24
NUMBER 169 DECEMBER 2015-Version 2 Second Version issued December 3, 2015 Newsletter for the Association of Applied Geochemists continued on page 5 EXPLORE NEWSLETTER WISHES TO THANK OUR CORPORATE SPONSORS FOR THEIR SUPPORT Gold Homogeneity in Certified Reference Materials; A Comparison of Five Manufacturers N. W. Brand, Geochemical Services Pty Ltd., Suite 10, 5 Colin Street, West Perth, 6005, Australia, [email protected] INTRODUCTION Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) inserted into analytical batches are a requirement by the international codes governing the mineral industry (JORC 2012; NI43- 101; SAMREC) and reporting to the standards laid out in these codes is a mandatory compliance for publicly listed companies on the Australian, New Zealand and Canadian Stock Exchanges. A CRM is a sample where the concentra- tions of one or more analytes have been quantified by valid methodologies and certified with valid documentation. These certified values are the consensus inter-laboratory mean for an analyte where typically each laboratory analy- ses multiple subsamples of the CRM. For gold (Au) CRMs, one of the key properties is the homogeneity of the CRM sample (i.e. testing for nugget effects). Quantifying this homogeneity by the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) is critical for assessment of laboratory results and the follow up of quality control (QC) failures. There is vast literature discussing the nugget effect in gold mineralising systems and protocols in reducing the sampling error (e.g., Stanley & Smee 2007), but very little information has been published on the homogeneity of gold CRMs. By their very nature CRMs are assumed to be homogeneous and any variation is attributed to labora- tory error (i.e. the variance attributed to the sampling error is less than the analytical error); so how homogenous are commercial gold CRMs? The homogeneity of a gold CRM sample reflects the capability and competency of a manufacturer to eliminate any nugget effects and provide a homogeneous product that, when analysed, will provide a repeatable result within the statistical limits provided on the CRM certificate. Al- though all manufactures refer to the homogeneity of their CRMs, only one manufacturer (OREAS), measures the homogeneity of the CRMs and provides this information as routine with their gold CRM Certificate of Analysis. Rock- labs undertake a homogeneity and segregation test, but do not provide the actual homogeneity results. This independent study evaluates the homogeneity of gold CRMs from commercial CRM manufacturers at four chosen gold grades (0.5 ppm Au, 1 ppm Au, 3 ppm Au and 9 ppm Au). These grades are typical in mining and explo- ration scenarios and reliable QC data at these grades is critical. This study provides a benchmark for further evalu- ations of potentially “nuggetty” CRM products including, but not restricted to, platinum group elements (PGEs), rare earth elements (REE), and Au. CRM MANUFACTURERS AND THEIR PREPARATION Four auriferous CRMS from each of five manufactur- ers were assessed (i.e. 20 CRMs in total). The CRMs were sourced from five manufacturers, as listed below alphabeti- cally. A summary description of the preparation process is also provided and taken from their CRM certificates: • African Mineral Standards (AMIS): http://www.amis. co.za/. The material was crushed, dry-milled and air- classified to <54 microns. Wet sieve particle size analysis of random samples confirmed the material was 98.5% <54 microns. It was then blended in a bi-conical mixer, systematically divided and then sealed into1 kg Labora- tory Packs. • CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd (CDN): http://www. cdnlabs.com/. Material was dried, crushed, pulverized and then passed through a 270 mesh screen. The +270 mesh material was discarded. The -270 mesh (53 microns) ma- terial was mixed for 5 days in a double-cone blender. • Geostats Pty Ltd (GST): http://www.geostats.com.au/. All CRMs are dried in an oven for a minimum of 12 hours at 110 °C. The dry material is then pulverised to finer than 75 microns (nominal mean of 45 microns) using an air classifier. The material is then homogenised and stored in a sealed, stable container ready for final packaging. • Ore Research and Exploration Pty Ltd (ORE): http:// www.ore.com.au/. Materials are jaw crushed to minus 3 mm, dried to constant mass at 105 °C, barren materials are milled to >98% minus 75 microns and gold bearing material milled to 100% minus 20-30 microns, blending in appropriate proportions to achieve the desired grade, packaging into 60 g and 100 g units in laminated foil pouches and 1 kg units in plastic jars. • Rocklabs (RLB): http://rocklabs.com/. Pulverized feld- spar minerals, basalt rock and barren ironpyrites were blended with finely divided gold containing minerals that have been screened to ensure there is no nuggetty gold. (NOTE no sizing information provided). See also Table 1 for a summary.

NUMBER 169 DECEMBER 2015-Version 2 Gold Homogeneity in ... Number... · The December 2015 issue of EXPLORE features a technical article about gold homogeneity in certified reference

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

NUMBER 169 DECEMBER 2015-Version 2

Second Version issued December 3, 2015Newsletter for the

Association of Applied Geochemists

continued on page 5

EXPLORE NEWSLETTER

WISHES TO THANK OUR CORPORATE SPONSORS FOR

THEIR SUPPORT

Gold Homogeneity in Certified Reference Materials; A Comparison of Five ManufacturersN. W. Brand, Geochemical Services Pty Ltd., Suite 10, 5 Colin Street, West Perth, 6005, Australia, [email protected]

INTRODUCTION CertifiedReferenceMaterials(CRMs)insertedintoanalyticalbatchesarearequirementbytheinternationalcodesgoverningthemineralindustry(JORC2012;NI43-101;SAMREC)andreportingtothestandardslaidoutinthesecodesisamandatorycomplianceforpubliclylistedcompaniesontheAustralian,NewZealandandCanadianStockExchanges.ACRMisasamplewheretheconcentra-tionsofoneormoreanalyteshavebeenquantifiedbyvalidmethodologiesandcertifiedwithvaliddocumentation.Thesecertifiedvaluesaretheconsensusinter-laboratorymeanforananalytewheretypicallyeachlaboratoryanaly-sesmultiplesubsamplesoftheCRM. Forgold(Au)CRMs,oneofthekeypropertiesisthehomogeneityoftheCRMsample(i.e.testingfornuggeteffects).QuantifyingthishomogeneitybytheRelativeStandardDeviation(RSD)iscriticalforassessmentoflaboratoryresultsandthefollowupofqualitycontrol(QC)failures. Thereisvastliteraturediscussingthenuggeteffectingoldmineralisingsystemsandprotocolsinreducingthesamplingerror(e.g.,Stanley&Smee2007),butverylittleinformationhasbeenpublishedonthehomogeneityofgoldCRMs.BytheirverynatureCRMsareassumedtobehomogeneousandanyvariationisattributedtolabora-toryerror(i.e.thevarianceattributedtothesamplingerrorislessthantheanalyticalerror);sohowhomogenousarecommercialgoldCRMs? ThehomogeneityofagoldCRMsamplereflectsthecapabilityandcompetencyofamanufacturertoeliminateanynuggeteffectsandprovideahomogeneousproductthat,whenanalysed,willprovidearepeatableresultwithinthestatisticallimitsprovidedontheCRMcertificate.Al-thoughallmanufacturesrefertothehomogeneityoftheirCRMs,onlyonemanufacturer(OREAS),measuresthehomogeneityoftheCRMsandprovidesthisinformationasroutinewiththeirgoldCRMCertificateofAnalysis.Rock-labsundertakeahomogeneityandsegregationtest,butdonotprovidetheactualhomogeneityresults. ThisindependentstudyevaluatesthehomogeneityofgoldCRMsfromcommercialCRMmanufacturersatfourchosengoldgrades(0.5ppmAu,1ppmAu,3ppmAuand9ppmAu).Thesegradesaretypicalinminingandexplo-rationscenariosandreliableQCdataatthesegradesiscritical.Thisstudyprovidesabenchmarkforfurtherevalu-

ationsofpotentially“nuggetty”CRMproductsincluding,butnotrestrictedto,platinumgroupelements(PGEs),rareearthelements(REE),andAu.

CRM MANUFACTURERS AND THEIR PREPARATION FourauriferousCRMSfromeachoffivemanufactur-erswereassessed(i.e.20CRMsintotal).TheCRMsweresourcedfromfivemanufacturers,aslistedbelowalphabeti-cally.AsummarydescriptionofthepreparationprocessisalsoprovidedandtakenfromtheirCRMcertificates:

•AfricanMineralStandards(AMIS):http://www.amis.co.za/.Thematerialwascrushed,dry-milledandair-classifiedto<54microns.Wetsieveparticlesizeanalysisofrandomsamplesconfirmedthematerialwas98.5%<54microns.Itwasthenblendedinabi-conicalmixer,systematicallydividedandthensealedinto1kgLabora-toryPacks.

•CDNResourceLaboratoriesLtd(CDN):http://www.cdnlabs.com/.Materialwasdried,crushed,pulverizedandthenpassedthrougha270meshscreen.The+270meshmaterialwasdiscarded.The-270mesh(53microns)ma-terialwasmixedfor5daysinadouble-coneblender.

•GeostatsPtyLtd(GST):http://www.geostats.com.au/.AllCRMsaredriedinanovenforaminimumof12hoursat110°C.Thedrymaterialisthenpulverisedtofinerthan75microns(nominalmeanof45microns)usinganairclassifier.Thematerialisthenhomogenisedandstoredinasealed,stablecontainerreadyforfinalpackaging.

•OreResearchandExplorationPtyLtd(ORE):http://www.ore.com.au/.Materialsarejawcrushedtominus3mm,driedtoconstantmassat105°C,barrenmaterialsaremilledto>98%minus75micronsandgoldbearingmaterialmilledto100%minus20-30microns,blendinginappropriateproportionstoachievethedesiredgrade,packaginginto60gand100gunitsinlaminatedfoilpouchesand1kgunitsinplasticjars.

•Rocklabs(RLB):http://rocklabs.com/.Pulverizedfeld-sparminerals,basaltrockandbarrenironpyriteswereblendedwithfinelydividedgoldcontainingmineralsthathavebeenscreenedtoensurethereisnonuggettygold.(NOTEnosizinginformationprovided).

SeealsoTable1forasummary.

