OBch4

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    1/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    PERSONALITY AND EMOTIONS

    LEARNING OBJECTIVES

    After studying this chapter, students should be able to:

    1. Explain the factors that determine an individualspersonality.

    2. Describe the MBTI personality framework.

    3. Identify the key traits in the Big Five personality model. 4. Explain the impact of job typology on thepersonality-job performance relationship.

    5. Differentiate emotions from moods. 6. Contrast felt vs. displayed emotions.7. Read emotions. 8. Explain any gender-differences in emotions.9. Describe external constraints on emotions. 10. Apply concepts on emotions to OB issues.

    CHAPTER OVERVIEW

    Personality

    A review of the personality literature offers general guidelines that can lead to effective job performance. As such, itcan improve hiring, transfer, and promotion decisions. Because personality characteristics create the parameters forpeoples behavior, they give us a framework for predicting behavior. For example, individuals who are shy,introverted, and uncomfortable in social situations would probably be ill-suited as salespeople. Individuals who aresubmissive and conforming might not be effective as advertising idea people.

    Can we predict which people will be high performers in sales, research, or assembly-line work on the basis of theirpersonality characteristics alone? The answer is no. Personality assessment should be used in conjunction withother information such as skills, abilities, and experience. However, knowledge of an individuals personality can aidin reducing mismatches, which, in turn, can lead to reduced turnover and higher job satisfaction.

    We can look at certain personality characteristics that tend to be related to job success, test for those traits, and usethe data to make selection more effective. A person who accepts rules, conformity, dependence, and rates high onauthoritarianism is likely to feel more comfortable in, say, a structured assembly-line job, as an admittance clerk in a

    hospital, or as an administrator in a large public agency than as a researcher or an employee whose job requires ahigh degree of creativity.

    EmotionsCan managers control the emotions of their colleagues and employees? No. Emotions are a natural part of anindividuals makeup. Where managers err is if they ignore the emotional elements in organizational behavior andassess individual behavior as if it were completely rational. As one consultant aptly put it, You cant divorceemotions from the workplace because you cant divorce emotions from people. Managers who understand the roleof emotions will significantly improve their ability to explain and predict individual behavior.

    Do emotions affect job performance? Yes. They can hinder performance, especially negative emotions. That isprobably why organizations, for the most part, try to extract emotions out of the workplace. Emotions can alsoenhance performance. How? Two ways. First, emotions can increase arousal levels, thus acting as motivators tohigher performance. Second, emotional labor recognizes that feelings can be part of a jobs required behavior. Forinstance, the ability to effectively manage emotions in leadership and sales positions may be critical to success inthose positions.

    What differentiates functional from dysfunctional emotions at work? While there is no precise answer to this, it hasbeen suggested that the critical moderating variable is the complexity of the individuals task. The more complex atask, the lower the level of arousal that can be tolerated without interfering with performance. While a certainminimal level of arousal is probably necessary for good performance, very high levels interfere with the ability tofunction, especially if the job requires calculative and detailed cognitive processes. Given that the trend is toward

    jobs becoming more complex, you can see why organizations are likely to go to considerable efforts to discouragethe overt display of emotionsespecially intense onesin the workplace.

    68

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    2/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    WEB EXERCISES

    At the end of each chapter of this instructors manual, you will find suggested exercises and ideas forresearching the WWW on OB topics. The exercises Exploring OB Topics on the Web are set up so thatyou can simply photocopy the pages, distribute them to your class, and make assignments accordingly.

    You may want to assign the exercises as an out-of-class activity or as lab activities with your class. Within thelecture notes the graphic will note that there is a WWW activity to support this material.

    The chapter opens with a profile of Charles B. Wang, the chairman of Computer Associates. Wang has been

    described as a mercenary brute, ruthless, authoritarian, defiant, volatile, blunt, tactless, and isolated. What makes

    him so tough and aggressive?

    The experiences that shaped Wangs life offer insight into his personality and behavior. He experienced racism

    discrimination as a Chinese immigrant in Brooklyn, knew what it was like to go hungry, and to be the only Chinese

    family at his school and on Little League teams. Despite his wealth and good fortune, he hasnt forgotten those

    experiences of his early years. Today he and his family live a secluded life on a large estate on Long Island.

    CHAPTER OUTLINE

    Personality Notes:

    A. What Is Personality?

    1. Personality is a dynamic concept describing the growth and development ofa persons whole psychological system--it looks at some aggregate whole that isgreater than the sum of the parts.

    2. Gordon Allport coined the most frequent used definition:

    Personalitythe dynamic organization within the individual of those

    psychophysical systems that determine his unique adjustments to his

    environment

    3. Personality is the sum total of ways in which an individual reacts to and interactswith others.

    4. It is most often described in terms of measurable traits that a person exhibits.

    B. Personality Determinants

    1. An early argument centered on whether or not personality was the result ofheredity or of environment.

    Personality appears to be a result of both influences.

    Today, we recognize a third factorthe situation.

    2. Heredity

    Heredity refers to those factors that were determined at conception.

    The heredity approach argues that the ultimate explanation of an individualspersonality is the molecular structure of the genes, located in thechromosomes.

    69

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    3/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    Three different streams of research lend some credibility to the heredityargument:

    a. The genetic underpinnings of human behavior and temperament amongyoung children. Evidence demonstrates that traits such as shyness,fear, and distress are most likely caused by inherited geneticcharacteristics.

    b. The study of twins who were separated at birth. Genetics accounts forabout 50 percent of the variation in personality differences and over 30percent of occupational and leisure interest variation.

    c. The consistency in job satisfaction over time and across situations.Individual job satisfaction is remarkably stable over time. This isindicates that satisfaction is determined by something inherent in theperson.

    Personality characteristics are not completely dictated by heredity. If theywere, they would be fixed at birth and no amount of experience could alterthem.

    3. Environment

    Factors that exert pressures on our personality formation:

    a. The culture in which we are raisedb. Early conditioningc. Norms among our familyd. Friends and social groups

    The environment we are exposed to plays a substantial role in shaping ourpersonalities.

    Culture establishes the norms, attitudes, and values passed from onegeneration to the next and creates consistencies over time.

    The arguments for heredity or environment as the primary determinant ofpersonality are both important.

    Heredity sets the parameters or outer limits, but an individuals full potentialwill be determined by how well he or she adjusts to the demands andrequirements of the environment.

