NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DocketNo. PAPO-00 · 2012. 11. 19. · UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE PRE-LICENSE APPLICATION PRESIDING OFFICER BOARD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

BEFORE THE PRE-LICENSE APPLICATION PRESIDING OFFICER BOARD

In the Matter of ) DocketNo. PAPO-00 )

1

Pre-Application Matters) 1

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ) ASLBP NO. 04-829-01-PAP0

(High Level Waste Repository: ) NEV-01

EXHIBITS TO THE ANSWER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY TO THE STATE OF NEVADA’S MOTION TO STRIKE

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

By:

Donald P. Irwin Michael R. Shebelskie Kelly L. Faglioni HUNTON & WILLIAMS Riverfront Plaza, East Tower 95 1 East Byrd Street Richmond, Virginia 232 19-4074 Telephone: (804) 788-8200 Facsimile: (804) 788-8218 Email: [email protected]

Of Counsel:

Martha S. Crosland U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of General Counsel Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, S . W. Washington, D.C. 20585

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Affidavit of Harry J. Leake

Affidavit of Beatrice E. Reilley

Affidavit of Colleen M. Lurwick

DEN Initial Certification Plan

March 28,2003 letter from Daniel Graser to Joseph Ziegler

April 11, 2003 letter from Joseph Ziegler to Daniel Graser

March 23, 1995 LSS ARP transcript (portion)

June 3,2003 LSN ARP transcript (portion)

December 9,2003 LSN ARP transcript (portion)

List of Call Memo recipients

List of Call Memo recipients that did not provide certifications

Agreement for Transfer of Responsibilities (portion)

LSN Guideline #23 (Access Control)

May 4,2004 letter from Joseph Ziegler to Daniel Graser

May 5,2004 letter from Daniel Graser to Joseph Zeigler

July 2,2004 letter from John Arthur to Daniel Graser

Number of DEN documents by collection

Number of RMS/RIS documents by document type

Number of paper documents by document type

Chart re: status of documents on Affidavit of Robert R. Loux

Exhibit 1

EXHIBIT 1


BEFORE THE PRIGLICENSE APPLICATION PRESIDING OFFICER BOARD

In the Matter of ) DocketNo. PAPO-00 )

1

Pre-Application Matters) )



AFF’IDAVIT OF HARRY E. LEA=

I, Harry E. Leake, do swear that the following is true and correct and that, if called as a

witness, I would testify as follo’ws:

1. I am the Licensing Support Network Project Manager for the Office of Civilian

Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM), Department of Energy (DEN). My responsibilities

include overall management of DEN’s participant server for the Licensing Support Network

(LSN) system. I have held this position since January 2003.

2. I am the person who made the estimate for DEN’s production of 3-4 million

documents that was provided to the LSN Administrator in April 2003. That estimate was

provided to help the LSN Administrator adequately size the LSN. I made the estimate at a very

preliminary stage of the collection process and was not able to rely on actual document counts.

Further, I made the estimate without regard to any particular definition of documentary material.

3. To process the documents for the LSN system, DEN and CACIC, 1nc.-Commercial

(CACI) had to ensure that legible electronic files were created of the documents’ image and text,

create bibliographic headers for the documents, and screen the documents to ensure that

sensitive-unclassified, Privacy Act, or privileged information was not released to the public.

Then, the electronic file of the documents needs to be shipped to the location of DEN’s

participant server where additional processing steps include validating the transmittal, loading

the content manager, updating the search engine, and exporting to the web server.

4. DEN adopted the April 15 cut-off date, in consultation with CACI and BSC, as

the lead time CACI and BSC needed to complete those activities. It provided time for record

originators in OCRWM to submit records and time for processing these records into the Records

Management System. It also allowed time for CACI to process documents, pursuant to

procedures, into the required electronic format to support initial certification.

5. DEN has procedures in pIace for CAC

receives after April 15,2004.

6. On June 30, 2004, DEN loaded onto its participant server the electronic files

containing the bibliographic headers of its documentary material and, where appropriate, the

electronic images and text of those materials. Those files are compatible with the LSN

Administrator’s indexing software and meet the technical requirements of the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission’s (NRC) regulations.

7. On June 30, 2004, DEN made all those files available to the LSN Admjnistrator.

Also on June 30, 2004, DEN made all these files available on the Internet through a link on its

website, which connects the user to DEN’s participant server.

8. DEN also made available on June 30, 2004, through its website an index of the

files on its participant website. The website includes a search engine that allows searches of both

headers and text in a manner similar to the LSN Administrator’s website.

9. Prior to June 30, 2004, DEN has been cooperating with the LSN Administrator to

expedite the LSN Administrator’s auditing and indexing of DEN’s documentary material.

2

Beginning on May 5, 2004, DEN provided its documentary material to the LSN Administrator

for indexing according to the LSN Administrator’s “Access Control Guidelines” that he adopted

in March 2004.

10. When DEN began to provide its documentary material for early crawling, the

LSN Administrator estimated that he could index 30,000 documents a day/l50,000 documents a

week. At that rate, there would have been sufficient time between May 5, when DEN started

providing documents, and June 30 for the LSN Administrator to index the number of documents

that DEN produced in full text.

11.

indexing process.

12.

The LSN Administrator experienced initial technical problems that delayed the

Near the date of its initial certification, DEN identified privileged documents that

had been indexed as part of the early crawling process and that needed to be removed from the

index before DEN’s certification, as permitted by the Access Control Guidelines. Processing

these necessary changes further limited the number of documents the LSN Administrator could

index before DEN’s initial certification.

13. The LSN Administrator indexed approximately 500,000 (or about one-half) of

DEN’s full text documents by June 30,2004.

14. DEN took its website off-line for four and a half days starting on July 1. This was

done to safeguard the content of certain documents that contain privacy protected information

and that were inadvertently made available in full text format through DEN’s website. The

problem was fixed as expeditiously as possible, and the website was turned back on the morning

of July 6,2004.

15. Since June 30, DEN has worked with the LSN Administrator to verify that his

index does not contain the text of any privileged documents crawled before June 30. The LSN

Administrator has verified to DEN that this is the case.

16. The LSN Administrator made available to the public on July 14, 2004 his partial

index of the documents on DEN’s participant server.

17. DEN is able to provide the LSN Administrator each day with as many files that

his office can index when the LSN Administrator informs DEN that it is ready to resume the

indexing of DEN’s collection.

28. It is my understanding that the LSN Administrator has temporarily ceased

indexing because of technical difficulties with his indexing system. It is DEN’s belief that these

difficulties are not due to problems with DEN’S electronic files.

19. DEN will continue to offer public access to the electronic files on its participant

server and the associated index through its website.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing i s true and correct. Executed on July

22,2004.

N

STATE: OF NEVADA 1 ) to-wit:

CITY/COUNTY OF ?,\ pr(2\cL 1

4

I, mi t t C \ * i C r n M , a Notary Public in and for the S-tctk & U U A P - P I - *

at large, hereby certify that on July 22, 2004, Harry E. Leake personally appeared before me and

executed this affidavit in my presence.

Given under my hand t h i s 2 2 day of July 2004.

w

MY commission expires: JW . I \3 -

5

Exhibit 2

EXHIBIT 2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICANUCLEAR REGULATORY CO1MMISSION

BEFORE THE PRIE-ICENSE APPLICATION PRESIDING OFFICER

In the Matter of ) Docket No. P'APO-0fl

U.S. DEPARTIMENT OF ENERGY ASLBP No. 04-829-01-PAPO

(Iligh Level Waste Repository: 3 NEV-O1Pre-Application Matters) )

AFFIDAVIT OF BEATRICE F.. RF.ILI.Y

1, Beatrice E. Reilly, do swear that the following is true and correct and zhat. if called as a

xilness. I would testify as follows:

1. 1 am the Internal and External Communications Manager for Bechtel SAIC Company,

LCC (BSC). My responsibilities include managing public information and internal

communications activities for the Yucca Mountain Project. I have held this position

sincc 1991 on the Yucca Mountain Project.

2. BSC is a contractor to the U.S. Department of Energy (DEN). Part of BSC-s

responsibilities for DlEN include operating the Yucca Mfountain Las Vegas Information

Center (tlVIC).

3. 1SC staffs the LVIC with its Communication Department persouinel. and they have high-

speed computerized access to the Internet. Also. members of the public can literally walk

into the LVIC and gain entry to the DEN's participant server through the LIVIC's two

available computers. Moreover, the center is equipped to accommodate visitors with

physical disabilities. 'lie LVIC has been in operation tbr more than a decade.

4. The IVIC anticipated that with the release of documents to the Licensing Support

Netvork (I.SN) system. it would receive an increased volume of inquiries. As a result. in

April 2004. the LVIC began to plan for the L.SN system's debut, including the increased

volumne of queries.

5. As part of that effort, personnel at the LVIC were advised before June 30 that they would

be designated as the point of contact for public queries regarding tile LSN.

6. Procedures and processes were developed in advance of June 30 to assist L[IC personnel

in answering public queries about the LSN. Specifically. BSC developed a Concept of

Operations to address external requests that related to the I.SN system. This Concept of

Operation has been in place since June 21, 2004.

7. According to the Concept or Operations, personnel at the LVIC will respond to calls and

docutnent all calls in a database. The LVIC also assists users in accessing documents

%without an image and addressing concern-s over material on the LSN by forwarding these

inquiries to CACI. Inc.

S. If the LVIC receives a request not related to a specific document. LVIC directs the caller

to the l)EN participant server and answvers the caller's general questions.

9. LVIC personnel were trained regarding these processes and procedures on June 23, 2004.

10. To gain access to the services provided by the LVIC. the public can contact the LVIC

through several methods: (i) LVIC's published local Nevada phone numbers; (ii) LVIC's

1-800 number; (iii) walk-ins to the LVIC center; and (iv) written inquiries. including

emails.

2

11. 1 am not awvare of any member of the LVIC staff who. in response to a call after DEN

activated its veb link to its LSN collectiont, stated ignorance of thc LSN or the LVIC's

role in responding to public qucries regarding it.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on

July 22, 2004.

Beatrice E. Reilly

STATE OF NEVADA) to-wit:

crry or V czsCOUNTY OF CLARIC

1, , E. 1 . ai.I a Notary Public in and for the County of Clark. hereby ccrtify

that on July 22. 2004, Beatricc E. Reilly personally appeared before rne and executed this

affidavit in my presence.

Given under my hand this 22 day of July, 2004.

r I t 1"i' Notary Public

My commission expires: Ocd-eh1xr 17, >°°05 .

3

0500 7.000002 YM 4101vl

Exhibit 3

EXHIBIT 3


BEFORE THE PRE-LICENSE APPLICATION PRESIDING OFFICER

In the Matter of ) DocketNo. PAPO-00 1

)

Pre-Application Matters) 1



AFFIDAVIT OF COLLEEN M. LURWICK

I, Colleen M. Lurwick, do swear that the following is true and correct and that, if called

as a witness, I would testify as follows:

1. I am a senior vice-president for CACI, hc.-- Commercial (CACI). CACI is the

litigation support contractor for the Department of Energy (DEN) for the collection and

processing of documents provided for possible inclusion on the Licensing Support Network

(LSN). I have the overall responsibility for CACI’s work on that project.

2. CACI maintained business records to track the documents that were collected and

processed for DEN’S production to the LSN. The data reported in this affidavit comes from

those business records.

3 . As a result of DEN’S and CACI’s efforts as described in the Certification Plans

for Document Collection and Processing, a group of approximately 2.9 million documents was

identified and processed for possible production as DEN’S initial certification. This group of

documents was obtained after excluding a large number of documents that were duplicative, that

did not meet criteria of the May 5,2003 memorandum from the Office of General Counsel (Call

Memo), or that were excludable by regulation.

. ..

4. The group of 2.9 million documents included: (i) approximately 1.3 million

documents from DEN’s Record Management System; (ii) approximately 850,000 paper and

approximately 50,000 electronic documents submitted in response to the May 5, 2003

memorandum from the Office of General Counsel (Call Memo); and (iii) approximately 700,000

emails and attachments that project personnel identified as potentially relevant.

5. CACI followed the directions in DEN’S Initial Certification Plan to identify which

of these 2.9 million documents are documentary material. These instructions resulted in the

identification of the approximately 2.1 million documents that were loaded onto DEN’s

~ ~ i c i p a n t server by June 30,2004.

6. CACI processed certain documents received after April 15,2004 in time for their

inclusion with DEN’s initial certification. CACI processed in time for the initial certification all

the Records Management System feeds it received through May 22,2004. CACI also processed

in time for the initial certification all the paper documents that it received in response to the Call

Memo through June 11,2004.

7. CACI received after April 15,2004 but did not process for the initial certification

approximately 81,000 documents. CACI received 62,000 of these before June 30, 2004. It

received the remaining 19,000 afterwards. The precise number of these documents will not be

known until the processing is complete, but CACI’s current estimate breaks down as follows: (i)

19,354 documents from the Records Management System; (ii) 1,040 paper documents submitted

in response to the Call Memo; (iii) 34,750 efiles produced in response to the Call Memo (and not

completely processed to eliminate duplicates); and (iv) 26,238 ernails identified as potentially

relevant by their authors.

2

8. CACI has begun processing these 81,000 documents pursuant to existing

procedures.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on

July 22,2004.

4 Colleen M. Lurwick AP -dL C O M M O ~ E A L T H OF VIRGINIA 1

) to-wit: CITY OF Ar tb&-UA-Q P )

I, kcv) 4 & /-/, a Notary Public in and for the @own on we4 )k 4 at large, hereby certify that on July 22,2004, Colleen M. Lurwick personally appeared before me

and executed this affidavit in my presence.

Given under my hand this E % y of July 22,2004.

3 65007.000002 YM 4 100~2

Exhibit 4

EXHIBIT 4

OFFZCE OF CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT' LICENSING SUPPORT NETWORK

CERTIFICATION PLAN FOR INITIAL CERTIFICATION

Revision 1

June 2004

U S . Department of Energy Ofice of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management

Las Vegas, Nevada

OCRWM LSN Cert. Plan for Initial Certification REV 1 June 2004

Preparation :

Licensing Support Nktwork Project Manager Office of Repository Development

Approval:

Deputy Director Office of Repository Development

O C R W M LSN Cert. Plan for Initial Certification REV 1 June 2004


CHANGE HISTORY

Revision Interim Effective Number Change No. Date Description of Change

0 0 06/25/2004 Initial issue

1 0 06/29/2004 Provided additional clarification in Section 4.3.

OCRWM LSN Cert. Plan for Initial Certification REV 1 V June 2004

OCRWM LSN Cert. Plan for Initial Certification REV I

I ~ T E ~ T I O N A L L Y LEFT BLANK

vi June 2004

CONTENTS

Page

ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................. ix

1 . BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... 1

2. PURPOSE ............................................................. ~ ................................................................... 1

3. CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS ...... .. . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . ... .. . . ..... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... .. . . ... . . . .. .. . . . . ....... .. .. 1

4. THE DOE’S PROCEDURES TO IMPLEMENT THE REQUREMENTS OF 10 CER 2.1003 .................................................................................................................... 2

ICAT TJON OF DOC NTS ...................................... 2 SING ................................................................................. 3

4.3 IDENTIFICATION OF DOCUMENTARY MATERIAL ...... ..... ............. ...................... 4 4.4 CACI CERTIFICATION ................................................................................................. 7

5 . BASIS FOR INITIAL CERTIFICATION ................................................................................ 7

6. PROCEDURES FOR S~PLEMENTAL PRODUCTIONS AND UPDATED CERT~ICATION .... . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. .. . . . .. . ._. . . . . . . . . . . ._. . . . . . . . .. . .. .. ..... ... . . . . . . 8

7. REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 8 7.1 DOCUMENTS CITED .................................................................................................... 8 7.2 CODES, STANDARDS, REGULATIONS, AND PROCEDURES ............................... 9

A - CACI, INC. CERT QC FOR LSN ........................................................................................................

APPENDXX B - NOTIFICATION TO CACI, INC. TO MAKE DOCUMENTS ELECTRONICALLY AVAILABLE ........................... ........ ............................ B-1

APPENDIX C - CACI, INC. CERTIFICATION OF ELECTRONIC AVAILABILITY .......... C-I

APPENDIX D - INITIAL LSN CERTIFICATION BY DOE CERTIFYING OFFICIAL ....... D-1

OCRWM LSN Cert. Plan for Initial Certification REV 1 vii June 2004

OCRWM LSN Cert. Plan for Initial Certification REV 1

~ ~ ~ ~ T ~ O N A L L Y LEFT BLANK

... Vl l l June 2004

ACRONYMS

DIRS DOE

LA LSN

NRC

OCRWM

RMS

TDMS

Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC

Document Input Reference System U.S. Department of Energy

License Application Licensing Support Network

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management

Records Management System

Technical Data Management System

OCRWM LSN Cert. Plan for Initial Certification REV 1 i X June 2004


~ T E ~ T I ~ N A L L Y LE

X June 2004

1. BACKGROUND

Pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 and the ensuing site recommendation approvals by the President and Congress, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) intends to apply for a license from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to construct a geologic repository for the storage of high-level radioactive waste at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. The Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) is currently preparing a license application (LA) that will be submitted to the NRC. NRC regulation 10 CFR 2.1003 requires the DOE to make available in advance of submitting its LA certain basic licensing documents as well as “documentary material” in connection with the Licensing Support Network (LSN). Additionally, a DOE-designated official must certify, in accordance with 10 CFR 2.1009(b), that the DOE has established and implemented procedures to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 2.1003, and that, to the best of the official’s knowledge, the documentary material specified in 10 CFR 2.1003 has been ident i~ed and made electronically available. The DOE must provide an i~ i t i a l ce~ificatjon to this effect and an updated ce~jfication at the ti

2. PURPOSE

The purpose of this document is to set forth the basis for the initial certification that (1) the DOE established procedures to implement the requirements in 10 CER 2.1003, and (2) to the best of the certifying official’s knowledge, the documentary material specified in 10 CFR 2.1003 has been identified and made electronically available.

3. CERTIFICATION ~ E Q ~ ~ ~ N T S

The LSN certification requirements are provided in the NRC regulations at 10 CFR 2.1009. The regulation contains two paragraphs, the first of which states:

(a) Each potentjal ant, or party shall:

(1) Designate an official who will be responsible for administration of its responsibility to provide electronic files of documentary material;

(2) Establish procedures to implement the requirements in 5 2.1003;

(3) Provide training to its staff on the procedures for jmplementation of the responsibility to provide electronic files of documentary material;

(4) Ensure that all documents carry the submitter’s unique identification number;

( 5 ) Cooperate with the advisory review process established by the NRC under 8 2.101 1 (d).

The second paragraph of 10 CFR 2.1009 states:

(b) The responsible official designated under paragraph (a)( 1 ) of this section shall certify to the Pre-License Application Presiding Officer that the procedures specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section have been implemented, and that to the best of his or

OCRWM LSN Cert. Plan for Initial Certification REV 1 1 June 2004

her knowledge, the documentary material specified in 8 2.1003 has been identified and made electronically available. The initial certification must be made at the time the participant is required to comply with 5 2.1003. The responsible official for the DOE shall update this certification at the time the DOE submits the LA.

4. THE DOE'S PROCEDURES TO IMPLEMENT THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 2.1003

As described below, the DOE established procedures to identify, collect, and process documents that might be potentially relevant to the Yucca Mountain proceeding. The DOE established additional procedures to identify and make electronically available from those documents, for purposes of its initial certification, the documents that comprise the documentary material called for under 10 CFR 2.1003.

The DOE, aided by its Litigation Support Contractor, CACI, lnc., identified and collected potentially relevant documents in accordance with the OCRIVM Licensing Suppol? Nenvork Cerrification Plan for Document Collection (DOE 2004a), including the procedures and training referenced therein. The DOE and CACI conducted compliance assurance reviews, as set forth in the Office of Civilian Radioucrive Waste Management Licensing Support Network Compliance Assurance Plan for Document Collection (DOE 2004c), to provide added assurance that affected DOE and contracior offices identified, segregated, and provided appropriate documents for processing by CACI.

As a result of those efforts, the foliowjng collectjons of documents were identified. documents in these various collectjons are, to a certain extent, duplicative:

The

age ys n effect since 1987, the an integrated records program designed to collect, categorize, and maintain documents for the Yucca Mountain project. Thjs includes a requirement to create and retain records packages for comments on draft technical work products circulated for comment, including comments transmitted via email. Affected DOE and contractor personnel are trained regarding the record-keeping requirements of the RMS, and audits and self- assessments are periodically performed to monitor compliance with those requirements. Deficiencies detected through those means are addressed and resolved through OCRWM's corrective action program.

* Paper collection-This collection consists of the paper documents identified and submitted to CACI in response to the May 5 , 2003 memorandum from the Office of the General Counsel to affected DOE and contractor offices seeking potentially relevant documents (Call Memo) (Otis 2003).

This collection includes potential documentary material in the files of the employee concerns programs of OCRWM and Bechtel SAJC Company, LLC (BSC). All such documents were received, generated, or collected in connection with concerns raised with the OCRWM Concerns Program (and its predecessors) or the BSC Concerns


Programs. These files are protected under the Privacy Act of 1974. Because of the confidential nature of these files, they were not made available to CACI for processing. Rather, the DOE provided CACI with information sufficient for CACI to create a bibliographic header for each employee concerns file containing potential documentary material and directed CACI to make the bibliographic header electronically available. The employee concerns files will be preserved and retained by the respective OCRWM and BSC concerns programs.

0 E-file collection-This collection consists of documents on electronic media identified and submitted to CACI by affected DOE and contractor offices in response to the Call Memo. Included in this collection are electronic copies of the emails that persons submitted in response to the Call Memo. These emails were not limited to those authored by the person submitting the emails.

a c -This collection consists of aper d o c u ~ e n t s from the chive files of former DOE contractors for the Yucca

0 Electronic databases-This collection consists of server-based electronic databases maintained by the DOE management and operating contractor for the Yucca Mountain Project, BSC, and the DOE information technology contractor, RSIS.

ails-This collection consists of emails from OCRWM’s Lotus Notes email system designated by their authors as potentially relevant to the Yucca Mountain proceeding when the emails were sent. This collection is the result of an electronic template added to the OCRWM email system in February 2004.

Archival emails-This collection consists of OCRWM email system back-up tapes that contain archival ernails authored or received by current and former OCRWM personnel.

used in the normal course of Q ~ R ~ M ’ s activities. Rather, they were created as a means of temporarily storing email data to guard against a catastrophic failure in OCRWM’s email systems. These back-up tapes would not have been saved indefinitely in the ordinary course, but these particular tapes were retained in connection with litigation involving the DOE. A small fraction of the OCRWM archival email was collected from other diverse sources. This includes a small group of archival emails retained in Foremost, which was an additional email retention system that was tested on some OCRWM systems for a limited period of time and that was never fully implemented across the Project.

ack-up tapes were not created as a supplement to the R S or otherwise to

4.2 I~ROCESSING OF ~ O C ~ ~ E N T S

At the direction of the DOE, CACI processed the documents from the foregoing collections that were submitted to i t as of April 15, 2004 according to the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Managenzent Licensing Support Network Certification Plan for Document Processing (DOE 2004b), including the procedures and training described in that plan. The cut-off date of April 15, 2004 was necessary for purposes of DOE’S initial certification because of the lead time necessary to process the large volume of documents consistent with the requirements of NRC


regulations and guidance. For purposes of the DOE’S updated certification, CACI will continue to process documents generated or received after April 15,2004.

