Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Nurturing Centers of Excellence
Experiential LearningDr. T. Ramasami
Secretary, Department of Science and Technology Government of India
Different Models of Seeking Excellence or surpassing
• One model is to surpass others at a particular time– India’s best example
is Sir C V Raman
• Another model is to surpass self with time– Global best
example is Mahathma Gandhi
Nurturing Centers of Excellence: As a Process would need• Identification and selection of centers of excellence• Gathering people for whom excellence is a pursuit
and shared goal• Creation of an ambiance where spirit of excellence
not only prevails but also self-propagates and unleashing of creative potentials
• Removal constraints which inhibit creativity• Ensuring of just right levels of resource flow• Define the value measures and establish a
monitoring system
Nurturing Centers of Excellence in Research: Challenges and caution• Research is a non-linear human activity with
many imponderables• While goals of Research could be defined a
priori, outcome of research is hard to predict• While value measures exist for evaluating
science leading to intellectual products, such measures for societal impact of science are not easy to derive
• While promoting excellence, one tends to maximize what can be measured and immeasurable dimensions of research may remain outside the purview of excellence
India’s Science, Technology and Innovation story
Some Unfolding lessons
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Content for Indian STI sector and its changing context
• Indian science remained mal-nourished for long. Investments into R&D remained low
• Robust economic growth ~8.5+0.5% is providing some surplus for investment
• Developmental choices to people are on the increase– ~400 million enjoy good purchasing power
• Inclusiveness of growth in a rapidly growing economy is a challenge– Faster and Inclusive growth remains the stated policy paradigm. It is a
challenge
• India mainstreams STI sector into the developmental strategy– STI sector needs to respond to the call of people
Research and Development: In Nation Building
Scholarship driven
Competition driven
Innovation
ScienceTechnology
Market driven
Creation of jobs Creation of knowledge
Creation of value
Advanced knowledge
Leadership in usable knowledge
Gainful and useful knowledge
National prosperity
Knowledge Seekers
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Anatomy of Indian Science, Technology and Innovation system
R&D in NGO groups
R&D by MNCs
Industrial R&D systems
Mission mode Non strategic R&D
bodies
Academic/Sector
Focused on education
GovernmentFunding
& developmental agencies
Mission modeStrategic Agencies
Indian STI system
Socio economic Ministries as users of S&T outputs
Some what thinly spread but rooted in all dimensions of STI system
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Varying Excellence modes of Eight-part Indian STI System
• Mission mode Agencies: Focused on self reliance, under transition in the era of techno-globalism for seeking excellence
• Government Agencies: Focused on the balancing in the art of funding and excellence in scholarship focused science, market driven technology and competition linked innovation system
• Academic sector: Challenged by need to expand many fold without dilutions of excellence and loss of focus on research
• Socio economic ministries seeking solutions from science: Challenged by mis-matched rates of scientific development and societal absorption of global solutions for absorbing excellence in society
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Varying Excellence modes of Eight-part Indian STI System
• Mission mode R&D in non strategic sector:Transition from command economy models to dynamic global competition in a weak technology demand status for rooting excellence in industry
• Industrial R&D systems: Lower levels of private sector investment into R&D and challenges of enhancing value addition to raw materials through innovation driven manufacturing
• R&D by MNCs: Taking advantage of low expertise costs for IP generation for global use and competitive excellence
• R&D by NGOs: Sustaining high manpower costs and R&D infrastructure in a largely public funded R&D landscape for collaborative excellence
Actions for Nurturing Excellence and some value measures
Science Advisory Council to PM Made several recommendations
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Doubling Public Investments into R&D
total investment
01000020000300004000050000600007000080000
8thplan
9thplan
10thplan
11thplan
total investment
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
Reqd
Realized
Annual Growth of about 20-25% has been maintained over 11th plan period
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Some Tools of Change designed and implemented since 2006
• Talent Supply Chain management– Innovation in Science Pursuit for Inspired Research
(INSPIRE); JC Bose (top-up provisions), Ramanujan, Ramalingaswamy, Ramanna, Wellcome-DBT Fellowships, revitalizing women component and young scientist’s programmes, CSIR initiatives etc. PPP programmes are planned.
• Rejuvenation of University Research– Promotion of University Research and Scientific Excellence
(PURSE), Consolidation of University Research, Innovation and Excellence (CURIE) for women-only universities, Special packages for some states, Revising of parameters for Fund for Infrastructure Strengthening (FIST)
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Indian Growth Trends: Publications and Patents
Growth Trends of SCI publications 1998-2007: Global Research Report Oct, 2009
Patents Filed (Number)
05000
10000150002000025000300003500040000
2000-012001 -022002 -032003 -042004 -052005 -062006 -072007 -08
Patents Filed(Number)
2006-09 growth rate 12% p.a.
