Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
No.16-1 Jan.2018
No.16-1 2018 i
Research on Timelines of Local Government against Earthquake and Tsunami Disaster– Action Research for Procedure of Hyogo Prefectural Response Plan for Earthquake and Tsunami Disaster –
··························································································· ··········· 1
Proposal of the logistics checklist for information sharing in the transportation of the international medical relief equipment
··············································································· ········· 13
Survey of Residents' Intentions about Long-distance Evacuation for Large-scale Flood in Big Cities·············································· ········· 27
Reduction of Evacuation Rate after Izu Oshima Sediment Disaster in 2013 and Examination of its Cause and Measures Based on Questionnaire Survey
············· ········· 37
Practical use of number of telephone report for estimating heavy rainfall disaster– –
····························································· ·········
No.16-1 2018ii
Wide Tokai and Nankai Earthquakes. ············································································ ········· 61
·························································· ········· 73
Response Operations··············································································· ········· 85
Lessons Learned from Earthquake Disasters: “3.11 Lessons Learned Web Database System” and “Earthquake Disaster Literature Web Database System”
································································ ·········
Needing Help in Evacuation············································································ ········ 105
650-8567 5-10-1
2015
FEMA ESF 1092 ICS
2012
2
2013
2016
2014a
2009 p.24
No.16-1 2018 1
2012
2015[ ]
20151
2
34
5
[
] 20153 30
1
53
4
3
3
550
1
30
1
3
A31
Excel
No.16-1 20182
910
. . . . . .. . . .
2014
2016
FEMA ESF Emergency Support Functions15
9
303
344
1m
4490
1
904
2
412
3
1224
4
2448
2
4872
3
721
1
No.16-1 2018 3
2016 p.4
20163
10
20132006
Management by Objectives
1
2014
10
WBS Work Breakdown StructureMicrosoft Excel
2014 FEMAESF Emergency Support Functions
No.16-1 2018
ExcelExcel
Excel
.
Excel
Excel
2009
1
2014b
4
4
102016 PERT
No.16-1 2018 5
Program Evaluation and Review Technique
2012 FEMA ICSIncident Command System
COMMAND PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICERSAFETY OFFICER
2.
.BCP Business continuity plan
24
.
.
2016
PERT
2013 pp.481-507
2013 2013 4 132014c 2014 8
20135 33
6
2014
2014
2012 18
2014a
2011
2014a
201480 20
44
2014b
No.16-1 20186
8
2014b
15
1/2
3040
2013 4 133
9 181 3
2 3
2 3
1
( )
3
1
1
1
1
11010531
15
3 5
5
5
No.16-1 2018 7
442017.1.16
.DMAT .
ESF
2015 3
2015A
16
2017 1
12015 p.13
No.16-1 20188
2016Best Practices from Leading Local
Governments in Japan
28 2016 7 11
47
2015[ ]
FEMA ESF 109
23
2015 p.13
2013
Management by Objectives
WBS(Work Breakdown Structure)
FEMA ESF(Emergency Support Functions) PERT
ICS
( )
20132014
No.16-1 2018
ICS
2016 , 2017.3.11 ,
http://www.kouiki-kansai.jp/contents.php?id=2422 2014 ,
, 2 2-3 2017.3.11 , http://www.mlit.go.jp/river/bousai/bousai-gensai/index.html
2016 ,
, 13, pp.34-47 2006 ,
, 8, pp.183-190
2012 , , 102-1 2017.3.11 ,
https://www.fdma.go.jp/neuter/topics/fieldList2_1_3.html 2015 , 8
2012 ,
2014 ,
2016 ,
2009 ,
2014a ,
2017.3.11 , https://web.pref.hyogo.lg.jp/kk37/jishintsunamihigaisoutei.html
2014b , ( ) 2017.3.11 , https://web.pref.hyogo.lg.jp/kk37/nantorashinsuisouteizu.html
2014c , 8 , 2017.3.11 ,
https://web.pref.hyogo.lg.jp/kk03/saigaijouhou/rainfall201408a.html
2015 , [] 2017.3.11 ,
https://web.pref.hyogo.lg.jp/kk37/documents/oukyuushinarioh2704kaitei.pdf 2017 1 http://web.pref.hyogo.jp/kk37/documents/oukyutaioukoudouscenario-h2901kaitei.pdf
2011 , , 9 2017.3.11 ,
https://web.pref.hyogo.lg.jp/governor/documents/000178737.pdf 2013 , 25 4 13
, 2017.3.11 ,
https://web.pref.hyogo.lg.jp/kk03/jishin/0413.html 2014 ,
26
2013 ,
2017.3.11 , http://www.mlit.go.jp/river/kokusai/disaster/america/
2013 , 6
2009 ,
, 11, pp.257-266
No.16-1 201810
Research on Timelines of Local Government against Earthquake and Tsunami Disaster
- Action Research for Procedure of Hyogo Prefectural Response Plan for Earthquake and Tsunami Disaster -
Tomohiro KOBAYASHI
Disaster Management Project Planning Division, Hyogo Prefectural Government
650-8567 5-10-1 Shimoyamatedori, Chuo-ku, Kobe-city, Hyogo, Japan
ABSTRACT
In order to verify the formulation process and effects of a timeline against earthquake and tsunami disaster, this paper has conducted an action research for procedure of "Hyogo Prefectural Response Plan (2015)". This plan is assembled based on the records of the past disaster response. This plan consists of ten category and nine phases, and considering that the gathering rate of staff varies with time, there are two types. The panoramic view and tables showing the role of each department at each phase are combined in this plan. In the process of formulating this plan, veteran tacit knowledge was accumulated as explicit intelligence. Training proved that timelines are effective not only for aggressive information acquisition but also for information triage.
