Law of Crimes

Offences against Public Tranquility

Chapter 8 of the Indian Penal Code | Sections 141 to 160

October 2010

Srinivas Atreya

519

Unlawful Assembly

Unlawful assembly is a legal term to describe a group of people with the

mutual intent of deliberate disturbance of the peace. A disturbance of the

public peace by a group of persons who meet together with an intent mutually

to assist each other in the execution of some unlawful enterprise of a private

nature, with force and violence. Chapter 8 of the Indian Penal Code defines the

various sections which deal with offences against public tranquility and

specifically section 141 defines the offence of Unlawful assembly.

Section 141 of the Indian Penal Code deals with the definition of unlawful

assembly.

Unlawful assembly - An assembly of five or more persons is designated an

“unlawful assembly”, if the common object of the persons composing that

assembly is –

First - To overawe by criminal force, or show of criminal force, [the Central

or any State Government or Parliament or the Legislature of any State], or any

public servant in the exercise of the lawful power of such public servant; or

Second - To resist the execution of any law, or of any legal process; or

Third - To commit any mischief or criminal trespass or other offence; or

Fourth - By means of criminal force, or show of criminal force, to any person,

to take or obtain possession of any property, or to deprive any person of the

enjoyment.

Fifth - By means of criminal force, or show of criminal force, to compel any

person to do what he is not legally bound to do, or to omit to do what he is

legally entitled to do.

The sections which deal with unlawful assembly are as follows.

a. Unlawful Assembly – Definition – Section 141

b. Being a member of an unlawful assembly – section 142

c. Punishment – section 143

d. Joining or continuing in an unlawful assembly armed with deadly

weapons – section 144

e. Joining or continuing in unlawful assembly, knowing it has been

commanded to disperse – section 145

f. Liability for constructive criminality – section 149

g. Rendering aid in various ways – section 150, 152, 154, 157, 158

Under section 141 of the IPC, an assembly of more than five people with a

common intention to commit a criminal offence can be termed as unlawful

assembly. The term is used in English law for an assembly of a group of

people, generally of three or more persons with the intention to commit a

crime by force, or to carry out a common purpose (whether lawful or

unlawful), in such a manner in such circumstances as would in the opinion of

firm and rational men endanger the public peace or to create fear of

immediate danger to the tranquility of the neighborhood.

The basis of the offense of unlawful assembly is the intent with which the

individuals assemble. The members of the assembled group must have in

mind a fixed purpose to perform an illegal act. The time when the intent is

formed is immaterial, and it does not matter whether the purpose of the group

is lawful or unlawful if they intend to carry out that purpose in a way that is

likely to precipitate a breach of the peace.

An assembly of individuals to carry on their ordinary business is not unlawful.

Conversely, when three or more persons assemble and act jointly in

committing a criminal offense, such as assault and battery, the assembly is

unlawful. All those who participate in unlawful assemblies incur criminal

responsibility for the acts of their associates performed in furtherance of their

common objective. The mere presence of an individual in an unlawful

assembly is enough to charge that person with participation in the illegal

gathering. Political gatherings and demonstrations raise the most

troublesome issues involving unlawful assembly. The line between protecting

freedom of assembly and protecting the peace and tranquility of the

community is often difficult for courts to draw.

The ingredients of unlawful assembly need to be established for it are

declared as an unlawful assembly.

1. There has to be an assembly of more than 5 people

2. They must have a common object

3. The common object must be one of the five specified in the section

The section also specifies the various instances where an unlawful assembly

may be assembled.

1. Overawing the central or state governments or its officers

2. Resistance to the execution of legal process

3. Commission of mischief

4. Forcible possession

5. Illegal compulsion

Section 142 which deals with the offence of Being member of unlawful

assembly.-

Section 142 – Being a member if unlawful assembly - Whoever, being

aware of facts which render any assembly an unlawful assembly, intentionally

joins that assembly, or continues in it , is said to be a member of an unlawful

assembly

Section 141 and 142 are closely related to section 149 of the IPC which deals

with Liability of constructive liability or common object.

Section 149 – Common object

Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in

prosecution of common object. - If an offence is committed by any member

of an unlawful assembly in prosecution of the common object of that

assembly, or such as the members of that assembly knew to be likely to be

committed in prosecution of that object, every person who, at the time of

the committing of that offence, is a member of the same assembly, is guilty

of that offence.