PAGE 2 NUMBER 169 EXPLORE

Paid AdvertisementOreas-November-Ad2.indd 1 11/5/15 2:22 PM

EXPLORE NUMBER 169 PAGE 3

Notes from the Editor

TABLE OF CONTENTSGoldHomogeneityinCertifiedMaterials:AComparison

ofFiveManufacturers.......................................................... 1

NotesfromtheEditor............................................................... 3

President’sMessage.................................................................. 4

GeochemicalNuggets............................................................... 17

JoinUsforExploration17....................................................... 17

Minutesofthe2015AAGAnnualGeneralMeeting............ 18

RecentlyPublishedinElements.............................................. 19

EricL.HoffmanMemorialScholarship................................. 19

AAG’sStudentSupportProgramRessurectedin2015......... 20

TreatiseofGeochemistry.......................................................... 20

Student-IndustryMineralExploration

Workshop............................................................................... 21

AAGNewMembers................................................................. 21

CalendarofEvents.................................................................... 23

ADVERTISERSActivationLaboratoriesLtd..................................................... 24

AGATLaboratories.................................................................. 22

ALS ........................................................................................... 4

BureauVeritasMinerals........................................................... 6

OREResearchandExploration.............................................. 2

SciApps,Inc............................................................................... 7

NewsletterNo.169 DECEMBER2015

Editor:BethMcClenaghan([email protected])

BusinessManager:PimvanGeffen1-604-681-6765([email protected])

BackIssuescontact:AlArseneault([email protected])

EXPLOREispublishedquarterlybytheAssociationofAppliedGeochemists,P.O.Box26099,72RobertsonRoad,Ottawa,ONCanadaK2H9RO.EXPLOREisatrademarkoftheAssociationofAppliedGeochemists.Type and layout of EXPLORE:VivianHeggie,HeggieEnterprises,Thornton,CO(303)288-6540;[email protected]

ADVERTISING RATESFullpage(Black&White) 241hx190wmm (9.5hx7.5win) US$1019Fullpage(Color) US$1223Halfpage(Black&White) 241hx89wmm (9.5hx3.5win) US$557 or 124hx190wmm (4-7/8hx7.5win)Halfpage(Color) US$667Thirdpage(Black&White) 241hx51wmm (9.5hx2win) US$441 or 178hx89wmm (7hx3.5win)Thirdpage(Color) US$530Quarterpage(B&W) 124hx89wmm (4-7/8hx3.5win) US$315 or 241hx41wmm (9.5hx1-5/8win)Quarterpage(Color) US$378Eighthpage(Black&White)60hx89wmm (2-3/8hx3.5win) US$200Eighthpage(Color) US$242BusinessCard(B&W) 51hx89wmm (2hx3.5win) US$53BusinessCard(Color) US$63

Pleasedirectadvertisinginquiriesto:PIMVANGEFFEN

([email protected])

EXPLORE Publication Schedule QuarterlynewslettersinMarch,June,September,December

Deadlinesforsubmissionofarticlesoradvertisements: Marchnewsletter:January15 Junenewsletter:April15 Septembernewsletter:July15 Decembernewsletter:October15

Information for Contributors Manuscripts should be double-spaced and submitted in digitalformatusingMicrosoft®WORD.DoNOTembedfiguresortablesinthetextdocument.Eachphotoand/orfigure(colourorblackandwhite)shouldbesubmittedasseparatehighresolutiontiff,jpegorPDF(2400resolutionorbetter)file.Eachtableshouldbesubmit-tedasseparatedigitalfileinMicrosoft®EXCELformat.Allsci-entific/technicalarticleswillbereviewed.Allcontributionsmaybeeditedforclarityorbrevity. Formats for headings, abbreviations, scientificnotations, refer-encesandfiguresmustfollowtheGuidetoAuthorsforGeochem-istry:Exploration,Environment,Analysis(GEEA)thatarepostedon the GEEA website at: http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/template.cfm?name=geea_instructions_for_authors Inadditiontothetechnicalarticle,authorsareaskedtosubmitaseparate250wordabstractthatsummarizesthecontentoftheirarticle.ThisabstractwillbepublishedinthejournalELEMENTS onthe‘AAGNews’page.

SubmissionsshouldbesenttotheEditorofEXPLORE:BethMcClenaghan

Email:[email protected]

TheDecember2015issueofEXPLOREfeaturesatechnicalarticleaboutgoldhomogeneityincertifiedreferencematerialsbyNigelBrand.EXPLOREthanksallcontributorstothisfourthissueof2015:SteveAmor,AlArsenault,DennisArne,NigelBrand,BobGarrett,PimvanGeffen,MattLeybourne,PaulMorris,JamilSader,andDaveSmith.Inthislastissueof2015,EXPLOREgratefullyacknowledgesourthreecorporatesponsorsfortheyear,ALSMinerals,AGATLaboratories,andREFLEXGeo-chemistry,aswellasouradvertizersfortheircontinuingfinancialsupportofEXPLORE.PimvanGeffen,ourBusi-nessManager,isthankedformanagingthefinancialaspectsofpublishingEXPLOREincludingcorporatesponsorsandadvertizers.PimandIwishallAAGmembersandotherreadersofEXPLOREasuccessful2016.

Beth McClenaghanEditor

PAGE 4 NUMBER 169 EXPLORE

President's Message

• Rapid, low cost, Pb isotope analysis

• Low detection limits with multi-element ICP-MS

• CoreViewer™ Technology

• Data integration with 3D modeling

• Industry leading hyperspectral technologies

The Global Benchmark

For more information, scan this QR code or visit www.alsglobal.com | Phone: +1 604-984-0221

Breaking Boundaries with Innovative Solutions

ThiswillbemyfinalmessageasPresidentoftheAssociationofAppliedGeochemists.RyanNoblewilltakeontheroleofPresidentfor

2016-2017,ablyassistedbySteveCookfromTeckResourc-esLimitedasVicePresident.Thepasttwoyearshave,asweallknow,beenverydifficultwithamajorandsustainedslow-downinthemineralexplorationindustry.Despitethat,theAssociationcontinuesunabatedwithanumberofsignificantmilestones.SinceBobEppingerpennedhisfinalPresidentialmessage(December2013EXPLORE),theAssociationhasheldtwosuccessfulIAGSconferences(Rotorua,2013andTucson2015),implementedanumberofsocialmediaavenuesofmemberexpression(LinkedIn,Facebook),andsuccessfullytransitionedtoanewEditor-in-Chief(KurtKyser)forourjournalGEEA.Ihopethatyouareallworkingdiligentlytoproducelargequantitiesofhigh-qualitypaperstoinundateKurtwith,ashehasalotoftimeonhishands.AsIhavestatedbefore,butitbearsrepeating,GwendyHalldidanoutstandingjobasourEditor-in-ChiefpriortoKurttakingover.Thankfully,shecontinuestomanagethearduoustaskofmaintainingandgrowingtheAssociationinvestmentsandoverallfinancesastheAAGTreasurer.DanLayton-Matthewsisthe2015-2017AAGDistinguishedLecturerand,withfinancialsupportfromtheAssociationfortravel,isavailabletopresentatalkataninstitutionnearyou.PleasegetintouchwithDantoorganizealecturetour([email protected]). IwouldliketoexpressmythanksandgratitudetoallmembersofCouncilfortheireffortsoverthelasttwoyears,andtoallAAGmemberswhocontinuetosupport

theAssociation.IwouldparticularlyliketothankmyVice-President,RyanNobleforhishelp,aswellasGwendyHall(Treasurer),DaveSmith(Secretary),BethMcClenaghan(EXPLOREeditor),PimvanGeffen(EXPLOREBusinessManager),PatricedeCaritatandDennisArne(Elementscoordinators),KurtKyser(GEEAEditor),2014-2015Councillors(AlejandroArauz,DennisArne,StephenCook,MeltLintern,PaulMorris,PeterSimpsonandBobEp-pinger),andthe2015-2016Councillors(DaveCohen,RayLett,TomMolyneux,JuanCarlosOrdóñezCalderón,PeterRogers,andPeterWinterburn).AlsodeservingofgratitudeareGemmaBonham-CarterandBrunoLemierefortheireffortsmaintainingandmanagingtheAssociationWebsite.IalsothankalltheRegionalCouncillors,andAAGCom-mitteemembersforalloftheirwork. Finally,anotherchangeoverthelasttwoyearswasthepassingofthereinsofmanagingourAssociationfromBettyArsenaulttoherhusbandAlArsenault;bothhavebeenindispensible,andithasmadethingseasierthattheycoinci-dentallyhavethelastname. Sadly,wehavealsolostsomeofthegreatsinourfieldoverthelastcoupleofyearsincludingEionCameron,BillCoker,andEricHoffman;allofthemaregreatlymissed. Toclose,Iwishtheincomingpresidentandvice-pres-identanoutstandingandsuccessfultwoyears.IhopethattheindustryisontheupswingthatwilltranslatetoastellarIAGSin2017or2018.

Matt LeybourneAAG President

EXPLORE NUMBER 169 PAGE 5

Gold Homogeneity in Certified Reference Materials… continued from page 1

CRMS SELECTED ToallowacomparisonbetweenCRMmanufacturesfour(4)auriferousgraderangeswerechosencentredaround0.5ppm;1ppm;3ppmand9ppm(seeTable2).TheselectionofCRMsfromthesegraderangesweredeterminedbytheavailabilityofmaterialsfromthemanu-facturers,andpreferencegiventoCRMsthataresiliceousinnatureandmanufacturedwithinthelastsixyears(tominimiseanyvariationduetochangeinthemanufacturingprocessand/orpossibleoxidationofsulphides).Tothisend,lowsulphursampleswerechosenwhereavailable.

ManufacturerMaterial grain size

Homogeneity testedLab list

providedStatistical metrics

ISO accreditation

Major and trace element data

AMIS < 54 umStated but details

not providedYes

SD, Between-lab SD, Within-Lab SD,

Combined Standard Uncertainty

YesMajors - certified; Traces - indicative

CDN < 53 um No Yes Between-lab SD NoMajors only -

indicative

Geostats < 75 um No NoSD, 95% Confidence

IntervalYes

Majors & Traces - indicative

OREAS < 30 μmYes (INAA

subsample method)Yes

SD, 95% Confidence limits, Tolerance limits

YesMajors & Traces -

indicative

RocklabsNot

specified

Yes (specific sampling/testing

regime incl segregation test)

YesBetween-lab SD, 95%

Confidence limitsNo

Majors only - indicative

Note: All manufacturers use multiple laboratory round robin for the certification process of gold by fire assay.

Table 1: Summary of attributes of the various manufacturer’s CRM as provided on their certificates.

•Fourx60gsachetsofeachofthefourCRMsfromOREASandreceivedinfoilpouches;

•One2.5kgplasticjarforeachCRMwereorderedandreceivedfromRocklabs.

ThematerialsasreceivedareshowninPhoto1.

