Offprint_ Screening Marine Microalgae

  • Upload
    anisah

  • View
    227

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/16/2019 Offprint_ Screening Marine Microalgae

    1/12

    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached

    copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research

    and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution

    and sharing with colleagues.

    Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or

    licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third partywebsites are prohibited.

    In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the

    article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or

    institutional repository. Authors requiring further information

    regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are

    encouraged to visit:

    http://www.elsevier.com/copyright

    http://www.elsevier.com/copyrighthttp://www.elsevier.com/copyright

  • 8/16/2019 Offprint_ Screening Marine Microalgae

    2/12

    Author's personal copy

    Screening of marine microalgae for biodiesel feedstock

    Thi Thai Yen Doan a,*, Balasubramanian Sivaloganathan b, Jeffrey Philip Obbard a,b

    a Division of Environmental Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, E1A #02-19,

    1 Engineering Drive 2, Singapore 117576, Singaporeb Tropical Marine Science Institute, National University of Singapore, S2S, 18 Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119227, Singapore

    a r t i c l e i n f o

    Article history:

    Received 9 June 2010

    Received in revised form

    5 February 2011

    Accepted 10 February 2011

    Available online 24 March 2011

    Keywords:

    Microalgae

    Biodiesel

    Flow cytometric cell sorting 

    Screening 

    Neutral lipid

    a b s t r a c t

    Biodiesel production from microalgae lipids is increasingly regarded as a more sustainable

    and feasible alternative to conventional biodiesel feedstocks derived from terrestrial bio-

    energy crops. A total of ninety-six strains of marine microalgae, with an elevated biomass

    productivity and intracellular lipid content, were isolated from the coastal waters of 

    Singapore using an automated flow cytometric cell-sorting technique. Cell sorting was

    based on the two-dimensional distribution of algal cells for red fluorescence (representing 

    chlorophyll auto-fluorescence) against forward-light scatter (representing cell size) and red

    vs. green fluorescence. Twenty-one of the strains were further characterized with respect

    to cell growth rate, biomass concentration, lipid content (total and neutral lipid) and fatty

    acid profile. The growth rates of  Skeletonema costatum, Chaetoceros and  Thalassiosira species

    were greatest among the entire strains, but in terms of absolute lipid yield  Nannochloropsis

    strains predominated.  Nannochloropsis   strains had a lipid content ranging from 39.4% to

    44.9% of dry weight biomass. Transesterification of the lipids yielded 25e51% of fatty acid

    methyl ester (FAME) i.e. biodiesel, where total FAME content ranged between 11 and 21% of 

    dry weight biomass. This study describes the microalgae screening process and demon-

    strates that  Nannochloropsis is a promising species for biodiesel feedstock.

    ª 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    1. Introduction

    Biodiesel, as derived from microalgae lipids, has become

    a focal area of contemporary, global biotechnological research

    as it holds the potential to provide   a  scalable, low-carbon,renewable feedstock without adversely affecting the supply of 

    food and other crop related products [1]. The most productive

    terrestrial bioenergy crops, including palm and soybean oil, do

    not match the potential high productivity of microalgae  [2,3].

    Development of a microalgae-based biodiesel technology for

    biodiesel production has the potential to dramatically

    improve our common environment and move the world

    beyond a petroleum-based economy. However, significant

    challenges must be surmounted, including the effective and

    rapid isolation of microalgae strains that have a high intrinsic

    lipid content and biomass yield.

    Theisland stateof Singapore lies180 km northof theequator

    and has a year-round tropical climate with temperatures

    ranging from 25 C to 32 C, and an annual precipitation rate in

    excess of 2500 mm (Yearbook of Statistic Singapore, 2008).

    Singapore’s coastal seas have a warm ambient temperature(approximately30 C) andcontaina high biodiversityof marine

    life, including microalgae. This biodiversity represents a valu-

    able resource for the development of an indigenous biodiesel

    feedstock in the form of microalgae lipid. Isolation of suitable

    microalgae from the natural environment is the first critical

    step in developing oil-rich strains for further exploitation in

    engineered systems for the production of biodiesel feedstock.

    High-throughput cellsorting,coupledwithflow cytometry,is

    a powerful tool to facilitate the rapid and efficient isolation of 

    microalgae strains for onward axenic culture. Microalgae have

    different photosynthetic pigments which emit various auto-

    *   Corresponding author. Jalan Tiga, Blk 49, #04-58, Singapore 390049, Singapore. Tel.: þ65 63007516; fax:  þ65 67744202.E-mail address: [email protected]  (T.T.Y. Doan).

    A v a i l a b l e a t w w w . s c i e n c e d i r e c t . c o m

    h t t p : / / w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / b i o m b i o e

    b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 2 5 3 4 e2 5 4 4

    0961-9534/$  e  see front matter ª  2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.021

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6457207_Biodiesel_From_Microalgae?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5629626_Biodiesel_From_Microalgae_Beats_Bioethanol?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5629626_Biodiesel_From_Microalgae_Beats_Bioethanol?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6457207_Biodiesel_From_Microalgae?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11057947_Botryococcus_braunii_A_Renewable_Source_of_Hydrocarbons_and_Other_Chemicals?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==

  • 8/16/2019 Offprint_ Screening Marine Microalgae

    3/12

    Author's personal copy

    fluorescence. These characteristics of microalgae have been

    applied in flow cytomertry to identify algae   [4]. Isolation of 

    microalg ae from natural waters using flow cytometric cell sort-

    ing has beenpreviouslyreported by Reckermann [5] and Crosbie

    et al. [6], where chlorophyll was used as a fluorescent probe to

    distinguish between different strains of microalgae. Reck-ermann [5] and Sensen et al. [7] used the chlorophyll auto-fluo-

    rescence (CAF) properties of eukaryoticphytoplankton,diatoms

    and picoautotrophic cells for isolation of axenic cultures,

    whereas Crosbie et al. [6] used both red and orange auto-fluo-

    rescence to differentiate between   algal strains. Green auto-

    fluorescence (GAF) is also considered to be a valuable taxonomic

    characteristic of dinoflagellates [8], where GAF is common in

    both autotrophic and heterotrophic dinoflagellate species.

    Flow cytometry, in conjunction with cell sorting, also

    represents an invaluable tool for screening and exploiting 

    microalgae strains for biodiesel feedstock development. In

    this study, the GAF and CAF properties of local marine

    microalgae were subjected to a cell-sorting protocol todifferentiate and isolate microalgae strains, which were then

    subsequently screened for high biomass productivity and

    elevated levels of intracellular lipids.