Ranking of India in publications moves from 15th in 2003 to 9th in 2010
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Nurturing Individual Excellence
Some recent examples and value measures
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Several initiatives are being proposed
Indian enrolment into Higher education ramping up with high demand for faculty positions
Innovation in Science Pursuit for Inspired Research Science and Innovation Scholarship to more than Million
people
Investment into Demographic Dividend
19.8% of Gross Budgetary Support to Education
20-25% CAGR in public expend into R&D since 2004
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
INSPIRE Internships50,000 per year
Top 1% in class X criterion75000 participated
10,000 ScholarshipsRs 80,000/yrfor 5 years
INSPIRE Awards200,000 per Year; Rs. 5,000 per award
Cover every high school in India0.61 million awards released
1,000 Fellowships1,000 Faculty positions
Age 10-15
Age 16-18
Age 17-22, BSc/MSc levels
7500 based on Top 1% students in class X and XII Board Exams 2500 based on
performance in national level examinations
Age 22-27, PhD levelTop ranker in any science, engineering, medical, agriculture and veterinary related faculty in Indian universities
Age 27-32National level selection based on merit and INSPIRE attachment without break
Assured Career Opportunity in Research
INSPIRE Program: At a Glance
15,000 students enrolled so far
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
JC Bose Fellowships: For promotion of individual excellence
• For high performers in research selected on the basis of recognitions, a new fellowship scheme with topping salaries and research grant is implemented
• ~180 performing scientists receive the fellowship• Performance of 67 scientists reviewed• Outputs are
– Average number of papers per scientist per year : 6.6– Average number of PhDs trained per year per person : 1– Average number of patents field per person/ year :0.33– Average citation per paper :~5.5– Average impact factor aggregate per person/ year : ~18
Output indicators compare favorably with global bench marks
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
A sample study of Stakeholder value of DST: Fast Track Scheme
-40 -20 0 20 40
Poor correspondanceDelay in releasesdelay in processingEase of managingapproval systemTalent supportFreedomStart up grantFund size limitationlack of reviewToo much paper work
83 of the 125 stake holders approached responded with a perceived value of 8.3 out of 10.
Limitations
Strength
Impl
emen
tatio
nFe
atur
e
For improving funding actions
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Rejuvenating Research in University Sector
Promotion of University Research and Scientific Excellence (PURSE)
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
UoHUoD
PunjabBHU
Jadh
avpur
UoPAU
UoMadras
JNU
AMU
UoMumbai
UoCalcutt
a
Annam
alaiUoR
Karnata
ka
Bharat
hidasa
nBha
rathi
UoBurdwan
Guruna
nak
Venka
teswara
MG uni
UoJammu
coch
in
MS Baroda
Shivaji
UoKerala
Utkal
MKUos
mania
Agour
Sagar
Mangalo
rean
dhra
UoKalyani
UoMysore
UoLuck
now
Haryan A
gri
Bangla
orePon
dy
Panjab
Agri
Agri ba
nglaore
TN Agri
Alagap
pa
Sardar
PatelNEHU
Kakatiy
a
UoAllahab
ad
h-index 1996-2006h-index 1998-2008
Performance growth of university sector in h-indices over 1996-2006 to 1998-2008
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
Pub in KSERC funds in crores
Evidence based policy building for R&D funding
14 universities had qualified for an award in 2008.