Keywords Timeline, Earthquake and Tsunami Disaster, Local Government, Emergency Response
No.16-1 2018 11
1
861-8520
(1)(2) (3) (4) (5)
(6) 646
4
Foreign Medical Teams
2016 2016 4216 4 17
(DMAT)
2015
2009
von Schreeb(2007)
7
Chu(2011)
Norton(2013) (Foreign Medical Teams
Aitken(2012)
No.16-1 2018 13
2012
(2016)
(2012)
(2012)
NGO
No.16-1 2018
ERU
( )
No.16-1 2018 15
2013 30
6
55
46
2013 30Haiyan
2013 1130 (Haiyan
11 13 ERU
Logistics ERUERU
ERU 11
19 6
152cm 103cm 153cm 26
21 8.993.407
19
20
21
1
No.16-1 201816
2 3 2
ERU
(1)(2)
(3) (4)
(5) (6)
1 11 19
2 11 19
3 11 20
4 11 20
5 11 21
6 11 21
(FACT)ERU
( 4)( 5) (
6) 2
5
(1) (2) (3)
(4) (5) ,
5
No.16-1 2018 17
5
No.16-1 201818
28
150 20
No.16-1 2018
372
17
28 8
37
1 11
2
2
3
2
4 (1) (2) 2
5 (1) (3) 1
6 (1),(2),(3) 2
7 17
27 8
5(1)
(2) (3) (4)4
11 5 3.5
(2)
(7)3.71
(4)
(3.68) (5)(3.47)
(1)(3.5)
(8)(3.5) (11)
(3.47)
3.50 0.62
3.71 0.52
3.12 0.88
3.68 0.47
3.47 0.79
3.09 0.71
3.71 0.46
3.50 0.66
3.38 0.60
2.76 0.74
3.47 0.56
(10)
2.76
63.09 3
3.12
No.16-1 201820
315
3.42
28
12
3.31 0.71
13
3.22 0.83
14 Cold Chain 3.31 0.79
15 3.42 0.81
12 113
16(3.44)
18 (3.42
NGO
(17)(3.31) (19)
(3.33) (23)(3.14)
3 (24)(2.89)
16 3.44 0.51
17
3.31 0.50
18 3.42 0.51
19 3.33 0.65
20 3.00 0.61
21
3.28 0.55
22 3.06 0.73
23 3.14 0.69
24 2.89 0.66
25 3.36 0.56
26 3.06 0.60
27 3.23 0.65
13 39 3.5
(28)3.83 (30)
(3.74) (29)(3.69) (31)
3.66(35) (3.6)
No.16-1 2018 21
37(3.14)
( 2005 32005 10
28 3.83 0.38
29
3.69 0.47
30
3.74 0.66
31
3.66 0.48
32 3.57 0.56
33 3.60 0.50
34
3.46 0.61
35 3.60 0.55
36 3.60 0.50
37 Packing List
3.14 0.73
38
3.53 0.55
39
3.36 0.61
40
3.43 0.56
6(3.46) 5 3.5
(3.89)
3.57
41 3.89 0.31
42 3.57 0.55
43 3.59 0.50
44 3.70 0.46
45 3.46 0.73
46 3.70 0.57
No.16-1 201822
t , 5% 3
8
1519
343
3
t
t df P
8
3.26 3.7 -2.17 30.96 .037
15
3.16 3.7 -2.21 26.79 .036
19
, ,
3.21 3.65 -2.15 32.05 .038
4644 4 3
No.16-1 2018 23
6
(2015), , , http://medical.radionikkei.jp/byoyaku/
(2012),
, Japanese Journal of Disaster Medicine (J. J. Disast. Med.) Vol. 17 No. 1, pp.214-220, 2012
(2009), Referral Hospital, Emergency Items Catalogue third edition, Vol 3., http:// procurement.ifrc.org/catalogue/#information, Johan von Schreeb, Louis Riddez, Hans Samnegård, Hans Rosling(2008), Foreign Field Hospitals in the
Recent Sudden-Onset Disasters in Iran, Haiti, Indonesia, and Pakistan, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, Vol.23, No.2, pp.144-151
Chu K, Stokes C, Trelles M, Ford N (2011), Improving Effective Surgical Delivery in Humanitarian Disasters: Lessons from
Haiti, PLoS Med 8(4): e1001025.doi:10.1371/journal. pmed.1001025
Ian Norton, Johan von Schreeb, Peter Aitken, Patrick Herard, Camila Lajolo(2015), CLASSIFICATION AND MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR FOREIGN MEDICAL TEAMS IN SUDDEN ONSET DISASTERS, Peter Aitken, Peter Leggat1, Hazel Harley, Richard Speare1, Muriel
Leclercq(2012), Logistic support provided to Australian disaster medical assistance teams: results of a national survey of team members, Emerging Health Journal,
No.16-1 2018
Proposal of the logistics checklist for information sharing in the transportation of the international medical relief equipment
Yasuhiro SOSHINO Akira MIYATA1
International Medical Relief Department, Japanese Red Cross Kumamoto Hospital
861-8520 2-1-1, Nagamine-minami, Higashi-ku, Kumamoto City, Kumamoto, Japan
ABSTRACT
In the future catastrophes such as Nankai Trough Earthquakes and Tokyo Inland Earthquake, the reception of foreign medical teams are considered to be an option. The transportation of the heavy and large units of equipment for establishing field clinics and field hospitals is the challenge in the reception of foreign medical teams. In the recent responses to catastrophic disasters, many reports pointed out the difficulties in transporting the medical relief equipment. One of the difficulties is the proper information collection and the information sharing among the logistics stakeholders. Therefore, this study aims to propose the logistics checklist for the transportation of the foreign medical relief equipment. The review of the past deployments of the Red Cross was conducted. This study categorized the transportation into the six phases and identified 46 logistics points to be assessed. To verify the logistics assessment points, a questionnaire survey was conducted to the staff of a private logistics service provider. The survey evaluated the 46 logistics points on a scale of one to four. 44 logistics points were recognized as important or extremely important. In catastrophes, the information collection and sharing by the logistics checklist is considered to be effective in the transportation of the foreign medical relief equipment during catastrophes.
Keywords Humanitarian Logistics, International Medical Relief, Relief Equipment, Foreign Medical Teams
No.16-1 2018 25
113-0033 7-3-1
376-0023 3-2-28 1F
13120 Gedung Graha BNPB Lt.16, Jl.Pramuka Kav.38, Jakarta Timur, Indonesia
100-8914 1-6-1 8
5
3 7
22 19471,100 303,160
31,3812010 34 1959
5,0982008
2013
No.16-1 2018 27
2011 2013
55
5 201628 2016 6
5
2016, 2017
5
5
22016
5 251228
172017
5 2029 2017 1 10 12
2,0005
50cm
1,874
64 40 50
5 20 29 2017 1 10 12
2,000 211 304583 374 528
62%
38%
121%
227%3
25%
418%
56%
6 3%
20 5%
3018%
4034%
5029%
6011%
70 3%
N=1,874
N=1,874N=1,874
88%
7%
5%
N=1,874
No.16-1 201828
6 1 42 3 5 1
12%7%
5%
25
5
2 80% 1 65%51%
2 13% 124% 32%
5
5 68%43%
3
21 5
2
1
6
13% 24% 30% 32%8%11%
15% 16%
80%65% 55% 51%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2 1 6
11%35% 44% 46%3%
13%21% 25%86%
52%35% 28%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2 1 6
5 5
N=1,874
68%
43%
31%
34%
31%
32%
57%
69%
66%
69%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
N=1,874
No.16-1 2018
13% 24%11% 211% 35% 24%
24% 135% 11%
8
70
7
5
5
45%
29%26%
72%25%
2 2248 5
39%2016
23 57
19%
14%
14%
14%
12%
37%
35%
40%
30%
27%
24%
22%
18%
9%
12%
8%
9%
6%
6%
5%
12%
20%
22%
41%
44%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1
2
3
4
5
2 1 6
20%
20%
14%
10%
13%
8%
38%
40%
33%
33%
27%
24%
20%
15%
16%
17%
22%
12%
9%
7%
6%
8%
8%
4%
13%
19%
31%
32%
29%
51%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
20
30
40
50
60
70
2 1 6
No.16-1 201830
74% 9%
3 420
2010 79%
5
170%
6 54% 46%
5 3
5
3
6517 19
91
54
137 4 74 5 80%
2
6%
51% 7%
41%
30%
9%
18%
51%
57%
74%
20%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
(544)
(191)
(154)
(740)
23%
20%
40%
49%
4%
6%
6%
5%
27%
26%
23%
18%
43%
43%
26%
22%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
(304)
(810)
(339)
(97)
No.16-1 2018 31
33
1
5
1
2
2 7
81%
304
73%
1
65%
91%
54%
37%
58%
61%
74%
80%
60%
60%
67%
71%
17%
22%
32%
23%
18%
9%
6%
16%
21%
15%
14%
19%
6%
24%
32%
19%
20%
16%
13%
24%
19%
17%
15%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1
2
3
4
5
3
3
1
5 5
(1,874)
(533)
(1,341)
(145)
(594)
(458)
(148)
(529)
(314)
(527)
(750)
(283)
29%
31%
9%
25%
29%
27%
46%
39%
64%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
55
(1,646)
(137)
(91)
26%
35%
16%
30%
25%
15%
44%
39%
68%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
(1,480)
(119)
(85)
No.16-1 201832
1
62%33%
5
3
65%
65%
52%
16%
20%
20%
18%
15%
29%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
55
(1,646)
(137)
(91)
21%
22%
18%
13%
12%
11%
27%
23%
18%
18%
15%
32%
33%
34%
39%
34%
23%
9%
10%
12%
13%
14%
9%
10%
12%
18%
17%
25%
49%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
N=1,874
44%
35%
34%
34%
31%
22%
20%
26%
23%
24%
25%
16%
30%
33%
34%
32%
35%
39% 15%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
N=1,874
31%
13%
31%
20%
34%
41% 15%12%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
N=1,874
No.16-1 2018 33
1
5 237
2
37
5
, , , 2013 ,
, B1 , Vol.69, No.1, pp.71-82.
