1

October 2, 2020

Summary of FY2019 Statistics of the Organization for Technical

Intern Training

Section 1 Accreditation of Technical Intern Training Plan

1. Number of technical intern training plans accredited (by training category)

（1-1）【Figure 1-1】

The number of technical intern training plans accredited in FY2019 was 366,167

(389,321 for FY2018 ： hereinafter the figures for FY2018 are shown in

parenthesis).

By training category, supervising-organization-type training (i) constituted the

largest share at 50.1％（47.0％）, followed by supervising-organization-type

training (ii) which was 40.3％（46.5％）.

2.0%

47.0%

0.9%

46.5%

0.1% 3.6%1.8%

50.1%

0.7%

40.3%

0.1%6.9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Indiv

idual-

ente

rprise-ty

pe

training(i)

Supe

rvising

-

org

anization-

type

training(i)

Indiv

idual-

ente

rprise-ty

pe

training(ii)

Supe

rvising

-

org

anization-

type

training(ii)

Indiv

idual-

ente

rprise-ty

pe-

training(iii)

Supe

rvising

-

org

anization-

type

-

training(iii)

Figure1-1 Number of technical intern training plans

accredited (by training category; percentage)

FY2018 FY2019

・ These statistics is a summary of the business results of the Organization for

Technical Intern Training (OTIT) from April 1,2019 to March 3, 2020.

・ Notations such as（1-1）refer to the numbers of the attached statistical data

sheet, and [Fig. 1-1] and [Table 1-1], etc. refers to the figures or table

numbers shown in this outline.

2

２. Number of technical intern training plans accredited (by age and gender;

percentage（1-2）【Figure 1-2】 【Figure1-3】

By trainees’ age（gender total）, trainees aged from 20 to 24 constituted the

largest share at 39.7％（38.8％）followed by 25 to 29 at 24.8％（30.0％）and

30 to 34 at 13.6％（16.4％）.

By gender, males accounted for 58.0 ％ （ 57.2 ％ ） , and females 42.0 ％

（42.8％）.

4.6%

38.8%

30.0%

16.4%

6.5%2.5%

1.0% 0.2%

13.5%

39.7%

24.8%

13.6%

5.3% 2.1%0.8% 0.1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Under 20 20-24

yrs.old

25-29

yrs.old

30-34

yrs.old

35-39

yrs.old

40-44

yrs.old

45-49

yrs.old

50 above

Figure 1-2 Number of technical intern training plans

accredited (by age; percentage)

FY2018

FY2019

57.2%

58.0%

42.8%

42.0%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

FY2018

FY2019

Figure1-3 Number of technical intern training plans

（by gender; percentage）

Male Female

3

３. Number of technical intern training plans accredited(by job category) (1-4）

【Figure1-4】

By job category (meaning job categories/operations eligible for shift to technical

training(ii) or (iii); the same applies hereinafter), “Others” (＊１）constitute the

largest share at 24.1％（22.0％）, followed by construction at 20.8％（18.3％）,

food manufacturing 18.8％（18.1％）and machinery 16.1％（18.7％）.

In addition, the share of technical intern training plans accredited for job

categories/operations not to shift was 4.1％（3.6％）.

*１ “Others” (job categories) refers to furniture making, printing, book binding,

plastic molding, reinforced plastic molding, painting, welding, industrial packaging,

carton box and corrugated card board making, industrial manufacturing of pottery,

automobile repair and maintenance, building cleaning, care worker, linen supply,

concrete product manufacturing and lodging (the same applies hereinafter).

*２ Job categories in the notification specified by the competent ministers are

airport ground handling (the same applies hereinafter)

*3 Job categories/operations not to shift are job categories/operations not eligible

for shift to technical intern training (ii) or (iii) (the same applies hereinafter).

