OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)

8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)

1/40

1United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet

15 January 2014

Optimizing The Fleet Response Plan

ADM Bill Gortney


2/40


Assess

EndsWays

RESOURCE

/ POLICY

ACCESS /

PROCURE

PRE-

INTRO

BASIC INTEGRATEDMAINT DEPLOY &

SUSTAIN

FRTP

SurfaceAviation

Submarines

C4ISR/CYBER

NECCWeaponSystem

OP/TAC HQs

Everyone is part of the Readiness Kill Chain

Everyone needs to know their place and role in the Readiness Kill Chain

Means and Ways must support the Endsour Deployability / Sustainment model, the FRP

CommonActions

SynchronizedTraining

Full WeaponSystem Ops

MeansPersonnelEquipmentSuppliesTrainingOrdnanceNetworks

InstallationsCommunity IndustryElectedLeaders

Governance / C2Drives integration & synchronization vertically across weapons systems & horizontally across the readiness lifecycle

As of

08MAY13

Readiness Kill ChainPast, Present, Way Ahead

2


3/40


The Readiness Kill Chain (RKC) is a way to break down institutionalbarriers, increase understanding of readiness production, ensure acommon understanding of Navy readiness on the same page, and ensurethat policies, resources, and products deliver the right capability andreadiness for mission requirements.

Specifically, RKC is a repeatable methodology to identify readinessproduction barriers and root causes, followed by development of effectivestrategies and solutions to remove these barriers. These processes resultin complete assessment and presentation for decisions used to improveforward deployed readiness and resolve barriers in an informed and costeffective manner.

O-FRP is one example of implementation of the RKC. O-FRP uses the RKCapproach to analyze various stages of the processes for training,inspections, parts, maintenance and manning to achieve desired endstates.

What is RKC?


4/40


We will deliver credible capability for deterrence,

sea control, and power projection to deter or

contain conflict and fight and win wars.

Operate forward at strategic maritime

crossroads; Sustain our fleet capability through

effective maintenance, timely modernization, and

sustained production of proven ships and aircraft.

.

We must ensure todays force is ready for its

assigned missions. Maintaining ships and aircraft

to their expected service lives is an essential

contribution to fleet capacity

WARFIGHTING

FIRST

OPERATE

FORWARD

BE

READYWe will operationalize

the Sail ing Direct ionsthrough the Optimized

Fleet Response Plan

using the Readiness

Kill Chain (RKC)

CNO Guidance

We developed the Optimized Fleet Response Plan to

establish a more manning-balanced and sustainable

cycle

- CNO Position Report: 2013, p 3


5/40


The CNOs tenets as outlined in his Sailing directions and reinforced in theNavigation Plan are clear.

The Readiness Kill Chain approach provides us a holistic construct, ormethodology, to ensure the Fleet is focused on warfighting forward and ready to conduct missions assigned and O-FRP is the answer to how

we balance those priorities.

CNOs Tenets


6/40


The Optimized Fleet Response Plan (O-FRP) has been developed toenhance the stability and predictability for our Sailors and families byaligning carrier strike group assets to a new 36 month training anddeployment cycle.

Beginning in fiscal year 15, all required maintenance, training, evaluations

and a single eight-month deployment will be efficiently scheduledthroughout the cycle in such a manner to drive down costs and increaseoverall fleet readiness.

Under this plan, we will streamline the inspection and evaluation process

and ensure that we are able to maintain a level of surge capacity.

O-FRP reduces time at sea and increases home port tempo from 49% to68% for our Sailors over the 36 month period. Initially focused on CarrierStrike Groups, O-FRP will ultimately be designed for all U.S Navy assetsfrom the ARG/MEU to submarines and expeditionary forces.

What is O-FRP?