    2. Instrumentations and methods

    2.1. Instrumentations

    A Becton Dickinson (Mountain View, Calif.) FACSVantage SE

    flowcytometerfittedwithacell-sorteranda100 mWArgonion

    laser (Spectra Physics, Darmstadt, Germany) and a 100  mm

    nozzle was used for experimentation. For single-cell sorting,theflow cell-sorter wasoperated witha drop-drive attenuation

    switched to a frequency of 21 kHz, a sheath pressure of 

    8e10 psi, a drive frequency of 15e20 kHz and an average

    sample flow rate of 110e170 events s1. Prior to sorting,

    instrumental tubings were sterilised by flushing with 70%

    ethanol for 30 min, followed by an autoclaved phosphate

    buffered saline (PBS) sheath fluid constituted from NaCl

    (0.137 M), KCl (2.7 mM),KH2PO4 (1.4 mM)and Na2HPO4 (0.01 M).

    A PerkineElmer LS-55 fluorescence spectrometer (Per-

    kineElmer Corp) was used to determine Nile red (NR) fluo-

    rescence of stained microalgae. The wavelength of excitation

    and emission was 480 nm and 575 nm respectively (excitation

    and emission slits at 5 nm).

    2.2. Sampling sites and cultivation conditions

    Seawater samples werecollectedat five locations in Singapore’s

    coastal waters (see Fig. 1). Sample locations circumnavigated

    Singapore’s coastline, so that microalgae collected represented

    as diverse a taxa as possible. Samples were collected from the

    water columnof 50 cm depth using a 15 mm-mesh plankton net,

    and then stored in cool boxes for transportation to the labora-

    tory.Samples werethen inoculated intoenrichedmedium f  /2 [9]

    andWalne’smedium[10] priortoplacementinaphotoincubator

    set at 25 1 C, a light intensity of 60 mmol photons1 m2

    (as supplied by cool-white fluorescence tubes) and a 12:12 h

    dark:light photoperiod for 3 days. Following incubation, micro-

    algae were isolated via flow cytometric cell sorting.

    2.3. Automated isolation using flow cytometric cell-sorter

    The sorting protocol of microalgae cells was based upon the

    differential and relative distribution of red fluorescence (rep-

    resenting CAF of microalgae) against forward-light scatter

    (FSC), representing cell size and green fluorescence vs. redfluorescence simultaneously. When a cell population exhibi-

    ted weak CAF, the GAF was utilized for supplementary confir-

    mation. With excitation at 488 nm using an argon laser, the

    CAF of microalgae was measured through a 635 20 nm long-

    pass filter and GAF via a 530 30 nm band-pass filter. Two-

    dimensional profiles of FSC against red fluorescence and green

    fluorescence vs. red fluorescence were electronically plotted,

    where the sorting windows were positioned at optimal areas

    within the distribution of an algal cell cluster. Using a two-

    dimensional cytogramof GAFagainstCAF for theselection and

    isolation of microalgae represents an efficient sorting tech-

    nique. For example, as can be seen in Fig. 2a and b, the micro-

    algae group labelled ‘R4’ had a weak CAF, but a high GAF. Toestablish axenic culturesduring the sorting process, cells were

    selected on the basis of the highest relative fluorescence

    according to theprocedure describedby Sensen et al. [7]. Fig.2a

    and b shows typical examples of flow cytometric dot plots for

    an enriched microalgae culture, where regions displayed in

    rectangle show the sort gates associated with each algal

    cluster.Individual sorted single cellswere placed intoseparate

    culture wells of a 48-well incubation plate (Iwaki, 3830-048),

    where each well contained 0.5 mL of  f  /2 and Walne medium.

    2.4. Control procedure for verifying a single-sorted cell

     per well

    Crosbie’s procedure was used to strictly deposit one cell into

    a single culture well,  where cells were sorted into odd row

    numbers of a multi-well plate, leaving the even rows of the

    culture plate blank [6]. After each sorting cycle, each well was

    thoroughly mixed with a pipette, and half the volume was

    transferred tothe adjacent well on an even row. If more than one

    cell was originally sorted i.e. if growth occurred in both the

    collected and the transferred wells, this represented a misplace-

    ment of sorted cells and was rejected   e   a procedure that

    improved the probability that subsequent cultures were gener-

    ated from single-sorted cells. Following inoculation and colony

    formation, 250 mL of medium from the well was analyzed using 

    anEpicsAltraflowcytometer todeterminethe purityof isolatedstrains. Expo32 version 1.2B for Altra (Beckmann Coulter) soft-

    ware wasusedfordataacquisitionandprocessing. 10 mLofeither

    3-mm or 10-mm fluorospheres (Beckmann Coulter) were added to

    samples as an internal cell size reference standard.

    2.5. Determination of growth rate

    The isolated microalgae strainswere screened to identifythose

    which grew mostrapidly andaccumulated thehighest biomass

    andintracellularlipid.The isolated strainswerescaled-upfrom

    coloniesgrown in the microplatesto 5 mLin cultureflasks to be

    used as stock solutions for further characterization. Motile

    strains and flagellate microalgae were cultivated in Walne

    medium, where the rest of isolated strains were grown in f  /2

    medium. All cultures were maintained in a photoincubator at

    b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 2 5 3 4 e2 5 4 4   2535

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5580732_Crosbie_ND_Pockl_M_Weisse_T_Rapid_establishment_of_clonal_isolates_of_freshwater_autotrophic_picoplankton_by_single-cell_and_single-colony_sorting_J_Microbiol_Meth_55_361-370?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249026012_The_production_of_clonal_and_axenic_cultures_of_microalgae_using_fluorescence-activated_cell_sorting_Europ_J_Phycol?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5580732_Crosbie_ND_Pockl_M_Weisse_T_Rapid_establishment_of_clonal_isolates_of_freshwater_autotrophic_picoplankton_by_single-cell_and_single-colony_sorting_J_Microbiol_Meth_55_361-370?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6527958_Green_Autofluorescence_in_Dinoflagellates_Diatoms_and_Other_Microalgae_and_Its_Implications_for_Vital_Staining_and_Morphological_Studies?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249026012_The_production_of_clonal_and_axenic_cultures_of_microalgae_using_fluorescence-activated_cell_sorting_Europ_J_Phycol?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5580732_Crosbie_ND_Pockl_M_Weisse_T_Rapid_establishment_of_clonal_isolates_of_freshwater_autotrophic_picoplankton_by_single-cell_and_single-colony_sorting_J_Microbiol_Meth_55_361-370?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6527958_Green_Autofluorescence_in_Dinoflagellates_Diatoms_and_Other_Microalgae_and_Its_Implications_for_Vital_Staining_and_Morphological_Studies?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/14221488_Flow_Cytometry_and_Cell_Sorting_of_Heterogeneous_Microbial_Populations_the_Importance_of_Single-Cell_Analyses?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249026012_The_production_of_clonal_and_axenic_cultures_of_microalgae_using_fluorescence-activated_cell_sorting_Europ_J_Phycol?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249026012_The_production_of_clonal_and_axenic_cultures_of_microalgae_using_fluorescence-activated_cell_sorting_Europ_J_Phycol?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5580732_Crosbie_ND_Pockl_M_Weisse_T_Rapid_establishment_of_clonal_isolates_of_freshwater_autotrophic_picoplankton_by_single-cell_and_single-colony_sorting_J_Microbiol_Meth_55_361-370?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5580732_Crosbie_ND_Pockl_M_Weisse_T_Rapid_establishment_of_clonal_isolates_of_freshwater_autotrophic_picoplankton_by_single-cell_and_single-colony_sorting_J_Microbiol_Meth_55_361-370?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5580732_Crosbie_ND_Pockl_M_Weisse_T_Rapid_establishment_of_clonal_isolates_of_freshwater_autotrophic_picoplankton_by_single-cell_and_single-colony_sorting_J_Microbiol_Meth_55_361-370?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==

  • 8/16/2019 Offprint_ Screening Marine Microalgae

    4/12

    Author's personal copy

    25 1  C, a light intensity of 60 mmol photon m2 s1 and

    a 12:12 h, light/dark period with manual shaking twice per day.

