nursery area are the numerical dominants in

the Myakka River; overall, eight of the ten most abundant taxa in the river channel and

five of the ten most abundant taxa in nearshore habitats can be considered estuarine-

dependent. Six of the ten most abundant taxa found in channel and nearshore habitats

of Myakkahatchee Creek are estuarine-dependent. Eight of the most abundant

estuarine-dependent taxa in the Myakka River and Myakkahatchee Creek spawn

outside Charlotte Harbor. Six of these offshore spawners are among the most

economically valuable species in Florida, including menhadens (Brevoortia spp.), spot,

striped mullet (Mugil cephalus), red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus), blue crab, and pink

shrimp. The other two abundant offshore-spawning taxa include eucinostomus mojarras

(Eucinostomus spp.) and southern kingfish (Menticirrhus americanus), a species of

some economic importance. Four additional common estuarine-dependent species

spawn within Charlotte Harbor. Two of these species have relatively minor direct

economic value (i.e., hardhead catfish [Ariopsis felis], and sand seatrout [Cynoscion

arenarius]), and two others are among the most abundant species in the system (i.e.,

hogchoker and bay anchovy). The juvenile nursery habitats for selected species were

characterized from seine and trawl data in terms of preference for the shoreline or

channel, type of shoreline, physical location (distance from river mouth), and salinity.

Page 8: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

-vii-

More taxa were collected by plankton net during the spring and summer months

than at other times of year. Alteration of inflows would appear to have the lowest

potential for impacting many taxa during the period from December through February,

which is the period when the fewest estuarine taxa were present. The highest potential

for impacting many species would appear to be from March to June, a time of year

when naturally low inflows are coupled with increasing use of the estuary as nursery

habitat. The potential for impact is species-specific. During fall, winter, and early

spring, for example, there could be impact on red drum and menhadens because these

fishes recruit to tidal river nursery habitats during fall and winter. The larvae or early

juveniles of other species, such the bay anchovy, are present year-round.

Based on seine and trawl data, few clear seasonal patterns of taxon richness

were evident in either the Myakka River or Myakkahatchee Creek. Monthly shoreline

taxon richness in the Myakka River was quite variable but appeared highest from May–

July and October–December. There was a lack of clear seasonal trends in taxon

richness from the channel habitat. The relatively short duration of sampling in

Myakkahatchee Creek (15 mo) hinders conclusions regarding seasonality of taxon

richness. Based on these data, we tentatively conclude that the potential for impacting

the greatest number of species by anthropogenic alteration of freshwater inflows in the

Myakka River occurs from May–July and October–December. Overall abundances and

abundances of new recruits of nekton taxa indicate extensive use of the tidal river

habitat during all months, but temporal resource partitioning among species is evident.

Estuarine spawners have peaks in all months except January, and offshore spawners

have peaks in all months except August and September. Many offshore spawners had

peaks in abundance from mid-autumn to mid-summer, while estuarine spawners tended

to peak in summer. Tidal river residents’ abundance peaks included late summer–late

winter and late spring/early summer periods. Recruitment peaks—indicated by elevated

abundance of the smallest size classes taken in seines and trawls—are concentrated in

late autumn and winter for offshore spawners, whereas those for estuarine spawners

and residents are concentrated in summer.

Page 9: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

-viii-

The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in

the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly for estuarine-dependent taxa

using the area as a nursery. This was largely due to the importance of the lower Myakka

River—the region below its confluence with Myakkahatchee Creek to the outflow into

Charlotte Harbor—for these taxa. Division of the study area into ~5-km reaches

generally shows that CPUE in Myakkahatchee Creek (river km 22.3–27.3) is very

similar to equivalent areas of the Myakka River.

Among organisms collected by plankton net, there were 41 significant distribution

responses to inflow into the tidal Myakka River. All except one (98%) were negative,

indicating that the vast majority of taxa collected by plankton net moved downstream in

response to increased inflow. The single positive relationship involved postlarvae of the

zostera shrimp, Hippolyte zostericola. Although this relationship may be spurious,

postlarval Hippolyte primarily occur in deeper waters near the mouth of the river.

Upstream movement could have been caused by strengthening of two-layered

circulation by inflow, causing animals in the lower part of the water column to move

farther upstream as inflows increased.

The plankton catch from Myakkahatchee Creek produced only seven distribution

responses, and three of these (43%) were positive (pelecypods, decapod mysis larvae

and an estuarine isopod, Sphaeroma quadridentata). Two possible explanations for

upstream movement of these organisms in Myakkahatchee Creek are (1) its largely

straight, dredged channel facilitated two-layered circulation and (2) downstream

movement of animals within the Myakka River increased the abundance of certain taxa

in the general area of Myakkahatchee Creek. However, decapod mysis larvae

generally moved well downstream of the mouth of Myakkahatchee Creek during

elevated inflows into the Myakka River, which would render the second explanation less

likely for this taxon.

In the case of seine and trawl data, over one-half (52%) of the 82 pseudo-

species/gear/river combinations (hereafter simply referred to as ‘pseudo-species’)

evaluated for distributional responses to freshwater inflow exhibited significant

Page 10: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

-ix-

responses. The percentage of pseudo-species showing significant relationships to

inflow was somewhat similar between the Myakka River (53%) and Myakkahatchee

Creek (50%). Over 72% of the best-fitting (i.e., high r2 values from regression models)

significant responses were negative (i.e., animals moved upstream with decreasing

freshwater inflow), and approximately half of the best models were associated with long

flow lag periods (i.e., average flow for the 98 to 364 days prior to nekton sample

collection). Of the ten best-fitting models suggesting movement upstream with

increasing inflow (i.e., a positive response to inflow), various explanations for the

observed trends can be offered. In several cases the results may be spurious since the

gradients of the regression slopes are very small, while in other cases outlying points

may have unduly influence regression results. Several tidal river residents (i.e., eastern

mosquitofish, redear sunfish [Lepomis microlophus], and sailfin molly [Poecilia

latipinna]) centered in the Myakka River above its confluence with Myakkahatchee

Creek may have moved downstream with increasing flow; individuals near the

downstream extent of these species’ distributions could have been displaced from the

entire system upon encountering the additional flow of Myakkahatchee Creek, thus

leaving the remaining members of their populations (and hence the center of

abundance) above the confluence and giving the impression of upstream movement.

There is no obvious explanation for downstream movement with decreasing inflow for

spot and clown goby (Microgobius gulosus). The ten overall best-fitting seine or trawl

models among residents most commonly incorporated long flow lag periods, although

there were also several medium-term lags. Best models among estuarine-dependent

estuarine spawners tended to include medium to long flow lag periods, while those of

estuarine-dependent offshore spawners principally possessed long flow lags, as well as

several short-term lags. Best models explained 22 to 92% of the variability in

distribution. The highest r2 values, >50%, were found among both estuarine-dependent

and resident species and incorporated flow lag periods ranging from 1 (blue crab) to

357 days (brook silverside, Labidesthes sicculus).

Page 11: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

-x-

Abundance responses were found for 48 taxa in the plankton-net collections from

the Myakka River, with half (48%) being positive, wherein abundance increased as

inflow increased. Of the 23 positive responses, 16 involved freshwater taxa that were

introduced downstream with increasing inflows, and seven involved estuarine or

estuarine-dependent taxa. The latter group consisted of bay anchovy adults, two early

stages of hogchoker, two stages of Americamysis mysids, juvenile silversides (Menidia)

and an estuarine isopod, Cyathura polita. Menidia is an estuarine fish, but it is known to

be able to complete its life cycle within fresh water as well. Menidia’s response time

was too short (3 d) to reflect a true population response, as was that of Cyathura (1 d).

Short response times by estuarine taxa may reflect behaviors that allow organisms to

reposition themselves in response to increased inflow. Animals may move into the

channel or, in the case of benthic forms such as Cyathura, may move into the water

column to take advantage of the fresh water’s downstream flow, causing the catch of

such animals to increase quickly as a function of inflow (Robins et al. 2005). On the

other hand, the responses of the bay anchovy, hogchoker and Americamysis had

durations that were commensurate with the effects of improved reproductive output or

improvement in growth and survival. Inflow explained 20-63% of the variation in these

estuarine/estuarine-dependent taxa. These responses are potentially meaningful to

inflow management.

Most plume-associated taxa, which are typically found in higher salinity estuarine

waters, moved away from the mouth of the tidal river during high-inflow periods, giving

them a negative abundance correlation with inflow. Several peracarid crustaceans that

are usually most abundant within the interior of the tidal river, such as cymothoid

isopods (Lironeca sp.), the isopod Edotea triloba, the isopod Sphaeroma quadridentata,

the mysid Bowmaniella dissimilis, and the mysid Taphromysis bowmani, also decreased

in abundance during high inflow periods. Several of these appeared to leave the survey

area during high-inflow periods.

Among the 98 pseudo-species considered in the seine and trawl regression

analyses, abundances of 67% were significantly related to average rates of preceding

Page 12: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

-xi-

freshwater inflows. Percentages of pseudo-species possessing significant relationships

to inflow were the same for the Myakka River and Myakkahatchee Creek at 67%. The

greatest proportion of variance in abundance was explained by linear models for 23

pseudo-species and by quadratic models for 42 pseudo-species. Of the 23 linear

models, 61% were negative relationships, i.e., increasing abundance with decreasing

inflow. Over 54% of quadratic models suggested greatest abundance at intermediate

inflows (‘intermediate-maximum’); the remaining quadratic models were relatively evenly

divided between positive, negative, and intermediate-minimum responses. The

proportion of abundance responses to inflow differed by life-history category: residents

contrasted with estuarine and offshore spawners in having more positive responses

than negative. Minimum abundance at intermediate inflows was only found in a few

resident and offshore-spawning pseudo-species. The best-fitting models tended to

incorporate longer lags (i.e., longer periods for averaging preceding freshwater inflows)

for all life-history categories. Lag periods ranged from 7 to 364 days, with peaks at 21–

28 and 154–168 days, for residents; 1 to 364 days, with peaks at 1 and 364 days, for

estuarine spawners; and 1 to 322 days, with a peak at 1 day, for offshore spawners.

The strongest abundance-inflow relationships among residents were for shoreline-

associated species and probably indicated inflow-related changes in catchability.

Increases in abundance of both size classes of Seminole killifish (Fundulus seminolis;

Myakkahatchee Creek) and brook silverside (both tributaries) with increased inflows

may have been due to immigration to the study area from upstream freshwater areas.

High abundance of eastern mosquitofish and bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) at

intermediate inflows in both tributaries may be caused by low catchability a) at low

inflows due to occupation of habitats upstream of the study area and b) at high inflows

due to spreading of the populations into a greater habitat area (facilitated by higher

water levels) or into areas inaccessible to our sampling gears. The best-fitting

relationships between estuarine spawner abundance and inflow were varied. Larger

hogchoker, for example, observed an increase in abundance in response to same-day

inflow in the Myakka River channel. This may be due to enhanced immigration from

Page 13: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

-xii-

upstream areas (see above). Several species had maximum abundance at intermediate

flow levels, e.g., larger spotted seatrout along shorelines of the Myakka River and

smaller sand seatrout in the channel of Myakkahatchee Creek. The form of this

response could be driven by chemical attraction to the Myakka River and

Myakkahatchee Creek: at low flow, the presumed odor attracting nekton to these

tributaries would be relatively weak; with increasing flow, the attractant signal would

increase and enhance recruitment to the tributaries; at very high flows, the chemical

signal could possibly be diluted, leading to diminished abundance. Alternatively,

favorable biological or chemical aspects of the environment such as food supply

(stimulated by phytoplankton growth) or pH may be optimal at intermediate flows. As

with residents and estuarine spawners, offshore-spawning species showed varying

responses to flow. A linear increase in shoreline abundance in relation to flow in the

Myakka River was evident in larger spot. Tidewater mojarra from shorelines of

Myakkahatchee Creek showed a nonlinear decrease in abundance in tandem with

increasing same-day flow; this may be attributable to displacement into the Myakka

River. Several offshore-spawning species had relationships with flow that suggested

highest abundance at intermediate flow, including smaller blue crab in the channel

habitat of the Myakka River, leatherjack (both size classes) in the near-shore Myakka

River, and red drum (larger individuals in the near-shore Myakka River habitat). The

opposite pattern—that of minimal abundance at intermediate flow— was shown by

larger pinfish in the shoreline habitat of Myakkahatchee Creek; this phenomenon is not

readily explained in biological terms.

Page 14: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

-xiii-

LIST OF FIGURES

Fig. 2.1.1. Map of survey area. .................................................................. 5

Fig. 2.5.1.1. Fish-stage designations, using the bay anchovy as an example. .............................................................................. 15

Fig. 3.1.1. Guged freshwater streamflow, with plankton survey dates indicated.................................................................................... 24

Fig. 3.2.1. Electronic meter data from the plankton-net surveys of the Myakka River. ..................................................................... 26

Fig. 3.2.2. Electronic meter data from the plankton-net surveys of Myakkahatchee Creek. ............................................................. 27

Fig. 3.6.1.1. Number of taxa collected per month by plankton net. ............... 35

Fig. 3.6.1.2. Examples of species-specific seasonality from Myakka River plankton-net data. ..................................................................... 36

Fig. 3.6.2.1 Number of taxa collected per month by seine and trawl............ 38

Fig. 3.6.2.2. Top three months of relative abundance for all individuals collected in seines (S) and trawls (T). ....................................... 39

Fig. 3.6.2.3. Months of occurrence ( ) and peak abundance ( ) for new recruits collected by seine and trawl. ................................. 40

Fig. 3.7.2.1 Summary of linear regression results assessing distribution (kmU) in relation to inflow and lag period................. 49

Fig. 3.8.1.1. Relationship between intercepts and abundances of plankton-net taxa in Table 3.8.1.1. ............................................ 53

Fig. 3.8.2.1. Summary of regression results assessing abundance (N̄ ) in relation to inflow. ........................................................... 59

Fig. 3.8.2.2. Summary of regression results assessing abundance (N̄ ) in relation to inflow and lag period...................................... 60

Page 15: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

-xiv-

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.2.1. Distribution of sampling effort within the tidal Myakka River (May 2003-December 2004). .................................................... 8

Table 2.5.1.1. Length-based staging conventions used to define developmental stage limits. ....................................................... 14

Table 3.2.1. Electronic meter summary statistics during plankton net deployment.......................................................................... 25

Table 3.4.1. Relative abundance of larval stages for non-freshwater fishes with a collection frequency >10 for the larval- stage aggregate. ....................................................................... 31

Table 3.7.1.1. Plankton-net organism distribution (kmU) responses to mean freshwater inflow (Ln F), ranked by linear regression slope. ..................................................................... 43

Table 3.7.2.1. Best-fit seine and trawl-based pseudo-species distributional response to continuously-lagged mean freshwater inflow (ln(cpue) vs. ln(inflow)) for the Hillsborough River estuary. ..................................................... 47

Table 3.8.1.1. Abundance responses to mean freshwater inflow (Ln F), ranked by linear regression slope. ................................. 51

Table 3.8.2.1. Best-fit seine and trawl-based pseudo-species abundance (N̄ ) response to continuously-lagged mean freshwater inflow [ln(cpue) vs. ln(inflow)] for the Hillsborough River estuary. ..................................................... 56

Page 16: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Rivers export nutrients, detritus, and other productivity promoting materials to the

estuary and sea. Freshwater inflows also strongly influence the stratification and

circulation of coastal waters, which in itself may have profound effects on coastal

ecosystems (Mann and Lazier 1996). Estuary-related fisheries constitute a very large

portion of the total weight of the U.S. fisheries yield (66% of finfish and shellfish harvest,

Day et al. 1989; 82% of finfish harvest, Imperial et al. 1992). The contribution of estuary-

related fisheries is consistently high among U.S. states that border the Gulf of Mexico,

where the estimates typically exceed 80% of the total weight of the catch (Day et al.

1989). Examples from around the world indicate that these high fisheries productivities

are not guaranteed, however. In many locations, large amounts of fresh water have been

diverted from estuaries to generate hydroelectric power or to provide water for agricultural

and municipal use. Mann and Lazier (1996) reviewed cases where freshwater diversions

were followed by the collapse of downstream fisheries in San Francisco Bay, the Nile

River delta, James Bay, Canada, and at several inland seas in the former U.S.S.R. Sinha

et al. (1996) documented a reversal of this trend where an increase in fisheries landings

followed an increase in freshwater delivery to the coast.

Fishery yields around the world are often positively correlated with freshwater

discharge at the coast (Drinkwater 1986). These correlations are often strongest when

they are lagged by the age of the harvested animal. In south Florida, Browder (1985)

correlated 14 years of pink shrimp landings with lagged water levels in the Everglades.

Associations between river discharge and fisheries harvests have also been identified for

various locations in the northern and western Gulf of Mexico (Day et al. 1989, Grimes

2001). Surprisingly, discharge-harvest correlations sometimes extend to non-estuarine

species. Sutcliffe (1972, 1973) reported lagged correlations between discharge of the St.

Lawrence River and the harvest of non-estuarine species such as American lobster and

haddock. In recognition of the potential complexities behind these correlations,

1

Page 17: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Freshwater influence on coastal ecosystems extends beyond its immediate

effects on fisheries. Because of the intricate nature of many food web interactions,

changes in the abundance of even a single species may be propagated along

numerous pathways, some anticipated and some not, eventually causing potentially

large changes in the abundance of birds, marine mammals and other groups of special

concern (Christensen 1998, Okey and Pauly 1999). Mann and Lazier (1996) concluded

“one lesson is clear: a major change in the circulation pattern of an estuary brought

about by damming the freshwater flows, a tidal dam, or other engineering projects may

well have far reaching effects on the primary and secondary productivity of the system.”

This project was conducted to support the establishment of minimum flows for

the Myakka River by the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD).

Minimum flows are defined in Florida Statutes (373.042) as the “limit at which further

withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology of the

area.” In the process of establishing minimum flows for an estuarine system, the

SWFWMD evaluates the effects of the freshwater inflows on ecological resources and

processes in the receiving estuary. The findings of this project will be used by the

SWFWMD to evaluate the fish nursery function of the Myakka River estuary in relation

to freshwater inflows. It is not the purpose of this project to determine the level of effect

that constitutes significant harm, as that determination will be made by the Governing

Board of the SWFWMD.

2

Page 18: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

1.1 Objectives

This project uses plankton-net, seine, and trawl surveys to document the

abundance and distribution of fishes and invertebrates that use the tidal Myakka River

and Myakkahatchee Creek as habitat. There were several objectives for this project.

One was to produce a descriptive database that could serve as a baseline for comparison

with future ecological change. These baseline data also provide seasonality records that

identify the times of year when the risk of adverse impacts would be greatest for specific

organisms.

Another principal objective was to develop regressions to model the responses of

estuarine organisms to variations in freshwater inflows. The resulting models would then

be available for evaluating proposed minimum flows or the potential impacts of proposed

freshwater management plans. These models were developed for both estuarine fishes

and the invertebrate prey groups that sustain young fishes while they occupy estuarine

nursery habitats.

3

Page 19: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

2.0 METHODS

2.1 Study Area

The Myakka River watershed covers approximately 1,554 km2 (600 mi2) in

Manatee, Sarasota, and Charlotte Counties. The river channel extends in a generally

southerly direction 106 km (66 mi) from the river’s headwaters to its mouth at Charlotte

Harbor. The 55 km segment of the Myakka River in Sarasota County has been

designated as a Florida Wild and Scenic River. This reach, plus the remaining

estuarine portion of the river in Charlotte County, have also been designated as an

Outstanding Florida Water. The Myakka River watershed is only lightly urbanized with

only 6.4% of the land use/cover classified as urban, residential, or industrial (SWFWMD

2004). Upland forests, wetlands, and open water comprise a total of 42% of the

watershed, while agriculture and rangeland comprise 27 and 16% of the land use/cover.

The tidal portion of the Myakka River (Fig. 2.1.1) is a microtidal, drowned-river-

valley estuary that connects to the Gulf of Mexico via Charlotte Harbor. At the river

mouth, the mixed, mainly semi-diurnal tide has a range of <1 m. Tidal influence on

water levels in the Myakka extend 40 km upstream from the river mouth to a small

structure in the river channel known as Down’s Dam. Major tributaries that enter the

Myakka River in this tidal reach are Deer Prairie Creek near river km 26 and

Myakkahatchee Creek, also known as Big Slough Canal, near river km 22.

Myakkahatchee Creek is used for water supply by the City of North Port at an intake site

located above a salinity barrier four kilometers upstream of the creek’s confluence with

the Myakka River. Water supply withdrawals from the Myakkahatchee Creek averaged

1.9 cfs during 2004. A highly urbanized tributary, the Cocoplum Waterway, is also

impounded by a salinity barrier and discharges to the tidal reach of Myakkahatchee

Creek just below the City’s water supply facility. Descriptions of the tidal Myakka River

and a review of earlier fish surveys are presented by Estevez et al. (1991).

NOTE: The downstream endpoint of the SWFMWD river km scale is -6.5 km (green centerline in Fig. 2.1.1). In the present study, this endpoint was reset to 0.0 to eliminate negative km values that would prevent Ln-transformation, which isrequired by certain types of regression. This adjustment is used throughout this report and is superimposed (yellow lines) on the SWFWMD scale in Fig. 2.1.1.

4

Page 20: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

2

2

2

2

2

2

-82.8 -82.6 -82.4 -82.2 -82.0

26.8

27.0

27.2

27.4

27.6

27.8

28.0

28.2

FL

OR

ID

A

2.2 km

7.6

13.4

18.1

23.1

28.4

34.6

41.8

Myakkahatchee Creek(Big Slough)

M

YA

KK

A

RI

VE

R

�21.8

23.8

26.1

Fig. 2.1.1 Map of survey area.. Numbers in circles identify sampling zones (see Note on p.4).

5

Page 21: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

2.2 Survey Design

Three gear types were implemented to monitor organism distributions: a plankton

net deployed during nighttime flood tides and a bag seine and otter trawl deployed during

the day under variable tide stages. The plankton net surveys were conducted by the

University of South Florida College of Marine Science, and the seine and trawl surveys

were conducted by the Fisheries-Independent Monitoring (FIM) program of the Fish and

Wildlife Research Institute (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission).

The small organisms collected at night by the plankton net represent a combination

of the zooplankton and hyperbenthos communities. The term zooplankton includes all

weakly swimming animals that suspend in the water column during one or more life

stages. The distribution of such animals is largely subject to the motion of the waters in

which they live. The term hyperbenthos applies to animals that are associated with the

bottom but tend to suspend above it, rising higher into the water column at night or during

certain times of year (vertical migrators). The permanent hyperbenthos of estuaries (non-

transient hyperbenthos) tends to be dominated by peracarid crustaceans, especially

mysids and amphipods (Mees et al. 1993). Many types of hyperbenthos are capable of

actively positioning themselves at different places along the estuarine gradient by

selectively occupying opposing tidal flows.

The faunal mixture that forms in the nighttime water column includes the planktonic

eggs and larvae of fishes (ichthyoplankton). One of the most common reasons for using

plankton nets to survey estuarine waters is to study ichthyoplankton. Although fish eggs

and larvae are the intended focus of such studies, invertebrate plankton and

hyperbenthos almost always dominate the samples numerically. The invertebrate catch

largely consists of organisms that serve as important food for juvenile estuarine-

dependent and estuarine-resident fishes. In an effort to characterize the invertebrate

catch more completely, all water-column animals collected by the plankton net were

enumerated at a practical taxonomic level.

6

Page 22: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Seines and trawls were used to survey larger organisms that typically evade

plankton nets. Generally speaking, the data from seine hauls document habitat use by

shallow-water organisms whereas the data from trawls document habitat use in deeper

areas. The dominant catch for both gear types is juvenile fishes, although the adults of

smaller species are also commonly caught. The seines and trawls also regularly collect a

few of the larger macroinvertebrate species from tidal rivers, notably juvenile and adult

blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) and juvenile pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus duorarum).

Monthly sampling in the Myakka River began in May 2003 and ended in December

2004. Sampling in Myakkahatchee Creek was conducted from May 2003 to July 2004.

The tidal portions of the Myakka River and Myakkahatchee Creek were divided into nine

collection zones (Fig. 2.1.1; Tables 2.2.1, 2.2.2). Within each zone, two plankton net

tows, two seine hauls and one trawl were made each month.

7

Page 23: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table 2.2.1. Distribution of sampling effort within the tidal Myakka River (May 2003–December 2004). Zone position is measured relative to the Myakka River mouth.

Zone (km) Plankton Seine Trawl

1 (2.2–7.6) 40 40 20

2 (7.6–13.4) 40 40 20

3 (13.4–18.1) 40 40 20

4 (18.1–23.1) 40 40 20

5 (23.1–28.4) 40 40 20

6 (28.4–34.6) 40 40 20

7 (34.6–41.8) 40 40 20

Totals 280 280 140

Table 2.2.2. Distribution of sampling effort within tidal Myakkahatchee Creek (May 2003–June 2004 [plankton]; May 2003-July 2004 [seine and trawl]). Zone position is measured relative to the Myakka River mouth.

Zone (km) Plankton Seine Trawl

8 (21.8–23.8) 28 30 15

9 (23.8–26.1) 28 30 15

Totals 56 60 30

8

Page 24: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

2.3 Plankton Net Specifications and Deployment

The plankton gear consisted of a 0.5-m-mouth-diameter 500-µm-mesh conical

(3:1) plankton net equipped with a 3-pt nylon bridle, a calibrated flow meter (General

Oceanics model 2030R or SeaGear model MF315), a 1-liter plastic cod-end jar, and a 9-

kg (20-lb.) weight. The net was deployed between low slack and high slack tide, with

sampling beginning within two hours after sunset and typically ending less than four hours

later. Tow duration was 5 min, with tow time being divided equally among bottom, mid-

water and surface depths. The fishing depth of the weighted net was controlled by

adjusting the length of the tow line while using tachometer readings to maintain a

constant line angle. The tow line was attached to a winch located on the gunnel near the

transom. Placement of the winch in this location caused asymmetry in the steering of the

boat, which caused propeller turbulence to be directed away from the towed net. Tow

speed was approximately 1.3 m s-1, resulting in a tow length of >400 m over water and a

typical filtration of 70-80 m3. Upon retrieval of the net, the flowmeter reading was

recorded, and the contents of the net were rinsed into the cod-end jar using an electric

wash-down pump and hose with an adjustable nozzle. The samples were preserved in 6-

10% formalin in ambient saline.

The net was cleaned between surveys using an enzyme solution that dissolves

organic deposits. Salinity, temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen were measured at one-

meter intervals from surface to bottom after each plankton-net deployment.

2.4 Seine and Trawl Specifications and Deployment

The gear used in all seine collections was a 21.3-m center-bag seine with 3.2-mm

mesh and leads spaced every 150 mm. To deploy the seine, the boat dropped off a

member of the seine crew near the shoreline with one end of the seine, and the boat then

9

Page 25: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

payed out the net in a semicircle until the boat reached a second drop-off point near the

shoreline. The lead line was retrieved simultaneously from both ends, with effort made

to keep the lead line in contact with the bottom. This process forced the catch into the

bag portion of the seine. Area sampled by each seine collection was approximately 68

m2.

The 6.1-m otter trawl had 38-mm stretched mesh, a 3.2-mm mesh liner, and a

tickler chain. It was towed in the channel for five minutes in either an arc or a straight

line. Tow speed averaged 0.6 m s-1, resulting in a typical tow length of about 180 m.

Trawl width averaged 4 m, giving an approximate area sampled by a typical tow of 720

m2. Salinity, temperature, pH, and dissolved oxygen were measured at the surface and

at 1-m intervals to the bottom in association with each gear deployment.

2.5 Plankton Sample Processing

All aquatic taxa collected by the plankton net were identified and counted, except

for invertebrate eggs and organisms that were attached to debris (sessile stages of

barnacles, bryozoans, sponges, tunicates and sessile coelenterates). During sorting,

the data were entered directly into an electronic database via programmable keyboards

that interfaced with a macro-driven spreadsheet. Photomicrographs of representative

specimens were compiled into a reference atlas that was used for quality-control

purposes.

Most organisms collected by the plankton net fell within the size range of 0.5-50

mm. This size range spans three orders of magnitude, and includes mesozooplankton

(0.2-20 mm) macrozooplankton/micronekton (>20 mm) and analogous sizes of

hyperbenthos. To prevent larger objects from visually obscuring smaller ones during

sample processing, all samples were separated into two size fractions using stacked

sieves with mesh openings of 4 mm and 250 µm. The >4 mm fraction primarily

consisted of juvenile and adult fishes, large macroinvertebrates and large particulate

organic matter. In most cases, the fishes and macroinvertebrates in the >4 mm fraction

could be identified and enumerated without the aid of microscopes.

10

Page 26: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

A microscope magnification of 7-12X was used to enumerate organisms in the

>250 µm fraction, with zoom magnifications as high as 90X being available for

identifying individual specimens. The >250 µm fraction was usually sorted in two

stages. In the first sorting stage, the entire sample was processed as 10-15 ml aliquots

that were scanned in succession using a gridded petri dish. Only relatively uncommon

taxa (n<50) were enumerated during this first stage. After the entire sample had been

processed in this manner, the collective volume of the aliquots was recorded within a

graduated mixing cylinder, the sample was inverted repeatedly, and then a single 30-60

ml aliquot was poured. The aliquot volume typically represented about 12-50% of the

entire sample volume. The second sorting stage consisted of enumerating the relatively

abundant taxa within this single aliquot. The second sorting stage was not required for

all samples. The second stage was, however, sometimes extended to less abundant

taxa (n<50) that were exceptionally small or were otherwise difficult to enumerate.

2.5.1 Staging Conventions.

All fishes were classified according to developmental stage (Fig. 2.5.1.1), where

preflexion larval stage = the period between hatching and notochord flexion; the tip of the straight notochord is the most distal osteological feature.

flexion larval stage = the period during notochord flexion; the upturned notochord or urostyle is the most distal osteological feature.

postflexion larval stage = the period between completion of flexion and the juvenile stage; the hypural bones are the most distal osteological feature.

metamorphic stage (clupeid fishes) = the stage after postflexion stage during which body depth increases to adult proportions (ends at juvenile stage).

juvenile stage = the period beginning with attainment of meristic characters and body shape comparable to adult fish and ending with sexual maturity.

11

Page 27: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Decapod larvae were classified as zoea, megalopa or mysis stages. These

terms are used as terms of convenience and should not be interpreted as technical

definitions. Planktonic larvae belonging to Anomura and Brachyura (crabs) were called

zoea. Individuals from these groups displaying the planktonic to benthic transitional

morphologies were classified as megalopae. All other decapod larvae (shrimps) were

classified as mysis stages until the uropods differentiated into exopods and endopods (5

total elements in the telsonic fan), after which they were classified as postlarvae until

they reached the juvenile stage. The juvenile stage was characterized by resemblance

to small (immature) adults. Under this system, the juvenile shrimp stage (e.g., for

Palaemonetes) is equivalent to the postlarval designation used by some authors.

In many fish species, the juvenile stage is difficult to distinguish from other

stages. At its lower limit, the juvenile stage may lack a clear developmental juncture

that distinguishes it from the postflexion or metamorphic stage. Likewise, at its upper

limit, more than one length at maturity may be reported for a single species or the

reported length at maturity may differ between males and females. To avoid

inconsistency in the staging process, length-based staging conventions were applied to

the more common taxa. These staging conventions agree with stage designations used

by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (e.g., Jones et al. 1978). The list in Table 2.5.1.1

is comprehensive, representing the conventions that have been required to date by

various surveys. Some of the species or stages in the list were not encountered during

the surveys covered by this report.

12

Page 28: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

reported length at maturity may differ between males and females. To avoid

inconsistency in the staging process, length-based staging conventions were applied to

the more common taxa. These staging conventions agree with stage designations used

by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (e.g., Jones et al. 1978). The list in Table 2.5.1.1

is comprehensive, representing the conventions that have been required to date by

various surveys. Some of the species or stages in the list were not encountered during

the surveys covered by this report.

13

Page 29: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table 2.5.1.1. Length-based staging conventions used to define developmental stage limits. Fish lengths

are standard length (SL) and shrimp length is total length.

Postflexion-juvenile transition (mm): Juvenile-adult transition (mm):

Lucania parva 10 Anchoa mitchilli 30 Menidia spp. 10 Lucania parva 15 Eucinostomus spp. 10 Gambusia holbrooki 15 Lagodon rhomboides 10 Heterandria formosa 10 Bairdiella chrysoura 10 Menidia spp. 35 Cynoscion arenarius 10 Eucinostomus spp. 50 Cynoscion nebulosus 10 Gobiosoma bosc 20 Sciaenops ocellatus 10 Gobiosoma robustum 20 Menticirrhus spp. 10 Microgobius gulosus 20 Leiostomus xanthurus 15 Microgobius thalassinus 20 Orthopristis chrysoptera 15 Gobiesox strumosus 35 Achirus lineatus 5 Trinectes maculatus 35 Trinectes maculatus 5 Palaemonetes pugio 20 Gobiesox strumosus 5 Membras martinica 50 Eugerres plumieri 10 Syngnathus spp. 80 Prionotus spp. 10 Poecilia latipinna 30 Symphurus plagiusa 10 Anchoa hepsetus 75 Anchoa mitchilli 15 Sphoeroides spp. 10 Chilomycterus schoepfii 10 Lepomis spp. 10 Micropterus salmoides 10 Metamorph-juvenile transition (mm):Membras martinica 10 Chloroscombrus chrysurus 10 Brevoortia spp. 30 Hemicaranx amblyrhynchus 10 Dorosoma petenense 30 Micropogonias undulatus 15 Chaetodipterus faber 5

14

Page 30: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

1 mm

1 mm

1 mm

1 mm

1 mmadult

juvenile

postflexion larva

flexion larva

preflexion larva

Fig. 2.5.1.1. Fish-stage designations, using the bay anchovy as an example. Specimens measured 4.6, 7.0, 10.5, 16, and 33 mm standard length.

15

Page 31: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

2.6 Seine and Trawl Sample Processing

Fish and selected crustaceans collected in seine and trawl samples were

removed from the net into a bucket and processed onboard. Animals were identified to

lowest practical taxonomic category, generally species. Representative samples (three

individuals of each species from each gear on each sampling trip) were brought back to

the FWC/FWRI laboratory to confirm field identification. Species for which field

identification was uncertain were also brought back to the laboratory. A maximum of 10

measurements (mm) were made per taxon, unless distinct cohorts were identifiable, in

which case a maximum of 10 measurements were taken from each cohort; for certain

economically valuable fish species, twenty individuals were measured. Standard length

(SL) was used for fish, post-orbital head length (POHL) for pink shrimp, and carapace

width (CW) for crabs. Animals that were not measured were identified and counted.

When large numbers of individuals (>> 1,000) were captured, the total number was

estimated by fractional expansion of sub-sampled portions of the total catch split with a

modified Motoda box splitter (Winner and McMichael, 1997). Animals not chosen for

further laboratory examination were returned to the river.

Due to frequent hybridization and/or extreme difficulty in the identification of

smaller individuals, members of several abundant species complexes were not

identified to species. We did not separate menhaden, Brevoortia, species. Brevoortia

patronus and B. smithi frequently hybridize, and juveniles of the hybrids and the parent

species are difficult to identify (Dahlberg, 1970). Brevoortia smithi and hybrids may be

the most abundant forms on the Gulf coast of the Florida peninsula, especially in tidal

rivers (Dahlberg, 1970), and we treated them as one functional group. The two

abundant silverside species (genus Menidia) tend to hybridize, form all-female clones,

and occur in great abundance that renders identification to species impractical due to

the nature of the diagnostic characters (Duggins et al., 1986; Echelle and Echelle, 1997;

Chernoff, personal communication). Species-level identification of mojarras (genus

Eucinostomus) was limited to individuals 40 mm SL due to great difficulty in

separating E. gula and E. harengulus below this size (Matheson, personal observation).

The term “eucinostomus mojarras” is used for these small specimens. Species-level

16

Page 32: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

identification of gobies of the genus Gobiosoma (i.e., G. robustum and G. bosc) used in

analyses were limited to individuals 20 mm SL for the same reason; these are

hereafter referred to as “gobiosoma gobies”. Similarly, needlefishes (Strongylura spp.)

other than S. notata were only identified to species at lengths 100 mm SL.

2.7 Data Analysis

2.7.1 Freshwater Inflow (F).

Inflow rates to the study area include data from two gauged streamflow sites. All

flow rates were expressed as average daily flows in cubic feet per second (cfs). Flows

to the Myakka River are measured by the US Geological Survey (USGS) at site

02298830 (Myakka River near Sarasota). Average daily flows for Myakkahatchee

Creek were obtained from records collected by the City of North Port at Water Control

Structure 101, a concrete weir equipped with slide gates that is located about 4.2

kilometers upstream of the mouth of Myakkahatchee Creek. Flows for days with

missing data in the county records were estimated by the SWFWMD using regressions

of flows from an upstream gage operated by the USGS (Big Slough Canal near Myakka

City, site 02299410) with the recorded daily flows at WCS 101 reported by the City (Big

Slough Canal and Myakkahatchee Creek refer to the same waterway). Streamflow data

from these sites were used for the period through December 31, 2004.

2.7.2 Organism-Weighted Salinity (SU).

The central salinity tendency for catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) was calculated as

UUS

SU

)(

where U is CPUE (No. m-3 for plankton data and No. 100 m-2 for seine and trawl data)

and S is water-column average salinity during deployment.

17

Page 33: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

2.7.3 Center of CPUE (kmU).

The central geographic tendency for CPUE was calculated as

UUkm

kmU

)(

where km is distance from the river mouth. A constant of 6.5 km was added to the

original values based on the center line provided by SWFWMD to accommodate

sampling below the 0 km mark. The confluence of the Myakka River and

Myakkahatchee Creek was therefore at an adjusted river km of 21.8.

2.7.4 Organism Number (N) and Relative Abundance (N̄ ).

Using plankton-net data, the total number of organisms in the tidal portion of

each survey area was estimated by summing the products of mean organism density

(U , as No. m-3) and tide-corrected water volume (V) from volume zones (Fig. 2.1.1) as

)( VUN

For most of the Myakka River, volumes corresponding to NGVD29 were

available from SWFWMD. These volumes were adjusted to the actual water level at the

time of collection using data from the water-level recorder on the Myakka River at US 41

(NOAA station 8725837), after using the NGS VERTCON program to convert the

NAVD88 datum of this recorder to NGVD29. Vertical-datum-adjusted bathymetric data

from Myakkahatchee Creek (from SWFWMD) and the mouth of the Myakka River

(NOAA chart ) were kriged (Surfer 7, Golden Software 1999, linear semivariogram

model) to provide a basis for the level-corrected volumes for the remaining parts of the

survey area.

For seine and trawl data, relative abundance (mean number per 100 m2 sampled

area) was calculated for each month as

total

total

ANN 100

18

Page 34: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

where Ntotal = total number of animals captured in that month and Atotal is the total area

sampled in that month. N is also occasionally referred to as CPUE in some instances.

2.7.5 Inflow Response Regressions.

All analyses treated data from the Myakka River and Myakkahatchee Creek

separately. Regressions were run for kmU on F, N on F, and N̄ on F. N, N̄ , kmU

(seine/trawl data only), and F were Ln-transformed prior to regression to improve

normality. For Myakka River regressions, F was the sum of flows from the gauges at

Myakka River at Sarasota and WCS 101 (see section 2.7.1 above); for Myakkahatchee

Creek regressions, only data from the latter gauge were used. To avoid censoring zero

values in seine and trawl regressions, a constant of 1 was added to F and N̄ .

Regressions using plankton-net data were limited to taxa that were encountered

during a minimum of 10 of the monthly surveys. Twelve linear and nonlinear regression

models were evaluated for each taxon. In these regressions, F was represented by

same-day inflow and by mean inflows extending as far back as 120 days prior to the

sampling date. The combination of consecutive dates that produced the maximum

regression fit was used to model the N and kmU responses to F for each taxon. This

approach provided an indication of the temporal responsiveness of the various taxa to

inflow variations. An organism was considered to be responsive if the regression slope

was significantly different from zero at p<0.05.

Seine and trawl regressions were limited to taxa that were reasonably abundant

(total abundance>100 in seines, >50 in trawls) and frequently collected (present in at

least 3% of collections for each gear). Monthly length-frequency plots (Appendix C)

were examined in order to assign appropriate size classes (‘pseudo-species’) and

recruitment windows for each of these taxa. For distribution regressions (kmU), all

months were considered when a pseudo-species was collected in at least one sample

from that month. For abundance regressions (N̄ ), all samples collected within a

determined recruitment period from monthly length-frequency plots (Appendix C) were

considered. Mean flows from the date of sampling, as well as continuously lagged

19

Page 35: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

weekly averages from the day of sampling to 365 d before sampling (i.e., average flow

of sampling day and preceding 6 days, average flow of sampling day and preceding 13

days, etc.), were considered and linear and quadratic regressions were evaluated.

2.7.6 Data Limitations and Gear Biases.

All nets used to sample aquatic organisms are size selective. Small organisms

pass through the meshes and large organisms evade the gear altogether. Intermediate-

sized organisms are either fully retained or partially retained. When retention is partial,

abundance becomes relative. However, temporal or spatial comparisons can still be

made because, for a given deployment method and size of organism, the selection

process can usually be assumed to have constant characteristics over space and time.

The 500-µm plankton gear retains a wide range of organism sizes completely, yet it

should be kept in mind that many estimates of organism density and total number are

relative rather than absolute. Organism measurements from Little Manatee River and

Tampa Bay plankton samples (Peebles 1996) indicate that the following taxa will be

collected selectively by 500-µm mesh: marine-derived cyclopoid copepods, some

cladocerans, some ostracods, harpacticoid copepods, cirriped nauplii and cypris larvae,

the larvacean Oikopleura dioica, some decapod zoeae, and some adult calanoid

copepods. Taxa that are more completely retained include: cumaceans, chaetognaths,

insect larvae, fish eggs, most fish larvae and postlarvae, some juvenile fishes,

gammaridean amphipods, decapod mysis larvae, most decapod megalopae, mysids,

isopods, and the juveniles and adults of most shrimps. This partitioning represents a

very general guide to the relative selectivities of commonly caught organisms.

The plankton nets were deployed during nighttime flood tides because larval

fishes and invertebrates are generally more abundant in the water column at night

(Colton et al. 1961, Temple and Fisher 1965, Williams and Bynum 1972, Wilkins and

Lewis 1971, Fore and Baxter 1972, Hobson and Chess 1976, Alldredge and King 1985,

Peebles 1987, Haney 1988, Lyczkowski-Shultz and Steen 1991, Olmi 1994) and during

specific tide stages (Wilkins and Lewis 1971, King 1971, Peebles 1987, Olmi 1994,

20

Page 36: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Morgan 1995a, 1995b). Organisms that selectively occupy the water column during

flood tides tend to move upstream, and organisms that occupy the water column during

all tidal stages tend to have little net horizontal movement other than that caused by net

estuarine outflow (Cronin 1982, McCleave and Kleckner 1982, Olmi 1994). The

plankton catch was therefore biased toward organisms that were either invading the

tidal rivers or were attempting to maintain position within the tidal rivers. This bias

would tend to exclude the youngest larvae of some estuarine crabs, which are released

at high tide to facilitate export downstream with the ebb tide (Morgan 1995a). However,

as the young crabs undergo their return migrations at later larval stages, they become

most available for collection during nighttime flood tides (Olmi 1994, Morgan 1995b).

Seines and trawls tend to primarily collect small fish, either adults of small-bodied

species or juveniles of larger taxa. Trawls tend to capture larger fish than seines

(Nelson and Leffler, 2001), and whether this is due to gear characteristics or preferred

use of channel habitat by larger fish is uncertain. Sampling efficiency inevitably varies

by species and size class (Rozas and Minello, 1997), but we assume reasonable

consistency between samples collected with a given gear type. We acknowledge that

movement of various taxa (e.g. killifishes, Fundulidae and Cyprinodontidae) into

emergent vegetation at high water levels occurs (Rozas and Minello, 1997) and could

complicate interpretation of some results.

21

Page 37: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1 Streamflow Status During Survey Years

The most prominent feature on the inflow hydrographs for both systems (Fig.

3.1.1) was the summer wet season. During both 2003 and 2004, peak summer inflows

occurred during the period between May and October.

3.2 Physico-chemical Conditions

Inflows during the 2003 wet season appeared to reduce salinities in the tidal

Myakka River slightly more than those of the 2004 wet season (Fig. 3.2.1).

Myakkahatchee Creek was nearly entirely fresh from June through October 2003 (fig.

3.2.2).

In the Myakka River, individual measurements of dissolved oxygen (DO, all

depths) varied more with pH (n=955, r=0.72, p<0.000) than water temperature (n= 955,

r=-0.58, p<0.0000) or salinity (n=955, r=0.41, p<0.0000). The results of forward

stepwise regression produced the same explanatory hierarchy (from high explanatory

value to low), wherein pH explained 52% (same as above, [0.72]²=0.52), water

temperature explained 12% of the residuals from the pH-DO relationship, and salinity

explained 4% of the residuals left by the two previous relationships. The first selected

variable (pH) will always be the variable with the highest independent correlation with

the dependent variable, but the behavior of the remaining explanatory variables is not

so clearly evident. In this case, the salinity coefficient reversed its sign and became

negative.

In Myakkahatchee Creek, individual measurements of dissolved oxygen (all

depths) also varied more with pH (n=196, r=0.68, p<0.000) than water temperature

(n=196, r=-0.66, p<0.0000) or salinity (n=196, r=-0.05, p=0.48). In this system, salinity

did not have a significant relationship with dissolved oxygen when considered

independently. However, in forward stepwise regression, pH explained 47%, salinity

explained an additional 17%, and water temperature explained an additional 5%. The

22

Page 38: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

general agreement between trends in pH and DO is evident in Fig. 3.2.1 and, in

particular, Fig. 3.2.2.

The domination of variation in DO by commensurate variation in pH has been

observed in other tidal rivers (Hillsborough, Alafia and Palm, MacDonald et al. 2005). In

semi-confined bodies of water, low pH and low DO can be caused by high levels of

respiration (i.e., high CO2 production lowers pH, and this is coupled with high O2

consumption), and high pH can be caused by high levels of photosynthesis (i.e., CO2

depletion raises pH, and this is coupled with high photosynthetic O2 production). These

results point to DO dynamics that are heavily influenced by biological processes. The

upper Myakka River is more confined than the lower river (i.e., it has longer flushing

times), and tends to have lower pH and DO levels (Table 3.2.1).

23

Page 39: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Gauged

FW

Str

eam

flow

(cfs

)Collection date

Fig. 3.1.1. Gauged freshwater streamflow, with plankton survey dates indicated.Myakka River data are from USGS gauge 02298830 (Myakka River near Sarasota).Myakkahatchee Creek data were obtained from Water Control Structure 101 by theCity of North Port.

1/1

/03

1/3

1/0

3

3/2

/03

4/1

/03

5/1

/03

5/3

1/0

3

6/3

0/0

3

7/3

0/0

3

8/2

9/0

3

9/2

8/0

3

10

/28

/03

11

/27

/03

12

/27

/03

1/2

6/0

4

2/2

5/0

4

3/2

6/0

4

4/2

5/0

4

5/2

5/0

4

6/2

4/0

4

7/2

4/0

4

8/2

3/0

4

9/2

2/0

4

10

/22

/04

11

/21

/04

12

/21

/04

1/2

0/0

5

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

MYAKKA RIVER

MYAKKAHATCHEE CREEK

1/1

/03

1/3

1/0

3

3/2

/03

4/1

/03

5/1

/03

5/3

1/0

3

6/3

0/0

3

7/3

0/0

3

8/2

9/0

3

9/2

8/0

3

10

/28

/03

11

/27

/03

12

/27

/03

1/2

6/0

4

2/2

5/0

4

3/2

6/0

4

4/2

5/0

4

5/2

5/0

4

6/2

4/0

4

7/2

4/0

4

8/2

3/0

4

9/2

2/0

4

10

/22

/04

11

/21

/04

12

/21

/04

1/2

0/0

5

Collection date

24

Page 40: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e 3.

2.1.

Ele

ctro

nic

met

er s

umm

ary

stat

istic

s as

soci

ated

with

pla

nkto

n ne

t dep

loym

ent.

Mea

n de

pth

is m

ean

dept

h at

dep

loym

ent.

Sam

ple

size

s (n

) ref

lect

the

com

bina

tion

of s

urve

y fre

quen

cy (2

0 m

onth

ly s

urve

ys in

Mya

kka

Riv

er a

nd 1

4 in

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

) and

dep

ths

of

mea

sure

men

t. M

easu

rem

ents

wer

e m

ade

at s

urfa

ce, b

otto

m a

nd a

t one

-met

er in

terv

als

betw

een

surfa

ce a

nd b

otto

m.

MYA

KK

A R

IVER

Loca

tion

Mea

nS

alin

ity (p

su)

Wat

er T

empe

ratu

re (°

C)

Dis

solv

ed O

xyge

n (m

g/l)

pH(k

m fr

omD

epth

nm

ean

std.

min

.m

ax.

nm

ean

std.

min

.m

ax.

nm

ean

std.

min

.m

ax.

nm

ean

std.

min

.m

ax.

mou

th)

(m)

dev.

dev.

dev.

dev.

3.7

3.5

9917

.97.

81.

126

.699

25.6

4.3

18.4

31.1

996.

22.

10.

310

.099

7.9

0.3

7.0

8.4

5.5

3.2

8817

.18.

20.

226

.688

25.5

4.3

18.4

31.5

886.

01.

80.

58.

488

7.9

0.3

7.0

8.3

8.8

1.9

6613

.89.

00.

125

.766

25.9

4.2

18.4

31.2

666.

12.

00.

911

.966

7.8

0.4

6.6

8.3

11.4

2.3

7412

.08.

70.

124

.574

26.1

4.0

18.1

31.0

746.

31.

43.

39.

174

7.7

0.5

6.5

8.2

14.6

1.8

639.

98.

30.

122

.763

26.2

4.0

18.2

31.0

636.

31.

43.

19.

063

7.6

0.6

6.3

8.2

16.6

1.2

487.

67.

40.

120

.948

25.9

4.1

17.8

30.8

486.

21.

63.

69.

348

7.5

0.6

6.3

8.2

18.8

1.9

646.

66.

20.

119

.064

26.0

3.9

18.2

31.1

646.

01.

53.

08.

464

7.4

0.6

6.3

8.1

20.7

2.6

775.

65.

70.

117

.277

25.9

3.6

18.8

30.5

775.

81.

72.

98.

377

7.3

0.6

6.1

8.1

23.8

1.1

492.

63.

80.

115

.049

26.1

3.9

17.5

31.7

495.

61.

92.

98.

349

7.0

0.6

5.8

7.9

26.8

1.7

621.

53.

10.

113

.862

26.1

3.7

18.5

31.1

625.

62.

22.

59.

262

7.0

0.6

5.8

8.0

29.6

1.5

570.

92.

60.

110

.357

26.1

3.8

15.0

30.6

575.

42.

42.

511

.357

6.9

0.7

5.7

8.5

32.1

2.4

750.

51.

40.

16.

575

25.5

3.9

17.1

30.5

755.

21.

72.

58.

375

6.9

0.6

5.6

7.9

37.8

2.0

690.

20.

20.

10.

969

25.4

3.9

17.1

30.1

694.

61.

62.

47.

969

6.6

0.6

5.5

7.8

40.2

1.9

640.

10.

10.

10.

464

25.7

3.9

17.0

31.0

644.

81.

82.

28.

264

6.6

0.5

5.6

7.7

MYA

KK

AH

ATC

HEE

CR

EEK

22.2

2.9

584.

75.

00.

116

.258

25.9

3.4

19.2

30.4

585.

81.

33.

68.

258

7.3

0.5

6.3

8.0

23.3

2.4

504.

24.

90.

117

.050

25.8

3.5

19.3

30.3

505.

91.

70.

88.

650

7.4

0.4

6.2

8.0

24.3

2.4

533.

84.

80.

117

.053

25.6

3.5

19.3

30.3

536.

01.

90.

89.

153

7.4

0.4

6.1

8.0

25.1

1.2

352.

84.

10.

116

.135

25.2

3.5

19.4

29.9

356.

31.

52.

29.

535

7.4

0.4

6.1

8.0

25

Page 41: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

15

18

21

24

27

30

33

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

5.4

6.4

7.4

8.4

9.4

pH

DO

(mg/l)

Salin

ity

(psu)

Tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

5/0

7/0

3

6/2

3/0

3

7/0

7/0

3

8/0

4/0

3

9/1

7/0

3

10

/15

/03

11

/19

/03

12

/10

/03

1/0

5/0

4

2/1

6/0

4

3/2

9/0

4

4/1

3/0

4

5/1

1/0

4

6/0

9/0

4

7/2

6/0

4

8/2

3/0

4

9/2

0/0

4

10

/07

/04

11

/29

/04

12

/14

/04

Fig. 3.2.1. Electronic meter data associated with the plankton-net surveys of theMyakka River, where the cross identifies the mean, the horizontal line identifies themedian, the box delimits the interquartile range, and the whiskers delimit the total range.

Myakka River

26

Page 42: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

19

21

23

25

27

29

31

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

0

2

4

6

8

10

6

6.4

6.8

7.2

7.6

8

pH

DO

(mg/l)

Salin

ity

(psu)

Tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

5/0

7/0

3

6/2

3/0

3

7/0

7/0

3

8/0

4/0

3

9/1

7/0

3

10/1

5/0

3

11/1

9/0

3

12/1

0/0

3

1/0

5/0

4

2/1

6/0

4

3/2

9/0

4

4/1

3/0

4

5/1

1/0

4

6/0

9/0

4

Fig. 3.2.2. Electronic meter data associated with the plankton-net surveys ofMyakkahatchee Creek, where the cross identifies the mean, the horizontal line identifiesthe median, the box delimits the interquartile range, and the whiskers delimit the totalrange. Note that the axes are scaled differently from those in Table 3.2.1.

