Occulsal Morphology Determinants

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    1/38

    INTRODUCTION TO OCCLUSION

    CUSP HEIGHT DETERMINANTS

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    2/38

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    3/38

    CUSP HEIGHT

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    4/38

    VERTICAL DETERMINANTS

    ANGLE OF EMINENTIA

    GRADUAL EMINENTIASLOPE REQUIRES SHORTCUSPS

    STEEP EMINENTIA SLOPEPERMITS LONGER CUSPS

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    5/38

    VERTICAL DETERMINATS

    VERTICAL OVERLAP (OVERBITE)

    DEEP ANTERIOR OVERBITEPERMITS LONGER CUSPS

    MINIMUM ANTERIOR OVERBITEREQUIRES SHORTER CUSPS

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    6/38

    VERTICAL DETERMINANTS HORIZONTAL

    OVERLAP

    (OVERJET) PRONOUNCED ANTERIOR

    OVERJET REQUIRES SHORTERCUSPS

    MINIMUM ANTERIOR OVERJET

    PERMITS LONGER CUSPS

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    7/38

    VERTICAL DETERMINANTS

    IMMEDIATE SIDE-SHIFT

    EXCESSIVE IMMEDIATE SIDE-SHIFT REQUIRES SHORT CUSPS

    GRADUAL IMMEDIATE SIDE-SHIFT PERMITS LONGER CUSPS

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    8/38

    SHORT CUSPS MAY BE INCREASED IN LENGTH BYINCREASING THE EFFECTS OF ANTERIOR GUIDANCE

    REDUCING OVERJET

    INCREASING OVERBITE

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    9/38

    INCISAL GUIDANCE

    Can be increased

    Has > influence on cusps

    Further from power source

    Has > proprioception

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    10/38

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    11/38

    INTRODUCTION TO OCCLUSION

    TYPES OF OCCLUSION

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    12/38

    TYPES OF OCCLUSION

    BILATERALLY BALANCED

    UNILATERALLY BALANCED (GROUP FUNCTION)

    MUTUALLY PROTECTED (CANINE GUIDANCE)

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    13/38

    BILATERAL BALANCEDOCCLUSION

    USED PRIMARILY IN REMOVABLEPROSTHETICS

    A MAXIMUM NUMBER OF TEETH SHOULDCONTACT IN ALL EXCURSIVE MOVEMENTS

    USEFULL TO PREVENT TIPPING OFDENTURES

    WILL CAUSE EXCESSIVE WEAR TO NATURALTEETH

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    14/38

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    15/38

    Maximal IntercuspationView

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    16/38

    Protrusive View

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    17/38

    Right Working View

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    18/38

    Left Working View

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    19/38

    UNILATERALLY BALANCEDOCCLUSION

    Group Function

    Elimination of all contacts on the non-

    working side More than one tooth on the working side is

    in contact during lateral excursions

    Distributes the occlusal load ACTIVATES/TRIGGERS MORE MUSCLE FIBERS

    (**not a good thing)

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    20/38

    UNILATERAL BALANCED

    OCCLUSION/ Group Function

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    21/38

    Anterior Guidance

    Canine Guidance aka. Cuspid Rise

    Anterior teeth bear all the load in excursivemovements of the mandible.

    Posterior teeth are discluded in all excursive

    movements

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    22/38

    MUTUALLY PROTECTEDOCCLUSION

    Anterior teeth protect the posterior teeth inall excursive movements of the mandible.(Working, Non-working, Protrusive, etc.)

    Posterior teeth protect the anterior teeth in

    the Maximal Intercuspal Position (MIP)

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    23/38

    MUTALLY PROTECTED

    OCCLUSION

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    24/38

    WHY USE ANTERIORGUIDED OCCLUSION?

    FORCE IS MORE FAVORABLY PLACED ON TEETH

    CLASS THREE LEVER IS THE LEAST EFFICIENT ANDTHUS LESS FORCE PLACED ON THE ANTERIORTEETH

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    25/38

    POSTERIOR VS ANTERIOR

    OCCLUSAL FORCE

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    26/38

    LEVER TYPES

    CLASS I LEVER SIMILAR TO A CROWBARPOWER FULCRUM WORK

    CLASS II LEVER SIMILAR TO A WHEELBARROW

    FULCRUM WORK POWER

    CLASS III LEVERSIMILAR TO A DRAWBRIDGE

    FULCRUM POWER WORK

    CONDYLE MUSCLE ANTERIOR TEETH

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    27/38

    Lever Class I: Crowbar

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    28/38

    Lever Class I

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    29/38

    Lever Class I: MostPowerful

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    30/38

    Lever Class II:WheelBarrow

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    31/38

    Lever Class III: Chopsticks

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    32/38

    CRITERIA FOR OPTIMUMOCCLUSION

    5 Criteria

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    33/38

    1. Stable contacts are established between theteeth when the condyles are in their mostanterior, superior, middle-most position.(MIP=CR)

    2 An anterior g idance that is in harmon

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    34/38

    2. An anterior guidance that is in harmony

    with the border movements of the

    envelope of function

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    35/38

    3. Disclusion of all posterior teeth in theprotrusive movement

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    36/38

    4. Disclusion of all posterior teeth on the

    Non-Working Side

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    37/38

    5. Disclusion of all posterior teeth on the

    Working Side

  • 8/10/2019 Occulsal Morphology Determinants

    38/38

    In Review

    Cusp height determinants

    Types of Occlusal Schemes

    Lever Classifications

    Optimal Occlusion Principles