    4. Situation

    Influences the effects of heredity and environment on personality

    The different demands of different situations call forth different aspects ofones personality.

    There is no classification scheme that tells the impact of various types ofsituations.

    Situations seem to differ substantially in the constraints they impose on

    behavior.

    70

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    4/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    C. Personality Traits Notes:

    1. Early work revolved around attempts to identify and label enduringcharacteristics.

    Popular characteristics include shy, aggressive, submissive, lazy, ambitious,loyal, and timid. These are personality traits.

    The more consistent the characteristic, the more frequently it occurs, themore important it is.

    2. Early research on personality traits resulted in isolating large numbers of traits17,953 in one study alonethat made it impossible to predict behavior.

    3. One researcher reduced a set of 171 traits to sixteen personality factors, orprimary, traits. (Exhibit 4-2).

    4. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

    One of the most widely used personality frameworks is the Myers-BriggsType Indicator (MBTI).

    It is 100-question personality test that asks people how they usually feel or

    act in particular situations. Individuals are classified as:

    a. Extroverted or introverted (E or I).b. Sensing or intuitive (S or N).c. Thinking or feeling (T or F).d. Perceiving or judging (P or J).

    These classifications are then combined into sixteen personality types. Forexample:

    a. INTJs are visionaries. They usually have original minds and greatdrive for their own ideas and purposes. They are characterized asskeptical, critical, independent, determined, and often stubborn.

    b. ESTJs are organizers. They are realistic, logical, analytical,decisive, and have a natural head for business or mechanics. Theylike to organize and run activities.

    c. The ENTP type is a conceptualizer. He or she is innovative,individualistic, versatile, and attracted to entrepreneurial ideas. Thisperson tends to be resourceful in solving challenging problems butmay neglect routine assignments.

    More than 2 million people a year take the MBTI in the United States alone,however, there is no hard evidence that the MBTI is a valid measure ofpersonality.

    71

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    5/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    D. The Big Five Model Notes:

    1. An impressive body of research supports that five basic dimensions underlie allother personality dimensions. The five basic dimensions are:

    Extraversion. Comfort level with relationships. Extraverts tend to begregarious, assertive, and sociable. Introverts tend to be reserved, timid,and quiet.

    Agreeableness. Individuals propensity to defer to others. Highagreeableness peoplecooperative, warm, and trusting. Lowagreeableness peoplecold, disagreeable, and antagonistic.

    Conscientiousness. A measure of reliability. A high conscientious person isresponsible, organized, dependable, and persistent. Those who score lowon this dimension are easily distracted, disorganized, and unreliable.

    Emotional stability. A persons ability to withstand stress. People withpositive emotional stability tend to be calm, self-confident, and secure.Those with high negative scores tend to be nervous, anxious, depressed,

    and insecure.

    Openness to experience. The range of interests and fascination withnovelty. Extremely open people are creative, curious, and artisticallysensitive. Those at the other end of the openness category are conventionaland find comfort in the familiar.

    2. Research found important relationships between these personality dimensionsand job performance.

    A broad spectrum of occupations was examined in addition to jobperformance ratings, training proficiency (performance during trainingprograms), and personnel data such as salary level.

    The results showed that conscientiousness predicted job performance for alloccupational groups.

    Individuals who are dependable, reliable, careful, thorough, able to plan,organized, hardworking, persistent, and achievement-oriented tend to havehigher job performance.

    Employees higher in conscientiousness develop higher levels of jobknowledge.

    For the other personality dimensions, predictability depended upon both theperformance criterion and the occupational group.

    Extraversion predicted performance in managerial and sales positions.

    Openness to experience is important in predicting training proficiency.

    72

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    6/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter FourInstructor Note: At this point in the lecture you may want to introduce the CASE INCIDENT: Roustabouts NeedUnderstanding Too!Found in the text. A summary of the case and questions can be found at the end of thischapter. A class exercise suggestion follows the introduction of the material.

    73

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    7/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    E. Major Personality Attributes Influencing OB Notes:

    1. Locus of control

    A persons perception of the source of his/her fate is termed locus of control.

    Internals: People who believe that they are masters of their own fate.

    Externals: People who believe they are pawns of fate.

    Individuals who rate high in externality are less satisfied with their jobs, havehigher absenteeism rates, are more alienated from the work setting, and areless involved on their jobs than are internals.

    Internals, facing the same situation, attribute organizational outcomes totheir own actions. Internals believe that health is substantially under theirown control through proper habits; their incidences of sickness and, hence,of absenteeism, are lower.

    2. There is not a clear relationship between locus of control and turnover becausethere are opposing forces at work.

    3. Internals generally perform better on their jobs, but one should consider

    differences in jobs.

    Internals search more actively for information before making a decision, aremore motivated to achieve, and make a greater attempt to control theirenvironment, therefore, internals do well on sophisticated tasks.

    Internals are more suited to jobs that require initiative and independence ofaction.

    Externals are more compliant and willing to follow directions, and do well onjobs that are well structured and routine and in which success dependsheavily on complying with the direction of others.

    4. Machiavellianism

    Named after Niccolo Machiavelli, who wrote in the sixteenth century on howto gain and use power.

    An individual high in Machiavellianism is pragmatic, maintains emotionaldistance, and believes that ends can justify means.

    High Machs manipulate more, win more, are persuaded less, and persuadeothers more.

    High Mach outcomes are moderated by situational factors and flourish whenthey interact face to face with others, rather than indirectly, and when thesituation has a minimum number of rules and regulations, thus allowinglatitude for improvisation.

    High Machs make good employees in jobs that require bargaining skills or

    that offer substantial rewards for winning.5. Self-esteem

    Self-esteemthe degree to which people like or dislike themselves.

    (SE) is directly related to expectations for success.

    Individuals with high self-esteem will take more risks in job selection and aremore likely to choose unconventional jobs than people with low self-esteem.

    74

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    8/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter FourE. Major Personality Attributes Influencing OB (cont.) Notes:

    The most generalizable finding is that low SEs are more susceptible toexternal influence than are high SEs. Low SEs are dependent on the receiptof positive evaluations from others.

    In managerial positions, low SEs will tend to be concerned with pleasingothers.

    High SEs are more satisfied with their jobs than are low SEs.

    6. Self-monitoring

    It refers to an individuals ability to adjust his or her behavior to external,situational factors.

