Northwest Mfg. WoodMaster, Inc. · 2018. 9. 17. · 6. Delmhorst J-2000 Wood Moisture Meter 7. Dayton 4c121 Blower for dilution tunnel -Emissions Booth #2 8. ScienTech Balance Scale

11785 SW Highway 212 – Suite 305 Clackamas, OR 97015-9050 (503) 650-0088 WWW.DIRIGOLAB.COM

Northwest Mfg. WoodMaster, Inc. Project # 033_HHW-059-1 Model: CleanFire 400 Type: Wood Fired Hydronic Heater April 26, 2016

EPA Certification Testing to Method 28WHH – Measurement of Particulate Emissions and Heating Efficiency of Wood Fired Hydronic Heating Appliances

Contact: Mr. Chuck Gagner 600 Polk Ave SW Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 (800) 932-3629 [email protected] www.woodmaster.com

Non CBI

http://www.dirigolab.com/

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.woodmaster.com/

Wood Master CleanFire 400 Project # 033-HHW-059-1

Prepared by Dirigo Laboratories, Inc.

Page | 1

This page intentionally left blank.

Non CBI



Page | 2

Table of Contents Affidavit: ......................................................................................................................... 4

Technician Notes: ......................................................................................................... 5

Test Procedures and Equipment: (14.1.6) ................................................................ 7 Work Station .......................................................................................................................................... 8 HEX, Flow Meters, Thermopile ............................................................................................................. 9

Results: ........................................................................................................................ 10

Estimated 1 hour Emissions: .................................................................................. 11

Run Summaries: (14.1.7) ......................................................................................... 12 Run 1: .................................................................................................................................................. 12 Run 2: .................................................................................................................................................. 12 Run 3: .................................................................................................................................................. 12 Run 4: .................................................................................................................................................. 13 Run 5: .................................................................................................................................................. 13

Category I: ................................................................................................................ 14

Statement of Estimated Uncertainty: (14.1.16) ..................................................... 14

Process Operations: ................................................................................................ 14

Air Flow & Fire Box: (14.1.10) .................................................................................... 15 Fire Box ............................................................................................................................................... 16

Test Fuel Properties: (14.1.6, 14.1.11) ...................................................................... 17 Run 1: .................................................................................................................................................. 17 Run 2: .................................................................................................................................................. 18 Run 4: .................................................................................................................................................. 19 Run 5: .................................................................................................................................................. 20

Test Condition Summary: (14.1.7) ............................................................................. 21

Particulate Catch Weights: ...................................................................................... 21 Run 1: .................................................................................................................................................. 21 Run 2: .................................................................................................................................................. 22 Run 5: .................................................................................................................................................. 23

Appliance Views: ......................................................................................................... 24 Front .................................................................................................................................................... 24 Left Side .............................................................................................................................................. 25 Right Side ............................................................................................................................................ 26 Rear With Burner Assembly ................................................................................................................ 27

Sampling Locations: (14.1.6) ................................................................................. 28 Traverse and Sampling Points ............................................................................................................ 28

Sampling Methods: .................................................................................................. 29

Non CBI



Page | 3

System Schematic: (14.1.6) ..................................................................................... 29

Sampling and Analytical Procedures: .................................................................... 30

Analytical Methods Description: ............................................................................ 30

Calibration, Quality Control and Assurances: ....................................................... 30

Appendices: ................................................................................................................. 31

Appendix A: Sampling and Analytical Procedures .............................................. 31

Appendix B: Alternate Procedures ........................................................................ 31

Appendix C: Complete Drawings, Manual, and Run Information: ...................... 31

Appendix D: Supporting Data (14.1.2) .................................................................. 31

Appendix E: Calibrations ....................................................................................... 32

Appendix F: Accreditations ................................................................................... 42

Non CBI



Page | 4

Affidavit: Dirigo Laboratories, Inc. was contracted by Northwest Mfg. AKA: WoodMaster, Inc. to provide testing services for the CleanFire 400 hydronic heater per EPA Methods 28WHH and ASTM 2618-13. All testing and associated procedures were conducted at Dirigo Laboratories located at 11785 SE Highway 212 – Suite 305, Clackamas, Oregon 97015. All protocols from Methods 28WHH and ASTM 2618-13 were followed in the testing, sampling, analysis, and calibrations, and all results are based on these methods. Particulate sampling was performed per ASTM E2515-11, Standard Test Method for Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions Collected in a Dilution Tunnel. Efficiency was measrued using EPA Method 28WHH and calculated using CSA-B415.1-10 Performance Testing of Solid-Fuel Burning Heating Appliances.

