Upload
duongtuong
View
221
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
In Full Life via the Breath of Life
Tor’asha • Yah’asha • Mor’asha
Inheritance • Legacy • Heredity
Sis. SentAsha KeyAma-Joy El(Copyright) (f/k/a SentAsha KeyAma-Joy Williams)
Authorized Representative/Beneficiary of the Corporate Trust/Estate: SENTASHA KEYAMA-JOY WILLIAMS MIP (Trademark)
c/o P.O. Box 957 • Terrestrial Atlanta, Gerogia [30301] • Continent: North America
Fax: 866.323.6925 | Phone: 404.944.2072 | Email: [email protected]
Heir Apparent • Aboriginal American • Primogeniture Descendant • In Propria Persona Sui Juris
All Universal Laws, The Zodiac Constitution, The Constitution for the United States of America,
Laws of the United States and International Treaties, Declarations and Conventions Accepted for Full Value.
All Rights Reserved. Without Prejudice.
\
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH
DISPUTE OF DEBT, DEMAND FOR VALIDATION,
DEBT ALREADY DISCHARGED IN BANKRUPTCY IN APRIL 2011 LOAN # WAS DISCHARGED IN BANKRUPTCY
IN MAY 2011 OCWEN EXECUTED A MODIFICATION ON A DISCHARGED LOAN
OCWEN IS 3RD
PARTY DEBT COLLECTOR / OCWEN HAD NO STANDING TO OFFER A MODIFICATION
OCWEN SHALL CEASE IN COLLECTING DEBT / OCWEN’S PMI CLAIMS SHALL NOT BE HONORED
OCWEN WAS NEVER THE REAL PARTY IN INTERST/ OCWEN IS NOT THE HOLDER IN DUE COURSE
MERS IS NOT A REAL PARTY IN INTEREST / THE MIN FOR THIS LOAN IS NOT ACTIVE IN MERS
OCWEN SHALL ZERO OUT LOAN #705794592 AND CEASE FROM COLLECTION PRACTICES
Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent. Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal.
Sent via Express Mail,
Email & Fax September 28, 2013
OCWEN Financial Corporation
P.O. Box 24738 / West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-4736
Attn: Bankruptcy Research Department, Customer Service
Ronald M Faris, CEO | John V. Britti, CFO (561) 682-8000 ext. | S.P. Ravi, CRO
Fax: 407.737.6375 | 407.737.5199
Peace and Good Day All:
1. Ocwen’s principals/agents do not have standing to foreclose on LOAN# 705794592 /
MIN# 1001944-6000226540-3. A.) The loan was discharged in Bankruptcy. B.) Ocwen is not the holder in due
course.
2. Ocwen’s principals/agents never were real parties in interest thus never had a right to administer a modification.
3. On May 12, 2006, I executed a Promissory Note (negotiable instrument) that was made payable to
FREEMONT INVESTMENT AND LOANS.
Page 2 of 15
Tor’asha • Yah’asha • Mor’asha
Inheritance • Legacy • Heredity
Affidavit of Truth
4. On May 12, 2006 A Security Deed was executed where the beneficiary/nominee was listed as Mortgage
Electronic Registration Systems (MERS). However, the promissory note (negotiable instrument) listed
FREEMONT INVESTMENT AND LOANS as the “The Lender”.
5. IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
regarding the Box Case No. 10-20086. An order demanding relief from stay, cited Missouri Court of Appeals take
on Ocwen’s Standing:
“In the case Bellistri v. Ocwen. Missouri Court of Appeals, the borrower executed a promissory note in favor of
lender BNC Mortgage Inc. As here, the deed of trust did not name BNC as the beneficiary, but instead named
Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS) solely as BNC’s nominee. The promissory note made no
reference to MERS. The note and deed of trust both required that payments be made to the lender, not MERS.
These facts regarding the loan documents are, for all relevant purposes, identical to those in the case at bar.
Thereafter this loan was securitized and placed into a pooling and service agreement.”