7/407United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet

Fleet Response PlanProblem Statement

We have lost predictability For Sailors, families, industrial base

Readiness producers, and readiness consumers

Length does not accommodate maintenance and training or maximizeoperational availability

Misaligned CSG / DESRON Chains of Command Manning levels not aligned to the phases of FRP

Maintenance and modernization

Not executing on time / budget

Requires better synchronization

Underfunded spares accounts

Unconstrained inspection process

Lack of standardized Operational /Tactical HQ academic, synthetic, andlive training



Potential Drivers toReadiness Production

C3

C5

C2

C4

IKE CSGFEB11

SEP13

C3

C5

C2

C4

HST CSGJUL10SEP13

Model Readiness Actual profile Anticipated profile

Cost Driver Maintenance Driven FRP Ineff iciency

Cost Driver Schedule Driven FRP Ineff iciency

C3

C5

C2

C4

NIM CSGFEB11SEP13

Cost Driver Maintenance and Schedu le Driven FRP Ineff iciency

Traditio nal Fleet FRP



The previous slide graphically depicts inefficiencies.

The solid blue line represents our readiness model and the dashed line isreality for these three Strike Groups.

Each of these three profiles is unique and our generic profile is not reliablypredictive of the investment of our means and ways in this process.

IKE CSG faced maintenance challenges which delayed her work-ups and

deployment and then she conducted a second deployment after a shorthomeport visit.

HST CSG trained up and then delayed due to a change in presencerequirementswe banked her readiness during this delay.

NIM CSG was a combination of both maintenance and schedule delays.

Comparing a generic planning FRP profile to these CSGs profiles highlightsthe need to find a model that is more predictable and reliable in the planningprocess and ensures that we conserve scarce resources and money.

O-FRP establishes a framework to develop a predictive model that will driveeach CSG to look and execute a more similar FRP profile.

Understanding Potential Drivers toReadiness Production Slide



DepSecDef-driven concept to generate 3.0-4.0 CSG Ao

7-7-7 plan (Deploy/Dwell/Deploy)

49 percent Homeport Time

Deployments are 39 percent of the FRP length

ECP Frame work: Provides a predictable FRP cycle

Extends/synchs CVN/CVW/SC FRP cycles to 36 months

Fixes CSG composition: Ships/aircraft/staffs remain aligned thru entire FRP cycle

Generates fully ready forces, trained to a single MCO certification standard

Establishes a stable and predictable maintenance plan

Maintenance interval remains constant

ECP concept ended Jan 13 due to sequester/POM fiscal limits

O-FRP Predecessor:Enhanced Carrier Presence



The following series of slides describe progress achieved in our effort tomanage Fleet wholeness across the Readiness Kill Chain (RKC) through theOptimized-Fleet Response Plan (O-FRP).

Managed Wholeness, is a term USFF coined to describe how we are

leading our forces through the tough fiscal turbulence expected over thecoming years.

Managed Wholeness



Weve started FY 14 under a Continuing Resolution Amendment at reducedfunding levels. Additionally, we are constrained by our current manpowerlevels and force structure. As a result, we have to carefully manage thewholeness of the Fleet with innovative cost saving measures that optimizereadiness at the reduced funding levels.

Current Fiscal Environment



Retains ECP framework / capacity with reduced global Ao (~2.0) 36 month FRP

Single 8-month deployment

Starts with HST CSG in Nov 2014

Enables delivery of:

Fixed CSG Composition

Aligned and stabilized CSG manning throughout the FRP

Stable maintenance plan Improved quality of work and enhanced quality of life

Embedded Electromagnetic Spectrum Maneuver Warfare and NavalIntegrated Fire ControlCounter Air

Forces trained to a single certification standard

Optimized Fleet Response Plan (O-FRP)



Optimized FRPLines of Effor t

Lineso

fEffor

t

AdvancedTraining

(USFF / CPF N7)

Maintenance/Modernization

(NAVSEA / NAVAIRUSFF / CPF )

Manning/Individual Training(OPNAV N1 /USFF)

CSGAlignment

(USFF / CPF N3)

FRP Length(USFF / CPF

OPNAV N3)

Unit Training

(TYCOMs)

Inspections(USFF/CPF N43)

Operational &Tactical HQs

(USFF / CPF N7)

Parts(USFF / CPF N41

OPNAV N8/N9)


15/40


16/40


What is AO?

