Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
NOTTING
HILL
Genesis
Housing
Trust
26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
1
Siège social Fulcrum House.Quartier Kings Cross 2012
Ou le
triomphe du
libéralisme
Thatchérien
Notting Hill Genesis ou comment
devenir très riche, au nom des
très pauvres….
« Social Business
Is,
Business
as usual… »26/02/2019
Yann.Maury-chairecoop
2
26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
3Notting Hill
Genesis en 2019
Notting Hill
Genesis : Un
patrimoine
social
abordable en
2019 ?
19 Sterndale Road
26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
4
Low carbon, energy
efficient family home
Notting Hill and partners
are converting this
Victorian property into a
low-carbon, energy
efficient family home, as
part of one of the most
extensive pilots
for sustainable
specifications in the UK.
26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
5
Angell Town's regeneration
scheme was resident driven
and included a self-build
element.
After residents had
construction training and
work placements with design
teams, they completed the
interior fitting of their homes
in return for enhanced
specifications. They fitted
their own kitchens, tiled and
decorated.
Angell Town, Lambeth
South East London
26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
6
Penfold Court, Westminster
Central London
Comprising more than 40 self-
contained extra care
apartments and two shared
accommodation clusters,
Penfold Court is designed to
give its residents as much
independence as possible.
The living areas are linked by a
winter garden and the rest of
the building features
community facilities and
activity spaces, which are used
by community groups from the
local area.
26/02/2019
Yann.Maury-chairecoop
7661 London Road, Hounslow
West London
At 661 London Road we
combine private sale, shared
ownership and affordable
rented homes in one
development. Arranged as
two buildings joined by a
glass link, its 190 homes
surround a communal
landscaped courtyard. The
terraced roof gardens have
views across the whole of
London.
Buying with us. Shared Ownership
26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
8
Accessible homes ??
NOTTING HILL H .Group. LONDRES
1963. Création de la “charity”, issue de l’église
anglicane, par le pasteur Bruce Kenrick,
désireux de “faire le bonheur des pauvres”,
face aux conditions “épouvantables” (awfull)
créées par le marché immobilier
1964. Achat de 5 maisons pour loger 47
personnes
1975. 1000 maisons achetées.
1970. Invention du "part-buy part-rent" (mi-
acheté mi-loué). 26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
9
NOTTING HILL H .Group. LONDRES
2010. Le gouvernement libéral reprend l’idée et la
baptise officiellement sous le nom de «shared
ownership » (propriété partagée).
Portfolio. 2016. 32.000 logements sociaux sur London
Juillet 2017. Fusion avec « Genesis Housing
Association » (CA £276 million (2011) 1500 Salariés.
As of 2016, stock owned and managed totals 32,139.
(Barnet, Brent, Camden and the City of Westminster)
Total Portfolio en 2018/19 : + 64.000
logements….(sociaux ??) 26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
10
NOTTING HILL H .Group. LONDRES
26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
11
Rev Bruce Kenrick (18 January 1920
– 15 January 2007) was an English
social activist and Minister in the
United Reformed Church and the
Church of Scotland. He is best known
for writing "Come out the
Wilderness" and as the founder of
British housing organisation Shelter.
NOTTING HILL H .Group. LONDRES
Activism
In response to the poor housing conditions, Kenrick set up
the Notting Hill Housing Trust, which maintained the fabric
of the area, and ironically, laid the foundations for its later
gentrification. It was out of the desire to put national
pressure on local government to improve housing that
Shelter was born at St Martin in the Fields in 1966.
After a dispute over the leadership of the organisation with
Des Wilson, Kenrick left Shelter. He remained a significant
figure on the broad left in the church, and his membership
of the Iona Community and work on the example set by the
revolution in Cuba helped set the direction of radical
Christianity in the UK. 26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
12
NOTTING HILL H .Group. LONDRES
26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
14
GOVERNANCE of NHHT
26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
15
« Staff » & « salaries »
26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
16
« Staff » & « salaries »
26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
17
26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
18 NHHT portfolio en 2015.2016
“Notting Hill Housing is one
of the most financially robust
housing associations in the
UK”
Contrats annuels
avec les “Local
Authorities” du GLA of
London
“ Club des
15”
NHHG CHAIRMAN’S REPORT (2015.2016)
• NNHG, Une “Charity”, très rentable…
• “Notting Hill Housing now owns or manages over 30,000 homes, almost
exclusively within the Greater London Area. We made a surplus of £121.3
million, an 85% increase on the previous year, primarily because of higher
sales values for the homes we have developed for sale. We do not pay any
dividends so these surpluses (..)
• This balance sheet strength has been recognised by the two principal credit
rating agencies, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s. ”
• 2017. Annual Report Annemarie Fenlon. As the new Group Director
of Housing26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
19
26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
20 Portfolio NHHG
Portfolio NHHG
26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
21
Portfolio NHHG
26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
22
Portfolio of NHHG
26/02/2019 Yann.Maury-chairecoop
23
“We generated a surplus of
£121.3m in 2014/15” (…) We do
not pay any dividends so these
surpluses.