Manufacturer CRMCertified Au (ppm)

Assay Method

Brief Material descriptionS

(%)SiO2

(%)Year of release

# labs

AMIS0352 0.45 Andesitic-dacite tuffaceous agglomerate 0.56 62.13 2012 23AMIS0310 1.03 Basalt, volcanics & granite 1.58 69.38 2012 17AMIS0360 2.94 BIF, mafic volcanics and sediments 6.46 48.05 2014 24AMIS0267 9.05 Qtz-carbonate-adularia 0.75 83.27 2012 19

CND-GS-P5C 0.571 Granitic 0.2 60.7 2014 15CND-GS-1M 1.07 Granitic 0.1 65.6 2013 15CND-GS-3L 3.18 Granitic 0.1 66.8 2013 15CND-GS-8C 8.59 Sourced from Cortez Hills Mine 0.6 56.6 2013 13

G909-6 0.57 Composite Gold Ores low sulphide nr nr 2009 132G313-1 1 Composite Mine Ore 0.035 64.56 2014 157G914-6 3.21 High Grade low sulphide ore 0.06 63.69 2015 179G914-7 9.81 High Grade low sulphide ore 0.04 60.87 2015 178

OREAS 201 0.514 Basaltic 0.39 53.69 2012 20OREAS 204 1.043 Basaltic 0.794 52.64 2012 20OREAS 17c 3.04 Basaltic 1.59 49.1 2009 18OREAS 62c 8.79 Andesitic volcanics 0.53 60.9 2009 16

SE68 0.599 2.3 54.76 2012 53SG66 1.086 2.6 54.52 2012 53SJ80 2.656 3 56.26 2013 54SN75 8.671 3.3 56.17 2013 54

nr = not reported

AMISFire

assay

CDN30 g Fire

assay

Feldspar, basalt & iron pyrites with minor fine gold minerals

Geostats50 g Fire

assay

OREAS30-50 g

Fire assay

Rocklabs30 g Fire

assay

Table 2: Summary of CRMs chosen for this study.

MATERIAL RECEIVED Amountscorrespondingtotheminimummanufacturersorderwerepurchased.Tothisend:•Twox100gsachetsofeachofthefourCRMwerepur-chasedfromAMISandreceivedinvacuumsealedfoilpouches;

•Fourx100gsachetsofeachofthefourCRMsfromCDNandreceivedinpaperbagsandsealedinplastic;

•Fourx100gsachetsofeachofthefourCRMsfromGeo-statsandreceivedinplasticbags;

ROCKLABS OREAS AMIS GEOSTATS CDN

Plate 1

Photo 1. CRM’s “as received” from the five manufacturers.

SAMPLE PREPARATION AND ANALYSIS Priortodispatchingthematerialsforanalysis,eachCRMwassubsampledtwentytimesinacleanroom.A10galiquotofeachCRMwasplacedintoaZiploc®plasticbagusingadisposableplasticspatulatoavoidanycrosscon-tamination.ThisprocedurewasrepeatedforeachCRMsothatthesamplesweresequencedinlotsof20,witheachlotcorrespondingtooneCRM. Forthehomogeneitytestwork,InstrumentalNeutronActivationAnalysis(INAA)wasused.INAAisahighlypreciseanduniqueassaymethodthatfocusesontheele-mentsnucleusirrespectiveofthesamplematrixorchemicalformoftheelement.Eachsampleissubjectedtoafluxofneutronstoproduceradioactivenuclides.Thesenuclidesdecayemittinggammaraysthatarecharacteristicforeachnuclide.Whencomparedwithaknownstandard,thein-tensityoftheemittedgammarayscanbequantifiedintoanelementconcentration(Lieser2001). The400x10gsubsamplesweredispatchedtoActiva-tionLaboratoriesLimited(Actlabs)inAncaster,Canada(www.actlabs.com)forINAA;Actlabswereinformedofthepurposeoftheanalysisandrequestedtoweighout1g

continued on page 6

Support Your Organization

ADVERTISE!

Note: All manufacturers use multiple laboratory round robin for the certification process of gold by fire assay.

PAGE 6 NUMBER 169 EXPLORE

continued on page 8Paid Advertisement

Bureau Veritas Minerals“Industry Leading Solutions for the Exploration & Mining Community”.

■ Geochemical, Metallurgical & Mineralogical Services ■ Technology and Innovation: ICP-ES, ICP- MS, LA-ICP-MS & XRF ■ Full Access to our Enterprise Management System (LIMS/EMS) ■ Industry Leading Quality Assurance

Ph: +1 604 253 3158 | www.bureauveritas.com/UM

Gold Homogeneity in Certified Reference Materials… continued from page 5

ofmaterialfromeachsample.Tominimiseanyeffectsofbetweenbatchbias,Actlabswererequestednottosplitanyofthe20sampleCRMlotsandallpossiblesourcesofmea-surementerror(e.g.,weighing,counting,detectorgeometry,fluxmonitorerrors,etc.)bekepttoaminimum.MinimisingthesourcesoferrorandensuringnosamplelotsweresplitprovidesconfidencethattheresultsareatruereflectionofCRMsamplingerrorsandhenceCRMhomogeneity,andthattheanalyticalprecisionerrorsareminorincompari-sontosamplingerrors.Bysubjectingallthesamplestotheidenticalnon-destructiveanalyticaltechniqueprovidedbyonelaboratorythatrequirednosamplepreparation,reagentsordigestion,anylaboratoryerrorisconstantforallsamplesandconsideredminimal.ThusvarianceinthespreadofanalyticalresultsfromeachoftheCRMswillrepresentthedegreeofhomogeneity.

RESULTS TheresultsofthisexercisearepresentedinAppendix1,whichisavailablefordownloadfromtheEXPLOREpageoftheAAGwebsite(www.appliedgeochemists.org).ThecertificatesoftheCRMsusedinthisstudyaredownload-ablefromtheAAGwebsite(www.appliedgeochemists.org)andtheGeochemicalServiceswebsite(http://www.gspty.com.au/).

Precision/homogeneity TheCertifiedValue(CV),RelativeStandardDevia-tion(RSDacrossthe20x1gINAAvaluesofeachCRM),

SamplingConstant(whichistheminimumrequiredsamplemasstoachievea1%RSD),meanINAAsamplemassanalysed(g),twoRelativeStandardDeviationsattypicalfireassaychargeweightsof30g(30g2RSD)and50g(50g2RSD)foreachCRMbymanufacturerispresentedinTable3.AmeanRSDforeachmanufacturerisalsopre-sentedasanindicationofoverallperformance.

Table 3. RSD Comparisons for the various CRM manufacturers (based on 20 x 1 gm INAA determinations per CRM).

Manufacturer CRMCertified

Value (ppm)

Mean INAA subsample

(g)

1 g RSD INAA

Mean RSDSampling

Constant (g)

30g 2RSD 50g 2RSDAMIS AMIS0352 0.450 1.05 4.48% 21.0 1.67% 1.30%

AMIS0310 1.03 1.06 12.80% 172.7 4.80% 3.72%AMIS0360 2.94 1.06 3.60% 13.7 1.35% 1.05%AMIS0267 9.05 1.05 27.46% 794.8 10.29% 7.97%

CDN CDN-GS-P5C 0.571 1.06 10.27% 111.8 3.86% 2.99%CDN-GS-1M 1.07 1.05 15.85% 263.4 5.93% 4.59%CDN-GS-3L 3.18 1.05 11.53% 140.0 4.32% 3.35%CDN-GS-8C 8.59 1.05 1.16% 1.4 0.43% 0.34%

Geostats G909-6 0.570 1.06 2.93% 9.1 1.10% 0.85%G313-1 1.00 1.04 6.14% 39.4 2.29% 1.78%G914-6 3.21 1.06 2.15% 4.9 0.81% 0.63%G914-7 9.81 1.05 1.15% 1.4 0.43% 0.33%

OREAS OREAS 201 0.514 1.06 1.87% 3.7 0.70% 0.54%OREAS 204 1.04 1.05 1.77% 3.3 0.66% 0.51%OREAS 17c 3.04 1.05 1.61% 2.7 0.60% 0.47%OREAS 62c 8.79 1.04 1.18% 1.4 0.44% 0.34%

Rocklabs SE68 0.599 1.06 1.90% 3.8 0.71% 0.55%SG66 1.09 1.06 5.05% 27.1 1.90% 1.47%SJ80 2.66 1.05 1.20% 1.5 0.45% 0.35%SN75 8.67 1.04 1.26% 1.7 0.47% 0.36%

NOTE: Sampling Constant is the required grams to achieve a 1% RSD.

Based on 1 gm INAA data and the Sampling

Constant

12.08%

3.09%

1.61%

2.35%

9.70%

Table 3: Relative Standard Deviation comparison for the various CRM Manufacturers (based on 20 x 1 g INAA determinations per CRM).

TheRSDisusedasastandardisedmeasureofdisper-sionthatindicatestheprecisionorrepeatabilityofanassay.ThelowertheRSD,themorerepeatable,preciseorhomo-geneoustheCRM;converselythehighertheRSDthelesshomogeneoustheCRM.GiventhecriticalimportanceofCRMsandtheirmandatoryuseintheminingandexplora-tionindustry,thelowertheRSDdeterminedfromrepli-cateanalysisviatheINAAmethodonreducedanalyticalsubsamples(e.g.1g)themorehomogenousthereferencematerialandthegreaterconfidenceandcontroltheQCofficerhasinvettingdataqualityfromalaboratory.TheoverallmeanRSDforeachmanufacturerhasbeenderivedfromthemeanoftheindividualRSD’softhe1gINAAdata.InorderofincreasingmeanRSD(correspondingtodecreasinghomogeneity)theyrangefromOREAS:1.61%,toRocklabs:2.35%,toGeostats:3.09%,toCDN:9.70%,toAMIS:12.08%. TheSamplingConstant(Ingamells&Switzer1973)hasbeencalculatedtoshowtheminimumsamplemassrequiredtomeasuregoldineachCRMbythe1gINAAmethodtoachievearelativestandarddeviationof1%.Forhighgradegoldsamples(~9ppmAu),thesamplingconstantrangesfromalowof1.4gfromCDN,GeostatsandOREASto794.8gforAMIS.ThissuggestsAMIS0267isinfluencedbyanuggeteffect. The30and50g2RSDshavebeencalculatedfromtheSamplingConstantsforeachCRMandinsomeinstances

EXPLORE NUMBER 169 PAGE 7

C

M

Y

CM

MY

CY

CMY

K

Geochem Ad-For Andrew_SomersR3OTLcmyk.pdf 1 10/29/15 12:23 PM

Paid Advertisement

PAGE 8 NUMBER 169 EXPLORE

continued on page 10

Gold Homogeneity in Certified Reference Materials… continued from page 6

revealsignificantsamplingerrors.Typicalmeasurementerrorfor30or50gfireassaychargeweightsareusu-allyaround5%atcommerciallaboratoriesfororegrademethods.The2RSDvaluesencapsulatethesamplingerrorcontributionfromtheCRMandthesecanbeaddedtothenominal5%measurementerrorlaboratoriestendtoachievetogetafeelforwhattheoverallerrorswouldbeinreportedanalyticalresults.Resultsfromindividualmanu-facturersarediscussedbelow:

AMIS:homogeneityforindividualAMISCRMsvariesfrom3.60%RSD(AMIS0360;2.94ppmAu)to27.46%RSD(AMIS0267;9.05ppmAu),aspreadof23.86%RSDshow-ingnosystematicchangeinhomogeneitywithchanginggrade.ThesamplingconstantforAMIS0267indicatesthat794.8gofsamplewouldberequiredtoensureaRSDof1%duringanalysis,andfora30gfireassayasamplingerrorof10.29%applies.AtthischargemassonlyAMIS0352(30g2RSDsamplingerrorof1.67%)andAMIS0360(30g2RSDof1.35%)wouldbefitforpurposeCRMsbasedonthesecalculations.ThegoldhomogeneityofCRMsproducedbyAMISisconsideredverypoortogood.

