49
Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation Kevin A Janni Professor & Extension Engineer Bioproducts & Biosystems Engineering University of Minnesota

Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Odor Management

Concepts for Animal

Feeding OperationKevin A Janni

Professor & Extension Engineer

Bioproducts & Biosystems Engineering

University of Minnesota

Page 2: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Odor Management Toolkit

• Right tools

• Skilled person

• Job well done

Page 3: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Odor Management Tools

• Understanding odors

• Concern & neighborliness

• Communications

• Siting tools

• Source assessment

• Mitigation practices

• Useful resources

• Implementation & follow up

Page 4: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

No single solution

• Many things vary

– Sources

– Level of mitigation needed

– Impact of practices on operations (ex. feeding,

ventilation, manure management and sanitation)

– Management and labor available

– Capital and operating costs

Page 5: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Manure Odors

• Mixture of volatile gases

• Over 300 volatile compounds identified from

animal manures

• Some compounds detectable by humans at

extremely low concentrations

• Generally considered unpleasant or

offensive

Page 6: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Odors

• Evoke emotional and

physiological responses

Page 7: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Pleasant odors

• Evoke emotional and

physiological responses

Page 8: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Offensive odors

• Evoke emotional and

physiological responses

Page 9: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Points of View

• Source owner or manager

• Neighbor

• Parent of sensitive child

• Community leader or politician

• Regulator

• Academic

Values

Goals

Actions

Page 10: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Unpleasant Odor Concerns

• Smell

– Nuisance, irritation, lost enjoyment

– Invade private or public property

• Health

• Costs to manage

• Other

Page 11: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Odor Impacts

• Normally local, depends on source size

• Interfere with use and enjoyment of public

areas, private land or home

• Offensive odors may

– Annoy and agitate people

– Trigger more symptoms

• Odors do not make people sick

O’Connor A.M., B. Auvermann, D. Bickett-Weddle, S. Kirkhorn, J.M. Sargeant, A. Ramirez, S.G. Von

Essen. (2010) The Association between Proximity to Animal Feeding Operations and Community Health:

A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE 5(3): e9530. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009530

Page 12: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Odor perception depends on

• Frequency

• Intensity or detected concentration

• Duration

• Offensiveness or emotional reaction

Page 13: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Odor Frequency

• Once or twice a month

• Twice a week

• Every day

• All the time

X X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Page 14: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Odor Intensity

• Odor strength

• Analogous to sound loudness

• Ranges from

– Non-detectable

– Barely detectable

– Detectable

– Recognizable

– Offensive – very loud

Page 15: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Odor Duration

• Seconds

• Minutes

• Hours

• Days

• Weeks

• Months

Page 16: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Odor Offensiveness

• Emotional & physiological reaction

Page 17: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Manage FIDO

• Some manure odors are commonly

acceptable in agricultural communities

• Questions you and your neighbors need to

answer and agree on

– How often?

– How intense?

– How long?

– How offensive?

Page 18: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Managing odors with good

communications

• Talk to neighbors about odors

• Ask if they smell odors

• Tell neighbors you are concerned

• Tell neighbors what you are doing to

manage odors

• Have process for complaints

• Visit annually

Page 19: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Develop good neighbor relations

• Discuss new building sites and/or

expansions early in planning

• Inventory impacted areas

– Nearby neighbors

– Public areas (parks, lakes)

– Schools and churches

– Towns, cities and public roads

Page 20: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Managing odors with site

assessment tools

• Minnesota – Odor From Feedlot Setback

Estimation Tool (OFFSET)

• South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT)

• Nebraska – Odor Footprint Tool (OFT)

• Iowa – Community Assessment Model for

Odor (CAM)

Page 21: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

If owner wants to do something . .

now what?

• Identify odor sources and odor emitting

activities

• Prioritize sources or activities

• Investigate mitigating practices

• Implement practice

• Assess impact

Page 22: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Mitigation planning

• For each source to mitigate

• Level of mitigation needed

• Impacts on production practices

• Management

• Capital and operating costs

Page 23: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Animal ag sources

• Barns and ventilation air exhaust

• Open lots

• Manure treatment and storage facilities

• Mortalities

• Land application

Page 24: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Mitigation approaches

• Reduce emissions

– Generate less odor, emit less odor

• Capture and treat

– Capture odors and treat, emit less odor

• Enhance odor dispersion

– Odors emitted are diluted more

Page 25: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Possible mitigation practices

• Reduce Generation

– Diet/ration modification

– Additives

– Manure treatment

• Solid/liquid separation

• Anaerobic digestion

• Enhance dispersion

–Vegetative buffer

• Reduce emissions

– Covers

– Oil spraying

• Capture and Treat

– Biofilters

– Wet scrubbers

Page 26: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Diet and Feed Management

