NOTICE OF AN APPLICATION FOR PLANNING PERMIT · Italiano lalan 96799859 V*−ngit ... • Three (3) copies of a Design Response Plan (drawn 13 to a scale of 1:200 and dimensioned)

NOTICE OF AN APPLICATION FOR PLANNING PERMIT

THE LAND AFFECTED BY THEAPPLICATION IS LOCATED AT: 20 Williams Grove, BONBEACH VIC 3196

THE APPLICATION ISFOR A PERMIT FOR:

Develop the Land for the Construction of Three(3) double storey Dwellings

THE APPLICATIONREFERENCE NUMBER IS: KP−72/2016

THE APPLICANT FOR THE PERMITIS: Lowe Design Pty Ltd

YOU MAY LOOK AT THEAPPLICATION AND ANY

DOCUMENTS THAT SUPPORT THEAPPLICATION AT THE OFFICE OFTHE RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY:

This can be done during office hoursand is free of charge

_

City of Kingston Municipal OfficesCheltenham Office: Level 1, 1230 Nepean

Highway, Cheltenham 3192During office hours 8.30am − 5.30pm

OR

www.kingston.vic.gov.au/link/planning

Any person who may be affected by the granting of the permit may object or make othersubmissions to .the responsible authority.

An objection must: • be made to the Responsible Authority in writing,• include the reasons for the objection, and• state how the objector would be affected.

The responsible authority must make a copy of every objection available at its office for anyperson to inspect during office hours free of charge until the end of the period during whichan application may be made for review of a decision on the application.

THE RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITYWILL NOT DECIDE ON THE

APPLICATION BEFORE:23 June 2016

If you object, the Responsible Authority will tell you of its decision.

Privacy Notification: The personal information provided in a submission/objection is collected for planning purposes in accordance withthe Planning & Environment Act 1987 (the Act). The public may view an objection or submission in accordance with Section 57 of theAct whilst the planning application is current In accordance with the Improving Access to Planning Documents" Practice Note datedDecember, 1999, a copy of your submission will be made available on request. If you fail to provide contact details your objection maynot be considered. For information regarding access to Planning documents please contact Council's Planning Department on 1300653 356.

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

LOWECONSTRUCT IQN

DESIGN& BUILDLEADING DESIGN. EXCEPTIONAL

5 February 2016

City of KingstonPO Box 1000Mentone VIC 3194

Re: Planning Permit ApplicationProposal: 3 dwelling constructionLocation: 20 Williams Grove Bonbeach

Please find enclosed the following documentation supporting our application for the aboveproposal. Plans submitted − Rev 0 dated 10.12.2015.

Enclosed

• Town Planning Permit Application Form• Residential Checklist• Certificate of title• Three (3) x copies of Cover page —TP−00• Three (3) x copies of Existing Conditions —TP−01• Three (3) x copies of Site Plan — Design Response —TP−02• Three (3) x copies of Ground floor plan —TP03• Three (3) x copies of First floor plan —TP04• Three (3) x copies of roof plan — TP05• Three (3) x copies Elevations (external materials nominated) − TP06• Three (3) x copies Elevations (external materials nominated) − TP07• Three (3) x copies of shadow diagrams —TP08• Three (3) x copies of W.S.U.D plan and Storm rating report —TP09• One (1) x copies of Written design response report (clause 55)• 1 x A3 set of plans

We will expedite any requests for additional information to enable advertising a.s.a.p. please contactme on 9271 8800 or email [email protected] if you have any queries.

Kind regards

PLANNING CO−ORDINATOR

Visit Lowe Construction Lowe Design Construction (03)9587 8400100 Nepean Highway 69 Beach Road Design (0319271 8800Aspendate VIC 3195 Mentone VIC 3194 Email. [email protected]

Web towecon.com.au

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

C i t y o f X

0

Kingston'sLanguage Line44,Arabic 96799881

(.,4odian 967998824,14Cantonese 96799883HrvatskiCroatian 96799884

EAknvucriGreek 96799885Italianolalan 96799859

V*−ngitVietnamese 96799886All Other LanguagesIncluding 9679 9887%,landarin −Poiish − Po!skiS:inhalese • atiw,Somali − SnotnaaliSpanish EspanolTurkish − Tiirkce

Checklist for Residential ApplicationsApplicant

Use

• Completed Planning Application Form — you should Ercomplete the current Kingston Application Form whichcan be downloaded from the Website or obtainedfrom the Planning Department. Ensure you completeall sections of the form in particular Section 8 inrelation to Encumbrances and Restrictive Covenants.

• Payment of the prescribed fee.

• Current and full copy of Title (clearly showingVolume/Folio numbers, current owner, sitedimensions and any restrictions), The Title shouldnot be more than 90 days old.

• Three (3) copies of a 'Neighbourhood and Site 121Description' Plan, (drawn to a scale of 1:200 anddimensioned) in accordance with the requirementsunder Clause 55.01−1 of the Scheme and showing allthe existing details of the subject site and itssurrounds

• Three (3) copies of a Design Response Plan (drawn 13to a scale of 1:200 and dimensioned) showing theproposed development in the context of all adjoiningand opposite properties, in accordance with therequirements under Clause 55.01−2 of the Scheme.

• Three (3) copies of a site plan (drawn to a scale of 2]1:100 and fully dimensioned), showing the layout ofproposed development including siting of buildings,vehicular access, car parking, landscaping andboundary fencing. This plan should include details ofbuildings adjoining the subject site.

• Three (3) copies of detailed elevation plans of the Eiproposed dwellings to scale (drawn to a scale of1:100 and fully dimensioned) including details ofbuilding materials, colours and finishes and frontfencing elevations.

• A report detailing how the proposal meets the 2objectives of Clause 54 or 55 of the KingstonPlanning Scheme as well as State and Local PlanningPolicies.

• Shadow Diagrafns at times 9.00am, 12.00noon and 133.00pm on 22 September (double storey dwellingsonly).

CouncilUse

0

0

0

0

Comments

Revised: 21 May 2007 Page 1 of 2

Customer Service Action line −300 653 356

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

ApplicantUse

* A Streetscape elevation detailing the proposal and twoproperties on either side (this is applicable if the newdevelopment will be visible from the street).

• A completed copy of Council's Neighbourhood CharacterDesign Response form.

* A landscape concept plan for the site (this can be included onthe site plan).

• A boundary re−establishment survey if there is constructionproposed within lm of site boundaries.

• One A3 copy of all plans submitted.

CouncilUse

0

0

0

0

Comments

Application Reviewed by: Date:

Standard forms are available on the City of Kingston website (www.kingston.vic.gov.au) or at Council's CheltenhamOffices.

This checklist is for standard information required for lodgement only.Additional information may still be required after registration.Customer Service General Enquiries Line — 1300 653 356

Revised: 21 May 2007 Page 2 of 2

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

THEN RTHPLANNING

20 williams grove, bonbeach

three dwellings

january 2016

,,veb henorthplanning_com.au I 61/148 chestenrille road, moorabbin I PO Box 61 southland sc, cheltenham

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

File No. 005720 Williams Grove, Bonbeach

1.0 IntroductionThis town planning submission has been made in support of a planning permit application for the construction of three dwellings onthe land at No. 20 Williams Grove, Bonbeach.

Please find below a list of those items applicable to the consideration of this application.

ADDRESSTITLE DETAILS

20 Williams Grove, BonbeachLot 13 on PS 004639

ZONING Clause 32.08 General Residential ZoneSchedule 2 (GRZ2) — General Residential Areas ASchedule Variations:• Front Fence height — Standard A32 — A front fence within 3 metres of a street should not exceed 2

metres in a Road Zone, Category 1.• Building Height −9 metres*

OVERLAYS Clause 43.02 Design and Development Overlay

• Schedule 1 (DD01) — Urban Coastal Height Control Area• Schedule 7 (DD07) — Urban Coastal Foreshore Setback Control Area

PLANNING PERMIT TRIGGER Construction of three dwellings on an allotmentRELEVANT PLANNING POLICY STATE PLANNING POLICY FRAMEWORK

• Clause 11 — Settlement

• Clause 15— Built Environment and Heritage• Clause 16— HousingLOCAL PLANNING POLICY FRAMEWORK

• Clause 21.05— Residential Land Use• Clause 22.11 — Residential Development PolicyPARTICULAR PROVISIONS• Clause 52.06— Car Parking

• Clause 55 — Two or more dwellings on a lot (ResCode)VARIATIONS TO CLAUSE 55 The following variations are proposed to Clause 55/ GRZ2;

• Standard 88: Site Coverage

• Standard B17: Side and Rear Setbacks

• Standard B18: Walls on BoundariesN/C Guidelines Character Area 65

• Materials & Other Building Features: major contribution to neighbourhood character.OTHER • We have been advised that no significant trees are to be removed from the said land.

• The land is located in a position of high cultural sensitivity and consideration of this matter is required. It isour understanding that this will be addressed by the permit applicant.

• We have cited a copy of title and the land is not encumbered by any restrictions. As illustrated at Section2 of this Report, the land benefits from a carriageway, drainage and sewerage easement through No. 16−18 Williams Grove. This is shown on the title for NO. 16−18 Williams Grove

• Planning Permit No. KP754/2012 issued on 16 May 2014 for the Development of the land for theconstruction of an extension to an existing dwelling and construction of one (1) dwelling to the rear. In theissuing of this Permit, it is recognised that:

o The plans take guidance from the previous approval in relation to the vegetation removed andretained as part of this proposal.

o The proposal has legal access through No. 16−18 Williams Grove, noting the carriagewayeasement referenced above.

o The plans take guidance from the previous approval in relation to maintaining access from theforeshore car park (Crown Land). A Memorandum of Advice was provided by Mr. GraemePeake (previous application), which confirms access rights to the public highway within CrownLand, along with the fact that any application did not have to referred to the Department.

• The endorsed plans (previous application) confirm the windows at No. 11A Harding Avenue are on 240axis from true north and therefore Standard B20 (North−facing windows objective) is not applicable.

• The plans take guidance from the previous approval in regards to building over the sewer line that islocated to the east end of the allotment. A letter has been provided by the applicant, from Shane FordConsulting Pty Ltd, confirming that the residence can be structurally designed such that the loading fromthe first floor can be supported/transferred to the grounds outside the easement.

• We have been advised that a pre−application meeting was held with the Responsible Authority and noissue was raised in relation to the construction of a mailbox structure within 4.5m of the foreshore reserve.

1

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws


2.0 Subject Site and Surrounds2.1 Subject Site

For simplicity purposes, a reference to the north boundary is a reference to the boundary shared with No. 16−18 Williams Grove,

unless expressed otherwise.

The subject site is described as follows:

• The subject land is located on the foreshore side of the Frankston Train Line, positioned at the westernmost end of Williams

Grove in Bonbeach. The allotment is positioned along an east−west axis and fronts the Port Phillip foreshore (Crown Land).

• The site is relatively rectangular in shape and enjoys a frontage to the foreshore reserve of 15.07m, a depth of 42.67m (south

boundary) and an overall land holding of 638.85m2.

• The site experiences a subtle rise in topography (southeast direction) of approximately 400mm.

• The land is not formally encumbered by an easement, although as depicted on TP−02, a sewer traverses along the east title

boundary (please see comments in Section 1).

• A double storey brick residence occupies the subject land, approximately 6.1m in height. Positioned towards the foreshore end

of the allotment, the dwelling is contained from the public realm via a 1.2m high bluestone fence, with double width gates

located along this boundary. The rear of the allotment is dedicated to secluded open space, and inclusive of a number of trees.

• Vehicle access is two fold. Access is via a large paved area comprising an entry road from Williams Grove, and includes acentral isle and car parking on both sides. The roadway extends south beyond the car park, with access being barred by alocked gate. A secondary access is available to the land via an easement of way, sewer and drainage that extends through No.

16−18 Williams Grove (see below).

P L A N F O R C R E A T I O N O F EASEMENT

P A R T O F C R O W N A L L O T M E N T 3 AP A R I S H O F LYNDHURSTc o u N r v O F MORNINGTON

2

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws


2.2 Surrounding Area

• The site itself is situated within the constantly evolving corridor of residential land bound by the Port Phillip Foreshore to the

west and the Nepean Highway to the east.

• The road network in proximity of the site is one of a relative grid formation, with both roads and allotments positioned along both

a north−south and east−west axis. Whilst a degree of uniformity is present in the allotments, a number of allotments include

direct (and sole) frontage to the foreshore reserve, with laneways extends from the side streets off the Nepean Highway. The

area contains a number of substantial size allotments.

• Given the areas proximity to the Port Phillip Foreshore, varied architectural styles and dwelling typologies are present, inclusive

of a mixture of brick, render, cladding and weatherboard dwellings of hipped and gable roofing together with more recent

buildings that incorporate parapet / skillion roof forms. The area is characterised by an eclectic mix of established single and

double storey dwellings interspersed with a cluster of multi dwelling developments, including apartment typologies.

• Immediate context (see aerial overleaf):

o Immediately south of the subject land is located No. 11A Harding Avenue. Contained behind a 1.6m high brick fence

is located a double storey brick and weatherboard dwelling, setback a minimum of 5.23m from the foreshore reserve.The dwelling extends a considerable length of the allotment, with the short side of the dwelling (inclusive of a number

of windows) straddling the common boundary with the subject land. From a review of the site (site inspection and

aerial photography), the dwelling looks to adopt a reverse living arrangement, with a first floor balcony facing the

foreshore reserve and rear of the allotment inclusive of a considerable amount of hardstand. Vehicle access is

gained from Harding Avenue, providing access to a brick garage located in the northeast corner of the allotment.

o Two storey brick units occupy the land at No. 16−18 Williams Grove, directly north of the subject site. The units arelocated within two building modules, each positioned along a north−south access, with a 'U' configuration driveway

extending through to two crossovers along Williams Grove. The units are internally orientated along an east−west

axis, each afforded with an in built garage.

o The subject land shares its east title boundary with No. 12 Williams Grove. The land in question is occupied by a two

storey brick and weatherboard dwelling, with the allotments secluded open space straddling the common boundary.

