12/15/17

1

OrangeCountyPublicSchools

SchoolTransformationOfficeDecember15,2017

School Transformation Office

OCPSVisionandMission

VisionTobethetopproducerofsuccessfulstudentsinthenation

MissionToleadourschoolstosuccesswiththesupportandinvolvementoffamiliesandthecommunity

12/15/17

2

OCPSGapDataReading

OCPSGapDataMath

4

12/15/17

3

MinorityAchievementOffice

MTSS Discipline Acceleration

SchoolTransformation

Office

LearningCommunitiesSW,SE,W,N,E

TEACHINGANDLEARNINGCurriculum- Instruction– Assessment

2013-2014

DistrictwideSupportsLEADERSHIPM

ONITO

RING

5

SchoolTransformationOffice(STO)

“Transformationliterallymeansmanagingbeyondyourform.”WayneDyer

12/15/17

4

OrangeCountyPublicSchools

SchoolTransformationOffice

DeputySuperintendent(buildscapacityofandsupervisestheAssociateSuperintendent)

AssociateSuperintendent(buildsthecapacity/supervisestheSchoolTransformationOffice)

ExecutiveAreaDirector(buildscapacityofleadership)

ExecutiveAreaDirector(buildscapacityofleadership)

SeniorAdministratorsSeniorAdministratorsOn-Assignment(supporttheworkofschool-basedleadershipteam)(fellow,observe,shadowtheroleofprincipalship)

InstructionalCoaches(supportschool-basedcoachesandteachers- commonplanning,coachingcycle,data

meetings,professionaldevelopment)

ExecutiveAreaDirector

(buildscapacityofleadership)

12/15/17

5

OrangeCountyPublicSchools

OrangeCountyPublicSchools

SchoolTransformation

12/15/17

6

DATAISOURREALITY

BaselineData:Cohort1(20schools)

Cohort1:ServedbySTOduringthe2013-14schoolyearBasedon2012-13SchoolGradeResults– FCAT

• SchoolGradeof‘D’or‘F’(includingschoolssafeguardedbyone-letter-gradedropprotection):20schools(100percentofthetargetedschoolshada“D”or“F”lettergradeorequivalent)

12/15/17

7

SchoolNameLearning

Community2013-2014Points

2012-13Actual

Points

2012-13to2013-14Point

Gain/Loss

2011-12ActualPoints

2011-12to2012-13

PointGain/Loss

2012-13Grade(*)w/outSafeguard

2013-14ACTUALGrade

Tentative2013-14Helpedby

Safeguard

PALMETTOELEMENTARY STO 566 356 210 428 -72 F A No

CYPRESSPARKELEMENTARY STO 481 376 105 431 -55 F C No

PINARELEMENTARY STO 500 405 95 404 1 D B No

LAKEGEMELEMENTARY STO 467 381 86 485 -104 C(F)=Grade C No

WHEATLEYELEMENTARY STO 507 426 81 365 61 D B No

EAGLESNESTELEMENTARY STO 438 358 80 477 -119 C(F)=Grade C No

ECCLESTONELEMENTARY STO 500 430 70 528 -98 B(D)=Grade B No

LOVELLELEMENTARY STO 459 390 69 500 -110 C(F)=Grade C No

CATALINAELEMENTARY STO 453 407 46 401 6 D C No

ROCKLAKEELEMENTARY STO 457 414 43 433 -19 D C No

MOLLIERAYELEMENTARY STO 401 368 33 433 -65 F D No

LANCASTERELEMENTARY STO 398 374 24 411 -37 D(F)=Grade D No

PINEWOODELEMENTARY STO 416 394 22 475 -81 D(F)=Grade D No

PINEHILLSELEMENTARY STO 452 431 21 419 12 D C No

SADLERELEMENTARY STO 428 422 6 429 -7 D D No

MEADOWBROOKMIDDLE STO 475 475 0 470 5 D D No

CARVERMIDDLE STO 438 463 -25 466 -3 D F No

WASHINGTONSHORESELEMENTARY STO 371 406 -35 434 -28 D F No

ORLOVISTAELEMENTARY STO 355 392 -37 498 -106 C(F)=Grade D Yes

RIDGEWOODPARKELEMENTARY STO 339 395 -56 505 -110 C(D)=Grade D Yes

FinalDataFinalDataSummary2013-2014

(Cohort1:20schools)

