NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION List of …mcdonline.gov.in/departmentdocs/Mtg. dt. 7.11.2012.pdfNORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION List of Business to be transacted at the Meeting

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION List of Business

to be transacted at the Meeting of the

Standing Committee to be held on

Wednesday, the 7th November, 2012 at 2.00 P.M.

at Satya Narayan Bansal Sabhagar, 2nd Floor, A-Wing,

Dr. S.P. Mukherjee Civic Centre,

New Delhi.

Item No Subject PART-A 46 Audit Comments on the Annual Account pertaining to erstwhile Municipal Corporation

of Delhi for the Year 2002-03. MCA’s letter No. MCA/RS./Annual Accounts-2002-03/Misc-21/1236 dated 3.10.2012

47 Award of works costing upto Rs. 5.00 lacs under Unit Rate System during 2012-13.

Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/214/C&C dated 9.10.2012 48 Finalization of Rate Contract and Agency for Diet Articles for all MCD Hospitals and Dispensaries of all three Mpl. Corporation for the year, 2012-2013 & 2013-2014. Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/Health/NDMC/217/C&C dated 10.10.2012.

49 Revision of rates of wages of Daily Wagers. Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/CLWO/NDMC/247/C&C dated 22.10.2012.

50 Regarding enhancement of remuneration of Kashmiri Migrant Contractual Teachers. (i) Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/Edu./NDMC/206/C&C dated 1.10.2012. (ii) Resolution No. 22 of the Education Committee dated 16.10.2012

51 Appointment and payment of salary to the employees against the post for which they

are working. Notice of resolution by Sh. Vijay Prakash Pandey.

ADDITIONAL LIST OF BUSINESS

52 Implementation of policy of conversion of commercial properties transferred from GOI (L&DO/Dte.of Estates) to Erstwhile MCD. Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/L&E/NDMC/264/C&C dated 5.11.2012

-2-

PART ‘B’ 49 Restoration of cut by pdg. cement concrete in C-96/KBZ [-] by pdg. RMC from R/R

Charges for laying of Natural gas Pipeline under Dig and Deposit Policy in South Patel Nagar and West Patel Nagar by I.G.L. in Ranjit Nagar. Restoration/ Improvement to lanes and by lanes from Cottage No. 1A to 15 A, Cottage No. 24 A to 1, Cottage No. 24 to 37 in West Patel Nagar and its in South Patel Nagar and West Patel Nagar in C-96/

KBZ. Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/203/C&C dated 28.9.2012.

50 Strengthening of 9m ROW internal lanes of ND-11 to ND-19, ND-31 to ND-44, ND-61

to ND-69, UU-9 to UU-79-A and Shiv Mandir CD Block to GD-109 and GP-107 to GP-119, GP-14 to GP-88, GP-57 to GP-71, GP-13 to GP-25, NP-1 to NP-61, NP-30 to NP-127 and NP-51 to NP-98 and CP-107 to CP-132, CP-201 to CP-213, CP-183 to CP-197, CP-13 to CP-25, CP-42 to CP-56, CP-74 to CP-88 and QP-63 to QP-136 and SD-1 to SD-154, SD-114 to SD-153, SD-161 to SD-314 with parking, SD-378 to SD-449 with parking and SD-297 to main road Pitampura by providing dense carpeting in ward No 53 in Rohini Zone (i) Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/146/C&C dated 5-9-2012. (ii) Resolution No. 14 of the Wards Committee (Rohini) dated 21.9.2012

51 Grant of Earned Leave to Sh. Nand Kishore, IA & AS, Municipal Chief Auditor.

MCA’s letter No. MCA/Admn./PF/Ch.Ar./1-5/555 dated 3.10.2012.

52 Development works in approved colony. Sub-Head:- (1) Imp. Dev. to lane by pdg. RCC Box Drain from 36 A to 112A (LHS) in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ. (2) Imp. Dev. to lane by pdg. RCC Box Drain from 36A yo 112A (RHS) in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ. Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/208/C&C dated 5.10.2012

53 Development works in approved colony. Sub-Head:- (1) Strengthening of road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from 98 E to 120 E in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ. (2) Strengthening of road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from Banglow Road to Mandelia Chowk in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ. (3) Strengthening of road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from Satyawati Road to Aggarsen Chowk in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ. (4) Strengthening of road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from Aggarsen Chowk to Mandelia Chowk in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ. (5) Strengthening of road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from Mandelia Chowk to Chandrawal Road (Kohlapur Road) in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ. Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/209/C&C dated 5.10.2012.

54 Imp. Dev. of parking in back side of commercial complex by pdg. RMC from in Wazirpur Industrial Area, Ward C-68, MRZ-II in Ashok Vihar. Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/210/C&C dated 5.10.2012.

55 Re-construction of M&CW Centre at ‘D’ Block Sant Ravidass Nagar (Jahangirpuri) in C-5/CLZ. Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/215/C&C dated 9.10.2012.

56 Improvement of internal lanes by P/L RMC and drainage system in A&B Block, Ashok Vihar, Phase-I in C-68, Rohini Zone. Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/216/C&C dated 9.10.2012

57 Promotion of Senior Auditors in Pay Band 2 : 9300-34800 with Grade Pay of Rs. 4,200/- to the post of Supervisor (Audit) in PB 2: Rs. 93000-34800 with Grade Pay of Rs.4,800/- on ad hoc basis. MCA’s letter No. MCA/Admn.PCA/3-33/Vol-I/595 dated 11.10.2012.

-3-

58 Construction of 35 Nos. classrooms, 1 store, 1 computer room, 1 office, 1 staff room, 1 science lab. room, toilet block (Eighteen seats) and Raising of Boundary Wall in M.C.Pry. School, Bhalaswa Dairy in CLZ. Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/222/C&C dated 15.10.2012.

59 Re-construction of Community Hall at D-Block, Sultanpuri W.No. 39 in Rohini Zone. Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/242/C&C dated 17.10.2012.

60 Improvement & Strengthening of 13.5 m & 18 m ROW Road of Sector-19, Rohini. Sub Head: Strengthening of Carriageway. Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/236/C&C dated 16.10.2012

61 Improvement & Strengthening of 13.5 m & 18 m ROW Road of Sector-15, Rohini.

Sub Head: Strengthening of Carriageway of 13.5m ROW. Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/237/C&C dated 16.10.2012 62 Imp./Dev. of drainage system in 7 Block, Ramesh Nagar [7/83-80’ Road] by pdg. B/W

from and RCC in C-98/KBZ in Mansarovar Garden. SH: (1) Imp./Dev. of drainage system in 7 Block ,Ramesh Nagar [7/153-7/213] by pdg.

B/W from and RCC in C-98/KBZ in Mansarovar Garden. SH: (2) Imp./Dev. of drainage system in 7 Block Ramesh Nagar [7/99-7/142] by pdg.

B/W from and Precast Slab in C-98/KBZ in C-98/KBZ in Mansarovar Garden. .

Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/244/C&C dated 17.10.2012 63 Construction of footpath and platform in Municipal Park opposite Veterinary Hospital in

Nizampur village in C-30 (Narela Zone) (Dr. Sahib Singh Verma Park) Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/245/C&C dated 17.10.2012

64 Remodelling and covering of drain at Archana Apptt. DDA Mkt. in Paschim Vihar by

pdg. RCC item from Archana Apartment to DDA Market in Paschim Vihar in West Zone. Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/246/C&C dated 18.10.2012

65 Strengthening of road in the jurisdiction of Ward No. C-58/RZ.

SH 1:- Stg. of road from Balbir Singh Road to Major Ashwani Marg in A-1 Block in C-58/RZ by pdg. Dense Carpeting from Paschim Vihar North.

SH 2:- Stg. of road from JK Apartment to Road No. 30 in A-3 Block Paschim Vihar in C-58/RZ by pdg. Dense Carpeting from inPaschim Vihar North.

SH 3:- Stg. of road from H.No. 274 to Road No. 30 and Triveni Apartment to Rohtak Road in C-4 Block Paschim Vihar in C-58/RZ by pdg. Dense Carpeting from Paschim Vihar North. SH 4:- Stg. of road from A-1 Lal Market to A-5B SFS Flats and Vishal Bharti School

to Rohtak Road (Atama Ram Marg) in C-58/RZ by pdg. Dense Carpeting from A-1,Paschim Vihar Lal Market to A-5B SFS Flats and Vishal Bharti School to Rohtak Road (Atma Ram Marg or Jain Sthanak Road) in Paschim Vihar North

Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/248/C&C dated 22.10.2012

66 Empanelment of advertising agencies for preparation, designing and release of North

Delhi Municipal Corporation advertisements in newspapers, broadcasting through radio channels and telecasting through television channels and other related works.

Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/Dir.(P&I)/NDMC/221/C&C dated 15.10.2012.

67 Construction of pucca school building at M.C.Pry.School C-1, Ashok Vihar, Phase-I, Rohini Zone.

Sub Head:- Development of site by providing storm water drains, water supply distribution line, main gate etc.

Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/249/C&C dated 23.10.2012.

-4-


68 Report in response to the Standing Committee Resolution No. 872 1.2.2012 Regarding grant of ownership rights to the Class III and IV employees of the MCD residing in the Municipal Colony in Azadpur and Dhaka under LIG Scheme. Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/L&E/NDMC/263/C&C dated 2.11.2012

PLACED ON TABLE

69 Improvement & strengthening of 13-5m & 18m ROW road of Sector-15, Rohini. Sub Head: Construction of drain & Imp. of side berms of 13.5m ROW road.

Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/257/C&C dated 1.11.2012.

70 v/;{k] LFkk;h lfefr ds dk;kZy; esa o”kZ 2012&2013 ds fy, fo’ks”k dk;kZf/kdkjh dh

fu;qfDr A Jh fot; izdk’k ik.Ms; }kjk izLrqr izLrko A

PART ‘C’ 2 Incorporation of Plot No. 19-B, Block-UA in the layout plan of Northern City Extn., Scheme No. 1, Kamla Nagar, Jawahar Nagar. Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/CTP/NDMC/204/C&C dated 1.10.2012

PART ‘A’

Item No. 46 :— Audit Comments on the Annual Account pertaining to erstwhileMunicipal Corporation of Delhi for the year 2002-03.

MCA’s letter No. MCA/RS/Annual Accounts-2002-03/Misc.-21/1236 dated 3-10-2012.

In accordance with Regulation 6 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation (Maintenance ofAccounts) Regulations 1959, the Municipal Chief Accountant is required to prepare Annual Account. TheAnnual Account is required to be checked by Municipal Chief Auditor who shall submit the same to theStanding Committee for being laid before the Corporation.

The Annual Account for the year 2002-2003, was due for submission to the Municipal ChiefAuditor by 15th June, 2003. The Account was, however, made available to Audit on 13-5-2008 i.e. afterthe delay in submission of Account of about five years. The scrutiny of Annual Account was held upmainly due to delay in submission of (i) bank reconciliation statement for the months of April, 2002 toMarch, 2003, (ii) non-submission of statement of Assets & Liabilities as required in terms of Regulation 33of D.M.C. Provident Fund Regulations and (iii) delay in submission of year-wise breakup of outstandingdishonoured cheques by the department.

2. Non-furnishing of Assets & Liabilities Statement :A statement of assets and liabilities is required to be submitted to Audit alongwith the Annual

Account in terms of Standing Committee Resolution No. 149 dated 5-5-1961. However the said statementwas not furnished to Audit alongwith the Annual Account for the year 2002-2003. Resultantly, the positionof assets and liabilities of the Corporation (General Wing) as on 31-3-2003 could not be examined in Audit.

3. Financial position :The table given below depicts the financial position of the General Wing of M.C.D. for the

year 2002-2003.(Rs. in lacs)

1. Opening balance as on 1-4-2002 18,753.302. Add. Receipts during the year on account of

(i) Transaction on revenue Account 1,65,949.75(ii) Transaction outside of revenue Account 90,277.78(iii) Transaction of Suspense Account (-) 4,213.00

—————2,70,767.83

3. Less Expenditure during the year on account of :(i) Transaction on revenue account 1,62,407.12(ii) Transaction on outside revenue account 81,664.69(iii) Transaction on Suspense Account- 2,880.15

—————2,46,951.96

—————Closing balance as on 31-3-2002 23,815.87

Besides liabilities to the extent of Rs. 710.77 crore remained outstanding towards plan loanand ways and means advances.

[ 2 (N) ]

4. Revenue Account :

(A) Revenue Receipts-Budget Estimates and Actual :

The table below indicates the budget estimates and actual of revenue receipts account during2002-2003 under major Heads of Account :—

(Rs. in lacs)——————————————————————————————————————————

Head of Account Revised Actual Variation %age ofBudget Receipts (+) excess variation

Estimates (–) savings——————————————————————————————————————————

1. Genl. tax, indirect taxation & 1,73,653.45 1,26,107.63 (–) 47,545.82 27.38misc. revenue

3. Education 11,722.98 11,750.34 (+) 27.36 0.23

5. Public health 390.00 297.61 (–) 92.39 23.69

6. Medical relief 290.00 182.72 (–) 107.28 36.99

7. Conservancy street cleanising & 120.00 125.53 (+) 5.53 4.61road watering

9. Roads & public lighting 1,815.60 4,639.76 (+) 2,824.16 155.55

10. Building land acquisition & 4,204.60 2,653.74 (–) 1,550.86 36.88management

12. Licensing & removal of 920.50 553.13 (–) 367.37 39.91encroachment from public street

13. Garden & open space 250.00 187.48 (–) 62.52 25.00

14. Market & slaughter house 1,710.00 165.24 (–) 1,544.76 90.34

16. Reimbursement of adhoc charges 1,000.00 2,475.87 (+) 1,475.87 147.59

17. Extraordinary receipt 6,000.00 16,400.00 (+) 10,400.00 173.33

22. Development charges 1,650.00 410.70 (–) 1,239.30 75.11——————————————————————————————————————————

Shortfall :—Shortfall was above 20% in 8 major Heads of Account viz. (1) Gen. tax, indirecttaxation and misc. revenue-27.38% (5) Public health-23.69% (6) Medical relief-36.99% (10) Bldg., landacquisition & management-36.88% (12) Licensing & removal of encroachment-39.91% (13) Garden &open space-25.00% (14) Market & slaughter houses-90.34% and (22) Development charges-75.11%.

Excess :—Surplus was above 100% in 3 major Head of Account viz. (9) Roads & publiclighting-155.55% (16) Reimbursement of ad-hoc charges-147.59% and (17) Extraordinary receipts-173.33%.

[ 3 (N) ]

The reasons for shortfall in income as brought out in the Commissioner’s note on theproposals for the Revised Estimates 2003-04 and Budget Estimates 2004-2005 (General Account) were asfollows :—

The shortfall in General Tax was due to not conducting survey of properties in all zones onaccount of various administrative constraints. Moreover, the new system of Property Tax valuation andassessment i.e. Unit Area Method was under consideration and there was delay in its implementation. Theincome from sale of lands and buildings and commercial ventures could not be materialized. Income fromEscrow Account could not pic-up fully during 2002-03 due to fresh directions of the Hon’ble Courtregarding additional FAR. The receipts from deficiency/development charges were also less. There were,however, more receipts under head Roads and public lighting.

(B) Expenditure on Revenue Account :

The table below indicates the comparative position of the expenditure on revenue accountduring 2002-03 under major Heads of Account with the budget provision there under and the expenditureduring the year therefrom :—

(Rs. in lacs)——————————————————————————————————————————

Head of Account Revised Actual Variation %age ofBudget (+) excess variation

Estimates (–) savings——————————————————————————————————————————

I. Gen. supervision & collection of 7,000.37 5,312.39 (–)1,687.98 24.11revenue

III. Education 41,860.21 36,941.20 (–) 4,919.01 11.75

IV. Libraries 83.20 65.93 (–)17.27 20.75

V. Public health 4,588.28 3,921.70 (–) 666.58 14.53

VI. Medical relief 18,051.39 14,710.32 (–) 3,341.07 18.51

VII. Conservancy street cleansing & 34,724.56 29,898.41 (–) 4,826.15 13.90road watering

VIII. Scavenging of drains & sewers 1,344.55 1,140.07 (–) 204.48 15.21

IX. Roads & public lighting 17,188.31 13,203.82 (–) 3,984.49 23.18

X. Building land acquisition & 3,062.16 2,179.59 (–) 882.57 28.82management

XII. Licensing & removal of 283.75 216.59 (–) 67.16 23.67encroachment from public street

XIII. Garden & open space 7,254.05 6,389.94 (–) 864.11 11.91

XIV. Market & slaughter house 574.00 491.23 (–) 82.77 14.42

XVI. Misc. 58,478.75 44,307.90 (–) 14,170.85 24.23

XVII. Reserve for unforseen charges 3,000.50 3,354.99 (+) 354.49 11.81

XXXVII. Development charges 5,950.89 273.04 (–) 5,677.85 95.41——————————————————————————————————————————

[ 4 (N) ]

The expenditure fell short of the budgeted estimates under 14 major Heads of Account. In allsuch major Heads the savings were above 10%. The savings were especially high in case of Head ofAccount XXXVII (37) Development charges (95.41%). The expenditure was however in excess ofbudgeted figure under one major Head of Account i.e. XVII-Reserve for unforeseen charges (11.81%).The reasons for shortfall and excess in expenditure were not elucidated to Audit.

5. Expenditure on Capital Account :

(A) IV-Expenditure on Capital Account :

The table given below indicates the comparative position of the expenditure on CapitalAccount under Division-IV of the account during the years 1998-99 to 2002-03, between the RevisedBudget Estimate and the Actual Expenditure with the Budget Estimates alongwith the correspondingfigures for the past five years :—

(Rs. in lacs)——————————————————————————————————————————

Year Revised Actual Variation %age ofBudget Expenditure (+) Excess variation

Estimates (–) Savings——————————————————————————————————————————

1998-1999 441.70 504.27 (+) 62.57 14.17

1999-2000 104.72 (–)264.88 (–) 369.60 352.94

2000-2001 20.61 25.83 (+) 5.22 25.33

2001-2002 26.00 25.28 (–) 0.72 2.77

2002-2003 92.20 38.98 (–) 53.22 57.72——————————————————————————————————————————

(B) Expenditure on Capital Work under Special Government Grants/Loans :

The table given below indicates the comparative position of the expenditure on capitalaccount under Division-V of the account during 2002-03 with the budget estimates alongwith thecorresponding figures for the past five years :—

(Rs. in lacs)——————————————————————————————————————————

Year Revised Actual Variation %age ofBudget Expenditure (+) Excess variation

Estimates (–) Savings——————————————————————————————————————————

1998-1999 375.63 67.09 (–) 308.54 82.14

1999-2000 245.60 89.61 (–) 155.99 63.51

2000-2001 236.15 16.38 (–) 219.77 93.06

2001-2002 245.60 14.84 (–) 230.76 93.96

2002-2003 245.60 12.35 (–) 233.25 94.97——————————————————————————————————————————

[ 5 (N) ]

As against the budgeted provisions for expenditure of Rs. 245.60 lacs only a sum ofRs. 12.35 lacs was incurred during the year 2002-2003. The reasons for the huge variation betweenrevised budget estimate and actual expenditure were not intimated to Audit.

6. Receipt and expenditure on Plan Scheme :

During the year, 2002-03, the revised budgeted receipt and expenditure under plan schemeunder (Account-II) of the General Wing of Municipal Corporation of Delhi were Rs. 63637.47 lacs andRs. 62950.00 lacs respectively. The table given below indicates the year-wise position of actual receipt,expenditure and closing balance of plan schemes for the last five years :—

(Rs. in lacs)——————————————————————————————————————————

Year Opening Receipts Total Expenditure Closingbalance during balance

the year——————————————————————————————————————————1998-1999 (+) 2,948.26 50,246.50 53,194.76 44,400.06 (+) 8,794.70

1999-2000 (+) 8,794.70 54,601.53 63,396.23 50,659.00 (+) 12,737.23

2000-2001 (+) 12,737.23 61,261.14 73,998.37 62,636.90 (+) 11,361.47

2001-2002 (+) 11,361.47 68,249.30 79,610.77 68,800.05 (+) 10,810.72

2002-2003 (+) 10,810.72 80,185.96 90,996.68 75,965.46 (+) 15,031.22——————————————————————————————————————————

Thus against the budgeted provisions for receipts and expenditure of Rs. 63,637.47 lacs andRs. 62,950.00 lacs the actuals were Rs. 80,185.96 lacs and Rs. 75965.46 lacs respectively.

7. Suspense Account :

The transactions accounted for under the Suspense Account during the year 2002-03 were asunder :—

(Rs. in lacs)

(i) Opening balance 9611.57

(ii) Receipts (–) 4213.01————

Total : 5398.56

(iii) Payments (–) 2880.15————

Closing balance 2518.41————

Statement of balance under Suspense Heads (Sub-heads) as worked out in the departmentalBroad Sheet/register to ensure correctness of balances taken in the account had not been attached withthe Annual Account. In the absence of the statement of actual balances the correctness of figures shownin the accounts cannot be ensured in Audit.

[ 6 (N) ]

8. Delay in adjustment of dishonoured cheques :

The following table indicates the year-wise position of dishonoured cheques lying outstandingfor want of adjustment during the year 1998-99 to 2002-03 as per Annual Account.

(Rs. in lacs)——————————————————————————————————————————

Year Opening Receipts Total Expenditure Closingbalance during balance

the year——————————————————————————————————————————1998-1999 1,946.96 2,629.36 4,576.32 1,070.45 3,505.87

1999-2000 3,505.87 2,317.09 5,822.96 703.39 5,119.57

2000-2001 5,119.57 2,529.08 7,648.65 545.03 7,103.62

2001-2002 7,103.62 3,168.28 10,271.90 1,364.37 8,907.53

2002-2003 8,907.53 2,999.86 11,907.39 975.11 10,932.28——————————————————————————————————————————

However, the dishonoured cheques shown outstanding at the end of every year in thedishonoured cheques Register taking the basis of dishonoured cheques of Rs. 15.99 lacs as on 31-3-74 ascorrect varied as given below :—

(Rs. in lacs)——————————————————————————————————————————

Year Figures of closing Figures of closing balance Variationbalance as on 31st March worked out as per monthly (+) Excess

as per monthly dishonoured account for the month of (–) shortcheques statement March, 2003

——————————————————————————————————————————1973-74 15.99 — —

1974-75 26.30 22.94 + 3.36

1975-76 33.85 30.76 + 3.09

1976-77 34.37 45.53 – 11.16

1977-78 34.09 31.82 + 2.27

1978-79 32.97 40.93 – 7.96

1979-80 57.20 41.36 + 15.84

1980-81 65.51 62.21 + 3.30

1981-82 101.43 89.17 + 12.26

1982-83 137.78 124.65 + 13.13

1983-84 196.49 180.63 + 15.86

1984-85 257.18 249.29 + 7.89

1985-86 282.62 282.79 – 0.17

[ 7 (N) ]

1986-87 363.76 376.52 – 12.761987-88 460.49 493.96 – 33.471988-89 532.16 561.90 – 29.741989-90 556.74 581.01 – 24.271990-91 678.57 768.95 – 90.381991-92 781.45 806.35 – 24.901992-93 605.01 628.31 – 23.301993-94 932.11 901.52 + 30.591994-95 740.72 710.33 + 30.391995-96 969.75 936.86 + 32.891996-97 1,347.60 1,314.80 + 32.801997-98 2,001.34 1,946.96 + 54.381998-99 3,560.24 3,505.87 + 54.371999-00 5,489.51 5,119.57 + 369.942000-01 7,472.56 7,103.62 + 368.942001-02 9,280.81 8,907.53 + 373.282002-03 11,382.89 10,932.28 + 450.61

——————————————————————————————————————————

The huge balances of dishonoured cheques worked out to Rs. 10932.28 lacs during 2002-03despite the instruction issued by the Chief Accountant vide Circular No. CA/F&G/3(28)/78/21/Part-11dated 3-8-78 and CA/F&G/390 dated 27-6-84.

The reasons for the huge outstanding balances of dishonoured cheques were not intimated toAudit.

9. Debt Position :

The following table indicates the debt position of the General Wing of Municipal Corporationof Delhi for the year 1995-96 to 2002-03.