    The growth rate of each strain was characterized based on cellcounts every two days using an Improved Neubauer haemo-

    cytometer slide under bright-field contrast microscopy

    (Olympus IMP-2, magnification 20e40) or via optical density

    at 680 nm wavelength (OD680 nm) in a Hitachi U-2900

    spectrophotometer. Thespecific growthrate of each isolatewas

    calculated from the slopeof the linearregression of time (days)

    and cell density (cells mL1

    ), asspecified by Wood etal. [11] i.e.:m ¼ ðln Nt ln NoÞ=ðt toÞ

    where Nt is cell density at time (t), and No is cell density at the

    start of the exponential phase (to).

    Fig. 1  e  Sampling locations: Kranji, Pulau Ubin, Changi, St. John Island and Second Link.

    Fig. 2  e  An example of a flow cytometric dot plot derived from single-cell sorting of microalgae containing four

    phytoplankton clusters i.e. R1, R2, R3, R4 that represent the sort gates for each cluster: (a) a sorting window based on cell size

    and chlorophyll auto-fluorescence of microalgae; and (b) a sorting window based on chlorophyll auto-fluorescence and

    green auto-fluorescence of microalgae.

    b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 2 5 3 4 e2 5 4 42536

  • 8/16/2019 Offprint_ Screening Marine Microalgae

    5/12

    Author's personal copy

    2.6. Nile red (NR) fluorescence of microalgae

    The increase in intracellular neutral lipid during the growth

    cycle of isolated microalgae strains was measured via fluores-

    cence intensity of NR stained cultures [12] simultaneously to cell

    growth. 10 mL of NR was added to 3 mL of algal suspensionswhichwasthenvortexedfor 1 minpriorto incubation for10 min

    in darkness at room temperature. NR emits a yellow-gold fluo-

    rescence when dissolved in neutral lipid which is the best

    substrate to produce biodiesel [13,14]. Fluorescence intensity of 

    a stained suspension of microalgae was measured at an excita-

    tion and emission wavelength of 480 nm and 575 nm respec-

    tively using an LS-55 fluorescence spectrometer (PerkineElmer

    Corp.) normalized at an optical density of 0.2 at wavelength

    680 nm (OD680). The microalgae suspension without NR,

    considered as auto-fluorescence, was also measured and sub-

    tracted from that measured as NR fluorescence.

    2.7. Biomass dry weight and total lipid content atstationary phase

    Cells at stationary phase were harvested and lyophilized. The

    total lipid content was extracted by solvent and determined

    gravimetrically.

    2.7.1. Biomass dry weight (DW)

    100 mL of algal suspension was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for

    10 min to produce biomass pellets. Pellets were then washed

    in 0.5 M of ammonium formate (twice) to remove salt. The

    algal pellets were then lyophilized in a freeze drier (Christ

    Alpha 2-4, Germany) to dryness to measure cell dry weight

    and total lipid content.

    2.7.2. Total lipid extraction

    Lipids were extracted from dry biomass pellets using a modi-

    fied solvent based method derived from Folch et al. [15]. First,

    lyophilized algal pellets were transferred into a chloroform/

    methanol (2:1, v/v) mixture and homogenized (Heidolph

    homogenizer DIAX900, Germany) for 10 min. This was fol-

    lowed by centrifugation at 5000 rpm at 12  C for 10 min (Bio-

    fuge Stratos, Germany). The supernatant was collected in

    a separation funnel. The entire extraction process was

    repeated twice. Sodium chloride solution (0.9%) was then

    added at a proportion of 1:5 v/v of lipid extract. The extract

    was then shaken vigorously for 1 min and allowed to undergophase separation for 15 min. The chloroform layer was

    collected and dried initially in a rotary evaporator, and then in

    an oven at 80 C to constant weight. The total lipid was then

    quantified gravimetrically.

    2.8. Fatty acid determination

    The fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) profile of the microalgae

    lipids was used as a proxy for the fatty acid profile. FAMEs

    were prepared via the direct methylation of fatty acids in the

    presence of an HCl catalyst according to the procedure given

    by Lewis etal. [16]. Dryalgal biomass was reacted directly with

    a mixture of methanol, chloroform and HCl (10:1:1 v/v/v) in

    10 mL crimped vials at 90 C for 2 h. FAMEs were then

    extracted using hexane/chloroform (4:1, v/v) and analyzed via

    gas chromatography using an ion trap (GC-QP2010, Shimadzu,

     Japan). Fatty acid profiles of the microalgae strains were

    deduced by comparison with a 37 FAME mix standard (i.e.

    Supelco 37 FAME mix, C4-C24). Each sample was spiked with

    n-heptadecanoic acid (C17:0) to a final concentration of 1 ppm

    as an internal standard. The capillary column of the GC/MSwasa DB-5MS, of 30 m length, a film thickness of 0.25 mm and

    an internal diameter of 0.25 mm. Helium was used as the

    carrier gas. The oven temperature and injection temperature

    were set at 50  C and 280 C respectively. The temperature

    program of the GC was held at 50  C for 2 min and then

    increased to 150 C at a rate of 10  Cmin1, then to 185  C for

    2 min and finally to 300  C for 2 min.

    2.9. Strain screening procedure

    Screening was carried out using the procedure expressed in

    Fig. 3. The procedural order was: sampling, automated isola-

    tion, pre-screening and screening. Pre-screening, mainly basedon NR fluorescence of stained algal cells, and cellular neutral

    lipid droplets was detected under epifluorescence microscopy.

    Strains that contained cellular lipid droplets were further

    screened with respect to cell division and lipid production. For

    cell division, growth rate and biomass concentration of each

    strain were examined. Simultaneously, lipid production of 

    these strains was investigated in two aspects i.e. total lipid

    content and fatty acid profile. To determine lipid content,

    gravimetric extraction and NR fluorescence measurements

    were conducted.Fattyacid profile is a criticalfactorfor decision

    of selection of candidate strain as it ultimately determines

    biodiesel quality. Selection criteriafor screening were based on

    biomass productivity and intracellular lipid content. Strainswhichdemonstratedcomparativelyhigh biomassproductivity,

    lipid content, and a suitable fatty acid profile were selected.

