23
October 30, 2012 Dan Parent Human Injury Research Division 10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 1

October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

October 30, 2012

Dan ParentHuman Injury Research Division

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 1

Page 2: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

1992 2001

TAD-50M THOR Alpha

2005

THOR-NT

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 2

Page 3: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

2005-2009

THOR-NTField Testing

- SAE THOR Evaluation Task Group- EEVC WG12- JAMA

Long Term Enhancements

Mod Kit DevelopmentHead, Neck

Thorax

Knee, Thigh, Hip

Abdomen

2009-2010

Short Term Enhancements

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 3

Page 4: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 4

THOR Mod Kit (n=1)

Evaluation

2010 2011 2012

THOR Mod Kit(n=3)

Consolidation and Fabrication

THOR Metric (n=1)

Conversion and Fabrication

Page 5: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 5

2012 2013

THOR Metric Evaluation

InspectionCert Testing

Multi-Point Thoracic

Injury Criteria Development

Repeatability & Reproducibility

THOR Mod Kit

Finalize Hardware

Finalize Hardware, Release Technical

Data Package

BiofidelityEvaluation

Hybrid III Comparison

FinalizeProcedures

Injury Criteria, IARVsSeatingCertification

Oblique MDBVehicle Testing

Advanced Adaptive Restraint Program

Rear Seat Advanced Restraints Program

Parallel NHTSA Agency Needs

THOR 50th

NHTSA Agency Decision

Page 6: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

Metric THOR

Status: Drafts provided by Humanetics, currently under revision

Drawing package to include: Bill of Materials (BOM) Drawing Index Drawing Specifications 2D Drawings (in DWG and PDF formats) 3D Parametric Database (in Autodesk Inventor and generic

formats)

Associated updates to documentation provided by Humanetics, more updates necessary

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 6

Mod KitAllow users to upgrade THOR-NT

Page 7: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

Include SD3 shoulder? Evaluation (University of Virginia)

• Decision matrix (following slides) Input from THORAX TAG

• Durability• Biofidelity evaluation• Guidance on SD3 certification

Is thoracic response sufficiently biofidelic?

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 7

Page 8: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

Updated “SD3” shoulder evaluated in NHTSA Mod Kit THOR

U. Virginia Gold Standard Condition 1: 40 km/h, standard belt Condition 2: 30 km/h, load-limited belt

Evaluate usability More joints more complexity

Evaluate durability Good compared to SD1, SD2 Comparable to standard THOR shoulder

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 8

Page 9: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

Include SD3 shoulder? Abstract submitted to 2013 ESV Shaw et al: Response Comparison of Hybrid III, THOR Mod Kit

with the Chalmers SD3 Shoulder, and PMHS in Frontal Sled Tests

Is thoracic response sufficiently biofidelic? Abstract submitted to 2013 ESV Parent et al: Thoracic Biofidelity Assessment of the Mod Kit

THOR ATD

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 9

Page 10: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

THOR 50th

Review, release TDP Fabricate additional Metric THORs? Finalize certification requirements Initiate thorough R&R

THOR 5th

Assess anthropometry (UMTRI) Update biomechanical response requirements Update design with Mod Kit components Fabricate, review, release TDP

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 10

Agency Decision in 2013

Agency Decision in 2014

Page 11: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 11

Page 12: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

THOR-NT FE model available for download from “Collab” website Feedback has been provided by

industry

Currently incorporating Mod Kit components into model Collaborative effort

Still need: SD3 shoulder

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 12

Page 13: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

University of Virginia

NASA / Virginia Tech

Toyota

Individual Body Regions

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 13

PDB

University of Virginia

Lower Limb

Head/Neck

Pelvis

Component Validation

Component Validation

Component Validation

Full-Body Validation

Integrate Components into Full Body Model

Additional Validation (Gold Standard)

Distribution

Chest, Abdomen Validation

Page 14: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

Contributions to THOR FE Model Update head skin geometry, mesh Simplify OC joint

• Will evaluate using defined joint properties instead of contact, bump stop deformation