    Individuals high in self-monitoring show considerable adaptability. They arehighly sensitive to external cues, can behave differently in differentsituations, and are capable of presenting striking contradictions betweentheir public persona and their private self.

    Low self-monitors cannot disguise themselves in that way. They tend todisplay their true dispositions and attitudes in every situation resulting in ahigh behavioral consistency between who they are and what they do.

    The research on self-monitoring is in its infancy, so predictions must beguarded. Preliminary evidence suggests:

    a. High self-monitors tend to pay closer attention to the behavior of others.

    b. High self-monitoring managers tend to be more mobile in their careersand receive more promotions.

    c. High self-monitor is capable of putting on different faces for differentaudiences.

    7. Risk taking

    The propensity to assume or avoid risk has been shown to have an impact

    on how long it takes managers to make a decision and how muchinformation they require before making their choice.

    High risk-taking managers made more rapid decisions and used lessinformation in making their choices.

    While managers in organizations are generally risk-aversive, there are stillindividual differences on this dimension. As a result, it makes sense torecognize these differences and even to consider aligning risk-takingpropensity with specific job demands.

    8. Type A

    A Type A personality is aggressively involved in a chronic, incessantstruggle to achieve more and more in less and less time, and, if required to

    do so, against the opposing efforts of other things or other persons. They are always moving, walking, and eating rapidly, are impatient with the

    rate at which most events take place, are doing do two or more things atonce and cannot cope with leisure time. They are obsessed with numbers,measuring their success in terms of how many or how much of everythingthey acquire.

    75

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    9/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    F. Major Personality Attributes Influencing OB (cont.) Notes:

    9. Type B

    Type Bs never suffer from a sense of time urgency with its accompanyingimpatience and feel no need to display or discuss either their achievementsor accomplishments unless such exposure is demanded by the situation.

    Play for fun and relaxation, rather than to exhibit their superiority at any costand can relax without guilt.

    10. Type As operate under moderate to high levels of stress.

    They subject themselves to continuous time pressure, are fast workers,quantity over quality, work long hours, and are also rarely creative.

    Their behavior is easier to predict than that of Type Bs.

    11. Are Type As or Type Bs more successful?

    Type Bs are the ones who appear to make it to the top.

    Great salespersons are usually Type As; senior executives are usually TypeBs.

    F. Personality and National Culture

    1. The Big Five model translates across almost all cross-cultural studies.

    2. Differences tend to surface by the emphasis on dimensions.

    Chinese use the category of conscientiousness more often and use thecategory of agreeableness less often than do Americans.

    There is a surprisingly high amount of agreement, especially amongindividuals from developed countries.

    There are no common personality types for a given country.

    There is evidence that cultures differ in terms of peoples relationship to theirenvironment. In North America, people believe that they can dominate theirenvironment. People in Middle Eastern countries believe that life isessentially preordained.

    2. The prevalence of Type A personalities will be somewhat influenced by theculture in which a person grows up.

    Instructor Note: At this point in the lecture you may want to introduce theexercise found in the MYTH ORSCIENCE?: Deep Down, People Are All Alike box found in the text and on the next page of these notes. Thepurpose of the exercise is to replace popularly held notions with research-based conclusions.

    76

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    10/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    MYTH OR SCIENCE? Deep Down, People Are All Alike

    This statement is essentially false. All people have values, attitudes, likes and dislikes, feelings, goals, and similargeneral attributes, but individual differences are far more illuminating. People differ in intelligence, personality,abilities, ambition, motivations, emotional display, values, priorities, expectations, and the like. Your ability to predictbehavior will be limited if you assume everyone is like you.

    Take the task of selecting among job applicants. Recognize that jobs differ in terms of demands andrequirements. Interview and test applicants to:

    Categorize them by specific traits.

    Assess job tasks in terms of the type of personality best suited for effectively completing those tasks.

    Match applicants and job tasks to find an appropriate fit.

    Using an individual-difference variable, managers improve the likelihood of identifying and hiring high-performingemployees.

    Class Exercise:

    1. Place the students in teams of five.

    2. Have one set of teams brainstorm specific traits essential to being a good professor.3. Another set of teams should brainstorm job tasks handled by a good professor.4. Have the teams record their criteria on the board.

    5. As a class, create one set of five traits and five tasks for a professorial position.6. Ask students what questions or teaching artifacts students would ask or review in matching professorial

    candidates to their jobs.

    G. Achieving Personality Fit Notes:

    1. The Person-Job Fit: This concern is best articulated in John Hollandspersonality-job fit theory.

    Holland presents six personality types and proposes that satisfaction andthe propensity to leave a job depend on the degree to which individualssuccessfully match their personalities to an occupational environment.

    Each one of the six personality types has a congruent occupationalenvironment. (See Exhibit 4-3)

    Vocational Preference Inventory questionnaire contains 160 occupationaltitles. Respondents indicate which of these occupations they like or dislike;their answers are used to form personality profiles.

    The theory argues that satisfaction is highest and turnover lowest whenpersonality and occupation are in agreement.

    2. The Person-Organization Fit

    Most important for an organization facing a dynamic and changingenvironment, and requiring employees who are able to readily change tasksand move fluidly between teams.

    It argues that people leave jobs that are not compatible with theirpersonalities.

    Matching people to the organizational culture at the time of hiring shouldresult in higher employee satisfaction and reduced turnover.

    77

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    11/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    78

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    12/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    Instructor Note: At this point in the lecture you may want to introduce theTEAM EXERCISE: What is a TeamPersonalityfound in the text and at the end of these chapter notes. The purpose of the exercise is to have studentsthink about personality traits that would be desirable when working with others in a team. A suggestion for a classexercise follows the introduction of the material.

    Emotions

    A. Introduction Notes:

    1. Emotions are a critical factor in employee behavior. Until very recently, the topicof emotions had been given little or no attention within the field of OB.

    2. The myth of rationality. Organizations have been specifically designed with theobjective of trying to control emotions. A well-run organization was one thatsuccessfully eliminated frustration, fear, anger, love, hate, joy, grief, and similarfeelings.

    3. The belief that emotions of any kind were disruptive. The discussion focused onstrong negative emotions that interfered with an employees ability to do his orher job effectively.

    B. What Are Emotions?

    1. Affectis a generic term that covers a broad range of feelings that peopleexperience and encompasses both emotions and moods.

    Emotions are intense feelings that are directed at someone or something.They are reactions, not a trait.