Myakkahatchee Creek

27

Page 43: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

3.3 Catch Composition

3.3.1 Fishes.

3.3.1.1 Plankton net. The bay anchovy (Anchoa mitchilli), gobiosoma gobies

(Gobiosoma bosc and G. robustum), the clown goby (Microgobius gulosus) and the

hogchoker (Trinectes maculatus) comprised 91% of the larval, juvenile and adult fishes

collected by the plankton net. Juvenile eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) and

larval silversides (Menidia spp.) were also frequently collected. Juvenile brown hoplo

catfish (Hoplosternum littorale), an introduced freshwater exotic, were the fourth most

abundant juvenile fish in the plankton net catch (Table A1).

3.3.1.2 Seine. The seine catch (Tables B1-B2, B5, B7-B8) was dominated by bay

anchovy (Anchoa mitchilli), silversides (Menidia spp.), eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia

holbrooki), spot (Leiostomus xanthurus), eucinostomus mojarras (Eucinostomus spp.),

and hogchoker (Trinectes maculatus). These taxa comprised over 85% of total seine

catch of fishes.

3.3.1.3 Trawl. The trawl catch (Tables B3-B4, B6, B9-B10) was dominated by bay

anchovy, hogchoker, sand seatrout (Cynoscion arenarius), spot, and southern kingfish

(Menticirrhus americanus). These taxa comprised nearly 94% of total trawl catch of

fishes.

3.3.2. Invertebrates.

3.3.2.1. Plankton net. Decapod zoeae, cumaceans, gammaridean amphipods, the

mysid Americamysis almyra, the copepod Acartia tonsa, the appendicularian Oikopleura

dioica, and unidentified Amerimysis mysid juveniles comprised 80% of the invertebrates

collected by the plankton net (Tables A1-A6). A. tonsa and O. dioica are river-plume

28

Page 44: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

taxa that invaded the tidal river during low inflow periods, whereas the abundances of all

other dominant taxa were typically centered within the tidal river proper.

3.3.2.2 Seine. The seine catch (Tables B1-B2, B5, B7-B8) was dominated by

daggerblade grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio) and brackish grass shrimp (P.

intermedius), which comprised over 85% of the invertebrate catch.

3.3.2.3 Trawl. The trawl catch (Table B3-B4, B6, B9-B10) was dominated by pink

shrimp (Farfantepenaeus duorarum) and blue crab (Callinectes sapidus). These taxa

comprised over 98% of total trawl catch of invertebrates.

3.4 Use of Area as Spawning Habitat

There are two lines of evidence that suggest local spawning by estuarine or

estuarine-dependent fishes: (1) the presence of eggs in the plankton samples and (2),

in cases where the eggs are known to be benthic or can’t be identified directly, a

preponderance of the earliest larval stage - the preflexion stage - relative to older larval

stages. The preflexion stage of most species does not undergo extensive horizontal

migrations, whereas the postflexion and early juvenile stages are often highly migratory.

The eggs of most species hatch within one or two days of spawning.

Percomorph fish eggs were the most common non-invertebrate taxon collected

by the plankton net. These were centered at km 8.6 at a weighted mean salinity of 22.6

psu. Ongoing hydroacoustic surveys of the Charlotte Harbor area conducted by James

Locascio (USFCMS, pers. comm. to EBP) indicate that sand seatrout (Cynoscion

arenarius) spawn within the mouths of the Myakka and Peace Rivers during spring and

early summer, but the spawning activity shifts south toward Cape Haze and the lower

harbor as summer inflows increase. The southward movement may simply be

avoidance of the benthic hypoxia zones that tend to form in the river mouths and in the

upper harbor during high inflow periods, but it also places the eggs where hatching

larvae would encounter more zooplankton prey because the zooplankton maximum also

29

Page 45: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

shifts seaward as inflows increase. The presence of early larvae of the silver perch

(Bairdiella chrysoura), sand seatrout and kingfishes (Menticirrhus spp.) suggests that

the percomorph eggs primarily belonged to these species. Eggs of the bay anchovy

(Anchoa mitchilli) and striped anchovy (A. hepsetus) were also present and were

directly identified. In general, these results agree with the findings of Estevez et al.

(1991), who also reported egg and early larva abundances as being most abundant

near the river mouth, particularly during spring.

The fish in Table 3.4.1 are highly likely to spawn within the tidal Myakka river –

primarily near the river mouth - or in close proximity to it. For these taxa, the numerical

dominance of the earliest larval stage suggests local origin. Live-bearing species such

as the eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki), gulf pipefish (Syngnathus scovelli),

chain pipefish (S. louisianae) and lined seahorse (Hippocampus erectus) probably

underwent parturition within the area.

30

Page 46: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table 3.4.1. Relative abundance of larval stages for non-freshwater fishes with a collection frequency >10 for the larval-stage aggregate, where Pre = preflexion (youngest larval stage), Flex = flexion stage (intermediate larval stage) and Post = postflexion (oldest larval stage). X identifies the most abundant stage and x indicates that the stage was present.

Taxon Common Name Pre Flex Post

Anchoa spp. anchovies X x x

Gobiesox strumosus skilletfish X x x

Menidia spp. silversides X x x

Membras martinica rough silverside X x x

gerreids mojarras X x x

Cynoscion arenarius sand seatrout X x x

Menticirrhus spp. kingfishes X x x

Blenniids blennies X x x

Gobiids gobies X x x

Bathygobius soporator frillfin goby X x

Trinectes maculatus hogchoker X x x

3.5 Use of Area as Nursery Habitat

Estuarine-dependent taxa that use the tidal river as a nursery area are the

numerical dominants in the Myakka River: Overall, eight of the ten most abundant taxa

in the river channel and five of the ten most abundant taxa in nearshore habitats can be

considered estuarine-dependent. For an overview of estuarine dependency see

Peebles (2005). Six of the ten most abundant taxa found in channel and nearshore

habitats of Myakkahatchee Creek are estuarine-dependent. Eight of the most abundant

estuarine-dependent taxa in the Myakka River and Myakkahatchee Creek spawn

outside Charlotte Harbor. Six of these offshore spawners are among the most

economically valuable species in Florida, including menhadens (Brevoortia spp.), spot,

31

Page 47: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

striped mullet (Mugil cephalus), red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus), blue crab, and pink

shrimp. The other two abundant offshore-spawning taxa include eucinostomus mojarras

(Eucinostomus spp.) and southern kingfish (Menticirrhus americanus), a species of

some economic importance. Four additional common estuarine-dependent species

spawn within Charlotte Harbor. Two of these species have relatively minor direct

economic value (i.e., hardhead catfish [Ariopsis felis], and sand seatrout [Cynoscion

arenarius]), and two others are among the most abundant species in the system (i.e.,

hogchoker and bay anchovy).

32

Page 48: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

3.6 Seasonality

3.6.1. Plankton Net.

The number of taxa collected during an individual survey is not a true measure of

species richness because many taxa could not be identified to species level.

Nevertheless, this index produces a clear seasonal pattern. Specifically, more taxa

tend to be collected during the spring and summer months than at other times of year

(Fig. 3.6.1.1), in agreement with results of a similar ichthyoplankton survey of the

Myakka River conducted by Estevez et al. (1991). Lowest apparent richness was

observed from September through February.

As in the Estevez et al. (1991) study, species diversity was highest near the

mouth of Myakka River due to an increased presence of marine-derived species.

Diversity was also occasionally high at the upstream end of the tidal river due to the

presence of freshwater species. This created a low-diversity zone in the middle

reaches of the tidal river, as observed by Merriner et al. (1976). Freshwater inflow and

the seasonal arrival of young animals can shift this pattern downstream or upstream.

Ichthyoplankton underwent a strong decrease in richness during the rainy season,

whereas invertebrate richness was enhanced by the addition of freshwater plankton to

the assemblage.

For a given species of fish, the length of the spawning season tends to become

shorter at the more northerly locations within a species’ geographic range, but the time

of year when spawning takes place is otherwise consistent. Among species with long or

year-round spawning seasons, local conditions have been observed to have a strong

influence on egg production within the spawning season (Peebles 2002). Local

influences include seasonally anomalous water temperature, seasonal variation in the

abundance of prey, and seasonal variation in retention or transport of eggs and larvae

after spawning. The latter processes (prey availability and retention and transport) are

influenced by freshwater inflows to the coast.

Alteration of inflows would appear to have the lowest potential for impacting

many taxa during the period from September through February, which is the period

33

Page 49: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

when the fewest estuarine taxa were present. The highest potential to impact many

species would appear to be from March to June, a time of year when naturally low

inflows are coupled with increasing use of the estuary as nursery habitat. The potential

for impact is species-specific. During fall, winter, and early spring, for example, there

could be impact on red drum and menhadens because these fishes recruit to tidal river

nursery habitats during fall and winter. Other species, such the bay anchovy, are

present year-round (Fig. 3.6.1.2). There is, therefore, no time of year when freshwater

inflow management is free from potential impact on estuarine nursery habitat.

34

Page 50: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

J F M A M J J A S O N D

2003

2004

J F M A M J J A S O N D

FishPlankton

InvertebratePlankton

Nu

mb

er

ofTa

xa

Co

llecte

d

Fig. 3.6.1.1. Number of taxa collected per month by plankton net (Myakka Riverand Myakkahatchee Creek combined).

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

35

Page 51: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Density

[Ln(N

o./m

3)

-4.5

-3.5

-2.5

-1.5

-0.5-4.4

-3.4

-2.4

-1.4

-0.4

0.6

4/1

/03

5/3

1/0

3

7/3

0/0

3

9/2

8/0

3

11/2

7/0

3

1/2

6/0

4

3/2

6/0

4

5/2

5/0

4

7/2

4/0

4

9/2

2/0

4

11/2

1/0

4

1/2

0/0

5

-4.5

-2.5

-0.5

1.5

3.5

Winter spawner - menhaden ( spp. larvae)Brevoortia

Spring and summer spawner - sand seatrout ( larvae)Cynoscion arenarius

Protracted spawner - bay anchovy ( juveniles)Anchoa mitchilli

Fig. 3.6.1.2. Examples of species-specific seasonality from Myakka River plankton-netdata.

36

Page 52: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

3.6.2. Seine and Trawl.

Few clear seasonal patterns of taxon richness were evident in either the Myakka

River or Myakkahatchee Creek. Monthly nearshore taxon richness in the Myakka River

was quite variable but appeared highest from May–July and October–December. This

pattern broadly agrees with previous tidal river estuary studies in the region (Alafia:

Peebles 2002a; Peace River/Shell Creek: Peebles 2002b; Hillsborough: MacDonald et

al. 2005). Lack of clear seasonal trends in taxon richness from the channel habitat also

agrees with previous studies. The relatively short duration of sampling in

Myakkahatchee Creek (15 months) hinders conclusions regarding seasonality of taxon

richness. Based on these data, we tentatively conclude that the potential for impacting

the greatest number of species by anthropogenic alteration of freshwater inflows in the

Myakka River occurs from May–July and October–December. Overall abundances and

abundances of new recruits of nekton taxa indicate extensive use of the tidal river

habitat during all months, but temporal resource partitioning among species is evident.

Thirty-nine taxa were deemed abundant enough in either the channel or along the

shoreline (i.e., total catch of at least 100 individuals in nearshore habitats or 50

individuals in channel habitats and occurrence in 3% of samples) to determine

seasonality. If the three months with maximum abundance for each of these taxa are

considered (Fig. 3.6.2.2), then peaks for residents occur in all months. Estuarine

spawners have peaks in all months except January, and offshore spawners have peaks

in all months except August and September. Many offshore spawners had peaks in

abundance from mid-autumn to mid-summer, while estuarine spawners tended to peak

in summer. Tidal river residents’ abundance peaks included late summer–late winter

and late spring/early summer periods. New recruits (i.e., the smallest two or three size

classes captured by our gears) were abundant for 28 taxa, and among these, peak

recruitment periods varied among life-history categories (Fig. 3.6.2.3). Recruitment

peaks for offshore spawners are concentrated in late autumn and winter, whereas those

for estuarine spawners and residents are concentrated in summer. This trend was also

noted in the Little Manatee and Hillsborough rivers (Peebles and Flannery 1992,

MacDonald et al. 2005).

37

Page 53: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Seine

J F M A M J J A S O N D5

10

15

20

25

30

35Trawl

J F M A M J J A S O N D25

30

35

40

45

50

55

20032004

Seine

J F M A M J J A S O N D2

4

6

8

10

12

14Trawl

J F M A M J J A S O N D

Num

ber o

f Tax

a C

olle

cted

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Myakka River

Myakkahatchee Creek

Fig. 3.6.2.1. Number of taxa collected per month by seine and trawl.

38

Page 54: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Fig. 3.6.2.2. Top three months of relative abundance for all individuals collected in seines (S) and trawls

(T).

January February March April May June July August September October November DecemberOffshore Spawners

F. duorarum ST ST STC. sapidus S S ST T T Brevoortia spp. S S S M. cephalus S S S M. martinica S S SO. saurus S S S E. gula ST S ST TE. harengulus S S SL. rhomboides S S S L. xanthurus ST ST ST M. americanus T T T S. ocellatus S S SP. tribulus T T TTotal Peaks 4 4 7 4 4 4 4 0 0 3 4 4

Estuarine Spawners A. felis T T TA. mitchilli T S S T S TD. plumieri ST ST S T B. chrysoura S S ST T TC. nebulosus S S S C. arenarius T T TT. maculatus S S ST T T Total Peaks 0 2 1 2 3 5 4 4 3 2 2 1

Tidal River Residents P. intermedius S S SP. pugio S S SI. punctatus T T T N. petersoni S S SF. grandis S S S F. seminolis S S SL. parva S S SL. goodei S S SJ. floridae S S SG. holbrooki S S SP. latipinna S S SL. sicculus S S SMenidia spp. S S S L. macrochirus S S ST T TL. microlophus S S S Tilapia spp. S S S G. bosc S S SM. gulosus T ST ST S Total Peaks 4 5 2 1 5 5 9 3 5 4 5 9

39

Page 55: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Fig. 3.6.2.3. Months of occurrence ( ) and peak abundance ( ) for new recruits collected by seine and

trawl.

January February March April May June July August September October November December

Offshore Spawners

F. duorarum C. sapidus Brevoortia spp. M. martinica P. tribulus M. cephalus O. saurus Eucinostomus spp.L. rhomboides L. xanthurus M. americanus S. ocellatus Total Peaks 4 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 0 2 4 6

Estuarine Spawners

A. mitchilli D. plumieri B. chrysoura C. nebulosus C. arenarius T. maculatus Total Peaks 0 0 0 0 3 4 3 0 0 1 0 1

Tidal River Residents N. petersoni F. seminolis L. parva G. holbrooki P. latipinna L. sicculus Menidia spp. L. macrochirus G. bosc M. gulosus Total Peaks 0 0 0 2 1 3 5 3 2 2 2 2

40

Page 56: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

3.7 Distribution (kmu) Responses to Freshwater Inflow

3.7.1 Plankton Net.

There were 41 significant distribution responses to inflow into the tidal

Myakka River. All except one (98%) were negative, indicating that the vast

majority of taxa collected by plankton net moved downstream in response to

increased inflow (Table 3.7.1.1, Appendix F). The single positive relationship

involved postlarvae of the zostera shrimp, Hippolyte zostericola. Although this

relationship may be spurious, postlarval Hippolyte primarily occur in deeper

waters near the mouth of the river. Upstream movement could have been

caused by strengthening of two-layered circulation by inflow, causing animals in

the lower part of the water column to move farther upstream as inflows

increased.

The plankton catch from Myakkahatchee Creek produced only seven

distribution responses, and three of these (57%) were positive (pelecypods,

decapod mysis larvae, and an isopod, Sphaeroma quadridentata). Two possible

explanations for upstream movement in Myakkahatchee Creek are (1) its largely

straight, dredged channel facilitated two-layered circulation and (2) downstream

movement of animals within the Myakka River increased the abundance of

certain taxa in the general area of Myakkahatchee Creek. The inflows into the

two systems were positively correlated during the survey period (May 2003-

December 2004, Ln-transformed values: n=606, r=0.96, p<0.0001). Comparing

the trends in Appendices F and H, it appears that decapod mysis larvae moved

well downstream of the mouth of Myakkahatchee Creek during elevated inflows

into the Myakka River, which would render the second explanation less likely.

Extensive upstream movement of a variety of taxa was also observed in the

Tampa Bypass Canal, which is channelized (Peebles 2004). Despite the

possible upstream movement of a few estuarine taxa during elevated inflows,

total numbers of estuarine taxa in Myakkahatchee Creek generally became

reduced during elevated inflow periods (see Section 3.8.1)

41

Page 57: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

The distribution analyses documented the fast (<4 d) repositioning of

many different types of freshwater taxa in the Myakka River as a response to

changing inflows. This pattern was not observed in Myakkahatchee Creek,

possibly because Myakkahatchee Creek was more thoroughly dominated by

freshwater inflows. During wet periods, freshwater organisms became

established in Myakkahatchee Creek and remained at the same locations for

months at a time, whereas freshwater taxa in the upper part of the Myakka

survey area underwent clear upstream-downstream shifts (Appendix F). Benthic

freshwater taxa such as ephemeropterans and trichopterans (insect larvae)

underwent subtle shifts and remained in the upper reaches of the tidal river,

whereas planktonic freshwater taxa such as Diaptomus (copepod) were

sometimes pushed to the river mouth by freshwater inflows.

42

Page 58: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table 3.7.1.1. Plankton-net organism distribution (kmU) responses to mean freshwater inflow (Ln F), ranked by linear regression slope. Other regression statistics are sample size (n), intercept (Int.), slope probability (P) and fit (adjusted r2, as %). DW identifies where serial correlation is possible (x indicates p<0.05 for Durbin-Watson statistic). D is the number of daily inflow values used to calculate mean freshwater inflow.

MYAKKA RIVER Description Common Name n Int. Slope P r2 DW D

Hippolyte zostericola postlarvae zostera shrimp 10 2.985 0.981 0.017 47 16

Acartia tonsa copepod 20 10.277 -0.613 0.018 23 1

decapod mysis shrimp larvae 20 16.736 -0.938 0.002 40 7

ephemeropteran larvae mayflies 20 40.253 -0.965 0.023 21 1

trichopteran larvae caddisflies 20 41.675 -1.142 0.003 37 x 1

dipterans, chironomid larvae midges 20 40.751 -1.237 0.007 30 x 1

Ilyocryptus sp. water flea 13 39.023 -1.514 0.023 33 1

decapod zoeae crab larvae 20 20.828 -1.559 0.000 52 6

Sphaeroma terebrans isopod 18 38.147 -1.661 0.003 40 x 10

Orthocyclops modestus copepod 16 43.461 -1.692 0.034 23 43

decapod megalopae post-zoea crab larvae 19 24.252 -1.712 0.004 36 13

acari water mites 20 43.620 -1.778 0.002 38 x 1

odonates, anisopteran larvae dragonflies 15 43.415 -1.795 0.026 28 1

amphipods, caprellid skeleton shrimps 10 18.166 -1.799 0.038 36 115

Simocephalus vetulus water flea 19 44.308 -1.884 0.002 42 x 42

dipteran, Chaoborus punctipennis larvae phantom midge 20 40.193 -1.959 0.014 25 3

gobiid flexion larvae gobies 15 27.349 -2.024 0.016 32 32

Osphranticum labronectum copepod 11 46.965 -2.060 0.025 38 11

odonates, zygopteran larvae damselflies 19 44.765 -2.134 0.000 69 x 1

Mesocyclops edax copepod 20 43.254 -2.189 0.000 57 1

Microgobius spp. flexion larvae gobies 17 27.800 -2.199 0.012 31 29

amphipods, gammaridean amphipods 20 35.779 -2.297 0.001 47 3

Mnemiopsis mccradyi comb jelly, ctenophore 13 24.703 -2.303 0.003 53 3

Trinectes maculatus juveniles hogchoker 16 38.570 -2.396 0.000 63 11

cymothoid sp. a (Lironeca) juveniles isopod 19 25.671 -2.414 0.000 59 22

gastropods, prosobranch snails 20 35.572 -2.442 0.000 54 x 44

dipterans, pupae flies, mosquitoes 20 46.685 -2.555 0.001 45 54

unidentified Americamysis juveniles opossum shrimps, mysids 20 31.703 -2.568 0.000 80 7

coleopterans, elmid adults riffle beetles 12 47.121 -2.671 0.013 43 1

Americamysis almyra opossum shrimp, mysid 20 34.877 -2.724 0.000 83 10

Anchoa mitchilli juveniles bay anchovy 20 35.306 -2.833 0.000 89 3

Heterandria formosa adults least killifish 10 54.131 -2.895 0.016 48 x 54

Menidia spp. juveniles silversides 13 37.544 -3.152 0.015 38 1

Taphromysis bowmani opossum shrimp, mysid 19 47.493 -3.186 0.000 71 35

Edotea triloba isopod 20 35.733 -3.480 0.000 84 27

43

Page 59: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table 3.7.1.1 (cont.). Description Common Name n Int. Slope P r2 DW D

Clytia sp. hydromedusa 11 33.333 -3.957 0.002 64 40

Trinectes maculatus postflexion larvae hogchoker 10 42.388 -4.253 0.000 80 40

Bowmaniella dissimilis opossum shrimp, mysid 18 38.918 -4.569 0.000 87 36

Microgobius spp. postflexion larvae gobies 10 42.610 -4.596 0.039 36 47

Diaptomus spp. copepods 14 57.022 -5.325 0.000 67 15

Anchoa mitchilli adults bay anchovy 20 50.840 -5.855 0.000 67 74

MYAKKAHATCHEE CREEK

Description Common Name n Int. Slope P r2 DW D

pelecypods clams, mussels, oysters 13 22.035 0.432 0.004 51 47

decapod mysis shrimp larvae 12 21.808 0.407 0.024 36 87

Sphaeroma quadridentata isopod 11 23.058 0.400 0.006 54 x 6

Americamysis almyra opossum shrimp, mysid 12 23.933 -0.228 0.001 63 43

amphipods, gammaridean amphipods 14 24.576 -0.268 0.041 25 120

Anchoa mitchilli juveniles bay anchovy 13 24.483 -0.286 0.005 49 4

Taphromysis bowmani opossum shrimp, mysid 10 24.518 -0.330 0.003 64 x 8

44

Page 60: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

3.7.2 Seine and Trawl.

The relatively short time series (15 months in Myakkahatchee Creek, 20

months in the Myakka River) did not produce a wide variety of flow conditions

over which to assess organism distribution responses; this limits the predictive

ability of the observed relationships. Over one-half (52%) of the 82 pseudo-

species/gear/river combinations (hereafter simply referred to as ‘pseudo-

species’) evaluated for distributional responses to freshwater inflow exhibited

significant responses. For the purposes of this discussion, we refer only to the

best-fitting models for each of the 82 pseudo-species (i.e., statistically significant

[p<0.05] models with normally distributed residuals that explain the greatest

proportion of the variance [highest r2 value] for each pseudo-species) (Table

3.7.2.1). The percentage of pseudo-species showing significant relationships to

inflow was somewhat similar between the Myakka River (53%) and

Myakkahatchee Creek (50%). Inflow lag periods are characterized as either

short (0-14 days), medium (21-91 days), or long (98-364 days). Best models are

plotted in Appendix G. Over 72% of the significant responses were negative (i.e.,

animals moved upstream with decreasing freshwater inflow), and approximately

half of the best models were associated with long flow lag periods (i.e., average

flow for the 98 to 364 days prior to nekton sample collection) (Fig. 3.7.2.1). Of the

12 best models suggesting movement upstream with increasing inflow (i.e., a

positive response to inflow), various explanations for the observed trends can be

offered. In several cases (i.e., bay anchovy, coastal shiner, and larger striped

mojarra; from Myakkahatchee Creek, the results may be spurious since the

gradients of the regression slopes are very small (Figs. G12, G13, G15, and

G25); striped mullet from the Myakka River exhibited a very steep slope which is

attributable to influence of two points on the regression (Fig. G36). Several tidal

river residents (i.e., eastern mosquitofish, sailfin molly, and redear sunfish)

centered in the Myakka River above its confluence with Myakkahatchee Creek

may have moved downstream with increasing flow; individuals near the

45

Page 61: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

downstream extent of these species’ distributions could have been displaced

from the study area upon encountering the additional flow of Myakkahatchee

Creek, thus leaving the remaining members of their populations (and hence the

center of abundance) above the confluence and giving the impression of

upstream movement (Figs. G18–20, G24). There is no obvious explanation for

downstream movement with decreasing inflow for spot and clown goby (Figs.

G32 and G37–38).

The best-fitting models among residents most commonly incorporated

long flow lag periods, although there were also several medium-term lags (Fig.

3.7.2.1). Best-fitting models among estuarine-dependent estuarine spawners

tended to include medium to long flow lag periods, while those of estuarine-

dependent offshore spawners principally possessed long flow lags, as well as

several short-term lags (Fig. 3.7.2.1). Best models explained 22 to 92% of the

variability in distribution. The highest r2 values, >50%, were found among both

estuarine-dependent and resident species and incorporated flow lag periods

ranging from 1 (blue crab) to 357 days (brook silverside) (Table 3.7.2.1).

46

Page 62: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e 3.

7.2.

1, P

age

1 of

2

Tabl

e 3.

7.2.

1. B

est-f

it se

ine

and

traw

l-bas

ed p

seud

o-sp

ecie

s di

strib

utio

nal r

espo

nse

to c

ontin

uous

ly la

gged

mea

n fre

shw

ater

inflo

w (l

n(km

U) v

s.

ln(in

flow

)) fo

r the

Mya

kka

Riv

er a

nd M

yakk

ahat

chee

Cre

ek.

Deg

rees

of f

reed

om (d

f), in

terc

ept,

slop

e, p

roba

bilit

y th

at th

e sl

ope

is s

igni

fican

t (P)

,an

d fit

(r2 ) a

re p

rovi

ded.

The

num

ber o

f day

s in

the

cont

inuo

usly

lagg

ed m

ean

inflo

w is

repr

esen

ted

by D

. A

n “x

” in

DW

indi

cate

s th

at th

e D

urbi

n-W

atso

n st

atis

tic w

as s

igni

fican

t (p<

0.05

), a

poss

ible

indi

catio

n th

at s

eria

l cor

rela

tion

was

pre

sent

.

Spec

ies

Riv

er S

egm

ent

Gea

r Si

ze

df

Inte

rcep

t Li

near

coe

f. Li

near

P

r2 D

W

D

Farfa

ntep

enae

us d

uora

rum

M

yakk

a R

iver

Se

ines

1

4 10

3.78

54

-0.3

143

0.00

263

14

Farfa

ntep

enae

us d

uora

rum

M

yakk

a R

iver

Tr

awls

1

5 13

7.33

14

-0.7

942

0.02

633

36

4

Cal

linec

tes

sapi

dus

Mya

kka

Riv

er

Sein

es

34

123.

8126

-0

.313

60.

0182

38x

7

Cal

linec

tes

sapi

dus

Mya

kka

Riv

er

Traw

ls

35

185.

8089

-0

.460

30.

0244

25x

32

2

Cal

linec

tes

sapi

dus

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

S

eine

s 3

5 6

3.27

26

-0.0

220.

0188

63

1

Cal

linec

tes

sapi

dus

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

Tr

awls

3

5 11

3.30

55

-0.0

287

0.02

6237

26

6

Anch

oa m

itchi

lli

Mya

kka

Riv

er

Sei

nes

26 to

35

175.

0526

-0

.431

60.

0017

45

91

Anch

oa m

itchi

lli

Mya

kka

Riv

er

Sein

es

36

164.

0801

-0

.315

40.

0005

54

21

Anch

oa m

itchi

lli

Mya

kka

Riv

er

Traw

ls

25

93.

5711

-0

.118

40.

0299

42

56

Anch

oa m

itchi

lli

Mya

kka

Riv

er

Traw

ls

26 to

35

113.

395

-0.1

009

0.03

9733

70

Anch

oa m

itchi

lli

Mya

kka

Riv

er

Traw

ls

36

144.

3723

-0

.338

90.

0069

42

105

Anch

oa m

itchi

lli

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

Tr

awls

2

5 9

3.11

63

0.02

260.

0459

37

1

Not

ropi

s pe

ters

oni

Mya

kka

Riv

er

Sein

es

30

124.

3646

-0

.134

30.

0008

62

154

Ario

psis

felis

M

yakk

a R

iver

Tr

awls

A

ll si

zes

94.

6225

-0

.310

50.

0392

39

70

Luca

nia

parv

a

Mya

kka

Riv

er

Sein

es

25

103.

9512

-0

.168

70.

0371

37

7

Gam

busi

a ho

lbro

oki

Mya

kka

Riv

er

Sein

es

26

133.

0601

0.

0828

0.01

4738

56

Poec

ilia la

tipin

na

Mya

kka

Riv

er

Sein

es

29

9-1

.611

1 0.

7321

0.00

8256

x

154

Poec

ilia la

tipin

na

Mya

kka

Riv

er

Sein

es

30

112.

1678

0.

2012

0.02

339

84

Poec

ilia la

tipin

na

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

S

eine

s 3

0 5

3.41

42

-0.0

510.

0068

80

224

Labi

dest

hes

sicc

ulus

M

yakk

a R

iver

Se

ines

3

5 14

5.35

5 -0

.279

80.

0015

53

357

47

Page 63: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e 3.

7.2.

1, P

age

2 of

2

Lepo

mis

mac

roch

irus

M

yakk

ahat

chee

Cre

ek

Traw

ls

35

57.

0131

-0

.712

30.

0102

76

329

Lepo

mis

mar

gina

tus

M

yakk

a R

iver

Se

ines

3

5 8

7.82

71

-0.6

778

0.00

5165

30

1

Lepo

mis

mic

rolo

phus

M

yakk

a R

iver

Se

ines

4

1 11

2.94

73

0.08

610.

0095

47

42

Euge

rres

plum

ieri

M

yakk

ahat

chee

Cre

ek

Sei

nes

36

103.

0734

0.

0245

0.02

7340

14

Cyn

osci

on n

ebul

osus

M

yakk

a R

iver

Se

ines

3

5 8

4.89

55

-0.4

761

0.00

3667

10

5

Cyn

osci

on n

ebul

osus

M

yakk

a R

iver

Se

ines

3

6 9

4.25

04

-0.3

381

0.03

3841

98

Cyn

osci

on a

rena

rius

M

yakk

a R

iver

Se

ines

4

0 7

4.66

92

-0.4

049

0.00

7866

7

Cyn

osci

on a

rena

rius

M

yakk

a R

iver

Tr

awls

4

0 14

4.00

72

-0.2

286

0.00

0264

x

28

Cyn

osci

on a

rena

rius

M

yakk

a R

iver

Tr

awls

4

1 13

4.14

79

-0.2

936

0.00

6245

35

Cyn

osci

on a

rena

rius

M

yakk

ahat

chee

Cre

ek

Traw

ls

40

63.

3064

-0

.031

50.

0146

66

252

Leio

stom

us x

anth

urus

M

yakk

a R

iver

Se

ines

3

1 5

-0.8

289

0.63

530.

0179

71

154

Men

ticirr

hus

amer

ican

us

Mya

kka

Riv

er

Traw

ls

35

84.

5939

-0

.411

20.

0175

53x

10

5

Men

ticirr

hus

amer

ican

us

Mya

kka

Riv

er

Traw

ls

36

133.

5873

-0

.245

10.

0037

49

112

Scia

enop

s oc

ella

tus

M

yakk

a R

iver

Se

ines

4

0 5

11.4

722

-1.3

590.

0257

66

182

Mug

il ce

phal

us

Mya

kka

Riv

er

Sein

es

30

5-1

6.89

12

2.92

980.

0005

93

329

Mic

rogo

bius

gul

osus

M

yakk

a R

iver

Se

ines

3

0 17

1.48

75

0.20

560.

0342

24

133

Mic

rogo

bius

gul

osus

M

yakk

a R

iver

Se

ines

3

1 16

0.84

77

0.30

520.

0121

33

168

Mic

rogo

bius

gul

osus

M

yakk

ahat

chee

Cre

ek

Sei

nes

30

93.

2589

-0

.018

60.

0091

55

42

Mic

rogo

bius

gul

osus

M

yakk

ahat

chee

Cre

ek

Sei

nes

31

83.

3206

-0

.032

90.

0144

55

126

Trin

ecte

s m

acul

atus

M

yakk

a R

iver

Tr

awls

2

5 16

3.88

68

-0.0

673

0.04

3823

49

Trin

ecte

s m

acul

atus

M

yakk

a R

iver

Tr

awls

2

6 18

9.41

91

-1.0

402

0.02

1126

36

4

48

Page 64: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Inflow Lag Period (days)

1-14 21-91 98-364

Perc

ent o

f Res

pond

ing

Pse

udos

peci

es

per L

ife H

isto

ry C

ateg

ory

0

20

40

60

80

100 residents (14 responses)estuarine spawners (16 responses) offshore spawners (11 responses)

Fig. 3.7.2.1. Summary of linear regression results assessing distribution (kmU) in relation to inflow and lag period.

3.8 Abundance (N, N̄ ) Responses to Freshwater Inflow

3.8.1 Plankton Net.

A linear model produced the best overall fit for this relationship when both terms

were Ln-transformed. Abundance responses were found for 51 taxa in the Myakka

River, with half (48%) being positive, wherein abundance increased as inflow increased

(Table 3.8.1.1). Of the 23 positive responses, 16 involved freshwater taxa that were

introduced downstream with increasing inflows, and seven involved estuarine or

estuarine-dependent taxa. The latter group consisted of bay anchovy adults, two early

49

Page 65: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

stages of hogchoker, two stages of Americamysis mysids, juvenile silversides (Menidia)

and an estuarine isopod, Cyathura polita. Menidia spp. are estuarine fish, but one

species in this genus (M. beryllina) is known to be able to complete its life cycle within

fresh water as well. Menidia’s response time was too short (3 d) to reflect a true

population response, as was that of Cyathura (1 d). Short response times by estuarine

taxa may reflect behaviors that allow organisms to reposition themselves in response to

increased inflow. Animals may move into the channel or, in the case of benthic forms

such as Cyathura, may move into the water column to take advantage of the fresh

water’s downstream flow, causing the catch of such animals to increase quickly as a

function of inflow (Robins et al. 2005). On the other hand, the responses of the bay

anchovy, hogchoker and Americamysis had durations that were commensurate with the

effects of improved reproductive output or improvement in growth and survival. Inflow

explained 20-63% of the variation in these estuarine/estuarine-dependent taxa. These

responses are potentially meaningful to inflow management.

Most plume-associated taxa, which are typically found in higher salinity estuarine

waters, moved away from the mouth of the tidal river during high-inflow periods, giving

them a negative abundance correlation with inflow. This pattern of downstream shift by

plume organisms during high-inflow periods was observed in the tidal Little Manatee

River by Rast et al. (1991). Several peracarid crustaceans that are usually most

abundant within the interior of the tidal river, such as cymothoid isopods (Lironeca sp.),

the isopod Edotea triloba, the isopod Sphaeroma quadridentata, the mysid Bowmaniella

dissimilis, and the mysid Taphromysis bowmani, also decreased in abundance during

high inflow periods. Several of these appeared to leave the survey area during high-

inflow periods (Appendix F).

In Myakkahatchee Creek, two freshwater taxa (the copepod Mesocyclopes edax

and dipteran pupae) increased in number with increased inflows. Ten estuarine taxa

became less abundant during elevated inflows, presumably because elevated inflows

either washed these animals out of the creek or the animals avoided the fresh waters

that dominated during high-inflow periods (Table 3.8.1.1).

50

Page 66: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table 3.8.1.1. Abundance responses to mean freshwater inflow (Ln F), ranked by linear regression slope. Other regression statistics are sample size (n), intercept (Int.), slope probability (P) and fit (adjusted r2, as %). DW identifies where serial correlation is possible (x indicates p<0.05 for Durbin-Watson statistic). D is the number of daily inflow values used to calculate mean freshwater inflow.

MYAKKA RIVER

Description Common Name n Int. Slope P r2 DW D

Anchoa mitchilli adults bay anchovy 20 8.751 1.302 0.007 31 97

dipterans, pupae flies, mosquitoes 20 10.422 1.026 0.000 53 x 38

Chaoborus punctipennis larvae phantom midge 20 10.794 0.970 0.000 60 1

ephemeropteran larvae mayflies 20 11.058 0.925 0.000 74 41

Gambusia holbrooki juveniles eastern mosquitofish 14 7.508 0.908 0.001 60 34

Ilyocryptus sp. water flea 13 9.612 0.896 0.004 50 3

Trinectes maculatus juveniles hogchoker 16 11.335 0.783 0.000 63 30

Trinectes maculatus postflexion larvae hogchoker 10 9.888 0.762 0.022 44 60

Diaptomus spp. copepods 14 9.513 0.731 0.013 37 4

odonates, anisopteran larvae dragonflies 15 8.786 0.722 0.000 63 1

Mesocyclops edax copepod 20 12.271 0.718 0.000 58 1

Simocephalus vetulus water flea 19 12.464 0.649 0.008 31 x 1

Cyathura polita isopod 17 11.657 0.641 0.004 39 1

dipterans, ceratopogonid larvae biting midges 13 9.690 0.628 0.012 40 x 1

acari water mites 20 10.469 0.598 0.000 52 1

coleopterans, elmid adults riffle beetles 12 9.145 0.590 0.009 47 1

unidentified Americamysis juveniles opossum shrimps, mysids 20 17.538 0.542 0.029 20 66

Americamysis almyra opossum shrimp, mysid 20 18.406 0.498 0.028 20 77

odonates, zygopteran larvae damselflies 19 10.455 0.477 0.005 35 1

dipterans, chironomid larvae midges 20 13.407 0.456 0.000 59 1

Menidia spp. juveniles silversides 13 11.766 0.408 0.001 60 3

trichopteran larvae caddisflies 20 11.788 0.391 0.011 27 x 1

Osphranticum labronectum copepod 11 9.733 0.356 0.049 29 15

cymothoid sp. a (Lironeca) juveniles isopod 19 20.218 -0.434 0.006 33 32

Bowmaniella dissimilis opossum shrimp, mysid 18 21.688 -0.463 0.029 22 4

pelecypods clams, mussels, oysters 20 18.996 -0.600 0.037 18 3

Hippolyte zostericola postlarvae zostera shrimp 10 20.196 -0.640 0.034 38 6

Sphaeroma quadridentata isopod 20 18.040 -0.650 0.014 25 65

Palaemonetes spp. postlarvae grass shrimp 19 21.407 -0.890 0.008 31 20

Edotea triloba isopod 20 24.137 -0.892 0.004 35 120

decapod mysis shrimp larvae 20 25.076 -0.911 0.000 55 x 92

gobiid preflexion larvae gobies 18 22.376 -0.988 0.023 24 x 120Acartia tonsa copepod 20 26.693 -1.009 0.001 47 1Pseudodiaptomus coronatus copepod 14 24.335 -1.072 0.001 56 27Taphromysis bowmani opossum shrimp, mysid 19 24.080 -1.127 0.027 21 120decapod zoeae crab larvae 20 30.882 -1.195 0.000 66 x 101

51

Page 67: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table 3.8.1.1 (cont.). Description Common Name n Int. Slope P r2 DW D

Anchoa mitchilli postflexion larvae bay anchovy 17 25.641 -1.279 0.001 49 120

Anchoa spp. preflexion larvae anchovies 13 26.245 -1.372 0.000 69 22

Gobiosoma spp. postflexion larvae gobies 11 23.937 -1.379 0.025 38 120

decapod megalopae post-zoea crab larvae 19 27.861 -1.383 0.004 35 120

chaetognaths, sagittid arrow worms 17 27.560 -1.473 0.000 64 24

Evadne tergestina water flea 11 25.952 -1.547 0.009 50 x 36

Labidocera aestiva copepod 18 29.024 -1.730 0.010 31 98

amphipods, caprellid skeleton shrimps 10 27.368 -1.740 0.014 50 101

Parasterope pollex ostracod, seed shrimp 14 29.916 -1.917 0.001 59 120

Anchoa spp. flexion larvae anchovies 16 29.877 -2.004 0.002 49 120

cumaceans cumaceans 20 33.610 -2.055 0.000 60 x 43

fish eggs, Percomorph sciaenid eggs (primarily) 10 41.216 -3.828 0.005 61 92

MYAKKAHATCHEE CREEK

Description Common Name n Int. Slope P r2 DW D

Mesocyclops edax copepod 11 13.803 1.421 0.000 74 41

dipterans, pupae fles, mosquitoes 13 16.011 0.684 0.003 53 x 56

branchiurans, Argulus spp. fish lice 13 17.166 -0.302 0.025 33 x 62

Sphaeroma quadridentata isopod 11 17.471 -0.346 0.036 34 6

cymothoid sp. a (Lironeca) juveniles isopod 10 19.468 -0.449 0.036 37 20

amphipods, gammaridean amphipods 14 23.891 -0.665 0.001 60 44

gobiid preflexion larvae gobies 11 19.223 -0.795 0.006 55 x 20

Americamysis almyra opossum shrimp, mysid 12 24.003 -1.068 0.003 57 3

Anchoa mitchilli juveniles bay anchovy 13 24.980 -1.104 0.001 59 x 88

cumaceans cumaceans 11 22.867 -1.412 0.001 71 75

decapod mysis shrimp larvae 12 25.010 -1.637 0.001 68 101

decapod zoeae crab larvae 13 32.668 -2.727 0.000 85 103

52

Page 68: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

3.8.2 Seine and Trawl.

As noted for distribution responses to freshwater inflow, the relatively short time

series of sampling did not give a wide variety of flows over which to assess abundance

responses; results should therefore be interpreted with caution. Among the 98 pseudo-

species considered in these analyses, abundances of 67% were significantly related to

average inflow (Table 3.8.2.1). Percentages of pseudo-species possessing significant

relationships to inflow were the same for the Myakka River and Myakkahatchee Creek

at 67%. The greatest proportion of variance in abundance was explained by linear

models for 23 pseudo-species and by quadratic models for 42 pseudo-species. Of the

23 linear models, 61% were negative relationships, i.e., increasing abundance with

decreasing inflow. Over 54% of quadratic models suggested greatest abundance at

intermediate inflows (‘intermediate-maximum’); the remaining quadratic models were

relatively evenly divided between positive, negative, and intermediate-minimum

responses. The proportion of abundance responses to inflow differed by life-history

category: residents contrasted with estuarine and offshore spawners in having more

positive responses than negative (Fig. 3.8.2.1). Minimum abundance at intermediate

inflows was only found in a few resident and offshore-spawning pseudo-species. All

best models are plotted in Appendix I.

The majority of best models incorporated long (98–364 days) lags for all life-

history categories (Fig. 3.8.2.2). Of the remaining best models, tidal residents had

relatively few short (1–14 days) abundance responses to inflow, offshore spawners had

relatively few medium (21–91 days) responses, and estuarine spawners were fairly

evenly divided between short and medium lag periods (Fig. 3.8.2.2). Lag periods ranged

from 7 to 364 days, with peaks at 21–28 and 154–168 days, for residents; 1 to 364

days, with peaks at 1 and 364 days, for estuarine spawners; and 1 to 322 days, with a

peak at 1 day, for offshore spawners.

The strongest abundance-inflow relationships—those where inflow explained a

sizeable portion of variance (r2>~60%) in at least eight data points—among residents

were for shoreline-associated species and probably indicated inflow-related changes in

catchability. Increases in abundance of both size classes of Seminole killifish

53

Page 69: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

(Myakkahatchee Creek) and brook silverside (both tributaries) with increased inflows

may have been due to immigration to the study area from upstream freshwater areas

(Figs. I19–20; Figs. I29–30). High abundance of eastern mosquitofish (Figs. I26–27)

and bluegill (Fig. I32–33) at intermediate inflows in both tributaries may be caused by

low catchability a) at low inflows due to occupation of habitats upstream of the study

area and b) at high inflows due to spreading of the populations into a greater habitat

area (facilitated by higher water levels) or into areas inaccessible to our sampling gears.

The longer lag periods (generally over 160 days) supports the latter mechanism as

opposed to simple displacement from the study area. High abundance of smaller

bluegill (Myakkahatchee Creek: Fig. I33) at intermediate inflow levels may be an

example of an isolated data point unduly influencing regressions.

The best-fitting relationships between estuarine spawner abundance and inflow

were varied. Larger hogchoker, for example, observed an increase in abundance in

response to same-day inflow in the Myakka River channel (Fig. I63). This may be due to

enhanced immigration from upstream areas (see above). The apparent high shoreline

abundance of larger striped mojarra at intermediate flows lagged by 210 days in the

Myakka River is a good example of a single data point (zero abundance at flow of 148

cfs) exerting excessive influence on the regression (Fig. I44); removal of this point gives

a negative relationship between abundance and flow that is not easily explained

biologically, because this species prefers low salinities and seems unlikely to have been

displaced from the system over such a long time lag. Maximum abundance of bay

anchovy in Myakkahatchee Creek differed according to size class and flow lag period:

small fish linearly declined in abundance with increasing inflow lagged over the previous

35 days (Fig. I11), whereas intermediate-sized fish (26–35 mm) were found in highest

abundance at either low or high same-day flows (Fig. I12). These examples are not

easily explained in biological terms. Several species had maximum abundance at

intermediate flows, e.g., larger spotted seatrout along shorelines of the Myakka River

and smaller sand seatrout in the channel of Myakkahatchee Creek (Figs. I48 and I51).

The form of this response could be driven by chemical attraction to the Myakka River

and Myakkahatchee Creek: at low flow, the presumed odor attracting nekton to these

tributaries would be relatively weak; with increasing flow, the attractant signal would

54

Page 70: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

increase and enhance recruitment to the tributaries; at very high flows, the chemical

signal would be diluted, leading to diminished abundance. Alternatively, favorable

biological or chemical aspects of the environment such as food supply (stimulated by

phytoplankton growth) or pH may be optimal at intermediate flows.

As with residents and estuarine spawners, offshore-spawning species showed

varying responses to flow. A linear increase in shoreline abundance in relation to flow in

the Myakka River was evident in larger spot (Fig. I54). This response was to flow lagged

over a long period. It is tempting to attribute this to increased flow enhancing

recruitment through beneficial effects on the reproductive population of the species, but

since they are offshore-spawning species this seems unlikely. Tidewater mojarra from

shorelines of Myakkahatchee Creek showed a non-linear decrease in abundance in

tandem with increasing same-day flow (Fig. I43); this may be attributable to

displacement into the Myakka River. Several offshore-spawning species had

relationships with flow that suggested highest abundance at intermediate flow, including

smaller blue crab (in the channel habitat of the Myakka River: Fig. I5), leatherjack (both

size classes in the near-shore Myakka River: Figs. I38–39), and red drum (larger

individuals in the near-shore Myakka River habitat: Fig. I56). The opposite pattern—that

of minimal abundance at intermediate flow— was shown by larger pinfish in the

shoreline habitat of Myakkahatchee Creek (Fig. I47); as noted by MacDonald et al.

(2005), this phenomenon is not readily explained in biological terms.

55

Page 71: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e 3.

8.2.

1, P

age

1 of

3

Tabl

e 3.

8.2.

1. B

est-f

it se

ine

and

traw

l-bas

ed p

seud

o-sp

ecie

s ab

unda

nce

(N̄) r

espo

nse

to c

ontin

uous

ly la

gged

mea

n fre

shw

ater

inflo

w (l

n(cp

ue)

vs. l

n(in

flow

)) fo

r the

Mya

kka

Riv

er (M

R) a

nd M

yakk

ahat

chee

Cre

ek (M

C).

The

type

of r

espo

nse

is e

ither

qua

drat

ic (Q

) or l

inea

r (L)

. D

egre

es o

f

freed

om (d

f), in

terc

ept,

slop

e (L

inea

r coe

f.), p

roba

bilit

y th

at th

e sl

ope

is s

igni

fican

t (Li

near

P),

quad

ratic

coe

ffici

ent (

Qua

d. c

oef.)

, pro

babi

lity

that

the

quad

ratic

coe

ffici

ent i

s si

gnifi

cant

(Qua

d. P

), an

d fit

(r2 ) a

re p

rovi

ded.

The

num

ber o

f day

s in

the

cont

inuo

usly

lagg

ed m

ean

inflo

w is

repr

esen

ted

by D

. A

n “x

” in

DW

indi

cate

s th

at th

e D

urbi

n-W

atso

n st

atis

tic w

as s

igni

fican

t (p<

0.05

), a

poss

ible

indi

catio

n th

at s

eria

l cor

rela

tion

was

pres

ent.

Spec

ies

Com

mon

nam

e R

iver

seg

men

t G

ear

Size

Pe

riod

Res

pons

e df

In

terc

ept

Line

ar

coef

.Li

near

PQ

uad.

C

oef.

Qua

d.

PA

dj-

r2D

W

D

Pala

emon

etes

in

term

ediu

sB

rack

ish

gras

s sh

rimp

M

yakk

a R

iver

se

ines

A

ll si

zes

Mar

. to

Dec

.Q

15

-3

.106

1.

961

0.04

9 -0

.198

0.

032

35

x

21

Pala

emon

etes

pu

gio

Dag

gerb

lade

gr

ass

shrim

p

Mya

kka

Riv

er

sein

es

All

size

s M

ar. t

o D

ec.

Q

15

-6.9

78

3.85

8 0.

013

-0.3

79

0.00

9 43

x

21

Pala

emon

etes

pu

gio

Dag

gerb

lade

gr

ass

shrim

p

Mya

kkah

atch

ee

Cre

ekse

ines

A

ll si

zes

Mar

. to

Dec

.Q

10

-2

.157

1.

801

0.01

5 -0

.261

0.

015

46

x

7

Cal

linec

tes

sapi

dus

Blu

e cr

ab

Mya

kka

Riv

er

sein

es

>=35

Ja

n. to

D

ec.

Q

17

-1.8

85

0.68

9 0.

039

-0.0

57

0.04

0 23

x

10

5

Cal

linec

tes

sapi

dus

Blu

e cr

ab

Mya

kka

Riv

er

traw

ls

<=34

O

ct. t

o M

ay

Q

9 -5

.265

1.

750

0.00

4 -0

.141

0.

004

63

14

0

Cal

linec

tes

sapi

dus

Blu

e cr

ab

Mya

kka

Riv

er

traw

ls

>=35

Ja

n. to

D

ec.

L

18

0.57

0 -0

.062

0.

022

. .

26

17

5

Anch

oa m

itchi

lli

Bay

anc

hovy

M

yakk

a R

iver

se

ines

<=

25

Jan.

to

Dec

.L

18

7.

129

-0.7

90

0.01

2 .

. 31

x

42

Anch

oa m

itchi

lli

Bay

anc

hovy

M

yakk

a R

iver

se

ines

26

to

35Ja

n. to

D

ec.

L

18

9.31

5 -1

.078

0.

001

. .

45

1

Anch

oa m

itchi

lli

Bay

anc

hovy

M

yakk

a R

iver

se

ines

>=

36

Jan.

to

Dec

.L

18

7.

296

-0.9

41

0.00

4 .

. 37

1

Anch

oa m

itchi

lli

Bay

anc

hovy

M

yakk

a R

iver

tra

wls

>=

36

Jan.

to

Dec

.L

18

2.

132

-0.2

83

0.02

1 .

. 26

7

Anch

oa m

itchi

lli

Bay

anc

hovy

M

yakk

ahat

chee

C

reek

sein

es

<=25

Ja

n. to

D

ec.

L

13

6.26

7 -0

.856

0.

020

. .

35

35

Anch

oa m

itchi

lli

Bay

anc

hovy

M

yakk

ahat

chee

C

reek

sein

es

26 to

35

Jan.

to

Dec

.Q

12

11

.458

-5

.641

0.

001

0.75

2 0.

001

66

1

Anch

oa m

itchi

lli

Bay

anc

hovy

M

yakk

ahat

chee

C

reek

traw

ls

<=25

Ja

n. to

D

ec.

Q

12

-495

.887

21

3.88

7 0.

038

- 22.9

440.

037

33

36

4

Anch

oa m

itchi

lli

Bay

anc

hovy

M

yakk

ahat

chee

C

reek

traw

ls

>=36

Ja

n. to

D

ec.

Q

12

-1.3

20

0.64

6 0.

027

-0.0

70

0.03

5 45

x

11

2

Not

ropi

s pe

ters

oni

Coa

stal

shi

ner

Mya

kka

Riv

er

sein

es

<=30

M

ay to

D

ec.

Q

13

-35.

570

12.3

56

0.02

1 -1

.027

0.

021

35

x

168

Icta

luru

s pu

ncta

tus

Cha

nnel

cat

fish

M

yakk

a R

iver

tra

wls

A

ll si

zes

Jul.

to

Oct

.L

6

-1.0

75

0.19

3 0.

011

. .

69

7

Fund

ulus

sem

inol

is

Sem

inol

e ki

llifis

h

Mya

kka

Riv

er

sein

es

<=40

M

ay to

D

ec.

Q

13

-74.

388

26.2

04

0.02

2 -2

.245

0.

020

40

x

287

Fund

ulus

sem

inol

is

Sem

inol

e ki

llifis

h

Mya

kka

Riv

er

sein

es

>=41

S

ep.

to J

ul.

Q

15

-406

.268

13

0.03

0 0.

017

- 10.3

530.

016

36

34

3

56

Page 72: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e 3.

8.2.

1, P

age

2 of

3

Fund

ulus

sem

inol

is

Sem

inol

e ki

llifis

h

Mya

kkah

atch

ee

Cre

ekse

ines

<=

40

May

to

Dec

.L

9

-1.5

22

0.47

4 0.