(Rs. in lacs)——————————————————————————————————————————

Year Opening Loan received Total Repayment Closingbalance during the year balance

——————————————————————————————————————————1995-1996 35,032.82 4,370.92 39,403.74 626.75 38,776.991996-1997 38,776.99 4,818.75 43,595.74 355.72 43,240.021997-1998 43,240.02 14,968.88 58,208.90 100.00 58,108.901998-1999 58,108.90 14,554.38 72,663.28 14,123.11 58,540.171999-2000 58,540.17 21,754.68 80,294.85 9,909.56 70,385.292000-2001 70,385.29 14,762.50 85,147.79 11,285.74 73,862.052001-2002 73,862.05 13,520.00 87,382.05 17,516.02 69,866.032002-2003 69,866.03 16,506.25 86,372.28 15,294.92 71,077.36——————————————————————————————————————————

[ 8 (N) ]

The department did not work out the amount of interest payable on loan as well as amount ofloan instalment due to be paid during the period under review. As such repayment made on this accountcould not be vouched safe in Audit.

10. Delay in adjustment of advances :

A temporary advance is required to be adjusted soon after the transaction for which theadvance is drawn is completed and in any case not later than one month after the date of payment ofadvance.

Temporary advances amounting to Rs. 30.32 lacs were outstanding as on 31-3-1966. Sincethen amount of these advances had progressively increased. As on 31-3-2003, temporary advancesamounting to Rs. 388.19 lacs were outstanding as would be evident from the details given below for theperiod 1997-98 to 2002-2003 :—

(Rs. in lacs)——————————————————————————————————————————

Year Opening Advance Total Adjustment O/s. O/s. Total ofbalance during during Temporary Other Advances

the year the year advance advance O/s——————————————————————————————————————————1997-1998 190.69 708.38 899.07 563.94 1095.00 – 726.80 335.13

1998-1999 335.13 44.49 379.62 838.54 391.38 – 850.30 – 458.92

1999-2000 – 458.92 21.80 – 437.12 60.76 388.68 – 886.56 – 497.88

2000-2001 – 497.88 6.45 – 491.43 54.00 388.72 – 934.24 – 545.52

2001-2002 – 545.52 12.97 – 532.55 23.29 388.32 – 944.16 – 555.84

2002-2003 – 555.84 2.47 – 553.37 16.50 388.19 – 958.06 – 569.87——————————————————————————————————————————

It would be clear from the above that the temporary advances amounting to Rs. 388.19 lacswere outstanding as on 31-3-2003. However as per the year-wise statement of advances outstandingagainst various departments upto 31-3-2003 appended with the Revised Budget Estimate 2003-04(Misc.Vol.-III), temporary advances outstanding under Suspense Head amounted to Rs. 218.07 lacs. Thedepartment-wise position of advances outstanding was as under :—

——————————————————————————————————————————S. Name of department Temporary Temporary Total

No. Advance under Advance underSuspense Head Final Head

(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)——————————————————————————————————————————

1. Engineering 1,32,87,615.22 8,54,87,135.71 9,87,74,750.93

2. Health 33,20,480.36 60,17,333.88 93,37,814.24

3. Horticulture 15,79,242.71 1,27,595.00 17,06,837.71

4. Education 13,45,738.72 5,43,482.62 18,89,221.34

5. C.S.E. 9,11,529.00 10,90,074.00 20,01,603.00

[ 9 (N) ]

6. Fire Office 1,28,315.01 4,20,099.59 5,48,414.60

7. Terminal Tax 27,267.63 — 27,267.63

8. Capital Uniform Cell 1,98,887.97 4,34,783.00 6,33,670.97

9. ZAC/ADC 1,47,618.91 23,31,146.90 24,78,765.81

10. Other Deptt. 8,60,754.78 1,82,91,878.68 1,91,52,633.46

11. Controller (Prg. & Sty.) — 1,44,30,399.00 1,44,30,399.00——————————————————————————————————————————

Total : 2,18,07,450.31 12,91,73,928.38 15,09,81,378.69——————————————————————————————————————————

Further yearwise statement of advances outstanding against various department upto31-3-2003 and not adjusted upto 31-8-2003 amounted to Rs. 1509.81 lacs.

The heavy outstanding advances were against the Engineering Department whichaccumulated to 65.42% of the outstanding advances followed by Controller (Printing & Stationery)Department 9.55%. The headwise details of advances shown under final Head were not made availableto Audit.

Further advances to the tune of Rs. 1,55,582.64 were shown against the Fire Office &Terminal Tax Office. Although these departments had not been existing since long, but advancesoutstanding against these were being shown/carried over year after year.

This all clearly shows that instructions issued by the Commissioner on the subject were notbeing followed strictly and efforts were not made to recover/adjust the advances within the prescribedlimit.

11. Non-discharging of liabilities towards drought relief fund Rs. 0.91 lac :

The position of Drought Relief Fund under Head of Account 20-A-13 for the year 2002-03 asreflected in the Budget Estimates Miscellaneous Vol. III for the year 2004-2005 is as follows :—

(Rs. in lacs)——————————————————————————————————————————Opening balance Receipts Payment Closing balanceas on 1-4-2002 as on 31-3-2003——————————————————————————————————————————

0.91 — — 0.91——————————————————————————————————————————

This indicates that recovery to the tune of Rs. 0.91 lac made from the employees of theMunicipal Corporation of Delhi was still to be remitted to the Government operating the Drought ReliefFund. Reasons for non-discharging of the liabilities to tune of Rs. 0.91 lacs were neither on record norelucidated to Audit.

12. Non-recovery of Flood Advance Rs. 5.11 lacs :

According to the departmental instruction issued vide Circular No. 78/35 dated 12-9-1978, theflood advances granted to various Municipal Officers/Employees, were required to be recovered inmaximum 24 equal monthly installments. Flood advances paid to the Municipal Officers/employees andhave been recovered latest by December,1980, assuming that all the advance had been paid to theOfficers/employees by December, 1978.

[ 10 (N) ]

Scrutiny of Revised Budget Estimate 2003-04 viz a viz Monthly Accounts of March, 2003(supplementary) however shows that Rs. 5.11 lacs are still outstanding on account of Flood Advance.

The matter may please be looked into and these advances may either be recovered or bewaved off under competent sanction.

13. Special Funds :

In terms of Regulation 3 of the D.M.C. (Special Funds) Regulations, 1959, the Corporationshall constitute special Funds under General Account.

These Regulations further provide that appropriate authority shall in every year set apartcertain amount to these funds. The position of the various Statutory Special Funds was as under :—

(Rs. in lacs)——————————————————————————————————————————Name of Fund Opening Addition Withdrawal Closing

balance during during balanceas on as on

1-4-2002 2002-03 2002-03 31-3-2003——————————————————————————————————————————Statutory Funds :

I. Risk Insurance Fund 372.41 16.34 — 388.75

II. Sinking Fund 4.11 0.50 — 4.61

III. Staff Welfare 3.14 — — 3.14

IV. Survey of Delhi 58.47 2.81 — 61.28

Endoment Fund :

(a) Medical Endowment Fund 3.76 — — 3.76

(b) King Edward 1.30 — — 1.30Memorial Garden Fund

(c) General investment fund 0.01 — — 0.01–—————————————————————————————————————————

AUDIT COMMENTS :

Statutory Fund :

I. Risk Insurance Fund :

This fund was started to meet all losses to the Municipal properties arising out of fire,accident, riots and the like charges payable to third party due to accidents caused by the MunicipalVehicles. Sum to be credited to this fund annually is to be based on such proportion of the value of theassets by this insurance as may be determined by the Corporation from time to time.

A review of the statement of special Fund (Risk Insurance Fund) disclosed that only a sum ofRs.16.34 lacs was credited to this fund during the year 2002-03. The adequacy of credit of Rs. 16.34 lacsneeds to be assessed. No expenditure was incurred during the year 2002-03.

[ 11 (N) ]

II. Sinking Fund :

This fund was created for the wasting assets of the Corporation by crediting such sum asappropriate authority provide at the end of each year to this fund. A review of the statement of fundsdisclosed that no contribution was made to this fund during the year 2002-2003.

III. Staff Welfare Fund :

This fund was created for providing the well being of the Municipal officers and otherMunicipal employees. Fines collected under Section 95 is credited to this Fund. In addition, theCorporation may from time to time contribute to this fund, such sum as the appropriate authority mayprovide in the Annual Budget Estimate.

A review of the statement of Funds disclosed that neither any sum was credited to this fundnor any expenditure was incurred during the year 2002-2003.

IV. Survey of Delhi Municipal Area Fund :

This fund was started for carrying out periodical survey of Delhi. A review of statement ofFunds disclosed that neither any sum was credited to this Fund nor any expenditure was incurred duringthe year 2002-2003.

V. Endowment Fund :

(a) Medical Endowment Fund :

This fund was established with donation received from the public. This fund had not beenutilized for the last 24 years.

(b) King’s Edward Memorial Garden Fund :

This Fund was constituted by Government of India in 1916 and the cost of maintenance ofKing Edward Memorial Garden Fund was met from its income. Later on the maintenance of the Gardenwith this fund was transferred to the Corporation. No expenditure from this fund was incurred by theCorporation on the maintenance of the Garden and the amount of Rs. 1.30 lacs had been lying at its creditfor the last 26 years. Since the maintenance of the gardens is now being done by the Corporation, thenecessity of continuing of this fund needs to be reviewed.

14. Recoverable amount on account of Deposit works Rs. 1049.86 lacs :

Para 16.2.10 of C.P.W.A. Code states that when a deposit work is to be carried out, the localbody or other party concerned should advance the gross estimated expenditure which is payable by it tothe Divisional Officer in one lump sump or in instalments and by such dates as may be specified by localAdministration.

Para 13.4.3 of C.P.W.A. Code further provides that outlay on deposit work should be limitedto the amount of deposit received.

A scrutiny of the statement of Deposit works appended with the Revised Budget estimate forthe year 2003-04 revealed that the Engineering Department of M.C.D. had incurred excess expenditureon works carried out on behalf of other department/agencies/societies than the amount deposited by theparties. Thus amount of Rs. 1049.86 lacs was recoverable as on 31-3-2003 from them.

[ 12 (N) ]

In the statement of Deposit Works which is appended with the Budget Estimates-Miscellaneous Vol.-III, every year, the department had/has been recording the remarks “Excess to berecovered by the Division”, but no effective steps had been taken in this regard.

Reasons for incurring excess expenditure against the deposited amount by the parties and nonrecovery of excess amount may be intimated to audit.

15. Non-furnishing of Asset & Liabilities on account of G.P.F. & G.I.S. :

In terms of Regulation 33 of D.M.C. Provident Fund Regulations, the employees ProvidentFund subscription and the employer contribution are required to be paid each month in the Municipalcorporation. Provident Fund Account Regulation 34 enjoins that with the sanction of the StandingCommittee the money standing at the credit of the Provident Fund Account may be invested ingovernment securities including national Plan Certificates and Municipal Debentures, the money pendinginvestment kept with any scheduled Bank approved by the Corporation for short term deposits.

Details of assets & liabilities on account of G.P.F. & G.I.S. were not appended with theAnnual Account for the year 2002-2003. In the absence of which the total liability on account of G.P.F. &G.I.S. during the year 2002-2003 could not be ascertained. The full details in this regard may please befurnished to Audit.

16. Non-reconciliation of Loan/Grants-in-Aid :

Loans and Grants in-Aid are released by the Delhi Government for implementing various Planand Non-plans schemes. The Accounts department was required to reconcile the amount of grant-in-aid/loan released/received and actually accounted for, but no relevant record to ensure correctness of thefigures were shown/furnished to Audit.

In the absence of any record, it is presumed that Accounts department is not reconciling suchaccounts, which is a serious lapse on the part of the department.

Steps may be taken to reconcile such accounts quarterly, half yearly and annually underintimation to Audit.

17. Non-furnishing of details of Bank Account :

During the checking of Annual Account for the year 2002-2003, the following information hadnot been supplied to Audit :—

1. Total number of Bank Accounts operative during the year 2002-03.

2. Name of the Department responsible for operating such Bank Accounts.

3. Difference in Bank Reconciliation in each Account showing the balance and action takento reconcile the difference.

4. Name of the Department responsible for maintaining Cash Books.

In the absence of above information, the correctness of the Bank Accounts could not beensured in Audit.

[ 13 (N) ]

Disclaimers :

As per the Annual Account for the year 2002-03, the closing balance as on 31-3-2003 wasshown as Rs. 23,815.87 lacs while as per Bank Reconciliation Statement for the month of March, 2003,Closing balance of Bank as on 31-3-2003 was taken as Rs. 2986.77 lacs. But neither the Bank statementsnor a certificate in regard to lying of so much balance in all the Accounts of M.C.D. were furnished fromconcerned Bank Managers.

In its absence, correctness of closing balance lying in Bank Accounts of M.C.D. could not becertified/verified in Audit. The possibility of theft/loss/embezlement, if any too could not be ruled out inAudit.

Further, as per Bank Reconciliation Statement for the month of March, 2003, the followingitems were interalia taken into account for reconciling the closing balance of cash as per cash book/Annual Account with that of what lying in the Bank Accounts of M.C.D. as on 31-3-2003 :—

Amount in Rs.

(i) Outstanding challans 405,04,66,045.49

(ii) Outstanding cheques 200,58,06,498.99

(iii) Direct Credits 344,72,13,743.00

(iv) Direct Debits 191,57,57,147.00

As the Department vide its letter No. DCA/FMB/2010-11/155 dated 15-9-2010 expressed itsinability to provide the details of the above amounts stating the same is not traceable, the correctness tothese figures as well as figures reflected in Bank Reconciliation Statement could not be certified/verified inAudit.

The Annual Account alongwith these comments may be placed before the StandingCommittee for being laid before the Corporation as required under Regulation 6 of Delhi MunicipalCorporation (Maintenance of Accounts) Regulation 1959.

[ 18 (N) ]

Item No. 47 :— Award of works costing upto Rs. 5.00 lacs under Unit Rate System during2012-13.

Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/Engg./NDMC/214/C&C dated 9-10-2012.

In the erstwhile MCD the unit rate system was being followed for execution of urgent andimportant works upto the limit of Rs 5.00 lacs without call of tenders for each individual work, asconsiderable time is saved if the tenders for each individual work would have been invited. Besides, therehad been a good response from registered Municipal Contractors in the erstwhile MCD for Unit RateSystem 2011-12 as 1046 contractors responded by quoting rates for various items of work.

Accordingly the Unit Rate System on same pattern may be adopted for execution of urgentand important civil works without call of tenders for each individual work upto the limit of Rs. 5.00 lacs inNDMC for the year 2012-13.

The Civil Works (including desilting works and dense carpet works) are proposed to be takenup as follows :—

1. To invite EOI for empanelment of contractors in NDMC and receipt of fresh rates as perthe existing modalities in the erstwhile MCD for the year 2012-13.

2. The tenders for works upto Rs. 5.00 lacs shall be opened in a single draw of lots by thezonal Superintending Engineers. For this purpose two sets of slips i.e. one for name of thework and other with the name of the contractor may be put in two separate boxes, pick uptwo slips i.e. one from each box for allotment of a specific work to a specific contractor inrotation. The competence for accepting the tenders shall be as per prevailing instructions/circulars in the erstwhile MCD. The work shall be accordingly allotted on rotation basisseparately for each of the six zones of the NDMC. A roster shall be maintained in thisregard.

3. Exemption of press publicity be granted for each work under URM. However, initialpublicity through EOI shall be made, through press notification.

4. Quality assurance/auditing shall also be applicable as being carried out for other similarworks as per circular vide No. D/SE(QC)/2006/1571 dated 25-10-2006 in the erstwhileMCD and further circulars issued from time to time.

5. The interested contractor shall have to deposit Registration Fee/performance Security ofRs. 1.00 lac.

6. Estimates shall be prepared on EDIS and without splitting of work.

7. Existing instructions of maximum limit of Rs 5.00 lacs per ward in a month and maximumlimit of Rs. 25.00 lacs per ward in a year will be adhered to.

8. The work will be awarded subject to availability of budget under the relevant head ofaccount.

It is proposed to continue this system by calling fresh Expression of Interest to empanelcontractors with new rates for the emergent works up to a value of Rs. 5. 00 lacs for financial year 2012-13. A committee comprising of members from Engineering and Finance will be constituted to finalizemodalities for Expression of Interest & tender evaluation.

[ 19 (N) ]

Finance has concurred the proposal with following observations, the reply to which is asunder :———————————————————————————————————————————S. No. Observations of Finance Department Reply——————————————————————————————————————————

1. Existing instructions of maximum limit of The condition will be adhered to.Rs. 5 lacs per ward in a month and maximumlimit of Rs. 25 lacs per ward in a year shouldbe strictly adhered to.

2. Department may include the performance Performance report for the year 2010-11 hasreport for the year 2010-11 & 2011-12 as per already been received. However the freshformat device by CA-cum-FA’s note dated registration of agencies for URM 2012-1322-12-2010 in the preamble. shall be done only after getting performance

report for the year 2011-12.

3. Justified rates to be taken as unit rate, if Justified rates will be taken as unit rate, iflowest quoted rate is higher than the justified lowest quoted rate is higher than the justifiedrate. This justification of rates should be got rate. The justification and rates will be workeddone from the CPWD or restricted to out on the basis of CPWD works manualestimated cost. 2012 and prevailing market rates at the time

of receipt of EOI/Tenders of items to belisted in URM. The suggestion of restrictingthe justified rates to estimated cost is nottenable because the justification is preparedaccordingly to and on the basis of currentmarket rates. It cannot be limited toestimated cost.

4. Categorization of contractors and allotment Categorization of contractors will be as perof work should be regulated as per CPWD CPWD manual. No guidelines available inmanual. CPWD manual for allotment of work under

URM.

5. Work allotted to the contractors through URM Necessary condition will be incorporated inshould be completed within the stipulated time the EOI.and no extension of time should be allowed.

6. Sites should be cleared before allotment of Necessary instructions will be issued.work.

7. The payment should be availability of funds The payment will be made subject toonly and in case, any court case, department availability of funds only and in case, anyshould contest the case with this condition. court case, department will contest the case

with this condition.

[ 20 (N) ]

8. Tender cost should be collected from the Collecting of tender cost and Earnest Moneycontractors before award of each work along before award of work will defeat the verywith Earnest Money. purpose of URM and will delay the work.

URM was introduced in erstwhile MCDduring 2005-06 and since then it is thepractice to deduct the tender cost from1st Running Bill and security @ 10%.

9. All the estimates of URM should be prepared The same has been included in the proposalon EDIS. at point No. 6.

——————————————————————————————————————————

Accordingly, the proposal may be placed before the North Delhi Municipal Corporationthrough Standing Committee as an item of urgent business for accord of approval to award of CivilEmergent Works (including desilting works and dens carpet works) up to Rs. 5.00 lacs under Unit RateSystem and to authorize the Commissioner to fix up the agencies after inviting Expression of Interest toempanel the contractors along with the recommended rates for the year 2012-13.

Item No. 48 :— Finalization of Rate Contract and Agency for Diet Articles for all MCDHospitals and dispensaries of all three Mpl. Corporation for the year,2012-2013 & 2013-2014.

Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/Health/NDMC/217/C&C dated 10-10-2012.

After obtaining administrative approval of the competent authority, Tenders were invited videtender No. 12529 through e-tenders on dual bid basis for Purchase of Diet Articles (Perishable) whichwas also published on 8-4-2012 in the following Leading Newspapers :—

Sl. No. Name of the Newspaper Language

1. Hindustan Times English

2. The Hindu English

3. Hindustan Hindi

4. Dainik Jagran Hindi

5. The Daily Milap Urdu

The technical bids of the said tenders were opened and in response to the said tenders the fivefirms M/s. Mehak Traders, M/s. National Fruit Centre, M/s Shiv Traders, Shiva Ice Depot and M/s. AnjuTraders submitted their offers. Comperative statement were prepared and same are Annexed at ‘A’.

A meeting of Purchase Board comprising of Addl. Cm. (Health), Dir. H.A. Medical Supdtt./KH, Addl. M.S./HRH, Addl. M.S./RBIPMT, Addl. M.S./KH, Addl. M.S./SDNH MO I/C Kitchen/RBIPMT,DCA (Health), DCA (F&G), Dietician/KH and Dietician/HRH was held on 28-5-2012 in the office ofAddl. Cm. (Health) to evaluate the Technical bids of all the firms. Board found that the firm M/s. AnjuTraders has not submitted any paper on line, hence the offer of the firm was rejected. The boardevaluated the technical bids of remaining four firms. The board recommended to obtain the details of thequoted items from the firms, in their bids Group-wise and also the details of the turn over Group-wise as

[ 21 (N) ]

per NIT. All the firms submitted their information as requested and again a meeting of board was held on12-7-2012. The board re-evaluated the technical bids and recommended as follows :———————————————————————————————————————————

Sl. Name of the firm Whether as per the terms Recommended for opening& Conditions of the NIT of the Price bid or not

——————————————————————————————————————————Group-I (Eggs) :

1. M/s. Mehak Traders Yes Recommended

2. M/s. Shiva Ice Depot Not quoted Not recommended

3. M/s. Shiv Traders Yes Recommended

4. M/s. National Fruit Centre Not quoted Not recommended

Group-II (Paneer) :


2. M/s. Shiva Ice Depot No (the firm has submitted Not recommendedthe authorization of MotherDairy which was not consideredand financial turn over submittedwas not as per the NIT)

3. M/s. Shiv Traders No (as financial turn over Not recommendedsubmitted was not as per theNIT)

4. M/s. National Fruit Centre No (as financial turn over Not recommendedsubmitted was not as per theNIT)

Group-III (Vegetables) :



3. M/s. Shiv Traders Not quoted Not recommended

4. M/s. National Fruit Centre Yes Recommended

Group-IV (Fruits) :

1. M/s. Mehak Traders YES Recommended


3. M/s. Shiv Traders No (as financial turn over Not recommendedsubmitted was not as per theNIT)

4. M/s. National Fruit Centre Yes Recommended

[ 22 (N) ]

Group-V (Ice) :


2. M/s. Shiva Ice Depot Yes Recommended

3. M/s. Shiv Traders Not quoted Not recommended

4. M/s. National Fruit Centre Not quoted Not recommended——————————————————————————————————————————

Again a meeting of Purchase Board was held on 23-7-2012 to evaluate the comparativestatements of price bids, Annexed at ‘B’. The board evaluated the price bids, rates quoted by the firmM/s. Mehak Traders for Group-A, C & D are the lowest and reasonable, though M/s. Shiv Traders forGroup ‘A’, M/s. National Fruit Centre for Group ‘C’ & ‘D’ and M/s. Mehak Traders for Group ‘E’ alsoqulified technically. Hence the offer of M/s. Mehak Traders for Group A, C & D, were recommended forapproval. Secondly the rates quoted by the firm M/s. Shiva Ice Depot for Group-E, i.e. for Ice are thelowest and recommended for approval. Further board observed that rates quoted by the firm M/s. MehakTraders for Group-B i.e. for Paneer @ Rs. 250/- per kg. are on higher side, hence firm be called fornegotiation for reductions of rates for supply of Paneer.

Negotiations for reduction of rates for supply of Paneer were held during the meeting ofpurchase board at 11.00 am on 26.07.2012 in the Office of Addl. Cm. (Health) and rates were reducedfrom Rs. 250/- per kg. to Rs. 233/- per kg. Annexed at ‘C’. In the meeting, the board also justified thereasonability of negotiated rates.

Mr. Raj Kumar Proprietor. M/s. Shiva Ice Depot represented vide his letter dated 21-7-2012,interalia quoted his grievances regarding the tender under reference. The complaint was reviewed inPurchase Board on 28-9-2012 in the Office of Addl. Cm. (Health) (North), it was found that thedocuments submitted by the firm were not as per terms and condition of NIT and the complaint wasdisposed off.

The board also recommends the above rates for approval for purchase for Annual RateContract for the year 2012-2013 & 2013-2014.

Earnest money for the lowest quoted firm of M/s. Mehak Traders for Group-A to Damounting to Rs. 80,000.00 has already been deposited vide G-8 Receipt No. 030125 dated 21-7-2012 andEarnest Money for Group E of lowest quotee firm i.e. M/s. Shiva Ice Depot has been deposited vide G-8Receipt No. 030140 dated 25-7-2012.

