38
Introduction to OJ Simpson Norway Crime and Justice Discussion OJ introduction

Norway Crime and Justice Discussion OJ introduction

  • View
    217

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • Norway Crime and Justice Discussion OJ introduction
  • Slide 2
  • What specifically is different about Norways C&J system? Should we adopt their model of the criminal justice system? WHY or Why not?
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Phil Vannatter
  • Slide 12
  • Police obtain enough evidence to put out a warrant for OJs arrest When OJ didnt turn himself in at a scheduled time, police went to his house POLICE FIND A LETTER
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Is Simpsons reaction to his exwifes murder typical of an innocent man? Admits he cut his finger the night of the murder No alabi Suicide note, slow car chase with weird communication with det. Lange, $8,750 cash, disguise, loaded gun, and passport There is much more evidence to come! HOW DOES HE GO FREE??!!!
  • Slide 15
  • Is on the Prosecution. Most prove BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT Protect the innocent/punish the guilty. Rather let guilty go free than imprison innocent person.
  • Slide 16
  • No weapon No confession No eyewitness Totality of circumstances Pieces of Puzzle
  • Slide 17
  • Prosecution needs to prove these to a jury. Means=how Motive=why Opportunity=window of time (no alibi)
  • Slide 18
  • Willful, deliberate, premeditated. 1 count for Nicole 1 count for Ronald
  • Slide 19
  • 1. Simpson was the person who stabbed Nicole and Ronald. 2. The stabbings were the cause of their deaths. Simpson intended to kill the victims. The killings were not committed on impulse, but were the result of planning, however brief.
  • Slide 20
  • Life in prison, no opportunity for parole. Could have been the death penalty, if the prosecution chose to.
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • 1. Filing the Case downtown 2. Prosecutors do not file for the death penalty
  • Slide 23
  • The Process Voir Dire Translation.. What is it? What is the objective? What do the defense Lawyers use to achieve this objective?
  • Slide 24
  • 3.) No use of Preemptory challenges 4.) Marcia Clark had the wrong idea regarding women on the jury
  • Slide 25
  • By Race: 9 black, 1 Hispanic, 2 white By Sex: 10 women, 2 men By Education: 2 college grads, 9 high school grads, 1 DROP OUT!
  • Slide 26
  • Opening Statements Prosecution Darden-(thesis) abusive husband who turned violent over jealousy Marcia Clark-(supporting details) overview of the evidence to come Defense Johnnie Cochran arthritis prevented OJ from committing these murders Evidence was contaminated, compromised, and ultimately corrupted
  • Slide 27
  • Nicoles Sister: Denise Brown Ron Ship 911 dispatcher Allan Park Kato Kaelin KEY EVIDENCE!
  • Slide 28
  • Mistake 5: Chris Darden has OJ try on the glove If the Glove dont fit, you must acquit
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Calling witnesses to the stand for days over..WHO KNOWS?!
  • Slide 31
  • Slide 32
  • Undermine the prosecutions evidence concerning motive Simpson was physically incapable of committing the crime Raise doubts about the timeframe Key evidence was either contaminated or planted by racist cops
  • Slide 33
  • Review: not present during interrogation Video produced by the prosecution taken shortly before the murders
  • Slide 34
  • Fuhrman testimony Henry Lees testimony If the glove dont fit, you must acquit Issue of race- RODNEY KING INCIDENT AND THE LA RIOTS OF 1992!
  • Slide 35
  • Record breaking Jury was sequestered for almost a year Prosecution Summation Defense Summation 3 HOURS!!! NOT GUILTY!!!!
  • Slide 36
  • Held in Santa Monica 3 months Simpson did not plead the 5th (clumsily trying to explain the unexplainable) New Judge does not allow race card to be played, or police conspiracy Jury concluded-using preponderance of the evidence test-OJ had wrongfully caused the death of Simpson and Goldman
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38