CDN:homogeneityforindividualCDNCRMsvariesfrom1.16%RSD(CDN-GS-8C;8.59ppmAu)to15.85%RSD(CDN-GS-1M;1.07ppmAu),aspreadof14.69%RSDshowingnosystematicchangeinhomogeneitywithchang-inggrade.OfthefourCRMsevaluatedonlyCDN-GS-8C(30g2RSDof0.44%),thehighestgradeCDNgoldCRMtested,wouldbesuitablefora30gfireassay.ForCDN-GS-P5C(0.571ppmAu)asamplemassof111.8gwouldberequiredtoobtainanRSDof1%duringanalysis;equiva-lenttoasamplingerror(30g2RSD)of3.86%;263.4gforCDN-GS-1M;equivalenttoa2RSDsamplingerrorof5.93%at30g;and140.0gforCDN-GS-3L(3.18ppmAu),equivalenttoa2RSDsamplingerrorof4.32%at30g.WhilethehomogeneityofCDN-GS-8Cisverygood,theremainingCDNCRMstestedareconsideredtobepoortoverypoor.

Geostats:homogeneityforindividualGeostatsCRM’svaryfrom1.15%RSD(G914-7;9.81ppmAu)to6.14%RSD(G313-1;1.00ppmAu),aspreadof4.99%RSDshowingnosystematicchangeinhomogeneitywithchanginggrade.ThreeofthefourCRM’s(G909-6at0.570ppmAu,G914-6at3.21ppmAu&G914-7at9.81ppmAu)arefitforpurposeasgradecontrolCRM’sfor30gfireassaywhilstG313-1at1.00ppmAuwouldbesuitablefora50gfireassaybasedonthesamplingconstant.The2RSDsamplingerrorsata30gchargeweightvaryfrom0.43%to2.29%.ThehomogeneityofCRM’sproducedbyGeostatsrangefrommediocretoverygood.

OREAS:AllOREASCRM’sshowconsistentlylowRSDsrangingfrom1.18%RSD(OREAS62cat8.79ppmAu)to1.87%RSD(OREAS201at0.514ppmAu)foraspreadof0.69%RSD.AninversecorrelationisapparentbetweengradeandRSDsuggestingapossibleinfluenceofanalytical

precision.AllfourOREASCRM’stestedarefitforpur-posefor30gfireassaywithsamplingconstantsindicatingthata4gfireassaychargeweightwouldprovideasamplingerrorof1%orlessforallOREASCRM’s.Thesamplinger-rorata30gchargeweightvariesfrom0.44%to0.70%.ThehomogeneityofCRM’sproducedbyOREASisconsideredverygood.

Rocklabs:IndividualRocklabsCRMhomogeneityvariesfrom1.20%RSD(SJ80at2.66ppmAu)to5.05%RSD(SG66at1.09ppmAu),aspreadof3.83%RSDwiththeCRM’sshowingnosystematicchangeinhomogeneitywithchanginggrade.ThreeofthefourCRM’s(SE68at0.599ppmAu,SJ80at2.66ppmAuandSN75at8.67ppmAu)arefitforpurposefor30gfireassaywhileSG66wouldprobablybemorefitforpurposefor50gfireassaybasedonthesamplingconstant.Thesamplingerrorsofa30gchargeweightrangefrom0.45%to1.90%.ThehomogeneityofCRM’sproducedbyRocklabsisconsideredgoodtoverygood.

Manufacturer CRMCertified Value Au

(ppb)NAA Mean Au

(ppb)NAA Min Au

(ppb)NAA Max Au (ppb)

NAA SDev Au (ppb)

AMIS0352 450 445.3 393 467 20AMIS0310 1030 1080 946 1450 138AMIS0360 2940 3014 2810 3280 109AMIS0267 9050 8849 7450 17900 2425

CDN-GS-P5C 571 492.7 423 642 51CDN-GS-1M 1070 975.4 774 1480 155CDN-GS-3L 3180 3136 2340 3800 365CDN-GS-8C 8590 8238 8100 8440 96

G909-6 570 545.8 510 576 16G313-1 1000 971.8 885 1130 60G914-6 3210 3269 3110 3390 70G914-7 9810 9657 9440 10000 112

OREAS 201 514 546.2 531 567 10OREAS 204 1043 1020 990 1050 18OREAS 17c 3040 3009 2940 3110 48OREAS 62c 8790 8411 8100 8570 99

SE68 599 615.5 591 638 12SG66 1086 1087 1030 1300 55SJ80 2656 2520 2450 2570 30SN75 8671 8000 7720 8150 100

AMIS

CDN

Geostats

OREAS

Rocklabs

Table 4: Summary Statistics for each CRM.

INTERNAL CRM VARIATION Control charts presented below show the variation inresultsof eachCRMforeachmanufacturer. Figures1 to5(A-Dplots)showgraphicalrepresentationofthe20x1gINAAdatawheretheXaxisrepresentstheorderofanalysis(analyticalsubsamples1to20)fromlefttoright;andtheYaxisshowsthemeasuredINAAconcentrationinAuppb.AsolidredlineshowsthemeanINAAvalue(seeTable4)foreachCRMandforeachgraderange(i.e.0.5ppmAu,1ppmAu,3ppmAuand9ppmAu).ThesameYaxisconcentra-tionrangeandscalehasbeenusedwherepossibletofacili-tate visual comparison between themanufacturers. TheYaxisinFigures1-5(E-Hplots)showsthepercentagediffer-encefromthecalculatedINAAmean.ThesediagramsarenotintendedasverificationchartsforeachCRMbyINAA,butasastandardisedgraphicalcommunicationtool.

EXPLORE NUMBER 169 PAGE 9

PAGE 10 NUMBER 169 EXPLORE

continued on page 11

Gold Homogeneity in Certified Reference Materials… continued from page 8

AMIS: Figure 1 graphically depicts results for the AMISCRMs. Individual values for each CRM show a widespreadofalmostrandomdatawithnosystematicvariation.AMIS0267(cert9.05ppm)rangesfrom7.45ppmAuto17.90ppmAu(Fig.1D)whichrepresents-15.8%to+102%dif-ferencefromtheINAAmeanofthisCRM(Fig.1H).Two

43.5% 102%

29.7% 34.2%

Au (p

pb)

Order of analysis

Au (p

pb)

Au (p

pb)

Au (p

pb)

Order of analysis

%ag

e di

ff fr

om M

ean

NAA

val

ue

%ag

e di

ff fr

om M

ean

NAA

val

ue

%ag

e di

ff fr

om M

ean

NAA

val

ue

%ag

e di

ff fr

om M

ean

NAA

val

ue

E

F

G

H

A

B

C

D

Figure 1 samplesshowasignificantdeparturefromtheINAAmean,reporting+43.5%(12.70ppmAu)and+102%(17.90ppmAu)ofthemeanvalue(Fig.1H)andreflects inhomogene-ity (presumably a nugget effect) of theCRM. AMIS0310(cert1.03ppm)alsoshows(Figs.1BandF)significantde-parturefromtheINAAmeanfortwosamples(+29.7%and

Figure 1. Control charts for AMIS CRMs showing INAA concentration (Au ppb) in relation to the certified value [A-D] and the percentage difference from the INAA mean value [E-H].

EXPLORE NUMBER 169 PAGE 11

continued on page 12

Gold Homogeneity in Certified Reference Materials… continued from page 1

+34.2%). This inhomogeneityofAMISCRMshaspoten-tiallysignificantimplicationsforlaboratoryreportingwhere-byauserwouldquestionthelaboratoryresultsbasedontheassumptionthattheCRMishomogeneous.

CDN:Figure2graphicallydisplaystheresultsfortheCDN

-25.4%

-20.6%

51.7%

Au (p

pb)

Order of analysis

Au (p

pb)

Au (p

pb)

Au (p

pb)

Order of analysis

%ag

e di

ff fro

m M

ean

NAA

valu

e %

age

diff

from

Mea

n NA

A va

lue

%ag

e di

ff fro

m M

ean

NAA

valu

e %

age

diff

from

Mea

n NA

A va

lue

E

F

G

H

A

B

C

D

30.3%

21.7%

Figure 2 CRMs.WiththeexceptionofCDN-GS-8C(cert8.59ppm)whichhasaverytightspreadofdataaroundtheINAAmeanrangingfrom-1.7%to+2.5%(Fig.2H).ThelowerthreeofthefourCDNCRMs(CDN-GS-P5C,CDN-GS-1MandCDN-GS-3L),showawidescatterofdatathatcom-monlyexceeds±20%oftheINAAmeanvalue;CDN-GS-

Figure 2. Control charts for CDN CRMs showing INAA concentration (Au ppb) in relation to the certified value [A-D] and the percentage difference from the INAA mean value [E-H].

PAGE 12 NUMBER 169 EXPLORE

Gold Homogeneity in Certified Reference Materials… continued from page 11

P5C(cert.0.571ppm)showsarangeof-14.2to+30.3%fromtheINAAmean(Figs.2Aand2E);CDN-GS-1M(cert1.07ppm)rangesfrom-20.6to+51.7(Figs.2Band2F)andCDN-GS-3L(cert3.18ppm)rangesfrom-25.4to+21.2%(Figs.2C&2G).ThisindicatesinhomogeneityinthreeoftheseCRMsproducedbyCDN.Theexceptionis

Au (p

pb)

Order of analysis

Au (p

pb)

Au (p

pb)

Au (p

pb)

Order of analysis

%ag

e di

ff fr

om M

ean

NAA

val

ue

%ag

e di

ff fr

om M

ean

NAA

val

ue

%ag

e di

ff fr

om M

ean

NAA

val

ue

%ag

e di

ff fr

om M

ean

NAA

val

ue

E

F

G

H

A

B

C

D

Figure 3 continued on page 13

Figure 3. Control charts for Geostats CRMs showing INAA concentration (Au ppb) in relation to the certified value [A-D] and the per-centage difference from the INAA mean value [E-H].

CDN-GS-8C(cert8.59ppm)whichhasaverytightspreadofdataaroundtheINAAmeanrangingfrom-1.7%to+2.5%(Figs.2Dand2H).