Thursday 20 July 2017
Notting Hill Housing Group has
recorded a record surplus of
£142m in the same year as
increasing housing supply in
London by 1,151 homes, bringing
the total number of homes owned
or managed to nearly 33,000.
NOTTING HILL H .Group. LONDRES
26/02/2019
Yann.Maury-chairecoop
24
“Customer satisfaction - We
have struggled to meet
customer satisfaction
targets in all parts of the
business, but the main
factor has been poor
satisfaction amongst
our leaseholders where
satisfaction was only 47% at
year end. We continue to
work to better understand
the drivers of leaseholder
dissatisfaction ».
NOTTING HILL H .Group. LONDRES
26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
25
Toujours plus de bénéfices, mais une réduction des dépenses
d’entretien….
26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
26
26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
27
Un Paradis fiscal…pour une
« Charity »
Les « voix »(es)
du seigneur
sont
impénétrables
Conclusion
Les « charities » HA sont devenues de grosses mécaniques financières,
Qui bénéficient d’un régime fiscal dérogatoire
Qui accroissent leurs profits et bénéfices sans aucune limite
Qui participent activement à l’augmentation des coûts du
logement (spéculation)
Tandis que le nombre de précaires, de mal-logés, de
« homeless » s’aggrave….
Mais conservent un discours originel sur le « faire le bien des pauvres ».. 26/02/2019
Yann.Maury-chairecoop
28
NOTTING HILL Housing Trust ou le triomphe du
libérarisme Thatchérien
Pour Quelles raisons en est on arrivé à une
pareille situation ?
Il s’agit désormais de dépasser le stade du
descriptif pour entrer désormais dans celui
de l’analyse.
L’histoire des idées politiques appliquées au
secteur du logement abordable en GB nous
apporte les clés de la compréhension.
Pour aller plus loin
2 Vidéos
• « Habitat privé & DALO ».ANAH. 2007
• « L’art de refaire son intérieur ». CSBA. Londres.
2011
• Pour aller plus loin : « Trust for London »
26/02/2019Yann.Maury-chairecoop
30
Annexes : Rough sleepers in London
What does this graph show?
The figures in the graph show the
number of people each year in London
that were in contact with services for
rough sleepers. In 2012/13, around
6,400 people were seen sleeping rough
at least once over the course of the year
by street outreach teams. This is a rise
of 750 people compared to the year
before and almost double the level of
four years earlier.
The statistics also show that almost 90%
of those sleeping rough are men. The
spread of ages of those sleeping rough is
quite wide. Around one in eight are aged
under 25, with around one quarter aged
26-35. Half of all rough sleepers are
aged 36-55.
What does this graph show?
After years of substantial falls,
the number of households
accepted as homeless in
London has been increasing
since 2010. In 2012/13 4.7
households per 1,000 were
accepted as homeless, well
below the peak of 10.1 per
1,000 in 2003/04, but around
50% higher than 2010/11. In
terms of numbers, this
translates to 15,500 people in
2012/13 compared to 9,500 in
2009/10.
What does this graph show?
This graph measures the duration
of stay in temporary
accommodation (upon leaving) in
London and compares it to rest of
the country.
39% of households leaving
temporary accommodation in
London had spent more than two
years in such accommodation,
compared with 2% elsewhere in
England. Similarly, 50% of
households leaving temporary
accommodation in London have
spent at least one year there
whereas in the rest of England, the
figure was closer to 20%.
Londons’ poverty profile
Key facts
•27% of Londoners live in poverty after housing costs are taken into account, compared with 20% in
the rest of England. The cost of housing is an important factor in London's higher poverty rate.
•The majority of people living in poverty are in a working family. As employment has increased so has
the number of people in a working family in poverty - from 700,000 to 1.2 million in the last decade,
an increase of 70%.
The number of unemployed adults is at its lowest level since 2008, at just over 300,000. The
unemployment ratio in Inner London has halved over the past 20 years reaching 5.6%, slightly
higher than Outer London (5.2%) and the rest of England (4.8%).
•Almost 700,000 jobs in London (18%) pay below the London Living Wage. This number has
increased for five consecutive years, particularly among men working full-time.
•At 860,000 there are more people in poverty in private rented housing than there are in social rented
or owner-occupied homes. A decade ago it was the least common tenure among those in poverty.
Londons’ poverty profile
•The vast majority of children in poverty are in rented housing (more
than 530,000), half with a registered social landlord and half with a
private landlord. The number of children in poverty in private rented
housing has more than doubled in ten years.
•In the three years to 2013/14 there was a net increase of 7,700
affordable homes a year compared with a target of 13,200, meaning the
target was missed by 40%. 60% of these new homes were available for
social rent.