AOis Operational Availability. Basically, this is the time a platform is employable.

This does not take into consideration OPTEMPO and PERSTEMPO.

The formula is the cycle length minus maintenance and training.

For example, in the 36-month O-FRP cycle, there are approximately 6 months

maintenance and 6 training. Therefore, AOis approximately 24 months.

AO = [ Cycle length(maintenance time and training time)]

AO = 36-(6+6) = 24

This does not mean that a Carrier Strike Group will be deployed for the entire

Operational Availability. Under O-FRP, deployment lengths are metered by ServiceQuality of Life factors. AOis simply a measure of when a platform is employable, andis used for planning both for rotational deployment and to determine surge capacityshould a National emergency arise.


17/40


FRP Length

36 month FRP cycle becomes the foundation upon which we generate CSGsready for deployment and provides maximum Ao for CSG presence/fundinglevel.

Under a sustainable O-FRP, a single 8 month deployment generates adeployed to FRP ratio (D/FRP) of 0.22 (or in other terms 5 CVNs can

generate 1.0 global presence) with the ability to go to 0.38 (or 3 CVNs togenerate a 1.0 presence) should resources ever become available.

These CSGs will be composed of 7-8, vice current 3-4, surface combatantswho will be aligned under a single DESRON and will aggregate for training

and certification.

Surface combatants deployment dates may vary slightly due to maintainingGlobal Force Management Allocation Plan (GFMAP) adjudicated presencerequirements: Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD), SCAN EAGLE, and FIRESCOUT.


18/40


CSG Alignment

Iterative changes will be required in out years to complete

Problem:

CSG and Destroyer SquadronMisalignment

- Operational Control (OPCON) andAdministrative Control (ADCON)Chain of Command and FITREPS

- DESRON Commanders do notdeploy with their assigned SC

- CSGs deploy with SC frommultiple squadrons

Multiple Independent deployerCERTEX events required

Advanced training produceslesser qualification (MSO vs.MCO)

- DESRON SC FRP cycles not inalignment

- Capability mismatch with CSG

Solution:

Fixed CSG Composition

- C2 Aligned with FRP cycle- OPCON aligned with deployment

cycle

- SC schedules more predictable- BMD integrated within CSG- Surface combatant CMP aligned

with CVN- Cost effective, Major Combat

Operations Independentdeployers


19/40


CSG Alignment

When examining DESRON alignments in conjunction with O-FRP, we sawan opportunity to fix numerous discrepancies, such as wholesale surfacecombatant swap outs between CSG multiple deployments as well asintegrating BMD capability into CSGs.

O-FRP aligns surface combatant and CVN/CVW cycles to optimize

resources required to achieve deployment certification.

Simple administrative alignment near term achieves 90% DESRONalignment. 21 of 29 moves have been mapped out for TYCOM execution tosupport 4 CSGs.

USFF is changing DESRON assignments so that all CRUDES will be alignedto their CSGs starting with the GHWB CSG for their FEB 2014 deployment.

Ownership alignment also allows ISICs to begin transmitting Commandersintent to assigned units earlyoperational and professional expectations.


20/40


Manning Wholeness

Personnel readiness standard 92/95/1 minimum deployment manning levels

Take risk in non-deployed units and postdeployment surge

Actions to achieve wholeness

Recruit/Access to meet demand

Manage Street to Fleet supply chain

Fund the Individuals Accounts

Define and prioritize critical operationalshore duty billets

Manage and sustain wholeness

Report and manage individual PERSTEMPO

Incentivize and retain quality sailors

Manage FIT/FILL risk ashore

Established PERS-454 to streamline LIMDUprocess

80.0%

85.0%

90.0%

95.0%

100.0%

Fit Fill Fit Forecast Fill Forecast Fit Threshold


21/40


In the previous slide, we used 92/95/1 as our endstate. This is also knownas FIT / FILL / Critical NEC

The first number is FIT

This indicates that a commanding officer will have 92 percent of sailorsauthorized with the right skill sets

The second number is FILL

This number indicates that at least 95 percent of the required manning is onboard

The third and final number indicates that there is at least 1 sailor on boardthat has the qualifications for every critical Navy Enlisted Classification(NEC)

FIT/FILL/CRITICAL NEC


22/40


The Fleet continues to face a fit/fill below the standard of 90/90/1 with anupward in trend of cross decks and diverts needed to maintain thatstandard.