001

. .

70

11

9

Fund

ulus

sem

inol

is

Sem

inol

e ki

llifis

h

Mya

kkah

atch

ee

Cre

ekse

ines

>=

41

Sep

. to

Jul

.Q

11

12

.414

-6

.613

0.

003

0.85

4 0.

001

87

15

4

Luca

nia

parv

aR

ainw

ater

kill

ifish

M

yakk

a R

iver

se

ines

<=

25

Nov

. to A

ug.

Q

13

-460

.707

14

8.05

1 0.

027

- 11.8

560.

026

53

x

364

Luca

nia

parv

aR

ainw

ater

kill

ifish

M

yakk

a R

iver

se

ines

>=

26

Nov

. to

Jul

.Q

11

-3

01.4

61

96.7

06

0.03

1 -7

.726

0.

030

38

x

343

Luca

nia

parv

aR

ainw

ater

kill

ifish

M

yakk

ahat

chee

C

reek

sein

es

<=25

N

ov.

to Aug

.

L

11

17.8

88

-3.5

69

0.00

7 .

. 50

364

Gam

busi

a ho

lbro

oki

Eas

tern

mos

quito

fish

Mya

kka

Riv

er

sein

es

<=25

Ja

n. to

D

ec.

L

18

-4.8

07

1.12

8 0.

002

. .

41

x

168

Gam

busi

a ho

lbro

oki

Eas

tern

mos

quito

fish

Mya

kka

Riv

er

sein

es

>=26

Ja

n. to

D

ec.

L

18

-4.3

12

0.93

0 0.

021

. .

26

x

168

Gam

busi

a ho

lbro

oki

Eas

tern

mos

quito

fish

Mya

kkah

atch

ee

Cre

ekse

ines

<=

25

Jan.

to

Dec

.Q

12

-3

1.59

0 15

.339

0.

010

-1.6

34

0.01

5 65

161

Gam

busi

a ho

lbro

oki

Eas

tern

mos

quito

fish

Mya

kkah

atch

ee

Cre

ekse

ines

>=

26

Jan.

to

Dec

.Q

12

-3

0.45

8 15

.115

0.

002

-1.6

97

0.00

2 62

161

Poec

ilia la

tipin

na

Sai

lfin

mol

ly

Mya

kka

Riv

er

sein

es

>=30

Ju

l. to

M

ay

Q

15

-378

.540

12

0.45

8 0.

032

-9.5

51

0.03

1 28

x

35

0

Labi

dest

hes

sicc

ulus

B

rook

silv

ersi

de

Mya

kka

Riv

er

sein

es

>=36

Ju

n. to

Ja

n.L

13

-1

.176

0.

426

0.00

0 .

. 64

56

Labi

dest

hes

sicc

ulus

B

rook

silv

ersi

de

Mya

kkah

atch

ee

Cre

ekse

ines

<=

35

Jun.

to

Jan.

L

8 -2

.336

0.

749

0.00

4 .

. 67

112

Labi

dest

hes

sicc

ulus

B

rook

silv

ersi

de

Mya

kkah

atch

ee

Cre

ekse

ines

>=

36

Jun.

to

Jan.

L

8 -1

.692

0.

648

0.01

6 .

. 54

77

Lepo

mis

m

acro

chiru

s

Blu

egill

M

yakk

a R

iver

se

ines

>=

36

Sep

. to Fe

b.

Q

7 -3

.003

1.

217

0.00

6 -0

.101

0.

008

76

21

Lepo

mis

m

acro

chiru

s

Blu

egill

M

yakk

ahat

chee

C

reek

sein

es

<=35

Ju

l. to

Ja

n.Q

5

-82.

562

40.2

39

0.00

5 -4

.634

0.

005

83

23

8

Lepo

mis

m

acro

chiru

s

Blu

egill

M

yakk

ahat

chee

C

reek

traw

ls

<=35

Ju

l. to

Ja

n.Q

5

1.58

9 -0

.730

0.

003

0.08

2 0.

004

85

28

Lepo

mis

m

icro

loph

us

Red

ear s

unfis

h

Mya

kka

Riv

er

sein

es

>=41

S

ep.

to M

ar.

Q

8 45

5.16

0 -1

39.7

1 0.

038

10.7

20

0.03

7 59

280

Lepo

mis

m

icro

loph

us

Red

ear s

unfis

h

Mya

kkah

atch

ee

Cre

ekse

ines

<=

40

May

to

Sep

.Q

5

1.23

0 -1

.064

0.

033

0.18

5 0.

010

91

35

Lepo

mis

m

icro

loph

us

Red

ear s

unfis

h

Mya

kkah

atch

ee

Cre

ekse

ines

>=

41

Sep

. to

Mar

. Q

4

6.64

6 -2

.700

0.

003

0.26

9 0.

005

97

11

9

Olig

oplit

es s

auru

sLe

athe

rjack

M

yakk

a R

iver

se

ines

<=

35

May

to

Aug

.Q

5

-4.7

62

2.40

6 0.

012

-0.2

30

0.01

0 77

35

Olig

oplit

es s

auru

sLe

athe

rjack

M

yakk

a R

iver

se

ines

>=

36

May

to

Aug

.Q

5

-6.9

07

2.95

6 0.

009

-0.2

72

0.00

8 79

1

Euci

nost

omus

gul

a

Silv

er je

nny

M

yakk

a R

iver

se

ines

40

to

70D

ec.

to O

ct.

Q

15

87.5

84

-27.

049

0.03

8 2.

092

0.04

6 48

322

Euci

nost

omus

ha

reng

ulus

Tide

wat

er

moj

arra

M

yakk

a R

iver

se

ines

40

to

70Ja

n. to

D

ec.

Q

17

4.96

9 -1

.515

0.

048

0.13

5 0.

049

21

14

Euci

nost

omus

Ti

dew

ater

M

yakk

a R

iver

se

ines

>=

71

Apr

. to

L

15

2.00

6 -0

.259

0.

031

. .

27

84

57

Page 73: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e 3.

8.2.

1, P

age

3 of

3

hare

ngul

usm

ojar

ra

Dec

. Eu

cino

stom

us

hare

ngul

usTi

dew

ater

m

ojar

ra

Mya

kkah

atch

ee

Cre

ekse

ines

40

to

70Ja

n. to

D

ec.

Q

12

2.87

5 -1

.415

0.

012

0.17

2 0.

030

54

1

Euge

rres

plum

ieri

S

tripe

d m

ojar

ra

Mya

kka

Riv

er

sein

es

>=36

Ju

l. to

D

ec.

Q

9 -5

6.59

9 19

.395

0.

002

-1.6

10

0.00

3 66

x

21

0

Euge

rres

plum

ieri

S

tripe

d m

ojar

ra

Mya

kkah

atch

ee

Cre

ekse

ines

>=

36

Jul.

to

Dec

.L

5

-0.5

84

0.28

8 0.

000

. .

97

63

Lago

don

rhom

boid

es

Pin

fish

M

yakk

a R

iver

se

ines

>=

36

Mar

. to

Jul.

Q

5 -7

1.15

6 25

.721

0.

001

-2.2

33

0.00

1 91

x

14

0

Lago

don

rhom

boid

es

Pin

fish

M

yakk

ahat

chee

C

reek

sein

es

>=36

M

ar. t

o Ju

l.Q

5

2.37

7 -1

.188

0.

025

0.15

2 0.

040

72

1

Cyn

osci

onne

bulo

sus

Spo

tted

seat

rout

M

yakk

a R

iver

se

ines

>=

36

May

to

Aug

.Q

5

-4.1

68

1.82

5 0.

015

-0.1

55

0.01

9 74

x

14

Cyn

osci

onar

enar

ius

San

d se

atro

ut

Mya

kka

Riv

er

sein

es

<=40

M

ay to

N

ov.

L

12

1.64

7 -0

.219

0.

042

. .

30

x

203

Cyn

osci

onar

enar

ius

San

d se

atro

ut

Mya

kka

Riv

er

traw

ls

<=40

M

ay to

N

ov.

L

12

5.03

5 -0

.718

0.

002

. .

56

30

1

Cyn

osci

onar

enar

ius

San

d se

atro

ut

Mya

kkah

atch

ee

Cre

ektra

wls

<=

40

May

to

Nov

.Q

7

-1.7

38

1.48

8 0.

019

-0.2

00

0.01

3 65

70

Baird

iella

ch

ryso

ura

Silv

er p

erch

M

yakk

a R

iver

tra

wls

<=

35

Apr

. to

Jul.

L

5 1.

121

-0.1

74

0.04

3 .

. 59

315

Baird

iella

ch

ryso

ura

Silv

er p

erch

M

yakk

a R

iver

tra

wls

>=

36

Aug

. to N

ov.

Q

5 22

.917

-6

.775

0.

050

0.50

0 0.

046

68

77

Leio

stom

us

xant

huru

sS

pot

Mya

kka

Riv

er

sein

es

>=31

Ja

n. to

Ju

n.L

6

-21.

099

3.65

5 0.

007

. .

73

30

1

Leio

stom

us

xant

huru

sS

pot

Mya

kkah

atch

ee

Cre

ektra

wls

>=

31

Jan.

to

Jun.

Q

5 10

0.70

1 -6

5.79

7 0.

015

10.7

23

0.01

5 72

119

Scia

enop

soc

ella

tus

Red

dru

m

Mya

kka

Riv

er

sein

es

>=41

N

ov.

to M

ar.

Q

4 -6

0.68

0 20

.362

0.

024

-1.6

59

0.02

3 79

168

Gob

ioso

ma

bosc

N

aked

gob

y

Mya

kkah

atch

ee

Cre

ekse

ines

>=

20

Jan.

to

Dec

.Q

12

34

.409

-1

5.34

1 0.

001

1.71

5 0.

001

65

30

1

Mic

rogo

bius

gu

losu

sC

low

n go

by

Mya

kka

Riv

er

sein

es

<=30

M

ay to

M

ar.

Q

16

4.32

8 -1

.560

0.

034

0.16

0 0.

017

43

x

28

Mic

rogo

bius

gu

losu

sC

low

n go

by

Mya

kka

Riv

er

sein

es

>=31

Ja

n. to

D

ec.

Q

17

3.73

4 -1

.186

0.

010

0.10

3 0.

011

34

x

28

Mic

rogo

bius

gu

losu

sC

low

n go

by

Mya

kkah

atch

ee

Cre

ekse

ines

<=

30

May

to

Mar

.L

12

5.

903

-1.0

73

0.00

3 .

. 53

308

Mic

rogo

bius

gu

losu

sC

low

n go

by

Mya

kkah

atch

ee

Cre

ekse

ines

>=

31

Jan.

to

Dec

.Q

12

11

.022

-4

.739

0.

013

0.51

7 0.

019

61

x

273

Trin

ecte

sm

acul

atus

H

ogch

oker

M

yakk

a R

iver

tra

wls

<=

25

Jan.

to

Dec

.Q

17

-3

2.88

4 11

.592

0.

002

-0.9

84

0.00

2 45

x

19

6

Trin

ecte

sm

acul

atus

H

ogch

oker

M

yakk

a R

iver

tra

wls

>=

26

Jan.

to

Dec

.Q

17

1.

708

-0.7

73

0.02

1 0.

098

0.00

4 74

1

Trin

ecte

sm

acul

atus

H

ogch

oker

M

yakk

ahat

chee

C

reek

traw

ls

<=25

Ja

n. to

D

ec.

L

13

23.7

97

-4.6

87

0.00

2 .

. 54

364

Trin

ecte

sm

acul

atus

H

ogch

oker

M

yakk

ahat

chee

C

reek

traw

ls

>=26

Ja

n. to

D

ec.

L

13

15.1

73

-3.0

07

0.00

6 .

. 45

364

58

Page 74: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Abundance vs. Average Inflow(best models for each of 98 pseudospecies)

Life History Category

Residents

Estuarine Spawners

Offshore SpawnersPer

cent

age

of P

seud

ospe

cies

per

Life

His

tory

Cat

egor

y

0

10

20

30

40

50positive negative intermediate-maximum intermediate-minimum not significant

Fig. 3.8.2.1. Summary of regression results assessing abundance (N̄ ) in relation to inflow. Positive and

negative indicate increase and decrease in abundance with increasing inflow, respectively, while

intermediate indicates maximum or minimum abundance at intermediate inflows.

59

Page 75: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Inflow Lag Period (days)

1-14 21-91 98-364

Per

cent

of R

espo

ndin

g P

seud

ospe

cies

per

Life

His

tory

Cat

egor

y

0

20

40

60

80

100residents (45 pseudospecies; significant responses in 69%)estuarine spawners (26 pseudospecies; significant responses in 77%)offshore spawners (27 pseudospecies; significant responses in 52%)

Fig. 3.8.2.2. Summary of regression results assessing abundance (N̄ ) in relation to inflow and lag

period

60

Page 76: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

4.0 CONCLUSIONS

4.1 Descriptive Observations

1.) Dominant Catch. The bay anchovy (Anchoa mitchilli), gobiosoma gobies

(Gobiosoma bosc and G. robustum), the clown goby (Microgobius gulosus) and

the hogchoker (Trinectes maculatus) comprised 91% of the larval, juvenile and

adult fishes collected by the plankton net. Juvenile eastern mosquitofish

(Gambusia holbrooki) and larval silversides (Menidia spp.) were also frequently

collected. Juvenile brown hoplo catfish (Hoplosternum littorale), and introduced

freshwater exotic, were the fourth most abundant juvenile fish in the plankton net

catch.

Seine (shoreline) fish collections were dominated by bay anchovy (Anchoa

mitchilli), silversides (Menidia spp.), eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki),

spot (Leiostomus xanthurus), eucinostomus mojarras (Eucinostomus spp.), and

hogchoker (Trinectes maculatus). The trawl (channel) catch was dominated by

bay anchovy, hogchoker, sand seatrout (Cynoscion arenarius), spot, and

southern kingfish (Menticirrhus americanus).

Decapod zoeae, cumaceans, gammaridean amphipods, the mysid

Americamysis almyra, the copepod Acartia tonsa, the appendicularian

Oikopleura dioica, and unidentified Amerimysis mysid juveniles comprised 80%

of the invertebrates collected by the plankton net. A. tonsa and O. dioica are

river-plume taxa that invaded the tidal river during low inflow periods, whereas

the abundances of all other dominant taxa were typically centered within the tidal

river proper.

Invertebrates collected by seines were dominated by daggerblade grass

shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio) and brackish grass shrimp (P. intermedius);

invertebrate trawl catches primarily consisted of pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus

duorarum) and blue crab (Callinectes sapidus).

2.) Use of Area as Spawning Habitat. Spawning within or near the survey

area was indicated by the presence of either eggs or newly hatched larvae.

61

Page 77: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Eggs of the bay anchovy and striped anchovy were directly identified in the

samples, with bay anchovy eggs being much more abundant. Larval

distributions indicated that skilletfish (Gobiesox strumosus), silversides (Menidia

spp., Membras martinica), unspecified mojarras (gerreids), sand seatrout

(Cynoscion arenarius), kingfishes (Menticirrhus spp.), blennies (blenniids),

gobies (gobiids) and the hogchoker (Trinectes maculatus) spawned within or

near the survey area. Most spawning took place near the mouth of the Myakka

River. Live-bearing species such as the eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia

holbrooki), gulf pipefish (Syngnathus scovelli), chain pipefish (S. louisianae) and

lined seahorse (Hippocampus erectus) probably underwent parturition within the

area.

3.) Use of Area as Nursery Habitat. Estuarine-dependent taxa that use the

tidal river as a nursery area are the numerical dominants in the Myakka River:

Overall, eight of the ten most abundant taxa in the river channel and five of the

ten most abundant taxa in nearshore habitats can be considered estuarine-

dependent. Six of the ten most abundant taxa found in channel and nearshore

habitats of Myakkahatchee Creek are estuarine-dependent. Eight of the most

abundant estuarine-dependent taxa in the Myakka River and Myakkahatchee

Creek spawn outside Charlotte Harbor. Six of these offshore spawners are

among the most economically valuable species in Florida, including menhadens

(Brevoortia spp.), spot, striped mullet (Mugil cephalus), red drum (Sciaenops

ocellatus), blue crab, and pink shrimp. The other two abundant offshore-

spawning taxa include eucinostomus mojarras (Eucinostomus spp.) and southern

kingfish (Menticirrhus americanus), a species of some economic importance.

Four additional common estuarine-dependent species spawn within Charlotte

Harbor. Two of these species have relatively minor direct economic value (i.e.,

hardhead catfish [Ariopsis felis], and sand seatrout [Cynoscion arenarius]), and

two others are among the most abundant species in the system (i.e., hogchoker

and bay anchovy). The juvenile nursery habitats for selected species were

characterized from seine and trawl data in terms of preference for the shoreline

62

Page 78: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

or channel, type of shoreline, physical location (distance from river mouth), and

salinity.

4.) Plankton Catch Seasonality. More taxa were collected by plankton net

during the spring and summer months than at other times of year. Alteration of

inflows would appear to have the lowest potential for impacting many taxa during

the period from December through February, which is the period when the fewest

estuarine taxa were present. The highest potential for impacting many species

would appear to be from March to June, a time of year when naturally low inflows

are coupled with increasing use of the estuary as nursery habitat. The potential

for impact is species-specific. During fall, winter, and early spring, for example,

there could be impact on red drum and menhadens because these fishes recruit

to tidal river nursery habitats during fall and winter. The larvae or early juveniles

of other species, such the bay anchovy, are present year-round.

5.) Seine and Trawl Catch Seasonality. Based on seine and trawl data, few

clear seasonal patterns of taxon richness were evident in either the Myakka River

or Myakkahatchee Creek. Monthly nearshore taxon richness in the Myakka River

was quite variable but appeared highest from May–July and October–December.

There was a lack of clear seasonal trends in taxon richness from the channel

habitat. The relatively short duration of sampling in Myakkahatchee Creek (15

mo) hinders conclusions regarding seasonality of taxon richness. Based on these

data, we tentatively conclude that the potential for impacting the greatest number

of species by anthropogenic alteration of freshwater inflows in the Myakka River

occurs from May–July and October–December. Overall abundances and

abundances of new recruits of nekton taxa indicate extensive use of the tidal

river habitat during all months, but temporal resource partitioning among species

is evident. Estuarine spawners have peaks in all months except January, and

offshore spawners have peaks in all months except August and September.

Many offshore spawners had peaks in abundance from mid-autumn to mid-

summer, while estuarine spawners tended to peak in summer. Tidal river

residents’ abundance peaks included late summer–late winter and late

spring/early summer periods. Recruitment peaks —indicated by elevated

63

Page 79: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

abundance of the smallest size classes taken in seines and trawls— are

concentrated in late autumn and winter for offshore spawners, whereas those for

estuarine spawners and residents are concentrated in summer.

6.) Differences in organism abundance between the Myakka River and Myakkahatchee Creek. The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100

m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek,

particularly for estuarine-dependent taxa using the area as a nursery. This was

largely due to the importance of the lower Myakka River—the region below its

confluence with Myakkahatchee Creek to the outflow into Charlotte Harbor—for

these taxa. Division of the study area into ~5-km reaches generally shows that

CPUE in Myakkahatchee Creek (river km 22.3–27.3) is very similar to the

equivalent reach within the Myakka River (Appendices D and E).

4.2 Responses to Freshwater Inflow

1.) Plankton Catch Distribution Responses. Among organisms collected

by plankton net, there were 41 significant distribution responses to inflow into the

tidal Myakka River. All except one (98%) were negative, indicating that the vast

majority of taxa collected by plankton net moved downstream in response to

increased inflow. The single positive relationship involved postlarvae of the

zostera shrimp, Hippolyte zostericola. Although this relationship may be

spurious, postlarval Hippolyte primarily occur in deeper waters near the mouth of

the river. Upstream movement could have been caused by strengthening of two-

layered circulation by inflow, causing animals in the lower part of the water

column to move farther upstream as inflows increased.

The plankton catch from Myakkahatchee Creek produced only seven

distribution responses, and three of these (57%) were positive (pelecypods,

decapod mysis larvae, and an isopod, Sphaeroma quadridentata). Two possible

explanations for upstream movement in Myakkahatchee Creek are (1) its largely

straight, dredged channel facilitated two-layered circulation and (2) downstream

64

Page 80: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

movement of animals within the Myakka River increased the abundance of

certain taxa in the general area of Myakkahatchee Creek. However, decapod

mysis larvae generally moved well downstream of the mouth of Myakkahatchee

Creek during elevated inflows into the Myakka River, which would render the

second explanation less likely. Pelecypods included both freshwater and

estuarine taxa.

2.) Seine and Trawl Catch Distribution Responses. Over one-half (52%) of

the 82 pseudo-species/gear/river combinations (hereafter simply referred to as

‘pseudo-species’) evaluated for distributional responses to freshwater inflow

exhibited significant responses. Similar percentages of pseudo-species showed

significant relationships to inflow in the Myakka River (53%) and Myakkahatchee

Creek (50%). Over 72% of the best-fitting significant responses were negative,

and approximately half of the best models were associated with long flow lag

periods. Of the ten best-fitting models suggesting movement upstream with

increasing inflow, some may be spurious because the gradients of the regression

slopes are very small, while in other cases outlying points may have unduly

influence regression results. Several tidal river residents centered in the Myakka

River above its confluence with Myakkahatchee Creek may have moved

downstream with increasing flow; individuals near the downstream extent of

these species’ distributions could have been displaced from the entire system

upon encountering the additional flow of Myakkahatchee Creek, thus leaving

their centers of abundance above the confluence and giving the impression of

upstream movement. The ten overall best-fitting seine or trawl models among

residents most commonly incorporated long flow lag periods. Best models among

estuarine-dependent estuarine spawners tended to include medium to long flow

lag periods, while those of estuarine-dependent offshore spawners principally

possessed long flow lags, as well as several short-term lags. Best models

explained 22 to 92% of the variability in distribution. The highest r2 values were

found among both estuarine-dependent and resident species and incorporated

flow lag periods.

3.) Plankton Catch Abundance Responses. Abundance responses were

65

Page 81: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

found for 51 taxa in the Myakka River plankton-net collections, with half (48%)

being positive, wherein abundance increased as inflow increased. Of the 23

positive responses, 16 involved freshwater taxa that were introduced

downstream with increasing inflows, and seven involved estuarine or estuarine-

dependent taxa. The latter group consisted of bay anchovy adults, two early

stages of hogchoker, two stages of Americamysis mysids, juvenile silversides

(Menidia) and an estuarine isopod, Cyathura polita. Menidia spp. are estuarine

fishes, but at least one species, M. beryllina, is known complete its life cycle

within fresh water as well. Menidia’s response time was too short (3 d) to reflect

a true population response, as was that of Cyathura (1 d). Short response times

by estuarine taxa may reflect behaviors that allow organisms to reposition

themselves in response to increased inflow. Animals may move into the channel

or, in the case of benthic forms such as Cyathura, may move into the water

column to take advantage of the fresh water’s downstream flow, causing the

catch of such animals to increase quickly as a function of inflow (Robins et al.

2005). On the other hand, the responses of the bay anchovy, hogchoker and

Americamysis had durations that were commensurate with the effects of

improved reproductive output or improvement in growth and survival. Inflow

explained 20-63% of the variation in these taxa. These responses are potentially

meaningful to inflow management.

Most plume-associated taxa, which are typically found in higher salinity

estuarine waters, moved away from the mouth of the tidal river during high-inflow

periods, giving them a negative abundance correlation with inflow. Several

peracarid crustaceans that are usually most abundant within the interior of the

tidal river, such as cymothoid isopods (Lironeca sp.), the isopod Edotea triloba,

the isopod Sphaeroma quadridentata, the mysid Bowmaniella dissimilis, and the

mysid Taphromysis bowmani, also decreased in abundance during high inflow

periods. Several of these appeared to leave the survey area during high-inflow

periods.

4.) Seine and Trawl Catch Abundance Responses. Two-thirds (67%) of

pseudo-species tested for relationships between abundance and inflow produced

66

Page 82: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

statistically significant results. Percentages of pseudo-species possessing

significant relationships to inflow were the same for the Myakka River and

Myakkahatchee Creek at 67%. The best-fitting regression models were linear for

23 pseudo-species and quadratic for 42 pseudo-species. Of the 23 linear

models, 61% were negative relationships, i.e., increasing abundance with

decreasing inflow. Over 54% of quadratic models suggested greatest abundance

at intermediate inflows (‘intermediate-maximum’); the remaining quadratic

models were relatively evenly divided between positive, negative, and

intermediate-minimum responses. The proportion of abundance responses to

inflow differed by life-history category: residents contrasted with estuarine and

offshore spawners in having more positive responses than negative. The best-

fitting models tended to incorporate longer lags for all life-history categories. The

strongest abundance-inflow relationships among residents were for shoreline-

associated species and probably indicated inflow-related changes in catchability.

For linear increases in abundance with flow, increased inflows may have

immigration to the study area from upstream freshwater areas. High abundance

at intermediate inflows may be caused by low catchability a) at low inflows due to

occupation of habitats upstream of the study area and b) at high inflows due to

spreading of the populations into a greater habitat area (facilitated by higher

water levels) or into areas inaccessible to our sampling gears. The best-fitting

relationships between estuarine spawner abundance and inflow were varied.

Some observed an increase in abundance in response to inflow. This may be

due to enhanced immigration from upstream areas (see above). Several species

had maximum abundance at intermediate flow levels. The form of this response

could be driven by chemical attraction to the Myakka River and Myakkahatchee

Creek: at low flow, the presumed odor attracting nekton to these tributaries would

be relatively weak; with increasing flow, the attractant signal would increase and

enhance recruitment to the tributaries; at very high flows, the chemical signal

would be diluted, leading to diminished abundance. Alternatively, favorable

biological or chemical aspects of the environment such as food supply

(stimulated by phytoplankton growth) or pH may be optimal at intermediate flows.

67

Page 83: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

As with residents and estuarine spawners, offshore-spawning species showed

varying responses to flow. A linear increase in shoreline abundance in relation to

flow in the Myakka River was evident in larger spot, for example. Tidewater

mojarra from shorelines of Myakkahatchee Creek showed a non-linear decrease

in abundance in tandem with increasing same-day flow; this may be attributable

to displacement into the Myakka River. Several offshore-spawning species had

relationships with flow that suggested highest abundance at intermediate flow.

The opposite pattern—minimal abundance at intermediate flow—is not readily

explained in biological terms.

68

Page 84: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

5.0 REFERENCES

1. Alldredge AL, King JM (1985) The distance demersal zooplankton migrate above the benthos: implications for predation. Mar Biol 84:253-260

2. Browder JA (1985) Relationship between pink shrimp production on the Tortugas grounds and water flow patterns in the Florida Everglades. Bull Mar Sci 37:839-856

3. Christensen V (1998) Fishery-induced changes in a marine ecosystem: insight from models of the Gulf of Thailand. J Fish Biol 53 (Supplement A):128-142

4. Colton JB, Honey KA, Temple RF (1961) The effectiveness of sampling methods used to study the distribution of larval herring in the Gulf of Maine. J du Conseil 26:180-190

5. Cronin TW (1982) Estuarine retention of larvae of the crab Rhithropanopeus harisii. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Sci 15:109-131

6. Dahlberg MD (1970) Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico menhadens, genus Brevoortia (Pisces: Clupeidae). Bull Fla Mus Nat Hist 15:91-162

7. Day JW, Hall CAS, Kemp WM, Yáñez-Arancibia A (1989) Estuarine Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York

8. Drinkwater KF (1986) On the role of freshwater outflow on coastal marine ecosystems - a workshop summary. In: Skreslet S (ed) The Role of Freshwater Outflow in Coastal Marine Ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p 429-438

9. Duggins CF Jr., Karlin AA, Relyea K, and Yerger RW (1986) Systematics of the key silverside, Menidia conchorum, with comments on other Menidia species (Pisces: Atherinidae). Tulane Studies in Zoology and Botany 25:133-150

10. Echelle AA and Echelle A F (1997) Patterns of abundance and distribution among members of a unisexual-bisexual complex of fishes (Atherinidae: Menidia). Copeia 2:249-259.

11. Estevez, ED, Tinsky M, Blanchard G (1991) Distribution and abundance of larval and juvenile fishes in the tidal waters of the Myakka River, Sarasota and Charlotte counties, Florida. Report prepared by Mote Marine Laboratory for the Sarasota County Office of Environmnetal Monitoring.

69

Page 85: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

12. Fore PL, Baxter KN (1972) Diel fluctuations in the catch of larval gulf menhaden, Brevoortia patronus, at Galveston extrance, Texas. Trans Am Fish Soc 101:729-732

13. Greenwood MFD, Matheson RE Jr., MacDonald TC, and McMichael RH Jr. (2004) Assessment of relationships between freshwater inflow and populations of fish and selected macroinvertebrates in the Peace River and Shell Creek, Florida. Report to the Southwest Florida Water Management District by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, St. Petersburg.

14. Grimes CB (2001) Fishery production and the Mississippi River Discharge. Fisheries 26:17-26

15. Haney JF (1988) Diel patterns of zooplankton behavior. Bull Mar Sci 43:583-603

16. Hobson ES, Chess J R (1976) Trophic interactions among fishes and zooplankters near shore at Santa Catalina Island, California. Fish Bull 74:567-598

17. Imperial MT, Robadue D, Hennessey TM (1992) An evolutionary perspective on the development and assessment of the National Estuary Program. Coastal Management 20:311-341

18. Jones PW, Martin FD, Hardy JD (1978) Development of Fishes of the Mid-Atlantic Bight - an atlas of egg, larval, and juvenile stages, Vol 1, Acipenseridae through Ictaluridae. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Biol. Rep. FWS/OBS-78/12

19. King BD (1971) Study of migratory patterns of fish and shellfish through a natural pass. Texas Parks and Wildlife Dept Tech Ser 9:1-54

20. Lyczkowski-Shultz J, Steen JPJ (1991) Diel vertical distribution of red drum Sciaenops ocellatus larvae in the north central Gulf of Mexico. Fish Bull 89:631-641

21. MacDonald TC, Peebles EB, Greenwood MFD, Matheson RE Jr, McMichael RH Jr. (2005) Freshwater Inflow Effects On Fishes And Invertebrates In The Hillsborough River Estuary. Report Prepared for by the University of South Florida College of Marine Science and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute for the Southwest Florida Water Management District.

22. Mann KH, Lazier JRN (1996) Dynamics of Marine Ecosystems. Blackwell Science, Cambridge, Massachusetts

70

Page 86: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

23. Matheson RE Jr, Camp DK, Sogard SM, Bjorgo KA (1999) Changes in Seagrass-associated Fish and Crustacean Communities on Florida Bay Mud Banks: The Effects of Recent Ecosystem Changes? Estuaries 22: 534-551.

24. Matheson RE Jr, Greenwood MFD, MacDonald TC, and McMichael RH Jr (2004) Assessment of relationships between freshwater inflow and populations of fish and selected macroinvertebrates in the lower Alafia River, Florida. Report prepared by the Florida Marine Research Institute for the Southwest Florida Water Management District.

25. McCleave JD, Kleckner RC (1982) Selective tidal stream transport in the estuarine migration of glass eels of the American eel (Anguilla rostrata). J du Conseil 40:262-271

26. Mees J, Dewicke A, Hamerlynck O (1993) Seasonal composition and spatial distribution of hyperbenthic communitites along estuarine gradients in the Westerschelde. Neth J Aquat Ecol 27:359-376

27. Merriner JV, Kreite WH, Grant GC (1976) Seasonality, abundance, and diversity of fishes in the Piankatank River, Virginia (1970-1971). Chesapeake Sci 17:238-245

28. Morgan SG (1995a) Life and death in the plankton: larval mortality and adaptation. In: McEdward L (ed) Ecology of Marine Invertebrate Larvae. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida

29. Morgan SG (1995b) The timing of larval release. In: McEdward L (ed) Ecology of Marine Invertebrate Larvae. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida

30. Nelson GA, Leffler D (2001) Abundance, spatial distribution, and mortality of young-of-the-year spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus) along the Gulf Coast of Florida. Gulf of Mexico Sci. 19:30-42

31. Okey TA and Pauly D (1999) A mass-balanced model of trophic flows in Prince William Sound: decompartmentalizing ecosystem knowledge.Ecosystem Approaches for Fisheries Management, Alaska Sea Grant College Program, AK-SG-99-01:621-634

32. Olmi EJ III (1994) Vertical migration of blue crab Callinectes sapidusmegalopae: implications for transport in estuaries. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 113:39-54

33. Peebles E B (1987) Early life history of the sand seatrout, Cynoscion arenarius, in southwest Florida. Tampa, Florida, University of South Florida

71

Page 87: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

34. Peebles EB (1996) Ontogenetic habitat and diet selection in estuarine-dependent fishes: comparisons of observed patterns with model predictions. Tampa, Florida, University of South Florida

35. Peebles EB (2002) Temporal resolution of biological and physical influences on bay anchovy Anchoa mitchilli egg abundance near a river-plume frontal zone. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 237:257-269

36. Peebles EB (2004) An analysis of fish and invertebrate data related to the establishment of minimum flows for the Tampa Bypass Canal. Report prepared by the University of South Florida College of Marine Science for the Southwest Florida Water Management District

37. Peebles EB, Flannery MS, Matheson Jr. RE, Rast JP (1991) Fish nursery utilization of the Little Manatee River Estuary (Florida): Relationships to physiochemical gradients and the distribution of food resources. In: Treat SF, Clark PA (eds) Proceedings, Tampa Bay Area Scientific Information Symposium 2, February 27 - March 1, 1991. Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, Tampa, Florida; p 341-368.

38. Peebles EB, Flannery MS (1992) Fish nursery use of the Little Manatee River estuary (Florida): Relationships with freshwater discharge. Southwest Florida Water Management District, Brooksville, Florida

39. Rozas LP, Minello TJ (1997) Estimating densities of small fishes and decapod crustaceans in shallow estuarine habitats: a review of sampling design with focus on gear selection. Estuaries 20:199-213

40. Sinha M, Mukhopadhyay MK, Mitra PM, Bagchi MM, Karamkar HC (1996) Impact of Farakka barrage on the hydrology and fishery of Hooghly estuary. Estuaries 19:710-722

41. Sutcliffe WH Jr (1972) Some relations of land drainage, nutrients, particulate material, and fish catch in two eastern Canadian bays. J Fish Res Bd Can 29:357-362

42. Sutcliffe WH Jr (1973) Correlations between seasonal river discharge and local landings of American lobster (Homarus americanus) and Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus). J Fish Res Bd Can 30:19-30

43. SWFWMD (2004) Myakka River: comprehensive watershed management plan. Southwest Florida Water Management District, Brooksville, FL

44. Temple RF, Fisher CC (1965) Vertical distribution of the planktonic stages of penaeid shrimp. Pub Inst Mar Sci, Univ Texas 10:59-67

72

Page 88: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

45. Tsou TS, Matheson RE Jr. (2002) Seasonal Changes in the Nekton Community of the Suwannee River Estuary and the Potential Impacts of Freshwater Withdrawal. Estuaries 25: 1372-1381.

46. Wilkins EPH, Lewis RM (1971) Abundance and distribution of yound Atlantic menhaden, Brevoortia tyrannus, in the White Oak River estuary, North Carolina. Fish Bull 69:783-789

47. Williams AB, Bynum KH (1972) A ten-year study of meroplankton in North Carolina estuaries: amphipods. Chesapeake Sci 13:175-192

48. Winner BL, McMichael RH Jr (1997) Evaluation of a new type of box splitter designed for subsampling estuarine ichthyofauna. Trans Am Fish Soc 126:1041-1047

73

Page 89: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Appendix A:

Plankton data summary tables

A-1

Page 90: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table A1, page 1 of 6.

Plankton-net catch statistics for the Myakka River

(May 2003 through December 2004, n=280)

O i li t d i h l ti dTaxon Common Name Number Collection Kmu Su Mean CPUE Max CPUECollected Frequency (km) (psu) (No./10³ m³) (No./10³ m³)

foraminiferans foraminiferans 3 2 7.4 21.4 0.07 35.3Liriope tetraphylla hydromedusa 13 3 7.6 20.9 0.31 124.6Clytia sp. hydromedusa 197 30 12.3 15.6 4.11 324.9medusa sp. a hydromedusa 1 1 5.5 8.9 0.02 14.7medusa sp. b hydromedusa 42 7 7.2 24.5 0.99 241.8medusa sp. d hydromedusa 74 6 25.3 7.4 1.45 445.0Mnemiopsis mccradyi comb jelly, ctenophore 25099 42 16.0 19.2 598.17 259704.5Beroe ovata sea walnut, ctenophore 357 5 14.8 13.4 6.87 4497.5turbellarians flatworms 14 7 15.9 14.0 0.30 119.0nemerteans ribbon worms 1 1 37.8 0.1 0.02 15.4nematodes roundworms, threadworms 2 2 14.8 4.2 0.04 15.0polychaetes sand worms, tube worms 4080 171 9.6 12.6 82.90 10703.9oligochaetes freshwater worms 97 29 30.7 0.9 1.94 213.9hirudinoideans leeches 63 35 20.4 4.5 1.22 78.6cladocerans, unidentified water fleas 42 3 37.7 0.2 0.78 501.9cladocerans, Daphnia spp. water fleas 199 10 37.0 0.3 3.64 1535.2Simocephalus vetulus water flea 11430 113 34.2 0.3 213.24 33741.2Ceridodaphnia sp. water flea 5 4 26.0 0.1 0.10 28.7Bunops sp. water flea 33 12 31.9 0.1 0.66 74.5Grimaldina brazzai water flea 100 20 32.3 0.1 1.95 447.3Ilyocryptus sp. water flea 1540 64 30.4 0.1 29.64 2025.1Sida crystallina water flea 821 51 30.6 0.3 17.08 1821.3Latona setifera water flea 67 11 32.9 0.2 1.28 425.9Penilia avirostris water flea 121 11 5.9 22.8 2.98 597.8Pseudosida bidentata water flea 4 2 24.7 0.1 0.08 31.1Latonopsis fasciculata water flea 1266 44 34.7 0.1 24.47 3943.2Euryalona occidentalis water flea 6 5 33.2 0.1 0.12 26.3Leydigia sp. water flea 28 8 34.9 0.1 0.53 89.6Moinadaphnia macleayii water flea 3 1 29.6 0.2 0.06 40.3Evadne tergestina water flea 3581 29 11.0 22.4 93.98 56978.0decapod zoeae crab larvae 377312 202 14.5 13.7 7826.67 307800.9decapod mysis shrimp larvae 7251 154 13.4 15.9 155.75 18172.3decapod megalopae post-zoea crab larvae 23553 151 20.7 8.2 461.39 41828.5shrimps, unidentified postlarvae shrimps 696 5 5.8 21.5 16.43 7775.4penaeid postlarvae penaeid shrimps 95 6 8.5 25.2 2.70 941.8penaeid metamorphs penaeid shrimps 7 5 5.7 13.2 0.15 43.7Farfantepenaeus duorarum juveniles pink shrimp 43 13 10.9 8.9 0.76 130.4Farfantepenaeus duorarum adults pink shrimp 3 2 11.5 15.9 0.06 29.9Lucifer faxoni juveniles and adults shrimp 34 15 16.0 16.0 0.67 107.1Leptochela serratorbita postlarvae combclaw shrimp 5 2 5.1 21.8 0.11 58.0Palaemonetes spp. postlarvae grass shrimp 864 88 14.5 15.8 18.25 1286.8Palaemonetes paludosus juveniles grass shrimp 1 1 18.8 0.2 0.02 12.0Palaemonetes pugio juveniles daggerblade grass shrimp 112 41 21.5 2.9 2.33 296.7Palaemonetes pugio adults daggerblade grass shrimp 26 16 24.6 1.5 0.56 99.3Palaemonetes vulgaris juveniles grass shrimp 3 1 5.5 19.9 0.07 46.6Periclimenes spp. postlarvae shrimps 1 1 3.7 25.5 0.02 13.7alphaeid postlarvae snapping shrimps 1008 26 6.9 22.6 22.42 4520.1alphaeid juveniles snapping shrimps 2 1 5.5 2.6 0.04 25.1Leptalpheus forceps juveniles snapping shrimp 2 2 4.6 6.3 0.04 12.1Hippolyte zostericola postlarvae zostera shrimp 276 25 6.2 22.9 6.16 933.0Hippolyte zostericola juveniles zostera shrimp 4 1 8.8 10.7 0.07 46.5Ogyrides alphaerostris juveniles and adults estuarine longeye shrimp 35 9 6.3 18.0 0.69 142.2Ambidexter symmetricus postlarvae shrimp 277 16 5.2 24.3 5.96 1441.5Ambidexter symmetricus juveniles shrimp 11 5 5.4 20.1 0.24 72.5Ambidexter symmetricus adults shrimp 3 1 5.5 7.9 0.06 41.4astacidean juveniles crayfish 1 1 40.2 0.1 0.02 13.6callianassid postlarvae ghost shrimps 1 1 11.4 20.9 0.02 16.9Callianassa spp. juveniles ghost shrimps 8 2 6.4 23.0 0.18 91.1Upogebia spp. postlarvae mud shrimps 10 4 6.4 23.2 0.24 80.4Euceramus praelongus megalops larvae olivepit porcelain crab 24 1 5.5 22.2 0.62 427.3Petrolisthes armatus juveniles porcelain crab 2 1 16.6 20.8 0.05 35.1

A-2

Page 91: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table A1, page 2 of 6.

Plankton-net catch statistics for the Myakka River

(May 2003 through December 2004, n=280)

O i li t d i h l ti dTaxon Common Name Number Collection Kmu Su Mean CPUE Max CPUECollected Frequency (km) (psu) (No./10³ m³) (No./10³ m³)

Callinectes sapidus juveniles blue crab 52 27 16.2 8.4 1.04 96.2portunid juveniles swimming crabs 2 2 4.6 10.8 0.04 13.3Rhithropanopeus harrisii juveniles Harris mud crab 9 4 19.2 1.7 0.43 153.8unidentified Americamysis juveniles opossum shrimps, mysids 44828 187 22.0 4.4 938.05 88638.9Americamysis almyra opossum shrimp, mysid 97603 202 22.1 4.3 1977.81 59051.5Americamysis bahia opossum shrimp, mysid 1936 21 11.0 8.8 35.45 8043.5Americamysis stucki opossum shrimp, mysid 1672 20 5.1 23.3 32.93 14530.0Bowmaniella dissimilis opossum shrimp, mysid 13734 116 20.1 8.7 272.00 24902.0Spelaeomysis sp. opossum shrimp, mysid 9 2 15.6 10.8 0.21 80.4Taphromysis bowmani opossum shrimp, mysid 23586 94 32.4 0.6 459.60 47134.9cumaceans cumaceans 244605 143 10.4 18.9 5210.12 271274.0Sinelobus stanfordi tanaid 18 12 15.7 10.6 0.37 62.8Apseudes sp. tanaid 7 2 19.1 7.7 0.13 78.6Hargeria rapax tanaid 9 3 21.8 7.1 0.20 80.4isopod sp. a isopod 1 1 5.5 22.2 0.03 17.8Cyathura polita isopod 360 51 20.2 1.2 9.21 2214.4Xenanthura brevitelson isopod 9 5 8.0 9.4 0.17 51.5Munna reynoldsi isopod 6106 58 10.9 18.1 115.88 49471.0Probopyrus sp. (attached ) isopod 5 5 25.0 1.6 0.10 13.5Anopsilana jonesi isopod 1 1 20.7 7.7 0.02 12.6cymothoid sp. a (Lironeca) juveniles isopod 1082 117 16.0 12.8 21.87 1440.1Cassidinidea ovalis isopod 12 8 16.4 13.0 0.24 52.7Harrieta faxoni isopod 2 2 29.3 3.9 0.04 12.7Sphaeroma quadridentata isopod 1881 82 32.2 4.0 35.56 8928.1Sphaeroma terebrans isopod 310 57 30.5 4.0 5.89 1227.6Sphaeroma walkeri isopod 6 3 26.0 2.2 0.11 50.1Edotea triloba isopod 12598 123 22.0 7.6 256.57 48294.7Erichsonella attenuata isopod 54 12 7.5 17.2 1.12 209.1Erichsonella filiforme isopod 3 3 6.1 23.9 0.05 13.6amphipods, gammaridean amphipods 100618 273 24.3 5.7 2030.04 242479.8amphipods, caprellid skeleton shrimps 732 29 9.0 22.4 14.73 3688.7cirriped nauplius stage barnacles 32419 54 6.6 22.4 770.17 75717.7branchiurans, Argulus spp. fish lice 193 85 15.9 11.3 3.94 123.6unidentified harpacticoids copepods 29 8 11.7 8.2 0.78 215.3Alteutha sp. copepod 2 2 12.3 12.5 0.04 13.7Oncaea spp. copepods 1 1 16.6 11.1 0.02 14.5siphonostomatids parasitic copepods 7 1 5.5 22.2 0.18 124.6unidentified freshwater cyclopoids copepods 45 21 28.6 0.6 0.87 160.4Cyclops spp. copepods 48 3 29.6 0.2 1.07 708.3Macrocyclops albidus copepods 514 50 35.9 0.2 10.16 3305.5Mesocyclops edax copepod 2446 133 29.1 0.3 50.27 2432.8Oithona spp. copepods 6723 26 6.5 20.7 159.56 34261.4Orthocyclops modestus copepod 281 58 32.0 0.3 5.51 814.2Saphirella spp. copepods 9 2 4.9 2.8 0.16 84.4paracalanids copepods 8 5 11.7 19.2 0.16 42.3Acartia tonsa copepod 77072 116 8.3 21.1 1777.04 124610.1Calanopia americana copepod 12 3 34.9 2.0 0.24 133.9Centropages hamatus copepod 11 2 10.8 18.7 0.24 130.8Centropages velificatus copepod 6 2 3.7 22.4 0.14 81.3Diaptomus spp. copepods 1103 33 32.2 0.3 19.83 5564.2Eurytemora affinis copepod 1 1 11.4 15.9 0.02 14.2Labidocera aestiva copepod 10661 69 6.5 22.1 226.98 29876.5Osphranticum labronectum copepod 40 19 32.9 0.2 0.76 119.0Pseudodiaptomus coronatus copepod 2977 76 9.3 19.6 66.02 6603.3Temora turbinata copepod 58 15 5.6 20.4 1.26 133.4Euconchoecia chierchiae ostracod, seed shrimp 6 2 10.5 22.4 0.18 66.4Sarsiella zostericola ostracod, seed shrimp 11 5 15.0 18.0 0.25 51.2Parasterope pollex ostracod, seed shrimp 2294 44 6.7 22.0 53.59 13054.8ostracods, podocopid ostracods, seed shrimps 505 81 27.3 4.5 10.08 1007.4collembolas, podurid springtails 22 10 31.2 0.1 0.50 90.8ephemeropteran larvae mayflies 7367 137 35.6 0.1 142.63 24193.1

A-3

Page 92: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table A1, page 3 of 6.

Plankton-net catch statistics for the Myakka River

(May 2003 through December 2004, n=280)

O i li t d i h l ti dTaxon Common Name Number Collection Kmu Su Mean CPUE Max CPUECollected Frequency (km) (psu) (No./10³ m³) (No./10³ m³)

odonates, anisopteran larvae dragonflies 85 36 29.9 0.2 1.61 136.7odonates, zygopteran larvae damselflies 139 58 31.5 0.2 2.66 86.4hemipterans, belostomatid adults giant water bugs 6 3 35.2 0.1 0.16 69.6hemipterans, corixid juveniles water boatmen 15 9 29.3 0.2 0.30 46.2hemipterans, corixid adults water boatmen 75 28 30.5 1.2 1.44 123.2hemipterans, gerrid adults water striders 19 12 29.3 1.2 0.35 45.6hemipterans, naucorid adults creeoing water bugs 5 3 33.7 0.1 0.10 33.1hemipterans, nepid adults water scorpions 3 3 29.6 0.5 0.06 13.3hemipterans, notonectid adults backswimmers 2 2 32.1 0.1 0.03 12.7hemipterans, pleid adults pygmy backswimmers 13 10 29.0 0.1 0.25 33.1megalopterans, corydalid larvae dobsonflies 1 1 37.8 0.1 0.02 12.7neuropterans, Climacia spp. larvae spongillaflies 66 27 36.8 0.1 1.22 99.8coleopterans, chrysomelid larvae beetles 1 1 40.2 0.2 0.02 13.5coleopterans, curculionid adults beetles 9 8 17.1 9.0 0.17 24.5coleopterans, dytiscid larvae predaceous diving beetles 36 11 35.8 0.1 0.70 112.3coleopterans, noterid adults burrowing water beetles 64 27 31.2 0.6 1.21 113.9coleopterans, dryopid larvae long-toed water beetles 13 3 39.8 0.1 0.24 127.2coleopterans, elmid larvae riffle beetles 79 23 39.0 0.2 1.51 168.1coleopterans, elmid adults riffle beetles 38 20 26.7 0.6 0.71 88.6coleopterans, lutrochid larvae beetles 6 4 36.8 0.1 0.12 27.2coleopterans, gyrinid larvae whirligig beetles 85 31 36.8 0.1 1.62 173.5coleopterans, gyrinid adults whirligig beetles 95 9 33.0 0.3 2.81 1541.3coleopterans, haliplid larvae crawling water beetles 24 4 36.8 0.2 0.41 123.2coleopterans, noterid larvae burrowing water beetles 43 7 38.3 0.2 0.75 212.7coleopterans, dytiscid adults predaceous diving beetles 21 11 29.4 2.1 0.44 90.8coleopterans, scirtid larvae marsh beetles 36 7 39.9 0.2 0.69 214.1coleopterans, scirtid adults marsh beetles 1 1 40.2 0.3 0.02 12.9dipterans, pupae flies, mosquitoes 2355 150 30.6 0.6 47.45 1908.2dipterans, ceratopogonid larvae biting midges 73 32 28.8 0.9 1.38 90.3dipteran, Chaoborus punctipennis larvae phantom midge 2487 144 23.0 0.3 51.74 2891.0dipterans, chironomid larvae midges 1841 132 33.5 0.3 37.61 1623.6dipterans, ephydrid larvae shore flies 1 1 26.8 0.1 0.02 14.3dipterans, stratiomyid larvae soldier flies 10 6 21.9 0.1 0.19 48.2dipterans, sciomyzid larvae marsh flies 30 11 36.9 1.2 0.57 127.2dipterans, syrphid larvae hoverflies 1 1 26.8 0.1 0.02 14.3dipterans, tabanid larvae deer flies 1 1 37.8 0.1 0.02 15.4trichopteran larvae caddisflies 645 75 35.6 0.2 12.15 1590.1lepidopterans, pyralid larvae aquatic caterpillars 10 5 36.8 1.0 0.18 63.6Limulus polyphemus larvae horsehoe crab 3 1 5.5 7.9 0.06 41.4acari water mites 325 83 33.3 0.2 6.16 251.8gastropods, prosobranch snails 7557 152 22.8 3.7 151.16 43643.6gastropods, opisthobranch sea slugs 79 18 16.1 13.0 1.66 470.8pelecypods clams, mussels, oysters 4762 97 26.4 5.0 103.74 21068.5Lolliguncula brevis juveniles bay squid 8 3 7.4 23.5 0.14 69.8brachiopod, Glottidia pyramidata larvae lamp shell 1804 5 4.4 22.5 44.28 18511.3chaetognaths, sagittid arrow worms 16513 72 6.5 22.8 355.55 37178.1ascidiacean larvae tunicate larvae 4 1 3.7 25.5 0.08 54.7appendicularian, Oikopleura dioica larvacean 63166 56 7.2 21.2 1523.67 160302.6Branchiostoma floridae lancelet 1 1 5.5 7.9 0.02 13.8Lepisosteus sp. postflexion larvae gar 1 1 29.6 2.1 0.02 15.5Lepisosteus sp. juveniles gar 3 3 25.7 2.5 0.05 12.5Elops saurus postflexion larvae ladyfish 18 7 35.6 0.4 0.43 147.0Elops saurus juveniles ladyfish 4 3 30.7 2.2 0.08 25.8Myrophis punctatus juveniles speckled worm eel 6 6 11.7 5.9 0.13 16.9clupeid preflexion larvae herrings 3 1 5.5 26.6 0.08 55.8Brevoortia spp. postflexion larvae menhaden 58 5 23.8 3.2 1.21 724.2Brevoortia spp. metamorphs menhaden 45 6 21.7 5.9 0.98 221.8Dorosoma spp. preflexion larvae shads 3 3 39.4 0.2 0.06 13.8Anchoa spp. preflexion larvae anchovies 5219 52 6.9 22.6 121.57 23512.3Anchoa spp. flexion larvae anchovies 1498 65 8.2 20.1 34.48 5750.5Anchoa hepsetus eggs striped anchovy 10 2 4.9 23.3 0.19 114.8

A-4

Page 93: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table A1, page 4 of 6.

