NSG 435 Telehealth Position Paper Final

8/2/2019 NSG 435 Telehealth Position Paper Final

1/18

Running head: EFFECTS OF TELEHEALTH ON U.S. HEALTH CARE

Effects of Telehealth on U.S. Health Care

Ashley Bennett, Christeen Davis, Bridget Mullins, and Eric Weberding

Miami University


2/18

EFFECTS OF TELEHEALTH ON U.S. HEALTH CARE 2

Effects of Telehealth on U.S. Health Care

The rapid evolution of technology is impacting all facets of our lives from entertainment

to health care. The impact of technology in health care is especially evident in the increasing use

of telehealth technologies. The Office for the Advancement of Telehealth (OAT), part of the

Office of Rural Health Policy, located within Health Resources and Services Administration

(HRSA) at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS, 2010) defines

telehealth as the use of telecommunications and information technologies to provide health care

services at a distance, to include diagnosis, treatment, public health, electronic medical records,

consumer health information, and health professions education (para. 1). Currently, the two

types of telehealth applications are real-time communication and store-and-forward. Real-time

communication allows patients and health care providers to connect with health care providers

via video conference, telephone or a home health monitoring device, while store-and-forward

refers to transmission of data, images, sound or video from one site to another for evaluation

(U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [USDHHS], 2010). Increased use of telehealth

technologies has the potential to positively impact health care outcomes by increasing

accessibility to health care for all regardless of their geographic location and making systems

more efficient and cost-effective.

Although telehealth technologies provide many opportunities, they also provide some

unique challenges. In spite of the extensive evidence supporting the benefits of telehealth, there

are opponents who maintain providing patient care via telehealth is neither legal nor safe.

Stanberry (2001) contended that current professional guidelines and state licensure systems do

not support the effective implementation of telehealth services. He maintained the current state-

by-state licensing systems requires health providers to obtain multiple state licenses and adhere


3/18


to diverse and sometimes conflicting state medical practice rules in order to treat patients in

multiple states. Opponents also cited difficulty in enforcing practice standards and disciplining

doctors in other states. The existing system only allows state medical boards to investigate and

sanction doctors within their borders (Stanberry, 2001).

In response to licensure concerns, the American Telemedicine Association (ATA, 2012)

has proposed a massive overhaul of the current medical licensure system. The ATA is working

to remove state licensure barriers to telehealth practice by seeking the support of Congress, state

medical boards, and federal regulators to create a federal "licensure portability" law that would

allow physicians to practice via telehealth in any state. They believe this law would eliminate

the duplicative structures of multiple state boards and promote quality health care and patient

safety across state boundaries (American Telemedicine Association [ATA], 2012).

However, instead of waiting for a massive overhaul of the current medical licensure

system, some states have initiated their own licensure revisions. The states of New Mexico and

Alaska have elected to address the challenge of health care providers not being in the same state

as their patients by creating a special telehealth licensure provision. This licensure provision

allows out-of-state physicians to provide services with consent from the patient (Helseth, 2011).

Another challenge related to the delivery of telehealth services is funding. Opponents of

telehealth services cited the limited reimbursement policies for telehealth services as a deterrent

to initiating and providing innovative telehealth care. According to Jones (2004), with the

exception of teleradiology and selected telehealth services offered through limited grant

programs, the majority of insurers, including Medicare, only reimbursed physicians for medical

care that was delivered face-to-face. He contended that until reimbursement policies are

expanded, the potential for improved access to quality health care through telehealth will not be


4/18


5/18


million of its annual budget to telehealth to improve health care by increasing access, eliminating

travel, reducing costs, and producing better patient outcomes (VA, 2010 February).

Therefore, to accomplish its goal of increased access to high quality health care, the VHA

offers a variety of telehealth services to veterans. VHA community-based outpatient clinics

utilize Clinical Video Telehealth (CVT) to bring the expertise of specialists to clinics located

closer to the veterans homes. Home telehealth services are offered to meet the health care needs

of the growing population of aging veterans managing chronic diseases. The implementation of

new telehealth technologies increases access to mental health services and intensive

rehabilitation services for wounded veterans with complex medical needs (VA, 2011b).