After a TYCOM RKC review and a USFF N1 led Navy-wide working group, aCNO approved POAM was developed to increase the personnel readiness

target, set actions to achieve wholeness and manage and sustain the gains.

OPNAV N1 was given the lead to execute the POAM.

Manning


23/40


HST CSG Manning to O-FRP

77%

82%

87%

92%

97%

102%

No v-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb -14 Mar-14 Ap r-14 May-14 Ju n -14 Ju l-14 Au g-14

H S T C S G

S J A F i l l ( P a y b a n d )

FILL THRESHOLD SUP FILL JNY FILL APP FILL

77%

82%

87%

92%

97%

102%

Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14

H S T C S G

S J A F i t ( P a y b a n d )

FIT THRESHOLD SUP FIT JNY FIT APP FIT

CVN 75 H.S. TRUMAN 92% 90% 70% 70% 90 40

COMCARSTRKGRU 10 90% 90% 53% 53% 87 1

CG 72 VELLA GULF 90% 85% 73% 73% 85 20

CG 61MONT EREY 90% 89% 71% 71% 86 7

CG 56 SAN JA CINTO 89% 86% 73% 73% 85 17

DDG 80 ROOSEVELT 94% 90% 67% 67% 86 6

DDG 87 MASON 85% 83% 65% 65% 82 23

DDG 94 NITZE 85% 83% 65% 65% 82 23

CVW 3 104% 91% 45% 45% 87 1

VFA 32 90% 86% 75% 75% 89 12

VFA 37 94% 92% 64% 64% 89 0

VFA 105 90% 89% 80% 80% 89 6

VAW 126 88% 85% 72% 72% 83 9

VAQ 130 89% 87% 80% 80% 89 7

HSC 7 94% 91% 81% 81% 87 1

HSM 74 96% 89% 60% 60% 84 7

180

Current Month

Total

Required

Manning

Actions to

92% (based

on Current

Month)

UnitRCN Fit

%

RCN Fill

%

NEC Fit

%

Crit NEC

Fit %

BBD QoA

(New

Metric

Under

Review)

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

H S T F I L L / F I TRCN Fill Threshold

RCN Fill

RCN Fill Proj

RCN Fit Threshold

RCN Fit

RCN Fit Proj

NEC Fit

NEC Fit Proj

Crit NEC Fit

Crit NEC Fit Proj

BBD QofA

BBD P4 ProjAvailMaintenance Basic Integrated

Achievementof92%Fitand95%Fill Sus

COGNOS Data Source : Nov 5, 2013

0

20

40

N ov -1 3 De c- 13 J an -14 F eb -1 4 Ma r- 14 A pr- 14 Ma y- 14 J un -1 4 J ul -1 4 A ug -1 4

M a n n i n g A c t i o n s

Distribution Unplanned

TBD


24/40


CNO Availability schedules are set: Aligned with CRUDES assignment to CSGs

Stable, predictable and integrated maintenance and modernization plan

Proper availability planning

Allowance for timely port loading adjustments

Integrated with assessments

Aligns Surface Ship Class Maintenance Plan to 36 months to match CVNs

Modernization improvements:

Interoperable and aligned CSG/ARG C5I capabilities

Integrated SOVT test to include all associated supporting systems

Improved aircraft inventory management to fully support training plan

Adjust SFRM to 36 month FRP

Maintenance & Modernization

Stable, Predictable, Integrated Maintenance & Modernization

that aligns and synchronizes CSG capabilities


25/40


Turning to maintenance and using the kill chain As is / To be construct,we found that maintenance was impacted by changes in schedules andfunding, and is constrained by port loading.