, 2011 , ,
Vol.63, No.4, pp.103-107. 5 2016 , 5
. , , 2013 ,
, , No.20, pp.39-48.
2008 , 1959 . 2010 , 1947 .
2016 , 2, 2 5 .
2017 , 3
, 3 5, 4 , 5-1
. 2010 , 5
.
No.16-1 2018
Survey of Residents' Intentions about Long-distance Evacuation for Large-scale Flood in Big Cities
Toshitaka KATADA Noriyuki KUWASAWA Naoto TADA Naoki YOSHIMATSU
Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies, The University of Tokyo
113-0033 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan Institute of Social Technology, IDA Co., Ltd.
376-0023 1F 3-2-28 Nishiki-cho, Kiryu, Gunma, Japan National Agency for Disaster Management in Indonesia (dispatched from Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism)
13120 Gedung Graha BNPB Lt.16, Jl.Pramuka Kav.38, Jakarta Timur, Indonesia Cabinet Office (Disaster Management)
100-8914 Central Common Government Offices No.8 1-6-1 Nagata-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan
ABSTRACT
In this study, we surveyed the evacuation intention of the residents living in the eastern lowlands of the Tokyo metropolitan area in case of large-scale flood. This survey is aimed at examining evacuation countermeasures during large-scale flood in big cities by investigating the reaction of the residents when inducing the long-distance evacuation.
The results of this survey are as follows: (a) Only half of those who intend to evacuate at the time of large-scale flood. However, less than half of those who are aware of the risk of large-scale flood and the necessity of long-distance evacuation. Therefore, there is a possibility that the number of people who have intention to evacuate may increase by giving appropriate information. (b) About half of the respondents have personal evacuation sites far from home. (c) Approximately 70% of people intend to accept evacuation at home, on the premise that the duration of submersion is less than 3 days. (d) Elderly people and persons with disabilities are difficult to move and stay in evacuation places, so special measures are necessary. On the other hand, households with infants and children have a possibility of proactive long-distance evacuation. (e) To promote long-distance evacuation, it is required to designate the evacuation destination, and to eliminate anxiety about departing from home and taking a rest from the company or school.
Keywords Large-scale Flood, Big Cities, Long-distance Evacuation, Evacuation Intentions, Questionnaire survey
No.16-1 2018 35
1 2 3 4 5 6
100-0101 1-1-14
100-8122 1-3-4
470-0392 1247 CeMI
160-0011 1-22
113-0033 7-3-1
100-0101 1-1-14
2013 10 16 26
39
3 6
40 5
3
2013 10 16 2639
2013
MSN2013 10 17
No.16-1 2018 37
7
NHK 2013 10 22
10 18
20133 6
201340% 5%
2012 2014
2008 2015
201326
1120 824
2014
450 16 02
1 100
2 3 2017 10 1539 22 400
19582 9
46
2013 10 15 09 16 09 1
2013 10 18
2013
2002
2
27 630
5km5
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
15 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 16 3 5 7 9
No.16-1 201838
82013 10 18 2015 7 14
20131
16512
7 37044 19066
/ /
2013 12 20146 2017 3 1
20133 6
2015 7 3 2016 8 22
0
10
20
30
40
50
2013/10/1 2014/10/1 2015/10/1 2016/10/1
2013/10/19
2014/4/3
2016/8/22
2014/10/5
2015/7/3
2013/10/25
1
2365 933 39.5185 57 30.87924 1329 16.8393 138 35.1407 19 4.730 4 13.3
1168 161 13.8393 38 9.7
2015/7/3 24 1 4.2 23.5 198.5
2016/8/22 262 4 1.5 54 290.5
2013/10/19
2013/10/25
2014/4/3
2014/10/5
133
143
165.5
255.5
25.5
20
20.5
22.5
No.16-1 2018
2013 10 25 278317 2015 7 3
16 242013
3 10 19 39.530.8 9 16.835.1 4.7
13.3 113.8 9.7 1 94.2 2 10 1.5
6
2016 9 15 162
4 3 31 11
2013 39
11 2013
3 A1 2
4 B 1 3 1
4 C
40 70
A1 A3 3
2013
B1 B4 4 22
B2 B3 2 23
C1 C4 4
2 A2 A3
7 A1 B1 B3 C1 C3 C41 C2
B1 B4
C1 C4
No.16-1 2018
B1 4 C1 4
A1 A3 3 B1 B2 C2 C4 4
B1
2013 345
764 100 10
101
5 1
2
2013 3
B1 1
B2
B3
B4
C1
C2
C3
8 C4
A1 A2
A2
B1
B2
B3
C2 C3
C4
A1 B1
B4
C2
2 C3
No.16-1 2018
2015 2 N
N
2015 12
2016 2
2016 3
2016 9
8
2013
82013
11
2013
8
8 54 5 6 7 8
2015 12 2013
34 N 131 2013
2015 250 N 6 2016 2 86 N 14
3 93 N 28 2016 9
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
93%
32%
29%
29%
7%
21%2016 3N 28
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
86%
64%
36%
43%
7%
14%2016 2N 14
0 2 4 6 8 10
50%
17%
17%
17%
17%2015 2N 6
0 10 20 30 40 50
26%
32%
8%
34%
2015 12N 131
0 10 20 30 40 50
11%
24%
47
9%
21%2016 9N 113
No.16-1 2018
2014 8
2015 12
2016 9
2014 8
2015 2
2015 12
2016 9
2014 8
2015 12
2016 9
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
70%
12%
5%
14%
2016 9N 43
0 20 40 60 80
25%
52%
22%
1%
2015 12N 153
0 20 40 60 80 100
61%
22%
13%
4%
2016 9N 143
0 5 10 15 20 25
66%
31%
3%
2014 8N 35
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
14%
46%
14%
14%
5%
9%2014 8N 15
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
13%
54%
8%
4%
13%
8%2015 12N 24
0 5 10 15 20 25
63%21%11%26%
3%5%3%2014 8
N 38
0 5 10 15 20
42%33%46%49%
46%33%
2015 2N 33
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
39%39%33%21%17%10%9%
2015 12N 163
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
66%
14%16%
5%
2016 9N 44
No.16-1 2018
47 N 113
55 N=66
8 N 131 36N 14 29% N14 43% N 14
2016 2 64 N 14 2016 332 N 28
8 33 5 8 82 2015 12
2013
51 N 242014 8 2016 9
46 N 15 70 N 4312 N 43
14 N 154 N 24 14 N 43
8 4 3 45 8
439 N 163 66 N
44 20169 21 N 38 39 N 163
11 N 38 46 N 3314 N 44 49 N 33
52014 8 N 38 9 2015 12 N 163
20133
3 5 8 4 3331 3
45 N 331
3782
16
2015 12 2016 9
2016 2 2016 3
2
3
201310 3 1 N 35
2 2 22 4 N 1532 11 13 18
N 143
2015 12 2016 9
2 5 73
30 N 24 2016 2 3 6 7
52013 10 19 2015 7 3
42112
0 5 10 15 20
41%
41%
38%
29%
26%
26%
26%
16%
21%2016 2 3N 42
0 2 4 6 8 10
38%
33%
30%
8%
4%
4%2015 12 2016 9N 24
No.16-1 2018
4138 29
2616
2013
2015
112013
2 2013 1 2
2 8
39.5 4.7
3 11
4
20133 76
9
2015 2 50% N6 2015 12 26% N 131 2016 386% N 14 2016 3 93% N 28
3
1 3
2017 3
No.16-1 2018
https://www.town.oshima.tokyo.jp/soshiki/bousai/bousai notebiki-husuigai.html
2
2014
33 127-140 http://www.jsnds.org/ssk/ssk_33_s_127.pdf
2012 2010 9 8
