4
Notes on the i3 Applications Received Summary Document 1. The information in this summary is based primarily on the supplemental Applicant Information Sheets submitted by applicants to the i3 grant program; because not all applicants submitted an Applicant Information Sheet, the summary that follows does not necessarily include all applications in all summary data. 2. Inclusion of an application in the summary data that follows does not ensure that the application will be considered eligible for an award, or that the application will be funded by the Department of Education. 3. Inclusion of an application in this summary information is not an endorsement of an organization, idea, program, or product, and the Department does not validate or guarantee the accuracy of this information. The data are provided in this summary solely for the convenience of the public.

Notes on the i3 Applications Received Summary Document 1.The information in this summary is based primarily on the supplemental Applicant Information Sheets

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Notes on the i3 Applications Received Summary Document 1.The information in this summary is based primarily on the supplemental Applicant Information Sheets

Notes on the i3 Applications Received Summary Document

1. The information in this summary is based primarily on the supplemental Applicant Information Sheets submitted by applicants to the i3 grant program; because not all applicants submitted an Applicant Information Sheet, the summary that follows does not necessarily include all applications in all summary data.

2. Inclusion of an application in the summary data that follows does not ensure that the application will be considered eligible for an award, or that the application will be funded by the Department of Education.

3. Inclusion of an application in this summary information is not an endorsement of an organization, idea, program, or product, and the Department does not validate or guarantee the accuracy of this information. The data are provided in this summary solely for the convenience of the public.

Page 2: Notes on the i3 Applications Received Summary Document 1.The information in this summary is based primarily on the supplemental Applicant Information Sheets

Competition Designation:

Applicant Type:

Absolute Priority Addressed:

Absolute Priority Scale-up Validation Total

Teacher or Principal Effectiveness 2 15 17

College & Career Ready Standards 1 16 17

Low- Performing Schools (Scale-up only) 1 n/a 1

STEM Education (Scale-up only) 0 n/a 0

Students with Disabilities (Validation only) n/a 4 4

Total 4 35 39

Funds Requested by Applicant Type

Non-profit w/ LEA $306,319,979

LEA $40,689,847

Non-profit w/ consortium $90,926,252

Total $437,936,078

Funds Requested by Competition

Scale-up $64,697,056

Validation $373,239,022

Total $437,936,078

Page 3: Notes on the i3 Applications Received Summary Document 1.The information in this summary is based primarily on the supplemental Applicant Information Sheets

Absolute Priority Designation Under the Rural Priority:

*Applicants applying under the rural priority must also address one of the other absolute priorities.

Competitive and Invitational Priorities Addressed:

*Applies exclusively to Validation grants under absolute priority one.

Priority Scale-up Validation

Teacher or Principal Effectiveness 2 4

College & Career Ready Standards 0 3

Students with Disabilities n/a 2

Total 2 9

Subpart Count

Teacher or Principal Effectiveness (subpart a): Models of induction & support 7

Teacher or Principal Effectiveness (subpart b): Extend highly effective teachers' reach 8

Total 15

Page 4: Notes on the i3 Applications Received Summary Document 1.The information in this summary is based primarily on the supplemental Applicant Information Sheets

ID Organization State Competition Designation1 Farmington Municipal Schools New Mexico Scale-up2 Higher Achievement Program, Inc. District of Columbia Scale-up3 North Carolina New Schools North Carolina Scale-up4 Success for All Foundation Maryland Scale-up5 826 National California Validation6 AppleTree Institute for Education Innovation, Inc. District of Columbia Validation7 Board of Regents, Univ of Nebraska, Univ of Nebraska-Lincoln NEBRASKA Validation8 Boys & Girls Club of North Central Georgia Georgia Validation9 Boys and Girls Club of America Georgia Validation10 District School Board of Pasco County Florida Validation11 Educational Testing Service New Jersey Validation12 Farmington Municipal Schools New Mexico Validation13 Higher Achievement Program, Inc. District of Columbia Validation14 Irwin and Florence Rosten Foundation Montana Validation15 Johns Hopkins University Maryland Validation16 KIPP Inc. Texas Validation17 Legacy Builders Foundation Georgia Validation18 Literacy Design Collaborative New York Validation19 Metropolitan Education Commission Arizona Validation20 National Academy Foundation New York Validation21 National Institute for School Leadership District of Columbia Validation22 National Math and Science Initiative Texas Validation23 New York University School of Medicine New York Validation24 Ohio Valley Educational Cooperative Kentucky Validation25 Ohio Valley Educational Foundation Kentucky Validation26 Old Dominion University Research Foundation Virginia Validation27 Southern Methodist University Texas Validation28 Successful Practices Network, Inc New York Validation29 Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station Texas Validation30 Texas A&M University Texas Validation31 The Regents of the University of California (Davis) California Validation32 THINK Together California Validation33 University of Central Oklahoma Oklahoma Validation34 University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc. Kansas Validation35 University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc. Kansas Validation36 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill North Carolina Validation37 Ventura County Office of Education California Validation38 Warwick Valley Central School District New York Validation39 WestEd California Validation

Applicant Organizations