OGP Safety Performance Indicator Data 2012

SAFETY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS – 2012 DATAReport No. 2012s (June 2013)

OGP DATA SERIES

I n t e r n a t i o n a l A s s o c i a t i o n o f O i l & G a s P r o d u c e r s

Global experience

The International Association of Oil & Gas Producers has access to a wealth of technical knowledge and experience with its members operating around the world in many different terrains. We collate and distil this valuable knowledge for the industry to use as guidelines for good practice by individual members.

Consistent high quality database and guidelines

Our overall aim is to ensure a consistent approach to training, management and best practice throughout the world.

The oil and gas exploration and production industry recognises the need to develop consistent databases and records in certain fields. The OGP’s members are encouraged to use the guidelines as a starting point for their operations or to supplement their own policies and regulations which may apply locally.

Internationally recognised source of industry information

Many of our guidelines have been recognised and used by international authorities and safety and environmental bodies. Requests come from governments and non-government organisations around the world as well as from non-member companies.

Disclaimer

Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, neither the OGP nor any of its members past present or future warrants its accuracy or will, regardless of its or their negligence, assume liability for any foreseeable or unforeseeable use made thereof, which liability is hereby excluded. Consequently, such use is at the recipient’s own risk on the basis that any use by the recipient constitutes agreement to the terms of this disclaimer. The recipient is obliged to inform any subsequent recipient of such terms.

Copyright notice

The contents of these pages are © The International Association of Oil and Gas Producers. Permission is given to reproduce this report in whole or in part provided (i) that the copyright of OGP and (ii) the source are acknowledged. All other rights are reserved. Any other use requires the prior written permission of the OGP.

These Terms and Conditions shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales. Disputes arising here from shall be exclusively subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.

Publications

OGP safety performance indicators 2012 data

Report No: 2012s

June 2013

Revision historyVersion Date Amendments

1.0 June 2013 First issued

1.1 June 2013 Corrections to Executive Summary

1.2 June 2013 Corrections to page 2-5

ii

International Association of Oil & Gas Producers

©OGP

iii

Safety performance indicators – 2012 data

© OGP

Safety

OGP has been collecting safety incident data from its member companies globally since 1985. The data collected are entered into the OGP safety database, which is the largest database of safety performance in the exploration and production (E&P) industry.

The principal purpose of the data collection and analysis is to record the global safety performance of the contributing OGP member companies on an annual basis. The submission of data is voluntary and is not mandated by OGP membership. The annual reports provide trend analysis, benchmarking and the identification of areas and activities on which efforts should be focused to bring about the greatest improvements in performance.

The OGP incident reporting system covers worldwide E&P operations, both onshore and offshore, and includes incidents involving both member companies and their contractor employees.

The key indicators presented are: number of fatalities, fatal accident rate, fatal incident rate, number of lost work day cases and number of lost work days, lost time injury frequency, number of restricted work day cases and restricted work day case days, number of medical treatment cases and total recordable injury rate. The report presents contributing OGP members’ global results for these indicators, which are then analysed by region, function and

company. A code is used to preserve the anonymity of the reporting company, which will typically report its own data as well as that of its associated contractors (see Appendix B).

In 2010, data collection was initiated to capture “causal factors” associated with fatal incidents and high potential events. These data are presented in section 2.11 of report № 2012s.

Wherever practicable, results are presented graphically. The data underlying the charts are presented in Appendix B. These data are available to OGP members in editable format from the members’ area of the OGP web-site. The tables are organised according to the section in the report where the chart appears.

Fatal incident and high potential event descriptions previously included in this report as appendices C and D are now available for download on the OGP Safety Zone website, http://info.ogp.org.uk/safety.

The main change to the 2012 Safety performance indicators report is:

• For the purposes of clarity the presentation of Fatal Incident Rate has been changed.

This change reflects the Safety Data Sub-Committee’s aim to improve the reliability of the data and its interpretation.

Data series

Other OGP data reports include the Environmental Performance Indicators, published every autumn and the Health Performance Indicators, published simultaneously with this report. These are available from the OGP website: http://www.ogp.org.uk/publications/

Preface

iv


©OGP

The safety statistics for 2012 were derived from data provided by the following companies:

Contributing OGP MembersADDAXADNOCAnadarkoBG GroupBHPBPCairn EnergyChevronCNOOCConocoPhillipsDolphin EnergyDONG E&PEniExxonMobilGDF Suez E&P InternationalHess CorporationINPEXKOSMOSKuwait Oil CompanyMaersk OilMarathonMOLNCOC (North Caspian Operating Co.)Nexen Inc

Oil SearchOMVPan American EnergyPemexPerencoPetrobrasPetronas Carigali Sdn BhdPremier OilPTTEPQatar PetroleumRasgasRepsolRWE Dea AGSasolShell CompaniesStatoilSuncorTalisman EnergyTNK-BPTotalTullow OilWintershallWoodsideYemen LNG

v


© OGP

Contents

Executive Summary v

1. Summary 1-11.1 General .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1-11.2 Fatalities ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1-21.3 Total recordable injuries ....................................................................................................................................................................1-41.4 Lost time injuries ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1-5

2. Overall results 2-12.1 Fatalities ................................................................................................................................................................................................2-12.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR) ..................................................................................................................................................................2-22.3 Fatalities by incident category and activity ...................................................................................................................................2-32.4 Number of fatal incidents per 100 million work hours ............................................................................................................ 2-42.5 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) ..............................................................................................................................................2-52.6 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) .................................................................................................................................................2-62.7 Lost work day cases by category and activity ................................................................................................................................2-72.8 Severity of lost work day cases ........................................................................................................................................................2-132.9 Severity of restricted work day cases .............................................................................................................................................2-152.10 Incident triangles ..............................................................................................................................................................................2-172.11 Causal factors analysis .....................................................................................................................................................................2-19

3. Results by region 3-13.1 Fatalities by region ..............................................................................................................................................................................3-13.2 Fatal Accident Rate (FAR) by region .............................................................................................................................................3-23.3 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) by region ............................................................................................................................3-23.4 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) by region ...............................................................................................................................3-33.5 FAR, TRIR and LTIF – 5-year rolling averages by region ...................................................................................................... 3-43.6 Severity of lost work day cases by region .......................................................................................................................................3-53.7 Individual country performance by region ...................................................................................................................................3-53.8 Incident triangles by region ..............................................................................................................................................................3-7

4. Results by function 4-14.1 Fatalities by function .........................................................................................................................................................................4-14.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR) – 3-year rolling average by function ...............................................................................................4-24.3 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) by function ........................................................................................................................4-34.4 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) – 3-year rolling average by function ..............................................................................4-34.5 Severity of lost work day cases by function .................................................................................................................................. 4-44.6 Exploration performance by function ...........................................................................................................................................4-54.7 Drilling performance by function ..................................................................................................................................................4-74.8 Production performance by function ............................................................................................................................................4-94.9 Construction performance by function ......................................................................................................................................4-114.10 Unspecifed performance by function ......................................................................................................................................... 4-13

5. Results by company 5-15.1 Overall company results ....................................................................................................................................................................5-15.2 Company results by function ...........................................................................................................................................................5-8

Appendix A: Database dimensions A-1

Appendix B: Data tables B-1

Appendix C: Contributing companies C-1

Appendix D: Countries represented D-1

Appendix E: Glossary of terms E-1

vi


©OGP

vii


© OGP

Executive Summary

The 2012 OGP safety performance indicators show that the fatal accident rate for reporting companies has increased by 27% compared with 2011. The number of fatalities has increased from 65 in 2011 to 88 in 2012. 31 of the fatalities occurred in one incident.

Analysis of the fatal incident description has shown that following an OGP Life Saving Rule may have helped to prevent 79% of the fatal incidents reported in 2012, see OGP report № 459.

Forty work force fatalities were identified as being related to process safety events (39 fatalities were related to six separate process safety events).

There are a number of common causal factors related to the fatal incidents and high potential events from 2010 to 2012. The top 6 causal factors each year were:

• Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment• Inadequate supervision • Inadequate work standards/procedures • Improper decision making or lack of judgment • Unintentional violation (by individual or group) • Inadequate training/competence.

Personal injury performance shows the lost time injury frequency has increased by 12%, and total recordable injury rate is virtually unchanged in 2012 compared with 2011 results.

Number of fatalities and fatal accident rate2003-2012

Lost time injury frequency and total recordable injury rateper million hours worked

0

1

2

3

4

5

LTIF

TRIR

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003

0

20

40

60

80

100

120Fatalities

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003

Num

ber o

f fat

aliti

es

FAR

- Fat

al a

ccid

ents

per 1

00 m

illio

n ho

urs

wor

ked

1

2

3

4

5

6

FAR

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003

Fatal accident rate (FAR)

The number of company/contractor fatalities per 100,000,000 (100 million) hours worked.

Total recordable injury rate (TRIR)

The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases + restricted work day cases + medical treatment cases) per 1,000,000 hours worked.

Lost time injury frequency (LTIF)

The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases) per 1,000,000 hours worked.

viii


©OGP

1-1


© OGP

1. Summary

The OGP safety performance indicators report summarises the safety performance of contributing OGP member companies for 2012.

The key performance indicators (KPI) used to benchmark safety performance are: number of fatalities, fatal accident and incident rates, total recordable injury rate and lost time injury frequency.

Third party fatalities are not included in this report.

• The safety performance of contributing OGP member companies in 2012 is based on the analysis of 3,691 million work hours of data.

• Submissions were made by 49 of the 63 operating company OGP members (45 reported in 2011).

• The data reported cover operations in 107 countries.

1.1 General

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

work hours contractor

work hours company

2012201020052000199519901985

Hours workedmillions [data page B-2]

1-2


©OGP

Fatality categories, 2012% fatalities associated with each reporting category [data page B-3]

Fatality activities, 2012% fatalities associated with each activity [data page B-3]

Struck by 15.9%

Water related, drowning 1.1%

Overexertion, strain 1.1%

Other 2.3%

Confined space 2.3%

Falls from height 3.4%

Exposure electrical 3.4%

Assault or violent act 3.4%

Pressure release 4.5%

Caught in, under or between 18.2%

Explosions or burns 44.3%

Unspecified – other 2.3%

Transport – water, inc. marine activity 2.3%

Transport – air 2.3%

Seismic/survey operations 2.3%

Production operations 3.5%

Transport – land 10.5%

Drilling, workover, well services 12.8%

Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 16.3%

Maintenance, inspection,testing 47.7%

1.2 Fatalities

Against the background of a 7% increase in work hours reported, the number of fatalities has increased from 65 in 2011 to 88. The fatalities occurred in 52 separate incidents in 2012. The resulting Fatal Accident Rate (2.38) is 27% higher than last year’s figure (1.88). The company and contractor FAR are 1.58 and 2.59 respectively. Onshore and offshore FAR are 2.87 and 0.89 respectively.

The reported fatalities are divided into ‘activity’ and ‘category’. The activity with the highest number of fatalities reported by the OGP member companies is ‘Maintenance, inspection, testing’ with 41 fatalities in 9 separate incidents. These included included a gas leak and explosion following the loss of mechanical integrity of a pipeline in Mexico in which 5 company and 26 contractor employees lost their lives. There were 14 fatal incidents reported in the activity ‘Construction, commissioning, decommissioning’ which resulted in 14 fatalities.

With regard to the incident category, the largest proportion of the fatalities reported in 2012 (44%) were categorised as ‘Explosions or burns’ and were related to 5 fatal incidents involving 39 fatalities (6% of fatal incidents reported in 2011 were in the category ‘Explosions or burns’).

Fatalities categorised as ‘Caught in, under or between’ were the second greatest contributors to the fatality statistics, accounting for 18% of the fatalities (25% in 2011).

1-3


© OGP

The Fatal Accident Rate for North America (7.5) is high compared with a global average of 2.38. This is mainly due to a single incident caused by a gas leak and explosion following the loss of mechanical integrity of a pipeline in Mexico in which 31 people died.

Fatal accident rate - company and contractorsper 100 million hours worked [data page B-2]

0

2

4

6

8

Overall

Company FAR

Contractor FAR

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003

1-4


©OGP

The rate for all recordable injuries (fatalities, lost workday cases, restricted workday cases and medical treatment cases) was 1.74 injuries per million hours worked (1.76 in 2011).

The region that showed an increase in TRIR compared with the TRIR for 2011 was the Middle East (24%).

A reduction in TRIR from 2011 to 2012 was shown in Africa (7%), Asia/Australasia (7%), Europe (6%), North America (13%) and South America (4%). The TRIR for the FSU was unchanged.

1.3 Total recordable injuries

Total recordable injury rate – company & contractorsper million hours worked [data page B-2]

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003

ContractorCompany

Overall

1-5


© OGP

Confined space 0.1%


Exposure electrical 0.7%Pressure release 0.9%


Exposure noise, chemical,biological, vibration 2.0%

Cut, puncture, scrape 3.6%

Other 6.6%




Slips and trips (at same height) 15.6%


Struck by 24.0%


Transport – water, including marine activity 5.2%

Transport – land 4.1% Transport – air 0.5%



Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 7.7%

Maintenance, inspection, testing 16.9%

Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 7.8%


Diving, subsea, ROV 0.6%


Lost work day cases – by category [data page B-3]

Lost work day cases – by activity [data page B-3]

1.4 Lost time injuries

The overall Lost Time Injury Frequency (LTIF) increased from 0.43 in 2011 to 0.48 in 2012. This represents an increase of 12% compared with 2011 and 307 more lost time injuries.

This increase is similar in both company and contractor performance. The company and contractor LTIF both show an increase compared with 2011 (12% and 14% respectively). The onshore and offshore LTIF both also show an increase compared with 2011 (12% and 9% respectively).

There were 1,699 reported injuries resulting in at least one day off work; 1,356 incidents were contractor related and 343 were company related.

• 53,325 lost work days were reported. • The greatest number of incidents was reported as

‘Struck by’ (408 cases accounting for 24% of the total; 2011 results showed 357 cases accounting for 25% of the total).

• ‘Caught in, under or between’ accounted for 21% of the total reported cases (19% in 2011).

Lost time injury frequency – company & contractorsper million hours worked [data page B-3]

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

Contractor

Company

Overall

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003

1-6


©OGP

2-1


© OGP

• 88 company and contractor fatalities were reported in 2012. This is 23 more than were reported in 2011 and 6 fewer than in 2010. The 88 fatalities occurred in 52 separate incidents.

• In 2012 there were 31 fatalities as a result of a single incident caused by a gas leak and explosion following the loss of mechanical integrity of a pipeline in Mexico

• There were 6 incidents that involved 2 fatalities. These were: ê two pilots died when a seismic helicopter crashed on its approach to a landing zone in a forested area in Gabon; ê a drill rig explosion in Nigeria; ê in Chad a gas accumulation from wellbore fluids in an open-top tank combusted; ê a security incident in Nigeria where two people were shot and killed whilst gathering environmental data; ê pressure release and fire while routine testing a mobile air compressor in Kuwait; and ê in Qatar a flash fire was caused by the ignition of liquid oxygen.

2. Overall results

2.1 Fatalities

In this section the primary indicators used to measure contributing OGP member companies’ safety performance are: the number and nature of fatalities, total recordable injury rate (TRIR), fatal accident rate (FAR), fatal incidents per 100 million work hours, and lost time injury frequency (LTIF).

Third party incidents are not included in this report.

Company/contractor fatalities

Fatalities Onshore 2012 (2011)

Offshore 2012 (2011)

Total 2012 (2011)

Company 10 (9) 2 (1) 12 (10)

Contractor 70 (43) 6 (12) 76 (55)

Total 80 (52) 8 (13) 88 (65)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120Fatalities

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003

Num

ber o

f fat

aliti

es

FAR

- Fat

al a

ccid

ents

per 1

00 m

illio

n ho

urs

wor

ked

1

2

3

4

5

6

FAR

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003

Fig 2.1.1: Number of fatalities and fatal accident rate2003-2012 [data page B-2]

2-2


©OGP

Fig 2.2.1: Fatal accident rate – company & contractorsper 100 million hours worked [Data page B-2]

Fig 2.2.2: Fatal accident rate – onshore & offshoreper 100 million hours worked [Data page B-2]

2.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR)

• In 2012 there were 12 company fatalities (10 in 2011) as a result of 6 separate incidents. ê 5 of the company fatalities were as a result of a single incident involving a gas leak and explosion following the loss of mechanical integrity of a pipeline in Mexico.

• In 2012 there were 76 contractor fatalities (55 in 2011). ê 26 of the contractor fatalities were as a result of a single incident involving a gas leak and explosion following the loss of mechanical integrity of a pipeline in Mexico.

The difference between the onshore and offshore FAR displays a large variation over the 10-year period shown. Neither is consistently lower. This is generally attributable to single transportation or fire and explosion incidents involving high numbers of fatalities.

