Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
OCCUPATIONAL INJURIES IN A CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY IN SAUDI ARABIA- A CASE STUDY
Syed Faizul H. Sayeedi
Master's Thesis
Public Health
School of Medicine
Faculty of Health Sciences
University of Eastern Finland
December 2018
2
ABSTRACT
UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND, Faculty of Health Sciences
Public Health
SYED FAIZUL H. SAYEEDI: Occupational Injuries in a Construction Company in Saudi Arabia
– a case study
Master's thesis 38 pages + 3 appendices
Supervisors: Kimmo Räsänen, MD, PhD, Professor in Occupational Health; Jarmo Heikkinen,
MD, Clinical Lecturer in Occupational Health
December 2018
Key words: occupational safety, occupational injuries, Saudi Arabia, construction, migrant
workers
OCCUPATIONAL INJURIES IN A CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN SAUDI ARABIA-
A CASE STUDY
Construction is defined as erecting infrastructures such as buildings, tunnels, roads, bridges and
airports. It is a major industry in the world contributing significantly in gross domestic product
(GDP) of a majority of countries. It plays a vital role in the economy of a country providing
infrastructure and facilitating the production of goods and services.
Saudi Arabia possesses a huge reservoir of oil and gas and utilizes this natural wealth to develop
its economy. This has resulted in a rapid increase in construction industry to build the necessary
infrastructure. Since there was a lack of manpower and human resources in the local population,
migrant workers were recruited from developing countries mostly from Asian and African region.
The construction boom has inevitably brought occupational hazards with it. Construction is by far
the most accident-prone industry in developed countries and more so in the developing nations.
Arabian Gulf Region has some unique variables in construction industry predisposing the foreign
workers to occupational accidents. Due to the restricted flow of information from Saudi Arabia, it
is extremely difficult to gather and analyse data from construction companies. This is a case study
of a construction company in Saudi Arabia which attempted to analyse distribution and types of
injuries during a five month period in 2010 by age and nationality of the injured workers, and to
determine the part of body injured according to ILO classification 2000.
Incident rate of injuries was highest in May, 1.58/100 workers. Altogether 14 nationalities were
presented among the injured workers; Pakistanis, Indians and Moroccans being the most common
nationalities. Of the 431 injuries 47% were dislocations, sprains and strain. One-third were
affected in upper extremities, while more than a quarter were affected in lower extremities. There
were no statistically significant differences in type of the injuries by age group, while superficial
injuries were most common among Filipinos.
Injuries were common in this study. As this is a case study of only one of the construction
companies in Saudi Arabia, more studies and research need to be done to comprehend, manage
and prevent occupational injuries.
3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
My profound and heartfelt gratitude to Dr. Kimmo Räsänen for his continuous support and
encouragement to complete this work. He has been a blessing to me and his unwavering faith in
me helped me realize this dream. Thank you Dr. Jarmo Heikkinen for your valuable input and
encouraging words. I deeply appreciate Annika Männikkö for her untiring assistance in
accomplishing my academics including this thesis.
My parents were the strength behind my endeavour. My wife and my children were my
inspirations to keep my hope alive.
4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................7
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Background....................................................................................................................8
2.2 Arabian Gulf construction industry..............................................................................10
2.2.1 Political instability.....................................................................................................11
2.2.2 Contract Forms..........................................................................................................11
2.2.3 Price inflation............................................................................................................11
2.2.4 Availability and quality of resources........................................................................11
2.2.5 Cross-cultural, religious differences and language barriers......................................12
2.2.6 Sponsorship (Kafala) system.....................................................................................12
2.2.7 Development of Saudi Arabia's construction industry..............................................13
2.3 Occupational safety......................................................................................................14
2.3.1 Occupational safety in construction industry............................................................16
2.4 Injuries in Construction................................................................................................19
2.4.1 Domino Theory.........................................................................................................20
2.4.2 Human Error Theories...............................................................................................20
3. AIM OF THE STUDY ......................................................................................................21
4. MATERIAL AND METHODS
4.1 Study design.................................................................................................................22
4.2 Study sample and setting .............................................................................................22
4.3 Data collection .............................................................................................................22
4.4 Data analysis ................................................................................................................22
5. RESULTS ..........................................................................................................................24
6. DISCUSSION
6.1 Review of the major findings.......................................................................................31
6.2 Ethical considerations...................................................................................................33
6.3 Strengths and weaknesses of the study.........................................................................33
6.4 Suggestions for future research....................................................................................34
7. CONCLUSION..................................................................................................................34
8. REFERENCES...................................................................................................................35
9. APPENDICES....................................................................................................................39
5
Figure 1: Work-related annual deaths –World in 2008......................................................17
Figure 2: Number of injuries recorded during Jan-May period in 2010 in the case-study
construction company...........................................................................................24
Table 1. Work-related injuries and diseases in the world 2013.........................................18
Table 2. International Statistical Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems
according to ILO, based on ICD-10 (Types of Injury).........................................23
Table 3. International Statistical Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems
according to ILO, based on ICD-10 (Part of the body injured)............................23
Table 4. Monthly incidence rate of occupational accidents in the case-study construction
company in a five month period in 2010................................................................25
Table 5. Age and nationality distribution of injured workers during the study.................26
Table 6. Types of injuries according to ILO classification (2000) among the injured
workers during the study......................................................................................27
Table 7. Part of the body injured according to ILO classification (2000) among the injured
workers during the study.......................................................................................28
Table 8. Types of injuries by age group among the injured workers during the study......29
Table 9. Type of injuries by nationality among the injured workers during the study......30
6
ABBREVIATIONS
AED Arab Emirate Dirham
AGR Arabian Gulf Region
FIDIC Federation des Ingenieurs Conseils
GCC Gulf Cooperation Council
GDP Gross Domestic Product
ILO International Labor Organization
KSA Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
RCA Root Cause Analysis
UAE United Arab Emirates
UK United Kingdom
USA United States of America
7
1. INTRODUCTION
Construction is defined as an industry whereby government or private-sector companies make
buildings for residential or commercial utilization. These include public works and infrastructures
such as bridges, airports, roads, dams or tunnels (Weeks 1998). It is a diverse sector consisting
mainly of craft, professional and industrial services related to building, demolition, renovation
and maintenance (Buckley et al. 2016).
Construction is one of the largest employers globally, employing 5-10% of the work force of
industrialized and industrializing countries (Bosch and Philips 2003, Martin 2009). Globally, it
accounts for 11-13% of the world GP which is expected to grow by 15% by 2020 (Schilling
2015).
Occupational health and safety is a crucial predicament which warrants constant scrutiny and
mediation. According to International Labor Organization (ILO) estimates, worldwide there are
2.3 million deadly work-related accidents and sicknesses every year, 160 million non-fatal
occupational diseases and 317 million non-fatal occupational injuries (ILO 2013).
In the Arabian Gulf Region (AGR) in 2003, there were 5.9 to 9.8 fatal occupational accidents per
100,000 while non-fatal accidents were between 5570-9250 per 100,000 workers. Fall from
height and hit-by falling objects were the most common accident types in the AGR (Hämäläinen
et al. 2008). In 2014, Saudi Arabia's General Organization for Social Insurance documented the
total number of occupational accidents to be 69,241 (GOSI 2015).