• Major arterials that feed the site include the Nepean Highway and McLeod Road.

Source: www.nearmap.com

3

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws


Source: www.nearmap.com

3.0 Proposed DevelopmentThe proposal, as expressed on the plans prepared by Lowe Architecture (277 WILNEP83, TPOO−TP09, Rev 0) shows the intent to

remove all structures and the majority of the vegetation and construct three dwellings on the said land. The proposal is described asfollows:

• The development will present in two modules. Unit 1 and Unit 2 will present in a semi−detached, integrated module to Williams

Grove / foreshore car park, whilst Unit 3 will sit standalone in the easternmost corner of the allotment. Both modules will be of adomestic two storey building form.

• The architectural language of the development has two distinct themes. Those dwellings fronting the Port Phillip foreshore areof a contemporary rectilinear composition, akin the vernacular typical to the coastal environs. A collection of finishes is

proposed to the dwellings, including render foam and block work, render, linea cladding and stone. The module adopts a

parapet composition. Conversely, Unit 3 adopts a more conventional presentation, with the dwelling contained within a complex

hip roof form. Finishes include blockwork, render and linea cladding.

• The site coverage of the proposed development is 62%, with permeability of 22.2% and a maximum building height of

approximately 9m as depicted on TP−06, due to the provision of a staircase/lift well providing access to the roof top decks

provided to Unit's 1 and 2.

• Access to the development will be two fold. Unit's 1 and 2 will utilise the existing crossover from the foreshore car parking

(Crown Land). The accessway is via a large paved area comprising an entry road, a central isle and car parking on both sides.

The roadway extends south beyond the car park, with access being barred by a locked gate. Unit 3 will gain access via the

carriageway easement across No. 16−18 Williams Grove. Each unit complies or exceeds the required car parking provision

expressed at Clause 52.06, via the provision of double width garages, with hardstand provided across the development to allow

vehicles to exit in a forward direction.

• Individually, the dwellings are described as follows;

o Unit's 1 and 2 adopt a similar room allocation per level, albeit in slightly different configuration at the ground floor level.

Unit 1 will include two beds, bath, powder and laundry at the ground floor level, with pedestrian entry positioned to the

rear of the double garage. The first floor includes an open plan kitchen/dining/living, master bedroom (with en−suite) and

powder room. Unit 2 will include a similar ground floor footprint, albeit slightly altered to only include one bedroom and

4

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws


study. The first floor adopts an identical room allocation. Each dwelling is afforded with an internal residential IRV,

which extends to a roof top terrace

o Open space to the units is provided in three forms, being a ground floor area located to the east side of the units, first

floor balconies (x2) and a rooftop terrace.

o Unit 3 is standalone and includes two bedrooms. The ground floor is occupied by a bed, bath, laundry, study and living,

with the first floor inclusive of an open plan kitchen/dining/living area, master suite (WIR and en−suite) and powder. The

unit is afforded with two areas of secluded private open space, being a balcony positioned at the first floor level and

accessed direct from primary living areas, along with a secondary area at the ground floor level and straddling the

allotments north title boundary. A service area is located to the rear of the garage.

• The proposal seeks to remove all vegetation from the subject land, less the 5m high Melaleuca located in the southeast cornerof the allotment.

• The proposal seeks to maintain the 1.2m high bluestone fence along the foreshore reserve, with the majority of boundary

fencing to be replaced with a 2m high paling fence (2m high render fence to the north side of Unit 3). The proposal seeks to

retain the 2.4m high brick fence in the southeast corner of the allotment.

4.0 Planning Consideration4.1 Design Response

The proposed development is well designed to ensure an appropriate interface with the neighbouring properties while providing agood level of amenity for future occupants. The proposal has utilised all the assets of the land, beings its location, topography and

planning scheme controls to present a proposal that capitalises on the features of the site while ensuring consistency with the

Kingston Planning Scheme.

Neighbourhood Character

• The Kingston Planning Scheme provides a clear hierarchy as to the where development/redevelopment is to be channelled.

The 'Increased Housing Diversity Areas' are positioned second on the hierarchy of change within the City of Kingston and it is

our submission that the strategies expressed within the Scheme provide a clear direction that the site is in an area where

Council has consciously decided that a regeneration in housing stock (comprising of a variety of housing types and layouts)

should be promoted. The proposal is a catalyst to this directive.

• The next question is that of neighbourhood character and the expectations within the increased diversity areas. The direction

as outlined at Clause 21.05 requires development to respond to the established but evolving urban character.

• On a number of occasions various divisions of the Tribunal have commented on the issue of how to assess development within

lands earmarked for housing diversity. In Tzourtzoulakis Pty Ltd v Kingston City Council Senior Member Baird observed:

Being within an area of increased diversity means that development can and probably will be different to what may have

otherwise, until now, been the norm. That can be expected to result in different housing types at higher levels of

development intensity than traditionally has been the case. Using the words of the policy, the character of these areas will

evolve. While existing residents clearly value the character of the area as it is at present, it is now policy in the scheme that

these areas will undergo redevelopment and the successful implementation of the policy must bring change. IT

• This statement is reaffirmed in Wilkinson Developments PL v Kingston CC [2005] VCAT 348, where it was stated:

However, the notion of "respectful" development must be considered in light of the strategic outcome envisaged by these

policies and strategies; that is, increased density. It is inevitable that a more intense built form, in terms of height and bulk,

will be required in locations where increased density is encouraged if the strategic outcome envisaged by the council's own

5

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

File No. 005720 Williams Grove, Bon beach

local policies, including a different or "evolving" character for the area, is to be realised [33]

• As it relates to the character of the area, it is submitted that:

o The physical manifestation of the "emerging character" shift in the Bonbeach foreshore area is well underway, evident

by the high level of redevelopment, which illustrates a significant level of change / shift in character. Contributing to

this diversity in character is the traditional housing typology, along with the more recent contemporary single dwelling,

town house and apartment typology developments. It is our submission that given the local amenities, a greater

degree of change and urban intensification will occur.

o The subject land and surrounding environs form part of a corridor that straddles the foreshore environs, one that has

a distinctly different character to the more hinterland areas to the opposite side of the Frankston Railway Line. In a

general sense, there is a clear identity to this corridor.

o Older, more established housing stock is variable in building placement, form and scale. They present both in single

and double storey form, with many occupying a significant portion of the allotment for which they are located. The

contribution of landscaping is primary achieved through the road reserves, front and rear setback areas, although

planting is scarce and tree canopy predominantly sits within the road reserve. Front fencing is varied, although many

are inclusive of high fencing. Holistically, established development represents traditional, coastal architecture, mainly

orientated to capture bay views (where possible).

o The next generation of housing typology lends itself to a bolder and robust built form, in both building footprint and

envelope. Significantly, a shift is evident in the language that defines coastal architecture, with redevelopment, both

as of right and that requiring planning approval, of a more contemporary finish. This contemporary building form co−exists with the established building fabric to create a character unique to this corridor, and it is our submission that

over time, redevelopment and regeneration of allotments will inevitably result in the areas embracing a more

contemporary architectural fabric throughout, one that no matter the policy directives will be distinctly different to

hinterland areas.

o Redevelopment, whether in tandem or semi−detached formation, occupies a significant portion of the land when

viewed from the public realm, noting that develop is extend deep into allotments and thereby removing rear open

space corridors, which are common to more hinterland areas. First floors are marginally recessed from side

boundaries, thereby contributing to the perception of building 'spacing'. Garages and carport structures contribute to

defining streetscapes, regularly constructed to one side boundary, or set within a basement.

• As it relates to building mass, we note the Members comments in Denver Downs Pty Ltd v Kingston CC [2013] VCAT 440:

The Council has drafted and implemented a clear policy direction that seeks for more intensive development, producing awider diversity of housing, to be established in this location. This will involve some level of change, including larger built

forms [75]

• We submit that the proposal has achieved an appropriate design response and will sit comfortably within its context, and state

the following;

o The presentation of built form to the Port Phillip foreshore will not compromise any prevailing setback patterns.

Holistically, the proportion of mass between ground to first floor level is consistent with the surrounds and well

articulated, noting that in an area conducive to reverse living, the ratio of ground to first floor level is usually greater

than conventional living. Importantly, the Unit's 1 and 2 read as an integrated solution, akin to the venacular fronting

the foeshore reserve. The module presents as a single entity.

o Architecturally, the façade of the module as been well managed, with the horizontality of the building form broken up

by large spams of windows (first floor level) and the use of varying materials / finishes, while depth is provided

6

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws


through the articulated floor plates and the inclusions of balconies facing the foreshore. We note that the first floor of

the Unit's 1−2 will be most appreciated from the public realm, given the bluestone fence. As such, the architectural

response, through the use of glazing, the framing of the balconies and the contrast in colours, results in a soft,

unimposing structure, which will not be overbearing when having regard to development in immediate proximity of the

site.

o Whilst it is recognised that Clause 22.11 discourages the dominance of garages, the development is not sited in aconventional street. In this instance, an alternate approach can be contemplated, and the contrast in colours, coupled

with the cantilever of the balconies and solid bluestone fence, will mask this area from the public realm.

o The appreciation of building separation is derived from first floor levels, and the proposal maintains this rhythm.

Articulation is achieved from the side boundaries, with the building form recessing as you move vertically up the

building, noting that the roof terraces will not have an appreciable impact on the public realm. We contend that the

level of building form contemplated at first floor level is not unreasonable, with the width and depth of the allotment

able to accommodate the development as proposed, without presenting in a 'box−like' manner or overbearing onto its

surrounds

o Unit's 1 and 2 are each afforded with substantial size roof terraces. It is our submission that they will not have an

unreasonable impact upon the public realm, noting the central location of the staircase / lift, which will not be readably

visible from immediately abutting properties. We note that the 1700mm high screen to the south side of the roof

terrace to Unit 2 is well recessed from the south title boundary, and given the proximity of the dwelling at No.11A

Harden Avenue, it is highly unlikely that it will be viewed from their windows. As illustrated in the photos below, the

degree of exposure of the proposed roof decking is similar to that already found in the area.

No. 15A Hardane Avenue (foreground) & No. 1 Hardane Lane (background)

o Unit 3 is located to the eastern end of the allotment and adopts a more established architectural response. The

dwelling has been sited to ensure the retention of the Melaleuca tree in the south−east corner of the allotment,

7

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws


presenting in a diminutive form as a result of the number of sensitive abuttals. In relation to the sense of address, it is

reduced in size from the dwelling approved in KP754/2012.

o As it relates to the spatial separation of the two building modules, the location of Unit's 1 and 2 is consistent with the

building placement on similar orientated allotments, noting its position, and its degree of exposure to abutting

allotments is consistent with the building form presently on the subject land. A clear view corridor is provided between

the two building modules (noting the sole window at No. 11A Hardane Avenue). As it relates to Unit 3, its location is

similar to that approved in KP574/2012.

View of No. 20 Williams Grove through drive of No. 16−18 Williams Grove

• Landscaping opportunities are available around the perimeter of the site, able to accommodate an arrangement of small,

medium and large size planting. A review of the area shows that it is not conducive to large canopy planting, beyond that which

may be located within the road reserve.

External Amenity

• We have reviewed the design and layout of the external spaces to ensure an acceptable level of amenity is maintained by

neighbourhing allotments.

• The proposal satisfies, and in many areas, exceeds the minimum setback requirements expressed at Standard B17, and for

those areas that do not comply with the perscriptive parameters (see below), they are positioned opposite areas of lesser

amenity. The generous setbacks also achieve compliance with Standard's B19 and the impact of overshadowing is minimal

and accords with Standard B20, B21 and B22 of Clause 55, where applicable.

• Windows and balconies with the potential for overlooking have been appropriately screened. We note that the north facing

deck of Unit 1 and the roof terrace have not been provided with 1700mm high balustrade. In this instance, the area being

overlooked (to the north) is of hardstand and car parking structures, noting that there are no habitble room windows or secluded

open space within 9m of these areas. Such a design response is appropriate in this instance, and whilst it is acknowledged that

there are balconies (and ground floor open space) able to be viewed in the distance, they are well beyond the 9m threshold.

• In relation to overshadowing, the extent of shadow cast over the adjoining allotments will be negligible, and will not impact uponhigh amenity areas. We note Unit 3 overshadows a garage and hard stand area.

• Given building placement, orientation and topographical features, the proposal will not discord with the volume of building form

found in the immediate locale.

8

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws


Internal Amenity / Secluded Private Open Space

• We have reviewed the design/layout of the internal/external spaces to ensure an acceptable level of amenity is afforded to

future occupants. It is our submission that the proposal will provide an acceptable level of internal amenity.

• In relation to the sense of address, it is our submission that this must be viewed in two ways, being the recognition of the

dwellings in the public realm, followed by the recognition of each dwelling when positioned on the subject land. In relation to the

former, the number of dwellings on the land has no bearing on the sense of address, but rather the recognition of the building

form and the location of the vehicle entry. This has been achieved in the architectural response to Unit's 1 and 2, noting other

allotments that share the same arrangement (fronting the foreshore) have their ground floor level masked due to high front

fencing (privacy and security purposes). In relation to the latter, the sense of address can be achieved in many ways; planning

policy does not call for a simplistic approach of doors fronting streets. If this were the case, then many dwellings positioned in a

tandem formation down the length of a site would not achieve this directive, nor would apartment developments that have

entries down the side of the building. In this instance, the entrance to Unit 1 is demarcated by the change in hardstand, along

with the arch structures guiding attendees to the site to the front door. As it relates to Unit 3, its ground floor layout draws upon

the design approved in KP754/2012.