0

2

4

6

8

Overall

Company FAR

Contractor FAR

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003

0

2

4

6

8Overall

Offshore

Onshore

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003



2012 (2011) FAR Relative to 2011 FAR

Company 1.58 (1.33) (19% higher)

Contractor 2.59 (2.03) (28% higher)

Overall 2.38 (1.88) (27% higher)

Onshore 2.87 (1.94) (48% higher)

Offshore 0.89 (1.67) (47% lower)

2-3


© OGP

2.3 Fatalities by incident category and activity

Fig 2.3.2: Fatalities by category, 2012% fatalities associated with each reporting category [Data page B-3]

Fig 2.3.1: Fatalities by activity, 2012% fatalities associated with each reporting category [Data page B-3]

Struck by 15.9%



Other 2.3%

Confined space 2.3%




Pressure release 4.5%




Transport – water, inc. marine activity 2.3%







Maintenance, inspection,testing 47.7%

• The largest proportion of the fatalities reported in 2012 were categorised as ‘Explosions or burns’ (44%) (6% in 2011). ê 31 of the fatalities were the result of a single gas leak and explosion following the loss of mechanical integrity of a pipeline in Mexico.

• 18% of the fatalities reported in 2012 were categorised as ‘Caught in under or between’ (25% in 2011). ê Two fatalities involved being run over by reversing trucks. ê Nine of the fatalities occurred during construction, commissioning or decommissioning activities, two separate incidents were related to excavations, two separate incidents involved the roll-over of a front end loader and a bull dozer and two further separate incidents involved being crushed by moving construction equipment.

• 16% of the fatalities reported in 2012 were the result of individuals being struck by falling or moving objects (18% in 2011). ê Two fatalities involved separate motor vehicle crashes. ê Two separate fatalities involved being struck by a bulldozer or backhoe bucket.

• A reduction is seen in the number of deaths resulting from land transport incidents (9 fatalities) compared with 2011 (15 fatalities in 2011, 8 in 2010). ê Nine fatalities were associated with nine separate land transport incidents, one of which was a shooting.

• 45 of the fatal incidents involved one fatality.• Incidents which involved two or more fatalities were

reported under the categories: ê Caught in, under or between (1 incident); ê Explosions or burns (4 incidents); and ê Assault and violent act (1 incident).

• There were no fatal incidents reported under the following categories: ê Cut, puncture, scrape; ê Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration; and ê Slips, trips, falls (at same height).

• There were no fatalities reported under the following activities: ê Diving, subsea, ROV; and ê Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering.

2-4


©OGP

Fatalities – by incident category and activity, 2012

Ass

ault

or v

iole

nt a

ct

Caug

ht in

, und

er o

r be

twee

n

Confi

ned

spac

e

Expl

osio

n or

bur

ns

Expo

sure

ele

ctri

cal

Falls

from

hei

ght

Ove

rexe

rtio

n, s

trai

n

Pres

sure

rel

ease

Stru

ck b

y

Wat

er r

elat

ed, d

row

ning

Oth

er

Tota

l

Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 14Drilling, workover, well services 0 1 0 4 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 11Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2Maintenance, inspection, testing 0 0 1 35 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 41Production operations 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 3Seismic/survey operations 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2Transport – air 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2Transport – land 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 9Transport – water, including marine activity 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2Unspecified – other 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2Total 3 16 2 39 3 3 1 4 14 1 2 88

2-5


© OGP

Fig 2.4.1: Fatal incidents per 100 million work hours – company & contractorsper 100 million hours worked [Data page B-2]

Fig 2.4.2: Fatal incidents per 100 million work hours – onshore & offshoreper 100 million hours worked [Data page B-2]

Fig 2.4.3: Number of fatalities and fatal incidents10 year trend [Data page B-5]

2.4 Number of fatal incidents per 100 million work hours

0

2

4

6

8

Overall FAR

ContractorCompanyOverall

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003

0

2

4

6

8Overall FAROverallOffshoreOnshore

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140FatalitiesFatal incidents

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003

The number of fatal incidents per 100 million work hours is a measure of the frequency with which fatal incidents occur, in contrast to the FAR which measures the frequency of fatalities. Accordingly, for company and contractor fatalities, the number of fatal incidents per 100 million work hours will be less than or equal to the FAR. Comparison of FAR and number of fatal incidents per 100 million work hours gives an indication of the magnitude of the incidents in terms of lives lost.

• Overall the number of fatal incidents per 100 million work hours has decreased by 3% compared with last year and is the lowest on record (52 fatal incidents in 2012, 50 fatal incidents in 2011).

• The number of fatal incidents per 100 million work hours offshore continues to reduce, showing a rate 14% lower than the 2011 result. The number of offshore fatalities has reduced (8 fatalities in 2012 and 13 in 2011).

Number of fatal incidents per 100 million work hours

The number of incidents that result in one or more fatalities per 100,000,000 (100 million) hours.

Number of fatal incidents per 100 million work hours

2012 (2011) Relative to 2011

Company 0.79 (0.8) (1% lower)

Contractor 1.57 (1.63) (4% lower)

Overall 1.41 (1.45) (3% lower)



2-6


©OGP

Fig 2.5.2: Total recordable injury rate – onshore & offshoreper million hours worked [Data page B-2]

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7OverallOffshore

Onshore

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003

Fig 2.5.1: Total recordable injury rate – company & contractorsper million hours worked [Data page B-2]

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003

ContractorCompany

Overall

2.5 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR)



2012 (2011) TRIR Relative to 2011 TRIR

Company 1.12 (1.32) (15% lower)


Overall 1.74 (1.76) (1% lower)



Submissions without information on medical treatment cases were filtered out, leaving a database of 3,651 million hours, 99% of the database (see Appendix A).

An overall reduction in TRIR of 1% can be seen in 2012, with company TRIR down by 15% and offshore TRIR down by 11% compared with 2011 results. Contractor and onshore TRIR show an increase of 1% and 3% respectively.

2-7


© OGP

Fig 2.6.2: Lost time injury frequency – onshore & offshoreper million hours worked [Data page B-3]

Fig 2.6.1: Lost time injury frequency – company & contractorsper million hours worked [Data page B-3]

2.6 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF)

• The overall LTIF increased by 12% from 0.43 in 2011 to 0.48 in 2012.

• The contractor LTIF increased by 14% compared with 2011.

There were 1,699 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, which equates to an average of 33 injuries resulting in at least one day off work every week of the year. Although the absolute number of LWDCs has increased (1,415 in 2011), the time away from work has reduced compared with 2011. See Section 2.8 for further information on Lost Work Day Case severity.

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0Overall

Offshore

Onshore

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

Contractor

Company

Overall

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003


The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases) per 1,000,000 hours worked.

2012 (2011) LTIF Relative to 2011 LTIF

Company 0.47 (0.42) (12% higher)


Overall 0.48 (0.43) (12% higher)


Offshore 0.81 (0.74) (9% higher)

2-8


©OGP

2.7 Lost work day cases by category and activity

Of the 1,699 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, 1,356 incidents were contractor related and 343 were company related.

The lost work day case category was provided for all of the Lost Work Day Cases reported, although 7% of the cases were categorised as ‘Other’.

The pie chart shows the percentage of LWDCs within each of the reporting categories for 2012.

• The greatest number of incidents was reported as ‘Struck by’ (408 cases accounting for 24% of LWDCs), (2011 results showed 357 cases accounting for 25%).

• ‘Caught in, under or between’ accounted for 21% of the total reported cases (19% in 2011).

• In comparison with 2011, the 2012 results were very similar; the only categories that differed by more than 2% were ‘Explosions or burns’ which increased by 4% and ‘Other’ which decreased by 4% compared with 2011.

Lost work day cases by category

Number %

Assault or violent act 17 1.0Caught in, under or between 352 20.7Confined space 1 0.1Cut, puncture, scrape 61 3.6Explosion or burns 127 7.5Exposure electrical 12 0.7Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 34 2.0Falls from height 158 9.3Overexertion, strain 133 7.8Pressure release 16 0.9

Slips and trips (at same height) 265 15.6Struck by 408 24.0Water related, drowning 3 0.2Other 112 6.6Total 1,699

Confined space 0.1%


Exposure electrical 0.7%Pressure release 0.9%


Exposure noise, chemical,biological, vibration 2.0%


Other 6.6%






Struck by 24.0%

Fig 2.7.1: Lost work day cases – by category% LWDCs associated with each reporting category [Data page B-3]

Lost work day case (LWDC)

A Lost Work Day Case is an incident resulting in at least one day off work. Fatal incidents are not included.

2-9


© OGP

Company ContractorAssault or violent act 2 15Caught in, under or between 37 315Confined space 0 1Cut, puncture, scrape 7 54Explosion or burns 31 96Exposure electrical 0 12Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration

5 29

Falls from height 35 123Overexertion, strain 33 100Pressure release 4 12Slips and trips (at same height) 69 196Struck by 70 338Water related, drowning 1 2Other 49 63Total 343 1356

Of the 1,699 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, 343 were company related and 1,356 incidents were contractor related, (309 and 1,106 respectively for 2011).


Assault or violent act 0.6%Pressure release 1.2%

Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 1.5%






Other 14.3%


Struck by 20.4%

Fig 2.7.2: Lost work day cases – by categoryCompany [Data page B-4]

Confined space 0.1%


Pressure release 0.9%Exposure electrical 0.9%

Assault or violent act 1.1%Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 2.1%


Other 4.6%




Slips and trips (at same height)14.5%


Struck by 24.9%

Fig 2.7.3: Lost work day cases – by categoryContractor [Data page B-4]

Lost work day cases by category – company & contractors

2-10


©OGP


Pressure release 0.8%Exposure electrical 0.9%

Assault or violentact 1.4%




Other 8.8%



Slips and trips (at same height)15.2%


Struck by 22.9%

Confined space 0.1%



Assault or violent act 0.4%Pressure release 1.1%




Other 3.6%


Overexertion, strain10.6%


Struck by 25.4%


Fig 2.7.4: Lost work day cases – by categoryOnshore [Data page B-4]

Fig 2.7.5: Lost work day cases – by categoryOffshore [Data page B-4]

Onshore OffshoreAssault or violent act 14 3Caught in, under or between 163 189Confined space 0 1Cut, puncture, scrape 37 24Explosion or burns 114 13Exposure electrical 9 3Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration

23 11

Falls from height 90 68Overexertion, strain 56 77Pressure release 8 8Slips and trips (at same height) 148 117Struck by 223 185Water related, drowning 1 2Other 86 26Total 972 727

Of the 1,699 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, 972 incidents were related to onshore activity and 727 were related to offshore activity (858 and 557 respectively for 2011).

Lost work day cases by category – onshore & offshore

2-11


© OGP

Number %Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 168 9.9Diving, subsea, ROV 10 0.6Drilling, workover, well services 360 21.2Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 133 7.8Maintenance, inspection, testing 287 16.9Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 131 7.7Production operations 211 12.4Seismic/survey operations 23 1.4Transport – air 8 0.5Transport – land 69 4.1Transport – water, including marine activity 89 5.2Unspecified – other 210 12.4Total 1,699

Lost work day case activities were reported for all of the 1,699 Lost Work Day Cases reported, although 12% of the cases were reported as ‘Unspecified-other’. In 2011, 10% were reported as ‘Unspecified-other’.

In comparison with 2011 data only 2 activities varied by more than 2% of the total:

• ‘Production operations’ reduced by 4% of the total from 2011 to 2012

• ‘Maintenance, inspection, testing’ increased by 3% of the total from 2011 to 2012

Fig2.7.6: Lost work day cases – by activity% LWDCs associated with each reporting category [Data page B-3]

Lost work day cases by activity



Transport – land 4.1% Transport – air 0.5%









2-12


©OGP

Company ContractorConstruction, commissioning, decommissioning

4 164

Diving, subsea, ROV 1 9Drilling, workover, well services 43 317Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 11 122Maintenance, inspection, testing 69 218Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering

46 85

Production operations 79 132Seismic/survey operations 1 22Transport – air 5 3Transport – land 19 50Transport – water, including marine activity

4 85

Unspecified – other 61 149Total 343 1356

Of the 1,699 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, 343 (20%) were company related and 1,356 (80%) incidents were contractor related (22% and 78% respectively in 2011).

Fig 2.7.7: Lost work day cases – by activity Company [Data page B-4]

Fig 2.7.8: Lost work day cases – by activity Contractor [Data page B-4]

Lost work day cases by activity – company & contractor















Transport – land 3.7%Transport – air 0.2%









2-13


© OGP

Fig 2.7.9: Lost work day cases – by activity Onshore [Data page B-4]

Fig 2.7.10: Lost work day cases – by activity Offshore [Data page B-4]

Onshore OffshoreConstruction, commissioning, decommissioning

113 55

Diving, subsea, ROV 1 9Drilling, workover, well services 189 171Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 52 81Maintenance, inspection, testing 162 125Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering

94 37

Production operations 105 106Seismic/survey operations 18 5Transport – air 5 3Transport – land 65 4Transport – water, including marine activity

15 74

Unspecified – other 153 57Total 972 727

Of the 1,699 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, 972 (57%) incidents were onshore related and 727 (43%) were offshore related (61% and 39% respectively in 2011).

Lost work day cases by activity – onshore & offshore




Transport – air 0.5%Seismic/survey operations 1.9%




















2-14


©OGP

Fig 2.8.1: Severity of lost work day cases – company & contractorsaverage days lost per LWDC [Data page B-4]

Fig 2.8.2: Severity of lost work day cases – onshore & offshoreaverage days lost per LWDC [Data page B-4]

2.8 Severity of lost work day cases

2012 (2011) severity

Relative to 2011 severity

Relative to 2007-2011 average severity

Company 38.81 (41.06) 5% lower 9% higher

Contractor 41.28 (42.58) 3% lower 6% higher

Overall 40.74 (42.26) 4% lower 7% higher

Onshore 36.83 (39.84) 8% lower 5% higher

Offshore 45.99 (46.42) 1% lower 2% higher

• OGP member companies reported 53,325 days of work lost through injuries.

• The number of days lost was reported for 78% of the lost work day cases.

• The difference between company and contractor severity levels is 7% (contractor is 7% higher).

• The offshore LWDC severity is 25% higher than onshore.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

ContractorCompany

Overall

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

OverallOffshoreOnshore

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003

Severity of lost work day cases

Severity is defined as the average number of days lost (where reported) for each lost work day case.

Lost work day case days are not reported by all companies. The database for this analysis is therefore reduced to 2,876 million work hours, 78% of all reported hours

2-15


© OGP

Fig 2.8.3: Severity of lost work day cases – company & contractorsaverage days lost per LWDC [Data page B-4]

Fig 2.8.4: Severity of lost work day cases – onshore & offshoreaverage days lost per LWDC [Data page B-4]

0 10 20 30 40 50

Overall

Contractor

Company

2012

2007-2011

0 10 20 30 40 50

Overall

Onshore

Offshore

2012

2007-2011

The figures show the average number of days lost per LWDC in 2012 compared with the average for the previous 5-year period. An increase is shown in LWDC severity in all areas of activity when compared with the previous 5-year period; an increase of 7% overall.

2-16


©OGP

2.9 Severity of restricted work day cases

Fig 2.9.1: Severity of restricted work day cases – company & contractorsaverage days lost per RWDC [Data page B-5]

Fig 2.9.2: Severity of restricted work day cases – onshore & offshoreaverage days lost per RWDC [Data page B-5]

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

ContractorCompany

Overall

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Overall

Offshore

Onshore

2012201120102009200820072006200520042003

2012 (2011) severity

Relative to 2011 severity

Relative to 2007-2011 severity

Company 13.84 (12.92) 7% higher 6% lower

Contractor 12.05 (10.17) 18% higher 1% higher

Overall 12.21 (10.4) 17% higher (no change)

Onshore 11.48 (11.67) 2% lower 2% lower

Offshore 13.41 (8.55) 57% higher 2% higher

A total of 12,006 days were restricted (RWDC days) as a result of restricted workday cases, in the sense that normal duties could not be performed. This compares with 53,325 days lost (LWDC days) on a 24% larger dataset.

• The number of days lost overall is virtually unchanged compared with the previous 5-year period but has increased by 17% compared with 2011 results.

• The average number of days lost to restricted work per case increased most noticeably in offshore operations 13.41 days, compared with 8.55 days in 2011 (an increase of 57%), however 2012 is within 10% of the 2010 figure of 14.35 days.

• The number of days lost among company employees has fallen by 6% compared with the previous 5-year period but has risen by 7% compared with 2011 results.

Severity of restricted work day cases

The average number of days of restricted work per restricted work day case.

Restricted work day case days are not reported by all companies. The database for this analysis is therefore reduced to 2,183 million work hours, 59% of all reported hours.

2-17


© OGP

Fig 2.9.3: Severity of restriced work day cases – company & contractorsaverage days of restricted work per RWDC [Data page B-5]

Fig 2.9.4: Severity of restriced work day cases – onshore & offshoreaverage days of restricted work per RWDC [Data page B-5]

0 3 6 9 12 15 18

Overall

Contractor

Company

2012

2007-2011

0 3 6 9 12 15 18

Overall

Onshore

Offshore

2012

2007-2011

The figures show the average number of days lost per RWDC in 2012 compared with the average for the previous 5-year period. The overall average is virtually unchanged compared with the average for the previous 5-year period.

2-18


©OGP

2.10 Incident triangles

In this section the relative numbers of types of occupational injury are shown in the form of ‘incident triangles’. The ratios have been corrected to account for the absence, in some data submissions, of medical treatment cases.

2011 incident triangles

2012 incident triangles

Overall

72 recordable injuries

lost time injuries

1 fatality

lost time injuries

1 fatality

lost time injuries

1 fatality

20

28

18



Company

Contractor

Overall


lost time injuries

1 fatality

lost time injuries

1 fatality

lost time injuries

1 fatality

22

31

21



Company

Contractor

Lost time injuries

Lost work day cases and fatalities

Recordable injuries

Fatalities, lost work day cases, restricted work day cases and medical treatment cases. Data are only included where medical treatment cases are reported for the data set.

Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities

The number of lost time injuries divided by the total number of fatalities (Lost time injuries/ fatalities)

Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities

The number of recordable injuries divided by the total number of fatalities (recordable injuries/fatalities)

Year Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities


2012 20:1 72:12011 22:1 93:12010 15:1 60:12009 16:1 63:12008 17:1 61:1

2-19


© OGP

The varying ratio of fatalities to lost time injuries to recordable injuries for 2011–2012 challenges the traditional notion of recordable injuries and lost time injuries overall as a precursor to fatalities as shown in the incident triangles. In some incident categories however such as “confined space”, “assault or violent act” and “water related, drowning”, the ratio will be higher as shown in the tables below.

Activity LTIs (fatalities+LWDCs) Fatalities Ratio LTI: FatalityConstruction, commissioning, decommissioning 182 14 13:1Diving, subsea, ROV 10 0 n/aDrilling, workover, well Services 371 11 34:1Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 135 2 68:1Maintenance, inspection, testing 328 41 8:1Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 131 0 n/aProduction operations 214 3 71:1Seismic / survey operations 25 2 13:1Transport – air 10 2 5:1Transport – land 78 9 9:1Transport – water, incl. marine activity 91 2 46:1Unspecified – other 212 2 106:1

Category LTIs (fatalities+LWDCs) Fatalities Ratio LTI: FatalityAssault or violent act 20 3 7:1Caught in, under or between 368 16 23:1Confined space 3 2 2:1Cut, puncture, scrape 61 0 n/aExplosions or burns 166 39 4:1Exposure electrical 15 3 5:1Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 34 0 n/aFalls from height 161 3 54:1Other 114 2 57:1

Overexertion, strain 134 1 134:1Pressure release 20 4 5:1Slips and trips (at same height) 265 0 n/aStruck by 422 14 30:1Water related, drowning 4 1 4:1

2-20


©OGP

2.11 Causal factors analysis

The allocation of ‘causal factors’ to fatal incidents and high potential events was requested for the 2012 data reported to OGP. This request was first made in 2010, therefore a comparison of three years of data is possible.

To standardise the response an OGP list of causal factors and a glossary was provided to the member companies as part of the OGP User Guide. The causal factors list is divided into two sections:

• People (Acts) classifications usually involve either the actions of a person or actions which were required but not carried out or were incorrectly performed. There are four major categories of actions, with an additional level of detail under each of the major categories.

• Process (Conditions) classifications usually involve some type of physical hazard or organizational aspect out of the control of the individual. There are five major classification categories, with an additional level of detail under each of the major categories

2-21


© OGP

• 47 of the 52 fatal incidents reported were assigned causal factors (42 of 50 in 2011)

• 212 causal factors were assigned for the 47 fatal incidents ê 92 were People (Acts) (81 in 2011, 109 in 2010) ê 120 were Process (Conditions) (122 in 2011, 133 in 2010)

• Between 1 and 11 causal factors were assigned per incident (1 to 12 in 2011, 1 to 18 in 2010).

The causal factors assigned to fatal incidents are shown below. The highlighted content indicates the top 10 causal factors assigned to fatal incidents in 2012 compared

to 2011 and 2010; seven of the ten were the same for all three years.

Additional information on the fatal incidents reported by region can be found on the OGP Safety Zone website: http://info.ogp.org.uk/Safety/. The information provided includes a narrative description of the incident, the corrective actions and recommendations and the causal factors assigned by the reporting company.

Note: the top 12 causal factors have been shown for 2012, as four of the causal factors were each assigned 7 times.

2.11.1 Fatal incident causal factors

Causal factors assigned for fatal incidents 2012 2011 2010Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment 17 15 30Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate supervision 16 18 18Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate work standards/procedures 15 8 10Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate training/competence 13 10 13People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation unintentional (by individual or group) 13 9 12People (acts): Following Procedures: Improper position (in the line of fire) 13 9 16People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgment 11 16 14People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Inadequate use of safety systems 9 4 5People (acts): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Improper use/position of tools/equipment/materials/products

7 6 9

Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate design/specification/management of change 7 5 10Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate/defective tools/equipment/ materials/products

7 5 4

People (acts): Following Procedures: Improper lifting or loading 7 2 8Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective guards or protective barriers 6 11 7Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate communication 6 9 12People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Lack of attention/distracted by other concerns/stress 5 7 5Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective warning systems/safety devices 5 6 5Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate maintenance/inspection/testing 5 6 4Process (conditions):Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective Personal Protective Equipment 5 5People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Failure to warn of hazard 4 8 7Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Inadequate surfaces, floors, walkways or roads 4 7 1People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Personal Protective Equipment not used or used improperly 4 6 1People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Equipment or materials not secured 4 4 6People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation intentional (by individual or group) 4 4 12Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Congestion, clutter or restricted motion 4 4 2Process (conditions): Organisational: Poor leadership/organisational culture 4 4 9Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate security provisions or systems 4 2 2People (acts): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Servicing of energised equipment/inadequate energy isolation

3 3

People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Disabled or removed guards, warning systems or safety devices 2 2 2People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Acts of violence 2 1 6Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Hazardous atmosphere (explosive/toxic/asphyxiant) 2 1 1People (acts): Following Procedures: Work or motion at improper speed 1 2People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awarenes: Fatigue 1 1People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Use of drugs or alcohol 1People (acts): Following Procedures: Overexertion or improper position/posture for task 1 3Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Storms or acts of nature 5 2Process (conditions): Organisational: Failure to report/learn from events 1 3

2-22


©OGP

• 169 of the 195 high potential events were assigned causal factors (69 of 76 in 2011)

• 603 causal factors were assigned for the 169 high potential events (317 in 2011) ê 225 were People (Acts) (131 in 2010) ê 378 were Process (Conditions) (186 in 2011)

• Between 1 and 14 causal factors were assigned per event (1 to 19 in 2011)

The causal factors assigned to fatal incidents are shown below. The highlighted content indicates the top 10

causal factors assigned to fatal incidents in 2012 compared to 2011 and 2010, seven of the ten were the same for both years.

Additional information on the fatal incidents reported by region can be found on the OGP Safety Zone website: http://info.ogp.org.uk/Safety/. The information provided includes a narrative description of the incident, the corrective actions and recommendations and the causal factors assigned by the reporting company

Note: the top 11 causal factors have been shown for 2010, as two of the causal factors were each assigned 15 times.

2.11.2 High potential event causal factors

Causal Factors assigned for high potential events 2012 2011 2010Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment 61 24 47Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate work standards/procedures 54 20 37Process (conditions):Organisational: Inadequate supervision 44 18 31People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgment 38 21 23Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate maintenance/inspection/testing 37 12 21Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate communication 36 15 19

Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate training/competence 36 15 22People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Failure to warn of hazard 31 13 9Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate/defective tools/equipment/ materials/products

27 13 16

People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation unintentional (by individual or group) 23 15 27Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective guards or protective barriers 22 9 10People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Lack of attention/distracted by other concerns/stress 21 8 15People (acts): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Improper use/position of tools/equipment/materials/products

21 17 9

People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Inadequate use of safety systems 19 12 2Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate design/specification/management of change 16 18 13People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Equipment or materials not secured 15 9 3People (acts): Following Procedures: Improper position (in the line of fire) 13 3 9People (acts):Following Procedures: Improper lifting or loading 11 9 5Process (conditions): Organisational: Poor leadership/organisational culture 10 9 15Process (conditions):: Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective warning systems/safety devices 8 15 13People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Personal Protective Equipment not used or used improperly 8 3 6People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation intentional (by individual or group) 7 6 9Process (conditions):: Work Place Hazards: Hazardous atmosphere (explosive/toxic/asphyxiant) 6 5 6Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Congestion, clutter or restricted motion 5 3 3Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Inadequate surfaces, floors, walkways or roads 5 2 5People (acts): Following Procedures: Work or motion at improper speed 5 3 3People (acts): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Servicing of energised equipment/inadequate energy isolation

5 3 6

People (acts):Use of Protective Methods: Disabled or removed guards, warning systems or safety devices 4 3 1Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate security provisions or systems 4 3 1Process (conditions): Organisational: Failure to report/learn from events 3 2 4Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Storms or acts of nature 2 2Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective Personal Protective Equipment 2 1 3People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Acts of violence 2 1People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Fatigue 1 4 4People (acts): Following Procedures: Overexertion or improper position/posture for task 1 1 3

2-23


© OGP

The following 6 causal factors were common to the top ten for both fatal incidents and high potential events in 2012, these were also all in the top ten in 2011 and 2010.

• Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment

• Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate work standards/procedures

• Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate supervision

• People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgement

• Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate training/competence

• People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation unintentional (by individual or group)

OGP has released a set of ‘life-saving rules’ (OGP Life-Saving Rules, OGP report № 459, released Feb 2012), intended for use by the oil & gas industry to mitigate risk and reduce fatalities. Each OGP Life-Saving Rule consists of a simple icon and descriptive text, providing clear, simple and consistent communication about risks in the workplace.

These Rules were developed by using the fatal incident and high potential event data from the 1991 to 2010 Safety Performance Indicators reports to identify the events and activities that are the highest risk and therefore provide clear instructions on how to avoid them. The Life-Saving Rules are split into eight ‘core rules’ and ten ‘supplementary rules’.

Analysis of the fatal incident descriptions for 2012 data has shown that 79% of the fatal incidents reported are covered by the OGP Life-Saving Rules and may have been prevented by the adoption of this system.

2.12 OGP Life-Saving Rules

Fig 2.12.1: OGP Life-Saving Rules applicable to 2012 fatal incidentsper cent of total 2012 incidents

Supplementary rules 50%

Core rules 29%

No appropriate rule 21%

2-24


©OGP

3-1


© OGP

3. Results by region

In this section the safety performance of the contributing OGP members is presented for regions and individual countries within those regions.

A list of countries from which companies have reported information and the division of countries into regions is provided in Appendix D.

3.1 Fatalities by region

The table shows the number of fatal incidents and fatalities in each of the 7 regions into which the data are partitioned.

Further analysis of the fatality statistics is presented in Section 3.5, where 5-year rolling averages of FAR are presented for each of the regions.

Fatalities2012 (2011)

FAR2012 (2011)

Fatal incidents2012 (2011)

Africa 17 (7) 2.83 (1.25) 13 (7)

Asia/Australasia 10 (20) 1.35 (3.28) 10 (12)

Europe 2 (3) 0.52 (0.87) 2 (3)

FSU 2 (7) 0.55 (1.59) 2 (6)

Middle East 13 (12) 1.95 (1.74) 11 (9)

North America 42 (6) 7.50 (1.50) 12 (6)

South America 2 (10) 0.54 (2.42) 2 (7)

Regions and countries throughout the Safety performance indicators are grouped in the same geographic regions as have been historically used in this report so as to ensure consistency.

Africa

Asia/Australasia

North America

South America

Europe

FSU

Middle East

3-2


©OGP

Submissions without information on medical treatment cases were filtered out, leaving a database of 3,651 million hours, almost 100% of the database (see Appendix A).

Further fatal accident rate analysis is presented in Section 3.5, where 5-year rolling averages of FAR are presented for each of the regions.

3.3 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) by region

Fig 3.3.1: Total recordable injury rateper million hours worked

0

2

4

6

OverallSouth America

North America

Middle East

FSUEuropeAsia/Australasia

Africa

20122011201020092008



2012 2011 2010 2009 2008

Africa 1.14 1.22 1.40 1.65 2.18

Asia/Australasia

1.37 1.46 1.30 1.22 1.34

Europe 2.64 2.81 3.05 3.48 3.89

FSU 0.99 0.99 1.08 1.21 1.22

Middle East 1.02 0.78 0.98 0.92 0.83

North America 2.82 3.19 2.89 3.08 4.25

South America 3.05 3.17 2.76 3.17 3.15

Overall 1.74 1.76 1.68 1.75 2.09

2012 2011 2010 2009 2008

Africa 2.83 1.25 3.38 2.21 4.40

Asia/Australasia

1.35 3.28 4.14 1.58 1.24

Europe 0.52 0.87 0.97 6.58 4.19

FSU 0.55 1.59 2.17 3.14 4.05

Middle East 1.95 1.74 1.63 2.16 2.40

North America 7.50 1.50 5.08 4.37 1.64

South America 0.54 2.42 1.57 2.37 5.17

Overall 2.38 1.88 2.76 2.76 3.12

3.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR) by region

Fig 3.2.1: Fatal accident rateper 100 million hours worked

0

2

4

6

8 20122011201020092008


North America

Middle East


Africa



3-3


© OGP

Further analysis of the lost time injuries is presented in Section 3.5, where 5-year rolling averages of LTIF are presented for each of the regions.

3.4 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) by region

Fig 3.4.1: Lost time injury frequencyper million hours worked

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5


North America

Middle East


Africa

20122011201020092008

2012 2011 2010 2009 2008

Africa 0.33 0.30 0.36 0.42 0.61

Asia/Australasia

0.26 0.30 0.29 0.29 0.29

Europe 0.91 1.08 1.06 1.31 1.38

FSU 0.28 0.31 0.31 0.35 0.45

Middle East 0.24 0.18 0.25 0.26 0.29

North America 0.94 0.59 0.48 0.51 0.55

South America 0.69 0.64 0.61 0.69 0.90

Overall 0.48 0.43 0.42 0.45 0.55


The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost workday cases) per 1,000,000 hours worked.

3-4


©OGP

3.5 FAR, TRIR and LTIF – 5-year rolling averages by region

The five year rolling average is calculated by summing the total number of incidents of the five previous years, and dividing by the sum of the work hours for these years. For example, the five year rolling average for 2012 is calculated by:

(Number of injuries in 2008+2009+2010+2011+2012)

(Total work hours in 2008+2009+2010+2011+2012)

The number series involved in the calculation is frame shifted along by one each year, e.g. 2011 will calculate from 2007-2011.

In order to smooth out variability in the annual values of the regional TRIR, FAR and LTIF, 5-year rolling averages are computed which should provide a more reliable indicator of performance trends.

The figures show TRIR, FAR and LTIF 5-year rolling averages for each of the seven regions, and includes the ‘all regions’ curve.

The increase in the North America FAR in 2012 can be attributed to the effect of a gas leak and explosion following the loss of mechanical integrity of a pipeline in Mexico (onshore) in which 31 individuals lost their lives.

3.5.1: FAR 5-year rolling averageper 100 million hours worked [Data from B-7]

3.5.2: TRIR 5-year rolling averageper million hours worked [Data from B-6]

3.5.3: LTIF 5-year rolling averageper million hours worked [Data from B-7]

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7 All regions

South AmericaNorth America

Middle EastFSUEurope

Asia/AustraliaAfrica

201220112010200920082007

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

201220112010200920082007

All regions


Middle EastFSUEurope

Asia/AustraliaAfrica

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

201220112010200920082007

All regions


Middle EastFSU

EuropeAsia/AustraliaAfrica

3-5


© OGP

3.7 Individual country performance

The safety performance reported by participating OGP member companies of individual countries is presented in terms of the lost time injury frequency of companies jointly with contractors. To preserve the anonymity of companies, performance is only published for those countries for which at least 2 companies have reported statistics. Countries with less than 50,000 reported hours worked are excluded, since results for such small populations of hours would be unrepresentative. Overall averages and regional averages include data from all countries regardless of work hours or number of contributing companies.

Of the 107 countries from which data have been reported, 23 are excluded by these constraints.

The chart of relative performance for the remaining 84 countries compares the 2012 performance with that of 2011 and 2010

The majority of countries in Asia/Australasia, FSU, the Middle East and South America achieved an LTIF equal to or lower than the overall average LTIF (0.48). The majority of countries in Africa, Europe and North America show an LTIF higher than the global average.

For comparison, the 5-year rolling average FAR is shown for each of the regions. There appears to be little if any correlation between these values and the regional average LTIF values.

3.6 Severity of lost work day cases by region

Fig 3.6.1: Severity of LWDCAverage days lost per LWDC [Data from B-7]

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

20122007–2011 Average

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa

2012 Average 40.7

The number of days lost was reported for 78% of lost work day cases.

The severity of lost workday cases is the highest in the South American region compared with the other regions (70 days lost per LWDC in 2012).

2012 LWDC severity Relative to 2007-2011 average LWDC severity

Africa 35.94 51% higher

Asia/Australasia 24.23 11% lower

Europe 38.06 5% lower

FSU 41.42 16% higher

Middle East 26.21 49% higher

North America 36.66 2% lower

South America 69.53 1% higher

Overall 40.74 7% higher


A Lost Work Day Case is an incident resulting in at least one day off work. Fatal incidents are not included.


Severity is defined as the average number of days lost (where reported) for each lost work day case.