Plankton-net catch statistics for the Myakka River

(May 2003 through December 2004, n=280)

O i li t d i h l ti dTaxon Common Name Number Collection Kmu Su Mean CPUE Max CPUECollected Frequency (km) (psu) (No./10³ m³) (No./10³ m³)

Anchoa hepsetus postflexion larvae striped anchovy 2 2 9.5 19.1 0.04 14.8Anchoa hepsetus juveniles striped anchovy 1 1 8.8 20.2 0.02 15.8Anchoa mitchilli eggs bay anchovy 34109 39 8.3 21.1 750.91 68363.8Anchoa mitchilli postflexion larvae bay anchovy 898 99 12.4 14.7 18.70 1824.5Anchoa mitchilli juveniles bay anchovy 8843 174 24.1 4.5 172.60 13548.6Anchoa mitchilli adults bay anchovy 603 89 14.6 8.8 12.25 1692.4Notropis spp. preflexion larvae minnows 3 2 32.2 0.2 0.06 28.1Notropis spp. juveniles minnows 2 2 39.0 0.2 0.04 13.3Notropis petersoni adults coastal shiner 1 1 29.6 0.1 0.02 12.5Erimyzon sucetta juveniles lake chubsucker 3 3 33.2 0.1 0.06 15.0Ameiurus catus juveniles white catfish 9 8 31.9 0.1 0.17 25.0Ameiurus natalis juveniles yellow bullhead 6 4 35.3 0.1 0.12 39.1Noturus gyrinus juveniles tadpole madtom 17 6 37.2 0.1 0.34 140.3Ictalurus punctatus juveniles channel catfish 7 5 26.4 4.3 0.15 47.5Arius felis juveniles hardhead catfish 1 1 8.8 0.7 0.02 13.2Bagre marinus juveniles gafftopsail sea catfish 1 1 11.4 0.2 0.02 12.9Liposarcus spp. juveniles suckermouth catfish 6 5 33.5 0.1 0.11 29.7Hoplosternum littorale preflexion larvae brown hoplo catfish 3 2 23.9 0.1 0.06 31.1Hoplosternum littorale flexion larvae brown hoplo catfish 18 5 30.8 0.1 0.40 202.0Hoplosternum littorale postflexion larvae brown hoplo catfish 9 4 35.0 0.1 0.18 37.4Hoplosternum littorale juveniles brown hoplo catfish 138 15 33.7 0.1 2.60 449.2Gobiesox strumosus preflexion larvae skilletfish 53 17 13.7 16.5 1.15 112.6Gobiesox strumosus flexion larvae skilletfish 20 9 18.2 13.1 0.43 110.9Gobiesox strumosus postflexion larvae skilletfish 12 4 22.9 9.6 0.25 95.8Gobiesox strumosus juveniles skilletfish 12 3 18.8 10.6 0.26 80.4Hyporhamphus unifasciatus preflexion larvae silverstripe halfbeak 2 2 39.0 0.2 0.04 13.8Hyporhamphus unifasciatus flexion larvae silverstripe halfbeak 2 2 33.7 0.3 0.04 13.8Strongylura spp. postflexion larvae needlefishes 5 1 29.6 2.1 0.11 77.4Strongylura spp. adults needlefishes 1 1 11.4 8.8 0.02 10.7Strongylura marina juveniles Atlantic needlefish 4 2 20.7 13.1 0.08 42.3Strongylura notata adults redfin needlefish 1 1 11.4 8.8 0.02 10.7Cyprinodon variegatus postflexion larvae sheepshead minnow 2 2 37.8 0.1 0.04 15.4Cyprinodon variegatus juveniles sheepshead minnow 1 1 40.2 0.1 0.02 13.3Jordanella floridae adults flagfish 2 1 40.2 0.1 0.07 46.4Fundulus spp. postflexion larvae killifishes 1 1 14.6 0.1 0.02 12.3Fundulus spp. juveniles killifishes 3 2 15.6 0.1 0.06 23.4Fundulus seminolis postflexion larvae Seminole killifish 2 1 32.1 0.1 0.03 22.1Fundulus grandis juveniles gulf killifish 3 2 35.8 0.1 0.05 23.5Lucania goodei juveniles bluefin killifish 6 4 23.3 0.1 0.18 61.5Lucania goodei adults bluefin killifish 5 4 38.1 0.1 0.09 25.0Lucania parva postflexion larvae rainwater killifish 1 1 40.2 0.2 0.02 12.6Lucania parva juveniles rainwater killifish 10 5 27.5 7.2 0.19 64.0Lucania parva adults rainwater killifish 2 2 35.0 3.1 0.04 12.7Gambusia holbrooki juveniles eastern mosquitofish 159 46 31.0 0.2 3.04 309.5Gambusia holbrooki adults eastern mosquitofish 31 15 33.7 0.1 0.58 62.6Heterandria formosa juveniles least killifish 17 9 29.9 0.1 0.33 90.8Heterandria formosa adults least killifish 54 23 32.0 0.1 1.02 94.6Poecilia latipinna juveniles sailfin molly 1 1 29.6 0.1 0.02 12.4Menidia spp. preflexion larvae silversides 116 34 25.8 2.4 2.18 338.4Menidia spp. flexion larvae silversides 5 3 17.6 9.6 0.11 32.2Menidia spp. juveniles silversides 33 20 25.0 5.1 0.64 65.5Menidia beryllina juveniles inland silverside 4 2 21.7 12.5 0.08 42.3Membras martinica preflexion larvae rough silverside 20 12 11.8 13.5 0.40 69.8Membras martinica flexion larvae rough silverside 4 2 6.6 19.3 0.08 32.2Membras martinica postflexion larvae rough silverside 3 3 9.2 13.0 0.06 13.9Membras martinica juveniles rough silverside 37 15 20.8 11.4 0.73 78.6Membras martinica adults rough silverside 1 1 3.7 24.3 0.02 14.8Labidesthes sicculus preflexion larvae brook silverside 7 3 32.0 0.1 0.15 59.5Labidesthes sicculus juveniles brook silverside 13 8 37.6 0.2 0.25 53.6Labidesthes sicculus adults brook silverside 1 1 40.2 0.2 0.02 13.5fish eggs, percomorph sciaenid eggs (primarily) 50897 41 8.6 22.6 1198.77 246383.1

A-5

Page 94: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table A1, page 5 of 6.

Plankton-net catch statistics for the Myakka River

(May 2003 through December 2004, n=280)

O i li t d i h l ti dTaxon Common Name Number Collection Kmu Su Mean CPUE Max CPUECollected Frequency (km) (psu) (No./10³ m³) (No./10³ m³)

Hippocampus erectus juveniles lined seahorse 11 8 8.6 22.0 0.23 34.9Syngnathus louisianae juveniles chain pipefish 11 7 14.1 16.2 0.22 42.3Syngnathus scovelli juveniles gulf pipefish 19 13 7.3 16.3 0.36 39.6Prionotus tribulus postflexion larvae bighead searobin 1 1 8.8 14.8 0.02 12.2Prionotus tribulus juveniles bighead searobin 3 3 4.9 21.3 0.06 15.5Elassoma evergladei juveniles Everglades pygmy sunfish 4 3 27.3 0.1 0.07 21.3Elassoma evergladei adults Everglades pygmy sunfish 3 3 37.1 0.1 0.07 23.2Elassoma okefenoke juveniles Okefenokee pygmy sunfish 1 1 18.8 0.2 0.02 12.0Enneacanthus gloriosus juveniles bluespotted sunfish 6 6 30.0 1.3 0.13 23.2Lepomis spp. preflexion larvae sunfishes 12 3 39.4 0.2 0.24 137.9Lepomis spp. flexion larvae sunfishes 3 2 32.6 0.2 0.06 30.8Lepomis spp. postflexion larvae sunfishes 1 1 40.2 0.1 0.02 14.2Lepomis spp. juveniles sunfishes 15 12 33.5 0.1 0.29 49.7Lepomis auritus flexion larvae redbreast sunfish 3 2 29.6 1.0 0.06 25.1Lepomis macrochirus juveniles bluegill 1 1 40.2 0.1 0.02 12.5Lepomis punctatus juveniles spotted sunfish 1 1 37.8 0.2 0.02 11.2Micropterus salmoides flexion larvae largemouth bass 15 7 37.8 0.2 0.29 103.7Micropterus salmoides postflexion larvae largemouth bass 2 2 40.2 0.2 0.04 12.6Micropterus salmoides juveniles largemouth bass 3 3 29.5 0.9 0.06 15.5Etheostoma fusiforme preflexion larvae swamp darter 6 2 38.3 0.2 0.12 69.0Etheostoma fusiforme flexion larvae swamp darter 1 1 37.8 0.2 0.02 12.9Chloroscombrus chrysurus postflexion larvae Atlantic bumper 1 1 3.7 10.6 0.02 14.6Oligoplites saurus flexion larvae leatherjack 13 4 16.4 16.2 0.30 82.7Oligoplites saurus postflexion larvae leatherjack 3 1 3.7 26.5 0.08 51.6Oligoplites saurus juveniles leatherjack 1 1 14.6 15.5 0.02 16.5Lutjanus griseus juveniles gray snapper 3 1 11.4 0.7 0.06 40.8gerreid preflexion larvae mojjaras 82 10 6.1 22.7 2.00 406.7gerreid flexion larvae mojjaras 19 3 7.7 21.3 0.45 130.8Eugerres plumieri flexion larvae striped mojarra 2 1 20.7 17.0 0.04 26.3Eugerres plumieri postflexion larvae striped mojarra 1 1 3.7 23.5 0.02 11.6Eucinostomus spp. postflexion larvae mojarras 2 2 28.7 6.2 0.04 12.9Eucinostomus spp. juveniles mojarras 2 1 16.6 9.4 0.04 25.9Eucinostomus gula juveniles silver jenny 2 1 8.8 10.7 0.03 23.3Lagodon rhomboides juveniles pinfish 2 2 14.6 7.9 0.04 14.1Bairdiella chrysoura preflexion larvae silver perch 15 2 4.5 26.5 0.39 154.9Bairdiella chrysoura flexion larvae silver perch 9 5 8.7 22.4 0.20 34.9Cynoscion arenarius preflexion larvae sand seatrout 41 8 6.0 22.8 0.95 223.8Cynoscion arenarius flexion larvae sand seatrout 12 5 10.3 16.2 0.29 82.7Cynoscion arenarius postflexion larvae sand seatrout 5 3 8.3 6.9 0.11 43.5Cynoscion arenarius juveniles sand seatrout 8 6 8.8 3.2 0.15 27.2Cynoscion nebulosus preflexion larvae spotted seatrout 16 3 5.5 25.9 0.41 206.5Cynoscion nebulosus flexion larvae spotted seatrout 9 3 9.9 20.1 0.22 82.7Menticirrhus spp. preflexion larvae kingfishes 48 9 5.2 21.9 1.12 292.6Menticirrhus spp. flexion larvae kingfishes 28 6 8.9 18.6 0.65 148.8Menticirrhus spp. postflexion larvae kingfishes 2 1 3.7 10.6 0.04 29.1Menticirrhus americanus juveniles southern kingfish 2 2 12.3 5.4 0.04 13.1Sciaenops ocellatus postflexion larvae red drum 1 1 5.5 15.3 0.02 13.1Tilapia spp. juveniles tilapias 1 1 16.6 0.1 0.02 12.7Mugil cephalus juveniles striped mullet 4 2 23.9 4.1 0.07 36.3blenniid preflexion larvae blennies 19 9 8.7 20.3 0.38 69.8Chasmodes saburrae postflexion larvae Florida blenny 3 2 17.2 17.5 0.07 28.6Chasmodes saburrae juveniles Florida blenny 1 1 23.8 10.7 0.02 13.7Hypsoblennius spp. postflexion larvae blennies 3 1 5.5 21.1 0.07 51.2Lupinoblennius nicholsi flexion larvae highfin blenny 2 2 4.6 22.2 0.04 13.7Lupinoblennius nicholsi postflexion larvae highfin blenny 1 1 11.4 20.9 0.02 16.9gobiid preflexion larvae gobies 477 90 18.6 10.5 9.52 471.6gobiid flexion larvae gobies 179 50 16.5 11.8 3.71 278.0Bathygobius soporator preflexion larvae frillfin goby 47 13 5.9 23.8 1.11 241.0Bathygobius soporator flexion larvae frillfin goby 4 2 15.8 17.7 0.09 31.7Gobionellus spp. postflexion larvae gobies 6 1 18.8 8.0 0.11 78.6Gobiosoma spp. postflexion larvae gobies 107 30 15.9 14.0 2.12 151.8

A-6

Page 95: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table A1, page 6 of 6.

Plankton-net catch statistics for the Myakka River

(May 2003 through December 2004, n=280)

O i li t d i h l ti dTaxon Common Name Number Collection Kmu Su Mean CPUE Max CPUECollected Frequency (km) (psu) (No./10³ m³) (No./10³ m³)

Gobiosoma bosc juveniles naked goby 96 12 28.9 9.5 1.81 447.8Gobiosoma bosc adults naked goby 2 2 22.4 0.1 0.10 54.1Gobiosoma robustum juveniles code goby 56 8 28.9 8.5 1.07 562.6Microgobius spp. flexion larvae gobies 288 54 15.9 12.2 5.94 434.3Microgobius spp. postflexion larvae gobies 58 23 15.3 9.4 1.12 101.9Microgobius gulosus juveniles clown goby 50 22 17.7 2.0 0.94 104.3Microgobius gulosus adults clown goby 5 4 12.5 1.5 0.12 30.8Microgobius thalassinus adults green goby 5 4 14.7 2.2 0.15 54.1Trinectes maculatus preflexion larvae hogchoker 58 20 8.1 21.5 1.25 162.7Trinectes maculatus flexion larvae hogchoker 27 11 8.9 17.5 0.59 103.3Trinectes maculatus postflexion larvae hogchoker 44 21 20.2 3.5 0.89 154.8Trinectes maculatus juveniles hogchoker 528 95 26.2 0.8 10.16 468.9Trinectes maculatus adults hogchoker 60 24 25.6 1.3 1.17 210.5Sphoeroides nephelus juveniles southern puffer 1 1 14.6 15.5 0.02 16.5Chilomycterus shoepfi juveniles striped burrfish 1 1 8.8 23.5 0.02 11.6unidentified preflexion larvae fish 2 2 33.8 1.1 0.04 13.2unidentified postflexion larvae fish 4 3 33.2 0.1 0.08 27.2anuran larvae tadpoles 63 22 26.2 0.3 1.47 215.3

A-7

Page 96: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table A2, page 1 of 3.

Plankton-net catch statistics for Myakkahatchee Creek

(May 2003 through June 2004, n=56)

O i li t d i h l ti dTaxon Common Name Number Collection Kmu Su Mean CPUE Max CPUECollected Frequency (km) (psu) (No./10³ m³) (No./10³ m³)

Craspedacusta sowberii hydromedusa 88 2 23.1 5.5 1.64 887.94Liriope tetraphylla hydromedusa 2 1 24.3 2.4 0.04 27.20Clytia sp. hydromedusa 35 5 24.2 3.5 0.69 268.23medusa sp. c hydromedusa 455 2 25.0 12.3 9.69 5407.98medusa sp. a hydromedusa 45 3 22.7 14.1 0.98 506.66medusa sp. d hydromedusa 4 1 22.2 14.7 0.08 57.90Mnemiopsis mccradyi comb jelly, ctenophore 6894 6 23.1 12.3 140.66 61173.52turbellarians flatworms 3 2 23.6 11.5 0.06 28.07polychaetes sand worms, tube worms 248 41 23.4 3.1 6.54 920.23oligochaetes freshwater worms 14 5 24.2 2.9 0.60 263.16hirudinoideans leeches 27 15 23.0 1.2 0.88 306.74cladocerans, Daphnia spp. water fleas 1 1 23.3 0.2 0.02 13.16Simocephalus vetulus water flea 219 21 24.2 0.2 5.86 855.28Ceridodaphnia sp. water flea 4 1 25.1 0.1 0.26 175.53Grimaldina brazzai water flea 4 1 25.1 0.1 0.26 175.53Ilyocryptus sp. water flea 288 15 23.9 0.2 5.67 1172.37Sida crystallina water flea 41 13 24.3 0.3 1.03 307.17Latonopsis fasciculata water flea 2 2 24.7 0.2 0.04 13.04Euryalona occidentalis water flea 1 1 25.1 0.2 0.02 12.56Leydigia sp. water flea 3 3 24.8 0.8 0.06 13.95decapod zoeae crab larvae 87989 44 23.5 9.4 1886.99 319082.55decapod mysis shrimp larvae 1997 37 23.0 10.7 41.96 8627.73decapod megalopae post-zoea crab larvae 6806 25 23.2 10.7 139.43 21603.33Palaemonetes spp. postlarvae grass shrimp 123 17 23.4 10.6 2.63 639.35Palaemonetes pugio juveniles daggerblade grass shrimp 13 6 23.3 2.7 0.32 65.79Palaemonetes pugio adults daggerblade grass shrimp 15 9 23.0 4.6 0.28 52.66Ambidexter symmetricus postlarvae shrimp 2 1 25.1 12.0 0.04 29.39Callinectes sapidus juveniles blue crab 1 1 22.2 13.3 0.02 14.31xanthid juveniles mud crabs 14 1 22.2 5.3 0.28 188.36Rhithropanopeus harrisii juveniles Harris mud crab 5 1 22.2 0.2 0.09 61.58unidentified Americamysis juveniles opossum shrimps, mysids 6701 40 23.1 5.9 129.33 16583.25Americamysis almyra opossum shrimp, mysid 19383 44 23.3 5.2 380.68 35948.60Bowmaniella dissimilis opossum shrimp, mysid 1380 22 23.2 9.1 27.25 3150.76Taphromysis bowmani opossum shrimp, mysid 3052 21 24.2 12.5 63.04 38869.15cumaceans cumaceans 6235 30 25.0 11.9 133.56 88614.51isopod sp. a isopod 1 1 23.3 1.6 0.02 12.79Cyathura polita isopod 33 13 23.5 6.4 0.65 81.59Xenanthura brevitelson isopod 1 1 22.2 3.2 0.02 13.85Munna reynoldsi isopod 17 9 22.9 0.8 0.33 40.57Probopyrus sp. (attached) isopod 2 1 23.3 0.2 0.04 26.32Anopsilana jonesi isopod 3 2 22.9 10.3 0.06 27.10cymothoid sp. a (Lironeca) juveniles isopod 490 32 23.9 8.1 10.47 901.64Cassidinidea ovalis isopod 2 2 22.8 2.3 0.04 13.95Sphaeroma quadridentata isopod 84 24 24.0 4.6 1.62 167.09Sphaeroma terebrans isopod 62 22 23.3 7.1 1.27 342.67Edotea triloba isopod 10616 34 23.7 5.0 209.52 23670.42amphipods, gammaridean amphipods 20151 54 23.7 6.7 404.10 45733.37cirriped nauplius stage barnacles 3 1 25.1 0.6 0.06 41.84branchiurans, Argulus spp. fish lice 47 30 23.5 5.8 0.92 107.63unidentified harpacticoids copepods 14 3 24.9 1.0 0.24 130.67Alteutha sp. copepod 1 1 24.3 0.2 0.02 13.04siphonostomatids parasitic copepods 1 1 22.2 5.3 0.02 13.45unidentified freshwater cyclopoids copepods 11 5 24.0 3.0 0.19 43.28Macrocyclops albidus copepods 54 7 23.4 0.2 0.99 273.81Mesocyclops edax copepod 10489 36 24.4 0.3 205.94 47257.51Orthocyclops modestus copepod 20 9 24.4 0.3 0.35 71.28Acartia tonsa copepod 76 16 23.3 4.7 1.51 430.53Diaptomus spp. copepods 6 4 23.2 0.2 0.12 40.57Labidocera aestiva copepod 23 3 24.0 12.3 0.54 262.30Osphranticum labronectum copepod 1 1 24.3 0.2 0.02 11.38Pseudodiaptomus coronatus copepod 11 7 23.7 3.9 0.21 54.45

A-8

Page 97: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table A2, page 2 of 3.

Plankton-net catch statistics for Myakkahatchee Creek

(May 2003 through June 2004, n=56)

O i li t d i h l ti dTaxon Common Name Number Collection Kmu Su Mean CPUE Max CPUECollected Frequency (km) (psu) (No./10³ m³) (No./10³ m³)

ostracods, podocopid ostracods, seed shrimps 200 34 23.4 0.9 9.23 3107.01collembolas, podurid springtails 6 2 23.3 11.9 0.14 81.59ephemeropteran larvae mayflies 1793 22 23.9 0.2 37.44 4694.76odonates, anisopteran larvae dragonflies 34 12 24.4 0.1 1.51 526.33odonates, zygopteran larvae damselflies 48 16 23.5 0.1 1.93 423.68hemipterans, belostomatid adults giant water bugs 2 2 23.3 0.2 0.03 13.04hemipterans, corixid juveniles water boatmen 5 2 22.3 0.1 0.47 306.74hemipterans, corixid adults water boatmen 8 7 24.4 0.6 0.15 25.11hemipterans, gerrid adults water striders 4 4 24.5 0.2 0.07 12.99hemipterans, naucorid adults creeoing water bugs 3 2 23.6 0.2 0.05 24.40hemipterans, nepid adults water scorpions 1 1 22.2 0.2 0.02 10.82hemipterans, pleid adults pygmy backswimmers 1 1 25.1 0.2 0.02 11.32coleopterans, curculionid adults beetles 2 2 22.8 0.2 0.03 12.20coleopterans, noterid adults burrowing water beetles 36 12 23.2 1.7 1.03 306.74coleopterans, elmid larvae riffle beetles 33 8 24.3 0.2 0.60 135.82coleopterans, elmid adults riffle beetles 30 13 24.2 0.2 0.56 66.58coleopterans, gyrinid larvae whirligig beetles 2 1 24.3 0.2 0.03 22.76coleopterans, haliplid adults crawling water beetles 3 1 22.2 0.2 0.05 36.95coleopterans, dytiscid adults predaceous diving beetles 5 2 25.1 0.2 0.09 50.25coleopterans, scirtid larvae marsh beetles 1 1 25.1 0.5 0.02 13.71dipterans, pupae flies, mosquitoes 802 43 23.8 0.8 21.94 3813.14dipterans, ceratopogonid larvae biting midges 16 8 24.1 7.5 0.34 131.15dipteran, Chaoborus punctipennis larvae phantom midge 2945 29 24.0 0.2 87.15 9603.47dipterans, chironomid larvae midges 639 41 24.2 1.7 17.68 3866.93dipterans, stratiomyid larvae soldier flies 4 2 24.5 10.7 0.08 42.11dipterans, sciomyzid larvae marsh flies 2 2 25.1 0.4 0.04 13.71dipterans, tipulid larvae crane flies 5 1 23.3 13.8 0.12 81.59trichopteran larvae caddisflies 210 15 24.3 0.2 4.10 545.94lepidopterans, pyralid larvae aquatic caterpillars 3 2 23.9 0.3 0.06 26.32acari water mites 70 16 24.0 0.2 2.08 423.68gastropods, prosobranch snails 1575 48 23.0 3.2 45.18 6735.72gastropods, opisthobranch sea slugs 33 4 22.5 6.7 0.63 341.38pelecypods clams, mussels, oysters 725 27 23.5 2.1 17.75 2942.75chaetognaths, sagittid arrow worms 15 6 23.3 5.1 0.30 81.67Lepisosteus sp. juveniles gar 34 2 24.8 1.3 0.60 249.46Elops saurus postflexion larvae ladyfish 1 1 24.3 4.7 0.02 13.15Elops saurus juveniles ladyfish 1 1 25.1 0.6 0.02 13.95Brevoortia spp. postflexion larvae menhaden 14 6 23.3 2.6 0.28 69.27Brevoortia spp. metamorphs menhaden 16 7 24.3 2.6 0.32 55.78Brevoortia smithi juveniles yellowfin menhaden 2 2 23.6 3.1 0.04 13.45Dorosoma petenense juveniles threadfin shad 1 1 25.1 0.2 0.02 11.32Anchoa spp. preflexion larvae anchovies 28 7 23.7 11.7 0.57 224.60Anchoa spp. flexion larvae anchovies 212 16 24.0 9.0 4.58 1032.79Anchoa mitchilli eggs bay anchovy 116 2 23.4 1.5 2.36 1478.61Anchoa mitchilli postflexion larvae bay anchovy 228 16 24.3 5.7 4.79 976.65Anchoa mitchilli juveniles bay anchovy 10519 46 24.0 5.3 205.93 20588.54Anchoa mitchilli adults bay anchovy 26 14 23.9 2.1 0.49 86.73Ameiurus catus juveniles white catfish 2 1 24.3 0.2 0.03 22.76Liposarcus spp. juveniles suckermouth catfish 4 3 24.3 0.2 0.07 22.76Hoplosternum littorale flexion larvae brown hoplo catfish 1 1 23.3 0.2 0.02 12.20Hoplosternum littorale juveniles brown hoplo catfish 1 1 23.3 0.2 0.02 12.20Gobiesox strumosus preflexion larvae skilletfish 10 3 22.4 5.3 0.20 78.78Gobiesox strumosus flexion larvae skilletfish 34 5 22.5 6.7 0.65 328.25Gobiesox strumosus postflexion larvae skilletfish 7 3 23.1 9.2 0.14 54.21Jordanella floridae juveniles flagfish 3 2 24.8 0.2 0.05 25.13Fundulus spp. juveniles killifishes 2 1 24.3 0.2 0.03 22.76Fundulus grandis juveniles gulf killifish 1 1 25.1 0.2 0.02 11.32Lucania goodei postflexion larvae bluefin killifish 1 1 24.3 0.1 0.10 65.79Lucania goodei juveniles bluefin killifish 6 5 23.9 0.1 0.34 131.58Lucania goodei adults bluefin killifish 2 2 24.2 0.2 0.03 12.20Lucania parva juveniles rainwater killifish 1 1 25.1 0.5 0.02 11.88

A-9

Page 98: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table A2, page 3 of 3.

Plankton-net catch statistics for Myakkahatchee Creek

(May 2003 through June 2004, n=56)

O i li t d i h l ti dTaxon Common Name Number Collection Kmu Su Mean CPUE Max CPUECollected Frequency (km) (psu) (No./10³ m³) (No./10³ m³)

Lucania parva adults rainwater killifish 2 2 23.5 0.5 0.12 70.61Gambusia holbrooki juveniles eastern mosquitofish 14 10 24.0 0.2 0.33 65.79Gambusia holbrooki adults eastern mosquitofish 5 5 23.8 0.9 0.09 13.85Heterandria formosa juveniles least killifish 2 1 24.3 13.7 0.04 28.07Heterandria formosa adults least killifish 7 5 24.1 0.2 0.12 24.40Menidia spp. preflexion larvae silversides 10 7 23.5 2.9 0.19 35.64Menidia spp. juveniles silversides 5 5 23.5 5.0 0.09 13.55Membras martinica juveniles rough silverside 1 1 22.2 4.9 0.02 13.17Labidesthes sicculus juveniles brook silverside 4 3 23.7 8.5 0.09 32.64fish eggs, percomorph sciaenid eggs (primarily) 6 3 24.5 9.8 0.12 58.78Syngnathus louisianae juveniles chain pipefish 9 2 24.4 11.0 0.21 131.15Syngnathus scovelli juveniles gulf pipefish 1 1 24.3 1.4 0.02 13.61Elassoma evergladei juveniles Everglades pygmy sunfish 1 1 22.2 0.2 0.02 12.32Elassoma evergladei adults Everglades pygmy sunfish 2 1 24.3 0.1 0.19 131.58Lepomis macrochirus juveniles bluegill 3 3 24.0 0.2 0.05 12.99Bairdiella chrysoura flexion larvae silver perch 1 1 22.2 7.0 0.02 13.13Cynoscion arenarius preflexion larvae sand seatrout 11 1 22.2 14.7 0.23 159.24Menticirrhus spp. postflexion larvae kingfishes 1 1 23.3 5.1 0.02 12.68gobiid preflexion larvae gobies 357 32 23.6 8.6 7.36 898.38gobiid flexion larvae gobies 168 19 23.9 10.2 3.61 522.16Bathygobius soporator flexion larvae frillfin goby 2 1 22.2 13.3 0.04 28.63Gobiosoma spp. postflexion larvae gobies 1554 16 23.9 12.9 35.36 7147.55Gobiosoma bosc juveniles naked goby 3 1 22.2 0.2 0.06 40.57Gobiosoma robustum juveniles code goby 4 3 24.3 7.7 0.09 35.81Microgobius spp. flexion larvae gobies 70 21 23.2 7.9 1.43 217.14Microgobius spp. postflexion larvae gobies 66 9 23.3 13.0 1.52 685.34Microgobius gulosus juveniles clown goby 4 4 23.2 7.9 0.08 13.33Microgobius thalassinus adults green goby 1 1 23.3 0.2 0.02 13.57Trinectes maculatus preflexion larvae hogchoker 1 1 22.2 7.0 0.02 13.13Trinectes maculatus flexion larvae hogchoker 4 3 22.2 10.6 0.08 28.95Trinectes maculatus postflexion larvae hogchoker 7 4 23.0 6.6 0.14 28.95Trinectes maculatus juveniles hogchoker 73 21 24.2 2.5 1.38 262.94unidentified postflexion larvae fish 3 1 23.3 2.4 0.06 39.98anuran larvae tadpoles 1 1 24.3 0.2 0.02 12.40

A-10

Page 99: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

3. P

age

1 of

8.

Mya

kka

Riv

er p

lank

ton

net c

atch

by

mon

th (M

ay 2

003

to D

ecem

ber 2

004)

.

Num

ber o

f mon

thly

sam

ples

is in

dica

ted

in p

aren

thes

es.

Taxo

nC

omm

on N

ame

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

(48)

(48)

(48)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

fora

min

ifera

nsfo

ram

inife

rans

2Li

riope

tetra

phyl

lahy

drom

edus

a13

Cly

tia s

p.hy

drom

edus

a3

7157

287

16

med

usa

sp. a

hydr

omed

usa

1m

edus

a sp

. bhy

drom

edus

a9

231

med

usa

sp. d

hydr

omed

usa

262

Mne

mio

psis

mcc

rady

ico

mb

jelly

, cte

noph

ore

241

3113

6447

1815

406

2454

41Be

roe

ovat

ase

a w

alnu

t, ct

enop

hore

86

turb

ella

rians

flatw

orm

s1

81

nem

erte

ans

ribbo

n w

orm

s1

nem

atod

esro

undw

orm

s, th

read

wor

ms

2po

lych

aete

ssa

nd w

orm

s, tu

be w

orm

s18

234

115

5454

041

220

925

111

7250

5ol

igoc

haet

esfre

shw

ater

wor

ms

116

14

313

4311

1hi

rudi

noid

eans

leec

hes

14

18

1212

71

32

clad

ocer

ans,

uni

dent

ified

wat

er fl

eas

240

clad

ocer

ans,

Dap

hnia

spp

.w

ater

flea

s2

14

187

32

Sim

ocep

halu

s ve

tulu

sw

ater

flea

3960

2320

789

5042

162

872

411

624

0C

erid

odap

hnia

sp.

wat

er fl

ea1

4Bu

nops

sp.

wat

er fl

ea20

85

Grim

aldi

na b

razz

aiw

ater

flea

384

94

Ilyoc

rypt

us s

p.w

ater

flea

33

2671

775

519

14S

ida

crys

tallin

aw

ater

flea

197

3322

936

833

4214

31

Lato

na s

etife

raw

ater

flea

16

4112

41

Pen

ilia a

viro

stris

wat

er fl

ea75

14

383

Pseu

dosi

da b

iden

tata

wat

er fl

ea4

Lato

nops

is fa

scic

ulat

aw

ater

flea

747

868

956

36Eu

ryal

ona

occi

dent

alis

wat

er fl

ea1

21

2Le

ydig

ia s

p.w

ater

flea

513

13

6M

oina

daph

nia

mac

leay

iiw

ater

flea

3Ev

adne

terg

estin

aw

ater

flea

1910

273

3307

394

14de

capo

d zo

eae

crab

larv

ae10

446

3618

520

165

3421

313

8916

7211

334

963

5607

1662

7698

deca

pod

mys

issh

rimp

larv

ae19

027

640

362

839

8076

288

5777

91de

capo

d m

egal

opae

post

-zoe

a cr

ab la

rvae

5215

151

5230

0178

4367

3416

118

217

shrim

ps, u

nide

ntifi

ed p

ostla

rvae

shrim

ps69

6pe

naei

d po

stla

rvae

pena

eid

shrim

ps93

2pe

naei

d m

etam

orph

spe

naei

d sh

rimps

31

Farfa

ntep

enae

us d

uora

rum

juve

nile

spi

nk s

hrim

p33

14

1Fa

rfant

epen

aeus

duo

raru

m a

dults

pink

shr

imp

1Lu

cife

r fax

oni j

uven

iles

and

adul

tssh

rimp

42

21

11

Lept

oche

la s

erra

torb

ita p

ostla

rvae

com

bcla

w s

hrim

pPa

laem

onet

es s

pp. p

ostla

rvae

gras

s sh

rimp

212

1319

724

761

179

72

Pal

aem

onet

es p

alud

osus

juve

nile

sgr

ass

shrim

p1

A-11

Page 100: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

3. P

age

2 of

8.

Mya

kka

Riv

er p

lank

ton

net c

atch

by

mon

th (M

ay 2

003

to D

ecem

ber 2

004)

.

Num

ber o

f mon

thly

sam

ples

is in

dica

ted

in p

aren

thes

es.

Taxo

nC

omm

on N

ame

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

(48)

(48)

(48)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

Pala

emon

etes

pug

io ju

veni

les

dagg

erbl

ade

gras

s sh

rimp

19

2136

820

10Pa

laem

onet

es p

ugio

adu

ltsda

gger

blad

e gr

ass

shrim

p1

39

1P

alae

mon

etes

vul

garis

juve

nile

sgr

ass

shrim

pP

eric

limen

es s

pp. p

ostla

rvae

shrim

psal

phae

id p

ostla

rvae

snap

ping

shr

imps

104

391

333

171

11

alph

aeid

juve

nile

ssn

appi

ng s

hrim

ps2

Lept

alph

eus

forc

eps

juve

nile

ssn

appi

ng s

hrim

p1

1H

ippo

lyte

zos

teric

ola

post

larv

aezo

ster

a sh

rimp

126

135

1858

10H

ippo

lyte

zos

teric

ola

juve

nile

szo

ster

a sh

rimp

4O

gyrid

es a

lpha

eros

tris

juve

nile

s an

d ad

ults

estu

arin

e lo

ngey

e sh

rimp

85

21A

mbi

dext

er s

ymm

etric

us p

ostla

rvae

shrim

p18

616

71A

mbi

dext

er s

ymm

etric

us ju

veni

les

shrim

p3

11

1A

mbi

dext

er s

ymm

etric

us a

dults

shrim

p3

asta

cide

an ju

veni

les

cray

fish

1ca

lliana

ssid

pos

tlarv

aegh

ost s

hrim

ps1

Cal

liana

ssa

spp.

juve

nile

sgh

ost s

hrim

ps8

Upo

gebi

a sp

p. p

ostla

rvae

mud

shr

imps

51

3E

ucer

amus

pra

elon

gus

meg

alop

s la

rvae

oliv

epit

porc

elai

n cr

ab24

Pet

rolis

thes

arm

atus

juve

nile

spo

rcel

ain

crab

2C

allin

ecte

s sa

pidu

s ju

veni

les

blue

cra

b1

67

118

portu

nid

juve

nile

ssw

imm

ing

crab

s2

Rhi

thro

pano

peus

har

risii

juve

nile

sH

arris

mud

cra

b9

unid

entif

ied

Amer

icam

ysis

juve

nile

sop

ossu

m s

hrim

ps, m

ysid

s72

257

577

8928

3055

393

6015

2541

885

3355

Amer

icam

ysis

alm

yra

opos

sum

shr

imp,

mys

id11

7715

3824

0915

191

7787

4785

1305

632

3116

9288

47A

mer

icam

ysis

bah

iaop

ossu

m s

hrim

p, m

ysid

414

974

7289

973

4A

mer

icam

ysis

stu

cki

opos

sum

shr

imp,

mys

id5

313

6223

28

523

Bow

man

iella

dis

sim

ilisop

ossu

m s

hrim

p, m

ysid

757

381

6884

293

011

8938

92

1135

Spe

laeo

mys

is s

p.op

ossu

m s

hrim

p, m

ysid

36

Taph

rom

ysis

bow

man

iop

ossu

m s

hrim

p, m

ysid

104

1104

448

3301

1170

6949

5793

8054

734

cum

acea

nscu

mac

eans

1503

925

169

1013

220

025

2504

920

251

7964

1287

2Si

nelo

bus

stan

ford

ita

naid

31

32

5Ap

seud

es s

p.ta

naid

7H

arge

ria ra

pax

tana

id8

1is

opod

sp.

ais

opod

1C

yath

ura

polit

ais

opod

233

926

166

4367

14

Xena

nthu

ra b

revi

tels

onis

opod

9M

unna

reyn

olds

iis

opod

224

4495

1516

208

17

24Pr

obop

yrus

sp.

(atta

ched

)is

opod

11

1An

opsi

lana

jone

siis

opod

cym

otho

id s

p. a

(Liro

neca

) juv

enile

sis

opod

327

7319

915

795

8313

639

Cas

sidi

nide

a ov

alis

isop

od1

14

11

Har

rieta

faxo

niis

opod

1

A-12

Page 101: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

3. P

age

3 of

8.

Mya

kka

Riv

er p

lank

ton

net c

atch

by

mon

th (M

ay 2

003

to D

ecem

ber 2

004)

.

Num

ber o

f mon

thly

sam

ples

is in

dica

ted

in p

aren

thes

es.

Taxo

nC

omm

on N

ame

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

(48)

(48)

(48)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

Spha

erom

a qu

adrid

enta

tais

opod

172

137

450

1242

6042

107

Spha

erom

a te

rebr

ans

isop

od2

91

3619

716

1115

20S

phae

rom

a w

alke

riis

opod

51

Edot

ea tr

iloba

isop

od36

789

1337

3629

1778

2525

106

107

2048

Eric

hson

ella

atte

nuat

ais

opod

274

193

Eric

hson

ella

filif

orm

eis

opod

2am

phip

ods,

gam

mar

idea

nam

phip

ods

371

3138

7375

2242

279

4331

290

8876

3084

1930

5538

amph

ipod

s, c

apre

llidsk

elet

on s

hrim

ps7

2516

448

533

151

cirri

ped

naup

lius

stag

eba

rnac

les

3477

6812

451

2034

0164

113

35br

anch

iura

ns, A

rgul

us s

pp.

fish

lice

23

2622

479

158

1313

unid

entif

ied

harp

actic

oids

cope

pods

93

17

9Al

teut

ha s

p.co

pepo

d1

Onc

aea

spp.

cope

pods

1si

phon

osto

mat

ids

para

sitic

cop

epod

s7

unid

entif

ied

fresh

wat

er c

yclo

poid

sco

pepo

ds1

36

47

201

Cyc

lops

spp

.co

pepo

ds1

461

Mac

rocy

clop

s al

bidu

sco

pepo

ds9

273

116

2051

5168

25M

esoc

yclo

ps e

dax

cope

pod

142

3733

732

725

715

826

641

922

819

9O

ithon

a sp

p.co

pepo

ds21

5564

531

252

131

Orth

ocyc

lops

mod

estu

sco

pepo

d9

382

131

2211

2723

103

Saph

irella

spp

.co

pepo

ds9

para

cala

nids

cope

pods

5Ac

artia

tons

aco

pepo

d13

6213

704

1350

639

3423

360

1102

755

553

3819

88C

alan

opia

am

eric

ana

cope

pod

Cen

tropa

ges

ham

atus

cope

pod

29

Cen

tropa

ges

velif

icat

usco

pepo

d5

1D

iapt

omus

spp

.co

pepo

ds20

1055

19

54

2Eu

ryte

mor

a af

finis

cope

pod

Labi

doce

ra a

estiv

aco

pepo

d2

2883

237

2758

3659

16

738

Osp

hran

ticum

labr

onec

tum

cope

pod

13

21

321

51

Pseu

dodi

apto

mus

cor

onat

usco

pepo

d41

353

100

4250

217

920

16Te

mor

a tu

rbin

ata

cope

pod

141

1219

Euco

ncho

ecia

chi

erch

iae

ostra

cod,

see

d sh

rimp

33

Sar

siel

la z

oste

ricol

aos

traco

d, s

eed

shrim

p3

22

4Pa

rast

erop

e po

llex

ostra

cod,

see

d sh

rimp

453

522

050

211

7330

42

ostra

cods

, pod

ocop

idos

traco

ds, s

eed

shrim

ps3

143

8331

124

3982

2221

colle

mbo

las,

pod

urid

sprin

gtai

ls2

128

ephe

mer

opte

ran

larv

aem

ayfli

es15

340

7875

616

819

877

693

725

9014

55od

onat

es, a

niso

pter

an la

rvae

drag

onfli

es5

320

1526

65

odon

ates

, zyg

opte

ran

larv

aeda

mse

lflie

s2

21

138

2711

1021

24he

mip

tera

ns, b

elos

tom

atid

adu

ltsgi

ant w

ater

bug

s3

3he

mip

tera

ns, c

orix

id ju

veni

les

wat

er b

oatm

en3

26

12

A-13

Page 102: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

3. P

age

4 of

8.

Mya

kka

Riv

er p

lank

ton

net c

atch

by

mon

th (M

ay 2

003

to D

ecem

ber 2

004)

.

Num

ber o

f mon

thly

sam

ples

is in

dica

ted

in p

aren

thes

es.

Taxo

nC

omm

on N

ame

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

(48)

(48)

(48)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

hem

ipte

rans

, cor

ixid

adu

ltsw

ater

boa

tmen

12

64

2423

54

hem

ipte

rans

, ger

rid a

dults

wat

er s

tride

rs2

74

6he

mip

tera

ns, n

auco

rid a

dults

cree

ping

wat

er b

ugs

41

hem

ipte

rans

, nep

id a

dults

wat

er s

corp

ions

11

1he

mip

tera

ns, n

oton

ectid

adu

ltsba

cksw

imm

ers

11

hem

ipte

rans

, ple

id a

dults

pygm

y ba

cksw

imm

ers

16

32

meg

alop

tera

ns, c

oryd

alid

larv

aedo

bson

flies

1ne

urop

tera

ns, C

limac

ia s

pp. l

arva

esp

ongi

llafli

es2

38

920

138

3co

leop

tera

ns, c

hrys

omel

id la

rvae

beet

les

cole

opte

rans

, cur

culio

nid

adul

tsbe

etle

s2

11

1co

leop

tera

ns, d

ytis

cid

larv

aepr

edac

eous

div

ing

beet

les

77

22co

leop

tera

ns, n

oter

id a

dults

burro

win

g w

ater

bee

tles

1230

109

2co

leop

tera

ns, d

ryop

id la

rvae

long

-toed

wat

er b

eetle

s1

cole

opte

rans

, elm

id la

rvae

riffle

bee

tles

418

167

43

36

cole

opte

rans

, elm

id a

dults

riffle

bee

tles

11

13

147

73

cole

opte

rans

, lut

roch

id la

rvae

beet

les

41

cole

opte

rans

, gyr

inid

larv

aew

hirli

gig

beet

les

35

156

15

2320

7co

leop

tera

ns, g

yrin

id a

dults

whi

rligi

g be

etle

s1

11

172

1co

leop

tera

ns, h

alip

lid la

rvae

craw

ling

wat

er b

eetle

s21

3co

leop

tera

ns, n

oter

id la

rvae

burro

win

g w

ater

bee

tles

23

353

cole

opte

rans

, dyt

isci

d ad

ults

pred

aceo

us d

ivin

g be

etle

s2

123

2co

leop

tera

ns, s

cirti

d la

rvae

mar

sh b

eetle

s1

161

cole

opte

rans

, sci

rtid

adul

tsm

arsh

bee

tles

1di

pter

ans,

pup

aefli

es, m

osqu

itoes

2845

3882

335

296

358

463

431

240

dipt

eran

s, c

erat

opog

onid

larv

aebi

ting

mid

ges

36

1618

612

46

dipt

eran

, Cha

obor

us p

unct

ipen

nis

larv

aeph

anto

m m

idge

3015

1393

5089

127

066

024

117

0di

pter

ans,

chi

rono

mid

larv

aem

idge

s91

189

8846

152

156

282

328

175

80di

pter

ans,

eph

ydrid

larv

aesh

ore

flies

1di

pter

ans,

stra

tiom

yid

larv

aeso

ldie

r flie

s1

18

dipt

eran

s, s

ciom

yzid

larv

aem

arsh

flie

s1

11

dipt

eran

s, s

yrph

id la

rvae

hove

rflie

s1

dipt

eran

s, ta

bani

d la

rvae

deer

flie

s1

trich

opte

ran

larv

aeca

ddis

flies

74

424

6339

115

2513

919

7le

pido

pter

ans,

pyr

alid

larv

aeaq

uatic

cat

erpi

llars

11

Lim

ulus

pol

yphe

mus

larv

aeho

rseh

oe c

rab

3ac

ari

wat

er m

ites

1411

2245

4430

2858

2937

gast

ropo

ds, p

roso

bran

chsn

ails

1777

715

4208

496

223

838

665

6718

4ga

stro

pods

, opi

stho

bran

chse

a sl

ugs

246

153

pele

cypo

dscl

ams,

mus

sels

, oys

ters

1539

27

3197

674

7221

2232

Lollig

uncu

la b

revi

s ju

veni

les

bay

squi

d1

6br

achi

opod

, Glo

ttidi

a py

ram

idat

a la

rvae

lam

p sh

ell

1217

92ch

aeto

gnat

hs, s

agitt

idar

row

wor

ms

7012

2386

332

5464

7123

0717

416

3

A-14

Page 103: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

3. P

age

5 of

8.

Mya

kka

Riv

er p

lank

ton

net c

atch

by

mon

th (M

ay 2

003

to D

ecem

ber 2

004)

.

Num

ber o

f mon

thly

sam

ples

is in

dica

ted

in p

aren

thes

es.

Taxo

nC

omm

on N

ame

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

(48)

(48)

(48)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

asci

diac

ean

larv

aetu

nica

te la

rvae

appe

ndic

ular

ian,

Oik

ople

ura

dioi

cala

rvac

ean

952

1128

419

681

4518

990

6430

1319

Bra

nchi

osto

ma

florid

aela

ncel

et1

Lepi

sost

eus

sp. p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

gar

1Le

piso

steu

s sp

. juv

enile

sga

r3

Elop

s sa

urus

pos

tflex

ion

larv

aela

dyfis

h1

Elo

ps s

auru

s ju

veni

les

lady

fish

3M

yrop

his

punc

tatu

s ju

veni

les

spec

kled

wor

m e

el1

11

11

1cl

upei

d pr

efle

xion

larv

aehe

rring

s3

Brev

oorti

a sp

p. p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

men

hade

n2

56Br

evoo

rtia

spp.

met

amor

phs

men

hade

n2

1726

Dor

osom

a sp

p. p

refle

xion

larv

aesh

ads

12

Anch

oa s

pp. p

refle

xion

larv

aean

chov

ies

7872

721

324

0417

3514

23

43An

choa

spp

. fle

xion

larv

aean

chov

ies

176

9784

922

911

018

48

Anch

oa h

epse

tus

eggs

strip

ed a

ncho

vy1

9An

choa

hep

setu

s po

stfle

xion

larv

aest

riped

anc

hovy

11

Anch

oa h

epse

tus

juve

nile

sst

riped

anc

hovy

1A

ncho

a m

itchi

lli eg

gsba

y an

chov

y33

1111

077

4594

5348

901

1A

ncho

a m

itchi

lli po

stfle

xion

larv

aeba

y an

chov

y34

7429

314

218

913

2623

Anc

hoa

mitc

hilli

juve

nile

sba

y an

chov

y73

323

977

553

515

1442

533

243

143

412

Anc

hoa

mitc

hilli

adul

tsba

y an

chov

y2

65

514

2460

3319

159

Not

ropi

s sp

p. p

refle

xion

larv

aem

inno

ws

21

Not

ropi

s sp

p. ju

veni

les

min

now

s1

1N

otro

pis

pete

rson

i adu

ltsco

asta

l shi

ner

1E

rimyz

on s

ucet

ta ju

veni

les

lake

chu

bsuc

ker

12

Am

eiur

us c

atus

juve

nile

sw

hite

cat

fish

11

22

2A

mei

urus

nat

alis

juve

nile

sye

llow

bul

lhea

d4

2N

otur

us g

yrin

us ju

veni

les

tadp

ole

mad

tom

211

4Ic

talu

rus

punc

tatu

s ju

veni

les

chan

nel c

atfis

h3

31

Ariu

s fe

lis ju

veni

les

hard

head

cat

fish

1B

agre

mar

inus

juve

nile

sga

fftop

sail

sea

catfi

sh1

Lipo

sarc

us s

pp. j

uven

iles

suck

erm

outh

cat

fish

24

Hop

lost

ernu

m li

ttora

le p

refle

xion

larv

aebr

own

hopl

o ca

tfish

12

Hop

lost

ernu

m li

ttora

le fl

exio

n la

rvae

brow

n ho

plo

catfi

sh1

116

Hop

lost

ernu

m li

ttora

le p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

brow

n ho

plo

catfi

sh3

6H

oplo

ster

num

litto

rale

juve

nile

sbr

own

hopl

o ca

tfish

100

38G

obie

sox

stru

mos

us p

refle

xion

larv

aesk

illet

fish

37

814

8G

obie

sox

stru

mos

us fl

exio

n la

rvae

skill

etfis

h10

24

Gob

ieso

x st

rum

osus

pos

tflex

ion

larv

aesk

illet

fish

38

Gob

ieso

x st

rum

osus

juve

nile

ssk

illet

fish

75

Hyp

orha

mph

us u

nifa

scia

tus

pref

lexi

on la

rvae

silv

erst

ripe

halfb

eak

11

Hyp

orha

mph

us u

nifa

scia

tus

flexi

on la

rvae

silv

erst

ripe

halfb

eak

11

A-15

Page 104: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

3. P

age

6 of

8.

Mya

kka

Riv

er p

lank

ton

net c

atch

by

mon

th (M

ay 2

003

to D

ecem

ber 2

004)

.

Num

ber o

f mon

thly

sam

ples

is in

dica

ted

in p

aren

thes

es.

Taxo

nC

omm

on N

ame

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

(48)

(48)

(48)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

Stro

ngyl

ura

spp.

pos

tflex

ion

larv

aene

edle

fishe

s5

Stro

ngyl

ura

spp.

adu

ltsne

edle

fishe

s1

Stro

ngyl

ura

mar

ina

juve

nile

sA

tlant

ic n

eedl

efis

h3

Stro

ngyl

ura

nota

ta a

dults

redf

in n

eedl

efis

h1

Cyp

rinod

on v

arie

gatu

s po

stfle

xion

larv

aesh

eeps

head

min

now

11

Cyp

rinod

on v

arie

gatu

s ju

veni

les

shee

pshe

ad m

inno

w1

Jord

anel

la fl

orid

ae a

dults

flagf

ish

2Fu

ndul

us s

pp. p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

killi

fishe

s1

Fund

ulus

spp

. juv

enile

ski

llifis

hes

3Fu

ndul

us s

emin

olis

pos

tflex

ion

larv

aeS

emin

ole

killi

fish

2Fu

ndul

us g

rand

is ju

veni

les

gulf

killi

fish

3Lu

cani

a go

odei

juve

nile

sbl

uefin

kill

ifish

15

Luca

nia

good

ei a

dults

blue

fin k

illifis

h2

3Lu

cani

a pa

rva

post

flexi

on la

rvae

rain

wat

er k

illifis

h1

Luca

nia

parv

a ju

veni

les

rain

wat

er k

illifis

h3

61

Luca

nia

parv

a ad

ults

rain

wat

er k

illifis

h1

1G

ambu

sia

holb

rook

i juv

enile

sea

ster

n m

osqu

itofis

h1

22

1640

7321

Gam

busi

a ho

lbro

oki a

dults

east

ern

mos

quito

fish

68

143

Het

eran

dria

form

osa

juve

nile

sle

ast k

illifi

sh11

21

11

Het

eran

dria

form

osa

adul

tsle

ast k

illifi

sh2

424

911

4P

oeci

lia la

tipin

na ju

veni

les

sailf

in m

olly

1M

enid

ia s

pp. p

refle

xion

larv

aesi

lver

side

s29

125

746

31

23

3M

enid

ia s

pp. f

lexi

on la

rvae

silv

ersi

des

22

1M

enid

ia s

pp. j

uven

iles

silv

ersi

des

96

24

23

Men

idia

ber

yllin

a ju

veni

les

inla

nd s

ilver

side

4M

embr

as m

artin

ica

pref

lexi

on la

rvae

roug

h si

lver

side

67

12

3M

embr

as m

artin

ica

flexi

on la

rvae

roug

h si

lver

side

22

Mem

bras

mar

tinic

a po

stfle

xion

larv

aero

ugh

silv

ersi

de1

11

Mem

bras

mar

tinic

a ju

veni

les

roug

h si

lver

side

119

72

Mem

bras

mar

tinic

a ad

ults

roug

h si

lver

side

1La

bide

sthe

s si

ccul

us p

refle

xion

larv

aebr

ook

silv

ersi

de6

1La

bide

sthe

s si

ccul

us ju

veni

les

broo

k si

lver

side

11

44

12

Labi

dest

hes

sicc

ulus

adu

ltsbr

ook

silv

ersi

defis

h eg

gs, p

erco

mor

phsc

iaen

id e

ggs

(prim

arily

)65

470

411

864

2416

414

085

11

Hip

poca

mpu

s er

ectu

s ju

veni

les

lined

sea

hors

e3

35

Syn

gnat

hus

loui

sian

ae ju

veni

les

chai

n pi

pefis

h1

52

3S

yngn

athu

s sc

ovel

li ju

veni

les

gulf

pipe

fish

13

12

1Pr

iono

tus

tribu

lus

post

flexi

on la

rvae

bigh

ead

sear

obin

1Pr

iono

tus

tribu

lus

juve

nile

sbi

ghea

d se

arob

inE

lass

oma

ever

glad

ei ju

veni

les

Eve

rgla

des

pygm

y su

nfis

h3

1E

lass

oma

ever

glad

ei a

dults

Eve

rgla

des

pygm

y su

nfis

h3

Ela

ssom

a ok

efen

oke

juve

nile

sO

kefe

noke

e py

gmy

sunf

ish

1

A-16

Page 105: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

3. P

age

7 of

8.