B1 Vol.68 No.4 I_1093-I_1098 http://disaster-i.net/notes/2012suiko.pdf
NHK 2013 10 22 MSN 2013 10 17
2014 :2013 10 16
2014 2008
Vol. 60 No.6 P. 48- 51 https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sabo1973/60/6/60_6_48/_pdf
2015
No.13 P.96-100
No.16-1 2018
Reduction of Evacuation Rate after Izu Oshima Sediment Disaster in 2013 and Examination of its
Cause and Measures Based on Questionnaire Survey
Akimi KAZIYA Kazuhide AKAISHI Takashi YOKOTA Fujio KUSANO
Naoya SEKIYA Yoshinori TAKAHASHI
Disaster Prevention Measures, Oshima Town Office 100-0101 1-1-4 Motomachi, Oshima-machi Tokyo, Japan
Volcanic Disaster Mitigation, Japan Meteorological Agency 100-8122 1-3-4 Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo, Japan
Disaster Prevention Research Center, Aichi Institute of Technology 470-0392 1247 Yachigusa, Yakusa-cho, Toyota-City Aichi Prefecture, Japan
Research Institute for Disaster Mitigation and Environmental Studies 160-0011 1-22 Wakaba Shinjuku-ku Tokyo, Japan
Center for Integrated Disaster Information Research Interfaculty in Information Studies,The University of Tokyo 113-0033 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku Tokyo, JAPAN
Rresidence Section, Oshima Town Office 100-0101 1-1-4 Motomachi, Oshima-machi Tokyo, Japan
ABSTRACT
The sediment disaster with 39 dead and missing people occurred in Izu Oshima Island on October 16, 2013. due to a record rainfall accompanied by Typhoon No. 26. Oshima Town has improved warning evacuation system against sediment disasters triggered by this case. The main improvements are formulation of evacuation information issuance following Landslide Alert Information and the localization of the area to be evacuated based on Real-time Landslide Risk Map. In addition, Oshima Town has provided education and awareness-raising efforts to residents on the prevention of sediment disasters. While such improvements are being promoted, Oshima Town issued an evacuation advisory six times against heavy rain in the three years after the sediment disaster in 2013. However, the evacuation rate was 40% immediately after the sediment disaster in 2013, but it decreased to about 5% after half a year.
According to the questionnaire and interview survey conducted in the three years after the sediment disaster in 2013, the reasons for the low evacuation rate are that; evacuation calls resulted in false alarm, the environment of evacuation centers was poor, crisis awareness reduced as time passes and elderly people had difficulty in evacuation. Therefore, improvements on these will lead to an increase in the evacuation rate. It is feasible to improve environment of evacuation centers and support elderly people, though cost issue remains. On the other hand, the adequacy of evacuation advisory depends on the accuracy of Landslide Alert Information and so the accuracy improvement is required.
Keywords Sediment disasters Evacuation advisories Evacuation behavior Questionnaire survey
No.16-1 2018
2014
507-8703 2-15
170-6055 3-1-1
422-8529 836
2014 8
2014
60
20172016
5km
No.16-1 2018
,2016
2016
2011 9
,2016
26 8
2011
2014 8 20
2014 AMeDAS 1
101.0 3 217.5 24 257.0
19762014 X MP 250m
8 20 0 5
74 4722 179
217
4 154 30
8.20 2015
119
1198 20 0 5
No.16-1 201850
400341
2014 119
76,9891 8.79
2015 8 20 0 5302 30 1
10 1198
21 3 305 30
8.20 2015
119
202
No.16-1 2018 51
30
119
119
2 2 30
2 30 119
2014
No.16-1 201852
web49
X MP250m
5km
1423
7 29
106
5%
4 12 30 119
5
8
No.16-1 2018 53
54.89km2
174.26km2 3 1
30
3
3
No.16-1 2018
1015
3 4
44
11930 2
3
33 30
119
76,989 1 10.0696
27 2015
2014 1191 1 0.0756
20,0008,400
2
230
X MP 250m 10
No.16-1 2018 55
22 250m0
10
1 30 1 40mm2 4
1 60mm
62,5001 1
10 2
2 301
30
X MP250m
1030 30
30 2
30
3
250m
1 80mm1 40mm
1
2011
No.16-1 201856
1
2015
119 119
119
119
2011
1119
1 52015
35 119
No.16-1 2018 57
142
210
2017
http://www.bousai.go.jp/oukyu/hinankankoku/h28_hinankankoku_guideline/pdf/gaiyo.pdf 2017 4 30
201628 11
http://www.mlit.go.jp/river/bousai/timeline/pdf/ timeline_sakutei_1611.pdf 2017 4 30
2016http://www.mlit.go.jp/river/bousai/
timeline/pdf/timeline_shishin.pdf 2017 4 30 2016
No.14 pp.164-173 2016 27
http://www.city.joso.lg.jp/ ikkrwebBrowse/material/files/group/6/kensyou_houkokusyo.pdf
2017 4 30 2014 26 8 20
http://www.mri-jma.go.jp/Topics/H26/260909/ Press_140820hiroshima_heavyrainfall.pdf 2017 5 7
2014 26 8 19
20 http://www. jma-net.go.jp/hiroshima/siryo/saigai/sokuhou_2014_0820.pdf
2017 4 30 8.20 201526 8 20
http://www.city.hiroshima.lg.jp/www/contents/1476873330360/files/01honpen.pdf 2017 4 30
2015 26 2014 http://www. city.hiroshima.lg.jp/www/contents/1440138338452/simple/shobounenpo.pdf 2017 5 7
http://www.kasen-bousai. pref.hiroshima.lg.jp/rivercontents/ 2017 4 30
2015 2014 8Vol.34 pp.47-59
2015 27 http://www.fdma. go.jp/html/hakusho/h27/h27/pdf/h27_all.pdf 2017 5 7
http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/kishou/know/
yougo_hp/amehyo.html 2017 6 1 2015
2015 2014 8
3 2-2 http://www.bousai.go.jp/fusuigai/ dosyaworking/pdf/dai3kai/siryo2_2.pdf 2017 4 30
No.16-1 201858
Practical use of number of telephone report for estimating heavy rainfall disaster
- Verification by the heavy rainfall disaster at Hiroshima city in August 2014 -
Tatsuya SHIOZAKI Motohiro HONMA Motoyuki USHIYAMA
Tajimi City
507-8703 2-15 Hinodemachi Tajimi Gifu, Japan Japan Weather Association
170-6055 3-1-1 Higashi ikebukuro Toshima-ku Tokyo, Japan Center for Integrated Research and Education of Natural hazards,Shizuoka University
422-8529 836 Ohya Suruga-ku Shizuoka, Japan
ABSTRACT
During disaster, it is necessary to recommend evacuation to the appropriate time and area. The government urges municipalities to strengthen disaster response by formulating manuals on evacuation recommendations and pre-action plans called “timeline”. However, most of the information indicating disaster risks covers a wide range, and there are many problems such as difficulties to understand in detail the area where the risk level is rising.