“The Missouri Court of Appeals discussed the law of mortgages in order to determine Ocwen’s interest in the
property. The Court explained:
Generally, a mortgage loan consists of a promissory note and security instrument, usually a mortgage or a deed
of trust, which secures payment on the note by giving the lender the ability to foreclose on the property. Typically,
the same person holds both the note and deed of trust. In the event that the note and the deed of trust are split,
the note, as a practical matter becomes unsecured. The practical effect of splitting the deed of trust from the
promissory note is to make it impossible for the holder of the note to foreclose, unless the holder of the deed of
trust is the agent of the holder of the note. Without the agency relationship, the person holding only the note lacks
the power to foreclose in the event of default. The person holding only the deed of trust will never experience
default because only the holder of the note is entitled to payment of the underlying obligation. The mortgage loan
[becomes] ineffectual when the note holder [does] not also hold the deed of trust.”
Regarding assignments
“When the holder of the promissory note assigns or transfers the note, the deed of trust is also transferred. An
assignment of the deed of trust separate from the note has no “force.” Effectively, the note and the deed of trust
are inseparable, and when the promissory note is transferred, it vests in the transferee “all the interest, rights,
powers and security conferred by the deed of trust upon the beneficiary therein and the payee in the notes.”
6. In the case of loan# 705794592, the Deed of Trust and the Note have been taken into 2 different paths. The deed
of trust was never transferred. The note was however pooled, sold and transferred LOAN# 705794592 / MIN#
1001944-6000226540-3 of $143,920 was combined with other loans and mortgages and this pool of loans and
mortgages is valued at approximately $638,832,000.
7. Per George v. Surkamp, 76 S.W.2d 368, 371 (Mo. 1934. An assignment of the deed of trust separate from the
note has no “force.”
8. The cut-off date for MIN# 1001944-6000226540-3 was November 1, 2006 and the closing date was December
12, 2006. This designates the timing for the initiation and completion of the securitization of the note. Since the
note had been securitized by December 12, 2006, there is no way that one would be able to transfer or assign the
note after December 12th because the note had already been securitized.
Page 3 of 15
Tor’asha • Yah’asha • Mor’asha
Inheritance • Legacy • Heredity
Affidavit of Truth
9. On April 7, 2011, Loan# 705794592 serviced by Barclay’s Homeq was discharged via a Chapter 7
Bankruptcy, Case No. 10-60992-jb in the United States Bankruptcy Court North District of Georgia.
10. For evidence of the discharge of the loan see Exhibit A & B.
11. On April 28, 2013 agents of OCWEN facilitated a modification of this loan #705794592 although it was
discharged on April 7, 2011 via a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.
12. Ocwen’s principals/agents knowingly administered a modification on loan #705794592 as if they were the Real
Party in Interest and the Holder in Due Course.
13. For the past 3 years Ocwen’s principals/agents have been collecting United States Dollars (Federal Reserve
Notes) from me as if they were the Real Party in Interest and the Holder in Due Course.
14. Per the Security Deed the MER’s Mortgage Identification Number for this loan is 1001944-6000226540-3.
See Exhibit C.
15. The MER’s Mortgage Identification Number 1001944-6000226540-3 is Inactive in the MERS Service ID
database system. See Exhibit C
16. An inactive status in MERS means that the either the note has been assigned to a non MERSCORP member or
that the loan is non-existent (i.e. foreclosed or discharged).
17. OCWEN has already documented for the record that the ‘Assignment is Lost’ which means that they do not
have proof of an assignment. In their own documented words ‘A good faith effort has been made in accordance
with our procedure for locating the lost assignment’ See Exhibit D.