The VHA has evolved from a hospital based system of large regional medical centers to a

more patient-centered care system including over 700 community-based outpatient clinics

providing specialty care via CVT. CVT is used to make diagnoses, manage care, perform check-

ups, and provide care. The utilization of this telehealth technology has brought specialized care

in areas such as cardiology, neurology, and psychiatry, closer to veterans homes and eliminated

potentially long and draining trips to access medical care at one of the regional VHA Medical

Centers. In 2010, over 6,000 veterans accessed CVT services in just one of the 21 VHA service

regions in the United States (VA, 2011a).

Another application of telehealth is the VHAs program, Care Coordination/Home

Telehealth (CCHT). CCHT provides home-based services that help aging veterans to manage

chronic conditions, to maintain independence, and to avoid unnecessary admission to long-term

institutional care facilities. Between July 2003 and December 2007, CCHT patients increased

from 2,000 to 31, 570 (Darkins et al., 2008). CCHT patients were predominately male and 65

years or older. Through the systematic use of health informatics, home telehealth, and disease


6/18


management technologies, CCHT helped aging veterans live independently at home. According

to Darkins, et al. (2008) a data analysis of 17,025 CCHT patients indicated a 25 percent

reduction in numbers of bed days of care, 19 percent reduction in hospital admissions, and a

satisfaction score rating of 86 percent after enrollment in the CCHT program. Additional costs

savings were also noted when comparing the CCHT cost of $1,600 per patient per year to the

cost of hospitalization or long-term nursing home care.

In another study of the effectiveness of VHAs home telehealth services, Wakefield et al.

(2008) compared the effectiveness of telehealth care to traditional care in recently discharged

outpatients with heart failure. In this randomized controlled clinical trial, the treatment subjects

received electronic blood pressure monitors and scales; they were instructed to measure daily

vital signs, weights, and ankle circumference. This information was communicated via

telephone or videophone to a registered nurse. Registered nurses managed intervention delivered

by either telephone or videophone for 90 days following discharge from the hospital. The

control subjects received traditional outpatient care. Data analysis indicated that although there

were no differences in Urgent Care visits or mortality, telehealth interventions were effective in

reducing time to first readmission during the active intervention time and up to 12 months later.

Wakefield et al. (2008) attributed this to the potential of telehealth-facilitated care to support

earlier detection of critical clinical symptoms, leading to early intervention and resulting in a

reduced need for hospitalization.

The VHA is responsible not only for the physical health of veterans but for the mental

health of American veterans as well. Meeting the mental health needs of veterans presents a

growing challenge. The VHA estimates 18.5 to 42.5 percent of recently returned service

members and veterans have been found to have a mental disorder (Watkins & Pincus, 2011).


7/18


In an attempt to provide access to quality mental health services, the VHA has initiated the use of

telehealth to deliver evidence-based psychotherapy. Although the number of studies on the

effectiveness of delivering psychotherapy via telehealth services is limited, one study by Gros,

Yoder, Tuerk, Lozano, & Acierno, ( 2011), suggested cognitive behavioral therapy delivered via

telehealth was effective in reducing the symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, anxiety,

depression, and stress. Additionally, their study indicated that telehealth mental health services

may have distinct advantages over in-person treatments in terms of easy access, eliminating

transportation costs, decreasing travel time, reducing absenteeism from employment, and

eliminating stigma that may deter some veterans from accessing mental health services (Gros,

Yoder, Tuerk, Lozano, & Acierno, 2011).