In addition to the above rates of the tendered diet articles, some non-tendered items are beingpurchased at the prevailing rates from DSCSC, Kendriya Bhandar and other Government Agenciesagainst cash/cheque payment. Handling and Cartage charges are to be paid extra wherever it requires.The details of such non tendered items is as under :———————————————————————————————————————————

S. Items Appx. quantity Average Name of the agencies EstimatedNo. per annum prevailing cost

rates (in Rs.) (Rs.)——————————————————————————————————————————

1. LPG Gas 7,655 cylinders 399 (per gas Indian Oil Corpoation 30,54,512/-cylinder) (Authoirzed dealer)

2. Dals 42,421 kgs. 80 (per kg.) DSCSC/Kendriya Bhandar/ 33,93,650/-Govt. Agencies

[ 23 (N) ]

3. Condiments 9, 642 kg. 125 (per kg.) DSCSC/Kendriya Bhandar/ 12,05,258/-Govt. Agencies

4. Sugar 24.157 kg. 32 (per kg.) DSCSC/Kendriya Bhandar/ 7,73,035/-Govt. Agencies

5. Breads 55, 205 in No. 20 (per 800 gm.) M/s. Modren Food Industries/ 11,04,110/-Britannia Industries Ltd. orGovt Agencies

6. Atta 1,65,467 kg. 20 (per kg.) DSCSC/Kendriya Bhandar/ 33,09,330/-Govt. Agencies

7. Rice 51,278 kg. 27 (per kg.) DSCSC/Kendriya Bhandar/ 13,84,495/-Govt. Agencies

8. Vegetable 16,508 ltr. 80 (per kg.) DSCSC/Kendriya Bhandar/ 13,20,675/-Ghee/Refind Govt. AgenciesOil

9. Milk 4,10,306 ltr. 27 (per ltr.) M/s. Delhi Milk Scheme 1,10,78,275/-

10. Tea Leaves 2,049 kg. 250 (per kg.) DSCSC/Kendriya Bhandar/ 5,12,152/-Govt. Agencies

11. Butter 1,913 kg. 300 (per kg.) Govt approved Agency 5,74,000/-

12. Maintenance N.A. N.A. Through board 90,000/-Gas

13. Tinning of N.A. N.A. Through board 25,000/-utensil

14. Soft Coke and N.A. N.A. Through board 25,000/-Fire Wood

15. Dalia 2,475 kg. 40 (per kg.) DSCSC/Kendriya Bhandar/ 99,000/-Govt. Agencies

16. Miscellaneous N.A.. N.A. Through board 1,06,000/-—————

Total Rs. : 2,80,54,492/-—————

The condition of depositing of Security money and execution of agreement may please bewaived off in respect of non tendered items. In case of the non availability of these items at above Govt.Agencies, board approved for the purchase of tendered items may be allowed to purchase these itemsfrom the local market on the basis of required quantity as done in the previous years.

Expenditure for tendered items is per anum is — Rs. 1, 88, 64, 454.00.

Expenditure for non tendered items per anum is — Rs. 2, 80, 54, 492.00.

Total Expenditure per anum is — Rs. 4, 69, 18, 956.00.

(Rs. four crore sixty nine lacs eighteen thousand nine hundred fifty six approximately).

[ 24 (N) ]

Finance has examined the proposal and allowed to place the same before the Competentauthority for approval along with the clarifications of the observation of finance. The same are Annexedat ‘D’.

The case is placed before the Corporation routed through Standing Committee for approvaland expenditure sanction for fixing the rate contract and agencies for Annual Contract for the purchase ofDiet articles for all the hospitals and dispensaries of all three Municipal Corporations for a period of twoyear i.e. 2012-2013 and 2013-2014.

ANNEXURE ‘A’

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT

For purchase of Diet Articles Tender No. 12529————————————————————————————————————————————————Sl. Name of the M/s. Mehak M/s. Shiva M/s. Shiva M/s. National M/s. AnjuNo. documents Traders Ice Depot Traders Fruit Centre Traders————————–————————————————————————————————————————1. (a) VAT Yes Yes Yes — No dicument

Registration has beenreceived.

(b) Experience Yes Yes Yes Yes

(c) Authorization — Yes — —

(d) PAN Yes Yes Yes Yes

(e) Turn Over Sheets :

(i) 2008-09 Yes Yes Yes Yes

(ii) 2009-10 Yes Yes Yes Yes

(iii) 2010-11 Yes Yes Yes Yes————————————————————————————————————————————————2. Earnest Money Rs. 20,000/- Rs. 20,000/- Rs. 20,000/- Rs. 20,000/- Rs. 20,000/-

Rs. each vide DD each vide DD each vide DD each vide DD each vide DDNo. 151914, No. 035307 & No. 051918, 19 No. 051888, No. 443801,151915,151913, 08 & 20 051915, 051987 07, 08 & 09151912 & 151911

————————————————————————————————————————————————

[ 25 (N) ]

ANNEXURE ‘B’

GROUP-WISE COMPARATIVE DETAILS OF DIET ARTICLES

VideTender No. 12529

Group-A (Egg)————————————————————————————————————————————————S. No. Name of the quoted firm Egg Annual cost Remarks————————–————————————————————————————————————————

7,74300 in Nos.

1. M/s. Mehak Traders 4.25 each Rs. 32,90,775/- L 1

2. M/s. Shiva Ice Depot — —

3. M/s. Shiv Trader 4.50 each Rs. 34,84,350/- L 2

4. M/s. National Fruits Centre — —————————————————————————————————————————————————

Approval rates for the 3.40 eachyear 2010-2012

————————————————————————————————————————————————



Group-B (Paneer)

————————————————————————————————————————————————S. No. Name of the quoted firm Paneer Annual cost Remarks————————–————————————————————————————————————————

14000 kg.

1. M/s. Mehak Traders 250 per kg. Rs. 35,00,000/- L 1

2. M/s. Shiva Ice Depot N.A. N.A.

3. M/s. Shiv Trader N.A. N.A.

4. M/s. National Fruits Centre N.A. N.A.————————————————————————————————————————————————

Approval rates for the 165/- per kg.year 2010-2012

————————————————————————————————————————————————

[ 26 (N) ]

GR

OU

P-W

ISE

CO

MPA

RA

TIV

E D

ETA

ILS

OF

DIE

T A

RT

ICL

ES

Vid

eTen

der

No.

125

29

Gro

up-C

(Ve

geta

bles

)

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

S.N

ame

of t

heSe

ason

alPo

tato

Pnio

nTo

mat

oG

inge

rLe

mon

Cor

rian

der

Appr

ox.

Rem

arks

No.

quot

ed f

irm

Vege

tabl

eAn

nual

(Kgs

.)(K

gs.)

(Kgs

.)(K

gs.)

(Kgs

.)(K

gs.)

(Kgs

.)C

ost

——

——

——

——

–——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

—14

5075

5327

542

570

4332

014

0020

012

80

1.M

/s. M

ehak

Tra

ders

18/-

15/-

20/-

20/-

45/-

45/-

40/-

26,1

1,35

0/-

7,99

,125

/-8,

51,4

00/-

8,66

,400

/-63

,000

/-9,

000/

-51

,200

/-52

,51,

475/

-L

1

2.M

/s. S

hiva

Ice

Dep

ot—

——

——

——

—

3.M

/s. S

hiv

Trad

ers

——

——

——

——

4.M

/s. N

atio

nal F

ruits

Cen

tre19

/-16

/-22

/-22

/-48

/-48

/-42

/-

27,5

6,42

5/-

8,52

,400

/-9,

36,5

40/-

9,53

,040

/-67

,200

/-9,

600/

-53

,760

/-56

,28,

965/

-L

2—

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

—A

ppro

ved

rate

s fo

r the

12/-

11/-

16/-

15.5

026

/-26

/-18

/-ye

ar 2

010-

1012

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

[ 27 (N) ]

GR

OU

P-W

ISE

CO

MPA

RA

TIV

E D

ETA

ILS

OF

DIE

T A

RT

ICL

ES

Vid

eTen

der

No.

125

29

Gro

up-D

(Fr

uits

)

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

S.N

ame

of t

heAp

ple

Ora

nge

Mos

sam

iM

ango

Mal

taBa

nana

Chi

koo

Appr

ox.

Rem

arks

No.

quot

ed f

irm

(Kgs

.)(K

gs.)

(Kgs

.)(K

gs.)

(Kgs

.)(K

gs.)

(Kgs

.)An

nual

cos

t—

——

——

——

—–—

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

1944

025

000

6528

096

0010

600

3260

086

40

1.M

/s. M

ehak

Tra

ders

60/-

45/-

40/-

—40

/-34

.50

40/-

11,6

6,40

0/-

11,2

5,00

0/-

26,1

1,20

0/-

—4,

24,0

00/-

11,2

4,70

0/-

3,45

,600

/-67

,96,

900/

-L

1

2.M

/s. S

hiva

Ice

Dep

ot—

——

——

——

—

3.M

/s. N

atio

nal F

ruits

Cen

tre62

/-48

/-42

/-—

42/-

36/-

42/-

12,0

5,28

0/-

12,0

0,00

0/-

27,4

1,76

0/-

—4,

45,2

00/-

11,7

3,60

0/-

3,62

,880

/-71

,28,

720/

-L

2—

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

—A

ppro

ved

rate

s fo

r the

40/-

34.5

035

/-30

/-30

/-23

.50

37/-

year

201

0-10

12—

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

—

[ 28 (N) ]



Group-E (ICE)————————————————————————————————————————————————S. No. Name of the quoted firm ICE Annual cost Remarks————————–————————————————————————————————————————

57240 kg.

1. M/s. Mehak Traders 5.29 per kg. Rs. 3,02,799.60/- L 2

2. M/s. Shiva Ice Depot 4.60 per kg. Rs. 2,63,304/- L 1

3. M/s. Shiv Trader — —

4. M/s. National Fruits Centre — —————————————————————————————————————————————————

Approval rates for the 4.29 per kg.year 2010-2012

————————————————————————————————————————————————

ANNEXURE ‘C’

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION(KASTURBA HOSPITAL)

NEGOTIATION PROFORMAE

Subject :—Negotiations for Reduction of Rated for supply of Paneer.

Tender No. : 12529

Date of Negotiation : 26-7-2012————————————————————————————————————————————————Sl. No. Name of the item 1st Offer 2nd Offer 3rd Offer————————–————————————————————————————————————————

1. Paneer 245/- 240/- 233/-————————————————————————————————————————————————

Other terms & conditions—remain unchanged.

For M/s. Mehak Traders.

Certified that negotiated rates are justified, hence offer is recommended for approval forpurchase.

Dietician/KH Dietician/HRH MO I/C Kitchen/RBIPMT

Addl. M.S./KH Addl. M.S./HRH Addl. M.S./SDNH

Addl. M.S./RBIPMT Medical Supdtt./KH DCA (F&G) (North)

DCA (Health) (North) Dir. HA (North) Addl. Cm. (Health) (North)

[ 29 (N) ]

ANNEXURE ‘D’

No. 7.8.12/CA/F&G/NDMC-1017/230 Dated : 24-8-12——————————————————————————————————————————S. No Finance observations are as under Reply to the finance observations dated 24-8-12——————————————————————————————————————————

1. Head of account may please be Head of a/c of all MCD hospitals is placed in file.placed on record.

2. Availability of budget under relevant Availability of budget under relevant head of a/c is asH/A may be placed on record. under :—

———————————————————————Name of Hospital Head of a/c Budget provision

per annum in Rs.———————————————————————RBIPMT 44-1040 1,50,00,000/-HRH 43-1040 90,00,000/-KH 45-1040 70,00,000/-SDNH 47-1040 30,00,000/-MVIDH 48-1040 30,00,000/-GLMH 46-1040 6,00,000/-Ballimaran Ayu. H. 49-1040 6,00,000/-Haiderpur Ayu. H. 50-1040 6,00,000/-———————————————————————

3. Draft NIT may be placed on record Draft NIT and Budget slip for PIO are placed in the file.properly.

4. Details of comparative statement Group wise/item wise comparative statements are placed item wise be placed on record. in the file.

5. FTC sheet dully filled up be placed FTC sheet dully filled up placed in the file.on record.

6. The contractual amount be placed on Contractual amount a sum of Rs. 1,88,64,454/- is placed inrecord. the file.

7. As per transaction list six firms have Tender forms have been down loaded by six firms and thecompleted the document purchase. tender fee had been deposited by five of them vide G-8However in the proposal department nos.submitted that five firms submitted ———————————————————————the tender, department may please Name of the firm G-8 No. with dateclarify whether all the firms who ———————————————————————have downloaded the tender docu- M/s. Mehak Traders 045468 dated 26-4-2012ment have deposited the required M/s. Shiv Traders 045478 dated 27-4-2012tender fee or not. M/s. National Fruit Centre 045477 dated 27-4-2012

M/s. Anju Traders 045484 dated 28-4-2012M/s. Shiva Ice Depot 045476 dated 27-4-2012M/s. Abhijeet Associates Not deposited———————————————————————M/s. Abhijeet Associates downloaded the tender form butdid not process further. The firm has been asked by letterNo. KH/Diet Articles/2012/2168 dated 27-8-2012 to payfor the tender cost immediately.

[ 30 (N) ]

8. Administrative approval to float the Expost facto approval of the Commissioners of respectivetender and terms & conditions after Corporations through Commissioner, NDMC have beenobtaining the advice of finance & obtained before opening the financial bid as recommendedLaw department has also not got by the purchase board in the meeting held in the office ofapproved by the competent authority. Addl. Commissioner (Health) North dated 28-5-12.

9. Please quote LPP & justified rates List of justified rates along with last purchase prices isby the department for each item. placed in the file.

——————————————————————————————————————————

No. 7.9.12/CA/F&G/NDMC/1017/269 Dated : 7-9-12

Subject :— Finalization of Rate contract & Agency for Diet Articles for all three CorporationHospital & Dispensaries for the year 2012-13 & 2012-14.

With reference to the earlier observation of finance conveyed vide No.7/8/12/CA/F&G/NDMC-1017/230 dated 24-8-12 and reply submitted by the department, the proposal has been reexaminedand the observations of finance are as under :—

——————————————————————————————————————————S. Finance observations Departmental clarifications

No. to finance queries——————————————————————————————————————————1. Draft NIT is not placed on record. Needful has been done. The

same has been placed onrecord in the file.

2. FTC sheet is incomplete/not filled-up properly. FTC sheet dully filled up isprovided in the file.

3. Department submitted that ex-post facto approval of the Permission to call tenders inCommissioner of respective corporations through Commissioner. anticipation of administrativeNDMC have been obtained before opening the financial bid as approval and expenditurerecommended by the purchase board in the meeting held in the office sanction have been obtainedof Addl. Commissioner (H) North dated 28-05-2012, Department from Commissioner EDMCshould have taken administrative approval to float the tender & and NDMC. However ex-approval in respect of T & C from the competent authority i.e. post facto sanction ofCorporation. administrative approval and

expenditure sanction shall beobtained from the Corpora-tion at the time of approvalof rates and agencies.

[ 31 (N) ]

4. The % increase in rates item-wise are as under w.r.t. the last yearpurchase

——————————————————————————— S. Name of Item Rates for Last purchase %No. the year price for the increase

2012-14 year 2010-12———————————————————————————1. Group-A Eggs 4.25 each 3.40 each 25

2. Group-B Paneer 233/- per kg. 165/- per kg. 41

3. Group-C Vegetables :

A Seasonal 18/- per kg. 12/- per kg. 50Vegetables

B Potato 15/- per kg. 11/- per kg. 36

C Onion 20/- per kg. 16/- per kg. 25

D Tomato 20/- per kg. 16/- per kg. 29

E Ginger 45/- per kg. 26/- per kg. 73

F Lemon 45/- per kg. 26/- per kg. 73

G Corriander 40/- per kg. 18/- per kg. 122

4. Group-D Fruits :

A Apple 60/- per kg. 40/- per kg. 50

B Orange 45/- per kg. 34.50 per kg. 30

C Mossami 40/- per kg. 35/- per kg. 14

D Malta 40/- per kg. 30/- per kg. 33

E Banana 34.50 per kg. 23.50 per kg. 46

F Chikoo 40/- per kg. 37/- per kg. 08

5. Group-E Ice 4.60 per kg. 4.29/- per kg. 07———————————————————————————

The rates for the items at Sl. No. 01, 02, 03, 04 (a to e) seems to be As per market inflation andon higher side (i.e. higher between 25% to 122%). Department may consumer price Index thejustify such sharp increase in prices of several items. rates have been increased in

the market. The previousrates have been approvedand applicable w.e.f 1-4-10and these rates will beapplicable for further twoyears (i.e. 2012-13-2014).The vegetable items men-tioned i.e. ginger, lemon andcoriander for which the

[ 32 (N) ]

increase is much on higherside in comparison to the lastyear ’s price are to beprocured in small quantityand the financial implicationwill be minimum, hence ratesare justified and reasonable.

Further, in respect of non-tendered items under the provisions of GFRRule which is reproduced below :—

For procurement of all items of office consumption beyond Rs. 1 lac For non tendered items theto Rs. 25 lacs, where limited tenders are to be invited as per Rule 151 provision of GFR shall beof the GFRs. 2005, KB and NCCF among other shall also be invited followed in future. Howeverto participate in such limited tenders, in case these Co-operatives are keeping in view to meet thefunctioning at the stations. Other thing being equal. Purchase day to day requirement thepreference will be granted to KB/NCCF, if the price quoted by the proposal for on time relaxa-co-operatives is within 10% of the L1 price and if these co-operatives tion will be obtained from theare willing to match the L1 price. No price preference over and competent authority.above the L1 price shall be given to these Co-operatives. However,KB/NCCF will be exempted from furnishing bid security (Earnestmoney deposit).

As per the above provision the limited tender are required to be However, the expenditureinvited hence the above provision of GFR may be followed in principle. will be restricted within theThe availability of budget provision under the relevant H/A may be allocated budget provisionscertified by the department. and for the additional require-

ment the provisions shall bemade in RB 2012-1

——————————————————————————————————————————

Item No. 49 :— Revision of rates of Wages of Daily Wagers.

Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/CLWO/NDMC/247/C&C dated 22-10-2012.

The Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi has revised the minimum rates ofwages in Schedule employments & Clerical & Non-Technical Supervisory Staff under the MinimumWages Act, 1948 vide its Notification No. F. No. 12(142)/11/MW/Lab./279 dated 20-4-2012 w.e.f.1-4-2012. The rates are as under :—

IN ALL THE SCHEDULED EMPLOYMENTS(For All Categories)

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––Category Rates as on Dearness Rates Revised from 1-4-2012

1-10-2011 Allowance ———————————————1-4-2012 Per Month Per Day

(Rs.) (Rs.)––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––Unskilled 6656.00 364.00 7020.00 270.00Semi-Skilled 7358.00 390.00 7748.00 298.00Skilled 8112.00 416.00 8528.00 328.00––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

[ 33 (N) ]

CLERICAL & NON-TECHNICAL SUPERVISORY STAFF––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Category Rates as on Dearness Rates Revised from 1-4-20121-10-2011 Allowance ———————————————

1-4-2012 Per Month Per Day(Rs.) (Rs.)

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––Non-Matriculation 7358.00 390.00 7748.00 298.00

Matriculate but not Graduates 8112.00 416.00 8528.00 328.00

Graduates and above 8814.00 468.00 9282.00 357.00––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

It is pertinent to mention here that prior to this the rates Daily Wager were revised w.e.f.1-4-2011 in pursuance of decision taken by Corporation on 23-1-2012 Resolution No. 878 on parity ofwages revised by Govt. of NCT of Delhi vide its Resolution No. F. No. 12(142)/02/MW/Lab./3650 dated31-10-2011. The rates were in all schedule employments & Clerical & Non-Technical Supervisory Staffwas as under :—

IN ALL THE SCHEDULED EMPLOYMENTS

(For All Categories)––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––


w.e.f. Per Month Per Day1-10-2011 (Rs.) (Rs.)

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––Unskilled 6422.00 234.00 6656.00 256.00

Semi-Skilled 7098.00 260.00 7356.00 283.00

Skilled 7826.00 286.00 8112.00 312.00––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

CLERICAL & NON-TECHNICAL SUPERVISORY STAFF––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––


w.e.f. Per Month Per Day1-10-2011 (Rs.) (Rs.)

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––Non-Matriculation 7098.00 260.00 7356.00 283.00

Matriculate but not Graduates 7826.00 286.00 8112.00 312.00


It is submitted that as and when the rates of minimum wages are revised by the Govt. ofN.C.T. of Delhi under the provision of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 which is applicable to M.C.D., it isstatutory obligation of the local authority to implement and pay to its daily wagers accordingly.

[ 34 (N) ]

It is also mention here that as per report received from various departments of the NorthDelhi Municipal Corporation there are 2470 approx. employees are working on daily wages if North DelhiMunicipal Corporation increase the wages of daily wagers the approx. additional expenditure will be aboutRs. 2,33,76,080/- in a month and Rs. 28,05,12,960/- in an year.

The CA-cum-FA has also concurred the financial implications.

It is, therefore proposed that minimum rates in North Delhi Municipal Corporation may berevised as stated above.

The matter may be placed before the Corporation routed through Standing Committee forapproval and as an item of URGENT BUSINESS.

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI(LABOUR DEPARTMENT)

5, SHAM NATH MARG, DELHI-54

F. No. 12(142)/11/MW/Lab./279 Dated : 20-4-2012

ORDER

1. Whereas the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi, had last revised the minimumrates of wages in Scheduled Employments under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 in the National CapitalTerritory of Delhi vide Notification No. 12(142)/11/MW/Lab./2023-47 dated 26-7-2011.

2. And whereas, in the abovementioned notification it was stipulated that the Dearness Allow-ance will be payable on the basis of six montly average index numbers of January to June and July toDecember, on 1st April and 1st October respectively.

3. And whereas, now, the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi after adjustment ofthe average Consumer Price Index Number of the period from June, 2011 to July, 2011 which is 196.33, anincrease of 9.66 points, hereby declares the following Dearness Allowance, which shall be payable for allcategories w.e.f . 1-4-2012.The rates after including additional D.A. are as follows.

4. The following rates are applicable in respect of unskilled, semiskilled and skilled categoriesin all scheduled employments except employment in ‘Shops and Establishments’ and employment in‘Clubs’ :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Category Rates as on Dearness Rates from 1-4-20121-10-2011 Allowance (pm) ———————————————

w.e.f. 1-4-2012 Per Month Per Day(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––Un-skilled 6656.00 364.00 7020.00 270.00

Semi-Skilled 7358.00 390.00 7748.00 298.00

Skilled 8112.00 416.00 8528.00 328.00––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

[ 35 (N) ]

5. The following rates are applicable in respect of unskilled, semiskilled and skilled categories in(i) Employment in Shops and Establishments (ii) Employment in Clubs, which are as follows :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Category Rates as on Dearness Rates from 1-4-20121-10-2011 Allowance (pm) ———————————————


––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––Unskilled (i) 6656.00 364.00 (i) 7020.00 (i) 270.00

(ii) 6531.00 (ii) 6895.00 (ii) 266.00

(iii) 5862.00 (iii) 6226.00 (iii) 240.00

(iv) 5755.00 (iv) 6126.00 (iv) 236.00

Semi-Skilled (i) 7356.00 390.00 (i) 7746.00 (i) 298.00

(ii) 7233.00 (ii) 7623.00 (ii) 294.00

(iii) 6564.00 (iii) 6954.00 (iii) 268.00

(iv) 6457.00 (iv) 6847.00 (iv) 254.00

Skilled (i) 8112.00 416.00 (i) 8528.00 (i) 328.00

(ii) 7987.00 (ii) 8403.00 (ii) 326.00

(iii) 7318.00 (iii) 7734.00 (iii) 298.00

(iv) 7211.00 (iv) 7627.00 (iv) 294.00––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

(i) Where neither meals nor lodging is provided (ii) Where only lodging is provided (iii) whereonly meals twice a day is provided (iv) Where both meals and lodging are provided.

6. The following rates are applicable in respect of Clerical and Non-Technical Supervisory Staffin all Scheduled employments :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Category Rates as on Dearness Rates from 1-4-20121-10-2011 Allowance ———————————————


––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––Non-Matriculates 7358.00 390.00 7748.00 298.00

Matriculates but not Graduates 8112.00 416.00 8528.00 328.00


Sd/-

(PIYUSH SHARMA)Addl. Labour Commissioner/Joint Secretary

NB :— Case of tampering with the order have come to our notice. Employers/Workers mayconfirm from Website of Labour Department-labour.delhigovt.nic.in.