• Each dwelling looks to maximise on northern orientation, where practicable, with the reverse living arrangement maximising on

unimpeded light, along with the use of roof top terraces.

• As it relates to the provision secluded private open space, it is our submission that the proposal satisfies the Objective To

provide adequate open space for the reasonable recreation and service needs of its residents. Secluded open space can be

provided in three forms, noting that Standard B28 allows for roof terraces as being the sole form of secluded open space. In

this instance, Unit's 1 and 2 are provided with three forms of open space, whilst Unit 3 is provided with two forms of open

space, each accessed via primary living areas.

Side and Rear Setbacks

Standard B17: A new building not on or within 150mm of a boundary should be set back 1 metres from the side boundary and 3

metres from the rear boundary, plus 0.3 metres for every metre of height over 3.6 metres up to 6.9 metres, plus 2 metres for every

metre of height over 6.9 metres.

The following walls do not comply with prescriptive requirements of Standard 817

1

Bed 1

Living

Bed 1

1.76m

1.692m

1.762m

1.87m

1.73m

1.87m

Having regard to the Decision Guidelines, we submit the following:

• Any relevant neighbourhood character objective, policy or statement set out in this scheme. Local policy seeks to maintain the

rhythm of spatial separation between buildings, and as discussed above, it is our submission that this is predominantly derived

from building forms at the first floor level and the proposal is consistent with this pattern of development. In this instance, the

areas of non−compliance are marginal and will not compromise the sense of space between dwellings, noting that they are

positioned opposite areas of lesser amenity.

• The design response. The design response makes it clear that it has attempted to provide a built form and scale that is

contemplated within the locale.

9

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

7


• The impact on the amenity of the habitable room windows and secluded private open space of existing dwellings. The impactof Unit 2 onto No. 11A Haldane Street is relatively consistent with that of the existing dwelling on premise, and as discussedabove, whilst we are not privy to the internal floor plan of No. 11A Haldane Street, the placement of the primary open spaceareas would suggest that the internal configuration of the dwelling is in an east−west manner.

• Whether the wall is opposite an existing or simultaneously constructed wall built to the boundary. N/A.

• Whether the wall abuts a side or rear lane. N/A.For these reasons it is submitted that the setbacks proposed are reasonable.

4.2 Zone and Overlay ProvisionsIt is submitted that the proposed medium density residential development is consistent with the purpose of the GRZ2. The proposalis generally in keeping with the objectives of the provisions contained within Clause 55 as discussed in Appendix A. Furthermore,the proposed development:

• Contributes to the provision of a range of dwelling types and densities, catering for the changing demographic and associatedliving arrangements.

• Respects the evolving character, utilising a range of building materials, inclusive of those common to the foreshore environs.

• Provides a high level of amenity to future residents, offering generously sized dwellings with ample north facing" secluded

private open space with additional open space provided to the side of each dwelling.

• The proposed development is compatible with the State Planning Policy Framework and the Local Planning Policy Framework,including the Municipal Strategic Statement and local planning policies (to be discussed later in the report).

The proposal satisfies the prescriptive parameters of DD01 & 0D07.

4.3 State Planning Policy Framework (SPPF)The locational attributes for an increase in density accords with the general thrust of the Planning Scheme's policies as set out inClauses 11, 15 and 16 of the SPPF. The issue surrounding urban consolidation is the balancing of the 'status quo' against thevarious government policies, which clearly contemplate change in order to achieve broader urban consolidation benefits on a subjectland such as this. The proposal achieves this balance, by providing appropriate family sized housing in an area where a significantlevel of change is clearly contemplated, within close proximity of a number of key facilities including shops, primary schools,

foreshore reserve and public open space. Furthermore, the following is highlighted:

• As encouraged by the SPPF the subject land is located in a residential area that is well serviced by various forms of social andphysical infrastructure including public transport, commercial areas, parkland, schools and public transport. The proposeddevelopment makes greater use of .the land that is available on the subject land and concentrates development in anestablished residential area without adversely affecting surrounding properties or services.

• The proposed development provides for an increase in the diversity of housing in this area, with the density consistent (i.e.

footprint and volume) with that emerging in the area.• The proposed development creates a high quality environment for the future occupants of each of the proposed dwellings by

providing well−oriented and sized private open space that is directly accessed from the primary living areas and will service therecreational and service needs of future residents.

It is for these reasons that we submit that the proposal is compatible and furthers the SPPF.

10

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws


4.4 Local Planning Policy Framework (LPPF)The proposed development is compatible with the Municipal Strategic Statement. The MSS clearly states that there is a growingneed for a variety of dwelling types to cater for a changing population, with diversity in housing options a key element in catering forthe various life cycles of residents.The policies within the Kingston's MSS identify that additional dwellings will be required to meet the increasing population anddemographic changes occurring. Accordingly, the objectives and strategies seek to ensure that development is consistent with theforecasts for increased population by encouraging higher density housing of varying degrees throughout the municipality. Thesubject land is earmarked for increased change and the proposal adheres to the preferred design outcomes for these areas.Importantly;

• It is well located in an area that has demonstrated that infill development is not uncommon and forms part of the evolving urbancharacter of the area, with increasing levels of development being experienced in this area given its proximity to the foreshore.

• The placement of the building form ensures that landscaping opportunities are available through the subject land, noting thatthe area is not conducive to large canopy planting.

• The domestic two−storey scale, along with setbacks provided from side common boundaries, ensures that the building envelopeexperienced from the public realm does not discord with building form found in the area.

• The proposed window shapes, building materials, and finishes complement the surrounding built form in the area, ensuring aconsistent rhythm.

Clause 22.11 identifies a number of preferred design outcomes for residential development in the Municipality. Several keyobjectives are established within this clause to assist with the realisation of a preferred character, with strategies detailing the designcriteria to achieve the desired outcome. It is our submission that there is support for the proposal in regards to building height, formand typology in both a State and Local policy context, with the proposal taking into account the existing and emerging character ofthe area. We make this submission on the following grounds:

• The proposed development provides sufficient space for the inclusion of planting across the subject site that will strengthen thelandscape character of the area.

• The rhythm of the building form and visual separation along the foreshore is maintained as discussed at Section 4.1.

• The siting and design solution to the garage structures incorporates them into the building façade, and they will not be highlyvisible from the public realm.

• The design of the proposed dwellings has considered the features of the site to provide a development that positively responds

to the subject site and is in keeping with the scale of the surrounding area.• The design of the proposed dwellings ensures that the new buildings are well articulated and present a visually interesting

façade to the streetscape that incorporates various materials common to the area.

4.5 Particular ProvisionsClause 52.06 − The proposal satisfies the applicable car parking controls. It is our understanding that the proposal satisfies thedesign specifications and clearance requirements expressed within this clause.

11

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

File No.005720 Williams Grove, Bonbeach

Clause 55 (ResCode)

Neighbourhood Character Clause 55.02

Title Standard Complies / Does Not Comply!Variation Required

B1NeighbourhoodCharacter

Appropriate design response to the neighbourhood and site. i CompliesDesign respects the existing or preferred neighbourhood character & responds to sitefeatures.

1 Complies

Comments:• Please refer to Section 4.1 of this ReportB2ResidentialPolicy .

Application to be accompanied by written statement that explains consistency withrelevant housing policy in SPPF, LPPF, MSS and local planning policies.

1 Complies

Comments: '• Please refer to Section 4 of this Report.B3DwellingDiversity

Developments of ten or more dwellings to provide for:• Dwellings with a different number of bedrooms.• At least one dwelling containing a kitchen, bath or shower, and a toilet and

washbasin at ground floor level.

− NIA

Comments:• The floor plan can accommodate for a variety of living forms.B4Infrastructure

Connection to reticulated sewerage, electricity, gas and drainage services.Capacity of infrastructure and utility services should not be exceeded unreasonably.Provision should be made for upgrading and mitigation of the impact of services orinfrastructure where little or no spare capacity exists.

1 Complies •• '

•Comments:• It is unders ood that the subject site has access to all reticulated services and the development will be attached to these services.

Furthermore, it is understood that the developMent will not unreasonably overload the capacity of the services.B5Integration withthe Street

,

Development orientated to front existing and proposed streets.

.

1 Complies

Vehicle and pedestrian links that maintain and enhance local accessibility. 1 CompliesHigh fences in front of dwellings should be avoided if practicable. 1 Complies

Development next to public open space should be laid out to complement the openspace.

− N/A'

Comments:• Please refer to Section 4.1 of this Report.

Site Layout and Buildina Massin Clause 55:03Title Standard Complies I Does Not Comply!

Variation RequiredB6StreetSetback

Walls of buildings should be set back from streets:• At least the distance specified in the schedule to the zone, or

1 Complies

Comments:• Given the location of the allotment, the setback requirements are derived from DD07. The proposal satisfies the prescriptive parameters of

the Overlay.BYBuildingHeight

The maximum building height should not exceed that specified in the zone, schedule tothe zone or any overlay that applies to the land. Or where no max is specified, 9 metres,unless slope is 2.5 degrees or more = 10 metres

1 Complies

Comments: •• The overall height of the development is well within the parameters of this Standard.B8SiteCoverage

The site area covered by buildings should not exceed:• The max site coverage specified in the schedule to the zone, or• If no max site coverage is specified 60%

.X Variation Required

Comments: −• The statistics reveal a site coverage of 62%, which is marginally greater than the preferred outcome within the GRZ2. Such a minor variation

is not unreasonable, given the degree of built form in the area, whilst the increase does not come at the expense of external amenityconsiderations.

B9Permeability

At least 20% of the site should not be covered by impervious surfaces 1 Complies

Comments:• The permeability figure well exceeds the minimum specified under this Standard (31%)

12

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws


B10EnergyEfficiency

Orientation, Siting and design of buildings should make appropriate use of solar energy.If practicable the living areas and private open space are to be located on the north side.Solar access for north−facing windows should be maximised.

.

V Complies

Comments:• All dwellings have been orientated and sited to maximise on energy efficiency, where practicable.B11Open Space

Public open spaces should:• Be substantially fronted by dwellings.• Provide outlook for dwellings.• Be designed to protect natural features.• Be accessible and usable. •

− N/A

Comments .• There are no public open space areas adjoining the development site.B12Safety

Entrances to dwellings and residential buildings should not be isolated or obscured fromthe street and internal accessways.Planting should not create unsafe spaces along streets and accesswaysGood lighting, visibility and surveillance of car parks and internal accessways.Protection of private spaces from inappropriate use as public thoroughfares.

V Complies

Comments:• The proposed development provides excellent safety and security to residents, especially as the dwelling entries are easily identifiable and in

highly visible locations. Please see Section 4.1 (Internal Amenity) for a more detailed response.B13Landscaping

Landscape layout and design should:• Protect predominant landscape features of the neighbourhood• Provide a safe, attractive and functional environment for residents• Specify landscape themes, vegetation location & species, paving & lighting.Development should:• Provide for the retention or planting of trees, where these are part of the character of

neighbourhood.• Provide for the replacement of any significant trees that have been removed in the

12 months prior to the application being made,

I Complies

Comments:• Adequate space is available for the planting of numerous species, including canopy trees. A landscape plan can be provided as a condition of

any permit issued.B14Access

Accessways should provide:• Safe, convenient and efficient vehicle movements and connections to the street •

• network• Designed to ensure that vehicles can exit in a forward direction if the accessway

serves more than 5 car spaces, 3 or more dwellings or connects to a road in a RoadZone.

• A width of at least 3m.• An internal radius of at least 4m at changes of direction.• A passing area at the entrance that is at least 5m wide and 7m long if the accessway

serves 10 or more car spaces and connects to a road in a Road Zone.

I Complies.

•

The width of the accessways or car spaces should not exceed:• 33% of the street frontage; or• 40% if the width of the street frontage is less than 20m.

I Complies

For each dwelling fronting a street, only one single width crossover should be provided. I CompliesThe location of crossovers will maximise the retention of on−street car parking spaces. I CompliesAccess points to a road in Road Zones to be minimised. − N/AAccess for service, emergency and delivery vehicles must be provided. I Complies

Comments:• It is submitted that there are no traffic or access related matters associated with the development that would preclude a permit issuing, with

_the appropriate design measures in place to ensure the safe and efficient movement of vehicles.

Amenity Im acts Clause 55.04Title &Objective

Standard Complies! Does Not Comply!Variation Required

B17Side and RearSetbacks

A new building not on or within 150mm of a boundary should be setback from side orrear boundaries:• At least the distance specified in the schedule to the zone, or• lm+ 0.3m for every metre of height over 3.6 metres up to 6.9 metres, plus 1

metre for every metre of height over 6.9 metres.

X Variation Required

• (

Comments:• Please see section 4.1 of this Report.B18Walls onBoundaries

A new wall constructed on or within 150mm of a side or rear boundary of a lot or acarport constructed on or within lm of a side or rear boundary of a lot should not abutthe boundary for a length of more than:

X Variation Required

.

13

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws


• 10m plus 25% of the remaining length of the boundary of an adjoining lot.or

• Where there are existing or simultaneously constructed walls or carports abuttingthe boundary of an abutting lot, the length of the existing or simultaneouslyconstructed walls or carports − whichever is the greater.

Comments:a A variation is required to the height provisions, noting the garage to Unit 2 and Unit 3 exceed 3.2m by 30−50mm. Given their location, along

with the minor increase in height, it is our submission that a variation is warranted.B19Daylight toExistingWindows

Buildings opposite an existing habitable room window should provide a light court of atleast 3sqm and a minimum dimension of lm clear to the sky (this can include land on theadjoining lot).