Dirigo Laboratories is accredited by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for the certification and auditing of wood heaters pursuant to Subpart AAA of 40 CFR Part 60, New Source Performance Standards for Residential Wood Heaters, and Subpart QQQQ of 40 CFR 60, Standards of Performance for New Hydronic Heaters and Forced Air Furnaces. Dirigo is certified for Methods 28R, 28 WHH, 28 WHH-PTS and all methods listed in Sections 60.534 and 60.5476. Dirigo holds EPA Accreditation Certificate Numbers 4 and 4M (mobile). Dirigo Laboratories, Inc. is accredited by A2LA to ISO 17020:2012 “Criteria for Bodies Performing Inspections”; ISO 17025:2005 “Requirements for Testing Laboratories”; and ISO 17065:2012 “Requirements for Bodies Operating Product Certification Systems”. Dirigo holds A2LA Certificate Numbers 3726.01, 3726.02, and 3726.03. See Appendix F for Certifications.

The following people were associated with the testing, analysis and technical report writing associated with this project:

Gary Nelke, CMfgE

Ben Nelke, Sr. Technician

Doug Towne, QA/QC

Non CBI



Page | 5

Introduction: (14.1.2, 14.1.4, 14.1.5) Northwest Mfg. contracted with Dirigo Laboratories, Inc. to perform EPA testing on the WoodMaster CleanFire 400 wood fired hydronic heater per 40 CFR Part 60: Subpart QQQQ-Standards of Performance for New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced Air Furnaces. Testing was performed using EPA Method 28 WHH and applicable portions of ASTM 2618-13 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Particulate Emissions and Heating Efficiency of Solid Fuel-Fired Hydronic Heating Appliances. Stack Loss efficiency testing was also performed per CSA B415.1-10 Performance Testing of Solid-Fuel Burning Heating Appliances. All test results apply solely to the CleanFire 400.

Dirigo Laboratories will be providing Third Party Certifcation services.

This test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Dirigo Laboratories, Inc.

Technician Notes: Unit arrived at Dirigo Laboratories on March 14, 2016.

• Conditioning occurred at manufacturer prior to arrival. • Prior to start of testing the dilution tunnel was cleaned with a 12” Steel chimney

brush. • 10 hour aging completed 3/15/16 • Run #1 occurred on 3/15/16 • Run #2 occurred on 3/16/16 • Run #3 occurred on 3/17/16 (Aborted) • Run #4 occurred on 3/18/16 • Run #5 occurred on 3/21/16

Non CBI



Page | 6

Wood Heater Identification: (14.1.3, 14.1.7)

• Appliance Tested: CleanFire 400 • Serial Number: 001 • Manufacturer: Northwest Mfg. • Address: 600 Polk Ave SW, Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 • Phone: (800) 932-3629 • Contact: Chuck Gagner • Email: [email protected] • Catalyst: Yes • Heat exchange blower: N/A • Type: Hydronic Heater • Style: Outdoor • Fuel: Crib – White Oak • Date Received: 3/14//2016 • Wood Heater Aging: At Manufacturer’s • Testing Period – Start: Tuesday, March 15 2016 Finish: Monday, March 21,

2016 • Test Location: Dirigo Laboratories, Inc. -11785 SE Highway 212 - Suite 305,

Clackamas, OR 97015 • Elevation: 30 Feet above sea level • Test Technician(s): Ben Nelke, Gary Nelke, Doug Towne • Test Observer(s): Chuck Gagner

Non CBI

mailto:[email protected]



Page | 7

Test Procedures and Equipment: (14.1.6) All Sampling and analytical procedures were performed by Ben Nelke, Gary Nelke, and Doug Towne. All procedures used were directly from EPA Method 28WHH, ASTM E2618-13, ASTM E2515-11, and CSA B415.1-10. See Figures 1, 2, for equipment used. See Appendix E for calibration data.