The pivotal question is applicability of Section 149 IPC. Said provision has its

foundation on constructive liability which is the sine qua non for its operation.

The emphasis is on the common object and not on common intention. Mere

presence in an unlawful assembly cannot render a person liable unless there

was a common object and he was actuated by that common object and that

object is one of those set out in Section 141. Where common object of an

unlawful assembly is not proved, the accused persons cannot be convicted

with the help of Section 149. The crucial question to determine is whether the

assembly consisted of five or more persons and whether the said persons

entertained one or more of the common objects, as specified in Section 141. It

cannot be laid down as a general proposition of law that unless an overt act is

proved against a person, who is alleged to be a member of unlawful assembly,

it cannot be said that he is a member of an assembly. The only thing required

is that he should have understood that the assembly was unlawful and was

likely to commit any of the acts which fall within the purview of Section 141.

The word object means the purpose or design and, in order to make it

common, it must be shared by all. In other words, the object should be

common to the persons, who compose the assembly, that is to say, they should

all be aware of it and concur in it. A common object may be formed by express

agreement after mutual consultation, but that is by no means necessary. It

may be formed at any stage by all or a few members of the assembly and the

other members may just join and adopt it. Once formed, it need not continue

to be the same. It may be modified or altered or abandoned at any stage.

The expression in prosecution of common object as appearing in Section 149

has to be strictly construed as equivalent to in order to attain the common

object. It must be immediately connected with the common object by virtue of

the nature of the object. There must be community of object and the object

may exist only up to a particular stage, and not thereafter. Members of an

unlawful assembly may have community of object up to certain point beyond

which they may differ in their objects and the knowledge, possessed by each

member of what is likely to be committed in prosecution of their common

object may vary not only according to the information at his command, but

also according to the extent to which he shares the community of object, and

as a consequence of this the effect of Section 149, IPC may be different on

different members of the same assembly.

Common object is different from a common intention as it does not require a

prior concert and a common meeting of minds before the attack. It is enough if

each has the same object in view and their number is five or more and that

they act as an assembly to achieve that object. The common object of an

assembly is to be ascertained from the acts and language of the members

composing it, and from a consideration of all the surrounding circumstances.

It may be gathered from the course of conduct adopted by the members of the

assembly. What the common object of the unlawful assembly is at a particular

stage of the incident is essentially a question of fact to be determined, keeping

in view the nature of the assembly, the arms carried by the members, and the

behavior of the members at or near the scene of the incident. It is not

necessary under law that in all cases of unlawful assembly, with an unlawful

common object, the same must be translated into action or be successful.

Under the Explanation to Section 141, an assembly which was not unlawful

when it was assembled may subsequently becomes unlawful. It is not

necessary that the intention or the purpose, which is necessary to render an

assembly an unlawful one, comes into existence at the outset. The time of

forming an unlawful intent is not material. An assembly which, at its

commencement or even for some time thereafter, is lawful may subsequently

becomes unlawful. In other words it can develop during the course of incident

at the spot eo instante.

Section 149, IPC consists of two parts. The first part of the section means that

the offence to be committed in prosecution of the common object must be one

which is committed with a view to accomplish the common object. In order

that the offence may fall within the first part, the offence must be connected

immediately with the common object of the unlawful assembly of which the

accused was member. Even if the offence committed is not in direct

prosecution of the common object of the assembly, it may yet fall under

Section 141, if it can be held that the offence was such as the members knew

was likely to be committed and this is what is required in the second part of

the section. The purpose for which the members of the assembly set out or

desired to achieve is the object. If the object desired by all the members is the