    2.10. Statistical analysis

    Statistical analyses were performed using SigmaStat 3.5 soft-

    ware. The screening data were analyzed using either a  t-test

    or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a Stu-

    denteNewmaneKeuls (SNK) multiple comparison test.

    Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.

    3. Results and discussion

    3.1. Sampling sites

    Five marine water locations were sampled around the coast of 

    Singapore. The average temperature of the surface water was

    between 25 and 30 C, and salinity rangedfrom 18& (at Kranji)

    to 37& (at Changi).

    3.2. Automated isolation usingflowcytometriccellsorting

    Isolation of suitable microalgae strains is an essential prereq-

    uisite for biodiesel feedstock production. Since microalgae are

    taxonomically diverse and not all strains are able to be

    cultured, the efficient isolation of microalgae is essential. The

    use of flow cytometric cell sorting is a powerful tool for the

    b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 2 5 3 4 e2 5 4 4   2537

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223869362_Fluorometric_determination_of_the_neutral_lipid_content_of_microalgal_cells_using_Nile_Red_J_Microbiol_Meth_6333-345?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224094532_Practical_Flow_Cytometry?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10137262_A_Sample_Method_for_the_Isolation_and_Purification_of_Total_Lipids_from_Animal_Tissue_J_Biol_Chem_226_497-509?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223869362_Fluorometric_determination_of_the_neutral_lipid_content_of_microalgal_cells_using_Nile_Red_J_Microbiol_Meth_6333-345?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224094532_Practical_Flow_Cytometry?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248287974_Spectrofluorometric_quantification_of_neutral_and_polar_lipids_in_zooplankton_using_Nile_Red_Marine_Chem_67_289-301?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==

  • 8/16/2019 Offprint_ Screening Marine Microalgae

    6/12

    Author's personal copy

    selection of microalgae with the desired phenotypes for feed-

    stock production. Flow cytometry combined with single-cell

    sorting is a high-throughput technique for screening and

    isolating microalgae from heterogeneous assemblages. Based

    on the developed protocols for FSC (indication of cell size) vs.

    red fluorescence (indication of CAF) or red fluorescence vs.

    green fluorescence, a total of 96 strains of microalgae were

    isolated fromthe five marine sample locations(see Table 1).As

    seen in Fig. 2, R1 is a group of microalgae which attained weak

    red and green fluorescence while group R2 had higher red and

    green fluorescence. Red and green fluorescence of group R3

    were highest, whereas red fluorescence of R4 was lowest

    amongst the groups, but its green fluorescence was as high as

    the R3 group. The result demonstrates that the size and chlo-

    rophyll content of sorted cells corresponds with sorting 

    criteria, i.e. sorted cells of group R1 and R2 had a size of 

    approximately 3  mm, and group R3 10  mm. CAF in each of the

    groups differed, where group R4, which was low in red fluo-

    rescence, was successfully sorted based on its GAF. In this

    study, the CAF of microalgae was used successfully as

    a biomarker to distinguish and isolate microalgae in natural

    seawater samples. Using the CAF vs. GAF protocol a diverse

    taxa of microalgae was isolated. In agreement with previous

    studies by Tang and Dobbs  [8]  and Lage et al.   [17], the GAF

    protocol aided in the taxonomic identification of dinoflagel-

    lates, diatoms, green algae, cyanobacteria, and raphidophytes.

    Fig. 3  e  Microalgae strain screening procedure.

    b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 2 5 3 4 e2 5 4 42538

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6527958_Green_Autofluorescence_in_Dinoflagellates_Diatoms_and_Other_Microalgae_and_Its_Implications_for_Vital_Staining_and_Morphological_Studies?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11910563_Flow_cytometric_analysis_of_chronic_and_acute_toxicity_of_copperII_on_the_marine_dinoflagellate_Amphidinium_carterae?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6527958_Green_Autofluorescence_in_Dinoflagellates_Diatoms_and_Other_Microalgae_and_Its_Implications_for_Vital_Staining_and_Morphological_Studies?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11910563_Flow_cytometric_analysis_of_chronic_and_acute_toxicity_of_copperII_on_the_marine_dinoflagellate_Amphidinium_carterae?el=1_x_8&enrichId=rgreq-0919a7a7-a346-444f-952b-560d6f63c5a6&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIzMjQwNzI4ODtBUzoxNDQzMjEzNTc1NTM2NjRAMTQxMTQyMDMwMTQzMw==

  • 8/16/2019 Offprint_ Screening Marine Microalgae

    7/12

    Author's personal copy

    Isolated strains were identified using their morphological

    features. The characteristics of the isolates are documented in

    Table 1. Most isolates (i.e. 83% of the total) were diatom

    species belonging to the genera of  Skeletonema,  Thalassiosira,

    Chaetoceros   and   Cyclotella   sp. Green microalgae, i.e.   Nanno-chloropsis sp. plus some unidentified strains were less abun-

    dant than the diatoms, but many isolates from this group

    exhibited the highest lipid content i.e.  >40% as biomass dry

    weight. Images of representative isolated strains are shown in

    Fig. 4.

    3.3. Verification of single-cell sorting efficacy

    In order to confirm that sorted cells were uniquely deposited

    in separate incubation wells, the sorted cells weresubjected to

    the control procedure. The success rate of one-cell-per-well

    sorting was high, ranging from 82% to 100%. Moreover,

    50e

    75% of thesorted cells remained viable. This ratio is higherthan that previously reported by Sensen et al. [7], where only

    20e30% of sorted cells grew successfully. 250  mL scaled-up

    cultures of the sorted cells were further analyzed using an

    Epics Altra flow cytometer to verify that isolates were in pure

    culture. The cytometric dot plots confirmed that the sorted

    cultures were derived from a single isolate.

    3.4. Growth rate and biomass production of isolatedmicroalgae

    Following isolation, a total of 96 isolated strains were pre-

    screened via NR fluorescence of cellular neutral lipid and epi-

    fluorescence microscopy. Isolates were inoculated into Guillar

     f  /2 or Walne medium. Almost all isolates grew robustly in  f  /2

    medium. However, the growth of motile and flagellate micro-

    algal isolates, e. g. strain 45 and 50, was promoted in Walne

    medium and exhibited a strong neutral lipid fluorescence

    when stained with Nile red. During cultivating, a number of 

    isolates could not survive due to challenges in culture accli-

    mation. Isolates that grew rapidly and manifested strong 

    yellow-gold fluorescence from NR stained cells (i.e. reflecting a relativelyhigh neutrallipid content)were further screened. A

    totalof21strainsofthe96isolatedmicroalgaeweresuitablefor

    further characterization, and results are shown in Table 2.