Equipment List:

1. Flow Meter - Omega FTB-1421, 0.6 – 3.0 GPM – Load side 2. Flow Meter - Omega FTB-1424, 3.0 – 30.0 GPM – Load side 3. Flow Meter - Omega FTB-1425, 5.0-50.0 GPM – Boiler Side 4. Flow Meter – Omega FTB-602B-T, 0.3 – 9 LPM- Load Side 5. Analyzer -California Analytical ZRE CO2/CO/O2 IR ANALYZER 6. Delmhorst J-2000 Wood Moisture Meter 7. Dayton 4c121 Blower for dilution tunnel -Emissions Booth #2 8. ScienTech Balance Scale 9. 10 lb Calibration Weight 10. DigiWeigh Bench Shipping Scale 11. APEX XC-60 Digital Emissions Sampling Box A 12. APEX XC-60 Digital Emissions Sampling Box B 13. Gast MOA-P122-AA Vacuum Pump -Analyzer 14. Rice Lake 4'x7' floor scale w/digital weight indicator 15. APEX AK 6000 Ambient Sampling Box 16. Delta T- 20 junction Thermopile

Non CBI



Page | 8

Work Station

Non CBI



Page | 9

HEX, Flow Meters, Thermopile

Non CBI



Page | 10

Results: The WoodMaster CleanFire 400 meets the Step 2 emissions limit of 0.10 lbs/MMBtu heat output (weighted average) and the 18.0 g/hr cap limit for each individual run. Using Table 2, EPA Method 28WHH, the CleanFire 400 has a weighted average emissions of 0.07 lbs/MMBtu output and 1.04 g/hr (average). The CleanFire 400 has a weighted average efficiency of 67%.

Results: Weighting and Data Summary: (14.1.13, 14.1.14, 14.1.15)

Data Summary Part Aθ Wfuel MCave Qin Qout

Wood Run Load% Actual Actual Test Weight Wood Heat Heat

Category No Capacity Load Load Duration as-fired Moisture Input Output% of

Btu/hr max hrs lb % DB Btu Btu16-24% of

II 2 max 16,385 ≤ 24,578 23,626 23.07 22.77 119.0 23.50 830,057 537,88416-24%

II 4 of max 16,385 to 24,578 23,332 22.78 23.50 120.0 22.80 841,792 548,30225-50%

III 5 of max 25,602 to 51,204 46,965 45.86 13.13 122.0 22.40 858,595 616,805Max

IV 1 capacity 94,385 92.17 6.80 125.0 22.60 878,238 641,818

Target Load

Btu/hr

102,408

Data Summary Part B

T2 Min E E Eg/hr Eg/kg ηdel ηSLM

Min StackRun Load% Return PM Output PM Output PM PM Delivered Loss

Category No Capacity H2O Temp Based Based Rate Factor Efficiency Efficiencylbs/MMBtu

°F Output g/MJ g/hr g/kg % %16-24% of

II 2 max 169.33 0.0646 0.0278 0.69 0.36 64.80 85.7016-24%

II 4 of max 171.49 0.0623 0.0268 0.66 0.35 65.13 85.3025-50%

III 5 of max 158.40 0.0691 0.0297 1.47 0.43 71.84 85.20Max

IV 1 capacity 143.33 0.0841 0.0362 3.60 0.53 73.08 83.70

ET

Total PMEmissions

g

15.76

24.48

19.34

15.50

Non CBI



Page | 11

Table 1C: Hang Tag Information:

Manufacturer: Wood Master Mfg. Model Number: CleanFire 400 Maximum Output

Rating: Qmax 102,408 Btu /hr Annual Efficiency

Rating: ηavg 67% (Using higher heating value) Particle Emissions: Eavg 1.04 Grams/hr (average) 0.07 Lbs/Million Btu Output *Carbon Monoxide: Grams/Minute

*This calculation cannot be made using the formula as provided in the standard for the type of test perfomed. Using CO data obtained from CSA B415.1-10, we can calculate a weighted average CO emissions of 0.93 g/min.

