Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF REACTION VIOLENCENUMERICAL SIMULATION OF REACTION VIOLENCETO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSTO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS
David DESAILLY - Yves GUENGANT SNPE Matériaux Energétiques - France
2 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
1. STAKES / OBJECTIVES
2. METHODOLOGY DEVELOPED BY SME
3. SIGNIFICANT RESULTS - LARGE SCALE APPLICATIONS
4. CONCLUSIONS - FUTURE PLANS
CONTENTSCONTENTS
3 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
WHAT ARE THE STAKES ?WHAT ARE THE STAKES ?
BURNING DETONATION
4 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
THERMAL SOURCE ACCIDENTSTHERMAL SOURCE ACCIDENTS
Forestall aircraft carrier DOHA camp
Ä Many research programs have been investigated at SME to reducevulnerability of systems to accidental and hostile environments
Stakes - objectivesStakes - objectives
5 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
Ä Supported by the European consortium EUCLID CEPA14 RTP2
Ä Sponsored by D.G.A. of the French Ministry of Defence
Stakes - objectivesStakes - objectives
« Develop and evaluate test methods and « Develop and evaluate test methods and
computer models for predicting the responsecomputer models for predicting the response
of generic explosive-loaded munitions » of generic explosive-loaded munitions »
FINANCIAL SUPPORTFINANCIAL SUPPORT
6 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
SME METHODOLOGYSME METHODOLOGY
7 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
Ä Characterisation tests on energetic material samples :
Methodology Methodology
KEY STEPS - MAIN IDEASKEY STEPS - MAIN IDEAS
Ä Physical model establishment - Fitting of numerical parameters
SELF-HEATING LOSS OF MASS(POROSITY) REACTIVITY
Ä Implementation of this physical model within Finite Elements codes
Predict the mechanical behaviour of systems subjectedto thermal threats
8 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
Ä Simulating the response of systems subjected to a thermal conditioningrequires thermo-chemical and structural analyses
ABAQUS / LS-DYNAABAQUS / LS-DYNA
WEAK COUPLING WEAK COUPLING
HYPOTHESES - NUMERICAL TOOLSHYPOTHESES - NUMERICAL TOOLS
Ä MODEL FEATURES :
Ø Accelerated combustion regimes
Ø Thermal damage prior ignition is a key parameter to reaction violence level
Methodology Methodology
9 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
Ä Energetic materials can exhibit endothermic and exothermicdecomposition processes
COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS FOR MODELSCOOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS FOR MODELS
SELF- HEATING / THERMO- IGNITION SELF- HEATING / THERMO- IGNITION (1)(1)
Temperature history
ALUMINIUMCASE
THE SAMPLE IS PACKED
INSIDE ALUMINIUM PAPER
THERMOCOUPLE
STEEL OVEN
THERMOCOUPLES
ELECTRICAL
RESISTANCEUNITS
SNPE n°41/ GEMO SEN307-00
Methodology Methodology
10 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
3.3 °C/h
50 °C/h
360 °C/h
Tube diamètre 40 mm
H.200 mmEpaisseur: 4 mm
2bouchons avec colliers chauffants
de 215 watt
5 colliers chauffantsde 180 watt
un tube ONU résistance 750 barset 2 bouchons résistance 450 bars
Ignited region prediction
Ä Reactional scheme : three steps Arrhénius law
DCBA REACTIONREACTIONREACTION → → → 321
Q1 > 0 Q2 < 0 Q3 > 0
SELF- HEATING SIMULATION via ABAQUSSELF- HEATING SIMULATION via ABAQUS
Methodology Methodology
11 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
UNDER CONFINEMENT PYROLYSIS TEST UNDER CONFINEMENT PYROLYSIS TEST (2)(2)
Pressure increase
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000
0
10
20
30
40
50
Pyrolyse Butalite 82/4 à 7% CrCu( C 1577-2 )
minutes
pres
sion
en
bar
196 °C
216 °C206 °C
203 °C
200 °C (*)
Ä Quantify loss of mass and increase of pressure
Ä Fit the kinetic parameters
Φ44.5
SNPE pyrolysis set-up
12 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
Ä Trials are performed in a HPCV Bomb under temperature control
)()()( γγγ nr PaV =
porosity ⇔ reactivity
HIGH PRESSURE CLOSED VESSEL BOMB HIGH PRESSURE CLOSED VESSEL BOMB (3)(3)
Ä Effect of thermal damage γ on an explosive composition reactivity :
Methodology Methodology
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 20 40 60 80 100
P (MPa)
V(P) (mm/s)
PBXN 109 - Pristine
PBXN 109 8 H - 134°C
PBXN 109 16 H - 140°C
PBXN 109 8 H - 160°C
PBXN 109 8 H - 150°C
PBXN 109 4 H - 148°C
13 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
COUPLED STRUCTURAL/BURNING MODEL V.R.E.M.E. COUPLED STRUCTURAL/BURNING MODEL V.R.E.M.E.