This particular case study is about a construction company in Saudi Arabia which was one of the
biggest construction companies in the Middle East employing more than 50,000 people coming
from more than 50 countries.
I was employed by this construction company as a physician to look after the well-being and
health of the other employees. There were two types of job location during the length of my stay
at the organization; either in the housing area or camp of the workers or the construction site.
8
Both these locations had a clinic equipped with first aid materials, ambulances and licensed
nurses apart from other administrative staff. The clinics received occupational as well as non-
work related illnesses. Occupational injuries cases were predominantly encountered in clinics at
construction sites as compared to non-work related cases which were seen more at the camp
clinics. Occasionally, however camp clinics would receive work accident cases as electricians,
plumbers, carpenters, drivers and others were working round the clock for the maintenance of the
services.
Initially the clinic would receive the injured employee and after stabilizing the patient, we would
refer him to a hospital for further evaluation and necessary management. My direct involvement
with the workers as a practitioner of adult medicine and occupational physician enabled me to
study the injuries during their job. This included the amount and types of injuries and the body
parts affected by those injuries.
Adding more to the scarce information available on accidents in construction sector would be
helpful for the supervisors at construction sites and to the policy planners in more general level.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Background
Construction is defined as an industry whereby government or private-sector companies erect
buildings for accommodation or commercial purposes. These include public works and
infrastructures such as bridges, airports, roads, dams or tunnels (Weeks 1998).
It is an extremely diverse sector consisting mainly of craft, professional and industrial services
related to the building, demolition and renovation. Civil construction (e.g., roads, water treatment
plants, bridges etc.) industrial construction (e.g. oil and gas platforms, miming infrastructure) and
residential and commercial construction (e.g. residential and office buildings) comprise major
sectors in construction industry. Occupationally the job categories vary from professional,
managerial, technical to manual laborers (Buckley 2016).
9
Construction contributes significantly to the economic activity all over the world. Globally,
construction accounts for 11-13% of global GDP (Schilling 2015). Approximately, seven percent
of global employment is in the construction industry. It is a significant component of the global
economy and one of the largest employers worldwide. It plays an enormous role in the gross
domestic product (GDP) of a country.
Construction sector’s role in economic development is enormous as it creates the facilities
including the infrastructure transforming these basic building blocks into a progressively
compound system. Most substantially, this industry produces all the amenities required for the
manufacturing of materials and provision of services, which are required by the producers and the
consumers as well (Crosthwaite 1999).
In most of the countries, construction has a basic contribution in developing their economies. It
produces the foundation on which other parts of the economy grow which reflects their level of
prosperity (Al Hadir and Panuwatwanich, 2011). However the poor countries witness less growth
of the GDP spending which attains a peak in developing countries and then declines in advanced
countries (Crosthwaite 1999).
China and nations in the oil-exporting AGR attracted migrant workers due to their low interest
rates, fast growing economy and crucial investments in infrastructure. The Gulf Cooperation
Council (GCC) member-states (Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates {UAE}, Kuwait,
Oman and Qatar) inhabit approximately 15 million foreign nationals among 40 million locals.
Majority of these foreigners are contractual workers having two-to-three year contracts.
Subsequently every year around five to seven million migrants arrive to replace those workers.
These migrant workers are mostly employed in construction entities, domestic help and other
services (Bosch and Philips 2003, Martin 2009).
The AGR governments in mid-1970s utilized their enormous revenues from crude oil to erect
infrastructure, to build housing, and to broaden the economy; this marked the advent of the
migrant workers era. Between 1975 and 1980 in the first phase, construction projects were
10
initiated which were usually controlled by multinational firms which recruited migrants workers
from Asian and other Arab countries (Martin 2009).
In developed nations 5-10% of the manpower are involved in construction sectors and in most of
these countries, companies employ relatively more part-time workers as compared to full-time
employees. Predominantly male, unskilled laborers form a major segment of construction
workers; others are grouped in multiple vocational trades like carpenters, electricians, painters
etc. In some countries especially in the rich Arabian Gulf states, the construction work is left to
migrant workers (Weeks 1998).
Construction projects are progressive and complex. Many types of contractors execute their work
at the same time and change with the different phases of the project. And as the work develops,
there is a simultaneous change in atmospheric temperature and ventilation (Weeks 1998).
2.2. Arabian Gulf construction industry
Arabian Gulf countries have a common language, Arabic, and share homogenous social, political
and economical features. Government in this region vary between absolute monarchy (Saudi
Arabia, Bahrain, UAE), state (Qatar), sultanate (Oman) to monarchy + republic (Kuwait).
Additionally, their local law consists of a common civil law mostly adapted from British / French
laws, as well as Islamic jurisprudence as in the case of Saudi Arabia. The impact of the peculiar
challenges associated with this area's construction industry are described in the following
sections.
AGR has an inclement climate; long summer months where temperature usually hovers above 40
degrees Celsius. In spite of official rules and regulations for the workers during these periods, the
implementation is far and few in between (Al-Sabah et al. 2014). Apart from heat, humidity and
night work are ubiquitous risks. Safety-related errors are high for Muslims during their fasting in
Ramadan (Fass 2017).
11
2.2.1. Political instability
During the last two decades i.e. from 1980 to 1988 Iran-Iraq war followed by the First Gulf war
in 1990-1991 caused turmoil and a sweeping change in this part of the world. This turmoil
existed even after 2003 when the Second Gulf war resulted in Kuwait's freedom. In 2011, a
struggle for the people's democratic rights, also known as Arab Spring, in Tunisia quickly spread
also to countries in the AGR. These events further affected the construction sector.
2.2.2 Contract Forms
Some countries require the use of a contract form derived from Federation des Ingenieurs
Conseils (FIDIC). However these Gulf countries can modify the contracts based on their own
local laws. Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, for example, implements this contract with foreign
companies by mandating them to form local corporations with local partners. In this context, it
might be challenging to have a smooth working relationship with a suitable partner (Al-Sabah et
al. 2014).
2.2.3 Price inflation
Due to a huge demand of construction materials, price increase is also one of the risks in
construction (Langdon 2010). In addition, in the AGR, architecture, engineering and construction
market is hugely dependent on construction materials imported from abroad, the cost of which
escalates accordingly with an increase in crude oil prices, along with the rising cost of sea and air
cargo charges.
2.2.4 Availability and quality of resources
The scarcity of skilled labor and extremely low productivity levels are a vital concern in the AGR
in spite of the generally low labor costs. Since there is a tight control of governments on the
companies, the workers are promptly sent back to their home countries which hinders the
availability of a permanent experienced labor market. Recently, thousands of workers who
overstayed their visas or were working illegally for other sponsors were evicted from Saudi
Arabia as the government announced an immigration amnesty program (Al-Sabah et al. 2014).
12
Mostly the workers have limited skills in latest algorithm in construction techniques and usually
these employees at site have exposure to clerical work only (Fass 2017).
2.2.5 Cross-cultural, religious differences and language barriers
Since there are a variety of nationalities in the same company site, this creates a language /
cultural barrier to communication. Illiteracy is also a common factor in these migrant workers
(Fass 2017).
