P a g e | 1

Occupational Certificate

Tax Professional

External Integrated Summative

Assessment (EISA)

SAQA ID: 93624

November 2017

Paper 1: Tax Awareness

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS

TRUE/FALSE QUESTIONS

CANDIDATE NUMBER

P a g e | 2

Instructions to Candidates

1. This external integrated summative assessment Paper 1 consist of 10 Multiple Choice

Questions and 10 True False questions.

2. Time: Paper 1 and Paper 2: 8 hours

3. Enter your examination number on each document and save all documents with

your examination number.

4. Your name must not appear anywhere in the answer books or saved documents.

5. Answer the questions using the Answer Sheet that was provided in your

assessment pack. Please use a pencil to indicate your answer.

5.1. For question 1, please choose the correct answer by drawing a cross.

5.2. For question 2, please choose the correct answer by drawing a cross over

the correct choice.

TRUE FALSE

6. It is your responsibility to ensure that all assessment stationary is handed in to the

invigilator before leaving the examination room and saved documents are

forwarded as per assessment requirements.

7. Total marks for Paper 1: 50

8. Pass mark: 50 % pass is required per paper and competence achieved on all exit

level outcomes per paper.

P a g e | 3

CASE STUDY

Background

Lyrical Wax (Pty.) Ltd ("Lyrical Wax") is a luxury scented candle manufacturer and retailer.

Lyrical Wax was incorporated in South Africa and has a July financial year end. Lyrical Wax

is a provisional tax payer. Lyrical Wax is also a registered category A Value-Added Tax (‘VAT’)

vendor and uses e-filing to submit its VAT 201 returns. All amounts exclude VAT, where

applicable, unless otherwise stated.

Lyrical Wax was founded by John Soar and Burn Lowell, both of whom are South African

residents. The issued share capital of Lyrical Wax is 2 shares – each of which were issued to

John and Burn for a consideration of R500. John is the CEO and Burn the CFO of Lyrical Wax.

Lyrical Wax employs 6 full-time staff.

The following diagram represents additional shareholdings held by Burn:

You were approached as a tax expert to assist Lyrical Wax with its tax compliance and

review functions. In this regard, you were provided with 3 folders of information.

FOLDER 1

Tax information for the period 1 August 2016 to 31 July 2017:

1. Within the store, there is a special station where customers can make wax moulds of

their hands. Profits arising from this income stream amounted to R248 000. There was

an incident where one customer suffered an injury as a result of the wax. The customer

sued Lyrical Wax for damages, citing negligence on the part of Lyrical Wax. As at the

end of the year of assessment, the legal team of Lyrical Wax were of the opinion that

the claim by the customer would succeed. Legal costs to defend the claim so far

amounted to R27 000.

2. Lyrical Wax and John Soar respectively own 31% and 25% of the voting-and

participation rights in Light Life Oy (“Light”). Light is a company incorporated in Finland

and the “Oy” indicates that it is a public limited company. Light is listed on a Finnish

stock exchange which is considered a “recognised exchange” by the Minister of

Finance. All the other shares of Light are held by non-residents. The net profit before

tax of Light as determined using Finland’s tax laws is R1 710 000 (correctly translated).

The rate of Finnish tax that Light must pay is 20%. SARS has determined that Light

does not meet the definition of a foreign business establishment. The net income of

Light for the purposes of section 9D of the Income Tax Act is R1 600 000.

Burn Lowell

8% in Bolts (Pty) Ltd (South African

resident company)

21% in Apples Inc (United States of America resident

company)

P a g e | 4

3. Lyrical Wax entered into an agreement with Light where it would sell Light some of its

premier candles for R1 500 000. The selling price of the candles in an arm’s length

transaction is R1 800 000.

The tax accountant of Lyrical Wax provided you with the following taxable income

calculation based on the above information:

Detail ZAR

Profits from wax mould station – gross income inclusion 248 000

Legal costs – no section 11(a) deduction because capital in nature 0

Light Life Oy – controlled foreign company inclusion section 9D 1 710 000

Sales to Light Life Oy – gross income inclusion No further tax implications

1 500 000

The tax accountant was unsure of the tax implications of the below transactions and

still has to determine their tax implications:

1. Lyrical Wax provided John with the right of use of a motor vehicle. This motor vehicle

was purchased for R225 000 from a registered VAT vendor dealer on 1 August 2016

and the right of use was granted to John on this same date. The motor vehicle has a

maintenance plan in place with the dealer.