As more particularly described in the document processing plan, CACI performed conformance reviews as part of its processing activities to determine whether the documents submitted from the paper, e-file, and legacy paper collections satisfied the criteria of the Call Memo. CACJ also created electronic images and searchable full text of submitted documents (when appropriate) as well as bibliographic headers for the documents consistent with the LSN regulations. The DOE and CACI also conducted compliance assurance reviews, as set forth in the Ofice of Civilian Radioactive Waste Maizagenzenf Licensing Supporl Network Compliance Assurance Plan for Document Processing (DOE 2004d), to provide added assurance that the processing of documents was consistent with the regulatory requirements.

oe OE directed CAC to identify the followjng documents from those t

to CACI for processing as of April 15. 2004 (and to the extent feasible, those submitted to and processed by CACI since April 15, 2004), and upon further notice by the DOE, to make those documents electronically available consistent with the LSN regulations:

0 The following basic licensing documents: Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Plan; Yucca Mountain Environmental Impact Statement.

0 From the RMS:

- Documents that are referenced in the Document Input Reference System (DIRS) or the Technical Data Management System (TDMS). The DIRS is a database established in 1999 to jdentify and track the inputs to OCRWM’s technical work products on the Yucca ~ o u n t a i n Project. The TDMS is a database that collects technical data generated by or on behalf of O ~ R ~ M in c o n n e c ~ i o ~ with the Yucca Mountain Project.

- Documents in the RMS comprising the records packages associated with these documents that are referenced in the DIRS or TDMS (with the proviso that CACI was not directed to include documents in the records packages if their only document type code’ is Package, Controlled Document Issuance, Position Description, Positjon Qualification Statement, Training Assignment Sheet, Training Attendance Record, Verification of Education, or Verification of Work Experience, because those categories of documents are not believed to contain information that would qualify the documents as documentary material).

- Documents with one or more of the following document type codes: AMR (Analysis Model Report), Design, Plan, PMR (Process Model Report), Report, Requirement, Software, and Vendor and Supplier, along with the other documents in

’ A code assigned to a category of documents, in the RMS, by OCRWM contractors.

OCRWM LSN Cert. Plan for Initial Certification REV I 4 June 2004

the RMS comprising the records package associated with each such document (with the proviso that CACI was not directed to include documents in the records packages if their only document type code is Controlled Document Issuance, Package, Position Description, Position Qualification Statement, Training Assignment Sheet, Training Attendance Record, Verification of Education, or Verification of Work Experience, because those categories of documents are not believed to contain information that would qualify the documents as documentary material); however, CACI was authorized to exclude documents with a document type code of AMR, Design, Plan, PMR, Report, or Requirement if a title review indicates that the documents concern a topic outside the draft Topical Guidelinesfor the Licensing Support Network (NRC 2002) or otherwise can be excluded from the LSN pursuant to regulation.

ocuments with one or ore of the following document type codes: Audit, ~al jbrat ion, Correspondence (except for congressional correspondence as p e ~ i t t e d by 10 CFR 2.1005(i)), Data, Email, Job Package, Notebook, Policy (final versions), Procedure or Instruction (final versions), Publication, Self-Assessment, and TDIF (Technical Data Information Form); however, CACI was authorized to exclude documents with a document type code of Audit, Data, Email, Job Package, Notebook. Policy, Procedure or Instruction, Publication, or Self-Assessment if a title review indicates that the documents concern a topic outside the draft Topical Guidelines for the Licensing Support Nemork (NRC 2002) or otherwise can be excluded from the LSN pursuant to regulation.

- The contracts for the DOE’S three management and operating contractors for the Yucca Mountain project.

- Documents wi th one or more of the f o ~ ~ o w i n ~ document type codes to the extent 1 referenced in MS, (2) cross-code with one of the

type codes above, or (3) included in a records package selected for inclusion with a document type code of Administration, Agreement, Change Control, Computer Documentation, Drawing, Legal, Map, Order or Directive, Package, Permit, Procurement, Qualification Records, Review, and Self-study.

- Documents with “errata” in the title, except that CACI was authorized to exclude such a document if a title review indicates that i t concerns a topic outside the draft Topical Guidelines for the Licensing Support Network (NRC 2002) or otherwise can be excluded from the LSN pursuant to regulation.

- For any document to be made available from the RMS pursuant to one of the foregoing criteria, any other document in the RMS that is identified as a related document in the bibliographic header with one or more of the following codes: CQR (corrects); CQR-BY (corrected by); DUP (duplicate); PARTS; PART-OF; SUPR (supersedes); SUPR-BY (superseded by); SUPL (supplements); and SUPL- BY (supplemented by).

OCRWM LSN Cert. Plan for Initial Certification R E V 1 5 June 2004

From the paper documents produced in response to the Call Memo and legacy paper:

- Documents with one or more of the following paper document type codes2: Data, Email, Meeting Aid, Notebook, and Report; however, CACI was authorized to exclude such a document if a title review indicates that it concerns a topjc outside the draft Topical Guidelines for the Licensing Support Network (NRC 2002) or otherwise can be excluded from the LSN pursuant to regulation.

- Documents with a paper document type code of Correspondence (except for congressional correspondence as permitted by 10 CFR 2.1005(i)).

- Documents with one or more of the following paper document type codes to the extent they are cross-coded with one of the paper document type codes otherwise

rawing, Financial Statement, Form, Legal Document, List, edia, ~hotograph, or Procurernent.

- Bibliographic header for the employee concerns files determined to contain potential documentary material.

From the e-files:

- All documents, i cluding the ernails that were submitte as e-files in response to the Call Memo.

0 From the databases:

- A bibliographic header only for each database jdentified as containing potential documentary material.

From the O C ~ ~ ~ emails:

- Emails identified as potentially relevant through the contemporaneous author-review process.

From the archival emails:

- Emails identified as potentially relevant through the current user review process that OCRWM implemented for purposes of identifying emails from the back-up tapes for potential inclusion on the LSN.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.1003, the DOE further instructed CACl to make available a bibliographic header only for any document identified for inclusion that has been designated as privileged, or that otherwise can be produced in header-only format pursuant to the LSN regulations.

* A code assigned to a category of documents by CACI.


The identification of certain documents as privileged was based solely on computer software screening protocols. The DOE is reviewing these designations.

4.4 CACl CERTIFICATION

CACI will certify to the DOE certifying official when i t has identified the documents outlined in Section 4.3 and that CACI is ready to make those documents electronically available upon notice by the DOE certifying official (Appendix A). Following notice by the DOE certifying official to make those documents electronically available (Appendix B), CACI will certify to the DOE certifying official when the documents have been made electronically available (Appendix C).

5. BASIS FOR INITIAL CERTIFICATION

The procedures referenced above, and the resul~jng certifications, provide the basis for the c e ~ i f ~ i n g official to ce OE has implemented rocedures require 10 CFR 2.1009(a)(2), and (2) to the best of the certifying official's knowledge, certain basic licensing documents as well as the three categories of documentary material specified in 10 CFR 2.1003 and submitted to CACl by April 15, 2004, have been identified and made electronically available (Appendix D). These procedures create a reasonable basis for that belief because:

-The documents that CAC has been instructed to make available are reasonably calculated to encompass the information from the documents processed by CACI that the DOE intends to cite or rely on in support of its LA (although the LA is not yet complete, additional information will be developed, new documents will be created, and existing ones revised).

C a l ~ g ~ r y >The documents that CACI has been instructed to make avaiIable are reasonably calculated lo encompass the i n f o ~ a t i o n that the OE knows of and has in its possession, or that the DOE has developed, but does not support the information the DOE intends to cite or rely on in support of the LA. The OCRWM Program has procedures for obtaining comments on technical products, resolving comments on technical work products, registering and resolving non-concurrences with technical work products, addressing employee concerns, and retaining records for all of these. The documents identified for production from RMS should capture these records. Additionally, the DOE is making available several hundred thousand paper and electronic documents that were identified in response to the Call Memo. The Call Memo directed production of documents regardless of whether their contents were supporting or non-supporting.

Category 3-The documents that CACl has been instructed to make available are reasonably calculated to encompass the reports and studies that the DOE prepared or that were prepared on its behalf, and that are relevant to the LA and the issues set forth in the draft Topical Guidelines for the Licensing Suppor~ Network (NRC 2002).

In addition, the DOE is making available the archival emails identified as potentially relevant through the current user review process. The NRC has staled in 53 FR 44414 that "DOE will not


be expected to make an exhaustive search of its archival material that conceivably might be within the topical guidelines but has not been reviewed or consulted in any way in connection with DOE’s work on its license application.” Nevertheless, the DOE decided to make available the archival emails identified through the current user review process. That review process did not include a small fraction of active users’ archival emails that posed technological difficulties in processing (i.e., encrypted emails and emails on the Foremost system) or emails authored by a small number of active users who were unavailable for the review process (e.g., the user was on medical leave).

The DOE has not undertaken to review or produce for its initial certifjcation the collection of archival emails that were authored by persons other than active users (i.e., persons who had accounts on OCRWM’s email system at the time of the email review process). The archival back-up tapes are an jndiscriminate snapshot of the OCRWM emajl system on a given day and contain all manner of email unrelated to Yucca ountain, including personal emails with privacy

rotected ~ n f o ~ a t j o n , an are not coded or arranged by content. Further, the intend to cite or rely on archival emails in supporl of its LA, and the emails would not appear to qualify as reports and studies. Given O C R W ’ s record-keeping procedures, the number of documents, including emails, being produced from the other document collections, and the experience of the current user review, only an extremely small number, if any, of archival emails in this group might contain non-supporting information not reflected in the other documents the DOE is producing. The “rule of reason” that the NRC has said “must be applied” to an LSN participant’s obligation to identify documentary material. 53 FR 444 14, does not require the DOE to review and produce this archival coIlection in light of (1) the extraordinary expenditure of public funds that would be required to process and review these emails authored by persons other than active users, (2) the extremely low percentage of these emails that might be considered even potentially relevant to the Yucca Mountain licensing (based on the active user email review), (3) the number of documents from other collections that are being produced (including emails authored by former DOE personnel), and (4) the otherwise marginal utility of the a r c ~ i v a ~ email co~lec~Ion.

6. PROCEDURES FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRODUCTIONS AND UPDATED CERTIFICATION

As set forth in the OCRWM Licensing Support Network Certification Plan for Document Collection (DOE 2004a) and the Ofice of Civilian Radioacrive Waste Management Licensing Support Network Certification Plan for Document Processing (DOE 2004b), the DOE’s collection, processing, and review efforts will continue for documents identified after April 15, 2004. Any documentary material identified as a result of those efforts will be made available as required by LSN regulations.

7. REFERENCES

7.1 D O C ~ ~ E ~ T S CITED

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy) 1988. Site Characterization Plan Yucca Mountain Site, Nevada Research and Development Area. DOEfRW-0199. Nine volumes. Washington, D.C.:


U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management. ACC: HQO. 1988 1201.0002.

DOE 2002. Environmental Impact Stutenient for a Geologic Repository for ihe Disposal of Spe7zl Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain. DOEIEIS-0250. Nye County, Nevada. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of CivilIan Radioactive Waste Management. ACC: MOL.20020524.03 14 through MOL.20020524.0320.

DOE 2004a. OCRM7M Licensing Support Network Certification Plan for Document Collection. Revision 0, April 2004. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management.

DOE 2004b. Ofice of Civilian Radioactive Wasze Management Licensing Support Network Certification Plan for Docunient Processing. Revision 0, May 2004. Washington, D.C.: U.S.

epartrnent of Energy, ffice of Civilian ~adioactive Waste

r ~ a g e ~ ? ~ e ~ r ~ i c e ~ ~ i n g ~ u ~ ~ o Compliance Assurance Plan for Document Collection. Revision 0, April 2004. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management.

DOE 2004d. Ofice of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Licensing Support Network Compliance Assurance Plan for Docunzenr Processing. Revision 0, May 2004. Washington,

.C.: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management.

Otis, L.L. 2003. “Screening and Processing of Licensing Support Nenvork Documentary . Material.” ~ e m o r a n d u ~ from L.L. Otis (Office of the General Counsel) to affected DOE and subcontractor offices, May 5,2003. ACC: HQ0.20030610.0012.

NRC (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com~jss ion) 2002. Regulatory Guide 3.69, Topical G u i ~ e l i ~ e s g S ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ o 22. C.: U.S. Nuclea

7.2 CODES, STANDARDS, REGULATIONS, AND PROCEDURES

10 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Part 2, Subpart J. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Rules of Practice for Domestic Licensing Proceedings and Issuance of Orders. Readily avai 1 able.

53 FR (Federal Register) 44414. Rule on the Submission and Management of Records and Documents Related to the Licensing of a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste. Readily available.

Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982.42 U.S.C. I0101 et seq. Readily available.

Privacy Act of 1974. 5 U.S.C. 552a. Readily available.


June 2004 OCRWM LSN Cen. Plan for Initial Certification REV I 10

CACI, INC. C ~ ~ T I F I C A C



APPENDIX A

CACI, INC. CERTlFlCATION OF DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION FOR LSN

Pursuant to the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Licensing Support Network Certifjcation Plan for Initial Certification (OGRWM, June 2004) ( “ O C R W Certification Plan”), I hereby certify that the documents identified in Section 4.3 of the OCRWM Certification Plan that were submitted to CACI, Inc. by April 15, 2004, have been processed by CACI, Inc. and loaded on the DOE Licensing Support Network server. These documents are ready to be accessed by the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and made available on the World Wide Web.

Sigizafure

Prinred Name

Title

ale

OCRWM LSN Cert. Plan for Initial Certification REV 1 A- 1 June 2004


~ ~ T E N T I O ~ A L L Y LEFT BLANK

A-2 June 2004

N TO CACI, INC. T MAKE D O C ~ ~ N ~ S ELECTRONICALLY AVAILABLE



APPENDIX B

NOTIFICATION TO CACI, INC. TO MAKE DOCUMENTS ELECTRON1 CALLY AVAILABLE

As provided in the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Licensing Support Network Certification Plan for Initial Certification (OCRWM, June 2004) (“OCRWM Certification Plan”), I hereby direct CACI, Inc. to make electronically available to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and on the World Wide Web the documents identified in Section 4.3 of the QCRWM Certification Plan.

Printed Name

Title

Date

OCRWM LSN Cert. Plan for Initial Certification REV 1 B- 1 June 2004


~ N T E ~ T I O ~ A L L Y LEFT BLANK

B-2 June 2004

NC. C E ~ T I ~ I CATION OF E L E C T ~ O ~ I C A ~ 7 A ~ ~ A ~ l L I T ~



APPENDIX C

CACI, INC. CERTIFICATION OF ELECTRONIC AVAILABILITY

Pursuant to the direction of the DOE Certifying Official, I hereby certify that the documents identified in Section 4.3 of the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Licensing Support Network Certification Plan for Initial Certification (OCRWM, June 2004) that were submitted to CACI, Jnc. by April 15, 2004, have been made electronically available to the NRC and on the World Wide Web.

Printed Name

Title

Date

OCRWM LSN Cert. Plan for Initial Certification REV 1 c- 1 June 2004

OCRWM LSN Cert. Plan for Initial Certification REV I

INTENT~ONALLY LEFT BLANK

(2-2 June 2004

SN C~RTIFJCATJON BY DOE CERTIFYIN



APPENDIX D

INITIAL LSN CERTIFICATION BY DOE CERTIFYING OFFICIAL

Based on the procedures referenced in the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Licensing Support Network Certification Plan for Initial Certification (OCRWM, June 2004), I certify that (i) DOE has implemented procedures as required by 10 CFR 2.1009(a)(2) and (ii) to the best of my knowledge, the documentary material specified in 10 CFR 2.1003 has been identified from those documents submitted to CACJ by April 15, 2004 and made electronically available. Pursuant to the LSN regulations, DOE will provide additional documentary material that it may hereafter identify. It will update this certification when it submits its License Appl j cation.

Signature

Title

ute

OCRWM LSN Cert. Plan for Initial Certification REV 1 D- I June 2004


LAN

D-2 June 2004

Exhibit 5

-- -

EXHIBIT 5

UNITED STATES

U C L E A R REGULATORY C 0 MM IS S 10 N WASHINGTON, DC 20555 - 0001

March 28, 2003

Mr. Joseph D. Ziegler Acting Director Office of License Application and Strategy U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 364629

orth Las Vegas, evada 89036-8629

RE: Update on DOE Document \doh e Estimates for Licensing Suppori

Dear Mr. Ziegler:

First of all, I would like to thank you for the comments submitted on the draft revision to the Licensing Support Network (LSN) guidelines for OCR accuracy and to let you know that DOE comments are being given thoughtful attention.

Attached is a summary document presented to the Licensing Support Network Advisory Review Panel (LSNARP) at its October 13, 1999 meeting. It summarizes information provided to NRC's Licensing Support Network Administrator in response to a survey of all parties, potential parties and interested governmental entities to be used in sizing the Licensing Support Network (LSN) system. You will note that estimates submitted by Claudia Newbury in September 1999 indicate an expected DOE document collection of .I 0,000 documents compris-ed of 100,000 pages of textual material (DOE information is listed in column F, and the informarion on document and page estimates will be found on the lines marked 7.9 and 7.h). These estimates were used to size the LSN portal server and software which was subsequently developed by NRC and operationally made available on October 18, 2001. Based on this 1999 information, the current LSN portal configuration is sized to a high-end maximum volume of 15 million pages.

As we get closer to the point in time where NRC must have the LSN operational in order to service parties in their compliance efforts, one of our great concerns is that the LSN database sizing assumptions will be exceeded during our fiscal year project execution, thereby introducing a constraint on the parties' ability to timely comply with the requirements of 10 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart J. At the same time, we are in the early stages of planning and assessment for a final cycle of technology refreshment for the LSN platform and software. We therefore ask you to review the 1999 DOE estimates and provide us with any revisions, as appropriate, based on your current planning basis for LSN document availability, including both volume and approximate timing.

I am certain that you can appreciate the importance of thoughtful advance planning and accurate information to ensuring that the LSN fulfills its mission in support of a potential construction authorization application for the High Level Waste repository. As we are currently

active in budget formulation for Fiscal Years 2004 through 2006, a response no later than April 7, 2003 would be greatly appreciated.

If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Matthew Schmit at 301-415-7469 or via e-mail at [email protected]. Your update information may be sent to me via e-mail at DJGZ@,NRC.GOV or may be mailed to my attention at:

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop T3-F23 Washington, DC 20555-0001

Once again, thank you for your assistance in our planning efforts. We will be following up this electronic communication with a paper record.

Sincerely,

Daniel J. Graser Licensing Support Network Administrator

Copies:

M. Schmit, ASLBP G. P. Bollwerk, ASLBP

Exhibit 6

EXHIBIT 6 Department of Energy

Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Office of Repository Development

P.O. Box 364629 North Las Vegas, NV 89036-8629

Q.4: NlA

APR 11 2003

OVERNIGHT MAIL

Daniel J. Graser, LSN Administrator Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel US. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Two White Flint North Rockville, MD 20852

REVIEW OF 1999 U S . DEPA~TMENT OE) ESTIMATES BASED ON CURRENT PLANNING FOR LICENSING SUPPORT NETWORK (LSN) DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY

Reference: Ltr, Graser to Ziegler, dtd 3/28/03

In the referenced letter, you requested a review of the I999 DOE estimates of the DOE LSN participant website. While, at this time, we are still reviewing our document collection. it is estimated that, at initial certification, the DOE LSN participant website will contain approximately 3,000,000-4,000,000 documents composed of 27,500,000-3 6,500,000 pages. The majority of pages will be “tif’’ images averaging 50KB per page, one page per file. There will be an additional 3,000,000-4,000,000 “xml” files (one per document) and 3,000,000-4,000,000 “html” files (also one per document).

You also requested timing information related to the DOE LSN participant website. The DOE has recently contracted with CACI, Inc. to perform services related to loading and operating DOE’S LSN website. At this time, DOE is evaluating when the website will be electronically available.

If you have any questions concerning these comments. please contact Harry E. Leake at (702) 794-1457 or Sheryl A. Morris at (702) 794-5487.

OLA&S :SAM- 1006 ~~e~~~~ ffice of Lice se Application and Strategy

@ Printed on recycled paper

Exhibit '7

Official Transcript of Proceedings EXHIBIT 7

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Title: Licensing Support System Advisory Review Panel

Docket Number: (not applicable)

Location : Las Vegas, Nevada

Date: Thursday, March 23, 1995

Work Order No.: NRC-165 Pages 143-321

NEAL R. GROSS AND CO., INC. Court Reporters and Transcribers 1323 Rhode Island Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 234-4433

143

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


+ + + + +

MEETING

LICENSING SUPPORT SYSTEM ADVISORY REVIEW PANEL

(LSSARP)

+ + + + +

THURSDAY

MARCH 23, 1995

+ + + + +

LAS VEGAS, NEVADA

+ + + + +

The Advisory Review Panel met at Marjorie

Berrick Museum of Natural History, 4505 Maryland Parkway,

at 9:06 a.m., John Hoyle, Chairman, presiding.

COMMITTEE MEMBERS:

JOHN HOYLE

CLAUDIA NEWBURY

CHIP CAMERON

MOE LEVIN

STEVE FRISHMAN

MAL MURPHY

BRAD METTAM

JOHN GANDI

Chairman

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

1 4 4

1 COMMITTEE MEMBERS : ( C o n t i n u e d )

2 JAY SILBERG

3 LLOYD MITCHELL

4 JUATYITA HOFFMAN

5 ROGER HARDWICK

6 KIRK BALCOM

7

8

10

11

1 2

1 3

1 4

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

15

1 6

17

18

1 9

2 0

2 1

22

23

24

2 5

145

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ALSO PRESENT :

T o m Narkner

Fielden Dickerson

Preston Junkin

Dan Graser

Lee Watt

Beverly Rawlos

Joe Speicher

Stan Echols

Jan Stotler

Stan Schofer

Paul Bollwerk

Dave Williams

Russ Irish

Tony Neville

Dave Warner

Dave Warriner

Philip Paul1

Michael Fishe

Elizabeth Carroll

Ken Kahlman

Bruce Alsher

Anna McMullen

Peggy Warner

Frederick Rodgers

146

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

ALSO PRESENT : (Continued)

Debbie Bryan

Jan Verden

Teri Lyn Pane

James W. Frank

Hans Ebner

Camille Kerrigan

A. C. Douglas

Laura €4. Tate

Terri L. Badredine

25

1

2

3

7

8

9

10

11

12

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

266

term to allow us to set up the administrative processes to

make those determinations.

MR. MURPHY: You know I wouldn’t even limit it

to a university library. Community library, you know - -

MS. NEWBURY: But they’re not likely to have

as many things.

MR. MURPHY: Well, but they may have some

stuff that the university library doesn’t have. I mean I

don’t know, hell, I’m not a librarian, what do I know.

All I’m saying is that if, you know, I think if you can go

and get it within a reasonable period of time from some

library, public library somewhere, it‘s not squirreled

away in some philanthropist‘s basement - -

MR. WARRINER: Or at interlibrary loan.

MR. MURPHY: Huh?

MR. WARRINER: Or you could use the

interlibrary loan system.

MR. GRASER: Yeah. Dan Graser from NRC, if I

could make a simple recommendation. If the document is to

be found in the OCLC or any other standard bibliographic

database that you could access through an interlibrary

loan, then exclude the document. If it‘s in OCLC then

it’s generally available through some sort of interlibrary

loan.

MR. SILBERG: What do those initials - -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

267

MR. GRASER: Ohio College Library Center. It

includes a large majority of government libraries,

educational libraries, local public library systems. It

has cataloging for millions and millions of records.

MR. CAMERON: I take it this is only - - this

only applies - - there could be a reference in a contractor

report to another technical study, okay. We’re only

talking about journal articles here, right?

MS. STOTLER: We‘re only talking about the

stuff that is not produced by OCRWM. I mean stuff

produced by OCRWM will go in by an - -

MR. CAMERON: Yeah.

MS. STOTLER: - - program will have to go in

anyway.

MR. WARRINER: If they would cite - -

MS. STOTLER: Our own reports.

MR. CAMERON: Yeah, right.

MR. WARRINER: If they would cite a report

that OCRWM generated that would be in the record system

because that’s an OCRWM record.

MR. CAMERON: What if it’s a report that’s

generated by someone else?