The countries in AGR share a common written and spoken Arabic language with varying dialects.
However, they have crucial differences in history, ethnicity, culture and tradition making it
difficult for multinational companies to transfer their know-how from one place in the region to
another. Additionally there are special cultural, religious occasions and celebrations for example
the holy month of fasting (Ramadan) and Haj (pilgrimage) season. These peculiarities may be
challenging and lead to disputes among local workers and the foreign workers of multinational
companies (Al-Sabah et al. 2014).
2.2.6 Sponsorship (Kafala) system
Workers in the Middle East region are working under their sponsor (also known as Kafeel) who
have absolute control over them through this Kafala system. The workers cannot work for other
companies or leave the country on their own free will. These sponsors can terminate their
contracts without any obligation (Buckley et al 2016). The worker has to surrender his passport to
his employer and cannot leave the country without his sponsor's permission. Their ordeal starts
from their home country as they are forced to pay huge sums of money to employment agents
either by selling land, livestock, jewels or taking large loans.
Once these migrant workers reach their destination, a different contract is enforced upon them
which leaves them with little choice as their travelling documents have already been confiscated
(Connell and Burgess 2012).Labor standards are difficult to enforce. Suicides are not uncommon
in camps along with reports of numerous mortalities due to occupational accidents at the
construction sites (Connell and Burgess 2012).
13
2.2.7 Development of Saudi Arabia's construction industry - based on Dubai experiences
Saudi Arabia is regarded as one of the rapidly growing countries in the AGR. In spite of this
reality, the general level of construction safety has been comparatively very low in Saudi Arabia.
Most of the construction businesses in Saudi Arabia have exerted their efforts to manage the
increasing expenditures as well as decrease project holdups due to work mishaps (Alli 2008).
Construction activities in Saudi Arabia have expanded at a fast pace especially during the past
two decades, which has subsequently lured international enterprises and firms to join and engage
in a multitude of developmental projects. Almost 15% of the total manpower of Saudi Arabia was
employed in the construction industry (Alli 2008).
There is a dearth of publications on Saudi Arabia's construction industry due to a tight control on
information coming out. Dubai model will be discussed which more or less correlates with the
scenario in Saudi Arabia.
Following the discovery of oil, AGR underwent a rapid economic development beginning from a
conventional agriculture foundation and trading with a population possessing least vocational
skills. In order to fulfill the mandatory requirements for a fast-paced financial growth, the lack of
manpower and skills were compensated by hiring contractual workforce from foreign countries.
The government completely regulated the industrial relations system as employers were to decide
workers' salaries and work-stoppages were (still are) considered illegal. There is a complete ban
on labor unions and collective bargaining agreement is forbidden. These laborers are meted out
with a very peculiar manner under local labor laws as compared to local or foreign professional
employees (Connell and Burgess 2012).
It is quite relevant to comprehend the situation of the migrant workforce which helps in
understanding the accident causations and consequent prevention strategy. The huge buildings
have been built by foreign workers, many of whom are hired on low salary such as 550 AED. In
14
contrast a UAE citizen (UAE) having primary school certificate receives 3000 AED and for those
who possess post-secondary qualification the pay is 5000 AED (Connell and Burgess 2012).
These inadequately paid foreign laborers face economic as well as social issues performing
difficult, dirty, hazardous, humiliating and unstable jobs that Emiratis generally avoid. Dubai's
rapid economic development has also come at a cost, as within the construction industry only,
approximately 880 people died from work-related accidents in 2005 (Jacob 2008). A UK report
linked the susceptibility of foreign workers due to non-existent or insufficient personal protective
equipment, an absence of safety training and poor English language skills leading to increase in
incidents of sickness, injury or even mortality at work (Anderson and Rogaly 2005).
At one end of social and economic spectrum are the migrant workers from UK, Germany and
South-Africa with professional degrees and experience and at the other end are the huge numbers
of semi-skilled workforce involved in the hospitality, construction and domestic services
industry. These are mostly Asian, and come from the Philippines, Indonesia, Pakistan, India,
Pakistan, Bangladesh and Thailand (Fernandez 2010).
Most of these workers are hired through employment agents in their native country. Upon arrival,
these laborers are accommodated in labor camps at or around the construction site in a poor living
and working condition (Buckley 2013).
There has been no official regulation of safety in construction industry in Saudi Arabia. A recent
study on safety amid various construction schemes throughout Saudi Arabia illustrates this fact:
one-fourth of the contractors failed to provide any orientation about safety to the novice workers;
one-fourth did not supply personal protective equipment; one-fourth were unable to deliver
emergency medical treatment at construction sites and more than one-third lacked trained safety
personnel (Berger 2008).
2.3 Occupational safety
Occupational safety and health means the science of the anticipation, recognition, evaluation and
control of hazards arising in or from the workplace that could impair the health and well-being of
15
workers, considering the plausible effect on the surrounding communities and the general
environment (Alli 2008).
It is a multi disciplinary activity encompassing the development of safe work, protection and
promotion of worker's health, his physical and mental improvement and social well-being thus
allowing them to lead socially and productive lives (WHO 2001).
Due to the globalization of the world economies, occupational safety has slowly and constantly
transformed in response to economic, social, political and technological changes (Alli 2008).
A coherent policy formulation includes governments, employers and workers participation. It
stresses upon; national goals, workers’ rights, government cooperation, national safety culture,
resources, coordination among institutions, compliance from employers and regular action. This
policy should be reviewed regularly (Alli 2008).
Occupational safety differs between nations, economic sectors and social groups. In developing
countries, agriculture, fishing and mining cause increased injury and mortality. Globally, women,
children, foreign workers and the poverty-stricken are often the most vulnerable and the most
impacted (ILO) (Bosch and Philips 2003).
Guaranteeing health and safety is a vital challenge in every society especially when the
fundamental information available is insufficient to plan potent mediation e.g. incident rates,
particular divisions of occupation, types of accidents, causative agents and available mitigation
strategies (Fass 2017).
A study based on questionnaire highlighted the important factors affecting the safety performance
in Saudi Arabia which include management involvement: planning and preparing for emergency
or catastrophe, mechanical and electrical equipment, crane and lifting machines, scaffolding and
ladders, prevention from fire and ionizing radiation, excavation, shoring and trenching (Jannadi
2002).
16
2.3.1 Occupational safety in construction industry
Construction companies often follow the adage; Jack be nimble! Jack be quick! This guideline is
always adapted by construction enterprises engaged in a fierce global competition. The
construction process is an inherently turbulent process, as the products cannot be stored or
transported to a place of demand. The geographical, irregular, and recurrent instability of this
industry combines prominently to the hazards associated with gathering human and physical
resources within the construction industry (Bosch and Philips 2003).
As per ILO, one worker encounters death from an occupational accident or sickness and 160
workers suffer an occupational accident every 15 seconds. Moreover, 313 million accidents occur
on the job annually; a significant human cost. In a majority of work-related accidents there is a
long absence from job. The economic cost of substandard occupational safety and health
practices is approximately 4% of global GDP annually (Bosch and Philips 2003).
It has been recorded that the construction has the highest rate of debilitating injuries and deaths
compared with other industries. For example, even in countries like Japan, around 40% of work-
related accidents are in the construction industry. Similarly, in Ireland it is 50% and in the Great
Britain it is 25% (AlHadir and Panuwatwanich 2011).
