View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 1
Defense Programs
Fusion in the NNSA
Donald L. CookDeputy Administrator for Defense Programs
National Nuclear Security Administration
Fusion Power AssociatesAnnual Meeting
December 1-2, 2010Washington, DC
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 2
Defense Programs
Defense Programs supports science as a foundation for national security
• Through scientific pre-eminence the U.S. has maintained the nuclear deterrent for 20 years without testing.
• Science underpins our nuclear security and enables policy and treaty decisions.
• I have elevated science within Defense Programs (NA-11)– Strengthens and recognizes key role.
– A new science council has been formed to advise on critical decisions.
Science is more essential for our prosperity, our security, our health, our environment, and our quality of life than it has ever been before. -- President Obama at the National Academy of Science
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 3
Defense ProgramsDefense Programs (NA-10)
Deputy Administrator Donald L. Cook
Principal Assistant Deputy Administrator for
Military ApplicationBrig Gen Garrett Harencak
Assistant Deputy Administrator for Planning, Resources and
Integration
Phillip A. Niedzielski-Eichner
(NA-14)Assistant Deputy Administrator
for Secure Transportation
Jeffrey P. Harrell
(NA-15)
Assistant Deputy Administrator for Stockpile Stewardship
Christopher Deeney
(NA-11)
Assistant Deputy Administrator for Stockpile Management
William S. Goodrum
(NA-12)
Science CouncilDimitri F. Kusnezov, Chair
August 10, 2010Staff Director
Joseph J. Maguire
Sites Chief Performance Officer
(NA-10.2)Roger A. Lewis
Joint Programs(NA-10.1)
Vacant
LASO, LSO, SSO, NSO, KCSO, PSO, SRSO, and YSO
NNSA Site Offices
Assistant Deputy Administrator for Nuclear Safety, Nuclear
Operations, and Governance Reform
James J. McConnell
(NA-17)
Assistant Deputy Administrator for Infrastructure and Construction
Michael A. Thompson
(NA-16)
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 4
Defense Programs
Christopher Deeney, ADAAndi H. Kasarsky, Senior Advisor Col. Mark M. Visosky, Dep for Ops
Office ofStockpile Stewardship (NA-11)
Assistant Deputy Administratorfor Stockpile Stewardship
NA-11
Office of Nuclear Experiments
Acting DirectorRobert J. Hanrahan
NA-115
Office of Institutional Programs
DirectorJamileh N. Soudah
NA-111
Office of Defense ScienceDirector
Ralph F. SchneiderNA-113
Office of Inertial Confinement
FusionActing Director
Ralph F. SchneiderNA-112
Office of Advanced Simulation
and ComputingDirector
Robert E. MeisnerNA-114
Chief Scientist Allan A. Hauer
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 5
Defense Programs
Three major DOE missions rely on High Energy Density Laboratory Plasmas (HEDLP)
for success
• National Security– Stockpile Stewardship– Protecting against technological surprise
• Fundamental Science– Stewardship of HED – Cross-cut with materials science mission
• Energy– Inertial Fusion Energy Sciences energy-related
HED
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 6
Defense Programs
After the explosive phase, weapons rapidly evolve into the HED and plasma regimes
(UGTs, sub-crits, DARHT, JASPER, etc)
HE phaseHigh explosive creates supercritical assembly
Primary phaseSuper-critical assembly
Primary energy production
Pre-nuclear phase
Energy transferX-rays transfer energy from
primary to secondary
Secondary phaseSecondary produces energy,
explosion and radiationNuclear Phase(UGTs NIF and, Z)
Weapons operation proceeds through the conditions of planetaryinteriors, to stellar interiors
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 7
Defense Programs
NNSA mission needs have driven the creation of HEDP environments that are ideal for the
study of complex HED plasmas and materials
Mass Outflow
High Mach Number unstable flows Jets Rayleigh Taylor
Instabilities
MHD, thermo-electric, and “anomalous” heatingShocks and radiation transport
Materials in the Extreme
Astrophysical and planetary science applications
HED laboratory experiments
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 8
Defense Programs
The ICF Program has created an extraordinary array of facilities for HED research
• National Ignition Facility (NIF)– Only access to burning plasma conditions– Important mission experiments have already been performed
• Omega EP– Sophisticated high irradiance capabilities– Important venue for advanced fusion research
• Z Machine– Key venue for weapons materials science measurements – Outstanding new results at 4 Mbar.
• Enormous increase in computational power
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 9
Defense Programs
High energy lasers and the Z Machine have been used to extend solid state
physics to the 10 Mbar regimeRamp compression shows diamond is stable and strong to 8Mbar
Ramp laser intensity to produce shockless compression
•Edwards, et al. (PRL 04)•Smith, et al. (PRL 06)•Bradley, et al. (PRL 08)•Eggert et al. (SCCM 07)
NIF designs use the same technique to study solids to many >30 Mbar
8
4
0P
ress
ure
(M
bar
)654
Density (g/cc)Bradley et al
New cold-solid-state ramp compressed data
Calculated Cold curve
Diamond cell data
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 10
Defense Programs
The National Ignition Facility is poised to make extraordinary contributions
Science, 327, 1228, Glenzer et al
A first THD shot was conducted in September.
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 11
Defense Programs
The achievement of igniting conditions will open new frontiers in
plasma research
• Plasma temperatures > 20 keV ; compressed densities > 1000
gm / cm2 ; pressures ~ 1 Tbar
• The high performance implosions needed for ignition can also
be employed in a variety of non-ignition basic science
investigations.
– Planetary and astro- physics
– Materials under extreme conditions
• Performing detailed measurements under igniting conditions will
present a considerable diagnostic challenge.