Thumb-rule used by maintenance providers is that costs go up by 3x forwork packages changes through mid-availability and as much as 8X forchanges in work packages from mid-to-late availability. So, this is a

significant cost driver. We also found that modernization is not aligned to the group and that there

is significant variance in combat systems. For instance, in the 62 shipArleigh Burke Class, there are 42 different configurations of only 8 majorC4I systems. Clearly, an interoperability challenge.

Configuration variance reduction is one element that will improve

maintenance and modernization execution.

Providing a stable and predictable FRP length with clear ownershipalignment to a particular CSG would alleviate many of these challenges.

Maintenance & Modernization

M i t & M d i ti


26/40


Maintenance & ModernizationRKC Analysis

Commanders Intent Use a Readiness Kill Chain approach

Analyze the various stages of the end to end process

Ship/Submarine Maintenance and Modernization:

NAVSEA lead Drive Work Package development and Planning effort to be done

earlier

Integrate Class Maintenance Plan requirements with Modernization

Aircraft Depot Maintenance- NAVAIR lead


27/40


Spares availability critical to readiness Stagnant/downward trends in key indicators drove action to get right parts

on the shelves

Outfitting Spares

Additional $51M added to outfitting spares accounts May13; minimal sparesbacklog

Outfitting spares funding green across Future Year Defense Plan

Fleet Shipboard Spares

Significant investments in AEGIS/BMD spares FY10-13

COSAL updates every 2 months since July 2012

Additional $21M investment in surface spares end of Fiscal Year 2013

Ship Construction Spares $14.6M added back to LPD-25 & LHA-6 programs end of Fiscal Year 2013

Surface Spares Wholeness

Coordinated Shipboard Allowance List (COSAL)effectiveness improving and expected to continue


28/40


Inspections

28

INSPECTIONPERIOD III

Maintenance Basic Integrated Deployment

MCMA

INSURV MI / MCMA

FUTURE:

As-Is

To-Be

= Independent Inspections

INSPECTIONPERIOD I

INSPECTION

PERIOD II

MI

CNO designated USFF asExecutive Agent for FleetAssessment:- Oversee changes to

Inspections, Certifications,Assessment and Visits events

- Approval authority for new orexpanded requirements

- Standardize AssessmentCriteria

- Maximize training value

- Develop enduring process forcontinual review

- Lead senior advisory group toCNO on ICAV matters

PRESENT: 466 inspections


29/40


This diagram approaches inspection and assessment processes in the Asis: at top and To be on the bottom of the chart. The curves represent ageneric readiness curve and are sub divided horizontally by phase.

Our Fleet Action Working Group found that there are 466 differentinspections, certifications, assists and visits scattered across the FRP.Some of these are time based, some are conditions based and others are

policy or law. Many are, frankly, outdated. Developing an assessment and inspection continuum across the FRP will:

Optimize external assessment and inspection events to eliminate redundancy

Optimize assessment timing within the FRP

Standardize assessment and inspection requirements

Standardize expectations to minimize impacts to ships force personnel

Develop institutionalized process for continuous adjudication of futureinspections within the FRP.

Inspections


30/40


Creating a Smarter INSURV

Reduced from 5 days to 3 days Commences on Tuesday vice Monday to reduce burden on crew

Improved Operational Risk Management Ships do not get underway before 0700 to enhance safety

Ship leadership afforded crew rest through improved scheduling of events andelimination of redundant and out dated requirements

Linked to Readiness Events Accepts TYCOM TSRA PMS data as INSURV data. This makes INSURV even

shorter (3 days or less)

Analyzes more data over broader period of time Collects TYCOM mid-cycle assessment data as INSURV data. This increases the

amount of data used to identify maintenance and readiness trends


31/40


EA For Fleet Assessments

PHASE ONEFAWG

PHASE TWOTYCOM/SYSCOM REVIEWS

PHASE FOURCENTRAL ICAV AUTHORITY

(CICAVA)