2. In addition, Lyrical Wax provides both John and Burn with travel allowances of R2 800

per month. Lyrical Wax is satisfied that less than 80% of these motor vehicles will be

used by John and Burn for business purposes.

3. Lyrical Wax had purchased a machine to be used in manufacturing candles on

1 June 2015 and immediately brought it into use. This machine was purchased new

for the market value of R1 200 000 from a seller that is not a registered VAT vendor.

The machine was disposed of for R855 000 (including VAT) during March 2017.

4. A special order of rare scents to be used in the candle manufacturing process was

purchased on credit for R278 000 in October 2015 from an unconnected creditor. The

creditor charged no interest on this credit purchase. These scents were used to

manufacture candles, all of which were sold in the 2016 year of assessment. Payment

of this debt became due in February 2017 and the unconnected creditor decided to

accept part payment of the debt for purely commercial reasons. Lyrical Wax paid the

creditor R250 000 and the full debt was extinguished.

5. During June 2017 Lyrical Wax donated some scented candles with an open market

value of R115 000 to an orphanage that is not registered as a public benefit

organisation per section 30 of the Income Tax Act. This enabled the orphanage to sell

these candles for its own benefit. The tax accountant noted that there would not be

any VAT implications as a result of this donation.

FOLDER 2

The following relates to the provisional tax affairs of Lyrical Wax:

1. The first provisional tax payment for the 2017 year of assessment was made on time.

This payment was based on an estimate of the 2017 year of assessment taxable

income which was estimated to be R645 000.

2. The 2014 assessment from SARS amounted to R550 000. There were no taxable

capital gains included in this amount.

3. The 2015 assessment from SARS is under dispute and had not yet been finalised.

P a g e | 5

4. The assessment for the 2016 year of assessment of R580 000 was received on

20 January 2017. There were no taxable capital gains included in this amount.

5. The second provisional tax payment was not made by 31 July 2017. The tax

accountant assured the management of Lyrical Wax that the only penalty as a result

of this failure to pay timeously would be in terms of paragraph 27 of the Fourth

Schedule.

FOLDER 3

Information for the months of June and July 2017:

1. Local sales for the period amounted to R390 000.

2. Export sales for the period amounted to R145 000.

3. A new single cab scented candle delivery vehicle was purchased for R321 000 from a

VAT vendor.

a. The tax accountant noted that the input tax on this delivery vehicle would be

denied and did not take it into account in the below VAT return.

4. Another second hand manufacturing building in the Republic was purchased from a

resident seller who is not a registered VAT vendor. The purchase price was

R2 450 000. The date of transfer is in July 2017 and the full amount was paid in the

same month. This factory is not yet operational.

5. Bad debts on local sales amounted to R24 000. There were no bad debts on export

sales.

6. Specialist services were imported from the United Kingdom for purposes of making the

manufacturing process of the scented candles more efficient. The cost of these

services totalled R75 000.

7. Salaries paid amounted to R160 000.

8. Operating expenses paid amounted to R80 000.

Based on the above VAT information, the tax accountant has prepared the VAT return

to be submitted to SARS for your review, as below:

A: Calculation of Output Tax and Imported Services

Supply of Goods and/or Services By You

Standard rate (excluding capital goods and/or services and accommodation)

1 R390 000 X 𝑟

100+𝑟 4 R47 894

Standard rate (only capital goods and/or services)

1A 0 X 𝑟

100+𝑟 4A 0

Zero rate (excluding goods exported) 2 0 0

Zero rate (only exported goods) 2A 0 0

Exempt and non-supplies 3 0 0

Supply of accommodation:

Exceeding 28 days 6 0 0

Value Not exceeding 28 days 7 0 0

Total (6+7) 8 0 X 𝑟

100+𝑟 9 0

Adjustments:

Change in use and export of second-hand goods

10 0 X 𝑟

100+𝑟 11 0

Other and imported services (75 000x14%) 12 R10 500

Total A: TOTAL OUTPUT TAX (4+4A+9+11+12) 13 R58 394

P a g e | 6

B: Calculation of Input Tax R

Capital goods and/or services supplied to you – building (2 450 000x14/114)

14 300 877

Capital goods imported by you 14A 0

Other goods and/or services supplied to you (not capital goods) ((160 000 salaries + 80 000 operating expenses) x14%)

15 33 600

Other goods imported by you (not capital goods) 15A 0

Adjustments:

Change in use 16 0

Bad debts (24 000x14%) 17 3 360

Other 18 0

Total B: TOTAL INPUT TAX (14+14A+15+16+17+18) 19 337 837

VAT PAYABLE/(REFUNDABLE) (Total A - Total B) 20 (279 443)

Additional information:

SARS considers the manufacturing process of luxury candles to be a process of

manufacture.