Every year 2.3 million people die due to occupation related accidents all over the world; 2 million
due to occupational sickness and 0.3 million affected by work-related injuries. However, these
two elements i.e. occupational sickness and injuries are variable due to the degree of development
of that particular country (Takala et al. 2012).
Work-related injuries and occupational communicable diseases in industrialized nations causes
fewer mortality compared to the inordinate mortality figures due to non-communicable diseases.
Occupational illnesses which are linked to ageing and have a lengthy dormant phase are
obviously increasing. Meanwhile, the developed countries have been able to considerably
decrease the number of work-related injuries courtesy of structural modification and better
anticipation (Takala et al. 2012).
17
Around 160 million workers encounter work-related injuries and these are the fourth major cause
of occupational mortality (Alli 2008).
Occupational well-being and health implementation vary prominently between nations, economic
divisions as well as company sizes. For instance, in Pakistan, a worker in a factory is eight times
more prone to work-related mortality as compared to his counterpart in France. Similarly, as in
construction, mining, agriculture and forestry also have highest death rate. Furthermore, small
workplaces have twice the rate of work-related injuries and deaths compared to large workplaces
(Alli 2008).
Figure 1. Work-related annual deaths –World in 2008 (Hamalainen & Takala 2008)
Although the occupational injuries are at a declining rate due to much better guidance, improved
administration and cultures, globally the fatalities in occupational industries has been on the rise
in Asian countries as construction, agriculture, manufacturing and mining have been shifted there
(Takala et al. 2012).
0.4% 8%1%
17%
32%
23%
1%
18%
Communicable diseases Respiratory Diseases Mental Disorders
Genitourinary system Cancer Circulatory diseases
Digestive system diseases Accidents and violence
18
In developed countries, occupational injuries are a small problem now and chronic complications
like lung cancer, musculoskeletal diseases, circulatory disorders, and psychosocial aspects are on
the rise (Takala et al. 2012).
Health and safety and competitiveness are bound with each other i.e. the lesser the number of
accidents there is increased productivity and competiveness in any organization. Even registering
the accidents can affect the economy, as low reporting will give the decision makers a sense of
false alarm of safety which in turn can not only affect the competitiveness and productivity but
human rights issues as well (Takala et al. 2012). The table below illustrates this phenomenon.
Table 1. Work-related Injuries and Diseases in the World in 2013 (WSH 2013)
Region
Economically
Active
Population
Fatal
(Reported)
Four or
more
days
absence
Fatal
Injuries
ILO
estimates
Four or more
days absence:
ILO mid-point
estimate
Fatal work-
related
diseases
Total work-
related
mortality
High-Income
Areas 494,365,003 11,850 4,959,039 14,090 14,665,130 306,988 321,077
African Region 251,588,449 759 46,616 44,699 46,561,176 336,144 380,843
American Region 315,509,490 1,944 657,580 25,534 8,866,101 113,023 138,557
Eastern
Mediterranean 152,610,995 0 0 17,912 18,657,924 117,164 135,076
European Region 213,740,690 6,777 325,004 16,191 18,093,167 198,366 214,557
Southeast Asia 642,390,831 81 1,676 83,096 86,558,781 523,355 606,451
Western Pacific 921,078,060 193 43,756 119,058 124,019,195 427,530 546,588
Total 2,991,283,518 21,604 6,033,671 320,580 317,421473 2,022570 2,343,149
19
In this context, reporting is also vital, as in rich nations, the reporting is fair unlike other
developing nations. Under-reporting might lead the decision makers to believe that everything is
normal which consequently undermines not only productivity and competitiveness but also
human rights (Takala et al. 2012).
A new philosophy Vision Zero has emerged which aims to modify the mindset and values of all
stake holders from business as usual to guaranteeing no harmful exposures, no sicknesses, no
accidents, no harassment, no violence and simply no trauma as the ultimate goal during entire
working life (Takala et al. 2012).
Former Secretary General of the United Nations, Kofi Annan has aptly reminded: "Health and
safety at work is not just sound economic policy it is a basic human right" (Takala et al. 2012).
2.4 Injuries in Construction
Construction is a hazardous work. Statistically, the highest rates of work-related deaths in the
world occurs in construction apart from agriculture, forestry and mining. According to the
National Safety Council, a thousand construction workers died during their job and another
350,000 suffered from debilitating injuries in the year 1996 alone. Although only 5% of the work
force of United States was involved in construction, occupational fatalities were 20% and
disabling injuries was 9% (Accidents 1997).
There is an increased risk of injury in construction workers who are younger than 24 years of age
(Loudoun 2010). Also, different types of construction workers have different types of injuries.
Consequently, masons tend to develop injuries due to overexertion as compared to carpenters
who are more prone to injuries involving hands and fingers (Helander 1991). Falls are the most
common cause of death in construction industry (Culver et al 1990).
All the construction work which include civil, industrial and commercial in Saudi Arabia is
undertaken by private contractors. Palaces and government buildings are also outsourced
including their maintenance as well. Therefore, in reality there is no public construction
enterprise.
20
Generally migrants face abusive and exploitative work environment: forced labor, low wages, no
associations for their rights, discrimination, xenophobia and social exclusion. Specifically,
language barriers, family separation, psychosocial anxiety, violence and limited ability to obtain
medical care, makes these migrant workers especially exposed to workplace safety and health
risks (Alli 2008).
2.4.1 Domino Theory
Heinrich (1959) theorized a domino theory model for causation of accidents: communal
environment and ethnic descent, personal mistakes, hazardous act, mechanical and physical
danger, accidents, and injury. According to him: "An accident is an unplanned and uncontrolled
event in which the action or reaction of an object, substance, person, or radiation results in
personal injury or the probability thereof." Heinrich's work can be summed up in two points:
accidents are basically caused by the human beings; and an able and competent management is
accountable for the avoidance of accidents.
2.4.2 Human Error Theories
Behavior models and human component models symbolize the hypothesis of human error. In
behavior model, humans are to be blamed mostly for the errors whereas the human factor
approach not only blames human but also on the architecture of the workplace and jobs which
fail to examine human being's constraints ultimately having hazardous effects (Abdelhamid and
Everett 2000).
21
3. AIM OF THE STUDY
The aim of this study was to analyze the occupational injuries in one construction company in
Saudi Arabia in a five months period in 2010. More specifically the aim was to
1) Determine distribution of occupational injuries by age group and nationalities
2) Determine types of occupational injuries and their distribution by age group and nationalities
3) Determine part of the body injured according to ILO classification 2000.
22
4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
4.1 Study design
A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the registers kept by the occupational health service of
the clinic of the construction company in Saudi Arabia. The monthly total number of employees
varied in the study period between approximately 5000 and 10,000. The time period was five
months.
4.2 Study sample and setting
The construction company which provided the workers with health facility through clinics at the
construction site and if the need aroused with further referral to hospital. The injured worker was
identified through his Iqama (residence permit issued by Saudi authorities) then attended by a
certified nurse and a doctor. All the pertinent data was written in a log book. Consequently he
was referred to the hospital if the condition of the patient warranted accompanied by the referral
paper.