MR. MURPHY: How about the Savannah River

Laboratory?

MR. CAMERON: Yeah, well, there’s a good

Exhibit 8

Official Transcript of Proceedings


Title: Licensing Sup port Network Advisory Review Panel Meeting

IC

Location: Las Vegas, Nevada

ate: uesday, June

0.1 NRC-943

EXHIBIT 8

NEAL R. GROSS AND CQ., INC. Court Reporters and Transcribers 1323 Rhode Island Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 234-4433

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

2



+ + + + +

LICENSING SUPPORT NETWORK ADVISORY REVIEW PANEL

(LSNARP)

MEETING

+ + + + +

TUESDAY

JUNE 3, 2003

+ + + + +

LAS VEGAS, NEVADA

+ + + + +

The Panel was called to order at the

Alexis Park Hotel, 375 East Harmon Avenue, Las Vegas,

Nevada 89109, at 8:30 a.m., by Dr. Andrew Bates,

Chairman, presiding.

COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT:

DR. ANDREW BATES, Chairman

DAN GRASER, NRC, Member

JOHN LINEHAN, NRC, Member

MITZI YOUNG, ESQ., NRC, Office of General Counsel

TONI CAIN, Esmerelda County, Member

HARRY LEAKE, DOE, Member

ROD MCCULLUM, NEI, Member

(202) 234-4433

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS

1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 (202) 234-4433

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

3

STEVE FRISHMAN, State of Nevada, Member

ENGLEBRECHT TIESENHAUSEN, Clark County N V , Member

JUDY TREICHEL, NNWTF, Member

ALSO PRESENT:

JIM BLANTON, NRC

CHIP CAMERON, NRC, OGC

JEFF CIOCCO, NRC

RON DEAVERS, NRC

JOHN MCINTYRE, DOE

JASON PITTS, Lincoln & White Pine Counties

STEWART SANDERS, CACI International

LYNN SCATTOLINI, NRC

JIM SCHAEFFER, NRC

MATT SCHMIT, NRC

JOHN SKOCZIAS, NRC

COURTNEY SMITH, Inyo Count

JOSEPH TURNER, NRC

(202) 234-4433



1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

51

technical options, and see what other possibilities

exist for producing such an index in a more

expeditious fashion than crawling over the internet.

And certainly just as the DOE has participated

in testing in the past, they could participate in

helping the NRC deal with this issue.

MR, GRASER: Well, thank you for your

observations, Harry. Back to the presentation. In

terms of the administrative module which we use for

monitoring the audit process of the system, that has

been revised to add additional security for our

audit staff to review the results of the Spidering

process.

And it reflects one of the security

recommendations from the NSA task force last year,

insofar as although the audit process is transacted

across the internet communications channels, it does

now require a CD-resident client side component to

features as a security feature that has been added.

In terms of training, I have some things to

report on the overall training activities. We have

now been scheduled to participate in a workshop in

November of 2003 at the Nevada State Librarian and

Archivists Meeting in Lake Tahoe.


1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 (202) 234-4433 (202) 234-4433

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2 3

24

2 5

5 2

We will be sending representatives there

provide State librarians an opportunity to see the

LSN software and to work with our staff in terms of

just familiarizing them with how the system works,

and responding to the typical sorts of questions

that the general public may have if they choose to

come into one of the Nevada libraries and access the

LSN via the internet terminals that are available in

all of the State libraries.

We will also provide the librarians with the

training tools, the same training tools that we

would make available to the parties. Training tools

will include a Quick Start reference sheet, kind of

a dummy sheet for people to have right close

available to the terminal that they happen to be

using.

And we will provide them quick start and short

cut tips and pointers sorts of information. We will

leave behind copies of CD-ROM tutorials and will

also leave behind a supply of the LSN brochures that

can be made available in the libraries.

And those brochures would be similar to the

brochures that we brought along and have a supply,

and have them available at the table in the back of

the room here.


1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W. (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 (202) 234-4433

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

1 6

17

18

19

20

21

22

2 3

24

25

53

Those are the same sorts of things that we

would make available as part of our outreach to all

the parties, and providing training to the parties

and potential parties.

And as parties are approaching the point of

making their document collection available, I would

urge that anybody that wants to engage us to come

out and do training with a core group of users at

your organization, we will be more than happy to do

that.

That will involve a certain amount of

scheduling and coordination to set up a mutually

convenient time frame to do that. But we are

willing to come out to wherever the organization is

located and as I said, train a core group of

individuals on how to use the system, and provide

copies of the tutorials and quick start reference

materials that they can then take and circulate

around the organization.

My next chart is addressing my understanding

of the current sizing projections based on the

information that has been made available to me. At

this point in time, the size of the NRC collection

is estimated to top at approximately 35,000

documents, roughly 800,000 pages of material.

(202) 234-4433



1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

54

The Department of Energy, based on

communication that I received in the month of March

from the Department of Energy, they have low-end and

high-end estimates ranging from 3-to-4 million

documents, comprised of 27-1/2 to 36-1/2 million

pages of content.

For Nevada, I am still operating on the

information provided in the 1999 survey, zero

documents and zero pages. Nye County, I am still

counting, and again the information from the 1999

survey, a thousand documents, and a thousand pages.

The other parties, the other counties

combined, a thousand documents, roughly 10,000

pages. This represents information that was

solicited as part of the LSN original design

activities in the fall of 1999.

Anybody who would like to update and provide

additional information, I would be most

appreciative. It helps me with my planning and

sizing activities.

The total range for the system right now is

ranging between 3,037,000 documents, to 4,037,000

documents; and 28,316,000 to 37,316,000 pages of

material.

As I mentioned earlier the current system is



1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

sized for roughly one million documents,

55

15 million

pages. Therefore, in the past couple of months our

staff has initiated an effort to do some planning

for growing the system to accommodate any of these

potential volumes of materials.

We have already gone before the NRC's

budgeting process and the budgeting organization and

group that goes through and starts, and we are doing

the fiscal year 2005 budget drill right now.

And as part of the presentation on the FY 2005

drill, we did do an issue paper identifying a

potential need to scale the system from 15 million

to 45 million pages, and we have identified that

that is a financial fiscal need that is going to

show up sooner than fiscal year '05, which is our

planning year that we are going through a drill for

right now.

And the Agency is in the process of trying to

identify a funding plan that would provide us

earlier availability to some funds that we can use,

and hopefully even in Fiscal Year 2003, with some

residual funds this year, and also Fiscal Year 2004,

that would allow us to triple the capacity, and

bring us to about 45 million pages worth of material

capacity.



1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

5 6

And we are targeting that contingent on the

availability of funds, and we would be able to have

the system expanded sometime towards the end of the

calendar and the early part of the calendar

year next year.

MR. MCCOLLUM: Dan, Rod McCollum, NEI. When

you talk about increasing the capacity from 15 to

45, you get a corresponding increase in the speed of

the crawler with this?

M R . GRASER: Well, that is the second bullet.

We are going to focus our efforts on further

enhancing the speed of the crawler. In response to

one of your earlier questions, part of the effort in

scaling the system up is to build multiple instances

of the search engine and multiple server devices.

So we would be taking our current architecture

and expanding or changing the architecture to

accommodate multiple servers and multiple search

engines, and then mirror those multiple search

engines so that we had both the public access site

and the priority access site.

So part of the effort to jump us past the 15

million page threshold is going to involve some

reorganization of the platforms and the server

configurations, getting additional instances of the



Exhibit 9

I Official Transcript of Proceedings

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION EXHIBIT 9

Title:

Docket Number:

oea t ion :

Date:

Work Order No.:

(202) 234-4433

Licensing Support Network Advisory Review Panel Meeting

(Not Applicable)

Tuesday, December 9, 2003

NRC-1229 Pages 1-132


1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nea1rgross.com



+ + + + +

LICENSING SUPPORT NETWORK ADVISORY REVIEW PANEL

(LSNARP )

MEETING

+ + + + +

TUESDAY

DECEMBER 9, 2003

+ + + + +

LAS VEGAS, NEVADA

+ + + + +

The Panel was called to order at the Alexis Park

Hotel, 375 East Harmon Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada

89109, at 8:30 a.m., by Dr. Andrew Bates, Chairman,

presiding.

COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT:

DR. ANDREW BATES, Chairman

DAN GRASER, NRC, Member

JOHN LINEHAN, NRC, Member

MITZI YOUNG, ESQ., NRC, Office of General Counsel

LYNN SCATTOLINI, NRC, Member

HARRY LEAKE, DOE, Member

ROD McCULLUM, NEI, Member

(202) 234-4433


1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com

2

COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT (CONT' D. } :

JASON PITTS, Automation Consultant Lincoln & White Pine Counties, Member

ABBY JOHNSON, Eureka County, Member

IRENE NAVIS, Clark County, Member

MIKE O'MEALIA, State of Nevada, Member

MAL MURPHY, Nye County, Member

ALSO PRESENT:

JEFF CIOCCO, NRC

JOE TURNER, NRC

(202) 234-4433


1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

127

participants would identify. So I think you have to

take all those things together, and it may totally

cancel out each other, or it may only make the

increase more modest. So that's something to give

thought to, too, in whatever comments you raise on

that point.

MR. LEAKE: I understand. It may well not

It's just that there is a

But your comments

turn out to be a problem.

certain uncertainty factor there.

are noted.

MR. LINEHAN: I just wanted to follow up

on the comment you made earlier, Harry, when you were

talking about the capacity of the system, Were you

inferring that even without going into the hearing and

later discovery, that the DOE collection could be

greater than four million? I wasn't quite sure what

you were saying.

MR. LEAKE: The DOE is still in the

process of executing its plan for preparing its LSN

materials. The information we've provided previously

was our best estimate. We have - - at this time, our

estimates still fall within that range. But it is not

outside the realm of possibility that we will have to

come back and revise that estimate at a future time.

And as soon as we had a basis for that, we would do so


1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W. (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.neaIrgross.com

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

128

to maximize your ability to respond. But what we've

provided was an estimate, and we are in the act of

going through a large quantity of material and doing

these tasks.

MR. LINEHAN: You know, I think as early

as DOE can get back to us, because, you know, as Dan

indicated, the increase that we became aware of - - I

don't know if it was within the last year or what the

time frame was - - created a tremendous burden on the

agency because we have nuclear waste fund money that

supports Dan's activities and the technical

activities, and we're required to take money from

places, you know, where we really need to be spending

it to get ready for the hearing. You know, the sooner

we know - - I mean, hopefully there will not be an

increase - - but the sooner we know, the better it will

be for us to be able to decide how we can deal with

it.

The only thing that bothers me is I've

heard in the June meeting and this meeting that, you

know, it takes a while to go through these documents.

Everyone has known for years that the documents were

out there. You know, we had versions of the Reg.

Guide out there. You know, it's not something that

has just come up all of a sudden. What's frustrating


1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W. (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nea1rgross.com

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

129

to us is the fact that folks don't have a handle on

it, and it's putting us in this budget position - - or

budget execution position, which is causing problems

within the agency trying to deal with this.

MR. MURPHY: Harry, is it possible that

you might revise your estimate downward as well as

upward? I mean, it seems to me that your upper end of

four mill- - - or both the three and the four million

may be based on some fairly conservative interpre-

tations of the definition of "documentary material"

and your requirements under 1003. I mean, I think

itls maybe not likely, but possible that, upon further

analysis, DOE might conclude that they don't really

have four million documents to post, they have two and

a half.

MR. LEAKE: And that is quite possible.

MR. MURPHY: I mean, am I right about

that?

MR. LEAKE: It is possible.

MR. MURPHY: It could go down as well as

UP *

MR. LEAKE: That is possible.

MR. GRASER: I do want to thank you all

for that update. And if I can just take this

opportunity to raise just - - or not so much raise an


1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W. (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com

Exhibit 10

EXHIBIT 10

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21 * 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41.

RECIPIENTS OF CALL MEMO:

ALPHA Services Atomic Energy of Canada, Ltd. (AECL Technologies, Inc) Bechtel - BWXT Idaho, Inc. (BBWI) Bechtel Jacobs Company Bechtel SAlC (BSC) Booz Allen Hamilton Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) Callan (L. Joseph) Case Western Reserve University DOE - Assistant Secretary for Policy and International Affairs DOE - Carlsbad Field Office

DOE - Deputy Secretary S-1 DOE - Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy DOE - Energy Information Administration, EIA DOE - Environment, Safety & Health, EH DOE - Environmental Management DOE - Environmental Management, EM 22 DOE - Executive Secretariat, ES DOE - General Counsel, GC DOE - Idaho Operations Office DOE - Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory DOE - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory DOE - Los Alamos National Lab DOE - Management, Budget and Evaluation (ME - 1) DOE - NNSA Office of Materials and Conversion (NA - 262) DOE - NNSA, Albuquerque Site Office DOE - NNSA, Kansas City Site Office DOE - NNSA, Livermore Site Office DOE - NNSA, Naval Reactors Office DOE - NNSA, Nevada Operations Office DOE - NNSA, Office of General Counsel DOE - NNSA, Pantex Site Office DOE - NNSA, Service Center DOE - Nuclear Energy, NE DOE - Oak Ridge Operations, EM DOE - Oak Ridge Operations, NNSA, Y-12 Site Office DOE - Office of National Transportation DOE - Office of Quality Assurance DOE - Office of Repository Development

- Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs

42. DOE - Office of River Protection

43. 44 * 45. 46. 47. 48. 49 * 50.

51. 52. 53. 54.

55 * 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. 77 * 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. 85.

DOE - Office of Science, Argonne - University of Chicago DOE - Office of Science, Argonne National Laboratory DOE - Office of Science, Argonne National Laboratory - West DOE - Office of Science, Brookhaven National Laboratory DOE - Office of Science, Brookhaven Sciences Associates DOE - Off ice of Science, Chicago Operations Office DOE - Office of Security DOE - Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance (previous

name: Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance)

DOE - Office of Security Policy (SO-10) DOE - Public Affairs DOE - Richland Operations Office (Hanford) DOE - Richland Operations Office (Hanford), Pacific Northwest National

Laboratory, PNL O E - R W 1

DOE - RW2E DOE - Sandia National Laboratory DOE - Savannah River Operations Office DOE - Secretary S-2 DOE - Under Secretary S-3 DOE -West Valley DOE -Business Information and Management Federal Occupation Health Gallagher (James L.) GIS Enterprises, Inc. Goodman (Leonard S.) Image Associates International Society for Risk Analysis lnyo County KPMG LLP L& M Techno log ies Lechel, Inc. Mine Safety & Health Administration (MSHS) Morgan, Lewis LLC National Academy of Science (NAS) National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) Navarro Quality Services, Inc. Nye County Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Oakland Operations Opportunity Village RCS Corporation RIO Technical Services RSIS, Inc.

2

86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 97. 92. 93. 94 *

Schmitt & Leslie, Inc. Technology & Management Services, Inc. Thorndal, Armstrong, Delk, Balkenbush, & Eisenger United States Geological Survey University and Community College System of Nevada University of Las Vegas University of Tennessee - Battelle, LLC University of Virginia WVNSCO

3

Exhibit 11

EXHIBIT 11

Oakland Operations Morgan, Lewis LLC

CALL MEMO RECIPIENTS THAT DID NOT PROVIDE CERTIFICATION:

Entity no longer exists. Former contractor: regulation does not require

1 RECIPIENT ENTITY I COMMENT

National Academy of Science Inyo County Nye County

Sent letter stating it had no documents. LSN participant - independent duty. LSN participant - independent duty.

I I collection from former contractors: . I

Exhibit 12

Department of Energy Olfice d Civilian Radioactive Waste Management

Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Oflice P.O. Box 30307

North Las Vegas, NV 89036-0307

EXHIBIT 12

QA: N1.4

R. L. Strickler, TRW, Fairfax, VA . K. G. HLZSS, BSC, Las Vegas, NV

Enclosed are ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n a ~ s ofxhe Agree SAlC Company, LLC, TRW Environmental Safety Systems, hc . , and the Department o f Energy, along with originals of my March 29,2001, letter of the same subject. The originals enclosed should be retained by your respective companies.

ansfer of ~ e s p o ~ s i ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ e s A ~ o n g

Thank you for your assistance in executing these documents in a timely manner.

b’ Contfacting Officer

Enclosures: As stated

YMP-5

A G R E E M E N T F O R TRANS FER OF R E S PONS I B I LIT1 ES

Among Bechtel S A l C C o m p a n y , LLC, T R W E n v i r o n m e n t a l S a f e t y Sys tems , Inc.

and t h e U.S. D e p a r t m e n t of Energy

R E G A R D I N G TRANSITION OF MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS SERVICES FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CIVILIAN

RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

THIS TRANSFER AGREEMENT (Agreement) is entered into by and among the UNITED STATES OF AMEF;ICA, acting through the United States Department of Energy (DOE). represented by the undenigned Manager; Bechtel SAlC Company, LLC (BSC), a limited liability company organized under the l a m of the State of Delaware: and TRW Environmental Safety Systems, Inc. ('TESS)., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of TRW inc. (TRW), and a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. DOE, BSC, and TESS are referred to ;n this Agreement collectively a s the Parties, and each indivjd~ally as a Party. .

HEREAS DOE and "r arties to Contract No. D E - A C 0 8 - $ 3 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 4 (hereina~er referred to as the TESS Contrad), pursuant to which TESS has f€?SpGnSibilitk§ for management and operation for the DOE'S Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) Program. which responsibilities expire February 1 I, 2001; and,

WHEREAS the DOE and BSC are parties to Contract No. DE-ACO&OINV?2101 (hereinafler referred to as the BSC Contract), which provides for BSC to GOmrnenCe its management and operating responsibilities for OCRWM beginning February 12, 2001: and.

WHEREAS the Farties desire to facilitate an orderly transfer of responsibility for the OCRWM . anagement and operations, and for the documents, agreements, and properly referred to in this

Agree rnent:

NOW, THEREFORE. in consideration of the mutual covenants and understandings contained herein [he Parties agree aS fG!kM'S:

The purpose of this Agreement is to ensure an orderly transfer to BSC of management and operating activities performed by TESS under the TESS Contract. Upon transfer of such activities, BSC shall perform its responsibilities in accordance with the terms of the BSC Contract. The Parties agree that this Agreement supplements the ESC Contract and the TESS Contract, but does not otherwise modify their respective rights, responsibilities, obligations, and dutles established under either the TESS Contract or the BSC Contract, and in the event of a COnfl id between the terms of this Agreement and the terms of either the TESS Contract or the BSC Contract, the tW?nS of such contract shall prevail. TESS shall be authorized to perform necessary post-transition cioseout activities PU~SUant to subarticle 7.P below.

2. TRANSITION DATE

The "Transition Date" is February 12, 2001.

3. ASSIGNMENT OF SUBCONTRACTS, PURCHASE ORDERS, AND OTHER AGREEMENTS

DOE hereby directs TESS, and TESS hereby transfers and assigns to BSC. a s of the Transition Date. all of TESS' obligations, rights. title, and interest in and to all contrsctual agreements, existing 3s of the

1 Trans AmtR

Transition Date, entered into by TESS under the TESS Contract with entities other than the Parties or their affiliates. This assignment includes, but is not limited to, purchase orders, subcontracts. memorandum purchase orders, requests for services, requests for proposals or other solicitations. Work For Others agreements, Cooperative Research And Development Agreements (CRADAs), leases for real Or personal property, licenses for use of third party Software, confidentiality agreements. nondisclosure agreements, collective bargaining agreements. and all unexpired warranties. 8SC hereby accepts' such assignment In accordance with the terms of the ESC Contract. This article does not apply to any such contractual agreement for which any of the costs are unallowable under the TESS Contract.

On or before !he Transition Date, TESS shall deliver t o BSC any third patty notices or consents required in connection with t h e assignment of agreements in the above paragraph.

4. ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERW

A.

C.

D.

DOE hereby directs TESS, and TESS hereby transfers and assigns to BSC, effective a s of the Transition Date, all rights, title. interest, and .obligations relating to intellectual property and intellectual propertyrelated contractual arrangements, a s these terms are defined below. and Bsc hereby accepts the transfer and assignment Of all such rights. title, interest, and obligations.

The i ~ ~ ~ l ~ & c ~ u a l p r o ~ e ~ ~ subject to this transfer and a~signment includes a?? intellectual property that TESS has generated or acquired puEUent to the krms of the TESS Cantrad, whether jointly or solely owned. including, but not limited to. intellectual property that arises under or relates 10 the work scope'of the TESS Contract.

For purposes of this provision, "intellectual propeny" means all forms of intellectual property whatsoever, including, but not limited to. inventions and invention disclosures (whether or not patentable); U.S. 2nd corresponding foreign patent applications and patents, and any registrations, divisions, continuations, continuatlons-in-pan, reissues, reexaminations or extensions of same; technical notebooks; proprietary information of a technical nature: mask works; software; and registered and unregjstered copyrights, trademarks. and service marks.

For purposes of this provision, "intellectual properly-related contractual arrangements" includes, but is not limited to, Cooperative Research And Development Agreements (CRADAs), Work-for- Others (WFO) agreements, facility user Sgm%"%?ntS', ma?erial transfer agreements, bailment agreements, proprietary information agreements (PIAS) and underlying information disclosed pursuant to such ~ g r e ~ ~ e n ~ s ~ non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), licenses, option agreements, beta site agreements, and Early access a g f m " I t S . subcontracts, including all files. records, and ofher infomation related to such intellectual property-relaled contractual arrangements.

5. TRANSFER OF AND ACCESS TO RECORDS. DOCUMENTS AND DATABASES

A. DOE hereby directs ESS, and TESS hereby transfers and assigns to BSC. effective as of the Transition Date. the custody O f ail Govemment-owned reCOfdS a5 that term Is defined in DEAR Clause 970,5204-79, entitled Access to and Ownership of Records (Jun 1997). (which is incorporated in both the TESS and BSC contracts), arid 8SC hereby accepts such assignment. TESS hereby assigns to BSC, effective a5 Of t h e Transition Date, the custody of all contrador- owned records :hat are transferred to BSC, including but not limited to financial and accounting records, and ernployment-related records for the employees that have accepted offers from BsC. and BsC hereby accepts such assignment.

B. The Parties agree that the term "records" as used in subarticle 5.A. shall include but not be limited to all documents and information including writings, drawings, graphs, charts. *

photographs, microfilm or microfiche, or data cornpilations/databases. whether stored on compute^, file servers on computer networks, magnetic or optical media, or any other storage devices from which infomation may be obtained or translated, that are in the care, custody or

TrmisAgmtR 2

control of TESS or its afiliates which were acquired or generated pursuant to the performance of the TESS Contract. The Term 'records" does not include documents or records generated by TESS after February 7 7 . 2001, or contractor-owned records (as that term is defined in DEAR Clause 970.5204-79) that are not transferred to BSC. including. but not limited to the personnel files of employees that have not accepted offers with BSC.

c. TESS reS€NES the right lo reasonable dired access to and inspection of all records transferred and/or assigned under this provision, including historical operating records, and the data from the costpoint DOEFlMS accouriting system which may be needed to close actions that may remain open or be opened subsequent to the Transition Date. BSC agrees to maintain reasonable and adequate custody of such records throughout the term of its contract.

D. TESS reserves the right to Claim privilege for documents that contain TESS confidential. proprietary. attorney work product, or attorney-client privileged information. except that any rights of privilege that TESS has in the following Documents are transferred and assigned to DOE and BSC: (1) Documents contained in a Privacy Act system of records maintained for the Government by TESS, (2) Documents related to litigation or claims. contracts. agreements. or matten transferred to BSC under the terms of this Agreement, or (3) any confidential or proprietary infomation accepted by PESS under proprietary information agreements. This privilege is only ~ n ~ ~ n d e d to extend to those types of informa~ion that are of a corporate confidential nature and not otherwise related to those mr;tlerS or opertitions transferred under the terms of this Agreement to BSC. If E?SC and TESS have a common or joint interest in the prosecution or defense of any claim, they agree to execute appropriate documentation to share athewise- privileged information While protecting any attorney-client, attorney work product, or other privilege.