Mya

kka

Riv

er p

lank

ton

net c

atch

by

mon

th (M

ay 2

003

to D

ecem

ber 2

004)

.

Num

ber o

f mon

thly

sam

ples

is in

dica

ted

in p

aren

thes

es.

Taxo

nC

omm

on N

ame

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

(48)

(48)

(48)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

Enne

acan

thus

glo

riosu

s ju

veni

les

blue

spot

ted

sunf

ish

51

Lepo

mis

spp

. pre

flexi

on la

rvae

sunf

ishe

s10

2Le

pom

is s

pp. f

lexi

on la

rvae

sunf

ishe

s3

Lepo

mis

spp

. pos

tflex

ion

larv

aesu

nfis

hes

1Le

pom

is s

pp. j

uven

iles

sunf

ishe

s1

36

32

Lepo

mis

aur

itus

flexi

on la

rvae

redb

reas

t sun

fish

3Le

pom

is m

acro

chiru

s ju

veni

les

blue

gill

1Le

pom

is p

unct

atus

juve

nile

ssp

otte

d su

nfis

h1

Mic

ropt

erus

sal

moi

des

flexi

on la

rvae

larg

emou

th b

ass

310

2M

icro

pter

us s

alm

oide

s po

stfle

xion

larv

aela

rgem

outh

bas

s1

1M

icro

pter

us s

alm

oide

s ju

veni

les

larg

emou

th b

ass

11

1Et

heos

tom

a fu

sifo

rme

pref

lexi

on la

rvae

swam

p da

rter

51

Ethe

osto

ma

fusi

form

e fle

xion

larv

aesw

amp

darte

r1

Chl

oros

com

brus

chr

ysur

us p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

Atla

ntic

bum

per

1O

ligop

lites

sau

rus

flexi

on la

rvae

leat

herja

ck8

5O

ligop

lites

sau

rus

post

flexi

on la

rvae

leat

herja

ck3

Olig

oplit

es s

auru

s ju

veni

les

leat

herja

ck1

Lutja

nus

gris

eus

juve

nile

sgr

ay s

napp

er3

gerre

id p

refle

xion

larv

aem

ojja

ras

5427

gerre

id fl

exio

n la

rvae

moj

jara

s16

3E

uger

res

plum

ieri

flexi

on la

rvae

strip

ed m

ojar

ra2

Euge

rres

plum

ieri

post

flexi

on la

rvae

strip

ed m

ojar

ra1

Euci

nost

omus

spp

. pos

tflex

ion

larv

aem

ojar

ras

Euc

inos

tom

us s

pp. j

uven

iles

moj

arra

sE

ucin

osto

mus

gul

a ju

veni

les

silv

er je

nny

2La

godo

n rh

ombo

ides

juve

nile

spi

nfis

h1

1Ba

irdie

lla c

hrys

oura

pre

flexi

on la

rvae

silv

er p

erch

15B

aird

iella

chr

ysou

ra fl

exio

n la

rvae

silv

er p

erch

35

1C

ynos

cion

are

nariu

s pr

efle

xion

larv

aesa

nd s

eatro

ut10

1614

1C

ynos

cion

are

nariu

s fle

xion

larv

aesa

nd s

eatro

ut8

13

Cyn

osci

on a

rena

rius

post

flexi

on la

rvae

sand

sea

trout

41

Cyn

osci

on a

rena

rius

juve

nile

ssa

nd s

eatro

ut3

32

Cyn

osci

on n

ebul

osus

pre

flexi

on la

rvae

spot

ted

seat

rout

115

Cyn

osci

on n

ebul

osus

flex

ion

larv

aesp

otte

d se

atro

ut1

53

Men

ticirr

hus

spp.

pre

flexi

on la

rvae

king

fishe

s15

1815

Men

ticirr

hus

spp.

flex

ion

larv

aeki

ngfis

hes

220

6M

entic

irrhu

s sp

p. p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

king

fishe

s2

Men

ticirr

hus

amer

ican

us ju

veni

les

sout

hern

kin

gfis

h1

1Sc

iaen

ops

ocel

latu

s po

stfle

xion

larv

aere

d dr

um1

Tila

pia

spp.

juve

nile

stil

apia

s1

Mug

il ce

phal

us ju

veni

les

strip

ed m

ulle

t3

1bl

enni

id p

refle

xion

larv

aebl

enni

es1

54

61

2

A-17

Page 106: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

3. P

age

8 of

8.

Mya

kka

Riv

er p

lank

ton

net c

atch

by

mon

th (M

ay 2

003

to D

ecem

ber 2

004)

.

Num

ber o

f mon

thly

sam

ples

is in

dica

ted

in p

aren

thes

es.

Taxo

nC

omm

on N

ame

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

(48)

(48)

(48)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

(60)

Cha

smod

es s

abur

rae

post

flexi

on la

rvae

Flor

ida

blen

ny1

2C

hasm

odes

sab

urra

e ju

veni

les

Flor

ida

blen

ny1

Hyp

sobl

enni

us s

pp. p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

blen

nies

3Lu

pino

blen

nius

nic

hols

i fle

xion

larv

aehi

ghfin

ble

nny

1Lu

pino

blen

nius

nic

hols

i pos

tflex

ion

larv

aehi

ghfin

ble

nny

1go

biid

pre

flexi

on la

rvae

gobi

es15

3637

215

7523

343

23go

biid

flex

ion

larv

aego

bies

3544

5420

101

5B

athy

gobi

us s

opor

ator

pre

flexi

on la

rvae

frillf

in g

oby

88

49

18B

athy

gobi

us s

opor

ator

flex

ion

larv

aefri

llfin

gob

y2

2G

obio

nellu

s sp

p. p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

gobi

es6

Gob

ioso

ma

spp.

pos

tflex

ion

larv

aego

bies

22

2555

152

2G

obio

som

a bo

sc ju

veni

les

nake

d go

by1

186

61

1G

obio

som

a bo

sc a

dults

nake

d go

by1

1G

obio

som

a ro

bust

um ju

veni

les

code

gob

y9

432

11

Mic

rogo

bius

spp

. fle

xion

larv

aego

bies

25

4312

238

1911

527

Mic

rogo

bius

spp

. pos

tflex

ion

larv

aego

bies

15

86

284

Mic

rogo

bius

gul

osus

juve

nile

scl

own

goby

15

356

A-18

Page 107: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

4. P

age

1 of

4.

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

pla

nkto

n ne

t cat

ch b

y m

onth

(May

200

3 to

Jun

e 20

04).

Num

ber o

f mon

thly

sam

ples

is in

dica

ted

in p

aren

thes

es.

Des

crip

tion

Com

mon

Nam

eJa

nFe

bM

arA

prM

ayJu

nJu

lA

ugS

epO

ct(4

)(4

)(4

)(4

)(8

)(8

)(4

)(4

)(4

)(4

)

Cra

sped

acus

ta s

owbe

riihy

drom

edus

a88

Lirio

pe te

traph

ylla

hydr

omed

usa

2C

lytia

sp.

hydr

omed

usa

282

med

usa

sp. c

hydr

omed

usa

455

med

usa

sp. a

hydr

omed

usa

837

med

usa

sp. d

hydr

omed

usa

4M

nem

iops

is m

ccra

dyi

com

b je

lly, c

teno

phor

e1

6712

181

turb

ella

rians

flatw

orm

s1

2po

lych

aete

ssa

nd w

orm

s, tu

be w

orm

s2

143

2756

3851

174

olig

ocha

etes

fresh

wat

er w

orm

s3

91

hiru

dino

idea

nsle

eche

s6

32

64

4cl

adoc

eran

s, D

aphn

ia s

pp.

wat

er fl

eas

1Si

moc

epha

lus

vetu

lus

wat

er fl

ea2

22

2628

117

1822

Cer

idod

aphn

ia s

p.w

ater

flea

4G

rimal

dina

bra

zzai

wat

er fl

ea4

Ilyoc

rypt

us s

p.w

ater

flea

1020

336

2910

Sid

a cr

ysta

llina

wat

er fl

ea5

723

31

2La

tono

psis

fasc

icul

ata

wat

er fl

ea1

1Eu

ryal

ona

occi

dent

alis

wat

er fl

ea1

Leyd

igia

sp.

wat

er fl

ea1

11

deca

pod

zoea

ecr

ab la

rvae

977

4676

6656

1190

839

104

2074

811

23

5de

capo

d m

ysis

shrim

p la

rvae

5111

2618

874

890

36

4de

capo

d m

egal

opae

post

-zoe

a cr

ab la

rvae

9351

2414

1008

3214

Pala

emon

etes

spp

. pos

tlarv

aegr

ass

shrim

p1

218

825

11

Pal

aem

onet

es p

ugio

juve

nile

sda

gger

blad

e gr

ass

shrim

p3

62

Pala

emon

etes

pug

io a

dults

dagg

erbl

ade

gras

s sh

rimp

21

2A

mbi

dext

er s

ymm

etric

us p

ostla

rvae

shrim

p2

Cal

linec

tes

sapi

dus

juve

nile

sbl

ue c

rab

1xa

nthi

d ju

veni

les

mud

cra

bs14

Rhi

thro

pano

peus

har

risii

juve

nile

sH

arris

mud

cra

b5

unid

entif

ied

Am

eric

amys

is ju

veni

les

opos

sum

shr

imps

, mys

ids

230

287

772

2676

524

564

158

Am

eric

amys

is a

lmyr

aop

ossu

m s

hrim

p, m

ysid

1298

639

4566

4091

2944

712

94

912

Bow

man

iella

dis

sim

ilis

opos

sum

shr

imp,

mys

id4

371

174

246

190

Taph

rom

ysis

bow

man

iop

ossu

m s

hrim

p, m

ysid

211

7327

832

392

cum

acea

nscu

mac

eans

1436

511

2660

611

3is

opod

sp.

ais

opod

1C

yath

ura

polit

ais

opod

13

910

34

3Xe

nant

hura

bre

vite

lson

isop

od1

Mun

na re

ynol

dsi

isop

od1

31

35

4Pr

obop

yrus

sp.

(atta

ched

)is

opod

2An

opsi

lana

jone

siis

opod

12

cym

otho

id s

p. a

(Liro

neca

) juv

enile

sis

opod

311

2212

310

610

5

A-19

Page 108: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

4. P

age

2 of

4.

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

pla

nkto

n ne

t cat

ch b

y m

onth

(May

200

3 to

Jun

e 20

04).

Num

ber o

f mon

thly

sam

ples

is in

dica

ted

in p

aren

thes

es.

Des

crip

tion

Com

mon

Nam

eJa

nFe

bM

arA

prM

ayJu

nJu

lA

ugS

epO

ct(4

)(4

)(4

)(4

)(8

)(8

)(4

)(4

)(4

)(4

)

Cas

sidi

nide

a ov

alis

isop

od1

1Sp

haer

oma

quad

riden

tata

isop

od16

511

75

53

2Sp

haer

oma

tere

bran

sis

opod

35

34

221

97

21

Edot

ea tr

iloba

isop

od93

2790

545

3465

1125

398

amph

ipod

s, g

amm

arid

ean

amph

ipod

s29

325

4450

712

6648

4651

8812

467

1850

8ci

rripe

d na

upliu

s st

age

barn

acle

s3

bran

chiu

rans

, Arg

ulus

spp

.fis

h lic

e3

12

317

64

11

2un

iden

tifie

d ha

rpac

ticoi

dsco

pepo

ds14

Alte

utha

sp.

cope

pod

1si

phon

osto

mat

ids

para

sitic

cop

epod

s1

unid

entif

ied

fresh

wat

er c

yclo

poid

sco

pepo

ds1

28

Mac

rocy

clop

s al

bidu

sco

pepo

ds1

1736

Mes

ocyc

lops

eda

xco

pepo

d41

2619

494

156

293

1678

969

7208

Orth

ocyc

lops

mod

estu

sco

pepo

d6

66

11

Acar

tia to

nsa

cope

pod

211

934

51

Dia

ptom

us s

pp.

cope

pods

15

Labi

doce

ra a

estiv

aco

pepo

d23

Osp

hran

ticum

labr

onec

tum

cope

pod

1Ps

eudo

diap

tom

us c

oron

atus

cope

pod

51

1os

traco

ds, p

odoc

opid

ostra

cods

, see

d sh

rimps

41

313

3367

1025

68

colle

mbo

las,

pod

urid

sprin

gtai

ls5

1ep

hem

erop

tera

n la

rvae

may

flies

36

5772

976

418

152

odon

ates

, ani

sopt

eran

larv

aedr

agon

flies

1411

36

odon

ates

, zyg

opte

ran

larv

aeda

mse

lflie

s14

144

97

hem

ipte

rans

, bel

osto

mat

id a

dults

gian

t wat

er b

ugs

11

hem

ipte

rans

, cor

ixid

juve

nile

sw

ater

boa

tmen

41

hem

ipte

rans

, cor

ixid

adu

ltsw

ater

boa

tmen

11

12

3he

mip

tera

ns, g

errid

adu

ltsw

ater

stri

ders

31

hem

ipte

rans

, nau

corid

adu

ltscr

eepi

ng w

ater

bug

s3

hem

ipte

rans

, nep

id a

dults

wat

er s

corp

ions

1he

mip

tera

ns, p

leid

adu

ltspy

gmy

back

swim

mer

s1

cole

opte

rans

, cur

culio

nid

adul

tsbe

etle

s2

cole

opte

rans

, not

erid

adu

ltsbu

rrow

ing

wat

er b

eetle

s9

212

22

cole

opte

rans

, elm

id la

rvae

riffle

bee

tles

145

68

cole

opte

rans

, elm

id a

dults

riffle

bee

tles

15

511

8co

leop

tera

ns, g

yrin

id la

rvae

whi

rligi

g be

etle

s2

cole

opte

rans

, hal

iplid

adu

ltscr

awlin

g w

ater

bee

tles

3co

leop

tera

ns, d

ytis

cid

adul

tspr

edac

eous

div

ing

beet

les

14

cole

opte

rans

, sci

rtid

larv

aem

arsh

bee

tles

1di

pter

ans,

pup

aefli

es, m

osqu

itoes

34

4446

4999

171

110

7018

7di

pter

ans,

cer

atop

ogon

id la

rvae

bitin

g m

idge

s1

113

1di

pter

an, C

haob

orus

pun

ctip

enni

s la

rvae

phan

tom

mid

ge8

32

4144

816

447

543

913

65

A-20

Page 109: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

4. P

age

3 of

4.

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

pla

nkto

n ne

t cat

ch b

y m

onth

(May

200

3 to

Jun

e 20

04).

Num

ber o

f mon

thly

sam

ples

is in

dica

ted

in p

aren

thes

es.

Des

crip

tion

Com

mon

Nam

eJa

nFe

bM

arA

prM

ayJu

nJu

lA

ugS

epO

ct(4

)(4

)(4

)(4

)(8

)(8

)(4

)(4

)(4

)(4

)

dipt

eran

s, c

hiro

nom

id la

rvae

mid

ges

286

78

320

137

5426

6119

dipt

eran

s, s

tratio

myi

d la

rvae

sold

ier f

lies

13

dipt

eran

s, s

ciom

yzid

larv

aem

arsh

flie

s1

1di

pter

ans,

tipu

lid la

rvae

cran

e fli

es5

trich

opte

ran

larv

aeca

ddis

flies

425

8984

8le

pido

pter

ans,

pyr

alid

larv

aeaq

uatic

cat

erpi

llars

21

acar

iw

ater

mite

s2

510

2319

83

gast

ropo

ds, p

roso

bran

chsn

ails

102

9329

527

420

203

1412

714

34ga

stro

pods

, opi

stho

bran

chse

a sl

ugs

32pe

lecy

pods

clam

s, m

usse

ls, o

yste

rs8

28

117

852

12

311

14ch

aeto

gnat

hs, s

agitt

idar

row

wor

ms

61

43

Lepi

sost

eus

sp. j

uven

iles

gar

34El

ops

saur

us p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

lady

fish

Elo

ps s

auru

s ju

veni

les

lady

fish

1Br

evoo

rtia

spp.

pos

tflex

ion

larv

aem

enha

den

49

1Br

evoo

rtia

spp.

met

amor

phs

men

hade

n5

29

Bre

voor

tia s

mith

i juv

enile

sye

llow

fin m

enha

den

2D

oros

oma

pete

nens

e ju

veni

les

thre

adfin

sha

d1

Anch

oa s

pp. p

refle

xion

larv

aean

chov

ies

33

220

Anch

oa s

pp. f

lexi

on la

rvae

anch

ovie

s58

3089

34A

ncho

a m

itchi

lli eg

gsba

y an

chov

y11

6A

ncho

a m

itchi

lli po

stfle

xion

larv

aeba

y an

chov

y12

918

656

Anc

hoa

mitc

hilli

juve

nile

sba

y an

chov

y93

015

2853

232

225

3717

3248

74

235

Anc

hoa

mitc

hilli

adu

ltsba

y an

chov

y1

22

312

Am

eiur

us c

atus

juve

nile

sw

hite

cat

fish

2Li

posa

rcus

spp

. juv

enile

ssu

cker

mou

th c

atfis

h3

1H

oplo

ster

num

litto

rale

flex

ion

larv

aebr

own

hopl

o ca

tfish

1H

oplo

ster

num

litto

rale

juve

nile

sbr

own

hopl

o ca

tfish

1G

obie

sox

stru

mos

us p

refle

xion

larv

aesk

illet

fish

46

Gob

ieso

x st

rum

osus

flex

ion

larv

aesk

illet

fish

12

292

Gob

ieso

x st

rum

osus

pos

tflex

ion

larv

aesk

illet

fish

34

Jord

anel

la fl

orid

ae ju

veni

les

flagf

ish

3Fu

ndul

us s

pp. j

uven

iles

killi

fishe

s2

Fund

ulus

gra

ndis

juve

nile

sgu

lf ki

llifis

h1

Luca

nia

good

ei p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

blue

fin k

illifis

h1

Luca

nia

good

ei ju

veni

les

blue

fin k

illifis

h3

3Lu

cani

a go

odei

adu

ltsbl

uefin

killi

fish

2Lu

cani

a pa

rva

juve

nile

sra

inw

ater

killi

fish

1Lu

cani

a pa

rva

adul

tsra

inw

ater

killi

fish

11

Gam

busi

a ho

lbro

oki j

uven

iles

east

ern

mos

quito

fish

11

62

22

Gam

busi

a ho

lbro

oki a

dults

east

ern

mos

quito

fish

13

1H

eter

andr

ia fo

rmos

a ju

veni

les

leas

t killi

fish

2

A-21

Page 110: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

4. P

age

4 of

4.

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

pla

nkto

n ne

t cat

ch b

y m

onth

(May

200

3 to

Jun

e 20

04).

Num

ber o

f mon

thly

sam

ples

is in

dica

ted

in p

aren

thes

es.

Des

crip

tion

Com

mon

Nam

eJa

nFe

bM

arA

prM

ayJu

nJu

lA

ugS

epO

ct(4

)(4

)(4

)(4

)(8

)(8

)(4

)(4

)(4

)(4

)

Het

eran

dria

form

osa

adul

tsle

ast k

illifi

sh6

1M

enid

ia s

pp. p

refle

xion

larv

aesi

lver

side

s3

11

3M

enid

ia s

pp. j

uven

iles

silv

ersi

des

21

Mem

bras

mar

tinic

a ju

veni

les

roug

h si

lver

side

Labi

dest

hes

sicc

ulus

juve

nile

sbr

ook

silv

ersi

de2

2fis

h eg

gs, p

erco

mor

phsc

iaen

id e

ggs

(prim

arily

)1

14

Syn

gnat

hus

loui

sian

ae ju

veni

les

chai

n pi

pefis

h1

8S

yngn

athu

s sc

ovel

li ju

veni

les

gulf

pipe

fish

1E

lass

oma

ever

glad

ei ju

veni

les

Eve

rgla

des

pygm

y su

nfis

h1

Ela

ssom

a ev

ergl

adei

adu

ltsE

verg

lade

s py

gmy

sunf

ish

2Le

pom

is m

acro

chiru

s ju

veni

les

blue

gill

11

1Ba

irdie

lla c

hrys

oura

flex

ion

larv

aesi

lver

per

ch1

Cyn

osci

on a

rena

rius

pref

lexi

on la

rvae

sand

sea

trout

11M

entic

irrhu

s sp

p. p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

king

fishe

s1

gobi

id p

refle

xion

larv

aego

bies

17

5010

753

127

11

gobi

id fl

exio

n la

rvae

gobi

es1

834

4279

Bat

hygo

bius

sop

orat

or fl

exio

n la

rvae

frillf

in g

oby

2G

obio

som

a sp

p. p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

gobi

es1

3956

294

8G

obio

som

a bo

sc ju

veni

les

nake

d go

by3

Gob

ioso

ma

robu

stum

juve

nile

sco

de g

oby

31

Mic

rogo

bius

spp

. fle

xion

larv

aego

bies

18

1124

204

Mic

rogo

bius

spp

. pos

tflex

ion

larv

aego

bies

13

851

1M

icro

gobi

us g

ulos

us ju

veni

les

clow

n go

byM

icro

gobi

us th

alas

sinu

s ad

ults

gree

n go

by1

Trin

ecte

s m

acul

atus

pre

flexi

on la

rvae

hogc

hoke

r1

Trin

ecte

s m

acul

atus

flex

ion

larv

aeho

gcho

ker

11

2Tr

inec

tes

mac

ulat

us p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

hogc

hoke

r1

22

2Tr

inec

tes

mac

ulat

us ju

veni

les

hogc

hoke

r6

33

418

96

unid

entif

ied

post

flexi

on la

rvae

fish

3an

uran

larv

aeta

dpol

es1

A-22

Page 111: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

5, p

age

1 of

7.

Loca

tion

spec

ific

plan

kton

-net

cat

ch in

the

Mya

kka

Riv

er.

Dat

a ar

e pr

esen

ted

as m

ean

num

ber p

er 1

,000

cub

ic m

eter

s.

Org

anis

ms

are

liste

d in

phy

loge

netic

ord

er.

Loca

tion

(km

from

mou

th)

Des

crip

tion

Com

mon

Nam

e3.

75.

58.

811

.414

.616

.618

.820

.723

.826

.829

.632

.137

.840

.2

fora

min

ifera

nsfo

ram

inife

rans

0.24

0.00

0.62

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Lirio

pe te

traph

ylla

hydr

omed

usa

0.00

2.19

0.56

1.02

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Cly

tia s

p.hy

drom

edus

a8.

376.

997.

927.

053.

030.

695.

023.

804.

830.

910.

690.

000.

000.

00m

edus

a sp

. ahy

drom

edus

a0.

000.

260.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00m

edus

a sp

. bhy

drom

edus

a5.

414.

510.

000.

000.

000.

450.

240.

001.

210.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00m

edus

a sp

. dhy

drom

edus

a0.

000.

000.

000.

380.

000.

000.

001.

817.

812.

335.

050.

000.

000.

00M

nem

iops

is m

ccra

dyi

com

b je

lly, c

teno

phor

e32

4.22

166.

0418

.83

562.

3768

.67

5011

.64

305.

0321

2.98

508.

230.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00B

eroe

ova

tase

a w

alnu

t, ct

enop

hore

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.27

79.4

10.

001.

221.

580.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00tu

rbel

laria

nsfla

twor

ms

0.00

0.00

0.26

0.25

0.26

2.31

0.25

0.23

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

nem

erte

ans

ribbo

n w

orm

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

270.

00ne

mat

odes

roun

dwor

ms,

thre

adw

orm

s0.

260.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

240.

000.

000.

000.

00po

lych

aete

ssa

nd w

orm

s, tu

be w

orm

s21

0.16

305.

3818

9.70

60.5

280

.84

34.2

232

.11

24.0

62.

8110

.54

18.6

05.

638.

8111

.45

olig

ocha

etes

fresh

wat

er w

orm

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

250.

230.

231.

133.

751.

745.

733.

892.

064.

24hi

rudi

noid

eans

leec

hes

0.38

0.00

0.44

1.53

0.94

1.36

2.81

1.62

1.17

2.13

1.79

0.22

0.22

0.00

clad

ocer

ans,

uni

dent

ified

wat

er fl

eas

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.34

8.80

0.23

clad

ocer

ans,

Dap

hnia

spp

.w

ater

flea

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

210.

000.

000.

210.

000.

001.

5213

.93

0.22

27.6

2S

imoc

epha

lus

vetu

lus

wat

er fl

ea0.

000.

242.

813.

656.

376.

6314

.09

44.9

226

.42

111.

1042

5.33

691.

4271

3.20

512.

68C

erid

odap

hnia

sp.

wat

er fl

ea0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

230.

240.

000.

500.

000.

000.

220.

00B

unop

s sp

.w

ater

flea

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.23

0.45

1.68

0.76

0.55

0.76

0.98

2.46

Grim

aldi

na b

razz

aiw

ater

flea

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.23

0.23

0.21

5.17

1.21

3.42

3.64

1.48

7.85

Ilyoc

rypt

us s

p.w

ater

flea

0.00

0.00

15.4

84.

725.

7611

.81

6.08

8.52

40.8

939

.39

33.4

055

.64

60.0

573

.90

Sid

a cr

ysta

llina

wat

er fl

ea0.

000.

000.

000.

421.

520.

210.

476.

495.

5728

.97

71.7

561

.58

19.3

58.

68La

tona

set

ifera

wat

er fl

ea0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

230.

000.

003.

568.

370.

682.

49P

enilia

avi

rost

risw

ater

flea

8.34

19.5

76.

811.

100.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00P

seud

osid

a bi

dent

ata

wat

er fl

ea0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

460.

000.

000.

000.

550.

000.

000.

00La

tono

psis

fasc

icul

ata

wat

er fl

ea0.

000.

001.

210.

233.

733.

163.

663.

4423

.42

1.63

39.1

033

.88

61.6

711

8.53

Eur

yalo

na o

ccid

enta

lisw

ater

flea

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.23

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.23

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.93

Leyd

igia

sp.

wat

er fl

ea0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

230.

001.

990.

442.

021.

63M

oina

daph

nia

mac

leay

iiw

ater

flea

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.71

0.00

0.00

0.00

Eva

dne

terg

estin

aw

ater

flea

33.8

240

.93

26.5

810

04.9

819

.20

1.29

0.74

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.26

0.00

0.00

0.00

deca

pod

zoea

ecr

ab la

rvae

8036

.12

1201

8.27

1029

5.31

1537

3.52

1163

2.81

4377

.27

9798

.54

7965

.87

3450

.33

4582

.11

3477

.26

2415

.60

484.

8812

.19

deca

pod

mys

issh

rimp

larv

ae16

7.68

143.

1121

9.03

327.

6641

6.74

70.5

821

9.72

246.

7834

.43

19.2

10.

220.

461.

971.

43de

capo

d m

egal

opae

post

-zoe

a cr

ab la

rvae

200.

2785

.30

510.

6162

1.95

477.

2435

5.95

545.

0316

7.69

120.

1949

6.41

1470

.23

449.

9634

.22

1.64

shrim

ps, u

nide

ntifi

ed p

ostla

rvae

shrim

ps13

6.41

8.43

21.4

115

.81

15.0

80.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00pe

naei

d po

stla

rvae

pena

eid

shrim

ps3.

8810

.37

1.66

16.5

20.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00pe

naei

d m

etam

orph

spe

naei

d sh

rimps

1.02

0.25

0.24

0.23

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Farfa

ntep

enae

us d

uora

rum

juve

nile

spi

nk s

hrim

p0.

700.

682.

762.

002.

290.

500.

000.

220.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00Fa

rfant

epen

aeus

duo

raru

m a

dults

pink

shr

imp

0.21

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.53

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Luci

fer f

axon

i juv

enile

s an

d ad

ults

shrim

p1.

392.

890.

980.

000.

260.

000.

000.

000.

000.

230.

000.

001.

880.

47Le

ptoc

hela

ser

rato

rbita

pos

tlarv

aeco

mbc

law

shr

imp

0.25

1.02

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Pal

aem

onet

es s

pp. p

ostla

rvae

gras

s sh

rimp

17.6

717

.00

33.7

927

.84

27.3

114

.98

19.2

837

.42

13.9

87.

531.

230.

000.

230.

70P

alae

mon

etes

pal

udos

us ju

veni

les

gras

s sh

rimp

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.21

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Pal

aem

onet

es p

ugio

juve

nile

sda

gger

blad

e gr

ass

shrim

p0.

001.

090.

000.

691.

270.

232.

6114

.24

2.36

2.73

1.36

0.23

0.74

0.41

Pal

aem

onet

es p

ugio

adu

ltsda

gger

blad

e gr

ass

shrim

p0.

000.

000.

000.

210.

220.

001.

741.

070.

460.

651.

740.

000.

410.

25P

alae

mon

etes

vul

garis

juve

nile

sgr

ass

shrim

p0.

000.

820.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00P

eric

limen

es s

pp. p

ostla

rvae

shrim

ps0.

240.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00al

phae

id p

ostla

rvae

snap

ping

shr

imps

90.0

253

.31

90.3

125

.72

8.20

0.69

0.00

0.50

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.23

alph

aeid

juve

nile

ssn

appi

ng s

hrim

ps0.

000.

440.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00Le

ptal

pheu

s fo

rcep

s ju

veni

les

snap

ping

shr

imp

0.21

0.21

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

A-23

Page 112: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

5, p

age

2 of

7.

Loca

tion

spec

ific

plan

kton

-net

cat

ch in

the

Mya

kka

Riv

er.

Dat

a ar

e pr

esen

ted

as m

ean

num

ber p

er 1

,000

cub

ic m

eter

s.

Org

anis

ms

are

liste

d in

phy

loge

netic

ord

er.

Loca

tion

(km

from

mou

th)

Des

crip

tion

Com

mon

Nam

e3.

75.

58.

811

.414

.616

.618

.820

.723

.826

.829

.632

.137

.840

.2

Hip

poly

te z

oste

ricol

a po

stla

rvae

zost

era

shrim

p27

.72

19.5

122

.66

3.75

0.00

0.23

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Hip

poly

te z

oste

ricol

a ju

veni

les

zost

era

shrim

p0.

000.

000.

820.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00O

gyrid

es a

lpha

eros

tris

juve

nile

s an

d ad

ults

estu

arin

e lo

ngey

e sh

rimp

2.50

3.25

2.08

0.00

0.46

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Am

bide

xter

sym

met

ricus

pos

tlarv

aesh

rimp

44.4

313

.45

9.97

2.29

1.40

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Am

bide

xter

sym

met

ricus

juve

nile

ssh

rimp

0.21

2.68

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Am

bide

xter

sym

met

ricus

adu

ltssh

rimp

0.00

0.73

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

asta

cide

an ju

veni

les

cray

fish

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.24

callia

nass

id p

ostla

rvae

ghos

t shr

imps

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.30

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Cal

liana

ssa

spp.

juve

nile

sgh

ost s

hrim

ps0.

001.

600.

560.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00U

poge

bia

spp.

pos

tlarv

aem

ud s

hrim

ps1.

210.

211.

410.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00E

ucer

amus

pra

elon

gus

meg

alop

s la

rvae

oliv

epit

porc

elai

n cr

ab0.

007.

500.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00P

etro

listh

es a

rmat

us ju

veni

les

porc

elai

n cr

ab0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

620.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00C

allin

ecte

s sa

pidu

s ju

veni

les

blue

cra

b0.

301.

041.

681.

240.

771.

153.

090.

911.

450.

680.

000.

240.

000.

00po

rtuni

d ju

veni

les

swim

min

g cr

abs

0.22

0.23

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Rhi

thro

pano

peus

har

risii

juve

nile

sH

arris

mud

cra

b0.

000.

000.

330.

000.

000.

002.

701.

900.

000.

250.

000.

000.

000.

00un

iden

tifie

d A

mer

icam

ysis

juve

nile

sop

ossu

m s

hrim

ps, m

ysid

s24

3.29

303.

4666

1.71

515.

8885

2.80

501.

4562

1.97

1188

.30

1891

.08

2002

.62

799.

2816

61.6

312

.67

0.46

Am

eric

amys

is a

lmyr

aop

ossu

m s

hrim

p, m

ysid

243.

5650

7.67

798.

5553

0.09

1893

.45

1670

.20

2381

.77

3440

.33

3818

.59

3559

.00

3059

.34

1557

.27

249.

2124

.67

Am

eric

amys

is b

ahia

opos

sum

shr

imp,

mys

id54

.15

53.8

164

.45

110.

090.

2614

1.11

1.26

0.21

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Am

eric

amys

is s

tuck

iop

ossu

m s

hrim

p, m

ysid

265.

4558

.26

43.6

027

.88

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Bow

man

iella

dis

sim

ilisop

ossu

m s

hrim

p, m

ysid

32.6

254

.52

109.

0333

8.32

124.

5421

6.09

422.

5074

8.81

492.

6660

4.61

91.9

427

.62

0.68

0.00

Spe

laeo

mys

is s

p.op

ossu

m s

hrim

p, m

ysid

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.10

0.00

0.00

1.41

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Taph

rom

ysis

bow

man

iop

ossu

m s

hrim

p, m

ysid

0.00

0.00

45.9

111

.19

67.4

142

.24

18.1

84.

7079

.69

1151

.31

850.

6210

80.9

014

37.6

072

5.41

cum

acea

nscu

mac

eans

9787

.20

8866

.95

1290

2.68

1650

2.71

6651

.05

5164

.41

1023

.66

75.1

78.

993.

894.

493.

7116

.37

1510

.09

Sin

elob

us s

tanf

ordi

tana

id0.

640.

230.

001.

300.

000.

000.

431.

100.

230.

230.

000.

260.

000.

00A

pseu

des

sp.

tana

id0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

001.

380.

210.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00H

arge

ria ra

pax

tana

id0.

000.

000.

000.

200.

000.

001.

410.

000.

000.

000.

810.

000.

000.

00is

opod

sp.

ais

opod

0.00

0.31

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Cya

thur

a po

lita

isop

od0.

000.

270.

448.

004.

316.

9647

.50

11.5

313

.81

11.3

16.

150.

200.

000.

00Xe

nant

hura

bre

vite

lson

isop

od0.

450.

231.

160.

000.

250.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00M

unna

reyn

olds

iis

opod

871.

6814

6.44

1.22

5.72

1.05

0.71

0.72

1.39

5.31

32.0

619

7.56

122.

892.

910.

88P

robo

pyru

s sp

. (at

tach

ed)

isop

od0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

210.

470.

230.

240.

000.

000.

00A

nops

ilana

jone

siis

opod

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.22

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

cym

otho

id s

p. a

(Liro

neca

) juv

enile

sis

opod

14.2

910

.04

14.6

128

.72

30.1

456

.16

51.0

431

.30

16.4

28.

610.

690.

440.

000.

00C

assi

dini

dea

oval

isis

opod

0.76

0.00

0.21

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.41

0.24

0.00

0.27

0.00

0.00

0.00

Har

rieta

faxo

niis

opod

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.22

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.22

0.00

Sph

aero

ma

quad

riden

tata

isop

od0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

001.

290.

474.

6811

.26

22.1

991

.57

207.

5569

.81

17.8

5S

phae

rom

a te

rebr

ans

isop

od0.

000.

000.

202.

660.

260.

671.

864.

132.

193.

3312

.01

28.6

010

.02

4.78

Sph

aero

ma

wal

keri

isop

od0.

000.

000.

000.

230.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

210.

880.

000.

000.

00E

dote

a tri

loba

isop

od8.

369.

6832

.28

22.6

712

3.27

284.

9817

6.72

440.

7416

36.3

530

9.41

25.5

78.

340.

230.

23E

richs

onel

la a

ttenu

ata

isop

od1.

756.

113.

900.

300.

720.

450.

240.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00E

richs

onel

la fi

lifor

me

isop

od0.

200.

210.

240.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00am

phip

ods,

gam

mar

idea

nam

phip

ods

605.

7882

5.22

951.

8811

04.1

184

6.75

589.

2724

32.4

214

75.7

922

61.1

625

86.3

064

25.4

119

08.8

515

98.7

374

8.78

amph

ipod

s, c

apre

llidsk

elet

on s

hrim

ps19

.71

24.0

878

.87

33.3

919

.06

0.91

0.00

0.50

0.00

0.23

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

cirri

ped

naup

lius

stag

eba

rnac

les

3334

.70

2757

.67

1765

.36

803.

9756

6.45

12.0

11.

230.

000.

000.

000.

000.

460.

000.

23br

anch

iura

ns, A

rgul

us s

pp.

fish

lice

4.28

4.09

9.45

6.67

4.90

2.70

2.56

1.82

0.24

2.53

2.18

2.22

1.58

2.03

unid

entif

ied

harp

actic

oids

cope

pods

2.52

0.90

1.70

0.23

0.00

0.00

3.78

0.00

0.00

0.28

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Alte

utha

sp.

cope

pod

0.00

0.23

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.24

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Onc

aea

spp.

cope

pods

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.25

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

siph

onos

tom

atid

spa

rasi

tic c

opep

ods

0.00

2.19

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

A-24

Page 113: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

5, p

age

3 of

7.

Loca

tion

spec

ific

plan

kton

-net

cat

ch in

the

Mya

kka

Riv

er.

Dat

a ar

e pr

esen

ted

as m

ean

num

ber p

er 1

,000

cub

ic m

eter

s.

Org

anis

ms

are

liste

d in

phy

loge

netic

ord

er.

Loca

tion

(km

from

mou

th)

Des

crip

tion

Com

mon

Nam

e3.

75.

58.

811

.414

.616

.618

.820

.723

.826

.829

.632

.137

.840

.2

unid

entif

ied

fresh

wat

er c

yclo

poid

sco

pepo

ds0.

000.

000.

240.

000.

000.

000.

000.

003.

781.

841.

501.

001.

200.

87C

yclo

ps s

pp.

cope

pods

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

12.8

80.

000.

000.

00M

acro

cycl

ops

albi

dus

cope

pods

0.00

0.00

0.46

0.21

0.48

0.88

1.80

0.40

8.83

9.27

5.97

8.11

11.7

273

.71

Mes

ocyc

lops

eda

xco

pepo

d0.

420.

004.

301.

727.

4743

.83

35.0

560

.78

40.2

452

.13

85.4

610

7.82

74.7

689

.20

Oith

ona

spp.

cope

pods

610.

1357

1.48

481.

0424

5.90

1.76

4.43

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Orth

ocyc

lops

mod

estu

sco

pepo

d0.

000.

000.

240.

420.

650.

000.

460.

212.

5316

.55

12.9

76.

2915

.97

9.85

Sap

hire

lla s

pp.

cope

pods

1.48

0.00

0.46

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

para

cala

nids

cope

pods

0.65

0.00

0.26

0.00

0.25

0.00

0.74

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Aca

rtia

tons

aco

pepo

d48

54.9

943

98.9

349

16.9

339

02.3

030

62.8

416

7.33

12.6

30.

672.

362.

500.

270.

921.

140.

70C

alan

opia

am

eric

ana

cope

pod

0.00

0.27

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

2.35

0.23

Cen

tropa

ges

ham

atus

cope

pod

0.00

0.00

0.62

2.30

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Cen

tropa

ges

velif

icat

usco

pepo

d1.

650.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00D

iapt

omus

spp

.co

pepo

ds0.

000.

680.

720.

440.

230.

210.

230.

700.

937.

7297

.62

78.5

211

.16

38.8

4E

uryt

emor

a af

finis

cope

pod

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.25

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Labi

doce

ra a

estiv

aco

pepo

d11

02.2

169

6.67

503.

2930

7.64

84.8

714

.77

0.00

8.54

0.48

1.81

0.00

0.00

2.05

1.41

Osp

hran

ticum

labr

onec

tum

cope

pod

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.20

2.09

0.64

0.44

1.27

1.73

2.71

Pse

udod

iapt

omus

cor

onat

usco

pepo

d58

.62

172.

1517

9.83

323.

3632

.40

17.1

05.

542.

070.

700.

440.

000.

000.

000.

00Te

mor

a tu

rbin

ata

cope

pod

7.56

4.53

1.16

1.91

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Euc

onch

oeci

a ch

ierc

hiae

ostra

cod,

see

d sh

rimp

0.00

0.94

0.00

0.00

1.16

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Sar

siel

la z

oste

ricol

aos

traco

d, s

eed

shrim

p0.

000.

900.

000.

590.

510.

620.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

430.

00P

aras

tero

pe p

olle

xos

traco

d, s

eed

shrim

p51

.51

387.

6913

5.72

60.4

67.

450.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

270.

00os

traco

ds, p

odoc

opid

ostra

cods

, see

d sh

rimps

3.13

0.50

1.05

5.59

2.12

4.82

1.38

8.48

4.44

25.5

533

.04

9.01

11.4

210

.40

colle

mbo

las,

pod

urid

sprin

gtai

ls0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

450.

000.

000.

440.

721.

091.

790.

271.

22ep

hem

erop

tera

n la

rvae

may

flies

0.63

0.00

2.11

5.10

7.84

6.35

19.6

820

.76

63.2

690

.16

146.

6023

0.17

304.

4181

4.53

odon

ates

, ani

sopt

eran

larv

aedr

agon

flies

0.19

0.00

1.46

1.07

0.86

0.00

1.17

0.65

0.47

0.26

1.53

2.00

5.10

4.53

odon

ates

, zyg

opte

ran

larv

aeda

mse

lflie

s0.

190.

000.

411.

481.

090.

500.

210.

442.

323.

351.

545.

677.

916.

86he

mip

tera

ns, b

elos

tom

atid

adu

ltsgi

ant w

ater

bug

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

470.

000.

000.

260.

001.

22he

mip

tera

ns, c

orix

id ju

veni

les

wat

er b

oatm

en0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

420.

691.

750.

530.

230.

00he

mip

tera

ns, c

orix

id a

dults

wat

er b

oatm

en0.

190.

000.

200.

000.

000.

230.

231.

252.

601.

471.

204.

354.

061.

50he

mip

tera

ns, g

errid

adu

ltsw

ater

stri

ders

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.24

1.04

0.00

0.00

0.76

1.29

0.89

0.00

hem

ipte

rans

, nau

corid

adu

ltscr

eepi

ng w

ater

bug

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

580.

190.

000.

41he

mip

tera

ns, n

epid

adu

ltsw

ater

sco

rpio

ns0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

230.

210.

000.

000.

230.

00he

mip

tera

ns, n

oton

ectid

adu

ltsba

cksw

imm

ers

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.42

0.00

0.00

hem

ipte

rans

, ple

id a

dults

pygm

y ba

cksw

imm

ers

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.24

0.48

0.26

0.48

1.59

0.00

0.00

meg

alop

tera

ns, c

oryd

alid

larv

aedo

bson

flies

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.22

0.00

neur

opte

rans

, Clim

acia

spp

. lar

vae

spon

gilla

flies

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.22

0.47

2.88

7.48

3.55

cole

opte

rans

, chr

ysom

elid

larv

aebe

etle

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

24co

leop

tera

ns, c

urcu

lioni

d ad

ults

beet

les

0.24

0.00

0.00

0.47

0.22

0.43

0.00

0.20

0.00

0.00

0.22

0.21

0.00

0.00

cole

opte

rans

, dyt

isci

d la

rvae

pred

aceo

us d

ivin

g be

etle

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

420.

000.

002.

992.

652.

40co

leop

tera

ns, n

oter

id a

dults

burro

win

g w

ater

bee

tles

0.00

0.00

0.20

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.21

0.44

2.61

1.07

1.53

4.46

1.03

2.99

cole

opte

rans

, dry

opid

larv

aelo

ng-to

ed w

ater

bee

tles

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.43

2.47

cole

opte

rans

, elm

id la

rvae

riffle

bee

tles

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.19

0.00

0.47

0.00

5.43

12.0

5co

leop

tera

ns, e

lmid

adu

ltsrif

fle b

eetle

s0.

000.

481.

230.

210.

650.

000.

220.

470.

230.

000.

251.

781.

111.

91co

leop

tera

ns, l

utro

chid

larv

aebe

etle

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

440.

470.

48co

leop

tera

ns, g

yrin

id la

rvae

whi

rligi

g be

etle

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

230.

000.

240.

461.

090.

252.

076.

198.

88co

leop

tera

ns, g

yrin

id a

dults

whi

rligi

g be

etle

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

360.

0027

.85

5.21

0.32

cole

opte

rans

, hal

iplid

larv

aecr

awlin

g w

ater

bee

tles

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.23

0.00

0.00

0.50

0.00

0.00

2.16

2.08

cole

opte

rans

, not

erid

larv

aebu

rrow

ing

wat

er b

eetle

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

784.

413.

78co

leop

tera

ns, d

ytis

cid

adul

tspr

edac

eous

div

ing

beet

les

0.23

0.00

0.23

0.20

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.41

0.22

1.59

0.27

1.06

A-25

Page 114: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

5, p

age

4 of

7.

Loca

tion

spec

ific

plan

kton

-net

cat

ch in

the

Mya

kka

Riv

er.

Dat

a ar

e pr

esen

ted

as m

ean

num

ber p

er 1

,000

cub

ic m

eter

s.

Org

anis

ms

are

liste

d in

phy

loge

netic

ord

er.

Loca

tion

(km

from

mou

th)

Des

crip

tion

Com

mon

Nam

e3.

75.

58.

811

.414

.616

.618

.820

.723

.826

.829

.632

.137

.840

.2

cole

opte

rans

, sci

rtid

larv

aem

arsh

bee

tles

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.11

7.12

cole

opte

rans

, sci

rtid

adul

tsm

arsh

bee

tles

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.23

dipt

eran

s, p

upae

flies

, mos

quito

es0.

412.

8519

.21

3.78

31.6

923

.87

17.0

439

.38

22.3

415

.29

65.9

168

.87

118.

4714

0.33

dipt

eran

s, c

erat

opog

onid

larv

aebi

ting

mid

ges

0.00

0.00

0.20

1.68

1.01

0.65

0.94

0.44

0.70

1.00

1.79

2.08

1.56

4.48

dipt

eran

, Cha

obor

us p

unct

ipen

nis

larv

aeph

anto

m m

idge

9.23

11.7

128

.98

50.0

949

.87

57.0

764

.87

65.6

945

.17

32.3

645

.65

62.2

444

.01

54.0

0di

pter

ans,

chi

rono

mid

larv

aem

idge

s0.

860.

441.

502.

851.

355.

645.

7924

.17

7.72

28.0

781

.87

57.9

610

1.71

131.

34di

pter

ans,

eph

ydrid

larv

aesh

ore

flies

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.25

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

dipt

eran

s, s

tratio

myi

d la

rvae

sold

ier f

lies

0.00

0.00

0.20

0.84

0.22

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.21

0.00

0.00

0.76

0.00

dipt

eran

s, s

ciom

yzid

larv

aem

arsh

flie

s0.

250.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

680.

000.

260.

914.

74di

pter

ans,

syr

phid

larv

aeho

verfl

ies

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.25

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

dipt

eran

s, ta

bani

d la

rvae

deer

flie

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

270.

00tri

chop

tera

n la

rvae

cadd

isfli

es0.

000.

000.

000.

210.

431.

340.

451.

126.

426.

3713

.43

17.2

651

.44

47.2

9le

pido

pter

ans,

pyr

alid

larv

aeaq

uatic

cat

erpi

llars

0.19

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.22

1.80

Lim

ulus

pol

yphe

mus

larv

aeho

rseh

oe c

rab

0.00

0.73

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

acar

iw

ater

mite

s0.

190.

000.

821.

060.

872.

471.

311.

713.

472.

937.

869.

6518

.52

23.0

1ga

stro

pods

, pro

sobr

anch

snai

ls58

.88

13.7

823

.13

8.62

19.4

847

.58

86.1

026

3.23

806.

5337

9.80

79.3

512

.31

7.29

7.83

gast

ropo

ds, o

pist

hobr

anch

sea

slug

s0.

822.

761.

893.

351.

200.

500.

220.

478.

730.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00pe

lecy

pods

clam

s, m

usse

ls, o

yste

rs2.

572.

511.

9748

.75

5.35

15.2

237

3.39

46.4

71.

8820

.70

260.

4235

1.16

96.4

618

.07

Lollig

uncu

la b

revi

s ju

veni

les

bay

squi

d0.

480.

001.

220.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00br

achi

opod

, Glo

ttidi

a py

ram

idat

a la

rvae

lam

p sh

ell

327.

4520

3.02

0.89

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

chae

togn

aths

, sag

ittid

arro

w w

orm

s18

51.2

772

2.89

1003

.79

631.

4544

.40

1.36

3.90

1.63

0.00

1.61

0.81

0.46

2.56

0.47

asci

diac

ean

larv

aetu

nica

te la

rvae

0.96

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

appe

ndic

ular

ian,

Oik

ople

ura

dioi

cala

rvac

ean

5106

.81

6249

.11

2664

.61

2803

.27

730.

7836

2.54

366.

490.

000.

000.

000.

000.

230.

000.

23B

ranc

hios

tom

a flo

ridae

lanc

elet

0.00

0.24

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Lepi

sost

eus

sp. p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

gar

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.27

0.00

0.00

0.00

Lepi

sost

eus

sp. j

uven

iles

gar

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.21

0.00

0.21

0.22

0.00

0.00

0.00

Elo

ps s

auru

s po

stfle

xion

larv

aela

dyfis

h0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

910.

940.

000.

782.

58E

lops

sau

rus

juve

nile

sla

dyfis

h0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

460.

000.

000.

000.

450.

00M

yrop

his

punc

tatu

s ju

veni

les

spec

kled

wor

m e

el0.

000.

240.

230.

550.

260.

000.

230.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00cl

upei

d pr

efle

xion

larv

aehe

rring

s0.

000.

980.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00B

revo

ortia

spp

. pos

tflex

ion

larv

aem

enha

den

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.49

0.53

12.7

10.

240.

490.

000.

000.

00B

revo

ortia

spp

. met

amor

phs

men

hade

n0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

007.

813.

980.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00D

oros

oma

spp.

pre

flexi

on la

rvae

shad

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

230.

47A

ncho

a sp

p. p

refle

xion

larv

aean

chov

ies

738.

4412

3.78

284.

5418

7.77

81.5

132

.16

4.39

4.30

1.23

0.45

0.27

0.00

0.00

0.00

Anc

hoa

spp.

flex

ion

larv

aean

chov

ies

80.8

215

6.75

80.9

740

.77

26.4

32.

020.

7312

.23

4.68

2.11

4.42

0.98

0.46

0.41

Anc

hoa

heps

etus

egg

sst

riped

anc

hovy

2.01

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.26

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Anc

hoa

heps

etus

pos

tflex

ion

larv

aest

riped

anc

hovy

0.22

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.26

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Anc

hoa

heps

etus

juve

nile

sst

riped

anc

hovy

0.00

0.00

0.28

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Anch

oa m

itchi

lli eg

gsba

y an

chov

y17

94.4

719

68.1

625

58.2

114

00.1

011

88.7

186

.21

0.45

3.42

0.00

1.61

7.91

1.66

0.00

0.00

Anch

oa m

itchi

lli po

stfle

xion

larv

aeba

y an

chov

y35

.62

19.6

354

.90

40.7

621

.02

9.38

6.19

4.26

7.31

9.02

10.1

14.

860.

690.

66An

choa

mitc

hilli

juve

nile

sba

y an

chov

y15

.47

12.1

260

.99

48.8

666

.60

101.

9623

7.62

232.

7127

3.78

440.

7336

1.03

132.

0810

.13

77.0

9A

ncho

a m

itchi

lli ad

ults

bay

anch

ovy

6.55

9.55

8.26

40.3

018

.69

38.6

38.

202.

754.

491.

824.

030.

422.

810.

47N

otro

pis

spp.

pre

flexi

on la

rvae

min

now

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

490.

000.

230.

00N

otro

pis

spp.

juve

nile

sm

inno

ws

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.23

0.23

Not

ropi

s pe

ters

oni a

dults

coas

tal s

hine

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

220.

000.

000.

00E

rimyz

on s

ucet

ta ju

veni

les

lake

chu

bsuc

ker

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.46

0.00

0.00

0.23

Am

eiur

us c

atus

juve

nile

sw

hite

cat

fish

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.25

0.67

0.64

0.46

0.00

Am

eiur

us n

atal

is ju

veni

les

yello

w b

ullh

ead

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.25

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.15

0.00

Not

urus

gyr

inus

juve

nile

sta

dpol

e m

adto

m0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

220.

482.

460.

95

A-26

Page 115: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

5, p

age

5 of

7.

Loca

tion

spec

ific

plan

kton

-net

cat

ch in

the

Mya

kka

Riv

er.

Dat

a ar

e pr

esen

ted

as m

ean

num

ber p

er 1

,000

cub

ic m

eter

s.

Org

anis

ms

are

liste

d in

phy

loge

netic

ord

er.

Loca

tion

(km

from

mou

th)

Des

crip

tion

Com

mon

Nam

e3.

75.

58.

811

.414

.616

.618

.820

.723

.826

.829

.632

.137

.840

.2

Icta

luru

s pu

ncta

tus

juve

nile

sch

anne

l cat

fish

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.06

0.00

0.00

0.22

0.00

0.46

0.00

Ariu

s fe

lis ju

veni

les

hard

head

cat

fish

0.00

0.00

0.23

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Bag

re m

arin

us ju

veni

les

gafft

opsa

il se

a ca

tfish

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.23

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Lipo

sarc

us s

pp. j

uven

iles

suck

erm

outh

cat

fish

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.22

0.72

0.43

0.00

Hop

lost

ernu

m li

ttora

le p

refle

xion

larv

aebr

own

hopl

o ca

tfish

0.00

0.00

0.20

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.55

0.00

0.00

0.00

Hop

lost

ernu

m li

ttora

le fl

exio

n la

rvae

brow

n ho

plo

catfi

sh0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

213.