GEOSTATS:Figure3showstheindividualresultsfortheGeostatsCRMs.G914-6(cert3.21ppm)andG914-7(cert

EXPLORE NUMBER 169 PAGE 13

continued on page 14

Gold Homogeneity in Certified Reference Materials… continued from page 12Au

(ppb

)

Order of analysis

Au (p

pb)

Au (p

pb)

Au (p

pb)

Order of analysis

%ag

e di

ff fr

om M

ean

NAA

val

ue

%ag

e di

ff fr

om M

ean

NAA

val

ue

%ag

e di

ff fr

om M

ean

NAA

val

ue

%ag

e di

ff fr

om M

ean

NAA

val

ue

E

F

G

H

A

B

C

D

Figure 4 9.81ppm)showarelativelytightclusteraroundtheINAAmeanwithG914-6rangingfrom-4.9%to+3.7%(Figs.3Eand3G)andG914-7-rangingfrom-2.2to+3.6%(Figs.3DandH).G909-6(cert0.57ppm)showsawiderscatterwhilstG313-1(cert1.0ppm)showsthewidestscatterof

allGeostatsCRMsrangingfrom-8.9%to+16.3%oftheINAAmean(Figs.3Band3F). OREAS:Figure4showstheindividualresultsfortheOREASCRMs.AllOREASCRMsshowaconsistent

Figure 4. Control charts for OREAS CRMs showing INAA concentration (Au ppb) in relation to the certified value [A-D] and the percent-age difference from the INAA mean value [E-H].

PAGE 14 NUMBER 169 EXPLORE

Gold Homogeneity in Certified Reference Materials… continued from page 13

tightrangewithin±5%oftheINAAmeanindicatingaconsistenthomogenousCRMproductovertherangeofCRMstested. Rocklabs:Figure5showstheindividualresultsforthe

Au (p

pb)

Order of analysis

Au (p

pb)

Au (p

pb)

Au (p

pb)

Order of analysis

%ag

e di

ff fr

om M

ean

NAA

val

ue

%ag

e di

ff fr

om M

ean

NAA

val

ue

%ag

e di

ff fr

om M

ean

NAA

val

ue

%ag

e di

ff fr

om M

ean

NAA

val

ue

E

F

G

H

A

B

C

D

Figure 5 Figure 5. Control charts for Rocklabs CRMs showing INAA concentration (Au ppb) in relation to the certified value [A-D] and the per-centage difference from the INAA mean value [E-H].

continued on page 15

RocklabsCRMs.ThreeofthefourCRMsevaluatedshowatightrangewithin±5%oftheINAAmeanindicatingaconsistenthomogenousproduct.SG66(cert1.086ppm)isslightlylesshomogenouswithvaluesrangingfrom-5.2%to+19.6%includingoneoutlier(Figs.5Band5F).

EXPLORE NUMBER 169 PAGE 15

Gold Homogeneity in Certified Reference Materials… continued from page 14

DISCUSSION TheapplicationofCRMsintheminingandexplora-tionindustryistomonitorlaboratoryqualityandtocomplywithmandatoryreportingrequirements(e.g.,TSX,ASX).Theyarealsoutilisedduringorereservecalculationstoun-derstandtheuncertaintyinaresourcethatultimatelyfeedsintoaneconomicmodel.ItisthusessentialthatusershaveconfidenceinthequalityandhomogeneityoftheirCRMs.TheCRMcertifiedvaluesareconsensusvaluesderivedbyinter-laboratoryroundrobinprograms.Themethodsusedbysomemanufacturerstofilteroutlierscanmaskpotentialissueswiththehomogeneityofthematerials.Onlyoutliersconfidentlyreasonedtobeanalyticalshouldberemovedandthisconfidenceonlyexistswherehomogeneityhasbeenindependentlyvalidated. Resultsfromthisstudyshowthatthedegreeofhomo-geneityofCRMsavailablefromthefivemanufacturersisvariable;usersandanalystsofthesematerialsneedcon-fidencethattheCRMsarehomogenoustoalevelfitforpurposesothatQCfailuresaregenuineandnotafunctionofsamplingerror(i.e.inhomogeneousmaterials).Arank-ingsystembasedonthevaluesforthe30g2RSDsamplingerrorwouldprovideaguidetohomogeneityofaCRMandenableuserstoselectappropriateCRMsfortheirprojectssuchthat<1%isconsideredVeryGood;1-2%consideredGood;2-3%consideredMediocre;3-4%consideredPoorand>4%consideredVeryPoor. AMIS(McWha&Smee2012a-c,2014)certificatescontainnoevidenceofhomogeneitytestingbutstate,“Sampleswererandomlyselectedforhomogeneitytestingandthirdpartyanalysis.Statisticalanalysisofbothhomo-geneityandtheconsensustestresultswerecarriedoutbyindependentstatisticians”.CDNcertificates(Sanderson&Smee2013a-c,2014)makenomentionofhomogeneity;Geostatscertificates(Geostats2009,2014,2015a,b)pro-videanunsupportedstatementthat“materialsaretestedregularlytoensurestabilityandhomogeneity”.OREASpublisheshomogeneitytestresultswiththeirgoldCRMcertificates(Hamlyn,2009a,b,2012a,b).Rocklabs(Smith&Ball2012a,b,2013a,b)certificatescontaina‘Homogene-ityAssessment’sectionwiththeRSDreportedbutdonotprovidetheactualresults.Segregation/Settlinginformationisalsoprovided. ToenabletheexplorationandminingindustrytohaveconfidenceinthequalityofgoldCRMsusedforQCandmandatoryreporting,manufacturersneedtoprovidedataonthehomogeneityofeverygoldCRM.Thishomogene-itytestworkcouldbethroughtheReducedAnalyticalSubsampleMethodasutilisedroutinelybyOREASandchosenforthisstudyorthroughtheReplicatesofLargeandSmallSampleMassasdescribedbyBagleyetal.(2015).WithoutCRMmanufacturersprovidingtranspar-encyonthehomogeneitythroughtestwork,usersshouldnotassumeallCRMsrepresentqualityproducts.

CONCLUSIONS ThehomogeneityoftwentycommercialgoldoreCRMsproducedbyAMIS(SouthAfrica),CDN(Canada),

Geostats(Australia),OREAS(Australia)andRocklabs(NewZealand)havebeenevaluatedandcompared.TheCRMsrangeingoldcontentfrom0.45to9.81ppm,typicalofthelevelscommonlyencounteredinminingexplorationprojects. TheCRMsofAMIS,CDN,GeostatsandOREASareproducedfromnaturallyoccurringgoldorestowhichvariablequantitiesofbarren/wasterockmaterialhasbeenaddedtoachievetargetgrades.RocklabsCRMsarepro-ducedfromarangeofrockandmineralproductstowhichfinegolddustparticleshavebeenaddedinconcentrationstoachievedesiredgrades. Theinvestigationhasshownaremarkablecontrastinhomogeneitybetweenthevariousproducers.Thesecon-trastinglevelsofhomogeneityhaveseriousramificationswithregardtosamplingerrors,whichinsomeinstancesareofamagnitudeequaltoorgreaterthantypical30gfireassaymeasurementerrorsrenderingthemofquestionablevalueasaQCtool.Samplingerrorsforatypicalfireassaychargeweight(25to50g)shouldbeveryminorcomparedtolaboratorymeasurementerrors.OtherwisetheCRMcannotbedeemedfitforpurposeastheuserisunableascertainthesourceoftheerrorseeninanalyticaldata. Thehomogeneityofthe20goldCRM’swereevalu-atedusingtheSamplingConstant,theminimumsamplemass(chargeweight)requiredtoachievea1%relativestandarddeviationinrepeatanalyses.ForthefourAMISCRM’stested,theSamplingConstantsreturnedarangefrom14to791g.CDNhadoneCRMwithaSamplingConstantof1.4gwhiletheotherthreerangedfrom111.8to263.4g.GeostatshadoneCRMwithaSamplingCon-stantof1.4gwiththeotherthreerangingfrom4.9to39.4g. TheOREASCRM’sallreturnedSamplingConstantsoflessthan4g.ForRocklabs,threeofthefourCRM’sre-turnedSamplingConstantsoflessthan4gwiththefourthcominginat27.1g.Currently,OREASistheonlyCRMmanufacturerroutinelyevaluatingandpublishingtheresultsofhomogeneitytestworkonalltheirgoldCRM’susingtheReducedAnalyticalSubsampleINAAmethod. ThisstudyclearlydemonstratesthatthereisawiderangeinqualityamongstcommerciallyavailablegoldoreCRM’sandthatthehomogeneityofgoldCRM’sfrommostmanufacturersvariesfromoneproducttothenext.ItisproposedthatallmanufacturersbeencouragedtoundertakeandpublishresultsofhomogeneitytestworkongoldinCRM’s,therebyprovidingendusersirrefutabledataonthemagnitudeofCRMsamplingerrorsandtheirimpactonQCprotocols.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND DISCLOSURE TheauthorwouldliketoacknowledgetworeviewerswhoassistedinframingthisarticleandRobertGarrett,EmeritusScientist,GeologicalSurveyofCanada,forhisconstructivecommentsonthemanuscript.Theauthorhasnofinancialinterests,directorindirect,inanyofthefiveCRMmanufacturers.

continued on page 16

PAGE 16 NUMBER 169 EXPLORE

Gold Homogeneity in Certified Reference Materials… continued from page 15

REFERENCES

Bagley,T.,Stanley,C.R.andMurimboh,J.2015.Deter-miningtheheterogeneityofReferenceMaterials.Pro-ceedingsofthe27thInternationalAppliedGeochemistrySymposium,April20-24,2015,Tucson,USA,9p.

GeostatsPtyLtd.2009.CertifiedGoldReferenceMaterialProductCodeG909-6.GeostatsPtyLtd.,1p.

GeostatsPtyLtd.2014.CertifiedGoldReferenceMaterialProductCodeG313-1.GeostatsPtyLtd.,1p.

GeostatsPtyLtd.2015a.CertifiedGoldReferenceMate-rialProductCodeG914-6.GeostatsPtyLtd.,1p.

GeostatsPtyLtd.2015b.CertifiedGoldReferenceMate-rialProductCodeG914-7.GeostatsPtyLtd.,1p.

Hamlyn,C.2009a.CertificateofAnalysisforGoldRefer-enceMaterialOREAS17c.OreResearchandExplorationPtyLtd.,10p.

Hamlyn,C.2009b.CertificateofAnalysisforGold-SilverReferenceMaterialOREAS62c.OreResearchandExplo-rationPtyLtd.,12p.

Hamlyn,C.2012a.CertificateofAnalysisforGoldOreReferenceMaterialOREAS201.OreResearchandEx-plorationPtyLtd.,7p.

Hamlyn,C.2012b.CertificateofAnalysisforGoldOreReferenceMaterialOREAS204.OreResearchandEx-plorationPtyLtd,7p.

Ingamells,C.O.&Switzer,P.1973.Aproposedsamplingconstantforuseingeochemicalanalysis.Talanta,20,547-568.

JORC.2012.AustralasianCodeforReportingofExplora-tionResults,MineralResourcesandOreReserves(TheJORCCode)[online].Availablefrom:(TheJointOreRe-servesCommitteeofTheAustralasianInstituteofMiningandMetallurgy,AustralianInstituteofGeoscientistsandMineralsCouncilofAustralia),44p.