• Formulate diets to more accurately meet

animal needs

• Reduce nutrients in feces and urine to

reduce emissions from stored and land

applied manure

Page 27: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Diet and Feed Management

• Examples

– Phase and Split-sex feeding

– Add amino acids to reduce crude protein

– Reduce nitrogen and sulfur

• Reduce feed waste and dust generation

• Not consistent significant odor reduction

• Consistent NH3 reduction

Page 28: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Additives

• Chemical

– Oxidize volatile compounds

– Adjust pH

– React and form precipitates

– Masking agents or counteractants

• Biological

– Modify biochemical pathways

Page 29: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Enhance dispersion

• Dilutes odors

• Property line limits

• Does not reduce emissions

• Methods

– Vegetative buffers

– Wind walls

– Chimneys

– Increased separation distance

http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/news/mar07/0315windbre

akprogram/tabid/18460/Default.aspx

http://rec.udel.edu/poultryextension/Vegetative%20Environmental%20Buffers/Vegeta1.jpg

Page 30: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Covers

• Permeable

• Impermeable

• Positive air pressure

• Negative air pressure

Page 31: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Permeable covers

• Geotextile fabric

• Straw

• Natural crust

• Limited life

• Emission reductions depend

on % covered and thickness

Page 32: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Impermeable covers

• Highly effective

• Expensive

• Manage

– Bubbles

– Precipitation

– Animals

– Manure removal

Page 33: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Oil sprinkling

• Reduces dust levels

and emissions

• Effective

• Questions about

slippery floors and

airborne oil mist

impacts on healthhttps://www-mwps.sws.iastate.edu/sites/default/files/imported/free/aed_42.pdf

Page 34: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Wet scrubbers

• Liquid spray entraps particulates and

absorbs gases

• Factors

– Gas solubility

– Liquid pH

– Air to liquid flow rates

• Wastewater handling

• Potential nutrient recycling

Gas

out

Gas

in

Liquid

in

Liquid

out

Page 35: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Biofilters

Manure Pit

Odorous

Air

Mechanically Ventilated

Building

Exhaust Fan

Treated Air Exhaust

Media Support

Air PlenumAir Duct

Biofilter

Media

Page 36: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Media studied

• Wood chips and compost

• Pine nuggets & shredded wood

• Lava rock

• Birch mulch wood chips

• Corn cobs

5 cm and 10 cm grind

Page 37: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Biofilter Effectiveness

• Odor detection threshold

– 78 to 95%

• Ammonia

– 50 to 82%

• Hydrogen sulfide

– 86 to 97%

% Reduction

Page 38: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Biofilter Designs

Biofilters

Vertical

A-Frame

Dairy

Deep bed

Page 39: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Manure treatment

• Anaerobic digestion

• Changes odor character, some reduction

Page 40: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Manure treatment

• Solid-liquid separation

• Variable odor control, best soon after voiding

Page 41: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Manure agitation

• Major odorous

activity

Page 42: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Land application techniques

• Broadcast – surface

application

• Broadcast followed by

incorporation

• Incorporation, injection

• Irrigation

Page 43: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Land application timing

• Avoid days prior to and of community

and neighbor celebrations

• Sunny unstable weather day – lifts odors

and mixes more

• Windy day – wind direction

• Dry day

Page 44: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Resources

• Air Quality in Animal Agriculture

• https://lpelc.org/air-quality/

Page 45: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Resources

• National Air Quality Site Assessment Tool

(NAQSAT)

• naqsat.tamu.edu

Page 46: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Four video websites

• Policy Considerations https://lpelc.org/air-quality-resources-for-policy-makers/

• Neighbor Relations & Setback Estimate Toolshttps://lpelc.org/air-quality-resources-for-policy-makers/

• Manure Covers & Biofilters https://lpelc.org/manure-covers-and-biofilters-for-managing-odor-and-air-emissions/

• Health Impacts https://lpelc.org/health-impacts-of-air-emissions-from-animal-feeding-operations/

Page 47: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

An odor management benefit

• Opportunity for income from new or

expanded animal feeding operation

Page 48: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Take home points

• Odors evoke emotional and

physiological responses

• Manage FIDO to manage odors

• Good communications are important

• There are effective odor control techniques

• Try methods and assess effectiveness

• Go to https://lpelc.org/air-quality/

Page 49: Odor Management Concepts for Animal Feeding Operation · •South Dakota Odor Footprint Tool (SDOFT) •Nebraska –Odor Footprint Tool (OFT) •Iowa –Community Assessment Model

Questions?

Kevin Janni

[email protected]

Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering

www.bbe.umn.edu