    Table 1 e Sample locations and characteristics of local isolated microalgae strains.

    Sampling locations

    Number of isolatedstrains

    Number of selectedstrains

    Number of diatoms

    Number of greenalgae

    Number of motile/flagellates

    Pulau Ubin island 39 9 35 (89.7)a 4 (10.3) NA

    St John’s island 26 4 23 (88.5) 3 (11.5) NAKranji coast 15 4 9 (60) 3 (20) 3 (20)

    Second link 13 3 10 (76.9) 2 (15.4) 1 (0.08)

    Changi 3 1 3 NA NA

    Total 96 21 80 (83.3) 12 (12.5) 4 (4.2)

    NA e not available.

    a Numbers in parentheses are percentage of total isolates.

    Fig. 4 e Photos of the representative isolated microalgal strains from Singapore’s coastal water. (a)  Skeletonema costatum; (b)

    Thalassionema nitzschoides; (c) Cyclotella sp; (d) Nannochloropsis sp; (e)  Thalassiosira sp.; (f)  Dunaliella sp.

    b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 2 5 3 4 e2 5 4 4   2539

  • 8/16/2019 Offprint_ Screening Marine Microalgae

    8/12

    Author's personal copy

    In general, most isolated strains had a growth cycle of 8

    days to stationary phase. However, some strains were found

    to have a shorter growth cycle, such as the long-chain diatom

    Skeletolema  sp. (strain 18) and   Chaetoceros socialis   (strain 35).

    Strains 18 and 35 bloomed at day 2, but collapsed between day

    3 and 4, and had a relatively low gravimetric lipid content (i.e.

    2.2e2.7% of biomass DW). These were therefore deemed

    unsuitable for further culture. Other strains had an extended

    growth log phase of up to 20 days, such as the group of 

    Nannochloropsis   sp. The diatoms  Skeletonema costatum,   Ach-

    nanles sp. and Chaetoceros sp. had higher specific growth rates

    i.e. 0.87e0.99 d1 than other strains. However, the   Nanno-

    chloropsis  group attained the best overall biomass yield i.e.

    0.2e0.4 g L1. From the screening, Nannochloropsis and several

    other strains among the best biomass producers were furtherinvestigated for lipid accumulation. Naturally, a strain which

    has high biomass productivity may manifest in a relative low

    lipid productivity and vice versa [18].

    3.5. Cellular lipid accumulation

    3.5.1. Total lipid content (gravimetric determination)

    One of the key criteria for selection of candidate microalgae

    strains for biodiesel feedstock production is a high intracel-

    lular lipid content. Based on gravimetric total lipid, the

    maximum yield of cellular lipid content in stationary phase,

    which has been the potential source for biodiesel production,was estimated. The results in   Table 2   show that approxi-

    mately half of the locally isolated marine microalgae strains

    contained a total lipid content greater than 25% as biomass

    DW. Among these strains, the total lipid content of strains 31,

    40, 44, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 and 51 exceeded 30%. The group of 

    Nannochloropsis  sp. i.e. strains 31, 44, 46, 47, 48, 49, 51 had

    a total lipid content of up to 45%. Next were  Achnanthes  sp.

    (strain 40), a benthic microalga and Heterosigma sp. (strain 50),

    a flagella microalga (class   Raphidophycae) which contained

    total lipid contents at 44.5 1.7 and 39.9 2.6%, respectively.

    Among locally isolated strains, Nannochloropsis sp. displayed

    thebest potential since they metthe balancebetween relatively

    high biomassproductivity anda high intracellular lipid content.Previous studies have also reported   Nannochloropsis   sp. as

    having a high biomass and lipid production potential [18e21].

    3.5.2. Neutral lipid (NR fluorescence)

    Total lipidsare composed of neutral lipid in theform of energy

    reserve bodies, as well as glyco- and phospholipids in the

    structural membranes. Neutral lipids are typically the major

    constituents of algal lipid-oil in aging or stressed cultures,

    mainly in the form of triacylglycerols (TAGs) [22e24]. Although

    both polar and neutral lipids can be converted to biodiesel

    [25,26], neutral lipid is the desirable fraction since TAGs are

    Table 2 e Genera, growth rate, biomass and lipid content of selected microalgal strains.

    Strain Genera/species

    Growthrate(d1)

    Biomassconcentration

    (g L1)

    Lipidcontent

    (% of DW)

    1   Skeletonema

    costatum

    0.95 0.09 0.01 9.5 1.7c

    4   Thalassiosira sp. 0.61 0.08 0.03 17.8 3.8b

    5   Thalassionema

    nitzschoides

    0.58 0.05 0.03 2.8 0.1c

    18   Skeletonema sp. 0.59 0.24 0.06 2.7 0.4c

    19   Thalassiosira sp. 0.79 0.05 0.01 0.9 0.1c

    30   Thalassiosira sp. 0.85 0.04 0.01 13.6 1.2b

    31   Nannochloropsis sp. 0.62 0.39 0.09 42.4 1.2a

    34   Chaetoceros sp. 0.87 0.06 0.01 16.3 4.0b

    35   Chaetoceros socialis   0.64 0.07 0.02 2.2 1.4c

    40   Achnanthes sp. 0.99 0.09 0.03 44.5 1.7a

    41   Cyclotella sp. 0.41 0.20 0.02 12.7 2.0c

    42 Unidentified 0.48 0.18 0.01 11.2 1.8c

    43 Unidentified 0.57 0.11 0.02 32.6 2.7b

    44   Nannochloropsis sp. 0.52 0.29 0.05 39.5 1.9a

    45   Cryptomomas sp. 0.47 0.07 0.02 28.6 0.6b

    46   Nannochloropsis sp. 0.42 0.27 0.03 41.4 1.3a

    47   Nannochloropsis sp. 0.60 0.4 0.03 44.8 1.7a

    48   Nannochloropsis sp. 0.47 0.28 0.04 40.3 1.3a

    49   Nannochloropsis sp. 0.46 0.22 0.05 42.7 1.9a

    50   Heterosigma sp. 0.50 0.07 0.01 39.9 2.0a

    51   Nannochloropsis sp. 0.55 0.35 0.07 42.2 1.6a

    Note: Biomass concentration and lipid content at stationary phase.

    Data expressed as mean SD (n ¼ 3). Means of total lipid content

    are compared using one-way ANOVA, followed by a Stu-

    denteNewmaneKeuls (SNK) multiple comparison test. Letters

    represented the order of significant differences between themeans: a > b > c.

    Fig. 5 e  NR fluorescence and cell density of  Thalasiossira sp. (strain 4) over a 10-day cultivation.

    b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 2 5 3 4 e2 5 4 42540

  • 8/16/2019 Offprint_ Screening Marine Microalgae

    9/12

    Author's personal copy

    easily transesterified to biodiesel. Determination of neutral

    lipid using high-throughput screening technique based on NR

    fluorescence has been widely used as NR staining is a rapid

    method to quantify intracellular lipid   in vivo  [12,27]. In this

    study, NR fluorescence represents as a high-throughput

    screening tool to select a favourable microalgae strain from

    many isolates. The screening of microalgae intracellular lipid

    production was carried out in two aspects: the kinetic accu-mulation of neutral lipid during the microalgae growth cycle;

    and the maximum level of neutral lipid in stationary phase.