10.1%

1.1%

18.3% 18.1%

8.2%

18.7%

22.0%

0.0%

3.6%

8.9%

0.8%

20.8%

18.8%

6.6%

16.1%

24.1%

0.0%

4.1%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Agriculture

Fishe

ry

Constructio

n

Food M

anufacturing

Textile

Machine

ry

Othe

rs

Job cate

gorie

s in the no

tification

specifie

d b

y the

com

pete

nt ministe

rs

Job cate

gorie

s/ope

rations

not to

shift

Figure1-4 Number of technical intern training plans

accredited（by job category; percentage）

FY2018 FY2019

4

4. Number of technical intern training plans accredited (by nationality/region;

percentage) are（1-5）,(1-6）【Figure 1-5】 - 【Figure 1-11】

By nationality and region, the number of plans related to trainees from Vietnam

was 196,001（196,732）or 53.5％ (50.5％), almost half of all plans, followed by

China at 69,795（89,918）or 19.1％（23.1％）, and Indonesia 32,508（31,900）

or 8.9％（8.2％）.

50.5%

23.1%

8.2% 9.1%

2.8%2.9% 2.3%

0.5%0.6%

53.5%

19.1%

8.9%8.3%

3.8%2.6%

2.4% 0.6%0.8%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Vietn

am

China

Indonesia

Philip

pines

Myan

mar

Thailan

d

Cam

bodia

Mongolia

Others

Figure1-5 Number of technical intern training plans

accredited (by job category; percentage)

FY2018 FY2019

5

By job category among the top three countries in terms of technical intern training

plans, the result are as follows:

Construction

24.2%

Food

manufacturing

21.6%Machinery

16.3%

Agriculture

6.8%

Textile

5.0%

Job categories/operations

not to shift

2.4%

Fishery

0.4%

Others

23.2%

FIGURE 1-6 VIETNAM

Food

Manufacturing

18.4%

Machinery

15.6%

Textile

14.7%Agriculture

11.9%

Construction

9.7%

Job

categories/operations

not to shift

7.1%

Fishery

0.7%

Others

21.7%

FIGURE 1-7 CHINA

6

By nationality and region, among the top three countries in terms of the number

of technical intern training plans, the results are as follows:

Machinery20.6%

Construction20.5%

FoodManufacturing

9.9%

Agriculture9.4%

Job categories/operations not to shift

6.4%

Fishery5.2%

Textile1.5%

Others26.6%

Figure 1-8 Indonesia

Vietnam62.4%

Philippines9.2%

China8.9%

Indonesia8.7%

Myanmar4.0%

Cambodia3.5%

Thailand1.2%

Mongolia1.1% Others

0.8%

Figure 1-9 Construction

7

Vietnam

61.5%China

18.7%

Philippines

5.3%

Myanmar

5.0%

Indonesia

4.7%

Thailand2.5%

Cambodia

1.6%Mongolia

0.3% Others

0.4%

Figure 1-10 Food Manufacturing

Vietnam54.5%

China18.5%

Indonesia11.4%

Philippines7.6%

Thailand4.2%

Myanmar1.9%

Cambodia0.6%

Mongolia0.5% Others

0.7%

Figure1-11 Machinery

8

5. Number of technical intern training plans accredited (by prefecture)

(1-7) 【Table 1-1】

Of the technical intern training plans accredited by prefecture where technical

intern training sites are located, Aichi prefecture accounts for the largest share at

9.8％.

* If the technical intern training is conducted in different sites in different

prefectures, the prefecture where the primary site is located is counted.

Table 1-1 Number of technical intern training plans

accredited in FY 2019（by prefecture; percentage）

Prefecture Percentage Prefecture Percentage Prefecture Percentage

Hokkaido 3.8% Ishikawa 1.5% Okayama 2.4%

Aomori 0.6% Fukui 1.1% Hiroshima 4.0%

Iwate 0.9% Yamanashi 0.6% Yamaguchi 1.2%

Miyagi 1.2% Nagano 2.1% Tokushima 0.7%

Akita 0.3% Gifu 3.9% Kagawa 1.5%

Yamagata 0.6% Shizuoka 4.0% Ehime 1.8%

Fukushima 1.2% Aichi 9.8% Kochi 0.5%

Ibaraki 4.1% Mie 2.9% Fukuoka 3.8%

Tochigi 1.8% Shiga 1.5% Saga 0.8%

Gunma 2.7% Kyoto 1.3% Nagasaki 0.9%

Saitama 4.8% Osaka 4.9% Kumamoto 2.1%

Chiba 4.4% Hyogo 3.3% Oita 1.1%

Tokyo 3.8% Nara 0.7% Miyazaki 1.0%

Kanagawa 3.6% Wakayama 0.4% Kagoshima 1.5%

Niigata 1.1% Tottori 0.4% Okinawa 0.9%

Toyama 1.6% Shimane 0.5%

9

6. Number of technical intern training plans accredited (by job category and

prefecture （1-8）【Table 1-2】

By job category among the top five prefectures in terms of the number of

technical intern training sites, the results are as follows:

