12
Olfactory function The psychobiological approach to understanding basic biological systems Behavior Direct monitoring Comparative models Experience Manipulation pharmacology ablation genes

Olfactory function The psychobiological approach to understanding basic biological systems Behavior Direct monitoring Comparative models Experience Manipulation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Olfactory function The psychobiological approach to understanding basic biological systems Behavior Direct monitoring Comparative models Experience Manipulation

Olfactoryfunction

The psychobiological approach to understanding basic biological systems

Behavior

Direct monitoring

Comparative models

Experience

Manipulation pharmacology ablation

genes

Page 2: Olfactory function The psychobiological approach to understanding basic biological systems Behavior Direct monitoring Comparative models Experience Manipulation

Learning mediated changes in behavior

Learning is: A persistent change in behavior based upon experience

Learning can be broken into two classes:

1. Non associative: Habituation Latent inhibition or CS pre exposure effect

2. Associative: Pavlovian or classical conditioning Instrumental or operant conditioning

Page 3: Olfactory function The psychobiological approach to understanding basic biological systems Behavior Direct monitoring Comparative models Experience Manipulation

Thompson and Spencer (1966) •A negative relationship between response strength and number of trials.•Spontaneous recovery of response strength following an extended intertrial interval.

•Recovery should be less than full.•Interstimulus interval (ITI) affects rate of habituation.

•Short ITI produces rapid habituation, long ITI produces slow habituation.•More intense stimuli produce greater response and slower habituation.•Very intense stimuli produce an initial increase in response (sensitization) then habituate.•Excessive habituation training produces subzero response.

Habituation

Page 4: Olfactory function The psychobiological approach to understanding basic biological systems Behavior Direct monitoring Comparative models Experience Manipulation

Helothis virescens Facts

Heliolithine moth larvae are serious agricultural pests causing hundreds of millions of dollars in agricultural damage annually.

A method of behavioral control of this species is mating disruption. – The control of male reproductive behavior with

synthetic female sex pheromones.

While mating disruption strategies have been successfully deployed for many years, exactly how they work is not well understood.

Page 5: Olfactory function The psychobiological approach to understanding basic biological systems Behavior Direct monitoring Comparative models Experience Manipulation

MEAN ETHOGRAM SCORES FOR ALL THREE GROUPS

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

TRIAL

ETHOGRAM SCORE

6-2 Group

2-6 Group

6 Mix Only

CONTROLS

DAY 1DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

Habituation of pheromone response in male H virescens

Page 6: Olfactory function The psychobiological approach to understanding basic biological systems Behavior Direct monitoring Comparative models Experience Manipulation

hexanal

geraniol

blank (air)

0.0

1.0

2.0

ME

AN

RE

SP

ON

SE

LE

VE

L

TRIAL

1 5 10 2015 25

HABITUATION TO ODORS IN Drosophila

Page 7: Olfactory function The psychobiological approach to understanding basic biological systems Behavior Direct monitoring Comparative models Experience Manipulation

Criteria Operant Conditioning Classical Conditioning

Type of BehaviorNon-reflexive, voluntary behaviors 

Reflexive, involuntary behaviors

Source of Behavior Emitted by organism  Elicited by stimulus

Basis of LearningAssociating a response and the consequence that follows it 

Associating two stimuli

Responses ConditionedActive behaviors that lead to reinforcement

Physiological and emotional responses

Extinction ProcessResponding decreases with elimination of reinforcing consequences 

Conditioned response decreases when conditioned stimulus is repeatedly presented alone 

Associative conditioning: Operant vs classical

Page 8: Olfactory function The psychobiological approach to understanding basic biological systems Behavior Direct monitoring Comparative models Experience Manipulation

Pavlovian conditioning: distinguishing associative and non associative effects

A.

C.

B.

odor (CS)

food (US)

on

on

off

off off

off

CS

US

CS

US

forward-paired and air-paired CS-US relationship

backward-paired CS-US relationship

random-paired CS-US relationship

on -25sec +25sec

4 sec

4 sec

4 sec

4 sec

Page 9: Olfactory function The psychobiological approach to understanding basic biological systems Behavior Direct monitoring Comparative models Experience Manipulation

Associative learning in the moth Manduca sexta

Photo: W. Armstrong

Page 10: Olfactory function The psychobiological approach to understanding basic biological systems Behavior Direct monitoring Comparative models Experience Manipulation

Development of an olfactory-learning behavioral paradigm

EMG electrode in feeding muscle

exposed proboscis tip for sucrose application

reference electrode

odor blown across antennae

.60

.50

.40

.30

.20

.10

01 2 3 4 5 6

Conditioning Trials

Res

pon s

e pr

o ba b

ili t

y

N=80/group

2-hexanone1-hexanol1-decanol

Time (sec) Time (sec)

A.pre post

0 5 10

odor on

0 5 10

Before learning

odor on

0 5 10

After learning

odor on

1-trial learning

Moths learn most odors with interesting exceptions

Once trained moths will respond to odor until they expire

Page 11: Olfactory function The psychobiological approach to understanding basic biological systems Behavior Direct monitoring Comparative models Experience Manipulation

Acquisition of conditioned response

31 2 654

.80

.70

.60

.50

.40

.30

.20

0

.10

Geraniol

Conditioning Trials

Res

pons

e pr

obab

ilit y

forward pairingrandom pairingair forward pairing

N=40/group

Page 12: Olfactory function The psychobiological approach to understanding basic biological systems Behavior Direct monitoring Comparative models Experience Manipulation

air- forward pairing

TRIAL

forward pairing

backward pairing

random pairing

BEFORETRIAL 1

BETWEENTRIALS 5 & 6

AFTERTRIAL 10

CH

AN

GE

IN E

MG

SP

IKE

FR

EQ

UE

NC

Y(P

OS

T-P

RE

)

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

7

8

6

10

9 Test Trial (EMG Response)

Only forward pairing produces a conditioned response

*N=30 per group