Upload
questa
View
26
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Office of Science Experience with Surveillance and Maintenance (S&M) of Environmental Remediation. David Michlewicz – DOE Office of Science, Office of Safety, Security and Infrastructure Contributors Susan Heston and Kaushik Joshi – Argonne Site Office - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Office of Science Experience with Surveillance and Maintenance (S&M)
of Environmental Remediation
David Michlewicz – DOE Office of Science, Office of Safety, Security and Infrastructure
ContributorsSusan Heston and Kaushik Joshi – Argonne Site OfficeHemant Patel – Berkeley Site OfficeGail Penny – Brookhaven Site OfficeMac Roddye – SC-Oak RidgeDavid Osugi – SLAC Site Office
2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance ConferenceNovember 16, 2010
2
Office of Science Mission Single largest supporter of basic research in the physical
sciences in the United States (Budget ~$5 billion) Office of Science (SC) manages and supports basic
science research programs in: Advanced Scientific Computing Research
Basic Energy Sciences (including materials sciences, chemistry, physical biosciences, and geosciences)
Biological and Environmental Research (including genomics-based systems biology for energy & environment, climate science, and subsurface science for DOE legacy sites)
Fusion Energy Sciences
High Energy Physics
Nuclear Physics
3
SC Stewards10 out of 17 DOE National Laboratories
4
EM to SC Site Transitions
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) – FY 2008
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) – FY 2010 Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) – Planned for
FY 2012 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC) – Planned
for FY 2012 Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) – >20 Years
5
Factors Affecting Transitions at SC Sites
All five sites have continuing science missions
so
S&M of environmental remediation is accepted as part of routine site operations and integrated into site-wide environmental monitoring program
6
SC and EM Conditions for Site Transition (2-9-2006)
Implement DOE O 430.1B (RPAM) Joint development of Site Transition Plan (STP) and S&M Plan SC support to EM with CD-4 for transferred activities Readiness Assessment prior to transfer EM transfers 5-year target to SC – functional transfer memo to
CFO EM transfers to SC records, real property, contracts and grants,
IT resources, etc. EM retains responsibility for litigation, closure of contracts,
Records of Decisions, worker compensation claims One year “warranty” on unanticipated cost and scope No transfer without adequate funding
7
LBNL - S&M Requirements Environmental remediation scope completed under RCRA in
FY 2007 Operating, maintaining, and monitoring the corrective measures
– 11 groundwater treatment systems and ~175 monitoring and extraction wells
Quarterly reporting on the status of the corrective measures Conducting five-year reviews (first review in 2012) Submitting documentation when cleanup standards have been
met Evaluating efficacy of continuing cleanup measures Evaluating requirements for land use restrictions Reporting and cleanup of newly discovered legacy releases Evaluating impacts of contamination on new construction
8
6
9
LBNL - Status of S&M S&M integrated into site-wide environmental
management system Corrective measures are being applied in seven areas of
groundwater contamination Eleven groundwater treatment systems operating The corrective measures have been effective in reducing
contaminant concentrations Groundwater plumes are stable or attenuating and
plumes are not migrating offsite Groundwater contaminant concentrations reduced below
the drinking water standard in some areas
10
ANL - S&M Requirements
Site-wide remediation program was conducted under Illinois EPA RCRA Corrective Action Program requirements, completed in September 2003
Operations and maintenance of groundwater extraction and phytoremediation at 300 Area
Maintenance of engineered clay covers for three landfills Periodic groundwater monitoring at 300 and 800 Areas
and reporting to IEPA Records management
11
Groundwater Monitoring Wells and Solid Waste Management Units
12
ANL - Status of S&M
S&M integrated into site-wide Environmental Management System
All remedial actions that were installed are operational and well-maintained
Recently IEPA approved S&M modification, thus reducing its scope and making it more cost effective
ANL will consider technically viable and cost-effective options to enhance current remediation actions at the 300 Area, thus eliminating or shortening the long-term groundwater monitoring
BNL - S&M Requirements Legacy cleanup to be completed under a BNL Interagency Agreement with the U.S EPA
and New York State by end of FY 2011
S&M of completed environmental remedies required under CERCLA
Operating, maintaining, and monitoring 16 groundwater treatment systems and ~700 monitoring wells
Monthly, quarterly and annual reporting
Monitoring and reporting on Peconic River cleanup Maintenance and monitoring of three capped landfills
Surveillance and maintenance of two decommissioned research reactors –
D&D completed in FY 2011
Implementing a land use controls management program and controlling uses of some soil remediation sites
Five-year reviews (2nd review in 2011)
Continued regulatory outreach
Reporting and cleanup of newly discovered legacy releases
13
14
16 Groundwater Treatment Systems13 Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Systems2 Sr-90 Systems
1 Tritium Pump & Recharge System
Since 1996:• 16 billion
gallons of contaminated groundwater treated and recharged to the aquifer
• 6,400 lbs VOCs removed
• 21 mCi Sr-90 removed
• 2 systems met cleanup goals and were dismantled
15
Cleanup Progress 1997 to 2009
16
BNL - Status of S&M STP/ target transfer being negotiated Additional remediation scope is an issue S&M will be integrated into site-wide environmental monitoring
program Monitoring has determined that additional cleanup scope was
required for Peconic River, additional extraction wells for Strontium-90 groundwater treatment and deep VOC contaminated soil removal
To be completed by FY 2012 prior to transfer to SC 2nd Five Year Review in progress Reactor D&D is in progress and S&M plans are under development Sixteen groundwater treatment systems are operating and have been
effective in reducing contaminant concentrations
17
SLAC - S&M Requirements A 2009 cleanup and abatement order from the San Francisco Bay Area
Regional Water Quality Control Board named both DOE and Stanford University as responsible parties and required the remediation process to be modeled on CERCLA guidelines
Environmental remediation for the current EM scope to be completed in FY 2011
Operation, maintenance, and monitoring of five (5) groundwater treatment systems and ~135 groundwater monitoring and extraction wells
Maintenance of site controls and surveillance of soil cleanup areas EM will have continuing responsibility (and liability) to prepare and fund
the preparation of applicable Water Board-required documents and perform any required modifications to remedies necessary to obtain regulator approval
18
Investigation Area Locations-1
19
Investigation Area Locations-2
20
SLAC - Status of S&M
STP/ target transfer being negotiated EM's future commitment on currently inaccessible
or unidentified legacy contamination will be addressed in the STP
S&M will be integrated into site-wide environmental monitoring program
21
ORNL
EM is expected to be responsible for all reservation cleanup, including S&M of environmental remediation measures, for at least twenty years. Responsibility will then transfer to SC.
Established S&M measures include Enforceable provisions in CERCLA RODs Annual monitoring and reporting to the State and
U.S. EPA Perpetual trust fund for onsite disposal facility
22
EM to SC Transfer Challenges
Completion of EM cleanup scope doesn’t mean that all cleanup has been completed. Examples of remaining scope: BNL – Demolition of BGRR Building 701 and cleanup of
soil contamination at Brookhaven Avenue SLAC – Future cleanup of inaccessible or unidentified
legacy contamination areas Excess facilities at ANL, BNL, LBNL, ORNL and SLAC
Funding from laboratory overhead increases overhead burden on lab programs