18. Ocwen’s agents: Joe Simmons, Noemi Morales, Leticis N. Arias, Christopher Kelley, and Debra Spruill signed
and bared witness to an Affidavit of lost assignment on April 26, 2013 which shows that Ocwen does not have the
assignment and could not find the assignment. Thus, Ocwen has no prima facie evidence of being a real party of
interest in this loan and as a result has no right to enforce the instrument. See Exhibit D
19. This Affidavit of Lost Assignment that the agents of Ocwen submitted was not signed under the penalty of perjury
thus, it is not a lawful affidavit. See Exhibit D
20. Per UCC 3-309 ENFORCEMENT OF LOST, DESTROYED, OR STOLEN INSTRUMENT.
(a) A person not in possession of an instrument is entitled to enforce the instrument if:
(1) the person seeking to enforce the instrument
(A) was entitled to enforce it the instrument when loss of possession occurred, or
(B) has directly or indirectly acquired ownership of the instrument from a person who was entitled to enforce
the instrument when loss of possession occurred;
(2) the loss of possession was not the result of a transfer by the person or a lawful seizure; and
(3)(a) the person cannot reasonably obtain possession of the instrument because the instrument was destroyed,
its whereabouts cannot be determined, or it is in the wrongful possession of an unknown person or a person that
cannot be found or is not amenable to service of process.
(b) A person seeking enforcement of an instrument under subsection (a) must prove the terms of the instrument
Page 4 of 15
Tor’asha • Yah’asha • Mor’asha
Inheritance • Legacy • Heredity
Affidavit of Truth
and the person's right to enforce the instrument. If that proof is made, Section 3-308 applies to the case as if the
person seeking enforcement had produced the instrument. The court may not enter judgment in favor of the
person seeking enforcement unless it finds that the person required to pay the instrument is adequately protected
against loss that might occur by reason of a claim by another person to enforce the instrument. Adequate
protection may be provided by any reasonable means
21. OCWEN Servicing is acting as a rightful collector and has been collecting payments from me since
April 28, 2010.
22. OCWEN did not fund this deal.
23. OCWEN has been collecting on a mortgage that has been discharged.
24. Per the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Laws regarding Collection of Discharged Debts Prohibited,
‘The discharge prohibits any attempt to collect from the debtor a debt that has been discharged. For example, a
creditor is not permitted to contact a debtor by mail, phone, or otherwise, to file or continue a lawsuit, to attach
wages or other property, or to take any other action to collect a discharged debt from the debtor. [In a case
involving community property: There are also special rules that protect certain community property owned by the
debtor's spouse, even if that spouse did not file a bankruptcy case.] A creditor who violates this order can be
required to pay damages and attorney's fees to the debtor.
25. Since SentAsha’s indorsement of the negotiable instrument which gave LIFE to the note, all insurance claims for
recoupment of the mortgage serve is an act of ERROR. All PMI Insurance claims shall be denied.
For the record, OCWEN and or DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE
POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENT DATED AS OF NOVEMBER 1, 2006 SECURITIZED ASSET BACKED
RECEIVABLE LLC TRUST 2006-FR4 did not fund the origination of this deal.
26. The first line of the May 12, 2006 promissory note states:
1. BORROWER'S PROMISE TO PAY In return for a loan that I have received, I promise to pay U.S. $
143,920.00 (this amount is called "Principal"), plus interest, to the order of the Lender. The Lender is FREMONT
INVESTMENT & LOAN
27. In return for a loan that I have received? It is obvious that full disclosure was not provided during execution of
this promissory note (negotiable instrument). For the akasha record, I didn’t receive a negotiable instrument
FREEMONT INVESTMENT AND LOANS that was made payable to me. If there was a loan made out to me, I
sure enough didn’t get the check or the memo. Where’s the check that listed me as the Payee?
28. The second paragraph of the May 12, 2006 promissory note states:
I will make all payments under this Note in the form of cash, check or money order. I understand that the Lender
may transfer this Note. The Lender or anyone who takes this Note by transfer and who is entitled to receive
payments under this Note is called the "Note Holder"
Per Black’s Law Dictionary 4th
Edition:
Note – A unilateral instrument containing an express and absolute promise of signer to pay to a specified person or
order, or bearer, a definite sum of money at a specified time.
