Upload
solomon-henson
View
65
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Federal Aviation Administration. NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace Redesign Project and Implementation Update. Presentation to: Congressional Staffers By: Steve Kelley, Airspace Redesign Manager Date: March 14, 2008. Record of Decision Issued – September 5, 2007. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace Redesign
Project and Implementation Update
Presentation to: Congressional Staffers
By: Steve Kelley, Airspace Redesign Manager
Date: March 14, 2008
Federal AviationAdministration
January 7, 2008 Federal AviationAdministration 2
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace RedesignMarch 14, 2008
Record of Decision Issued – September 5, 2007
• The Selected Project for this study is the Integrated Airspace Alternative with the Integrated Control Complex (ICC) with mitigation.
• The study took over 9 years culminating in a Record of Decision (ROD)
• Procedural adaptations for noise abatement (mitigation measures) was also implemented
• Draft Environmental Impact Statement DEIS was published in December 2005
• Comments were taken on the DEIS and some of those comments were used in developing the noise mitigation measures
• In April of 2007 the FAA identified its Preferred Alternative and provided analysis of the mitigation measures
• Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was published on August 3, 2007
January 7, 2008 Federal AviationAdministration 3
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace RedesignMarch 14, 2008
Implementation Overview
• Planning has already started• Initial changes were implemented on December 19, 2007• Expected timeframe for completion five years• Implementation approach was broken into four stages in the ROD:
Changes in N90,
ZNY,PHL
Changesoutside
Proceduralchanges
Integration ofZNY, N90
Boundary changes
Transfer of Sectors
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
Stage 4
January 7, 2008 Federal AviationAdministration 4
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace RedesignMarch 14, 2008
Newark Departure Headings Runway 22L/R
Moderate Demand
Heavy Demand
215239
263
190
Existing
Dispersal
January 7, 2008 Federal AviationAdministration 5
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace RedesignMarch 14, 2008
N
Red 0-2500’
Green 2500-5000
Blue 5000-7000’
Newark Liberty International Airport
December 19, 2007 AMDispersal Headings
215 and 239
January 7, 2008 Federal AviationAdministration 6
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace RedesignMarch 14, 2008
Philadelphia Departure Headings Runway 27L/R
Dispersal Headings
268
245
230255
Existing
Dispersal
January 7, 2008 Federal AviationAdministration 7
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace RedesignMarch 14, 2008
Philadelphia International AirportRunway 27 Departures
Dispersal Headings December 19, 2007
245 and 268
January 7, 2008 Federal AviationAdministration 8
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace RedesignMarch 14, 2008
Philadelphia Runway 9L/R Departures
Dispersal Headings
081096
112
127
085Existing
Dispersal
January 7, 2008 Federal AviationAdministration 9
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace RedesignMarch 14, 2008
Blue 5000-10000Green 3000-5000Red 0-3000
Philadelphia International AirportRunway 9 DeparturesDispersal Headings December 20, 2007
081 and 096
January 7, 2008 Federal AviationAdministration 10
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace RedesignMarch 14, 2008
Implementation - A Work in Progress
• Beyond the implementation of dispersal headings at Philadelphia and Newark, which were implemented on December 19, 2007, we do not anticipate any project elements to be implemented that will create additional noise impacts prior to the Fall of 2008.
• The use of dispersal headings will be refined and adjusted to meet traffic demands while maintaining the integrity of the environmental process.
• We are currently in a detailed planning process of further implementation steps.
January 7, 2008 Federal AviationAdministration 11
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace RedesignMarch 14, 2008
Stage 2
• Expanding the west gate for NY departures• Opening the west gate for JFK departures• Allowing stacked departures at the departure fixes
• Expanding the use of terminal separation rules• Providing flexible use of the arrival airways
• PHL• Establishing a new arrival route into PHL• Third westbound departure fix for PHL
January 7, 2008 Federal AviationAdministration 12
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace RedesignMarch 14, 2008
Increased Number of Jet Routes Reduces Delay
Selected Project:• Increased number of jet
routes• Increased number of
access points • Less competition for
departures means decreased delay
Current System:• Few jet routes for
departures • Access is limited • Competition for resources
means increased delay
January 7, 2008 Federal AviationAdministration 13
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace RedesignMarch 14, 2008
JFK Access to Westgate Decreases Complexity
Selected Project:Current System:• JFK traffic crosses through
departures from LGA, EWR, TEB, etc.