Estimated 1 hour Emissions: Run 1 Run 2 Run 4 Run 5

Catch (mg) 0.90 0.70 0.70 0.30 Est. Emissions (g) 3.73 3.02 2.98 1.27

Year Round Use Weighting:

Weighting

Category Run No. Factor (Fi) ηdel,i x Fi ηdel-LHV,i x Fi Eg/MJ,i x Fi Eg/kg,i x Fi Elb/MMBtu,i x Fi Eg/hr,i x Fi

II 2 0.338 21.87 23.547375 0.0093825 0.12146625 0.0218025 0.232875II 4 0.338 21.981375 23.6655 0.009045 0.118125 0.02102625 0.22275III 5 0.275 19.756 21.2685 0.0081675 0.11748 0.0190025 0.40425IV 1 0.050 3.654 3.934 0.00181 0.02642 0.004205 0.18

Totals: 1.000 67.3 72.4 0.0284 0.38 0.07 1.04

Non CBI



Page | 12

Run Summaries: (14.1.7)

Run 1: Run 1 was a category IV burn rate and was performed on 3/15/16. The test duration was 6.8 hours and had a target load of 102,408 BTU and an actual load of 94,385 BTU. The fuel weight as-fired was 125 lbs. The calculated heat input was 878,238 BTU and the calculated heat output was 641,818 BTU. The minimum return water temperature was 143.33°F. There were total PM emissions of 24.48 g at 0.0841 lbs/MMBtu. The appliance had a PM rate of 3.60 g/hr with a delivered efficiency of 73.08% and stack loss efficiency of 83.7%. Filter changed at 1 hr. This run had a 1-hour filter catch of 0.90 mg. All test results were appropriate and valid. The burn rate category was achieved. There were no anomalies and all criteria were met.

Run 2: Run 2 was a category II burn rate and was performed on 3/16/16. The test duration was 22.77 hours and had a target load of 16,612 BTU to 24,918 BTU and an actual load of 23,626 BTU. The fuel weight as-fired was 119 lbs. The calculated heat input was 830,057 BTU and the calculated heat output was 537,884 BTU. The minimum return water temperature was 169.33°F. There were total PM emissions of 15.76 g at 0.0646 lbs/MMBtu. The appliance had a PM rate of 0.69 g/hr with a delivered efficiency of 64.80% and stack loss efficiency of 85.70%. Filter changed at 1 hr. This run had a 1-hour filter catch of 0.70 mg. All test results were appropriate and valid. The burn rate category was achieved. There were no anomalies and all test criteria were met.

Run 3: Test run aborted due to failure to follow operating instructions. During the reload portion, as indicated by the controller, the catalyst temp dropped below 700 degrees. The manual states the following (page 17):

“Close the door completely and activate the reload function on the controller. This will purge any excess oxygen from the furnace. Once the oxygen has been purged and the catalyst is at or above a set value, the furnace will automatically enter burn mode. On lower heat loads, the reload function may need to be activated more than once if the catalyst temperature is below 700°F and falling.”

The reload function was not engaged per the instructions in order to activate the catalyst.

Non CBI



Page | 13

Run 4: Run 4 was a category II burn rate and was performed on 3/18/16. The test duration was 23.5 hours and had a target load of 16,612 BTU to 24,918 BTU and an actual load of 23,332 BTU. The fuel weight as-fired was 120 lbs. The calculated heat input was 841,792 BTU and the calculated heat output was 548,302 BTU. The minimum return water temperature was 171.49°F. There were total PM emissions of 15.50 g at .0623 lbs/MMBtu. The appliance had a PM rate of 0.66 g/hr with a delivered efficiency of 65.13% and stack loss efficiency of 85.30%. Filter changed at 1 hr. This run had a 1-hour filter catch of 0.70 mg. All test results were appropriate and valid. The burn rate category was achieved. There were no anomalies and all test criteria were met.

Run 5: Run 5 was a category III burn rate and was performed on 3/21/16. The test duration was 13.13 hours and had a target load of 25,956 BTU to 51,912 BTU and an actual load of 46,965 BTU. The fuel weight as-fired was 122 lbs. The calculated heat input was 858,595 BTU and the calculated heat output was 616,805 BTU. The minimum return water temperature was 158.40°F. There were total PM emissions of 19.34 g at .0691 lbs/MMBtu. The appliance had a PM rate of 1.47 g/hr with a delivered efficiency of 71.84% and stack loss efficiency of 85.20%. Filter changed at 1 hr. This run had a 1-hour filter catch of 0.30 mg. All test results were appropriate and valid. The burn rate category was achieved. There were no anomalies and all test criteria were met.