Lyrical Wax obtained valid tax invoices for all relevant expenditure.

P a g e | 7

REQUIRED

1.1. Multiple Choice Questions [30 Marks]

Each question is a multiple-choice question with five answer choices. Read each question and answer choice carefully and choose the ONE best answer. Please use the Multiple Choice Answer Grid that was included and mark one box only for each question.

Only use a pencil and make a (X) over the correct choice.

1. Refer to the information under Folder 1. Of the below statements relating to the

travel allowance and right of use granted to John Soar by Lyrical Wax, which

one is true: [3 Marks]

(A) For employees’ tax purposes, 20% of the cash equivalent value of the right of use

of the motor vehicle will be included in John’s remuneration (as defined).

(B) For employees’ tax purposes, 20% of the travel allowance will be included in John’s

remuneration (as defined).

(C) For employees’ tax purposes, 100% of the cash equivalent value of the right of use

of the motor vehicle will be included in John’s remuneration (as defined).

(D) For employees’ tax purposes, 100% of the travel allowance will be included in

John’s remuneration (as defined).

(E) There are no employees’ tax implications for John as a result of Lyrical Wax

granting John a travel allowance.

ANSWER: D

Because a right of use and a travel allowance are granted to John Soar on the same vehicle,

there will be no deductions allowed to be set-off against the travel allowance per section

8(1)(a)(i)(aa).

So the travel allowance will be included at 100%.

The cash equivalent value of the right of use of the motor vehicle will be included in John’s

remuneration at 80% (as not more than 80% is used for business purposes).

P a g e | 8

2. Refer to the information under Folder 1. With regards to the disposal of the

manufacturing machine in March 2017 by Lyrical Wax, which of the below

statements is true: [3 Marks]

(A) The total allowances for tax purposes claimed by Lyrical Wax until the date of

disposal amounted to R720 000.

(B) The proceeds for capital gains tax purposes is R855 000.

(C) The value of a recoupment for tax purposes is R510 000.

(D) The base cost of the manufacturing machine for capital gains tax purposes is

R1 052 632 as it must exclude VAT.

(E) As the sale was for below the cost, Lyrical Wax can claim a section 11(o) scrapping

allowance.

ANSWER: C

The total allowance claimed to date of disposal is R960 000 (40% in 2015, 20% in 2016 and

20% in 2017 – accelerated because new).

The recoupment calculation is equal to:

Selling value of R750 000 (R855 000 excluding VAT) limited to cost (R1 200 000) – no

limit = R750 000

LESS Tax Value = Cost of R1 200 000 less R960 000 allowances = R240 000

Recoupment = R750 000 – R480 000 = R510 000

As there is a recoupment, no section 11(o) can be claimed.

Capital Gains Tax calculation:

Proceeds = R750 000 (must exclude VAT) – R510 000 = R240 000

Base Cost = R1 200 000 (notional input VAT not excluded) – R960 000 = R240 000

No capital gain or loss.

P a g e | 9

3. If Lyrical Wax (Pty) Ltd wanted to register as a small business corporation with

SARS: [3 Marks]

(1) Lyrical Wax would need to dispose of its shareholdings in Light Life Oy.

(2) The taxable income of Lyrical Wax would need to be less than R20 000 000 for the

year of assessment.

(3) Burn Lowell would need to dispose of his shareholdings in Bolts (Pty) Ltd.

(4) John Soar would need to dispose of his shareholdings in Light Life Oy.

(5) Lyrical Wax would need to meet the requirements of a personal services provider

as per the Fourth Schedule.

Which of the above statements are true?

A. 1

B. 2 and 3

C. 3 and 4

D. 2 and 5

E. 5

ANSWER: B

1 is false as per section 12E(4)(a)(ii) the shareholders may not hold shares in other companies

(other than listed companies), not the company itself.