.

1 Complies

Walls or carports more than 3m in height opposite should be setback from the window atleast 50% of the height of the new wall if the wall is within a 55 degree arc from thecentre of the existing window. The arc may be swung to within 35 degrees of the plane ofthe wall containing the existing window.

/ Complies

Comments:• Given the axis of the allotment and the siting of the new dwelling, the proposal will not have an unreasonable impact upon daylight to existing

windows.820North FacingWindows

Buildings should be setback lm if an existing north−facing habitable window is within 3mof the abutting lot boundary. (Add 0.6m to this setback for every metre of height over3.6m and add 1m for every metre over 6.9m.)

NIA

Comments:• The proposal will have no impact upon any north facing windows. Please see comments at Section 1 of this Report.B21OvershadowingOpen Space

Where sunlight to a private open space of an existing dwelling is reduced, at least 75%,or 40sqm with min. 3m, whichever is the lesser area, of the open space should receive amin. of 5 hours of sunlight between 9 am and 3pm on 22 Sept.If the existing sunlight to the private open space of an existing dwelling is less than theserequirements, the amount of sunlight should not be reduced further.

1 Complies

Comments:• The proposed dwellings will not unreasonable overshadow existing private open space areas, noting that which extends into No. 3 Wyuna

Lane is durin9 the early morning hours and with a relatively used area (i.e. not an area of high amenity).B22Overlooking

•

A habitable room window, balcony, terrace, deck or patio should be designed to avoiddirect views into the secluded private open space of an existing dwelling within 9m (seeclause for details) should have either:• A minimum offset of 1.5m from the edge of one window to the other.• Sill heights of at least 1.7m above floor level. .• Fixed obscure glazing in any part of the window below 1.7m above floor level.• Permanently fixed external screens to at least 1.7m above floor level and be no

more than 25% transparent.

1 Complies

Obscure glazing below 1.7m above floor level may be openable if there are no directviews as specified in this standard.

1 Complies.

Screens to obscure view should be:.• Perforated panels or trellis with solid translucent panels or maximum 25%

openings.• Permanent, fixed and durable.• Blended into the development

I Complies

Comments:• Please see Section 4.1 (External Amenity) of this Report.B23Internal Views

Windows and balconies should to be designed to prevent overlooking of more than 50%of the secluded private open space of a residential building within the samedevelopment.

i t Complies

•Comments:• No unreasonable internal overlooking will occur.B24Noise Impacts

Noise sources should not be located near bedrooms of immediately adjacent existingdwellings.

1 Complies

Comments:• Noise sources close to the development have been taken into consideration in the design of the development.

On−Site Amenity and Facilities Clause 55.05Title &Objective

Standard•

Complies I Does Not Comply!Variation Required

825Accessibility

Dwelling entries of the ground floor of buildings should be accessible or able to be easilymade accessible to people with limited mobility. .

1 Complies

•Comments:• It is submitted that dwelling entries can be made easily accessible to people with limited mobility.

14

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

File No, 005720 Williams Grove, Bonbeach

B26Dwelling Entry

Entries are to be visible and easily identifiable from streets and other public areas.The entries should provide shelter, a sense of personal address and a transitional space.

1 Complies

Comments:• The dwelling entries are clearly visible from the public domain. Please refer to Section 4.1 (Internal Amenity) for more discussion on this

matter.827Daylight toNew Windows

Habitable room windows to face:• Outdoor space open to the sky or light court with minimum area of 3sqm and a min.

dimension of 1m clear to the sky or,• Verandah, provided it is open for at least one third of its perimeter or;• A carport provided it has two or more open sides and is open for at least one third of

its perimeter.

1 Complies

.Comments: .• Orientation of all windows allow for adequate solar access and natural daylight into primary and secondary living areas throughout the day.B28Private OpenSpace

Unless specified in the schedule to the zone, a dwelling should have private open spaceconsisting of:• 40sqm with one part at the side or rear of the dwelling/residential building with a

minimum dimension of 3m, a minimum area of 25sqm and convenient access from aliving room or,

• Balcony − minimum 8sqm, minimum width 1.6m and accessed from living room or;• Roof−top — minimum 10sqm, minimum width 2m and convenient access from living

MOM.

1 Complies

Comments: .• Each residential dwelling has been provided with an open space area of a sufficient size to service the social, recreational and passive needs

of its residents.829Solar Accessto Open Space

The private open space should be located on the north side of the dwelling if appropriate.1 Complies

Southern boundary of open space should be setback from any wall on the north of thespace at least (2+0.9h) h= height of wall.

1 Complies

Comments:• No south facing open space (primary) is proposed as part of this development. Unit 3 is provided with a service yard to the south side of the

dwelling.B30Storage

Each dwelling should have access to a minimum 6m3 of externally accessible, securestorage space.

1 Complies

.Comments:• Storage areas are provided within the garages or rear yards of each unit.

Detailed Desi n Clause 55.06Title &Objective

Standard Complies! Does NotComply! VariationRequired

B31Design Detail

Design of buildings should respect the existing or preferred neighbourhood characterGarages and carports should be visually compatible with the development and neighbourhoodcharacter. .

1 Complies

Comments:• Please refer to Section 4.1 of the Planning Report.832Front Fences

The front fence should complement the design of the dwelling or any front fences on adjoiningproperties.

I Complies

A front fence within 3m of the street should not exceed the maximum height specified in theschedule to the zone or if no max. Specified, the front fence should not exceed:• 2m if abutting a Road Zone, Category 1.• 1.5m in any other streets.

1 Complies

Comments:• The bluestone fence is to be retained as part of this application.B33CommonProperty

Should be functional and capable of efficient management.Public, communal and private areas should be clearly delineated.

1 Complies

Comments:• Common p operty will be required as a result of the shared access and driveway for Unit's 1 and 2.834Site Services

Dwelling layout and design should provide for sufficient space and facilities for services to beinstalled and maintained.Bin and recycling enclosures, mailboxes and other site facilities should be adequate in size,durable, waterproof and should blend in with the development.

I Complies

.

Comments:• It is understood that all the facilities required for the development can be accommodated within the development.

' 15

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws


4.6 Other ProvisionsThe subject site is located within Character Area 65, with an assessment against the characteristics features is as follows:

• Perceived lot pattern: Remains unchanged

• Building placement: Please refer to Section 4.1 of this Report.

• Building footprint: The building footprint is consistent with the level of redevelopment already experienced in the area.• Roof shape: The proposed parapet and skillion roof forms are consistent with the building fabric of the area.• Materials: The palette of colours and finishes is consistent with that found in the locale.

• Window shapes: The windows used in the development are fitting to the area.• Front boundary and garden: Adequate space is available to accommodate a variety of plant species.

• Other building features: As being a major contributor to neighbourhood character, the proposal has included balconies and

porches.

5.0 ConclusionThe proposal contributes to achieving an incremental form of urban consolidation, in an area where this form of redevelopment isencouraged under the Municipal Strategic Statement. Holistically, the proposal contributes to providing greater density and diversityin housing choice, with the layout and design of the development able to accommodate for a variety of potential occupants and living

arrangements.The proposed development is consistent with the City of Kingston's Planning Scheme provisions, including being compatible with theobjectives of Clause 55 and that off−site amenity impacts have been kept to a minimum; the proposed development presents anacceptable planning outcome for the area.It is for these reasons that we respectfully request that the application be considered at the earliest possible time.

The North Planning Pty LtdJanuary 2016

16

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

SHANE FORD CONTRACTING P/LSHANE MICHAEL FORD (Bachelor of Building Engineering)Mobile: 0419 886 207Address: 36 Nepean Hwy, Brighton 3186

To:

ACN 11110402723EC — 24576

Lowes — Gary Davidson Date: 17/02/15

Sender: Shane Ford Pages: 1

PROPOSED NEW REAR RESIDENCE2 / 20 WILLIAMS GROVEBONBEACH

Project No: 0902

Engineering Instruction:

Please be advised that the proposed residence can be structurally designed such that the'loading from the first floor area can be supported/transferred to the outside ground floorfooting/foundation of the garage.'

This is as required by the local water authority.

Regards

Shane Ford.

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

VictoriaCopyright State of Victoria. This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the CopyrightAct and for the purposes of Section 32 of the Sale of Land Act 1962 or pursuant to a written agreement. The information is only valid at the time and in the formobt7,−−,4c1 from the LANDATA REGO TM System. The State of Victoria accepts no responsibility for any subsequent release, publication or reproduction of theinfon, cation.

REGISTER SEARCH STATEMENT ( T i t l e S e a r c h ) T r a n s f e r o f Page 1 of 1

L a n d A c t 1958VOLUME 0 3 3 8 4 F O L I O 7 1 7 S e c u r i t y n o : 124058915509G

P r o d u c e d 0 2 / 0 2 / 2 0 1 6 1 1 : 5 7 am

LAND DESCRIPTION

L o t 1 3 o n P l a n o f S u b d i v i s i o n 004639.PARENT T I T L E V o l u m e 0 3 1 8 3 F o l i o 456C r e a t e d b y i n s t r u m e n t 0 6 0 9 5 1 6 02/12/1909

REGISTERED PROPRIETOR

E s t a t e F e e SimpleJ o i n t Proprietors

ROBERT EDWARD SILVADIANA S I L V A b o t h o f 2 0 WILLIAMS GR BONBEACH 3196U 9 4 2 1 7 6 R 21/08/1997

ENCUMBRANCES, CAVEATS AND NOTICES

MORTGAGE U 9 4 2 1 7 7 N 21/08/1997COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA

MORTGAGE V 1 7 3 5 5 2 W 29/12/1997COMMONWEALTH BANK O F AUSTRALIA

A n y e n c u m b r a n c e s c r e a t e d b y S e c t i o n 9 8 T r a n s f e r o f L a n d A c t 1 9 5 8 o r Section2 4 S u b d i v i s i o n A c t 1 9 8 8 a n d a n y o t h e r e n c u m b r a n c e s h o w n o r e n t e r e d o n thep l a n o r i m a g e d f o l i o s e t o u t u n d e r DIAGRAM LOCATION below.

DIAGRAM LOCATION

SEE T P 6 5 3 7 2 7 S FOR FURTHER D E T A I L S AND BOUNDARIES

A C T I V I T Y I N THE LAST 1 2 5 DAYS

) NIL

END O F R E G I S T E R SEARCH STATEMENT

A d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n : ( n o t p a r t o f t h e R e g i s t e r S e a r c h Statement)

S t r e e t A d d r e s s : 2 0 WILLIAMS GROVE BONBEACH V I C 3196

DOCUMENT END

Title 3384/717 Page 1 of 1

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

Imaged Document Cover Sheet

The document following this cover sheet is an imaged document supplied by LANDATA®,Land Victoria.

Document Type instrumentDocument Identification U942176R .

Number of Pages

(excluding this cover sheet)

2 •

Document Assembled 02/02/2016 11:59

Copyright and disclaimer notice:© State of Victoria. This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process exceptin accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act and for the purposes of Section 32 of the Saleof Land Act 1962 or pursuant to a written agreement. The information is only valid at the time and inthe form obtained from the LAN DATA® System. The State of Victoria accepts no responsibility forany subsequent release, publication or reproduction of the information.

The document is invalid if this cover sheet is removed or altered.

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

Delivered by LANDATA®. Land Victoria timestamp 02/02/2015 11:59 Page 1 of 2'

TRANSFER OF LANDSection 45 Transfer of Land Act 1958Lodged by:Name:Phone:

. i•−−4\/

Addless: . 7Ref: s's.".1Customer Code:

U942176R210897 0911 45 275

1111UIIIIIllIIIIIIIIMADE AVAILABLE/CHANGE CONTROL

Lund Titles Office Use Only

The transferor at the direction of the directing party (if any) transfers to the transferee the estate and interest specifiedin the land described for the consideration expressed and subject to the encumbrances affecting the land including anycreated by dealings lodged for registration before the lodging of this transfer.

(Land:Certificate of Title Volume 3384 Folio 717 11111111111

IllEstate and Interest_All Our Eslate−and Interest In Fee Simple − −

Consideration:(S−275,00−01−0−0)− −TWO HUNMED/AND SEVENTY−FIVE THLOIJSAA−D−CILLIRS

• 2 Transferor:MICHAEL CONSTANTINOU AND BETTY JOAN CONSTANTINOUTransferee:ROBERT EDWARD SILVA AND. DIANA.gLYA

TifFloVirLfAKIVditerVi, B O A t E−Attrif9e−1A.IS JOINT PROPRIETORS

Directing Party:NIL

• Dated: ,7iExecution and AttestationSigned by the Transferorin the presence of:

Signed by thein th

.−..Witness. −_ansferee

of:

− Witness

anis frri(−41−0−1−,Li

Approval No. 4409512A ORDER TO REGISTER

TiPage 1 of 1

Customised Databases

„Victorian StampPlease register and issue title toDuty − API 84

• '2'7.iConsicieration $ 1 A 7S0Quty Payable $ −12 —)1T0−(n

Signed 'Cost. Code: Flef:3141.1%•30 1Date 'lir

THE BACK OF THIS FORM MUST NM

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

Delivered by LAN DATA®. Land Victoria timestamp 02/02/2016 1,1:59 Page 2 of 2

3

Tmkjei 4)i let• f . 0 ' 4 4 ' * 1 1 : P a a : Z e i l i

of

• ''−'471,t,s Sustainability

and EInvironinerpiNTENTIONALLY

,BLANK

. • •

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

Imaged Document Cover Sheet


Document Type instrumentDocument Identification U942177N

Number of Pages


4


Copyright and disclaimer notice:C. State of Victoria. This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process exceptin accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act and for the purposes of Section 32 of the Saleof Land Act 1962 or pursuant to a written agreement. The information is only valid at the time and inthe form obtained from the LAN DATA® System. The State of Victoria accepts no responsibility forany subsequent release, publication or reproduction of the information.


Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

Delivered by LANDATA®. Land Victoria timestamp 02/02/2018.11;59 13._g.e I of 4• −

3

Mortgage of LandSection 74 Transfer of L'and Act 1958

Lodged by:0911sli

Name: COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA ACN 123 123 124.

Phone:

Address: 385 Bourke Street, Melbourne 3000

." Ref:

Customer Code: 20S

Approved Fomi M

u!!?1.11,771'1111151111 I IIIII1I1

MADE AVAILABLE / CHANGE CONTROL

Land Titles Office Use Only

1

• The mortgagor mortgages to the mortgagee the estate and interest specified in the land described (in this mortgage referred to as THEPROPERTY) subject to the registered encumbrances affecting THE PROPERTY and any encumbrances created by dealings lodged forregistration before this mortgage was lodged. This mortgage is given for the purpose of securing the payment of the AMOUNT OWINGby the mortgagor to the mortgagee.

Land (Title)CERTIFICATE OF TITLE VOLUME 3384 FOLIO 717

Estate or interest being mortgaged

Mortgagor's estate and interest infeef,‘"

Mortgagor (Full Name)

ROBERT EDWARD SILVA AND DIANA SILVA

Mortgagee

,COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA ACN 123 123 124385 BourkTSVeet,Wellyourne73000Date of this mortgage

is−− Y−11

DU942177N−1−5 11III

The provisions contained in each annexure to this cover sheet and in a memorandum of common provisions retained by the Registraro f Titles in No. AA486 are incorporated in this mortgage.

Approval No. 464961A ORDER TO REGISTER

vicronINRL1(VIC)16/1/96

Please register and issue title to:

SignedCustomer Code

CONTINUED ON M PAGE 2

Victorian Stamp Duty − AP184TAT−ritMet".−TEEPAFF::*JCOLL'Consideration 4,41,c) −−

ity Payable $ NjI

Date II/

THE BACK OF THIS FORM MUST NOT BE USED

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

Delivered b LANDATAO. Land Victoria timestam 02/02/2016 11:59 Pa .e 2 of 4

( )Deportment otSustairabilityand Etavironmen.

iNTENTROMALLYBLANK

10.

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

Delivered by LANDATA4D. Land Victoria timestamp 02102/2016 11:59 Page 3 of 4•:••

−COVENANTS−

You (the mortgagor) agree With us (the mortgagee) as follows:

1. A reference to "this mortgage" in this cover sheet, in any annexure to this cover sheet or in the memorandum ofcommon provisions specified in the first page of this cover sheet is a reference to the mortgage constituted by thiscover sheet, each annexure to this cover sheet and that memorandum. You agree to keep to the provisions in thememorandum, and you acknowledge that you received, read and understood a copy of the memorandum beforesigning this mortgage.

2. You acknowledge giving this mortgage and incurring obligations and giving rights under it in return for the thingswe do when we enter into a SECURED AGREEMENT.

3. You warrant that:

neither you nor any person on your behalf has sold THE PROPERTY under a terms contract within the meaningo f the Sale o f Land Act 1962; and

• you have told us if you have a tenant in THE PROPERTY.

4. The memorandum is varied as follows:

−EXECUTION AND ATTESTATION−

Signed in my presence

Signature of Witness

11144t4tf 04 Path A) asualsmName and Address of Witness (BLOCK LETTERS)


Signature of Witness

wool to Poiti(U 594eAtaAName and Address of Witness (BLOCK LETTERS)

Signature of Mortgagor


Approval NO.46496IA

E PAGE 2

GE. 17

lacros:0RL I (VIC)16/1/96

U942177N210897 0911 74

1111111111II

ROLil1111111111111THE BACK OF THIS FORM MUST NOT BE USED

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

Delivered by LANDATMD. Land Victoria timestam 02/02/2016 11:59 Pa e 4 of 4

Department ofSustainabilityand Environment

RIMTEKTgOWALLYfr4t0A1V11,1

.1

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

Vichria Imaged Document Cover Sheet


Document Type instrument •Document Identification VI 73552W

Number of Pages


3

Document Assembled 02/02/201611:59



Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

Delivered by LANDATA0.• Land Victoria timestamp 02/02/2016 11:59 Page 1 of 3

M o r t g a g e o f Land

'.Section 74 Transfer o f Land Act 1958 ORiG1,14

Lodged by:Name: C O M M O N W E A L T H B A N K O F AUS

ACN 123 123 124Phone:

Address: 385 Bourke Street, Melbourne 3000

Ref:

Customer Code: 21Q

villeN)Y .MADE AVAILABLE / CHANGE CONTROL

Land Titles Office Use Only

Pilk−kk°Ct34.0

−(0

The Mortgagor mortgages to the Mortgagee the estate and interest specified−in the land described (hereinafter called the mortgagedproperty) subject to the encumbrances affecting the mortgaged property including any created by dealings lodged for registration beforethe lodging of this mortgage. This mortgage is given in consideration of certain advances and accommodation granted or to be granted atthe request of the Mortgagor to the Debtor by the Mortgagee and for the purpose of securing to the Mortgagee the payment of theSecured Moneys as defined in Memorandum of Common Provisions retained by the Register of Titles in No. AA370

Land (Title)_CERTIFICATE OF TITLE VOLUME 3384 FOLIO 717

di

)

Estate and Interest being mortgaged

The Mortgagor's estate and interest in fee simpleMortgagor (Full Name)Robert Edward Silva and Diana Silva / Victorisn 74amr, ri,h_1: '

−, ;.;.„,Consideration $ diNgLiDuty Payable $ 6 / 1 '−Ref: •

Mortgagee Date. ,COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTFtALKACN 123 123 124 Initials

.385 Bourke Street, Melbourne 3000Debtor (Full Name)R.E. & D. Silva Nominees Pty Ltd ACN 005 999 486

Date of this Mortgage

o7/0 a iCollateral to $ ROOGG3"iv−/Queensland Stamp Duty PaidCommonwealth Bank of AustraliatQf,'6,1v −Old Proportion $ tac−−−−zio • 6 7 7 al−

dis −au t I /91 AuthoriseceOfficer

The provisions contained in Memorandum of Common Provisions retained by the Registrar of Titles in No. AA370 'are incorporated inthis mortgage.

Approval No. 46396IA ORDER TO REGISTER

T/L S4 (VIC)16/1/96

Please Register and issue Title to:

SignedCustomer Code

CONTINUED ON M PAGE 2 .00"Stamp Duty Use Only

Victorian Stamp Dultw

Cut' Pat;P1Ref: IDatI ale

44111

0,4),111%

THE BACK OF THIS FORM M U S T NOT SED

T−140 −7−1− lqqk Bank

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

Delivered by LAN DATA®. Land Victoria timestarnp 02/02/2016 11:59 Page 2 of 3

−COVENANTS−

For the consideration aforesaid the Mortgagor and the Debtor covenant with the Mortgagee as follows:

1. The Mortgagor and the Debtor will observe the provisions contained in Memorandum of'Common Provisions retainedby the Registiar o f Titles being Instrument No. AA370 AND the Mortgagor and Debtor acknowledges that he hasreceived and read a copy o f the said Memorandum prior to executing this mortgage.

The Mortgagor warrants that the Mortgagor has not nor has any person on his behalf sold the mortgaged property undera terms contract within the meaning o f the Sale o f Land Act 1962.

3. The Mortgagor warrants that, except as advised in writing to the Mortgagee prior to the date hereof, the mortgagedproperty is not the subject o f a leasehold interest nor is any person other than the Mortgagor in occupation o f themortgaged property.

−EXECUTION AND ATTESTATION.


Signatur o f Witness

014t4 IMO,/ 1% W i t Ad ditoseA14441Name and Address o f Witness (BLOCK LETTERS)


110191 f i Oct* 14)Name and Address o f Witness (BLOCK LETTERS)

The Common Seal ofR.E. & D. Silva Nominees Pty Ltd )was affixed under theAuthority o f the Directorsin the presence of

Isith(tia Director whose signatureappears opposite hereto

,V

• ) Director


Signature o f Mortgagor

Approval No. 463961A

PAGE 2

V173552W291297 0908 74

II11111111IIIIIIIITR. S4 (VIC)i6/1(96

THE B A C K OF THIS FORM M U S T N O T BE USED

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

Delivered by LI;NDATA® Land Victoria timestamp 02/0212016 11:59 Page 1 of 1

TITLE PLAN EDITION 1 TP 653727S

Location o f Land

Parish:

Township:Section:

Crown Altotiretiet SA (PT)

Crown Portion!

L NEWILIRST

Last Plan Reference: LP4839

Derived From: VOL 3384 FOL 717

Depth Limitation NIL

Notations

ANY REFERENCE TO MAP IN THE TEXT MEANS THE DIAGRAM SHOWN ONTHIS TITLE PLAN−

Descript ion o f Land / E a s e m e n t Information

(:−:I•A 11£ I ( / / / ( ! ( r//er;:e−e. / 1 −̀..−.,!rrir d, a'i−47te4kS' 44/ a' ea W.;triec;'

hi , : −4 m., (zit−, 4 4... .1tz:4... .244.4−z.,49. ..".−− t−...,,,,.(::;−/ 4,34,..,..ictliz,_,. ,AU:.3−t

1.t

I D, A.− l t V I A . I a l ( V 4 , 1 , 3 7 —7

, i t t c . : 1 ' 47

,a l 1 : 1 4 . 1 − . 4 . 1 4 4 4 . 4 .

0I ' C ' '

a − t it c , I i ; c . i . Ilia).

ii−fiC Vi,,,.ur Y":1.4'I4.41. i ' ( 0−4 −c ' 01−'1.− 4−: it'z' rz .r.' '!1

,.1

THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED

FOR THE LAND REGISTRY, LAND

VICTORIA, FOR TITLE DIAGRAM

PURPOSES AS PART OF THE LAND

TITLES AUTOMATION PROJECT

COMPILED 17/101200

VERIFIED'

E a s e m e n t s o f w a y , d r a i n a g e a n d s e w e r a g e appurtenantt o t h e w i t h i n l a n d h a v e b e e n r e s e r v e d byT r a n s f e r H938513

COLOUR CODER = RED

A r a TO

A T 9645

VIDE A.O. IN s.a. 7522

LENGTHS ARE INFEET & INCHES

Metres = 0 304$ x Feet

Metres = 0201165 x LinksSheet 1 of 1 sheets

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

Victoria Imaged Document Cover Sheet


Document Type planDocument Identification TP653727S

Number of Pages


1




Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

Delivered by LAINDATAO. Land Victoria timestamp 02/02/2016 11:59 Page 3 of 3

RE & D SILVA NOMINEES PTY LTD ACN 005 999 486

R e g i s t e r e d O f f i c e 1 s t Floor3 5 7 C a m b e r w e l l RdC a m b e r w e l l V i c 3124

Telephone

D a t e 3/11/97

To

0 3 9 7 7 6 0390

T h e R e g i s t r a r o f TitlesT i t l e s OfficeMelbourne

[−13cRECEIVED

−5NOV1997

CENTRAL BRANCHCHELTENHAM, VIC.

I , D i a n a S i l v a , b e i n g t h e S e c r e t a r y o f RE & D SilvaN o m i n e e s P t y L t d A N 0 0 5 9 9 9 4 8 6 , c o n f i r m t h a t thec o m p a n y i s a m u l t i d i r e c t o r c o m p a n y h o w e v e r i t s Articleso f A s s o c i a t i o n a l l o w t h e C o m p a n y S e a l t o b e a f f i x e d tod o c u m e n t s i n t h e p r e s e n c e o f o n e d i r e c t o r only.

Director/Secretary

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

licenceto

reprod LOWECONSTRUCTION

20 WILLIAMS GROVEADDITIONAL DWELLING

I Robert & Diana Silva

1 TOWN PLANNINGINDEX

DRAWING No. DRAWING NAME:TP−00 COVER PAGE

TP−01 SITE PLAN − EXISTING

TP−02 SITE PLAN−DESIGN RESPONSE

TP−03 GROUND FLOOR PLAN

TP−04 FIRST FLOOR PLAN

TP−05 ROOF PLAN

TP−06 ELEVATIONS

TP−07 ELEVATIONS

TP−08 SHADOW DIAGRAMS

TP−09 W.S.U.D PLAN

TP−10 SECTIONS

TP−11 SITE COVERAGE

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

BITUMENCARPARK

0—

04'

BITUMENCARPARK

WILLIAMS GROVEe. POWER

POLE

EXISTINGCROSSOVER

3 614

POS

CO

TWO STOREYTILED, BRICK

UNITS

cc−

NO WINDOWS TO FIRSTOR GROUND FLOOR

••4k'0−,64b

GARAGE LID

0−e

No. 16.18 TWO STOREYTILED, BRICK

UNITS

4.

NO WINDOWSWINDOWS TO FIRSTFLOOR 1 x NH ON GROUND

cb

EXISTING PALINGS 1 95 H EXISTING BRICK WALL 2.6 H 73° 37' 50" 42.17EXISTING PALINGS 2.1 H

3

POS

3PPROX. LOCATION

OF EXISTINGPAVING

EXISTING m APPROX. LOCATION OFCROSSOVER z 'EXISTING

eL, DRIVEWAY

1−5La

0,4<;ASSUMED0 ' HAB.

TOPSTOREY

EXISTING BRICK 1.6et•I> " " RATIVE..., −POWER ..i.