[ 36 (N) ]

Copy forwarded to :—

1. Secretary of Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, Shram Shakti Bhawan, Rafi Marg, NewDelhi.

2. Principal Secretary to the Lt. Governor, Govt. of NCT of Delhi.

3. Principal Secretary to the Speaker, Delhi Vidhan Sabha, Delhi.

4. Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister, Government of Delhi.

5. Secretary to Minister of Finance, Planning, Urban Development and Land and Building,Government of Delhi.

6. Secretary to Minister of Education, Transport, Gurudwara Election and Administration,Govt. of Delhi.

7. Secretary to Minister of Development, Revenue, PWD, Irrigation and Flood and Welfareof SC and ST, Govt. of Delhi.

Item No. 50 :— Regarding enhancement of remuneration of Kashmiri MigrantContractual Teachers.

(i) Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/Edu./NDMC/206/C&C dated 1-10-2012.

Erstwhile Municipal Corporation of Delhi had engaged 82 Kashmiri Migrants as PrimaryTeacher on contract basis in 1999. However, presently only 35 Kashmiri Migrants are working as teacheron contract basis in three Corporations. As these Kashmiri Migrants working as teacher on contract basishad to migrate under compelling circumstances due to disturbance in the Kashmir Valley, a compassionateand sympathetic view is needed to be taken considering them as distinct category. Accordingly, ErstwhileMCD has revised remuneration of Kashmiri Migrant Teacher from time to time.

In pursuance of the Corporation Resolution No. 1331 dated 9-3-2012 ( Annexure ‘A’),Education Department of North DMC vide Office Order No/ D/66/ ADE/Admn./2012 dated 10-7-2012enhanced the monthly remuneration of Kashmiri Migrants Teacher from Rs. 13,500/- to Rs. 20,385/-(Minimum of the pay in the Pay Band i.e. Rs. 9,300/- + Rs. 4,200/- (Grade Pay) + Rs. 6,885/- (the thenexisting DA @51%) alongwith increase in dearness allowance once a year based on price index inconformity with the Order No. F-2(8)(78)/E-11/2011/7384-7401 dated 11-7-2011 of Directorate of Edn.,GNCT of Delhi issued in pursuance of the Cabinet Decision No. 1784 dated 27-6-2011 of Govt. of NCTof Delhi.

The order dated 11-7-2011 of Directorate of Education, Govt. of NCT of Delhi came intoforce w.e.f. 11-7-2011 but herein North DMC, it was implemented w.e.f. 10-7-2012 vide O.O. No.D/66-ADE/Admn./2012 dated 10-7-2012 (Annexure ‘B’) after a lapse of 4 months from the approval ofCorporation Resolution No. 1331 dated 9-3-2012. At the time of passing of the Resolution No. 1331, theexisting DA was 65% whereas in the said Resolution it was calculated @51%. In the ResolutionNo. 1331.

In view of the above facts & circumstances, the existing remuneration of Kashmiri MigrantsTeachers working on contract basis in North DMC schools be enhanced from Rs. 13,500/- to Rs. 20,385/-(Minimum of the pay in the Pay Band i.e. Rs. 9,300/- + Rs. 4,200/- (Grade Pay) + Rs. 6,885/- (the thenexisting DA @51%) with retrospective effect i.e. w.e.f. 11-7-2011 as per Order No. F-2(8)(78)/E-11/2011/7384-7401 dated 11-7-2011 alongwith increase in dearness allowance be given once a year based on

[ 37 (N) ]

increase in price index. Accordingly, the emoluments will be revised form Rs. 20,385/- to 22,275/-(Minimum of the pay in the Pay Band i.e. Rs. 9,300/- + Rs. 4,200/- (Grade Pay) + Rs. 8,775/- (existingDA @65%) w.e.f. 1-1-2012 and with revision of DA as and when effected once in a year on the analogyof GNCTD.

Accordingly, the instant proposal for enhancement of remuneration of Kashmiri MigrantsTeacher with retrospective effect i.e. w.e.f. 11-7-2011 may please be placed before North Delhi MunicipalCorporation routed through Education Committee and Standing Committee for approval as an item ofUrgent Business.

ANNEXURE ‘A’

Copy of Resolution No. 1331 of the Ordinary March (2012) Meeting of the Corporationheld on 9-3-2012

Urgent Business No. 657

Subject :— Regarding enhancement of remuneration of Kashmiri Migrant Contractual Teacher.

(i) Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/P.Edu./2560/C&C dated 30-12-2011.

1. Municipal Corporation of Delhi had engaged 82 Kashmiri Migrants as Primary Teacher onContract Basis in 1999. However, only 35 Kashmiri Migrants are working as teacher on contract basis atpresent. The Govt. of Delhi also has engaged 177 Kashmiri Migrants as TGT and 46 Kashmiri Migrantsas PGTs respectively on contract Basis, to whom special pay has been granted vide No. F. 2(8)(78)/E-II/2011/7384-7401 dated 11-7-11. This is in consideration of the Kashmiri Migrants belonging to a distinctcategory. As these Kashmiri Migrants working as teacher on contract basis had to migrate under compel-ling circumstance of disturbance in the Kashmir Valley a compassionate and sympathetic view needed tobe taken considering them as distinct category. The Cabinet Decision of GNCTD and the order in thisregard issued by the GNCTD vide No.F. 2(8)(78)/E-II/2011/7384-7401 dated 11-7-2011 are enclosed asAnnexure ‘A’.

2. Having considered the above facts and circumstance, the Corporation has also enhanced themonthly remuneration of Kashmiri Migrant Teacher and other categories of teachers working on contractbasis in MCD schools from Rs. 11,000/- to Rs. 13,500/- vide Corporation Resolution No. 167 dated25-8-2011 and an office order has been issued to that effect vide No. D/DDE/Admn./HQ/2011/1137 dated26-9-2011, which are annexed as Annexure ‘B’ (colly).

3. In view of the above and following the order issued by GNCTD vide No. F. 2(8)(78)/E-II/2011/7384-7401 dated 11-7-11 enclosed as Annexure ‘A’ the existing remuneration of Kashmiri MigrantTeachers working on Contract basis in MCD schools be enhanced from Rs. 13,500/- to Rs. 20,385/-(minimum of pay in the pay band i.e. Rs. 9,300/- + 4,200/- (Grade pay) + 6885 (DA @ 51%) along withincrease in dearness allowance once a year based on price index in conformity with the orders dated11-7-2011 of Asstt. Director of Education, E-II issued in pursuance of the Cabinet Decision No. 1784dated 27-6-2011 of Govt. of GNCTD. There will be an extra burden of Rs. 6,885/- per teacher per monthand in total Rs. 24,09,750.00 ( 6885 x 35 x 10) on exchequer for 10 months in a year. The MCD shouldfollow the above said orders of GNCTD to keep parity in allowance being paid to Kashmiri MigrantsContract Teachers.

4. CA-cum-FA has concurred the proposal.

Accordingly, the instant proposal for enhancement of remuneration of Kashmiri MigrantContractual Teachers may please be placed before the Corporation routed through Education Committeeand Standing Committee for approval of the Corporation.

This may kindly be treated as an item of Urgent Business.

[ 38 (N) ]

ANNEXURE ‘A’

GOVT. OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI(EDUCATION DEPARTMENT)

E-II, BRANCH, OLD SECTT., DELHI

No. F. 2(8)(78)/E-II/2011/ 7384-7401 Dated : 11-7-11

ORDER

In pursuance of the Cabinet Decision No. 1784 dated 27-6-2011 communicated vide letter No.F. 3/2/2011-GAD/CN-2133-2144 dated 29-6-2011 of the General Administration Department, Govt. ofNCT of Delhi, the monthly emoluments being paid to Kashmiri Migrant Teachers working as TGTs andPGTs in the Government schools of Directorate of Education are hereby revised with immediate effect asunder :———————————————————————————————————————————Sl. No. Category Existing remuneration Enhanced remuneration——————————————————————————————————————————

1. TGTs Rs. 11,140/- Rs. 20,989/- [Minimum of the pay in the pay band i.e.Rs. 9,300/- + Rs. 4,600/- (Grade Pay) + Rs. 7,089/-(existing DA @ 51%].

2. PGTs Rs. 13,160/- Rs. 21,291/- [Minimum of the pay in the pay band i.e.Rs. 9,300/- + Rs. 4,800/- (Grade Pay) + Rs. 7,191/-(existing DA @ 51%].

——————————————————————————————————————————

2. Increase in dearness allowance will be given once a year based on increase in price index.

3. The term of appointment of the Kashmiri Migrant Teachers be extended for a period of fiveyears at a time or till contract Kashmiri teachers attains the age of 60 years, whichever is earlier w.e.f.1-4-2012 i.e. after the expiry of their present term of appointment on 31-3-2012.

4. In all other aspects, the services of all the Kashmiri Migrant contract teachers working in theGovt. Schools of the Directorate of Education, Delhi shall continue to be governed/regulated by the termand conditions already prevailing.

Sd/-

(S.N. SAH)Asstt. Director of Edu. (E-II)

No. F. 2(8)(78)/E-II/2011/ 7384-7401 Dated : 11-7-11

Copy forwarded for information and necessary action to :

1. Principal Secretary to the Lt. Governor, Delhi.

2. Secretary to the Chief Minister, Delhi.

3. Secretary to the Minister of Finance.

4. Seeretary to Minister of Education.

[ 39 (N) ]

ANNEXURE ‘B’

Copy of Resolution No. 167 of the Ordinary August (2011) Meeting of the Corporationheld on 25-8-2011

Item No. 17 :— Regarding increase in salary, relaxation in RRs and extension of services toKashmiri Migrants Teachers working on contract basis in MCD.

(i) Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/Pry. Edu./2378/C&C dated 17-3-2011.

In the Corporation (MCD), in the year 1995-96, 82 Kashmiri Teachers were engaged oncontract basis and presently 35 Kashmiri Teachers are still working: A meeting was held on 17-1-2011under the Chairmanship of Hon’ble Chief Minister, Mrs. Shiela Dixit, GNCTD at 4-00 P.M. at I.P.Secretariat to discuss the plight of Kashmiri Migrants Teachers working in the Directorate of Educationand MCD in general and particularly in the light of judgment passed by the Hon’ble Central AdministrativeTribunal in the matter of Santosh Kumar Yacha & Ors. Vs. GNCTD & Ors. case. The matter has beenexamined and it has been decided that the following relief can be granted to Kashmiri Migrants Teachersbeing a distinct class. On the other hand the issue of examining/challenging the above order is beingprocessed in a separate file.

(a) Extension in Service :

At present the contract period of Kashmiri Migrants Teachers is extended for three years andpresently extended upto 31-3-2011. In future the contract period will be extended for five years excludingsummer vacations.

(b) Increase in Remuneration :

That the Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal in the matter of Santosh Kumar Yacha& Ors. Vs. GNCTD & Ors. has directed that they are (Kashmiri Migrants} entitled to the minimum of thepay scale as revised to their counter parts regular employees from time to time and are also entitled notonly for fixation of pay accordingly but also arrears to be calculated thereof from the inception of theservice of the applicants. That the department cannot grant full pay scale as discussed by the Hon’bleChief Minister of GNCTD, because there are about 4000 teachers who are working in MCD on contractbasis. Therefore considering Kashmiri Migrants Teachers as a distinct class, they will be paid Rs. 13,500/-p.m. (Pay Band (Rs. 9300/-) + Grade Pay (Rs. 4200). The abovesaid emoluments will be less than regularteacher, who are getting Rs. 25,945/- p.m. but more than Contract Teachers whose emoluments have beenincreased recently to Rs. 11,000/- p.m. However, the same will be not applicable to other categories ofcontract teachers working in MCD.

(c) Regularisation of Kashmiri Migrants :

That the services of the Kashmiri Migrants Teachers cannot be regularized as per the decisiontaken in the meeting by the Hon’ble Chief Minister, GNCTD. However, the department may amend theRRs in their cases and would obtain the approval of Hon’ble L.G.. to grant them one time relaxation inage/qualification considering Kashmiri Migrants Teachers being a special category in view of the situationin Jammu Kashmir. The Kashmiri Migrants Teachers will be eligible for appearing in the examination to beconducted by DSSSB.

[ 40 (N) ]

(ii) Resolution No. 3 of the Education Committee dated 24-5-2011.

Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation through the Standing Committee that theproposal as contained in the Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/Pry. Edu./2378/C&C dated 17-3-2011,be approved.

Resolved further that the salary will be applicable to all contracted teachers, whether KashmiriMigrants Teachers or teachers working on contract basis, will draw equal salary.

(iii) Resolution No. 145 of the Standing Committee dated 13-7-2011.

Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that as recommended by the EducationCommittee vide its Resolution No. 3 dated 24-5-2011, the proposal of the Commissioner as contained in hisletter No. F. 33/P. Edu./2378/C&C dated 17-3-2011, be approved.

Resolved further that the salary will be applicable to all contracted teachers, whether KashmiriMigrants Teachers or teachers working on contract basis, will draw equal salary.

Resolution No. 167 Resolved that as recommended by the Standing Committee vide its ResolutionNo. 145 dated 13-7-2011, the proposal of the Commissioner as contained in his letterNo. F. 33/Pry. Edu./2378/C&C dated 17-3-2011, be approved.

Resolved further that the salary will be applicable to all contracted teachers,whether Kashmir Migrant Teachers or teachers working on contract basis, will drawequal salary.

ANNEXURE ‘C’

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHIEDUCATION DEPARTMENT : HQ

DR. S.P. MUKHERJEE CIVIC CENTRE

No. D/DDE/Admn./HQ/2011/1137 Dated : 26-9-11

OFFICE ORDER

The monthly remuneration of all Contract Teachers weather Kashmiri Migrant Teachersor Teachers working on Contract Basis in MCD Schools is hereby increased from Rs. 11,000/- toRs. 13,500/- with immediate effect vide Corporation Resolution No. 167 dated 25-8-2011.

This is issued with the approval of the competent authority.

Sd/-

Asstt. Dir. of EducationAdministration

All Zonal DDE/ADEs

Copy to :—

1. Hon’ble Chairman, Education Committee.

2. Additional Commissioner (Education).

3. Secretary to Commissioner, MCD for kind information of the Commissioner, MCD.

4. Director (Education).

[ 41 (N) ]

5. Addl. Director (I, II & III).

6. ADC (Edn.).

7. DCA (HQ/Zones).

8. All recognised unions.

9. Chairman, S.K. Foundation, D-5, Pamposh Enclave, G.K.-I, New Delhi-48.

10. Office copy.

Unions : 1. Secy. JSCSTTF, Delhi.

2. Secy. MCTA, Delhi.

3. Secy. ADPSS, Delhi.


Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation through Standing Committee that asproposed in the Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/Pry. Edu/2560/C&C dated 30-12-2011, proposal regardingenhancement in remuneration of Kashmiri Migrant Contract Teachers on the terms and conditions asmentioned in the aforesaid letter, be accorded.

(iii) Resolution No. 910 of the Standing Committee dated 24-2-2012.

Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that as recommended by the EducationCommittee vide its Resolution No. 67 dated 14-2-2012, the proposal of the Commissioner as contained inhis letter No. F. 33/P.Edu./2560/C&C dated 30-12-2011, be approved.

Resolution No. 1331 Resolved that as recommended by the Standing Committee vide its ResolutionNo. 910 dated 24-2-2012, the proposal of the Commissioner as contained in his letterNo. F. 33/P.Edu./2560/ C&C dated 30-12-2011, be approved.

ANNEXURE ‘B’

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONEDUCATION DEPARTMENT : HQ

15th FLOOR Dr. S.P.M. CIVIC CENTREMINTO ROAD, NEW DELHI-110002

No. D/66/ADE/ADMN./2012 Dated : 10-7-2012

OFFICE ORDER

In compliance of Corporation Resolution No. 1331 dated 9-3-2012, the remuneration ofKashmiri Migrant Teachers working on contractual basis in North DMC Schools has been enhanced fromRs. 13,500 to Rs. 20,385/- (Minimum of pay in the pay band i.e. Rs. 9,300 + Rs. 4,200/- (Grade Pay) + Rs.6,885/- (DA @51%) alongwith increase in Dearness Allowance once a year based on price index withimmediate effect.

[ 42 (N) ]

This issues with the prior approval of Commissioner North DMC.

Sd/-

Asstt. Dir. of Education(Administration)

Distribution :—

1. All Zonal DDEs/ADEs.

2. All Zonal DCA/Accounts Officers.

3. DCA/Edn.

4. Office copy.

Copy for kind information to :—

1. Hon’ble Mayor, North Delhi Municipal Corporation.

2. Hon’ble Chairman, Education Committee.

3. Additional Commissioner (Education).

4. Addl. Director (Education).

5. Sh. Ram Kishan Punia, Supremo, Joint SC/ST Teachers front & P.S.K.B., H. No. 118Village Barwala, New Delhi-110039.

6. Sh. Joginder Joon, President, MCTA, M.C.P.S., Subhadra Colony-II, New Delhi-110035.

7. Sh. Ram Chander Dabas, General Secretary, ADPSS, M.C. Pry. School Janak Puri,New Delhi.


Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation through the Standing Committee that theproposal of the Commissioner as contained in his letter No F. 33/Education/NDMC/206/C&C dated1-10-2012, be approved with tile following modification :—

Whereas, as in compliance of decision vide Resolution No. 167 dated 25-8-2011 ofEducation Committee and Standing Committee, salary of Kashmiri Migrant Teachers andother contractual teachers was increased by the Education Department from Rs. 11,000/-to Rs. 13,500/- vide orders of its letter No. 1137 dated 26-9-2011 but only the salary inrespect of Kashmiri Migrant has been increased by a new order issued by the EducationDepartment vide letter No. D/66/ADE/ADMN/2012 dated 10-7-2012. Whereas, thisincrease in salary may also be given to all other contractual teachers by treating themat par with the Kashmiri Migrant. Similar increased amount may be given to all theteachers.

[ 43 (N) ]

Item No. 51 :— Appointment and payment of salary to the employees against the post forwhich they are working.

Notice of resolution by Sh. Vijay Prakash Pandey.

Whereas, in the erstwhile Municipal Corporation of Delhi appointment for the post of ‘B’ and‘C’ category was made through the designated agency (DSSB) as per Section 92(a) of DMC Act.

Whereas, as per the amended DMC Act, unified Municipal Corporation of Delhi has beentrifurcated, no amendment has been made in Section 92(a) of the Act. Accordingly, appointment of ‘B’ and‘C’ category posts has also to be made through DSSB by the Govt. in North Delhi Municipal Corporationas well.

Whereas, it takes numbers of years for filling-up the posts through DSSB as per therequisition of Municipal Corporation. Due to this, category ’B’ and ‘C’ posts which are the back bone ofthe administration, are lying vacant since very long time and the administration his become almoststagnated.

Whereas, some of the educated ‘D’ category employees, discharging their duty satisfactorilyand also there is no complaint against for work assigned to them, have been posted in their existing scalefor working on ‘C’ category posts (clerk etc.). So that general public may not suffer.

Whereas, as per the provision of FR 17, an employee working against a particular post, shouldbe paid salary and allowances attached to the same post, till he works on the post.

Therefore, this meeting of Standing Committee recommends to the Corporation that those ‘D’category employees (Class-IV) who have been appointed against LDC or equivalent post of Class-III,should be given salary and allowances attached to their existing post and if they posses educationqualification for the said post then they may be considered for appointment in the same cadre.

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

No. F.33/L&E/NDMC/264/C&C Date: 5/11/2012 From The Commissioner, North Delhi Municipal Corporation Civic Centre, New Delhi-110002. To The Municipal Secretary, North Delhi Municipal Corporation Civic Centre, New Delhi-110002.

Sub: Implementation of policy of conversion of commercial properties transferred from GOI (L&DO/Dte. Of Estates) to Erstwhile MCD ___________________________________________

The Govt. of India, in 2006 by virtue of a Cabinet Decision, transferred the markets hitherto under the control and management of L&DO and Directorate of Estates to the local bodies viz. MCD and NDMC vide a Gazette Notification dated 24-03-2006 .The total number of markets transferred was 79 (L&DO and DOE) out of which 38 fall under North Delhi Municipal Corporation. There are 2920 shops which are on leasehold basis; 1104 shops which are license fee basis out of which 8 shops in Minto Road Complex, which as per the Cabinet Decision, 2000, of GOI, do not come under the purview of conversion as Minto Road Complex has been listed as a non-ownership market.

In the above mentioned notification of GOI, it is stated that these markets are being transferred to the local bodies for further control and management including performing administrative functions such as allotment, cancellation, regularization in favour of a legal heir, in favour of a sub-lettee or partner, restoration, mutual exchange, grant of ownership rights, conversion from licence to leasehold, lease administration functions as allotment, re-entry, grant of sale permission, mortgage permission, gift permission, levy of damages for unauthorized construction/misuse, conversion to freehold, etc. It also provides inter alia the applicability of Building Bye-laws where unauthorized construction exists in the premises or public/govt. land is encroached upon.

The Town Planning Department has observed that the opinion of SE Bldg. (HQ) and Architecture Department be obtained in respect of regularization of unauthorized construction, as an issue was raised by the then Hon’ble Chairman, Standing Committee while maintaining, the standard designs are applicable and shall be taken into consideration while considering regularization of unauthorized construction.

Accordingly, the matter was referred to the SE (Bldg.) HQ and they agreed with the opinion of the CTP and desired that the opinion of Architecture Dept. may also be obtained. The Architecture Dept. is also of the view that the standard design with respect to these markets are applicable and shall be kept in mind while considering regularization of unauthorized construction. The issue shall be subject to scrutiny and action under the existing municipal building by-laws which has been incorporated in the brochure which also contains Salient Features of the scheme as well as other terms and conditions (Annexure ‘A’).

As per GOI’s policy, the process of conversion will comprise of two stages:-

1. Conversion from licence to leasehold (commercial units transferred from Dte. Of Estates/ GOI) in respect of specified categories only.

2. Conversion from leasehold to freehold – conversion of leasehold properties (transferred from DOE & L&DO, GOI.)

The first stage consists of:- a. Grant of ownership rights to the existing licencees/shopkeepers of markets

transferred to erstwhile MCD by GOI b. Conversion from licence to leasehold in respect of those shops to which the

DOE has already conferred ownership rights (payment of Capitalized Value i.e. premium of land + cost of superstructure have been paid by them and nothing is outstanding against them towards Capitalized Value)

c. Conversion from licence to leasehold in respect of those shops to which the DOE had conferred ownership rights and where the shopkeeper had opted for payment of Capitalized Value in installments through Hire Purchase Agreement, subsequently without having made full payment/any payment, transferred the shop to another individual, subject to payment of Capitalized Value along with interest and penalty as applicable.

Brochure has been prepared and got vetted by the Law Dept. which has opined that - “the scheme is only in respect of properties transferred to MCD vide Notification dated 24-03-2006 be included in the Brochure” which has been incorporated in the brochure.

The Finance has observed that calculations as detailed in GOI’s Brochure at Pages 14, 15 and Annexure ‘A’ be reproduced if the same is applicable. However, these pertain to residential properties and calculations pertaining to commercial properties as applicable have been incorporated in the brochure.

The Brochure can also be downloaded from North Delhi Municipal Corporation’s official website by payment of Rs.250/- from credit/debit card or obtained form the office of Deputy Commissioner, Land and Estate, North Delhi Municipal Corporation , 7th Floor Civic Centre, J.L N Marg, Delhi-110002 on payment of Rs 250/- in cash.

PROCEDURE FOR GRANT OF OWNERSHIP RIGHTS BY NORTH DMC:

The process will comprise of (i) inviting applications from the shopkeeper(s) in the prescribed proforma, (ii) issue of letters with the request for submission of requisite documents if deficiencies are there, (iii) scrutiny of the applications, (iv) inspection of site by the L & E officials in respect of those shops/units where the application/ documents are complete in all respects, then (v) intimation of Capitalized Value payable along with arrears of licence fee, if any.