2 is true as per section 12E(4)(a)(i).

3 is true as per section 12E(4)(a)(ii) – shareholders may not have shares in companies other

than listed companies.

4 is false as per section 12E(4)(a)(ii) the shareholders can hold shares in listed companies –

and because Light Life Oy is a listed company, this is an accepted shareholding.

5 is false because if Lyrical Wax is a personal services provider per paragraph 1 of the Fourth

Schedule, then it cannot be a small business corporation.

P a g e | 10

4. Refer to the information under Folder 1. With respect to the payment for the

scents purchased on credit made to the unconnected creditor that extinguishes

the full debt: [3 Marks]

(1) The value of the opening stock deduction (section 22(2)) must be reduced by

R28 000.

(2) The value of the closing stock addition (section 22(1)) must be reduced by

R28 000.

(3) The reduction amount as per section 19 is R278 000.

(4) The creditor will have a capital loss of R28 000.

(5) Lyrical Wax will have a section 8(4)(a) recoupment equal to R28 000.

Which of the above statements are true?

A. 1

B. 1 and 2

C. 2 and 3

D. 4

E. 4 and 5

ANSWER: E

1 is false as the trading stock is no longer on hand on the date of the debt reduction – section

19(3) does not apply.

2 is false as the trading stock is no longer on hand on the date of the debt reduction – section

19(3) does not apply.

3 is false as the reduction amount as defined in section 19(1) is the total debt reduced

(R278 000) less any consideration paid (R250 000) – which makes it equal to R28 000.

4 is true as the Proceeds of this loan asset will be R250 000 and the Base Cost will be

R278 000, giving rise to a capital loss of R28 000 in the hands of the creditor.

5 is true because the trading stock is no longer on hand at the time of the debt reduction. As

a result, section 19(5) applies making the debt reduction of R28 000 a section 8(4)(a)

recoupment.

P a g e | 11

5. Refer to the information under Folder 1. With regards to the treatment by the tax

accountant of Light Life Oy for section 9D, of the below statements, which one

is correct: [3 Marks]

(A) The treatment is correct because Light Life Oy is a subsidiary of Lyrical Wax.

(B) The treatment is incorrect because Light Life Oy is not a controlled foreign

company.

(C) The treatment is incorrect because the net income of Light Life Oy will be deemed

to be Rnil because the foreign tax is at least 75% of the South Africa tax.

(D) The treatment is incorrect because the amount included in the gross income of

Lyrical Wax should be R496 000.

(E) The treatment is correct because Lyrical Wax holds more than 50% of the shares

in Light Life Oy.

ANSWER: D

Light Life Oy is a controlled foreign company (residents own 56% which is more than 50%).

Additionally, the foreign tax is only 71% of the South African tax (20%/28% = 71%) so the net

income is NOT deemed to be Rnil.

As a result, 31% of the net income (not the profit before tax) of the controlled foreign company

(being R496 000 = R1 600 000*31%) must be included in the gross income of Lyrical Wax.

Lyrical Wax only holds 31%, not more than 50%

P a g e | 12

6. Refer to the information under Folder 1. With regards to the sale of the candles

by Lyrical Wax to Light Life Oy: [3 Marks]

(1) The treatment of the sales to Light Life Oy is incorrect because the gross income

inclusion should be R1 800 000.

(2) The treatment of the sales to Light Life Oy is incorrect because there were no

donations tax implications determined.

(3) The treatment of the sales to Light Life Oy is correct because the goods were sold

for an amount of R1 500 000.

(4) The treatment of the sales to Light Life Oy is correct because Lyrical Wax and Light

Life Oy are not connected persons.

(5) The treatment of the sales to Light Life Oy is incorrect because no dividends tax

implications have been determined.

Which of the above statements are true?

A. 1 and 2

B. 2

C. 2 and 3

D. 4

E. 1 and 5

ANSWER: E

1 is true because as per section 31(2) the transaction must be determined as if it was an arm’s

length transaction.

2 is false because Lyrical Wax is a company, there will be dividends tax consequences not

donations tax consequences.

3 is false because the transaction must be determined as if it was an arm’s length transaction

– so R1 800 000 should be used, not R1 500 000.

4 is false because Lyrical Wax owns 31% of the shares in Light Life Oy, which is more than

20%, so they are connected persons.

5 is true because of section 31(3)(b) and Lyrical Wax is a company.