Holder – The holder of a bill of exchange, promissory note, or check is the person who has legally acquired possession
of the same, by endorsement or delivery, and who is entitled to receive payment of the instrument. Crocker-Woolworth
national Bank vs. Nevada Bank, 139 Cal. 564, 73 P. 456, 63 L.R.A. 245, 96 Am. St. Rep 169
Page 5 of 15
Tor’asha • Yah’asha • Mor’asha
Inheritance • Legacy • Heredity
Affidavit of Truth
Holder in Due Course – A holder who has taken a bill of exchange (check or note) complete and regular on the face of
it, under the following conditions, namely: (a) That he became the holder of it before it was overdue, and without notice
that it had been previously dishonored, if such was the fact. (b) That he took the bill (check or note) in good faith and for
value, and that at the time it was negotiated to him he had no notice of any defect in the title of the person who
negotiated it. Uniform Negotiable Instrument Act Section 52.
29. The promissory note that I executed on May 12, 2006 shows that:
a. The Payee/Indorsee = FREEMONT INVESTOMENT AND LOANS
b. The Payor/Payer who Indorsed the promissory note (Negotiable Instrument) = SentAsha KeyAma-Joy
Williams the authorized representative for: SENTASHA KEYAMA-JOY WILLIAMS
c. The Indorser who signed the back of the promissory note = FREEMONT INVEMENT & LOANS, Vice President
Michael Koch. Who made the promissory note (negotiable Instrument) payable to the order of
Sutton Funding LLC (without recourse)
d. Sutton Funding LLC then made the promissory note (negotiable instrument) payable to the order of DEUTSCHE
BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENT
DATED AS OF NOVEMBER 1, 2006 SECURITIZED ASSET BACKED RECEIVABLE LLC TRUST 2006-FR4 which
is where the securitization occurred. The official close out date on this negotiable instrument was on December 12,
2006.
DEMAND FOR VALIDATION OF DEBT, DEMAND FOR PROOF OF AGENCY AND STANDING
On April 25, 2013, I sent OCWEN’s Attorney, John Young with WEISSMAN NOWACK CURRY & WILCO, P.C.
a Writ of Discovery that demanded validation of the debt connected to LOAN# 705794592. There were 17 request points that
contained a multitude of queries. To date, September 25, 2013 the principals and agents of Ocwen alongside with their
attorney, John Young have only fulfilled 75% of the 17 requested points.
Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Title V Rule 26. Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery,
Rule 36 Special Admissions and the Fair Debt Collection and Practices Act 15 USC §1692g (b) – Validation of Debts, I am
demanding for you all to fulfill the remaining 25% of the original 17 requested points and a new set of additional
points:
30. Provide evidence of the location and registrants of the security and all security issuance documents.
31. Where’s the Check? The check that FREEMONT issued that was made payable to SENTASHA KEYAMA-JOY
WILLIAMS. Provide evidence that there were funds paid to me. Again the first sentence of the promissory notes reads:
‘In return for a loan that I have received’. Where’s the Check? ETF? ACH? Etc. Records are required.
32. Provide evidence that either, SUTTON FUNDING LLC, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY,
SECURITIZED ASSET BACKED RECEIVABLE LLC, SECURITIZED ASSET BACKED RECEIVABLE LLC TRUST,
MERS, HomEq or Ocwen issued a negotiable instrument where SentAsha KeyAma-Joy Williams was listed as the
Payee.
33. Provide the original Pooling and Servicing Agreement (Including actual indorsements of the PSA) and the contact
information name, mailing address, phone, fax, email for the primary contacts for the natural persons: principals and/or
agents of DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE POOLING AND SERVICING
AGREEMENT DATED AS OF NOVEMBER 1, 2006 SECURITIZED ASSET BACKED RECEIVABLE LLC TRUST 2006-FR4.
34. Provide a copy of all PMI insurance claims. Front and back of all claims along with the name of the PMI Insurance
carrier and the contact information (phone, mailing address, fax, email address) for the lead principal and agents.