same, the knowledge that is the object which is being pursued is shared by all

the members and they are in general agreement as to how it is to be achieved

and that is now the common object of the assembly. An object is entertained in

the human mind, and it being merely a mental attitude, no direct evidence can

be available and, like intention, has generally to be gathered from the act

which the person commits and the result there from. Though no hard and fast

rule can be laid down under the circumstances from which the common object

can be culled out, it may reasonably be collected as noted above from the

nature of the assembly, arms carried and behavior at or before or after the

scene of occurrence. The word knew used in the second limb of the section

implies something more than a possibility and it cannot be made to bear the

sense of might have been known. Positive knowledge is necessary. When an

offence is committed in prosecution of the common object, it would generally

be an offence which the members of the unlawful assembly knew was likely to

be committed in prosecution of the common object. That, however, does not

make the converse proposition true; there may be cases which would come

within the second part but not within the first part. The distinction between

the two parts of Section 149 cannot be ignored or obliterated. In every case it

would be an issue to be determined, whether the offence committed falls

within the first part or it was an offence such as the members of the assembly

knew to be likely to be committed in prosecution of the common object and

falls within the second part. However, there may be cases which would be

within first part of the offences committed in prosecution of the common

object would also be generally, if not always, within the second part, namely,

offences which the parties knew to be likely committed in the prosecution of

the common object.

Section 144 - Joining unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapon

Whoever, being armed with any deadly weapon, or with anything which, used

as a weapon of offence, is likely to cause death, is a member of an unlawful

assembly, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a

term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

Rioting

Section 146 and 147 of the IPC covers the act of rioting. While section 146

covers the act of rioting, section 147 covers the punishment for rioting.

Section 146 - rioting - Whenever forces or violence is used by an unlawful

assembly, or by any member thereof, in prosecution of the common object of

such assembly, every member of such assembly is guilty of the offence of

rioting.

Section 147 - Punishment for rioting - Whoever is guilty of rioting, shall be

punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may

extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

A riot is a form of civil disorder characterized often by disorganized groups

lashing out in a sudden and intense rash of violence against authority,

property or people. While individuals may attempt to lead or control a riot,

riots are typically chaotic and exhibit herd behavior, and usually generated by

civil unrest.

Riots often occur in reaction to a perceived grievance or out of dissent.

Historically, riots have occurred due to poor working or living conditions,

government, oppression, taxation or conscription, conflicts between races,

food supply or the outcome of a sporting event or frustration with legal

channels through which to air grievances.

Riots typically involve vandalism and the destruction of private and public

property. The specific property to be targeted varies depending on the cause

of the riot and the inclinations of those involved. Targets can include shops,

cars, restaurants, state-owned institutions, and religious buildings.

Some rioters have become quite sophisticated at understanding and

withstanding the tactics used by police in such situations. Manuals for

successful rioting are available on the internet. These manuals also encourage

rioters to get the press involved, as there is more safety with the cameras

rolling. There is also more attention. Citizens with video cameras may also

have an effect on both rioters and police.

Dealing with riots is often difficult task for police departments, and police

officers sent to deal with riots are usually armed with ballistic shields and riot

shotguns, mainly because of the larger spread of the shorter barrels. Police

may also use tear gas and CS gas to stop rioters. Most riot police have moved

to using less-than-lethal methods to control riots, such as shotguns that fire

rubber slugs and flexible baton rounds to injure or otherwise incapacitate

rioters for easy arrest.

Section 148 of the IPC deals with the offence of rioting with a deadly weapon.

148. Rioting, armed with deadly weapon. - Whoever is guilty of rioting, being

armed with a deadly weapon or with anything which, used as a weapon of

offence, is likely to cause death, shall be punished

CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENCE

The punishment for an offence under 148 is prescribed as Imprisonment for 3

years, or fine or both. It is a cognizable offence and it is Triable by any

Magistrate of the first class.

Affray

In many legal jurisdictions related to English common law, affray is a public

order offence consisting of the fighting of two or more persons in a public

place to the terror of ordinary people. Depending on their actions, and the

laws of the prevailing jurisdiction, those engaged in an affray may also render

themselves liable to prosecution for assault, unlawful assembly, or riot; if so, it

is for one of these offences that they are usually charged.

The Indian Penal Code (sect. 159) adopts the old English Common-Law

definition of affray, with the substitution of actual disturbance of the peace for

causing terror to the lieges

Affray - When two or more persons, by fighting in a public place, disturb

the public peace, they are said to ―Commit an affray.

Bibliography

Books

Indian Penal Code, Ratanlal & Dhirajlal, 2007

Law of Crimes, PSA Pillai

Encyclopedia of the American Constitution,

Encyclopedia Britannica, 1911

Articles

lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/1-50/Report43.pdf

The Historical Background of the Police Power, Harvard Law Review (2007)