The increasing severity and complexity of combat injuries has mandated long-term

rehabilitation to support the medical needs of Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

veterans (Cruise, Darkins, Armstrong, Peters, & Finn, 2008). In order to meet the unique needs

of these veterans in a timely manner and provide multiple locations for access to specialized

rehabilitation care, the VHA developed a sophisticated and highly-specialized Polytrauma

Telehealth Network (PTN). The PTN connects the Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center (PRC) hub

sites located at four Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) in Richmond,

Virginia; Tampa, Florida; Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Palo Alto, California. These four hub

sites have specialized clinical expertise in polytrauma and are linked via PTN to polytrauma

network sites (PTNs) in regional VAMCs. This network provides tiered interdisciplinary

rehabilitation services for veterans at multiple VHA facilities across the U.S. and eliminates

extensive travel for severely wounded veterans and their families (Cruise et al., 2008).


8/18


During the past decade, the VHA has extensively reconfigured patient health care

delivery to reduce barriers to quality health care. As a result of this transformation, the VHA has

emerged as a leader in the delivery and research of telehealth services. The VHA serves as a

model for private and other public health care systems as they seek innovative ways to

effectively implement telehealth technology.

Veterans are not the only group of Americans to benefit from telehealth

technology. Citizens in underserved areas in rural America receive a variety of health care

services via telehealth. The HRSA works to promote and improve health care in these

underserved areas by fostering partnerships among federal and state agencies and the private

sector. The HRSA also administers telehealth grant programs while providing technical

assistance. Telehealth technology and programs are evaluated through the HRSA as agencies

work collaboratively to improve access to quality health services in underserved areas

(USDHHS, 2010).

The HRSA houses the Office for the Advancement of Telehealth (OAT) which promotes

the use of telehealth technologies for health care delivery, education, and health information

services (USDHHS, 2010). This office is part of the Office of Rural Health Policy, which also

supports the HRSAs mission to assure quality health care for underserved, vulnerable, and

special needs population. In 2005, the OAT administered 159 telehealth/telemedicine projects,

of those, 92 were awarded funds totaling more than $34.9 million (USDHHS, 2010). According

to the OAT grantee directory, projects administered by OAT received funds in the following four

ways:

1. The Telehealth Network Grant Program (TNGP): The TNGP funded projects that demonstrate

the use of telehealth networks to improve healthcare services for medically underserved


9/18


populations in urban, rural, and frontier communities. The networks can be used to expand

access to high quality of health care services; improve and expand the training of health care

providers; and/or expand and improve the quality of health information available to providers,

patients, and their families. The primary objective of the TNGP is to assist communities in

building capacity to develop sustainable telehealth programs and networks.

2. Congressionally Mandated Projects (CMP): OAT also administered funds specially earmarked

by Congress to support a wide variety of telehealth initiatives to improve access to health care.

3. Special Projects: These projects were funded through OAT grantees to support program

evaluation and distribution of telehealth technologies among grantees.

4. Rural Telemedicine Grant Program (RTGP): The OAT awarded competitive grants through

2002. The goal of the RTGP was to improve quality health services for rural residents and reduce

the isolation of rural practitioners through the implementation of telehealth technologies

(USDHHS, 2010).

As telehealth expands, rural community hospitals are gaining virtual access to the

expertise of board certified emergency physicians, neurologists, intensivists, pharmacists,

cardiologists, dermatologists, psychologists, as well as wound and infectious disease specialists.

In the 1990s, a privately owned medical company, Avera, moved into the virtual world using

closed circuit televisions to provide eConsult, live doctor-patient consultations. Today, Avera

connects rural patients and providers with specialty providers using telehealth services such as

eEmergency, eICU, eStroke, eConsult, eNursery, ePharmacy, and eUrgent Care (Helseth, 2011).

Averas eEmergency is their most highly requested eCARE service. This service is a

hospital-based telehealth emergency support service that connects rural hospitals with board

certified emergency physicians and emergency-trained nurses 24 hours a day. These specialists


10/18


provide treatment advice, initiate diagnostic testing, and facilitate patient transfer if indicated.