• 75.0%ofthetargetedschoolsimprovedtheiroverallnumberofpercentagepointsearnedbyatleast20(15/20)

• 70.0%ofthetargetedschoolsimprovedtotheequivalenceatleastonelettergrade(14/20)

Ø Sevenschoolsimprovedtotheequivalenceoftwolettergradesandoneschoolimproved4lettergrades

Ø Sixschoolsimprovedtotheequivalenceofonelettergrade

• Thetargetedschoolsimprovedoverall+847percentagepointsintheasopposedtoadeclineofanoverall-929pointsintheschoolgradethepreviousyear

12/15/17

8

Cohort2:ServedbySTOduringthe2014-16schoolyearsBasedon2013-14SchoolGradeResults-FCAT

• SchoolGradeof‘C’orhigher:5schools

• SchoolGradeof‘D’or‘F’(includingschoolssafeguardedbyone-letter-gradedropprotection):14schools(73%ofthetargetedschoolsearneda‘D’or‘F’gradeorequivalent)

2014-2015:PartialGradesearned;nolearninggains(samecohort)

BaselineData:Cohort2(19schools)

FinalDataSummary2015-2016(Cohort2:19schools)

MoreRigorousStandards:NewAssessment

• 63.2%ofthetargetedschoolsearnedaschoollettergradeofatleasta‘C’(12/19)

• 78.6%oftheschoolswitha2013-2014SchoolGradeof‘D’or‘F’(includingthosesafeguarded)improvedtoalettergradeofa‘C’(11/14)

• 57.9%ofthetargetedschoolsimprovedoneormorelettergrades(11/19)

• 52.6%ofthetargetedschoolsimprovedachievementinsciencefrom2014-2015to2015-2016(10/19)

• 75.0%ofthetargetedmiddleschoolsimprovedachievementincivicsfrom2014-2015to2015-2016(3/4)

12/15/17

9

OrangeCountyPublicSchools

Cohort3:ServedbySTOduringthe2016-17schoolyearBasedon2015-16SchoolGradeResults– FSA(NewAssessment)

· SchoolGradeof‘C’:3 schools· SchoolGradeof‘D’:6schools· SchoolGradeof‘F’:2schools

BaselineData:Cohort3(11schools)

FinalDataSummary2016-2017(Cohort3:11schools)

• 100%ofthetargetedmiddleschoolsimprovedtheirschoollettergrade(2/2)

• 90.9%oftheschoolsearnedaschoollettergradeofa‘C”orhigher(10/11)

• 90.9%ofthetargetedschoolsimprovedtheiroverallpercentagepoints(10/11)

• 81.8%ofthetargetedschoolsimprovedtheirschoollettergrade(9/11)

12/15/17

10

FinalSchoolGradeSummary2016-2017(Cohort3:11schools)

OrangeCountyPublicSchools

FinalDataSummaryHighlights 2016-2017(Cohort3)

12/15/17

11

OrangeCountyPublicSchools

FinalDataSummaryHighlights2016-2017(Cohort3)

SchoolTransformationOfficePrincipalHighlights

• 3Beginningprincipalsturnedaroundtheirschoolin1year

• 1PrincipaloftheYearfortheStateofFlorida

• 2Beginningprincipalsturnedaroundtheirschoolinoneyear,(2)lettergrades

• 1principalturnedaroundherschoolinoneyear,(4)lettergrades

12/15/17

12

BuildingCapacity

OrangeCountyPublicSchools

Questions?