3-6


©OGP

Fig 3.7.1: Lost time injury frequency – companies with contractorsper million hours worked [Data from B-8]

FAR5-year rolling average2.8




6.98

12.50




Global average LTIF(2012): 0.48

0 1 2 3 4 5

2010

2011

2012

French GuianaSurinamUruguay

ArgentinaEcuador

VenezuelaColombia

PeruTrinidad & Tobago

BoliviaBrazil

South America

CanadaUSA

CubaMexico

North America

IranSyria

OmanKuwait

UAEQatarYemenJordan

IraqTurkey

Middle East

AzerbaijanRussia

TurkmenistanKazakhstan

UkraineFSU

GreenlandIrelandFrance

RomaniaSpain

NetherlandsUK

GermanyNorwayDenmarkCroatia

ItalyHungary

PolandEurope

BruneiBangladesh

JapanSingapore

PakistanThailand

Papua New GuineaIndonesia

ChinaMalaysia

South KoreaPhilippines

IndiaMyanmar

VietnamAustralia

New ZealandAsia-Australasia

LiberiaMadagascarSouth Africa

NigeriaAngolaAlgeria

EgyptEquatorial Guinea

CongoUganda

KenyaLibya

CamerounMauritaniaDR Congo

GabonMozambique

TanzaniaGhanaTunisia

Sierra LeoneIvory Coast

MoroccoAfrica

2012 regional average LTIF

5-year rolling average FAR

One or more fatalities (2012) – country listed in orange

3-7


© OGP

In this section the relative numbers of types of occupational injury are shown in the form of ‘incident triangles’. The ratios have been corrected to account for the absence, in some data submissions, of medical treatment cases.

The triangles are shown for comparison overleaf.

N/A is used where there are no fatalities and no ratio can be derived.

3.8 Incident triangles by region

Lost time injuries

Fatalities and lost work day cases

Recordable injuries

Fatalities, lost work day cases, restricted work day cases and medical treatment cases. Data are only included where medical treatment cases are reported for the data set.

Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities

The number of lost time injuries divided by the total number of fatalities (Lost time injuries/ fatalities)


The number of recordable injuries divided by the total number of fatalities (recordable injuries/fatalities)

3-8


©OGP

2012 incident triangles – Europe

2012 incident triangles – FSU

2012 incident triangles – Middle East

2012 incident triangles – North America

2012 incident triangles – South America



2012 11:1 40:12011 23:1 97:12010 10:1 41:12009 18:1 74:1



2012 19:1 101:12011 9:1 43:12010 7:1 31:12009 18:1 77:1



2012 174:1 507:12011 124:1 315:12010 108:1 309:12009 19:1 52:1



2012 51:1 179:12011 19:1 61:12010 14:1 50:12009 11:1 38:1



2012 12:1 52:12011 10:1 44:12010 15:1 60:12009 12:1 42:1


Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalitiess

2012 12:1 35:12011 39:1 213:12010 9:1 57:12009 11:1 70:1



2012 129:1 570:12011 26:1 130:12010 38:1 175:12009 29:1 133:1

2012 incident triangles – Africa

2012 incident triangles – Asia/Australsia

3-9


© OGP

Africa

Asia/Australasia

Europe

FSU

Middle East

North America

South America

Overall (region)

Companies

Contractors

1140

2173

1138

1140

recordable injuries

lost time injuries

1 fatality

recordable injuries

lost time injuries

1 fatality

recordable injuries

lost time injuries

1 fatality

recordable injuries

lost time injuries

1 fatality

recordable injuries

lost time injuries

1 fatality

recordable injuries

lost time injuries

1 fatality

recordable injuries

lost time injuries

1 fatality

18100

21107

19101

174507

91195

256819

51179

42151

1252

1335

1257

1235

2033

1135

129570

113518

1138

n/an/a

n/an/a

3-10


©OGP

4-1


© OGP

4. Results by function

In this section the safety performance within different functions performed in the E&P industry is presented. Functions are defined as ‘exploration’, ‘drilling’, ‘production’, ‘construction’ and ‘unspecified’. The category ‘other’ is no longer in use. See the Glossary of Terms at Appendix E for definitions.

2012 2011

Fatal incidents

Fatalities Fatal incidents

Fatalities

Exploration 4 4 0 0

Drilling 11 12 7 12

Production 12 15 22 32

Construction 17 19 16 16

Unspecified 8 38 5 5

Total 52 88 50 65

% of 2012 work hours % of 2011 work hours % of 2010 work hours % of 2009 work hours % of 2008 work hours

Exploration 2 2 2 2 2

Drilling 18 19 15 10 9

Production 33 35 28 26 30

Construction 25 24 25 30 27

Unspecified 22 20 29 32 31

4.1 Fatalities by function

The distribution of company and contractor fatal incidents and fatalities between the functions is shown for both 2012 and 2011.

The percentage of work hours reported under each function has been detailed below. See Appendix B for further data.

4-2


©OGP

Fig 4.2.1: Fatal accident rate 3-year rolling averageper 100 million hours worked [Data from B-9]

0

2

4

6

8

10

UnspecifiedConstruction

ProductionDrillingExploration

201220112010200920082007

4.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR) – 3-year rolling average by function

In order to smooth out variability in the annual fatal accident rate values 3-year rolling averages are presented. These should provide a more reliable indicator of performance trends.

In this section, 3 year rolling averages are used rather than 5 year rolling averages, as the function ‘other’ was replaced by ‘construction’ for the first time in 2006.

The increase in 2012 ‘unspecified’ FAR is as a result of a single incident involving a gas leak and explosion following the loss of mechanical integrity of a pipeline in Mexico, in which 31 individuals lost their lives.

The increase in the 2010 ‘drilling’ FAR can be attributed to the effect of a fire and explosion offshore in the USA in which 11 individuals lost their lives.

.

Note: The function ‘other’ was replaced by ‘construction’ for the first time in 2006, thus the 2007 3-year average figure for ‘construction’ is not available.

The three year rolling average is calculated by summing the total number of incidents of the three previous years, and dividing by the sum of the work hours for these years. For example, the three year rolling average for drilling FAR 2012 is calculated by:

(Number of fatalities in drilling function 2010+2011+2012)

(Total work hours in drilling 2010+2011+2012)

The number series involved in the calculation is frame shifted along by one each year, e.g. 2011 will calculate from 2009-2011, inclusive.

4-3


© OGP

4.4 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) – 3-year rolling average by function

Lost time injury frequency 3-year rolling averageper million hours worked [Data from B-10]

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

Unspecified

Construction

Production

Drilling

Exploration

201220112010200920082007

Note: The function ‘other’ was replaced by ‘construction’ for the first time in 2006, thus 2007 3-year average figure for ‘construction’ is not available.

4.3 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) by function

Fig 4.3.1: Total recordable injury rateper million hours worked [Data from B-10]

0

1

2

3

4

5 20122011201020092008

UnspecifiedConstructionProductionDrillingExploration

Submissions without information on medical treatment cases were filtered out, leaving a database of 3,650 million hours, almost 100% of the database (see Appendix A).

2012 TRIR

2011 TRIR

2010 TRIR

2009 TRIR

2008 TRIR

Exploration 2.14 2.70 2.30 2.31 3.81

Drilling 2.59 2.84 2.94 3.81 4.63

Production 1.92 2.05 2.14 2.32 2.64

Construction 1.32 1.13 0.99 0.78 1.00

Unspecified 1.21 0.95 1.13 1.53 1.72

All functions 1.74 1.76 1.68 1.75 2.09

4-4


©OGP

4.5 Severity of lost work day cases by function

Fig 4.5.1: Severity of LWDCaverage lost days per LWDC [Data from B-10]

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2012

2012 Average 40.7

2007–2011 Average

UnspecifiedConstructionProductionDrillingExploration

The 2012 average number of days lost per Lost Work Day Case (LWDC) offshore is 46.0 days compared with 36.8 days for onshore activities (46.4 and 39.8 respectively for 2011). See Section 2.8 for additional information and Section 3.6 for LWDC severity by region.

4-5


© OGP

4.6 Exploration performance

Exploration

Geophysical, seismographic and geological operations, including their administrative and engineering aspects, construction, maintenance, materials supply and transportation of personnel and equipment; excludes drilling.

The figures show the TRIR for companies and contractors for exploration related activities, in different regions of the world.

82 million work hours were used in this analysis of which company activities represent 27% and contractor activities represent 73%. This represents an increase of 10 million work hours over 2011, with the same ratio of company to contractor activities.

In 2012 the overall TRIR values for companies and contractors engaged in exploration activities are 0.67 and 2.69 respectively; the overall average TRIR for exploration activities is 2.14.

The TRIR for companies has more than doubled for exploration activities in Europe compared with the average for the previous 5-year period. Company TRIR has reduced for exploration activities in all other regions.

The TRIR for contractors in exploration activities has increased in Asia/Australasia by 31% and in the Middle East where it has risen to 2.5 times the average for the previous 5-year period. 2012 contractor rates have fallen by between 13% (Europe) and 63% (FSU) for all other regions.

Fig 4.6.1.1: Total recordable injury rate – explorationper million hours worked [Data from B-11]

0

2

4

6

Company 2012

Company 2007–2011

2012 Company average 0.67

2012 Contractor average 2.69

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa0

2

4

6

Contractor 2012

Contractor 2007–2011

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa

4.6.1 Exploration total recordable injury rate

4-6


©OGP

The figures show the LTIF for companies and contractors for exploration related activities, in different regions of the world. The 2012 result is compared with average LTIF results in the previous 5-year period.


In 2012 the overall LTIF values for companies and contractors engaged in exploration activities are 0.53 and 0.63 respectively; the overall average LTIF for exploration activities is 0.60. The company result is up by 83% compared with the 2007-2011 average and the contractor result is down by 10%.

Company LTIF values associated with exploration show a reduction in LTIF in all regions except Europe and the Middle East where the LTIF has risen to three times and nine times the regional averages for the previous 5-year period respectively.

LTIF results associated with exploration activities for contractors have reduced in all regions except the Middle East where it has risen to three times the regional average for 2007-2011.

Note: In many instances where the LTIF or TRIR is reported as 0.00, the number of work hours reported for the specific function and region are relatively low. A detailed breakdown of the hours by region and function is presented in Appendix B..

Fig 4.6.2.1: Lost time injury frequency – explorationper million hours worked [Data from B-11]

0

2

4

6

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa0

2

4

6

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa



Company 2012

Company 2007–2011

Contractor 2012


4.6.2 Exploration lost time injury frequency

4-7


© OGP

4.7 Drilling performance

Drilling

All exploration, appraisal and production drilling and workover as well as their administrative, engineering, construction, materials supply and transportation aspects. It includes site preparation, rigging up and down and restoration of the drilling site upon work completion. Drilling includes ALL exploration, appraisal and production drilling.

The figures show the TRIR for companies and contractors for drilling related activities in different regions of the world.

663 million work hours were used in this analysis of which company activities represent 13% and contractor activities represent 87%. This represents an increase of 24 million work hours compared with 2011, with a similar ratio company to contractor activities (12% to 88% respectively).

In 2012 the overall TRIR values for companies and contractors engaged in drilling activities are 1.23 and 2.79 respectively; the overall TRIR for drilling activities is 2.59.

Company TRIR for drilling operations shows a reduction in all regions of between 11% (South America) and 70% (Africa) compared with the average for the previous 5-year period.

A reduction can be seen in TRIR results for contractors in drilling operations of between 3% (South America) and 39% (Africa) in all regions when compared with the 2007-2011 regional averages.

Fig 4.7.1.1: Total recordable injury rate – drillingper million hours worked [Data from B-11]

0

2

4

6

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa0

2

4

6

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa



Company 2012

Company 2007–2011

Contractor2012


4.7.1 Drilling total recordable injury rate

4-8


©OGP

673 million work hours were used in this analysis, of which company activities represent 13% and contractor activities represent 87%. This represents an increase of 31 million work hours compared with 2011, with the same ratio company to contractor activities.

The figures show the LTIF for companies and contractors in drilling related activities in different regions of the world. In 2012 the overall LTIF for both companies and contractors engaged in drilling activities is 0.82.

In 2012 the overall LTIF values for companies and contractors engaged in drilling activities are 0.94 and 0.80 respectively.

The company LTIF has increased by 57% compared with the 2007-2011 average and the contractor LTIF has fallen by 21%.

Company LTIF for drilling operations shows an increase in the Middle East (71%) and South America (22%) and notably North America where the average is 90 times the average for the previous 5-year period.

A reduction can be seen in LTIF results for contractors in drilling operations in all regions except Europe, where it is unchanged, and North America, where it has increased by 18%, when compared with the 2007-2011 regional averages.

Fig 4.7.2.1: Lost time injury frequency – drillingper million hours worked [Data from B-11]

0

2

4

6

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa0

2

4

6

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa



Company 2012

Company 2007–2011

Contractor 2012


4.7.2 Drilling lost time injury frequency

4-9


© OGP

4.8 Production performance

Production

Petroleum and natural gas producing operations, including their administrative and engineering aspects, minor construction, repairs, maintenance and servicing, materials supply, and transportation of personnel and equipment. It covers all mainstream production operations including wireline. It does not cover production drilling and workover. See the Appendix E: Glossary of Terms for details.

4.8.1 Production total recordable injury rate

The figures show the TRIR for companies and contractors for production related activities in different regions of the world.

1,211 million work hours were used in this analysis of which company activities represent 27% and contractor activities represent 73%. This represents an increase of 15 million work hours compared with 2011, with a similar ratio of company to contractor activities (29% to 71% respectively).

In 2012 the overall TRIR values for companies and contractors engaged in production activities are 1.53 and

2.06 respectively; the overall average TRIR for production activities is 1.92.

TRIR for companies in production activities has reduced for all regions with the exception of South America where it has risen by 2.7% when compared with the 2007-2011 average.

TRIR for contractors when compared with the average for the previous 5-year period, a reduction is shown in all regions when compared with the 2007-2011 average with the exception of South America.

Fig 4.8.1.1: Total recordable injury rate – productionper million hours worked [Data from B-12]

0

2

4

6

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa0

2

4

6

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa



Company 2012

Company 2007–2011

Contractor 2012


4-10


©OGP

4.8.2 Production of lost time injury frequency

The figures show the LTIF for companies and contractors for production related activities in different regions of the world.

1,220 million work hours were used in this analysis of which company activities represent 27% and contractor activities represent 73%. This represents an increase of 12 million work hours over 2011, with a similar ratio of company to contractor activities (30% to 70% respectively).

In 2012 the overall LTIF values for companies and contractors engaged in production activities are 0.48 and

0.49 respectively; the overall average LTIF for production activities is 0.49.

The LTIF for companies working in production activities has reduced in all regions by between 2% (South America) and 48% (Middle East and Africa) compared with the 2007-2011 regional averages.

The 2012 LTIF associated with contractors working in production activities has reduced in all regions by between 7% (North America) and 45% (Africa) compared with the 2007-2011 average.

Fig 4.8.2.1: Lost time injury frequency – productionper million hours worked [Data from B-12]

0

2

4

6

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa0

2

4

6

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa



Company 2012

Company 2007–2011

Contractor 2012


4-11


© OGP

4.9.1 Company total recordable injury rate

Fig 4.9.1.1: Total recordable injury rate – constructionper million hours worked [Data from B-12]

0

2

4

6

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa0

2

4

6

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa



Company 2012

Company 2007–2011

Contractor 2012


The company and contractor results for 2012 construction performance are presented below.

Construction activities are predominately conducted by contractors therefore the work hours reported for contractors

are much greater than those reported for company employees. Refer to Appendix B for detailed information.


In 2012 the overall TRIR values for companies and contractors engaged in construction activities are 0.50 and 1.38 respectively; the overall average TRIR for construction activities is 1.32.

The TRIR in Europe and North America is high compared with the FSU and the Middle East for contractors.

4.9 Construction performance

Construction

All major construction, fabrication activities and also disassembly, removal and disposal (decommissioning) at the end of the facility life. Includes construction of process plant, yard construction of structures, offshore installation, hook-up and commissioning, and removal of redundant process facilities.

4-12


©OGP

911 million work hours were used in this analysis, of which company activities represent 6% and contractor activities represent 94%. This represents an increase of 144 million work hours compared with 2011, with the same of ratio company to contractor activities.

In 2012 the overall LTIF values for companies and contractors engaged in construction activities are 0.21 and 0.24 respectively; the overall average LTIF for construction activities is 0.24.

The LTIF is high for contractors employed in construction activities in Europe and South America compared with other regions.

Fig 4.9.2.1: Lost time injury frequency – constructionper million hours worked [Data from B-13]

0

2

4

6

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa0

2

4

6

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa



Company 2012

Company 2007–2011

Contractor 2012


4.9.2 Construction lost time injury frequency

4-13


© OGP

4.10.1 Unspecified total recordable injury rate

Fig 4.10.1.1: Total recordable injury rate – unspecifiedper million hours worked [Data from B-13]

0

2

4

6

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa0

2

4

6

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa



Company 2012

Company 2007–2011

Contractor 2012


789 million work hours were used in this analysis of which company activities represent 32% and contractor activities represent 68%. This represents an increase of 100 million work hours over 2011, with a similar ratio of company to contractor activities (34% to 66% respectively).

In 2012 the overall TRIR values for companies and contractors engaged in activities where the work function was not specified are 0.73 and 1.43 respectively; the overall average TRIR for unspecified activities is 1.21.

4.10 Unspecifed performance

Unspecified

Unspecified is used for the entry of data associated with office personnel who’s work hours and incident data cannot be reasonably assigned to the administrative support of one of the function groupings of exploration, drilling, production or construction. Corporate overhead support function personnel such as finance or human resources staff may be examples where work hours cannot be specifically assigned to a particular function.

4-14


©OGP

802 million work hours were used in this analysis of which company activities represent 32% and contractor activities represent 68%. This represents an increase of 109 million work hours over 2011, with a similar ratio of company to contractor activities (34% to 66% respectively).