According to Deanna Larson, Vice-President of Quality Initiatives and eCARE Services,

eEmergency has reduced patient length of stay, patient transfers to tertiary facilities, and overall

costs. Larson also noted a high level of satisfaction among clinicians at the remote sites

(Helseth, 2011).

In 2003, Sutter Health, a northern California-based health care organization, became the

first health care organization on the West Coast to connect a rural hospital to eICU. According

to Sutter Health, death related sepsis decreased by 28 percent andpatients lengths ofstay have

also decreased by 15 percent from 2007 to 2010 (Helseth, 2011). Teresa Rincon, Sutter Health

eICU nurse director, attributed these improved outcomes to community medical staffs, eICU

nurses, and intensivists working closely together to quickly detect and treat infections and other

of life-threatening symptoms that occur in these critically ill patients (Helseth, 2011).

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL, 2012), a

national bipartisan organization, patients in rural America face unique challenges to access

health care due to the limited numbers of physicians practicing in their communities. The NCSL

(2012) noted that although 20 percent of the U.S. population lives in rural settings, only 10

percent of physicians practice there. This has resulted in disparities between rural and urban

physician supplies. To address this problem, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) provides

workforce incentives to encourage medical providers to practice in rural areas. However,

recruiting and retaining physicians in rural settings continues to be a challenge. In an attempt to

improve access to health care in rural areas, telehealth networks are being increasingly used to

connect patients and providers in various settings (NCSL, 2012).


11/18


In the private sector in patients homes, telehealth technologies are also removing

distance barriers and assisting patients to manage chronic illnesses from their homes. Home

health monitoring devices allow chronically ill patients to transmit vital signs and health status

data remotely to care providers who monitor their health status and provide timely medical

interventions. Providing such accessible interaction and disease management has helped reduce

hospital readmission rates as well as decrease medical emergencies (Helseth, 2011). Similar

benefits of telehealth were also noted in rural California. According to Steve Barrow, Policy

Director for the California State Rural Health Association, telehealth services have decreased the

number of days economically strapped patients are absent from work due to traveling long

distances to health care facilities, reduced the effects of medical provider shortages, and

improved management of chronic diseases (NCLS, 2012). Additionally, a 2010 report by the

Federal Communications Commission estimated that remote patient monitoring for heart disease,

diabetes, pulmonary disease, and skin disease could save an estimated $197 billion nationwide

over 25 year (as cited in USDHHS, 2010).

Accordingly, many states have begun to include telehealth technology in public health

efforts to increase access to underserved populations. Currently 39 states provide some form of

Medicaid reimbursement for telehealth services, and 12 of these states require private insurance

plans to cover telehealth services. In 2005, New Mexico created the Telehealth Commission to

offer coverage for telehealth services to Medicaid recipients and to fund telehealth services at

school- based health centers. Alaskan state officials have also been working to establish a large

telehealth network that connects rural and remote Alaskans to medical care providers. Rural

communities face unique challenges when attempting to access health care providers and suffer

greater health disparities than urban communities (Helseth, 2011). To meet the unique health


12/18


care needs of rural communities, state policies need to mandate reimbursement by Medicare and

Medicaid for telehealth costs to eliminate health care disparities in rural areas.

Another application of telehealth technology is the use of Electronic Medical Records

(EMRs). According toOpenClinical, a nonprofit international organization providing resourceson advanced technological health care, progress in medical informatics over the last 30 years

have supported the evolution of EMRs. When compared to paper-based health care records, the

advantages of EMRs are immense. EMRs not only support improved access to quality health

care but also support efficient and cost-effective health care (OpenClinical, 2012).

Technologic advances support the ongoing inclusion of all patient data, including clinical

documentation, diagnostic tests, and imaging studies directly into the electronic record. To

protect the patients privacy,access to the EMR is password protected and data are encrypted.

EMRs support convenient access to multiple providers, hospitals, and offices within a particular

record system. Simultaneous access by multiple providers supports timely decisions and the

continuity of care. Commonly used EMR systems include Epic, Meditouch, Vitera, and

Allscripts (OpenClinical, 2012).