    Moods are feelings that tend to be less intense than emotions and whichlack a contextual stimulus. They are not directed at an object.

    2. Emotions can turn into moods when you lose focus on the contextual object.

    3. A related affect-term that is gaining increasing importance in organizational

    behavior is emotional labor. Originally developed in relation to service jobs. It iswhen an employee expresses organizationally desired emotions duringinterpersonal transactions.

    C. Felt vs. Displayed Emotions `

    1. Emotional labor creates dilemmas for employees when their job requires them toexhibit emotions incongruous with their actual feelings. It is a frequentoccurrence. For example, when there are people that you have to work withwhom you find it very difficult to be friendly toward. You are forced to feignfriendliness.

    2. Felt emotions are an individuals actual emotions.

    3. Displayed emotions are those that are organizationally required and consideredappropriate in a given job. They are learned.

    4. Keyfelt and displayed emotions are often different. This is particularly true inorganizations, where role demands and situations often require people to exhibitemotional behaviors that mask their true feelings.

    79

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    13/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    D. Emotion Dimensions Notes:

    1. Variety

    There are many emotions. Six universal emotions have been identified:anger, fear, sadness, happiness, disgust, and surprise. (See Exhibit 4-6).

    Emotions are identified along a continuum from positive to negative. The

    closer any two emotions are to each other on this continuum, the morepeople are likely to confuse them.

    2. Intensity

    People give different responses to identical emotion-provoking stimuli.Sometimes this can be attributed to personality.

    People vary in their inherent ability to express intensityfrom never showingfeelings to displaying extreme happiness or sadness

    Jobs make different intensity demands in terms of emotional labor. Forexample, air traffic controllers must remain calm even in stressful situations.

    3. Frequency and duration

    Emotional labor that requires high frequency or long duration is moredemanding and requires more exertion by employees.

    Whether or not the employee can successfully meet the emotional demandsof a job depends on both the intensity of the emotions displayed and for howlong the effort has to be made.

    E. Can People Be Emotionless?

    1. Some people have difficulty in expressing their emotions and understanding the

    emotions of others. Psychologists call this alexithymia.

    2. People who suffer from alexithymia rarely cry and are often seen by others asbland and cold. Their own feelings make them uncomfortable, and they are notable to discriminate among their different emotions.

    3. Are people who suffer from alexithymia poor work performers? Not necessarily.They might very well be effective performers, in a job requiring little or noemotional labor. Sales or customer service jobs would not be good careerchoices.

    F. Gender and Emotions

    1. It is widely assumed that women are more in touch with their feelings thanmen.

    2. The evidence does confirm differences between men and women when it comesto emotional reactions and ability to read others.

    Women show greater emotional expression than men, experience emotionsmore intensely, and display more frequent expressions of both positive andnegative emotions.

    F. Gender and Emotions (cont.) Notes:

    80

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    14/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    Women also report more comfort in expressing emotions.

    Women are better at reading nonverbal cues than are men.

    3. These differences may be explained several ways:

    The different ways men and women have been socialized.

    Women may have more innate ability to read others and present theiremotions than do men.

    Women may have a greater need for social approval and, thus, a higherpropensity to show positive emotions such as happiness.

    G. External Constraints on Emotions

    1. Every organization defines boundaries that identify what emotions areacceptable and the degree to which they can be expressed. The same applies indifferent cultures.

    2. Organizational influences:

    There is no single emotional set sought by all organizations.

    In the United States, there is a bias against negative and intense emotions.Expressions of negative emotions such as fear, anxiety, and anger tend tobe unacceptable except under fairly specific conditions.

    Consistent with the myth of rationality, well-managed organizations areexpected to be essentially emotion-free.

    3. Cultural influences:

    Cultural norms in the United States dictate that employees in serviceorganizations should smile and act friendly when interacting with customers.But this norm does not apply worldwide.

    Cultures differ in terms of the interpretation they give to emotions. Theretends to be high agreement on what emotions mean within cultures but notbetween cultures. For example, smiling is often seen as an expression ofhappiness by Americans. However, in Israel, smiling by cashiers is seen asbeing inexperienced.

    Studies indicate that some cultures lack words for such standard emotionsas anxiety, depression, or guilt.

    Instructor Note: At this point in the lecture you may want to introduce the ETHICAL DILEMMA: ManagingEmotions at Work. A summary of the case can be found at the end of this chapter and in the text.

    H. OB Applications Notes:

    1. Ability and Selection: People who know their own emotions and are good atreading others emotions may be more effective in their jobs.

    Emotional intelligence (EI) refers to an assortment of non-cognitive skills,capabilities, and competencies that influence a persons ability to succeed incoping with environmental demands and pressures.

    81

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    15/25

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    16/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    83

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    17/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    H. OB Applications (cont.) Notes:

    Employee Deviance: Voluntary actions that violate established norms andwhich threaten the organization, its members, or both.

    They fall into categories such as:

    a. Production: leaving early, intentionally working slowly

    b. Property: stealing, sabotagec. Political: gossiping, blaming co-workers

    d. Personal aggression: sexual harassment, verbal abuse

    Many of these deviant behaviors can be traced to negative emotions. Forexample, envy is an emotion that occurs when you resent someone forhaving something that you do not, and which you strongly desire and canlead to malicious deviant behaviors.

    OB IN THE NEWS The Increasing Popularity of Anger-Management Classes

    Anger-management classes have become a trendy solution for dealing with people who have difficulty controllingtheir tempers. Prosecutors across the United States, for instance, are sending thousands of criminals for anger-management instruction each year. Men who menace their wives or girlfriends are finding that a frequent legalsolution is for them to attend anger-management classes. Hotheaded celebrities such as Mike Tyson, TommyLee, Sean Puffy Combs, Latrell Sprewell, Shannon Doherty, and Courtney Love have been required to takethese classes to help them cool their tempers. Companies are increasingly sending short-tempered employees tothese classes to help them manage their negative emotions.

    Courses in anger management tend to be similar in content. Participants share their stories that have ledthem to the class; then they are told to think about the consequences of what they do when they get worked up.They are taught how to look at the big picture, how not to let small things bother them, how to be a good listener,how to accept someone elses opinion without losing control, etc.