In case there is unauthorized construction/encroachment on Mpl./Govt. land, the application for grant of ownership rights shall be rejected and will be considered again only after the violations/unauthorized construction/encroachments are removed.

Eligibility criteria for grant of ownership rights as laid down by the DOE/GOI shall be applicable to only following specific categories(only in respect of properties transferred to MCD vide Notification dated 24-03-2006) :-

a. The person who is an original allottee b. The person who has come into possession of the property by virtue of

Partnership Deed/Dissolution Deed entered into and exited prior to 31-08-2000.

c. An occupant/sub-lettee who is in occupation of the shop prior to 31-08-2000 but unable to produce a Partnership/Dissolution Deed - subject to submission of sufficient other documentary evidence such as IT Returns, Bank Account Statements and other business/transaction records with respect to the shop.

The Law Dept., in this regard has observed as under: “Licensee cannot transfer/sell the license as it is a personal right and non-

transferable. In case there is a policy of conversion from license to leasehold, property in the hands of the original licensee shall be considered..” .These observations are not in consonance with the spirit of the GOI policy of conversion from License to Lease hold categories specified as ‘a’, ‘b’, and ‘c’ as above under the heading Eligibility criteria for grant of ownership rights shall only be considered for grant of ownership.

An another category has emerged, as in certain cases the original allottee has parted with the possession of the shop after having been granted ownership rights and having paid the Capitalized Value but where only the lease deed has not been executed. It is proposed to regularize such cases by charging one time lump sum payment from the shopkeeper i.e. regularization of shop in favour of Agreement to Sell/GPA holders. This relief is applicable to only those properties where the above criteria are fulfilled. Instances where the shop keeper has parted with the possession of the shop without conferring of ownership rights and not covered under categories as specified as ‘a’, ‘b’, and ‘c’ as above under the heading Eligibility criteria for grant of ownership rights shall not be entitled to this relief.

Such cases can be regularized for execution of lease deed by charging one time lump sum fee depending upon the category viz. A, B, C, etc. into which a given locality/area falls. The minimum fee shall be Rs.3.00 lakhs (for Category H) locality with an increase of Rs.50,000/- to each higher category as detailed below on the analogy of Corpn. Res. No. 21 dated 27-05-2011 followed by Circular No. D/AO(L&E)/2011-12/1902 dated 20-07-2011 in respect of MCD markets:

Category A - Rs. 6.50 lakhs Category B - Rs.6.00 lakhs Category C - Rs. 5.50 lakhs Category D - Rs.5.00 lakhs Category E - Rs. 4.50 lakhs Category F - Rs.4.00 lakhs Category G - Rs.3,50 lakhs Category H - Rs. 3.00 lakhs

A sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) shall be chargeable to each additional transaction.

For e.g. if a shop in Kamla Market, which falls under Category D has changed hands twice, then the purchaser seeking regularization shall be required to pay a sum of Rs. 6.00 lakhs (Rupees six lakhs only) i.e. Rs. 5.00 lakhs for the first change in hand and additional Rs.1.00 lakh for the subsequent transaction. This will not only augment the revenue of the Corporation on the one hand while streamlining these cases and lessening the administrative burden on the other. Upon payment of the aforesaid sum by the shopkeeper, the shop shall be regularized in his favour prior to execution of lease deed.

Upon grant of ownership rights, Capitalized Value (Premium of land + cost of superstructure) would be intimated to the shopkeeper(s). Draft letter for grant of ownership rights and other related forms/letters are available in Brochure.

Payment may be made by the licencees/shopkeepers either in lump sum or in 6 (six) half-yearly installments. Where the shopkeeper opts to make payment in installment, a hire purchase agreement in the prescribed form shall be executed between the department and the shopkeeper. The first installment shall be 25% of the Capitalized Value i.e. cost of land plus cost of superstructure while the remaining 75% of the Capitalized Value shall be payable in five equated installments along with interest @ 15% p.a. Copy of Hire Purchase Agreement executed between DOE and the shopkeeper is available in brochure.

Where the premises/unit is part of a multi-storeyed structure i.e. where the ground floor of the building comprises of shops and the upper floors consist of Commercial./residential flats, the amount arrived at by multiplying the area of the shop with applicable land rates (current circle rates), the premium of land is divisible by the number of floors as was done by the DOE/L&DO.

For example, if the shop situated in Lehna Singh Market measures 10 sq. m., the applicable land rate is, say Rs. 2,61,600/- per sq. m. and the cost of superstructure works out to say Rs.50,000 (after applicable depreciation), the shop is part of a two-storeyed building, then the Capitalized Value shall be:

(a) where the shop/unit is part of a single storeyed structure”

Area of the Shop : 10 sq.m. Locality : Kamla Market Category (as per Circle Rates) : D Circle Rate applicable : Rs.87200/- per sq.m. (res.)

– for Commercial, the rate chargeable is three times the base rate i.e. 87200x 3 = Rs. 261600/- per sq.m.

Factor : 1. Land Rate Chargeable : Rs. 1x261600/- per sq.m. Premium of Land : Rs. 2616000/-

Cost of superstructure : Rs. 50,000/- Capitalized Value Payable : Rs. 2666000/-

(b) Where the shop/unit is part of a two -storeyed structure i.e. ground floor – shop whereas the upper floor comprises of residential flats: Area of the Shop : 10 sq. m. Locality : West Patel Nagar Category (as per Circle Rates) : D

Circle Rate applicable : Rs.87,200/- per sq.m. (res.)


Factor : 2/3– Commercial ; 1/3 Residential. Land Rate Chargeable : 2/3 x 261600/- per sq.m. i.e. 174400/- Premium of Land : Rs. 1744000/-


(c) Where the shop/unit is part of a two -storeyed structure i.e. ground floor – shop whereas the upper floor comprises of commercial flats: Area of the Shop : 10 sq. m. Locality : Desh Bandhu Gupta Mkt. Category (as per Circle Rates) : D Circle Rate applicable : Rs.87200/- per sq.m. (res.)


Factor : ½– Commercial ; 1/2 Residential. Land Rate Chargeable : 1/2x261600/- per sq. m. i.e.130800/- Premium of Land : Rs. 13,08,000/-

Cost of superstructure : Rs. 50,000/- Capitalized Value Payable : Rs. 13,58,000/- The above illustrations are purely indicative in nature and the Circle/Land

Rates prevailing as on date of conversion, shall be applicable. The calculations shown above are on the basis which the DOE/L&DO has worked

out the Capitalized Value at the time of conferring ownership rights to a shopkeeper.

Upon payment, the shopkeeper is required to submit the application for execution of lease deed along with prescribed documents such as Affidavit, Undertaking and Indemnity Bond, copy of site/key plan, ID Proof and occupancy proof. Site will be inspected to know as to whether there is unauthorized construction/encroachment on Govt./Mpl. Land, if any, by the officials of Land & Estate Department and photographs shall be taken and placed on record while presenting the case for approval. Instances where unauthorized construction/ encroachment is found, the request/application for execution of lease deed shall be rejected and will be considered only where the deficiencies have been rectified and that too not after two months.

In cases where application is complete in all respects, proposal shall be put up before the competent authority i.e. Dy. Commissioner/ADC, for approval. After approval, lease deed shall be executed by Addl. Dy. Com/Asst. Commissioner and handed over to the shopkeeper for payment of stamp duty with the Collector of Stamps and subsequently for registration of the same with the area Sub-Registrar.

The entire process shall take at least 4 (four) months provided the shopkeeper makes the payment of CAPITALIZED VALUE in lump sum. Cases where the shopkeeper makes payment in installments, no specific time frame can be given. However, after receipt of whole payment, the above mentioned process will be followed.

LIST OF MARKETS WHICH ARE TO BE COVERED UNDER THE SCHEME OF CONVERSION:

S. No.

Name of Market Zone Total No. of Properties

Status Applicability of Scheme

1 Ashoka Market CLZ 73 Lease Leasehold to Freehold 2 Azad Market SPZ 351 Lease Do 3 Baird Road SPZ 66 do do 4 Deshbandhu Gupta

Market KBZ 248 do

5 Gaffer Market KBZ 276 do do 6 Gokhale Market CLZ 130 do do 7 Indira Market CLZ 189 do do 8 Lehna Singh Market CLZ 80 do do 9 Mirdard Road

Market CZ 48 Licence/

Lease Licence to Leasehold including Grant of ownership rights and

conversion to freehold 10 Old Rohtak Road

Mkt. KBZ 285 do do

11 Roshanara Road Market

SPZ 12 Lease Leasehold to Freehold

12 Teliwara Market SPZ 88 do do 13 Timarpur New

Market CLZ 62 do do

14 Gulabi Bagh(truck repair centre)

SPZ 30 do do

15 Old Rajinder Nagar Market

KBZ 105 do do

16 Ramesh Nagar Mkt. KBZ 80 do do 17 Old Ramesh Nagar KBZ 24 do do 18 West Patel Nagar

New Market KBZ 45 do do

19 West Patel Nagar Old Market

KBZ 51 do do

20 West patel Nagar, Nala Market

KBZ 32 do do

21 Jawahar Market, Lancer Road Timar Pur

CLZ 29 Licence Licence to Lease-hold including Grant of ownership rights and

conversion to freehold 22 New Qutab Road

Market SPZ 124 Lease do

23 South Patel Nagar, Mkt.

KBZ 96 do do

24 Malka Ganj Mkt CLZ 20 do do 25 Malka Ganj Inner

Market CLZ 16 do do

26 Malka Ganj Main Market

CLZ 26 do do

27 East patel Nagar Market

KBZ 68 do do

28 New Rajender Nagar Market

KBZ 67 do do

29 Edward Lane Mkt CLZ 150 do do 30 Pleasure Garden

Market CZ 450 Licence/

Lease Licence to Lease-hold including grant of ownership rights and

conversion to freehold 31 Kamla Market CZ 284 do do 32 Pachkuian Rd Mkt SPZ 43 Lease Leasehold to Freehold 33 Krishna Market,

Pahar Ganj SPZ 19 do do

34 Rani Jhansi Market, Karol Bagh

KBZ 92 do do

35 Old Timar Pur Mkt CLZ 17 Rent do 36 Hathi Khana SPZ 86 (Shops +

Flats) Lease do

37 Khurshid Market SPZ 110 do do 38 Moti Nagar KBZ 64 do do

In cases where the DOE had conferred ownership rights and the shopkeeper has made the payment of Capitalized Value along with applicable interest (in case of payment in installments partly with DOE and partly with MCD) in compliance of the Hire Purchase Agreement, the application/documents submitted shall be scrutinized, property will be inspected and case shall be processed only if no unauthorized construction/encroachment is found, otherwise, the application is liable to be rejected and the shopkeeper shall be intimated.

Instances where the allottee after having been conferred ownership rights on hire purchase basis and prior to clearance of dues has parted with possession/ ownerships status of the property can be considered for execution of lease deed subject to clearance of balance payment with interest and along with penalty as defined supra by relaxing the condition of conversion, cut-off date i.e. 31-08-2000.

PROCEDURE FOR CONVERSION FROM LEASEHOLD TO FREEHOLD:

In respect of the existing leasehold properties, the application for conversion shall be processed and Conveyance Deed shall be issued after approval of the competent authority, i.e. Deputy Commissioner/ADC in charge of L&E Dept. subject to clearance of upto date ground rent and other dues and provided no unauthorized construction/ encroachment in the premises. However in case of unauthorized construction site plan as on date prepared by a registered architect shall be obtained for assessment of damage charges. The applicant shall also furnish an undertaking to either get the compoundable deviations regularized or remove the same within stipulated period. Damages shall be charged up to June or December, as the case may be. Encroachment on Govt./Mpl. Land shall not be allowed under any circumstances. The Conveyance Deed shall be signed by DC/ADC/AC (L&E).

Original Lessees are entitled for a 40% remission/rebate on conversion charges whereas others, who have come into possession by virtue of registered sale deed, are liable to pay Rs 3,000/- (Rupees three thousand only) per annum for non-intimation of sale and are also liable to pay unearned increase wherever applicable in addition to conversion charges.

In fresh cases, the Lessee can apply for conversion to freehold after the prescribed period of 45 days from the date of registration of lease deed after purchasing the Brochure from the department. Those who had applied earlier need not apply again provided their documents were complete in all respects. The same application will be processed for issue of conveyance deed, stamping and registration. The date of receipt of the initial application will be the crucial date for calculation of Conversion Charges in cases where complete conversion charges along with processing fee and damages if any, as communicated, have been cleared.

Notwithstanding any unauthorized construction, the conversion to freehold is to be carried out subject to action on unauthorized construction and encroachments by respective DCs/SEs of concerned zones under the provisions of DMC Act and Building Bye-laws.

The damages shall be levied as under:

Area x Land Rate (of the corresponding period) x 10/100

The policies of DOE (for licenced properties) and L&DO for leasehold properties were first adopted vide Res. No. 494 (policy for licenced properties of DOE) and Res. No. 495 (policy for leasehold properties of L&DO) respectively in the year 2005. Later on, a single resolution encompassing the properties of DOE, L&DO and MCD was passed by the Corporation vide Res. No. 894 dated 05-03-2007.

In the present proposal the properties transferred to erstwhile MCD by GOI vide Cabinet Decision dated 31-08-2000 and subsequent Gazette Notification dated 24-03-2006 shall be taken up and MCD properties (other than those of DOE/L&EO) stand delinked as per decision of the then Hon’ble Mayor and Hon’ble Chairman, Standing Committee dated 24/8/2011. This is in consonance with the stand taken by Erstwhile MCD in various courts on this issue. Since administrative setup of Erstwhile MCD was different from that of L&DO/DOE, execution of various activities cannot be restricted in tune with various guidelines of L&DO/DOE. Hence, in the interest of disposal of work, any administrative transaction may be carried out to the satisfaction of the competent authority within the executive frame work of the Land & Estate Department under the provisions of DMC Act, 1957.

As such form for grant of ownership rights on the lines of DOE/L&DO, GOI, required some modifications under the changed circumstances after their transfer to MCD. The Terms and Conditions duly vetted by the Law and Finance departments have been incorporated in the Brochure accordingly.

In view of and subject to fulfillment of the above requirements, the following recommendations are made for approval of the competent authority with respect to:-

1. Implementation of policy of Conversion with respect to properties transferred from GOI i.e. i. Grant of ownership rights to existing licencees of GOI markets (to eligible

categories elaborated above as under the heading “Procedure for Grant of Ownership Rights” for conversion from licence to leasehold;

ii. Executing lease deed in respect of those shops/units to which the GOI has already conferred ownership rights by the GOI, where full payment of Capitalized Value (premium of land + cost of superstructure) has been received (for eligible categories elaborated above).

iii. Carrying out conversion from leasehold to freehold with respect to leasehold properties.

2. Regularization of shops in favour of Agreement to Sell/GPA holders where the

original allottee has parted with the possession of the shop after having been granted ownership rights. These shopkeepers after having made full and final payment towards the Capitalized Value have parted with possession of the shop.

The observations of Finance, Engineering, Architecture and Law departments have been incorporated in the Brochure and as such the proposal may be placed before the Corporation routing through the Standing Committee for approval.

ADDL. COMMISSIONER (Estt.) For Commissioner


2012�

BROCHURE

SCHEME OF CONVERSION FROM LICENCE TO LEASEHOLD & LEASEHOLD TO FREEHOLD of commercial units transferred from GOI (L&DO/DOE) to erstwhile MCD �

Rs. 250/-

FR

SCHEMLEASE

REEHOLD

B

ME OF COEHOLD AD FOR c

Govt.

BROC

ONVERSIAND LEASommerc of India

CHUR

ION FROSEHOLD cial unitsa (L&DO/

E

M LICEN SYSTEMs transfe/DOE)

NCE TO M INTO erred fro

Rs.250

om

0/‐

SCHEME OF CONVERSION FROM LICENCE TO LEASEHOLD (for specific categories) and LEASEHOLD SYSTEM OF LAND INTO

FREEHOLD FOR PROPERTIES transferred from Govt. of India (L&DO/DOE)

(FOR COMMERCIAL BUILT UP SHOPS/STALLS/SHOW WINDOWS/COMMERCIAL FLATS OF L&DO/mixed land

residential flats over shops and shops)

Nature of properties covered Conversion charges Time span for payment Liability to pay ground rent NOC for mortgaged properties Applicability to power of Attorney Holders Un-earned Increase/Damages Conversion rates for various Localities/Zones Model calculation Mode of Remittances PRODUCERE FOR SUBMISSION OF APPLICATION FOR

CONVERSION DOCUMENTS TO BE SUBMITTED GUIDELINES FOR FILLING UP THE APPLICATION FORM APPLICATION FORM FOR GRANT OF OWNERSHIP RIGHTS PROFORMA OF LETTER INTIMATING CONFERMENT OF

OWNERSHIP PROFORMA OF HIRE PURCHASE AGREEMENT DOCUMENTS TO BE SUBMITTED FOR LICENCE TO LEASEHOLD

DETAIL OF ANNEXURES: CONVERSION FROM LEASEHOLD TO FREEHOLD Annexure ‘A’ Formula for calculation of Conversion fee/charges

Annexure ‘B’ Conversion rate of various localities/ Zones

Annexure ‘C’ Illustrative cases for calculation of Conversion charges Annexure ‘D’ Format of undertaking Annexure ‘E’ Format of Affidavit Annexure ‘F’, Format(s) of indemnity Bond Annexure ‘G’ Format for specimen signature & affixing photos Annexure ‘H’ Format of information regarding payment of ground rent Annexure ‘I’ Format of Indemnity Bond to be

submitted where the original lease deed has been lost GRANT OF OWNERSHIP RIGHTS/CONVERSION FROM LICENCE TO LEASEHOLD /EXECUTION OF LEASE DEED Annexure ‘J’ Format of Indemnity Bond Annexure ‘K’ Format of Agreement Annexure ‘L’ Format of Undertaking Annexure ‘M’ Self- Assessment sheet for conversion etc. Annexure ‘N’ Format of application for grant of Ownership rights Annexure ‘O’ Format of letter requesting submission of Documents Annexure ‘P’ Format of letter conferring ownership rights Annexure ‘Q’ Affidavit

The scheme of conversion from Licence to Leasehold and Leasehold system of Land Tenure into Freehold

INTRODUCTION

The Government of India by virtue of a Cabinet Decision dated 31-08-2000 and subsequent Gazette Notification dated 24-03-2006 transferred markets hitherto under its control to the erstwhile MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI for further control and management.

The North Delhi Municipal Corporation has decided to implement the policy of Government

of India for grant of ownership rights to the certain category of licencees (rehabilitation properties only) i.e. conversion from licence to leasehold/Leasehold to Freehold in respect of properties transferred from Govt. of India.

In response to the long pending demand of the Lessees in respect of leases other than

‘residential’ properties, it has now been decided to allow conversion of properties transferred from L&DO/DOE(GOI)..

This brochure gives information that a Lessee would like to know before applying for the

conversion to freehold. It is expected that the public will find the Brochure useful and helpful in getting their properties converted into freehold.

The prescribed conversion charges are applicable as per Circle Rates notified by the GNCTD

on 15-11-2011 (effective/applicable from 16-11-2011) (or circle rates prevailing on the date of conversion whichever is later)

SALIENT FEATURES OF THE SCHEME

The scheme covers the following properties.

Grant of ownership rights to the certain category of licencees (rehabilitation properties

only) conversion from such category of licence to leasehold in respect of properties transferred from Govt. of India. This scheme extends to all built up commercial and mixed land use properties allotted by the department of Rehabilitation , L&DO or the Directorate of Estate, for which ownership rights have been conferred and lease deed executed and registered. All residential plots ,irrespective of area for which the allotment/perpetual lease is issued by the department of Rehabilitation or L&DO for residential purpose and building thereon is constructed and where completion certificate or at least D- form in respect of such construction is obtained from the Local Body. A and C type tenements allotted on leasehold basis by the Department of Rehabilitation or Land and Development Office subject to payment of conversion charges calculated based on the land rates prevailing on the date of submission of the conversion application (in the cases where complete conversion charges along with processing fee apart from damages as communicated, have been cleared).

a) The properties which are not specifically not mentioned above are not covered under the

conversion policy (e.g. institutional allotment including allotment to press, hotels, cinemas, properties covered under the disinvestment policy of the Govt., Petrol Pumps, Fuel Depots, CNG Station etc. any MCD property)

One time charges payment for conversion from lease hold to freehold are set out in Annexure- ‘B’ read with Annexure ‘C’. These charges are to be paid in lumpsum.

Original lessees/allottee would be entitled to 40% remission in the conversion charges as specified in Annexure-‘C’ whereas if there has already been a transaction regarding the property/properties and the original lessee and sale deed has been registered though not brought to the knowledge of this department the last purchaser can apply for conversion in his name himself or by way of his attorney. However, penal charges towards non intimation of transaction and applicable unearned increase shall also be charged.

Conversion would be allowed only with respect to the properties existing in markets transferred from DOE/L&DO.

The application for conversion shall not be entertained unless accompanied by prescribed document(s).

Those who have applied before will not be required to apply again. However, the date of

initial application shall be the crucial date for calculation of Conversion Charges where the payment towards conversion charges has been accepted by the L&DO. In cases, the payment made towards conversion charges by way of cheque/demand draft has been returned on account of rejection of the application by L&DO on scrutiny, the relief is not applicable. Where the payment made has been returned on account of transfer of properties to the local bodies, the applicant/lessee shall be eligible for relief (only in the cases where complete conversion charges along with processing fee apart from damages as communicated, have been cleared).

The person/persons in whose name(s) appear on the records of the Land & Estate Dept. as lessee(s) can apply for conversion. If there are a number of lessees, all of them will have to sign the application. However, the lessee(s) can also give Power of Attorney (which should be registered in the office of the Sub-Registrar) to sign the application his his/her/their behalf.

If there has already been a transaction regarding the property/ properties and the original

lessee and sale deed has been registered though not brought to the knowledge of this department the last purchaser can apply for conversion in his name himself or by way of his attorney. However, penal charges towards non intimation of transaction and applicable unearned increase shall also be charged.

The arrears of ground rent along with interest @18% per annum wherever applicable would

have to be paid by the applicant before conversion can be permitted. In case where revision of ground rent has become due, the revised amount of ground rent will be notified to the lessee for depositing the amount before the execution of the conveyance deed.

In case of mortgaged properties, conversion would be allowed only after the submission of ‘No

Objection Certificate’ issued by all the mortgagees/lending banks by the person seeking conversion.

In case of any legal dispute relating to title of the property, conversion shall not be allowed until

the legal dispute is settled. I. CONVERSION FROM LEASEHOLD TO FREEHOLD

IF A PERSON HOLDS LEASE FOR MORE THAN ONE PROPERTY, WHETHER HE CAN SEEK CONVERSION FOR ALL THE PROPERTIES IN ONE APPLICATION?

No. One application can be considered only for one property. Therefore, if a person holds more than one property he will have to apply separately in respect of each property.

WHETHER CONVERSION WILL BE GRANTED EVEN IF THERE IS UNAUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION?

(i) Conversion will be granted to the leasehold properties if there is unauthorized construction, subject to payment of damage charges, whether earlier demanded or not and also submission of undertaking regarding either to get the compoundable deviations regularized or remove the same within the stipulated period. However, after that, the applicant will be liable for action under municipal bye-laws. The conversion to freehold in the presence of misuse/ unauthorized construction does not act as a waiver of any action, which is liable to be taken under the building bye-laws by the local body. (ii) Conversion will be allowed only when all dues including misuse charges, damages, ground rent, service/maintenance charges etc. have been paid by the applicant in respect of the property. (iii) In case of re-entered properties conversion would be allowed only when re-entered notice has been withdrawn and the lease/ allotment restored. (iv) For the purpose of conversion, misuse charges would be liable to be paid up to the period as stipulated, even after which action against misuse would continue to be taken by the respective local bodies under the building by-laws/regulations. (v) Conversion to freehold shall not be permitted in respect of properties involving encroachment on government/public land. These lessees would have to vacate the encroached land before consideration of the conversion application and shall also be liable to payment of occupation charges/damages for the relevant period as per prevalent rules at prescribed rates. (vi) Conversion will be allowed to the extent of area originally allotted/leased out. For example, if the area in the lease deed is 10 sq. m., conversion is applicable only to that extent. Excess area shall not be taken into consideration and the same is liable for action under the existing municipal by-laws. (vii) No request for regularization of unauthorized construction beyond provisions as under MPD 2021 shall be considered. Request for regularization beyond compoundable limits are liable to be rejected. (viii) Computation of damages/misuse charges will be done in respect of unauthorized construction based on Circle Rates prevalent when the unauthorized construction had supposedly taken place.