4.3 Data collection
Non-computerized registers were used to analyze the appropriate information. The total number
of new cases of occupational injury was studied on a monthly basis. Data was extracted to a data
collection sheet which was developed during the study (Appendix).
4.4 Data analysis
The following data was analyzed according to ILO codes and classification adopted by the Sixteenth
International Conference of Labor Statisticians in October 1998. In this particular case study data was
collected on age, nationality, type of injuries, and, part of body injured The data was cross tabulated and
relevant differences in proportions were tested for statistical significance with chi2-test;
www.socscistatistics.com/tests/chisquare2/
23
Table 2. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems
according to ILO, based on ICD-10
Code1 Superficial injuries and open wounds
Code 2 Fractures
Code 3 Dislocations, sprains and strains
Code 4 Traumatic amputations
Code 5 Concussions and internal injuries
Code 6 Burns, corrosions, scalds and frostbite
Code 7 Acute poisonings and infections
Code 8 Other specified types of injury
Code 10 Type of injury, unspecified
Table 3. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems
according to ILO, based on ICD-10
Code1 Head
Code 2 Neck including spine and vertebra in the neck
Code 3 Back, including spine and vertebra in the back
Code 4 Trunk and internal organs
Code 5 Upper extremities
Code 6 Lower extremities
Code 7 Whole body and multiple sites
Code 8 Other parts of body injured
Code 10 Part of body injured, unspecified
24
5. RESULTS
The total number of workers in each month were as follows: January 9949, February 6843, March
7626, April 5195 and May 4947. As can be seen in Figure 1, January had the highest number of
accidents which correspond to the highest number of workers as well as compared to other
months. However, the incident rate was highest in May. The incident rate was lowest for the
month of March (Table 4).
Figure 2. Number of injuries by month recorded during Jan-May period 2010. The number at the
bottom denotes total number of workers in that particular month.
128
8880
59
76
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
January(n=9949)
February(n=6843)
March(n=7626)
April(n=5195)
May(n=4947)
Num
ber
of
inju
ries
per
mo
nth
Number of workers per month
25
Table 4. The monthly incidence rate (number of accidents/number of workers) of occupational
accidents in the study construction company in a five month period in 2010.
Month in 2010 Number of accidents Number of workers Incidence/100 workers
January 129 9949 1.30
February 85 6843 1.24
March 80 7626 1.05
April 59 5195 1.14
May 78 4947 1.58
Two-thirds of the workers were under 35 years of age, and only two percent were over 55 years
of age. Altogether 14 nationalities were represented. Almost one-third of the workers were
Pakistani, followed by Filipinos, Indians and Moroccans (Table 5).
26
Table 5. Age and nationality distribution of injured workers
Age, years n %
<25 56 (13)
25-34 219 (51)
35-44 111 (26)
45-54 34 (8)
>55 11 (2)
Nationality
Pakistani 128 (30)
Filipino 85 (20)
Indian 84 (19)
Moroccan 57 (13)
Turkish 27 (6)
Senegalese 12 (3)
Bangladeshi 10 (2)
Sri Lankan 10 (2)
Portugal 5 (1)
Nepalese 4 (1)
Lebanese 3 (1)
Chinese 3 (1)
Egyptian 2 (0.5)
Jordanian 1 (0.5)
All 431 (100.0)
All together 431 injuries were recorded during the study period. Almost half of the injuries were
dislocations, sprains and strain followed by lacerations, punctured wounds, blunt trauma to chest,
27
trunk etc, which made up more than one-third of injuries. More severe injuries like fractures and
traumatic amputations were rare, but however present (Table 6).
Table 6. Type of injuries according to ILO classification (2000)
Type of Injury n (%)
Dislocation, sprain & strain 204 (47)
Other specified types of injury 159 (37)
-Lacerations, punctured wounds,
blunt trauma to chest, trunk etc.
Superficial 54 (12)
Concussions & internal injuries 3 (1)
Fracture 2 (0.5)
Traumatic amputations 1 (0.5)
Burns, corrosions, scalds & frostbite 1 (0.5)
Acute poisonings and infections 1 (0.5)
Type of injury, unspecified 6 (1)
All 431 (100)
28
Of the 431 injuries, one-third affected upper extremities, while more than a quarter affected lower
extremities. Eye injuries were the third most common ones, followed by back and spine injuries.
Injuries to whole body / multiple sites as well as trunk / internal organs were (Table 7).
Table 7. Part of the body injured according to the ILO classification (2000)
Part of body injured n (%)
Upper extremities 136 (32)
Lower extremities 120 (28)
Head* 75 (17)
Back, including spine and vertebra 55 (13)
Whole body & multiple sites 15 (3)
Trunk & internal organs 10 (2)
Neck, including spine & vertebra 1 (0.5)
Part of body injured, unspecified 3 (0.5)
Other parts of body injured 16 (4)
All 431 (100)
*of these eye injuries, n=61
29
There were no statistically significant differences in type of the injuries by age groups (Table 8).
Table 8. Type of injuries by age group among the injured workers during the study.
Age group, years
Type of injury
<25
n=56 (%)
25-34
n=219 (%)
35-44
n=111 (%)
>45
n=45 (%)
All
n=431
p-value*
Dislocation,
sprain & strain
29 (52) 102 (47) 49 (44)
24 (53)
204
0.65
Fractures,
amputations
0 (0)
1
(1)
1 (1)
1 (2)
3
..
Superficial 4 (7) 27 (12) 17 (15) 6 (13) 54 0.46
Other specified
types of injury:
laceration, blunt
trauma to other
parts of body,
punctured
wound
20 (36) 84 (38) 41 (37) 14 (31) 159 0.83
Concussions &
internal injury,
burns, acute
poisoning
1 (2) 2 (1) 2 (2) 0 (0) 5 ..
Typeof injury,
unspecified
2 (3) 3 (1) 1 (1) 0 (0) 6 ..
All 56 (100) 219 (100) 111 (100) 45 (100) 431
*chi2–test; www.socscistatistics.com/tests/chisquare2/
.. p-value not calculated due to small number of observations or zero values in cells
30
There were no statistically significant differences in the type of injury, except superficial injuries,
which were most common among Filipinos and most rare among Moroccans (Table 9).
Table 9.Type of injuries by nationality among the injured workers during the study
Nationality
Pakistani Filipino Indian Moroccan Others All p-value
Type of injury n=128 (%) n=85 (%) n=84 (%) n=56 (%) n=78 (%) n=431
Dislocation, sprain &
strain
39 (30) 16 (19) 23 (27) 20 (36) 27 (35) 125
0.12
Fractures, amputations 0 (0) 0(0) 1 (1) 0 (0) 1 (1) 2 ..
Superficial 10 (8) 21 (24) 10 (12) 2 (4) 7 (9) 50 0.001
Other specified types
of injury: laceration,
blunt trauma to other
parts of body,
punctured wound
72 (56) 43 (50) 47 (56) 32 (57) 42 (54) 236 0.90
Concussions &
internal injury, burns,
acute poisoning
0(0) 0(0) 0(0) 0 (0) 1 (1) 1 ..
Type of injury,
unspecified
7 (5) 5 (6) 3 (4) 2 (4) 0 (0) 17 ..
