1
EDITORIAL Nurse Practitioners: Who We Are, and Who We Are Not Martha K. Swartz, PhD, RN, CPNP, FAAN When I first entered nursing, I remember encoun- tering the classic work by Florence Nightingale, Notes on Nursing: What It Is and What It Is Not (Nightingale, 1860). At the time I believed this was something of a strange title because, way back then, I thought I knew it all and that I certainly knew what the field of nursing was. Yet I soon learned that this transformative 136-page book—written in England in 1859, a time when there was considerable poverty, neglect, and prejudice—challenged the contemporary views of nursing and of nurses as being ignorant, uneducated people. Ms. Nightingale’s book and its title are still strangely relevant today. Nurses (particularly those in advanced practice) continue to struggle with issues of identity and with the perceptions and knowledge that other colleagues and patients have of our work. How many of us have bristled upon hearing the term ‘‘mid-level’’ or at being lumped together with other equally impor- tant clinicians as ‘‘non-physician health care providers’’ or even ‘‘allied health professionals’’ by our respective practice institutions? The terms ‘‘mid-level’’ and ‘‘physician-extender’’ are essentially industrial terms originated by bureaucracies and organizations. They are not professional, descrip- tive terms. They also have the unfortunate effects of calling into question the legitimacy of nurse practi- tioners to function according to our established scope of practice, education, and license, and they only further confuse health care consumers and the public. The use of such terms should not be considered a fringe issue in any health care setting. Pharmacists, physician assistants, dieticians, research associates, and care coordinators are all key members of just about any health care organization, and we should not accept the rationale that using ‘‘mid-level provider’’ and other such nomenclature is a matter of expediency and is not meant to degrade any one’s position. Fortunately, the Society of Hospital Medicine has recently taken the giant step of beginning to phase out the inaccurate nomenclature for health care profes- sionals (Shank, 2014). Specifically, they will begin phasing out the following terms in their materials, database, and registration systems: ‘‘allied health,’’ ‘‘non-physician provider,’’ ‘‘physician-extender,’’ and ‘‘mid-level.’’ Good for them. We all know that identity and the value and expertise of all members of the health care team are important for the broad field of health care, for caregivers, and for their patients. We have taken important steps to devel- oping strong interprofessional models of education and collaborative practice. Yet as part of this ongoing con- tinuum, we need to continually be grounded by our own identity as nurse practitioners and to have that accurately described and reflected in our professional and corporate language systems. We also need to perfect our elevator and airplane passenger speeches, when we may have less than a minute to say who we are and who we are not. In a nutshell, we need to be known for what we do rather than by what we don’t do. When she wrote her classic Notes on Nursing, I think perhaps Miss Nightingale may have had a sense that, going forward, the various roles of nurses would continue to be challenged, and I believe she realized that a fundamental identity, scope of practice, and accountability are crucial to the success of nursing in all of its forms. I like to think that she is still teaching us. REFERENCES Nightingale, F. (1860). Notes on nursing: What it is and what it is not. London: Harrison. Shank, B. (May, 2014). Society of Hospital Medicine phases out inaccurate nomenclature for healthcare professionals. The Hos- pitalist. Retrieved from: http://www.the-hospitalist.org/details/ article/6121671/Society_of_Hospital_Medicine_Phases_Out_ Inaccurate_Nomenclature_for_Healthcare_P.html# J Pediatr Health Care. (2014) 28, 475. 0891-5245/$36.00 Copyright Q 2014 by the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2014.07.005 www.jpedhc.org November/December 2014 475

Nurse Practitioners: Who We Are, and Who We Are Not

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

EDITORIAL

Nurse Practitioners: WhoWeAre, and Who We Are Not

Martha K. Swartz, PhD, RN, CPNP, FAAN

When I first entered nursing, I remember encoun-tering the classic work by Florence Nightingale, Noteson Nursing: What It Is and What It Is Not(Nightingale, 1860). At the time I believed this wassomething of a strange title because, way back then, Ithought I knew it all and that I certainly knew whatthe field of nursing was. Yet I soon learned that thistransformative 136-page book—written in England in1859, a time when there was considerable poverty,neglect, and prejudice—challenged the contemporaryviews of nursing and of nurses as being ignorant,uneducated people.

Ms. Nightingale’s book and its title are still strangelyrelevant today. Nurses (particularly those in advancedpractice) continue to struggle with issues of identityand with the perceptions and knowledge that othercolleagues and patients have of our work. How manyof us have bristled upon hearing the term ‘‘mid-level’’or at being lumped together with other equally impor-tant clinicians as ‘‘non-physician health care providers’’or even ‘‘allied health professionals’’ by our respectivepractice institutions?

The terms ‘‘mid-level’’ and ‘‘physician-extender’’ areessentially industrial terms originated by bureaucraciesand organizations. They are not professional, descrip-tive terms. They also have the unfortunate effects ofcalling into question the legitimacy of nurse practi-tioners to function according to our established scopeof practice, education, and license, and they onlyfurther confuse health care consumers and the public.

The use of such terms should not be considered afringe issue in any health care setting. Pharmacists,physician assistants, dieticians, research associates,

J Pediatr Health Care. (2014) 28, 475.

0891-5245/$36.00

Copyright Q 2014 by the National Association of Pediatric

Nurse Practitioners. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights

reserved.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2014.07.005

www.jpedhc.org

and care coordinators are all keymembers of just aboutany health care organization, andwe should not acceptthe rationale that using ‘‘mid-level provider’’ and othersuch nomenclature is a matter of expediency and is notmeant to degrade any one’s position.Fortunately, the Society of Hospital Medicine has

recently taken the giant step of beginning to phaseout the inaccurate nomenclature for health care profes-sionals (Shank, 2014). Specifically, they will beginphasing out the following terms in their materials,database, and registration systems: ‘‘allied health,’’‘‘non-physician provider,’’ ‘‘physician-extender,’’ and‘‘mid-level.’’ Good for them.We all know that identity and the value and expertise

of all members of the health care team are important forthe broad field of health care, for caregivers, and fortheir patients. We have taken important steps to devel-oping strong interprofessionalmodels of education andcollaborative practice. Yet as part of this ongoing con-tinuum, we need to continually be grounded by ourown identity as nurse practitioners and to have thataccurately described and reflected in our professionaland corporate language systems. We also need toperfect our elevator and airplane passenger speeches,when we may have less than a minute to say who weare and who we are not. In a nutshell, we need to beknown forwhat we do rather than bywhatwe don’t do.When she wrote her classic Notes on Nursing, I think

perhaps Miss Nightingale may have had a sense that,going forward, the various roles of nurses wouldcontinue to be challenged, and I believe she realizedthat a fundamental identity, scope of practice, andaccountability are crucial to the success of nursing inall of its forms. I like to think that she is still teaching us.

REFERENCESNightingale, F. (1860). Notes on nursing: What it is and what it is not.

London: Harrison.Shank, B. (May, 2014). Society of Hospital Medicine phases out

inaccurate nomenclature for healthcare professionals. The Hos-

pitalist. Retrieved from: http://www.the-hospitalist.org/details/article/6121671/Society_of_Hospital_Medicine_Phases_Out_Inaccurate_Nomenclature_for_Healthcare_P.html#

November/December 2014 475