.

E. DOE hereby directs BSC, and BSC agrees that it will provide reasonable direct access to TESS or its designees to any record (as described in 5.A. 5.8, and 5.C, above) under its control related to any matter, or thlng, as soon as reasonably possible after request, and shall provide reasonable direct access to its employees and records, for interviews, depositions, hearings, etc., during regular business hours, on reasonable notice and request. Payments for the cost of retrieving and copying records will be determined on a case-by-case basis by t h e Parties. "Reasonable direct x c e s s " to such records and employees shall depend on (i) all relevant circumstances at the time of t h e request including, without llmitalion, the employee's job responsibilities and requirements of the BSC Contract, and (ii) t he number and gravity of such requests. When the estimated level of effort is expected to be material TESS will provide an estimate of the level of effort expected from BSC in suppori of this subarticle 5.E.

F. DOE hereby directs TESS, and TESS agrees that it will provide reasonable direct access to BSC or its designees to any record (as described in 5.D. above) retained under its control related to any matter, or thlng, except as specifically exempted from access in this Agreement, a s soon as reasonably possible after request, and shall provide reasonable direct access to its employees and records, for interviews, depositions, hearings, etc., during regular business hours, on reasonable notice and request. Payments to TESS for the cost of retrieving and copying records will be determined on a case-by-case basis by the Parties. "Reasonable direct access" to such records and employees shall depend on (i) all relevant circumstances at the time of the request including without limitation, the employee's job responsibilities and (ii) the number and gravity of such requests. When the estinwied level of effort is expected to be material. ESC will provide an estimate of the level of effort expected from TESS in support of this subarticle 5F.

G. In order to comply with various federal laws and internal procedures, TESS may require access to the records being transferred and assigned until, at a minimum, the end of 2009. in the event of

,the discontinuation of the BSC contract due to DOE'S failure to exercise the contraci option. program andlor contract termination or cancellation or for some other reason. TRWflEsS shall continue to have direct access to the records being hereby transferred and/or assigned from DOE or its designee (e.g.* a successor contractor) until the end of 2009 at a minimum.

. . . .

H. The parties acknowledge that federal law requires medical records on personnel who have worked on the project, including. but not (imited to. industrial hygiene sampling records, radiation safety records, pre-placement health records, to be meintained in a DOE repository for 75 years TESS, and its parenl company. TRW, reserve the right to reasonable access to and inspection ot all such medical records a s they may be needed in the future to handle any claim or matter that '

arises out of TESS' performance of the TESS Contract.

6. TRANSFER OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS

DOE hereby directs TESS, and on the Transition Date, TESS shall transfer the care, custody, and control of all classifled documents to BSC, and ESC shall accept t h e care. custody, and control of said classified documents in accordance with the terms and conditions of the BSC Contract.

7. FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION

Note: This section applies to all financial records and administration for TESS as M&O contractor for DOE, but does not apply 10 any contractual agreement for which any of [he costs are unallowable

ESS Conl~act , or any TESS corporate recor s, assets. or transact~ons.

A. Payroll

(i) The finsl pay date for TESS employees is Februaw 9, 2001 for salaries earned through February 11,2001: this payroll will be processed and paid by TESS.

(ii) (a) Internal Revenue Service Procedure 96-60 provides for standard and alternate procedures for filing Forrn W-2 under a "successor-predecessor" relationship. TESS and BSC agree to omp ply wlth Internal Revenue Procedure 96-60. Section 5. "Standard Procedure". The standard procedure requires that the predecessor employer (i.e.a TESs) file all F o n s 941, Forms W-2, and related tax filings until final wage and salary payments cease.

(b) As stated by IRS Revenue Procedure 96-60, Standard Procedure, TESS (or its designee) will be responsible for completing and filing various Federal and State tax forms (as ~ p ~ i i c ~ b l e ) for wages paid and taxes withheld for TESS employees, This includes payments made to all TESS er'nployees through the date of transfer a s specified in item 7.A(i)(si) above znd finsl payments to TESS employees terminating on or before February I I, 2001. TESS will be responsible for at least the following Calendar Year (cv) 2001 tax forms:

- Form 941 Quanerly tax reports; - CY 2007 Form 940; - CY 2001 Forms W-2 and related transmittals; - Forms 1099 MlSC and 1099R for deceased employees and related 1096

- CY 2001 Social Security Administration (SSA) Magnetic Media, and - All related state and local reports and tapes.

transmlttals;

( i i i ) To the extent permitted under opplicable law, BSC. as successor, will recognize employee FICA earnings and deductions and employer FICA, Federal Unemployrneni Tax, and State Unemployment Tax payments made by TESS for TESS employees who become employed by BSC on the Transition Date in determining FICA taxable earnings. FICA withholding, and FICAlFUTAlSUTA payments for the balance of the calendar year, TESS agrees to provide BSC with such information and documentation as needed to comply with IRS Revenue Procedure 96-60.

TronsAgmtR 4

Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be GOnstrUed as creating any rights in third paflies. inc[udinQ without limitation, a n y Ef-fIplOYee Of f0m-w employee of TESS, and no third party beneficiary rights are created or intended to be created by this Agreement.

18. SIGNATURES,

The individuals whose signatures appear below hereby certify that thzy are authorized to sign on behalf of their respective Parties to this Agreement.

This Agreement is effective as of the date that it is executed by all of the Parties: provided however, that no assignment or transfer of any matter covered by this Agreement shall occur until the Transition Date.

So AGREED:

ate:

ate:

TRW Environmental Safety Systems. Inc.

Titie: Presidehti

Bechtel SAlC Company. LLC

Title: President

UNlTED STATES OF AMERICA BY: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

13

Exhibit 13

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20555 - 0001

EXHIBIT 13

March 11, 2004

TO: Members of the Licensing Support Network Advisory Review Panel

FROM: Daniel J. Graser \RA\ LSN Administrator

RE: LSN Guideline on Access Control Prior to Initial Certification

Guideline 23, Access Control rior to Initial Certification, as been develope being transmitted to you via this letter.

Given the expected large volume of some document collections, the operational capabilities of the NRC LSN system may require an extended period of time in advance of the intended date of certification of document availability in order to index/load participant documents so that they will be fully accessible to the public, parties, and potential parties by the certification date. If a participant requests, documents loaded onto the participant’s LSN website for the purpose of being indexed/loaded into the central LSN site need not be made available to the public or to any other party or potential participant until such time as the participant provides its certification of documentary material availability in compliance with 10 C.F.R. §2.1003(a), or at any earlier date that the participant may specify. The new guideline has been developed to document the responsibilities and process of access control to participant documents prior to initial certification.

The guideline as presented represents technical and procedural methods that are currently implementable and immediately available to any participant electing to pursue this alternative. Further input from the LSNARP membership regarding the new guideline is requested on or before Friday, March 19, 2004, and will be documented and added to the guideline, as appropriate, insofar as it is within NRC’s technical, regulatory, and legal ability to do so. This guideline in no way affects or supersedes or otherwise relieves a participant from compliance with the Commission’s Rules of Practice in 10 C.F.R. Part 2.

As a result of the above new guideline, the Table of Contents and Appendix A, Acronyms, were revised.

Please delete or remove the current Cover and Table of Contents and Appendix A, replace them with the attached revisions, and add the new guideline. The online guidelines posted on the LSN web site will be revised accordingly.

Attachments:

GL 00-Cover and TOC 0

GL 23-Access Control

A. Bates, SECY, NRC M. Janney, ASLBP, NRC M. Schmit, ASLBP, NRC

LSN Guidelines March 2004

0 23 ACCESS CONTROL PRIOR TO INITIAL CERTIFICATION

23.1 Requesting Access Control

If a participant requests, documents loaded onto the participant’s LSN website for the purpose of being indexedlloaded into the central LSN site need not be made available to the public or to any potential participant until the participant provides its initial certification of documentary material availability in accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 2.1003(a), or at any earlier date that the participant may specify.

The existing provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart J regarding initiation of the HLW proceeding and attendant NRC procedural rules are not affected by a participant request for access control prior to section 2.1003(a) initial certification or by a participant providing documents for LSN indexing/loading in accord with such a request.

3.2 Esdim rtici

At the same time a participant provides its request for access control prior to section 2.1003(a) initial certification, it should also furnish a current estimate regarding I ) the existing size of the participant HLW document collection that will be loaded onto the participant’s LSN site; and 2) a projected schedule for making those documents available for indexing. This information will be used to coordinate projected schedules for performing indexing operations. In formulating its response relative to an indexing schedule, the participant should anticipate that the current LSN indexing capacity is approximately 150,000 documents per week.

23.3 Ownership of Information

Participant documents provided for L S N indexing/loading are not considered to be records in the possession or control of the NRC such that the NRC would consider them responsive to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request directed to the NRC (54 Fed. Reg. 14925, 14936 (Apr. 14, 1989)). Rather, any such FOIA request would be referred to the participant for its direct response to the requester.

23.4 Responsibilities for Access Control

The NRC and a participant have joint responsibility for preventing unauthorized access to participant documents provided for indexing/loading into the LSN pursuant to a participant’s request for access control prior to section 2.1 003(a) initial certification.

23.4.1 NRC Responsibilities for Access Control

Appropriate measures will be taken by the LSN staff to ensure that any documentary material made available for indexing/loading pursuant to a participant request for access control prior to section 2.1003(a) initial certification, including restricting access to the documents to only those LSN staff members directly involved with the maintenance of the LSN.

Page 23-1


In preserving this information, the LSN staff will use the same standard of care it uses to secure and safeguard its own confidential information of similar importance, but in no event with less than reasonable care by means that will include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) because participant documentary material is captured only in index form in Autonomy’s contextual constructs and resides only in the LSN electronic repository on servers, no hard copy versions of the documentary material can or will be made and no digital copy of the documentary material can or will be retained; 2) the facility hosting the LSN meets the Government Information Security Reform Act (GISRA) and NRC requirements for system security; and 3) remote access to system administration routines can be obtained only by use of a CD containing a software module key that is accessible only by LSN staff, thereby preventing unauthorized access.

0

Documentary materials provided for indexingAoading into the LSN pursuant to a request for access control prior to section 2.1003(a) initial certification will not be accessible to any user other than the LSN staff. Using administrative tools provided by the LSN’s Autonomy COTS search engine package, any LSN repository of indexed documentary ma~erial that has been provided to the LSN pursuant to a participant request for access control prior to section 2.1003(a) initial certification will not be available to other system users, including the submitting organization, for searching via the LSN.

23.4.2 Participant Responsibilities for Access Control

As an additional coincident measure to prevent inadvertent early release, a participant requesting LSN access control prior to section 2.1003(a) initial certification should block access from its web server (HTTP) by disabling the normal access path for public users (e.g., Port 80). To ensure there are no technical issues, a participant should advise the LSNA in advance when this measure is implemented.

The technical staff of a participant that requests LSN access control prior to section 2.1003(a) initial certification will be provided access to the LSN system to verify via system testing that the joint actions of the LSN staff and the participant has resulted in its documents not being publicly accessible.

23.5 Deleting Documents Prior to Public Access

Prior to section 2.1 003(a) initial certification, a participant can delete previously indexed information that it later determines is not relevant, but a register of LSN accession numbers initially assigned to each subsequently withdrawn item will be maintained on the LSN website consistent with Guideline 14. Likewise, a participant can change the manner in which information is disclosed if it decides the information is privileged or otherwise sensitive (i.e., substitute a header indicating a privilege claim for the header and the full-text of the document). In this regard, however, the participant is advised that the LSN spidering process is not instantaneous nor can it handle an unlimited volume of changes in any particular day (i.e., as the spider recrawls the existing collection checking for changes or deletions, any reindexing it must do will not be reflected

Page 23-2


until it has completed all indexing for that load, including any new documents). Therefore, it is possible that some information that the participant intends should be withheld could be inadvertently released if the deletions/changes are not implemented sufficiently before the initial certification. To avoid this problem, the participant must plan for and make deletionskhanges far enough in advance of its section 2.1 003(a) initial certification to ensure those deletionskhanges are reflected in the LSN material that is available when the collection is made accessible to the public.

Page 23-3

Exhibit 14

_ _ EXHIBIT 14

Department of Energy Office of Civitian Radioactive Waste Management

QA: N/A Project No. WM-00011

Office of Repository Development 1551 Hillshire Drive

Las Vegas, NV 891 34-632 1

MAY 0 4 2004

OVERNIGHT MAIL

Mr. Daniel 3. Graser Licensing Support Network Administrator Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel US. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Subject: Participant Request for Licensing Support Network (LSN) Access Control Prior to Initial Certification

Dear Mr. Graser:

As provided in Chapter 23 of the April 2004 Licensing Support Guidelines (Access Control Guidelines), the US. Department of Energy (DOE) submits this request for access control prior to its initial certification under 10 CFR 2.1003(a). As requested in the Access Control Guidelines, DOE provides the following information:

DOE currently estimates that the size of its document collection to be made available at the time of its initial certification is approximately one million documents consisting of approximately 12 million pages. DOE expects to begin populating its participant website with these documents on or about May 5,2004, with weekly feeds thereafter. The feed for the initial, as well as subsequent weeks wiII approximate 150,000 documents, which we understand is the current weekly capacity of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) technical staff to crawl documents for the LSN. An exact schedule will be determined after consultation between the DOE and the NRC technical staff to ensure that operational and technical factors are considered.

DOE requests acknowledgement from the NRC that DOE will be provided access control pursuant to Access Control Guidelines for the documents that DOE populates on its participant website prior to its initial Certification. Additionally, DOE understands the Access Control Guidelines to mean (i) that the documents DOE populates on its participant website will not be in any way released to the web, identified in response to web queries, or otherwise disclosed by the NRC before DOE makes its initial certification per 10 CFR 2.1003(a); (ii) that DOE can recall documents for any reason prior to its initial certification; and (iii) that DOE does not waive any privileges by providing documents to the NRC technical staff for crawling pursuant to the Access Control Guidelines. DOE requests NRC’s confirmation that this understanding of the Access Control Guidelines is correct.

Mr. Daniel J. Graser -2- MAY 04 Z ~ U 4

In consideration of DOE’S desire to begin populating its participant website this week as earIy as Wednesday, May 5,2004, DOE requests by May 5,2004, NRC’s acknowledgement that it will be providing access control and confirmation that DOE’S understanding of the Access Control Guidelines on the three points referenced above is correct.

If you have any questions, please contact Harry E. Leake at (702) 794-1457 or e-mail at [email protected].

I Sincerely,

~ Office of Licen ~e~ e Application and Strategy

cc: A. C. Campbell, NRC, Rockville, MD L. L. Campbell, NRC, Rockville, MD D. D. Chamberlain, NRC, Arlington, TX G. P. Hatchett, NRC, Rockville, MD R. M. Latta, NRC, Las Vegas, NV J. D. Parrott, NRC, Las Vegas, NV D. B. Spitzberg, NRC, Arlington, TX N. K. Stablein, NRC, Rockville, MD B. J. Garrick, ACNW, Rockville, MD H. J. Larson, ACNW, Rockville, MI3 W. C. Patrick, C M , San Antonio, TX Budhi Sagar, CNWRA, San Antonio, TX W. D. Bamard, NWTFU3, Arlington, VA J. R. Egan, Egan & Associates, McLean, VA J. H. Kessfer, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA M. J. Apted, Monitor Scientific, LLC, Denver, CO Rod McCullum, NEI, Washington, DC R. R. Loux, State of Nevada, Carson City, NV Pat Guinan, State of Nevada, Carson City, NV Alan KaIt, Churchill County, Fallon, NV Irene Navis, Clark County, Las Vegas, NV George McCorkell, Esmeralda County, Goldfield, NV Leonard Fiorenzi, Eureka County, Eureka, NV Michael King, Inyo County, Edmonds, WA

.& ' 0

Mr. Daniel J. Graser -3- HAY 0 4 2004

cc: (continued) Andrew Remus, Inyo County, Independence, CA Mickey Yarbro, Lander County, Battle Mountain, NV Spencer Hafen, Lincoln County, Pioche, NV Linda Mathias, MineraI County, Hawthorne, NV L. W. Bradshaw, Nye County, Pahrump, NV Mike Simon, White Pine County, Ely, Nv R. I, Holden, National Congress of American Indians, Washington, DC

Exhibit 15

EXHIBIT 15 UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY C 0 M M IS S I 0 N WASHINGTON, DC 20555 - 0001

May 5,2004

Mr. Joseph D. Ziegler Acting Director Office of License Application and Strategy U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 364629 North Las Vegas, Nevada 89036-8629

Subject : LSN Access Controls Prior to Initial Certification

Relative to your May 4, 2004 access control request, as that memorandum suggests, Licensing Support Network (LSN) access to Department of Energy (DOE) documents would be provided in accord with the LSN Guideline No. 23, Access Control Guideline. In this regard:

1. Relative to the release, identification, or other disclosure of DOE documents made available for indexing prior to DOE making an initial certification pursuant to 10 C.F.R. §§ 2.1003(a), 2.1009(b), in accord with Guideline 23.4.1, LSN staff will take appropriate measures to ensure that material made available for indexinglloading into the LSN is restricted only to those LSN project staff members directly involved with LSN maintenance.

2. Relative to the ability of DOE to recall documents prior to its initial certification, in accord with Guideline 23.5, prior to its initial certification DOE may delete previously indexed information that it later determines is not relevant or may change the manner in which the information is disclosed if it decides the information is privileged or otherwise sensitive.

3. In accord with 10 C.F.R. !j 2.1006(a), traditional discovery privileges recognized in NRC adjudicatory proceedings and the exceptions from disclosure in 10 C.F.R. § 2.390 are applicable to documents provided to the LSN for indexing.

Thank you for providing information regarding the size of the initial collection DOE intends to make available at the time of its initial certification. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (301)415-7'401 if I can be of further assistance.

Sincerely,

\RA\

Daniel J. Graser Licensing Support Network Administrator

Exhibit 16

JUL-02-2004 03 :48PM FROM-ORD DEPUTY DIRECTOR 702 784 1428

Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management

Office of Repository Development 1551 Hillshire Drive

Las Vegas. NV 89134-6321

Mr. Daniel J. Graser Licensing Support Network Administrator Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738

T-B20 P. 002/006 F-387

EXHIBIT

QA: NIA

ear Mr. Graser:

TlGs i s in response PO your letter of July 2,2004. As I believe you h o w from H ~ T Y E. Ledce, tlie Department of Energy (DOE) took its LSN website off-line yesterday afternoon because of a technical problem that occurred after DOE'S initial certification. This enor inadvertently made available on the website the text and image of a number of documents that contain privacy protected infomiation of project personnel, such as social security numbers, rhar were to be produced in "header"' fonnat only. DOE took its website off-line in order to safeguard Illis information.

DOE is working PO restore irs website as qnickly as possible. However, DOE does not want to prernatLu-el y restore its website without taking reasonable measures to safeguard this informwion. DOE also does not want this information accessible through rhe U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Coinmission (NRC) websire. As part of DOE's analysis, we now have reason to believe rhar die NRC index contains additional documents that C O I ~ ~ ~ ~ privacy i ~ o ~ n a ~ i o n in the text.

Accordingly, DOE requests the NFCC to defer activating its index of DOE's documents until ir has verified that its websire will not make available the documenrs that may contain privacy protected informarion. We are working as expeditiously as possible to correct the problem. Hany Leoke, as always, is available to work with you and your staff as much as possible to coordinate this activity.

Thank you for your consideration of this request.

Sincerely,

16

. W. J o b Adiur, I11 Deputy Director

Exhibit 17

EXHIBIT 17

EMAIL PAPER

Document Counts bv Collection

689,600 1,209 690,809 497.284 361,388 858,672

Exhibit I8

EXHIBIT 18

DOC TYPE (DOC MAY BE ASSIGNED MORE THAN 1 DOCUMENT TYPE)

Document Types and Count for RIS Collection on DOE LSN

~ COUNT

I

Total Documents ! 846.5281

ADMINISTRATION 53,708

AUDIT 1 50,321 CALIBRATION ! 30.652

AGREEMENT 509

, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT 10,950 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION 12,656 CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE 467 CORRESPONDENCE 41 5,588 DATA ~ 90,265 DESIGN DOCUMENT 37,506 DRAWING 13,237

15,948 EMAlL JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT ~ 8,187 LEGAL DOCUMENT 35 MAP

PLAN PMR I

I

3,217 NOTEBOOK

SOFTWARE 1 3.7241

6.084 ORDER OR DIRECTIVE PACKAGE PERMIT

307 ~ 19,364

168

Page 1 of 28

VERIFICATION OF EDUCATION 1 V E R I F I CAT I0 N 0 F W 0 R K EX P E R I EN C E ITotal (Reflects dudicative countina due to cross-codina) I 1.037.707

~

POLICY 262 POSITION DESCRIPTION I 263 POSITION QUALIFICATION STATEMENT 93 PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION , 29,699 PROCUREMENT 5,806 PUBLICATION , 21,521 QUALIFICATION RECORD 2,179 REPORT 84,509 REQUIREMENT 5,440 REVIEW 80,077 SELF ASSESSMENT 21 5 SELF STUDY 74

I

~

SUPPLIERNENDOR DOCUMENT TDIF ~

TRAINING ASSIGNMENT TRAINING ATTENDANCE RECORD

- 7 -

33 20,339

88 47


REPORT ADMINISTRATION, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE ADMINISTRATION, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT ADMINISTRATION, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, REVIEW ADMINISTRATION, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, DESIGN DOCUMENT ADMINISTRATION, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING ADMINISTRATION, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT ADMINISTRATION, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, PACKAGE, REPORT, REQUIREMENT, REVIEW ADMINISTRATION, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, REPORT ADMINISTRATION, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, REQUIREMENT

UNIQUE DOC TYPES /COUNT ADMINISTRATION 1 23.221

1 48

2 1 3 8 2

I 1 1

ADMINISTRATION, AUDIT 1,938 ADMINISTRATION, AUDIT, CALIBRATION 1 ADMINISTRATION, AUDIT, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, REVIEW 1 ADMINISTRATION, AUDIT, COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION 1 ADMINISTRATION. AUDIT. CORRESPONDENCE I 14 -

ADMINISTRATION, AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, EMAIL 2 ADMINISTRATION. AUDIT. CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL 3 ADMINISTRATION, AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, PLAN 1 ADMINISTRATION, AUDIT, DATA 1 ADMINISTRATION, AUDIT, DESIG~OCUMENT 2 ADMINISTRATION, AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REQUIREMENT 1 ADMINISTRATION, AUDIT, DRAWING 1 ADMINISTRATION, AUDIT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT 13 ADMINISTRATIO~UDIT, PLAN 35 ADMINISTRATION, AUDIT, PROCUREMENT 1 ADMINISTRATION, AUDIT, REPORT 5 mMmSTRATlON, AUDIT, REPORT, REVIEW 1 ADMINISTRATION, AUDIT, REVIEW 66 ADMINIST~TION, CALIBRATION 1,520 - ADMINISTRATION, CALIBRATION, CORRESPONDENCE 2 ADMINISTRATION, CALIBRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL 1 ADMINISTRATION, CALIBRATION, DATA ADMINISTRATION, CALIBRATION, DATA, NOTEBOOK, PACKAGE, REPORT, TDIF ADMINISTRATION, CALIBRATION, DATA, PACKAGE 1 ADMINISTRATION, CALIBRATION, PACKAGE 3 ADMINISTRATION, CALIBRATION, PACKAGE, REVIEW, TDIF 1 ADMINISTRATION, CALIBRATION, PROCUREMENT 12 ADMINISTRATION, CALIBRATION, REPORT 22 ADMINISTRATION, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT 125 ADMINISTRATION, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE,

------12 1

PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION I ADMINISTRATION, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE,