Non CBI



Page | 14

Category I:

The appliance can not operate at or below category I without going into “lock-out” mode. Permission to use alternate method was requested and approved by the EPA in the attached letter dated January 25, 2016.

Statement of Estimated Uncertainty: (14.1.16)

The combined estimated uncertainty of measurement is ± 10% for emissions results1 and ± 4% for efficiency .

Process Operations:

The appliance was operated according to procedures as described in the Operations Manual. Preset manufacturer settings were used in the operation of the cord wood boiler to achieve the required burn rates. No adjustments were made.

All exterior draft measurements around the unit for all 4 runs were less than 1 ft3 per minute.

1ASTM E2515 – 11 Standard Test Method for Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions Collected by a Dilution Tunnel. Section X1.3.5

Non CBI



Page | 15

Air Flow & Fire Box: (14.1.10)

Non CBI

Reception

Typewritten Text

CBI

Reception

Typewritten Text

Reception

Typewritten Text



Page | 16

Fire Box

Non CBI

Reception

Typewritten Text

CBI

Reception

Typewritten Text

Reception

Typewritten Text



Page | 17

Test Fuel Properties: (14.1.6, 14.1.11) Run 1:

Project Number Date033-HHW-059-1

Firebox Volume (ft3) Assessment No

Test Fuel Charge Range 120 - 125Coal bed range (lbs) 20.00 - 25.00

Vol > 3.0 ft3

Fuel Piece Length Inches

Run # 1Test Run Fuel Moisture (db)

Piece S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S61 24.4 23.6 23.7 22.9 21.2 23.2 10.102 23.5 20.5 21.9 22.5 22.2 22.1 11.133 24.0 22.5 22.4 22.9 23.4 23.0 10.014 22.7 24.5 22.7 22.8 25.0 23.5 10.345 24.2 24.4 22.6 23.1 22.4 23.3 10.936 21.2 21.4 23.4 22.3 25.3 22.7 10.127 22.5 21.9 22.8 22.6 23.4 22.6 9.728 23.3 21.9 20.8 22.9 21.9 22.2 10.439 25.3 24.8 20.4 25.0 22.4 23.6 9.5210 25.0 24.3 24.7 22.3 23.0 23.9 9.2611 24.5 24.5 24.7 25.3 23.5 24.5 9.2212 19.0 21.5 22.3 19.0 19.0 20.2 9.72131415

Spacer Average 19 22.6 W/Cleats 125lbs

3/15/2016

AVG (%) Fuel

22.50

Weight (Lbs) W/O Cleats

Vol > 1.5 < 3.0 ft3

12.5

Vol < 1.5 ft3

Client: WoodMasterModel: CleanFire 400

Signature Date

Longest useable measurement parallel or perpendicular to front of unit. 28''

Hydronic Heater

4x2x4

Fuel Average

42x4 2x4 4x4x4

Non CBI



Page | 18

Run 2:




Vol > 3.0 ft3



Piece S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S61 22.7 24.1 23.4 25.0 23.7 23.8 10.212 24.1 23.4 24.6 20.2 19.0 22.3 9.923 24.4 25.0 25.0 24.5 23.6 24.5 9.154 23.6 25.0 25.1 23.2 25.0 24.4 9.155 24.2 25.1 22.2 25.3 23.3 24.0 9.946 19.3 23.6 25.0 24.6 24.7 23.4 8.757 22.2 24.7 24.9 23.7 24.2 23.9 10.018 23.5 24.6 24.9 21.4 22.7 23.4 10.059 24.6 22.4 25.0 24.2 24.5 24.1 9.9210 22.2 20.4 22.9 24.6 25.3 23.1 8.7711 25.0 25.2 25.0 24.5 24.0 24.7 9.7212 23.7 23.1 24.9 24.5 21.2 23.5 9.28131415