Lieser,K.H.2001.Nuclear and Radiochemistry,2ndEd.:JohnWiley&Sons,Inc.

McWha,M.&Smee,B.W.2012a.AMIS0267,CertifiedReferenceMaterial,Goldsilver,epithermalveinore(highgrade)Guanajuato,Mexico.AfricanMineralStandards,11p.

McWha,M.&Smee,B.W.2012b.AMIS0310,CertifiedReferenceMaterial,GoldandCopperore,greenstone(rougherfeed)BuzwagiMine,Tanzania,AfricanMineralStandards,9p.

McWha,M.&Smee,B.W.2012c.AMIS0352,CertifiedReferenceMaterial,Mediumgradeepithermalgoldore,MasbateGoldProject,Philippines.AfricanMineralStan-dards,9p.

McWha,M.&Smee,B.W.2014.AMIS0360,CertifiedReferenceMaterial,Goldore,TaylorsMine,BarbertonGreenstoneBelt,SouthAfrica,10p.

NI43-101.2011.Standardsofdisclosureformineralproj-ects(Ni43-101);Chapter5,RulesandPolicies,CanadianInstituteofMining,MetallurgyandPetroleum,7043-7086,(http://web.cim.org/).

SAMREC.2009.TheSouthAfricanMineralCodefortheReportingofExplorationResults.MineralResourcesandMineralReserves(TheSAMRECCode),2007EditionasamendedJuly2009,61p(http://www.samcode.co.za/).TheSouthAfricanInstituteofMiningandMetallurgy(SA-MIM);GeologicalSocietyofSouthAfrica(GSSA).

Smith,M.&Ball,T.2012a.CertificateofAnalysisROCK-LABSReferenceMaterialSE68.Rocklabs,6p.

Smith,M.&Ball,T.2012b.CertificateofAnalysis.ROCK-LABSReferenceMaterialSG66.Rocklabs,6p.

Smith,M.&Ball,T.2013a.CertificateofAnalysis.ROCK-LABSReferenceMaterialSJ80.Rocklabs,6p.

Smith,M.&Ball,T.2013b.CertificateofAnalysis.ROCK-LABSReferenceMaterialSN75.Rocklabs,6p.

Sanderson,D.&Smee,B.W.2013a.ReferenceMaterials:CDN-GS-1M.CDNResourcesLaboratoryLtd.,2p.

Sanderson,D.&Smee,B.W.2013b.ReferenceMaterials:CDN-GS-3L.CDNResourcesLaboratoryLtd.,2p.

Sanderson,D.&Smee,B.W.2013c.ReferenceMaterials:CDN-GS-8C.CDNResourcesLaboratoryLtd.,2p.

Sanderson,D.&Smee,B.W.2014.ReferenceMaterials:CDN-GS-P5C.CDNResourcesLaboratoryLtd.,2p.

Stanley,C.R.&Smee,B.W.2007Strategiesforreducingsamplingerrorsinexplorationandresourcedefinitiondrillingprogrammesforgolddeposits.Geochemistry: Ex-ploration, Environment, Analysis,7,329–340.

EXPLORE NUMBER 169 PAGE 17

Geochemical Nuggets *New Feature*Sometimes an ICP-MS Never Forgets!

Table 1. Gold analyses by ICP-MS following an aqua regia diges-tion, with a lower detection limit of 0.1 ppb and an upper detec-tion limit of 100 ppb.

Asageneralrule,itisalwaysagoodideatomatchboththematrixandgrade

ofcertifiedreferencematerials(CRM)withthesamplesinageochemicalsurvey.Thefollowingexampleillustrateswhatcanhappenwhenthisisnotthecase. Table1illustratesasub-sampleofICP-MSaquaregiaAudataforsoilsamplesinaregionalsurveydesignedtodetectsub-10ppbAuanomalies.Thecontrolmaterialchosenforthesurveywasasulphidic,oregradeAuCRMbecausethisiswhattheexplorationcrewhadonhand.Asthetableillustrates,regionalbackgroundisprobablyontheorderof2ppb,sotheCRMchosenwasmorethanthreeordersofmagnitudeabovethislevel.ThehighlevelsofAuintheCRMhavecarriedacrosstothe“downstream”sampleswithintheanalyticalsequence,givingthemvaluesthatwouldotherwisebeconsideredanomalous.Theeffectpossiblycontinuesfurtheralongtheanalyticalsequencealthoughthelevelofcontaminationgraduallydiminishes.Asaconsequence,themostobviouslyaffectedsampleshadtobefilteredoutoftheinterpretationofasurveyinvolvingseveralhundredsoilsamples. The“memoryeffect”isawell-knownissuewithanaly-sesbyconventionalICP-MSusinganaquaregiadigestion(WangandBrindle,2014),orevenun-acidifiedsamples.Es-sentially,metalsmaybeadsorbedfromsolutionontoglasswareortubingduringsampleinjectionandnebulizationwithinanICP.Thesemetalsmaynotbeeffectivelyremovedbystandard,diluteacidicwashsolutionsanditmaybesometimebeforecrosscontaminationlevelsarereducedtobackgroundlevels,aswasthecasehere.Hadtheissuebeenrecognizedintime,thesamplesolutionsmighthavebeenre-readbeforedisposal,withouttheCRMs. Whileadvancesininstrumentationnowallowustode-tectthelevelsofsomeanalytesdowntotheppborevenpptlevel,theseadvancesmustbematchedwithanunderstand-ingofinstrumentationandtheconsequencesoffailingtouseappropriateCRMs.Inthisinstanceawell-intentionedattempttointroducequalitycontrolssamplesintoalow-levelAusoilsurveysucceededonlyincompromisingthedataduetopoorCRMselection.

References

Wang,Y.&Brindle,I.D.2014,Rapidhigh-performancesampledigestionforICPdeterminationbyColdblockTMdigestion:part2:golddeterminationingeologicalsampleswithmemoryeffectelimination.Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry,29,1904-1911.

Join us for Exploration ‘17October 21-25, 2017, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Exploration ‘17 is the sixth of the very successful series of Decennial Mineral Exploration Conferences which have been held in the seventh year of every decade starting in 1967. The theme of the Exploration ’17 conference is “Integrating the Geosciences: The Challenge of Discovery”, featuring a multi-national, multi-disciplinary technical programme, exhibition, workshops and field schools.

Decennial Conference Proceedings from the past five conferences (1967, 1977, 1987, 1997, 2007) are available for download on the web site under the ‘Resources’ header.

Web site: http://www.exploration17.com

PAGE 18 NUMBER 169 EXPLORE

Minutes of the 2015 AAG Annual General Meeting

Minutesofthe2015AnnualGeneralMeetingoftheAs-sociationofAppliedGeochemists,heldatthe27thInterna-tionalAppliedGeochemistrySymposium,Tucson,Arizona,USA,20April2015

I. Call to Order – Establishment of Quorum PresidentLeybournecalledtheAnnualGeneralMeet-ing(AGM)toorderat6:00PMlocaltime.Morethan30AAGFellowswerepresent,exceedingthenecessary15requiredforaquorum.

II. President’s report (M. Leybourne) PresidentLeybournethankedtheAAGExecutive,Council,andRegionalCouncilorsfortheircontributionstoAAGduringthetimesincethe2014AGM.HeextendedaspecialthankyoutoGwendyHallforhertremendouscontributiontoAAGasEditorofGEEAsinceitsinception(Volume1,Number1beingpublishedinFebruary2001)to2015.HealsowelcomedKurtKyserasthenewEditorofGEEA.HethankedBethMcClenaghan(Editor)andPimvanGeffen(BusinessManager)fortheircontributionstotheAAGnewsletterEXPLORE.HealsoextendedthankstoPatricedeCaritatforservingasAAG’sliaisonwithEle-mentsmagazineforthepastfewyearsandannouncedthatDennisArnewouldbetakingoverthoseresponsibilities.BrunoLemièreandGemmaBonham-Carterwererecog-nizedfortheiroutstandingcontributionstoAAG’swebsiteandAlArseneaultforhisdedicationtoAAGastheAs-sociation’sBusinessManager.Lastly,PresidentLeybournethankedErickWeiland,RobBowell,SarahLincoln,andRickSchwarzfortheirhardworkastheLocalOrganizingCommitteeforthe27thInternationalAppliedGeochemis-trySymposium. PresidentLeybourneannouncedthatDanielLayton-MatthewsofQueen’sUniversity,Kingston,Ontario,Cana-da,willbeAAG’sDistinguishedLecturerfor2015–2016.

III. Vice President’s report (R. Noble) VicePresidentNoblereportedonprogressinthepubli-cationofBobBoyle’sbookonthehistoryofgeochemistryandcosmochemistry.AneditorialteamisnowinplaceanditishopedthisbookmightbereadyforthenextIAGSin2017. Duringthisyear,AAGhasreceivedthreeupdatesfromRegionalCouncilors.NealBrewardhassteppeddownasRegionalCouncilorfortheUKandRepublicofIreland.VicePresidentNobleextendedhisthankstoNealforhisservicetotheAssociation.

VicePresidentNoblerecognizedPeterBradshawwhoreportedonprogressofthebookaboutthecontributionsofTonyBarringertothefieldofgeochemistry.Thefirstdraftislargelyeditedandthefirsttwochaptershavebeenprintset.Whencomplete,thebookwillbeavailableforpurchaseontheAAGwebsite. Lastly,VicePresidentNobleannouncedthatSteveCookwillbeAAG’snewVicePresidentbeginninginJanu-ary2016.

IV. Treasurer’s report (G. Hall) In2014,AAGsuccessfullyaccomplishedallthepaper-worknecessarytocontinueitsnon-profitstatusunderthenewCanadaNot-for-ProfitCorporationsAct. Ourinvestmentholdingsat3MacsforMarch31,2015:$615,301.29inCdn$(7%ofthatiscash)and$89,514.85inUS$cash(soontobeinvested). AlsoasofMarch31,ouraccountsare: CIBCCdn $25,539 CIBCUS $15,303

V. GEEA (G. Hall) AAG’sshareoftheprofitfromGEEAfor2014wasUS$43,797.Therejectionrateforsubmittedmanuscriptsisabout64%.

VI. EXPLORE (B. McClenaghan and P. van Geffen) B.McClenaghanthankedallthecorporatesponsorsandadvertisersforEXPLORE.In2014,welostonecorpo-ratesponsor.Thenewsletteroperatedatasmallprofitin2014.

VII. Awards and medals (B. Eppinger) ColinDunn(2014)andRaviAnand(2015)willbereceivingAAG’sGoldMedalduringtheIAGS.BethMc-ClenaghanwillbereceivingtheSilverMedal.Requestsfornominationsfor2016willbesenttoAAGmemberssoon.