Page 2 of 28


s; CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL 1 ADMINISTRATION, COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PLAN 1

~ I N I S T R A T I O N . COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION. CORRESPONDENCE T I

ADMINISTRATION, COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, REVIEW ~~ 1 ADMINISTRATION, COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PLAN ADMINISTRATION, COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DATA 11 ADMINISTRATION, COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, NOTEBOOK, REVIEW ADMINISTRATION, COMPUTER D O ~ N T A T I O N , PACKAGE 5 ADMINISTRATION, COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, PLAN 2 ADMINISTRATION, COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, REPORT 1

'ADMINISTRATION, CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, CORRESPONDENCE ~~ 1

ADMINISTRATION, CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, CORRESPONDENCE, REVIEW I A D ~ ~ N I S T ~ A T ~ ~ ~ , CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, DATA 5 ADMINISTRATION, CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, PACKAGE 2 ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE 7,648 ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA 91 ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, PROCUREMENT, REVIEW 1 ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, EMAIL 21 ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PACKAGE I ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, D A T A , m REPORT 1 ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PACKAGE 2 ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PACKAGE, REPORT, REVIEW ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PACKAGE, REPORT, REVIEW, TDlF ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION

ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, REVIEW 2 ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT 4 - ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, EMAIL ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PACKAGE, REPORT ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REVIEW I 1 ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING 7

ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, MAP 1 ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PLAN 3 ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PLAN, REVIEW ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, POLICY 1 ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION

ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REVIEW ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PROCUREMENT 2 ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, REPORT 21 ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, REPORT, REVIEW ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, REQUIREMENT 1

ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, MAP 12

1

9

ADMINISTRATION, COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, REVIEW 13 ADMINISTRA~CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE 40

~

-

I 2 1

ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, REPORT 6

1 1

ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL 1,194

2

10

1

5

ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, REVIEW 23 4

Page 3 of 28


ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE ADMINISTRAW, CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, PLAN ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, PLAN, PROCUREMENT

9 2 1

ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, TDIF m m A T I O N , CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, PROCUREMENT 1

2

ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, PROCUREMENT, REPORT, REVIEW ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, PROCUREMENT, REQUIREMENT, REVIEW ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, REVIEW ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, TDIF

m~ IN I S T ~ O N , co R R ES PO N D E N c E , PLAN, REV I E w ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, POLICY, REPORT ADM~NJSTR~T~ON, CORRESPONDENCE-PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REPORT ADMINISTRATION. CORRESPONDENCE, PROCUREMENT

ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PLAN

1

1 1

44 32 9 1 7 1

11

- _--______ ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, QUALIFICATION RECORD, REPORT A D M I N I S T R A T I O N ~ ~ O N D E N C E , REPORT

t ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PUBLICATION 5 ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PUBLICATION, REVIEW ADMINISTRATION. CORRESPONDENCE. QUALIFICATION RECORD 1

1- 1

ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, REPORT, REVIEW 5 ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, REQUIREMENT ~ 7 ADMINISTRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, REVIEW 1 55 ADMINISTRATION, DATA 5,702 ADMINISTRATION, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REPORT, REVIEW

~ 2 ADMINISTRATION, DATA, DRAWING 8 ADMINISTRATION, DATA, DRAWING, PLAN 1 ADMINISTRATION, DATA, DRAWING, REPORT 2 ADMINISTRATION, DATA, EMAIL 2 ADMINISTRATION, DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT 2 ADMINISTRATION, DATA, MAP 1 ADMINISTRATION, DATA, NOTEBOOK 121 ADMINISTRATION, DATA, NOTEBOOK, PACKAGE, REVIEW 1 ADMINISTRATION, DATA, PACKAGE 133

~

ADMINISTRATION. DATA. PACKAGE. REPORT I 3

I :I ADMINISTRATION, DATA, PACKAGE, TDIF ADMINISTRATION. DATA, PLAN

ADMINISTRATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT ADMINISTRATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING

~

ADMINISTRATION, DATA, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION ~ 2

i 1 i 2 t 47

ADMINISTRATION, ADMINISTRATION, DATA, DATALPROCUREMENT PUBLICATION, REPORT ~~ 15 ADMINISTRATION, DATA, REPORT

ADMINISTRATION, DATA, REPORT, REQUIREMENT ADMINISTRATION, DATA, REPORT, REVIEW ADMINISTRATION. DATA. REVIEW

2,032 4

Page 4 of 28


ADMINISTRATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, REPORT ADMINISTRATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, REVIEW ADMINISTRATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT ADMINISTRATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PLAN

1 5 1 1

Page 5 of 28

ADMINISTRATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REPORT ADMINISTRATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REPORT, REVIEW ADMINISTRATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REQUIREMENT ADMINISTRATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REVIEW ADMINISTRATION, DRAWING

2 3 1

56 31

ADMINISTRATION, DRAWING, MAP, REPORT ADMINISTRATION, DRAWING, REPORT ADMINISTRATION, DRAWING, REPORT, REVIEW AD M I N I ST RAT I0 N , DRAW IN GI REV I E W ADMINISTRATION, EMAIL ADMINISTRATION, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT ADMINISTRATION, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REPORT A D M I N ~ S T R ~ T ~ O ~ , JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REVIEW ADMINISTRATION, MAP ADMINISTRATION, NOTEBOOK ADMINISTRATION, ORDER OR DIRECTIVE ADMINISTRATION, ORDER OR DIRECTIVE, REQUIREMENT IADMINISTRATION, PACKAGE ADMINISTRATION, PACKAGE, PLAN

1 22 10 64 3

202 8 1 9

49 2 1

622 3

-~

'ADMINISTRATION, PACKAGE, REPORT, REVIEW IADMINISTRATION, PACKAGE, REPORT, REVIEW, TDlF

2 1

ADMINISTRATION, POLICY ADMINISTRATION, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REPORT, REQUIREMENT ADMINISTRATION, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REVIEW ADMINISTRATION, PROCUREMENT ADMINISTRATION, PROCUREMENT, REPORT ADMINISTRATION, PROCUREMENT, REVIEW -~

ADMINISTRATION, PUBLICATION ADMINISTRATION, PUBLICATION, REPORT ADMINISTRATION, PUBLICATION, REVIEW ADMINISTRATION, QUALIFICATION RECORD ADMINISTRATION, REPORT ADMINISTRATION, REPORT, REQUIREMENT ADMINISTRATION, REPORT, REVIEW ADMINISTRATION, REQUIREMENT

1 - 6 122

2 1

57 1 1

12 2,713

168 29

a

ADMINISTRATION, REQUIREMENT, REVIEW 1 ADMINISTRATION, REVIEW __ 1,116 AGREEMENT 196 AGREEMENT, AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE 1 AGREEMENT, CALIBRATION 1 AGREEMENT, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE AGREEMENT, COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION 1

AGREEMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, EMAIL 2

AGREEMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, ORDER OR DIRECTIVE AGREEMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, PLAN, REVIEW 1 AGREEMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION AGREEMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, PROCUREMENT 2 AGREEMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, PUBLICATION 1 AGREEMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, REPORT 2 AGREEMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, REVIEW 1 AGREEMENT, DATA 12 AGREEMENT, DATA, NOTEBOOK 12 AGREEMENT, DATA, REPORT 1 AGREEMENT. JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT 1

1

AGREEMENT, CORRESPONDENCE 152

AGREEMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL 24 1

2

~

AGREEMENT, NOTEBOOK 21 AGREEMENT, NOTEBOOK, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION _._

AGREEMENT, NOTEBOOK, PROCUREMENT 2 AGREEMENT, PACKAGE __

1

3 AGREEMENT. PACKAGE, REQUIREMENT 1 AGREEMENT, PLAN 5 AGREEMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION 8 AGREEMENT,PROCUREMENT 26 AGREEMENT, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 1 AGREEMENT. PUBLICATION 1 AGREEMENT, REPORT 10 AGREEMENT. REQUIREMENT I 3 AGREEMENT, REVIEW 6 AMR AMR. CORRESPONDENCE. EMAIL

12 3

AMR, DATA, REPORT AMR. DESIGN DOCUMENT AMR~ DESIGN DOCUMENT, REPORT ~ 2 AMR, REPORT ~ 314

AUDIT 35,124 AUDIT, CALIBRATION 234

AMR, REPORT, REVIEW 2

AUDIT, CALIBRATION, CORRESPONDENCE 7 AUDIT, CALIBRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA 1 AUDIT, CALIBRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT AUDIT, CALIBRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT AUDIT, CALIBRATION, DATA 10 AUDIT, CALIBRATION, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT AUDIT. CALIBRATION. DATA. DESIGN DOCUMENT. JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT

2 3

9 1

Page 6 of 28

Document Types and Count for RIS Collection on DOE LSN -1 AUDIT, CALIBRATION, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REPORT AUDIT. CALIBRATION. DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PUBLICATION

1 1

AUDIT; CALIBRATION, DATA, PUBLICATION AUDIT. CALIBRATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT

1 70

AUDIT; CALIBRATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCUREMENT AUDIT, CALIBRATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REPORT

2 4

Page 7 of 28

AUDIT; CALIBRATION, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION AUDIT, CALIBRATION, PROCUREMENT AUDIT, CALIBRATION, PUBLICATION

AUDIT, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE AUDIT, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT AUDIT, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, REVIEW

AUDIT, CALIBRATION, REPORT AUDIT, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT

AUDIT, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, DESIGN DOCUMENT

-

1 4 1 6

164 4 1 1 6

r


AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PUBLICATION AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, REPORT

1 1 3

AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, REPORT, REVIEW AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT ___

~~

AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING

1 37 14

IAUDIT: CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING. RE VIE^

AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, PROCUREMENT

_ _ nl 3-

3 1 1 5

-

AUDIT: CORRESPONDENCE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, PUBLICATION AUDIT. CORRESPONDENCE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, QUALIFICATION RECORD

AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REPORT AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PLAN AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION

AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PUBLICATION

AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT

AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, PUBLICATION

AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING

AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR I NSTR U CT ION

1 3 2

1 2 6 1

1

~~

~~

VERIFICATION OF WORK EXPERIENCE 1 AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, REPORT AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, REPORT, REVIEW

AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, REVIEW AUDIT, DATA

~~ 77 AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, REQUIREMENT 1

AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, PLAN 1 AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, REPORT 2 AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL 106 AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PLAN 3 AUDIT. CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL. PLAN, REVIEW 1

-- ~~

~

Page 8 of 28

AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, REQUIREMENT AUDIT. CORRESPONDENCE. EMAIL. REVIEW

1 8 I - - _ _

AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE; JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PLAN AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REPORT AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, LEGAL DOCUMENT, REVIEW AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, REPORT

-

-~ 4 1 5 1 3

AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, PROCUREMENT, REVIEW AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, PUBLlCAflON AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, QUALIFICATTON RECORD AUDIT, CORRESPONDENCE, QUALIFICATION RECORD, VERIFICATION OF EDUCATION,

1 4 4

~

I Document Types and Count for RIS Collection on DOE LSN 1 AUDIT, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT AUDIT, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING AUDIT, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT AUDIT, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REPORT AUDIT, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, PUBLICATION AUDIT, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT AUDIT, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PLAN AUDIT, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION AUDIT, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR

98 14 21

1 3

122 6

1

INSTRUCTION, REPORT 1 AUDIT. DATA. DESIGN DOCUMENT. JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT. PUBLICATION 1

Page 9 of 28

AUDIT, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PLAN AUDIT, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION AUDIT, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, PUBLICATION AUDIT, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCUREMENT AUDIT, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PUBLICATION

1 1 1 2

20

AUDIT; DATA, DRAWING 18

1 2

AUDIT, DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT 64 AUDIT, DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PLAN I 6

1 1 2

11

2

AUDIT, DATA, DRAWING, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT ~ 4

AUDIT, DATA, DRAWING, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REPORT AUDIT, DATA, DRAWING, PUBLICATION ~-

AUDIT, DATA, DRAWING, REPORT 9

~

AUDIT, DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PLAN, PROCUREMENT AUDIT, DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PROCUREMENT AUDIT, DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PUBLICATION AUDIT, DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REPORT AUDIT, DATA, POLICY 3 AUDIT, DATA, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION

AUDIT, DATA, PUBLICATION AUDIT, DATA, REPORT AUDIT, DATA, REPORT, REVIEW ~

AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING

28 35

1 ~ 679

508

AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, PLAN AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REPORT

1 1

~ 1

AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PERMIT

35 1

Document Types and Count for R E Collection on DOE LSN

AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PUBLICATION

AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REVIEW AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PERMIT

AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REPORT

DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PLAN AI lnlT nF91CN nnCl IAAFNT . InR PACKAGF DOCIJMFNT PI A N RFPORT

110 5

24 2 1

I - - - ._ - AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCUREMENT, PUBLICATION AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCI IRFMFNT R FVlFW

AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PUBLICATION, REPORT

AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REPORT RFVIFW AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REQUIREMENT 2

2 1

AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, P[SBLICATION 88 1

AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, Q U A L l F l C A T l O m O R D 6 AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REPORT 18

1

AUDIT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REVIEW 38 AUDIT. DRAWING I 133

-

.--...-I. * , . -. .. . -- I

AUDIT, NOTEBOOK AUDIT, ORDER OR DIRECTIVE AUDIT, ORDER OR DIRECTIVE, REVIEW

AUDIT, PACKAGE, QUALIFICATION RECORD AUDIT, PACKAGE, REPORT AUDIT. PACKAGE. REPORT. RE01 IlRFhAFNT

AUDIT, PACKAGE

AUDIT; DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, PUBLICATION AUDIT. DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REVIEW

14 2 1

36 2

33 1

I AIJDIT: DESIGN DOCUMENT. PROCUREMENT

I 11 .~ , . . . - - _ _ -. . __ - . . . . JSTR U CT ION 5 AUDIT; DRAWING, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REPORT

AUDIT, DRAWING, PLAN L 1 __

AUDIT. DRAWING. PROCUREMENT I 2 ~~

6 3

I I

AUDIT; DRAWING, REVIEW AUDIT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT AUDIT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PLAN AUDIT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PLAN, PROCUREMENT AUDIT. JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT. PROCEDURE OP INSTRI JCTION 17 .-

I I . .._- * . .- - . - I INSTRUCTION. REPORT IT: JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OF

AUDIT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PROCUREMENT AUDIT. JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT. PUBLICATION

I - - - -

62 2

AUDIT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REPORT AUDIT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REPORT, REVIEW AUDIT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REVIEW 1 - 1 2 AUDIT, MAP 1 - 3

Page 10 of 28


AUDIT, PACKAGE, REPORT, REVIEW 1 AUDIT, PACKAGE, TDlF 2 AUDIT, PLAN 435 AUDIT, PLAN, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION - AUDIT, PLAN, REPORT 3 AUDIT, PLAN, REVIEW 1 AUDIT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION 104 AUDIT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, PROCUREMENT

~~ 1 AUDIT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, PUBLICATION 8

.AUDIT. PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION. REPORT I 3.

1

~

AUDIT, PROCUREMENT

AUDIT, PUBLICATION AUDIT, PROCUREMENT, REPORT

AUDIT, PUBLICATION, REPORT AUDIT, PUBLICATION, REVIEW AUDIT, QUALIFICATION RECORD AUDIT, REPORT

31 5 4

108 1 1

30 3,738

AUDIT, REQUIREMENT AUDIT, REQUIREMENT, REVIEW AUDIT, REVIEW AUDIT. TRAINING ATTENDANCE RECORD

33 6

590 1

CALIBRATION CALIBRATION, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT CALIBRATION, CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE CALIBRATION, COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION CALIBRATION. COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DATA

Page 11 of 28

24,463 2

22 5 4

CALIBRATION, COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DATA, NOTEBOOK, PACKAGE, REVIEW, TDIF CALIBRATION, COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, PLAIT CALIBRATION, CORRESPONDENCE CALIBRATION. CORRESPONDENCE. DATA

1 4

236 13 1 1 1

CALIBRATION; CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, EMAIL 7 CALIBRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PACKAGE CALI BRAT ION, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PACKAGE, TDI F CALIBRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL 3 CALIBRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PROCUREMENT 1 CALIBRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, REVIEW 1 CALIBRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, PROCUREMENT 1 CALIBRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PROCUREMENT 1

CALIBRATION, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT

20 1,329

1 15 1 1 5 4 1 2

CALIBRATION, CORRESPONDENCE, REPORT - 1 CALIBRATION, DATA

CALIBRATION, DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT CALIBRATION, DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PLAN, PROCUREMENT CALIBRATION, DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REPORT CALIBRATION, DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REVIEW CALIBRATION, DATA, NOTEBOOK ~

I ~: -~

CALIBRATION, DATA, NOTEBOOK, PACKAGE, REPORT, TDlF CALIBRATION, DATA, NOTEBOOK, PACKAGE, REVIEW, TDIF


CALIBRATION, DATA, PACKAGE CALIBRATION, DATA, PACKAGE, REPORT CALIBRATION, DATA, PACKAGE, REPORT, REVIEW CALIBRATION, DATA, PACKAGE, REVIEW -- CALIBRATION, DATA, PACKAGE, REVIEW, TDIF CALIBRATION, DATA, PACKAGE, TDlF CALIBRATION, DATA, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION

CALIBRATION, DATA, REQUIREMENT CALIBRATION, DATA, REVIEW CALIBRATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT

CALIBRATION, DATA, REPORT

~

31 1 I 2 9 5 4

17 3 3 3

CALIBRATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT CALIBRATION, DRAWING 3

CALIBRATION, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PLAN

4

CALIBRATION, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT 27 1

CALIBRATION, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REPORT 8 CALIBRATION, NOTEBOOK 27

I

-

CALIBRATION, ORDER OR DIRECTIVE 1 CALIBRATION, PACKAGE , 91 CALIBRATION, PACKAGE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION I 3 CALIBRATION, PACKAGE, PROCUREMENT 10 CALIBRATION, PACKAGE, PROCUREMENT, REPORT __ 1 1

CALIBRATION, PACKAGE, TDlF 3 CALIBRATION, PLAN, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION ~~ c 2 -E O m R U C T I O N 90 CALIBRATION, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, PROCUREMENT, REQUIREMENT

CALIBRATION, PROCUREMENT, PUBLICATION 1 CALIBRATION, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 2

-

CALIBRATION, PACKAGE, REPORT 50 ~

1 CALIBRATION, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REPORT r 6 CALIBRATION, PROCUREMENT 80

pp

CALIBRATION, PROCUREMENT, REQUIREMENT 66 6

14 CALIBRATION, PUBLICATION CALIBRATION, QUALIFICATION RECORD CALIBRATION, REPORT 1,971

~ i

CALIBRATION, REPORT, REQUIREMENT 4 CALIBRATION, REQUIREMENT 3 CALIBRATION, REVIEW 19 CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT 7,357 CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION 81 CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DATA 25

2 2

~

CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, ORDER OR DIRECTIVE CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, PROCEDURE OR

Page 12 of 28

CORRESPONDENCE, REPORT CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, PLAN

1 1


CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, C O m m L L E D DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, REPORT

CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PAC-GE CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMETKZORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, EMAIL

CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE ~~

_ _ _ ~

~

CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PROCEDURE OR I NSTR UCTl ON, REV I E W CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, REVIEW CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, MAP CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, ORDER OR DIRECTIVE CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CO~RESPONDENCE, PACKAGE CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT,COwS-NDENCE, PACKAGE, REPORT CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, PLAN CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, PLAN, POLICY CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, PROCUREMENT CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, QUALIFICATION RECORD CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, REPORT CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, REQUIREMENT CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, REQUIREMENT, REVIEW CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, CORRESPONDENCE, REVIEW CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, DATA

-

1 1,056

1 5 2 1

18

3 1 3 3 8

I 5 2 5 1 5 3 1

34 2 1

20 9

Page 13 of 28

CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, DATA, DESIGN D O C U M 8 1 1 1 1

632 184

3 1 3 1

47 CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, DRAWING 30

10 1 9

/CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE D~cU~V~ENT 118 1

CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION 1 CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT,-PROCUREMENT 1 CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, - - REVIEW 8 CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, MAP, REQUIREMENT 1 CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, ORDER OR DIRECTIVE 11

CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, DATA, PROCUREMENT CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, DATA, REPORT CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, DATA, REQUIREMENT CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, DESIGN DOCUMENT CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING

-

CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, REVIEW CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PACKAGE, REPORT CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REPORT CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REPORT, REVIEW CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REVIEW

CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, DRAWING, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT

CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, DRAWING, REVIEW CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, DRAWING, PROCEDURE-OR - - INSTRUCTION- ~-

/CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PERMIT

/CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, EMAIL ~ 1

~

-


INSTRUCTION 7 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, REPORT 2

I CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, PACKAGE CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, PACKAGE, PLAN CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, PACKAGE, REPORT CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, PACKAGE, REQUIREMENT CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT.

COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PUBLICATION COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, REPORT COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, REVIEW COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, PUBLICATION COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, REPORT COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, TDlF COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PLAN COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PLAN, PROCUREMENT COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, CORRESPONDENCE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION

- CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, PLAN 16

1 1

264

3 CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT. PROCUREMENT 20

CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, PLAN, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, PLAN, REPORT CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REQUIREXNT CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMWT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REVIEW

~ 2

2 2 8 3 1 1 2 2 1 1

COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DATA COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REQUIREMENT COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DATA, PACKAGE COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DATA, PACKAGE, REVIEW, TDlF

COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PLAN

REQUIREMENT, REVIEW

COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PLAN, REPORT COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION. CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PLAN, REVIEW

2,075 3 1 4 1

Page 14 of 28


COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DATA, PLAN COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DATA, PROCEDUREOR INSTRUCTION COMPUTER D O m N T A T l O N , DATA, PROCUREMENT COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DATA, REPORT COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DATA, REVIEW COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION. DESIGN DOCUMENT

4 1 1 7 3

74 _ _ COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PLAN 1 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION 1 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REPORT, REVIEW 2 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REQUIREMENT 4 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REVIEW 13 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, EMAIL 1

~

-

COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, JOB PA: 1

_ _ COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PLAN COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REPORT, REVIEW COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REQUIREMENT

1 1 2 4

~

-

- - ~- 13 - - ICOMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, EMAIL 1 _ - OCUMENT 1 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, NOTEBOOK ~

COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, NOTEBOOK, REVIEW COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, PACKAGE

9 1

28 1

COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, NOTEBOOK ~

COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, NOTEBOOK, REVIEW _ _ - __ _ _

Page 15 of 28

9 1

28 1

COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, PACKAGE, REPORT, REVIEW 1 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, PACKAGE, TDIF 1 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, PLAN 651 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, PLAN, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION 7 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, PLAN, PUBLICATION 1 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, T A N , REPORT 1 - M ~ R DOCUMENTATION, PLAN, REQUIREMENT 3 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, PLAN, REVIEW 12 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION -78 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, PROCUREMENT 1 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, PROCUREMENT 3 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 1 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, PUBLICATION - 539 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, PUBLICATION, REPORT 2 COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, REPORT 1,19c

-

-

COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, REQUIREMENT, REVIEW COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, REVIEW COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, SOFTWARE CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, CORRESPONDENCE CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, REPORT CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, CORRESPONDENCE, PLAN CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, CORRESPONDENCE, REPORT CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, DATA CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, DATA, PACKAGE CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REVIEW

2 346

1 43

1 1 5

121 2

13 1

CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, DRAWING

CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PACKAGE, PLAN CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT

1 27 2

Document Types and Count for RIS Collection on DOE LSN ,

CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PLAN CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, PACKAGE 12 CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, PACKAGE, PLAN CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, PACKAGE, REPORT CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, PLAN ~

CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, PUBLICATION 1

CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, REQUIREMENT 5 CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, REVIEW 1 CORRESPONDENCE 348,697 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA 3,333

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, EMAIL

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, EMAIL 10 CORRES~ONDEN~E, DATA, ~RAWING, EMAIL, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, PACKAGE 2 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, PROCUREMENT 2 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, PUBLICATION 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, REPORT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, EMAIL 735 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, EMAIL, MAP 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, EMAIL, PLAN 4 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, EMAIL, PROCUREMENT 3 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, EMAIL, REPORT I CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, EMAIL, REQUIREMENT 2 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, EMAIL, REVIEW 9 CORRESmNDENCE, DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT CORRE-ONDENCE, DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PERMIT

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MAP 33 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MAP, REPORT 2 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MAP, REQUIREMENT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, NOTEBOOK 2 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, NOTEBOOK, PACKAGE, TDlF CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, NOTEBOOK, REPORT, REVIEW CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, NOTEBOOK, REVIEW 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PACKAGE - 49 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PACKAGE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PACKAGE, PROCUREMENT 3 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PACKAGE, PROCUREMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PACKAGE, REPORT 4 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PACKAGE, REPORT, REVIEW CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PACKAGE, REPORT, REVIEW, TDlF CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PACKAGE, REPORT, TDIF CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PACKAGE, REVIEW 4

1

4 5

12 CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION 69

CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ISSUANCE, REPORT 48

~

____

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT 8 1

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING 26

1

1

-

41 12 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, EMAIL, REPORT, REVIEW

12 1 2

- CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REPORT

~

1 1

-

3

2

9 1 1

Page 16 of 28

Document Types and Count for RIS Collection on DOE LSN CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PACKAGE, REVIEW, TDlF CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PACKAGE, TDlF 2 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PERMIT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PLAN 11 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PLAN, PROCUREMENT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PROCUREMENT, REPORT, REVIEW

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, QUALIFICATION RECORD 3 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, QUALIFICATION RECORD, REPORT

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, REPORT, REVIEW 3 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, REPORT, TDlF 2

C O ~ ~ € S ~ O N D ~ ~ ~ E , DATA, ~ E Q U ~ R ~ M E N T , REVIEW 1

4

~

7 CORRESPONDEN-ATA, PROCUREMENT 25

1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PUBLICATION 6

1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, REPORT I 203

~

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, REQUIREMENT 13

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, REVIEW 71 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, TDlF 14 CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT 462

CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, EMAIL 28 11 1 7 1

~~ -

~ 5 5

CORRESPWENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, EMAIL, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, EMAIL, REPORT, REVIEW CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, EMAIL, REVIEW CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, MAP 2 CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PLAN 2 CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PLAN, PROCUREMENT CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PLAN, REQUIREMENT, REVIEW C O R R E S P O ~ N C E , DESIGN DOCUMENT, PLAN, REVIEW

~ 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCUREMENT 3

~~

~~

~

1 I

1 -

~~

CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PUBLICATION 4 CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REPORT 7 CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REPORT, REVIEW 6 CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REVIEW 109 CORRESPONDENCE, DESIGN DOCUMENT, TDIF 1

CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, EMAIL 57 CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, EMAIL, PLAN 2 CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, EMAIL, REPORT - I CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, EMAIL, REVIEW

~ 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, MAP 5 CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, MAP, REVIEW CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, PLAN

CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING ~ ~ 412

4

1 3 5 1

23

~

i I

CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, PROCUREMENT I .CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, PROCUREMENT, PUBLICATION r CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, REPORT

Page 17 of 28


CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, REQUIREMENT 2 CORRESPONDENCE. DRAWING. REVIEW 8 - _ CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL 10,060 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REVIEW CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL. MAP CORRESPONDENCE; EMAIL; NOTEBOOK 3 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, NOTEBOOK, REPORT 1 CORRESPONDENCE. EMAIL. ORDER OR DIRECTIVE 2 _ -

CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PACKAGE ~ 3 CORRESPONDENCE. EMAIL. PLAN 119 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PLAN, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REVIEW 2 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PLAN, REPORT 4 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PLAN, REPORT, REVIEW 2 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PLAN, REVIEW 146 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, POLICY 3 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION 74 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, PROCUREMENT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REPORT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REVIEW ~~ 127 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PROCUREMENT 125

1 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, PROCUREMENT, REPORT ___ I 1

13 9 4

~~

i

2 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, REPORT 684 CORRESPONDENCE[ EMAIL; QUALIFICATION RECORD --

CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, REPORT, REQUIREMENT ~ 2 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, REPORT, REVIEW 85 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, REQUIREMENT I09 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, REQUIREMENT, REVIEW 16 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, REVIEW 1,630 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, SELF ASSESSMENT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, EMAIL, TRAINING ATTENDANCE RECORD 1 CORRESPONDENCE, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT 217 CORRESPONDENCE, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, MAP 2 CORRESPONDENCE, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PACKAGE. REPORT 1

1 CORRESPONDENCE, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PERMIT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PLAN, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REPORT 13 CORRESPONDENCE, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REVIEW ~~ -~ 13 CORRESPONDENCE, LEGAL DOCUMENT ~ 1 CORRESPONDENCE, MAP 362 CORRESPONDENCE, MAP, NOTEBOOK 1 CORRESPONDENCE, MAP, PACKAGE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, TDlF 1 CORRESPONDENCE, MAP, PACKAGE, TDlF 4 CORRESPONDENCE, MAP, PERMIT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, MAP, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION 2 CORRESPONDENCE. MAP. PROCUREMENT 1

Page 18 of 28

r Document Types and Count for RIS Collection on DOE LSN

CORRESPONDENCE, MAP, PUBLICATION, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, MAP, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, MAP, REPORT, REVIEW CORRESPONDENCE, MAP, REVIEW CORRESPONDENCE, NOTEBOOK

, CORRESPONDENCE, MAP, PUBLICATION I 11

1 9 3 1

73

CORRESPONDENCE. NOTEBOOK, PACKAGE, TDlF 1 CORRESPONDENCE, NOTEBOOK, REVIEW CORRESPONDENCE, ORDER OR DIRECTIVE CORRESPONDENCE. ORDER OR DIRECTIVE. PACKAGE. PLAN

6 144

1

CORRESPONDENCE. ORDER OR DIRECTIVE, PROCUREMENT 1

Page 19 of 28

CORRESPONDENCE, ORDER OR DIRECTIVE, QUALIFICATION RECORD CORRESPONDENCE, ORDER OR DIRECTIVE, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, ORDER OR DIRECTIVE, REVIEW

1 1

~ 5 163 CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE ~-

CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, PLAN 10 CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, PLAN, PROCUREMENT 3 CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, POSITION QUALIFICATION STATEMENT, TDlF I 1 CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, TDlF CORRESPONDENCE,PACKAGE,PROCUREMENT 2

7

CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 8 CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, REPORT--- 23 CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, REPORT, REVIEW 10 CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, REPORT, REVIEW, TDlF 4 CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, REVIEW 10 CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, REVIEW, TDIF 5 CORRESPONDENCE, PACKAGE, TDIF 105 CORRESPONDENCE, PERMIT ~ 44 CORRESPONDENCE, PLAN 1,275 CORRESPONDENCE, PLAN, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION 6 CORRESPONDENCE, PLAN, PROCUREMENT 3 CORRESPONDENCE, PLAN, PUBLICATION 3 CORRESPONDENCE. PLAN, QUALIFICATION RECORD 3

~~

CORRESPONDENCE, PLAN, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, PLAN, REPORT, REVIEW CORRESPONDENCE, PLAN, REQUIREMENT CORRESPONDENCE, PLAN, REVIEW CORRESPONDENCE. POLICY

11 31 3

101 47

CORRESPONDENCE, POLICY, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION CORRESPONDENCE, POLICY, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, POLICY, REVIEW CORRESPONDENCE, POSITION DESCRIPTION CORRESPONDENCE, POSITION DESCRIPTION, POSITION QUALIFICATION STATEMENT CORRESPONDENCE, POSITION DESCRIPTION, POSITION QUALIFICATION STATEMENT, QUALIFICATION RECORD CORRESPONDENCE, POSITION DESCRIPTION, POSITION QUALIFICATION STATEMENT, QUALIFICATION RECORD, VERIFICATION OF EDUCATION

1 1 2

11 15

27

2

~~


EXPERIENCE

!

CORRESPONDENCE, POSITION DESCRIPTION, POSITION QUALIFICATION STATEMENT, QUALIFICATION RECORD, VERIFICATION OF EDUCATION, VERIFICATION OF WORK

16

VERIFICATION OF EDUCATION CORRESPONDENCE, POSITION DESCRIPTION, POSITION QUALIFICATION STATEMENT, VERIFICATION OF EDUCATION, VERIFICATION OF WORK EXPERIENCE m E S P O N D E N C E , POSITION DESCRIPTION, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION CORRESPONDENCE, POSITION DESCRIPTION, QUALIFICATION RECORD CORRESPONDENCE, POSITION DESCRIPTION, QUALIFICATION RECORD, TRAINING ASSIGNMENT, VERIFICATION OF EDUCATION, VERIFICATION OF WORK EXPERIENCE CORRESPONDENCE, POSITION DESCRIPTION, QUALIFICATION RECORD, VERIFICATION OF EDUCATION

QUALIFICATION RECORD, VERIFICATION OF WORK EXPERIENCE CORRESPONDENCE, POSITION DESCRIPTION, POSITION QUALIFICATION STATEMENT,

1

7 1

31

3

1

1

WORK EXPERIENCE CORRESPONDENCE, POSITION DESCRIPTION, VERIFICATION OF EDUCATION, VERIFICATION OF WORK EXPERIENCE CORRESPONDENCE, POSITION DESCRIPTION, VERIFICATION OF WORK EXPERIENCE CORRESPONDENCE, POSITION QUALIFICATION STATEMENT CORRESPONDENCE, POSITION QUALIFICATION STATEMENT, QUALIFICATION RECORD CORRESPONDENCE, POSITION QUALIFICATION STATEMENT, VERIFICATION OF EDUCATION, VERIFICATION OF WORK EXPERIENCE CORRESPONDENCE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION CORRESPONDENCE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, PUBLICATION CORRESPONDENCE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REPORT, REVIEW CORRESPONDENCE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REQUIREMENT

-

CORRESPONDENCE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REVIEW

CORRESPONDENCE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, TRAINING ATTENDANCE RECORD CORRESPONDENCE, PROCUREMENT CORRESPONDENCE, PROCUREMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, PROCUREMENT, REPORT, REVIEW CORRESPONDENCE. PROCUREMENT, REQUIREMENT

6

24 4 3 4

2 74E

1 E 2 1

62

1 892 5E

1 I_ C

__

EDUCATION, VERIFlCATlON OF WORK EXPERIENCE I 97 CORRESPONDENCE, POSITION DESCRIPTION, QUALIFICATION RECORD, VERIFICATION OF/

CORRESPONDENCE, PROCUREMENT, REVIEW CORRESPONDENCE, PUBLICATION CORRESPONDENCE, PUBLICATION, QUALIFICATION RECORD, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, PUBLICATION, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, PUBLICATION, REPORT, REVIEW

E 29s

1 1:

1

CORRESPONDENCE, QUALIFICATION RECORD, REPORT

CORRESPONDENCE, QUALIFICATION RECORD, SELF STUDY CORRESPONDENCE, QUALIFICATION RECORD,TRAINING ASSIGNMENT

CORRESPONDENCE, QUALIFICATION RECORD, REVIEW 12 14 2 9

Page 20 of 28

Document Types and Count for RIS Collection on DOE LSN I

CORRESPONDENCE, QUALIFICATION RECORD, TRAINING ASSIGNMENT, TRAINING ATTENDANCE RECORD i 11 CORRESPONDENCE, QUALIFICATION RECORD, TRAINING ATTENDANCE RECORD CORRESPONDENCE. QUALIFICATION RECORD, VERIFICATION OF EDUCATION

1 2

CORRESPONDENCE; QUALIFICATION RECORD; VERIFICATION OF EDUCATION, VERIFICATION OF WORK EXPERIENCE 16 CORRESPONDENCE, REPORT 14,891 CORRESPONDENCE, REPORT, REQUIREMENT 4 CORRESPONDENCE, REPORT, REVIEW 253 CORRESPONDENCE, REPORT, TRAINING ATTENDANCE RECORD 1 CORRESPONDENCE. REQUIREMENT 333

1

CORRESPONDENCE, REQUIREMENT, REVIEW 22 CORRESPONDENCE, REVIEW 10,147 CORRESPONDENCE, REVIEW, TDlF 9 CORRESPONDENCE, SELF ASSESSMENT 28 CORRESPONDENCE, SELF STUDY 1 CORRESPONDENCE, TDIF 1,015 CORRESPONDENCE, TRAINING ASSIGNMENT 28 CORRESPONDENCE, TRAINING ATTENDANCE RECORD 13

CORRESPONDENCE, VERIFICATION OF EDUCATION, VERIFICATION OF WORK EXPERIENCE CORRESPONDENCE, VERIFICATION OF WORK EXPERIENCE

CORRESPONDENCE, VERIFICATION OF EDUCATION 5

DATA 54,724 DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT 91 5

2 1 ~

1 1

12 2

I

DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING 1 DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, PROCUREMENT DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, PUBLICATION DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, NOTEBOOK, REVIEW DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PACKAGE I 20 DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PACKAGE, REPORT DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCUREMENT 1 DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, PUBLICATION 1 DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REPORT 9 DATA, DESIGN DOCUMENT, REVIEW 204 DATA, DRAWING 694

2 1

DATA, DRAWING, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT DATA, DRAWING, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, NOTEBOOK 3 DATA, DRAWING, PACKAGE 4 DATA, DRAWING, PACKAGE, PROCUREMENT 1 DATA, DRAWING, PLAN 1 DATA. DRAWING. PUBLICATION 1

10 DATA; DRAWING, REPORT I I DATA. DRAWING, REVIEW i 4 DATA, EMAlL 1 DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT 1,581 DATA. JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT. MAP 3

Page 21 of 28


-DATA; MAP, PACKAGE DATA, MAP, PACKAGE, PROCUREMENT DATA, MAP, PACKAGE, REPORT DATA, MAP, PACKAGE, REVIEW

DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PACKAGE DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PACKAGE, PLAN DATA. JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT. PACKAGE. REPORT

c DATA, MAP, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION DATA, MAP, PROCUREMENT DATA, MAP, PUBLICATION DATA. MAP. REPORT

DATA: JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT; PACKAGE, REPORT, REVIEW DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PACKAGE, TDIF DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PLAN DATA. JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION

w DATA, NOTEBOOK, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION DATA. NOTEBOOK. PROCUREMENT

DATA; JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REPORT DATA, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REVIEW DATA. MAP DATA, MAP, NOTEBOOK DATA. MAP. NOTEBOOK. PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION

DATA; NOTEBOOK DATA, NOTEBOOK, PACKAGE DATA. NOTEBOOK. PACKAGE. PLAN DATA: NOTEBOOK; PACKAGE; PUBLICATION ___ DATA. NOTEBOOK. PACKAGE, REVIEW. TDlF

DATA: NOTEBOOK; QUALIFICATION RECORD DATA, NOTEBOOK, REPORT DATA, NOTEBOOK, REVIEW DATA, PACKAGE DATA, PACKAGE, PLAN DATA, PACKAGE, PLAN, PROCUREMENT DATA, PACKAGE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION DATA, PACKAGE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, QUALIFICATION RECORD DATA, PACKAGE, PROCUREMENT DATA, PACKAGE, PROCUREMENT, REPORT DATA, PACKAGE, PUBLICATION DATA, PACKAGE, PUBLICATION, REVIEW, TDIF DATA, PACKAGE, QUALIFICATION RECORD DATA, PACKAGE, REPORT DATA, PACKAGE, REPORT, REQUIREMENT DATA, PACKAGE, REPORT, REVIEW DATA, PACKAGE, REPORT, REVIEW, TDIF DATA, PACKAGE, REPORT, TDIF DATA, PACKAGE, REVIEW DATA, PACKAGE, REVIEW, TDIF

1

5 6,317

5 3

15 1

52 2 3 1 1

194 1 3 2 1

89 41

Page 22 of 28

Document Types and Count for RIS Collection on DOE LSN DATA, PACKAGE, TDlF 237 DATA, PERMIT 4 DATA, PLAN 168 DATA, PLAN, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION 2 DATA, PLAN, REPORT 4 DATA. PLAN, REVIEW i 2

~-

DATA, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION 61 7

DATA, PROCUREMENT 264 DATA, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REVIEW

DATA, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 3 DATA, PUBLICATION 45 DATA, PUBLICATION, REPORT 7 DATA, PUBLICATION, REVIEW 2 DATA, QUALIFICATION RECORD I 5 DATA, QUALIFICATION RECORD, REVIEW 1 DATA, REPORT 5,435 DATA, REPORT, REQUIREMENT 4 DATA, REPORT, REVIEW 288 DATA, REQUIREMENT 575 DATA, REQUIREMENT, REVIEW 4 DATA, REVIEW 452 DATA, TDIF 177

10,922 DESIGN DOCUMENT DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING 1,657 DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT 16 DESIGN DOCUMENT. DRAWING, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PROCUREMENT 1

~~

- DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, MAP 6 DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, MAP, REVIEW 36 DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, PACKAGE 1

2 DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, PLAN -

DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, PLAN, REVIEW 2 DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION 6 DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, PUBLICATION 1 DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REPORT 2 DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, PROCUREMENT 4 DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, PUBLICATION 2 DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, REPORT 7 DESIGN DOCUMENT, DRAWING, REVIEW 3,241 DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT 90 DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION 1 DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PUBLICATION 1 1DESlGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REPORT 1 :DESIGN DOCUMENT, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REVIEW 1

7 DESIGN DOCUMENT, MAP ~~ ~ ~.

DESIGN DOCUMENT, MAP,REVIEW 4 DESIGN DOCUMENT, NOTEBOOK 2 DESIGN DOCUMENT, NOTEBOOK, REVIEW 2 DESIGN DOCUMENT, ORDER OR DIRECTIVE 2 DESIGN DOCUMENT, PACKAGE DESIGN DOCUMENT. PACKAGE. REPORT 7

1

Page 23 of 28


DESIGN DOCUMENT, PACKAGE, REPORT, REVIEW DESIGN DOCUMENT, PACKAGE, REVIEW 1

DESIGN DOCUMENT, PLAN, REPORT 10

7

DESIGN DOCUMENT, PLAN 118

DESIGN DOCUMENT, PLAN, REPORT, REVIEW 6 DESIGN DOCUMENT, PLAN, REVIEW 41 DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION 70 DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REPORT 6 DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REVIEW 6

~

DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCUREMENT 77 DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCUREMENT, PUBLICATION 1 DESIGN DOCUMENT, PROCUREMENT, REVIEW 13 DESIGN DOCUMENT, PUBLICATION 16 DESIGN DOCUMENT, PUBLICATION, REVIEW 4 DESIGN DOCUMENT, QUALIFICATION RECORD 1

~

DESIGN DOCUMENT, REPORT 836 DESIGN DOCUMENT, REPORT, REVIEW 296 DESIGN DOCUMENT, REQUIREMENT 103 DESIGN DOCUMENT, REQUIREMENT, REVIEW 7 DESIGN DOCUMENT, REVIEW 12,404 DESIGN DOCUMENT, REVIEW, SELF STUDY 2 DRAWING 3,636 DRAWING, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT 76

1 1 1 1

DRAWING, MAP 14

DRAWING, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PLAN DRAWING, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION DRAWING, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PROCUREMENT DRAWING, JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REVIEW

DRAWING, MAP, PLAN 4 DRAWING, MAP, REPORT 1 DRAWING, NOTEBOOK, PUBLICATION 1

~

DRAWING, PLAN 38 DRAWING, PLAN, REVIEW 6 DRAWING, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION ~ ~ 23 DRAWING, PROCUREMENT 18 DRAWING, PROCUREMENT, PUBLICATION 1 DRAWING, PUBLICATION 5 DRAWING. PUBLICATION. REPORT 1 DRAWING, REPORT ~

DRAWING, REPORT, REVIEW DRAWING, REQUIREMENT DRAWING, REVIEW ~~~~~~

DRAWING, REVIEW, SUPPLIERNENDOR DOCUMENT DRAWING, SUPPLIERNENDOR DOCUMENT DRAWING, TDlF ~~~ ~

EMAIL ~

EMAIL, REVIEW JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, MAP JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT. NOTEBOOK

50 2 2

1,715 2

~ 23 1

134 1

1,846 5

35

~~ ~

Page 24 of 28


JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, ORDER OR DIRECTIVE JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PACKAGE JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PACKAGE, PLAN

4 8

10

JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT. PACKAGE. REPORT. REVIEW 5 JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PERMIT JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT. PERMIT. PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION

13 1

JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PLAN, REPORT JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT. PLAN. REVIEW

5 15

Page 25 of 28

JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION 180 JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REPORT 1 JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REQUIREMENT 1 JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REVIEW 7 JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, PROCUREMENT 108 m m K A G E DOCUMENT, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 2 JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, QUALIFICATION RECORD 2 JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REPORT 1,320 JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REPORT, REVIEW 151

~.

JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REQUIREMENT JOB PACKAGE DOCUMENT, REVIEW LEGAL DOCUMENT LEGAL DOCUMENT, PUBLICATION LEGAL DOCUMENT, REPORT LEGAL DOCUMENT, REQUIREMENT MAP MAP, NOTEBOOK MAP, PACKAGE MAP, PACKAGE, REPORT MAP, PACKAGE, REVIEW, TDIF

3 210 26

I 1 4 1

1,662 3

13 2

I 8

~~

MAP, PLAN, POLICY MAP, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION MAP. PROCUREMENT

1 26 5

MAP, PUBLICATION MAP, PUBLICATION, REPORT MAP, REPORT -

MAP, REPORT, REVIEW MAP, REVIEW NOTEBOOK

24 5

130 13

159 4,173

NOTEBOOK, PACKAGE, TDIF NOTEBOOK, PLAN NOTEBOOK, PLAN, REVIEW NOTEBOOK, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION NOTEBOOK, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, PUBLICATION NOTEBOOK, PROCUREMENT

18

1 4 1 1

a


ORDER OR DIRECTIVE ORDER OR DIRECTIVE, POLICY ORDER OR DIRECTIVE, PROCUREMENT ORDER OR DIRECTIVE, PUBLICATION ORDER OR DIRECTIVE, REPORT PACKAGE PACKAGE, PLAN PACKAGE, PLAN, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION PACKAGE, PLAN, PROCUREMENT PACKAGE, PLAN, PROCUREMENT, REPORT -

PACKAGE, PLAN, PROCUREMENT, REPORT, TDlF PACKAGE, PLAN, QUALIFICATION RECORD PACKAGE, PLAN, TDlF

~

PACKAGE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION

103 1 3 5 4

3,189 314

6 7 1 1

191 1 6

NOTEBOOK, REVIEW NOTEBOOK, TDlF

PACKAGE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REPORT PACKAGE, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REPORT, REQUIREMENT PACKAGE, PROCUREMENT 202 PACKAGE, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 5 PACKAGE, PROCUREMENT, REQUIREMENT 2

PACKAGE, PUBLICATION, REPORT, REVIEW 1 PACKAGE, PUBLICATION, REVIEW 3 PACKAGE, PUBLICATION, REVIEW, TDlF 1 PACKAGE, PUBLICATION, TDlF 2

PACKAGE, QUALIFICATION RECORD, REQUIREMENT 1 PACKAGE, QUALIFICATION RECORD, SELF STUDY PACKAGE, QUALIFICATION RECORD, TRAINING ATTENDANCE REC-

PACKAGE, REPORT, REQUIREMENT 2 PACKAGE, REPORT, REVIEW 73 PACKAGE, REPORT, REVIEW, TDlF 9

PACKAGE, REPORT, TRAINING ASSIGNMENT 3

1 1

PACKAGE, PUBLICATION 52 ~

___

PACKAGE, QUALIFICATION RECORD 336

3 1

PACKAGE, REPORT 1,306 ________________

1

PACKAGE, REPORT, TDIF 28

PACKAGE, REQUIREMENT 50 PACKAGE, REVIEW 324

PACKAGE, TDlF 3,626 PACKAGE, REVIEW, TDlF 43

PACKAGE, TRAINING ATTENDANCE RECORD 2 PERMIT ~ 93 PERMIT, REPORT 2 PLAN I 7,054

Page 26 of 28

PLAN, POLICY, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION PLAN, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION PLAN, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REPORT

1 96 2


PLAN, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REQUIREMENT

PLAN, PUBLICATION, QUALIFICATION RECORD 2

PLAN, REPORT, REVIEW 5 IPLAN, REQUIREMENT 21 PLAN, REQUIREMENT, REVIEW 1 PLAN, REVIEW 736 PLAN. SELF ASSESSMENT 1

4 PLAN, PROCUREMENT 67 PLAN, PUBLICATION 16

PLAN, QUALIFICATION RECORD 28 1 PLAN, REPORT 161

. .... .