P a g e | 13

7. Refer to the information under Folder 3. With regards to the treatment of the VAT

on the delivery vehicle, which of the below is true: [3 Marks]

(A) The treatment is correct because section 17(2)(c) of the VAT Act denies the input

tax on the purchase of delivery vehicles.

(B) The treatment is incorrect because the input tax claim is not denied for single cab

delivery vehicles.

(C) The treatment is correct because input tax can be only be claimed on assets where

those assets are used in a process of manufacture – and the delivery vehicle is not

used in a process of manufacture.

(D) The treatment is incorrect because notional input tax can be claimed.

(E) The treatment is correct because a delivery vehicle is a motor car as defined.

ANSWER: B

The delivery vehicle is not a motor car as defined in section 1 of the VAT Act. As a result,

section 17(2)(c) does not deny the input tax.

As this was purchased from a VAT vendor, there will be actual VAT and there will be actual

input tax claimed, not notional. The input tax can be claimed on the purchase of this delivery

vehicle.

For the input tax to be claimed, the asset must be used in the production of taxable supplies

(not a process of manufacture) – in this case the delivery of candles is a taxable supply so

input tax can be claimed.

P a g e | 14

8. Refer to the information under Folder 2. With regards to the first provisional tax

payment made by Lyrical Wax in the 2017 year of assessment: [3 Marks]

(1) The first provisional tax payment should have been based on the amount of

R580 000 from the assessment for the 2016 year of assessment.

(2) The use of the estimate is incorrect as the first payment is based only on the basic

amount.

(3) The use of an estimate for the first payment is correct, but the estimate may not be

less than the basic amount.

(4) The basic amount for the first provisional tax payment is R550 000.

(5) The basic amount must be increased by 24% (3 sets of 8%).

Which of the above statements are false?

A. 1

B. 1 and 2

C. 2 and 3

D. 3 and 4

E. 3, 4 and 5

ANSWER: B

1 is false as this 2016 assessment was not received more than 14 days before the due date

of the first payment (due date of the first payment being 31 January 2017 – 6 months into the

year of assessment).

2 is false as the first provisional tax payment is based on as estimate, but the estimate may

not be less than the basic amount.

3 is true as per paragraph 19(1)(c) of the Fourth Schedule.

4 is true as the latest preceding year of assessment is the 2014 year of assessment, making

the basic amount the 2014 assessment amount of R550 000. (The 2015 assessment was not

yet been received by the time of the first payment (31 January 2017) and the 2016 assessment

was received on 20 January 2017 which is not more than 14 days before the date of payment

(31 January 2017) (it is 11 days), therefore 2016 not used).

5 is true because the number of months from the end of the 2014 year of assessment (31 July

2014) to the date of payment of the first provisional tax payment (31 January 2017) is 30

months, which is more than 18 months. Increase by 8% from 2014 to 2015, 2015 to 2016 and

2016 to 2017 (3 sets).

P a g e | 15

9. Refer to the information under Folder 3. With regards to the treatment of the VAT

on the purchase of the manufacturing building, which of the below statements

is true: [3 Marks]

(A) The treatment is incorrect because the tax fraction is used instead of 14%.

(B) The treatment is correct because the seller levied VAT on sale of the manufacturing

building.

(C) The treatment is correct because notional input tax may be claimed.

(D) As there is notional tax on the transaction, there will be no transfer duty levied.

(E) The treatment is incorrect because the input tax claimed is limited to the transfer

duty.

ANSWER: C

It is correct that the tax fraction is used per the “input tax” definition in section 1.

The seller is not a VAT vendor and would not have levied any tax on the sale, and since the

building is second hand and the buyer, seller and goods are in South Africa, then notional

input tax can be claimed.

There will be transfer duty levied on the sale of the manufacturing building because the seller

did not levy actual VAT.

The notional input tax claimed is no longer limited to the transfer duty paid (it was in the past).

P a g e | 16

10. Refer to the information under Folder 1. With regards to the treatment of the legal

costs incurred by Lyrical Wax on defending the claim by the injured customer:

[3 Marks]

(1) The treatment is incorrect because the legal costs are deductible under section

11(c).

(2) The treatment is correct because the claim by the customer is capital in nature.

(3) The treatment is incorrect because the claim has not yet been settled so no

deduction can be considered until the claim is settled.