PHASE THREEFLEET CDR REVIEW

PHASE FIVESTEADY STATE

DELIVERABLES1. EA FOR ICAV DESIGNATED

COMPLETE2. REFINE/CONCUR WITH ICAV

CONCEPT - COMPLETE

3. COMMENT/CONCUR WITH ICAV

CHANGESSTAKEHOLDERS

REVIEWING CHARTER

4. All AIRFOR AND SURFOR ICAVs

TIED TO FOUR PHASES IN FRP

COMPLETE

5. AIRFOR AND SURFOR

IDENTIFIED ICAVS TO COMBINE

- COMPLETE

6. LINKAGE INSTRUCTION

DRAFTED AND TESTED ON JETBLAST DEFLECTORS (JBDs)

COMPLETE

7. SUBLANT JOINED FAWG

DELIVERABLES1. AS-IS ICAV

LISTCMP

2. PROPOSED

ICAV CHANGES

COMPLETE3. PROPOSED

TO-BE STATE

COMPLETE

4. ICAV CHARTER

DRAFTED

5. RESOURCESDELIVERABLES

1. DRAFT AND SIGN ICAV INSTRUCTION

2. ASSUME DUTIES FROM FAWG

3. PRIORITIZE ICAV CHANGES

4. DEVELOP ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY

5. SURFACE SHIP INSURV

INSPECTIONS REDUCED TO 3.5 DAYS

APR 2014

DELIVERABLES1. CICAVA ACTS AS

THE GATEKEEPER

TO SYNCHRONIZEALL ICAV EVENTS

2. CICAVA EXTENDS

PROCESS TO

OTHER FRP-

DRIVEN ENTITIES

DELIVERABLES1. SIGN CHARTERTYCOMS

HAVE REVIEWED WITH

ONLY MINOR CHANGES

2. DESIGNATE CICAVA

CONTAINED WITHIN

CHARTER

3. STANDUP CICAVA

4. RESOURCE CICAVA

5. INSURV MESSAGE

6. INSURV HAS ACTION TO

LEAD LINKAGEESTABLISHMENT BETWEEN

TYCOM AND INSURV

INSPECTIONS

IPR

25 SEP 13

18 OCT 13

ECD

14 FEB 14

ECD

1 OCT 14

CICAVA MAKES CHANGESDELETE, MOVE CONSOLIDATE,

AND OPTIMIZE ICAV EVENTS

(MOVE FROM AS-IS TO TO-BE)DELIVERABLESBLUECOMPLETED

REDNOT COMPLETED

17 JAN 14


32/40


O-FRP Training

Carrier, air-wing, and all surface combatants training aligned

ALL units trained to one standard

People and equipment ready for training at the end of maintenance

Basic unit training

Retains training time entitlement

Integrates inspection, certification, and continuous maintenance requirements

Advanced unit and integrated group training

Standardized Group Sail

More efficient training schedule

Standardized training Fleet-wide

Synthetic

CVW FALLON

Live

CVW

CRUDES

CVNAcademic

GroupSail

TSTA /FEP

14 Weeks

TSTAWCC

A-A ARP

CVN

TIER 1 - MobilityREAD-6/ CMAV

TIER 2 - Unit Tactical

A-G ARPCVW

CRUDES

Non Skid

24 Weeks

TYCOM Tasking

Operational Level to Tactical Level


33/40


Operational Level to Tactical LevelHeadquarter Alignment

Aligned and standardized Navywarfighting staffs from operational to

tactical level

Functions based on Mission Essential

Tasks aligned from Combatant to Tactical

Commander

Personnel assigned with right skill sets to

meet HQ fit

Interoperable systems between

Operational and Tactical Level HQ

Standardized and codified staff training

and exercise program

OptimizedFleet Response Plan will provide alignedand standardized Operational and Tactical Level Headquarters