PMR, REPORT POLICY

I PMR I 27 35

162 POLICY, PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION 3 POLICY. PUBLICATION 1

: EDUCATION, VER I Fl CATION OF WORK EX PER1 ENCE POSITION DESCRIPTION. PROCUREMENT, REQUIREMENT

POLICY, REPORT POLICY, REQUIREMENT POLICY. REVIEW

2 2

19

POSITION DESCRIPTION, POSITION QUALIFICATION STATEMENT, QUALIFICATION RECORD

RECORD, VERIFICATION OF EDUCATION, VERIFICATION OF WORK EXPERIENCE POSITION DESCRIPTION, POSITION QUALIFICATION STATEMENT, QUALIFICATION

POSITION DESCRIPTION, POSITION QUALIFICATION STATEMENT, VERIFICATION OF

5

1

PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REPORT 61 PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION,-REPORT, REVIEW PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION. REQUIREMENT

POSITION DESCRIPTION, QUALIFICATION RECORD POSITION DESCRIPTION, QUALIFICATION RECORD, VERIFICATION OF EDUCATION POSITION DESCRIPTION, QUALIFICATION RECORD, VERIFICATION OF EDUCATION,

PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, REVIEW 882 I PROCUREMENT I 2,586

4 1

VERIFICATION OF WORK EXPERIENCE

Page 27 of 28

3 POSITION QUALIFICATION STATEMENT 6 POSITION QUALIFICATION STATEMENT, QUALIFICATION RECORD PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, PROCUREMENT PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, PROCUREMENT, REVIEW PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, PUBLICATION PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, PUBLICATION, REVIEW PROCEDURE OR INSTRUCTION, QUALIFICATION RECORD

1 25,650

97 1

37 1

12

~

PROCUREMENT, QUALIFICATION RECORD ~

PROCUREMENT, REPORT, REVIEW

PROCUREMENT, REQUIREMENT, REVIEW

PROCUREMENT, REPORT -

PROCUREMENT, REQUIREMENT

PROCUREMENT. REVIEW

1

1 25

3 17

291 -~


PUBLICATION PUBLICATION, QUALIFICATION RECORD PUBLICATION, REPORT PUBLICATION, REPORT, REQUIREMENT PUBLICATION, REPORT, REVIEW PUBLICATION, REQUIREMENT PUBLICATION, REVIEW QUALIFICATION RECORD QUALIFICATION RECORD, REPORT QUALIFICATION RECORD, REQUIREMENT QUALIFICATION RECORD, REVIEW QUALIFICATION RECORD. SELF STUDY

19,321 1

297 1 2

19 333 56 1 42 9

28 9

QUALIFICATION RECORD, SELF STUDY, TRAINING ASSIGNMENT 1

I EXPERIENCE I 21

QUALIFICATION RECORD, TRAINING ASSIGNMENT 5 L

QUALIFICATION RECORD, TRAINING ATTENDANCE RECORD QUALIFICATION RECORD, VERIFICATION OF EDUCATION, VERIFICATION OF W O ~ K

1

REPORT 40,651 REPORT. REQUIREMENT

SELF ASSESSMENT - 163 SELF STUDY ~ 48

21 7

~ 3 ~ 7 ~ 1 SELF STUDY, TRAINING ASSIGNMENT SOFTWARE SUPPLIERNENDOR DOCUMENT TDIF 14,636 TRAINING ASSIGNMENT TRAINING ATTENDANCE RECORD

REPORT, REQUIREMENT, REVIEW REPORT, REVIEW REPORT. SELF ASSESSMENT

Page 28 of 28

6 4,363

22 REPORT, SELF STUDY 7

~

I REPORT; TRAINING ATTENDANCE RECORD 1 REQUIREMENT 1 3,047 REQUIREMENT. REVIEW 376 REQUIREMENT, TRAINING ASSIGNMENT REVIEW REVIEW, SUPPLIERNENDOR DOCUMENT REVIEW, TDIF REVIEW. TRAINING ASSIGNMENT

~

~ 1 36,738

1 3 1

Exhibit 19

EXHIBIT 19

__ Total Paper Docs

DOC TYPE (DOC MAY BE ASSIGNED MORE THAN 1 DOCUMENT TYPE) CORRESPONDENCE e

Document Types and Count for Paper Collection on DOE LSN I 497,284

I __ COUNT

226,721 110.685

MAP 5,724 MEDIA 937 MEETING AID 14,269 NOTEBOOK 1,735 PHOTOGRAPH 6,250 PROCUREMENT 6,267 REPORT 266,190

~

~

~

DRAWING __ 10,114 E-MAIL 1,190 FINANCIAL STATEMENT 2,767 FORM 94,302 LEGAL DOCUMENT 1.71 6

~

Page 1 of 20

UNIQUE DOC TYPES CORRESPONDENCE CORRESPONDENCE, DATA CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING

COUNT 182,114

2,344 38

~

Page 2 of 20

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, E-MAIL, MANUAL, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, E-MAIL, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT

1 2

~

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, PROCUREMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, FORM CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, FORM, LIST

1 3 2

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, FORM, LIST, MANUAL CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, FORM, LIST, NOTEBOOK CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, FORM, LIST, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, FORM, MANUAL CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, FORM, MANUAL, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, FORM, MAP, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, FORM, NOTEBOOK, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, FORM, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, FORM, PROCUREMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, FORM, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MEETING AID, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, LEGAL DOCUMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, LIST 2 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, LIST, MANUAL, MAP CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, LIST, MANUAL, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, LIST, MAP CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, LIST, MAP, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, LIST, MEETING AID, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, LIST, NOTEBOOK, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, LIST, PHOTOGRAPH, PROCUREMENT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, LIST, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT I 8 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, LIST, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, MANUAL, MAP, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, MANUAL, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, MANUAL, NOTEBOOK, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, MANUAL, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, MAP 2 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, MAP, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, MAP, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, MEDIA ~ ~ 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, MEDIA, MEETING AID, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, MEDIA, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, MEETING AID CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, MEETING AID, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, NOTEBOOK, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, PHOTOGRAPH 1

1 2 5 1 1 2 5 2 2 5 1 1

1 2 1

12 3 1 1

33 1 1 1 1

1 3 2 7

1 1 1 9 1 2

~

~

~

___

I

Document Types and Count for Paper Collection on DOE LSN

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, PHOTOGRAPH, PROCUREMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, PROCUREMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, DRAWING, REPORT 48 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, E-MAIL 7 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, E-MAIL, FORM, LIST, PROCUREMENT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, E-MAIL, FORM, LIST, REPORT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, E-MAIL, FORM, PROCUREMENT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, E-MAIL, FORM, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, E-MAIL, LIST, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, E-MAIL, LIST, REPORT 2 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, E-MAIL, MEDIA, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, E-MAIL, NOTEBOOK, REPORT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT 15 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, LIST, REPORT 1 CORRESPONDENCE. DATA. FINANCIZL STATEMENT. FORM. MAP. REPORT I 3

1 7 2

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, PROCUREMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LIST, MANUAL, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LIST, NOTEBOOK, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE. DATA. FINANCIAL STATEMENT. LIST. REPORT

1 1 1 3

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MANUAL, MEETING AID, REPORT 1 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MAP, REPORT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, REPORT 11 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM 41 0 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, LEGAL DOCUMENT 3 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, REPORT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MANUAL 2

1 1 1 8 2 2 1

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MANUAL, MAP CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MAP, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, LEGAL DOCUMENT, PROCUREMENT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, LIST CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, LIST, MANUAL CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, LIST, MANUAL, NOTEBOOK CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, LIST, MANUAL, PROCUREMENT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, LIST, MANUAL, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, LIST, MAP, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, LIST, MEETING AID, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, LIST, NOTEBOOK CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, LIST, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, LIST, NOTEBOOK, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, LIST, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, LIST, PROCUREMENT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, LIST, PROCUREMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, LIST, REPORT

~~ 3

~

~~

1 1

9

2 4

25

Page 3 of 20


CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, MANUAL, NOTEBOOK CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, MANUAL, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, MANUAL, NOTEBOOK, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, MANUAL, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, MANUAL, PROCUREMENT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, MANUAL, PROCUREMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, MANUAL, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, MAP, PROCUREMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, MAP, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, MEETING AID CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, MEETING AID, NOTEBOOK, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, MEETING AID, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, NOTEBOOK 19

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, NOTEBOOK, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, PROCUREMENT 22 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, PROCUREMENT, REPORT

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT 7 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, MANUAL, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, MAP, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, MEDIA, REPORT

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MEDIA, NOTEBOOK, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT, REPORT

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LIST, MAN. ~ 10 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LIST, MANUAL, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LIST, MANUAL, PROCUREMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LIST, MANUAL, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LIST, MAP 2 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LIST, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LIST, MAP, PROCUREMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LIST, MAP, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LIST, MEETING AID CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LIST, MEETING AID, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LIST, NOTEBOOK 2 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LIST, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH CORRESPONDENCE, DATATLIST, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LIST, NOTEBOOK, REPORT

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LIST, PHOTOGRAPH, PROCUREMENT, REPORT ~

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LIST, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LIST, PROCUREMENT 3 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LIST, PROCUREMENT, REPORT

3 2 1 1 1 1 5 1 2 3 3 1 2

6 9 1

5 CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, REPORT 147

1 1 1 1 1 3

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LIST 71

1 3 3

3 1 7 3 5

1 1 1

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LIST, PHOTOGRAPH 6 1 7

4

~

~

~

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, FORM, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT ~

~

~ ~~~ ~

~-

Page 4 of 20


CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, LIST, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MANUAL CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MANUAL, MAP CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MANUAL, MAP, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MANUAL, MEDIA, MEETING AID, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MANUAL, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MANUAL, MEETING AID, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MANUAL, NOTEBOOK CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MANUAL, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MANUAL, NOTEBOOK, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MANUAL, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MAP CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MAP, MEDIA, MEETING AID, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MAP, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MAP, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MAP, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MAP, NOTEBOOK, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH, PROCUREMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MAP, PROCUREMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MAP, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MEDIA CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MEDIA, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MEETING AID CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT ~

CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, MEETING AID, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, NOTEBOOK CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, NOTEBOOK, PROCUREMENT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, NOTEBOOK, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PHOTOGRAPH CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PROCUREMENT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, PROCUREMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DATA, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, LIST, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, FORM ~~~

CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, FORM, LIST, MANUAL, MAP ~

CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, FORM, MANUAL CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, FORM, PROCUREMENT CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, FORM, PROCUREMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, FORM, REPORT

~

110 19 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 1

12 6 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1

23 6 1

33 1 1

21 19

1 I 1

7 28 64 32

4 936 81

1 1 1

14 1 2 1 1

t 14

~ ~

CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWING, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MEDIA, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH

Page 5 of 20

1


Page 6 of 20

1


CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, LIST, MANUAL, PROCUREMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, LIST, MANUAL, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, LIST, MAP, REPORT

~ 1 2 1

- .

ICORRESPONDENCE. FORM. LIST. MEETING AID 21

CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, LIST, PROCUREMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, LIST, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, MANUAL CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, MANUAL, MEETING AID, PROCUREMENT

2 10

~ 53 1 2

Page 7 of 20

CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, MANUAL, MEETING AID, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, MANUAL, PROCUREMENT

1

~ 2 CORRESPONDENCE,FORM,MA"T,R\ ~ 2 CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, MANUAL, REPORT I 8 CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, MAP ~ 6 CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, MEDIA 2 CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, MEDIA, MEETING AID I 1 CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, MEDIA, MEETING AID, REPORT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, MEETING AID

~ 20 CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, MEETING AID, PROCUREMENT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, MEETING AID, REPORT 7 CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, NOTEBOOK 37

CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, NOTEBOOK, REPORT I CORRESPONDENCE,FORM,PHOTOGRAPH 3 CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 4 CORRESPONDENCE,FORM,PROCUREMENT 448 CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, PROCUREMENT, REPORT - ~ 21 CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, REPORT 91 2 CORRESPONDENCE, LEGAL DOCUMENT 1 52 CORRESPONDENCE, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST 1 CORRESPONDENCE, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MANUAL 5 CORRESPONDENCE, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MEETING AID CORRESPONDENCE, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MEETING AID, REPORT

~

CORRESPONDENCE, FORM, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH 1 1 ~

4

~~

1 1

CORRESPONDENCE, LEGAL DOCUMENT, PROCUREMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, LEGAL DOCUMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, LIST CORRESPONDENCE, LIST, MANUAL CORRESPONDENCE, LIST, MANUAL, MAP ~

CORRESPONDENCE, LIST, MANUAL, MEETING AID CORRESPONDENCE, LIST, MANUAL, REPORT ~ ~- ~~ ~-

CORRESPONDENCE, LIST, MAP CORRESPONDENCE, LIST, MEDIA

2 37

1,376 44

1 1

13 1 2

CORRESPONDENCE, LIST, PROCUREMENT CORRESPONDENCE, LIST, PROCUREMENT, REPORT

8 7

F c u m e n t Types and Count for Paper Collection on DOE LSN

ICORRESPONDENCE, LIST, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, MANUAL CORRESPONDENCE, MANUAL, MAP CORRESPONDENCE, MANUAL, MAP, MEETING AID CORRESPONDENCE, MANUAL, MAP, REPORT

CORRESPONDENCE, MANUAL, MEETING AID CORRESPONDENCE, MANUAL, MEETING AID, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, MANUAL, PROCUREMENT

CORRESPONDENCE, MANUAL, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, MAP CORRESPONDENCE, MAP, MEDIA

/CORRESPONDENCE, MANUAL, MEDIA -

-CORRESPONDENCE, MANUAL, PROCUREMENT, REPORT

295 525

2

1 4 3 2

10 3

77 23

1

~ 1

CORRESPONDENCE, MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH, PROCUREMENT CORRESPONDENCE, MAP, PROCUREMENT, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, MAP, REPORT

1 1 1

15

Page 8 of 20

CORRESPONDENCE, MEDIA CORRESPONDENCE, MEDIA, REPORT CORRESPONDENCE, MEETING AID CORRESPONDENCE. MEETING AID. NOTEBOOK

63 21

1,054 4

CORRESPONDENCE, MEETING AID; PHOTOGRAPH 2 /CORRESPONDENCE, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, MEETING AID, PROCUREMENT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, MEETING AID, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 1 ICORRESPONDENCE, MEETING AID, REPORT 224 7, NOTEBOOK 148 'CORRESPONDENCE, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 1 CORRESPONDENCE, NOTEBOOK, REPORT 9 CORRESPONDENCE,PHOTOGRAPH 28 CORRESPONDENCE, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT ~ 8 CORRESPONDENCE,PROCUREMENT 607 CORRESPONDENCE, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 88 CORRESPONDENCE, REPORT 9,873

10,449 DATA, DRAWING 745 DATA, DRAWING, E-MAIL, FORM, MAP, REPORT 1 DATA, DRAWING, E-MAIL, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 2

2 DATA, DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM,-LIST, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, MANUAL, REPORT 1 DATA, DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, MAP, REPORT 1

1 DATA, DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, REPORT 2 DATA, DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LIST, MANUAL, REPORT 1 DATA, DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LIST, MAP, REPORT 2 DATA, DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LIST, MEDIA, REPORT 1 DATA, DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LIST, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 2 DATA, DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LIST, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 1

DATP. DATA, DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH I

Document Types and Count for Paper Collection on DOE LSN I I

b A . DRAWING. FINANCIAL STATEMENT. LIST. REPORT I 5 - DATA; DRAWING; FINANCIAL STATEMENT; MAP; MEETING AID, REPORT 2

3

a 1 4

DATA, DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MAP, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, PROCUREMENT, REPORT

~~ 3

IDATA. DRAWING. FINANCIAL STATEMENT. REPORT 2c -- . _..

DATA; DRAWING; FORM 3 DATA, DRAWING, FORM, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, FORM, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MANUAL, REPORT

1 1

16 DATA, DRAWING, FORM, LIST, MANUAL, REPORT ~ DATA, DRAWING, FORM, LIST, MAP, REPORT 29

1 DATA, DRAWING, FORM, LIST, MEDIA, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, FORM, LIST, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, FORM, LIST, NOTEBOOK, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, FORM, LIST, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, FORM, LIST, PROCUREMENT, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, FORM, LIST, REPORT DATA. DRAWING. FORM. MANUAL. MAP. REPORT

~ 1

~ a

1 ~

12

89 P

-

- ~

DATA; DRAWING; FORM; MANUAL; MEETING AID, REPORT ~ 1

DATA. DRAWING, FORM, MANUAL, NOTEBOOK. REPORT E REPORT 9

4 34

-~

_ . ___ DATA; DRAWING; FORM; MAP 1 2 DATA, DRAWING, FORM, MAP, MEDIA, REPORT 1

~

DATA, DRAWING, FORM, MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, FORM, MAP, NOTEBOOK, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, FORM, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, FORM, MAP, PROCUREMENT, REPORT

5 ~ a ~ 19

MAP, REPORT 25 MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 2

4

DATA, DRAWING, FORM, MEETING AID, PROCUREMENT, REPORT DATA. DRAWING. FORM. MEETING AID. REPORT DATA; DRAWING; FORM; NOTEBOOK ’ I DATA. DRAWING. FORM, NOTEBOOK. PHOTOGRAPH. REPORT DATA, DRAWING, FORM, NOTEBOOK, REPORT

DATA. DRAWING. FORM. PROCUREMENT. REPORT I 1

9 DATA, DRAWING, FORM, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT - ~ ~~ 1 1,

DATA: DRAWING; FORM; REPORT I DATA. DRAWING. LEGAL DOCUMENT I 1

~~

DATA; DRAWING, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST:-MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT

DATA, DRAWING, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MANUAL, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MAP, REPORT DATA. DRAWING. LEGAL DOCUMENT. REPORT

1

1 2 2 9

DATA, DRAWING, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, REPORT -~ 2

Page 9 of 20


~

DATA, DRAWING, LIST, MANUAL, NOTEBOOK, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, LIST, MANUAL, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, LIST, MANUAL, PROCUREMENT, REPORT

DATA, DRAWING, LIST, MAP 1 DATA, DRAWING, LIST, MAP, MEDIA, REPORT

~ 2

1 20 3

133 DATA, DRAWING, LIST, MANUAL, REPORT

DATA, DRAWING. LIST, MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT 13

DATA, DRAWING, LIST, MANUAL 4 DATA, DRAWING, LIST, MANUAL, MAP, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, LIST, MANUAL, MEETING AID, REPORT

31 2

DATA, DRAWING, LIST, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA. DRAWING. LIST. MAP. PROCUREMENT

111 1 3 7 5

DATA, DRAWING. LIST, MAP, REPORT 409 DATA, DRAWING, LIST, MEDIA, MEETING AID, REPORT 3

DATA. DRAWING. LIST. MEDIA. REPORT 3

DATA, DRAWING, LIST, PHOTOGRAPH, PROCUREMENT, REPORT DATA. DRAWING, LIST, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT

DATA; DRAWING; LIST; MEETING AID DATA, DRAWING, LIST, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT

1 8

DATA, DRAWING, LIST, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, LIST, NOTEBOOK, REPORT DATA. DRAWING. LIST. PHOTOGRAPH. PROCUREMENT

Page 10 of 20

53 2 1

DATA, DRAWING, LIST, REPORT DATA. DRAWING. MANUAL

1,048 11

DATA, DRAWING, MANUAL, MAP, MEDIA, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, MANUAL, MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, MANUAL, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT

DATA, DRAWING, MANUAL, MEDIA, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, MANUAL, MEDIA, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, MANUAL, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT

DATA, DRAWING, MANUAL, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, MANUAL, PHOTOGRAPH DATA, DRAWING, MANUAL, PHOTOGRAPH, PROCUREMENT, REPORT ~

DATA, DRAWING, MANUAL, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, MANUAL, PROCUREMENT, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, MANUAL, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, MAP DATA, DRAWING, MAP, MEDIA, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, MAP, MEDIA, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, MAP, MEDIA, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, MAP, MEETING AID DATA, DRAWING, MAP, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH

DATA, DRAWING, MANUAL, MAP, REPORT

DATA, DRAWING, MANUAL, MEETING AID, REPORT

~

DATA. DRAWING. MAP. MEETING AID. PHOTOGRAPH. REPORT

2 2 3

25 3 1 2

14 4 4 1

25 4

177 16

7 6 2 7 3

138


DATA, DRAWING, MAP, MEETING AID, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 2 DATA, DRAWING, MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT 225 DATA, DRAWING, MAP, NOTEBOOK, REPORT 1 DATA, DRAWING, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH 2 DATA. DRAWING. MAP. PHOTOGRA- 1 DATA; DRAWING; MAP; PHOTOGRAPH; REPORT 135 DATA, DRAWING, MAP, PROCUREMENT 1 DATA, DRAWING, MAP, REPORT 51 0

,DATA, DRAWING. MEDIA, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH. REPORT 1 DATA, DRAWING, MEDIA, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, MEDIA, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA. DRAWING. MEDIA. REPORT

5 4

20 DATA, DRAWING, MEETING AID DATA, DRAWING. MEETING AID, NOTEBOOK, REPORT

_.