Table 1-2 Number of technical intern training plans

accredited in FY 2019 (by job category; percentage)

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

１ Agriculture Ibaraki Kumamoto Hokkaido Chiba Gunma

18.2% 10.0% 9.0% 6.1% 4.9%

２ Fishery Hiroshima Hokkaido Okayama Miyazaki Hyogo

29.1% 14.0% 7.5% 5.7% 5.0%

３ Construction Tokyo Saitama Aichi Kanagawa Osaka

9.6% 9.2% 8.2% 7.6% 6.7%

４ Food Manufacturing Hokkaido Aichi Chiba Saitama Shizuoka

9.4% 6.1% 6.1% 4.9% 4.4%

５ Textile Gifu Okayama Aichi Fukui Ehime

13.0% 6.6% 6.5% 5.2% 4.8%

６ Machinery Aichi Gifu Mie Osaka Hyogo

16.4% 6.2% 6.1% 5.9% 5.8%

７ Others Aichi Osaka Hiroshima Shizuoka Saitama

12.8% 6.0% 5.7% 4.8% 4.6%

８ Job categories in the notification

specified by the competent ministers

Chiba Osaka － － －

84.6% 15.4%

９ Job categories not to shift Nagano Aichi Shizuoka Hiroshima Gunma

11.5% 8.8% 6.0% 5.5% 5.3%

10

7. Number of technical intern training plans accredited (by prefectures and

nationality/region) （1-9）【Table 1-3】

By nationality of trainees among the top five prefectures in terms of number of

technical intern training sites, the results are as follows:

Table 1-3 Number of technical intern training plans accredited in

FY2019 (by prefecture and nationality/region; percentage)

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

Vietnam Aichi Osaka Saitama Fukuoka Chiba

9.2% 5.9% 4.8% 4.7% 4.2%

China Aichi Gifu Ibaraki Hokkaido Chiba

10.9% 7.0% 5.3% 5.1% 4.7%

Indonesia Aichi Ibaraki Shizuoka Saitama Kanagawa

9.2% 7.8% 6.0% 5.1% 4.8%

Philippines Aichi Hiroshima Shizuoka Saitama Chiba

10.9% 7.0% 6.8% 5.1% 4.6%

Myanmar Aichi Tokyo Hokkaido Fukuoka Saitama

7.6% 6.0% 5.8% 5.5% 5.0%

Thailand Aichi Chiba Ibaraki Mie Hiroshima

13.1% 8.3% 7.2% 6.4% 6.3%

Cambodia Aichi Gifu Ibaraki Osaka Kumamoto

9.6% 7.1% 6.3% 4.6% 4.3%

Mongolia Saitama Kanagawa Chiba Aichi Tokyo

11.9% 11.9% 11.6% 8.5% 8.4%

Others Aichi Ibaraki Chiba Saitama Hyogo

16.4% 9.3% 7.1% 6.5% 4.9%

11

8. Number of technical intern training plans accredited (by nationality/region,

prefecture and job category)（1-10-1）to（1-10-9）【Table 1-4】 to 【Table 1-6】

By the top three countries with the highest number of technical intern training

plans accredited（Vietnam, China, Indonesia）, job categories and top five

prefectures in terms of technical intern training sites, the results are as follows:

Table 1-4 Number of technical intern training plans accredited in

FY2019 (by prefecture and job category; percentage)（Vietnam）

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

１ Agriculture Kumamoto Ibaraki Hokkaido Chiba Kagoshima

12.4% 10.8% 10.0% 5.3% 5.2%

２ Fishery Hiroshima Hokkaido Okayama Miyagi Hyogo

50.8% 26.6% 17.8% 2.6% 1.3%

３ Construction Saitama Tokyo Osaka Kanagawa Aichi

8.6% 8.4% 8.2% 7.6% 7.0%

４ Food Manufacturing Hokkaido Chiba Saitama Fukuoka Aichi

8.5% 5.3% 4.9% 4.8% 4.6%

５ Textile Okayama Aichi Gifu Hiroshima Fukui

8.1% 6.8% 5.8% 5.2% 4.8%

６ Machinery Aichi Osaka Hyogo Gifu Mie

16.4% 7.1% 6.8% 5.7% 4.7%

７ Others Aichi Osaka Shizuoka Fukuoka Gifu

13.5% 6.8% 4.9% 4.9% 4.7%

８ Job categories not to shift Hiroshima Nagano Fukuoka Aichi Osaka

10.1% 9.0% 6.1% 6.0% 5.1%

（Note）The number of job categories in the notification specified by the competent

ministers, is 0.

12

Table 1-5 Number of technical intern training plans accredited in

FY2019 (by prefecture and job category; percentage)（China）

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

１ Agriculture Ibaraki Hokkaido Aichi Chiba Kumamoto

27.2% 13.4% 6.9% 6.7% 6.5%

２ Fishery Hiroshima Okayama Hyogo Hokkaido Miyagi

66.1% 16.1% 8.9% 8.0% 0.6%

３ Construction Saitama Tokyo Aichi Chiba Kanagawa

13.4% 12.5% 12.4% 12.0% 7.4%

４ Food Manufacturing Hokkaido Aichi Chiba Shizuoka Osaka

14.6% 9.0% 7.8% 6.4% 4.9%

５ Textile Gifu Aichi Okayama Ehime Fukui

21.0% 6.4% 5.8% 5.6% 4.8%

６ Machinery Aichi Mie Gifu Hyogo Shizuoka

17.6% 8.8% 8.3% 6.9% 5.6%

７ Others Aichi Osaka Hiroshima Ehime Gifu

13.9% 6.4% 6.0% 5.8% 5.7%

８ Job categories not to shift Gunma Nagano Aichi Hokkaido Saitama

14.2% 11.2% 7.7% 5.4% 5.3%

（Note）The number of job categories in the notification specified by the competent

ministers, is 0.

13

Table 1-6 Number of technical intern training plans accredited in

FY2019 (by prefecture and job category; percentage)（Indonesia）

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

１ Agriculture Ibaraki Gunma Chiba Aichi Tochigi

42.2% 9.9% 5.0% 4.4% 4.0%

２ Fishery Miyazaki Hokkaido Kochi Ishikawa Hiroshima

10.2% 9.9% 8.9% 8.2% 7.6%

３ Construction Tokyo Kanagawa Saitama Aichi Shizuoka

12.2% 10.0% 8.0% 6.3% 5.2%

４ Food manufacturing Miyagi Saitama Aichi Ibaraki Shizuoka

7.4% 7.2% 6.7% 6.0% 5.5%

５ Textile Fukui Mie Okayama Ehime Aichi

11.4% 8.1% 7.9% 7.5% 7.3%

６ Machinery Aichi Shizuoka Gunma Gifu Okayama

12.8% 9.9% 5.0% 5.0% 4.8%

７ Others Aichi Ibaraki Saitama Kanagawa Shizuoka

13.0% 5.8% 5.6% 5.3% 5.0%

８ Job categories in the notification

specified by the competent ministers

Osaka － － － －

100%

９ Job categories not to shift Oita Shiga Shizuoka Aichi Nagano

12.1% 11.6% 10.6% 9.6% 9.6%

14

Section２ License of supervising organization

１ Number of supervising organizations licensed (by business category)

（2-1）【Figure 2-1】

The number of supervising organizations licensed in FY2019 was 422（486）.

By business category, the excellent supervising business was１（24）or 0.2％,

and normal supervising business was 421（462）or 99.8％.