NCC

CombatantCommander

CSG, CVW, DESRON, PHIBRON

Standardization

Alig

nment

CTFCTG


34/40

Optimized FRP


35/40


Lineso

fEffort

Optimized FRPLines of Effor t

Foundation to O-FRP ---------- CVN/CVW There Now ---------- SC w/HST

HST

HSTIOC MAY 14

HST

HST

HST

HST / GHWB / TR by MSGAUG 13

GHWBIOC AUG 13

TRIOC SEP 13

GHWB VIN TR

GHWB VIN

GHWB VIN

GHWB VIN

HST GHWB VIN TR

OL/TL HQs(USFF / CPF N7)

AdvancedTraining

(USFF / CPF N7)

Unit Training(TYCOMs)

CSGAlignment

(USFF / CPF N3)

FRP Length(USFF/CPF

OPNAV N43)

Inspections(USFF/CPF N43)

Parts(USFF / CPF N41OPNAV N8/N9)


(USFF / CPF N43/N6)

Manning/Individual Training(USFF / OPNAV N1)


36/40


Starts with maintenance cycle in Nov 14. CRUDES will be aligned by HST

CSG FRP start (NOV 2014), pending rework of class maintenance plans byNAVSEA.

Inspections begin approximately 1 month prior to Basic training phase

Manning is aligned to Basic training phase to gain efficiency in trainingaudience participating in all of work-ups

Integrated training occurs in Nov 15

CSG alignment has already started by message in Aug 13 for HST / GHWB /and TR. The first CSG to be aligned for deployment will be GHWB in Feb14.

HST CSG staff will receive pipeline and fleet training for OL/TL alignment in

May 14.

First O-FRP CSG: TRUMAN


37/40


The other CSGs officially enter O-FRP at the maintenance phase: GHWB

May 14, VINJul 15, TRDec 15

Where able, we have instituted elements of O-FRP as early as possible.GHWB conducted elements of Integrated training by conducting a new GRPSail event.

TR is conducting increased integrated training b/c of NIFC-CA. CSGalignment for HST / GHWB / TR is de facto complete after the first ADCONshift message in August 13 (CCSGs already briefing their to be units atupdate briefs)

Follow On Carrier Strike Groups

R di Kill Ch i


38/40


Assess

EndsWays

RESOURCE

/ POLICY

ACCESS /

PROCURE

PRE-

INTRO

BASIC INTEGRATEDMAINT DEPLOY &

SUSTAIN

FRP

2. O-FRP.. OL/TL HQs. Advanced Training........................................................................................................... Unit Training.... Inspections... Parts.. Maintenance... Manning.

CSG Alignment FRP Length.

Ma

nagingWholeness

MeansPersonnelEquipmentSuppliesTrainingOrdnanceNetworks

InstallationsCommunity IndustryElectedLeaders

Governance / C2Drives integration & synchronization vertically across weapons systems & horizontally across the readiness lifecycle

1. Cost to Own..

3. Surge Capacity.....

Readiness Kill ChainNavy -Wide Ap proach to Managing Who leness

It takes everyone to manage Fleet wholeness across the ReadinessKill Chain

Optimized FRP


39/40


Lineso

fEffor

t

AdvancedTraining


Manning/

IndividualTraining

CSGAlignment

FRP Length

UnitTraining

Inspections

Operational &

Tactical HQs

Optimized FRPTake Aways

Parts

Standardize & align NCC, CSG and Warfare CDR training tracks

Combine JTFX / C2X; standardize Group Sail; NIFC-CA & EMMW

ISIC-led, CSG-wide aggregated training with a predictable schedule

Consolidate to specific inspection periods aligned to the FRP

RKC methodology to ensure spares are available when needed

Stable, predicable, synchronized execution of Maint & Modernization

Sea Centric Manning; Incentivize and Retain Quality Sailors

C2 aligned with FRP cycle

36 Month Fleetwide introduction begins with TRUMAN CSG in Nov 2014


40/40

UNCLASSIFIED

Documents

OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)