In 2012 the overall LTIF values for companies and contractors engaged in activities where the work function was not specified are 0.33 and 0.52 respectively; the overall average LTIF for unspecified activities is 0.46.

Reported under the ‘unspecified’ function in 2012 were:• 7 company and 31 contractor fatalities • 79 company and 254 contractor lost work day cases

Reported under the ‘unspecified’ function from 2007 to 2011 were:

• 36 company and 77 contractor fatalities • 468 company and 1,122 contractor lost work day cases

Fig 4.10.2.1: Lost time injury frequency – unspecifiedper million hours worked [Data from B-13]

0

2

4

6

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa0

2

4

6

South America

North America

Middle East


Africa



Company 2012

Company 2007–2011

Contractor 2012


4.10.2 Unspecified lost time injury frequency

5-1


© OGP

5. Results by company

This section compares the safety performance of individual companies with each other and with their performance in previous years.

5.1 Overall company results

For reasons of anonymity each of the 48 companies that has contributed relevant data and is to be included in this analysis has been allocated a unique code letter (A to VV). These codes change every year in line with LTIF performance. One company was excluded from this analysis as they did not report contractor data. One company did

not report MTC so their data could not be included in the TRIR analysis, and to protect their anonymity their company/contractor results are not shown on the LTIF and FAR graphs but their data have been included within the overall average figures.

5.1.1 Fatal accident rate by company

In the figure below the FAR is presented for those companies that, with their contractors, reported more than 50 million hours worked. 20 companies met this criterion in 2012, compared with 18 in 2011. Companies are shown in rank order of company-with-contractor FAR.

• Ten of the 20 companies with their contractors performed below the overall average for companies with contractors reporting more than 50 million hours worked (1.40).

• The range in 2012 was between 0 and 5.15 fatalities per 100 million hours worked.

• 17 of the 20 companies suffered one or more fatalities.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6 Company with contractorsFatality in 2012

Average company with contractors 1.40

Top quartile

DAASLLMDDQQKKIIHHLOOSSFFJJPPOCCEGG

Fig 5.1.1.1: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors, joint hours >50 million – fatal accident rateper 100 million hours worked [Data page B-14]

5-2


©OGP

Fig 5.1.2.1: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors – total recordable injury rateper million hours worked [Data page B-14]

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Company only

Top quartile

Average companies with contractors 1.74

Company with contractors

VVTTSSUUHHOOEEPPGGQQDDWKKFFCCIIAAYLLKNNLBBJJRRPCVROJTSBGMZUDNFHIEXQMM

Fatality in 2012

5.1.2 Total recordable injury rate

The TRIR for companies together with their contractors is presented below. Data are only included where Medical Treatment Cases (MTC) are reported. Data from 47 of the 49 participating companies qualified for inclusion.

The TRIR for company alone is plotted alongside the TRIR for company and contractors jointly. The incidence of a fatality in either company or contractor operations is also indicated. Details of results are tabulated in Appendix B.

• 20 of the 47 companies presented below suffered one or more fatality.

• In 5 instances, contractors achieved a lower TRIR than the companies they were employed by.

5-3


© OGP

Fig 5.1.2.2: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors, joint hours >50 million – total recordable injury rateper million hours worked

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Company only


SSHHOOGGPPQQDDKKFFCCIIAALLLJJOSMDE


Top quartileFatality in 2012

In the figure below the TRIR is presented for those companies that, with their contractors, reported more than 50 million hours worked. 20 companies met this criterion in 2012, compared with 18 in 2011. Companies are shown in rank order of the company-with-contractor TRIR.

• 12 of the 20 companies with their contractors performed below the overall average for companies with contractors reporting more than 50 million hours worked (1.53).

• The range in 2012 was between 0.33 and 4.17 injuries per million hours worked.

• 17 of the 20 companies suffered one or more fatalities.

5-4


©OGP

Fig 5.1.2.3: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors, joint hours <50 million – total recordable injury rateper million hours worked

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Company only


TTVVUUEEWYKNNBBRRPCVRJTBGZUNFIHXQMM



The remaining 27 companies which, with their contractors, reported less than 50 million hours worked are presented below in rank order of the company-with-contractor TRIR.

• Eight of the 27 companies with their contractors performed below the overall average for smaller companies with contractors (1.94).

• The range in 2012 was between 0.00 and 4.88 injuries per million hours worked.

• Three of the 27 smaller companies suffered one or more fatalities.

5-5


© OGP

Fig 5.1.3.1: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors – lost time injury frequencyper million hours worked [Data page B-14]

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

Company only

Top quartile



VVUUTTSSRRQQPPOONNMMLLKKJJIIHHGGFFEEDDCCBBAAZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCB

Fatality in 2012

5.1.3 Lost time injury frequency

The figure shows, in rank order, the LTIF for companies together with their contractors. 48 of the 49 participating companies (A to VV) contributed both company and contractor data, although not always for every country in which operations were conducted. One company did not report medical treatment cases (MTC) so their data could not be included in the TRIR analysis, and to protect their anonymity their company/contractor results are not shown in the graphs but their data have been included within the overall average figures. The remaining 47 companies are therefore shown below.

The LTIF for the company alone is plotted alongside the LTIF for company and contractors jointly. The incidence of a fatality in either company or contractor operations is also indicated. Details of results are tabulated in Appendix B.

• 42 companies with their contractors delivered a LTIF of less than 1.

• 20 of the 47 companies presented below suffered one or more fatality.

• In 7 instances, contractors achieved a lower LTIF than the companies they were employed by.

5-6


©OGP

In the figure below the LTIF is presented for those companies that, with their contractors, reported more than 50 million hours worked. 20 companies met this criterion in 2012, compared with 18 in 2011. Companies are shown in rank order of the company-with-contractor LTIF.

• Eleven of the 20 companies with their contractors performed below the overall average for companies with contractors reporting more than 50 million hours worked (0.39).

• The range in 2012 was between 0.04 and 1.19 lost time injuries per million hours worked.

• Seventeen of the 20 companies suffered one or more fatalities.

Fig 5.1.3.2: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors, joint hours>50 million – lost time injury frequencyper million hours worked

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

Company only


SSQQPPOOLLKKJJIIHHGGFFDDCCAASOMLED



5-7


© OGP

The remaining 27 companies which, with their contractors, reported less than 50 million hours worked are presented below in rank order of the company-with-contractor LTIF.

• 23 of the 27 companies with their contractors performed below the overall average for smaller companies with contractors (1.03).

• The range in 2012 was between 0.00 and 1.62 lost time injuries per million hours worked.

• Three of the 27 smaller companies presented below suffered one or more fatalities.

Fig 5.1.3.3: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors, joint hours ≤ 50 million – lost time injury frequencyper million hours worked

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

VVUUTTRRNNMMEEBBZYXWVUTRQPNKJIHGFCB


Top quartile

Company only

Company with contractors Fatality in 2012

5-8


©OGP

Results of companies together with their contractors have been analysed by function to allow more in-depth benchmarking between companies. The TRIR indicator has been selected, and the ranked results are shown in the following charts. Only companies that provided data by function are included, and then only those companies

that reported more than 100,000 hours worked. Results against smaller numbers of hours would not have statistical significance. The company code letters are the same as used elsewhere in this section.

Exploration was the only function where the top quartile company with contractors shows a TRIR of zero.

5.2 Company results by function

Fig 5.2.1: Total recordable injury rate – explorationper million hours worked - company with contractors [Data page B-15]

0

2

4

6

8

10

12


ZYUTTPPOOMMHHBBAAGGDDJJBEEQQNMQLLLFFCCSDNNPOTVCRGHJI

Overall 2.14 (all companies with contractors)

Top quartile

Fig 5.2.2: Total recordable injury rate – drillingper million hours worked - company with contractors [Data page B-15]

0

2

4

6

8

10

12


RCQQSSKKOOEEHHCCDDGGBBNNTYNFFLLLRRPAAOBJJZSHMUVQDJXPPIKMMG

Overall 2.59(all companies with contractors)

12.9Top quartile

Fig 5.2.3: Total recordable injury rate – productionper million hours worked - company with contractors [Data page B-15]

0

2

4

6

8

10

12


SSUUHHEEWGGDDQQPPPRRFFOLLROOLYNNCCKAAGJMJJBBVSUITDHMMNZQB


Top quartile

Fig 5.2.4: Total recordable injury rate – constructionper million hours worked - company with contractors [Data page B-15]

0

2

4

6

8

10

12


VVUQNKHHPPSSUUOOLLGGPLAARRCCBBJDDJJQQYWFFVDTSHMMNNGOIXR


Top quartile

A-1


© OGP

Appendix A Database dimensions

Fig A-1: Hours workedmillions

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

work hours contractor

work hours company

2012201020052000199519901985

The database for the year 2012 covers 3,691,040,000 hours worked in the exploration and production sector of the oil and gas industry. The database is 7% larger than it was in 2011.

• 76% of the hours reported were associated with onshore activities, 24% with offshore activities.

• 107 countries are represented in the database, 9 more than in the 2011 database. Countries are listed in appendix D.

• 49 companies contributed data. All but one contributed contractor statistics, though not in every case for each country of operation.

• Of the 49 companies, 45 had contributed data in 2011. Since these 45 accounted for 100% of the database in 2011 and 97% of the database in 2012, comparison of the year 2012 results with those of 2011 is meaningful. 41 of the companies submitting 2012 data had also provided data in 2010.

• 22 of the companies contributed 90% of the hours. 7 companies between them covered 52% of the hours, and the largest contributor accounted for 12%.

• 21% of the reported work hours were related to company personnel and 79% were related to contractors.

A summary of the key elements of the database is shown in the table at the end of this section.

Hours reported (‘000s)

Onshore Offshore

Company 609,342 (16.5%) 150,258 (4.1%)

Contractor 2,178,961 (59.0%) 752,479 (20.4%)

A-2


©OGP

‘Unspecified’ is used for the entry of data associated with office personnel whose work hours and incident data cannot be reasonably assigned to the administrative support of one of the function groupings of exploration, drilling, production or construction. Corporate overhead support function personnel such as finance or human resources staff may be examples where work hours cannot be specifically assigned to a particular function. All other data that are not separated out by function are reported as ‘unspecified’.

Fig A-2: Exposure hours – by region, 2012 Fig A-3: Exposure hours – by region, 2011

Fig A-4: Exposure hours – by function, 2012 Fig A-5: Exposure hours – by function, 2011

South America 10%

North America 15%

Middle East 18%

FSU 10%

Europe 11%

Asia/Australasia 20%

Africa 16%

Exploration 2%

Unspecified 22%

Construction 25%

Production 33%

Drilling 18%

South America 12%

North America 11%

Middle East 20%

FSU 13%

Europe 10%

Asia/Australasia 18%

Africa 16%

Exploration 2%

Unspecified 20%

Construction 24%

Production 35%

Drilling 19%

A-3


© OGP

For calculations of FAR, fatal incidents per 100 million work hours, and LTIF:

• All hours in the database were used.

For calculations of TRIR:• Submissions without information on medical

treatment cases were filtered out, leaving a database of 3,651 million hours, 99% of the database.

• In 2011, the TRIR database was 3,428 million hours, 99% of the total database.

• The region where the smallest proportion of the database could be used was North America (93%). In all other regions 100% of the database was used.

For calculations of lost work day severity:• Submissions without information on days off work

were filtered out, leaving a database of 2,876 million hours, 78% of the total database.

• In 2011, this database was 2,728 million hours, 79% of the total database.

• North America and Europe have only 44% and 53% severity information respectively, whereas more than 97% of the Middle East database was useable.

For calculations of restricted work day severity:• Submissions without information on days assigned to

restricted activities were filtered out, leaving a database of 2,183 million hours, 59% of the total database.

• In 2011 this database was 2,041 million hours, 59% of the total database

More detailed information is shown in the tables below.

Proportion of database used in analysis

Percent. of useable data – regions

TRIR analyses

LWDC severity analyses

Restricted workday case severity analyses

Africa 100% 88% 65%

Asia/Australasia

100% 77% 73%

Europe 100% 53% 42%

FSU 100% 89% 24%

Middle East 100% 97% 75%

North America 93% 44% 33%

South America 100% 95% 84%

Percent. of useable data – overall

TRIR analyses



99% 78% 59%

Percent. of useable data – functions

TRIR analyses



Exploration 96% 90% 69%

Drilling 98% 84% 49%

Production 99% 75% 65%

Construction 99% 83% 64%

A-4


©OGP

B-1


© OGP

Appendix B Data tables

Summary of data

Region Type

Hours worked (‘000s)

No. fatalities

No. LWDCs

No. RWDCs No. MTCs FAR LTIF TRIR

Africa Company Onshore 92,966 0 9 13 22 0.00 0.10 0.47

Company Offshore 14,976 1 10 6 11 6.68 0.73 1.87

Contractor Onshore 388,076 12 92 90 170 3.09 0.27 0.94

Contractor Offshore 104,460 4 69 70 107 3.83 0.70 2.39

Sub Total 600,478 17 180 179 310 2.83 0.33 1.14

Asia/Australasia

Company Onshore 99,200 0 17 13 39 0.00 0.17 0.70




Sub Total 741,523 10 182 336 486 1.35 0.26 1.37

Europe Company Onshore 113,300 1 65 11 40 0.88 0.58 1.03




Sub Total 384,669 2 347 184 482 0.52 0.91 2.64

FSU Company Onshore 59,906 0 18 3 31 0.00 0.30 0.86




Sub Total 363,943 2 101 37 220 0.55 0.28 0.99

Middle East Company Onshore 83,147 3 35 12 55 3.61 0.46 1.13




Sub Total 666,915 13 148 106 422 1.95 0.24 1.02

North America Company Onshore 125,693 6 81 29 110 4.77 0.69 1.45




Sub Total 560,027 42 485 431 775 7.50 0.94 2.82

South America Company Onshore 35,130 0 11 16 13 0.00 0.31 1.14




Sub Total 373,485 2 256 352 530 0.54 0.69 3.05

Total Company Onshore 609,342 10 236 97 310 1.64 0.40 0.98


Contractor Onshore 2,178,961 70 736 986 1,854 3.21 0.37 1.64


Grand Total 3,691,040 88 1,699 1,625 3,225 2.38 0.48 1.74

B-2


©OGP

Section 1 Summary

Section 1 summary intentionally excluded.