IF PAST MISUSE AND UNAUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION WERE TAKEN COGNIZANCE OF BY THE LESSOR HOW THESE CASES WILL BE HANDLED? In respect of these properties where any amount earlier claimed by the Lessor and not paid by the lessees will have to be paid before the application for conversion can be considered. In respect of those properties where misuse and/or unauthorized construction exists, conversion may be allowed only after recovering the misuse charges and/or damages charges, irrespective of whether earlier demanded or not.

WHETHER CONVERSION WILL BE GRANTED IF THERE IS DISBUTE BETWEEN THE LESSOR AND TE LESSEES ABOUT PAYMENT OF CERTAIN DUES? No, Conversion will not be granted unless any pending dispute including for payment of certain dues in respect of leasehold premises between the Lessor and the lessee is resolved.

WHETHER APPLICATION FOR CONVERSION CAN BE GIVEN DURING THE PENDENCY OF SUBSTITUTION/MUTATION?

Applications can be given by the person/persons in whose names the substitution/mutation will be have to be carried out. However, these applications will be considered only on disposal of pending substitution/mutation case. On disposal of substitution/mutation case, if it is found the substitution/mutation is carried out in the name(s) of the person/persons who applied for conversion, the same application will be taken in to account, on the rates applicable as on date of substation/mutation. Otherwise the conversion application will be rejected.

In case of any dispute between original lessee/allottee and power of Attorney holders, application for the grant of free hold rights would be entertained only after the dispute is settled.

WHETHER CONVERSION WILL BE GRANTED EVEN IF THE LEASE DEED IS NOT SIGNED OR REGISTERED?

i) In respect of rehabilitation colonies/markets, in cases where lease deed is not signed or executed on account of administrative delays, the conversion will be allowed. In such cases, even in case lease deed was executed but was not got registered by the Lessees for whatsoever reasons, the conversion will be allowed.

ii) However, if the lease deed was not signed or not executed for certain defaults on the part of the allottee, the conversion will not be allowed.

iii) In respect of commercial/mixed land use premises, conversion will be allowed only after the

lease deed is executed and registered.

In cases where applications for mutation or substitution are pending before the Lessor, conversion would be allowed only after the necessary mutation/ substitution has been carried out.

The conversion shall be allowed in the cases where lessee/allottee has parted with the possession of the property, provided that:

Application for conversion is made by a person holding power of attorney from lessee/allottee to alienate (sale/transfer) the property.

A remission of 40% on the conversion charges will be allowed in case of conversion in favour of original lessee.

Model calculation of conversion charges have been given in Annexure ‘c’.

The requisite conversion charges and surcharge as applicable along with processing fee of Rs.500/- (payable in cash) are required to be deposited at time of submission of application form.

Mode of remittance shall be by pay order/demand draft payable at Delhi, drawn in favour of Commissioner, NDMC (North Delhi Municipal Corporation). The amount of remittance has to be rounded off to the nearest rupee.

After depositing the application form and the conversion charges, applicant must ensure to obtain an acknowledgement

The conversion charges wherever applicable are to be deposited in lump sum.

The original lease deed should be produced at the time of execution of the conveyance deed. The same will be cancelled and returned along with the conveyance deed.

If the original lease deed is lost, the lessee/applicant must issue notice in two prominent newspapers (one Hindi and one English) having circulation in the area where the property is suited and also execute an affidavit before the First class magistrate indicating there in how the original lease deed was lost. A copy of the public notice published in the news-paper and the original affidavit must be submitted at least 10 days before the debate of execution of the conveyance deed.

ON WHAT GROUNDS THE CONVERSION APPLICATION WILL BE REJECTED?

The conversion application will be rejected on any of the following grounds:-

• When the lease stood determined/cancelled or the property stood re-entered. • When there is a pending litigation about the title of the property. • When there is a pending litigation between the lessee and Lessor. • When the property is mortgaged and No Objection Certificate for conversion obtained from

the mortgagee is not enclosed with the application. • When the application is signed by a person who is not eligible to apply for conversion or the

property is not eligible for conversion under the policy. • When the application is holder of Power of Attorney and the conversion is to be granted in

favour of the purchasers and there is no evidence produced in support of registration of sale deed in favour of the purchaser.

• When the charges payable under different heads mentioned in the application forms are not fully paid.

• If the property involves encroachment on public land/government land. • When the application is incomplete.

WHAT IS THE AMOUNT PAYABLE FOR GETTING THE CONVERSION FROM

LEASEHOLD TO FREEHOLD?

• Conversion Fee (after deduction of remission 40% on the prescribed free admissible to the recorded lessee OR

• If there has already been a transaction regarding the property/properties and the original lessee and sale deed has been registered penal charges towards non intimation of transaction and applicable unearned increase shall also be charged Arrears of ground rent, if any, inclusive of Revised Ground Rent along with applicable interest.

• Misuse charges/damage charges, if any, recoverable. • Balance cost of land/premium, if any. • Arrears of any other dues earlier levied by the Lessor and not paid by the Lessee. • Processing fee of Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred only).

HOW MUCH IS THE CONVERSION FEE PAYABLE?

• The formulae for calculation of conversion fee for different sizes of built-up

shops/stalls/show windows/commercial flats /mixed land use markets where residential flats exits over shop are given in Annexure –C.

• The formulae for calculation of conversion charges payable is given in Annexure –C. • Remission of 40% of the prescribed conversion fee is admissible in respect of recorded

lessees.

WHAT ARE THE LAND RATES TO BE APPLIED IN THE FORMULAE GIVEN IN ANNEXURE –C. The notified land rates prevailing on the date of submission of the initial application shall be the crucial date for calculation/computation of Conversion Charges payable. In case of fresh applications, Circle Rates currently in force shall be applicable for calculation conversion fee.

WHAT IS THE MODE OF PAYMENT? The payments referred to in the application shall be paid in the shape of a Demand Draft/Banker’s Cheque drawn in favour of Commissioner, North Delhi Municipal Corporation.

WHETHER CONVERSION CHARGES/FEE ETC. ARE PAYABLE IN LUMPSUM OR PAYMENT IN INSTALLMENTS IS PERMISSIBLE? The conversion fee/charges and surcharge, wherever applicable, can be deposited either in lump sum or in not more than five (5) equal installments. If the amount is paid in installments, interest calculated @ 10% p.a. on the balance shall also be payable. The applicants are also liable to pay interest @ 10% on any short payment of conversion fee from the date of submission of application till date of final payment. The Conveyance Deed shall be handed over to the Lessee/Allottee/applicant only after the entire amount of dues is cleared.

IF THE APPLICANT CHOOSES TO PAY THE CONVERSION FEE ETC. IN INSTALLMENTS AND THE FIRST INSTALLMENT IS PAID ALONG WITH THE APPLICATION IS NOT COMMENSURATE WITH THE NUMBER OF INSTALLMENTS OPTED FOR BY HIM, HOW WILL IT BE TREATED? The shortfall in the payment of 1st installment will be intimated to the applicant and the applicant is required to pay the balance amount within 30 days, from the date of such communication. If this amount is not paid within the stipulated time, the crucial date will be reckoned with reference to the date of payment of such amount, for applying the land rates for the purpose of calculation of conversion fee, wherever applicable.

HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE TO GRANT CONBVERSION AND ISSUE CONVEANCE DEED? The grant of conversion will be communicated within four months from the date the complete in all respects is submitted along with complete payments.

WHAT DOCUMENTS WILL BE ISSUED TO EVIDENCE THE GRANT OF CONVERSION? A Conveyance Deed will be issued on granting the conversion to freehold.

WHETHER CONVEYANCE DEED WILL BE SENT TO THE PARTY ON GRANT OF CONVERSION? No. On approval of the application for grant of conversion, a communication will be sent to the applicant specifying the date on which he should come to the Land & Estate Department along with original documents including lease deed, two witnesses, ID Proof in order to execute the conveyance deed. This communication will also indicate if any marginal amounts are payable.

WHO IS TO SIGN THE CONVEYANCE DEED? If the applicant is the lessee/ last purchaser, the applicant has to sign the conveyance deed. If the applicant is a Attorney of the allottee, the he may sign on behalf of the person on whose name the conversion is granted.

WHETHER THE CONVEYANCE DEED IS REQUIRED TO BE REGISTERED? Yes, the conveyance deed must be registered.

WHETHER STAMP DUTY IS PAYABLE FOR REGISTRATION OF CONVEYANCE DEED? Yes, stamp duty is payable on the conversion amount for registration of the Conveyance Deed. If the lease deed was not registered, the stamp duty is payable on the amount earlier paid for getting the leasehold rights plus the amount how paid for conversion. If the conveyance deed is not registered with in 4 (four) months from the date of execution for whatsoever reason, the same will become invalid and fresh documents are required to be executed. Fresh documents shall be executed subject to payment of conversion charges (prevailing on the date of application for revalidation) and as per policy prevailing on such date. However, if, there is no change in the conversion fee, 25% of the stamp duty payable on the documents subject to a minimum of Rs.100/- shall be recovered. In case of loss of the documents, FIR should be registered and advertisement may be made in any leading local daily newspaper and affidavit to the effect that the property is not mortgaged/transferred is required to be submitted.

WHAT HAPPENS TO THE ORIGINAL LEASE DEED? The original lease deed should be produced at the time of execution of the conveyance deed. An endorsement to the effect that the property has been converted into freehold is made on the same and returned along with the conveyance deed.

WHAT TO DO IF THE ORIGINAL LEASE DEED WAS LOST? If the original lease deed was lost, the lessee/applicant must issue a public notice in a prominent daily newspaper having circulation in the area where the property is situated and also execute an affidavit before the First Class Magistrate indicating therein how the original lease deed was lost. Format of the affidavit is at Annexure ‘E’. A copy of the newspaper bearing the public notice and the original affidavit must be submitted at least 10 days before the date of executing the conveyance deed. The public notice should have been published in the newspaper at least one month prior to execution of the conveyance deed.

WHAT DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED TO BE ENCLOSED TO THE APPLCATION IN CASE OF LEASEHOLD TO FREEHOLD? The following documents should be enclosed in all cases: a. Copy of the G-8 receipt indicating remittance of conversion charges and processing fee b. Passport size photograph (original) of the lessee/purchaser/GPA holder c. Completion certificate/’D’ form (attested copy) {in case of plotted allotment d. Site plan as on date from a registered Architect e. Indemnity Bond as per Annexure ‘F’ f. Undertaking (proforma enclosed as Annexure ‘G’) g. Copy of site plan as on date duly prepared by Registered Architect. h. The following additional documents should be enclosed if sale deed has been executed and registered in the name of applicant but the fact has not been brought to the knowledge of this department

i. Evidence of Transaction (Attested Copy) viz. copy of registered sale deed

ii. Affidavit to the effect the property is still in possession of purchaser and that he has not parted with the possession of the property by way of any agreement to sell/sale deed/gift deed etc. and also to furnish proof of his possession. The following documents should be enclosed if the property is mortgaged: No Objection Certificate from the mortgagee (Attested copy).

PRODUCERE FOR SUBMISSION OF APPLICATIONS FOR CONVERSION The brochure along with prescribed application form will be available for sale on payment

of Rs. 250/- at Land & Estate Department, 7th Floor, E-wing, SPM Civic Centre, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, New Delhi – 110 002.

The application form duly complete in all respects along with prescribed conversion and

other charges shall be deposited at the Land & Estate Department, 7th Floor, E-Wing, SPM Civic Centre, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, New Delhi – 110 002.

If any application is found incomplete or defective in any manner, the applicant shall be

given an opportunity to furnish the prescribed documents not closed to the application and to remove the defects within the period of 30 days. On the failure of the applicant to remove the defects within the period specified, the application shall be deemed to have been rejected. Application found in order will be deposited of within a maximum period of 90 days.

Conveyance deed shall be sent to the applicant/person in whose name conversion is sought

by registered post after the due deliberations/procedures are complete. The recipient shall then get it stamped from collector of stamps and submit within 45 days, from the receipt thereof at the specified counter located at 7th Floor, E-wing, SPM Civic Centre for signature of authorized person.

On receipt of the conversion deed, a date will be given on which the signed conveyance deed

can be collected from the specified counter at 7th Floor, E-wing, SPM Civic Centre. Thereafter the recipient shall get the conveyance deed registered with the concerned Sub-registrar. Stamp duty and registration charges shall be borne by the person in whose favour the conversion is allowed.

DOCUMENTS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED

The applicant shall be required to furnish the following documents along with the

application form:-

(a) Undertaking the prescribed format duly attested by First Class Magistrate. (Annexure ‘D’ or ‘L’) (b) Affidavit in prescribed format duly attested by First Class Magistrate. (Annexure ‘E’ or ‘P’) (c) Indemnity bond(s) in prescribed format(s) duly attested by First Class Magistrate. (Annexure ‘F’

or ‘J’) (d) Copy of registered Sale deed (e) Where application is made by attorney copy of registered SPA - Proof of physical possession by

the person in whose name the conversion is sought viz. latest paid copy of Electricity/Telephone (MTNL only) bill towards proof of occupation/possession and photocopy of passport/driving licence/ Voter Identity card etc. duly attested by Gazetted Officer.

(f) 4 attested passport size photographs and 4 attested specimen signature of the person in whose favour the conversion is sought duly attested by a Gazetted officer/Notary Public as per Annexure ‘G’ (If the applicant is allottee/lessee, then his/her photographs and incase of applicant being an attorney, photographs of person in named in column “3” of the application form are required to submitted).

(g) Copy of lease deed/conveyance deed/allotment letter/demand letter duly attested by a Gazetted Officer. (h) Copy of N.O.C.(s) from the mortgagee(s) duly attested by Gazetted Officer. (i) Information regarding payment details of Ground (Rent Annexure ‘H’).

(j) Copy of Site plan from registered architect existing as per site as on date showing separately (1) Size of plot (2) total covered area (separate for each floor) (3) Total covered Area exceeding sanctioned plan /standard plan. Any other violations/ deviations noticed.

GUIDELINES FOR FILLING-UP THE APPLICATION FORM.

Column 1

If there is only one allottee/lessee of the property sought to be converted into freehold, his name and other particulars should be given in sub-column (a). If there are two allottee/lessees, the names and other particulars should be given separately in sub-column ‘a’ & ‘b’. If there are more than two lessee/allottee, a separate sheet be attached giving the requirement particulars.

Column 2

If the application is submitted by an attorney duly authorized to seek sale permission, execute the Sale Deed and get it registered on behalf of the lessee/allottee, his particulars should be given in this column. However, 1st column also shall be filled up in such cases.

Column 3

The column is applicable only in case where the conversion is sought in favour of a person other than the lessee/allottee and the application is submitted by the Attorney. It would, however, be necessary that the person in whose favour the conversion is sought in the physical possession of the property under the valid agreement of sell executed in his/her favour.

Column 4

Under sub-column (ii) some authentic document Viz. attested Photostat copy of Ration Card, Passport, Driving Licence etc. should be submitted in proof of possession with the person named in column 3. Under sub-column (iii), attested true copy of agreement of sell or any other authentic document showing that the person named in column 3 has already agreed to purchase the property is required to be submitted.

Column 5

File number is given on the communication sent to the lessee/allottee by the NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION and can taken from there.

Column 18

It is necessary that the Lessee/Allottee pay up to the date Ground Rate, along with the simple interest @ 10% per annum for arrears, if any, before applying for conversion.

Column 19

The applicant is required to assesses the conversion charges carefully on the basis of the formula and the notified land rates, applicable in respect of plots/shops as given in (Annexure ‘A’ and Annexure ‘B’).

Column 20

If there has already been a transaction regarding the property/properties and the original lessee and sale deed has been registered though not brought to the knowledge of this department penal charges towards non intimation of transaction @ Rs 3000/- per month and applicable unearned increase shall also be charged

II. CONVERSION FROM LICENCE TO LEASEHOLD:

Eligibility criteria for grant of ownership rights as laid down by the DOE/GOI shall be applicable to only following specific categories :-

a. The person who is an original allottee

b. The person who has come into possession of the property by virtue of partnership Deed/Dissolution Deed entered into and exited prior to 31-08-2000.

c. An occupant/sub-lettee who is in occupation of the shop prior to 31-08-2000 but

unable to produce a Partnership/Dissolution deed- subject to submission of sufficient other documentary evidence such as IT Returns, Bank Account Statements and other business/transaction records with respect to the shop.

Changes shall be allowed for conversion from to lease (only for aforesaid categories),

by charging one time lump sum payment from the shopkeeper i.e. regularization of shop in favour of Agreement to Sell/GPA holders where the original allottee has parted with the possession of the shop after having been granted ownership rights and having paid the Capitalized Value but only the lease deed has not been executed. This relief is applicable to only those properties where the above criteria is fulfilled.

Such cases be regularized for execution of lease deed by charging one time lump sum fee depending upon the category viz. A, B, C, etc. into which a given locality/area falls. The minimum fee shall be Rs.3.00 lacks (for Category H) locality with an increase of Rs.50,000/- to each higher category as detailed below:

Category A - Rs. 6.50 lakhs Category B - Rs.6.00 lakhs Category C - Rs. 5.50 lakhs Category D - Rs.5.00 lakhs Category E - Rs. 4.50 lakhs Category F - Rs.4.00 lakhs Category G - Rs.3,50 lakhs Category H - Rs. 3.00 lakhs

A sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) shall be chargeable to each additional transaction.

Instances where the shop keeper has parted with the possession of the shop without conferring of ownership rights and not covered under categories as specified as ‘a’, ‘b’, and ‘c’ as above under the heading Eligibility criteria for grant of ownership rights shall not be entitled to this relief.

Payment may be made by the licencees/shopkeepers either in lump sum or in 6 (six) half-yearly installments. Where the shopkeeper opts to make payment in installment, a hire purchase agreement in the prescribed form shall be executed between the department and the shopkeeper. The first installment shall be 25% of the Capitalized Value i.e. cost of land plus cost of superstructure while the remaining 75% of the Capitalized Value shall be payable in five equated installments along with interest @ 15% p.a. Copy of Hire Purchase Agreement executed between DOE and the shopkeeper is available at Annexure ’K’

ANNEXURE-A

Formula for calculation of one time conversion fee for various Commercial and mixed land use properties.

Area x Notified land rates x 10 (Commercial) 100 On the date of application

ANNEXURE-‘B’)

Conversion fee applicable up to 31.03.2011 for built up Commercial Shops of L&DO will be as per the notified Circle Rates (indicative). The prescribed conversion charges are applicable as per Circle Rates notified by the GNCTD on 15-11-2011 (effective/applicable from 16-11-2011)( or circle rates prevailing on the date of conversion whichever is latter )

SL. No. Category Conversion fee per Sq.mtr. Commercial Shops/stalls/ show windows/commercial flats/fuel depots

1 A 2,58,000 (86000 x 3) 2 B 2,04,600 (68200 x 3) 3 C 1,63,800 (54600 x 3) 4 D

1,30,800 (43600 x 3)

5 E 1,10,400 (36800 x 3) 6 F 96,600 (32200 x 3) 7 G 82,200 (27,400 x 3) 8 H 41,400 (13,800 x 3)

Formula for calculation of one time conversion fee.

(i) In case of commercial lease hold plots including mixed land use plots.

Permissible floor area or plot area whichever is higher

Notified Circle Rate/land rates as on the date of application

10/100

Note: A remission of 40% will be allowed on the conversion charges in case of

original lessees and in case where change of hands has taken place by way of sale deed a penalty for non intimation of sale @ Rs. 3000 per annum shall be charged apart from payment of unearned increase.

(ANNEXURE ‘B-1’)

CONVERSION RATES APPLICABLE FOR COMMERCIAL LEASES IN VARIOUS LOCALITIES/ZONES OF DELHI

SI. No.

Name of Market Name of Locality Category Conversion Rates Per sqm.

1 Ashoka Market Subzi Mandi (old) E As per Circle Rate in force (Annexure –A)

2 Azad Market Bara Hindu Rao F Do 3 Baird Road Pahar Ganj E 4 DB Gupta Market Karol Bagh D Do 5 Ghaffar Market Karol Bagh D Do 6 Gokhale Market Tis Hazari D Do 7 Indira Market Subzi Mandi (old) E Do 8 Khursheed Market Sadar Bazar E Do 9 Lehna Singh Market Malka Ganj E Do

10 Mirdard Road Market Minto Road D Do 11 Old Rohtak Road Market Sarai Rohilla E Do 12 Rani Jhansi Market Karol Bagh D Do 13 Roshanara Road Market Sabzi Mandi E Do 14 Teliwara, Sadar Bazar E Do 15 Timar Pur Market Timar Pur D Do 16 Gulabi Bagh Market Kamla Nagar E Do 17 Moti Nagar Market Karampura E Do 18 Old Rajinder Nagar Market Rajendra Nagar C Do 19 Ramesh Nagar Market Ramesh Nagar D Do 20 Old Ramesh Nagar Market Ramesh Nagar D Do 21 West Patel Nagar (New Market) East Patel Nagar D Do 22 West Patel Nagar (Old) Market East Patel Nagar D Do 23 West Patel Nagar (Nala) Market East Patel Nagar D Do 24 New Qutub Road Market Sadar Bazar E Do 25 South Patel Nagar Market South Patel Nagar D Do 26 Malka Ganj Market Subzi Mandi E Do 27 Inner Market, Malka Ganj Subzi Mandi E Do 28 Main Road Market, Malka Ganj Subzi Mandi E Do 29 East Patel Nagar Market East Patel Nagar D Do 30 New Rajinder Nagar Market New Rajender Ngr D Do 31 Edward Lane Market GTB Nagar D Do 32 Panchkuian Road Market Pahar Ganj E Do 33 Pleasure Garden Market Chandni Chowk E DO 34 Jawaher Market (Lancer Road ) Timar Pur D Do 35 Pahar Ganj Market Pahar Ganj E Do 36 Kamla Market Pahar Ganj E Do 37 Hathi Khana Market, Azad

Market Bara Hindu Rao F Do

ANNEXURE ‘C’

ILLUSTRATION OF CALCULATION CONVERSION CHARGES. ILLUSTRATION 1

Suppose an allottee is having a built up shop/stall/show window/commercial flat/ at Local Shopping centre in DB Gupta Road Market or Commercial Flat of DB Gupta Road Market measuring 10 Sq. mtr. The conversion charges will be as follows.

(Shop Area x Rate x 10) MINUS 40% Rebate

100 = P x R x 10 MINUS 40% Rebate = P x R x 10 - 40 P x R x 10 100 100

Where P= Area of built up shop as per the demand cum allotment letter which is 10 sq.mtr.

Where R= Circle Rates notified by the GNCTD adopted by North DMC ( erstwhile MCD) as on 08-02-2011 for D B Gupta Road Mkt. as per the List at Annexure ‘B’ which is Rs.43600 x 3 /-

Rebate/remission applicable in case of original allottee/Lessee is 40% on the conversion charges. Substituting the above values the conversion charges will be;

i) 10*130800*10/100=Rs.130800/-

ii) 40% of the above values will be 40/100*130800=Rs.77480/-

Therefore the actual conversion charges=130800 (-) 52320 = 77480/- Processing Fee of Rs.500/- will also be added to the conversion charges hence conversion charges payable will be Rs.77980/-

ILLUATRATION 2

Suppose an allottee/Firm/Company ‘X’ is having a built up shop measuring 100 Sq.mts. in

DB Gupta Road Market or having the commercial Flat of similar size. He/she executed sale deed in favour of person ‘Y’ with Y’ applied for grant of free hold right then the conversion charges will be calculated as under:

(Shop Area *R*10) (+) penalty @ Rs 3000 per annum for non intimation of sale + unearned increase

100

Where P= Area of built up shop as per the demand cum allotment letter which is 10 sq.mtr. Where R= Circle Rates notified by the GNCTD adopted by North DMC ( erstwhile

MCD)as on 08-02-2011 for D B Gupta Road Mkt. as per the List at Annexure ‘B’ which is Rs.43600 x 3 /-

Where the premises/unit is part of a multi-storeyed structure i.e. where the ground floor of the building comprises of shops and the upper floors consist of commercial/ residential flats, the amount arrived at by multiplying the area of the shop with applicable land rates (current circle rates), the premium of land is divisible by the number of floors as was done by the DOE/L&DO.