    Mental-health professionals say that anger-management classes can be beneficial. They say that makingmature decisions is a skill that can be taught, but it requires committed students over a long period. Unfortunately,

    many people who suffer from anger problems are not willing to admit they have a problem and are even lesswilling to put in the effortone expert says her clients typically need about a year to overcome their anger issuesto try to control it. But studies of anger-management programs find little to support their effectiveness. This maybe due to several factors. It may reflect a lack of commitment by participants. It may be that many people in theseprograms actually need other kinds of therapy. Anger management is designed to deal with spontaneous rage,yet many of the individuals taking these courses are just cold, calculating people. Or it may well be that it is notpossible to change a basic personality that includes the tendency to exhibit spontaneous rage when angered orfrustrated.

    Class Exercise:

    Nearly everyone has experienced Road Rage in some form whether they have observed it, been a victim of it, orwhen they have acted out at another driver. Conduct this exercise as a class to develop effective strategies for

    preventing and dealing with Road Rage.

    I. Ask the students to define Road Rage and what common responses would be. Is there a continuum of angerresponse in their answers? List responses along the continuum or in columns. For example, students may

    have the following ideas: Shrug Off Verbal Response within my car Verbal Response directed at other

    driver Physical Gestures Erratic Driving (Cutting Other Driver Off, ) etc., Physical Violence.J. Now ask your students to develop an Anger-Management Plan directed at diffusing each of the situations

    they listed earlier. (This can be done as a class or in small groups).K. Is the plan they developed workable? Would they use it in the future when confronted with a similar situation?

    Why or Why not? Could these strategies be applied in the workplace?

    84

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    18/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW

    1. What is personality?Answer A dynamic concept describing the growth and development of a persons whole psychologicalsystem. Personality looks at some aggregate whole that is greater than the sum of the parts. Personality is thedynamic organization within the individual of those psychophysical systems that determine his uniqueadjustments to his environment. Personality is the sum total of ways in which an individual reacts to andinteracts with others. It is most often described in terms of measurable traits that a person exhibits.

    2. What behavioral predictions might you make if you knew that an employee had (a) an external locus of control?(b) a low Mach score? (c) low self-esteem? (d) a Type A personality?Answer a) Individuals who rate high in externality are less satisfied with their jobs, have higher absenteeismrates, are more alienated from the work setting, and are less involved on their jobs than are internals. Externalsare more compliant and willing to follow directions. Externals should do well on jobs that are well structured androutine and in which success depends heavily on complying with the direction of others. b) An individual high inMachiavellianism is pragmatic, maintains emotional distance, and believes that ends can justify means. HighMachs manipulate more, win more, are persuaded less, and persuade others more. High Mach outcomes aremoderated by situational factors. High Machs flourish when they interact face to face with others rather thanindirectly, when the situation has a minimum number of rules and regulations, thus allowing latitude forimprovisation, and when emotional involvement with details irrelevant to winning distracts low Machs. HighMachs make good employees in jobs that require bargaining skills or that offer substantial rewards for winning.

    c) Self-esteemthe degree to which they like or dislike themselves. It is directly related to expectations forsuccess. Individuals with high self-esteem will take more risks in job selection and are more likely to chooseunconventional jobs than people with low self-esteem. The most generalizable finding is that low SEs are moresusceptible to external influence than are high SEs. Low SEs are dependent on the receipt of positiveevaluations from others. In managerial positions, low SEs will tend to be concerned with pleasing others. d) AType A personality is aggressively involved in a chronic, incessant struggle to achieve more and more in lessand less time, and, if required to do so, against the opposing efforts of other things or other persons. They:

    Are always moving, walking, and eating rapidly;

    Feel impatient with the rate at which most events take place;

    Strive to think or do two or more things at once;

    Cannot cope with leisure time;

    Are obsessed with numbers, measuring their success in terms of how many or how much ofeverything they acquire.

    3. What is the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator?Answer The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is one of the most widely used personality frameworksMyers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). It is a 100-question personality test that asks people how they usually feel or actin particular situations. Individuals are classified as

    Extroverted or introverted (E or I).

    Sensing or intuitive (S or N).

    Thinking or feeling (T or F).

    Perceiving or judging (P or J).These classifications are then combined into sixteen personality types. There is no hard evidence that the MBTIis a valid measure of personality.

    4. Describe the factors in the Big Five model. Which factor shows the greatest value in predicting behavior? Why

    does it?Answer Research supports that five basic dimensions underlie all other personality dimensions. The fivebasic dimensions are:

    Extraversion: Comfort level with relationships. Extraverts tend to be gregarious, assertive, and sociable.Introverts tend to be reserved, timid, and quiet.

    Agreeableness: Individuals propensity to defer to others. Highly agreeable peoplecooperative, warm,and trusting. Low agreeableness peoplecold, disagreeable, and antagonistic.

    85

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    19/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    Conscientiousness: A measure of reliability. A high conscientious person is responsible, organized,dependable, and persistent. Those who score low on this dimension are easily distracted, disorganized, andunreliable.

    Emotional stability: A persons ability to withstand stress. People with positive emotional stability tend to becalm, self-confident, and secure. Those with high negative scores tend to be nervous, anxious, depressed,and insecure.

    Openness to experience: The range of interests and fascination with novelty. Extremely open people arecreative, curious, and artistically sensitive. Those at the other end of the openness category areconventional and find comfort in the familiar.

    Of the five factors conscientiousness predicted job performance across all occupational groups. Individualswho are dependable, reliable, careful, thorough, able to plan, organized, hardworking, etc. tend to have a high

    job performance record.

    5. Do people from the same country have a common personality type? Explain.Answer The Big Five model translates across almost all cross-cultural studies. There are no commonpersonality types for a given country. There is evidence that cultures differ in terms of peoples relationship totheir environment. In North America, people believe that they can dominate their environment. People in MiddleEastern countries believe that life is essentially preordained. The prevalence of Type A personalities will besomewhat influenced by the culture in which a person grows up. There are more in capitalistic countries. In

    cultures such as Sweden and France, where materialism is less revered, we would predict a smaller proportionof Type A personalities.

    6. Why might managers today pay more attention to the person-organization fit than the person-job fit?Answer It is most important for an organization facing a dynamic and changing environment, and requiringemployees who are able to readily change tasks and move fluidly between teams. It argues that people leave

    jobs that are not compatible with their personalities. Matching people to the organizational culture at the time ofhiring should result in higher employee satisfaction and reduced turnover.

    7. What is emotional labor, and why is it important to understanding OB?Answer Emotional labor is when an employee expresses organizationally desired emotions duringinterpersonal transactions. Originally developed in relation to service jobs, but now seems to apply to every job.For example, you are expected to be courteous and not hostile in interactions with coworkers.