    Firstly, an investigation of the kinetic accumulation of 

    intracellular neutral lipid of selected strains during the cell

    growth cycle was conducted. Fig. 5 shows the growth curve

    and cellular lipid accumulation of strain 4 i.e. Thalassiosira sp.,

    as a representative strain. NR fluorescence was positively

    correlated to lipid accumulation (R2 ¼ 0.84). Neutral lipid

    content was low (intensity of 0.6e1.4 relative units) for the

    first 4 days of culture, after which it increased by twelve times

    to a peak value on day 10 during the stationary phase. During 

    the exponential phase (day 1 to day 4), cell density increased

    from 1.6 104

    to 10.3 104

    cell mL1

    . Fig. 5 shows that during early exponential phase, neutral lipid production was limited,

    but then increased substantially during the stationary phase.

    In addition, NR fluorescence of neutral lipids can be utilized to

    determine the relationship between lipid accumulation and

    the growth phase of microalgae [12,27e29]. Typically, protein

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    1 4 5 18 19 30 31 34 35 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51

    Strain

       R  e   l  a   t   i  v  e   f   l  u  o  r  e  s  c  e  n  c  e   i  n   t  e  n  s   i   t  y   (  a .  u .   )

    Fig. 6  e  NR fluorescence of 21 local microalgae strains at stationary phase. Fluorescence intensity was measured at an

    excitation wavelength 480 nm and emission at 575 nm. Cell density was normalized at 0.2 (OD680 nm ).

    Table 3 e Fatty acid composition of several isolated microalgae strains (% of total FAME, n[3).

    Fatty acid Strains

    31 40 44 46 47 48 49 50 51

    Myristic acid (C14:0) 3.5 0.5 7.0 0.3 3.5 0.1 3.7 0.2 3.4 0.2 3.4 0.3 3.8 0.6 9.0 02.3 4.4 0.0

    Pentadecanoic acid (C15:0) 0.5 0.1 1.5 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.1 nd 0.7 0.3 nd

    Palmitoleic acid (C16:1) 29.2 3.9 45.0 5.5 29.8 6.5 29.4 6.5 31.0 6.1 30.7 4.9 32.8 3.2 20.5 4.3 30.0 0.3

    Palmitic acid (C16:0) 28.4 6.2 30.4 3.5 29.6 2.4 29.9 5.8 29.5 4.5 29.2 4.5 31.4 1.8 33.4 2.6 40.8 0.1

    Linolenic acid (C18:3) nd 0.5 0.1 nd nd nd nd 0.6 0.1 3.6 0.3 nd

    Linoleic acid (C18:2n6) 2.1 1.2 1.0 0.2 0.6 0.3 1.2 0.1 1.4 0.5 2.1 0.8 2.1 0.9 5.0 0.9 0.7 0.1

    Oleic acid (C18:1n9) 5.5 1.9 0.94 0.2 5.9 1.4 6.4 1.5 6.3 1.7 6.6 1.2 6.4 0.9 10.6 2.3 12.0 0.0

    Stearic acid (C18:0) 2.0 0.5 0.6 0.2 3.2 0.9 2.4 0.9 1.9 0.1 1.8 0.1 2.3 0.5 0.9 0.3 1.8 0.2

    Arachidonic acid (C20:4n6) 4.8 1.5 0.6 0.1 4.1 2.3 6.2 0.4 5.3 0.0 5.4 0.1 6.4 0.9 1.8 0.3 2.5 0.1

    Eicosapentaenoic acid (C20:5n3) 18.6 4.5 12.3 2.5 18.2 4.5 18.5 4.5 17.9 5.5 17.6 5.2 12.4 4.3 13.0 4.3 7.5 0.1

    Docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6n3) nd nd nd nd nd nd nd 2.1 0.7 nd

    Behenic acid (C22:0) nd nd nd nd nd nd nd 1.5 0.1 nd

    Lignoceric acid (C24:0) 1.4 0.5 0.8 0.2 1.9 0.5 1.6 0.5 1.2 0.4 0.5 0.1 1.3 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.45 0.1

    Others 3.9 0.8 2.2 0.5 3.4 1.5 1.4 0.4 2.1 0.8 2.9 0.9 1.5 0.1 4.1 0.9 0.3 0.0

    nd¼ non-detectable level. Others: fatty acid constituents as identified using a 37 FAME standard, but where concentration was below 0.5% of total FAME. Data expressed as mean SD (n ¼ 3). Fatty acids are compared using one-way ANOVA, followed by a StudenteNewmaneKeuls

    (SNK) multiple comparison test. Letters represented the order of significant differences between the means: a > b > c.

    b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 2 5 3 4 e2 5 4 4   2541

  • 8/16/2019 Offprint_ Screening Marine Microalgae

    10/12

    Author's personal copy

    synthesis is predominant over neutral lipid accumulation in

    the exponential phase of cell growth [30], where neutral lipid

    accumulation is elevated in the stationary phase as prevailing 

    nutrients become limited and cell division is reduced. Basedon the NR fluorescence measurement as an indicator for

    intracellular neutral lipid content, the harvesting time of 

    microalgae can be optimized for maximum yield.

    Secondly, to isolate candidate strain(s) that accumulate

    high neutral lipid, NR was used to stain selected strains in

    stationary phase. The NR fluorescence of neutral lipid content

    of selected strains is shown in Fig. 6. Most diatoms responded

    rapidly to NR staining,whereemission of NR fluorescencewas

    representative of total intracellular neutral lipid [12,31]. Ach-

    nanthes sp. (strain 40) had the highest NR fluorescence inten-

    sity which corresponded to total lipid, at a relative intensity of 

    32 au. and 44.5%, respectively. However,  Nannochloropsis  sp.

    was not efficiently stained using the conventional NR fluo-rescence method. Thus, the level of total lipid and neutral

    lipid did not correspond, where the fluorescence of stained

    cells was weak (see Fig. 6) but gravimetric total lipid content in

    stationary phase was high (see Table 2). Inefficient NR staining 

    of   Nannochloropsis   strain has been previously reported by

    Sheehan et al. [32], and is likely due to cell wall properties of 

    Nannochloropsis  sp. which resist dye absorption. In order to

    address this problem, a modified Nile red staining procedure

    for  Nannochloropsis  is required. In this study, therefore only

    gravimetric lipid content was used to select the most favour-

    able Nannochloropsis strains.