VIII. Symposia (D. Cohen) Thebidtoholdthe2017IAGSinFlorence,ItalywasrejectedbyCouncilbecauseofconcernsaboutsomeofthecostestimates.TheAssociationiscurrentlyinvestigatingholdingthe2017IAGSinCanada.Moreinformationwillbeavailableinthenextfewmonths.

IX. Other business PresidentLeybourneopenedthemeetingtoquestionsfromtheattendingAAGFellows.Avarietyoftopicswerediscussedthatwererelatedtoothersectionsoftheminutesandconcluded.

X. Adjournment PresidentLeybournethankedalltheparticipantsforattendingthe2015AGManddeclaredthemeeetingad-journedat6:47PMlocaltime.

Association of Applied GeochemistsStudent Membership

$10 US

Encourage a student to join!

EXPLORE NUMBER 169 PAGE 19

Recently Published in ElementsVolume 11, no. 4 Social and Economic Impact of Geochemistry TheAugusteditionofElementsfocusedonthemanywaysthatappliedgeochemistryimpactssociety.Itstartswithanoverviewoftheimpactofgeochemistry(Ludden,Albarède&Coleman),looksathowgeochemistryisusedinmineralexploration(Kyser,Barr&Ihlenfeld)andthenatnewchallengesandmaterialsinthefieldofenvironmentalmineralogy(Calas,McMillan&Bernier-Latmani).AnarticlebasedonacasestudyfromtheCityofLondonexamineshowgeochemistrycanbeappliedtourbanplanning(Ludden,Peach&Flight),whilstanotherexplorestheuseofstableisotopesinforensicgeochemistry(Ehleringer,Chesson,Valenzuela,Tipple&Martinella).Thefinalcontributionexplorestheusesofmetalstableisotopesinmedicine(Rakovan&Pasteris).TheAAGSocietyNewsincludedasummaryofthesuccessful27thIAGSbyErickWeilandandanabstractofBobGarrett’sthought-provokingarticleonQA/QCplotsthatappearedinExplore167.Therecertainlyshouldbesomethingfornearlyeverygeochemistinthisvol-ume!

Volume 11, no. 5, Supergene Metal Deposits TheOctobereditionofElementsfocusesonsupergenemetaldeposits.Itbeginswithanoverviewofthegeologicalandeconomicsig-nificanceofsupergenemetaldeposits(Reich&Vasconcelos),exploressupergenealterationoforedeposits(Dill),paleoclimaticsignaturesofthisdeposittype(Vasconcelos,Reich&Shuster),theuseofCuisotopesinunderstandingsupergeneprocesses(Mathur&Fantle),predictinggeologicalcorrosionwithelectrodes(Renock&Shuller-Nickles),andfinisheswithanexaminationofthegeomicrobiologyofsupergenemetaldeposits(Zammit,Shuster,Gagen&Southam).TheAAGSocietyNewsincludedashortobituaryforEricHoffman,aswellascitationsforthewinnersofthe2014and2015goldandsilvermedals.Thisiscertainlyanissueforthoseinvolvedinregolithgeochemistryandwithaninterestinsupergenemineraldeposits.

Dennis Arne

InlovingmemoryofDr.EricHoffman,Ph.D,P.Geo,theEricL.HoffmanMemorialScholarshiphasbeenes-tablishedattheUniversityofToronto,Canada.ThisEarthSciencesgraduatescholarshipwillbeabletohelpfuturestudentsadvanceafieldthatEricwassopassionateabout.Dr.EricHoffmanwasthePresidentandfounderofActi-vationLaboratoriesLtd.(Actlabs),withheadquartersinAncaster,Ontario,Canada,specializingincontractanalyti-calservicestomanyindustriesincluding;Minerals,Metal-lurgy,Petroleum,LifeSciences,Environmental,Forensics,MaterialsTesting,andAgriculture.EricdedicatedhiscareertoadvancingActlabsandthegeochemicalfieldandquicklybecamearespectedandvaluablecontributortothegeochemistrycommunity.Ericwasastrongsupporterofcollaborativeindustry-Universityresearchsupporting

bothundergraduateandgraduatestudentswhileprovidingprojectguidanceandcontributingtohundredsofresearchpublications. Eveninhisabsence,Actlabswillcontinuetoprovideindustry-leadinginnovativetechnologiesandhighqual-ityservicesandsupportstudentsthroughActlabsandtheEricL.HoffmanMemorialScholarship.Eric’smemorywillneverbeforgottenandhislegacywillliveforever. Tocontributetothescholarship,visitthewebpageontheUniversityofTorontowebsite:

https://donate.utoronto.ca/give/show/85 IfyouhaveanyquestionsregardingtheMemorialScholarshiporhavememoriesorcommentsaboutEricthatyouwouldliketoshare,contact:[email protected]

Eric L. Hoffman Memorial Scholarship

PAGE 20 NUMBER 169 EXPLORE

AAG’s Student Support Program Resurrected in 2015

Treatise on Geochemistry. Edition No. 2

Researchcarriedoutbystudentsofappliedgeochemis-tryusuallyinvolvesgeochemicalanalysis,thecostofwhichcanbeonerous.Recognisingthisfact,theAssociationofAppliedGeochemists(AAG)institutedaStudentSupportProgramin2011,inwhichanalyticallaboratoriesofferedsupporttoappliedgeochemistrystudentsintheformoffreeanalyses.ThisprogramhasbeenimplementedbytheAAGforovertwoyears.Duetothedownturninthemineralexplorationsector,participatinglaboratorieswerenotbe-ingabletosustaintheirinvolvementandtheprogramwassuspendedin2014.However,allparticipatinglaboratories(ALS,Ultratrace,Genalysis,Becquerel)andAAGagreedthattheaimoftheprogramwassound,andtheprogramhasbeenrevised.Actlabs,ALS-Australia,Intertek-Genaly-sis,andBureauVeritasUltratracehaveagreedtobepartofthisrevisedversionoftheStudentSupportprogram. Initsrevampedform,participatinglaboratoriesdonothavetopre-commitfundstotheprogram,butcanchoosewhethertheywilloffersupport–andtowhatlevel–onacase-by-casebasis.Thisrevisionmeansthatlaboratoriesarenotobligedtosupportallprojectsofferedtothem,butalsothatprojectsendorsedbyAAG’sEducationCommit-teemaynotreceivesupport,ormayonlyreceivepartialsupport.Thesechangestotheprogramhavenot,however,affectedtheapplicationprocess.ApplicationscanbemadeusingtheformavailableontheStudentspageoftheAAGwebsite(www.appliedgeochemists.org).Followingsubmis-sionofthecompletedformtoAAG’sEducationCommit-tee([email protected]),themeritoftheapplicationisassessed,andthoseworthyofsupportarerecommendedtoparticipatinglaboratories.Inmakingtheapplication,itisusefultolookatthescopeofworkthatisofferedbyparticipatinglaboratoriesassetoutintheirscheduleofservicesavailableontheirrespectivewebsites.Theseschedulesalsoprovideanalyticalcosts:inmakingthe

application,itismorelikelythatanapplicationwillreceivesupportfromAAG’sEducationCommitteeandcommit-mentfromlaboratoriesifthescopeofworkrequestedisstronglyalignedwithappliedgeochemistryandrealisticintermsofcosts. ExamplesofgeochemicalresearchsupportedbyAAG’sStudentSupportProgramincludeprojectscarriedoutbyAndyLucasandXinDu,bothofwhomreceivedin-kindanalyticalsupportfromIntertek-Genalysis.BothAndyandXinfulfilledtheirobligationsfromtheAAGStudentSup-portProgrambypublishinginEXPLORE: Lucas,A.R.,Rate,A.W.,Salmon,S.U.,Reid,N.,Anand,R.R.,2013.Evaluatingthediffusivegradientsinthinfilmstechniqueforthedetectionofmulti-elementanomaliesinsoils.EXPLORE,161,1-15. Du,X.,Rate,A.W.,Gee,M.A.M.,2012.ParticlesizefractionationandchemicalspeciationofREEinalateriticweatheringprofileinWesternAustralia.EXPLORE,157,1-14. Currently,studentsMarcusPhua(UniversityofMel-bourne)andEnerstTata(UniversityofBuea,Cameroon)havereceivedsupportfortheirresearch.Marcus’sworkinvolvesthepetrogenesisofgabbroicintrusionshostingNi–Cu–PGEmineralizationinWesternTasmania(supportedbyBureauVeritas–Ultratrace),andEnerst’sPhDthesisdealswithgranite-hostedgoldmineralizationfromsouth-eastCameroon(supportedbyIntertek-Genalysis). IftheAAGStudentSupportProgramisofinteresttoyouasasupervisor,orasastudentofappliedgeochemistry,pleasevisittheStudentpageoftheAAGwebsite(https://www.appliedgeochemists.org)tofindoutmoreaboutthisprogram,anddownloadanapplicationform.

Paul MorrisChair, AAG Education Committee

ThisextensivelyupdatedneweditionofthewidelyacclaimedTreatiseonGeochemistryhasincreaseditscoveragebeyondthewiderangeofgeochemicalsubjectareasinthefirstedition,withfivenewvolumeswhichinclude:thehistoryoftheatmosphere,geochemistryofmineraldeposits,archaeologyandanthropology,organicgeochem-istryandanalyticalgeochemistry.Inaddition,theoriginalVolume1on"Meteorites,Comets,andPlanets"wasexpandedintotwoseparatevolumesdealingwithmeteoritesandplanets,respectively.TheseadditionsincreasedthenumberofvolumesintheTreatisefrom9to15withtheindex/appendicesvolumeremainingasthelastvolume(Volume16).Eachoftheoriginalvolumeswasscrutinizedbytheap-propriatevolumeeditors,withrespecttonecessaryrevisionsaswellasadditionsanddeletions.Asaresult,27%wererepublishedwithoutmajorchanges,66%wererevisedand126newchapterswereadded. Formoreinformationpleasegotoon:http://www.researchandmarkets.com/publication/me5b86z/treatise_on_geochemistry

EXPLORE NUMBER 169 PAGE 21

Student-Industry mineral exploration workshop

Inanefforttoattractmorestudentsintothemineralexplorationindustry,theProspectorsandDevelopersAsso-ciationofCanada(PDAC)convenedits9thannualStudent-IndustryMineralExplorationWorkshop(S-IMEW)fromMay1-15,2015.Twenty-sixseniorgeosciencestudentsfromuniversitiesandcollegesfromacrossCanadaconvergedonSudburytoparticipateinlectures,presentationsandhands-onsessionscoveringexplorationtechniques,mineraldeposits,geophysics,geochemistry,environmental,healthandsafetyandcorporatesocialresponsibilityissues.Thetwo-week,allexpenses-paidgatheringprovidedthestudentswithanopportunitytoexperiencethemanyfacetsofthemineralexplorationindustry. ‘GeochemistryDay’isoneofthehighlightsoftheworkshopeachyearandwasorganizedandtaughtthisyearbyStewHamilton,RichardDyer,AndyBajc,andSarahHashmioftheOntarioGeologicalSurveyandBethMc-ClenaghanfromtheGeologicalSurveyofCanada.Theyintroducedstudentstoexplorationgeochemicaltechniquesandprovidedhands-onfieldandlabexperiencesthatstudentswereunlikelytoreceiveatuniversity,includingor-ganiclakesedimentsampling,soilprofilesandtillsampling,andthemicroscopicworldofindicatorminerals. Theworkshopwasagreatopportunityforstudentstolearnaboutthewidevarietyofcareeropportunitiesinmineralexploration,gainexperiencewithexplorationtech-niquesnottypicallytaughttoundergraduatestudentsandexperiencesomeoftheadventuresofbeingageoscientist. InformationaboutthePDAC’sS-IMEWprogramisavailableatthisweblink:http://www.pdac.ca/programs/students/s-imew/