For example, if the shop situated in Lehna Singh Market measures 10 sq. m., the applicable land rate is, say Rs. 2,61,600/- per sq. m. and the cost of superstructure works out to say Rs.50,000 (after applicable depreciation), the shop is part of a two-storeyed building, then the Capitalized Value shall be:

(a) where the shop/unit is part of a single storeyed structure”

Area of the Shop : 10 sq.m. Locality : Kamla Market Category (as per Circle Rates) : D Circle Rate applicable : Rs.87200/- per sq.m. (res.)


Factor : 1. Land Rate Chargeable : Rs. 1x261600/- per sq.m. Premium of Land : Rs. 2616000/-


(b) Where the shop/unit is part of a two -storeyed structure i.e. ground floor –

shop whereas the upper floor comprises of residential flats:

Area of the Shop : 10 sq. m. Locality : West Patel Nagar Category (as per Circle Rates) : D Circle Rate applicable : Rs.87,200/- per sq.m. (res.)


Factor : 2/3– Commercial ; 1/3 Residential. Land Rate Chargeable : 2/3 x 261600/- per sq.m. i.e. 174400/- Premium of Land : Rs. 1744000/-


(c) Where the shop/unit is part of a two -storeyed structure i.e. ground floor – shop whereas the upper floor comprises of commercial flats:

Area of the Shop : 10 sq. m. Locality : Desh Bandhu Gupta Mkt. Category (as per Circle Rates) : D Circle Rate applicable : Rs.87200/- per sq.m. (res.)


Factor : ½– Commercial ; 1/2 Residential. Land Rate Chargeable : 1/2x261600/- per sq. m. i.e.130800/- Premium of Land : Rs. 13,08,000/-

Cost of superstructure : Rs. 50,000/- Capitalized Value Payable : Rs. 13,58,000/-

(ANNEXURE –“D”)

UNDERTAKING

(To be submitted by the person in whose conversion is sought on non-judicial stamp paper of Rs.10/- duly attested by First Class Magistrate.)

I,......................................................., S/o, W/o, D/o Sh. ............ ..... ........................................,R/o............................................................................. ................................................ do hereby undertake as under-.

1. That I shall pay to NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, immediately on demand, such amount as may be demanded by it an account of arrears of ground rent and/or interest thereon, in respect of commercial/Industrial Plot/shop/commercial flat (*strike off whichever is not applicable) Plot No. ......................at................................................

2. That I shall pay to NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, immediately on demand, such amount, as may be demanded by it on account of maintenance/service charges (applicable only in case of shops/commercial flats).

3. That I shall pay, within such time such additional sum/sums towards Conversion Charges, as may be demanded by Lessor, NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, in consonance with revision in Circle Rates by GNCTD prior to the date of execution of Conveyance Deed.

4. That on my failure to pay any sum referred above the compensation of lease hold rights into free hold rights in respect of the above referred property shall be deemed to be null and void and the Lessor/Authority shall be entitled to recover the same as arrears of land revenue.

5. That it is found by NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, or any other Local Authority, at any point of time, that the above referred property or any part thereof is being used for the purposes other the specified in the lease deed architect control, in violation of the Master Plan of Delhi, I shall, forthwith, stop such use.

6. That I shall remove all non compoundable deviations if any at the aforesaid premises, and shall be liable to remove the same at my cost. 7. That I shall get regularized all compoundable deviations within stipulated period or remove the same. 8. That MCD shall be at full liberty to impose penalty, remove the violations, if any, at my cost. 9. That shall abide by the directions issued to me in this regard by the MCD.

10. That all the documents submitted by me are signed by genuine persons 11. That no court case /stay etc is pending against the said property.

………. day of .......................................2012.........

Lessee/Allottee/ Purchaser In the presence of,

1..................................................

2.................................................

(ANNEXURE –“E”)

AFFIDAVIT

(To be sworn by person whose favour the conversion is sought on non-judicial stamp paper of Rs. 10/- duly attested by First Class Magistrate) I, ...................................................... S/o.,D/o.,W/o. Sh.................................. ................ R/o............................................................................... do hereby solemnly declare and affirm as under:- That I am lessee/sub-lessee/allottee in physical possession of the Commercial shop/flat/stall/show window (strike off whichever is not applicable) bearing No.____, measuring _____ sq.m. in ____________________ Market, _____________, Delhi/New Delhi.

OR

That I am physical possession, under the valid agreement to sell/General Power of Attorney dated _________ executed in my favour in respect of Commercial Shop/Stall/Show Window/Commercial Flat (strike off whichever is not applicable) situated in ________________ Market, _______________________, Delhi/New Delhi.

That the prescribed use of the aforesaid property, as per the lease deed, is commercial.

That up to ground date rent has been paid in respect of the above referred property.

That the content of accompanying application for conversion of lease hold rights into free hold rights in respect of the above referred property are true and correct and the documents annexed thereto are genuine.

DEPONENT

VERIFICATION

Verified that the contents of the above affidavit are correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and nothing contained herein is untrue and nothing material is concerned therefrom.

DEPONENT

(ANNEXURE –“F”)

(To be executed by the applicant no Non-judicial stamp paper of Rs.100/-and to be attested by First Class Magistrate.)

INDEMNITY BOND

Sh./Smt./Km......................................................................, S/o,W/o,D/o,Sh............... .... . .... ....... ........................ R/o.................................................................................. (hereinafter called ‘Executant’ which terms shall include his/her heirs, successors/executors/administrator and legal assigns in favour of President of India/NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (herein after called the ‘Lessor’) which terms shall include its heirs, successors, executors administrators and legal assigns.

WHEREAS the Executant is the lessee/allottee in physical possession of the Commercial/Industrial/Shop/Flat No...............,

OR

WHERE AS the Executant is duly considered attorney of Sh./Smt./ Km. .......................................... R/o. ________________________________ _________________ and is competent to seek mutation on behalf of sale deed /conversion .

WHERE AS the Executant has applied to the Lessor for conversion of lease hold rights into free hold rights in respect of the above referred property. AND WHERE AS the Lessor, on the faith and the representation made to it, has agreed to convert lease hold rights in respect of the above referred property into freehold rights subject to the Executant giving such indemnity, as is hereinafter contained and keeping the Lessor harmless from any claim which anyone may, at any time, institute against the Lessor in respect of the above referred property.

Now this deed witnesses that in consideration of the Lessor agreeing to convert the leasehold rights in respect of the above referred property into freehold rights, the executant hereby covenants with the Lessor that he will at all times indemnify and keep harmless the said Lessor from all claims and the demand made and all action and proceeding taken against the said Lessor by anyone in respect of the aforesaid property or any part thereof, on any ground whatsoever.

on this day of ...................................................2012.

Witness Executants 1.................................................. 2..................................................

ANNEXURE (‘G’)

SPECIMEN SIGNATURE AND PASSPORT SIZE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PERSON IN WHOSE FAVOUR CONVERSION SOUGHT DULY ATTESTED BY NOTARY/FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE Name __________________________, S/o; W/o. _______________________ Application No._____________ , Property No.________, ___________________ __________________________________________

1. (Specimen Signature) Attestation

Affix Photograph


Affix Photograph


Affix Photograph


Affix Photograph

If the applicant is allottee/lessee, then his/her photographs and in case of applicant being an attorney the photographs of person named in column 3 of the application form are required to be submitted as above.

(ANNEXURE ‘H’) DETAILS OF PAYMENT GROUND RENT

S.L.NO Challan No. Date of Deposits Amount Period From To

(Attested true copies of the proof of above payment to be enclosed)

App,/Challan No.________

CONVERSION FROM LEASE HOLD INTO FREEHOLD

Challan for remittance of money towards conversion charges and processing fees

FIRST COPY (Applicant’s copy) File No................................. Date: ................ 20.................

Name & Address of the allottee with details of property.

Details of deposits (score out whichever is not applicable)

Amount

Name and Address: _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ _______________________

1. Conversion charges etc. 2. Processing Fee Total

Rs.________/- Rs. 500/- Rs.________/-

1. Total amount deposited (in words)____________________________ 2. Cash/Demand/Draft No._______ dated.............................. 3. Name of the Bank on which Drawn

Dated...................................

Signature of the applicant

Received the above amount on __________________________ Abstract of details as per columns 19 & 20 of application

1. Conversion Charges Rs. 2. Surcharge Rs. 3. Processing Fee (Total) Rs.500/-

*500 *100 *50 *20 *10 Total......

Conditions: 1. Conversion is subject to verification of document and records and their correctness. 2. This form is not to be used for payment of Ground Rent or any other dues.

App,/Challan No.________

CONVERSION FROM LEASE HOLD INTO FREEHOLD

Challan for remittance of money towards conversion charges and processing fees

SECOND COPY (Applicant’s copy) File No................................. Date: ................ 20.................

Name & Address of the allottee with details of property.

Details of deposits (score out whichever is not applicable)

Amount

Name and Address: _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ _______________________

1. Conversion charges etc. 2. Processing Fee Total

Rs.________/- Rs. 500/- Rs.________/-

1. Total amount deposited (In words)____________________________ 2. Cash/Demand/Draft No._______ dated.............................. 3. Name of the Bank on which Drawn

Dated...................................


Received the above amount on __________________________ Abstract of details as per columns 19 & 20 of application

1. Conversion Charges Rs. 2. Surcharge Rs. 3. Processing Fee (Total) Rs.500/-

*500 *100 *50 *20 *10 Total......

Conditions: 1. Conversion is subject to verification of document and records and their correctness. 2. This form is not to be used for payment of Ground Rent or any other dues.

ANNEXURE –I

INDEMNITY BOND

(To be submitted by the Lessee where the original Lease Deed has been lost) (On non-judicial stamp paper of Rs.100/- duly attested by First Class Magistrate)

This Indemnity Bond witnesseth on this ____ day of Oct. 2012, I/We ________, S/o.; W/o.; D/o. ____________________, R/o.______ ____________ ________________________, hereinafter called the ‘Executant’ which terms shall include his/her heirs, successors/executors/ administrator and legal assignees in favour of MCD (herein after called the ‘Lessor’) which terms shall include its heirs, successors, executors administrators and legal assigns.

WHEREAS the executants are the Lessee/Lessee(s) of the allottee and are in physical possession of the Commercial Shop No._____________________.

WHEREAS the executants have applied to the Lessor for conversion of the above referred property from leasehold to freehold in their names.

WHEREAS the original Lease Deed executed between the undersigned Lessee(s) and L&DO has been lost.

WHEREAS the Executant(s) have accordingly filed a First Information Report with the police and also have published notices in four leading national newspapers as required under the rules.

AND WHEREAS the Lessor, on the faith and the representation made to it, has agreed to carry out mutation/substitution in respect of the above referred property subject to the Executant giving such indemnity, as is hereinafter contained and keeping the Lessor harmless from any claim which anyone may, at any time, institute against the Lessor in respect of the above referred property.

Now this deed witnesses that in consideration of the Lessor agreeing to carry out regularization of licence in respect of the above referred property, the Executant hereby covenants with the Lessor that he will at all times indemnity and keep harmless the said Lessor from all claims and the demand made and all action and proceeding taken against the said Lessor by anyone in respect of the aforesaid property or any part thereof, on any ground whatsoever.

on ____ day of Oct. 2012.

Executant(s)

Witness: 1..................................................

2..................................................

Annexure ‘J’

To be executed by the person in whose favour conversion is required on Non-judicial stamp paper of Rs.100/- duly attested by First Class Magistrate) – GPA/Agreement to Sell holder.

INDEMNITY BOND Sh./Smt/Km.......................................................S/o.................................................................

R/o............................................................................................................(hereinafter called ‘Executant’ which terms shall include his/her heirs, successors/executors/administrator and legal assigns in favour of Commissioner, NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (herein after called the ‘Lessor’) which terms shall include its heirs, successors, executors administrators and legal assigns.

WHERE AS the Executant is in physical possession of the shop/stall/show window/. ............. measuring ____ sq.mtr. by virtue of a valid General Power of Attorney/Agreement to Sell dated __________ executed in his/her favour.

AND WHERE AS the Lessor, on the faith and representation made to it, has agreed to convert leasehold rights in respect of the above referred property into freehold rights subject to the Executant giving such indemnity, as is hereinafter contained, and keep the Lessor harmless from any claim which anyone may, at anytime, institute against the Lessor in respect of the above preferred property.

NOW THIS DEED WITNESSESS that in consideration of the Lessor agreeing to convert the lease hold rights in respect of the above referred property into freehold rights the Executant hereby covenants with the Lessor that he will at all times indemnity and keep harmless the said Lessor from all claims and demands made and all actions and proceeding taken against the said Lessor by anyone in respect of the aforesaid property of any part thereof, or any ground whatsoever.

bond on this day of ..............................2012. Executant

Witnesses 1........................................... 2............................................

Annexure ‘K’ (To be submitted on non-judicial stamp paper of Rs.100/-)

HIRE PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR Shop /Stall /Platform/.____, _______ _________Market, Delhi.

1. AN AGREEMENT made this the ________________ day of _________________ between the Commissioner, North Delhi Municipal Corporation acting through the Addl. Dy. Commissioner/Asst. Commissioner, North Delhi Municipal Corporation, New Delhi (hereinafter called the “CORPORATION/DEPARTMENT” which expression shall include his successors and assigns) of the one part and ____________ W/o, S/o, D/o ______________ (hereinafter called the “LICENCEE” which expression shall mean and include the said ___________ and his/her heirs, executors, administrators, representatives and permitted assigns) of the other part.

2. Whereas the Licencee is an allottee of shop/stall /platform/ _____________, Sector- _________, ___________,

New Delhi under the Corporation/Department as per the licencee deed executed between the parties referred to above on _____________ and has requested the Corporation/Department to grant a lease for the said premises after payment of the premium for land of _____________ and replacement cost of the structure minus depreciation of __________________.

3. And whereas the Corporation/Department has agreed to demise all that Plot of land underneath the structure and

convey the shop/stall/flat/platform/fuel depot No. ___________ situated in Market, Sec. ________, _____________, New Delhi and fully described in the schedule hereunder written.

4. And Whereas, the Corporation/Department has also agreed to allow the party of the other part to have the said land

leased out to him/her after receiving the full payment and to convey the superstructure comprising shop/stall/flat/platform/fuel depot No. ____, Market, Sec. ________, _______________, New Delhi on conditions set out in this indenture.

5. And whereas in respect of the said land and superstructure the other party has agreed to pay the licence fee, rates,

taxes etc., in the manner provided hereinafter appearing:-

(i) The party of the other part shall hold the said premises as a licencee and he/she shall occupy it as per the conditions set out in the earlier licence deed dated _________ executed between the parties referred to above and shall hold the same till such time the ownership of the shop/stall/flat/platform/fuel depot is transferred to him/her in the manner prescribed hereinafter.

(ii) 25% of the cost of superstructure comprising shop/stall/platform/. ____, Market, Sec. ________,

_______________, New Delhi including premium of land shall be paid by the party of the second part at the time of making this agreement and the balance amount in five six monthly equal installments of __________ each together with interest @12% P.A. on the remaining balance amount shall be paid on the _________ January and __________________ July of each year. Provided that in the event of non-payment of any of the installment on the due date, the interest shall be charged @15% p.a. instead of 12% p.a. on the remaining balance amount for the period commencing from the due date of the installment till the payment thereof is made.

(iii) That in addition to the installments the Licencee Shall pay annual ground lease rent in advance for the

demised premises at the rate of 2/2% of the premium for land and the same is payable in two halves on 15th January and 15th of July of each year.

(iv) That in the case of default on the part of the licence in the payment of any installment or ground rent, the

right of the licence to get the lease deed conveyance deed executed with respect to licenced premises shall stand forfeited and this action on his part would disentitle the licencee to claim ownership right on lease hold basis as stated above and in that event he/she shall become a temporary monthly licencee as per licencee deed dated _________ executed earlier by the licencee in favour of the Commissioner, North Delhi Municipal Corporation. That in event of the allottee failing to make the full payment of capitalized cost in time then the Corporation/Department shall be at liberty to withdraw the offer of ownership rights and also will refund the amount paid towards capitalized cost and ground rent after deducting the licencee fees for the entire period which shall be payable by the allottee(s) and no interest shall be payable by the Corporation/ Department.

6. The licencee shall acquire the ownership of the said superstructure please hold basis by getting conveyance on the licencee paying all installments which will also include the cost of superstructure and ground rent as well as the premium for the land.

7. On the non-observance of any of the covenants and conditions of this agreement and the licence deed dated _________ executed earlier with respect to monthly licence and on his/her part to be observed and performed (in respect of which, the decision of the Commissioner to the whom the work is transferred shall be final and binding () then and in any case the Corporation/Department shall be at liberty by giving 30 days notice in writing to forthwith determine this agreement and will have the right to resume possession of the premises or cancel the allotment and evict the licencee without making any compensation thereof.

8. The party of the other part shall not permit the said premises or any part thereof being used by my other person for any purpose whatsoever and also shall not introduce any partner nor shall he/she/they transfer possession of the premises with any other person or assign, transfer, change or otherwise alien-ate his interest in the premises till all the installments along with the interest are fully paid.

9. That in the event of determination of this agreement due to default in payment of any installment or ground rent etc. or otherwise, the allottee shall be liable to pay 10% of premium of land as service charges.

10. The allottee shall, until and unless all installments and its interest thereof are fully paid, keep and maintain all the building and structure of the shop in good order and condition and preserve them and make good all damages whether accidental or otherwise and at all times allow the Corporation/Department or its officials to inspect the same whenever demanded. In the event of the shop being damaged or destroyed beyond repairs by fire or any other cause, the allottee shall nevertheless remain liable for and pay the Corporation/Department of remaining installments and interest thereof due.

11. The allottee(s) shall not carry out any further construction over and above the existing structure except in accordance with the municipal by-laws and with prior permission of the Corporation/Department.

12. The allottee(s) shall not transfer, sell, assign nor encumber of subject the shop or suffer any decree or order of any court whereby the shop or any portion thereof may be attached or charged, encumbered or otherwise seized or taken in execution nor composition with his or editors until and unless all the installments and interest thereof are full paid and written approval of the department had been obtained.

13. Any time concession or indulgence granted or shown on part of the Corporation/ Department will not prejudice its rights under this agreement.

SCHEDULE ABOVE REFERRED TO Description of structure of the transferred premises: (i) All that ground/first floor brick built shop/stall/platform. ____, __________________ Market, New Delhi. (ii) ____________________________________________ share in the staircase

__________________________ in the common passage and ________________________ share in the lavatory block. Bounded by _________________________ in the East Bounded by _________________________ in the West Bounded by _________________________ in the West Bounded by _________________________ in the West

In witness where of the parties here in to have set their hands to his agreement the day month and year first above written.

Witness No. 1 ____________________ Witness No. 2 ____________________

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER LAND & ESTATE DEPARTMENT

for and on behalf of THE COMMISSIONER, North D.M.C Witness No. 1 ______________ With his residential address Witness No. 2 _______________With his residential address

(Signature of the party of the other part)

Annexure ‘L’

UNDERTAKING

(To be submitted by the person in whose name ownership is sought sought on non-judicial stamp paper of Rs.10/- duly attested by First Class Magistrate.)

I,...........................................................S/o, W/o, D/o Sh. ................. ........................................,R/o.......................................................... ........................ ..................................do hereby undertake as under-.

1. That I shall pay to NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, immediately

on demand, such amount as may be demanded by it an account of arrears of ground rent and /or interest thereon, in respect of commercial/Industrial Plot/shop/ commercial flat (*strike off whichever is not applicable) Plot No. ......................at................................................

2. That I shall pay to NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, immediately on demand, such amount, as may be demanded by it on account of maintenance/service charges (applicable only in case of shops/commercial flats).

3. That I shall pay, within such time such additional sum/sums towards Conversion Charges, as may be demanded by Lessor, NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, in consonance with revision in Circle Rates by GNCTD prior to the date of execution of Conveyance Deed.

4. That on my failure to pay any sum referred above the compensation of lease hold rights into free hold rights in respect of the above referred property shall be deemed to be null and void and the Lessor/Authority shall be entitled to recover the same as arrears of land revenue with retrospective effect.

5. That it is found by NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, or any other Local Authority, at any point of time, that the above referred property or any part thereof is being used for the purposes other the specified in the lease deed architect control, in violation of the Master Plan of Delhi, I shall, forthwith stop such use.

8. That MCD shall be at full liberty to impose penalty, remove the violations, if any, at my cost. 9. That shall abide by the directions issued to me in this regard by the MCD. 10. That all the documents submitted by me are signed by genuine persons. 11. That no court case /stay etc is pending against the said property.

………. day of .......................................2012.........

Lessee/Allottee/ Purchaser In the presence of, 1.................................................. 2.................................................

Annexure ‘M’

SELF ASSESSMENT SHEET FOR CONVERSION ETC.

1. Application No. ........................................

2. DETAILS OF PROPERTY (Score off paras not applicable)

A. For Plots: 1. Plot area in Sq.mtr. ...................................................................... 2. Locality of the plot ...................................................................... 3. Permissible built up area in Sq.mtr.............................................. (in case of commercial plot)

B. For NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION BUILT UP

SHOPS/COMMERCIAL FLATS 1. Shops area in Sq.m. .....................................................................

(as in the allotment cum demand letter) 2. Locality.........................................................................................

3. CONVERSION CHARGES

1. (As per Annexure A&B)

(to be mentioned in Column.19 of the Application Form)

4. SURCHARGE:

In case the freehold right are sought in favour of person other than the original lessee(s)/(s) /allottee(s)

A copy of duly registered sale deed with penalty of Rs 3000 per annum

towards non intimation of sale with unearned increase of 50% as applicable.

5. TOTAL OF CONVERSION CHARGES & SURCHARGE

Total of Column (3) + (4) above=Rs.________________

(N.B- to be mentioned in Col.21 of the Application Form.)

Annexure ‘N’

APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF OWNERSHIP RIGHTS

To

The Dy. Commissioner, Land & Estate Department, North Delhi Municipal Corporation, 7th floor, SPM Civic Centre, JL Nehru Marg, New Delhi – 110 002.

Sir,

With reference to your recent advertisement in the Press, I request that ownership rights in respect of

Shop/Stall/Show Window/Com. Flat/Fuel Depot No.___, ________________ Market, New Delhi, may

kindly be granted to me. The necessary details are given below:

1. Full Name of the Applicant : _________________________

2. Location/address of the shop/stall/ show window/com. flat/fuel depot for which ownership is being applied : _________________________ _________________________ _________________________

3. Present residential address : _________________________ _________________________ _________________________

4. Permanent residential address : _________________________

_________________________ _________________________

5. Nationality : _________________________

6. Under which category the applicant falls : (a) Whether original allottee : Yes/No

(b) Whether the Shop/Stall/Show Window/ Com. Flat stands regularized in his name on the basis of partnership, etc. documents on or before 31-08-2000 : Yes/No

(c) Whether the applicant was in bonafide and undisputed possession of the shop on or before 31-08-2000 and still authorizedly running business from there : Yes/No

Passport size photograph of

(d) Documentary proof: (Attested photocopies of documents to be enclosed in support of actual possession) i. Shop Registration Certificate : Yes/No ii. Partnership Deed : Yes/No iii. Dissolution Deed : Yes/No iv. No Objection from the bonafide allottee : Yes/No

I hereby accept the terms and conditions under which the North Delhi Municipal Corporation has decided to confer ownership rights including payment and all arrears against the premises, revised licence fee and any other charges from the date(s) fixed by the Dept. from time to time.

Enclosures: (1) ………………………………………….. (2) ………………………………………….. (3) ………………………………………….. (4) ………………………………………….. (5) ……………………………………………

Yours faithfully,


Date: _________ Place:_________ ___________________________________________________________________________

Verification/identification respective Market Association and Federation of Markets Association

___________________ ___________________ Signature & seal of Signature & seal of President/Secretary President/Secretary ________________ Market Association ______________Market Association ___________________________________________________________________

Note: *Photograph should be attested by a gazette officer/First Class Magistrate on the front.

