34
Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Office of Highway Safety

Linden, New JerseyLinden, New Jersey

May 1, 2003

Page 2: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

N

Mercedes at final rest Ford at final rest

Water puddle

6-inch raised median curb

Page 3: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003
Page 4: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003
Page 5: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Parties to the Investigation Parties to the Investigation

• Federal Highway Administration• New Jersey Department of

Transportation• City of Linden, New Jersey, Police

Department • No public hearing, depositions, or

party submissions

Page 6: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Major Issues IdentifiedMajor Issues Identified

• Alcohol impairment• Speed enforcement• Criteria for the use of median

barriers on high-volume, high-speed roadways

Page 7: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Proposed RecommendationsProposed Recommendations

• Federal Highway Administration • American Association of State

Highway and Transportation Officials

• City of Linden, New Jersey• Reiterated safety recommendation

to State of New Jersey

Page 8: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003
Page 9: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Office of Highway Safety

Human PerformanceHuman Performance

Page 10: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

OverviewOverview

• Driver experience and health• Driver activities• Toxicology• Fatigue and alcohol

Page 11: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Experience/HealthExperience/Health

• Properly licensed• No current or pending license

suspensions• No record of recent accidents or

moving violations• Described as being in “good health”

Page 12: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Driver ActivitiesDriver Activities

• Driver had “nontraditional” schedule• Did not work the 2 days before the

accident• Active in the 12 hours prior to crash

– Stopped at a bar– Played softball– Returned to the bar– Spoke with a friend

Page 13: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

ToxicologyToxicology

• Negative for illicit drugs• Testing found alcohol

– 0.326% in blood (BAC)– 0.379% in urine– 0.210% in vitreous humor

• Levels indicate significant alcohol consumption

Page 14: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Alcohol and DrivingAlcohol and Driving

• Impairment seen at 0.02%• Driving-related behaviors impaired

at 0.08%• Higher BAC levels result in greater

impairment• Functioning at this level suggests

alcohol tolerance

Page 15: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

ToleranceTolerance

• Not immunity• Learned through practice• Problem lies in unexpected events• Driver steering response consistent

with negated tolerance

Page 16: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Operator Fatigue and AlcoholOperator Fatigue and Alcohol

• Alcohol and sleep interact• Driver’s sleep night before accident

unknown • Combined effect of alcohol

consumption and low-quality sleep impaired performance

Page 17: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003
Page 18: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Office of Highway Safety

HIGHWAY ISSUESHIGHWAY ISSUES

Page 19: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Highway Safety IssuesHighway Safety Issues

• Motorists do not comply with the 40-mph speed limit

• No median barrier at accident location

Page 20: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Speed Data for U.S. 1Speed Data for U.S. 1

• Calculated speed of Mercedes was 62 mph

• Roadway design speed of 45 mph• Posted speed limit is 40 mph• No records of a speed survey being

conducted prior to the accident

Page 21: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

NTSB Speed StudyNTSB Speed Study

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

35-39

45-49

55-59

65-69

75-79

85-89

40-mph speed limit

Number of vehicles

Rec

ord

ed s

pee

d

Page 22: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Consequences of SpeedingConsequences of Speeding

• Nationwide, speeding contributed to 30 percent of all fatal accidents reported in 2004

• Increases the severity of crash forces• Reduces the ability to steer around curves

and obstacles• Increases vehicle stopping distance• Reduces a driver’s ability to react to

dangerous situations

Page 23: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Linden P.D. Speed EnforcementLinden P.D. Speed Enforcement

• Officials were aware of problem• Police department lacked the

resources to address the problem

Page 24: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003
Page 25: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

N

Accident Location

3 southbound lanes

3 northbound lanes

6-inch-high raised median

U.S. 1 near milepost 41.4

Mercedes at final rest Ford at final rest

Page 26: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Source: Linden P.D.

Accident location

Beginning ofmedian barrier

North

Page 27: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Southbound Approach on U.S. 1

Page 28: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Northbound Approach on U.S. 1

Page 29: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Source: Microsoft

No median barrier

Page 30: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Postaccident EvaluationPostaccident Evaluation

• New Jersey DOT evaluated the accident site for a median barrier

• Determined a barrier was not needed

• Nothing to prevent another catastrophic crash

Page 31: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

AASHTO Roadside Design GuideAASHTO Roadside Design Guide

• AASHTO establishes guidance for roadway design

• Barriers should only be used if the consequence of striking the barrier are less severe than if no barrier existed

• Severity of the accident would have been reduced had a barrier been installed in place of a raised median

Page 32: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Trip points

Source: Linden Police Department

Page 33: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

Median Barrier EvaluationMedian Barrier Evaluation

• High-speed, controlled-access roadways

• High-volume, non-controlled-access roadways

• Multilane expressways • Highways with partial control of

access• Lack of evaluative criteria

Page 34: Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003