All 128 (100) 85 (100) 84 (100) 56 (100) 78 (100) 431
*chi2_test; www.socscistatistics.com/tests/chisquare2/
.. p-value not calculated due to small number of observations or zero values in cells
31
6. DISCUSSION
6.1 Review of the major findings
In this particular case study, January had the highest number of accidents which corresponds to
highest number of workers however, month of May had the highest incident rate. One plausible
explanation could be the extreme heat which commences from March until October (temperatures
in this region exceeds 45 Celsius) combined with high humidity. Similarly when newly-arrived
workers (sans prior experience) are put to work in the construction site, the chances of accidents
are exponentially high. Occasionally, the project manager or supervisor would order to expedite
the work to receive the financial budget, usually disbursed in tranches, from the government.
Nevertheless, it was difficult to correlate the number of accidents in any particular period to
possible causative factors.
More than 50% of the injured workers were in their late 20s to early 30s. Since the construction
work requires hard manual labor such as lifting of heavy objects and manual shoveling,
performed under inclement weather conditions, more of the younger workforce is recruited.
Hence higher incidence in this younger age group. The other tenable reasons might include
limited experience and poor judgment. Only 25% of the injured workers were above the 55 age
group as their cohort was smallest in comparison with other age group.They were in this
company for at least ten years and were more into supervisory roles hence lesser involvement in
accidents and injuries.
There are nearly 50 million expatriates in the Gulf region; 33% in Saudi Arabia and 72 % in other
Gulf countries (Raghu and Sartawi 2012). Nearly two-thirds of the low-skilled laborers are from
Pakistan, the Philippines and India due to the prevalent economic situation including high
unemployment and currency difference in their countries. This situation makes it lucrative for the
Arab Gulf countries to acquire cheap labor. As the migrants constitute the bulk of construction
workers in Gulf countries consequently, south Asians constitute a majority of the injured workers
also in this case-study (75%); rest were Africans and Arabs.
Laceration, blunt trauma to other parts of the body and punctured wound were the most common
types of injuries amounting to one-half of the total injuries in all nationalities. Dislocation, sprain
32
and strain were the second-most common type of injuries ranging from 19% in Filipinos to 36%
in Moroccans. Consequently, superficial injuries were the third-most common type of injuries
ranging from 4% in Moroccan workers to 24% in Filipinos. Unspecified types of injuries ranged
between 4% (Indians) to 6% (Filipinos). Fractures, amputations, concussions and internal injury,
burns and acute poisonings were 1% of the total injuries. 17% of the injuries did not fit into any
of the above criteria.
Unsafe conditions at the worksite are the main cause of accidents resulting in injuries and even
death. Defective equipments, improperly constructed scaffolds, protruding metals, ungrounded
electrical tools, un-shored trenches etc are some of the examples which contribute either directly
or indirectly to the occuppational accidents. Additionally, management's failure to impart
conventional orientation, training as well as insufficient or substandard personal protective
equipment makes these workers vulnerable to accidents. Dislocation, strain and sprain,
lacerations, punctured wounds, blunt trauma and superficial injuries constitute almost 95% of the
total injuries. Dislocation, sprain and strain are mostly caused by jackhammer; lifting jobs are
also a causative factor. Superficial injuries include foreign bodies in eyes mostly due to welding
during which minute particles of iron get embedded in cornea or conjunctiva. Incidentally,
fracture and traumatic amputations were insignificant in this case study although being
conventionally higher in construction industry in other parts of the world. Due to the nature of
construction industry, acute poisonings and infections, burns, corrosions, scalds and frostbite
incidents are negligible.
ILO estimates 30% of the fatalities are due to falls (Weeks 2011), although this case-study paints
a completely different picture because of varied reasons. In European Union, Spain had the
highest number of injuries i.e. 70% which predominantly constituted fall, slip and struck-by
falling objects and fragments. Gulf countries also have a similar pattern as accidents due to falls
were 33.1% and struck-by 25.2% (Al-Humaidi and Tan 2010). The literature suggests that fall
from height, slips and struck-by are the major types of construction injuries.
Similarly, extremities are involved in more than half of the injuries as compared to other body
parts apparently due to their more frequent usage. As described before, eye injuries form a bulk
33
of injuries resulting from welding. Sandstorms are a regular feature in this part of the world
which can also cause minute sand particles to embed in the eye. Lifting weights beyond their
recommended limits and utilising incorrect posture leads to backache ranging from benign
muscular spasms, which resolve spontaneously, to herniated discs requiring hospitalizations.
6.2 Ethical considerations
There was no need for ethical approval of the study. Name of the construction company and the
patient identity were not disclosed. All the data was extracted anonymously to the data collection
sheet by the physician in charge (the student).
6.3 Strengths and weaknesses of the study
One strength of the study was that the student, as a physician in-charge of the clinic at the
construction site, was able to receive firsthand the workers who sustained injury during work
(occupational) or who suffered from non-work related sicknesses.
In case of any work-related injuries and depending upon the nature of the injury, the patient was
provided emergency treatment at the in-house clinic and referred to the designated hospital for
further evaluation and management depending on the severity of the injury. The injured worker
was consequently followed-up with the attending physician in the referred hospital until
discharged.
Consequently, a physical fitness to work was conducted and the employee would then be
evaluated by the physician prior to resume work. Each and every patients' data was recorded in a
log book maintained by the nurse and under the supervision of the physician. A monthly
compilation was then forwarded to the higher management.
One weakness of the study was that due to strict rules and regulations, unfortunately not much
data is available. However, this case study is quite reflective of the prevaling scenario at the
different construction sites all over the country. During the length of my employment in this
organization, I had been assigned at several construction sites and I observed similar situation.
34
6.4 Suggestions for future research.
As this is a case study of only one of the many construction companies in Saudi Arabia, more
studies and research need to be done to comprehend, manage and prevent occupational injuries.
The government has to legislate and implement the labor safety laws fairly and squarely with the
help of the stake holders. Transparency and unrestricted flow of information are key elements in
proper formulation of laws.
7. CONCLUSION
Construction is a hazardous occupation and the injuries in this sector far outweigh the number of
accidents in any other sector. Risk management which includes identification, assessment and
classification, is crucially vital to deliver construction projects in a successful manner.
Furthermore, risk management application should be evaluated by the construction companies in
order to isolate barriers and imperfections. Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is an indispensable tool
to identify and prevent future accidents. There should be more resources and time spent to
improve the safety performance in the construction industry.
Similarly, developing countries have a larger share of occupational injuries than the developed
countries. Migrant workers are more exposed to these occupational risks unlike the local workers
and there is dire need to improve conditions in their workplace vis-à-vis minimum wages,
accomodations and leaves. Management should be more proactive in ensuring safe procedures as
it has the most significant role by setting targets, providing safety training and inculcating
teamwork in a heterogeneous group along with suitable supervision. Personal attitude (of the
workers) is an integral part, too.
Due to restrictions in this region, the data coming from Arab Gulf states are few and far between
and hence greater transparency, awareness and auditing are mandatory to protect these workers
from injuries. All safety program implementations need to be followed by an effective
enforcement; both by the private contractor and the related governmental agency.