    3.6. Fatty acid profile of isolated strains

    In addition to screening microalgae for elevated biomass

    productivity and intrinsic cellular lipid content, the fatty acid

    profile of microalgae is also an important characteristic as it

    ultimately affects the quality of the biodiesel product [20,33,34].

    Thecarbonchainlengthofsaturatedandunsaturatedfattyacids

    affects biodiesel properties such as cetane number, oxidative

    stability and cold-flow properties   [35,36]. Generally, high

    proportion of saturated fatty acids (SFA) and monounsaturated

    fatty acids (MUFA) are preferred for increased energy yield,

    superior oxidative stability, and higher cetane numbers.

    However,oilsdominatedbythesefattyacidsarepronetosolidify

    at low temperature. While oils rich in polyunsaturated fatty

    acids (PUFAs) have very good cold-flow properties, they are, on

    the other hand, more susceptible to oxidation.

    On the basis of cell growth rate and lipid content (see data in

    Table 2 and Fig. 5), nine strains of microalgae which had a total

    lipid content significantly greater (SNK test,   p< 0.05) than

    others, ranging from 39.5 to 44.8%, were further characterizedwith fatty acid profile using FAME profile as a proxy. Results in

    Tables 3 and 4 show that the majority of fatty acids present in

    isolated microalgae were palmitic (C16:0), palmitoleic (C16:1)

    and eicosapentaenoic (C20:5n3) acids which comprised 63e80%

    of thetotalFAME. Threestrains of Nannochloropsis (i.e.strains 31,

    47, 51) and   Heterosigma   (strain 50) had a fatty acid content

    significantly higher (SNK test, p < 0.05) than the rest (see Table

    3). Although strain 50 accumulated high total lipid and FAME

    content (39.9% and 19.6% of biomass DW, respectively), it had

    a relatively low biomass concentration i.e. 0.07 g L1, and was

    therefore eliminated fromfurther evaluation. SFA andMUFA in

    Nannochloropsis strains31, 47 and51 were predominant at>70%

    of the total lipid content (see Table 4) which is favourable forhigh cetane number  [20,33,37]. However,   Nannochloropsis  had

    PUFAs in range of 10.7e27% which exceeded the requirements

    in the International Biodiesel Standard for Vehicles (EN14214).

    The PUFA of  Nannochloropsis were mainly arachidonic acid (AA,

    C20:4n6) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, C20:5n3) which are

    high-valuefattyacidsforhumannutritionandfoodadditives.In

    order to comply with biodiesel standard on the PUFA ratio, AA

    and EPA of Nannochloropsis canbe extracted before the restof oil

    can be converted to biodiesel. This makes   Nannochloropsis-

    derived biodiesel less susceptible to oxidation in storage and

    takes full advantage of  Nannochloropsis.

    4. Conclusions

    High-throughput isolation, using flow cytometric cell sor-

    ting based on red and green fluorescence, and forward-light

    scatter was used to isolate a diverse range of microalgae taxa

    from Singapore’s coastal marine waters. Of 96 strains isolated,

    a total of 21 strains were characterized for intrinsic growth

    rate, biomass production and intracellular lipid content. The

    three best strains with respect to lipid accumulation and

    biomass generation were all Nannochloropsis sp. (strains 31, 47

    and 51), with a rapid and robust growth (growth rate-

    > 0.55 d1), lipid contents ranging from 42.5 to 45% as biomass

    DW, and a corresponding FAME yield ranging between 16 and

    22% of DW. Furthermore, these strains have a predominance

    of SFA and MUFA e corresponding to a favourably high cetane

    Table 4 e Composition (% of total FAME) and yield of FAME (% of DW) of microalgae strains.

    Properties Strains

    31 40 44 46 47 48 49 50 51

    SFA (% of total FAME) 35.7 1.8 40.2 5.4 35.5 4.9 38.1 5.6 36.5 1.2 35.3 1.3 39.0 0.8 45.4 2.5 47.5 0.7MFA (% of total FAME) 34.8 2.9 45.9 3.4 35.6 1.8 35.7 4.9 37.3 3.9 37.3 3.7 39.1 5.3 31.0 5.7 41.8 1.7

    PUFA (% of total FAME) 27.0 6.8 14.3 3.7 25.9 1.7 25.2 2.7 24.6 1.6 25.2 1.9 21.1 1.6 23.7 3.7 10.7 0.9

    Total FAME content (% DW) 19.8 2.7a 15.8 2.7b 15.5 1.2b 11.2 2.7b 16.6 1.4a 14.7 3.1b 14.1 2.2b 19.6 1.7a 21.3 1.6a

    Total FAME content (% total lipid) 46.7 2.5 35.5 2.9 39.2 3.1 25.0 2.3 37.1 4.1 36.7 2.6 33.5 2.8 48.8 3.3 49.8 2.5

    SFA¼ Saturated fatty acids (14:0, 15:0, 16:0, 18:0, 22:0, 24:0), MUFA ¼monounsaturated fatty acids (16:1, 18:1n9), PUFA¼ polyunsaturated fatty

    acids (18:2n6, 18:3n3, 20:4n6, 20:5n3, 22:6n3). Data expressed as mean SD (n ¼ 3). Means of total FAME content are compared using one-way

    ANOVA, followed by a StudenteNewmaneKeuls (SNK) multiple comparison test. Letters represented the order of significant differences

    between the means: a > b > c.

    b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 2 5 3 4 e2 5 4 42542

  • 8/16/2019 Offprint_ Screening Marine Microalgae

    11/12

    Author's personal copy

    number for biodiesel feedstock. The screening procedure

    provided useful ways to select microalgae, and is recom-

    mended as an essential process for biodiesel feedstock

    production. In the screening process, NR fluorescence was

    used as a high-throughput screening method for determina-

    tion of microalgae cellular lipid content. Besides lipid content,biomass production is also a critical factor to select a favour-

    able microalgae strain. Nannochloropsis strains are undergoing 

    on-going investigation to further enhance biomass produc-

    tivity and lipid yield to improve their viability as a biodiesel

    feedstock.

    Acknowledgements

    Funding of this research project was provided by Agency for

    Science, Technology and Research of Singapore (A* STAR). We

    also thank Toh Kok Tee (NUMI) and Yeo Yin Sheng Wilson of 

    the Tropical Marine Science Institute (TMSI) for technical

    support on theuse of the flowcytometer, Dang TheCuong and

    Sarah Siti Binte Aziz for microalgae sampling and

    identification.

    r e f e r e n c e s

    [1] Chisti Y. Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol Adv 2007;25:294e306.

    [2] Chisti Y. Biodiesel from microalgae beats bioethanol. TrendsBiotechnol 2008;26:126e31.

    [3] Banerjee A, Sharma R, Chisti Y, Banerjee UC. Botryococcusbraunii: a renewable source of hydrocarbons and otherchemicals. Crit Rev Biotechnol 2002;22:245e79.

    [4] Davey HM, Kell DB. Flow cytometry and cell sorting of heterogeneous microbial populations: the importance of single-cell analyses. Microbiol Rev 1996;60:641e96.