540.

520.

270.

25H

oplo

ster

num

litto

rale

pos

tflex

ion

larv

aebr

own

hopl

o ca

tfish

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.50

0.00

0.52

0.00

1.09

Hop

lost

ernu

m li

ttora

le ju

veni

les

brow

n ho

plo

catfi

sh0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

940.

472.

677.

906.

053.

629.

59G

obie

sox

stru

mos

us p

refle

xion

larv

aesk

illetfi

sh0.

480.

002.

863.

023.

250.

562.

950.

460.

250.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00G

obie

sox

stru

mos

us fl

exio

n la

rvae

skille

tfish

0.00

0.27

0.80

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.49

3.09

0.48

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Gob

ieso

x st

rum

osus

pos

tflex

ion

larv

aesk

illetfi

sh0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

001.

061.

680.

230.

000.

000.

000.

00G

obie

sox

stru

mos

us ju

veni

les

skille

tfish

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.16

1.41

0.00

0.50

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Hyp

orha

mph

us u

nifa

scia

tus

pref

lexi

on la

rvae

silv

erst

ripe

halfb

eak

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.23

0.24

Hyp

orha

mph

us u

nifa

scia

tus

flexi

on la

rvae

silv

erst

ripe

halfb

eak

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.23

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.24

Stro

ngyl

ura

spp.

pos

tflex

ion

larv

aene

edle

fishe

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

001.

360.

000.

000.

00S

trong

ylur

a sp

p. a

dults

need

lefis

hes

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.19

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Stro

ngyl

ura

mar

ina

juve

nile

sA

tlant

ic n

eedl

efis

h0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

740.

000.

000.

230.

000.

000.

000.

00S

trong

ylur

a no

tata

adu

ltsre

dfin

nee

dlef

ish

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.19

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Cyp

rinod

on v

arie

gatu

s po

stfle

xion

larv

aesh

eeps

head

min

now

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.49

0.00

Cyp

rinod

on v

arie

gatu

s ju

veni

les

shee

pshe

ad m

inno

w0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

23Jo

rdan

ella

flor

idae

adu

ltsfla

gfis

h0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

81Fu

ndul

us s

pp. p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

killif

ishe

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

220.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00Fu

ndul

us s

pp. j

uven

iles

killif

ishe

s0.

000.

000.

410.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

250.

000.

000.

000.

00Fu

ndul

us s

emin

olis

pos

tflex

ion

larv

aeS

emin

ole

killif

ish

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.39

0.00

0.00

Fund

ulus

gra

ndis

juve

nile

sgu

lf ki

llifis

h0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

220.

410.

00Lu

cani

a go

odei

juve

nile

sbl

uefin

killi

fish

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.43

0.00

1.08

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.27

0.00

0.00

0.41

Luca

nia

good

ei a

dults

blue

fin k

illifi

sh0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

220.

000.

000.

91Lu

cani

a pa

rva

post

flexi

on la

rvae

rain

wat

er k

illifis

h0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

22Lu

cani

a pa

rva

juve

nile

sra

inw

ater

kill

ifish

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.25

1.83

0.00

0.00

0.22

0.00

Luca

nia

parv

a ad

ults

rain

wat

er k

illifis

h0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

220.

220.

00G

ambu

sia

holb

rook

i juv

enile

sea

ster

n m

osqu

itofis

h0.

000.

000.

200.

000.

000.

000.

692.

443.

017.

862.

329.

633.

127.

17G

ambu

sia

holb

rook

i adu

ltsea

ster

n m

osqu

itofis

h0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

660.

933.

010.

901.

42H

eter

andr

ia fo

rmos

a ju

veni

les

leas

t killi

fish

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.24

0.20

0.47

0.18

0.80

1.59

0.00

0.45

Het

eran

dria

form

osa

adul

tsle

ast k

illifis

h0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

430.

000.

000.

000.

841.

921.

363.

702.

271.

72P

oeci

lia la

tipin

na ju

veni

les

sailf

in m

olly

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.22

0.00

0.00

0.00

Men

idia

spp

. pre

flexi

on la

rvae

silv

ersi

des

0.19

0.00

0.00

0.48

0.26

0.49

2.80

2.76

4.94

4.19

6.48

2.12

0.50

0.93

Men

idia

spp

. fle

xion

larv

aesi

lver

side

s0.

000.

220.

560.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

530.

000.

00M

enid

ia s

pp. j

uven

iles

silv

ersi

des

0.26

0.24

0.23

0.00

0.21

1.14

0.45

0.67

0.00

1.60

0.69

0.68

0.79

0.70

Men

idia

ber

yllin

a ju

veni

les

inla

nd s

ilver

side

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.74

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.27

0.00

0.00

0.00

Mem

bras

mar

tinic

a pr

efle

xion

larv

aero

ugh

silv

ersi

de0.

710.

001.

840.

820.

210.

280.

710.

000.

000.

000.

270.

000.

000.

00M

embr

as m

artin

ica

flexi

on la

rvae

roug

h si

lver

side

0.43

0.00

0.56

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Mem

bras

mar

tinic

a po

stfle

xion

larv

aero

ugh

silv

ersi

de0.

420.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

240.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00M

embr

as m

artin

ica

juve

nile

sro

ugh

silv

ersi

de0.

430.

270.

000.

500.

000.

451.

241.

861.

691.

600.

690.

000.

000.

00M

embr

as m

artin

ica

adul

tsro

ugh

silv

ersi

de0.

260.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00La

bide

sthe

s si

ccul

us p

refle

xion

larv

aebr

ook

silv

ersi

de0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

220.

000.

000.

000.

001.

040.

490.

00La

bide

sthe

s si

ccul

us ju

veni

les

broo

k si

lver

side

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.24

0.23

1.36

1.16

Labi

dest

hes

sicc

ulus

adu

ltsbr

ook

silv

ersi

de0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

24fis

h eg

gs, p

erco

mor

phsc

iaen

id e

ggs

(prim

arily

)14

96.2

413

20.8

785

13.9

927

56.2

815

4.24

26.9

211

1.64

1.62

0.00

0.23

0.25

0.45

0.64

1.88

Hip

poca

mpu

s er

ectu

s ju

veni

les

lined

sea

hors

e0.

000.

831.

160.

820.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00

A-27

Page 116: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

5, p

age

6 of

7.

Loca

tion

spec

ific

plan

kton

-net

cat

ch in

the

Mya

kka

Riv

er.

Dat

a ar

e pr

esen

ted

as m

ean

num

ber p

er 1

,000

cub

ic m

eter

s.

Org

anis

ms

are

liste

d in

phy

loge

netic

ord

er.

Loca

tion

(km

from

mou

th)

Des

crip

tion

Com

mon

Nam

e3.

75.

58.

811

.414

.616

.618

.820

.723

.826

.829

.632

.137

.840

.2

Syn

gnat

hus

loui

sian

ae ju

veni

les

chai

n pi

pefis

h0.

290.

680.

000.

260.

000.

000.

740.

490.

000.

220.

000.

000.

000.

00S

yngn

athu

s sc

ovel

li ju

veni

les

gulf

pipe

fish

0.66

0.00

0.88

0.00

0.44

1.37

0.73

0.00

0.00

0.23

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Prio

notu

s tri

bulu

s po

stfle

xion

larv

aebi

ghea

d se

arob

in0.

000.

000.

210.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00P

riono

tus

tribu

lus

juve

nile

sbi

ghea

d se

arob

in0.

250.

530.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00E

lass

oma

ever

glad

ei ju

veni

les

Eve

rgla

des

pygm

y su

nfis

h0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

210.

000.

370.

000.

000.

000.

000.

24E

lass

oma

ever

glad

ei a

dults

Eve

rgla

des

pygm

y su

nfis

h0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

190.

000.

270.

41E

lass

oma

okef

enok

e ju

veni

les

Oke

feno

kee

pygm

y su

nfis

h0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

210.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00E

nnea

cant

hus

glor

iosu

s ju

veni

les

blue

spot

ted

sunf

ish

0.19

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.24

0.00

0.19

0.27

0.23

0.41

Lepo

mis

spp

. pre

flexi

on la

rvae

sunf

ishe

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

200.

222.

42Le

pom

is s

pp. f

lexi

on la

rvae

sunf

ishe

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

540.

000.

000.

22Le

pom

is s

pp. p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

sunf

ishe

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

25Le

pom

is s

pp. j

uven

iles

sunf

ishe

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

220.

000.

000.

000.

000.

231.

260.

000.

691.

10Le

pom

is a

uritu

s fle

xion

larv

aere

dbre

ast s

unfis

h0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

710.

000.

000.

00Le

pom

is m

acro

chiru

s ju

veni

les

blue

gill

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.22

Lepo

mis

pun

ctat

us ju

veni

les

spot

ted

sunf

ish

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.20

0.00

Mic

ropt

erus

sal

moi

des

flexi

on la

rvae

larg

emou

th b

ass

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.27

0.00

2.28

0.91

Mic

ropt

erus

sal

moi

des

post

flexi

on la

rvae

larg

emou

th b

ass

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.44

Mic

ropt

erus

sal

moi

des

juve

nile

sla

rgem

outh

bas

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

230.

270.

220.

000.

00E

theo

stom

a fu

sifo

rme

pref

lexi

on la

rvae

swam

p da

rter

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.27

0.00

0.00

1.21

Eth

eost

oma

fusi

form

e fle

xion

larv

aesw

amp

darte

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

230.

00C

hlor

osco

mbr

us c

hrys

urus

pos

tflex

ion

larv

aeA

tlant

ic b

umpe

r0.

260.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00O

ligop

lites

sau

rus

flexi

on la

rvae

leat

herja

ck0.

000.

940.

000.

001.

450.

000.

000.

000.

480.

000.

690.

000.

000.

00O

ligop

lites

sau

rus

post

flexi

on la

rvae

leat

herja

ck0.

910.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00O

ligop

lites

sau

rus

juve

nile

sle

athe

rjack

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.29

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Lutja

nus

gris

eus

juve

nile

sgr

ay s

napp

er0.

000.

000.

000.

720.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00ge

rreid

pre

flexi

on la

rvae

moj

jara

s14

.38

4.10

1.11

1.02

3.12

0.00

0.24

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

gerre

id fl

exio

n la

rvae

moj

jara

s0.

912.

190.

002.

300.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00E

uger

res

plum

ieri

flexi

on la

rvae

strip

ed m

ojar

ra0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

460.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00E

uger

res

plum

ieri

post

flexi

on la

rvae

strip

ed m

ojar

ra0.

200.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00E

ucin

osto

mus

spp

. pos

tflex

ion

larv

aem

ojar

ras

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.22

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.23

Euc

inos

tom

us s

pp. j

uven

iles

moj

arra

s0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

450.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00E

ucin

osto

mus

gul

a ju

veni

les

silv

er je

nny

0.00

0.00

0.41

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Lago

don

rhom

boid

es ju

veni

les

pinf

ish

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.46

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Bai

rdie

lla c

hrys

oura

pre

flexi

on la

rvae

silv

er p

erch

2.72

1.96

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Bai

rdie

lla c

hrys

oura

flex

ion

larv

aesi

lver

per

ch0.

000.

331.

730.

300.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00C

ynos

cion

are

nariu

s pr

efle

xion

larv

aesa

nd s

eatro

ut4.

134.

142.

161.

020.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00C

ynos

cion

are

nariu

s fle

xion

larv

aesa

nd s

eatro

ut0.

300.

940.

510.

001.

680.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00C

ynos

cion

are

nariu

s po

stfle

xion

larv

aesa

nd s

eatro

ut0.

260.

000.

760.

250.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00C

ynos

cion

are

nariu

s ju

veni

les

sand

sea

trout

0.43

0.22

0.44

0.48

0.00

0.22

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Cyn

osci

on n

ebul

osus

pre

flexi

on la

rvae

spot

ted

seat

rout

3.62

0.21

0.00

1.10

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Cyn

osci

on n

ebul

osus

flex

ion

larv

aesp

otte

d se

atro

ut0.

910.

270.

000.

001.

450.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00M

entic

irrhu

s sp

p. p

refle

xion

larv

aeki

ngfis

hes

6.19

5.84

0.64

0.47

0.25

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Men

ticirr

hus

spp.

flex

ion

larv

aeki

ngfis

hes

0.64

3.41

1.11

0.00

2.61

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Men

ticirr

hus

spp.

pos

tflex

ion

larv

aeki

ngfis

hes

0.51

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Men

ticirr

hus

amer

ican

us ju

veni

les

sout

hern

kin

gfis

h0.

000.

220.

000.

000.

000.

000.

230.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00S

ciae

nops

oce

llatu

s po

stfle

xion

larv

aere

d dr

um0.

000.

230.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00Ti

lapi

a sp

p. ju

veni

les

tilap

ias

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.22

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Mug

il ce

phal

us ju

veni

les

strip

ed m

ulle

t0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

260.

000.

000.

000.

640.

000.

000.

000.

00bl

enni

id p

refle

xion

larv

aebl

enni

es1.

121.

171.

220.

870.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

230.

00

A-28

Page 117: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

5, p

age

7 of

7.

Loca

tion

spec

ific

plan

kton

-net

cat

ch in

the

Mya

kka

Riv

er.

Dat

a ar

e pr

esen

ted

as m

ean

num

ber p

er 1

,000

cub

ic m

eter

s.

Org

anis

ms

are

liste

d in

phy

loge

netic

ord

er.

Loca

tion

(km

from

mou

th)

Des

crip

tion

Com

mon

Nam

e3.

75.

58.

811

.414

.616

.618

.820

.723

.826

.829

.632

.137

.840

.2

Cha

smod

es s

abur

rae

post

flexi

on la

rvae

Flor

ida

blen

ny0.

000.

000.

000.

300.

000.

000.

000.

500.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00C

hasm

odes

sab

urra

e ju

veni

les

Flor

ida

blen

ny0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

240.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00H

ypso

blen

nius

spp

. pos

tflex

ion

larv

aebl

enni

es0.

000.

900.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00Lu

pino

blen

nius

nic

hols

i fle

xion

larv

aehi

ghfin

ble

nny

0.22

0.24

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Lupi

nobl

enni

us n

icho

lsi p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

high

fin b

lenn

y0.

000.

000.

000.

300.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00go

biid

pre

flexi

on la

rvae

gobi

es6.

241.

9213

.95

9.26

7.58

7.37

21.6

411

.63

10.8

47.

028.

705.

640.

681.

77go

biid

flex

ion

larv

aego

bies

0.81

4.52

9.88

3.06

3.66

1.97

5.11

6.21

1.17

2.73

2.55

2.04

0.23

0.62

Bat

hygo

bius

sop

orat

or p

refle

xion

larv

aefri

llfin

gob

y4.

954.

503.

660.

000.

260.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00B

athy

gobi

us s

opor

ator

flex

ion

larv

aefri

llfin

gob

y0.

000.

000.

560.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

480.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00G

obio

nellu

s sp

p. p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

gobi

es0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

001.

380.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00G

obio

som

a sp

p. p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

gobi

es1.

893.

653.

433.

630.

262.

150.

971.

623.

132.

260.

691.

310.

430.

00G

obio

som

a bo

sc ju

veni

les

nake

d go

by0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

230.

240.

488.

347.

364.

360.

650.

00G

obio

som

a bo

sc a

dults

nake

d go

by0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

950.

000.

000.

220.

000.

000.

00G

obio

som

a ro

bust

um ju

veni

les

code

gob

y0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

230.

450.

191.

1510

.41

0.45

0.00

0.00

Mic

rogo

bius

spp

. fle

xion

larv

aego

bies

2.50

2.04

11.2

212

.31

8.10

3.01

12.1

28.

434.

174.

852.

040.

450.

000.

00M

icro

gobi

us s

pp. p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

gobi

es0.

210.

542.

603.

230.

422.

481.

171.

400.

250.

450.

000.

000.

430.

24M

icro

gobi

us g

ulos

us ju

veni

les

clow

n go

by0.

000.

001.

080.

821.

351.

792.

762.

280.

230.

230.

680.

000.

000.

00M

icro

gobi

us g

ulos

us a

dults

clow

n go

by0.

000.

240.

410.

210.

000.

000.

540.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00M

icro

gobi

us th

alas

sinu

s ad

ults

gree

n go

by0.

000.

480.

200.

000.

220.

000.

000.

950.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00Tr

inec

tes

mac

ulat

us p

refle

xion

larv

aeho

gcho

ker

7.77

1.34

2.97

0.00

0.51

0.28

0.49

0.96

0.48

0.23

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Trin

ecte

s m

acul

atus

flex

ion

larv

aeho

gcho

ker

2.84

1.85

0.76

0.00

0.00

0.45

0.00

0.21

0.48

0.45

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Trin

ecte

s m

acul

atus

pos

tflex

ion

larv

aeho

gcho

ker

0.48

0.00

1.76

0.98

0.49

1.21

0.24

0.48

0.71

0.44

3.41

0.23

0.23

0.00

Trin

ecte

s m

acul

atus

juve

nile

sho

gcho

ker

0.45

0.25

2.24

1.94

6.40

18.6

77.

509.

709.

1710

.81

14.8

413

.55

14.5

511

.91

Trin

ecte

s m

acul

atus

adu

ltsho

gcho

ker

0.00

0.00

1.44

0.45

0.46

1.17

0.00

0.24

0.22

3.27

1.88

4.28

0.41

0.23

Sph

oero

ides

nep

helu

s ju

veni

les

sout

hern

puf

fer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.29

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Chi

lom

ycte

rus

scho

epfi

juve

nile

sst

riped

bur

rfish

0.00

0.00

0.20

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

unid

entif

ied

pref

lexi

on la

rvae

fish

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.21

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.23

unid

entif

ied

post

flexi

on la

rvae

fish

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.23

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.71

anur

an la

rvae

tadp

oles

0.19

0.24

1.64

1.06

0.43

0.45

3.78

0.00

0.47

0.18

0.83

2.95

2.10

3.31

A-29

Page 118: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

6, p

age

1 of

6.

Loca

tion

spec

ific

plan

kton

-net

cat

ch in

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

.D

ata

are

pres

ente

d as

mea

n nu

mbe

r per

1,0

00 c

ubic

met

ers.

Org

anis

ms

are

liste

d in

phy

loge

netic

ord

er.

Loca

tion

(km

from

Mya

kka

Riv

er m

outh

)

Des

crip

tion

Com

mon

Nam

e22

.223

.324

.325

.1

Cra

sped

acus

ta s

owbe

riihy

drom

edus

a4.

1515

.58

0.00

0.00

Lirio

pe te

traph

ylla

hydr

omed

usa

0.00

0.00

0.48

0.00

Cly

tia s

p.hy

drom

edus

a1.

330.

004.

712.

21m

edus

a sp

. chy

drom

edus

a0.

000.

0021

.43

94.8

8m

edus

a sp

. ahy

drom

edus

a8.

890.

002.

300.

52m

edus

a sp

. dhy

drom

edus

a1.

020.

000.

000.

00M

nem

iops

is m

ccra

dyi

com

b je

lly, c

teno

phor

e45

6.69

1073

.44

126.

5531

.20

turb

ella

rians

flatw

orm

s0.

230.

000.

490.

00po

lych

aete

ssa

nd w

orm

s, tu

be w

orm

s26

.51

25.6

29.

7316

.67

olig

ocha

etes

fresh

wat

er w

orm

s0.

001.

674.

620.

95hi

rudi

noid

eans

leec

hes

6.37

1.54

1.14

1.50

clad

ocer

ans,

Dap

hnia

spp

.w

ater

flea

s0.

000.

230.

000.

00S

imoc

epha

lus

vetu

lus

wat

er fl

ea4.

1217

.63

25.7

122

.87

Cer

idod

aphn

ia s

p.w

ater

flea

0.00

0.00

0.00

3.08

Grim

aldi

na b

razz

aiw

ater

flea

0.00

0.00

0.00

3.08

Ilyoc

rypt

us s

p.w

ater

flea

9.38

19.7

924

.80

14.1

1S

ida

crys

tallin

aw

ater

flea

2.69

0.90

0.62

8.18

Lato

nops

is fa

scic

ulat

aw

ater

flea

0.00

0.00

0.23

0.22

Eur

yalo

na o

ccid

enta

lisw

ater

flea

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.22

Leyd

igia

sp.

wat

er fl

ea0.

000.

000.

230.

48de

capo

d zo

eae

crab

larv

ae49

66.3

283

73.7

878

25.9

814

77.8

4de

capo

d m

ysis

shrim

p la

rvae

278.

3711

1.52

88.7

824

.86

deca

pod

meg

alop

aepo

st-z

oea

crab

larv

ae68

6.63

367.

5858

7.07

31.9

2P

alae

mon

etes

spp

. pos

tlarv

aegr

ass

shrim

p10

.83

6.09

12.8

81.

80P

alae

mon

etes

pug

io ju

veni

les

dagg

erbl

ade

gras

s sh

rimp

1.37

1.03

1.15

0.23

Pal

aem

onet

es p

ugio

adu

ltsda

gger

blad

e gr

ass

shrim

p1.

631.

080.

680.

00

A-30

Page 119: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

6, p

age

2 of

6.

Loca

tion

spec

ific

plan

kton

-net

cat

ch in

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

.D

ata

are

pres

ente

d as

mea

n nu

mbe

r per

1,0

00 c

ubic

met

ers.

Org

anis

ms

are

liste

d in

phy

loge

netic

ord

er.

Loca

tion

(km

from

Mya

kka

Riv

er m

outh

)

Des

crip

tion

Com

mon

Nam

e22

.223

.324

.325

.1

Am

bide

xter

sym

met

ricus

pos

tlarv

aesh

rimp

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.52

Cal

linec

tes

sapi

dus

juve

nile

sbl

ue c

rab

0.25

0.00

0.00

0.00

xant

hid

juve

nile

sm

ud c

rabs

3.30

0.00

0.00

0.00

Rhi

thro

pano

peus

har

risii

juve

nile

sH

arris

mud

cra

b1.

080.

000.

000.

00un

iden

tifie

d A

mer

icam

ysis

juve

nile

sop

ossu

m s

hrim

ps, m

ysid

s62

9.69

595.

1124

2.73

84.4

9A

mer

icam

ysis

alm

yra

opos

sum

shr

imp,

mys

id16

25.5

015

57.6

989

4.40

490.

52B

owm

anie

lla d

issi

milis

opos

sum

shr

imp,

mys

id11

4.76

151.

5830

.37

30.3

4Ta

phro

mys

is b

owm

ani

opos

sum

shr

imp,

mys

id23

.79

11.5

669

7.41

23.7

5cu

mac

eans

cum

acea

ns27

.48

7.79

10.9

415

56.5

4is

opod

sp.

ais

opod

0.00

0.22

0.00

0.00

Cya

thur

a po

lita

isop

od2.

003.

031.

820.

93Xe

nant

hura

bre

vite

lson

isop

od0.

240.

000.

000.

00M

unna

reyn

olds

iis

opod

2.53

0.68

0.24

0.49

Pro

bopy

rus

sp. (

atta

ched

)is

opod

0.00

0.46

0.00

0.00

Ano

psila

na jo

nesi

isop

od0.

230.

480.

000.

00cy

mot

hoid

sp.

a (L

irone

ca) j

uven

iles

isop

od19

.09

36.8

542

.00

27.7

5C

assi

dini

dea

oval

isis

opod

0.24

0.24

0.00

0.00

Sph

aero

ma

quad

riden

tata

isop

od3.

225.

282.

728.

24S

phae

rom

a te

rebr

ans

isop

od3.

259.

141.

791.

09E

dote

a tri

loba

isop

od47

2.19

756.

3889

6.59

389.

12am

phip

ods,

gam

mar

idea

nam

phip

ods

979.

3610

61.3

523

80.2

442

8.26

cirri

ped

naup

lius

stag

eba

rnac

les

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.73

bran

chiu

rans

, Arg

ulus

spp

.fis

h lic

e3.

782.

422.

522.

29un

iden

tifie

d ha

rpac

ticoi

dsco

pepo

ds0.

000.

200.

432.

29A

lteut

ha s

p.co

pepo

d0.

000.

000.

230.

00si

phon

osto

mat

ids

para

sitic

cop

epod

s0.

240.

000.

000.

00

A-31

Page 120: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

6, p

age

3 of

6.

Loca

tion

spec

ific

plan

kton

-net

cat

ch in

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

.D

ata

are

pres

ente

d as

mea

n nu

mbe

r per

1,0

00 c

ubic

met

ers.

Org

anis

ms

are

liste

d in

phy

loge

netic

ord

er.

Loca

tion

(km

from

Mya

kka

Riv

er m

outh

)

Des

crip

tion

Com

mon

Nam

e22

.223

.324

.325

.1

unid

entif

ied

fresh

wat

er c

yclo

poid

sco

pepo

ds0.

760.

210.

001.

35M

acro

cycl

ops

albi

dus

cope

pods

5.46

0.21

5.40

0.84

Mes

ocyc

lops

eda

xco

pepo

d12

5.87

406.

2094

2.17

997.

04O

rthoc

yclo

ps m

odes

tus

cope

pod

0.38

0.48

1.48

1.89

Aca

rtia

tons

aco

pepo

d8.

441.

426.

441.

84D

iapt

omus

spp

.co

pepo

ds0.

710.

230.

230.

22La

bido

cera

aes

tiva

cope

pod

1.26

0.00

4.60

0.63

Osp

hran

ticum

labr

onec

tum

cope

pod

0.00

0.00

0.20

0.00

Pse

udod

iapt

omus

cor

onat

usco

pepo

d0.

660.

421.

190.

24os

traco

ds, p

odoc

opid

ostra

cods

, see

d sh

rimps

26.1

159

.58

9.01

16.0

7co

llem

bola

s, p

odur

idsp

ringt

ails

0.00

1.67

0.00

0.00

ephe

mer

opte

ran

larv

aem

ayfli

es40

.86

177.

2612

2.58

108.

58od

onat

es, a

niso

pter

an la

rvae

drag

onfli

es0.

800.

8610

.49

5.92

odon

ates

, zyg

opte

ran

larv

aeda

mse

lflie

s7.

248.

801.

096.

08he

mip

tera

ns, b

elos

tom

atid

adu

ltsgi

ant w

ater

bug

s0.

190.

000.

230.

00he

mip

tera

ns, c

orix

id ju

veni

les

wat

er b

oatm

en5.

380.

000.

220.

00he

mip

tera

ns, c

orix

id a

dults

wat

er b

oatm

en0.

000.

430.

660.

71he

mip

tera

ns, g

errid

adu

ltsw

ater

stri

ders

0.00

0.21

0.20

0.43

hem

ipte

rans

, nau

corid

adu

ltscr

eepi

ng w

ater

bug

s0.

000.

430.

200.

00he

mip

tera

ns, n

epid

adu

ltsw

ater

sco

rpio

ns0.

190.

000.

000.

00he

mip

tera

ns, p

leid

adu

ltspy

gmy

back

swim

mer

s0.

000.

000.

000.

20co

leop

tera

ns, c

urcu

lioni

d ad

ults

beet

les

0.19

0.21

0.00

0.00

cole

opte

rans

, not

erid

adu

ltsbu

rrow

ing

wat

er b

eetle

s5.

763.

191.

621.

84co

leop

tera

ns, e

lmid

larv

aerif

fle b

eetle

s0.

711.

830.

883.

75co

leop

tera

ns, e

lmid

adu

ltsrif

fle b

eetle

s1.

160.

921.

303.

32co

leop

tera

ns, g

yrin

id la

rvae

whi

rligi

g be

etle

s0.

000.

000.

400.

00

A-32

Page 121: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

6, p

age

4 of

6.

Loca

tion

spec

ific

plan

kton

-net

cat

ch in

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

.D

ata

are

pres

ente

d as

mea

n nu

mbe

r per

1,0

00 c

ubic

met

ers.

Org

anis

ms

are

liste

d in

phy

loge

netic

ord

er.

Loca

tion

(km

from

Mya

kka

Riv

er m

outh

)

Des

crip

tion

Com

mon

Nam

e22

.223

.324

.325

.1

cole

opte

rans

, hal

iplid

adu

ltscr

awlin

g w

ater

bee

tles

0.65

0.00

0.00

0.00

cole

opte

rans

, dyt

isci

d ad

ults

pred

aceo

us d

ivin

g be

etle

s0.

000.

000.

001.

12co

leop

tera

ns, s

cirti

d la

rvae

mar

sh b

eetle

s0.

000.

000.

000.

24di

pter

ans,

pup

aefli

es, m

osqu

itoes

27.8

710

5.42

76.5

253

.51

dipt

eran

s, c

erat

opog

onid

larv

aebi

ting

mid

ges

0.48

0.23

2.73

0.65

dipt

eran

, Cha

obor

us p

unct

ipen

nis

larv

aeph

anto

m m

idge

129.

5825

6.77

353.

8130

5.63

dipt

eran

s, c

hiro

nom

id la

rvae

mid

ges

20.0

756

.00

34.2

610

1.87

dipt

eran

s, s

tratio

myi

d la

rvae

sold

ier f

lies

0.00

0.00

0.74

0.24

dipt

eran

s, s

ciom

yzid

larv

aem

arsh

flie

s0.

000.

000.

000.

47di

pter

ans,

tipu

lid la

rvae

cran

e fli

es0.

001.

430.

000.

00tri

chop

tera

n la

rvae

cadd

isfli

es2.

8210

.79

12.0

823

.55

lepi

dopt

eran

s, p

yral

id la

rvae

aqua

tic c

ater

pilla

rs0.

000.

460.

000.

23ac

ari

wat

er m

ites

0.83

9.96

9.14

5.08

gast

ropo

ds, p

roso

bran

chsn

ails

272.

8314

9.88

100.

1619

.29

gast

ropo

ds, o

pist

hobr

anch

sea

slug

s5.

991.

340.

240.

00pe

lecy

pods

clam

s, m

usse

ls, o

yste

rs83

.29

48.2

720

.87

60.6

3ch

aeto

gnat

hs, s

agitt

idar

row

wor

ms

1.44

0.48

1.66

0.00

Lepi

sost

eus

sp. j

uven

iles

gar

0.00

0.00

2.81

4.38

Elo

ps s

auru

s po

stfle

xion

larv

aela

dyfis

h0.

000.

000.

230.

00E

lops

sau

rus

juve

nile

sla

dyfis

h0.

000.

000.

000.

24B

revo

ortia

spp

. pos

tflex

ion

larv

aem

enha

den

1.22

0.70

1.43

0.00

Bre

voor

tia s

pp. m

etam

orph

sm

enha

den

0.46

0.45

0.94

1.95

Bre

voor

tia s

mith

i juv

enile

sye

llow

fin m

enha

den

0.24

0.00

0.00

0.21

Dor

osom

a pe

tene

nse

juve

nile

sth

read

fin s

had

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.20

Anc

hoa

spp.

pre

flexi

on la

rvae

anch

ovie

s1.

700.

703.

940.

52A

ncho

a sp

p. fl

exio

n la

rvae

anch

ovie

s5.

2713

.07

29.6

86.

94

A-33

Page 122: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

6, p

age

5 of

6.

Loca

tion

spec

ific

plan

kton

-net

cat

ch in

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

.D

ata

are

pres

ente

d as

mea

n nu

mbe

r per

1,0

00 c

ubic

met

ers.

Org

anis

ms

are

liste

d in

phy

loge

netic

ord

er.

Loca

tion

(km

from

Mya

kka

Riv

er m

outh

)

Des

crip

tion

Com

mon

Nam

e22

.223

.324

.325

.1

Anc

hoa

mitc

hilli

eggs

bay

anch

ovy

0.00

25.9

42.

390.

00A

ncho

a m

itchi

lli po

stfle

xion

larv

aeba

y an

chov

y7.

034.

9322

.82

22.6

5A

ncho

a m

itchi

lli ju

veni

les

bay

anch

ovy

527.

3736

8.54

805.

4976

9.74

Anc

hoa

mitc

hilli

adul

tsba

y an

chov

y0.

701.

772.

021.

40A

mei

urus

cat

us ju

veni

les

whi

te c

atfis

h0.

000.

000.

400.

00Li

posa

rcus

spp

. juv

enile

ssu

cker

mou

th c

atfis

h0.

000.

210.

400.

22H

oplo

ster

num

litto

rale

flex

ion

larv

aebr

own

hopl

o ca

tfish

0.00

0.21

0.00

0.00

Hop

lost

ernu

m li

ttora

le ju

veni

les

brow

n ho

plo

catfi

sh0.

000.

210.

000.

00G

obie

sox

stru

mos

us p

refle

xion

larv

aesk

illetfi

sh2.

110.

000.

240.

00G

obie

sox

stru

mos

us fl

exio

n la

rvae

skille

tfish

6.24

1.37

0.24

0.00

Gob

ieso

x st

rum

osus

pos

tflex

ion

larv

aesk

illetfi

sh0.

460.

950.

240.

00Jo

rdan

ella

flor

idae

juve

nile

sfla

gfis

h0.

000.

000.

220.

44Fu

ndul

us s

pp. j

uven

iles

killif

ishe

s0.

000.

000.

400.

00Fu

ndul

us g

rand

is ju

veni

les

gulf

killif

ish

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.20

Luca

nia

good

ei p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

blue

fin k

illifis

h0.

000.

001.

150.

00Lu

cani

a go

odei

juve

nile

sbl

uefin

killi

fish

0.19

1.24

2.51

0.20

Luca

nia

good

ei a

dults

blue

fin k

illifis

h0.

000.

210.

000.

20Lu

cani

a pa

rva

juve

nile

sra

inw

ater

killi

fish

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.21

Luca

nia

parv

a ad

ults

rain

wat

er k

illifis

h0.

001.

240.

240.

00G

ambu

sia

holb

rook

i juv

enile

sea

ster

n m

osqu

itofis

h0.

381.

351.

151.

07G

ambu

sia

holb

rook

i adu

ltsea

ster

n m

osqu

itofis

h0.

240.

210.

430.

20H

eter

andr

ia fo

rmos

a ju

veni

les

leas

t killi

fish

0.00

0.00

0.49

0.00

Het

eran

dria

form

osa

adul

tsle

ast k

illifis

h0.

190.

430.

200.

62M

enid

ia s

pp. p

refle

xion

larv

aesi

lver

side

s1.

190.

000.

240.

85M

enid

ia s

pp. j

uven

iles

silv

ersi

des

0.19

0.66

0.00

0.23

Mem

bras

mar

tinic

a ju

veni

les

roug

h si

lver

side

0.23

0.00

0.00

0.00

A-34

Page 123: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tabl

e A

6, p

age

6 of

6.

Loca

tion

spec

ific

plan

kton

-net

cat

ch in

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

.D

ata

are

pres

ente

d as

mea

n nu

mbe

r per

1,0

00 c

ubic

met

ers.

Org

anis

ms

are

liste

d in

phy

loge

netic

ord

er.

Loca

tion

(km

from

Mya

kka

Riv

er m

outh

)

Des

crip

tion

Com

mon

Nam

e22

.223

.324

.325

.1

Labi

dest

hes

sicc

ulus

juve

nile

sbr

ook

silv

ersi

de0.

000.

810.

000.

24fis

h eg

gs, p

erco

mor

phsc

iaen

id e

ggs

(prim

arily

)0.

230.

000.

221.

03S

yngn

athu

s lo

uisi

anae

juve

nile

sch

ain

pipe

fish

0.00

0.00

2.30

0.24

Syn

gnat

hus

scov

elli

juve

nile

sgu

lf pi

pefis

h0.

000.

000.

240.

00E

lass

oma

ever

glad

ei ju

veni

les

Eve

rgla

des

pygm

y su

nfis

h0.

220.

000.

000.

00E

lass

oma

ever

glad

ei a

dults

Eve

rgla

des

pygm

y su

nfis

h0.

000.

002.

310.

00Le

pom

is m

acro

chiru

s ju

veni

les

blue

gill

0.19

0.00

0.22

0.23

Bai

rdie

lla c

hrys

oura

flex

ion

larv

aesi

lver

per

ch0.

230.

000.

000.

00C

ynos

cion

are

nariu

s pr

efle

xion

larv

aesa

nd s

eatro

ut2.

790.

000.

000.

00M

entic

irrhu

s sp

p. p

ostfl

exio

n la

rvae

king

fishe

s0.

000.

220.

000.

00go

biid

pre

flexi

on la

rvae

gobi

es25

.04

20.7

525

.37

17.1

9go

biid

flex

ion

larv

aego

bies

3.78

12.9

121

.71

4.91

Bat

hygo

bius

sop

orat

or fl

exio

n la

rvae

frillf

in g

oby

0.50

0.00

0.00

0.00

Gob

ioso

ma

spp.

pos

tflex

ion

larv

aego

bies

35.0

113

2.05

223.

8233

.47

Gob

ioso

ma

bosc

juve

nile

sna

ked

goby

0.71

0.00

0.00

0.00

Gob

ioso

ma

robu

stum

juve

nile

sco

de g

oby

0.24

0.00

0.20

0.63

Mic

rogo

bius

spp

. fle

xion

larv

aego

bies

7.65

4.24

2.48

2.78

Mic

rogo

bius

spp

. pos

tflex

ion

larv

aego

bies

2.73

12.4

72.

540.

45M

icro

gobi

us g

ulos

us ju

veni

les

clow

n go

by0.

440.

220.

000.

23M

icro

gobi

us th

alas

sinu

s ad

ults

gree

n go

by0.

000.

240.

000.

00Tr

inec

tes

mac

ulat

us p

refle

xion

larv

aeho

gcho

ker

0.23

0.00

0.00

0.00

Trin

ecte

s m

acul

atus

flex

ion

larv

aeho

gcho

ker

0.97

0.00

0.00

0.00

Trin

ecte

s m

acul

atus

pos

tflex

ion

larv

aeho

gcho

ker

1.22

0.00

0.00

0.49

Trin

ecte

s m

acul

atus

juve

nile

sho

gcho

ker

2.21

1.67

6.40

6.33

unid

entif

ied

post

flexi

on la

rvae

fish

0.00

0.70

0.00

0.00

anur

an la

rvae

tadp

oles

0.00

0.00

0.22

0.00

A-35

Page 124: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Appendix B:

Seine and trawl summary tables

B-1

Page 125: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table B1, page 1 of 2. Seine catch statistics for Myakka River (n=280).

Organisms are listed in phylogenetic order.

Number Collection km U S U Mean CPUE Max CPUETaxon Common Name Collected Frequency (km) (psu) (No./seine) (No./seine)

Limulus polyphemus Horseshoe crab 1 7 3.1 14.8 0.00 1Farfantepenaeus duorarum Pink shrimp 312 54 8.369 13 1.11 36Palaemonetes spp. Grass shrimps 13 9 19.68 8.68 0.05 5Palaemonetes intermedius Brackish grass shrimp 670 41 10.4 14.2 2.39 84Palaemonetes paludosus Riverine grass shrimp 73 12 34.64 0.16 0.26 38Palaemonetes pugio Daggerblade grass shrimp 3335 68 19.76 6.77 11.91 1035Ambidexter symmetricus Night shrimp 1 1 5.4 21.3 0.00 1Callinectes sapidus Blue crab 239 68 12.25 14.8 0.85 25Dasyatis sabina Atlantic stingray 6 6 14.18 12 0.02 1Lepisosteus osseus Longnose gar 6 6 21.48 3.64 0.02 1Lepisosteus platyrhincus Florida gar 15 14 27.83 2.2 0.05 2Amia calva Bowfin 1 1 28.3 0.15 0.00 1Elops saurus Ladyfish 1 1 34.2 0.3 0.00 1Brevoortia spp. Menhadens 477 16 12.39 13.9 1.70 352Dorosoma petenense Threadfin shad 1 1 28.3 0.15 0.00 1Harengula jaguana Scaled sardine 20 2 8.965 16.2 0.07 19Anchoa hepsetus Striped anchovy 75 11 11.01 14.2 0.27 21Anchoa mitchilli Bay anchovy 62260 115 15.22 11.9 222.36 13568Synodus foetens Inshore lizardfish 17 12 8.394 19.5 0.06 6Notemigonus crysoleucas Golden shiner 12 1 25.4 0.2 0.04 12Notropis spp. Shiners 2 1 32.3 0.2 0.01 2Notropis maculatus Taillight shiner 4 2 29.83 0.13 0.01 3Notropis petersoni Coastal shiner 614 44 34.09 0.34 2.19 88Ameiurus catus White catfish 1 1 33.9 0.1 0.00 1Hoplosternum littorale Brown hoplo 1 1 20.6 0.1 0.00 1Gobiesox strumosus Skilletfish 7 7 6.986 16.6 0.03 1Strongylura spp. Needlefishes 42 24 11.35 14.9 0.15 7Strongylura marina Atlantic needlefish 17 11 15.29 15 0.06 3Strongylura notata Redfin needlefish 43 17 8.309 14.7 0.15 14Strongylura timucu Timucu 3 3 18.6 8.72 0.01 1Cyprinodon variegatus Sheepshead minnow 68 15 8.378 18.1 0.24 16Fundulus confluentus Marsh killifish 64 5 31.44 0.94 0.23 51Fundulus similis Striped killifish 126 9 11.15 16.5 0.45 47Fundulus grandis Gulf killifish 100 19 18.65 6.21 0.36 28Fundulus chrysotus Golden topminnow 21 3 39.32 0.11 0.08 17Fundulus seminolis Seminole killifish 1839 51 34.61 0.39 6.57 457Lucania parva Rainwater killifish 433 37 23.18 4.05 1.55 75Lucania goodei Bluefin killifish 103 21 34.81 0.2 0.37 23Adinia xenica Diamond killifish 11 7 18.35 8.74 0.04 3Floridichthys carpio Goldspotted killifish 1 1 9.8 18.4 0.00 1Jordanella floridae Flagfish 91 8 38.03 0.12 0.33 62Gambusia holbrooki Eastern mosquitofish 6736 92 32.81 0.45 24.06 1628Poecilia latipinna Sailfin molly 1072 31 31.04 0.69 3.83 681Heterandria formosa Least killifish 63 18 38.08 0.13 0.23 26Membras martinica Rough silverside 328 21 15.39 11.1 1.17 97Menidia spp. Silversides 8514 188 16.36 6.94 30.41 463Labidesthes sicculus Brook silverside 1134 74 34.69 0.29 4.05 162Syngnathus louisianae Chain pipefish 3 3 7.5 17.5 0.01 1Syngnathus scovelli Gulf pipefish 13 12 12.31 15.1 0.05 2Hippocampus erectus Lined seahorse 1 1 12.6 18.3 0.00 1Prionotus scitulus Leopard searobin 7 2 5.071 20.3 0.03 6Prionotus tribulus Bighead searobin 8 8 10.55 14.7 0.03 1Centropomus undecimalis Common snook 15 14 14.97 4.28 0.05 2Enneacanthus gloriosus Bluespotted sunfish 1 1 40.2 0.1 0.00 1

B-2

Page 126: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table B1, page 2 of 2. Seine catch statistics for Myakka River (n=280).

Organisms are listed in phylogenetic order.

Number Collection km U S U Mean CPUE Max CPUETaxon Common Name Collected Frequency (km) (psu) (No./seine) (No./seine)

Lepomis spp. Sunfishes 77 12 33.6 0.18 0.28 33Lepomis gulosus Warmouth 11 6 35.24 1.75 0.04 6Lepomis macrochirus Bluegill 357 47 30.5 0.2 1.28 94Lepomis marginatus Dollar sunfish 47 19 28.97 0.59 0.17 15Lepomis microlophus Redear sunfish 112 36 33.52 0.44 0.40 23Lepomis punctatus Spotted sunfish 12 9 37.75 0.09 0.04 3Micropterus salmoides Largemouth bass 39 16 37.32 0.18 0.14 8Pomoxis nigromaculatus Black crappie 1 1 22.9 0.8 0.00 1Elassoma evergladei Everglades pygmy sunfish 2 2 34.3 0.08 0.01 1Etheostoma fusiforme Swamp darter 62 18 34.52 0.13 0.22 25Oligoplites saurus Leatherjack 224 34 10.31 14.6 0.80 30Lutjanus griseus Gray snapper 16 12 16.93 4.34 0.06 3Eucinostomus spp. Eucinostomus mojarras 3581 125 12.53 12.5 12.79 343Eucinostomus gula Silver jenny 209 17 7.21 17.1 0.75 69Eucinostomus harengulus Tidewater mojarra 663 78 12.93 12.3 2.37 61Eugerres plumieri Striped mojarra 706 57 9.268 11.9 2.52 229Orthopristis chrysoptera Pigfish 1 1 13.6 12.5 0.00 1Lagodon rhomboides Pinfish 1050 60 10.24 15.5 3.75 134Archosargus probatocephalus Sheepshead 16 10 12.32 10.8 0.06 4Cynoscion nebulosus Spotted seatrout 284 41 11.27 11.7 1.01 29Cynoscion arenarius Sand seatrout 61 21 13.4 7.75 0.22 10Bairdiella chrysoura Silver perch 116 16 12.28 16 0.41 23Leiostomus xanthurus Spot 4253 41 16.09 9.99 15.19 746Menticirrhus americanus Southern kingfish 30 13 10.59 13.5 0.11 7Sciaenops ocellatus Red drum 1444 49 6.885 15.5 5.16 404Tilapia spp. Tilapias 129 10 33.33 0.26 0.46 80Mugil cephalus Striped mullet 393 28 15.26 12.1 1.40 147Mugil curema White mullet 15 4 11.25 12.4 0.05 6Mugil gyrans Fantail mullet 183 10 5.852 19.6 0.65 62Chasmodes saburrae Florida blenny 1 1 5 19 0.00 1Gobiosoma spp. Gobiosoma gobies 211 49 23.91 2.34 0.75 23Gobiosoma bosc Naked goby 111 46 23.74 2.72 0.40 13Gobiosoma robustum Code goby 54 8 3.893 16.8 0.19 46Microgobius gulosus Clown goby 731 110 14.97 7.43 2.61 80Bathygobius soporator Frillfin goby 15 5 12.35 6.89 0.05 6Paralichthys albigutta Gulf flounder 1 1 3.7 21.5 0.00 1Trinectes maculatus Hogchoker 2043 135 31.37 0.79 7.30 138Achirus lineatus Lined sole 9 7 5.589 16.1 0.03 2Symphurus plagiusa Blackcheek tonguefish 10 9 5.28 13.7 0.04 2Sphoeroides nephelus Southern puffer 11 5 9.845 20.1 0.04 6

B-3

Page 127: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table B2, page 1 of 1. Seine catch statistics for Myakkahatchee Creek (n=60).

Organisms are listed in phylogenetic order.

Number Collection km U S U Mean CPUE Max CPUETaxon Common Name Collected Frequency (km) (psu) (No./seine) (No./seine)

Palaemonetes paludosus Riverine grass shrimp 3 2 24.3 0.1 0.05 3Palaemonetes pugio Daggerblade grass shrimp 29 6 22.76 2.33 0.48 18Callinectes sapidus Blue crab 43 18 23.36 4.58 0.72 8Lepisosteus platyrhincus Florida gar 6 3 24.85 2.03 0.10 3Elops saurus Ladyfish 1 1 24.6 3.2 0.02 1Brevoortia spp. Menhadens 1440 4 25 4.32 24.00 846Dorosoma petenense Threadfin shad 71 1 25.9 0.1 1.18 71Anchoa mitchilli Bay anchovy 11830 40 23.67 4.19 197.17 2377Notemigonus crysoleucas Golden shiner 10 1 25.7 0.1 0.17 10Notropis maculatus Taillight shiner 14 4 24.53 2.84 0.23 10Notropis petersoni Coastal shiner 16 5 24.59 0.53 0.27 6Ictalurus punctatus Channel catfish 1 1 25.2 0.1 0.02 1Hoplosternum littorale Brown hoplo 1 1 24.3 0.1 0.02 1Cyprinodon variegatus Sheepshead minnow 1 1 24.6 0.4 0.02 1Fundulus grandis Gulf killifish 10 2 22.2 0.1 0.17 9Fundulus chrysotus Golden topminnow 2 2 25 0.1 0.03 1Fundulus seminolis Seminole killifish 144 10 24.91 0.57 2.40 53Lucania parva Rainwater killifish 159 13 23.88 0.96 2.65 65Lucania goodei Bluefin killifish 14 7 23.97 0.88 0.23 5Jordanella floridae Flagfish 11 3 24.35 1.12 0.18 9Gambusia holbrooki Eastern mosquitofish 1856 30 24.01 1.03 30.93 278Poecilia latipinna Sailfin molly 255 13 22.95 0.92 4.25 69Heterandria formosa Least killifish 4 4 24.8 1.43 0.07 1Menidia spp. Silversides 2265 44 24.36 3.59 37.75 267Labidesthes sicculus Brook silverside 277 19 25.52 0.39 4.62 125Syngnathus louisianae Chain pipefish 1 1 23.6 11.6 0.02 1Enneacanthus gloriosus Bluespotted sunfish 8 5 23.89 0.1 0.13 2Lepomis spp. Sunfishes 16 5 25.14 0.1 0.27 9Lepomis gulosus Warmouth 5 4 24.2 1.45 0.08 2Lepomis macrochirus Bluegill 169 17 24.99 0.58 2.82 61Lepomis marginatus Dollar sunfish 38 10 24.14 0.79 0.63 10Lepomis microlophus Redear sunfish 58 13 24.89 0.9 0.97 14Lepomis punctatus Spotted sunfish 2 2 25 0.1 0.03 1Micropterus salmoides Largemouth bass 2 2 25.05 1.83 0.03 1Etheostoma fusiforme Swamp darter 4 3 24.58 0.43 0.07 2Oligoplites saurus Leatherjack 1 1 23.4 0.65 0.02 1Lutjanus griseus Gray snapper 1 1 25.2 0.55 0.02 1Eucinostomus spp. Eucinostomus mojarras 220 19 23.11 2.73 3.67 64Eucinostomus harengulus Tidewater mojarra 59 7 23.08 8.54 0.98 25Eugerres plumieri Striped mojarra 70 20 23.83 1.33 1.17 11Lagodon rhomboides Pinfish 107 14 23.95 3.95 1.78 45Cynoscion nebulosus Spotted seatrout 3 3 23.57 7.59 0.05 1Leiostomus xanthurus Spot 734 17 24.11 2.63 12.23 425Sciaenops ocellatus Red drum 5 5 23.56 2.79 0.08 1Cichlidae spp. Cichlids 1 1 24.6 11 0.02 1Tilapia spp. Tilapias 11 3 23.81 0.17 0.18 8Sarotherodon melanotheron Blackchin tilapia 1 1 24.3 0.1 0.02 1Mugil cephalus Striped mullet 588 13 24.53 1.73 9.80 183Gobiosoma spp. Gobiosoma gobies 127 18 24.51 1.32 2.12 50Gobiosoma bosc Naked goby 58 21 24.55 1.59 0.97 18Gobiosoma robustum Code goby 1 1 24.6 3.2 0.02 1Microgobius gulosus Clown goby 112 29 23.77 1.86 1.87 22Trinectes maculatus Hogchoker 992 49 24.38 1.76 16.53 124

B-4

Page 128: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table B3, page 1 of 2. Trawl catch statistics for Myakka River (n=140).

Organisms are listed in phylogenetic order.

Number Collection km U S U Mean CPUE Max CPUETaxon Common Name Collected Frequency (km) (psu) (No./trawl) (No./trawl)

Farfantepenaeus duorarum Pink shrimp 405 7 11.85 13.1 2.89 69Rimapenaeus constrictus Roughneck shrimp 8 3 3.788 22.6 0.06 5Palaemonetes intermedius Brackish grass shrimp 1 1 15.5 0.1 0.01 1Palaemonetes paludosus Riverine grass shrimp 2 2 36 0.15 0.01 1Palaemonetes pugio Daggerblade grass shrimp 2 2 14.45 14.6 0.01 1Callinectes sapidus Blue crab 250 79 15.81 11.4 1.79 13Dasyatis sabina Atlantic stingray 26 19 13.22 13.7 0.19 3Rhinoptera bonasus Cownose ray 1 1 13.7 11.8 0.01 1Lepisosteus osseus Longnose gar 5 3 32.1 0.85 0.04 3Lepisosteus platyrhincus Florida gar 5 4 35.76 0.1 0.04 2Elops saurus Ladyfish 1 1 17.9 11.4 0.01 1Dorosoma petenense Threadfin shad 1 1 2.7 22.5 0.01 1Anchoa spp. Anchovies 2 1 11 17 0.01 2Anchoa hepsetus Striped anchovy 1 1 16.6 11.1 0.01 1Anchoa mitchilli Bay anchovy 8864 51 15.76 12.1 63.31 2118Synodus foetens Inshore lizardfish 2 2 10.4 16.8 0.01 1Notropis petersoni Coastal shiner 1 1 36 0.1 0.01 1Ameiurus catus White catfish 8 7 33.43 0.13 0.06 2Ictalurus punctatus Channel catfish 94 16 33.43 0.2 0.67 24Bagre marinus Gafftopsail catfish 36 10 13.98 3.86 0.26 12Ariopsis felis Hardhead catfish 186 18 8.154 3.63 1.33 85Pterygoplichthys multiradialis Orinoco sailfin catfish 6 4 36.1 0.23 0.04 3Pterygoplichthys spp. Sailfin catfishes 6 2 38 0.17 0.04 5Pterygoplichthys disjunctivus Vermiculated sailfin catfish 1 1 35.5 1.17 0.01 1Urophycis floridana Southern hake 4 1 9.6 20.5 0.03 4Fundulus confluentus Marsh killifish 1 1 29.5 0.5 0.01 1Fundulus seminolis Seminole killifish 2 1 37.7 0.2 0.01 2Lucania parva Rainwater killifish 2 1 27.3 9.43 0.01 2Gambusia holbrooki Eastern mosquitofish 1 1 36 0.1 0.01 1Menidia spp. Silversides 3 3 21.03 8.88 0.02 1Syngnathus louisianae Chain pipefish 9 7 8.544 16.2 0.06 3Syngnathus scovelli Gulf pipefish 3 3 19.07 12.1 0.02 1Hippocampus zosterae Dwarf seahorse 1 1 5.5 23.3 0.01 1Prionotus scitulus Leopard searobin 18 9 5.144 20.1 0.13 6Prionotus tribulus Bighead searobin 73 18 8.36 18.8 0.52 26Lepomis spp. Sunfishes 1 1 37.7 0.2 0.01 1Lepomis gulosus Warmouth 1 1 37.7 0.2 0.01 1Lepomis macrochirus Bluegill 41 13 36.67 0.11 0.29 13Lepomis marginatus Dollar sunfish 1 1 37.7 0.2 0.01 1Lepomis microlophus Redear sunfish 10 4 37.39 0.22 0.07 5Lepomis punctatus Spotted sunfish 8 3 39.15 0.14 0.06 4Micropterus salmoides Largemouth bass 4 2 38.4 0.13 0.03 3Pomoxis nigromaculatus Black crappie 3 1 30.4 0.5 0.02 3Etheostoma fusiforme Swamp darter 1 1 37.7 0.1 0.01 1Chloroscombrus chrysurus Atlantic bumper 9 2 3.611 21.3 0.06 8Lutjanus griseus Gray snapper 2 2 20.1 1.98 0.01 1Lutjanus synagris Lane snapper 2 1 3 14.9 0.01 2Eucinostomus spp. Eucinostomus mojarras 24 9 14.63 9.56 0.17 5Eucinostomus gula Silver jenny 58 11 6.907 20.2 0.41 18Eucinostomus harengulus Tidewater mojarra 18 7 7.094 6.45 0.13 10Eugerres plumieri Striped mojarra 58 13 15.57 4.56 0.41 22Lagodon rhomboides Pinfish 19 7 7.816 17.9 0.14 13Cynoscion nebulosus Spotted seatrout 21 12 11.51 8.88 0.15 6Cynoscion arenarius Sand seatrout 1183 48 14.84 8.33 8.45 237

B-5

Page 129: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table B3, page 2 of 2. Trawl catch statistics for Myakka River (n=140).