35
More research and case studies are needed to identify the elements or causative factors of
occupational accidents in the construction industry in this region to minimize the injuries,
decrease the costs and implement completion of the project in a timely manner.
8. REFERENCES
Abdelhamid TS, Everett J. Identifying Root Causes of Construction Accidents. Journal of
Construction Engineering and Management, Jan Feb 2000;126:1
Accidents facts. National Safety Council, Itasca, Illinois. 1997
Al Hadir S, Panuwatwanich K. Critical success factor for safety program implementation among
construction companies in Saudi Arabia. Procedia Engineering. 2011;14:148-155.
Al-Humaidi HM, Tan FH. Construction safety in Kuwait. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 2000; 24 (1),
70-77, http://ascelibrary.org./doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000055/.
Alli BO. Fundamental principles of occupational health and safety. International Labour Office –
Geneva: ILO, 2008.
Al-Sabah R, Menassa C, Hanna A. Evaluating impact of construction risks in the Arabian Gulf
Region from perspective of international architecture, engineering and construction firms,
Construction Management and Economics, 2014;32:4, 382-402.
Anderson B, Rogaly B. Forced Labour and Migration to the UK, 2005.
https://www.tuc.org.uk/research-analysis/reports/forced-labour-and-migration-uk (accessed on
05.05.2018)
Berger H. Study finds safety poor on KSA sites, ArabianBusiness.com, 2008. Available at:
http://www.arabianbusiness.com/507489-study-finds-safety-poor-on-ksa-sites
36
Bosch G, Philips P. Building Chaos, An international comparison of deregulation in the
construction industry. Routledge, New York 2003.
Buckley M. Locating Neoliberalism in Dubai: Migrant Workers and Class Struggle in the
Autocratic City. Antipode 2013;45:2:250-279.
Buckley M, Zendel A, Biggar J, Frederiksen L, Wells J. Migrant work and employment in the
construction sector: International Labour Office, Sectoral Policies Department, Conditions of
Work and Equality Department. Geneva: ILO, 2016.
Connell J, Burgess J. Vulnerable workers in an emerging Middle Eastern economy: what are the
implications for HRM? The International Journal of Human Resource Management 2012; 24:22,
4166-4184, DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2013.845448
Crosthwaite D. The global construction market: a cross sectional analysis, UK. Nov 1999.
Culver C, Florczak G, Casteli R Jr., Pelton G, Connolly C. Analysis of construction fatalities -
The OSHA Data 1985-1988. Rep., Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
1990. U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, D.C
Fass S, Yousef R, Liginlal D, Vyas P. Understanding causes of fall and struck-by incidents: What
differentiates construction safety in the Arabian Gulf region? Applied Ergonomics 2017;58;515-
526.
El-Sayegh SM (2008). Risk assessment and allocation in the UAE construction industry,
International Journal of Project Management 2008; 26:4:431-8.
Fernandez B (2010). Cheap and Disposable: The Impact of the Global Financial Crisis on the
Migration of Ethiopian Women Domestic Workers to the Gulf, Gender and Development
2010;18:2:249-262.
37
Government Organization of Social Insurance. Annual statistical report 1435H. 2015 [cited 2015
14/04]; Available from:http://www.gosi.gov.sa/portal/web/ guest/statistics/view-
statistic?StatisticsId=1379226
Hamalainen P, Takala J, Saarela K L, TUT, ILO, EU-OSHA, 2008
Heinrich H W. Industrial accident prevention. McGraw Hill, New York. 1959.
Helander M G. Safety hazards and motivation for safe work in the construction industry.
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, London, 1991;8:4:205-223.
International Labour Organization. http://www.ilo.org/safework/countries/arab-states/saudi-
arabia/lang--en/index.htm
International Labour Organization. http://www.ilo.org/global/statistics-and-databases/standards-and-
guidelines/resolutions-adopted-by-international-conferences-of-labour-
statisticians/WCMS_087528/lang--en/index.htm accessed 27.04.2016
International Labour Organization. ILO Calls for Urgent Global Action to Fight Occupational
Diseases, International Labor Office Press release April 26, 2013:
http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/media-centre/press-releases/WCMS_211627/lang-
en/index.html.
Jacob C. Slave Labour in Dubai’s Building Boom 2008. http://news.sky.com/skynews/home/sky-
news-archive/article/20080641281723.
Jannadi OA. Safety factors considered by industrial contractors in Saudi Arabia, Building and
Environment, 2002;37:5:539-547.
Langdon D. Middle East: Property and Construction Handbook 2010/2011, Middle East.
available at www.bit.ly/ 18i2O–zV (accessed 4 January 2016).
38
Loudoun R J. Injuries sustained by young males in construction during day and night work,
Construction Management and Economics 2010;28:12:1313-1320, DOI:
10.1080/01446193.2010.521760.
Martin P. The Recession and Migration: Alternative Scenarios. International Migration Institute,
James Martin 21st Century School. University of Oxford. 2009;13. Accessed at: http://www.age-
of-migration.com/uk/financialcrisis/updates/1c.pdf.
Raghu M R, Sartawi M. GCC Demographic Shift; Intergenerational Risk-transfer at play. Kuwait
Financial Centre Markaz research 2012.
https://www.markaz.com/MARKAZ/media/Markaz/Documents/Business%20Activities/Demogra
phicsResearch-MarkazResearch-June-2012.pdf
Safety and health at work, http://www.ilo.org/global/topics/safety-and-health-at-work/lang--
en/index.htm (accessed on 22.07.2015)
Schilling D R. “Global Construction Expected to Increase by $4.8 Trillion by 2020 Industry Tap
2015. http://www.industrytap.com/global-construction-expected-to-increase-by-4-8-trillion-by-
2020/1483
Takala J, Hämäläinen P, Saarela KL, Yun LY, Manickam K, Jin TW, Heng P, Tjong C, Kheng
LG, Lim S, Lin GS. Global Estimates of the Burden of Injury and Illness at Work in 2012,
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 2014;11:5:326-337.
DOI:10.1080/15459624.2013.863131
Weeks JL. Encyclopedia of Occupational and Safety. ILO Geneva. 1998
World Health Organization. Occupational health, a manual for primary health care workers 2001.