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 12
Defense Programs
NNSA relies on intermediate scaleplasma science facilities for basic science support
Intermediate-size plasma facilities provide both direct and indirect mission support, and we are encouraging user access at our
intermediate facilities
Examples of intermediate size plasma facilities:
• Jupiter at LLNL (lasers): support of NIC and NIF; mission; users
• Trident at LANL (laser): support of NIF and NIC; mission; users
• Texas Petawatt at UTX (laser): discovery-driven research; users
• Z-Beamlet / Z Petawatt at SNL (laser): diagnostic for ZR; users
• Nevada Terawatt at UNR: pulsed power
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 13
Defense Programs
A portion of time at NNSA Facilities will be devoted to basic science investigations
• The NNSA encourages the exploitation of its HEDP facilities by the academic scientific community.
• NNSA will provide resources to establish user programs and dedicate a fraction of the shots to fundamental science experiments.
• Open proposal and peer review processes will be employed.
• NNSA strongly encourages technical competition
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 14
Defense Programs
As the head of Defense Programs, I will expect technical competition in the HEDP Program – this looks like …
• Multiple approaches to solving the major challenges to ensure creativity, peer review and successful completion
• Breadth in the community – the best in laboratories, industry, and academia working together
• Outside engagement and applying our tools, methods and scientists to other challenging science issues
• Teaming with the Office of Science and peer reviewed competition where appropriate
• Support for and access to a range of different technologies and facility scale (intermediate to NIF)
Deuterium EOS is a poster child for how technical competition benefits our program.
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 15
Defense Programs
NNSA collaborates with the DOE Office of Science in encouraging HED basic science
• NNSA is committed to providing the required resources to NIF, Z and Omega each year both to establish user programs on these facilities and to dedicate a fraction of the shots on each facility for experiments on fundamental science proposed and led by members of the academic community. The selection of those experiments will proceed through an open, transparent proposal and peer review process similar to that employed at Office of Science facilities. We hope that you will encourage your scientific communities to investigate this opportunity
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 16
Defense Programs
NNSA / Office of Science Collaboration in HED Basic Science (cont.)
• Purpose: – Inform broad science communities about capabilities at NIF and other
HEDP platforms.– Solicit input in identifying and prioritizing research connected to the Office
of Science that could benefit from utilization of these facilities.– Involves NNSA, Office of Science programs: Nuclear Physics (NP), High
Energy Physics (HEP), Basic Energy Sciences (BES), Fusion Energy Science (FES)
• Tri-Chairs: – John Sarrao (Los Alamos), Mike Wiescher (Notre Dame), Kim Budil (Livermore)
• Organizing Committee: – Paul Drake, Roger Falcone, Rus Hemley, Bill Goldstein, Chan Joshi, Margaret
Murnane, Richard Petrasso, Alan Wootton
• Office of Science/NNSA staff: – Jim Glownia, Mike Kreisler
Joint sponsorship of Workshop: Basic Research Directions at the National Ignition Facility –Spring 2011
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 17
Defense Programs
The DOE is beginning to develop an approach toward inertial fusion energy
An NAS study has been commissioned. Defense Programs will be working closely with the Office of Science.
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 18
Defense Programs
Inertial Fusion Energy- a snapshot in 2010
• Fusion Energy – no carbon dioxide, modest nuclear waste,
• 50 years of exploration – ignition at NIF will be key
• NAS to provide recommendations on IFE priorities
• Timeline and demonstration potentially similar to ITER
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 19
Defense Programs
Inertial Fusion Energy 2010Principles applied by Working Group
• Focus on IFE specific program that relies on ICF and FES but does not replace them
• Look at fastest route to demonstrate most critical elements– Rapid repeated ignition (once per second for hours)– Using technology applicable for steady and affordable
energy source
• Flexible management and budget with risks• Driver technology and specific ignition approach
identified as critical components– 5 years to down select, – Use existing facilities including NIF
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 20
Defense ProgramsBackup Slides
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 21
Defense Programs
HEDP is one of the core disciplines of stewardship science
HEDP research allows us to validate our models in environments that remove the need for nuclear testing - the level
of challenge requires technical competition
Scientific Challenge Incredible Tools
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 22
Defense Programs
Department of Energy and other agencies have defined major challenges for the field of high energy density physics
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 23
Defense Programs
High Energy Density Physics is a key discipline underpinning Stockpile Stewardship
• Extreme conditions in temperature, density, pressure allow investigation of a large span of
physical states.
• These extreme conditions are required to meet national security needs but also enable
contributions to a broad span of basics physics including astrophysics, materials in extreme
conditions and many other sub-disciplines.
• Stewardship of HED and plasma science provides essential support for the NNSA mission.
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 24
Defense Programs
NNSA / Office of Science Collaboration in HED Basic Science(cont.)
• Established Joint Program in HED Laboratory Plasmas
– Funding from both NNSA and Office of Fusion Energy Science
– Annual funding level $7 M
– ~25 grants awarded
– Joint Program awardees (H. Kapteyn and M. Murnane) won the 2010
Schawlow Prize in Laser Science and the 2010 R.W. Wood Prize from
Optical Society of America
• Held the 2009 ReNeW Workshop (Basic Research Needs for HED
Laboratory Plasmas)
– Report has just been published
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 25
Defense Programs
NNSA collaborates with the DOE Office of Science in encouraging HED basic science
Cont.
OMB Brief Oct. 2009 26
Defense Programs
Technical competition will ensure that the best ideas are advanced
• Competitive solicitation for science at ICF facilities– 40 proposals submitted 2010
• Joint programs with office of science– HEDLP: $7M, 25 grants
• Healthy balance between large and small facilities to enable technical innovation
selection of these experiments will proceed through an open, transparent proposal and peer-review process … - letter to Bill Brinkman