As a method to solve these problems, we think that the counting of the number of telephone report for each area accepted by municipality can be utilized. In a report verifying response to heavy rain disasters, telephone report from residents is often pointed out as one factor that inhibits disaster response. However, if it is impossible to suppress increasing telephone report from residents during disaster, in order to strengthen disaster response, it is important not only to take measures against the negative characteristics of telephone report but also to actively utilize as a disaster prevention information. For this purpose, analysis in other cases is required.
In this research, we investigated the relationship between the precipitation, the number of telephone report from residents, and the number of damage during heavy rainfall disaster occurred at Hiroshima City in August 2014, based on the previous study at Tajimi City, Gifu Prefecture.
As a result, the precipitation, the number of telephone report, and the number of damage occurred during this disaster had a certain relationship, which was the same trend as in previous study. In addition, it was shown that the time when the number of telephone report increased was just before many human damages occurred.
From these facts, it is suggested that the method of counting the number of telephone report for each area contributes to understanding the risk of heavy rainfall disasters.
Keywords Heavy rainfall disaster, Telephone report, Understanding the disaster risk, Mitigation, The heavy rainfall disaster at Hiroshima City in August 2014
No.16-1 2018
569-1098 7-1
569-1098 7-1
9 M8 100~150
2011 3 11
2016
100~150
(M)81707
M8.61854 M8.4 32
M8.4 1944 M7.91946 M8.0 2
2016
No.16-1 2018 61
WG
2016 p.1
WG
WG
4
2016
2016
2016
2007 2008 2010
2010
1
1530 60 90 30 990
365379 394 1354
1
2015 8
23 391 6700
B 10.159kl kl
M8
2003
WEB
5 511
6 31
365
No.16-1 201862
2016
1
2015 8
1 2015kl/
1 kl/D B/D
WEB
2003b
2,385,700B/D 2,265,500B/D1,492, 500B/D
313,529,700B/D 3,413,700B/D
No.16-1 2018 63
60.9% 57.8%69.1%
38.131 90.1%
87.2%
1 1215 30 60 30 99035 420
11 5 5
31 6
365
31
390
1 23
2 31 2 8 1 2
81 2 8
1
390
140
x x
420
43 2212 1
8 115
No.16-1 2018
990
365
390
30 360D(a) x
x (1) ( ) = 0.42 + 293.35 (1)
30 360 3023 26
24.85(1) 24.85
( ) = 0.42 + 293.35 + 24.85 ( ) = 0.42 + 318.2 (2)
(2) 30 360 30
2(2)
(2)
(2)
(3)
(4)D(ma) D(mi)390
D(fa) (5)
( ) = 0.0013 + 0.0851 + 339.08 (3) ( ) = 0.0016 1.0621 + 310.1 (4) ( ) = 0.396 + 313.9 (5)
100
2
12
3
1 2 8
1 2 8
390
990
Ldfh(l)Ldfh(a) Ldfh(e)(6) (8)
No.16-1 2018 65
390
( ) = + 363 (6) ( ) = 0.0008 + 0.6146 + 347.1 (7)
( ) = 0.0011 + 0.3617 + 301.78 (8)
1 390 30(6)
20 10 390 990
Ldlh(l)Ldlh(a) Ldlh(e)
( ) = + 363 (9) ( ) = 1.0104 + 300.9 (10) ( ) = 1.0133 + 212.27 (11)
990
Ldf(l)Ldf(a) Ldf(e)
(12) (14) ( ) = + 363 (12) ( ) = 9 × 10 + 0.8999 + 329.84 (13)
( ) = 0.0002 + 0.7825 + 274.83 (14)
12 1 12 1
42012 1
390 1515 9
12 1
1 11 30
12 1210 6 28 240
7 28(16)
1Co(g) ( ) = 4.9705 1060.7 (15)
(16)213
7 1
1 213
1
1
214
2014 20152
1
No.16-1 201866
2014
(kl)
A
B C180 210
1
12 1 1
Ga(g) Na(g)Ke(g)
Je(g) Di(g) AHOA(g) B C HOBC(g)
x -6
( ) = 22363 5 × 10 (16) ( ) = 7665.2 2 × 10 (17) ( ) = 7033 2 × 10 (18) ( ) = 6400.8 10 (19)
( ) = 17148 4 × 10 (20) ( ) = 5689.6 10 (21) ( ) = 8850.5 2 × 10 (22)
2014
A
A
B C
3030
(16) (22)
1561
2841
No.16-1 2018 67
1987
Hori 2006
3
3
322 3
3
2013
323
= 3 × 10 . (23)
h mh
1 h 0h 1
1096M8.0 8.5 2
1 (23) M7.9 9.0
M9.0 M8.7
M8.6~M8.5 M8.4
2013
3
M
h 1
M8.2 M8.1 2
M8.0 8 M7.9 28
h
No.16-1 201868
(23)
3 (5) (12) (14)
M8.5 8.2
1
M8.1 M8.0 M7.9
M8.2
M9.0 M8.4
M8.0 M8.3
12 1
11
1
140
No.16-1 2018
1801
(23)
2016
2016 1099
1096
31 pp.81 88 http://sakuya.ed.shizuoka.ac.jp/rzisin/kaishi_31/HE31_081_088_Ishibashi.pdf
(2013)
1987pp.73 78
2015 http://www.meti.go.jp/statistics/tyo/sekiyuka/xls/h2dhhpe2014k.xlsx
WEB2017.06.28
http://ceh.cosmo-oil.co.jp/information/120428/ JX WEB
5 3 21 10:3015 4 12 10:30
2017.06.28 http://www.noe.jxtg-group.co.jp/newsrelease/2010/20110321_01_0944355.html http://www.noe.jxtg-group.co.jp/newsrelease/2011/2011 0412_01_0950261.html
WEB 2015
8 2017.06.28http://www.paj.gr.jp/statis/statis/data/08/paj-8%E7%B2%BE%E8%A3%BD%E8%83%BD%E5%8A%9B%E4%B8%80%E8%A6%A7201508.pdf
Takane Hori 2006 Mechanisms of separation of rupture area and variation in time interval and size of great earthquakes along the Nankai Trough, southwest Japan Journal of the Earth Simulator Vol.5 pp.8-19 http://www.jamstec.go.jp/esc/publication/journal /jes_vol.5/pdf/JES5_22-Hori.pdf
(2003)14
2017.06.28http://www.bousai.go.jp/kaigirep/chuobou/senmon/tounankai_nankaijishin/14/pdf/tonankai_gijiroku14.pdf
2003a2017.