Beth McClenaghanGeological Survey of Canada

Voting Members

DavidMurphyAnglogoldAshantiLtd.PrincipalGeochemist19WhitfieldSt.Floreat,WAAUSTRALIA6014Membershipno.3675 PerttiSaralaGeologicalSurveyofFinlandP.O.Box77Rovaniemi,FINLAND96101Membershipno.3893

Regular Members StephenDeWitConsultingGeologist3020MeadowDriveNanaimo,B.C.CANADAV9R7C6Membership#4307 SusanDriebergPrincipalGeochemist,RioTinto224N2200WestSaltLakeCity,UTUSA84116Membership#4308 EvgeniaLebedevaGeochemist,Intertek156CanningHighwaySouthPerth,WAAUSTRALIA6151Membership#4310 DouglasC.MenziesConsultingGeologist,Geoinsite16CullenDriveKiama,NSWAUSTRALIA2533Membership#4311 Student Members JasmineA.MoertleCaliforniaStateUniversity,LongBeach6750E.RosebaySt.LongBeach,CAUSA90808Membership#4309

New AAG Members

Students examining indicator minerals during Geochem-istry Day lab exercise.

PAGE 22 NUMBER 169 EXPLORE

Canadian Science and Technology in Action Coast to Coast

MINERAL EXPLORATION LABORATORY SERVICES

MINERAL EXPLORATION SERVICES

Full Service Geochemical Analysis Sample Preparation and Storage Precious Metals Fire Assay Core handling and cutting Multi Element by ICP

THE AGAT LABS ADVANTAGE

Expert Client Project Management Fast Turnaround Times Sampling Supplies Accurate Results Reliable Service

AGAT LABS IS ACCREDITED

Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation (CALA): ISO/IEC 17025 Standard Standards Council of Canada (SCC): Tests within our scope of accreditation

With over 36 years of experience and more than 1,200 employees, AGAT Laboratories offers Precise, Accurate and Reliable analytical services nationwide.

Paid Advertisement

EXPLORE NUMBER 169 PAGE 23

CALENDAR OF EVENTSInternational,national,andregionalmeetingsofinteresttocolleaguesworkinginexploration,environmentalandotherareasofappliedgeochemistry.TheseeventsalsoappearontheAAGwebpageat:www.appliedgeochemists.org.

Pleaseletusknowofyoureventsbysendingdetailsto:Steve Amor

GeologicalSurveyofNewfoundlandandLabradorP.O.Box8700,St.John’s,NL,Canada,A1B4J6

Email:[email protected]:+1-709-729-1161

2016 10-16JANUARY WinterConferenceonPlasma Spectrochemistry.TucsonAZUSA. Website:icpinformation.org/ Winter_Conference.html19-21JANUARY 10thInternationalSymposiumon EnvironmentalGeochemistry.PerthAustralia. Website:www.iseg10.com/25-28JANUARY MineralExplorationRoundup.Vancouver BCCanada.Website:amebc.ca/roundup5-6FEBRUARY AtlanticGeoscienceSocietyAnnual Colloquium.TruroNSCanada.Website: www.acadiau.ca/~raeside/ags2016/14-18FEBRUARY TheMineralsMetals&MaterialsSociety 145thAnnualMeeting&Exhibition.Nash- villeTNUSA. Website:tinyurl.com/nbdyqeh21-26FEBRUARY2016OceanSciencesMeeting.NewOrleans LAUSA.Website:osm.agu.org/2016/6-9MARCH ProspectorsandDevelopersAssociationof CanadaAnnualConvention.TorontoON Canada.Website:www.pdac.ca/convention21-23MARCH NorthAtlanticCratonMeetingEdinburgh UK.Website:www.bgs.ac.uk/nac201617-22APRIL EuropeanGeosciencesUnionGeneral Assembly2016.ViennaAustria.Website: www.egu2016.eu/16-18MAY 7thGeochemistrySymposiumwithInter- nationalParticipation.SideTurkey. Website:jeokimya.ankara.edu.tr/en22-25MAY 10thSouthAmericanSymposiumon IsotopeGeology.PuertoVallartaMexico. Website:www.ssagi10.geofisica.unam.mx/1-3JUNE GAC/MACAnnualMeeting.Whitehorse YTCanada.Website:whitehorse2016.ca/13-17JUNE 8thInternationalSiberianEarlyCareer GeoScientistsConference.Novosibirsk Russia.Website:conf.ict.nsc.ru/sibconf201619-23JUNE 6thInternationalCongressonArsenic intheEnvironment.StockholmSweden. Website:www.as2016.se26-30JUNE AustralianEarthSciencesConvention. AdelaideSAAustralia.Website: aesc2016.gsa.org.au26JUNE-1JULYGoldschmidt2016.YokohamaJapan. Website:www.geochemsoc.org/programs/ goldschmidtconference/10-13JULY 3rdInternationalConferenceon3D MaterialsScience.St.CharlesILUSA. Website:tinyurl.com/psr55at

10-13JULY 9thInternationalConferenceonEnviron- mentalCatalysis.NewcastleAustralia. Website:tinyurl.com/pts5mtv11-15JULY 4thInternationalWorkshoponHighly SiderophileElementGeochemistry. DurhamUK. Website:community.dur.ac.uk/hse.ws17-22JULY Eurosoil2016.IstanbulTurkey.Website: www.eurosoil2016istanbul.org19-21JULY 39thInternationalSymposiumonEnviron- mentalAnalyticalChemistry.Hamburg GermanyWebsite:tinyurl.com/pnaswjw23-27JULY EuroscienceOpenForum2016.Manchester UK.Website:www.esof.eu24-28JULY Microscopy&Microanalysis2016. ColumbusOHUSA. Website:tinyurl.com/pdyxkpz27-28JULY 8thInternationalCongressofEnvironmen- talResearch.LübeckGermany.Website: www.icer16.jerad.org20-21AUGUST 6thInternationalConferenceonEnviron- mentalPollutionandRemediation. BudapestHungary.Website:icepr.org21-25AUGUST 33rdInternationalGeographicalCongress. BeijingChinaWebsite:www.igc2016.org27AUGUST– 35thInternationalGeologicalCongress4SEPTEMBER CapeTownSouthAfrica. Website:www.35igc.org4-7SEPTEMBER IAP2016:InterfacesAgainstPollution. LleidaSpain.Website:www.iap2016.org4-7SEPTEMBER15thWorkshoponProgressinTraceMetal SpeciationforEnvironmentalAnalytical Chemistry.GdanskPoland.Website:chem. pg.edu.pl/tracespec5-9SEPTEMBER 13thInternationalNickel-Copper-PGE Symposium.FremantleWAAustralia. Website:www.iagod.org/node/5811-15SEPTEMBER2ndEuropeanMineralogicalConference. RiminiItaly. Website:emc2016.socminpet.it/25-28SEPTEMBERSEG2016Conference:TethyanTectonics andMetallogeny.ÇeşmeTurkey.Website: www.seg2016.org9-13OCTOBER WorldWaterCongress&Exhibition. BrisbaneQLDAustralia. Website:tinyurl.com/pgrbkwu16-21OCTOBER WaterRockInteraction15.ÉvoraPortugal. Website(pdf):tinyurl.com/lch75x8

PAGE 24 NUMBER 169 EXPLORE

Actlabs adds value to your projects:

· Precise and Accurate Results

· Fast Turnaround

· Responsive and Knowledgeable

Customer Service

A global company with a

local full laboratory presence.

[email protected]

www.actlabs.com

Paid Advertisement

Gwendy E.M. Hall, Treasurer 110 Aaron Merrick Drive Merrickville, ON K0G 1N0 Canada TEL: +1-613-269-7980 email: [email protected]

David B. Smith, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Box 25046, MS 973 Denver, CO 80225, USA TEL: (303) 236-1849 email: [email protected]

Al Arseneault, Business ManagerP.O. Box 26099, 72 Robertson Road, Ottawa, ON K2H 9R0 CANADA,

TEL: (613) 828-0199 FAX: (613) 828-9288, e-mail: [email protected]

Matt Leybourne, President DepartmentofEarthSciencesand MineralExplorationResearch Laurentian University 935 Ramsey Lake Road Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada TEL: +1-705-675-1151 ext. 2263 email: [email protected]

THE ASSOCIATION OF APPLIED GEOCHEMISTSP.O. Box 26099, 72 Robertson Road, Ottawa, Ontario K2H 9R0 CANADA • Telephone (613) 828-0199

www.appliedgeochemists.org

AAG COMMITTEES

COUNCILLORS

Brazil João Larizzatti [email protected] Brian Townley [email protected] Xueqiu Wang [email protected]

Northern Europe Pertti Sarala [email protected] Europe Benedetto De Vivo [email protected] Asia Iftikar Malik [email protected]

Southern Africa Theo Davies [email protected] and Republic of Ireland Kate Knights [email protected]

Ryan Noble, Vice-President CSIRO P.O. Box 1130 Bentley, Australia 6102 TEL: +61 8 6436 8684 email: [email protected]

New MembershipNigel Radford, [email protected] Awards and [email protected] BennPertti Sarala Romy Matthies

AdmissionsNigel Radford, [email protected] EducationPaul Morris, [email protected]

SymposiaDavid Cohen, [email protected]

2014-2015 Alejandro Arauz Dennis Arne StephenCook Mel Lintern Paul Morris PeterSimpson BobEppinger,Ex Officio

AAG COORDINATORS

AAG Student Paper PrizeDavid Cohen, [email protected]

AAG WebsiteGemma Bonham-Carter, [email protected] Coordinator: Bruno Lemiere, [email protected]

Geoscience CouncilsDavid Cohen, [email protected]

GEEAKurt Kyser, [email protected]

EXPLOREBeth McClenaghan, [email protected]

ELEMENTSDennis Arne, [email protected]

AAG Regional CouncillorsRyan Noble, [email protected]

2015-2016 Dave Cohen Ray Lett Tom Molyneux Juan Carlos Ordóñez Calderón Peter Rogers Peter Winterburn

OFFICERSJanuary - December 2015