Now 44 have qualified
Share of publications increased from 15 to 31%
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
ACPP
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
JNCASR39
TIFR15IIC
T14NCL1
7IACS23CDRI35UoH
24PoU
16IIS
c1IIT
K7UoP
UNE32GUD42UoD
10SGPIM
S30SINP36NPL4
0UoM
21Nati
onal
JNU31
BARC5IIT
Kgp2
IITMUM8UoR
33IIT
GU28IIT
R13
MANGAL50
AIIMS4
BHU18
ANNAMA19
VENKATE47IITD3
JAD9
UoMUMB44
CMC, VE25
TMC48IIT
M6UoC
22CUSAT41ISI27
AMU20UoA
LL46
IARI34AU12
PGIMER11
UOMY29IG
CAR39
OSMANIA45ISRO26
IVRI37
ANDHRA43PAU49
ACPP
Average Citation per paper as value measure
ACPP profile of 50 institutions with large number of publications reveal 23 universities figure among leaders
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Citation impact gain from international collaborations
02468
101214
UoR33
TIFR15
TMC48
JNCASR
39PoU
16SGPIM
S30CM
C, VE25
IICT14AIIM
S4CDRI35BAR
C5NCL1
7IAR
I34JNU31
UoD10UoH24BHU18GUD42IISc
1NATI
ONALPGIMER1
1JAD9
VENKATE
47IACS
UoPUNE32
IITMUM
8IITK
7IVR
I37IITR
13UoC22
ANNAMA19SINP36AU12
OSMANIA45UoM21IITD
3IITG
U28ANDHRA4
3UOMY29ISRO
26ISI27
CUSAT41
IIT Kgp
2MANGAL5
0UoMUMB44
IGCAR3
9PAU49IITM
6AM
U20UoALL4
6NPL4
0
ACPP ACPPI
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Gain of citation of impact of university research on account of collaboration
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
JAD
UoD AUPoUBHU
ANNAMAAMUUoMUoCUoHUoMY
JNU
UoPUNEUoR
CUSATGUD
ANDHRAUoMUM
OSMANIAUoALL
VENKATEPAU
MANGALOR1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
ACPPI/ACIPP
ACPPIG/ACPP
More than 2 fold increase in citation impact for indo German collaboration
All universities gain from international collaboration
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Net Gainers from International collaboration
02468
101214
UoR33TIFR15TMC48
JNCASR39PoU16
SGPIMS30CMC , V
E25IIC
T14AIIM
S4CDRI35BARC5
NCL17IARI34JNU31UoD10UoH24BHU18GUD42
IISc1
NATIONAL
ACPP ACPPI
In medical area, gain is maximum
Universities gain most
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
DST nurtures some autonomous R&D institutions
Some Excellence indicators
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Outputs indicators of some institutions nurtured by DST
• Aggregated Average number of– Papers in SCI journals per scientist per year ranges : 2.2– Average impact factor per paper : 2.9– Number of PhDs per faculty per year : 0.4– Number of patents per year per faculty : 0.33
• Eminence indicators– Bhatnagar prize winners : >40– Fellows of the academies :67– Scientists with H index > 25 per 100 scientists` :16
• S&T indicators of two high performing institutions– JBCASR: Paper/scientist per year: ~ 7.5; Average citation per paper
over five year cycle; ~ 7.5, Impact factor per paper: 4.5– IACS: Paper/scientist per year: ~ 6; Average citation per paper over
five year cycle; ~ 5.7, Impact factor per paper: 2.9
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Decade of Innovations 2010-20: Stated Plan
• The Government has committed through a presidential address declared that 2010-20 period as a “Decade of Innovations”.
• Designing and developing a National Innovation Ecosystem accorded highest priority
• Policy instruments to stimulate the engagement of the private sector into R& D in public and social good areas including clean energy
• International S&T cooperation is a part of the National strategy of the plan for Decade of Innovations
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Addressing the call for Decade of Innovations: Work in Progress
World is pursuing the Innovation Agenda. Is there a unique opportunity for an Indian model for Designing an innovation landscape?
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Comparisons and Contrasts of Innovation systems
• Most developed countries invest about 2% of GDP into R&D with a share of 0.7:1.3 from public and private sector, respectively. In such economies, competition among the private sector drives the innovation for gaining leadership in the market space. Therefore the process of innovation is the focus of the design in their innovation system for “Quality Innovations” for global competitiveness
• In India, investments into R&D are at about 0.95% of GDP with shares of 0.7: 0.25% from public and private sector, respectively. Under such conditions, public and social goods priorities could drive the purpose of innovations and focus on “Affordable Innovations” for inclusive growth agenda of the country.