Ä Physical representation :
Ø Burning : surface regression model
Ø Two-phases flow model with compressible solid and gas phases
ve
eVR
BeVR
Ap VRvR ωωω+
−+
−= −− 21
21
11
Ø Laws of mixture : pressure equilibrium - additivity of volumes and internal energies
21
21
)1(
)1(
FeeFexe
FvvFvxv
ii
ii
+−=∑=+−=∑=
Methodology Methodology
- FOG method : )(γα rVdtdF
=
- « Level - Set » method (front « capturing » approach) :→→→
∇=∇+∂∂
FVFutF
r )(. γ
14 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
SURFACE REGRESSION (HAMILTON - JACOBI)SURFACE REGRESSION (HAMILTON - JACOBI)
Methodology Methodology
15 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
SIGNIFICANT RESULTSSIGNIFICANT RESULTS
(Application to large scale tests)(Application to large scale tests)
16 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
Ø Energetic material : B2238 explosive (RDX, PBHT binder)
Ø Thermal conditioning : fast cook-off conditions (heating profile 360 °C/h)
VIOLENCE PREDICTION TO FAST HEATING RATESVIOLENCE PREDICTION TO FAST HEATING RATES
Significant resultsSignificant results
Ä Description - boundary conditions
Heat source
17 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
ILLUSTRATIONILLUSTRATION
Significant resultsSignificant results
18 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
FRACTURE IN THE MIDDLE PLANE
Significant resultsSignificant results
19 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
Ø Full-scale warhead - Strong confinement
Ø Energetic material : PBXN109/SNPE explosive (I-RDX based)
Ø Thermal conditioning : slow cook-off conditions (heating profile 3.3 °C/h)
Significant resultsSignificant results
WARHEADS BEHAVIOUR TO SLOW HEATING RATESWARHEADS BEHAVIOUR TO SLOW HEATING RATES
20 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
I-RDX BASED WARHEAD – THERMO-CHEMICALI-RDX BASED WARHEAD – THERMO-CHEMICALANALYSISANALYSIS
Temperature
Significant resultsSignificant results
Test : 163 °CCalculation : 165°C
Mass loss
21 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
NON -VIOLENT EVENTTYPE IV REACTION
I-RDX BASED WARHEAD - VIOLENCE LEVELI-RDX BASED WARHEAD - VIOLENCE LEVEL
22 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
FUTURE PLANSFUTURE PLANS
23 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
Ø Prediction of the reaction violence of multi-dimensionnal systems (ABAQUS / LS-DYNA)
In combustion modes, we can estimate :
Ä SNPE developed a methodolgy for predicting the violence level ofsystems submitted to a thermal threat :
Ø Characterisation tests on samples of energetic material
PRESSURISATION&
EXPANSION VELOCITY
Ø Fitting of the numerical model parameters
Conclusions - future plansConclusions - future plans
ACHIEVEMENTSACHIEVEMENTS
REACTION TYPESIII, IV, V
24 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTSNUMERICAL SIMULATION TO COOK-OFF EXPERIMENTS 2003 IMEMTSMarch 10-13
Ø Violence level prediction : need a validation phase by precise measurements
Moderate reaction due to good microstructural and morphologicalproperties of PBXN109/SNPE explosive (I-RDX based)
Ø Improve the model by incorporating physical components for simulatingmore violent events (DDT for instance)
FURTHER WORKFURTHER WORK
Conclusions - future plansConclusions - future plans
REACTION TYPESI, II, III, IV, V
Ø Thermochemical processes : good agreement with tests (< 5 % variations)for explosive and propellant
RESULTS ACCURACYRESULTS ACCURACY