3/16/2016

AVG (%) Fuel

22.50


Vol > 1.5 < 3.0 ft3

12.5

Vol < 1.5 ft3


Signature Date


Hydronic Heater

4x2x4

Fuel Average

42x4 2x4 4x4x4

Non CBI



Page | 19

Run 4:




Vol > 3.0 ft3



Piece S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S61 25.0 22.3 24.2 23.6 25.0 24.0 10.652 22.9 20.5 19.0 22.9 21.9 21.4 8.383 25.0 24.1 24.4 25.3 24.9 24.7 8.914 19.0 24.6 24.9 22.5 23.2 22.8 9.855 24.6 22.7 25.0 23.7 20.2 23.2 10.476 23.5 24.5 24.2 21.9 25.0 23.8 10.827 23.2 24.9 22.6 18.4 24.5 22.7 9.778 23.1 25.0 24.5 24.4 25.2 24.4 10.059 22.8 24.3 20.8 21.9 25.0 23.0 8.5810 24.3 24.9 25.0 23.1 20.6 23.6 8.9511 25.3 24.5 23.4 21.3 23.4 23.6 9.5712 22.2 19.0 19.0 21.2 21.0 20.5 9.90131415



Signature Date


Hydronic Heater

3/18/2016

AVG (%) Fuel

22.50


Vol > 1.5 < 3.0 ft3

12.5

Vol < 1.5 ft3

4x2x4

Fuel Average

42x4 2x4 4x4x4

Non CBI



Page | 20

Run 5:




Vol > 3.0 ft3



Piece S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S61 23.3 21.9 23.3 24.8 25.0 23.7 9.812 24.8 23.7 20.2 23.1 25.0 23.4 9.613 21.4 24.9 22.5 18.2 23.3 22.1 8.584 19.0 25.0 23.1 20.9 23.6 22.3 8.975 22.9 23.3 18.6 22.8 24.1 22.3 9.356 20.4 25.0 25.0 18.0 24.0 22.5 8.867 18.9 22.5 22.5 21.9 22.5 21.7 10.308 23.7 24.6 22.4 23.8 23.7 23.6 10.389 23.4 23.3 20.8 21.0 24.4 22.6 10.1910 20.0 22.8 20.2 20.8 24.4 21.6 10.4911 25.0 24.5 25.0 24.8 25.0 24.9 10.3412 23.5 25.0 21.9 20.2 22.3 22.6 10.80131415



Signature Date


Hydronic Heater

3/21/2016

AVG (%) Fuel

22.50


Vol > 1.5 < 3.0 ft3

12.5

Vol < 1.5 ft3

4x2x4

Fuel Average

42x4 2x4 4x4x4

Non CBI



Page | 21

Test Condition Summary: (14.1.7)

All testing conditions for runs 1,2,4, & 5 fell within allowable specifications per Method 28WHH. Details of all run conditions can be found in corresponding run folders.

Runs Ambient (Deg. F) Barometric

Pressure (In. Hg.)

Test Fuel

Burned (Lbs.)

Test Fuel Moisture (Dry

Basis, %) Run Time (Min.)

Pre Post

1 71 70 30.27 125 22.6 408

2 67 71 30.30 119 23.5 1366

4 68 72 30.04 120 22.8 1410

5 73 72 29.80 122 22.4 788

Particulate Catch Weights:

Run 1:

Project # MFGRun # 1 ModelDate

Train A Front Rear Filter # Tare Final Net Train B Front Rear Filter # Tare Final NetFirst Hour 2686 0.1206 0.1215 0.0009 2688

2687 2689 2691 O ring

O Ring O ringO Ring

6.0 mg 5.6 mg

Nozzle Nozzle# Net # Net1A 0 0 1B 0.0001 0.1

6.0 5.7

Ambient Filter # Tare Final Net Vol (liter)2690 0.1191 0.1195 0.0004 2081.856

O ring 1.7041 1.7043 0.0002Total 0.0006 mg

Notes:

0.00560.0051

3.5670

0.2425 0.2479

3.5672

Train A Total: 6.0mg Train B Total: 5.7mg Ambient Total: 0.6mg One Hour Catch: 0.9mg