    8. How does national culture influence expressed emotions?Answer Cultural norms in the United States dictate that employees in service organizations should smile andact friendly when interacting with customers, but this norm does not apply worldwide. Cultures differ in terms ofthe interpretation they give to emotions. There tends to be high agreement on what emotions mean withincultures, but not between. Studies indicate that some cultures lack words for such standard emotions asanxiety, depression, or guilt.

    9. What is emotional intelligence, and why is it important?Answer Emotional intelligence (EI) refers to an assortment of non-cognitive skills, capabilities, andcompetencies that influence a persons ability to succeed in coping with environmental demands and pressures.

    Self-awareness: Being aware of what you are feeling.

    Self-management: The ability to manage ones own emotions and impulses.

    Self-motivation: The ability to persist in the face of setbacks and failures. Empathy: The ability to sense how others are feeling.

    Social skills: The ability to handle the emotions of others.

    Several studies suggest EI may play an important role in job performance.

    86

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    20/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    QUESTIONS FOR CRITICAL THINKING

    1. Heredity determines personality. (a) Build an argument to support this statement. (b) Build an argumentagainst this statement.Answer Personality is a dynamic concept describing the growth and development of a persons wholepsychological system. Personality is the sum total of ways in which an individual reacts to and interacts withothers. It is most often described in terms of measurable traits that a person exhibits. Theearly argument wasthat personality was the result of heredity or of environment. It now appears that personality appears to be aresult of both influences and even a third factorthe situation. Heredity refers to those factors that weredetermined at conception.

    The heredity approach argues that the ultimate explanation of an individuals personality is the molecularstructure of the genes, located in the chromosomes. Three different streams of research lend some credibility tothe heredity argument.

    The genetic underpinnings of human behavior and temperament among young children

    The study of twins who were separated at birth

    The consistency in job satisfaction over time and across situationsPersonality characteristics are not completely dictated by heredity. Factors that exert pressures on our

    personality formation are:

    The culture in which we are raised

    Early conditioning

    Norms among our family Friends, and social groups

    The environment we are exposed to plays a substantial role in shaping our personalities. Culture establishesthe norms, attitudes, and values passed from one generation to the next and creates consistencies over time.

    Heredity sets the parameters or outer limits, but an individuals full potential will be determined by how well heor she adjusts to the demands and requirements of the environment.

    2. The type of job an employee does moderates the relationship between personality and job productivity. Doyou agree or disagree with this statement? Discuss.Answer Students can take either position but their discussion should include elements of the data of person-organizational fit. Hollands research is central to this discussion. He presents six personality types andproposes that satisfaction and the propensity to leave a job depend on the degree to which individualssuccessfully match their personalities to an occupational environment. Each one of the six personality types has

    a congruent occupational environment. The theory argues that satisfaction is highest and turnover lowest whenpersonality and occupation are in agreement. There does appear to be intrinsic differences in personalityamong individuals. There are different types of jobs. People in job environments congruent with their personalitytypes should be more satisfied and less likely to voluntarily resign than should people in incongruent jobs.

    3. One day, your boss comes in, and hes nervous, edgy, and argumentative. The next day, he is calm andrelaxed. Does this behavior suggest that personality traits are not consistent from day to day?Answer No, these are simply variations in his emotional state. Emotions are reactions to an object, not a trait.They are object-specific. Emotions have a number of dimensions: variety, intensity, frequency and duration.

    4. What, if anything, can managers do to manage emotions?Answer They cannot control the emotions of their colleagues and employees. Emotions are a natural part ofan individuals makeup. Where managers err is if they ignore the emotional elements in organizational behavior

    and assess individual behavior as if it were completely rational. Managers who understand the role of emotionswill significantly improve their ability to explain and predict individual behavior.

    5. Give some examples of situations where the overt expression of emotions might enhance job performance.Answer Emotions can also enhance performance in two ways. First, emotions can increase arousal levels,thus acting as motivators to higher performance. Second, emotional labor recognizes that feelings can be partof a jobs required behavior. So, for instance, the ability to effectively manage emotions in leadership and salespositions may be critical to success in those positions.

    87

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    21/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    POINT-COUNTERPOINT Traits Are Powerful Predictors of Behavior

    POINTThe essence of trait approaches in OB is that employees possess stable personality characteristics that significantlyinfluence their attitudes toward, and behavioral reactions to, organizational settings. Trait theorists recognize that alltraits are not equally powerful. They tend to put them into one of three categories. Cardinaltraits are those so strongand generalized that they influence every act a person performs. Primarytraits are generally consistent influenceson behavior, but they may not show up in all situations. Finally, secondarytraits are attributes that do not form a vitalpart of the personality but come into play only in particular situations. Trait theorists do a fairly good job of meetingthe average persons face-validity test. Managers seem to have a strong belief in the power of traits to predictbehavior.

    COUNTER POINTFew people would dispute that there are some stable individual attributes that affect reactions to the workplace, buttrait theorists go beyond that generality and argue that individual behavior consistencies are widespread andaccount for much of the differences in behavior among people. There are two important problems with using traits.First, organizational settings are strong situations that have a large impact on employee behavior. Second,individuals are highly adaptive, and personality traits change in response to organizational situations.Organizational settings tend to be strong situations because they have rules and other formal regulations that defineacceptable behavior and punish deviant behavior, and they have informal norms that dictate appropriate behaviors.

    These formal and informal constraints minimize the effects of personality traits. There is a growing body of evidencethat an individuals traits are changed by the organizations that individual participates in. Moreover, people typicallybelong to multiple organizations that often include very different kinds of members, and they adapt to those differentsituations. Instead of being the prisoners of a rigid and stable personality framework, as trait theorists propose,people regularly adjust their behavior to reflect the requirements of various situations.

    Class Exercise:

    1. Divide the class into two groupsone group to take on the issues raised in Point, the other group to take on theissues raised in Counter Point. You may want to divide each half into smaller groups to enable all classmembers to participate in the groups discussions.

    2. Ask the class to act as an organizations management team. Their job is make a recommendation as to whattypes of testing they will use in their organization when selecting employees for hire or promotion using the

    issues assigned by the Point/Counter Point arguments. Which types of testing will be used and why? (Youmay want to give students time to do some researcheither Internet or Libraryon this topic. There areseveral exercises in the Exploring the Web section at the end of this chapter.)