06.28 2003b2017.06.28
http://www.bousai.go.jp/kaigirep/chuobou/9/pdf/haifu_2-2.pdf http://www.bousai.go.jp/kaigirep/chuobou/9/pdf/zuhyou_2-2.pdf
2016 1
2017.06.28http://www.bousai.go.jp/jishin/nankai/taio_wg/pdf/h281122shiryo01.pdf
2010
No.29 -3 pp.365-380 http://jsnds.org/ssk/ssk_29_3_365.pdf
2007 , , ,
No.9 pp.137-146. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/els/110007151938.pdf?id =ART0009099919&type=pdf&lang=jp&host=cinii&order_no=&ppv_type=&lang_sw=&no=1481354552&cp=
2008 ,
, No.10 pp.417-426. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/els/110007152012.pdf?id=ART0009099989&type=pdf&lang=jp&host=cinii&order_no=&ppv_type=&lang_sw=&no=1481354957&cp=
2010 ,
, No.12 pp.53-60. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/els/110009484143.pdf?id=ART0009953273&type=pdf&lang=jp&host=cinii&order_no=&ppv_type=&lang_sw=&no=1481354762&cp=
No.16-1 201870
WEB6
2017.06.28 http://www.hd.jxtg-group.co.jp/newsrelease_tg/pdf/2011-03-14_1ja.pdf http://www.hd.jxtg-group.co.jp/newsrelease_tg/pdf/2011-03-16_1ja.pdf http://www.hd.jxtg-group.co.jp/newsrelease_tg/pdf/2011-03-18_ 1ja.pdf
2016 5
2017.06.28 http://www.bousai.go.jp/jishin/nankai/tyosabukai
_wg/pdf/h281013shiryo05.pdf 2016
,No.14 pp.154-163. 2013 1605
29 p.263http://sakuya.ed.shizuoka.ac.jp/rzisin/kaishi_29/HE29_263_263_Matsuura.pdf
2016
D3 Vol.72No.5 pp. _111- _121
( 2017.6.30) ( 2017.11.9)
No.16-1 2018 71
On Damage Oil Refining Capacity and Lack of Fuel Production at the Time Difference between Wide Tokai
and Nankai Earthquakes
Shogo HASHITOMI Yoshiaki KAWATA
Graduate School of Societal Safety Sciences, Kansai University
569-1098 7-1 Hakubai-cho Takatsuki-shi Osaka, Japan Chair Professor of Faculty of Societal Safety Sciences, Kansai University
569-1098 7-1 Hakubai-cho Takatsuki-shi Osaka, Japan
ABSTRACT
Along the Nankai Trough, M8 class earthquakes may occur consecutively. Among these two earthquakes, the earthquake occurring on the east side is called the Wide Tokai earthquake(WT), west side earthquake is called the Nankai earthquake(N) in this paper. This study was conducted to clarify the period during which the crude oil processing capacity is insufficient when the N occurs at an arbitrary time difference after the occurrence of the WT. After WT occurred, the reduced crude oil processing capacity was estimated during the period up to 365th day of N occurrence. In the case where the number of days when crude oil processing capacity is insufficient is the largest, N occurred on the 60th day after WT occurrence. In addition, it became clear that the case where the final day when crude oil processing capacity is insufficient becomes the latest will always be the day before the final day of the estimation period.
Keywords Nankai-Trough, Earthquake, Time lag, Crude Oil Refining Capacity, Crude Oil Refineries,
No.16-1 201872
611-0011
606-8501 36-1
52%72
2 1
2014
2017 6 730, 2017
2 2
, 2014
No.16-1 2018 73
, 2017
3 1
2013199
2011 12 2
2014 NPO
, 2016
, 2016
Google ”” “ ” “ ” OR “ ”
2015
, 2016
i)
2016 3
1, 2016a
743
, 2017 2017 1
, 2016b
730 109
JR
Google ” ” “ ” “ ” OR “ ” 167 20176 25
No.16-1 2018
ii)
201112
iii)
2016 62017
, 2016
, 2017
iv)
2015
, 2017
3 40
2016 2017
, 2017 v)
2015
, 2016 2015 NPO
, 2017
2014
2062
NPO 5 0 5
72 24 11
3 7
NPO
0 30 8
No.16-1 2018 75
46
1998 19992005 1998
1999
3 8
2005
20142014
AG
2003 20082012 2003
2002 6
20082006 7
2012 2010 6
2009
2011
2011
120
12072
2015
No.16-1 201876
2005
WS
2,6865,764 2015 6 30 2015 6
20 11 212015
6 20
5,6 110140
28
4
6 20
11 21
No.16-1 2018 77
2015
620 WS 11 21
WS
WS90 9
12 10-16
6
2
64
11 21WS
2 1
45, (48%)
39, (41%)
7, (7%) 3, (3%)
(94 ) WS
WS
2
1
10
6
4
8
5
0 5 10 15
33
. WS
No.16-1 201878
WS96 103 WS
WS53
WS
89%
22
19
37
21
27
40
2
4
1
2
2
3
5
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
3
2
12
6
3
( 94 91 )
13 4 2 4
15
1 4
17
18
1
2
1
2 1 2
3
1
0
10
20
30
40
50
72 48 24 0 0 -24 -48 -72
3
6
12
2
3
91hr
()
WS
WS
2
7
1
7
3
19
12
24
11
17
29
17
3
2
5
1
15
2
2
2
11
1
1
3
1
2
1
1
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
3
2
12
6
3
52 ,52 ,50 ,48
1 4 2
12 12
12
5
1
2 1
0
10
20
30
72 48 24 0 0 -24 -48 -72
3
6
12
2
3
52hr
()
WS WS
WS WS
WSWS
WS WS
WSMann-Whitney U
WS
No.16-1 2018
56%
79% 76%
WS
WS53 WS 33
WS
10 264% 21 WS
WS
2 48 22%24 43%
2 48 43% 2422%
372 2 48 24
0
40%52%
WS
WS
WS
2 48 46% 2433% 2
48 23% 24 56%
Wilcoxon
24 90%
5 WS
WS
WSWS
-3.84 WS+0.64 WS
+14.2+5.97 WS
Mann-Whitney Up<.05
No.16-1 201880
52%24 2 48
12.9
72
27.345
, 2014
WSWS
2017 5 17
27.3 15.1
15.1
27.3
7272
27.3 2 4823.0%
2016 2014
15% 5 12% 4
340 20
, 2017
WS WSWS
No.16-1 2018 81
WS
52%2
WS
WS 62%
2015
2014
, 2 .