Organisms are listed in phylogenetic order.

Number Collection km U S U Mean CPUE Max CPUETaxon Common Name Collected Frequency (km) (psu) (No./trawl) (No./trawl)

Bairdiella chrysoura Silver perch 82 17 10.16 7.17 0.59 21Leiostomus xanthurus Spot 101 12 23.71 2.65 0.72 65Menticirrhus americanus Southern kingfish 343 39 9.223 13.5 2.45 116Sciaenops ocellatus Red drum 14 3 26.15 2.06 0.10 11Chaetodipterus faber Atlantic spadefish 2 2 8.75 11.9 0.01 1Tilapia spp. Tilapias 3 2 34.07 0.23 0.02 2Mugil cephalus Striped mullet 2 1 26 0.67 0.01 2Gobiidae spp. Gobies 1 1 21.4 12.7 0.01 1Gobiosoma spp. Gobiosoma gobies 6 5 10.83 13.8 0.04 2Gobiosoma bosc Naked goby 1 1 21.4 12.7 0.01 1Gobiosoma robustum Code goby 1 1 10.9 15.9 0.01 1Microgobius gulosus Clown goby 129 26 19.74 7.61 0.92 35Microgobius thalassinus Green goby 5 1 8.9 19.1 0.04 5Etropus crossotus Fringed flounder 1 1 9.9 19.5 0.01 1Trinectes maculatus Hogchoker 2145 99 23.39 2.64 15.32 279Achirus lineatus Lined sole 8 4 6.05 11.4 0.06 4Symphurus plagiusa Blackcheek tonguefish 24 11 9.075 18.3 0.17 5Stephanolepis hispidus Planehead filefish 1 1 3.6 16 0.01 1Sphoeroides nephelus Southern puffer 4 4 7.025 21.4 0.03 1Chilomycterus schoepfii Striped burrfish 3 2 2.933 18.7 0.02 2

B-6

Page 130: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table B4, page 1 of 1. Trawl catch statistics for Myakkahatchee Creek (n=30).

Organisms are listed in phylogenetic order.

Number Collection km U S U Mean CPUE Max CPUETaxon Common Name Collected Frequency (km) (psu) (No./trawl) (No./trawl)

Palaemonetes paludosus Riverine grass shrimp 1 2 22.3 0.1 0.03 1Callinectes sapidus Blue crab 65 20 23.38 3.42 2.17 7Dasyatis sabina Atlantic stingray 2 1 23.6 12.2 0.07 2Lepisosteus osseus Longnose gar 3 2 24.7 1.93 0.10 2Lepisosteus platyrhincus Florida gar 2 1 25.9 2.67 0.07 2Elops saurus Ladyfish 5 2 23.08 6.76 0.17 4Dorosoma petenense Threadfin shad 3 2 22.4 2.38 0.10 2Anchoa mitchilli Bay anchovy 2998 16 24.78 2.04 99.93 2271Ameiurus catus White catfish 4 1 22.3 0.1 0.13 4Ictalurus punctatus Channel catfish 22 4 22.73 0.1 0.73 15Ariopsis felis Hardhead catfish 2 1 22.6 3.2 0.07 2Loricariidae spp. Suckermouth catfish 1 1 25.1 1.13 0.03 1Fundulus seminolis Seminole killifish 1 1 25.7 0.73 0.03 1Lucania parva Rainwater killifish 3 3 25.33 2.61 0.10 1Menidia spp. Silversides 3 2 25.7 3.24 0.10 2Prionotus tribulus Bighead searobin 1 1 22.6 3.2 0.03 1Centropomus undecimalis Common snook 1 1 25.7 0.5 0.03 1Lepomis spp. Sunfishes 1 1 25.9 2.67 0.03 1Lepomis gulosus Warmouth 4 1 25.9 2.67 0.13 4Lepomis macrochirus Bluegill 37 8 25.43 1.68 1.23 21Lepomis microlophus Redear sunfish 1 1 25.7 0.73 0.03 1Lutjanus griseus Gray snapper 2 2 22.7 4.32 0.07 1Eucinostomus spp. Eucinostomus mojarras 30 2 22.99 5.13 1.00 28Eugerres plumieri Striped mojarra 12 6 23.88 0.71 0.40 4Lagodon rhomboides Pinfish 9 3 24.17 1.93 0.30 4Archosargus probatocephalus Sheepshead 1 1 25.2 5.97 0.03 1Cynoscion arenarius Sand seatrout 206 12 23 3.71 6.87 101Bairdiella chrysoura Silver perch 1 1 24.2 12 0.03 1Leiostomus xanthurus Spot 455 6 22.88 4.69 15.17 270Sciaenops ocellatus Red drum 1 1 22.3 1.98 0.03 1Tilapia spp. Tilapias 2 1 25.1 1.13 0.07 2Oreochromis aureus Blue tilapia 1 1 25.3 0.1 0.03 1Gobiosoma spp. Gobiosoma gobies 1 1 22.5 0.1 0.03 1Gobiosoma bosc Naked goby 4 2 23.25 3.87 0.13 3Microgobius gulosus Clown goby 19 7 24.14 1.82 0.63 10Bathygobius soporator Frillfin goby 2 2 22.6 5.51 0.07 1Trinectes maculatus Hogchoker 2115 23 24.13 1.53 70.50 616

B-7

Page 131: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tab

le B

5. P

age

1 of

4.

Sei

ne c

atch

by

mon

th, M

yakk

a R

iver

and

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

com

bine

d.

Num

ber

of m

onth

ly s

ampl

es is

indi

cate

d in

par

enth

eses

.

Tax

onC

omm

on N

ame

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

(18)

(18)

(18)

(18)

(36)

(36)

(36)

(32)

(32)

(32)

(32)

(32)

Lim

ulus

pol

yphe

mus

Hor

sesh

oe c

rab

00

00

00

00

00

10

Far

fant

epen

aeus

duo

raru

mP

ink

shrim

p4

90

00

844

3611

4312

532

Pal

aem

onet

essp

p.G

rass

shr

imps

00

00

10

20

12

61

Pal

aem

onet

es in

term

ediu

sB

rack

ish

gras

s sh

rimp

00

13

7671

9915

128

152

233

Pal

aem

onet

es p

alud

osus

Riv

erin

e gr

ass

shrim

p0

00

10

04

13

254

38P

alae

mon

etes

pug

ioD

agge

rbla

de g

rass

shr

imp

00

906

5129

083

1314

173

785

1859

Am

bide

xter

sym

met

ricus

Nig

ht s

hrim

p0

00

00

00

00

01

0C

allin

ecte

s sa

pidu

sB

lue

crab

2712

515

2013

44

16

734

26D

asya

tis s

abin

aA

tlant

ic s

tingr

ay0

02

02

00

10

01

0Le

piso

steu

s os

seus

Long

nose

gar

00

01

01

12

01

00

Lepi

sost

eus

plat

yrhi

ncus

Flo

rida

gar

00

21

25

11

34

20

Am

ia c

alva

Bow

fin0

10

00

00

00

00

0E

lops

sau

rus

Lady

fish

00

00

11

00

00

00

Bre

voor

tiasp

p.M

enha

dens

010

356

860

105

586

00

00

00

Dor

osom

a pe

tene

nse

Thr

eadf

in s

had

01

00

00

710

00

00

Har

engu

la ja

guan

aS

cale

d sa

rdin

e0

01

00

190

00

00

0A

ncho

a he

pset

usS

trip

ed a

ncho

vy0

00

057

180

00

00

0A

ncho

a m

itchi

lliB

ay a

ncho

vy23

4261

6896

4464

9037

2254

4317

484

421

2163

2896

810

802

Syn

odus

foet

ens

Insh

ore

lizar

dfis

h0

00

34

20

00

06

2N

otem

igon

us c

ryso

leuc

asG

olde

n sh

iner

00

00

00

010

012

00

Not

ropi

ssp

p.S

hine

rs0

00

02

00

00

00

0N

otro

pis

mac

ulat

usT

ailli

ght s

hine

r0

110

00

05

00

10

1N

otro

pis

pete

rson

iC

oast

al s

hine

r0

14

227

5121

615

433

2868

46A

mei

urus

cat

usW

hite

cat

fish

00

00

00

01

00

00

Icta

luru

s pu

ncta

tus

Cha

nnel

cat

fish

00

00

00

01

00

00

Hop

lost

ernu

m li

ttora

leB

row

n ho

plo

00

00

00

01

10

00

Gob

ieso

x st

rum

osus

Ski

lletfi

sh2

00

01

00

01

12

0S

tron

gylu

rasp

p.N

eedl

efis

hes

00

00

1816

20

14

01

Str

ongy

lura

mar

ina

Atla

ntic

nee

dlef

ish

00

00

610

00

10

00

Str

ongy

lura

not

ata

Red

fin n

eedl

efis

h0

00

05

821

00

54

0

B-8

Page 132: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tab

le B

5. P

age

2 of

4.

Sei

ne c

atch

by

mon

th, M

yakk

a R

iver

and

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

com

bine

d.

Num

ber

of m

onth

ly s

ampl

es is

indi

cate

d in

par

enth

eses

.

Tax

onC

omm

on N

ame

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

(18)

(18)

(18)

(18)

(36)

(36)

(36)

(32)

(32)

(32)

(32)

(32)

Str

ongy

lura

tim

ucu

Tim

ucu

00

00

01

00

10

10

Cyp

rinod

on v

arie

gatu

sS

heep

shea

d m

inno

w33

110

01

01

10

90

13F

undu

lus

conf

luen

tus

Mar

sh k

illifi

sh5

00

03

00

00

00

56F

undu

lus

sim

ilis

Str

iped

kill

ifish

00

00

4741

371

00

00

Fun

dulu

s gr

andi

sG

ulf k

illifi

sh39

30

01

019

016

027

5F

undu

lus

chry

sotu

sG

olde

n to

pmin

now

00

00

00

181

10

03

Fun

dulu

s se

min

olis

Sem

inol

e ki

llifis

h13

3710

792

132

716

78

7815

014

811

7Lu

cani

a pa

rva

Rai

nwat

er k

illifi

sh79

110

911

127

8515

10

142

112

Luca

nia

good

eiB

luef

in k

illifi

sh2

30

135

1028

18

73

19A

dini

a xe

nica

Dia

mon

d ki

llifis

h9

00

00

00

00

01

1F

lorid

icht

hys

carp

ioG

olds

potte

d ki

llifis

h0

00

00

00

00

00

1Jo

rdan

ella

flor

idae

Fla

gfis

h0

00

03

063

19

00

26G

ambu

sia

holb

rook

iE

aste

rn m

osqu

itofis

h68

423

228

5575

628

286

270

767

840

1238

3408

Poe

cilia

latip

inna

Sai

lfin

mol

ly31

445

148

069

112

76

4095

5H

eter

andr

ia fo

rmos

aLe

ast k

illifi

sh1

11

28

033

10

54

11M

embr

as m

artin

ica

Rou

gh s

ilver

side

10

00

216

5314

00

242

0M

enid

iasp

p.S

ilver

side

s30

957

562

370

310

4298

120

1077

267

313

9259

311

06La

bide

sthe

s si

ccul

usB

rook

silv

ersi

de19

36

123

8725

428

933

322

614

435

Syn

gnat

hus

loui

sian

aeC

hain

pip

efis

h0

00

01

00

00

02

1S

yngn

athu

s sc

ovel

liG

ulf p

ipef

ish

01

02

22

10

00

23

Hip

poca

mpu

s er

ectu

sLi

ned

seah

orse

00

01

00

00

00

00

Prio

notu

s sc

itulu

sLe

opar

d se

arob

in0

00

00

00

00

07

0P

riono

tus

trib

ulus

Big

head

sea

robi

n0

00

00

00

00

07

1C

entr

opom

us u

ndec

imal

isC

omm

on s

nook

00

00

10

15

22

22

Enn

eaca

nthu

s gl

orio

sus

Blu

espo

tted

sunf

ish

00

00

00

22

40

10

Lepo

mis

spp.

Sun

fishe

s0

00

059

07

188

10

0Le

pom

is g

ulos

usW

arm

outh

21

00

00

10

92

10

Lepo

mis

mac

roch

irus

Blu

egill

2917

29

49

318

2630

5219

11Le

pom

is m

argi

natu

sD

olla

r su

nfis

h8

50

11

10

1025

262

6Le

pom

is m

icro

loph

usR

edea

r su

nfis

h9

1412

54

061

638

66

9

B-9

Page 133: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tab

le B

5. P

age

3 of

4.

Sei

ne c

atch

by

mon

th, M

yakk

a R

iver

and

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

com

bine

d.

Num

ber

of m

onth

ly s

ampl

es is

indi

cate

d in

par

enth

eses

.

Tax

onC

omm

on N

ame

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

(18)

(18)

(18)

(18)

(36)

(36)

(36)

(32)

(32)

(32)

(32)

(32)

Lepo

mis

pun

ctat

usS

potte

d su

nfis

h1

01

01

04

14

10

1M

icro

pter

us s

alm

oide

sLa

rgem

outh

bas

s0

90

34

39

07

51

0P

omox

is n

igro

mac

ulat

usB

lack

cra

ppie

00

10

00

00

00

00

Ela

ssom

a ev

ergl

adei

Eve

rgla

des

pygm

y su

nfis

h0

00

00

01

00

01

0E

theo

stom

a fu

sifo

rme

Sw

amp

dart

er0

01

01

050

03

54

2O

ligop

lites

sau

rus

Leat

herja

ck0

00

093

9029

100

30

0Lu

tjanu

s gr

iseu

sG

ray

snap

per

00

00

11

13

23

42

Euc

inos

tom

ussp

p.E

ucin

osto

mus

moj

arra

s59

439

730

069

5332

535

984

155

240

703

522

Euc

inos

tom

us g

ula

Silv

er je

nny

12

817

167

100

111

10

0E

ucin

osto

mus

har

engu

lus

Tid

ewat

er m

ojar

ra4

525

7620

091

3266

5573

788

Eug

erre

s pl

umie

riS

trip

ed m

ojar

ra2

36

014

143

379

9216

2331

67O

rtho

pris

tis c

hrys

opte

raP

igfis

h1

00

00

00

00

00

0La

godo

n rh

ombo

ides

Pin

fish

9238

731

914

014

150

231

21

01

Arc

hosa

rgus

pro

bato

ceph

alus

She

epsh

ead

00

01

40

04

12

13

Cyn

osci

on n

ebul

osus

Spo

tted

seat

rout

00

00

4713

065

194

216

4C

ynos

cion

are

nariu

sS

and

seat

rout

00

00

125

119

714

21

Bai

rdie

lla c

hrys

oura

Silv

er p

erch

00

012

4946

20

00

70

Leio

stom

us x

anth

urus

Spo

t21

2619

8670

374

7522

00

00

10

Men

ticirr

hus

amer

ican

usS

outh

ern

king

fish

00

04

94

10

05

70

Sci

aeno

ps o

cella

tus

Red

dru

m21

6910

20

01

20

906

273

165

Cic

hlid

ae s

pp.

Cic

hlid

s0

00

01

00

00

00

0T

ilapi

asp

p.T

ilapi

as0

00

012

62

101

01

00

Sar

othe

rodo

n m

elan

othe

ron

Bla

ckch

in ti

lapi

a0

00

00

00

01

00

0M

ugil

ceph

alus

Str

iped

mul

let

417

211

213

416

23

10

190

95M

ugil

cure

ma

Whi

te m

ulle

t6

01

00

62

00

00

0M

ugil

gyra

nsF

anta

il m

ulle

t0

163

31

420

00

011

62C

hasm

odes

sab

urra

eF

lorid

a bl

enny

00

00

00

10

00

00

Gob

ioso

ma

spp.

Gob

ioso

ma

gobi

es2

90

09

1017

637

3123

338

Gob

ioso

ma

bosc

Nak

ed g

oby

811

101

37

3714

727

638

Gob

ioso

ma

robu

stum

Cod

e go

by0

00

03

491

00

02

0

B-10

Page 134: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tab

le B

5. P

age

4 of

4.

Sei

ne c

atch

by

mon

th, M

yakk

a R

iver

and

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

com

bine

d.

Num

ber

of m

onth

ly s

ampl

es is

indi

cate

d in

par

enth

eses

.

Tax

onC

omm

on N

ame

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

(18)

(18)

(18)

(18)

(36)

(36)

(36)

(32)

(32)

(32)

(32)

(32)

Mic

rogo

bius

gul

osus

Clo

wn

goby

2533

145

4614

031

914

047

3419

21B

athy

gobi

us s

opor

ator

Fril

lfin

goby

00

01

00

16

00

70

Par

alic

hthy

s al

bigu

ttaG

ulf f

loun

der

10

00

00

00

00

00

Trin

ecte

s m

acul

atus

Hog

chok

er84

173

345

101

148

128

754

175

120

352

270

385

Ach

irus

linea

tus

Line

d so

le0

00

02

30

00

22

0S

ymph

urus

pla

gius

aB

lack

chee

k to

ngue

fish

00

00

00

01

12

51

Sph

oero

ides

nep

helu

sS

outh

ern

puffe

r0

00

07

10

00

03

0

B-11

Page 135: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tab

le B

6. P

age

1 of

3.

Tra

wl c

atch

by

mon

th, M

yakk

a R

iver

and

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

com

bine

d.

Num

ber

of m

onth

ly s

ampl

es is

indi

cate

d in

par

enth

eses

.

Tax

onC

omm

on N

ame

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

(9)

(9)

(9)

(9)

(18)

(18)

(18)

(16)

(16)

(16)

(16)

(16)

Far

fant

epen

aeus

duo

raru

mP

ink

shrim

p20

815

90

1083

48

9597

56R

imap

enae

us c

onst

rictu

sR

ough

neck

shr

imp

10

00

00

00

00

52

Pal

aem

onet

es in

term

ediu

sB

rack

ish

gras

s sh

rimp

00

00

00

01

00

00

Pal

aem

onet

es p

alud

osus

Riv

erin

e gr

ass

shrim

p0

00

01

00

10

01

0P

alae

mon

etes

pug

ioD

agge

rbla

de g

rass

shr

imp

00

00

00

00

00

02

Cal

linec

tes

sapi

dus

Blu

e cr

ab25

1234

2830

1648

2018

1729

38D

asya

tis s

abin

aA

tlant

ic s

tingr

ay0

04

55

50

21

14

1R

hino

pter

a bo

nasu

sC

owno

se r

ay0

00

00

00

00

10

0Le

piso

steu

s os

seus

Long

nose

gar

00

30

21

00

00

02

Lepi

sost

eus

plat

yrhi

ncus

Flo

rida

gar

00

00

00

10

03

30

Elo

ps s

auru

sLa

dyfis

h0

50

01

00

00

00

0D

oros

oma

pete

nens

eT

hrea

dfin

sha

d0

00

00

10

00

21

0A

ncho

asp

p.A

ncho

vies

00

00

20

00

00

00

Anc

hoa

heps

etus

Str

iped

anc

hovy

00

00

01

00

00

00

Anc

hoa

mitc

hilli

Bay

anc

hovy

210

2325

273

893

561

5504

263

1512

778

813

377

0S

ynod

us fo

eten

sIn

shor

e liz

ardf

ish

00

00

11

00

00

00

Not

ropi

s pe

ters

oni

Coa

stal

shi

ner

00

00

00

00

01

00

Am

eiur

us c

atus

Whi

te c

atfis

h0

00

03

03

51

00

0Ic

talu

rus

punc

tatu

sC

hann

el c

atfis

h0

00

00

014

7026

60

0B

agre

mar

inus

Gaf

ftops

ail c

atfis

h0

08

00

10

1012

30

2A

riops

is fe

lisH

ardh

ead

catfi

sh0

10

00

26

126

398

15

Loric

ariid

ae s

pp.

Suc

kerm

outh

cat

fish

00

00

01

00

00

00

Pte

rygo

plic

hthy

s m

ultir

adia

lisO

rinoc

o sa

ilfin

cat

fish

01

00

40

00

00

01

Pte

rygo

plic

hthy

ssp

p.S

ailfi

n ca

tfish

es0

00

00

00

00

00

6P

tery

gopl

icht

hys

disj

unct

ivus

Ver

mic

ulat

ed s

ailfi

n ca

tfish

00

00

01

00

00

00

Uro

phyc

is fl

orid

ana

Sou

ther

n ha

ke0

40

00

00

00

00

0F

undu

lus

conf

luen

tus

Mar

sh k

illifi

sh0

00

00

00

00

00

1F

undu

lus

sem

inol

isS

emin

ole

killi

fish

10

00

20

00

00

00

Luca

nia

parv

aR

ainw

ater

kill

ifish

10

01

21

00

00

00

Gam

busi

a ho

lbro

oki

Eas

tern

mos

quito

fish

00

00

00

00

01

00

Men

idia

spp.

Silv

ersi

des

10

01

02

00

00

02

Syn

gnat

hus

loui

sian

aeC

hain

pip

efis

h0

01

02

30

00

02

1

B-12

Page 136: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tab

le B

6. P

age

2 of

3.

Tra

wl c

atch

by

mon

th, M

yakk

a R

iver

and

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

com

bine

d.

Num

ber

of m

onth

ly s

ampl

es is

indi

cate

d in

par

enth

eses

.

Tax

onC

omm

on N

ame

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

(9)

(9)

(9)

(9)

(18)

(18)

(18)

(16)

(16)

(16)

(16)

(16)

Syn

gnat

hus

scov

elli

Gul

f pip

efis

h0

00

00

20

00

00

1H

ippo

cam

pus

zost

erae

Dw

arf s

eaho

rse

00

00

10

00

00

00

Prio

notu

s sc

itulu

sLe

opar

d se

arob

in5

00

12

60

00

02

2P

riono

tus

trib

ulus

Big

head

sea

robi

n11

31

00

01

00

518

35C

entr

opom

us u

ndec

imal

isC

omm

on s

nook

00

00

00

00

00

01

Lepo

mis

spp.

Sun

fishe

s0

00

01

00

00

01

0Le

pom

is g

ulos

usW

arm

outh

00

00

10

00

00

40

Lepo

mis

mac

roch

irus

Blu

egill

30

11

00

82

311

3118

Lepo

mis

mar

gina

tus

Dol

lar

sunf

ish

10

00

00

00

00

00

Lepo

mis

mic

rolo

phus

Red

ear

sunf

ish

12

00

00

30

00

05

Lepo

mis

pun

ctat

usS

potte

d su

nfis

h0

00

03

00

00

01

4M

icro

pter

us s

alm

oide

sLa

rgem

outh

bas

s0

00

10

00

00

00

3P

omox

is n

igro

mac

ulat

usB

lack

cra

ppie

00

03

00

00

00

00

Eth

eost

oma

fusi

form

eS

wam

p da

rter

00

10

00

00

00

00

Chl

oros

com

brus

chr

ysur

usA

tlant

ic b

umpe

r0

00

00

10

00

00

8Lu

tjanu

s gr

iseu

sG

ray

snap

per

01

00

00

01

00

02

Lutja

nus

syna

gris

Lane

sna

pper

00

00

00

00

02

00

Euc

inos

tom

ussp

p.E

ucin

osto

mus

moj

arra

s3

280

00

75

00

00

11E

ucin

osto

mus

gul

aS

ilver

jenn

y2

57

00

118

10

50

19E

ucin

osto

mus

har

engu

lus

Tid

ewat

er m

ojar

ra0

00

01

11

103

01

1E

uger

res

plum

ieri

Str

iped

moj

arra

00

00

021

276

103

30

Lago

don

rhom

boid

esP

infis

h16

25

00

11

02

00

1A

rcho

sarg

us p

roba

toce

phal

usS

heep

shea

d0

00

10

00

00

00

0C

ynos

cion

neb

ulos

usS

potte

d se

atro

ut0

10

01

78

11

11

0C

ynos

cion

are

nariu

sS

and

seat

rout

60

05

7930

631

513

611

669

342

15B

aird

iella

chr

ysou

raS

ilver

per

ch0

01

03

1014

342

108

1Le

iost

omus

xan

thur

usS

pot

385

110

502

01

62

00

00

Men

ticirr

hus

amer

ican

usS

outh

ern

king

fish

00

32

2713

138

3936

377

23S

ciae

nops

oce

llatu

sR

ed d

rum

00

00

00

00

02

211

Cha

etod

ipte

rus

fabe

rA

tlant

ic s

pade

fish

00

00

00

20

00

00

Tila

pia

spp.

Tila

pias

00

00

32

00

00

00

Tila

pia

aure

aB

lue

tilap

ia0

00

00

00

01

00

0

B-13

Page 137: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Tab

le B

6. P

age

3 of

3.

Tra

wl c

atch

by

mon

th, M

yakk

a R

iver

and

Mya

kkah

atch

ee C

reek

com

bine

d.

Num

ber

of m

onth

ly s

ampl

es is

indi

cate

d in

par

enth

eses

.

Tax

onC

omm

on N

ame

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

(9)

(9)

(9)

(9)

(18)

(18)

(18)

(16)

(16)

(16)

(16)

(16)

Mug

il ce

phal

usS

trip

ed m

ulle

t2

00

00

00

00

00

0G

obiid

ae s

pp.

Gob

ies

00

00

10

00

00

00

Gob

ioso

ma

spp.

Gob

ioso

ma

gobi

es0

00

04

11

01

00

0G

obio

som

a bo

scN

aked

gob

y0

00

11

30

00

00

0G

obio

som

a ro

bust

umC

ode

goby

00

00

01

00

00

00

Mic

rogo

bius

gul

osus

Clo

wn

goby

23

12

3085

108

21

04

Mic

rogo

bius

thal

assi

nus

Gre

en g

oby

00

00

00

50

00

00

Bat

hygo

bius

sop

orat

orF

rillfi

n go

by1

10

00

00

00

00

0E

trop

us c

ross

otus

Frin

ged

floun

der

00

00

00

00

00

01

Trin

ecte

s m

acul

atus

Hog

chok

er63

721

126

309

1397

1031

573

332

8416

463

Ach

irus

linea

tus

Line

d so

le0

00

00

20

50

00

1S

ymph

urus

pla

gius

aB

lack

chee

k to

ngue

fish

01

11

01

20

00

126

Ste

phan

olep

is h

ispi

dus

Pla

nehe

ad fi

lefis

h0

00

00

10

00

00

0S

phoe

roid

es n

ephe

lus

Sou

ther

n pu

ffer

00

01

10

00

00

11

Chi

lom

ycte

rus

scho

epfii

Str

iped

bur

rfis

h0

00

02

10

00

00

0

B-14

Page 138: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table B7, page 1 of 2. Location-specific seine catch, Myakka River.

Data are presented as mean number per deployment.

Organisms are listed in phylogenetic order.

Location (km from mouth)

Taxon Common Name 2.4-7.5 7.5-13.5 13.5-18.5 18.5-23.4 23.4-28.8 28.8-35.0 35.0-42.0

Limulus polyphemus Horseshoe crab 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Farfantepenaeus duorarum Pink shrimp 4.875 0.950 1.450 0.400 0.125 0.000 0.000Palaemonetes spp. Grass shrimps 0.075 0.000 0.125 0.025 0.000 0.050 0.050Palaemonetes intermedius Brackish grass shrimp 7.450 2.225 5.100 1.950 0.025 0.000 0.000Palaemonetes paludosus Riverine grass shrimp 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.050 0.775Palaemonetes pugio Daggerblade grass shrimp 10.625 1.500 7.500 28.300 30.525 4.900 0.025Ambidexter symmetricus Night shrimp 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Callinectes sapidus Blue crab 2.300 1.000 1.450 0.775 0.250 0.175 0.025Dasyatis sabina Atlantic stingray 0.025 0.025 0.050 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000Lepisosteus osseus Longnose gar 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.050 0.025 0.025 0.000Lepisosteus platyrhincus Florida gar 0.000 0.000 0.025 0.100 0.075 0.100 0.075Amia calva Bowfin 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.025 0.000 0.000Elops saurus Ladyfish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.025 0.000Brevoortia spp. Menhadens 0.325 8.875 1.700 0.800 0.200 0.025 0.000Dorosoma petenense Threadfin shad 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.025 0.000 0.000Harengula jaguana Scaled sardine 0.025 0.475 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Anchoa hepsetus Striped anchovy 1.125 0.000 0.375 0.250 0.000 0.125 0.000Anchoa mitchilli Bay anchovy 264.200 295.775 217.100 699.675 56.575 18.975 4.200Synodus foetens Inshore lizardfish 0.250 0.125 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Notemigonus crysoleucas Golden shiner 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.300 0.000 0.000Notropis spp. Shiners 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.000Notropis maculatus Taillight shiner 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.025 0.075 0.000Notropis petersoni Coastal shiner 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 1.700 6.225 7.375Ameiurus catus White catfish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.025 0.000Hoplosternum littorale Brown hoplo 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000Gobiesox strumosus Skilletfish 0.150 0.000 0.000 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000Strongylura spp. Needlefishes 0.500 0.125 0.175 0.125 0.050 0.075 0.000Strongylura marina Atlantic needlefish 0.050 0.050 0.225 0.075 0.000 0.025 0.000Strongylura notata Redfin needlefish 0.525 0.225 0.325 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Strongylura timucu Timucu 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.025 0.000 0.025 0.000Cyprinodon variegatus Sheepshead minnow 0.975 0.500 0.125 0.075 0.025 0.000 0.000Fundulus confluentus Marsh killifish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.150 0.000 1.450 0.000Fundulus similis Striped killifish 0.050 2.825 0.275 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Fundulus grandis Gulf killifish 0.075 0.075 0.725 1.525 0.100 0.000 0.000Fundulus chrysotus Golden topminnow 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.075 0.450Fundulus seminolis Seminole killifish 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.225 1.025 24.500 20.200Lucania parva Rainwater killifish 0.875 0.100 0.075 3.800 3.950 2.000 0.025Lucania goodei Bluefin killifish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.075 1.625 0.875Adinia xenica Diamond killifish 0.000 0.025 0.075 0.150 0.025 0.000 0.000Floridichthys carpio Goldspotted killifish 0.000 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Jordanella floridae Flagfish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.025 0.000 0.650 1.600Gambusia holbrooki Eastern mosquitofish 0.250 0.300 0.150 6.650 19.425 101.850 39.775Poecilia latipinna Sailfin molly 0.075 0.050 0.350 0.925 1.025 23.250 1.125Heterandria formosa Least killifish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.375 1.200Membras martinica Rough silverside 0.400 3.200 3.150 1.400 0.025 0.025 0.000Menidia spp. Silversides 17.200 62.325 64.275 30.275 25.325 9.900 3.550Labidesthes sicculus Brook silverside 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.075 4.300 7.350 16.625Syngnathus louisianae Chain pipefish 0.050 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Syngnathus scovelli Gulf pipefish 0.050 0.125 0.100 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000Hippocampus erectus Lined seahorse 0.000 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Prionotus scitulus Leopard searobin 0.175 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Prionotus tribulus Bighead searobin 0.100 0.025 0.025 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000Centropomus undecimalis Common snook 0.125 0.025 0.025 0.125 0.050 0.025 0.000Enneacanthus gloriosus Bluespotted sunfish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.025Lepomis spp. Sunfishes 0.000 0.025 0.000 0.050 0.200 1.000 0.650Lepomis gulosus Warmouth 0.000 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.025 0.225Lepomis macrochirus Bluegill 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.100 3.050 4.000 1.775Lepomis marginatus Dollar sunfish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.100 0.350 0.550 0.175Lepomis microlophus Redear sunfish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.100 0.625 0.850 1.225Lepomis punctatus Spotted sunfish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.250Micropterus salmoides Largemouth bass 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.150 0.050 0.775Pomoxis nigromaculatus Black crappie 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000Elassoma evergladei Everglades pygmy sunfish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.025 0.025Etheostoma fusiforme Swamp darter 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.175 0.225 0.275 0.875Oligoplites saurus Leatherjack 2.475 1.800 0.575 0.425 0.225 0.100 0.000Lutjanus griseus Gray snapper 0.075 0.000 0.125 0.125 0.075 0.000 0.000

B-15

Page 139: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table B7, page 2 of 2. Location-specific seine catch, Myakka River.

Data are presented as mean number per deployment.

Organisms are listed in phylogenetic order.

Location (km from mouth)

Taxon Common Name 2.4-7.5 7.5-13.5 13.5-18.5 18.5-23.4 23.4-28.8 28.8-35.0 35.0-42.0

Eucinostomus spp. Eucinostomus mojarras 17.075 31.225 22.650 15.950 2.225 0.075 0.325Eucinostomus gula Silver jenny 2.400 2.800 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Eucinostomus harengulus Tidewater mojarra 2.775 6.925 4.200 2.300 0.375 0.000 0.000Eugerres plumieri Striped mojarra 9.650 4.150 1.475 1.500 0.825 0.050 0.000Orthopristis chrysoptera Pigfish 0.000 0.000 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Lagodon rhomboides Pinfish 12.750 5.200 2.925 5.025 0.325 0.025 0.000Archosargus probatocephalus Sheepshead 0.100 0.175 0.050 0.025 0.050 0.000 0.000Cynoscion nebulosus Spotted seatrout 2.125 1.850 2.600 0.500 0.025 0.000 0.000Cynoscion arenarius Sand seatrout 0.575 0.100 0.325 0.300 0.025 0.200 0.000Bairdiella chrysoura Silver perch 1.475 0.000 0.700 0.150 0.000 0.575 0.000Leiostomus xanthurus Spot 28.125 8.025 10.225 36.025 23.925 0.000 0.000Menticirrhus americanus Southern kingfish 0.250 0.150 0.300 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000Sciaenops ocellatus Red drum 26.275 5.625 2.400 1.650 0.150 0.000 0.000Tilapia spp. Tilapias 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.025 2.850 0.350Mugil cephalus Striped mullet 0.475 0.925 7.825 0.575 0.000 0.025 0.000Mugil curema White mullet 0.000 0.225 0.150 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Mugil gyrans Fantail mullet 4.150 0.350 0.075 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Chasmodes saburrae Florida blenny 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Gobiosoma spp. Gobiosoma gobies 0.150 0.100 0.200 1.875 1.450 1.400 0.100Gobiosoma bosc Naked goby 0.025 0.125 0.100 0.950 1.150 0.350 0.075Gobiosoma robustum Code goby 1.250 0.075 0.000 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000Microgobius gulosus Clown goby 5.225 3.000 2.925 3.425 2.925 0.775 0.000Bathygobius soporator Frillfin goby 0.000 0.375 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Paralichthys albigutta Gulf flounder 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Trinectes maculatus Hogchoker 0.100 0.350 1.325 6.250 6.575 19.000 17.475Achirus lineatus Lined sole 0.200 0.000 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Symphurus plagiusa Blackcheek tonguefish 0.225 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Sphoeroides nephelus Southern puffer 0.125 0.000 0.150 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

B-16

Page 140: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table B8, page 1 of 2. Location-specific seine catch, Myakkahatchee Creek.

Data are presented as mean number per deployment.

Organisms are listed in phylogenetic order.

Location (km from mouth)

Taxon Common Name 22.3-24.3 24.3-26.4

Palaemonetes paludosus Riverine grass shrimp 0.000 0.100Palaemonetes pugio Daggerblade grass shrimp 0.667 0.300Callinectes sapidus Blue crab 1.033 0.400Lepisosteus platyrhincus Florida gar 0.033 0.167Elops saurus Ladyfish 0.000 0.033Brevoortia spp. Menhadens 0.367 47.633Dorosoma petenense Threadfin shad 0.000 2.367Anchoa mitchilli Bay anchovy 236.100 158.233Notemigonus crysoleucas Golden shiner 0.000 0.333Notropis maculatus Taillight shiner 0.033 0.433Notropis petersoni Coastal shiner 0.033 0.500Ictalurus punctatus Channel catfish 0.000 0.033Hoplosternum littorale Brown hoplo 0.000 0.033Cyprinodon variegatus Sheepshead minnow 0.000 0.033Fundulus grandis Gulf killifish 0.333 0.000Fundulus chrysotus Golden topminnow 0.000 0.067Fundulus seminolis Seminole killifish 1.167 3.633Lucania parva Rainwater killifish 1.533 3.767Lucania goodei Bluefin killifish 0.133 0.333Jordanella floridae Flagfish 0.000 0.367Gambusia holbrooki Eastern mosquitofish 27.200 34.667Poecilia latipinna Sailfin molly 5.833 2.667Heterandria formosa Least killifish 0.000 0.133Menidia spp. Silversides 22.067 53.433Labidesthes sicculus Brook silverside 0.833 8.400Syngnathus louisianae Chain pipefish 0.033 0.000Enneacanthus gloriosus Bluespotted sunfish 0.133 0.133Lepomis spp. Sunfishes 0.100 0.433Lepomis gulosus Warmouth 0.033 0.133Lepomis macrochirus Bluegill 1.233 4.400Lepomis marginatus Dollar sunfish 0.467 0.800Lepomis microlophus Redear sunfish 0.433 1.500Lepomis punctatus Spotted sunfish 0.000 0.067Micropterus salmoides Largemouth bass 0.000 0.067Etheostoma fusiforme Swamp darter 0.033 0.100Oligoplites saurus Leatherjack 0.033 0.000Lutjanus griseus Gray snapper 0.000 0.033Eucinostomus spp. Eucinostomus mojarras 5.233 2.100Eucinostomus harengulus Tidewater mojarra 1.867 0.100Eugerres plumieri Striped mojarra 1.167 1.167Lagodon rhomboides Pinfish 1.167 2.400Cynoscion nebulosus Spotted seatrout 0.067 0.033Leiostomus xanthurus Spot 5.467 19.000

B-17

Page 141: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table B8, page 2 of 2. Location-specific seine catch, Myakkahatchee Creek.

Data are presented as mean number per deployment.

Organisms are listed in phylogenetic order.

Location (km from mouth)

Taxon Common Name 22.3-24.3 24.3-26.4

Sciaenops ocellatus Red drum 0.067 0.100Cichlidae spp. Cichlids 0.000 0.033Tilapia spp. Tilapias 0.100 0.267Sarotherodon melanotheron Blackchin tilapia 0.000 0.033Mugil cephalus Striped mullet 0.333 19.267Gobiosoma spp. Gobiosoma gobies 0.600 3.633Gobiosoma bosc Naked goby 0.433 1.500Gobiosoma robustum Code goby 0.000 0.033Microgobius gulosus Clown goby 1.733 2.000Trinectes maculatus Hogchoker 9.500 23.567

B-18

Page 142: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table B9, page 1 of 2. Location-specific trawl catch, Myakka River.

Data are presented as mean number per deployment.

Organisms are listed in phylogenetic order.

Location (km from mouth)

Taxon Common Name 2.4-7.5 7.5-13.5 13.5-18.5 18.5-23.4 23.4-28.8 28.8-35.0 35.0-42.0

Farfantepenaeus duorarum Pink shrimp 5.650 4.250 9.000 0.950 0.400 0.000 0.000Rimapenaeus constrictus Roughneck shrimp 0.400 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Palaemonetes intermedius Brackish grass shrimp 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Palaemonetes paludosus Riverine grass shrimp 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.050Palaemonetes pugio Daggerblade grass shrimp 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000Callinectes sapidus Blue crab 2.100 3.300 2.200 2.250 0.950 1.350 0.350Dasyatis sabina Atlantic stingray 0.300 0.450 0.100 0.350 0.100 0.000 0.000Rhinoptera bonasus Cownose ray 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Lepisosteus osseus Longnose gar 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.150 0.050Lepisosteus platyrhincus Florida gar 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.100 0.150Elops saurus Ladyfish 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Dorosoma petenense Threadfin shad 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Anchoa spp. Anchovies 0.000 0.100 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Anchoa hepsetus Striped anchovy 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Anchoa mitchilli Bay anchovy 7.550 115.250 227.250 68.300 23.600 1.250 0.000Synodus foetens Inshore lizardfish 0.050 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Notropis petersoni Coastal shiner 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050Ameiurus catus White catfish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.100 0.100 0.200Ictalurus punctatus Channel catfish 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.500 0.150 0.950 2.850Bagre marinus Gafftopsail catfish 0.250 0.350 0.750 0.050 0.400 0.000 0.000Ariopsis felis Hardhead catfish 4.550 3.850 0.400 0.150 0.300 0.050 0.000Pterygoplichthys multiradialis Orinoco sailfin catfish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.150 0.150Pterygoplichthys spp. Sailfin catfishes 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.250Pterygoplichthys disjunctivus Vermiculated sailfin catfish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050Urophycis floridana Southern hake 0.000 0.200 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Fundulus confluentus Marsh killifish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.000Fundulus seminolis Seminole killifish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.100Lucania parva Rainwater killifish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.100 0.000 0.000Gambusia holbrooki Eastern mosquitofish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050Menidia spp. Silversides 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.100 0.000 0.000Syngnathus louisianae Chain pipefish 0.250 0.100 0.050 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000Syngnathus scovelli Gulf pipefish 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.100 0.000 0.000Hippocampus zosterae Dwarf seahorse 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Prionotus scitulus Leopard searobin 0.700 0.200 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Prionotus tribulus Bighead searobin 1.200 2.000 0.450 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Lepomis spp. Sunfishes 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050Lepomis gulosus Warmouth 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050Lepomis macrochirus Bluegill 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.100 0.450 1.500Lepomis marginatus Dollar sunfish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050Lepomis microlophus Redear sunfish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.450Lepomis punctatus Spotted sunfish 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.400Micropterus salmoides Largemouth bass 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.200Pomoxis nigromaculatus Black crappie 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.150 0.000Etheostoma fusiforme Swamp darter 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050Chloroscombrus chrysurus Atlantic bumper 0.400 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Lutjanus griseus Gray snapper 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000Lutjanus synagris Lane snapper 0.100 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Eucinostomus spp. Eucinostomus mojarras 0.200 0.400 0.050 0.300 0.200 0.050 0.000Eucinostomus gula Silver jenny 2.000 0.900 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Eucinostomus harengulus Tidewater mojarra 0.550 0.300 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Eugerres plumieri Striped mojarra 0.050 1.400 0.100 1.050 0.050 0.100 0.150Lagodon rhomboides Pinfish 0.650 0.200 0.050 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000Cynoscion nebulosus Spotted seatrout 0.150 0.600 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.000 0.000Cynoscion arenarius Sand seatrout 2.900 22.250 23.200 7.200 3.400 0.100 0.100Bairdiella chrysoura Silver perch 1.400 1.450 0.900 0.350 0.000 0.000 0.000Leiostomus xanthurus Spot 0.150 0.100 0.200 0.850 3.450 0.300 0.000Menticirrhus americanus Southern kingfish 4.650 10.800 1.400 0.300 0.000 0.000 0.000Sciaenops ocellatus Red drum 0.000 0.000 0.100 0.050 0.000 0.550 0.000Chaetodipterus faber Atlantic spadefish 0.000 0.100 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Tilapia spp. Tilapias 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.100Mugil cephalus Striped mullet 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.100 0.000 0.000Gobiidae spp. Gobies 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000Gobiosoma spp. Gobiosoma gobies 0.150 0.000 0.050 0.100 0.000 0.000 0.000Gobiosoma bosc Naked goby 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000Gobiosoma robustum Code goby 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Microgobius gulosus Clown goby 0.000 0.550 2.500 1.050 2.300 0.050 0.000

B-19

Page 143: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table B9, page 2 of 2. Location-specific trawl catch, Myakka River.

Data are presented as mean number per deployment.

Organisms are listed in phylogenetic order.

Location (km from mouth)

Taxon Common Name 2.4-7.5 7.5-13.5 13.5-18.5 18.5-23.4 23.4-28.8 28.8-35.0 35.0-42.0

Microgobius thalassinus Green goby 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Etropus crossotus Fringed flounder 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Trinectes maculatus Hogchoker 6.950 22.300 13.650 2.750 21.950 9.550 30.100Achirus lineatus Lined sole 0.350 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Symphurus plagiusa Blackcheek tonguefish 0.500 0.400 0.250 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000Stephanolepis hispidus Planehead filefish 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Sphoeroides nephelus Southern puffer 0.050 0.150 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Chilomycterus schoepfii Striped burrfish 0.150 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

B-20

Page 144: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Table B10, page 1 of 1. Location-specific trawl catch, Myakkahatchee Creek.

Data are presented as mean number per deployment.

Organisms are listed in phylogenetic order.

Location (km from mouth)

Taxon Common Name 22.3-24.3 24.3-26.4

Palaemonetes paludosus Riverine grass shrimp 0.067 0.000Callinectes sapidus Blue crab 3.667 0.667Dasyatis sabina Atlantic stingray 0.133 0.000Lepisosteus osseus Longnose gar 0.000 0.200Lepisosteus platyrhincus Florida gar 0.000 0.133Elops saurus Ladyfish 0.267 0.067Dorosoma petenense Threadfin shad 0.200 0.000Anchoa mitchilli Bay anchovy 32.667 167.200Ameiurus catus White catfish 0.267 0.000Ictalurus punctatus Channel catfish 1.333 0.133Ariopsis felis Hardhead catfish 0.133 0.000Loricariidae spp. Suckermouth catfish 0.000 0.067Fundulus seminolis Seminole killifish 0.000 0.067Lucania parva Rainwater killifish 0.000 0.200Menidia spp. Silversides 0.000 0.200Prionotus tribulus Bighead searobin 0.067 0.000Centropomus undecimalis Common snook 0.000 0.067Lepomis spp. Sunfishes 0.000 0.067Lepomis gulosus Warmouth 0.000 0.267Lepomis macrochirus Bluegill 0.200 2.267Lepomis microlophus Redear sunfish 0.000 0.067Lutjanus griseus Gray snapper 0.133 0.000Eucinostomus spp. Eucinostomus mojarras 1.867 0.133Eugerres plumieri Striped mojarra 0.467 0.333Lagodon rhomboides Pinfish 0.400 0.200Archosargus probatocephalus Sheepshead 0.000 0.067Cynoscion arenarius Sand seatrout 12.267 1.467Bairdiella chrysoura Silver perch 0.000 0.067Leiostomus xanthurus Spot 28.067 2.267Sciaenops ocellatus Red drum 0.067 0.000Tilapia spp. Tilapias 0.000 0.133Oreochromis aureus Blue tilapia 0.000 0.067Gobiosoma spp. Gobiosoma gobies 0.067 0.000Gobiosoma bosc Naked goby 0.200 0.067Microgobius gulosus Clown goby 0.533 0.733Bathygobius soporator Frillfin goby 0.133 0.000Trinectes maculatus Hogchoker 71.333 69.667

B-21

Page 145: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Appendix C:

Length-frequency plots for selected taxa

C-1

Page 146: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Farfantepenaeus duorarum (Pink shrimp)

Fig. C1. Monthly length frequencies of Pink shrimp collected in seines and trawls.

C-2

Page 147: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

Callinectes sapidus (Blue crab)

Fig. C2. Monthly length frequencies of Blue crab collected in seines and trawls.

C-3

Page 148: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

200

400

600

800

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

Brevoortia spp. (Menhadens)

Fig. C3. Monthly length frequencies of Menhadens collected in seines and trawls.

C-4

Page 149: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Anchoa mitchilli (Bay anchovy)

Fig. C4. Monthly length frequencies of Bay anchovy collected in seines and trawls.

C-5

Page 150: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Notropis petersoni (Coastal shiner)

Fig. C5. Monthly length frequencies of Coastal shiner collected in seines and trawls.

C-6

Page 151: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

Ictalurus punctatus (Channel catfish)

Fig. C6. Monthly length frequencies of Channel catfish collected in seines and trawls.

C-7

Page 152: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Ariopsis felis (Hardhead catfish)

Fig. C7. Monthly length frequencies of Hardhead catfish collected in seines and trawls.

C-8

Page 153: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Fundulus grandis (Gulf killifish)

Fig. C8. Monthly length frequencies of Gulf killifish collected in seines and trawls.

C-9

Page 154: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Fundulus seminolis (Seminole killifish)

Fig. C9. Monthly length frequencies of Seminole killifish collected in seines and trawls.

C-10

Page 155: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Lucania parva (Rainwater killifish)

Fig. C10. Monthly length frequencies of Rainwater killifish collected in seines and trawls.

C-11

Page 156: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Lucania goodei (Bluefin killifish)

Fig. C11. Monthly length frequencies of Bluefin killifish collected in seines and trawls.

C-12

Page 157: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Jordanella floridae (Flagfish)

Fig. C12. Monthly length frequencies of Flagfish collected in seines and trawls.

C-13

Page 158: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

100

200

300

400

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

100

200

300

400

500

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Gambusia holbrooki (Eastern mosquitofish)

Fig. C13. Monthly length frequencies of Eastern mosquitofish collected in seines and trawls.

C-14

Page 159: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Poecilia latipinna (Sailfin molly)

Fig. C14. Monthly length frequencies of Sailfin molly collected in seines and trawls.

C-15

Page 160: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

Membras martinica (Rough silverside)

Fig. C15. Monthly length frequencies of Rough silverside collected in seines and trawls.

C-16

Page 161: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

100

200

300

400

500

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

Menidia spp. (Silversides)

Fig. C16. Monthly length frequencies of Silversides collected in seines and trawls.

C-17

Page 162: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Labidesthes sicculus (Brook silverside)

Fig. C17. Monthly length frequencies of Brook silverside collected in seines and trawls.

C-18

Page 163: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

Prionotus tribulus (Bighead searobin)

Fig. C18. Monthly length frequencies of Bighead searobin collected in seines and trawls.

C-19

Page 164: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Lepomis macrochirus (Bluegill)

Fig. C19. Monthly length frequencies of Bluegill collected in seines and trawls.

C-20

Page 165: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Lepomis marginatus (Dollar sunfish)

Fig. C20. Monthly length frequencies of Dollar sunfish collected in seines and trawls.

C-21

Page 166: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

Lepomis microlophus (Redear sunfish)

Fig. C21. Monthly length frequencies of Redear sunfish collected in seines and trawls.

C-22

Page 167: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

Oligoplites saurus (Leatherjacket)

Fig. C22. Monthly length frequencies of Leatherjacket collected in seines and trawls.

C-23

Page 168: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Eucinostomus spp. (Eucinostomus mojarras)

Fig. C23. Monthly length frequencies of Eucinostomus mojarras collected in seines and trawls.

C-24

Page 169: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Eucinostomus gula (Silver jenny)

Fig. C24. Monthly length frequencies of Silver jenny collected in seines and trawls.

C-25

Page 170: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Eucinostomus harengulus (Tidewater mojarra)

Fig. C25. Monthly length frequencies of Tidewater mojarra collected in seines and trawls.

C-26

Page 171: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

Eugerres plumieri (Striped mojarra)

Fig. C26. Monthly length frequencies of Striped mojarra collected in seines and trawls.

C-27

Page 172: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

Lagodon rhomboides (Pinfish)

Fig. C27. Monthly length frequencies of Pinfish collected in seines and trawls.

C-28

Page 173: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Cynoscion nebulosus (Spotted seatrout)

Fig. C28. Monthly length frequencies of Spotted seatrout collected in seines and trawls.

C-29

Page 174: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Cynoscion arenarius (Sand seatrout)

Fig. C29. Monthly length frequencies of Sand seatrout collected in seines and trawls.

C-30

Page 175: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

Bairdiella chrysoura (Silver perch)

Fig. C30. Monthly length frequencies of Silver perch collected in seines and trawls.

C-31

Page 176: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

Leiostomus xanthurus (Spot)

Fig. C31. Monthly length frequencies of Spot collected in seines and trawls.

C-32

Page 177: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

Menticirrhus americanus (Southern kingfish)

Fig. C32. Monthly length frequencies of Southern kingfish collected in seines and trawls.

C-33

Page 178: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

Sciaenops ocellatus (Red drum)

Fig. C33. Monthly length frequencies of Red drum collected in seines and trawls.