Section 2 Overall results

Total recordable injury rate

Year Onshore Offshore Overall Company Contractor

2003 3.74 4.87 4.00 1.79 4.72

2004 3.17 6.36 3.94 3.71 4.00

2005 2.82 3.87 3.05 1.76 3.50

2006 2.68 3.66 2.92 1.85 3.24

2007 2.51 3.26 2.68 2.41 2.76

2008 1.75 3.09 2.08 1.49 2.23

2009 1.45 2.79 1.75 1.28 1.89

2010 1.41 2.45 1.68 1.19 1.81

2011 1.45 2.84 1.76 1.32 1.88

2012 1.49 2.53 1.74 1.12 1.90

Hours 2012 (‘000s) 2,766,911 884,470 3,651,381 747,901 2,903,480

Fatal accident rate

Year Onshore Offshore Overall Company Contractor Number of fatalities

2003 5.18 4.16 4.94 2.26 6.06 111

2004 5.00 6.02 5.24 2.82 6.18 120

2005 3.94 1.99 3.53 1.25 4.36 84

2006 4.64 1.58 3.92 2.04 4.54 115

2007 3.01 2.92 2.99 1.65 3.39 87

2008 3.38 2.25 3.12 2.81 3.20 103

2009 2.75 2.78 2.76 1.58 3.11 99

2010 2.62 3.16 2.76 3.17 2.64 94

2011 1.94 1.67 1.88 1.33 2.03 65

2012 2.87 0.89 2.38 1.58 2.59 88

Hours 2012 (‘000s) 2,788,303 902,737 3,691,040 759,600 2,931,440

Fatal incidents per 100 million work hours


2003 4.66 3.97 4.49 1.96 5.56

2004 4.32 4.55 4.32 2.82 4.90

2005 3.41 1.99 3.11 1.25 3.79

2006 4.10 1.58 3.51 1.91 4.04

2007 2.74 1.69 2.51 1.35 2.85

2008 2.71 1.72 2.48 2.53 2.47

2009 1.86 1.90 1.87 1.22 2.06

2010 1.70 1.69 1.70 1.10 1.86

2011 1.57 1.03 1.45 0.80 1.63

2012 1.58 0.89 1.41 0.79 1.57

Hours 2012 (‘000s) 2,788,303 902,737 3,691,040 759,600 2,931,440

B-3


© OGP

Fatalities by category, 2012

Category Number %

Assault or violent act 3 3.4

Caught in, under or between 16 18.2

Confined space 2 2.3

Cut, puncture, scrape 0 N/A

Explosions or burns 39 44.3

Exposure electrical 3 3.4

Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 0 N/A

Falls from height 3 3.4

Overexertion, strain 1 1.1

Pressure release 4 4.5

Slips and trips (at same height) 0 N/A

Struck by 14 15.9

Water related, drowning 1 1.1

Other 2 2.3

Lost work day cases by category, 2012

Category Number %

Assault or violent act 17 1.0

Caught in, under or between 352 20.7

Confined space 1 0.1

Cut, puncture, scrape 61 3.6

Explosions or burns 127 7.5

Exposure electrical 12 0.7

Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 34 2.0

Falls from height 158 9.3

Overexertion, strain 133 7.8

Pressure release 16 0.9

Slips and trips (at same height) 265 15.6

Struck by 408 24.0

Water related, drowning 3 0.2

Other 112 6.6

Fatalities by activity, 2012

Activity Number %

Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 14 15.9

Diving, subsea, ROV 0 N/A

Drilling, workover, well services 11 12.5

Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 2 2.3

Maintenance, inspection, testing 41 46.6

Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 0 N/A

Production operations 3 3.4

Seismic/survey operations 2 2.3

Transport – air 2 2.3

Transport – land 9 10.2

Transport – water, including marine activity 2 2.3

Unspecified – other 2 2.3

Lost work day cases by activity, 2012

Activity Number %

Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 168 9.9

Diving, subsea, ROV 10 0.6

Drilling, workover, well services 360 21.2

Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 133 7.8

Maintenance, inspection, testing 287 16.9

Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 131 7.7

Production operations 211 12.4

Seismic/survey operations 23 1.4

Transport – air 8 0.5

Transport – land 69 4.1

Transport – water, including marine activity 89 5.2

Unspecified – other 210 12.4

Lost time injury frequency


2003 1.13 1.27 1.16 0.79 1.32

2004 1.04 1.26 1.09 0.87 1.17

2005 0.92 1.12 0.97 0.83 1.02

2006 0.95 1.13 0.99 0.89 1.03

2007 0.62 0.82 0.66 0.54 0.70

2008 0.47 0.81 0.55 0.52 0.56

2009 0.38 0.70 0.45 0.44 0.46

2010 0.35 0.62 0.42 0.41 0.42

2011 0.34 0.74 0.43 0.42 0.43

2012 0.38 0.81 0.48 0.47 0.49

Hours 2012 (‘000s) 2,788,303 902,737 3,691,040 759,600 2,931,440

B-4


©OGP

Lost work day cases by category, 2012

Category Company Contractor Overall Onshore Offshore

Assault or violent act 2 15 17 14 3

Caught in, under or between 37 315 352 163 189

Confined space 0 1 1 0 1

Cut, puncture, scrape 7 54 61 37 24

Explosions or burns 31 96 127 114 13

Exposure electrical 0 12 12 9 3

Exposure noise, pressure, chemical, biological, vibration 5 29 34 23 11

Falls from height 35 123 158 90 68

Overexertion, strain 33 100 133 56 77

Pressure release 4 12 16 8 8

Slips and trips (at same height) 69 196 265 148 117

Struck by 70 338 408 223 185

Water related, drowning 1 2 3 1 2

Other 49 63 112 86 26

343 1,356 1,699 972 727

Lost work day cases by activity, 2012

Activity Company Contractor Overall Onshore Offshore

Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 4 164 168 113 55

Diving, subsea, ROV 1 9 10 1 9

Drilling, workover, well services 43 317 360 189 171

Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 11 122 133 52 81

Maintenance, inspection, testing 69 218 287 162 125

Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 46 85 131 94 37

Production operations 79 132 211 105 106

Seismic/survey operations 1 22 23 18 5

Transport – air 5 3 8 5 3

Transport – land 19 50 69 65 4

Transport – water, including marine activity 4 85 89 15 74

Unspecified – other 61 149 210 153 57

343 1,356 1,699 972 727

Lost work day case severity

Year Company Contractor Overall Onshore Offshore

2003 41.40 18.60 24.16 21.33 36.71

2004 21.01 24.85 23.79 23.42 25.10

2005 25.59 23.74 24.18 24.46 23.11

2006 20.59 26.22 24.85 24.66 25.48

2007 32.73 35.55 35.00 33.04 42.02

2008 35.21 34.58 34.72 32.05 41.01

2009 35.30 38.25 37.53 34.77 44.40

2010 35.43 46.02 43.90 39.39 52.56

2011 41.06 42.58 42.26 39.84 46.42

Ave ‘07-’11 35.66 38.86 38.17 35.20 45.26

2012 38.81 41.28 40.74 36.83 45.99

Hours 2012 (‘000s) 567,256 2,309,135 2,876,391 2,224,660 651,731

B-5


© OGP

Restricted work day case severity

Year Company Contractor Overall Onshore Offshore

2003 11.85 11.78 11.79 8.91 18.95

2004 13.75 11.20 11.44 10.98 12.90

2005 12.45 13.77 13.66 14.74 9.55

2006 11.78 11.07 11.15 10.33 13.01

2007 15.28 10.46 10.93 8.90 15.95

2008 16.08 13.39 13.72 13.34 14.35

2009 15.26 13.80 13.94 12.42 15.75

2010 14.72 13.78 13.88 13.59 14.35

2011 12.92 10.17 10.40 11.67 8.55

Ave ‘07-’11 14.80 11.98 12.25 11.74 13.10

2012 13.84 12.05 12.21 11.48 13.41

Hours 2012 (‘000s) 429,928 1,752,726 2,182,654 1,615,502 567,152

Section 3 Results by region

Fatalities

Region Fatalities 2012 (2011)

FAR 2012 (2011)

Fatal incidents 2012 (2011)

Africa 17 (7) 2.83 (1.25) 13 (7)

Asia/Australasia 10 (20) 1.35 (3.28) 10 (12)

Europe 2 (3) 0.52 (0.87) 2 (3)

FSU 2 (7) 0.55 (1.59) 2 (6)

Middle East 13 (12) 1.95 (1.74) 11 (9)

North America 42 (6) 7.5 (1.5) 12 (6)

South America 2 (10) 0.54 (2.42) 2 (7)

Fatal accident rate

Region 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008

Africa 2.83 1.25 3.38 2.21 4.40

Asia/Australasia 1.35 3.28 4.14 1.58 1.24

Europe 0.52 0.87 0.97 6.58 4.19

FSU 0.55 1.59 2.17 3.14 4.05

Middle East 1.95 1.74 1.63 2.16 2.40

North America 7.50 1.50 5.08 4.37 1.64

South America 0.54 2.42 1.57 2.37 5.17

All regions 2.38 1.88 2.76 2.76 3.12


YearAfrica

Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East

North America

South America All regions

2007 1.96 1.43 4.10 3.22 2.06 4.53 3.31 2.68

2008 2.18 1.34 3.89 1.22 0.83 4.25 3.15 2.09

2009 1.65 1.22 3.48 1.21 0.92 3.08 3.17 1.75

2010 1.40 1.30 3.05 1.08 0.98 2.89 2.76 1.68

2011 1.22 1.46 2.81 0.99 0.78 3.19 3.17 1.77

2012 1.14 1.37 2.64 0.99 1.02 2.82 3.05 1.74

B-6


©OGP

Total recordable injury rate – 5-year rolling average

YearAfrica


North America


2003 2.5 2.3 7.9 2.0 4.3 7.7 5.9 4.4

2004 3.1 2.3 7.5 2.1 3.8 7.3 5.7 4.3

2005 3.0 2.1 6.4 1.9 3.6 6.5 5.2 3.8

2006 3.0 1.9 6.0 1.9 3.3 5.7 4.5 3.4

2007 2.9 1.7 5.3 2.2 3.0 5.2 4.1 3.2

2008 2.8 1.6 4.7 2.1 1.9 4.9 3.8 2.8

2009 2.2 1.4 4.3 1.9 1.5 4.4 3.5 2.4

2010 2.0 1.4 3.9 1.8 1.3 4.0 3.2 2.2

2011 1.7 1.3 3.4 1.6 1.1 3.6 3.1 2.0

2012 1.5 1.3 3.1 1.1 0.9 3.2 3.1 1.8

Hours worked (‘000s)

YearAfrica


North America


2003 443,101 377,806 187,209 201,375 368,936 458,471 210,128 2,247,026

2004 453,714 364,929 191,992 364,741 370,625 242,906 301,546 2,290,453

2005 472,879 348,806 191,127 443,782 383,968 224,603 315,505 2,380,670

2006 473,646 473,100 282,856 451,036 447,657 302,632 506,047 2,936,974

2007 496,830 540,809 296,407 418,534 553,424 285,769 321,028 2,912,801

2008 499,818 562,677 310,237 444,106 835,031 304,076 348,223 3,304,168

2009 542,110 697,524 319,178 350,792 1,018,682 320,541 337,015 3,585,842

2010 562,121 725,171 308,870 461,827 676,337 295,339 381,479 3,411,144

2011 558,573 609,466 344,762 439,420 690,171 400,902 412,784 3,456,078

2012 600,478 741,523 384,669 363,943 666,915 560,027 373,485 3,691,040


Region 2012 2011 Hours 2012 (‘000s)

Africa 0.33 0.30 600,478

Asia/Australasia 0.26 0.30 741,523

Europe 0.91 1.08 384,669

FSU 0.28 0.31 363,943

Middle East 0.24 0.18 666,915

North America 0.94 0.59 560,027

South America 0.69 0.64 373,485

All regions 0.48 0.43 3,691,040

B-7


© OGP

Fatal accident rate – 5-year rolling average

YearAfrica


North America


2003 8.9 2.8 4.3 6.3 5.9 4.7 5.0 5.4

2004 8.3 2.6 3.5 6.8 6.1 5.0 4.6 5.4

2005 7.0 2.1 3.5 6.6 4.9 4.5 3.8 4.7

2006 6.6 1.8 3.5 6.3 4.3 4.0 3.9 4.4

2007 6.0 1.5 3.0 5.5 4.2 3.6 3.8 4.1

2008 5.1 1.4 3.5 5.2 3.6 2.8 3.9 3.7

2009 4.1 1.4 4.6 4.4 2.8 2.4 3.7 3.2

2010 3.8 2.1 4.0 3.7 2.5 3.1 3.3 3.1

2011 2.9 2.3 3.4 2.9 2.3 2.7 2.9 2.7

2012 2.8 2.3 2.5 2.3 2.0 4.4 2.4 2.6

Lost time injury frequency – 5-year rolling average

YearAfrica


North America


2003 1.0 0.6 2.3 0.8 1.6 1.4 2.5 1.4

2004 1.0 0.6 2.2 0.9 1.4 1.4 2.5 1.3

2005 0.8 0.5 2.0 0.8 1.2 1.2 2.3 1.2

2006 0.7 0.4 1.8 0.8 1.0 1.0 2.2 1.1

2007 0.7 0.4 1.7 0.8 0.9 0.9 2.0 1.0

2008 0.7 0.3 1.5 0.7 0.6 0.8 1.7 0.8

2009 0.6 0.3 1.5 0.6 0.4 0.7 1.4 0.7

2010 0.5 0.3 1.4 0.5 0.4 0.6 1.2 0.6

2011 0.5 0.3 1.2 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.8 0.5

2012 0.4 0.3 1.1 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.7 0.5


YearAfrica


North America


2007 22.16 21.98 37.68 32.06 20.56 37.3 58.76 35.00

2008 21.63 27.32 43.47 29.85 16.01 37.16 56.66 34.72

2009 23.08 31.77 42.26 32.55 20.37 38.92 68.87 37.53

2010 27.22 27.61 32.83 42.23 14.68 46.63 98.54 43.90

2011 27.63 26.74 44.50 46.44 12.31 31.29 71.60 42.26

Ave ‘07-’11 23.80 27.33 40.15 35.74 17.59 37.39 68.99 38.17

2012 35.94 24.23 38.06 41.42 26.21 36.66 69.53 40.74

Hours 2012 (‘000s) 529,148 574,634 204,661 323,773 644,401 244,083 355,691 2,876,391

B-8


©OGP

Region Country LTIF One or more fatalities in 2012

2012 2011 2010

Africa Morocco 4.67 0.00 0.00 noIvory Coast 3.33 0.00 0.00 noSierra Leone 2.78 n/a n/a noTunisia 1.61 1.89 1.61 noGhana 1.43 0.52 1.19 noTanzania 0.87 3.24 3.55 noMozambique 0.78 1.11 0.00 yesGabon 0.70 0.72 0.75 yesCongo – DR 0.63 0.64 0.56 noMauritiana 0.63 1.57 2.11 noCameroun 0.59 0.62 1.36 noLibya 0.54 0.52 0.48 noKenya 0.43 1.29 n/a noUganda 0.37 0.40 0.41 noCongo 0.34 0.37 0.06 yesAfrica average 0.33Equatorial Guinea 0.32 0.11 0.30 noEgypt 0.27 0.29 0.28 noAlgeria 0.24 0.19 0.88 noAngola 0.23 0.28 0.13 yesNigeria 0.15 0.16 0.23 yesSouth Africa 0.00 0.00 0.00 noMadagascar 0.00 0.00 0.00 noLiberia 0.00 n/a n/a no

Asia/Australasia

New Zealand 3.11 2.07 2.01 noAustralia 0.64 0.60 0.71 noVietnam 0.52 0.38 0.45 noMyanmar 0.46 0.86 0.39 noIndia 0.43 0.74 0.41 noPhilippenes 0.37 0.40 1.05 noSouth Korea 0.34 0.00 0.00 noMalaysia 0.27 0.25 0.20 yesChina 0.26 0.48 0.27 yesAsia/Australasia avg. 0.26Indonesia 0.16 0.17 0.12 yesPapua New Guinea 0.13 0.25 0.49 yesThailand 0.11 0.25 0.28 noPakistan 0.05 0.28 0.80 noSingapore 0.00 0.00 0.15 noJapan 0.00 1.50 0.00 no

Bangladesh 0.00 0.00 0.10 noBrunei 0.00 0.00 0.00 no

Region Country LTIF One or more fatalities in 2012

2012 2011 2010

Europe Poland 3.66 0.00 0.00 noHungary 1.76 2.44 1.17 noItaly 1.55 1.55 1.76 noCroatia 1.38 1.78 2.61 noDenmark 1.04 1.93 1.55 noNorway 0.98 1.27 1.24 noGermany 0.92 0.92 0.23 noEurope average 0.91UK 0.82 0.95 0.95 yesNetherlands 0.65 0.88 0.93 noSpain 0.64 2.00 2.70 noRomania 0.60 0.53 0.72 yesFrance 0.27 0.43 0.73 noIreland 0.00 0.53 0.39 noGreenland 0.00 4.27 1.04 no

FSU Ukraine 3.55 12.50 0.00 noKazakhstan 0.33 0.29 0.33 noTurkmenistan 0.32 0.46 0.27 noFSU average 0.28Russia 0.27 0.32 0.31 yesAzerbaijan 0.11 0.17 0.04 no

Middle EastTurkey 2.61 0.92 0.00 noIraq 1.15 1.00 1.77 yesJordan 0.75 0.00 0.00 noYemen 0.43 0.34 0.46 yesQatar 0.26 0.22 0.16 yesMiddle East average 0.24UAE 0.16 0.06 0.31 yesKuwait 0.12 0.14 0.30 yesOman 0.00 0.00 0.00 noSyria 0.00 0.33 0.41 noIran 0.00 0.00 0.98 no

North America

Mexico 6.98 2.18 0.00 yesCuba 1.80 0.00 0.00 noNorth America avg. 0.94USA 0.56 0.65 0.49 yesCanada 0.35 0.39 0.46 no

South America

Brazil 0.78 0.66 0.58 yesBolivia 0.76 0.19 0.23 noSouth America avg 0.69Trinidad & Tobago 0.63 0.50 0.55 noPeru 0.62 1.53 0.75 noColombia 0.35 1.61 0.74 noVenezuela 0.21 0.69 0.37 noEcuador 0.16 0.63 0.31 noArgentina 0.15 0.46 0.73 noUruguay 0.00 n/a n/a noSurinam 0.00 0.00 0.00 noFrench Guiana 0.00 0.00 0.00 no

Lost time injury frequency by country

B-9


© OGP

Section 4 Results by function

Fatal accident rate – 3-year rolling average

Year Exploration Drilling Production Construction Unspecified

2007 8.01 4.17 3.20 3.19

2008 6.11 4.49 3.60 2.41 3.13

2009 2.88 3.74 4.06 1.99 2.49

2010 2.35 5.23 3.70 1.51 2.50

2011 1.37 4.04 3.14 1.51 1.92

2012 2.06 3.11 1.97 1.72 2.96

Exposure hours by function (‘000s)

2012 2011 2010 2009 2008

Exploration 84,947 74,306 83,397 61,435 67,962

Drilling 672,728 642,462 518,505 348,515 298,855

Production 1,220,365 1,208,473 965,145 948,771 1,001,303

Construction 911,045 839,178 869,540 1,076,322 906,142

Unspecified 801,955 691,659 974,557 1,150,799 1,029,906

All functions 3,691,040 3,456,078 3,411,144 3,585,842 3,304,168

Fatal incidents and fatalities by function (‘000s)

2012 2011

Fatal incidents Fatalities Fatal incidents Fatalities

Exploration 4 4 0 0

Drilling 11 12 7 12

Production 12 15 22 32

Construction 17 19 16 16

Unspecified 8 38 5 5

All functions 52 88 50 65

Fatal accident rate


2007 2.55 2.43 3.14 3.00 3.03

2008 2.94 4.02 4.19 1.88 2.91

2009 3.26 4.59 4.85 1.49 1.65

2010 1.20 6.36 2.07 1.15 3.08

2011 0.00 1.87 2.65 1.91 0.72

2012 4.71 1.78 1.23 2.09 4.74

Note: the method of calculating rolling averages changed with the publication of 2010 data. Historic figures presented above have been recalculated accordingly.