• Long ground delays necessary to maintain safe and orderly flow of traffic
• Stacked flows are more efficient and less complex
JFK flights JFK flights
January 7, 2008 Federal AviationAdministration 14
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace RedesignMarch 14, 2008
Westgate Stage 2 Airspace Redesign Initiatives
Increase ELIOT’s potential throughput capacity
Eliminate RBV crossing to J60/J64
Reduce MIT at WestgateReduce vectoring in ZNY39
Support potential throughput increase by - Dual J80s- ZNY sector vertical splits- Reroute from Northgate
Reduce enroute MIT
Reduce NY metro departure delay
2nd ELIOT for J60/J64 departures
Create new fix west of ELIOT
Route offset forIAD arrivals
Apply Terminal separation rules
up to FL230
Separate route for IAD arrivals
JFK access to ELIOT
Separate route for CDA/BWI arrivals
Increase PARKE’s potential throughput capacity
Increase BIGGY’s potential throughput capacity
Allow easy offload from WHITE
Realign Westgatefixes
Create new fix east of BIGGY
and/or
January 7, 2008 Federal AviationAdministration 15
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace RedesignMarch 14, 2008
Stage 3 and Stage 4
Stage 3• Adding a third airway to the north gate
Stage 4• Creating a new jet airway for departures to the west• Enabling dependent instrument arrivals to the parallel runways at
EWR and the required shift of the arrival streams into the NY/NJ area
• Creating a south gate for departures out of the NY/NJ area
January 7, 2008 Federal AviationAdministration 16
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace RedesignMarch 14, 2008
Increased Number of Jet Routes Reduces Delay
Selected Project:• Increased number of jet
routes• Increased number of
access points • Less competition for
departures means decreased delay
Current System:• Few jet routes for
departures • Access is limited • Competition for resources
means increased delay
Stage 2
January 7, 2008 Federal AviationAdministration 17
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace RedesignMarch 14, 2008
Example of Delay Savings with New Usage of Runways
Selected Project:• Dual arrivals to EWR
04/22• Increased use of
EWR 11• Efficient use =
reduced delay
Current System:• Conflicting flows
restrict use of runways• Inefficient use of
runways = increased delay
Dependent IFR approaches
Dual Arrivals
EWR
January 7, 2008 Federal AviationAdministration 18
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace RedesignMarch 14, 2008
Noise changes: Raw Data Map – Selected Project
Raw Change in Db from Future No Action with Mitigation
Number of Census Points
planIhotspots by I2011impact
20 to 25 (81)15 to 20 (643)10 to 15 (1506)5 to 10 (14194)0.1 to 5 (160136)
-0.1 to 0.1 (32858)-5 to -0.1 (103859)
-10 to -5 (7542)-15 to -10 (1922)-30 to -15 (966)
mitigatedImpact by MitigatedI2011impact
200 to 250 (26)150 to 200 (622)100 to 150 (576)50 to 100 (9044)1 to 50 (153067)
-1 to 1 (41060)-50 to -1 (107108)
-100 to -50 (9230)-150 to -100 (1985)-300 to -150 (991)
January 7, 2008 Federal AviationAdministration 19
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace RedesignMarch 14, 2008
Next Steps
• Continue to address and resolve legal and political challenges • Develop full implementation team• Continue full RNAV implementation• Implement terminal separation standards in former EnRoute
airspace sectors• Continue safety assessment of all changes• Develop Airspace design activities with adjacent facilities that enhance the benefits of integration