C-34

Page 179: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

Tilapia spp. (Tilapias)

Fig. C34. Monthly length frequencies of Tilapias collected in seines and trawls.

C-35

Page 180: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

Mugil cephalus (Striped mullet)

Fig. C35. Monthly length frequencies of Striped mullet collected in seines and trawls.

C-36

Page 181: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

Gobiosoma spp. (Gobiosoma gobies)

Fig. C36. Monthly length frequencies of Gobiosoma gobies collected in seines and trawls.

C-37

Page 182: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

Gobiosoma bosc (Naked goby)

Fig. C37. Monthly length frequencies of Naked goby collected in seines and trawls.

C-38

Page 183: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

Microgobius gulosus (Clown goby)

Fig. C38. Monthly length frequencies of Clown goby collected in seines and trawls.

C-39

Page 184: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

January

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

May

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

September

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

February

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

June

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

October

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

March

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

July

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

November

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

April

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

August

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

December

Size class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

Trinectes maculatus (Hogchoker)

Fig. C39. Monthly length frequencies of Hogchoker collected in seines and trawls.

C-40

Page 185: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Appendix D:

Seine catch overview plots

D-1

Page 186: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

= 314Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2 (149) (131) (60)

Farfantepenaeus duorarum (Pink shrimp), Seines

Fig. D1. Relative abundance of Pink shrimp in shoreline habitats.

D-2

Page 187: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

5

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6 (149) (131) (60)

Palaemonetes intermedius (Brackish grass shrimp), Seines

Fig. D2. Relative abundance of Brackish grass shrimp in shoreline habitats.

D-3

Page 188: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

5

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

5 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5 (149) (131) (60)

Palaemonetes pugio (Daggerblade grass shrimp), Seines

Fig. D3. Relative abundance of Daggerblade grass shrimp in shoreline habitats.

D-4

Page 189: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

= 282Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

10 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0 (149) (131) (60)

Callinectes sapidus (Blue crab), Seines

Fig. D4. Relative abundance of Blue crab in shoreline habitats.

D-5

Page 190: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

200

400

600

800

= 1,916Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0 (149) (131) (60)

Brevoortia spp. (Menhadens), Seines

Fig. D5. Relative abundance of Menhadens in shoreline habitats.

D-6

Page 191: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d shore

line

small

terre

s. ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

5

10

15

20

25

30(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2 to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to32

.2

32.2

to 37

.2

37.2

to41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

= 74,096Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

10

20

30

40

50

60 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

20

40

60

80

100

120 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35 (149) (131) (60)

Anchoa mitchilli (Bay anchovy), Seines

Fig. D6. Relative abundance of Bay anchovy in shoreline habitats.

D-7

Page 192: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

5

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

= 632Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0 (149) (131) (60)

Notropis petersoni (Coastal shiner), Seines

Fig. D7. Relative abundance of Coastal shiner in shoreline habitats.

D-8

Page 193: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s. ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to27

.2

27.2

to32

.2

32.2

to 37

.2

37.2

to41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

= 108Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0(number of samples)

(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high m

esoh

aline

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35 (149) (131) (60)

Fundulus grandis (Gulf killifish), Seines

Fig. D8. Relative abundance of Gulf killifish in shoreline habitats.

D-9

Page 194: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

= 1,984Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5 (149) (131) (60)

Fundulus seminolis (Seminole killifish), Seines

Fig. D9. Relative abundance of Seminole killifish in shoreline habitats.

D-10

Page 195: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

= 593Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

5 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2 (149) (131) (60)

Lucania parva (Rainwater killifish), Seines

Fig. D10. Relative abundance of Rainwater killifish in shoreline habitats.

D-11

Page 196: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

= 117Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5 (149) (131) (60)

Lucania goodei (Bluefin killifish), Seines

Fig. D11. Relative abundance of Bluefin killifish in shoreline habitats.

D-12

Page 197: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s. ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to27

.2

27.2

to32

.2

32.2

to 37

.2

37.2

to41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

= 102Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7(number of samples)

(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high m

esoh

aline

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25 (149) (131) (60)

Jordanella floridae (Flagfish), Seines

Fig. D12. Relative abundance of Flagfish in shoreline habitats.

D-13

Page 198: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s. ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

10

20

30

40

50(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2to

7.2

7.2 to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to 21

.8

21.9

to27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to 37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

10

20

30

40

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

= 8,602Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

5

10

15

20

25 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high m

esoh

aline

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

10 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

10

12 (149) (131) (60)

Gambusia holbrooki (Eastern mosquitofish), Seines

Fig. D13. Relative abundance of Eastern mosquitofish in shoreline habitats.

D-14

Page 199: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

= 1,327Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6 (149) (131) (60)

Poecilia latipinna (Sailfin molly), Seines

Fig. D14. Relative abundance of Sailfin molly in shoreline habitats.

D-15

Page 200: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

= 329Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6 (149) (131) (60)

Membras martinica (Rough silverside), Seines

Fig. D15. Relative abundance of Rough silverside in shoreline habitats.

D-16

Page 201: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s. ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

10

20

30

40(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2to

7.2

7.2 to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to 21

.8

21.9

to27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to 37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

= 10,787Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

10

20

30

40

50 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high m

esoh

aline

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

10

20

30

40

50 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

5

10

15

20

25 (149) (131) (60)

Menidia spp. (Silversides), Seines

Fig. D16. Relative abundance of Silversides in shoreline habitats.

D-17

Page 202: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d shore

line

small

terre

s. ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

5

10

15

20(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2to

7.2

7.2 to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to 21

.8

21.9

to27

.2

27.2

to32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

= 1,407Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

5

6(number of samples)

(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high m

esoh

aline

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

5 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

5 (149) (131) (60)

Labidesthes sicculus (Brook silverside), Seines

Fig. D17. Relative abundance of Brook silverside in shoreline habitats.

D-18

Page 203: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

= 525Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6 (149) (131) (60)

Lepomis macrochirus (Bluegill), Seines

Fig. D18. Relative abundance of Bluegill in shoreline habitats.

D-19

Page 204: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

= 85Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6 (149) (131) (60)

Lepomis marginatus (Dollar sunfish), Seines

Fig. D19. Relative abundance of Dollar sunfish in shoreline habitats.

D-20

Page 205: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

= 171Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0 (149) (131) (60)

Lepomis microlophus (Redear sunfish), Seines

Fig. D20. Relative abundance of Redear sunfish in shoreline habitats.

D-21

Page 206: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

= 227Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0 (149) (131) (60)

Oligoplites saurus (Leatherjack), Seines

Fig. D21. Relative abundance of Leatherjacket in shoreline habitats.

D-22

Page 207: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s. ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

10(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2to

7.2

7.2 to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to 21

.8

21.9

to27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to 37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

200

400

600

800

1000

= 3,810Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

5

10

15

20

25 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high m

esoh

aline

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

10 (149) (131) (60)

Eucinostomus spp. (Eucinostomus mojarras), Seines

Fig. D22. Relative abundance of Eucinostomus mojarras in shoreline habitats.

D-23

Page 208: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

= 210Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5 (149) (131) (60)

Eucinostomus gula (Silver jenny), Seines

Fig. D23. Relative abundance of Silver jenny in shoreline habitats.

D-24

Page 209: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

5

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

= 725Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

5 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5 (149) (131) (60)

Eucinostomus harengulus (Tidewater mojarra), Seines

Fig. D24. Relative abundance of Tidewater mojarra in shoreline habitats.

D-25

Page 210: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

= 773Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

5 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4 (149) (131) (60)

Eugerres plumieri (Striped mojarra), Seines

Fig. D25. Relative abundance of Striped mojarra in shoreline habitats.

D-26

Page 211: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

= 1,166Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

10 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5 (149) (131) (60)

Lagodon rhomboides (Pinfish), Seines

Fig. D26. Relative abundance of Pinfish in shoreline habitats.

D-27

Page 212: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

= 287Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2 (149) (131) (60)

Cynoscion nebulosus (Spotted seatrout), Seines

Fig. D27. Relative abundance of Spotted seatrout in shoreline habitats.

D-28

Page 213: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s. ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to27

.2

27.2

to32

.2

32.2

to 37

.2

37.2

to41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

= 61Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6(number of samples)

(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high m

esoh

aline

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30 (149) (131) (60)

Cynoscion arenarius (Sand seatrout), Seines

Fig. D28. Relative abundance of Sand seatrout in shoreline habitats.

D-29

Page 214: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

= 116Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4 (149) (131) (60)

Bairdiella chrysoura (Silver perch), Seines

Fig. D29. Relative abundance of Silver perch in shoreline habitats.

D-30

Page 215: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d shore

line

small

terre

s. ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2 to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to32

.2

32.2

to 37

.2

37.2

to41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

= 4,992Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

20

40

60

80

100 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0 (149) (131) (60)

Leiostomus xanthurus (Spot), Seines

Fig. D30. Relative abundance of Spot in shoreline habitats.

D-31

Page 216: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s. ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to27

.2

27.2

to32

.2

32.2

to 37

.2

37.2

to41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

= 30Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5(number of samples)

(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high m

esoh

aline

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25 (149) (131) (60)

Menticirrhus americanus (Southern kingfish), Seines

Fig. D31. Relative abundance of Southern kingfish in shoreline habitats.

D-32

Page 217: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

5

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

100

200

300

400

= 1,449Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

5 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8 (149) (131) (60)

Sciaenops ocellatus (Red drum), Seines

Fig. D32. Relative abundance of Red drum in shoreline habitats.

D-33

Page 218: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d shore

line

small

terres

. veg

.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2to

7.2

7.2 to

12.2

12.2

to17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

= 140Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6(number of samples)

(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high m

esoh

aline

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35 (149) (131) (60)

Tilapia spp. (Tilapias), Seines

Fig. D33. Relative abundance of Tilapias in shoreline habitats.

D-34

Page 219: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

100

200

300

400

500

= 982Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

10 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8 (149) (131) (60)

Mugil cephalus (Striped mullet), Seines

Fig. D34. Relative abundance of Striped mullet in shoreline habitats.

D-35

Page 220: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

= 340Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4 (149) (131) (60)

Gobiosoma spp. (Gobiosoma gobies), Seines

Fig. D35. Relative abundance of Gobiosoma gobies in shoreline habitats.

D-36

Page 221: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

= 169Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0 (149) (131) (60)

Gobiosoma bosc (Naked goby), Seines

Fig. D36. Relative abundance of Naked goby in shoreline habitats.

D-37

Page 222: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s.ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to21

.8

21.9

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

= 843Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

10 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5 (149) (131) (60)

Microgobius gulosus (Clown goby), Seines

Fig. D37. Relative abundance of Clown goby in shoreline habitats.

D-38

Page 223: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Dominant shore typeha

rdene

d sho

reline

small

terre

s. ve

g.

shrub

s/tree

s

emerg

ent m

arsh

mangro

ve

miscell

aneo

us

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14(13)(100)(101)(53)

River km

2.2to

7.2

7.2 to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to 21

.8

21.9

to27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to 37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

5

10

15

20

25

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

= 3,039Total number of individuals

MonthJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18 (number of samples)(18) (18) (18) (18) (36) (36) (36) (32) (32) (32) (32) (32)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high m

esoh

aline

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

10

12 (number of samples)(38) (37) (48) (83) (134) (44)

(number of samples)

(40) (36) (40) (27)(33) (45,60) (31) (28)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14 (149) (131) (60)

Trinectes maculatus (Hogchoker), Seines

Fig. D38. Relative abundance of Hogchoker in shoreline habitats.

D-39

Page 224: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Appendix E:

Trawl catch overview plots

E-1

Page 225: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to22

.2

22.2

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

= 408Total number of individuals

Month

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2 (number of samples)(9) (9) (9) (9) (18) (18) (18) (16) (16) (16) (16) (16)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2 (number of samples)(24) (19) (27) (36) (64)

(18) (18) (19) (11)(19) (20,30) (20) (15)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7 (74) (66) (30)

Farfantepenaeus duorarum (Pink shrimp), Trawls

Fig. E1. Relative abundance of Pink shrimp in channel habitats.

E-2

Page 226: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to22

.2

22.2

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

= 315Total number of individuals

Month

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0 (number of samples)(9) (9) (9) (9) (18) (18) (18) (16) (16) (16) (16) (16)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7 (number of samples)(24) (19) (27) (36) (64)

(18) (18) (19) (11)(19) (20,30) (20) (15)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4 (74) (66) (30)

Callinectes sapidus (Blue crab), Trawls

Fig. E2. Relative abundance of Blue crab in channel habitats.

E-3

Page 227: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to22

.2

22.2

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

10

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

= 11,866Total number of individuals

Month

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16 (number of samples)(9) (9) (9) (9) (18) (18) (18) (16) (16) (16) (16) (16)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

5

6 (number of samples)(24) (19) (27) (36) (64)

(18) (18) (19) (11)(19) (20,30) (20) (15)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5 (74) (66) (30)

Anchoa mitchilli (Bay anchovy), Trawls

Fig. E3. Relative abundance of Bay anchovy in channel habitats.

E-4

Page 228: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to17

.2

17.2

to22

.2

22.2

to27

.2

27.2

to32

.2

32.2

to 37

.2

37.2

to41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

= 113Total number of individuals

Month

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0(number of samples)

(9) (9) (9) (9) (18) (18) (18) (16) (16) (16) (16) (16)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high m

esoh

aline

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30 (number of samples)(24) (19) (27) (36) (64)

(18) (18) (19) (11)(19) (20,30) (20) (15)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25 (74) (66) (30)

Ictalurus punctatus (Channel catfish), Trawls

Fig. E4. Relative abundance of Channel catfish in channel habitats.

E-5

Page 229: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

River km

2.2to

7.2

7.2 to

12.2

12.2

to17

.2

17.2

to22

.2

22.2

to 27

.2

27.2

to32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

= 190Total number of individuals

Month

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2(number of samples)

(9) (9) (9) (9) (18) (18) (18) (16) (16) (16) (16) (16)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high m

esoh

aline

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4 (number of samples)(24) (19) (27) (36) (64)

(18) (18) (19) (11)(19) (20,30) (20) (15)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25 (74) (66) (30)

Ariopsis felis (Hardhead catfish), Trawls

Fig. E5. Relative abundance of Hardhead catfish in channel habitats.

E-6

Page 230: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to17

.2

17.2

to22

.2

22.2

to27

.2

27.2

to32

.2

32.2

to 37

.2

37.2

to41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

= 74Total number of individuals

Month

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5(number of samples)

(9) (9) (9) (9) (18) (18) (18) (16) (16) (16) (16) (16)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high m

esoh

aline

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5 (number of samples)(24) (19) (27) (36) (64)

(18) (18) (19) (11)(19) (20,30) (20) (15)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18 (74) (66) (30)

Prionotus tribulus (Bighead searobin), Trawls

Fig. E6. Relative abundance of Bighead searobin in channel habitats.

E-7

Page 231: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

River km

2.2to

7.2

7.2 to

12.2

12.2

to17

.2

17.2

to22

.2

22.2

to 27

.2

27.2

to32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

= 77Total number of individuals

Month

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5(number of samples)

(9) (9) (9) (9) (18) (18) (18) (16) (16) (16) (16) (16)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high m

esoh

aline

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18 (number of samples)(24) (19) (27) (36) (64)

(18) (18) (19) (11)(19) (20,30) (20) (15)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25 (74) (66) (30)

Lepomis macrochirus (Bluegill), Trawls

Fig. E7. Relative abundance of Bluegill in channel habitats.

E-8

Page 232: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to17

.2

17.2

to22

.2

22.2

to27

.2

27.2

to32

.2

32.2

to 37

.2

37.2

to41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.20

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

= 54Total number of individuals

Month

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8(number of samples)

(9) (9) (9) (9) (18) (18) (18) (16) (16) (16) (16) (16)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high m

esoh

aline

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25 (number of samples)(24) (19) (27) (36) (64)

(18) (18) (19) (11)(19) (20,30) (20) (15)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.20 (74) (66) (30)

Eucinostomus spp. (Eucinostomus mojarras), Trawls

Fig. E8. Relative abundance of Eucinostomus mojarras in channel habitats.

E-9

Page 233: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to17

.2

17.2

to22

.2

22.2

to27

.2

27.2

to32

.2

32.2

to 37

.2

37.2

to41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

= 58Total number of individuals

Month

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30(number of samples)

(9) (9) (9) (9) (18) (18) (18) (16) (16) (16) (16) (16)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high m

esoh

aline

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4 (number of samples)(24) (19) (27) (36) (64)

(18) (18) (19) (11)(19) (20,30) (20) (15)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14 (74) (66) (30)

Eucinostomus gula (Silver jenny), Trawls

Fig. E9. Relative abundance of Silver jenny in channel habitats.

E-10

Page 234: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

River km

2.2to

7.2

7.2 to

12.2

12.2

to17

.2

17.2

to22

.2

22.2

to 27

.2

27.2

to32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

= 70Total number of individuals

Month

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35(number of samples)

(9) (9) (9) (9) (18) (18) (18) (16) (16) (16) (16) (16)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high m

esoh

aline

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25 (number of samples)(24) (19) (27) (36) (64)

(18) (18) (19) (11)(19) (20,30) (20) (15)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12 (74) (66) (30)

Eugerres plumieri (Striped mojarra), Trawls

Fig. E10. Relative abundance of Striped mojarra in channel habitats.

E-11

Page 235: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to22

.2

22.2

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

= 1,392Total number of individuals

Month

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5 (number of samples)(9) (9) (9) (9) (18) (18) (18) (16) (16) (16) (16) (16)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5 (number of samples)(24) (19) (27) (36) (64)

(18) (18) (19) (11)(19) (20,30) (20) (15)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0 (74) (66) (30)

Cynoscion arenarius (Sand seatrout), Trawls

Fig. E11. Relative abundance of Sand seatrout in channel habitats.

E-12

Page 236: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to17

.2

17.2

to22

.2

22.2

to27

.2

27.2

to32

.2

32.2

to 37

.2

37.2

to41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

= 84Total number of individuals

Month

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5(number of samples)

(9) (9) (9) (9) (18) (18) (18) (16) (16) (16) (16) (16)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high m

esoh

aline

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25 (number of samples)(24) (19) (27) (36) (64)

(18) (18) (19) (11)(19) (20,30) (20) (15)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18 (74) (66) (30)

Bairdiella chrysoura (Silver perch), Trawls

Fig. E12. Relative abundance of Silver perch in channel habitats.

E-13

Page 237: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to22

.2

22.2

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

50

100

150

200

250

= 555Total number of individuals

Month

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

5

6 (number of samples)(9) (9) (9) (9) (18) (18) (18) (16) (16) (16) (16) (16)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0 (number of samples)(24) (19) (27) (36) (64)

(18) (18) (19) (11)(19) (20,30) (20) (15)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2 (74) (66) (30)

Leiostomus xanthurus (Spot), Trawls

Fig. E13. Relative abundance of Spot in channel habitats.

E-14

Page 238: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to22

.2

22.2

to 27

.2

27.2

to 32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

20

40

60

80

= 342Total number of individuals

Month

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8 (number of samples)(9) (9) (9) (9) (18) (18) (18) (16) (16) (16) (16) (16)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high mes

ohali

ne

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0 (number of samples)(24) (19) (27) (36) (64)

(18) (18) (19) (11)(19) (20,30) (20) (15)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6 (74) (66) (30)

Menticirrhus americanus (Southern kingfish), Trawls

Fig. E14. Relative abundance of Southern kingfish in channel habitats.

E-15

Page 239: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

River km

2.2 to

7.2

7.2to

12.2

12.2

to17

.2

17.2

to22

.2

22.2

to27

.2

27.2

to32

.2

32.2

to 37

.2

37.2

to41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

= 150Total number of individuals

Month

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0(number of samples)

(9) (9) (9) (9) (18) (18) (18) (16) (16) (16) (16) (16)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high m

esoh

aline

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4 (number of samples)(24) (19) (27) (36) (64)

(18) (18) (19) (11)(19) (20,30) (20) (15)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18 (74) (66) (30)

Microgobius gulosus (Clown goby), Trawls

Fig. E15. Relative abundance of Clown goby in channel habitats.

E-16

Page 240: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

River km

2.2to

7.2

7.2 to

12.2

12.2

to 17

.2

17.2

to 22

.2

22.2

to27

.2

27.2

to32

.2

32.2

to37

.2

37.2

to 41

.8

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

2

4

6

8

Myakka R. below confluence Myakka R. above confluenceMyakkahatchee Creek

Size-class mid-point (mm)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Num

ber o

f ind

ivid

uals

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

= 4,254Total number of individuals

Month

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

5

6(number of samples)

(9) (9) (9) (9) (18) (18) (18) (16) (16) (16) (16) (16)

confluence confluence

(number of samples)

Modified Venice salinity classification

polyh

aline

high m

esoh

aline

low m

esoh

aline

oligo

halin

e

limne

tic

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4 (number of samples)(24) (19) (27) (36) (64)

(18) (18) (19) (11)(19) (20,30) (20) (15)

(number of samples)

Segment

Myakka R. below Myakka R. above Myakkahatchee C.

Geo

met

ric m

ean

abun

danc

e.10

0 m

-2 ±

95%

CL

0

1

2

3

4

5 (74) (66) (30)

Trinectes maculatus (Hogchoker), Trawls

Fig. E16. Relative abundance of Hogchoker in channel habitats.

E-17

Page 241: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Appendix F:

Plots of the plankton-net distribution responses in Table 3.7.1.1

F-1

Page 242: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Hippolyte zostericola postlarvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

Acartia tonsa

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

decapod mysis

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

ephemeropteran larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

trichopteran larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

dipterans, chironomid larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

MYAKKA RIVER

F-2

Page 243: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Ilyocryptus sp.

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

decapod zoeae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

Sphaeroma terebrans

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

Orthocyclops modestus

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

decapod megalopae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

acari

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

MYAKKA RIVER

F-3

Page 244: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

odonates, anisopteran larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

amphipods, caprellid

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

Simocephalus vetulus

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

dipteran, Chaoborus punctipennis

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

gobiid flexion larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

Osphranticum labronectum

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

MYAKKA RIVER

F-4

Page 245: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

odonates, zygopteran larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

Mesocyclops edax

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

Microgobius spp. flexion larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

amphipods, gammaridean

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

Mnemiopsis mccradyi

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

Trinectes maculatus juveniles

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

MYAKKA RIVER

F-5

Page 246: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

cymothoid sp. a (Lironeca) juveniles

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

gastropods, prosobranch

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

dipterans, pupae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

unidentified Americamysis juveniles

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

coleopterans, elmid adults

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

Americamysis almyra

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

MYAKKA RIVER

F-6

Page 247: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Anchoa mitchilli juveniles

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

Heterandria formosa adults

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

Menidia spp. juveniles

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

Taphromysis bowmani

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

Edotea triloba

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

Clytia sp.

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

MYAKKA RIVER

F-7

Page 248: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Trinectes maculatus postflexion larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

Bowmaniella dissimilis

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

Microgobius spp. postflexion larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

Diaptomus spp.

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

Anchoa mitchilli adults

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

2 4 6 8 10 12

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

MYAKKA RIVER

F-8

Page 249: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

pelecypods

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

-1 1 3 5 7

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

decapod mysis

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

-1 1 3 5 7

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Sphaeroma quadridentata

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

-1 1 3 5 7

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Americamysis almyra

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

-1 1 3 5 7

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

amphipods, gammaridean

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

-1 1 3 5 7

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Anchoa mitchilli juveniles

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

-1 1 3 5 7

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

MYAKKAHATCHEE CREEK

F-9

Page 250: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Taphromysis bowmani

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Loca

tion

in R

iver

(km

u)

-1 1 3 5 7

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

MYAKKAHATCHEE CREEK

F-10

Page 251: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Appendix G:

Plots of the seine and trawl distribution responses in Table 3.7.2.1

G-1

Page 252: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(14-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Farfantepenaeus duorarum (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:<=14 mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.6044 - 0.2901x r2 = 0.6245

Fig. G1. Distribution response of Pink shrimp (<=14 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 14-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(364-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0Farfantepenaeus duorarum (trawls): Myakka River

Sizes:>=15mmJan. to Dec. y = 7.5059 - 0.8297x r2 = 0.3244

Fig. G2. Distribution response of Pink shrimp (>=15 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 364-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-2

Page 253: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(7-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Callinectes sapidus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:<=34 mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.6867 - 0.2983x r2 = 0.3875

Fig. G3. Distribution response of Blue crab (<=34 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 7-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(322-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4Callinectes sapidus (trawls): Myakka River

Sizes:>=35mmJan. to Dec. y = 5.8692 - 0.4759x r2 = 0.2564

Fig. G4. Distribution response of Blue crab (>=35 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 322-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-3

Page 254: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(1-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Callinectes sapidus (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:>=35mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.2316 - 0.0174x r2 = 0.6039

Fig. G5. Distribution response of Blue crab (>=35 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 1-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(273-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Callinectes sapidus (trawls): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:>=35mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.2762 - 0.0276x r2 = 0.3473

Fig. G6. Distribution response of Blue crab (>=35 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 273-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-4

Page 255: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(91-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4

5Anchoa mitchilli (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:26 to 35 mmJan. to Dec. y = 4.9 - 0.4126x r2 = 0.4416

Fig. G7. Distribution response of Bay anchovy (26 to 35 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 91-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(21-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4Anchoa mitchilli (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=36mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.8867 - 0.2881x r2 = 0.5319

Fig. G8. Distribution response of Bay anchovy (>=36 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 21-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-5

Page 256: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(56-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4Anchoa mitchilli (trawls): Myakka River

Sizes:<=25 mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.4905 - 0.1087x r2 = 0.4168

Fig. G9. Distribution response of Bay anchovy (<=25 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 56-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(70-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Anchoa mitchilli (trawls): Myakka River

Sizes:26 to 35 mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.3416 - 0.0958x r2 = 0.3393

Fig. G10. Distribution response of Bay anchovy (26 to 35 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 70-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-6

Page 257: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(105-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Anchoa mitchilli (trawls): Myakka River

Sizes:>=36mmJan. to Dec. y = 4.3042 - 0.3323x r2 = 0.4187

Fig. G11. Distribution response of Bay anchovy (>=36 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 105-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(1-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Anchoa mitchilli (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:26 to 35 mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.1334 + 0.0113x r2 = 0.3417

Fig. G12. Distribution response of Bay anchovy (26 to 35 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 1-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-7

Page 258: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(1-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Anchoa mitchilli (trawls): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:<=25 mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.1277 + 0.018x r2 = 0.3789

Fig. G13. Distribution response of Bay anchovy (<=25 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 1-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(154-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4Notropis petersoni (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:<=30 mmJan. to Dec. y = 4.3479 - 0.1348x r2 = 0.6245

Fig. G14. Distribution response of Coastal shiner (<=30 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 154-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-8

Page 259: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(1-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4Notropis petersoni (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=31mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.2478 + 0.0425x r2 = 0.3338

Fig. G15. Distribution response of Coastal shiner (>=31 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 1-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(70-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4Ariopsis felis (trawls): Myakka River

All sizes Jan. to Dec. y = 4.5294 - 0.3011x r2 = 0.3951

Fig. G16. Distribution response of Hardhead catfish(All sizes) in the Myakka River estuary to 70-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-9

Page 260: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(7-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4Lucania parva (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:<=25 mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.889 - 0.1644x r2 = 0.3931

Fig. G17. Distribution response of Rainwater killifish (<=25 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 7-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(56-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4Gambusia holbrooki (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=26mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.0536 + 0.0827x r2 = 0.3864

Fig. G18. Distribution response of Eastern mosquitofish (>=26 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 56-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-10

Page 261: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(154-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4

5Poecilia latipinna (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:<=29 mmJan. to Dec. y = -1.5423 + 0.7257x r2 = 0.5541

Fig. G19. Distribution response of Sailfin molly (<=29 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 154-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(84-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4

5Poecilia latipinna (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=30mmJan. to Dec. y = 2.1718 + 0.2001x r2 = 0.3879

Fig. G20. Distribution response of Sailfin molly (>=30 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 84-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-11

Page 262: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(175-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Poecilia latipinna (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:>=30mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.3563 - 0.0479x r2 = 0.8914

Fig. G21. Distribution response of Sailfin molly (>=30 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 175-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(357-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4Labidesthes sicculus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:<=35 mmJan. to Dec. y = 5.4368 - 0.2969x r2 = 0.5109

Fig. G22. Distribution response of Brook silverside (<=35 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 357-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-12

Page 263: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(301-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4Lepomis marginatus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:<=35 mmJan. to Dec. y = 8.2253 - 0.7463x r2 = 0.6407

Fig. G23. Distribution response of Dollar sunfish (<=35 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 301-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(42-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4Lepomis microlophus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=41mmJan. to Dec. y = 2.9509 + 0.084x r2 = 0.4679

Fig. G24. Distribution response of Redear sunfish (>=41 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 42-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-13

Page 264: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(14-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Eugerres plumieri (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:>=36mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.0814 + 0.0208x r2 = 0.4244

Fig. G25. Distribution response of Striped mojarra(>=36 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 14-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(105-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Cynoscion nebulosus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:<=35 mmJan. to Dec. y = 4.7817 - 0.4641x r2 = 0.6864

Fig. G26. Distribution response of Spotted seatrout (<=35 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 105-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-14

Page 265: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(98-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4Cynoscion nebulosus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=36mmJan. to Dec. y = 4.1368 - 0.3247x r2 = 0.4148

Fig. G27. Distribution response of Spotted seatrout (>=36 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 98-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(7-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4Cynoscion arenarius (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:<=40 mmJan. to Dec. y = 4.4726 - 0.3813x r2 = 0.6642

Fig. G28. Distribution response of Sand seatrout (<=40 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 7-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-15

Page 266: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(28-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4Cynoscion arenarius (trawls): Myakka River

Sizes:<=40 mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.8646 - 0.2104x r2 = 0.6174

Fig. G29. Distribution response of Sand seatrout (<=40 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 28-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(35-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4Cynoscion arenarius (trawls): Myakka River

Sizes:>=41mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.9996 - 0.2747x r2 = 0.4413

Fig. G30. Distribution response of Sand seatrout (>=41 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 35-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-16

Page 267: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(245-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Cynoscion arenarius (trawls): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:<=40 mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.2502 - 0.0256x r2 = 0.6046

Fig. G31. Distribution response of Sand seatrout (<=40 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 245-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(154-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4Leiostomus xanthurus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=31mmJan. to Dec. y = -0.6597 + 0.6075x r2 = 0.7016

Fig. G32. Distribution response of Spot (>=31 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 154-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-17

Page 268: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(105-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Menticirrhus americanus (trawls): Myakka River

Sizes:<=35 mmJan. to Dec. y = 4.4395 - 0.3914x r2 = 0.5123

Fig. G33. Distribution response of Southern kingfish (<=35 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 105-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(112-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0Menticirrhus americanus (trawls): Myakka River

Sizes:>=36mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.5223 - 0.2378x r2 = 0.495

Fig. G34. Distribution response of Southern kingfish (>=36 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 112-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-18

Page 269: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(182-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Sciaenops ocellatus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:<=40 mmJan. to Dec. y = 11.9625 - 1.4407x r2 = 0.6641

Fig. G35. Distribution response of Red drum (<=40 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 182-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(329-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Mugil cephalus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:<=30 mmJan. to Dec. y = -17.7874 + 3.0912x r2 = 0.9225

Fig. G36. Distribution response of Striped mullet (<=30 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 329-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-19

Page 270: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(133-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4Microgobius gulosus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:<=30 mmJan. to Dec. y = 1.5087 + 0.2018x r2 = 0.2388

Fig. G37. Distribution response of Clown goby (<=30 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 133-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(168-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Microgobius gulosus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=31mmJan. to Dec. y = 0.8804 + 0.3003x r2 = 0.3348

Fig. G38. Distribution response of Clown goby (>=31 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 168-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-20

Page 271: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(112-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Microgobius gulosus (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:<=30 mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.2427 - 0.0194x r2 = 0.4982

Fig. G39. Distribution response of Clown goby (<=30 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 112-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(126-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Microgobius gulosus (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:>=31mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.2845 - 0.0309x r2 = 0.5512

Fig. G40. Distribution response of Clown goby (>=31 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 126-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-21

Page 272: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(49-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4Trinectes maculatus (trawls): Myakka River

Sizes:<=25 mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.8502 - 0.064x r2 = 0.2205

Fig. G41. Distribution response of Hogchoker (<=25 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 49-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(364-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0

1

2

3

4Trinectes maculatus (trawls): Myakka River

Sizes:>=26mmJan. to Dec. y = 9.6863 - 1.093x r2 = 0.2607

Fig. G42. Distribution response of Hogchoker (>=26 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 364-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-22

Page 273: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(28-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(k

mU)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Trinectes maculatus (trawls): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:>=26mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.2354 - 0.0184x r2 = 0.4054

Fig. G43. Distribution response of Hogchoker (>=26 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 28-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

G-23

Page 274: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Appendix H:

Plots of the plankton-net abundance responses in Table 3.8.1.1

H-1

Page 275: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Anchoa mitchilli adults

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

11

13

15

17

19

21

dipteran, Chaoborus punctipennis

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

12

14

16

18

20

22

Ilyocryptus sp.

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

11

13

15

17

19

21

ephemeropteran larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

12

14

16

18

20

Gambusia holbrooki juveniles

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

11

12

13

14

15

16

Mesocyclops edax

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

12

14

16

18

20

MYAKKA RIVER

H-2

Page 276: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

dipterans, pupae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

11

13

15

17

19

21

Trinectes maculatus juveniles

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

11

13

15

17

19

Trinectes maculatus postflexion larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

odonates, anisopteran larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

10

12

14

16

18

Diaptomus spp.

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

11

13

15

17

19

Simocephalus vetulus

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

11

13

15

17

19

21

MYAKKA RIVER

H-3

Page 277: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Cyathura polita

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

11

13

15

17

19

dipterans, ceratopogonid larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

10

12

14

16

18

coleopterans, elmid adults

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

10

12

14

16

18

acari

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

11

13

15

17

19

unidentified Americamysis juveniles

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

odonates, zygopteran larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

10

12

14

16

18

MYAKKA RIVER

H-4

Page 278: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

dipterans, chironomid larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

12

14

16

18

20

Americamysis almyra

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

19

20

21

22

23

24

Menidia spp. juveniles

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

12

13

14

15

16

trichopteran larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

Osphranticum labronectum

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

10

11

12

13

14

15

coleopterans, elmid larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

10

11

12

13

14

MYAKKA RIVER

H-5

Page 279: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

cymothoid sp. a (Lironeca) juveniles

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

Bowmaniella dissimilis

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

15

17

19

21

23

Sphaeroma quadridentata

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

12

14

16

18

20

pelecypods

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

11

13

15

17

19

21

Hippolyte zostericola postlarvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

14

16

18

20

22

Edotea triloba

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

MYAKKA RIVER

H-6

Page 280: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

decapod mysis

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Palaemonetes spp. postlarvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

gobiid preflexion larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

12

14

16

18

20

Taphromysis bowmani

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

13

15

17

19

21

23

Pseudodiaptomus coronatus

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

13

15

17

19

21

23

Acartia tonsa

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

15

17

19

21

23

25

MYAKKA RIVER

H-7

Page 281: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

decapod zoeae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

20

22

24

26

28

Anchoa mitchilli postflexion larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

14

16

18

20

22

Gobiosoma spp. postflexion larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

11

13

15

17

19

decapod megalopae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

15

17

19

21

23

25

chaetognaths, sagittid

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

14

16

18

20

22

24

Evadne tergestina

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

11

14

17

20

23

26

MYAKKA RIVER

H-8

Page 282: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Anchoa spp. preflexion larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

15

17

19

21

23

amphipods, caprellid

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

14

16

18

20

22

Labidocera aestiva

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

14

16

18

20

22

24

Parasterope pollex

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

15

17

19

21

23

Anchoa spp. flexion larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

11

13

15

17

19

21

23

cumaceans

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

11

14

17

20

23

26

MYAKKA RIVER

H-9

Page 283: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

fish eggs, percomorph

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 4 6 8 10 12

11

14

17

20

23

26

MYAKKA RIVER

H-10

Page 284: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Mesocyclops edax

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 3 4 5 6 7

14

16

18

20

22

24

dipterans, pupae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 3 4 5 6 7

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ostracods, podocopid

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 3 4 5 6 7

14

16

18

20

22

polychaetes

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 3 4 5 6 7

15

16

17

18

19

20

branchiurans, Argulus spp.

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 3 4 5 6 7

14

15

16

17

18

Sphaeroma quadridentata

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 3 4 5 6 7

14

15

16

17

18

19

MYAKKAHATCHEE CREEK

H-11

Page 285: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Americamysis juveniles

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 3 4 5 6 7

20

21

22

23

24

amphipods, gammaridean

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 3 4 5 6 7

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Americamysis almyra

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 3 4 5 6 7

16

18

20

22

24

Anchoa mitchilli juveniles

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 3 4 5 6 7

16

18

20

22

24

gobiid preflexion larvae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 3 4 5 6 7

14

16

18

20

22

cumaceans

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 3 4 5 6 7

14

16

18

20

22

24

MYAKKAHATCHEE CREEK

H-12

Page 286: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

decapod mysis

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 3 4 5 6 7

14

16

18

20

22

24

decapod zoeae

Freshwater Inflow (Ln cfs)

Ln N

umbe

r in

Cha

nnel

2 3 4 5 6 7

15

17

19

21

23

25

27

MYAKKAHATCHEE CREEK

H-13

Page 287: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

Appendix I:

Plots of the seine and trawl abundance responses in Table 3.8.2.1

I-1

Page 288: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(21-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0Palaemonetes intermedius (seines): Myakka River

All sizes Mar. to Dec. y = -3.1058 + 1.9611x - 0.1979 x2

r2 = 0.3499

Fig. I1. Abundance response of Brackish grass shrimp (All sizes mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 21-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(21-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6Palaemonetes pugio (seines): Myakka River

All sizes Mar. to Dec. y = -6.9784 + 3.8584x - 0.3792 x2

r2 = 0.4267

Fig. I2. Abundance response of Daggerblade grass shrimp (All sizes mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 21-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-2

Page 289: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(7-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5Palaemonetes pugio (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

All sizes Mar. to Dec. y = -2.1565 + 1.8007x - 0.2605 x2

r2 = 0.4623

Fig. I3. Abundance response of Daggerblade grass shrimp (All sizes mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 7-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(105-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

-0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4Callinectes sapidus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=35mmJan. to Dec. y = -1.8853 + 0.689x - 0.0573 x2

r2 = 0.2296

Fig. I4. Abundance response of Blue crab (>=35 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 105-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-3

Page 290: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(140-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

-0.10

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25Callinectes sapidus (trawls): Myakka River

Sizes:<=34 mmOct. to May y = -5.2654 + 1.7501x - 0.1413 x2

r2 = 0.6274

Fig. I5. Abundance response of Blue crab (<=34 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 140-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(175-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

-0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5Callinectes sapidus (trawls): Myakka River

Sizes:>=35mmJan. to Dec. y = 0.5695 - 0.0619x r2 = 0.2595

Fig. I6. Abundance response of Blue crab (>=35 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 175-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-4

Page 291: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(42-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7Anchoa mitchilli (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:<=25 mmJan. to Dec. y = 7.1292 - 0.7903x r2 = 0.3053

Fig. I7. Abundance response of Bay anchovy (<=25 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 42-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(1-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

2

4

6

8

10Anchoa mitchilli (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:26 to 35 mmJan. to Dec. y = 9.3153 - 1.078x r2 = 0.4452

Fig. I8. Abundance response of Bay anchovy (26 to 35 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 1-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-5

Page 292: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(1-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7Anchoa mitchilli (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=36mmJan. to Dec. y = 7.2959 - 0.9413x r2 = 0.3733

Fig. I9. Abundance response of Bay anchovy (>=36 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 1-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(7-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0Anchoa mitchilli (trawls): Myakka River

Sizes:>=36mmJan. to Dec. y = 2.132 - 0.2827x r2 = 0.2621

Fig. I10. Abundance response of Bay anchovy (>=36 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 7-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-6

Page 293: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(35-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

2

4

6

8Anchoa mitchilli (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:<=25 mmJan. to Dec. y = 6.2673 - 0.8556x r2 = 0.3499

Fig. I11. Abundance response of Bay anchovy (<=25 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 35-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(1-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

2

4

6

8

10Anchoa mitchilli (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:26 to 35 mmJan. to Dec. y = 11.4579 - 5.6411x + 0.752 x2

r2 = 0.664

Fig. I12. Abundance response of Bay anchovy (26 to 35 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 1-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-7

Page 294: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(364-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

1

2

3

4

5Anchoa mitchilli (trawls): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:<=25 mmJan. to Dec. y = -495.8865 + 213.8872x - 22.9435 x2

r2 = 0.3348

Fig. I13. Abundance response of Bay anchovy (<=25 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 364-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(112-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

-0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4Anchoa mitchilli (trawls): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:>=36mmJan. to Dec. y = -1.3197 + 0.646x - 0.0703 x2

r2 = 0.4474

Fig. I14. Abundance response of Bay anchovy (>=36 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 112-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-8

Page 295: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(168-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Notropis petersoni (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:<=30 mmMay to Dec. y = -35.5699 + 12.3557x - 1.0269 x2

r2 = 0.3488

Fig. I15. Abundance response of Coastal shiner (<=30 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 168-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(7-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8Ictalurus punctatus (trawls): Myakka River

All sizes Jul. to Oct. y = -1.0752 + 0.1933x r2 = 0.689

Fig. I16. Abundance response of Channel catfish (All sizes mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 7-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-9

Page 296: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(287-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

1

2

3

4Fundulus seminolis (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:<=40 mmMay to Dec. y = -74.3878 + 26.2035x - 2.2447 x2

r2 = 0.3996

Fig. I17. Abundance response of Seminole killifish (<=40 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 287-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(343-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

1

2

3

4Fundulus seminolis (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=41mmSep. to Jul. y = -406.2679 + 130.0295x - 10.353 x2

r2 = 0.3586

Fig. I18. Abundance response of Seminole killifish (>=41 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 343-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-10

Page 297: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(119-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5Fundulus seminolis (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:<=40 mmMay to Dec. y = -1.5215 + 0.4739x r2 = 0.7006

Fig. I19. Abundance response of Seminole killifish (<=40 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 119-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(154-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Fundulus seminolis (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:>=41mmSep. to Jul. y = 12.4139 - 6.6127x + 0.8539 x2

r2 = 0.8748

Fig. I20. Abundance response of Seminole killifish (>=41 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 154-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-11

Page 298: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(364-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0Lucania parva (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:<=25 mmNov. to Aug. y = -460.7067 + 148.0506x - 11.8563 x2

r2 = 0.5349

Fig. I21. Abundance response of Rainwater killifish (<=25 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 364-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(343-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5Lucania parva (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=26mmNov. to Jul. y = -301.4606 + 96.7056x - 7.726 x2

r2 = 0.3809

Fig. I22. Abundance response of Rainwater killifish (>=26 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 343-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-12

Page 299: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(364-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

1

2

3

4Lucania parva (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:<=25 mmNov. to Aug. y = 17.8884 - 3.5689x r2 = 0.5026

Fig. I23. Abundance response of Rainwater killifish (<=25 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 364-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(168-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6Gambusia holbrooki (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:<=25 mmJan. to Dec. y = -4.807 + 1.1275x r2 = 0.4097

Fig. I24. Abundance response of Eastern mosquitofish (<=25 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 168-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-13

Page 300: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(168-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6Gambusia holbrooki (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=26mmJan. to Dec. y = -4.3118 + 0.9303x r2 = 0.2623

Fig. I25. Abundance response of Eastern mosquitofish (>=26 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 168-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(161-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7Gambusia holbrooki (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:<=25 mmJan. to Dec. y = -31.5895 + 15.3389x - 1.6335 x2

r2 = 0.6497

Fig. I26. Abundance response of Eastern mosquitofish (<=25 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 161-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-14

Page 301: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(161-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

1

2

3

4

5Gambusia holbrooki (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:>=26mmJan. to Dec. y = -30.4576 + 15.1147x - 1.6968 x2

r2 = 0.6154

Fig. I27. Abundance response of Eastern mosquitofish (>=26 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 161-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(350-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

1

2

3

4Poecilia latipinna (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=30mmJul. to May y = -378.5399 + 120.4577x - 9.5512 x2

r2 = 0.2817

Fig. I28. Abundance response of Sailfin molly (>=30 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 350-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-15

Page 302: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(56-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0Labidesthes sicculus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=36mmJun. to Jan. y = -1.1758 + 0.4261x r2 = 0.6402

Fig. I29. Abundance response of Brook silverside (>=36 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 56-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(112-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Labidesthes sicculus (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:<=35 mmJun. to Jan. y = -2.3362 + 0.7493x r2 = 0.6697

Fig. I30. Abundance response of Brook silverside (<=35 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 112-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-16

Page 303: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(77-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

1

2

3

4Labidesthes sicculus (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:>=36mmJun. to Jan. y = -1.6922 + 0.6476x r2 = 0.5358

Fig. I31. Abundance response of Brook silverside (>=36 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 77-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(21-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0Lepomis macrochirus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=36mmSep. to Feb. y = -3.0033 + 1.2166x - 0.1009 x2

r2 = 0.7567

Fig. I32. Abundance response of Bluegill (>=36 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 21-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-17

Page 304: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(238-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

2

4

6

8Lepomis macrochirus (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:<=35 mmJul. to Jan. y = -82.5624 + 40.2392x - 4.6339 x2

r2 = 0.8299

Fig. I33. Abundance response of Bluegill (<=35 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 238-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(28-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0Lepomis macrochirus (trawls): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:<=35 mmJul. to Jan. y = 1.5886 - 0.73x + 0.082 x2

r2 = 0.851

Fig. I34. Abundance response of Bluegill (<=35 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 28-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-18

Page 305: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(280-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4Lepomis microlophus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=41mmSep. to Mar. y = 455.1599 - 139.709x + 10.7196 x2

r2 = 0.5884

Fig. I35. Abundance response of Redear sunfish (>=41 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 280-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(35-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0Lepomis microlophus (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:<=40 mmMay to Sep. y = 1.2299 - 1.0644x + 0.1851 x2

r2 = 0.9089

Fig. I36. Abundance response of Redear sunfish (<=40 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 35-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-19

Page 306: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(119-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6Lepomis microlophus (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:>=41mmSep. to Mar. y = 6.6457 - 2.7003x + 0.2693 x2

r2 = 0.9705

Fig. I37. Abundance response of Redear sunfish (>=41 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 119-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(35-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5Oligoplites saurus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:<=35 mmMay to Aug. y = -4.7621 + 2.4063x - 0.2298 x2

r2 = 0.7732

Fig. I38. Abundance response of Leatherjack (<=35 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 35-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-20

Page 307: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(1-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6Oligoplites saurus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=36mmMay to Aug. y = -6.9067 + 2.9564x - 0.2718 x2

r2 = 0.7871

Fig. I39. Abundance response of Leatherjack (>=36 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 1-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(322-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

1

2

3

4Eucinostomus gula (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:40 to 70 mmDec. to Oct. y = 87.5835 - 27.0493x + 2.092 x2

r2 = 0.4829

Fig. I40. Abundance response of Silver jenny (40 to 70 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 322-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-21

Page 308: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(14-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0Eucinostomus harengulus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:40 to 70 mmJan. to Dec. y = 4.9689 - 1.5146x + 0.1351 x2

r2 = 0.2109

Fig. I41. Abundance response of Tidewater mojarra (40 to 70 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 14-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(84-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5Eucinostomus harengulus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=71mmApr. to Dec. y = 2.0059 - 0.2594x r2 = 0.2743

Fig. I42. Abundance response of Tidewater mojarra (>=71 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 84-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-22

Page 309: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(1-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0Eucinostomus harengulus (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:40 to 70 mmJan. to Dec. y = 2.8745 - 1.415x + 0.1716 x2

r2 = 0.5432

Fig. I43. Abundance response of Tidewater mojarra (40 to 70 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 1-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(210-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0Eugerres plumieri (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=36mmJul. to Dec. y = -56.5986 + 19.3947x - 1.6103 x2

r2 = 0.658

Fig. I44. Abundance response of Striped mojarra(>=36 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 210-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-23

Page 310: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(63-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4Eugerres plumieri (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:>=36mmJul. to Dec. y = -0.5835 + 0.2882x r2 = 0.9703

Fig. I45. Abundance response of Striped mojarra(>=36 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 63-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(140-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

1

2

3

4Lagodon rhomboides (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=36mmMar. to Jul. y = -71.1564 + 25.7205x - 2.2332 x2

r2 = 0.9061

Fig. I46. Abundance response of Pinfish (>=36 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 140-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-24

Page 311: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(1-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5Lagodon rhomboides (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:>=36mmMar. to Jul. y = 2.3774 - 1.188x + 0.1521 x2

r2 = 0.7235

Fig. I47. Abundance response of Pinfish (>=36 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 1-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(14-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8Cynoscion nebulosus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=36mmMay to Aug. y = -4.1677 + 1.8254x - 0.1545 x2

r2 = 0.7359

Fig. I48. Abundance response of Spotted seatrout (>=36 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 14-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-25

Page 312: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(203-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0Cynoscion arenarius (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:<=40 mmMay to Nov. y = 1.6472 - 0.2189x r2 = 0.3009

Fig. I49. Abundance response of Sand seatrout (<=40 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 203-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(301-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0Cynoscion arenarius (trawls): Myakka River

Sizes:<=40 mmMay to Nov. y = 5.0349 - 0.7177x r2 = 0.5588

Fig. I50. Abundance response of Sand seatrout (<=40 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 301-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-26

Page 313: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(70-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0Cynoscion arenarius (trawls): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:<=40 mmMay to Nov. y = -1.7384 + 1.4875x - 0.2002 x2

r2 = 0.6505

Fig. I51. Abundance response of Sand seatrout (<=40 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 70-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(315-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

-0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4Bairdiella chrysoura (trawls): Myakka River

Sizes:<=35 mmApr. to Jul. y = 1.1205 - 0.1736x r2 = 0.5929

Fig. I52. Abundance response of Silver perch (<=35 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 315-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-27

Page 314: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(77-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8Bairdiella chrysoura (trawls): Myakka River

Sizes:>=36mmAug. to Nov. y = 22.9174 - 6.7753x + 0.5 x2

r2 = 0.6814

Fig. I53. Abundance response of Silver perch (>=36 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 77-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(301-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

1

2

3

4

5Leiostomus xanthurus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=31mmJan. to Jun. y = -21.0988 + 3.6551x r2 = 0.7276

Fig. I54. Abundance response of Spot (>=31 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 301-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-28

Page 315: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(119-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8Leiostomus xanthurus (trawls): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:>=31mmJan. to Jun. y = 100.7013 - 65.7968x + 10.7227 x2

r2 = 0.7247

Fig. I55. Abundance response of Spot (>=31 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 119-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(168-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5Sciaenops ocellatus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=41mmNov. to Mar. y = -60.6797 + 20.3615x - 1.659 x2

r2 = 0.7904

Fig. I56. Abundance response of Red drum (>=41 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 168-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-29

Page 316: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(301-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Gobiosoma bosc (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:>=20mmJan. to Dec. y = 34.4085 - 15.3406x + 1.7152 x2

r2 = 0.6497

Fig. I57. Abundance response of Naked goby (>=20 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 301-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(28-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Microgobius gulosus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:<=30 mmMay to Mar. y = 4.3279 - 1.5597x + 0.16 x2

r2 = 0.426

Fig. I58. Abundance response of Clown goby (<=30 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 28-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-30

Page 317: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(28-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8Microgobius gulosus (seines): Myakka River

Sizes:>=31mmJan. to Dec. y = 3.7335 - 1.186x + 0.1033 x2

r2 = 0.3391

Fig. I59. Abundance response of Clown goby (>=31 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 28-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(308-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Microgobius gulosus (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:<=30 mmMay to Mar. y = 5.9026 - 1.0733x r2 = 0.5307

Fig. I60. Abundance response of Clown goby (<=30 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 308-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-31

Page 318: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(273-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8Microgobius gulosus (seines): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:>=31mmJan. to Dec. y = 11.0221 - 4.7389x + 0.5171 x2

r2 = 0.6051

Fig. I61. Abundance response of Clown goby (>=31 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 273-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(196-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0Trinectes maculatus (trawls): Myakka River

Sizes:<=25 mmJan. to Dec. y = -32.8843 + 11.5918x - 0.984 x2

r2 = 0.4534

Fig. I62. Abundance response of Hogchoker (<=25 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 196-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-32

Page 319: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(1-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8Trinectes maculatus (trawls): Myakka River

Sizes:>=26mmJan. to Dec. y = 1.7075 - 0.7732x + 0.0984 x2

r2 = 0.738

Fig. I63. Abundance response of Hogchoker (>=26 mm) in the Myakka River estuary to 1-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

ln(364-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6Trinectes maculatus (trawls): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:<=25 mmJan. to Dec. y = 23.7967 - 4.6868x r2 = 0.5359

Fig. I64. Abundance response of Hogchoker (<=25 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 364-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-33

Page 320: ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE MYAKKA RIVER …The catch-per-unit-effort (number of animals per 100 m2) was generally greater in the Myakka River than Myakkahatchee Creek, particularly

ln(364-day-lagged inflow, cfs)

2 4 6 8

ln(c

atch

-per

-uni

t-effo

rt, a

nim

als.

100m

-2)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Trinectes maculatus (trawls): Myakkahatchee Creek

Sizes:>=26mmJan. to Dec. y = 15.1729 - 3.0068x r2 = 0.454

Fig. I65. Abundance response of Hogchoker (>=26 mm) in the Myakkahatchee Creek estuary to 364-day-lagged inflow. Solid lines: predicted values; dashed lines: 95% CI.

I-34