. C 6/ 7 H −

POLE 5 230,Ik ,e.

,..?̀−• ASSUMED(<".0"HAB.

NO. 20EXISTING

OLD, FLAT ROOFEDPART 2 STOREY

s .n • t " BRICK RESIDENCETO BE DEMOLISHED

7.022

9.103

0 0

▪POS <

•

J

253° 37' 50" 42.67

POS

PALINGS 1<5 H

POS

4.

PALINGS 1.95 H

"SW B.

EXIST! RIC

•95

ASSUMED N.H. ASSUMEC ASSUMEDHAS. HAB. HAB.

No. 11APART TWO STOREY,

C I ROOFED,BRICK & W.B. RESIDENCE

FLAT ROOFEDBRICK EXTENSION

G.I. ROOFEDBRICK BUNGALOW

DRIVE

4.326

SD

GARAGE

CONCRETEDRIVE

CONCRETEDRIVE

=.1

CONCRETEDRIVE

0010 0<

0en111 <0 CO1=− 0

8 −A−1

SITE T.B.M.ALUMIN. RIVET

RL : 4.09

;SE RPIT

GAT0 BE REMO. ED

MELALEUCA5 H

0.1 ROOFGE

DRIVE

PALINGS

1.85H

NEPEAN HWY. 150m \(NEAREST STREET CORNER) /

BONBEACH TRAINSTATION • 400m

ST. JOSEPH'SPRIMARY • 11cm

•

PICKETS ON BRICK 1.559

GARAGE BALCONY

CLEARROOFED

11,714

No. 12

PART TWO STOREYTILED, BRICK &W.B RESIDENCE

2 239

ELALE JCA49

2 719

,1,219)r_

CLEAR ROOFEDPARTLY ENCLOSED

OUTDOOR AREA

5 949

,ZikR(4,‘

POS

0.1 ROOFEDGARAGE

POS

•PALINGS 1.8 H•

DRIVE

No. 10

PART TWO STOREYG.I ROOFED

BRICK RESIDENCE

−

,

2 4 MAY 2016

BRICK 0.9 H

No. 8PART TWO STOREY

G.I ROOFEDCEMENT RENDERED

RESIDENCE

LEGEND:

VEGETATION TOES REMOVED

EXISTING VEGETATION

− s SEWER

− s w STORM WATER

− w WATER

ELECTRICITY

− T −TELECOM

GASG —THERMOSTAT AT 1500mm HIGH

DUCTED VACUUM SYSTEM

• SMOKE DETECTOR

• EXHAUST FAN

PROECT: ACORES&

−iiillr LOWEARCHITECTURE

69 Beach RoadMentone Vdoria 3194

T 9271 8800F 9271 8888

do@loweconcomauAW, 57 006 338 692

ADDITIONAL DWELLING 20 WILLAMS GROVE, BONBEACHCLENT' Robert & Diana SilvaCUENT 93NATURE & CATE

MELWAYS REF: 97 B4 SCALE 1:200 @ AZ'ORAVVINGSETE PLAN − EXISTING

DWGN"

TP−01REVGION: A

.. 08,08/2012p.T..: 277 WLCOUNCL. KingstonDRAWN BY: Ki ISSUE:

TOVVN PLANNINGMODIFED BY: IQ& PLOT DATE 23/05/16

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

0 2bWillima_fits.110212.22alettee

eva

BITUMENCARPARK

013−

4,94'

METERS

− −EXISTINGCROSSOVER −

opBITUMENCARPARK

SSUMEDHAB.

TOPSTOREY

POS

> −0

t'S


UNITS


4−1*

TTERBOXES

,s1 6,55781

6 806

XISTING BRICK WALL 2.

0 ENTRY

/9 103 No. 11A

, . ! >−I >− PART TVVO STOREY,z cc is 0.1 ROOFED,

1 0 0 o o BRICK & W.B. RESIDENCEco

o 1.−.<

:−c r,

ASSUMEDHAB.

«1"

No. 16−18

0

73° 37' 50" 42.17

253° 750" 42.67

ASSUMED N.H ASSUMECHAB. I−IAB.

G I ROOFEDBRICK BUNGALOW

ASSUMEDHAB.



UNITS

GROVE8$,

DRIVE

C.1

4,326

GARAGE

a

La−

a

EXISTINGCROSSOVER

>t..7PICKETS ON BRICK 1 . 5 H I PALINGS 1 8 H

GA GEBALCPUI

PART TWO STOREYTILED, BRICK &W.B RESIDENCE

NO WINDOWS TO FIRSTFLOOR 1 x NH ON GROUND

PALINGS 1,95 H

a,t....b SITE T.B.M.

ALUMIN. RIVET

oRL : 4.09

ItPALINGS 1.95 H CONCRETE

t

• SE , , R .

e ,,− WATERPIT

_<t• 2.719 /

TANKv ,i,t, cs\

.L E T A O ) CLEAR ROOFED

v v.

WATERPARTLY ENCLOSED

',RENDRED FENCE 0 , _' /..

−11−eN

− 3 −

OUTDOOR AREAC i t i k1

PROIOSED 2m H 8 _ _ _ _ _ _ − _ _ _ . / Y I−

s I − − − −−, „ , „ , , , ,'

‘ , JALFRESCO1̀..,,7−

„''''. , ., w

PROPOSED0 SEWER,DETAILS:

x w . .

f?'OS It2I I Z)

4.1.1

29 − − −−I LT

0,' .'2

..

5CC:QRNI:CE14 RE D−2'RWEAT:rE,

0

−. −

r

11.1 6_...,,,so .6:_i.2 sssiDEsz,PETH15: 0168, 8

OFFSET1,1 .50riL−−

NTR− .

< I ,

WATER l

6 3STORELNING METE i POS

F. j.11

Towsi.42 ,.....,',/ ..,__.], ,0 i • a− )

s p i t R DETAILS:

POS 0 i t − .,„„L..

0 FSET 1,75ri

0 4 1 M 1 1

.0

DEPTH: /0BED 21

II ' ' 000 r . , zSIZE 1500

13ED−2 −

1 3 , 1 ‘ A i l e −.19411 " LE.,

.. S S −I ,

I

a ,

Jr−1J,

−11C−Iiiliel9

IlirMELA_ _LE: CA

_

5 H 5.949

CLEARROOFED

tr,

CONCRETEDRIVE

0.1 ROOF

ELALE CA4H

TREE PROTECTIONZONE TBC

11,714

0.1 ROOFEDGARAGE

POS

No. 10

PART TWO STOREYG.I ROOFED

BRICK RESIDENCE

'ADRIVE

HORNINGSUN

2 M A Y 2016

BRICK 0.9 H

No. 8PART TWO STOREY

r; RODRFDC A R E A SCHEDULE

UNIT 1GROLND FLOOR 74.89m.GARAGE 35.59m.FRET FLOOR 10345m.FF CECKS 1721m.ROOF−TOP DECK 54.48m'TOTAL 285.62m.POS (TOTAL) 8232m.

MIT 2GROUND FLOOR 73.45m°GARAGE 45.69m.FRET FLOOR 10526m.FF DECKS 18.000i°ROOF−TO, DECK 52114m.TOTAL 2952869POS (TOTAL) 86.68m°

UNIT 3GROUND FLOOR 7079m.FRST FLOOR 87.59m.FRET FLOOR DECKS 12.01m°GARAGE 36.69m'TOTAL 207.0869POS (TOTAL) 50.61m*

SITE AREA 638.850SITE PERNEABLITY: 14178e 222%

TOTAL SITE COVERAGE: 397.9369 62%

LEGEND:

„

VEGETATION TO BE REMOVED

EXISTING VEGETATION

− s SEWER

STORM WATER

− w WATER

ELECTRICITY

− T −TELECOM

−GAS

− G

E THERMOSTAT AT 1500mm HIGH

0 DUCTED VACUUM SYSTEM

• SMOKE DETECTOR

• EXHAUST FAN

NOTES:

VEHICLE CROSSINGS CONSTRUCTED TO COUNCIL'S ANDVIC ROADS STANDARDS.

DIMENSIONS & LEVELS SHOWN ARE SUBJECT TOSURVEYORS SITE SURVEY. ALL LEVELS TAKEN FROMA.H.D.

GLASS:ALL GLASS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.S 1288

SMOKE DETECTORS:SMOKE DETECTORS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER B.C.A VOL.2. PART 3.7.2.

EXHAUST FANS:DUCTED TO EXTERNAL AIR AS PER B.C.A VOL. 2 PART3.8.5.2 (c)

ARTICULATION JOINTS AS PER ENGINEERING

LOWEi l l r i _ i _ l i

ARCHITECTURE

69 Beach RoadMentone Victoria 3194

T9271 8800F 9271 8888

i n f a lojeos.6.o nf.3.o8miti

PRO,ECT:

ADDITIONAL DWELLINGADDRESS:

20 WILLIAMS GROVE, BONBEACHCLENT: Robert & Diana SilvaCLEM' SISKATIRE 8 DATE

M3BAYS REF 97 B4 Ar.41 r. 1200 @A2 DilAwNG:

srrE PLAN − DESIGN RESPONSEDWG N1:

TP−02REVISION: A

4),DATE. 08/08/2012rsoEcrtf: 277 VVLODUACL KingstonDRAM BY Kj ssue TOVVN PLANNINGMOWED BY: Kmc PLOT DATE 23/05/16

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

fEXISTING 7I

CROSSOVER

RUBBISHBINS

POWERPOLE

c,<<−e9,e'


PROPOSED 2m HIGH PALING FENCEWATER MER

COMMON PROPERTY LINE− −LETTERBOXES

UNIT 1− 6.557

GARAGE

EXISTING BRICK WALL 2.6 H

ILO I; i i i r s i n ,

e7.70.7_

x I ,

ul

s−1

co 8 1. .< i I ''.',F, (GARAGE 'r

6.0m x 5.5m ,−−I

0L I . I

1..Z 17.C: I

.−.1.=−−

. 8 IAn 5,200L UNDERGROUNDur EXPOSED AGGREGATE

."−

.I I − WATER TANK CONNECTED

CONCRETE DRIVEWAY M,

I TO TOILETS FOR FLUSHING0 , ' , 0 I

__A

. v . HI−

_fl /− ._

I PORCHor 13mx15m

6 806 _I −−a−−−−..;Lu

− −RUBBISH−

UNIT 2

BANKS!4110

OPOSED 2m HIGH PALING FENCE

5,23X

7 022

TcR

N4'<'

9.103

ENTRY5.5m x 1 5m

'GARAGE", 6.0m x 5.6m 2.4n1NS.

T L

− 5,200L UNDERGROUND− WATER TANK CONNECTED

_ A TO TOILETS FOR FLUSHING

27,770

6100 ENTR2m x 2 5

F L.51

NO WINI;OWSTO FIRST

FLOOR 1 x NH ON GROUND

73°3750" 42.17

DEGICLINrADOVSHR

R97!,BED 3

3.6m x 3.1m

1 [16 PROVISION PD

FOR LIFT

−

>−0

TOP

STOREY

8,400WALL LENGTH ON BOUNDARY

ASSUMEDHAB

NOTE:WINDOW IS NOT NORTH

FACING DUE TO ITSPOSITION MORE THAN 20°

WEST OF TRUE NTH

TOP

STOREY

STUDY2 1m x 2.5m

PROVISIONFOR LIFT

cibPROPOSED m HIGH PALING FENCE

LLOIM−M INF

BED 23.6m x 3.5m

LDY6m 2 arr

WIR1 9m x 1.6m

LDY60 x 33,

g COM

TAP

BATH30m, x00m

DECK L NE ABOVE00

CLaIHESLINL__

PROPOSED 2m HIGH PALING FENCE

P−1

WIR2.7m x 1.6m

BED 24.4m x 3.5m

−1r

ASSUMEDHAS.

No. 11A

PART TWO STOREY,G.I ROOFED,

BRICK & WE. RESIDENCE

N.H. ASSUMEDHAB.

N PROPERTY LINE

−<

f (3000

P.O.S)6.14 m2

11_

SHEDSTORE6m'.MIN.

, P.O.S122.14 m2

3 000

Sc

r.r.r

POS

PALINGS 1.95 H

14.400

,tibPROPOSED ZT HIGH RENDERED FENCE',

111111

06

I aALFRESCO I −"3.7m x 3 7m 1_

P.O.S r−

20.16 m24 * _

rr−csr./

A−1


RL : 4.09

CONCRETEDRIVE

EXPOSED AGGREGATE ICONCRETE DRIVEWAY

. .−i− G520−0EURDER OUND[

1

− WATER TANK C NNECTEDTO TOILETS FO FLUSHING FLOOR LINE ABOVE In

STU YLIVING 1 6m x 2m3.4m x 3.7m

lATH

3 9m x 27m'

ASSUMEDRAE.

NOTE:WINDOW IS NOT NORTH

FACING DUE TO ITSPOSITION MORE THAN 20°

WEST OF TRUE NTH


LBED 28.6m x 3.7m

I− − −I


LOWEARCHITECTURE


T9271 8800P9271 8888

[email protected] M 57 006 338 692

PRUCT

ADDITIONAL DWELLING 20 WILLIAMS GROVECLENT: Rober t & Diana Silva

CLEM' 8131,WRRE 6 DUE

_

PORCH− − − −11111.6m x 1.2m

M −−−N,

2.719

LETTERBOX

−±

E N T R Y120

5.6"x 6−1„...m II1.5m x/1.9m

, F F L 4 5 1 I D−LjIn

LDY− 1.7m xam

ETTING 2400mm HI

CONCRETEDRIVE

II1HI−SIINI−

H BRICK FENCE

AELWAYS REF 9 7 B4 SCALE

PROVIDE6M. MIN. I

I −2 I

STORAGE I .5,LF.F.L.4 42 I In

I 7RUBSSI−1„.SINS I

I

−5−

−"GARAGE 5,00R 2400 x 4800

P.O.S18.41m2

RUBBISH1− BINS

A.