* The supervising organization license has two categories, namely, excellent

supervising business and normal supervising business. The excellent

supervising business license allows the licensee to engage in supervising

business for all types of supervising-organization-type training (i) to (iii). The

normal supervising business license allows the licensee to engage in

supervising-organization-type training (i) and (ii).

4.9%

0.2%

95.1%

99.8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

FY2018

FY2019

Figure 2-1 Number of supervising organizations

licensed （by business category; percentage）

Excellent supervising business Normal supervising business

15

2. Number of supervising organizations licensed (by job category)

(2-3）【Figure 2-2】

In relation to the job categories for supervision designated by a supervising

organization at the time of applying for a license, Construction accounts for the

largest share, 1,854（1,088）or 47.7％, followed by Machinery, 687（397）or

17.7％, and “Others” 678（436）or 17.4%.

Construction47.7%

Machinery17.7%

Food manufacturing9.8%

Textile3.6%

Agriculture3.1%

Job categories not to shift0.5%

Fishery0.2%

Others17.4%

Figure 2-2 Number of supervising organizations

licensed （by job category; percentage）

16

3. Number of supervising organizations licensed (by sending country/region)

（2-4）【Figure 2-3】

In relation to the foreign sending organizations designated by a supervising

organization at the time of applying for a license by country and region, Vietnam

accounts for the largest share, 253（297）or 52.1％, followed by China, 77（149）

or 15.8％, and Philippines, 39（60）or 8.0％.

Vietnam52.1%

China15.8%

Philippines8.0%

Myanmar7.2%

Indonesia6.8%

Cambodia3.5%

Thailand2.1%

Nepal1.2%

Mongolia1.2%

Others2.1%

Figure 2-3 Number of supervising organizations

licensed (by sending country/region; percentage)

17

4. Number of supervising organizations licensed (by prefecture)

（2-5）【Figure 2-4】

In relation to prefectures where supervising organizations are located, Osaka

prefecture accounts for the largest share, 38 organizations（38 organizations）or

9.0％, followed by Aichi prefecture 37 organizations（47 organizations）or 8.8％,

and Tokyo, 33 organizations（41 organizations）or 7.8％.

Osaka9.0%

Aichi8.8%

Tokyo7.8%

Fukuoka6.6%

Shizuoka6.4%

Chiba5.5%

Ibaraki5.2%

Saitama4.7%

Hiroshima4.5%

Hokkaido4.3%

Others37.2%

Figure 2-4 Number of supervising organizations

licensed (by prefecture; percentage)

18

Section３ Report of difficulty in continuing the technical intern training

1. Number of reports of difficulty in continuing the technical intern training (by

reason) （3-1）【Figure 3-1】

The number of reports of difficulty in continuing the technical intern training

due to reasons why the technical intern training was not implemented in

accordance with the accredited technical intern training plan in FY2019 was

44,773（22,664）.

By reason for report, the percentage of “reasons on the trainees’ side” was

77.6％, “reasons on the implementing organization’s side”, 13.3％ and “reason

on the supervising organization’s side”, 9.0％.

4.0%

9.0%

14.5%

13.3%

81.4%

77.6%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

FY2018

FY2019

Figure 3-1 Number of reports (by reason; percentage)

Reason on the supervising organization's side Reason on the implementing organization's side

Reason on the trainee's side

19

Section４ Consultation and assistance

1. Number of native language consultations（4-1）and declarations by language

（4-2）【Figure 4-1】 to 【Figure 4-3】

The number of native language consultations (consultations on training and

daily life from trainees in their mother tongues) in FY2019 was 7,452（2,695）.

By language, Vietnamese constitutes the largest share, 4,317 cases（1,537

cases）or 57.9％, followed by Chinese, 1,643 cases（455 cases）or 22.0％.

In relation to the topics of consultation, “management” was 1,673（445）,

“working conditions including salaries and overtime work” was 1,320（541）.

In addition, the number of declarations made in FY2019 was 133 cases

（cases where the implementing organization or supervising organization, or

these officers and employees’ violates provisions of the technical intern training

act, etc, the technical intern trainee may declare such fact to the competent

ministers. (Ministry of Justice or Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare)）.