    3. Have students present their recommendations to the class and make a decision as to what is the best argumentfor testing, type of test, etc. What gains do they expect as a result of the testing?

    4. Have them list the recommendations and benefits on the board for the class to evaluate during the discussion.5. You may want them to research the cost of implementing these tests in an organization. Does testing cost of

    testing offset the benefits?

    Instructor Note: This would make an excellent topic for a research paper. Many fine resources are available onthe Internet and in scholarly publications for the student.

    1 Some of the points in this argument are from R.J. House, S.A. Shane, and D.M. HeroId, Rumors of the Death of Dispositional Research AreVastly Exaggerated,Academy of Management Review, January 1996, pp. 20324.2 Based on A. Davis-Blake and J. Pfeffer, Just a Mirage: The Search for Dispositional Effects in Organizational Research, Academy ofManagement Review, July 1989, pp. 385400.]

    88

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    22/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    TEAM EXERCISE Whats a Team Personality?

    It is the unusual organization today that is not using work teams. But not everybody is a good team player. Thisprompts the questions: What individual personality characteristics enhance a teams performance? And whatcharacteristics might hinder team performance?1. Break into groups of five or six.2. Based on the research presented in this chapter, each group should (a) identify personality characteristics they

    think are associated with high performance teams and justify their choices, (b) identify personalitycharacteristics they think hinder high performance teams and justify their choices, and (c) resolve whether it isbetter to have teams composed of individuals with similar or dissimilar traits.

    3. Each group should select an individual who will present the groups findings to the class.

    Note: Two keys to this exercise are 1) the best traits depend on the task, and 2) teams need a variety of traits forthe cross-fertilization of ideas, ways of thinking, etc.

    Ethical Dilemma Managing Emotions at Work

    Our understanding of emotions at work has increased rapidly in the past decade. We are now at the point atwhich we are capable of, or close to being capable of, managing the emotions of employees. For instance,

    companies that want to create open and friendly work places are using the selection process to select out jobapplicants who are not outgoing and enthusiastic and are providing training to teach employees how to smile andappear cheerful. Some organizations are going further in attempting to create emotionally humanistic workenvironments by not only shaping the emotions that workers evoke in their daily contacts with customers but also byselecting employee applicants with high emotional intelligence, controlling the emotional atmosphere of teams andwork groups, and similar emotion-management practices.

    Groucho Marx once joked that the secret of success in show business is honesty and sincerity. Once youlearn how to fake that, you have got it made. In many service organizations today, Grouchos remark is beingapplied. For instance, telephone-sales staff in a number of insurance companies are trained to invoke positivefeelings from customersto make it easy for them to say yes. Employees are taught to avoid words with negativeconnotations and replace them with upbeat and confidence-building words such as certainly, rest assured,immediate, and great. Moreover, employees are taught to convey these scripts in a way that seems natural andspontaneous. To ensure that these authentic positive feelings are consistently evoked, the phone calls of these

    sales people are often monitored.Organizations like McDonalds, Disney, and Starbucks select and program employees to be upbeat and

    friendly. They allow employees no choices. Moreover, these organizations export their emotional expectations toeverywhere in the world in which they locate. When the hamburgers or lattes come to town, the typical grimace ofthe Moscovite or shyness of the Finnish employee are subject to a similar genre of smile-training.

    Is asking people to feign specific job-related emotions unethical if it conflicts with their basic personality? Isexporting standardized emotional rule books to alien cultures unethical? What do you think?

    This dilemma is based on S. Fineman, Managing Emotions at Work: Some Political Reflections; paper presented at a symposium at theAcademy of Management Conference; Washington, DC, August 2001.

    Teaching NotesThese questions can be used as a group Q & A in class or to assign the questions as a journal entry or shorthomework assignment.

    Questions:1. What is emotional labor? Is it fair for companies to ask employees to display emotions they may not be

    feeling? Or, feelings that may by interpreted as culturally out of place?2. Would your answer be the same if companies were asking employees to be rude or abrupt rather than

    smiling? (For example, a trendy restaurant.) Or sad? (For example, a funeral home.)3. Should individuals not be chosen for jobs when they do not display the desired behaviors? Should they not

    be chosen when training would be an option?4. How should employees be counseled on their display of emotions if it does not meet company

    expectations?

    89

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    23/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    CASE INCIDENT Roustabouts Need Understanding Too!

    If you were to walk around one of Transocean Sedco Forexs oil rigs, off the New Orleans coast, you would seesomething that might puzzle you. Most of the workers have three stickers on their hard hats. One says Start toUnderstand Me. The other two are colored dots. What is this all about? The colored dots are there to tell co-workers about the personality under the hat. The company believes that workers are better able to understand eachother and get along if they know the personalities of the people with whom they have to work.

    Transocean has hired an outside consulting firm to provide personality assessment to its 8,300 workers worldwide.For instance, employees are presented with 28 sets of four words. Each worker picks a word that describes himbest and a word that describes him least. A typical set: fussy, obedient, firm, playful. Employees then are shownhow to score their test and find out their two dominant colors. For instance, reds are driven. Yellows are emotional,talkative, and have a fondness for people. Greens are cautious and serious. Reds are strong-willed and decisive.

    And blues dislike change and can be a little wishy-washy. Rig workers wear their dots on their hats, while land-based employees post theirs outside their office doors. No one is forced to display their colors and some think theprogram may be too intrusive. Tim Callais, a Transocean adviser for operational safety, says those who question theprograms credibility are probably blue people.

    A number of employees seem to find the dots helpful. Thom Keeton, a redgreen rig manager, keeps a color chartunder the glass covering his desk for quick reference. Tom Watkins, a senior rig hand on a drilling ship who is also aredgreen, thinks the colors correctly reflect his personality: blunt, to the point, and not liking to talk much. David

    Gray, a blueyellow, says the colored dots help him deal with high-strung redgreens now that he has figured outthat he just has to get to the point more quickly.

    This program is not being applied only at Transocean. Similar personality-based coding systems are being put intoplace with a number of blue-collar employees. Assembly-line workers in Kentucky are using the system. So arepolice officers in Kansas, electricians in Texas, construction crews in Florida, and carpenters and plumbers in NewYork City.