2017 , 2017.06.25 ,
http://www.mlit.go.jp/river/bousai/timeline/create.html 2014
29 28 , 4 .
2013 , .
2017 , , 29 3 10 .
CeMI 2016 , , .
2016 , in 2017.06.25 ,
http://www.npo-cemi.com/works/image/timeline/timeline_conf_kiho.pdf
2015 , . 2016 ,
, 28 5 20 . 2016a ,
, 4 .
2017 , ,
2 . 2016b ,
!!, 27 08 27
. 2016 ,
, 28 .
2016 ,
, F6 , Vol.72, No.2, pp.I_41-I_46.
2017 , , 29 5 .
2017 , ,
No.16-1 201882
29 3 . 2015 ,
27 8 . 2016 , 28
. 2017 ,
2017.06.25 , https://www.city.iida.lg.jp/uploaded/attachment/30965.pdf
2015 , DIG
, , vol.108, pp.517.
2014 , , , Vpl.33,
No.3, pp.271-292. 1998 ,
, No.4, pp.291-296. 1999 ,
Vol.18No.1 pp.103-116.
2005 ,
, No.800, IV-69, pp.1-14. 2014 ,
, , No.12 pp.64-756. 2003 ,
, No.9, pp.293-298.
2008 ,
, No.6 pp.51-60.
2012 , 2010 9 8B1
, Vol.68, No.56, pp.I_1093-I_1098. 2008 ,
, , 27 1 , pp.25-43. 2011 ,
. 2015 , 2004 2014
, , Vol.51, pp.1-6. 2005 ,
, , No.786/ -67, pp.77-88.
2015 , , , Vol.34, No.3,
pp.243-258. 2014 ,
, 3., , Vol.33,
No.3, pp.187-194. 2016 ,
2, 2 .
2014 , , 25 12 .
No.16-1 2018 83
Awareness Change of Inhabitants’ Disaster Action through Disaster Reduction Timeline in Daily Life
Kensuke TAKENOUCHI Katsuya YAMORI1 Yasuhito KAWATA2
1Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University
611-0011 Gokasho Ujishi Kyoto, Japan 2Graduate School of Informatics , Kyoto University
606-8501 36-1 Yoshidahonmachi Sakyoku Kyoto, Japan
ABSTRACT
Timeline disaster prevention action plan (Timeline) regulates time-series actions of stakeholders. Heretofore, residents didn’t join to this plan and the participation method hasn’t been considered enough. However, the more this plan is spreading to society, the more residents are beginning to join in some areas.
In this study, we showed the situation of the Timeline on residents’ participation and check residents’ awareness about time-series disaster prevention action through the trials of “Disaster Reduction Timeline in Daily Life”.
In the first trial, most of the participants showed the increase of previous disaster awareness, but about 52% didn’t show the change of the timing. The second trial showed the Disaster Reduction Timeline in Daily Life can advance the earlier previous-action and create the custom they are conscious of the Timeline in daily life.
Keywords Timeline Disaster Prevention Action Plan, Time Series Information, Residents’ Participation, Disaster Reduction in Daily Life
No.16-1 2018
No.16-1 2018 85
No.16-1 201886
No.16-1 2018 87
No.16-1 201888
No.16-1 2018
No.16-1 2018
No.16-1 2018
No.16-1 2018
No.16-1 2018
2
3.11
980-0845 468-1
980-0021 4-10-3
980-0845 468-1
3.11
2 2
1 1 200500 2
3.113
4 3.11
5
2
a b
Sato & Imamura 2016
No.16-1 2018
3.11
2 2015 42015
2
Sato & Imamura 2016 3.11
1
3.11
2 3.11
IRIDeS-1
-2 2
2017 3152
Sato & Imamura, 2016
20173 4,554
-1 2 3.11
2
-3 -4
3.11
3.11
3.11
152
4,554
2017 3
3.11
No.16-1 2018
50200
-3
-4
9 11
a
b1993
c
20022016
SAIGAI
12
3 3.11
1 3
3.11
3.11
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
2015
420
155
2015
620
157
2015
820
159
2015
1020
1511
2015
1220
161
2016
220
163
2016
420
165
2016
620
167
2016
820
169
2016
1020
1611
2016
1220
171
2017
220
173
2017
4
3.11 179.046
401,292
No.16-1 2018
1 2 34
12
25
12
200 3.11
69.0 31.0 10 20 5.5 3019.0 40 31.5 50 28.5 60 15.5
66.5 33.510 20 8.0 30 16.0 40 33.5 50 26.560 16.0 40
-5 2015 4 2017 4
3.11179,046 7,162
/ 239 /401,292 16,052 / 535 /
2.2
30 3.11152 4,554
3.11
2016 1
2016 2017 2
32017 3
3 11
-53.11 6 8
13
5
3.11
7
11
9
15
13
18
12
29
13
26
42
53
45
52
35
53
36
56
42
46
57
54
85
80
88
84
72
64
91
92
75
75
53
44
52
39
68
48
49
34
19
7
8
9
12
6
12
3
5
2
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
3.11 DB
DB
3.11 DB
DB
3.11 DB
DB
3.11 DB
DB
3.11 DB
DB
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
3.11
3
7
4
9
4
6
26
26
31
44
24
24
43
48
80
74
87
88
110
98
78
62
76
69
18
21
7
11
9
13
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
3.11 DB
DB
3.11 DB
DB
3.11 DB
DB
1.
2.
3.
2
8
4
5
4
4
6
3
2
4
1
1
10
20
7
7
10
5
5
4
17
9
16
3
55
76
50
40
99
67
63
77
80
79
92
24
110
85
116
124
70
104
97
93
84
94
81
119
23
11
23
24
17
20
29
23
17
14
10
53
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
1.
2.
3.
4.