    [5] Reckermann M. Flow sorting in aquatic ecology. Sci Mar 2000;64:235e46.

    [6] Crosbie ND, Pockl M, Weisse T. Rapid establishment of clonalisolates of freshwater autotrophic picoplankton by single-cell and single-colony sorting. J Microbiol Meth 2003;55:361e70.

    [7] Sensen C, Heimann K, Melkonian M. The production of clonal and axenic cultures of microalgae using fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Eur J Phycol 1993;28:93e7.

    [8] Tang YZ, Dobbs FC. Green autofluorescence indinoflagellates, diatoms, and other microalgae and itsimplications for vital staining and morphological studies.Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:2306e13.

    [9] Guillard RRL. Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marineinvertebrates. In: Smith WL, Chaley MH, editors. Culture of marine invertebrate animals. New York: Plenum Press; 1975.p. 26e60.

    [10] Walne PR. Studies on food value of nineteen genera of algaeto juvenile bivalves of the genera Ostrea,  Crassostrea,Mercenaria and Mytilus. Fish Invest Lond Ser 2 1970;26:1e62.

    [11] Wood AM, Everroad RC, Wingard LM. Measuring growthrates in microalgal cultures. In: Andersen RA, editor. Algalculturing techniques. Elsevier Academic Press; 2005. p.269e85.

    [12] Cooksey KE, Guckert JB, Williams SA, Callis PR. Fluorometric-determination of the neutral lipid-content of microalgal cellsusing Nile Red. J Microbiol Meth 1987;6:333e45.

    [13] Alonzo F, Mayzaud P. Spectrofluorometric quantification of neutral and polar lipids in zooplankton using Nile red. MarChem 1999;67:289e301.

    [14] Shapiro HM. Practical flow cytometry. 3rd ed. New York:Wiley-Liss; 1995.

    [15] Folch J, Lees M, Stanley GHS. A simple method for theisolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues.

     J Biol Chem 1957;226:497e509.[16] Lewis T, Nichols PD, McMeekin TA. Evaluation of extraction

    methods for recovery of fatty acids from lipid-producing microheterotrophs. J Microbiol Meth 2000;43:107e16.

    [17] Lage OM, Sansonetty F, O’Connor JE, Parente AM. Flowcytometric analysis of chronic and acute toxicity of copper(II)on the marine dinoflagellate Amphidinium carterae. Cytometry2001;44:226e35.

    [18] Rodolfi L, Zittelli GC, Bassi N, Padovani G, Biondi N, Bonini G,et al. Microalgae for oil: strain selection, induction of lipidsynthesis and outdoor mass cultivation in a low-costphotobioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 2009;102:100e12.

    [19] Chiu S-Y, Kao C-Y, Tsai M-T, Ong S-C, Chen C-H, Lin C-S.Lipid accumulation and CO2 utilization of   Nannochloropsisoculata in response to CO2 aeration. Bioresour Technol 2009;100:833e8.

    [20] Gouveia L, Oliveira AC. Microalgae as a raw material forbiofuelsproduction.J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2009;36:269e74.

    [21] Zou N, Zhang C, Cohen Z, Richmond A. Production of cellmass and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) in ultrahigh celldensity cultures of   Nannochloropsis sp. (Eustigmatophyceae).Eur J Phycol 2000;35:127e33.

    [22] Alonso DL, Belarbi EL, Rodriguez-Ruiz J, Segura CI,Gimenez A. Acyl lipids of three microalgae. Phytochemistry1998;47:1473e81.

    [23] Chen GQ, Jiang Y, Chen F. Variation of lipid classcomposition in  Nitzschia laevis  as a response to growthtemperature change. Food Chem 2008;109:88e94.

    [24] Hu Q,SommerfeldM, JarvisE, GhirardiM, PosewitzM, SeibertM,et al. Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for biofuelproduction: perspectives and advances. Plant J 2008;54:621e39.

    [25] Ichihara K, Yamaguchi C, Araya Y, Sakamoto A, Yoneda K.Preparation of fatty acid methyl esters by selectivemethanolysis of polar glycerolipids. Lipids 2010;45:367e74.

    [26] NotaG, Musso SS,NaviglioD, RomanoR, Sabia V.Determinationof sterolsand their estersin fats by wayof transesterification indifferent solvents. Anal Lett 1999;32:811e25.

    [27] Elsey D, Jameson D, Raleigh B, Cooney MJ. Fluorescentmeasurement of microalgal neutral lipids. J Microbiol Meth2007;68:639e42.

    [28] da Silva TL, Reis A, Medeiros R, Oliveira AC, Gouveia L. Oilproduction towards biofuel from autotrophic microalgaesemicontinuous cultivations monitorized by flow cytometry.

    Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2009;159:568e

    78.[29] Yu ET, Zendejas FJ, Lane PD, Gaucher S, Simmons BA,Lane TW. Triacylglycerol accumulation and profiling in themodel diatoms  Thalassiosira pseudonana  and  Phaeodactylumtricornutum   (Baccilariophyceae) during starvation. J ApplPhycol 2009;21:669e81.

    [30] Sukenik A, Wahnon R. Biochemical quality of marineunicellular algae with special emphasis on lipid composition.I.  Isochrysis galbana. Aquaculture 1991;97:61e72.

    [31] Greenspan P, Mayer EP, Fowler SD. Nile red: a selectivefluorescent stain for intracellular lipid droplets. J Cell Biol1985;100:965e73.

    [32] Sheehan J, Dunahay T, Benemann J, Roessler P. Look back atthe U.S. Department of Energy’s Aquatic Species Program;Biodiesel from algae. United States; 1998. p. 294.

    [33] Ramos MJ, Fernandez CM, Casas A, Rodriguez L, Perez A.Influence of fatty acid composition of raw materials onbiodiesel properties. Bioresour Technol 2009;100:261e8.

    b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 2 5 3 4 e2 5 4 4   2543

  • 8/16/2019 Offprint_ Screening Marine Microalgae

    12/12

    Author's personal copy

    [34] Knothe G. Dependence of biodiesel fuel properties on thestructure of fatty acid alkyl esters. Fuel Process Technol 2005;86:1059e70.

    [35] Smith PC, Ngothai Y, Nguyen QD, O’Neill BK. Improving the low-temperature properties of biodiesel: methodsand consequences. Renew Energy 2010;35:1145e51.

    [36] Knothe G, Matheaus AC, Ryan TW. Cetane numbers of branched and straight-chain fatty esters determinedin an ignition quality tester. Fuel 2003;82:971e5.

    [37] Francisco EC, Neves DB, Jacob-Lopes E, Franco TT. Microalgaeas feedstock for biodiesel production: carbon dioxidesequestration, lipid production and biofuel quality. J ChemTechnol Biotechnol 2010;85:395e403.

    b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 2 5 3 4 e2 5 4 42544