(4) The treatment is correct because the compensation payment to be made by the

company would be revenue in nature and, therefore, the legal costs would be revenue

in nature.

(5) The treatment is incorrect because the legal costs are revenue in nature and are

deductible.

Which of the above statements are true?

A. 1 and 5

B. 2, 3 and 4

C. 3

D. 4 and 5

E. 5

ANSWER: A

1 is true because section 11(c) is the specific provision for the deduction of legal costs, so

section 11(a) will not apply.

2 is false because the claim is not capital in nature – if any claim was paid, it would be in the

production of income (necessary concomitant of trade) and, therefore, be revenue in nature.

The legal costs would then follow the nature of the claim.

3 is false as the amount of the claim is uncertain, but the legal costs do have a value and

Lyrical Wax would have an unconditional legal obligation to make the payments.

4 is false because the correct treatment would be to have a section 11(c) deduction where

the claim is revenue in nature.

5 is true because if any claim was paid, it would be in the production of income (necessary

concomitant of trade) and, therefore, be revenue in nature. The legal costs would then follow

the nature of the claim.

P a g e | 17

REQUIRED

1.2. True/False Questions [20 Marks]

Each question is a True/False question Read each question and answer choice carefully and choose the ONE best answer. Please use the Multiple Choice Answer Grid that was included and mark one box only for each question. Only use a pencil and make a (X) over the

correct choice.

Indicate whether each of the below statements are true or false:

1. Refer to the information under Folder 1. The donation to the orphanage of the

candles is not deductible for tax purposes. [2 Marks]

TRUE because the orphanage is not a public benefit organisation and

no section 18A certificate was received by Lyrical Wax.

2. If Lyrical Wax distributes candles as a dividend to John Soar and Burn Lowell,

the shareholders themselves will be liable for the dividends tax. [2 Marks]

FALSE because Lyrical Wax will be liable for the dividends tax on a

dividend in specie as per section 64EA(b).

3. The VAT 201 return for the June/July 2017 VAT period needs to be submitted

by 25 August 2017. [2 Marks]

FALSE because e-filing is used, Lyrical Wax must submit the VAT 201

return to SARS by the last business day of August 2017 (proviso (ii) to

section 28(1)).

4. Refer to the information under Folder 1. Lyrical Wax can reduce the taxable

amount for donations tax purposes of its donation to the orphanage by

R100 000. [2 Marks]

FALSE because the section 56(2)(b) R100 000 deduction is only

available to natural persons and Lyrical Wax is a company and not a

natural person.

5. Refer to the information under Folder 2. Is the statement by the tax accountant

that the only penalty on late payment of the second provisional tax payment is

paragraph 27 of the Fourth Schedule true or false? [2 Marks]

FALSE because there will also be a paragraph 20 penalty along with

section 89bis interest.

6. Refer to the information under Folder 3. The treatment of the bad debts for VAT

purposes in the VAT return is correct. [2 Marks]

TRUE because the bad debts is 24 000 (excluding VAT) and the VAT

is, therefore, R3 360 (24 000*14%).

7. Refer to the information under Folder 1. Based on the statement by the tax

accountant that there are no VAT implications on the donation of the candles

to the orphanage, is this true or false? [2 Marks]

P a g e | 18

FALSE as there will be a section 18(1) change in use adjustment (from

being used to make taxable supplies to being used other than in the

making of taxable supplies) and Lyrical Wax will need to account for

output tax on the open market value of the supply of the candles.

8. The treatment of salaries and operating expenses for VAT purposes in the VAT

return is correct. [2 Marks]

FALSE because salaries are excluded from the definition of enterprise

or they are merely a transfer or money and no input tax can be claimed.

The operating expenses are correct.

9. Refer to the information under Folder 3. The treatment of the local sales in the

VAT 201 return is correct. [2 Marks]

FALSE because the R390 000 excludes VAT, so the amount in the VAT

return must include VAT – being R444 600 (390 000x1.14). The output

tax is, therefore, R54 600, not R47 894.

10. Refer to the information under Folder 3. The imported services to make the

manufacturing process more efficient were included in the VAT return at

R10 500, but this should have been R0. [2 Marks]

TRUE because VAT on imported services is only charged where the

services are used to make exempt supplies or not used in the

production of taxable supplies. These imported services relate to the

manufacturing process and, therefore, were used to make 100%

taxable supplies so no output tax should be levied.