MELALEUCA5 H

G.I ROOFEDBRICK GA E

−

P POSED 200ING FENCE


OUTDOOR AREA

POS

TREE PROTECTIONZONE TBC

11,714

FT−−;

2i MAY 2016

BY:−tioownrgame−−−− −GROUND FLOOR PLANDATE CREATED 08/08/2012 PROECTN°: 2 7 7 WI_

COUNCL Kingston CRAIAN BY. K.1

MODFED BY: KM PLOT DATE 23/05116

LSSUE:TOWN PLANNING

LEGEND:


EXISTING VEGETATION

s SEWER

STORM WATER

w WATER

ELECTRICITY

T TELECOM

GAS

THERMOSTAT AT 1500mm HIGH

0 DUCTED VACUUM SYSTEM

• SMOKE DETECTOR

• EXHAUST FAN

NOTES:VEHICLE CROSSINGS CONSTRUCTED TO COUNCIL'S ANDVIC ROADS STANDARDS.

DIMENSIONS 8, LEVELS SHOWN ARE SUBJECT TOSURVEYOR'S SITE SURVEY. ALL LEVELS TAKEN FROMA.H.D.

GLASS:ALL GLASS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.S 1288

SMOKE DETECTORS:SMOKE DETECTORS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER B.C.A VOL.2. PART 3.7.2.



DWGN°:

TP−03

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

EXISTINGCONCRETE

DRIVE

POWERPOLE


E

−I UNIT 1 I "f 5,729f 4,504

4.840

6,071

UNIT 2−I

5.230

DECli11. x 4.4n

DECKNo x 4.7p

oc)

9:31>.9−N4'

No. 11A

9,103

GARAGE

BRICK WALL 2.6 H

.ks• <<4;i41,4, I

LIVING3 2m x 4.8m

LIVING3.2m x 5.1m

c.r

IP TOROO,pp

4 5m x 2.8r−,

FEL769

CONCRETEDRIVE

NOWINDOWS

TO FIRSTFLOOR 1 x NH ON GROUND

PALINGS 1.95 H

PALINGS

1.95H

11 166

A−1


RL : 4.09

PALINGS 1.95 H

4.P73 37 s r 42.17

OPEN 7PERGOLABELOW _ J 1.7m HIGH SCREEN NOT

−EXCEED 25%−TRANSPA13E−NOY

P.O.S11 70 m=

KIT DECK4 Om x 2.9m

OWN TO

OWN TO

PROVISIONFOR LIFT

(−1BED 1

4.3m x 3.7m•

LINEN

LINEN

__FOR LIFT WIRPROVISION

24nr11117m 0

2171YAM

SHRJ

.2.4m x 1.7m

UP TOROOFTOP

KIT4.5m x 2.8m

1 = =ASSUMED

HAB

TOP

STOREY

DECK4.0m x 2.9m

−

P.O.S11.70 m2

1.7m HIGH SCREEN NOT TO(−0− EXCEED 25% TRANSPARENCY

SHR

EN2,7m x 1.7m

BED 14.3m a 3,7m

253 37' 50" 42.67

ASSUMEDHAB.

PART TWO STOREYG.I ROOFED,


N.H ASSUMEDHAB.

XCEED 25% TRANSPARE CTI

z, w

1 916t

z gz cn

0 .

I 212 .LIY' g0 1−

−± .E it

− x 4 465

1 466

1,916

−P.O.S

12.04m2

450mm PAVE' −T

1,420

m04.lm

CONCRETEDRIVE

4501w1 EAVE

OPENPERGOLAABOVE

_ LIVIN

SEWERPIT

1E −1,?W/−

DININC4 Om x 4.2m

/ 7− −

\ \

−

,o\

\

PDR.1m.X2.7m−

−K I T

2

UNIT 3

1,940

\1

.„,„\ ,ENS 1innn 1.7m x 2 7m

1.9m x 2.7m \_,s,

−E7,. V . I M )413M

\

E

375,11 RAVE

C•2

ASSUMEDHAS.


Q I I I e

ARCHITECTURELOWE


T9271 8800F 9271 8888

inflowecon.comau'AM.• 57 006 338 692

PRCIECT

ADDITIONAL DWELLINGAEOREEE

450mm EAVE

NC CONDENSORUNIT

2 239

2,719


OUTDOOR AREA

0.1 ROOFEDBRICK GARAGE

11.714

24 MAY 2016

20 WILLIAMS GROVEa−Ewr, Robert & Diana SilvaCLENT SIGNATURE &DATE

M1WAYS REF 97 E340(41 F' r t e r Z Wtirti aFIRST FLOOR PLANDATECREATED 08/08/2012PROJECT N.': 277 WL

LEGEND:


EXISTING VEGETATION

− s SEWER

− s w STORM WATER

− w WATER

ELECTRICITY

T TELECOM

AS− G −

G

E THERMOSTAT AT 1500mm HIGH

814,

DUCTED VACUUM SYSTEM

SMOKE DETECTOR

EXHAUST FAN

NOTES:VEHICLE CROSSINGS CONSTRUCTED TO COUNCIL'S ANDVIC ROADS STANDARDS.

DIMENSIONS 11 LEVELS SHOWN ARE SUBJECT TOSURVEYOR'S SITE SURVEY. ALL LEVELS TAKEN FROMA.H.D.

GLASS:ALL GLASS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A S 1288

SMOKE DETECTORS:SMOKE DETECTORS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER B.0 A VOL.2. PART 3.7.2.



COUNCL: KingstonDRAM BY: KJMODFED BY: KAt PLOT DATE 23/05/16

ISSIE:TOWN PLANNING

DIA/G :

REVISION, A

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

EXISTINGCROSSOVER

1.>

POWERPOLE

J,


tib

METAL DECK R9OF@2° PITCH

GARAGE

EXISTING BRICK WALL 2.6 H

•cl•

' − ' b METAL DECK ROOF2° PITCH

UNIT 1

6 769

METAL DECK ROOF@2° PITCH

UNIT 2


5.230

7 014

7,022

ctr.,

9,103

Pos

NO WINDOWS TO FIRSTFLOOR 1 >i NH ON GROUND

CONCRETEDRIVEDRIVE

73°37'50" 42.17

III11111.1,117—METAL DECK ROOF

@2° PITCHHI _WWII 1.

700mm HIGH WALL

1700mm HIGH PARTY WALL

:12.;§E

P.O.S54.22 m2

TIMBER DECKING,

TIMBER DECKING

P.O.S54.12 m2

700mm HIGH WALL

1.0

PALINGS 1.95 H

1050mm HIGH GLASS BALUSTRADE

METAL DECK ROOF@ 2 PITCH ABOVE

1700mm HIGH PARTY WALL

METAL DECK ROOF@ 2° PITCH ABOVE

3.916

NC CONDENSORUNIT

A/C CONDENSORUNIT

13 916


H i l l I 11 I

c•−;


METAL DECK ROOF ,0 0 9 @2° PITCHMETAL DECK ROOF

1F− .1n

TOP

STOREY

1 = =ASSUMED

HAS.

TOP

STOREY

600 X 1200mmSKYLIGHTS

253°37'50" 42.67

P.19 TP P−1

ASSUMEDHAS,

No. 11A

PART TWO STOREY,G.I ROOFED,


N.H. ASSUMEDHAB.

OPEN PERGOLABELOW

CONCRETEDRIVE

40,

A−1

SITE 'ULM,ALUMIN. RIVET

RL : 4.09

SEWERPIT

UNIT 3


ASSUMEDHAS.


ETAL DECK RO20 PITCH

CONCRETEDRIVE

PALINGS

1.85H

2239

2,719

“0;

CLEAR ROOPARTLY ENCL

OUTDOOR A

POs


G.I ROOFEDBRICK GARAGE

5 949

11,714

•

24 Mp 2016

LOWE−1−iill! ARCHITECTURE

69 Beach RoadManteca Vdoria 3194

T 9271 8800F 9271 8888

infaiojeoco6on33.ontCLEW'

PROJECT:

ADDITIONAL DWELLINGADCRF−SS,

20 WILLIAMS GROVECLENT' Rober t & Diana Silva

SIGNATURE 00075

M1WAYS REF T r Bet SCALE 1:100 @A2 DRAW56:ROOF PLAN

TP−05,REVISM A

DIME CREATED 08/08/2012 PROECTNT 2 7 7 WL

COMM K ingston DMWN BY, CJ IS SUETOWN PLANNINGMOOf ED BY: KMc FLOTOME 23/05/16

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

0,1

R.L.+13.16

METAL DECK ROOF@ r PITCH

UNIT 1

C.L

F.L

C.L

R.L.+10.71

+7.68EL

C.L

C.LGARAGE

FL

F.LGARAGE

R.L.+4.51

EXISTING 1.2m HIGHBLUESTONE FENCE −

WEST ELEVATION>−re

C.L

R.L.+10.70EL p

C.L

EL R.L.+7.68p

C.L

s

Cs1

C.LGARAGE BL.2

EXISTINGBLUESTONEWALL

R L +451=

GARAGE

PROPOSED 2000mm HIGHPALING BOUNDARY FENCE −

SOUTH ELEVATION

C.L

F.L

C.L

375EAV

El

rAR−11−1METAL DECK ROOF@ 2° PITCH

R.L.+7.68

POWDERCOATEDALUMINIUM WINDOW

FINS

−TO PREVENT OVERLOOKING

UC−1

R.L.+4.51EL 77

0

AR−1

BR−1

^I

•

EL −−−−−−−−−−GARAGE 4800mm x 2400mm

TILT UP GARAGE DOOR −

NORTH ELEVATION

1AR−1

UNIT 2

−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−

AR−11 I AR−11 I

LC−11,

R.L.+13.16'77

C.L

R.L.+10.71 F.L

−1AR−21

, METAL DECK ROOF@ 2° PITCH

4800mm x 2400mmSECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR

'1AR−1− N.G.L ON BOUNDARY 4800mm x 2400mm

SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR

[AR,

N.G.L

UNIT 3

METAL DECK ROOF@ 20° PITCH

AR−21

8 400WALL LENGTH ON BOUNDARY

LC−1

450I I I N I

45011111

− AR−1

1.00.

PROPOSED 2000mm HIGHo c k i n c o c n O f , A D V C0,1,3

POWDERCOATEDALUMINIUM SCREEN −NOT EXCEEDING 25%TRANSPARENY

METAL DECK ROOF450 @ r PITCH

IIlEAVE

METAL DECK ROOF_ @ 2° PITCH

CO

UNIT 2

R.L.+7.68_FL

C.L

C.LGARAGE

0.1

R.L.+4.51 F.L

8

c.11

GARAGE —

PROPOSED PRIVACY SCREENINGNOT TO EXCEED 25% TRANSPARENCY

CLOTHESLINE

AR−2

BL−2

NC CONDENSORUNIT

−AXCfd

1BL−2

AR−1

'et

R.L.*13.16

C.L

CO

METAL DECK ROOFUNIT 2 r© PITCH

NC CONDENSOR − AR−1 −

R.L.+10 71F.L

CL

C.L

METAL DECK ROOF−@ 2° PITCH

BL−2

EAST ELEVATIONMETAL DECK ROOF@2 PITCH

− N C CONDENSOR UNIT '

AR−1

LC−2

−1R−21—

PROPOSED2000mm HIGH−PALING BOUNDARY FENCE

I AR−2

UNIT 3


UNIT 1

− A/C CONDENSOR

1AR−2− AR−2

450. 5011 V E

I I

I NI 11 ittEAV

cca.1 T T : I


)1'

NOT TO EXCEED 25% TRANSPARENCYAR−11

UNIT 111.C−1

I LC−2

1AR−1

AR−2

[ I Hi, Fri

METAL DECK ROOF(gr PITCH

I

11

11111I 1 , '1

1− • .. • . • . .. • − •

I

R.L.+13.16

I\

−.‘,− C.L li[

_METAL DECK feooF@ 2' PITCH I oo

c.i

BL−2

N.G.L ON BOUNDARY H AR−2

r 7 1 7−1 ^77,

375−OA

AR−1

UC 1

− CLOTHESLINE

GLASS BALUSTRADETO ROOFTOP TERRACE

PROPOSED 2000mm HIGH0.3111.111ADV 11,1/2 C31,,C

EL −2N.G. L ON BOUNDARY

BL−2 AR−1 OPEN PERGOLA−ON BOUNDARY BR−1

AX0.1

AR−2METAL DECK ROOF@ 2° PITCH

EXISTING BRICK WALLON BOUNDARY

ARA

− Lc−11

BL−21

C.L

NC CONDENSOR UNIT

R.L.+7.68sz_ F.L

R.L.+10.717 7 FL

C.L

1−x(..D o

c−J

x −...

zcc7 6 R.L.+7.68−.5 4 EL

\co

CNI

c41

C.L

R.L.+4.51 F.L

F.L 8GARAGE

R.L.+13.15

_ _1

m,A.L.+10.70

−−1−F.L o_4_ m−−,

4.2.L.+7.68

C.L

C.L

i.

EXISTING C.LGARAGEH − BLUESTONE

1 WALL omm<V

R.L.+4.517 7 F.L

PROPOSED 2000mm HIGH • GARAGEBOUNDARY PALING FENCE

2 4 MAY 2016

C.L

C•1

R.L.+4.517 7 EL

LOWEi l l r

ARCHITECTURE


T8271 8800F 9271 8888

infakno6n3c,o38m.6r2

CI

ADDITIONAL DWELLINGADDRESS

20 WILLIAMS GROVECLIENT' Rober t & Diana Silva

CUBIT SIGNATURE &DATE

MELWAYS REF 97 B,4SCA P 1:100 @A2 DRAWING

ISSUE

ELEVATI*1,−.