    Note to Instructor: Break up the class in groups of three or four students each. Ask them to discuss the questionsand share their answers later as a class. You might ask groups to take a decidedly pro or managementviewpoint on each question and other groups to take a decidedly con or a position as to why employees may reactnegatively to this program. Student answers will vary, but could include the elements bulleted below each question.

    1. Are you surprised that oil-rig workers would buy into a program like this? Why not? Everyone has a personality despite the job he or she does. If the dots improve

    communication between group membersespecially oil rig workerspossibly safety can be improvedand production increased.

    2. How valid do you think color-coded personality ratings are?

    Because the instrument was self scored, it may not be as valid as other similar instruments. However,you still have some insight as to how the person sees him or herself even if the instrument is notentirely valid.

    3. Do you think having employees wear their personalities on their hats is a personal intrusion? Is it unethical?

    No one is forced to wear the dots, however, stating that those who do not are probably blue by theadvisor is insensitive and has no basis in fact. He picked the color with the least desirable traits so that

    anyone without dots is perceived to have those traits, which may or may not be true.

    4. Transoceans CEO supports the program but says, I can be whatever color I want to be. Do you agree withhim? Explain.

    While personality traits are generally fixed, you can change your response to situations to reflect a traitthat you wish to convey.

    Based on C. Cummins, Workers Wear Feelings on Their Hard Hats and Show True Colors, Wall Street Journal, November 7, 2000, p. A1.

    90

  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    24/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    Exploring OB Topics on the World Wide Web

    Search Engines are our navigational tool to explore the WWW. Somecommonly used search engines are:

    www.goto.com

    www.google.comwww.yahoo.comwww.lycos.com

    www.hotbot.comwww.looksmart.com

    1. Go to the American Psychological web sitehttp://helping.apa.org/daily/anger.html to read aboutstrategies for controlling anger. Write a two page paper about what you learned and how itmight apply to your life. (For example, maybe you already use mediation as a stress reliever,but plan to incorporate more exercise into your day.)

    2. Learn more about yourself! Go towww.2h.com/personality-tests.html . There you will find a

    variety of personality tests such as Are you a Type A?, the Stress O Meter, and other IQ andpersonality tests. Most are free and often fun to take. Take two or three of your choice. Printthe results you get on yourself and bring them to class where we will discuss the validity of yourfindings.

    3. Heres another site for personality tests. Remember these tests are more for fun than anythingelse. Go to www.davideck.com/cgi-bin/test.cgi?action=personality for a variety of tests. TheAll Guide to Your Personality is an indicator of the Big Five. Theres also the GoofyPersonality tests, and Kingdom Personality test among others. Print your results and bringthem to class and we will discuss the validity of your results.

    4. How does your Big Five profile (completed in number 3 above) compare against the MBTI? Go

    to www.personalitytype.com/quiz.html to get a brief assessment of your MBTI profile. Bringcopies of both results to class for discussion.

    5. Whats your EQ? Dan Goldman has developed a short quiz to give you an idea of where youmight fall on the Emotional Quotient scale. Visit www.unte.com/azEQ.tmpl to read a brief articlepublished in the Unte Reader on EQ. Then select Take the Test Now to take the test. Be sureto score your results and print them off. Bring to class and we will discuss the validity of thetest.

    6. Read about EQ at http://trochim.human.cornell.edu/gallery/young/emotion.htm , which is now thehottest topic in emotion theory. This site provides an overview of the theory and why it isimportant. It is a great place to begin research on the topic. Write five interesting facts about

    EQ and bring them to class. Be prepared to discuss how EQ can be utilized in the workplace.

    7. How are personality tests and employment linked? Why would an employer or employee beinterested in the results of a personality test? Go to the following sites to learn morehttp://www.signonsandiego.com/marketplace/jobs/myjobsearch/ccsdt/advance/personal/personal2.shtmlhttp://www.employmentreview.com/2002-06/features/CNfeat02.asp http://www.flinders.edu.au/careers/EmpTest.html http://www.careerjournal.com/jobhunting/interviewing/20010622-webb.html

    91

    http://www.goto.com/http://www.google.com/http://www.yahoo.com/http://www.lycos.com/http://www.hotbot.com/http://www.looksmart.com/http://helping.apa.org/daily/anger.htmlhttp://helping.apa.org/daily/anger.htmlhttp://www.2h.com/personality-tests.htmlhttp://www.2h.com/personality-tests.htmlhttp://www.davideck.com/cgi-bin/test.cgi?action=personalityhttp://www.personalitytype.com/quiz.htmlhttp://www.unte.com/azEQ.tmplhttp://trochim.human.cornell.edu/gallery/young/emotion.htmhttp://trochim.human.cornell.edu/gallery/young/emotion.htmhttp://www.signonsandiego.com/marketplace/jobs/myjobsearch/ccsdt/advance/personal/personal2.shtmlhttp://www.signonsandiego.com/marketplace/jobs/myjobsearch/ccsdt/advance/personal/personal2.shtmlhttp://www.employmentreview.com/2002-06/features/CNfeat02.asphttp://www.flinders.edu.au/careers/EmpTest.htmlhttp://www.careerjournal.com/jobhunting/interviewing/20010622-webb.htmlhttp://www.goto.com/http://www.google.com/http://www.yahoo.com/http://www.lycos.com/http://www.hotbot.com/http://www.looksmart.com/http://helping.apa.org/daily/anger.htmlhttp://www.2h.com/personality-tests.htmlhttp://www.davideck.com/cgi-bin/test.cgi?action=personalityhttp://www.personalitytype.com/quiz.htmlhttp://www.unte.com/azEQ.tmplhttp://trochim.human.cornell.edu/gallery/young/emotion.htmhttp://www.signonsandiego.com/marketplace/jobs/myjobsearch/ccsdt/advance/personal/personal2.shtmlhttp://www.signonsandiego.com/marketplace/jobs/myjobsearch/ccsdt/advance/personal/personal2.shtmlhttp://www.employmentreview.com/2002-06/features/CNfeat02.asphttp://www.flinders.edu.au/careers/EmpTest.htmlhttp://www.careerjournal.com/jobhunting/interviewing/20010622-webb.html
  • 7/31/2019 OBch4

    25/25

    Robbins: Organizational Behavior Chapter Four

    http://www.hr-guide.com/data/G312.htm

    Bring five new facts you learned from at least two of the above sites to class for a groupdiscussion.

    92

    http://www.hr-guide.com/data/G312.htmhttp://www.hr-guide.com/data/G312.htm