Note: the method of calculating FAR on a functional basis has changed with the publication of 2010 data to use the incident function instead of the function of the victim.Historic figures presented above have been recalculated acordingly.

B-10


©OGP

Lost time injury frequency – 3-year rolling average


2007 0.91 1.53 1.05 0.69

2008 0.83 1.46 0.89 0.35 0.59

2009 0.69 1.21 0.72 0.27 0.42

2010 0.55 1.01 0.63 0.23 0.34

2011 0.47 0.81 0.57 0.22 0.29

2012 0.52 0.78 0.53 0.23 0.31


Year Exploration Drilling Production Construction Unspecified Other Overall

2003 1.19 1.73 1.11 1.93 0.64 1.16

2004 0.61 1.71 1.23 1.12 0.77 1.09

2005 1.12 1.53 1.22 0.69 0.76 0.97

2006 0.91 1.73 1.16 0.50 0.84 0.99

2007 0.79 1.31 0.82 0.38 0.49 0.66

2008 0.78 1.33 0.70 0.27 0.41 0.55

2009 0.47 1.02 0.64 0.21 0.36 0.45

2010 0.42 0.82 0.54 0.24 0.25 0.42

2011 0.53 0.70 0.55 0.21 0.22 0.43

2012 0.60 0.82 0.49 0.24 0.46 0.48

Hours 2012 (‘000s) 84,947 672,728 1,220,365 911,045 801,955 3,691,040


Year Exploration Drilling Production Construction Unspecified All functions

2007 25.6 40.6 37.9 24.2 30.7 35.1

2008 37.6 42.2 30.2 26.9 37.6 34.7

2009 45.5 44.3 38.4 34.7 29.9 37.5

2010 28.7 55.8 49.8 27.3 22.6 43.9

2011 42.4 51.8 40.4 36.4 22.8 42.3

Ave ‘07-’11 34.0 47.1 38.7 29.8 30.7 38.2

2012 37.6 50.4 39.6 36.8 26.2 40.7

Hours 2012 (‘000s) 76,224 571,216 924,049 757,977 545,271 2,874,737

Note: the method of calculating rolling averages changed with the publication of 2010 data. Historic figures presented above have been recalculated accordingly.



2007 2.66 5.34 3.03 1.62 2.23

2008 3.81 4.63 2.64 1.00 1.72

2009 2.31 3.81 2.32 0.78 1.53

2010 2.30 2.94 2.14 0.99 1.13

2011 2.70 2.84 2.05 1.13 0.95

2012 2.14 2.59 1.92 1.32 1.21

B-11


© OGP

Exploration – TRIR for company & contractor by region

Company Contractor Company hours worked Contractor hours worked

Region 2012 2007–2011 2012 2007–2011 2012 (‘000s) 2012 (‘000s)

Africa 0.00 1.84 1.69 2.72 2,720 20,160

Asia/Australasia 0.19 0.48 3.10 2.37 5,215 16,749

Europe 1.72 0.58 2.44 2.79 5,233 4,922

FSU 0.00 1.03 0.85 2.32 214 1,181

Middle East 0.00 0.80 5.28 2.11 1,842 4,544

North America 0.78 0.96 3.89 4.87 5,136 5,397

South America 0.52 3.11 2.42 5.78 1,935 6,603

All regions 0.67 1.07 2.69 3.32 22,295 59,556

Exploration – LTIF for company & contractor by region


Region 2012 2007–2011 2012 2007–2011 2012 (‘000s) 2012 (‘000s)

Africa 0.00 0.57 0.50 0.58 2,720 20,160


Europe 1.15 0.29 1.42 1.65 5,233 4,922

FSU 0.00 0.95 0.00 1.39 214 1,181

Middle East 2.62 0.26 2.20 0.53 1,912 4,544

North America 0.00 0.16 0.37 0.51 5,340 8,147

South America 0.00 0.31 0.45 1.00 1,935 6,603

All regions 0.53 0.29 0.63 0.70 22,569 62,378

Drilling – TRIR for company & contractor by region


Region 2012 2007–2011 2012 2007–2011 2012 (‘000s) 2012 (‘000s)

Africa 0.52 1.74 2.38 3.93 5,774 70,136


Europe 1.73 1.97 5.09 5.49 20,194 36,714

FSU 1.36 1.89 1.09 1.49 28,764 168,436

Middle East 1.14 1.60 3.09 3.98 5,258 38,489

North America 0.38 0.64 3.90 5.86 7,969 97,122

South America 1.38 1.55 4.68 4.81 10,847 88,756

All regions 1.23 1.57 2.79 3.92 86,420 576,142

Drilling – LTIF for company & contractor by region


Region 2012 2007–2011 2012 2007–2011 2012 (‘000s) 2012 (‘000s)

Africa 0.17 0.34 0.78 1.25 5,774 70,136


Europe 0.89 1.22 2.07 2.06 20,194 36,714

FSU 0.31 0.58 0.27 0.37 28,764 168,436

Middle East 1.30 0.76 0.57 0.90 5,374 38,489

North America 3.73 0.04 1.04 0.88 11,789 103,352

South America 0.55 0.45 1.16 1.27 10,847 88,756

All regions 0.94 0.60 0.80 1.01 90,356 582,372

B-12


©OGP

Construction – TRIR for company & contractor by region


Region 2012 2007–2011 2012 2007–2011 2012 (‘000s) 2012 (‘000s)

Africa 0.20 1.18 1.32 1.68 9,781 80,578


Europe 0.29 0.61 2.33 4.23 6,890 40,765

FSU 0.41 0.66 1.22 1.05 4,936 60,597

Middle East 0.67 0.57 0.64 0.53 7,496 360,640

North America 0.73 0.68 2.61 4.13 8,261 53,320

South America 0.77 0.94 3.66 2.60 1,294 19,970

All regions 0.50 0.58 1.38 1.09 55,847 851,592

Production – LTIF for company & contractor by region


Region 2012 2007–2011 2012 2007–2011 2012 (‘000s) 2012 (‘000s)

Africa 0.26 0.50 0.29 0.53 45,454 178,481


Europe 0.82 0.88 1.22 1.69 70,399 98,560

FSU 0.29 0.51 0.29 0.41 23,844 40,743

Middle East 0.43 0.83 0.27 0.43 41,480 121,076

North America 0.50 0.72 0.70 0.75 50,091 109,588

South America 0.53 0.54 0.61 0.66 44,948 173,124

All regions 0.48 0.65 0.49 0.64 332,129 888,236

Production – TRIR for company & contractor by region


Region 2012 2007–2011 2012 2007–2011 2012 (‘000s) 2012 (‘000s)

Africa 0.86 1.98 1.02 1.68 45,454 178,481


Europe 1.78 2.28 4.40 5.40 70,399 98,560

FSU 0.38 1.94 0.88 1.86 23,428 40,743

Middle East 1.46 1.78 1.10 1.64 41,155 121,076

North America 2.42 2.99 3.59 4.54 47,136 104,425

South America 1.89 1.84 2.92 2.89 44,948 173,124

All regions 1.53 2.02 2.06 2.57 328,193 882,597

Construction – LTIF for company & contractor by region


Region 2012 2007–2011 2012 2007–2011 2012 (‘000s) 2012 (‘000s)

Africa 0.00 0.10 0.30 0.39 9,781 80,578


Europe 0.29 0.11 0.69 1.40 6,890 40,765

FSU 0.00 0.28 0.38 0.36 4,936 60,597

Middle East 0.26 0.15 0.10 0.13 7,711 360,640

North America 0.12 0.05 0.59 0.45 8,365 55,976

South America 0.00 0.51 0.70 1.02 1,294 19,970

All regions 0.21 0.13 0.24 0.26 56,192 854,853

B-13


© OGP

Unspecified – TRIR for company & contractor by region


Region 2012 2007–2011 2012 2007–2011 2012 (‘000s) 2012 (‘000s)

Africa 0.63 0.61 0.87 1.08 44,210 143,181


Europe 0.61 1.36 1.48 3.26 39,258 61,296

FSU 0.50 2.79 0.34 1.20 12,030 23,198

Middle East 0.97 0.67 1.31 1.92 36,103 49,586

North America 1.05 1.13 2.86 3.76 67,877 126,776

South America 0.23 0.74 1.51 1.60 8,844 17,164

All regions 0.73 1.20 1.43 1.69 255,146 533,593

Unspecified – LTIF for company & contractor by region


Region 2012 2007–2011 2012 2007–2011 2012 (‘000s) 2012 (‘000s)

Africa 0.16 0.16 0.26 0.25 44,213 143,181


Europe 0.23 0.64 0.41 1.21 39,696 61,296

FSU 0.25 0.38 0.13 0.34 12,030 23,198

Middle East 0.25 0.23 0.38 0.41 36,103 49,586

North America 0.75 0.25 1.35 0.54 70,603 136,776

South America 0.11 0.17 0.12 0.40 8,844 17,164

All regions 0.33 0.33 0.52 0.37 258,354 543,601

B-14


©OGP

Section 5 Results by company

Company code

Company & Contractor FAR

Company & Contractor TRIR

Company only TRIR

Company & Contractor LTIF

Company only LTIF

B 0 3.25 3.81 1.62 1.27

C 0 2.47 3.81 1.23 0

D 0 3.83 2.56 1.19 0.99

E 3.17 4.17 2.21 1.11 0.86

F 0 4.12 2.55 1.03 0.71

G 11.31 3.28 2.35 0.99 0.78

H 0 4.14 2.82 0.94 1.10

I 0 4.14 2.10 0.92 1.05

J 0 2.98 0.61 0.85 0.24

K 0 1.79 1.09 0.82 0.55

L 1.40 1.88 1.22 0.80 0.72

M 0.73 3.30 1.94 0.79 0.63

N 0 3.86 1.32 0.75 0.59

O 2.25 2.84 0.47 0.71 0.26

P 0 2.16 0.68 0.70 0.34

Q 0 4.45 1.41 0.70 0

R 0 2.77 2.00 0.69 0.67

S 0 3.02 1.38 0.62 0.23

T 3.37 3.00 0.35 0.61 0.17

U 0 3.42 1.08 0.59 0

V 0 2.64 1.58 0.54 0

W 0 1.03 1.04 0.51 1.04

X 0 4.40 0 0.49 0

Overall 2.38 1.74 1.12 0.48 0.47

Y 6.26 1.56 1.16 0.44 0

Z 0 3.39 0 0.42 0

AA 0 1.52 1.50 0.41 0.56

BB 0 1.95 0.52 0.41 0.26

CC 2.59 1.41 0.53 0.41 0.15

DD 0.83 0.97 0.54 0.39 0.28

EE 0 0.76 0 0.38 0

FF 1.69 1.40 0.78 0.34 0.33

GG 5.15 0.88 0.63 0.34 0.33

HH 1.37 0.55 0.15 0.32 0.07

II 1.37 1.48 0.50 0.31 0.07

JJ 1.96 2.07 1.57 0.29 0.30

KK 1.16 1.19 1.38 0.27 0.30

LL 0.65 1.60 0.70 0.27 0.10

MM 0 4.88 3.72 0.21 0.62

NN 0 1.87 1.84 0.19 0.26

OO 1.40 0.73 0.56 0.15 0

PP 2.25 0.88 2.14 0.13 0.29

QQ 1.16 0.96 0.71 0.12 0.05

RR 0 2.08 0 0.12 0

SS 1.41 0.33 0.15 0.04 0.14

TT 0 0 0 0 0

UU 0 0.34 0.29 0 0

VV 0 0 0 0 0

B-15


© OGP

Total recordable injury rate by function

Exploration Drilling Production Construction

Company code

Company & Contractor

Company code


Company code


Company code


I 10.97 G 12.9 B 9.07 R 9.90

J 10.28 MM 8.23 Q 5.97 X 8.67

H 8.33 K 7.45 Z 5.91 I 5.17

G 7.68 I 7.27 N 5.39 O 4.95

R 6.49 PP 6.83 MM 5.02 G 3.94

C 6.14 X 6.09 H 4.73 NN 3.89

V 5.81 J 4.96 D 4.48 MM 3.81

T 5.30 D 4.86 T 4.36 H 3.63

O 4.02 Q 4.82 I 3.36 S 3.63

P 3.89 V 4.68 U 3.36 T 3.58

NN 2.89 U 4.66 S 3.31 D 2.32

D 2.62 M 4.62 V 3.28 V 2.15

S 2.47 H 4.08 BB 2.92 FF 1.97

CC 2.39 S 3.96 JJ 2.82 W 1.88

Overall 2.14 Z 3.72 M 2.80 Y 1.84

FF 1.95 JJ 3.61 J 2.63 QQ 1.70

LL 1.81 B 3.55 G 2.25 JJ 1.38

L 1.69 O 3.47 AA 2.20 DD 1.36

Q 1.64 AA 3.45 K 2.20 Overall 1.32

M 1.33 P 3.25 Overall 1.92 J 1.28

N 1.30 RR 3.23 CC 1.86 BB 1.20

QQ 1.14 L 2.91 NN 1.85 CC 1.17

EE 1.12 LL 2.91 Y 1.76 RR 1.00

B 1.07 FF 2.75 L 1.74 AA 0.95

JJ 0.53 Overall 2.59 OO 1.48 L 0.90

DD 0.44 N 2.57 R 1.47 P 0.87

GG 0.26 Y 2.54 LL 1.39 GG 0.73

AA 0 T 2.53 O 1.37 LL 0.60

BB 0 NN 2.47 FF 1.24 OO 0.59

HH 0 BB 2.24 RR 1.19 UU 0.54

MM 0 GG 2.20 P 1.14 SS 0.40

OO 0 DD 2.18 PP 1.06 PP 0.26

PP 0 CC 1.98 QQ 0.90 HH 0

TT 0 HH 1.82 DD 0.75 K 0

U 0 EE 1.34 GG 0.66 N 0

Y 0 OO 1.30 W 0.62 Q 0

Z 0 KK 1.19 EE 0.49 U 0

SS 1.15 HH 0.41 VV 0

QQ 0.90 UU 0.28

C 0.83 SS 0.10

R 0

B-16


©OGP

Database dimensions (Appendix A)

Total exposure hours

Hours worked (millions)

Year Overall Company Contractor

1985 656 410 245

1986 544 306 238

1987 602 356 247

1988 616 364 253

1989 656 331 325

1990 721 332 389

1991 941 441 499

1992 944 431 513

1993 919 410 509

1994 872 397 475

1995 841 356 485

1996 912 360 551

1997 1,161 389 772

1998 1,131 386 746

1999 1,197 395 802

2000 1,634 572 1062

2001 1,977 633 1,344

2002 2,121 636 1,484

2003 2,247 664 1,583

2004 2,290 639 1,652

2005 2,381 639 1,741

2006 2,937 734 2,203

2007 2,913 668 2,245

2008 3,304 712 2,592

2009 3,586 822 2,764

2010 3,411 726 2,685

2011 3,456 753 2,703

2012 3,691 760 2,931

Exposure hours by region (‘000s)

2012 2011

Africa 600,478 558,573

Asia/Australasia 741,523 609,466

Europe 384,669 344,762

FSU 363,943 439,420

Middle East 666,915 690,171

North America 560,027 400,902

South America 373,485 412,784

All regions 3,691,040 3,456,078

Exposure hours by function (‘000s)

2012 2011

Exploration 84,947 74,306

Drilling 672,728 642,462

Production 1,220,365 1,208,473

Construction 911,045 839,178

Unspecified 801,955 691,659

All functions 3,691,040 3,456,078

C-1


© OGP

Appendix C Contributing companies

The table below shows the size of the database in thousands of hours worked for each contributing company and whether reported data include information on contractor statistics, breakdown by function, medical treatment cases, restricted work day cases, days lost following lost work day and restricted work day cases. All company submissions include data on numbers of fatalities and lost work day cases.