0.2484

115.6616 115.6616TARE FINAL

115.9034 115.9035

Train A Total Catch Train B Total Catch

3.6061 3.6069

033-HHW-059-1

3/21/16

WoodMasterCleanFire 400

TARE FINAL

0.2441

Non CBI



Page | 22

Run 2:

Run 4:



2693 2695 2697 O ring

O Ring O ringO Ring

4.1 mg 3.9 mg

Nozzle Nozzle# Net # Net2A 0 0 2B 0 0

4.1 3.9


O ring 1.6718 1.6721 0.0003Total 0.0007 mg

Notes:

0.00390.0034

3.5407

0.2402 0.2437

3.5411


0.2433

116.2368 116.2368TARE FINAL

116.3305 116.3305


3.6050 3.6057

033-HHW-059-1

3/21/16


TARE FINAL

0.2406



2705 2707 2709 O ring

O Ring O ringO Ring

4.1 mg 4.1 mg

Nozzle Nozzle# Net # Net4A 0.0001 0.1 4B 0 0

4.2 4.1


O ring 1.7002 1.7005 0.0003Total 0.0010 mg

Notes:

033-HHW-059-1

3/28/16


TARE FINAL

0.2402

Train A Total: 4.2mg Train B Total: 4.1mg Ambient: 1.0mg One Hour Catch: 0.7mg

0.2425

116.1833 116.1834TARE FINAL

116.3979 116.3979


3.5543 3.55540.0041

0.00343.6048

0.2395 0.2427

3.6057

Non CBI



Page | 23

Run 5:



2711 2713 2715 O ring

O Ring O ringO Ring

4.4 mg 4.5 mg

Nozzle Nozzle# Net # Net5A 0 0 5B 0 0

4.4 4.5


O ring 1.6940 1.6941 0.0001Total 0.0003 mg

Notes:

033-HHW-059-1

3/28/16


TARE FINAL

0.2372


0.2406

116.7743 116.7742TARE FINAL

116.8822 116.8821


3.5513 3.55200.0045

0.00413.5582

0.2373 0.2413

3.5587

Non CBI



Page | 24

Appliance Views:

Front

Non CBI



Page | 25

Left Side

Non CBI



Page | 26

Right Side

Non CBI



Page | 27

Rear With Burner Assembly

Non CBI



Page | 28

Sampling Locations: (14.1.6) Sample ports are located 16.5 feet downstream from any disturbances and 4 feet upstream from any disturbances. Flow rate traverse data was collected 12 feet downstream from any disturbances and 5.5 feet upstream from any disturbances.

Traverse and Sampling Points

Non CBI



Page | 29

Sampling Methods:

A dual filter dry sampling train system (ASTM 2515-11) was used in collecting particulate samples. The dilution tunnel is 12 inches in diameter. All particulate sampling conditions per ASTM 2515-11 were followed.

System Schematic: (14.1.6)

Non CBI



Page | 30

Sampling and Analytical Procedures:

All sampling and analytical procedures used followed EPA Method 28WHH, ASTM E2618-13, ASTM E2515-11, and CSA B415.1-10.

Analytical Methods Description:

All sample recovery and analysis procedures followed ASTM E2515-11 procedures. At the end of each test run, filters and probes were removed from their housings, dessicated for 24 hours, and then weighed to a constant weight per ASTM E2515-11 Section 10.

Calibration, Quality Control and Assurances:

Calibration procedures and results were conducted per ASTM E2515-11 Section 8 and ASTM E2618-13 Section 10. Test method quality control procedures (leak checks, volume meter checks, stratification checks, proportionality results) followed procedures outlined in ASTM E2515-11.

Non CBI



Page | 31

Appendices:

Appendix A: Sampling and Analytical Procedures All sampling and analytical procedures were performed by Gary Nelke, Ben Nelke and Doug Towne. All procedures used were directly from EPA Method 28WHH, ASTM E2618-13, and ASTM E2515-11. Stack loss efficiency testing was performed to CSA B415.1-10.

Appendix B: Alternate Procedures The formula in the test method for calculating CO in g/min requires clarification from EPA. As it is written, we cannot provide an answer. In lieu of that forumula, we are providing the CO in g/min from CSA B415.1-10 based on a weighted average. Permission to use this alternative method was approved by the EPA in the attached email dated, January 21, 2016, from Mike Toney of the EPA.