WSH Institute and World Economic Forum Lausanne, Switzerland, 2012-13
http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF GlobalCompetetivenessReport 2012-13.pdf
39
9. APPENDICES
Appendix 1. Example of the data extraction sheet, January 2010
January
Age (years) Nationality Initial diagnosis Specialist
27 Filipino foreign body, L eye ophthalmologist
37 Filipino foot sprain L Orthopedic
35 morocco small laceration scalp Emergency
27 morocco punctured wound sole L Emergency
26 indian foreign body, R eye ophthalmologist
37 Filipino foreign body, L eye ophthalmologist
35 Filipino trauma, R eye ophthalmologist
26 morocco cut wound middle finger L Emergency
28 morocco trauma, L eye Emergency
24 pakistani deep laceration forehead Emergency
45 Filipino sprain L hand Emergency
26 pakistani cut wound supraorbital R Emergency
24 indian pain swelling knee R Orthopedic
42 indian trauma knee L Orthopedic
23 pakistani foreign body R eye ophthalmologist
39 srilanka laceration tricep L Emergency
39 srilanka trauma forearm L Emergency
28 pakistani foreign body L eye ophthalmologist
40 Filipino foreign body R eye ophthalmologist
26 Filipino foreign body R eye ophthalmologist
27 pakistani ankle injury R Orthopedic
36 pakistani sprain R hand Orthopedic
36 Filipino laceration foot R Emergency
40
27 pakistani foreign body R eye ophthalmologist
36 indian deep cut wound forehead Emergency
23 Turkish foreign body R eye ophthalmologist
33 Filipino severe leg pain R Orthopedic
36 Filipino eye trauma R ophthalmologist
47 Filipino foreign body L eye ophthalmologist
32 indian sprain foot L Orthopedic
30 morocco trauma foot L Orthopedic
43 pakistani punctured wound foot L Emergency
37 Filipino foreign body L eye ophthalmologist
28 Filipino foreign body R eye ophthalmologist
32 Senegalese cut wound eyebrow R Emergency
30 pakistani foreign body L eye ophthalmologist
30 Filipino punctured wound Emergency
28 morocco laceration 4th digit R hand Emergency
24 indian puntured wound R sole Emergency
25 Filipino foreign body R eye ophthalmologist
40 Turkish trauma lower cheek R emergency
25 Pakistani knee joint pain R emergency
28 Pakistani crushing injury hand R emergency
25 moroccan trauma thumb R emergency
28 Filipino trauma chest R, tibia L emergency
29 Turkish low back pain emergency
36 moroccan trauma hand R emergency
24 Bangladeshi low back pain emergency
26 Pakistani trauma hand, 3rd digit R emergency
30 Turkish sprain foot R emergency
25 Pakistani ankle pain R emergency
28 Pakistani laceration hand L emergency
41
27 Pakistani sprain foot L emergency
38 Pakistani sprain hand L emergency
25 Bangladeshi wrist joint swelling L emergency
27 moroccan foreign body L eye emergency
29 Filipino trauma lower back emergency
41 Filipino low back pain emergency
24 indian trauma leg L emergency
27 Pakistani foot pain R emergency
23 Nepali trauma hand L emergency
33 moroccan trauma shoulder, hand L emergency
27 Pakistani trauma foot L emergency
39 senegalese low back pain emergency
36 Pakistani trauma chest emergency
32 indian trauma chest, knee R emergency
36 Pakistani trauma 3rd digit R emergency
40 Lebanese trauma hand R emergency
22 indian trauma hand L emergency
26 Pakistani foot swelling L emergency
29 Filipino trauma 4th digit, hand L emergency
30 Nepali cut wound hand L emergency
26 indian trauma 2nd digit L emergency
27 Pakistani trauma, face emergency
25 Pakistani trauma 2nd & 3rd digit emergency
34 Pakistani trauma thigh & scrotum emergency
22 moroccan trauma foot L emergency
36 Turkish trauma 2nd digit R emergency
50 Filipino trauma foot R emergency
24 moroccan low back pain emergency
40 moroccan trauma 2nd digit L emergency
42
36 indian knee joint pain L emergency
45 Pakistani low back pain emergency
27 Filipino low back pain emergency
33 Filipino strain leg R emergency
42 Filipino trauma head emergency
42 Bangladeshi trauma thumb L emergency
38 Filipino pain arm, elbow L emergency
36 Filipino pain shoulder L emergency
24 indian trauma chest emergency
28 indian knee joint pain R emergency
28 Turkish low back pain emergency
44 srilanka fracture, wrist L emergency
28 indian twisting injury knee L emergency
33 Filipino trauma leg L emergency
38 Filipino trauma foot R emergency
48 moroccan trauma foot L emergency
35 Bangladeshi trauma forehead & nose emergency
33 Bangladeshi sprain foot L emergency
34 indian foreign body R eye emergency
30 indian trauma shoulder L emergency
41 indian multiple trauma emergency
38 Pakistani severe backache & leg pain emergency
30 indian arm fracture R emergency
27 moroccan trauma arm R,thigh L, head emergency
22 Pakistani trauma 2nd & 4th digit L emergency
36 Filipino trauma leg R emergency
34 indian trauma knee R emergency
30 Filipino trauma eye R, forehead emergency
25 Pakistani trauma elbow R emergency
43
23 Pakistani swelling hand R emergency
29 Pakistani foreign body eye L emergency
47 Filipino twisted hand while drilling emergency
49 Pakistani trauma knee R due to fall emergency
30 Jordanian severe arm pain R emergency
27 Pakistani severe low back pain emergency
25 Pakistani unspecified injury due to fall emergency
26 indian foreign body eye R emergency
65 Portugal pain foot L emergency
35 srilanka trauma 3rd digit R emergency
28 Turkish pain shoulder R emergency
32 Filipino trauma leg L, back emergency
36 Filipino sprain foot L emergency
32 senegalese trauma shoulder R emergency
27 indian trauma chest wall emergency
42 Pakistani contusion knee R emergency
35 indian trauma head emergency
25 Pakistani trauma knee R emergency
Total cases = 128
Total number of workers = 9949
Incidence Rate/1000 workers = 128/9949 x 1000 =12.87
44
Appendix 2. Coding of the data
Age group Nationality group Type of injury (accdg. to ILO classification) Speciality Referred to
<25=1 Bangladeshi =1 Superficial = Code 1 Emergency = 1
25˗34=2 Filipino = 2 Fracture = Code 2 Ophthalmologist = 2
35˗44=3 Indian = 3 Dislocation sprain & strain = Code 3 Orthopedics = 3
45˗54=4 Jordanian = 4 Traumatic amputations = Code 4 Surgeon = 4
>55=5 Lebanese = 5 Concussions & internal injuries = Code 5
Moroccan = 6 Burns, corrosions, scalds & frostbite = Code 6
Nepali = 7 Acute poisonings & infections = Code 7
Pakistani = 8 Other specified types of injury = Code 8
Senegalese = 9 Type of injury, unspecified = Code 10
Srilanka = 10
Turkish = 11 Part of the body injured
Portugal = 12 Head = Code 1
Chinese = 13 Neck including spine & vertebra in the neck = Code 2
Egypt = 14 Back, including spine &vertebra in the back = Code 3
Trunk & internal organs = Code 4
Upper extremities = Code 5
Lower extremities = Code 6
Whole body & multiple sites = Code 7
Other parts of body injured = Code 8
Part of body injured, unspecified = Code 10
45
Appendix 3. Example sheet of the coded data
Age group Nationality group Type of Injury Part of body Injured Speciality
2 2 1 2 2
3 2 3 7 3
3 6 8 1 1
2 6 8 7 1
2 3 1 2 2
3 2 1 2 2
3 2 8 2 2
2 6 8 6 1
2 6 8 2 1
1 8 8 1 1
4 2 3 6 1
2 8 8 1 1
1 3 3 7 3
3 3 3 7 3
1 8 1 2 2
3 10 8 6 1
3 10 3 6 1
2 8 1 2 2
3 2 1 2 2
2 2 1 2 2
2 8 3 7 3
3 8 3 6 3
3 2 8 7 1
2 8 1 2 2
3 3 8 1 1
1 11 1 2 2
2 2 3 7 3
46