35. Provide proof that the principals and agents of WEISSMAN NOWACK CURRY & WILCO, P.C., OCWEN , DEUTSCHE
BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, SECURITIZED ASSET BACKED RECEIVABLE LLC TRUST
have a license to handle securities.
Page 6 of 15
Tor’asha • Yah’asha • Mor’asha
Inheritance • Legacy • Heredity
Affidavit of Truth
36. Per Fed. R. Civ. P. 17, and Rule 17(a)(1) “An action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest.”
Provide evidence that WEISSMAN NOWACK CURRY & WILCO, P.C., OCWEN , DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL
TRUST COMPANY, SECURITIZED ASSET BACKED RECEIVABLE LLC TRUST are the real parties in interest that
have legal standing to allege anything or enforce any type of borrower's allegations. If you all are claiming to be the
agent of the real lender (real party in interest) then show proof that such agency existed at the time of the loan closing.
37. Per Wahl v. Braun, 980 S.W.2d 322 (Mo. App. E.D. 1998). Lack of standing cannot be waived and may be considered
by the court sua sponte.
38. Produce proof that I, SentAsha indorsed an authority agreement making WEISSMAN NOWACK CURRY & WILCO,
P.C/ John Young the Attroney-In-Fact for Me.
39. Provide proof of John Young’s BAR membership.
40. Provide the names and contact information for all parties (attorneys, notaries, et allii) of WEISSMAN NOWACK CURRY
& WILCO, P.C that facilitated the closing on May 12, 2006.
41. Ocwen, Deutsche Bank National Trust et alii or its Assigns are hereby ‘Requested’ to produce all Bookkeeping Journal
Entries associated with the Loan bearing the Account Number 705794592 and given to SENTASHA KEYAMA-JOY
WILLIAMS. Include the complete names, the addresses, the locations, and the business contacts of all the acting
Trustee(s) and / or the Surety Holders.
42. Ocwen, Deutsche Bank National Trust et alii or its Assigns are hereby ‘Requested’ to produce evidence of the
‘Insurance Policy’ that was put in place on or against SENTASHA KEYAMA-JOY WILLIAMS “Borrower’s” ‘Promissory
Note’ and associated with the Loan.
43. Ocwen, Deutsche Bank National Trust et alii or its Assigns are hereby ‘Requested’ to produce all ‘Call Reports’ and any
other related ‘Notes’ or instruments made or constructed for the entire RP period covering the Loan.
44. Ocwen, Deutsche Bank National Trust et alii or its Assigns are hereby ‘Requested’ to produce evidence of the
original ‘Deposit Slip’ issued for the Deposit of SENTASHA KEYAMA-JOY WILLIAMS “Borrower’s”
‘Promissory Note’ associated with the Loan.
45. Ocwen, Deutsche Bank National Trust et alii or its Assigns are hereby ‘Requested’ to produce the ‘Original Order’
authorizing the withdrawal of Funds from the Borrower’s ‘Promissory Note’ Deposit Account.
46. Ocwen, Deutsche Bank National Trust et alii or its Assigns are hereby ‘Requested’ to produce the ‘Account Number’
and source from which the money came to ‘Fund’ the original ‘Check’ given to the ‘Borrower’.
47. Ocwen, Deutsche Bank National Trust et alii or its Assigns are hereby ‘Requested’ to produce ‘Verification’ evidence,
and proof that SENTASHA KEYAMA-JOY WILLIAMS “Borrower’s” ‘Promissory Note’ was a ‘Gift’ to the ‘Lender’ from
SENTASHA KEYAMA-JOY WILLIAMS, Borrower; and that the same was disclosed to the Borrower (SENTASHA
KEYAMA-JOY WILLIAMS).
48. Ocwen, Deutsche Bank National Trust et alii or its Assigns are hereby ‘Requested’ to produce the full and complete ‘Names’
and the ‘Addresses’ of the ‘Lender’s CPA and ‘Auditor’ or any other holder or record - keeper for the entire period covering the
Execution of the Mortgage or Loan.