Company Hours (‘000)

Contractor data

Data by function

MTCs RWDCs LWDC days

RWDC days

ADDAX 15,987 yes yes yes yes yes yesADNOC 214,000 yes yes yes yes yes yesAnadarko 63,063 yes no yes yes partly partlyBG Group 89,085 yes yes yes yes yes yesBHP 9,727 yes yes mostly mostly mostly mostlyBP 154,575 yes yes yes yes no noCairn Energy 346 yes yes yes yes yes yesChevron 431,173 yes yes yes yes yes yesCNOOC 73,128 yes yes yes yes yes yesConocoPhillips 145,946 yes no yes yes no noDolphin Energy 8,909 yes yes yes yes yes yesDONG E&P 2,361 yes yes yes yes yes yesE.on 2,044 yes yes mostly mostly partly partlyEni 240,395 yes yes yes yes yes noExxonMobil 254,611 yes yes yes yes no noGDF Suez E&P International 6,792 yes no mostly mostly mostly mostlyHess Corporation 44,644 yes yes yes yes yes yesINPEX 2,892 yes yes yes yes yes yesKosmos 1,622 yes yes yes yes yes yesKuwait Oil Company 133,534 yes yes yes yes yes noMaersk Oil 22,775 yes yes yes yes no noMarathon 30,712 yes yes yes yes no noMOL 15,698 no yes mostly partly yes partlyNCOC 4,122 yes yes yes yes yes noNexen Inc 30,456 yes yes yes yes yes mostlyOil Search 12,877 yes yes yes yes yes yesOMV 71,248 yes yes yes yes yes yesPan American Energy 17,270 yes yes yes yes yes noPemex 36,608 yes yes no no yes noPerenco 35,365 yes yes yes yes yes yesPetrobras 273,294 yes yes yes yes yes yesPetronas Carigali Sdn Bhd 97,119 yes yes mostly mostly mostly mostlyPremier Oil 6,130 yes yes yes yes no noPTTEP 32,074 yes yes yes yes yes yesQatar Petroleum 131,814 yes yes yes yes yes yesRasgas 70,686 yes yes mostly mostly partly partlyRepsol 29,709 yes yes yes yes yes noRWE Dea AG 5,542 yes yes yes yes yes noSASOL 5,233 yes yes yes no yes noShell Companies 296,661 yes yes yes yes yes yesStatoil 93,366 yes yes yes yes no noSuncor 4,717 yes yes yes yes yes yesTalisman Energy 52,037 yes yes yes yes partly noTNK-BP 171,788 yes yes yes partly yes noTotal 192,973 yes yes yes yes yes yesTullow Oil 18,557 yes yes mostly mostly mostly mostlyWintershall 8,546 yes yes yes yes yes yesWoodside 19,105 yes yes yes yes yes yesYemen LNG 9,724 yes yes yes yes yes no

Note: a data row is a single entry for a company for one country and location (one of company onshore, company offshore, contractor onshore, contractor offshore), e.g. Acompany, UK, company offshore.

yes = reported for all data rowsmostly = reported for more than 50% of data rowspartly = reported for less than 50% of data rowsno - not reported at all

C-2


©OGP

D-1


© OGP

Appendix D Countries represented

No. reporting HoursCountry companies (‘000)Africa

Algeria 11 29,140Angola 8 77,962Cameroun 3 8,487Chad 1 13,423Congo 3 34,841Congo (Democratic Republic of) 2 4,726Egypt 8 59,340Equatorial Guinea 4 9,352Ethiopia 1 1,555Gabon 6 34,444Ghana 5 8,382Ivory Coast 2 600Kenya 3 4,641Liberia 2 191Libya 14 18,639Madagascar 3 488Mauritiana 4 1,600Morocco 4 214Mozambique 5 15,290Namibia 1 3Nigeria 9 254,700Senegal 1 6Sierra Leone 2 360South Africa 3 399Sudan 1 49Tanzania 3 3,460Tongo 1 398Tunisia 6 12,443Uganda 2 5,345

Asia/Australasia

Australia 15 101,211Bangladesh 2 10,062Brunei 2 1,461Cambodia 3 42China 11 96,516India 3 4,624Indonesia 18 210,745Japan 3 1,359Malaysia 10 132,907Myanmar 4 8,620Nepal 1 6New Zealand 3 644Pakistan 7 20,029Papua New Guinea 3 83,693Philippines 2 5,380Singapore 4 517South Korea 4 5,851Taiwan 1 8Thailand 7 53,988Timor Leste 1 7Vietnam 7 3,853

Europe

Austria 1 2,771Croatia 2 9,431Denmark 5 11,512Faroe Islands 1 273France 7 14,643Germany 5 10,873

No. reporting HoursCountry companies (‘000)Europe (continued)

Greenland 3 587Hungary 2 5,123Ireland 2 1,900Italy 4 14,856Latvia 1 1Monaco 1 17Netherlands 8 20,135Norway 21 119,060Poland 8 1,638Portugal 1 71Romania 2 49,841Spain 3 1,555Switzerland 1 475UK 27 119,907

FSU

Azerbaijan 5 28,465Kazakhstan 10 135,437Russia 14 189,509Turkmenistan 6 9,359Ukraine 3 282Uzbekistan 1 891

Middle East

Bahrain 1 106Iran 5 1,269Iraq 13 24,368Israel 1 9Jordan 3 1,340Kuwait 5 152,034Oman 4 4,141Qatar 9 238,442Saudi Arabia 1 97Syria 2 99Turkey 3 2,297UAE 11 219,243Yemen 6 23,470

North America

Canada 11 106,569Cuba 2 556Mexico 5 36,981USA 20 415,921

South America

Argentina 5 26,219Bolivia 3 9,271Brazil 13 290,759Chile 1 159Colombia 8 8,533Ecuador 2 6,114French Guiana 2 1,107Guatamala 1 2,204Guyana 1 2Peru 4 12,958Surinam 3 175Trinidad & Tobago 6 11,135Uruguay 2 91Venezuela 7 4,758

The tabulation shows the breakdown of reported hours worked in regions and countries. Also shown is the number of companies reporting data in each country. The table does not necessarily show all hours worked in the exploration & production sectors of the oil & gas industry in each country.

D-2


©OGP

E-1


© OGP

Assault and violent act (as an incident/ event category)

Intentional attempt, threat or act of bodily injury by a person or person(s) or by violent harmful actions of unknown intent, includes intentional acts of damage to property.

Caught in, under or between (as an incident/event category)

Injury where injured person is crushed or similarly injured between machinery moving parts or other objects, caught between rolling tubulars or objects being moved, crushed between a ship and a dock, or similar incidents. Also includes vehicle incidents involving a rollover.

Company employee

Any person employed by and on the payroll of the reporting Company, including corporate and management personnel specifically involved in E&P. Persons employed under short-service contracts are included as Company employees provided they are paid directly by the Company.

Confined space (as an incident/ event category)

Spaces that are considered “confined” because their configurations hinder the activities of employee who must enter, work in, and exit them. Confined spaces include, but are not limited to underground vaults, tanks, storage bins, manholes, pits, silos, process vessels and pipelines.

Construction (as a work function)

Major construction, fabrication activities and also disassembly, removal and disposal (decommissioning) at the end of the facility life. Includes construction of process plant, yard construction of structures, offshore installation, hook-up and commissioning, and removal of redundant process facilities.

Construction, commissioning, decommissioning (as a type of activity)

Activities involving the construction, fabrication and installation of equipment, facilities or plant, testing activities to verify design objectives or specification, and also disassembly, removal and disposal (decommissioning) at the end of the facility life.

Contractor

A ‘Contractor’ is defined as an individual or organisation performing work for the reporting company, following verbal or written agreement. ‘Sub-contractor’ is synonymous with ‘Contractor’.

Contractor employee

Any person employed by a Contractor or Contractor’s Sub-Contractor(s) who is directly involved in execution of prescribed work under a contract with the reporting Company.

Cut, puncture, scrape (as an incident/ event category)

Abrasions, scratches and wounds that penetrate the skin.

Diving operations

The personnel, equipment and management systems to support a person who dives. A person ‘Dives’ if he enters water or any other liquid, or a chamber in which he is subject to pressure greater than 100 millibars above atmospheric pressure: and in order to survive in such an environment he breathes air or other gas at a pressure greater than atmospheric pressure. Or for such a purpose uses a vehicle, capsule or suit where a sealed internal atmospheric pressure is maintained and where the external pressure differential is greater than 100 millibars.

Diving, subsea, ROV (as a type of activity)

Operations involving diving (see definition for diving operations), subsea equipment or activities and/or operations involving underwater remotely operated vehicles (ROV).

Drilling (as a work function)

All exploration, appraisal and production drilling and workover as well as their administrative, engineering, construction, materials supply and transportation aspects. It includes site preparation, rigging up and down and restoration of the drilling site upon work completion. Drilling includes ALL exploration, appraisal and production drilling.

Drilling/workover/well services (as a type of activity)

Activities involving the development, maintenance work or remedial treatments related to an oil or gas well.

Event

An unplanned or uncontrolled outcome of a business operation or activity that has or could have contributed to an injury, illness, physical or environmental damage.

Exploration (as a work function)

Geophysical, seismographic and geological operations, including their administrative and engineering aspects, construction, maintenance, materials supply, and transportation of personnel and equipment; excludes drilling.

Explosion or burn (as an incident/event category)

Burns or other effects of fires, explosions and extremes of temperature. ‘Explosion’ means a rapid combustion, not an overpressure.

Exposure: electrical (as an incident/event category)

Exposure to electrical shock or electrical burns etc.

Appendix E: Glossary of terms

E-2


©OGP

Exposure: noise, chemical, biological, vibration (as an incident/event category)

Exposure to noise, chemical substances (including asphyxiation due to lack of oxygen not associated with a confined space), hazardous biological material, vibration or radiation.

Falls from height (as an incident/event category)

A person falls from one level to another.



Fatality

Cases that involve one or more people who died as a result of a work-related incident or occupational illness.

First aid case

Cases that are not sufficiently serious to be reported as medical treatment or more serious cases but nevertheless require minor first aid treatment, e.g. dressing on a minor cut, removal of a splinter from a finger. First aid cases are not recordable incidents.

High potential event

Any incident or near miss that could have realistically resulted in one or more fatalities.

Hours worked

The actual ‘hours worked’, including overtime hours, are recorded in the case of onshore operations. The hours worked by an individual will generally be about 2,000 per year. For offshore workers, the ‘hours worked’ are calculated on a 12 hour work day. Consequently, average hours worked per year will vary from 1,600 to 2,300 hours per person depending upon the on/off shift ratio. Vacations and leaves are excluded.

Hours worked in year (000’s)

Hours are rounded to the nearest thousand.

Incident

An unplanned or uncontrolled Event or chain of Events that has resulted in at least one fatality, recordable injury or illness, or physical or environmental damage.

Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations (as a type of activity)

Activities related to the use of mechanical lifting and hoisting equipment, assembling and dis-assembling drilling rig equipment and drill pipe handling on the rig floor.

Key performance indicators (KPI)

In this report, these include: number of fatalities, fatal accident and incident rates, lost time injury frequency, restricted work day case + lost time injury frequency and total recordable injury rate.

Lost time injury (LTI)

A fatality or lost work day case. The number of LTIs is the sum of fatalities and lost work day cases.


The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases) incidents per 1,000,000 hours worked.


Any work related injury other than a fatal injury which results in a person being unfit for work on any day after the day of occurrence of the occupational injury. “Any day” includes rest days, weekend days, leave days, public holidays or days after ceasing employment.

LWDC severity

The average number of lost days per lost work day case.

Maintenance, inspection and testing (as a type of activity)

Activities related to preserving, repairing, examining and function testing assets, equipment, plant or facilities.

Medical cause of death

This is the cause of death given on the death certificate. Where two types of causes are provided, such as “pulmonary oedema” caused by “inhalation of hot gases from a fire”, both are recorded.

Medical treatment case (MTC)

Cases that are not severe enough to be reported as fatalities or lost work day cases or restricted work day cases but are more severe than requiring simple first aid treatment.

Near miss

An unplanned or uncontrolled event or chain of events that has not resulted in recordable injury, illness, physical or environmental damage but had the potential to do so in other circumstances.

Number of days unfit for work

The sum total of calendar days (consecutive or otherwise) after the days of the occupational injuries on which the employees involved were unfit for work and did not work.

Number of employees

Average number of full-time and part-time employees involved in exploration & production, calculated on a full-time basis, during the reporting year.

E-3


© OGP

Number of fatalities

The total number of Company’s employees and or Contractor’s employees who died as a result of an incident. ‘Delayed’ deaths that occur after the incident are included if the deaths were a direct result of the incident. For example, if a fire killed one person outright, and a second died three weeks later from lung damage caused by the fire, both are reported.

Occupational injury

Any injury such as a cut, fracture, sprain, amputation, etc., or any fatality, which results from a work-related activity or from an exposure involving a single incident in the work environment, such as deafness from explosion, one-time chemical exposure, back disorder from a slip / trip, insect or snake bite.

Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering (as a type of activity)

Activities related to work conducted in offices, warehouses, workshops, accommodation and catering facilities.

Offshore work

All activities and operations that take place at sea, including activities in bays, in major inland seas such as the Caspian Sea, or in other inland seas directly connected to oceans. Incidents including transportation of people and equipment from shore to the offshore location, either by vessel or helicopter, should be recorded as ‘offshore’.

Onshore work

All activities and operations that take place within a landmass, including those on swamps, rivers and lakes. Land-to-land aircraft operations are counted as onshore, even though flights are over water.

Other (as an incident/event category)

Used used to specify where an incident cannot be logically classed under any other category. In the case of incident activities, includes air transport incidents.

Note: the work function ‘Other’ was replaced by ‘construction’ for the first time in 2006.

Overexertion or strain (as an incident/ event category)

Physical overexertion e.g. muscle strain

Pressure release (as an incident/ event category)

Failure of or release of gas, liquid or object from a pressurised system.

Process safety event (PSE)

A process safety event, which can also be referred to as an asset integrity event, is a Loss of Primary Containment (LOPC) and is recordable if:

• the consequence was a reportable employee or contractor injury or fatality, a third party hospital admission or fatality, a community or site evacuation or a fire / explosion; or

• a pressure relief device discharge or material release occurs which exceeded defined thresholds (even if none of the consequences above occurred)

as specified within OGP report № 456, Process safety – recommended practice on key performance indicators which provides consequence and threshold definitions consistent with API Recommended Practice No.754 http://www.ogp.org.uk/pubs/456.pdf, the supplement to this report provides Process Safety Upstream PSE examples http://www.ogp.org.uk/pubs/456supp.pdf.

Production (as a work function)

Petroleum and natural gas producing operations, including their administrative and engineering aspects, minor construction, repairs, maintenance and servicing, materials supply, and transportation of personnel and equipment. It covers all mainstream production operations including wireline. Gas processing activities with the primary intent of producing gas liquids for sale including;

• work on production wells under pressure• oil (including condensates) and gas extraction and

separation (primary production)• heavy oil production where it is inseparable from upstream

(i.e. stream assisted gravity drainage) production• primary oil processing (water separation, stabilisation)• primary gas processing (dehydration, liquids separation,

sweetening, CO2 removal)• Floating Storage Units (FSUs) and sub-sea storage units• gas processing activities with the primary intent of

producing gas liquids for sale ê secondary liquid separation (i.e. Natural Gas Liquids

[NGL] extraction using refrigeration processing) ê Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and Gas to Liquids

(GTL) operations• flow-lines between wells and pipelines between facilities

associated with field production operations• oil and gas loading facilities including land or marine

vessels (trucks and ships) when connected to an oil or gas production process

• pipeline operations (including booster stations) operated by company E&P business

Production excludes:• production drilling or workover• mining processes associated with the extraction of heavy oil

tar sands• heavy oil when separable from upstream operations• secondary heavy oil processing (upgrader)• refineries

E-4


©OGP

Production operations (as a type of activity)

Activities related to the extraction of hydrocarbons from source such as an oil or gas well or hydrocarbon bearing geological structure, including primary processing, storage and transport operations. Includes normal, start-up or shut-down operations.

Recordable

A type of event, incident, injury, illness, release or other outcome which has been determined to meet or exceed definitions, criteria or thresholds for inclusion and classification in reported data.

Restricted work day case (RWDC)

Any work-related injury other than a fatality or lost work day case which results in a person being unfit for full performance of the regular job on any day after the occupational injury. Work performed might be:

• an assignment to a temporary job;• part-time work at the regular job;• working full-time in the regular job but not performing all

the usual duties of the jobWhere no meaningful restricted work is being performed, the incident is recorded as a lost work day case (LWDC).

Seismic/survey operations (as a type of activity)

Activities relating to the determination of sub-surface structures for the purpose of locating oil and gas deposits including geophysical and seismic data acquisition.

Slips and trips (at the same height) (as an incident/event category)

Slips, trips and falls caused by falling over or onto something at the same height.

Struck by (as an incident/event category)

Incidents/events where injury results from being hit by moving equipment and machinery, or by flying or falling objects. Also includes vehicle incidents where the vehicle is struck by or struck against another object.

Third party

A person with no business relationship with the company or contractor.



Transport – air (as a type of activity)

Involving aircraft, either fixed wing or helicopters. Injuries caused by accidents on the ground at airports are classified in one of the other categories.

Transport – land (as a type of activity)

Involving motorised vehicles designed for transporting people and goods over land, e.g. cars, buses, trucks. Pedestrians struck by a vehicle are classified as land transport incidents. Incidents from a mobile crane would only be land transport incidents if the crane were being moved between locations.

Transport – water, including Marine Activity (as a type of activity)

Involving vessels, equipment or boats designed for transporting people and goods over water (including inland, marine, ice roads and marsh/swamp) e.g. supply vessels, crew boats.

Unspecified – other (as a type of activity)

Incidents that cannot be logically classed under other headings or where the activity is unknown.

Unspecified (as a work function)

Unspecified is used for the entry of data associated with office personnel whose work hours and incident data cannot be reasonably assigned to the administrative support of one of the function groupings of exploration, drilling, production or construction. Corporate overhead support function personnel such as finance or human resources staff may be examples where work hours cannot be specifically assigned to a particular function. All other data that are not sepa rated out by function are reported as ‘unspecified’.

Water related/drowning (as an incident/

event category)

Incidents/events in which water played a significant role including drowning.

Work-related injury

See occupational injury.

For further information and publications, please visit our website at

www.ogp.org.uk

209-215 Blackfriars RoadLondon SE1 8NLUnited KingdomTelephone: +44 (0)20 7633 0272Fax: +44 (0)20 7633 2350

165 Bd du Souverain4th FloorB-1160 Brussels, BelgiumTelephone: +32 (0)2 566 9150Fax: +32 (0)2 566 9159

Internet site: www.ogp.org.uke-mail: [email protected]

International

Association

of Oil & Gas

P r o d u c e r s

Documents

OGP Safety Performance Indicator Data 2012