Embedded features of EMRs support efficient practice and improved outcomes for

patients. The decision support component gives clinicians easy access to guidelines and

literature related to theirpatients care; it also generates clinical reminders to facilitate treatment

and preventive care. The physician order entry feature reduces common transcription errors and

automatically searches for drug interactions. The patient support component gives patients

access to portions of their medical records through systems such as My Chart. Furthermore,

EMRs patient support provides education and home monitoring to assist patients as they

manage their health care. In terms of telehealth services ability to improve administrative
http://www.accessmedicine.com/content.aspx?aID=3658754http://www.accessmedicine.com/content.aspx?aID=3658754http://www.accessmedicine.com/content.aspx?aID=3658754


13/18


processes in the hospitals and clinics, EMRs streamline scheduling and prompt servicing of

patients (OpenClinical, 2012). The advantages of EMRs are extensive; however, to attain

maximum benefits from EMRs, state and federal policies and incentives are needed to support

national participation and system interconnectivity.

The benefits of telehealth to diverse populations in the U.S. are well documented.

However, to ensure all patients have maximum access to telehealth technologies, extensive

policy change is needed. To accomplish this, we propose that the Obama Administration directs

the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to uniformly provide the same coverage

for health care services delivered either in person or through telehealth services. The exclusion

of health care services from coverage because they are delivered via telehealth technologies

would be forbidden unless contraindicated. This policy change would support Medicare-

Medicaid payment and service models for hospital intensive care unit services from telehealth

intensivists and other specialists, telehealth outpatient services, including telerehabilitation for

stroke or traumatic brain injuries, and telemental health counseling; the use of telehealth to

provide chronic care coordination for conditions such as Parkinsons, autism, muscular sclerosis,

epilepsy and Alzheimers; and telehealth models for serving at-risk pregnancies, premature

infants, and newborn screenings (ATA, 2011).

Additionally, the CMS should work diligently to improve telehealth coverage by

expanding the use of video conferencing to deliver services to Medicare-Medicaid beneficiaries

in metropolitan areas with a focus on telestroke diagnosis and emergency cardiac care. The

CMS should implement plans to improve the delivery of Medicare-Medicaid services using

store-and-forward technology, particularly for specialist consultations using medical images to

target key medical conditions, such as diabetic retinopathy screening and wound management


14/18


15/18


16/18


Gros, D., Yoder, M., Tyerk, P., Lozano, B., & Acierno, R. (2011). Exposure therapy for

PTSD delivered to veterans via telehealth: Predictors of treatment completion and

outcome and comparison to treatment delivered in person.Behavior Therapy, 42(2),

276-283.

Helseth, C. (2011). e-Emergency services bring specialists to rural patients with the push of a

button.Rural Assistance Center. Retrieved from

http://www.raconline.org/newsletter/summer11/feature.php#story1

Jones, J. W. (2004). Payment and other legal obstacles slow telemedicine growth.

Managed Health Executive, 53-54. Retrieved from

http://managedhealthcareexecutive.modernmedicine.com/mhe/data/articlestandard/mhe/1

22004/89059/article.pdf

National Conference of State Legislatures. (2011). Telehealth and rural health care delivery.

Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/health/telehealth-and-rural-health-

care-delivery.aspx

OpenClinical. (2012).Electronic medical records.

Retrieved from http://www.openclinical.org/emr.html

Stanberry, B. (2001). Legal, ethical and risk issues in telemedicine. Computer Methods and