49. Provide evidence that the holder of the deed of trust is the agent of the holder of the note.
50. Provide evidence that MERS is the original holder of the promissory note or that the principals/agents of
FREEMONT INVESTMENT AND LOANS gave MERS the authority to transfer the note.
Page 7 of 15
Tor’asha • Yah’asha • Mor’asha
Inheritance • Legacy • Heredity
Affidavit of Truth
51. Provide copies of the following:
1) Form S3 registration statement 2) Form 424(b)(5) prospectus (for the SBC)[;]
3) Form FR 2046 balance sheets[;] 4) Form FR 2049 balance sheets[;]
5) Form FR 2099s balance sheets
All of which are subject to disclosure under the privacy act, Title 5 USC 552(b)(4).
52. Provide a copy of the 1099 OID for this loan and fill out the enclosed W-9.
53. Stipulate via an affidavit that is signed under the penalty of perjury that Ocwen (principals/agents) are in-fact the Creditor in
this loan/security instrument that is the Real Party in Interest and that a note can be transferred and assigned to another party
after it has been securitized.
54. Stipulate via affidavit of truth that the closing attorney, WEISSMAN NOWACK CURRY & WILCO, did not receive any funds
(money) from FREEMONT INVESTMENT and LOANS that pertained to the loan proceeds outside of the pertinent closing
costs.
55. Stipulate via an affidavit of truth that the Allonge that transferred the promissory note (negotiable instrument) from Secured
Funding LLC to DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE POOLING AND SERVICING
AGREEMENT DATED AS OF NOVEMBER 1, 2006 SECURITIZED ASSET BACKED RECEIVABLE LLC TRUST 2006-FR4
was not robo-signed.
56. Provide a copy of All Assignment and Assumption Agreement that have been created since the commencement of this loan to
date.
57. Provide a copy of the chain of securitization for LOAN# 705794592 / MIN# 1001944-6000226540-3.
58. Provide a copy of the corporate charters for OCWEN, WEISSMAN NOWACK CURRY & WILCO & ALTISOURCE.
59. Who has lawful possession of the securities? Names and titles of the investors, principals and agents (natural persons).
Produce the prospectus and the detailed earnings report for this note that has been securitized?
60. Per my public constructive notice that is filed on the Public Records of the Superior Court of Fulton County,
LIBER# 2013-243863-MISC-NR-BOOK-MS-24-Page 436-438 use or publishing of the trademark, SENTASHA KEYAMA-
JOY WILLIAMS without my written/verbal consent is a violation that creates a self-executing agreement where the violator(s)
agree to compensate me for such ill-will.
61. Who placed the order to print my trademark, SENTASHA KEYAMA-JOY WILLIAMS inside of the Daily Report Newspaper?
Names, titles, and contact numbers for the principals and agents (natural persons) along with the name of the corporate entity.
Do provide a copy of the order entry form that was submitted in June 2013. As a result of that order my trademark was
published in the newspaper without my consent.
Refusal to provide the aforementioned shall be deemed as a violation of
15 USC §1692g (b), the Uniform Commercial Code, laws of Discovery, The Truth & Lending Act,
and the Real Estate Settlement and Procedures Act
Validation of Ocwen’s alleged claims and data within the letter is required within 5 business days.
Page 8 of 15
Tor’asha • Yah’asha • Mor’asha
Inheritance • Legacy • Heredity
Affidavit of Truth
If you all wish to waive this disclosure and discovery process, then it will be fair plumb and square to release all
claims, liens and cease all existing/future controversy and honor the facts of this matter; acknowledge that this loan
has been discharged and that Ocwen is not the true party in interest and that Ocwen never lent I, SentAsha anything.
