Upload
vunhi
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Nuclear physics with a medium–energy EICC. Weiss (JLab), POETIC Workshop, Indiana University, Bloomington, 20–Aug–12
I) 3D structure of nucleon in QCD
Sea quark and gluon polarization
Spatial distributions, orbital motion
Multiparton correlations
II) Fundamental color fields in nuclei
Nuclear quark/gluon densities
Shadowing, coherent processes
Color transparency
III) Emergence of hadrons fromcolor charge
Color neutralization, hadron formation
Interaction of color charge with matter
• Overview of ep/eA physics with“generic” medium–energy EIC
√s = 20–70 GeV, L ∼ 1034cm−2s−1
Based on review article A. Accardi et al., EPJA48 (2012) 92.Input to JLab MEIC Concpetual Design Report (2012)
• Guiding principles
Focus on physical system,not formal descriptors:“What do we learn about dynamics?”
Unifying perspective low ↔ high energies
1
Science Requirements and Conceptual Design for a Polarized
Medium Energy Electron-Ion Collider at Jefferson Lab
S. Abeyratne12
, A. Accardi1,7
, S. Ahmed1, D. Barber
6, J. Bisognano
18, A. Bogacz
1, A.
Castilla13,17
, P. Chevtsov14
, S. Corneliussen1, J. Delayen
13, W. Deconinck
5, Ya. Derbenev
1, S.
DeSilva13
, D. Douglas1, V. Dudnikov
11, R. Ent
1, B. Erdelyi
12, Yu. Filatov
9,10, D. Gaskell
1, V.
Guzey1, T. Horn
4, A. Hutton
1, C. Hyde
13, R. Johnson
11, Y. Kim
8, F. Klein
4, A. Kondratenko
16,
M. Kondratenko16
, G. Krafft1,13
, R. Li1, F. Lin
1, S. Manikonda
2, F. Marhauser
11, R. McKeown
1,
V. Morozov1, P. Nadel-Turonski
1, E. Nissen
1, P. Ostroumov
2, M. Pivi
15, F. Pilat
1, M. Poelker
1,
A. Prokudin1, R. Rimmer
1, T. Satogata
1, M. Spata
1, H. Sayed
3, M. Sullivan
15, C. Tennant
1, B.
Terzić1, M. Tiefenback
1, H. Wang
1, S. Wang
1, C. Weiss
1, B. Yunn
1, Y. Zhang
1
1
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA 23606, USA 2
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439, USA 3
Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA 4
Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064, USA 5
College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187, USA 6
Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY), 22607 Hamburg, Germany 7
Hampton University, Hampton, VA 23668
8 Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA
9 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia
10 Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprydny, Russia
11 Muons Inc., Batavia, IL 60510, USA
12 Northern Illinois University, De Kalb, IL 60115, USA
13 Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA
14 Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
15 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94305, USA
16 Science and Technique Laboratory Zaryad, Novosibirsk, Russia
17 Universidad de Guanajuato, 36000 Guanajuato, Mexico
18 University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
Editors: Y. Zhang and J. Bisognano
(August 10, 2012)
3D nucleon structure: Fields and particles
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
2Q e’
e
x,
interactions
wave function
• Hadrons in QCD
Relativity: Particle creation/annihilation,space–time picture frame dependent
Strong interactions: Vacuum structure,non–perturbative effects
Quantum mechanics: FluctuationsUniquely challenging dynamical system!
• Field–theoretical description
Imaginary time t → iτ , statistical mechanicsLattice QCD; analytic methods
• Particle–based description
Parton picture P → ∞: Wave functionFeynman, Gribov: Closed system. Alt: Light–front quantization
Components with different particle number
Many–body system: Constituents, interactions,spatial structure, orbital motion, . . .
High–energy process takes snapshotShort–distance interactions: Factorization
3D nucleon structure: Landscape
1
101
102
10-3 10-2 10-1 1
Q2
[GeV
2 ]
x
JLab 12 GeV
√s = 20 GeV
√s = 70 GeV
Theoretical coverage
10−3
10−2
10−1
1
saturationradiation non−pert.
interact.
radiative sea quarksgluonsgluons/sea
valence quarksgluons
QCD
EIC
.....
.
.
.. ...... ....... ...
.......
......
• Components probed predominantly
x > 0.1 Valence quarks: Source,quantum numbersAlso gluons at large x!Intrinsic sea ss̄, cc̄?
x ∼ 10−1 Sea quarks, gluons:−10−2 Quantum numbers
Generated by non–perturbativeQCD interactions!
x < 10−2 Gluons, singlet sea:Radiatively generatedSaturation at small x: New dyn. scale
Learn about interactions!
• Quantities measured
Particle number densities,incl. spin/flavor dependence PDFs
Transverse spatial distributions GPDs
Orbital motion, angul. momentum TMDs
Particle correlations MP distributions, GPDs
Densities with operator definition 〈N |QCD–Op |N〉Calculable with non–perturbative methodsScale dependence from RNG equation.