Model neoprene spacer in neck safety cable Implemented neck pitch change joint, lumbar spine

pitch change joint in positioning tree

Model Validation Conditions Head impact test Neck flexion/extension/lateral bending pendulum

tests Neck flexion NBDL tests once data available

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 14

Page 15: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

Created mesh of Mod Kit pelvis flesh and bone

Option A – With Bosses* Option B – Without Bosses

• *bosses = raised geometry intended to reduce pelvis bone motion relative to pelvis flesh

Minimum element size • With Bosses: 4mm• Without Bosses: 5mm

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 15

With Bosses Simplified

Page 16: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

Component Tests Flat plate compression,

bottom of pelvis Flat plate compression,

angled pelvis

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 16

Flat Plate (300 mm square)Compression V=0.1m/s

Bottom Compression Angled Compression

24 deg.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32Compression (mm)

Forc

e (N

)

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32Compression (mm)

Original Material Model

Softened Material Model (x0.16)

Page 17: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

Full-body Tests Gold Standard sled test

without knee bolster Evaluate difference with and

without bosses

Decision Since there does appear to be

a difference, retain bosses in model

Also found large difference between existing and “soft” pelvis model

Validation University of Virginia to run

Gold Standard test without knee bolster to validate ASIS, seat reaction loads

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 17

Kinematics similar…

…but local loading to ASIS differed

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

0 50 100 150

05

1015

202530

3540

4550

0 50 100 150Time (ms)

FX (kN) My (Nm)

Without BossesWith Bosses

Time (ms)

Existing Material Model

Page 18: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

Mod Kit FE Pelvis Model will be included in next THOR FE Model release

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 18

Mod Kit THOR Pelvis FE Model Pelvis

Page 19: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

Contributions to THOR FE Model Updated femur geometry, response Integrated knee slider joint, restraint Improved load cell definitions Initiated modeling of molded shoe

• Scanned, meshed• On hold due to potential changes from

Humanetics

Model Validation Conditions Dynamic X-version Dynamic Dorsiflexion Heel impact

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 19

Page 20: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

After body region model is complete and response is verified and presented, components will be uploaded to Collab and PDB will integrate into full body modelAdditional model usability updates requested: Body region segmentation Instrumentation consistent with hardware

• Use locking joints where possible• Ideally label output with ISO-MME codes

Complete positioning tree (use NASA / VT work) Renumbering Revision control

Model validation in defined conditions

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 20

Page 21: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

Proposal A – Body Region Segmentation

Proposal B – Renumbering

Proposal C – Validation Conditions

Proposal D – Model Acceptance

10/23/2012 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 21

Page 22: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

10/23/2012 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 22

Verify response in: After modifications to:

Bio/Certification TestsSee THOR Cert and BioManuals for details

Head impact (forehead) pelvis and above

Neck pendulum head or neck

Upper ribcage 4.3m/s impact pelvis and above

Lower ribcage oblique impact pelvis and above

Upper abdomen impact pelvis and above

Lower abdomen impact pelvis and above

Seated knee impact LX/KTH

X-version, BOF/Heel Impact LX

NBDL neck head or neck

Other Component Tests

Pelvis compression tests pelvis

Fixed femur dynamic compression femur

Knee slider dynamic knee slider

Sled TestsGold Standard 1 everything but LX

Gold Standard 2 everything but LX

Page 23: October 30, 2012 - NHTSA

10/30/12 This is a U.S. Government Work not subject to copyright protection in the U.S. It may be copied and distributed without permission and without limitation. 23

Minimum Correlation Method rating = 0.900

Relevant measurements for given test For certification tests, compare signals included in

certification requirement For other tests, propose relevant signals

• Example: for Gold Standard sled tests, compare belt loads, head and chest accelerations, multi-point chest deflection

ShapeMagnitude PhaseSimilarity AnalysisCompare time-historiesCORA 3.6 Software

Gehre, 2011 ESVProvides overall rating

1.000 = Perfect Agreement