3.11DB
DB
3.11
No.16-1 2018
-6
123 4
5
5 -63.11
3.11 DBDB
-6
13.11
423 5
4
3.11
50200
Sato & Imamura 2016
-2 No. 17 -7
12 3
5 15 6
4
1 2
3.11
No.3.11
DB DB1 31 24 552 16 37 533 17 14 314 7 18 255 13 8 216 11 4 157 9 2 118 4 7 119 5 7 12
10 5 3 811 5 2 712 1 6 713 4 3 714 PR 2 3 515 1 3 416 1 3 417 8 - 818 8 - 819 7 - 720 5 - 521 4 - 422 3 - 323 2 - 224 2 - 225 1 - 126 - 14 1427 - 7 728 - 2 229 - 2 230 28 31 59
No.16-1 2018
3.11
-8
-5 -6 3.11
3.111
2 34 5
67 8
12 3
4
5 -8 3.11
1 34
6 78
5 72 4
1
23 5
-7 48
1
-2
No1 16 No. 17 25
3.11No 26 29
No 30
-2
-2 5
1 No 1
3.11 31 2455
3.11
3.11
No 23.11 16
37 53
3.11
No 3 3.11
17 14 31
No 4
3.11 718 25
No 5
3.11 13
No.16-1 2018100
8 21
No 6 3.11
5 7 12
No 7
3.11 11 4 15
1 No 8 3.11
9 2 11 No 3
HP
No 9 3.114 7 11
No
No 10 3.11
5 3 8
2017 5-9
No 11
3.11 52 7
No 12 3.11
1 6 7
2 3.11
No 17
3.11 8 3.11
No 18 3.11
8 3.11
No 19 3.11
7
No 20
3.11 53.11
3.11
No.16-1 2018 101
3
No 26
14
No 27
7
156
37.8 9122.8 92 23.0
-2 -6 -8
3.11 No 17
No 12
-2 No.1
No. 17No. 2
No. 20
No. 9No. 16
3.11
2
2
1 1 3.11
200500
2 3.11
3
4
5 3.11
S
No.16-1 2018102
a
2017.6.21http://www.bousai.go.jp/kyoiku/kyokun/hanshin_awaji/data/index.html
b 2017.6.21http://www.bousai.go.jp/kyoiku/keigen/ichinitimae/
Shosuke Sato, Fumihiko Imamura 2016 , An Attempt of Extraction and Sharing Lessons Learned from Experiences of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster Based on Viewpoints of Experts on Disaster Science: 3.11 Lessons Learned Web Database System, Journal of Disaster Research, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 881-888
2015 , 23.11
. 2017.6.21https://www.tohoku.ac.jp/japanese/2015/04/press20150414-01.html
2015 3.11 IRIDeS
2017.6.21 http://311manabi.irides.tohoku.ac.jp/ 2015
2017.6.21 http://edbunken.irides.tohoku.ac.jp/
c2017.6.21
http://www.bousai.go.jp/kyoiku/kyokun/hokkaidonaiseioki/index.htm
2017.6.21http://www.fdma.go.jp/html/life/saigai_densyo/
2002No.
4 pp. 261-266 2016 1600
18 pp. 32-33 SAIGAI 2017.6.21
http://maple.dpri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/saigai/ 2016 2016 1
9
( 2017.6.30) ( 2017.11.9)
No.16-1 2018 103
Development and its Users Evaluation of Two Web Database Systems to Extract and Share
Lessons Learned from Earthquake Disasters: 3.11 Lessons Learned Web Database System” and
Earthquake Disaster Literature Web Database System”
Shosuke SATO Toru OKAMOTO Fumihiko IMAMURA
International Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University
980-0845 468-1 Aoba Aramaki Aoba-ku Sendai, Japan Reconstruction Aid Term, Sendai Branch, Nippon Sogo Systems Inc.
980-0021 4-10-3 Chuo Aoba-ku Sendai, Japan
ABSTRACT
It is important to share lessons learned from disasters for preparedness and effective response in a disaster. This paper aims to evaluate two web database systems to share lessons learned from experiences of the disasters with traffic analysis and monitor survey. The former database system “3.11 Lessons Learned Web Database System” archives and publishes lessons submitted by experts of disaster science. The latter database system “Earthquake Disaster Literature Web Database System” registers lessons based on conclusion described in papers and report related the 2011 event and past earthquake disasters. The results are as follows. 1) Each database system received 200-500 hits a day. 2) Almost monitors of “3.11 Lessons Learned Web Database System” answered good mark on questionnaire items of interest and understandability. 3) Users can easily search with recommended category keywords and disaster event names controlled vocabulary. 4) Between two database systems are established a mutually complementary in point of quantitatively and qualitatively. 5) However, few monitors answered negative evaluation at text representation and web page layout.
Keywords Lesson Learned from Disaster, Science Communication, Disaster Education, the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster, Nankai Trough Earthquake
No.16-1 2018
569-1098 7 1
569-1098 7 1
No.16-1 2018 105
No.16-1 2018106
No.16-1 2018 107
No.16-1 2018108
No.16-1 2018
51.9
41.5
4.3
2.4
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
(n=219)
(n=175)
(n=18)
(n=10)
No.16-1 2018110
58.3
28.3
18.2
3.8
6.6
0% 20% 40% 60%
(n=231)
(n=112)
(n=72)
(n=15)
(n=26)
No.16-1 2018 111
No.16-1 2018112
52.043.2
34.8
27.5
19.2
2.8
2.3
1.8
15.7
0% 20% 40% 60%
(n=206)
(n=171)
( )(n=138)
(n=109)
(n=76)
(n=11)
()(n=9)
(n=7)
(n=62)
44.2
31.6
19.9
16.2
7.8
6.8
6.3
5.3
5.1
3.3
2.0
2.0
0.8
15.7
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
(n=175)
(n=125)
(n=79)
(n=64)
(n=31)
(n=27)
(n=25)
(n=21)
(n=20)
(n=13)
(n=8)
(n=8)
(n=3)
(n=62)
41.9
30.1
21.7
6.3
0% 20% 40% 60%
(n=166)
(n=119)
(n=86)
(n=25)
No.16-1 2018 113
57.350.7
21.317.316.0
5.35.34.0
1.3
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
(n=43)(n=38)(n=16)(n=13)(n=12)
(n=4)(n=4)(n=3)(n=1)
72.320.8
6.9
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
(n=261)(n=75)(n=25)
49.6
27.4
13.9
7.2
8.6
0% 20% 40% 60%
(n=179)
( )(n=99)
(n=50)
(n=26)
(n=31)
No.16-1 2018
107(4),91-99
,
No.16-1 2018 115
A Study on Local Governments’ System Establishment Process to Utilize the List of Individuals Needing Help in Evacuation
Takayuki RIKUKAWA Yoshiaki KAWATA
Graduate School of Societal Safety Sciences, Kansai University
5691098 7-1 Hakubaicho Takatsuki city Osaka, Japan Research Center for Societal Safety Sciences, Kansai University
5691098 7-1 Hakubaicho Takatsuki city Osaka, Japan
ABSTRACT It is becoming increasingly important for local governments to establish a system for the support of individuals
needing help in evacuation. The purpose of this paper is to examine the current developments and issues of the system after the enforcement of the new Disaster Countermeasures Basic Act, based on the survey results. The data was obtained from approximately 400 local government offices nationwide in the form of a questionnaire. The Act was revised in 2013 and new guidelines were given by the Cabinet Office. Survey contents were prepared based on this guideline and analyzed for each process.
Based on the results, issues as well as some effective measures have been observed in the process of grasping people in absolute need of help. Also problems in the following areas have been identified; information control, measures to improve mutual help, measures to secure the safety of supporters in evacuation, and how to deal with those who haven’t given a consent. The new Act and guidelines do not elaborate on these issues and therefore each office is required to draft plans for these issues to effectively advance the system. Local governments are responsible not only for making the list but also for making the framework for community-based self and mutual support in normal times, which is considered to be the fundamental goal of this whole project.
Keywords local governments, the list of ndividuals needing help in evacuation, enforcement of the new Disaster Countermeasures Basic Act, community-based self and mutual support
No.16-1 2018116