DWG NI:

TP 06REVSION

464EWE CREATED, 08/08/2012PROJECT N° 277 WLCOUNCIL KingstonCRAM RC KJ TOVVN PLANNINGMODIFIED BY Kw FLOT DATE 23/05/16

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

2

PF−1

C.L

POWDERCOATEDALUMINIUM SCREENNOT EXCEEDING 25%TRANSPARENY

R.L.+7.68F.L

8 r C.L

CV

CV

EL

PF−1

WEST ELEVATION U3

C.L

UNIT 3METAL DECK ROOF@ 2 V PITCH

...‘ilifill1161111111111111111111110.111111111111e...

B

METAL DECK ROOFLC−1 @ r PITCH

1 I I−1 '

NC CONDENSOR UNIT —

L−1

UNIT 3

METAL DECK ROOF@ 20° PITCH

III

.111111

LC−1

METAL DECI•1 ROOF@ 2° PITCH

R.L.+7.68F.L

C.L

R.L.+4.51F.L pLFo •GARAGE BL−1

CDEAST ELEVATION UNIT 3

L ci/r

T j T− IT IT−71−717

1L_L_111

iBL−11−

6440WALL LENGTH ON BOUNDARY

=_ I

_• •

r L L I __L,I,−,,−−; ' , ,−,,i_t ,j r1 I 1 _L.,.

.___, < ,

I I I I rI 0 t_, 1 I 1 04,170

WALL LENGTH ON BOUNDARY

−1LC−1

1AR−11

jPF−1

PP−1

C.L

R.L.+7.68 EL

BL−11

C.L

C‘i

R.L.+4.51 EL\

ALUMINIUM FINS TOPREVENT OVERLOOKING

C.L

F.L

− N.G.L. ON BOUNDARY

C L 8,\

EL

24 MAY ?.016

B Y :

FINISHES SCHEDULE:AR ACRYLIC RENDER

BL BLOCKWORK

BR BRICKWORK

PF PAINT FINISH

ST STONE

RC ROUGHCAST RENDER

SR SMOOTH CEMENT RENDER

TC TIMBER CLADDING

PLY PLY CLADDING

SC SHADOWCLAD

TSC TIMBER SLATS CLADDING

UC ULTRACLAD

ALC ALUMINIUM CLADDING

CRT CORTEN STEEL

ZNC ZINC CLADDING

AXC JH SCYON AXON CLADDING

LC JH SCYON LINEA CLADDING

MXC JH SCYON MATRIX CLADDING

GAL BALUSTRADE

SCR − SCREEN

NOTE: REFER SPECIFICATION SECTION 11FOR COLOUR SELECTION

69 Beach Road

LOWE Mentone Victccie 3194T 9271 8800.

PROECT

ADDITIONAL DWELLINGADDRESS

20 WILLAMS GROVECteff Rober t & Diana Silva

CLIENT SIGNATURE & DATE

IELWAYS REP 9 7 94 SCALE 1 1 0 0 @A2 DRAWINGELEVATION6

DNG N°

TP−07REVISION

DATE CREATED 08/08/2012 P'ROECT N°' 2 7 7 WL

_,\ P9271 8888

ARCHITECTURE i n f i a b5w7 eocoo6ngnatCOUNCIL' Kingston [WARN BT, Kt BSUE:

TOVVN PLANNINGMODFED BY: ki,ik FLOT DATE 23/05/16

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

;TINGSOVER

POWERPOLE

eva

e9ep`b


5 230g10

,\°,,flx

7022

9 103

GARAGE

EXISTING BRICK WALL 2 6

0−0

9AM

ASSUMEDHAB


04<,

73° 37 50" 42.17

255" 37 50" 4267

ASSUMED NI−1 ASSUMESHAB. HAS.


0.1 ROOFED,BRICK & W.B RESIDENCE

−4(RPOS I

I <

x−

1 PALINGS 1.95 IL,/

ASSUMEDHAB


A−1

SITE T.B..ALUMIN, RIVET ec_

RL 4.09 2 239

cPeoNO WINDOWS TO FIRST

OR GROUND FLOOR

CONCRETE IDRIVE • SEWER I

PIT 17, 2 710−

C',\ \−−−−, CLEAR ROOFED/6 Ia PARTLY ENCLOSED

CONCRETEDRIVE

11.714

OUTDOOR AREA

POS


0,GARAGE

<u°11161°

XISTING BRICK WALL 2 6 H

0

73° 37' 50" 42.17


055.

POS

cc

PALINGS 1.95 H

Lu

a\I

;TIkUSOVF,

0.1

aPOWER −;55 215• POLE /

<zr5.

9103

7 022

I mII y

6

I "ATIC6

,

,

3PM

ASSUMED

53 6'0 253° 37' 50" 42.67

ASSUMED N.H. ASSU1s1ECHAS NAB

No. 11A

− PARLDNOSTOREYG.I ROOFED.

BRICK & W.8 RESIDENCE

ASSUMEDHAB.


PALINGS

1.95H

CONCRETEDRIVE

C071CRETEDRIVE

A−1

I o, SITE T.B.M. I z1ALUMIN. RIVET ' •••141_

RL:409 2239

• SEWERPIT− 2 719

CLEAR ROOFED 7PARTLY ENCLOSE)

OUTDOOR AREA

SEVER1f7111−1'

5 9,1"−


11 714

POS

G I RIGAF

3 4 1 r

ARCHITECTURELOWE

89 Beach RoadMentone Viloria 3194

T9271 8860F 9271 81388

infoAbwecon.comauA M 57 CO6 338 692

CT

ADDITIONAL DWELLING

C11e− opok43

PPOOWLEER1 5 —

_ .4<c,−−5−230

‘7171−x 11−C,711'

7,022

GARAGE0,

LO

EXISTING BRICK WALL 2

9.103

>

ASSUMEDHAB

12 NOON


73°37'50 42.17

IL253' 37' 50" 42.67

"K.

POS

−Sc«Y'c,c5

PALINGS 1.95 H

ASSUMED NH ASSUMEDHAB.

_ _HAB/


0.1 ROOFED,BRICK & W.B. RESIDENCE

HAS


PALINGS

1.95H

A−1

SITE T.B.MALUMIN. RIVET <1

RL : 4.09 /2,239

CONCRETE153

DRIVE• SEWER

PIT

6‘.

CONCRETEDRIVE

/ 2,715


11 714z


OUTDOOR AREA

1.1− −24 MAY 2015

113

POS

a l RC −GAF

ADDRESS

20 WILLIAMS GROVECLENT Robert & Diana SilvaCLIENT SIGNATURE & DATE

AELWAYS REF 97 B4 SCALE 1200 ©A2DATE CREATED. 08/08/2012 PROECT N° 2771NL

DRAVViNGSHADOW DIAGRAMS

COUNCL. Kingston CRAWN EF KJMODFED BK K k t ROT EIATE 23/05/16

ISSUETOWN PLANNING

DWG N°:

Tp_08REVLSION 0

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

BIORETENTIONSYSTEM6.09 m2

aa',

CRAZY PAVING —8.43 m2


73 3T 50 2.17

SEWERPIT

irdIrd'er.sks−AlerwAGrAiAldrAIr.draitifiraggrAtii.

I

−F 711

520010 UNDERGROUNDWATER TANK CONNECTED

• TO ALL TOILETS FOR FLUSHING / \

• EXPOSED ADD.' −CONCRETE DRIVEWAY

73.90 rill

520010 UNDERGROUNDWATER TANK CONNECTED

.TO ALL TOILETS FOR FLUSHING

417.0f4refial


SANDY LOAM(FILTER MEDIA)

COURSE SAND(TRANSITION LAYER)

GRAVF_L(DRANAGE LAYER)

AG PIPE CONNECTED TOLEGAL POINT OF DISCHARGE

BIORETENTION SYSTEM1:1021 1:10

−

cc

FFL 4.51

EF1.4.51

Ii

COLOURED BIORETENTIONCONCRETE SYSTEM

9.26m' 1 26 m2A'

2s3 37 s r 42.67

5200ItrUNDERGROUNDWATER TANKCONNECTED TO ALLTOILETS FOR FLUSHING

−I−

COLOUREDCONCRETE —/

12.24M'

EXPOSED ADD.CONCRETE DRIVEWAY

40.77m1

I I−−1

1k I I

• F 4.5:71

I14.3

FFL442

— te

1I'• 1

1

UP

COLOUREDCONCRETE

7.47m2

Melbourne STORM Rating ReportWaterTransactionID: 295633

Municipality: KINGSTON

Rainfall Station: KINGSTON

Address: 20 Williams Grove

Bonbeach

VIC 3196

Assessor: Lowe Construction

Development Type: Residential − Multiunit

Allotment Site (m2): 638.85

STORM Rating %: 121


Description Impervious Area Treatment Type Treatment Occupants! Treatment % Tank Water(m2) Area/Volume Number Of Supply

(m2 or L) Bedrooms Reliability (%)


Driveways 114.67 Infiltration Sandy Loam 12.47 220.00 0.00

Roof Area 398.03 Rainwater Tank 6,000.00 7 85.80 95.60

Hard Paving 25.16 Infiltration Sandy Loam 4.20 0 220.00 0.00

Date Generated: 12−Dec−2015 Program Version: 1.0.0

24 MAY 2016

−1.1−111P1_1_ LOWEARCHITECTURE


T 9271 8800F 9271 8888

intavtoor.gn692,

PROECT:

ADDITIONAL DWELLINGADCRESS:

20 WILLIAMS GROVE, BONBEACHCI−ENE

Robert & Diana SilvaMINT SEMTLRE & CWIE

M1WAYS REF: 97 B4 SCALE

1:100DEAWIC:

W.S.U.D RANDWG kr:

TP−09REVISION 0

nA7EcREA7so08/08/2012pRoEcnr: 277 WLCGLIIICL: KingstonDRAWN SY, Kj ISSLE

TOWN PLANNINGMOWED BY KM RAT DUE 23/05/16

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

.c

2

Z1

UNIT 2

SECTION

SECTION

UNIT 2

UNIT 1

NATURAL GROUND LINE

UNIT 1

NATURAL GROUND LINE

§i

9,000

2 4 MAY 2 016

− 1 − l i r _ 1 −

ARCHITECTURELOWE

69 Beach RoadMentone Victori3 3194

T 9271 8800F 9271 8888

i n f a b5yncon.c38omai

PRO,ECT

ADDITIONAL DWELLINGADDRESS.

20 WILLIAMS GROVECUENT: Robert & Diana SilvaCLIENT SIGNATURE 8 DATE

MELWAYS REF: 97B4 SCALE 1:100 @A2 DRAWINGSECTIONS

Tp_10REVISION: 0

4174DA1E CREATED 09/99/292 PRCLECT N°, 277 INLCOUNCIL KingstonCRAM BY: KJ ISSUE

TOVVN PLANNINGMOWED BY KMc PLOT GATE 23/05/16

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws

6,769

7,014

5.230

7,022

638.90


Ap

„2−47>ir

C*.k

9,103

TOP

STOREY

ASSUMEDHAB.

TOP

STOREY

30

NOWIN6OWS

TO FIRSTFLOOR 1 NH ON GROUND

rn

CONCRETEDRIVE

73°37'50" 42.17

4.0",/kir de' 4 0 = it/

/

253°37'50" 42.67

ASSUMEDHAB.

No. 11A

PART TWO STOREY,0.1 ROOFED,

BRICK 8, W.B. RESIDENCE

N.H. ASSUMEDHAB.

PALINGS 1.95 H

ASSUMEDHAB.


CONCRETEDRIVE


RL: 4.09

SEWERPIT

CONCRETEDRIVE

G.I ROOFEDBRICK GARAGE

2 239

2 719

11.714

1B.

24 MAY ZU16


OUTDOOR AREA

POS

5.949

AREA SCHEDULEUNIrl

GROUND FLOORGARAGE

74.89m'35.59rif

FRST FLOOR 103.45m°FF DECKS 1721m°ROOF−TOP DECK 54A8m°TOTAL 285.62WPOS (TOTAL) 82320

UNIT 2GROUND FLOOR 73.494°GARAGE 45694°FRST FLOOR 10526m°FF DECKS 18.04MROOF−TOP DECK 52.84MTOTAL 295294?POS (TOTAL) 86.680

UNIT 3GROIN) FLOOR 70.79MFIRST FLOOR 8759MFRST FLOOR DECKS 12.01MGARAGE 36.69m'TOTAL 207.08m'POS (TOTAL) 50.61m'

SITE AREA,: 638.85MSITE PERWABLITY: 141.78nf 222%

TOTAL SITE COVERAGE 397.93m' 62%

LOWEARCHITECTURE

69 F3each RckadMentone Victoria 3194

T 9271 8800F 9271 8888

t r i a kg v7v oeco,o6n3sm9i

FRQECT,

ADITIONAL DWELLINGADDRESS:

20 WILLAMS GROVE, BONBEACHCLEW: Robert & Diana Silva

CLENT SONATLRE &DATE

NELWAYS REF 97 B4 SCALE 1:100 DRAVVNGSFE COVERAGE

WIG N°:

TP−11REVGON 0

.. 08/08/2012PRaEcT • 277 WLComm KingstonCRAM BT K,1 ISSUE

TOVVN PLANNING1

NONE) BY: Kivb FLOT DATE 23/05/16

Advert

ising

Doc

umen

tation

May

Be S

ubjec

t To C

opyri

ght L

aws