By language, Vietnamese constitutes the largest share, 70 cases or 52.6％,

Chinese, 45 cases or 33.8％, Filipino, 15 cases or 11.3％, Indonesia,３cases or

2.3％.

1,537

455 282

116 96 60 131 5 13

4,317

1,643

837 335

143 100 66

5 6

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Vie

tnamese

Chine

se

Filipino

Indone

sian

Cam

bodia

Myanm

ar

Thailand

Eng

lish

Othe

rs

Figure 4-1 Number of native language consultation

(by language)

FY2018 FY2019

（cases）

20

Vietnamese57.9%Chinese

22.0%

Filipino…

Indonesian4.5%

Cambodian1.9%

Burmese1.3%

Thailand0.9%

English0.1%

Others0.1%

Figure 4-2 Number of native language consultations

（percentage）

241

78

445541

11616

292

39 106

259

11 21 47

483469415

1,673

1,320

681

77

798

117

260

870

1870 94

590

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

Technical inte

rn training pro

gram

Othe

r issues re

lated to

the pro

gram

Manag

em

ent

Work

ing co

nditio

ns, including

salaries

and o

vertim

e w

ork

Diffe

rence

in job cate

gorie

s

Penaltie

s and co

mpe

nsation

Leav

ing J

apan witho

ut com

pleting

the

training

Send

ing o

rganizatio

n

Social se

curity and

labor insurance

Chang

e o

f training site

Daily

living

Health issue

s

Tro

uble

in relatio

nship with o

thers

Othe

rs

Figure 4-3 Number of native language consultation

(by topic)

FY2018 FY2019

（件）

21

2. Number of assistance in procedures for taking examinations（by job category;

total number of people）（4-4）【Figure 4-4】

In relation to the number of assistance provided to trainees for taking Exams

(such as forwarding exam applications to testing institutions to support trainees

in taking examinations properly and going on to the next stage of technical intern

training) by job category in FY2019, ready-made foods manufacturing work

accounts for the largest share 302,579 （ 205,060 ） or 8.6 ％ , followed by

cultivated agriculture at 7.0％, and welding at 6.9％.

Ready-made foods manufacturing work

8.6%

Cultivated agriculture7.0%

Welding6.9%

Scaffolding6.2%

Plastic molding5.4%

Ladies' and children's dress making

4.6%

Machining4.0%

Painting3.4%

Electronic equipment assembling

3.2%

Industrial packaging3.2%

Others47.5%

Figure 4-4 Number of Exam applications forwarded to

organizations

（by job category; percentage）

22

3. Number of cases of individual support for changing training sites（breakdown

by nationality/region, job category）（4-6）【Figure 4-5】【Figure 4-6】

The number of individual support cases for changing training sites in FY2019

was 54 cases（36）.

By nationality / region, Vietnam accounted for 49.1% of the total with 28 cases,

followed by China with 14 cases or 24.6% and Cambodia with 6 cases or 10.5%.

By job category, 13 cases related to textiles and clothing accounted for 22.8%,

11 cases or 19.3% related to machinery, and “Others” at 10 cases or 17.5%.

※ １support case may include multiple nationalities / regions and job categories.

Vietnam

49.1％

China

24.6％

Cambodia

10.5％

Philippines

7.0％ Others

8.8％

Figure 4-5 Breakdown by Nationality/Region;

(percentage）

23

Section５ International Affairs（5-1）

1. Conclusion of Memorandum of Cooperation (MOC) and approval of Sending

organizations

Technical intern trainees are dispatched from a sending organization

recommended by the government of the sending country. In this regard, if the

MOC has been signed, the government of the sending country approves the

sending organization according to the MOC.

As of the end of March 2020, 14 countries (13 countries) have signed the MOC.

At the same time, the number of sending organizations is 1,511 (957).

Section６ On-site inspection（6-1）（6-2）（6-3）【Figure 6-1】 to 【Figure 6-4】

The number of implementing organizations and supervising organizations in

which the OTIT conducted on-site inspection during the period of April 2019 to

March 2020 was 18,057（10,369）.