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Designing Science, Technology and Innovation ecosystem
• To meet the challenges of faster and more inclusive growth by balancing between Open Source and Competitive innovations
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Four part Approach to Innovations
• New Millennium Indian Technology Leadership Initiative: PPP model for global referencing
• Venture fund support system: Technology Development Board equity participation model
• Grass Root Innovation: National Innovation Foundation involving 2,50,000 grass root innovators
• National Innovation Council: For global bench marking and alliances
• Power of Ideas support
Cotton Stripper from grass root innovation
Health care products from formal innovation system
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Some recent and good examples fromIndian innovation system
Nano Car: 2500 US $ car from Tatas for providingan opportunity for middleincome families Hepatitis Vaccines: 40 cents a dose
product giving health care access to large number of people with low purchasing power
Jaipur foot: Affordable
prosthetics @ US $ 28
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Jaipur Foot: A case of disruptive affordable innovation from India
Available, Affordable, Accessible Innovation
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Seeking Solutions from Science: A New Indian Trend
• Supreme Court of India orders that Secretary Science and Technology will solve the water problem of India through R&D solutions and the Government will make available all resources needed.– This is in some sense an expression of trust in R&D-led solutions
for water problems– A Technology Mission on Winning, Augmentation and Renovation
(WAR) for water is mounted and ongoing for demonstrating convergent technology solutions for 26 different types of water challenges in different locations in the country
First StepSelection of water challenges for research
Second StepSelection of ~25 locations with a
population of 10,000
Collection and analysis of data for site selection
Third StepInviting Technology solution providers through
tender
Collection of site specific conditions for technical evaluation
Fourth StepResearch on available technical solutions
Technical evaluation and assessment of global solutions
Fifth StepSelection of solutions for each water challenge
Selection of sire specific solutions based on technical merit and transparent criteria
Sixth StepPilot trials for the best revenue model for
sustainability
Proving the technical viability at 10,000 population scale
Seventh StepScaling successful solutions for 100000
population in the contiguous area
Socio economic impact assessment study and research
Eighth Step Replication of viable solutions in a non-
contiguous area
Research on scalability, site neutrality and replication value
Submission of Final Research Report
Mission Implementation Strategy
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Favorable Contexts for STI Collaboration between among nations in Asia
Science, Technology and Innovation sector has gained entry into the main stream national developmental agendas in some what similar time space for most nations in Asia
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
History of Excellence and New Perspectives in Asian S&T
• Pursuit of Excellence has been a social practice in Asian countries for several centuries prior to industrial revolution– Gun powder from China, Number “0” from India are some examples
• Post industrial revolution and post war era, Japan remained the sole representative of Asia in global S&T space until 1990s– Japan innovated and gained large share of global trade
• Since 1990s Asian thrust into S&T sector has been significant– Asia’s share of S&T outputs indicators, is growing and is reaching values
similar to those of Europe and North Americas. In areas like materials sciences Asia leads
• By 2020, Asia may emerge as a major source of S&T by virtue of demography and engagement– For the new Perspective, collaboration may seem an unexplored area
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Affordable Innovations for Public and Social good under PPP
• Agriculture for food and nutrition security– Water and land saving agriculture; Avoiding food wastes
• Affordable human health care– Extremely low cost solutions to human health care challenges; Diseases
suffered by people with low purchasing power• Technologies for clean energy
– Renewable energy systems; Enhancing energy efficiency in use; high focus on solar energy
• Innovations for sustainable environment– Zero emission in industrial production; Atom and Energy efficient
manufacture• Innovative deployment of technologies for water
security– Technology agnostic approaches for sustainable solutions
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Advantage of collaborative excellence in STI sector
1. World faces threat of climate change and focus on adaptation and mitigation call for new technologies and life style adjustments
Global bad can not be fought by countries through competitive excellence models alone. Collaboration for global good is without choice.
2. With weather extremes and natural disasters challenging the world, new tools and forewarning systems with global collaboration seem necessary
Earth and atmosphere being common, science for global health monitoring and natural disaster mitigation call for collaborative excellence
3. Affordable human health care is a global priority“Not-Reaching the un-reached” is not an option for human health care. STI has to deliver values for affordable health care
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Strategic Alliances and Partnerships: In Innovation Agenda
• Global Technology and Innovation Alliance (GITA) is the planned step forward for building strategic alliances and partnerships where India’s strength in cost optimization while partners strength in quality of innovations could provide a win-win formula
• PAN India initiative based on Pubic-Private-People-Partnership (PPPP) model involving carefully developed strategic alliances for affordable quality innovations under S&T partnerships
27 Nov 11 ASIAHORC
Summary and some lessons
• Nurturing excellence in Asian centers demands culture specific approaches– For surpassing other and surpassing one self with time
• Excellence in Research demands varying modes depending on the nature of enterprises and programme goals– Strategic and non-strategic sectors demand different tools
• Excellence in passion driven science demands autonomy, right-sized funding and right value measures– Individual and institution models may vary
• Asian countries are in the right context of gaining global competitiveness– Collaborative excellence in some areas might be valuable
Challenge Aheadmotivating scientists to
discover solutions
Discovery priority of scientists
Solution priority of people and states
High Solution Low Discovery
Low Solution Low Discovery
High Solution High Discovery
Low Solution High Discovery
Solution priority of people
Thank you