Appendix C: Complete Drawings, Manual, and Run Information: All drawings, manuals, and run information have been submitted in separate digital folders.

Appendix D: Supporting Data (14.1.2) Supporting data, pictures, fuel loads, and particulate catches have been submitted in separate digital folders.

Non CBI



Page | 32

Appendix E: Calibrations

EPA Method 5 Dry Gas Meter Calibration forγ and ΔH@

Average DGM γ factor = Manufacturer / Model: Apex-AK-600 0.999ID: Ambient BoxSerial Number 810016 Average Meter Orifice ΔH@ = Equipment No.: Dirigo 055 30.755Calibration Date: 1/19/2016Next Calibration Due: 7/19/2016Barometric Pressure: 29.79 inHgSignature/Date:

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Standard Meter DataStandard DGM Initial Volume (L) 0.000 0.000 0.000 Date 2/19/2015Standard DGM Final Volume (L) 181.723 164.612 162.714 γ Factor 0.998Standard Ave. Meter Temperature (°F), (Tstd) 72.0 69.0 69.0 Model SK25DADGM Initial Volume (cuft) 0.000 0.000 0.000 Serial Number 1101001DGM Final Volume (cuft) 6.505 5.810 5.784DGM Average Temperature (°F), (TDGM) 76.6 76.6 76.9 Pre-Calibration DataTime (min) 30.0 35.0 30.0 Date 7/30/2015Orifice ΔH ("H2O) 2.45 1.50 2.00 γ Factor 1.016Vacuum ("H2O) 0.00 0.00 0.00 ΔH@ 32.841Total Volume for Standard DGM (Vstd) (cuft) 6.417 5.813 5.746 Tolerance (5%) 0.051Total Volume for DGM (VDGM) (cuft) 6.505 5.810 5.784 Deviation 0.017 Pass

Dry Gas Meter γ Factor 0.987 1.009 1.001γ Factor Deviation From Average 0.012 0.010 0.002 DGM Calibration DataMeter Orifice ΔH@ 30.720 30.704 30.841 γ Deviation Tolerance 0.020Orifice ΔH@ Deviation From Average 0.035 0.051 0.087 Maximum γ Deviation 0.012

ΔH@ Deviation Tolerance 0.200Calculations: Maximum dH@ Deviation 0.0871. Deviation = |Average value for all runs - current run value| Pass2. γ = (Vstd x (Std γ factor) x (Pbar) x (TDGM + 460) / (VDGM x (Tstd + 460) x (Pbar + (dH / 13.6)))3. ΔH@ = 0.0319 x ΔH (((TDGM+ 460) x (Time 2̂)) / (Pbar x (γ factor 2̂) x (VDGM 2̂)))

Measurement of uncertainty = +/- 0.14 cfm

Non CBI



Page | 33


Average DGM γ factor = Manufacturer / Model: XC-60-ED 1.002ID: Box-ASerial Number 1902130 Average Meter Orifice ΔH@ = Equipment No.: Dirigo 053 58.685Calibration Date: 3/8/2016Next Calibration Due: 9/8/2016Barometric Pressure: 29.94 inHgSignature/Date:





Non CBI



Page | 34


Average DGM γ factor = Manufacturer / Model: XC-60-ED 1.001ID: Box BSerial Number 1902133 Average Meter Orifice ΔH@ = Equipment No.: Dirigo 054 59.917Calibration Date: 3/8/2016Next Calibration Due: 9/8/2016Barometric Pressure: 29.94 inHgSignature/Date:





Non CBI



Page | 35 Non CBI



Page | 36

Non CBI



Page | 37 Non CBI



Page | 38 Non CBI



Page | 39 Non CBI



Page | 40

Non CBI



Page | 41

Non CBI



Page | 42

Appendix F: Accreditations

Non CBI



Page | 43

Non CBI



Page | 44 Non CBI



Page | 45 Non CBI



Page | 46

Non CBI

Documents

Northwest Mfg. WoodMaster, Inc. · 2018. 9. 17. · 6. Delmhorst J-2000 Wood Moisture Meter 7. Dayton 4c121 Blower for dilution tunnel -Emissions Booth #2 8. ScienTech Balance Scale