23
OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL

ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION

FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Page 2: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Overview

• Federal and Provincial Legislative Powers relating to the Environment

• Oldman Dam Project

• Federal Legislative Powers (EA) – Environmental Assessment and Review Process

Guidelines Order – Canadian Environmental Assessment Act – Possible EA Law Reforms (national concern

projects, sustainability assessment)

Page 3: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Federal and Provincial Legislative Powers (Environment)

• “Federal patchwork superimposed on provincial carpet”

• Provincial Powers (s.92, 92A)– Property and civil rights– Matters of a merely local or private nature– Lands, mines, minerals; non-renewable

natural resources; forestry; electrical energy

– Local works and undertakings

Page 4: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Federal and Provincial Legislative Powers (Environment)

• Federal Legislative Powers (s.91)– Sea coast and inland fisheries – Navigation and Shipping– Federal works and undertakings– Criminal law– Spending – Indians and lands reserved for Indians– Peace order and good government – Trade and Commerce – Taxation

Page 5: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Delimiting Federal and Provincial Powers

• Interpretative Tools and Legal Principles– Exclusive vs. Concurrent Jurisdiction– Administrative vs. Legislative

Interdelegation – Interjurisdictional Immunity– Role of Territory and Ownership– Treaty Implementation

Page 6: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Fisheries Powers

• R. v. Fowler – Wood debris deposited into a stream contrary to

Fisheries Act – No evidence actual harm to fish, habitat– Not within federal legislative authority

• R. v. Northwest Falling Contractors– Diesel oil - deleterious substance deposited

into waters frequented by fish– Evidence of harm to fish– Within federal authority

Page 7: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Criminal Law Power

• R. v. Hydro-Quebec • PCBs released into Quebec stream by

Hydro-Quebec facility contrary to Canadian Environmental Protection Act

• Tests for valid exercise of criminal law power (RJR MacDonald):– Legitimate public purpose– Prohibition of an activity– Penalty

Page 8: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Criminal Law Power

• R. v. Hydro-Quebec • Issue: does CEPA use appropriate tools to

pursue the legitimate public purpose?• Is CEPA about environmental protection or

control of toxic substances?• Laforest (majority)

– lengthy process identify toxic substances– regulatory measures to reduce, control justifiable

so long as combined with prohibitions

Page 9: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Peace Order and Good Government Powers

• Anti-Inflation Reference, Crown Zellerbach, R. v. Hydro-Quebec

• Emergency Branch of POGG

• National Concern Branch of POGG– Singleness, Distinctiveness, Indivisibility

• Atomic Energy, Marine Pollution justified under POGG

• Toxic Substances not justified

Page 10: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Oldman Dam Project

Page 11: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Oldman Dam Project

Page 12: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Oldman Dam Project

• Alberta government initiated in 1980s• Irrigation benefits to 200 farmers plus up

to 25 MW electricity • Peigan First Nations (Milton Born with a

Tooth) and Friends of the Oldman River (FORS, Martha Kostuch) opposed project

• Peigan Reserve 12 km downstream from Oldman Dam site

Page 13: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Oldman Dam Environmental Effects

• Loss of riparian habitat (cottonwood forests

• Loss of cold-water trout habitat

• Mercury contamination

• Increased dust and related air pollution

Page 14: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Oldman Dam Project

• Alberta prepared environmental assessment, found no significant effects

• Federal Environment Minister refused to conduct EA under EARGO although Navigable Waters Protection Act permit and Fisheries Act authorization required

• FORS launches Rafferty-style application for judicial review

• Application denied at trial, appealed successfully

Page 15: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Oldman Dam Legal IssuesStatutory Validity

• Is the Guidelines Order authorized by s. 6 of the Department of the Environment Act?

• Is the Guidelines Order inconsistent with the Navigable Waters Protection Act and the Fisheries Act?

• Does the Guidelines Order apply to projects other than new federal projects?

Page 16: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Oldman Dam Legal IssuesObligations of Ministers

• Is the Guidelines Order applicable to the Oldman Dam Project?

• Are the Ministers "initiating departments"?

• Is the Navigable Waters Protection Act binding on the Crown in right of Alberta?

Page 17: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Applicability of the Guidelines Order

• Transport Canada decision-making authority for NWPA; DFO not decision-making authority for Fisheries Act

• No affirmative regulatory duty on DFO

• Proponents can construct dam without DFO authorization (not unlawful to build dam without authorization but if you do you may be in jeopardy

Page 18: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Oldman Dam Legal IssuesConstitutional Validity

• Is the Guidelines Order so broad as to offend ss. 92 and 92A of the Constitution Act, 1867 and therefore constitutionally inapplicable to the Oldman River Dam owned by Alberta?

Page 19: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Oldman Dam Analysis of Constitutional Issues

• Authority to conduct a federal assessment of a proposal?

• EA is merely a component of federal decision-making

• Distinguish between subject matter that brings feds in as decision-maker from broader range of issues to be considered in making decision

Page 20: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Constitutional Limits on Issues to be Considered in Decision?

• No for straightforward projects such as rail lines. Once jurisdiction to make decision established, integrated decision can be made that takes into account how proposal affects issues with provincial jurisdiction

• Scholarly opinion divided on projects subject to a narrower federal role

Page 21: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Applying Oldman Decision to CEAA

Constitutional Validity? • Is CEAA constitutionally valid?

• Does CEAA address Supreme Court’s determination that Fisheries Act creates no affirmative regulatory duty?

Page 22: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Applying Oldman Decision to CEAA

Constitutional Validity? • EA required when a “federal authority”

exercises a power or performs a duty or function in respect of a “project” such as:– Acts as proponent of a project – Provides financial assistance for project – Disposes of federal lands for project– Issues a permit or licence included on Law

List regulations

Page 23: OLDMAN DAM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Applying Oldman Decision to CEAA Reforms

• Under any circumstances is it constitutionally valid for federal EA law to apply to project for which government has no decision-making authority?

• Constitutionallly valid for federal EA law to establish list of nationally significant projects requiring federal assessment?

• Constitutionally valid for federal law to require sustainability assessment?