20
Lesson 17- Leadership and Change NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014

NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014. Go Navy, Beat Army!!! Go Navy, Beat Army!!!

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014.  Go Navy, Beat Army!!! Go Navy, Beat Army!!!

Lesson 17- Leadership and

ChangeNVSC 210

LT Peña6 Nov 2014

Page 3: NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014.  Go Navy, Beat Army!!! Go Navy, Beat Army!!!

If organizations do not change and adapt to the times they are in, they will most surely fail.

Leading change is perhaps the most difficult challenge facing any leader◦ Differentiates leaders and managers◦ Differentiates mediocre leaders from exceptional leaders

Best leaders…◦ Recognize the situational and follower factors inhibiting or

facilitating change◦ Paint a compelling vision of the future◦ Formulate and execute a plan that moves their vision from a

dream to reality

Introduction

Page 4: NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014.  Go Navy, Beat Army!!! Go Navy, Beat Army!!!

C= D x M x P > R

D = Dissatisfaction M = Model P = Process R = Resistance C = Amount of change

The model maintains that organizational change is a very systematic process and large-scale changes can take months if not years to implement

Rational Approach to Organizational Change

Page 5: NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014.  Go Navy, Beat Army!!! Go Navy, Beat Army!!!

Followers who are more or less content are not very apt to change

Key for leaders is to increase dissatisfaction (D) to the point where followers are inclined to take action ◦ To raise dissatisfaction, a leader can talk about

potential threats to the status quo or capitalize on some current crisis

◦ Leader must ensure that all his or her actions in increasing dissatisfaction are geared towards their vision of change

Dissatisfaction

Page 6: NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014.  Go Navy, Beat Army!!! Go Navy, Beat Army!!!

Four key components◦ Environmental scanning◦ Vision◦ Setting of identification of new goals to support the vision◦ Needed system changes

Systems thinking approach- asks leaders to think about the organization as a set of interlocking systems and explains how changes to one part can have unintended consequences

Siloed thinking- leaders act to optimize their part of the organization at the expense of suboptimizing the organization’s overall effectiveness

Model

Page 7: NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014.  Go Navy, Beat Army!!! Go Navy, Beat Army!!!

Part of the model where change becomes tangible and actionable

Consists of executing a change plan

The plan is only a road map for change. Change will only occur when the action steps outlined in the plan are actually carried out

A good way to have followers accept and buy into the change plan is to have them help create it

Process

Page 8: NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014.  Go Navy, Beat Army!!! Go Navy, Beat Army!!!

Resistance can occur because changes take a while to manifest themselves in rewards.

Expectation-performance gap- Difference between initial expectations and reality when there is a temporary drop in performance or productivity while learning new systems or skills

Followers might also be afraid of loss brought by the change

Resistance

Page 9: NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014.  Go Navy, Beat Army!!! Go Navy, Beat Army!!!

Expectation-Performance Gap

Page 10: NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014.  Go Navy, Beat Army!!! Go Navy, Beat Army!!!

SARA Model

Page 11: NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014.  Go Navy, Beat Army!!! Go Navy, Beat Army!!!

Many of history’s biggest changes have come from charismatic leaders

Charismatic leaders are able to create sweeping changes and can be the catalyst for major social changes

However, they can also be used for selfish, personal gains and can have an equally devastating effect on society

Emotional Approach to Organization Change: Charismatic and Transformational Leadership

Page 12: NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014.  Go Navy, Beat Army!!! Go Navy, Beat Army!!!

Max Weber maintained that societies could be categorized into one of three types of authority systems:◦ Traditional authority system◦ Legal-rational authority system◦ Charismatic authority system

James MacGregor Burns believed that leadership could take one of two forms:◦ Transactional leadership

Leaders and followers have an exchange relationship in order to get needs met.

◦ Transformational leadership Appeals to followers’ values and their sense of higher purpose Use reframing to point out how the problems facing followers

can be resolved if they fulfill the leader’s vision of the future.

Charismatic Leadership: A Historical Review

Page 13: NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014.  Go Navy, Beat Army!!! Go Navy, Beat Army!!!

Leader characteristics◦ Vision◦ Rhetorical skills◦ Image and trust building◦ Personalized leadership

Follower characteristics◦ Identification with the leader and the vision◦ Heightened emotional levels◦ Willing subordination to the leader◦ Feelings of empowerment

Situational characteristics◦ Crises◦ Task interdependence and social networks◦ Other situational characteristics

Example

Common Characteristics of Charismatic and Transformational Leadership

Page 14: NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014.  Go Navy, Beat Army!!! Go Navy, Beat Army!!!

Uses perceptions or reactions of subordinates to determine whether a leader was transformational

Transformational leaders- more successful at driving organizational change because of followers’ heightened emotional levels and willingness to work toward accomplishment of leader’s vision

Transactional leaders-motivate followers by setting goals and promising rewards for desired performance◦ Perpetuates status quo- Rewards do not typically result in

long-term changes associated with transformational leadership

Bass’ Theory of Transformational and Transactional Leadership

Page 15: NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014.  Go Navy, Beat Army!!! Go Navy, Beat Army!!!

Leadership skills are needed when changes need to be made to existing systems and processes

Two major approaches to organizational change◦ Rational◦ Emotional

Charismatic leaders are more likely to emerge during times of uncertainty or crisis

Summary

Page 16: NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014.  Go Navy, Beat Army!!! Go Navy, Beat Army!!!

Questions?

Page 17: NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014.  Go Navy, Beat Army!!! Go Navy, Beat Army!!!

STRUCTURE, STRUCTURE, STRUCTURE!!

◦ Make an outline!! Intro Paragraph Supporting Paragraphs Concluding Paragraph

Each paragraph should have it’s own intro and conclusion, with your points neatly organized in the middle. Don’t jump around!

Writing Review

Page 18: NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014.  Go Navy, Beat Army!!! Go Navy, Beat Army!!!

Do NOT:◦ Use numeral words to start sentences. First,

second, third, etc. Be more creative than that.

◦ Start neighboring sentences with the same word.

◦ Say “In conclusion”

◦ *Try a thesaurus if you get stuck

Style

Page 19: NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014.  Go Navy, Beat Army!!! Go Navy, Beat Army!!!

Their, they’re, there

Run-on sentences

Don’t be afraid of commas and semicolons

Grammar

Page 20: NVSC 210 LT Peña 6 Nov 2014.  Go Navy, Beat Army!!! Go Navy, Beat Army!!!

PEER EDIT!

University Writing Center

Common Essay Mistakes

A Final Note