Of these, the number of implementing organizations and supervising

organizations found to violate the Technical Intern Training Act was 6,253（4,169）

（violation rate: 34.6％（40.2％））and the number of violations was 10,708

cases（8,513 cases）.

The major cases of violation are as follows:

・ In relation to implementing organizations, “Insufficient preparations of books

and records” , 2,258 cases（1,904 cases）and “Training content, etc. differs

from the training plan” ,1,575 cases（608 cases）.

・ In relation to supervising organizations, “Improper preparations of books and

Textile

22.8%

Machinery

19.3%

Food manufacturing

15.8%

Construction

15.8%

Agriculture

7.0%

Fishery

1.8%

Others

17.5%

Figure 4-6 Breakdown by job category

(percentage)

24

records, notification, etc.（1,170 cases（2,115 cases）,

“Insufficient management system of the supervising organization

（679 cases（1,107cases）

実地検査を実施した実習実施者及び監理団体の数

Implementing organization 14,970（7,886）

Supervising organization 3,087（2,483）

Total 18,057（10,369）

Number of implementing organizations and supervising organizations detected

as violating the Technical Intern Training Act

Implementing organization 4,922（2,752）（violating entities; 32.9％（34.9％））

Supervising organization 1,331（1,417） （violating entities 43.1％（57.1％））

Total 6,253（4,169）（violating entities 34.6％（40.2％））

Number of cases of non-compliance detected in relation to implementing

organizations and supervising organizations（number of provisions violated）

Implementing organization 7,979（4,707）

Supervising organization 2,729（3,806）

Total 10,708（8,513）

OTIT provides guidance to entities detected as violating the Technical Intern Training Act

and monitors them for improvement.

In addition, particularly malicious cases are subject to administrative measures, etc. by the

Commissioner of the Immigration Services Agency of Japan and the Minister of Health, Labour

and Welfare (an order for improvement or revocation of accreditation of plan against an

implementing organization; an order for improvement or revocation of license against a

supervising organization, etc.).

（Note）As a single organization or supervising organization may violate two or more cases,

the number of implementing organizations detected as being in violation of the Technical

Intern Training Act may differ from the number of cases of violation.

【Reference： Number of administrative measures taken in 2019】

◎Implementing organization：Revocation of accredited plan, 23 entities (244 cases)

order for improvement, ２entities 44 (cases)

◎Supervising organization：Revocation of license ４ entities, order for improvement 0

25

FY2019 FY2018

Number of implementing organizations detected as violating the Technical Intern Training Act

Number of implementing organizations not detected as violating the Technical Intern Training

Act

FY2019 FY2018

Number of supervising organizations detected as violating the Technical Intern Training Act

Number of supervising organizations not detected as violating the Technical Intern Training

Act

10,048

5,134

4,922

2,752

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

Figure 6-1 Violation rate and numbers of

implementing organizations that were conducted on-

site inspection

violation rate 32.9％

violation rate 34.9％

1,756

1,066

1,331

1,417

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

Figure 6-2 Violation rate and numbers of supervising

organizations that were conducted on-site inspection

violation rate

57.1％

violation rate

43.1％

26

* Figures in parenthesis Figures 6-3 and 6-4 represent the percentage to the entire number of

violations.

34 （0.4％）

146 （1.8％）

785 （9.8％）

953 （11.9％）

1,063 （13.3％）

1,165 （14.6％）

1,575 （19.7％）

2,258 （28.3％）

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500

Protection of technical intern training

Inappropriate amount of expenses to be

paid by the trainee

Inadequate training implementation system

Inappropriate notification and report

Improper accomodation and other facilies

Inappropriate payment of salaries other

remuneration

Particulars of training different from the

plan

Insufficient preparations of books and

records

Figure 6-3 Violation cases

（Implementing Organization）

21 （0.8％）

215 （7.9％）

644 （23.6％）

679 （24.9％）

1,170 （42.9％）

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400

Protection of technical intern trainees

Inappropriate submission of audit reports and

others

Inappropriate supervision and guidance of the

implementing organization

Inadequate management system of the

supervising organization

Improper preparations of books and records,

notification, etc.

Figure 6-4 Violation cases

（Supervising Organization）