33 1

DATA, DRAWING, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 2 DATA, DRAWING, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 172

DATA. DRAWING. MEETING AID, REPORT 646 *- 9 DATA, DRAWING, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 4 DATA. DRAWING. NOTEBOOK. REPORT 26 DATA, DRAWING, PHOTOGRAPH DATA. DRAWING, PHOTOGRAPH, PROCUREMENT. REPORT

Page 11 of 20

9 4

DATA, DRAWING, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, DRAWING, PROCUREMENT

367 1

DATA; DRAWING; REPORT DATA. E-MAIL

2,284 6

DATA, E-MAIL, FORM, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 1 DATA. E-MAIL. FORM. REPORT 1 DATA, E-MAIL, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, E-MAIL, NOTEBOOK, REPORT DATA, E-MAIL, PHOTOGRAPH DATA, E-MAIL, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT

1 1 1 1

DATA, E-MAIL, REPORT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT DATA. FINANCIAL STATEMENT. FORM

16 25

2 DATA; FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, LIST, MANUAL, REPORT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, LIST, MAP, REPORT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, LIST, PROCUREMENT, REPORT DATA, FlNANChL STATEMENT, FORM, LIST, REPORT

~~

- ~~

1 2 3 9

DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, MAP, REPORT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, PROCUREMENT, REPORT

~~

1 1 1 7

I Document Types and Count for Paper Collection on DOE LSN I DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, REPORT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, MAP, REPORT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LIST DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LIST, MANUAL, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA. FINANCIAL STATEMENT. LIST. MANUAL. REPORT

307 1 1 4 5 3

I

I DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MANUAL, MEETING AID, REPORT I 3

~~ 12 IDATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MANUAL, PROCUREMENT, REPORT IDATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MANUAL, REPORT

1

2 2 7 1

DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MAP, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MAP, REPORT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MEDIA, MEETING AID, REPORT

DATA; FINANCIAL STATEMENT;:- DATA. FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LIST. MAP. PHOTOGRAPH. REPORT

2 2

DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LIST, MAP; REPORT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LIST, MEETING AID, PROCUREMENT, REPORT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LIST, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LIST, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LIST, PROCUREMENT, REPORT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LIST, REPORT DATA. FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MANUAL

__ 3 1 5 1

13 62 2

DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, PROCUREMENT, REPORT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MEETING AID, REPORT

I I

DATA; FORM; LIST, MAP; PROCUREMENT, REPORT DATA. FORM. LIST. MAP. REPORT

1 46

Page 12 of 20

DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, PROCUREMENT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, PROCUREMENT, REPORT DATA, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, REPORT

2 I

30 709

DATA; FORM, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, FORM, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, PROCUREMENT, REPORT

- I - - -

1 1

DATA, FORM, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, REPORT DATA, FORM, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MANUAL, REPORT DATA, FORM, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MAP, MEDIA, REPORT DATA, FORM, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MAP, REPORT

1 2

1 - 2

DATA, FORM, LIST,MANUAL, MAP, REPORT DATA, FORM, LIST, MANUAL, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, FORM, LIST, MANUAL, NOTEBOOK, REPORT DATA, FORM, LIST, MANUAL, PROCUREMENT, REPORT

19 1 4 7

~~


DATA, FORM, LIST, MEDIA, REPORT DATA, FORM, LIST, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, FORM, LIST, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA. FORM. LIST. NOTEBOOK. PROCUREMENT. REPORT

2 15 3 1

DATA. FORM. LIST. PHOTOGRAPH. REPORT 9 DATA: FORM; LIST; PROCUREMENT, REPORT DATA, FORM, LIST, REPORT DATA, FORM, MANUAL DATA, FORM, MANUAL, MAP, REPORT DATA, FORM, MANUAL, MEDIA, REPORT DATA, FORM, MANUAL, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, FORM, MANUAL, NOTEBOOK, REPORT DATA, FORM, MANUAL, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, FORM, MANUAL, PROCUREMENT DATA, FORM, MANUAL, PROCUREMENT, REPORT

DATA, FORM, MAP, MEDIA, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, FORM, MAP, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA. FORM. MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT

DATA, FORM, MANUAL, REPORT

Page 13 of 20

17 490

10 2 1 1 9 4 I

10 320

1 2 3

DATA; FORM, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH, PROCUREMENT, REPORT DATA, FORM, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, FORM, MAP, PROCUREMENT, REPORT

DATA, FORM, MEDIA, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, FORM, MEDIA, REPORT DATA, FORM, MEETING AID DATA, FORM, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, FORM, MEETING AID, PROCUREMENT, REPORT

DATA, FORM, MAP, REPORT

DATA, FORM, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, FORM, NOTEBOOK

1 4 2

48 2 2 2 3 2

68

DATA, FORM, PROCUREMENT, REPORT DATA, FORM, REPORT ~

DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT- ~~

DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, MANUAL, MAP, REPORT DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, MANUAL, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, MANUAL, REPORT DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, MAP, REPORT DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, MEETING AID; REPORT DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, PROCUREMENT, REPORT DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, REPORT DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MANUAL, MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MANUAL, REPORT

~

320 13,719

36 1

3 2 1 1

11 1

10

- 1


DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MAP, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MAP, REPORT DATA. LEGAL DOCUMENT. MEDIA. REPORT

2 1 2 1

DATA; LEGAL DOCUMENT; MEETING AID, REPORT ~ 2

DATA. LEGAL DOCUMENT. PHOTOGRAPH. REPORT 2 - ZWA; LEGAL DOCUMENT; PROCUREMENT 1 DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 2 DATA, LEGAL DOCUMENT, REPORT 178 DATA, LIST 182 DATA. LIST. MANUAL 11 DATA, LIST, MANUAL, MAP 1 DATA, LIST, MANUAL, MAP, MEDIA, REPORT

~ DATA, LIST, MANUAL, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, LIST, MANUAL, MAP, PROCUREMENT, REPORT DATA, LIST, MANUAL, MAP, REPORT DATA, LIST, MANUAL, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, LIST, MANUAL, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, LIST, MANUAL, PHOTOGRAPH 1

DATA, LIST, MANUAL, PROCUREMENT, REPORT

~ DATA, LIST, MAP, MEDIA, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, LIST, MAP, MEDIA, REPORT ,DATA, LIST, MAP, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT

1 6 1

35 7 2

DATA, LIST, MA~UAL, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 14 12

DATA, LIST, MANUAL, REPORT 281 1 3 2

~

P

I DATA. LIST. MAP. MEETING AID. REPORT 8 - DATA,EBooK, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 1 DATA. LIST. MAP, NOTEBOOK. REPORT 5 ~ A T A ~ 1 DATA, LIST, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, LIST, MAP, PROCUREMENT, REPORT DATA, LIST, MAP, REPORT IDATA. LIST. MEDIA. MEETING AID. REPORT

91 4

61 E 1

DATA; LIST, MEDIA, NOTEBOOK, REPORT 1 I

DATA. LIST, MEDIA, PHOTOGRAPH. REPORT 1 7 ~

DATA, LIST, MEDIA, REPORT 10 DATA, LIST, MEETING AID DATA. LIST. MEETING AID. PHOTOGRAPH. REPORT 4 DATA; LIST; MEETING AID; PROCUREMENT, REPORT 1 DATA, LIST, MEETING AID, REPORT ! -124

2 DATA, LIST, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, LIST, NOTEBOOK, REPORT I -19 - -~~ ~ ~

DATA, LIST, PHOTOGRAPH 1 DATA, LIST, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 35 1 DATA. LIST. PROCUREMENT 4

52 DATA. LIST, REPORT ~ 4.226 DATA; LIST; PROCUREMENT, REPORT ~~

DATA, MANUAL 61 DATA, MANUAL, MAP, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 2 I

Page 14 of 20

Document Types and Count for Paper Collection on DOE LSN i

Page 15 of 20


DATA, MEETING AID, REPORT DATA, NOTEBOOK DATA, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH DATA, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, NOTEBOOTREPORT DATA, PHOTOGRAPH DATA, PHOTOGRAPH, PROCUREMENT DATA, PHOTOGRAPH, PROCUREMENT, REPORT DATA, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DATA, PROCUREMENT DATA, PROCUREMENT, REPORT DATA, REPORT DRAWING

~

3,145 171

5 25

277

2 9

71 6 65

736 49,123

12

268

DRAWING, E-MAIL 1

Page 16 of 20

~~

DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, PROCUREMENT, REPORT DRAWING, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, REPORT DRAWING, FORM, LIST, MANUAL, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DRAWING, FORM, LIST, MANUAL, REPORT

1 3 1 5 -

DRAWING, FORM, LIST, MAP, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 1 DRAWING, FORM, LIST, MAP, REPORT 3 DRAWING, FORM, LIST, MEETING AID, REPORT 1 DRAWING, FORM, LIST, REPORT a DRAWING, FORM, MANUAL, MAP, REPORT 1

1 DRAWING, FORM, MANUAL, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DRAWING, FORM, MANUAL, REPORT 6 DRAWING, FORM, MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT 1 DRAWING, FORM, MAP, REPORT 4 DRAWING, FORM, MEDIA, MEETING AID, REPORT

~~

~ _ _

DRAWING: FORM; PROCUREMENT, REPORT DRAWING, FORM, REPORT DRAWING, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MEETING AID, REPORT DRAWING, LIST, MANUAL, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DRAWING, LIST, MANUAL, REPORT DRAWING, LIST, MAP, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DRAWING, LIST, MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT DRAWING, LIST, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT

DRAWING, LIST, MEDIA, REPORT DRAWING, LIST, MEETING AID, REPORT

DRAWING, LIST, REPORT- DRAWING, MANUAL, MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT DRAWING, MANUAL, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DRAWING, MANUAL, MAP, REPORT

DRAWING, LIST, MAP, REPORT

DRAWING, LIST, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT

1 62

1 1

11 1

7 23 3

13 66

1 1 1

~ 1

~~~~~

a

~ - -

Document Types and Count for Paper Collection on DOE LSN I

DRAWING, MANUAL, MEDIA, REPORT 2 DRAWING, MANUAL, MEETING AID, REPORT DRAWING, MANUAL, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 1 DRAWING, MANUAL, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 2 DRAWING, MANUAL, REPORT 59 DRAWING, MAP, MEDIA, REPORT 1 DRAWING, MAP, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT DRAWING, MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT DRAWING, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH, PROCUREMENT, REPORT

3

3 10

1 0 13 DRAWING, MAP, REPORT 89 DRAWING, MEDIA, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 4 DRAWING, MEDIA, REPORT 19 DRAWING, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, PROCUREMENT, REPORT DRAWING, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT

1 8 1

96 I DRAWING, MEETING AID, PROCUREMENT, REPORT DRAWING, MEETING AID, REPORT DRAWING, NOTEBOOK 1 DRAWING, NOTEBOOK, REPORT 5 DRAWING, PHOTOGRAPH, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 1

DRAWING, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 5 DRAWING, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 41

DRAWING. REPORT I 67 1 E-MAIL I 528 E-MAIL, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, REPORT 1 E-MAIL. FORM. REPORT 1

~~

E-MAIL, LIST, REPORT E-MAIL, MEDIA E-MAIL, MEETING AID E-MAIL, PHOTOGRAPH E-MAIL, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT

2 1 1 1 1

~

E-MAIL. REPORT 193 FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, LEGAL DOCUMENT, REPORT

~

FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, LIST, MEETING AID, PROCUREMENT, REPORT FINANCIAL STATEMENT. FORM. LIST. PROCUREMENT. REPORT

1 1 1

FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, LIST, REPORT FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, MANUAL, PROCUREMENT, REPORT FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, MANUAL, REPORT FINANCIAL STATEMENT,-FORM, PROCUREMENT, REPORT

Page 17 of 20

1 1 1

15 FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FORM, REPORT FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, REPORT FNANCIAL STATEMENT. LEGAL DOCUMENT. REPORT

-

206

4 - 1

FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LIST FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LIST, MANUAL, REPORT FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LIST, PROCUREMENT, REPORT FINANCIAL STATEMENT, LIST, REPORT

-

i

1 2

16 20

FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MANUAL, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 2


FORM; MANUAL, PROCUREMENT, REPORT FORM, MANUAL, REPORT FORM, MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT FORM, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT IFORM, MAP, REPORT FORM, MEDIA, MEETING AID, REPORT FORM, MEDIA, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT ~~

FORM, MEDIA, REPORT FORM, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT FORM, MEETING AID, REPORT FORM, NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT ~

FORM, NOTEBOOK, REPORT

IFORM, PROCUREMENT

~

IFORM, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT

FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MANUAL, REPORT 5 FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MAP, REPORT 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MEDIA, REPORT I 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 2 FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MEETING AID, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENT, MEETING AID, REPORT 12 FINANCIAL STATEMENT, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 1

29 FINANCIAL STATEMENT, PROCUREMENT, REPORT -~

FINANCIAL STATEMENT, REPORT 858 FORM 256

8 84 1

1 1

29 1 1 1 1

91 1

57 15 2

FORM, LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, REPORT FORM, LEGAL DOCUMENT, MAP, REPORT

1 1

FORM, LEGAL DOCUMENT, PROCUREMENT, REPORT I 27 FORM, LEGAL DOCUMENT, REPORT 64 FORM, LIST 1 FORM, LIST, MANUAL 1 FORM, LIST, MANUAL, MAP, REPORT 1 FORM, LIST, MANUAL, MEETING AID, REPORT 2 FORM. LIST. MANUAL. NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 1 FORM[ LIST; MANUAL; PROCUREMENT, REPORT 3 FORM, LIST, MANUAL, REPORT 63 FORM. LIST. MAP. REPORT 12

AID, REPORT 12 2

FORM; LIST, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 1 FORM, LIST, PROCUREMENT, REPORT -. __ 1E FORM. LIST. REPORT I 568

___

FORM, MANUAL 2 FORM, MANUAL, MAP, REPORT 2 FORM, MANUAL, MEDIA, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT I 1

~

FORM, MANUAL, MEETING AID, REPORT FORM. MANUAL. NOTEBOOK. REPORT 1

.- \

FORM, MANUAL; PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT FORM. MANUAL. PROCUREMENT

Page 18 of 20


FORM, PROCUREMENT, REPORT FORM, REPORT LEGAL DOCUMENT LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, MANUAL, MAP, PROCUREMENT, REPORT LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, MANUAL, PROCUREMENT, REPORT LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, MANUAL, REPORT LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, MEETING AID, REPORT LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, PROCUREMENT, REPORT LEGAL DOCUMENT, LIST, REPORT LEGAL DOCUMENT, MANUAL, MAP, REPORT LEGAL DOCUMENT, MANUAL, MEDIA, MEETING AID, REPORT LEGAL DOCUMENT, MANUAL, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT LEGAL DOCUMENT, MANUAL, REPORT LEGAL DOCUMENT, MAP, REPORT LEGAL DOCUMENT, MEDIA, REPORT

807 44,113

9 1 1 4 1 1

26 1 1 1

35 1

11

LIST I 11

LEGAL DOCUMENT, MEETING AID, REPORT LEGAL DOCUMENT, PROCUREMENT, REPORT LEGAL DOCUME-

13 10

91 7 ~

___ LIST: MANUAL. PHOTOGRAPH. REPORT I 1

LIST, MANUAL, MAP, REPORT LIST, MANUAL, MEDIA, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT LIST, MANUAL, MEETING AID, REPORT LIST, MANUAL, NOTEBOOK, REPORT

1 1 7 1

LIST: MANUAL; PROCUREMENT, REPORT LIST. MANUAL, REPORT

-

LIST; MAP; PROCUREMENT, REPORT 3 LIST, MAP, REPORT 55 LIST, MEDIA, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 1 LIST, MEDIA, REPORT 5

18 307

J

LIST, MEETING AID 1 LIST, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT ~ 1 LIST, MEETING AID, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 3 LIST, MEETING AID, REPORT 196 LIST. NOTEBOOK. REPORT 7

~ _ _ . LIST; MAP, MEDIA, REPORT LIST, MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT

16

4.629

~

LIST, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT

LIST. REPORT LIST, PROCUREMENT, REPORT ~~

1 2

MANUAL ~~

MANUAL. MAP. PHOTOGRAPH. REPORT 21 1 - 2

~

MANUAL; MAP, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 1 MANUAL, MAP, REPORT 12 MANUAL, MEDIA, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT

~ 3 MANUAL, MEDIA, REPORT i 3 MANUAL, MEETING AID, REPORT

~~~

MANUAL, NOTEBOOK, REPORT 7 82

Page 19 of 20

I Document Types and Count for Paper Collection on DOE LSN

MANUAL, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 9 MANUAL, PROCUREMENT 2 MANUAL, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 73 MANUAL, REPORT 3,484 MAP 4 MAP, MEDIA, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 2 MAP, MEDIA, REPORT 6 MAP, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 10 MAP, MEETING AID, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 1 MAP, MEETING AID, REPORT ~ 58 MAP, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 52 MAP, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 7 MAP, REPORT 456 MEDIA 1 MEDIA, MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 1 MEDIA, MEETING AID, REPORT 9 MEDIA, NOTEBOOK, REPORT 1 MEDIA, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 44 MEDIA, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 2 MEDIA, REPORT 41 9 MEETING AID 109 MEETING AID, NOTEBOOK, REPORT 2 MEETING AID, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT I 51 MEETING AID, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 16 MEETING AID, REPORT 6,168 NOTEBOOK 45 NOTEBOOK, PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 4 NOTEBOOK, REPORT 550 PHOTOGRAPH 13 PHOTOGRAPH, PROCUREMENT, REPORT 3 PHOTOGRAPH, REPORT 369 PROCUREMENT 5 PROCUREMENT, REPORT 2,231 REPORT 93,793

Page 20 of 20

Exhibit 20

DEN’S RESPONSE TO DOCUMENTS IDENTIFIED

IN EXHIBIT NO. 7 TO NEV’S MOTION TO STRIKE

DEN LSN Accession No.

MOI~.19971201.0221

Title

”Probabilistic Volcanic Hazard Analysis for Yucca Mountain, Nevada,” June 1996.

Explanation

4s an initial matter, the main body of this document along with 3 (A-C) of its 8 (A-H) appendices was publicly available on the NRC’s ADAMS system (accession number ML003743285) and NRC’s LSN server (accession number NRC000021970). The DEN version of this document with appendices A through H was, despite NEV’s claim to the contrary, available in header-only format on the DEN participant server when NEV filed its motion. The document was in header-only format, because it was flagged by DEN’s privacy and privilege screening software. As part of DEN’s ongoing processes and procedures, DEN would have reviewed this document’s bibliographic header- only status. In light of NEV’s motion, DEN expedited its review of this document and determined that the privacy and privilege concern flagged by the screening software did not require DEN to continue withholding the full text and image of this particular document. Thus, in addition to the document’s header, it is now also available in full text and image format on DEN’s participant server.


?Jot available on DEN participant server.

NNA.19870731.0041

MOL.20021010.0291

Title

Au, F.H.F.; Lcavitt, V. D.; Beckert, W. F.; and McFarlane, J. C. 1977. “Incorporation of Transuranics into Vegetable and Field Crops Grown at the Nevada Test Site.” Trunsurunics in Desert Ecosystems. White, G.M.; Dunaway, P. B.; and Wireman, D.L., eds. NVO-181. Pages 1-15. Las Vegas, Nevada: U.S. Energy Research & Development Administration.

Baes, C. F.., 111; Sharp, R. D.; Sjoreen, A.I.; and Shor, R. W. 1984. A Review and Analysis of Parameters for Assessing Transport of Environmentally Released Radionuclides Through Agriculture. ORNL-5786. Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Bird, G. A. and Ewing, L.L. 1996, Surjiace Water Model Simcilations of the Fate of 14C Added to Lake 226, Experimental Lakes Area, Technical Record TR-729.

Explanation

rhis document is readily available to Vevada and other interested persons hrough the Online Computer Library Zenter (OCLC). The accession lumber for this document on the 3CLC is 439193. DEN therefore is lot required to make this document available. See 10 C.F.R. 3 2.1005(h) [exclusion of readily available documents); see also March 25, 1995 LSS AN? Transcript (Exhibit 7) at 266 (Dan Graser stated that if a “document is to be found in the OCLC or any other standard bibliographic database that you could access through an interlibrary loan, then exclude the document. If it’s in OCLC then it’s generally available through some sort of interlibrary loan.”). This document was inadvertently deemed irrelevant due to human error during DEN’s title review of documents coded as reports. A bibliographic header for this document as well as the document’s full text and image are now available on DEN’s participant server. DEN will conduct additional quality assurance and control reviews on its title review. This document is copyright protected. DEN therefore is not required to make this document available. See 10 C.F.R. 3 2.1005(h) (exclusion of documents that may be subject to copyright). Nevertheless, a bibliographic header for this document was available on DEN’s participant server when NEV filed its motion.

2


4LH.200406 18.9480

MOL.2003 1029.0202

Title

BIOMASS (The IAEA Programme on Biosphere Modeling and Assessment Methods) 2001TIC: 252966

B00000000-0 17 17-5700-0002 I REV 04 ICN 02 (Documentation of Program Change, September 2002); dpc~402.txt.

Explanation

rhis document is a proceeding of a ;ymposium not conducted by DEN. ]EN therefore is not required to make his document available. See 10 CFR 3 ?.1005(h) (exclusion of proceedings hat may be subject to copyright). Vevertheless, a CD ROM containing hese materials is part of the TIC latabase maintained by DEN’s :ontractor, BSC. A bibliographic leader for this database was available 3n DEN’s participant server when VEV filed its motion. DEN is allowed LO produce a single header for a database. 10 CFR 8 2.1003(a)(2). Despite NEV’s claim to the contrary, a bibliographic header of this document was available on the DEN participant server when NEY filed its motion. The document was in header-only format, because it was flagged by DEN’s privacy and privilege screening software. As part of DEN’s ongoing processes and procedures, DEN would have reviewed this document’s bibliographic header-only status. In light of NEV’s motion, DEN expedited its review of this document and determined that the privacy concern flagged by the screening software did not require DEN to continue withholding the full text and image of this particular document. Thus, in addition to the document’s header, it is now also available in full text and image format on DEN’S participant server.

3

7.

8.

9.

10.


Not available on DEN participant server.

Not available on DEN participant server. ALP.20Q406 12.8 159

Not available on DEN participant server.

Title

E-mail from Zell Peterman (DEN) to William Boyle (DEN) dated May 5 , 2000, subject: C1-36 Validation Project.

E-mail from Zell Peterman to William Boyle, dated July 23, 2001, subject C1- 36. E-mail from Mark Tynan (DEN) to Richard Quittmeyer (DEN) and Daniel Soeder (DEN) dated June 6, 1996, subject: Long Range Plan.

E-mail from Warren Day to Mark Tynan (DEN) dated September 1 1 , 1997, subject: Where are we? .....

Explanation

[his cmail comes from OCRWM’s :mail system. As described in DEN’s rune 30 Initial Certification Plan, ]EN’S active users reviewed their :mails from back-up tapes for potential eelevance. In the case of this specific :mail, the author did not identify it as 2otentially relevant. As a result, DEN md CACI did not process it for ?reduction on DEN’s participant server. DEN will, however, make this =mail electronically available on DEN’s participant server. Same as No. 7.

Despite NEV’s claim to the contrary, a bibliographic header of this document was available on the DEN participant server when NEV filed its motion. The document was in header-only format, because it was flagged by DEN’s privacy and privilege screening software. As part of DEN’s ongoing processes and procedures, DEN would have reviewed this document’s bibliographic header-only status. In light of NEV’s motion, DEN expedited its review of this document and determined that the privacy concern flagged by the screening software did not require DEN to continue withholding the full text and image of this particular document. Thus, in addition to the document’s header, it is now also available in full text and image format on DEN’s participant server. This email was authored by an inactive user and might reside on OCRWM’s archival back-up tape emails. As described in DEN’s June 30 Initial Certification Plan, however, only current OCRWM users reviewed their email for potential relevance and so DEN made available only that subset of emails. DEN will make this email electronically available on DEN’s

4

12.


2LP.20040612.8586

ALP.20040612.8 129

Title

+mail from Dwight Hoxie (DEN) to ioger Henning (DEN) et al., dated September 15, 1998, subject: nfiltration maps and data ....

E-mail from Mark Tynan (DEN) to Cady Johnson dated June 14, 1996, subject: SRO Weekly Report . . . .

Explanation

)articipant server. rhis email is contained within a string )f emails. Despite NEV’s claim to the :ontrary, a bibliographic header for this :mail string was available on the DEN Iarticipant server when NEV filed its notion. The document was in header- mly format, because it was flagged by ]EN’S privacy and privilege screening joftware. As part of DEN’s ongoing xocesses and procedures, DEN would lave reviewed this document’s 2ibliographic header-only status. In light of NEV’s motion, DEN expedited Its review of this document and jetermined that the privacy concern flagged by the screening software did not require DEN to continue withholding the full text and image of this particular document. Thus, in addition to the document’s header, it is now also available in full text and image format on DEN’s participant server. Despite NEV’s claim to the contrary, a bibliographic header of this document was available on the DEN participant server when NEV filed its motion. The document was in header-only format, because it was flagged by DEN’s privacy and privilege screening software. As part of DEN’s ongoing processes and procedures, DEN would have reviewed this document’s bibliographic header-only status. In light of NEV’s motion, DEN expedited its review of this document and determined that the privacy and privilege concern flagged by the screening software did not require DEN to continue withholding the full text and image of this particular document. Thus, in addition to the document’s header, it is now also available in full text and image format on DEN’S participant server.

5