3D nucleon structure: Sea quark polarization
d−u,−−ss,
π, ΚSpin
Interactions?
x-410 -310 -210 -110 1
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3 (x))d∆(x)-u∆x(
HERMES 5 Flavor
EIC 5 on 50
EIC 5 on 50 GeV100 days, 10^33Kinney, Seele 2008
• How are sea quarks polarizedin nucleon?
Non-perturbative QCD interactionsconnecting valence ↔ sea quarks
Role of mesonic degrees of freedom?
• Semi–inclusive scattering: Identifyparticles produced from struck quark
Flavor asymmetries poorly constrainedby present dataHERMES SIDISFirst constraints from RHIC W data
• EIC: Map sea quark distributionsand their spin dependence
High energy ensures independentfragmentation of struck quark
3D nucleon structure: Gluon polarization
Spin
Interactions?Q2
EIC stage-1 data
EIC 30×325
DSSV ∆χ2/χ2=2% bandx∆G
x
Q2 = 10 GeV2-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
1
M. Stratmann, INT Workshop 2010
• What is the polarized gluon distribution?
Origin of non-perturbative gluon fields?“Constituent quark” structure, quark correlations?
Gluon contribution to nucleon spin?Orbital angular momentum in wave function?
• ∆G(x) presently poorly constrained
Q2 dependence of g1(x,Q2)
EMC/SMC, SLAC, HERMES, COMPASS, JLab 6/12 GeV
Hard processes in ~p~p RHIC: Recent data
• EIC: Fully quantitative determinationGood results already with medium energy → Talk Stratmann
• Quark/gluon orbital angular momentum
Much progress in theoretical understandingINT Workshop Feb–12; many recent papers
Manifest in semi–inclusive spin asymmetriese.g. Sivers effect → Talk Prokudin
Challenge to separate OAM in wave functionfrom QCD final–state interactions→ Talk Burkardt
3D nucleon structure: Spatial distributions
x
x
q−
gluons
q +
changes with
���������� ����������
������������
������������
/ψJ
������������������������
������������������������
2
GPD
Q
t
hard
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
dσT (
ep
→ e
’p J
/ψ)
/ dx
dQ2 d
t [
µb /
GeV
4 ]
-t [GeV2]
sep = 1000 GeV2, L = 1034 cm-2 s-1, 16 weeks
J/ψ electroproduction
Weiss INT 10
5 < Q2 < 10 GeV2
power-like?
x = 0.05
0.1
0.2
40 < W2 < 60 GeV2
80 < W2 < 100 GeV2
160 < W2 < 200 GeV2
• How are quarks/gluons distributedin transverse space?
Fundamental size and “shape”of nucleon in QCD
Distributions change with x:Diffusion, chiral dynamics
Input for saturation models,multiparton interactions in pp@LHC
• Exclusive processes γ∗+N → J/ψ+N
Gluonic form factor of nucleon:Generalized parton distribution
Other channels γ, ρ0, π,Ksensitive to quarks → Talks Hasch, Liuti, Fazio
• EIC: “Gluon imaging” of nucleon
Luminosity for low rates,differential measurements
Color fields in nuclei: Physics
�����������������������������������
�����������������������������������
����������������������������������������
����������������������������������������
����������������������������������������
����������������������������������������
structuremodified
effectscollective
l coh
Q2
• What are the fundamental color fieldsin nuclei?
Modification of nucleon structure
Collective effects A 6= ∑N
Non–nucleonic degrees of freedom
→ QCD origin of NN interaction at different energies→ Approach to black–disk/saturation regime
• Interaction with high–energy probe
Transverse resolution r ∼ 1/Q
Coherence length lcoh ∼ ν/Q2 × factor
Final states: Inclusive, identified spectators,exclusive, . . .
Color fields in nuclei: Landscape
1
10
100
1 10 100 1000
Q2
[GeV
2 ]
lcoh [fm]
JLab 12
√s = 20 GeV
√s = 70 GeV
Theoretical coverage
cohl
Q2
RA
EIC
• Fields probed in eA
lcoh ≪ RA: Modified nucleon structure,short–range correlationsJLab 12 GeV: EMC effect for valence quarksEMC effect for gluons, antiquarks?
lcoh & RA: Collective effectsNew regime accessible with medium–energy EIC!
• QCD phenomena
Shadowing: QM interference inscattering from multiple nucleonsIs it different for gluon and quark fields?