Programs in Biomedicine, 64(3), 225-233. Retrieved from

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169260700001425

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration-

Rural Health. (2010). Telehealth. Retrieved from

http://www.hrsa.gov/ruralhealth/about/telehealth/index.html
http://www.raconline.org/newsletter/summer11/feature.php#story1http://managedhealthcareexecutive.modernmedicine.com/mhe/data/articlestandard/mhe/1%0922004/89059/article.pdfhttp://managedhealthcareexecutive.modernmedicine.com/mhe/data/articlestandard/mhe/1%0922004/89059/article.pdfhttp://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/health/telehealth-and-rural-health-%09care-delivery.aspxhttp://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/health/telehealth-and-rural-health-%09care-delivery.aspxhttp://www.openclinical.org/emr.htmlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169260700001425http://www.hrsa.gov/ruralhealth/about/telehealth/index.htmlhttp://www.hrsa.gov/ruralhealth/about/telehealth/index.htmlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169260700001425http://www.openclinical.org/emr.htmlhttp://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/health/telehealth-and-rural-health-%09care-delivery.aspxhttp://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/health/telehealth-and-rural-health-%09care-delivery.aspxhttp://managedhealthcareexecutive.modernmedicine.com/mhe/data/articlestandard/mhe/1%0922004/89059/article.pdfhttp://managedhealthcareexecutive.modernmedicine.com/mhe/data/articlestandard/mhe/1%0922004/89059/article.pdfhttp://www.raconline.org/newsletter/summer11/feature.php#story1


17/18


U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs. VHA Office of Telehealth Services.

(2010, January). The office formerly known as care coordination services.

VHA Telehealth Quarterly, 9(3). Retrieved from

http://www.telehealth.va.gov/newsletter/2010/011510-Newsletter_Vol9Iss3.pdf

U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs, House Committee on Veterans Affairs.

(2010, February). Statement of the Honorable Eric K. Shinsekise, Secretary, U.S.

Department of Veterans. Retrieved from

http://www.va.gov/OCA/testimony/hvac/100204EKS.asp

U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (2011a). VISN 4 Strategic Plan FY2011-2013.

Retrieved from http://www.virec.research.va.gov/DataSourcesName/Medical-SAS-

Datasets/MedSAS-Outpt-RUG/MedSAS-RUG-Outpt09er.pdf

U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs. VHA Office of Telehealth Services. (2011b).

What is telehealth? Retrieved from http://www.telehealth.va.gov/index.asp

Wakefield, B., Ward, M., Holman, J., Ray, A., Scherubel, M., Burns, T.,Rosenthal, G. (2008).

Evaluation of home telehealth following hospitalization for heart failure: A randomized

trial. Telemedicine and e-Health, 14(8), 753-761. doi:10.1089/tmj.2007.0131.

Watkins, K. E. & Pincus, H. A. (2011). Veterans Health Administration mental health program

evaluation. Sponsored by the Veterans Health Administration.

http://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/capstone revised TR956 compiled.pdf
http://www.telehealth.va.gov/newsletter/2010/011510-Newsletter_Vol9Iss3.pdfhttp://www.va.gov/http://www.va.gov/OCA/testimony/hvac/100204EKS.asphttp://www.virec.research.va.gov/DataSourcesName/Medical-SAS-%09Datasets/MedSAS-Outpt-RUG/MedSAS-RUG-Outpt09er.pdfhttp://www.virec.research.va.gov/DataSourcesName/Medical-SAS-%09Datasets/MedSAS-Outpt-RUG/MedSAS-RUG-Outpt09er.pdfhttp://www.telehealth.va.gov/index.asphttp://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/capstone%20revised%20TR956%20compiled.pdfhttp://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/capstone%20revised%20TR956%20compiled.pdfhttp://www.telehealth.va.gov/index.asphttp://www.virec.research.va.gov/DataSourcesName/Medical-SAS-%09Datasets/MedSAS-Outpt-RUG/MedSAS-RUG-Outpt09er.pdfhttp://www.virec.research.va.gov/DataSourcesName/Medical-SAS-%09Datasets/MedSAS-Outpt-RUG/MedSAS-RUG-Outpt09er.pdfhttp://www.va.gov/OCA/testimony/hvac/100204EKS.asphttp://www.va.gov/http://www.telehealth.va.gov/newsletter/2010/011510-Newsletter_Vol9Iss3.pdf


18/18

Documents

NSG 435 Telehealth Position Paper Final