In accepting this offer, one of your principals and/ or leading agents shall write a letter stating that this there is a zero
balance and that you all acknowledge that this loan has been discharged in bankruptcy and that Ocwen had no
standing to administer a modification and apologizes for such error. Also all pertinent documentation in regards the
release of all liens shall be provided as well. The letter and documentation can be sent to my attention via USPS
express/certified mail and faxed to:
Sis. SentAsha KeyAma-Joy El (f/k/a SentAsha KeyAma-Joy Williams)
IN RE: SENTASHA KEYAMA JOY WILLIAMS (Trademark)
P.O. BOX 957
Terrain: Atlanta, Georgia [30301]
Continent: North America
Fax: 866.323.6925
Affiant Closing Statement and Exhibits to Follow
Page 9 of 15
Tor’asha • Yah’asha • Mor’asha
Inheritance • Legacy • Heredity
Affidavit of Truth
______________________________ _______________________________________________________
In Full Life via the Breath of Lfie; All Rights Reserved. Without Prejudice.
SentAsha KeyAma-Joy El (f/k/a SentAsha KeyAma-Joy Williams),In Propria Persona Sui Juris
Authorized Representative and Beneficiary for the Corporate Trust/Estate: SENTASHA KEYAMA-JOY WILLIAMSMIP (Trademark)
c/o Post Office Box 957 • Terrain: Atlanta, Georgia Terrain [30301] • Continent: North America
Phone: 404.944.2072 • [email protected] • Fax: 866.323.6925
I Am:
Hibu (Love), Haqq (Truth), Salaam (Peace), Hurryatun (Freedom), Adl (Justice)
Tor’asha (Inheritance), Yah’asha (Legacy), Mor’asha (Heredity)
Page 10 of 15
Tor’asha • Yah’asha • Mor’asha
Inheritance • Legacy • Heredity
Affidavit of Truth
EXHIBIT A: DISCHARGE ORDER
Page 11 of 15
Tor’asha • Yah’asha • Mor’asha
Inheritance • Legacy • Heredity
Affidavit of Truth
EXHIBIT B: Mortgage Discharged
EXHIBIT
EXHIBIT: 1st Mortgage
Proof that the
loan has been
discharged.
Page 12 of 15
Tor’asha • Yah’asha • Mor’asha
Inheritance • Legacy • Heredity
Affidavit of Truth
EXHIBIT C: Mortgage is Inactive In MERS
Page 13 of 15
Tor’asha • Yah’asha • Mor’asha
Inheritance • Legacy • Heredity
Affidavit of Truth
EXHIBIT D: Page 1 -Affidavit of Lost Assignment
Page 14 of 15
Tor’asha • Yah’asha • Mor’asha
Inheritance • Legacy • Heredity
Affidavit of Truth
EXHIBIT D: Page 2 - Affidavit of Lost Assignment
Page 15 of 15
Tor’asha • Yah’asha • Mor’asha
Inheritance • Legacy • Heredity
Affidavit of Truth
ACKNOWLEDGED
NO AMOUNT DUE
DISCHARGED IN
BANKRUPTCY
Case# 10-60992-jb
Ocwen: Should’ve Never Been Collecting
Payments or Administering Modifications.
Ocwen: NOT the Holder in Due Course.
Ocwen: NOT the Real Party in Interest
Ocwen: Has NO Standing
Ocwen: NOT a winner in the case
Bellistri v. Ocwen
Why? Ocwen Couldn’t Prove that they
are the Holder in Due Course and couldn’t
prove that they have standing and could not
prove that they are the real party in interest.
Page 16 of 15
Tor’asha • Yah’asha • Mor’asha
Inheritance • Legacy • Heredity
Affidavit of Truth
ACKNOWLEDGED
NO AMOUNT DUE
DISCHARGED IN
BANKRUPTCY
Case # 10-60992-jb
Ocwen: Should’ve Never Been Collecting Payments or
Administering Modifications.
Ocwen: NOT the Holder in Due Course.
Ocwen: NOT the Real Party in Interest
Ocwen: Has NO Standing
Ocwen: NOT a winner in the case Bellistri v. Ocwen
Why? Ocwen Couldn’t Prove that they
are the Holder in Due Course and couldn’t prove that they
have standing and could not prove that they are the
real party in interest.