Color transparency: Disappearance ofinteraction for small probes σ ∝ r2
Fundamental prediction of QCD as gauge theory
Coherent scattering: Quark/gluon fieldsof entire nucleus Nuclear GPDs, quark/gluon size
Quantum fluctuations: Diffraction
Saturation: Strong gluon fields,black disk regime in hard interactionsNew dynamical scale Qs
Color fields in nuclei: Gluon density
0.20.40.60.81.01.21.4
0.20.40.60.81.01.21.4
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
10.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.4
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-10.0
0.20.40.60.81.01.21.4
Q2=100 GeV
2
Q2=1.69 GeV
2
EPS09NLO
C C C(
,2 =
100
GeV
2 )C
(,
2 =1.
69G
eV2 )
C
Eskola et al. 09
valence quarks sea quarks gluons
ShadowingEMC
• Nuclear quark/gluon densitiesx > 0.1 “EMC effect:” Modification of
free nucleon structure:
x ∼ 0.1 Antishadowing: Poorly understood
x ≪ 0.1 “Shadowing:” QM interference
• Gluon poorly constrained
Q2 dependence of nuclearstructure function F2A(x,Q
2)
x-410 -310 -210 -110 1
]2 [
GeV
2Q
1
10
210
310
410 EIC Stage IIEIC Stage I
= 0.5c2Q = 1.5c
2Q1/3Pb = 0.5Ac
2Q1/3Pb = 1.5Ac
2Q
MEIC NNPDF analysis Accardi, Dupre INT 10
• Medium–energy EIC: Precise determinationof nuclear quark/gluon densities
Wide coverage in x,Q2
• Inportant for understanding approachto saturation at small xShadowing affects nuclear enhancement of Qs
Color fields in nuclei: New probes with EIC
tagged
transparency
coherent
V,γ
• Spectator tagging
Bound nucleon structure: EMC effect
Neutron structure from D(e, e′p)XJLab BONUS experiment
Requires forward p/n detection
• Coherent nuclear processes A(e, e′M)A
Fundamental quark/gluon radii of light nucleiKowalski, Caldwell 09: Heavy nuclei, very challeging
Impact parameter dependent shadowing
• Color transparency in meson production
Fundamental prediction of QCD
Complement to saturation experiments:“Disappearance” at high Q2
Hadrons from color charge: Fragmentation
?e−e+
??"hole"
spinx,
ep
����������N
x
z
xF
Current
Target
fragmentation
fragmentation
Correlations
• How do hadrons emergefrom QCD color charge?
Conversion energy → matterCosmic ray physics, early universe
Dynamical mechanisms: QCD radiation,pair creation by soft fieldsVacuum structure, qq̄ condensate
• Fragmentation functions from e+e−
Many puzzles: ss̄, kaons, baryonsEssential input to SIDIS
• EIC: New possibilities
Fragmentation functions from ep:Favored ↔ unfavored, test universality
Target fragmentation: How does nucleonwith “color hole” materialize?x, spin dependence
Correlations current–target regions:Multiparton correlationsNew field of study: pp at LHCNew possibilities for nucleon structure
Qualtiatively new! Many applications! Unique for EIC
Hadrons from color charge: Matter
A
m a t t e r
+
q
h
q
−
e e
cold QCD
A A A
q
hot QCDm a t t e r
0
tCN
Ft
t h
??
Z0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4 HERMES data+π+K
EIC error bars is arbitrary)h
A(Rs = 200 GeV^2
< 30 GeVν20 < +π+K
D Meson
< 70 GeVν50 < +π+K
D Meson
Multiplicity Ratio Accardi, Dupre INT 10
2Q1 10 210
0.6
0.65
0.7
0.75
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
HERMES data+π
EIC error bars is arbitrary)A
h(R
)2 (s=200 GeV+π &&2 (s=1000 GeV+π
< 130 GeV)ν100 <
2Ratio Vs Q
• How does fast color charge interactwith hadronic matter?
Energy loss, attenutation
Time scales for color neutralization tN ,hadron formation tF
Cold vs. hot matter? eA/γA ↔ jets in AA
• EIC: Comprehensive studies
Wide range of energy ν = 10 − 100 GeV:Move hadronization inside/outside nucleus,distinguish energy loss and attenuationFixed–target: Correlations ν–Q2
Wide range of Q2: QCD evolution offragmentation functions and medium effects
Hadronization of charm, bottom:Clean probes, QCD predictions
High luminosity: Multidimensional binning
√s > 30GeV: Study jets and
their substructure in eA
Summary
• Unique nuclear physics program with medium-energy EIC√s = 20-70 GeV
Three–dimensional structure of nucleon in QCD
Fundamental color fields in nuclei
Emergence of hadrons from color charge
Natural organization . . . could be sharpened further!
• Focus on what we learn about the dynamical system
Many questions addressed by more than one measurement:Orbital angular momentum — inclusive ∆G, semi–inclusive asymmetries;Quark correlations — exclusive and semi–inclusive processes
• Qualitatively new probes available in eA
Spectator tagging, coherent processes: Should be developed further!
ep better formalized, but eA completely new