*Affidavit on a non-judicial stamp paper of Rs.10/- attested by a First Class Magistrate.

ANNEXURE - O NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

LAND & ESTATE DEPARTMENT E-BLOCK, 7TH FLOOR, SPM CIVIC CENTRE,

JL NEHRU MARG, NEW DELHI-110 002

NO. ____________ DATE:________

To,

Smt./Shri ....................... Shop/Stall/Flat No. ................... ...................................................... New Delhi.

Sub: Grant of ownership rights in respect of Shop No. ..........,

.................................... Market, Delhi/New Delhi. _______________________________________

Sir/ Madam,

Please refer to this Office letter No. .................. dated ................ on this subject citied above and to request you to submit following documents:-

1. Affidavit duly attested by First Class Magistrate regarding your present and permanent address. 2. Affidavit duly attested by First Class Magistrate regarding no unauthorised

construction/encroachment in the said premises. 3. Two photographs & Election Card/PAN Card/Passport towards ID Proof, duly attested by

Gazetted Officer. 4. Present Occupancy proof in your name (self attested photocopy of latest paid BSES/MTNL Bill). 5. Attested photocopy of Permanent Account Number. 6. Hire Purchase Agreement/Indemnity Bond/Undertaking. 7. Bank Draft of Rs.................. 8. Affidavit duly attested by First Class Magistrate as to no other person/persons has/have ever

raised any claim/objection of your possession of the shop. 9. Affidavit duly attested by First Class Magistrate to the effect that you have no other shop in your

name. 10. To appear before A.O./A.C./A.D.C. (L&E) along with the original allotted on the day intimated

for the purpose. 11. In case it is not possible, please furnish the Death Certificate of the original allotted or no

objection from his legal heirs. • All Affidavits must be on Rs. 10/- stamp paper. • Payment will be accepted only after submission of the requisite documents.

Yours faithfully,

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER LAND & ESTATE DEPARTMENT

Annexure ‘P’

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION LAND & ESTATE DEPARTMENT

E-BLOCK, 7TH FLOOR, SPM CIVIC CENTRE, JL NEHRU MARG, NEW DELHI:-110 002

No. ____________________ Date:_________

To ........................................................... ............................................................ ............................................................. ...............................................................

Sub: Grant of ownership rights on lease hold basis of Shop/Stall/Resi. Flat/Com. Flat/ Platform/

Covered Stall No. .................... in .................................... Market, New Delhi. _________________________________________________________

Dear Sir/Madam,

It has been decided by the NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION to grant lease hold rights of land underneath the premises of Shop/Stall/Com. Flat/Platform/Covered Stall/Fuel Depot No. ............. in ..................................... Market, New Delhi and conveyance of super-structure standing thereon to you on the execution of lease and conveyance deeds as in the proforma prescribed by the NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION and on your registering the same with the sub-registrar Delhi/New Delhi as your own cost. This offer is subject, inter-alia, to the following terms and condition:-

(a) The land under Shop/Stall/Com. Flat/Platform/Covered Stall/Fuel Depot will be on lease for 99 years. (b) Payment to be made in lump sum of Rs. ........................ being the premium for the land. ............................................................................. ............................................................................. (c) Payment to be made in lump sum of Rs. .................. being the replacement cost of the structure minus

depreciation. (d) Arrears of licence fee along with damages if any and licence fee/damages arrears as detailed below and

interest @ 12% on the arrears to be cleared. The rate of licence fee/damages recoverable from the dates mentioned against each is as under: (i) Licence fee/damage Rs. ................ P.M. from ....................... to .......................... (ii) ..................................................................................................................... (iii) ..................................................................................................................... (iv) ..................................................................................................................... (v) ................................................................................................................. (vi) Any additional charges to be recoverable: ___________________. (vii) Interest on (i) to (..........) above upto ........................ Rs. ......................

(e) Licence fee is being revised w. e. f. ............... . You will be required to clear the dues as and when the

revised rates are intimated. Please give an undertaking to this effect as in enclosed proforma. (f) Give an affidavit sworn before a First Class Magistrate that there is no unauthorized

construction/encroachment in the premises and if any such irregularity is noticed later, you will remove the same whenever you are directed to do so and that in case of failure to do so the offer will be treated as withdrawn and you will be liable to such action as may be deemed necessary.

(g) Payment of annual ground lease rent at the rate of 2.5% of the cost of land as in (b) above which works

out to Rs......... No representation in this regards will be entertained. The annual ground rent is subject to revision.

(h) The annual ground lease rent shall be required to be paid in half yearly instalments in advance, i. e. on

15th January and 15th July each year irrespective of the fact whether the same have been demanded or not and in case of your failure to make payment of ground lease rent on due dates you or not and in case of your failure to make payment of ground lease rent on due dates you will render yourself liable to pay interest at such rates as NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION may fix from time to time for the period the ground rent is delayed from the date if fell due.

(i) You shall not be entitled to sub-divide the premises or to transfer the whole or part thereof by

sale/mortgage/gift or otherwise the said premises or building erected thereon or any part thereof without obtaining prior approval in writing of the Government.

(j) 50% unearned increase will be required to be paid to the NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

in advance at the time of each assignment or transfer. (k) No addition and alteration in the premises will be carried out without the approval of the NORTH DELHI

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION. (l) The NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION shall also have the right to revise the annual ground

lease rent after every successive period of 30 years. (m) You will not be allowed to encroach upon the common services areas including the common verandah or

passage or staircase or any other place meant for common use or to raise construction of any sort or place goods thereon so as to obstruct the common use thereof. You will pay maintenance charges for the common services places as may prescribed from time to time.

(n) You are liable to pay licence fee/damages till full payment as in (b), (c) and (d) above is made.

The right to grant lease or refuse ownership of superstructure of Shop/Stall/Com. Flat/ Platform/Covered Stall/Fuel Depot referred to above to any person/body is reserved by the NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION and no representation on that account shall be entertained.

If the above terms and conditions are acceptable to you, you are requested to send your UNQUALIFID

CONSENT in writing immediately together with two separate Bank Drafts one in respect of arrears and another in respect of premium of land plus cost of structure as referred to in para-1 above drawn in favour of the COMMISSIONER, NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION within 60 (Sixty) days from the date of issue of this letter, failing which the offer hereby made will stand withdrawn and cancelled without any further reference to you.

You are also required to furnish Income-Tax Clearance Certificate and Permanent Account No._________

In case you desire to make payment of Capitalized value in installments, then please collect the Hire Purchase Agreement proforma from this Office.

Yours faithfully,

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER LAND & ESTATE DEPARTMENT

Annexure ‘Q’

AFFIDAVIT

(To be submitted on non-judicial stamp paper of Rs.10/- duly attested by a First Class Magistrate).

I/We _________________, S/o; W/o.; D/o. ________________, R/o. ________________________________ do hereby undertake as under-.

That I/we am/are the allottee/licencee(s) in physical possession of _____ measuring ____ sq.m. bearing No.___, ________________ Market, ______________, New Delhi.

That there is no unauthorized construction/encroachment in the premises.

That the site/key plan has been duly prepared by a registered architect.

That there is no case pending in any court of law in respect of the aforesaid property.

That the use of the aforesaid property, as prescribed in the terms and conditions of licence deed is commercial and the trade is as per terms and conditions of Licence Deed.

The up to date Licence Fee and CV have been paid in respect of the above referred property.

That the contents of accompanying application for conversion from licence to leasehold in respect of the above referred property are true and correct and the documents annexed thereto are genuine.

DEPONENT

VERIFICATION:

Verified on this ____ day of Nov. 2011 that the contents of the above affidavit are correct to my knowledge and belief. Nothing contained herein is untrue and nothing material is concealed therefrom.

DEPONENT

PART ‘B’

Item No. 49 :— Restoration of cut by pdg. cement concrete in C-96/KBZ [—] by pdg. RMC fromR/R Charges for laying of Natural Gas Pipeline under Dig and Deposit Policy in SouthPatel Nagar and West Patel Nagar by I.G.L. in Ranjit Nagar. Restoration/Improve-ment to lanes and by lanes and by lanes from Cottage No. 1A to 15A, Cottage No.24A to 1, Cottage No. 24 to 37 in West Patel Nagar and its in South Patel Nagar andWest Patel Nagar in C-96/KBZ.


An amount of Rs. 65,46,166/- has been deposited by IGL (Indraprastha Gas Ltd.) as R/Rcharges for laying natural gas pipeline in Ranjit Nagar in Ward No. C-96/KBZ, under Deposit & DigScheme, The said amount has been deposited in Municipal Treasury after deducting the deparrmentalcharges and service charges, detailed estimate amounting to Rs. 43,56,500/- was framed and got checkedby the S.W. for restoration of the cut and other improvement works by laying RMC in Ward C-96. Theproposal for administrative approval and expenditure sanctioned has been approved by the WardCommittee vide Resolution No. 9 dated 21-10-2011.

The draft NIT was also approved by the competent authority amounting to Rs. 28,28,889/-.The tenders were called vide NIT No. 27/EE-(M)-I/TC/KBZ/11-12 dated 9-12-2011 due on 30-12-2011through E-tendering having tender reference No. 147431.

Due publicity was given through the Notice Board and also through press as per details givenbelow :—

S. No. Name of Newspaper Medium Dated

1. The Hindu English 15-12-2011

2. Dainik Jagran Hindi 15-12-2011

3. Daily Tej Urdu 14-12-2011

Fourteen contractors downloaded the tender documents and only five received online on thedue date as per details given below :———————————————————————————————————————————

S. Agency Rates Quoted Total Amount RemarksNo. (Rs.)

——————————————————————————————————————————1. M/s. Plan-up consts. 03.33% above 29,23,091/- L1

2. M/s. Kapoor Brothers 08.19% above 30,60,575/-

3. M/s. Goldy Const. Co. 09.39% above 30,94,522/-

4. M/s. Naresh Kumar 11.49% above 31,53,928/-

5. M/s. Krishna & Co. 33.33% above 37,71,758/-——————————————————————————————————————————

[ 2 (N) ]

The justification of rates checked by the department comes to @ 47.87% above. Since thentes quoted by the lowest tenderer M/s. Plan-up Consts. @ 03.33% above are abnormally below whencompared with the justification. However, to ensure quality, 100% test check by A.E. and 50% by EEwould be done apart from the third party quality assurance.

M/s. Plan-up Consts. is a registered contractor with MCD in Class-III and eligible to tenderup to Rs. 60.00 lacs. The financial and technical performance of the contractor is stated to be satisfactory.

The total cost of this work comes to Rs. 29,23,091/- chargeable under Head of Account66-1076 (Deposit Head). The time of completion is three months and the rate has been extended by thecontractor up to 15-10-2012.

Finance has seen and concurred in the proposal for placing it before the competent authorityfor consideration.

The case may be placed before the Standing Committee U/S 202 (c) of D.M.C. Act, 1957(amended to date) for approval of rates and agency in favour of M/s. Plan-up Consts. @ 3.33% aboveagainst the justification worked out by the department @ 47.87% above with contractual amount ofRs. 29,23,091/- under Head of Account 66-1076 (Deposit head) and to authorize the Commissioner toenter into the agreement with lowest tenderer as per NIT condition.

Item No. 50 :— Strengthening of 9 m ROW internal lanes of ND-11 to ND-19, ND-31 to ND-44, ND-61 to ND-69, UU-9 to UU-79-A and Shiv Mandir CD Block to GD-109 andGP-107 to GP-119, GP-14 to GP-88, GP-57 to GP-71, GP-13 to GP-25, NP-1 toNP-61, NP-30 to NP-127 and NP-51 to NP-98 and CP-107 to CP-132, CP-201 toCP-213, CP-183 to CP-197, CP-13 to CP-25, CP-42 to CP-56, CP-74 to CP-88 andQP-63 to QP-136 and SD-1 to SD-154, SD-114 to SD-153, SD-161 to SD-314 withparking, SD-378 to SD-449 with parking AND SD-297 to main road Pitampura byproviding dense carpeting in Ward No. 53 in Rohini Zone.

(i) Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/Engg./NDMC/146/C&C dated 5-9-2012.

The administrative approval & expenditure sanction has been accorded by the Addl. Cm.(Engg.) on 24-1-2012 for Rs. 20,98,300/, Rs. 23,56,200/-, Rs. 24,06,900/- & Rs. 24,36,200/- under Head ofAccount XL-VIII-S in respect of above cited works. The permission for clubbing these estimates hasbeen accorded by the Chief Engineer (Rohini) on 24-1-2012 (Annexure ‘A’).

Accordingly, a detailed estimate amounting to Rs. 92,97,600/- based on DSR-2007 &approved rates of M.C.D. was got technically sanctioned from the competent authority. Subsequently adraft NIT for Item Rate was also got approved from the competent authority. The item rate tenders werecalled vide NIT No. EE(Pr.)-I/Rohini/TC/2011-12/23/1 dated 27-1-2012 due on 7-2-2012 after givingpublicity in following Newspapers and E-tendering through websites of M.C.D. :–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

S. Name of Newspaper Language Date of Place ofNo. publication publication

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––1. Times of india English 31-1-12 Delhi

2. Economics Times English 31-1-12 Deihi

3. Nav Bharat Times Hindi 31-1-12 Deihi

4. Punjab Kesari Hindi 31-1-12 Delhi

5. Pratap Urdu 31-1-12 Delhi––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

[ 3 (N) ]

Single tenderer started tender purchase process out of which single tenderer has submitted itsbids. The detail is given below :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Sl. Name of Agency Rate G-8 No. & Amount ContractualNo. date (Rs.) amount (Rs.)

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––1. M/s. Vinod Kumar, 15/m2 (TC) 025437 dated 1,19,000/- 85,47,066/-

Regd. with MCD in 5,975/m3 (BM) 8-2-12Class-I 8,975/m3 (AC)

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Justification of rates worked out by the Planning Department comes @ Rs. 18.65/m2 for ItemNo. 1 (TC), Rs. 8,163.85/m3 for Item No. 2 (BM) & Rs. 11,146.80/m3 for Item No. 3 (AC) (i/e labourcess). The rates quoted by the lowest tenderer, M/s. Vinod Kumar @ Rs. 15.00/m2 tor Item No. 1 (TC),Rs. 5,975/m3 for Item No. 2 (BM) & Rs. 8,975/m3 for item No. 3 (AC) are well within the justification ofrates. Hence the case is recommended for acceptance. Being abnormally low rates in item B.M.,100% test check by AE and 50% test check by EE is required.

M/s. Vinod Kumar is registered under Class-I category with MCD and is eligible to tender forthis work. The contractor is not blacklisted/debarred at the time of purchase of tenders. The contractualamount of the work comes to Rs. 85,47,066/-. The expenditure of the work will be charged under Head ofAccount XL-VIII-S. The time of completion of the work is 4 months reckoned from the 10th day of issueof work order. The rates are valid upto 6-7-2012. The total expenditure is allocated and booked withE.E.(P)-IV office.

Finance has seen and concurred in the proposal.

The case is placed before the Standing Committee through Wards Committee (Rohini) foradministrative approval & expenditure sanction for approval of rates and agency in favor of M/s. VinodKumar @ Rs. 15.00/m2 for Item No. 1 (TC), Rs. 5,975/m3 for Item No. 2 (BM) & Rs. 8,975/m3 for ItemNo. 3 (AC) for a contractual amount Rs. 85,47,066/- as per NIT conditions and to authorise theCommissioner to enter into agreement with the lowest tenderer as required under DMC Act, 1957(amended to date).

(ii) Resolution No. 14 of the Wards Committee (Rohini) dated 21-9-2012.

Resolved that it may be recommended to the Standing Committee that the proposal ascontained in Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/Engg./NDMC/146/C&C dated 5-9-2012 for the work ofstrengthening of internal lanes having 09 meter ROW providing dense carpeting in Ward No. 53 in RohiniZone from ND-11 to ND-19, ND-31 to ND-44, ND-61 to ND-69, UU-9 to UU-79-A and Shiv MandirCD Block to GD-109 and GP-107 to GP-119, GP-74 to GP-88, GP-57 to GP-71, GP-13 to GP-25, NP-1 toNP-61, NP-30 to NP-127 and NP-51 to NP-98 and CP-107 to CP-132, CP-201 to CP-213, CP-183 toCP-197, CP-13 to CP-25, CP-42 to CP-56, CP-74 to CP-88 and QP-63 to QP-136 and SD-1 to SD-154,SD-114 to SD-153, SD-161 to SD-314 with parking, SD-378 to SD-449 with parking and SD-297 to mainroad Pitampura with the contractual amount of item wise rated as mentioned for approval of rates andagency in favour of M/s. Vinod Kumar be accorded and Commissioner be authorized to enter intoagreement with the lowest tenderer.

Further resolved that as proposed in Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/Engg./NDMC/146/C&Cdated 5-9-2012, administrative approval and expenditure sanction amounting to Rs. 85,47,066/- for thework of strengthening of internal lanes having 09 meter ROW providing dense carpeting in Ward No. 53 inRohini Zone from ND-11 to ND-19, ND-31 to ND-44 , ND-61 to ND-69, UU-9 to UU-79-A and ShivMandir CD Block to GD-109 and GP-107 to GP-119, GP-74 to GP-88, GP-57 to GP- 71, GP-13 to GP-25,NP-1 to NP-61 , NP-30 to NP-127 and NP-51 to NP-98 and CP-107 to CP-132, CP-201 to CP-213,CP-183 to CP-197, CP-13 to CP-25, CP-42 to CP-56, CP- 74 to CP-88 and QP-63 to QP-136 and SD-1to SD-154, SD-114 to SD-153, SD-161 to SD-314 with parking, SD-378 to SD-449 with parking andSD-297 to main road Pitampura, be accorded.

[ 4 (N) ]

Item No. 51 :— Grant of Earned Leave to Sh. Nand Kishore, IA & AS, Municipal Chief Auditor.

MCA’s letter No. MCA/Admn./PF/Ch.Ar./1-5/555 dated 3-10-2012.

Sh. Nand Kishore, IA & AS, Municipal Chief Auditor has requested for grant of EarnedLeave for seven days w.e.f. 25-9-2012 to 1-10-2012 suffixing 2nd October, 2012 on account of urgentprivate affairs. Sh. Nand Kishore is on Foreign Service from Indian Audit & Accounts Service and leaveapplied for is admissible to him.

The office of the Chief Auditor is still functioning as a combined Audit Office for North, Southand East Delhi Municipal Corporations. Therefore, being the lead Corporation, approval of the StandingCommittee of North Delhi Municipal Corporation for grant of seven days’ Earned Leave w.e.f. 25-9-2012to 1-10-2012 suffixing 2nd October, 2012 to Shri Nand Kishore, IA & AS, Municipal Chief Auditor issolicited.

Item No. 52 :— Development works in Approved Colony.

Sub-Head :— (1) Imp. Dev. to lane by pdg. RCC Box Drain from 36A to 112A (LHS) in KamlaNagar in C-69/CLZ.

(2) Imp. Dev. to lane by pdg. RCC Box Drain from 36A to 112A (RHS) in KamlaNagar in C-69/CLZ.


A clubbed estimates amounting to Rs. 23,13,150 + Rs. 23,05,200 = Rs. 46,18,350/- wereprepared and administrative approval & expenditure sanction of the same were accorded by thecompetent authority.

Accordingly, a detailed estimate amounting to Rs. 23,13,150 + Rs. 23,05,200 = Rs. 46,18,350/-has been got technically sanctioned from the competent authority and a draft NIT was also got approvedfor percentage rate from the competent authority. Tender amounting to Rs. 29,51,350/- were called videNIT No. EE-M-III/CLZ/TC/2011-12/33/01 dated 16-1-2012 due on 10-2-2012. Downloading of tenderdocuments & opening of tenders was online & the same were opened on 10-2-2012.

The tender were published in various newspaper details as under :—

S. No. Name of Newspaper Language Dated

1. The Pioneer English 19-1-2012

2. The Statesman English 19-1-2012


4. Partap Urdu 19-1-2012

[ 5 (N) ]

Single tender was sold and received. The quoted rates of the contractor were as per thecomparative statement given below :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

S. No. Name of Agency Quoted Rates Remarks––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1. M/s. Vipin Kumar Gupta @ 39.39% above G-8 No. –––––– dated 10-2-2012

——————————————————————————————————————————

The justification of rate has been worked out @ Rs. 44.14% above against the lowestcontractor M/s. Vipin Kumar Gupta @ Rs. 39.39%. The work is covered under scope of sanctionedscheme. The validity of rates holds good upto 31-10-2012 and Head of A/c XL-VIlI-ZA. The total cost ofthe work comes to Rs. 41,14,686/-.

The finance has seen & concurred the proposal.

M/s. Vipin Kumar Gupta, Class 2nd in MCD and is eligible to tender amount. His financial aswell as technical performance is satisfactory. He is not blacklisted/debarred at the time of purchase oftender.

The expenditure will be charged under the Head of A/c XL-VIlI-ZA. The time of completionof this work is six months reckoned from the 10th day of issue of work order. Rates are valid upto31-10-2012.

The case may be placed before the Standing Committee for approval of Rate & agency infavor of M/s. Vipin Kumar Gupta at their quoted rate @ Rs. 39.39% above against the justification of @Rs. 44.14% above at a contractual cost of Rs. 41,14,686/- and authorize the Commissioner to enter intocontract as required U/S 202-C of DMC Act amended till date.

Item No. 53 :— Development works in approved colony.

Sub-Head :— (1) Strengthening of road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from 98 E to 120 E in KamlaNagar in C-69/CLZ;

(2) Stregthening of road by pdg. Bitumionus Mastic from Banglow to MandeliaChowk in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ;

(3) Strengthening of road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from Satyawati Road to AggarsenChowk in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ;

(4) Strengthening of road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from Aggarsen Chowk toMandelia Chowk in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ;

(5) Strengthening of road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from mandelia Chowk toChandrawal Road (Kohlapur Road) in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ.


A clubbed estimates amounting to Rs. 24,82,160 + 15,48,900 + 18,39,300 + 24,76,220 +13,40,400 = Rs. 96,86,980/- were prepared and administrative approval & expenditure sanction of thesame were accorded by the competent authority.

Accordingly, a detailed estimate amounting to Rs. Rs. 24,82,160 + 15,48,900 + 18,39,300 +24,76,220 + 13,40,400 = Rs. 96,86,980/- has been got technically sanctioned from the competent authority

[ 6 (N) ]

and a draft NIT was also got approved for percentage rate from the competent authority. Tenderamounting to Rs. 61,91,680/- were called vide NIT No. EE-M-III/CLZ/TC/2011-12/33/04 dated 16-1-2012due on 10-2-2012. Downloading of tender documents & opening of tenders was online & the same wereopened on 10-2-2012.

The tender were published in various newspaper details as under :—

S. No. Name of Newspaper Language Dated

1. The Pioneer English 19-1-2012



4. Partap Urdu 19-1-2012

Four tenders were sold and received. The quoted rates of the contractor were as per thecomparative statement given below :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

S. No. Name of Contractor Rates Remarks––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1. M/s. Maman Chand Bansal @ 26.70% above G.8. No. 011441 dated 10-2-2012

2. M/s. Roshan Lal Vohra @ 31.50% above

3. M/s. Ram Chander Goel @ 34.00% above(Individual)

4. M/s. Jai Bhagwan @ 40.96% above(Individual)

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

The justification of rate has been worked out @ 60.18% above, against offer of the lowestcontractor M/s. Maman Chand Bansal @ 26.70% above, which are well within the justified rates. Thework is covered under scope of sanctioned scheme. The validity of rates holds good upto 31-12-2012.Budget provision exists under Head of A/c XL-VIII-Z-A.

The finance has seen & concurred the proposal.

M/s. Maman Chand Bansal, Class 2nd in MCD and is eligible to tender amount. His financialas well as technical performance is satisfactory. He is not blacklisted/debarred at the time of purchase oftender.

The expenditure will be charged under the Head of A/c XL-VIlI-ZA. The time of completionof this work is six months reckoned from the 10th day of issue of work order. Rates are valid upto31-12-2012.

The case may be placed before the Standing Committee for approval of Rate & agency infavor of M/s. Maman Chand Bansal at their quoted rate @ Rs. 26.70% above against the justification of@ Rs. 60.18% above at a contractual cost of Rs. 78,44,859/- and authorize the Commissioner to enter intocontract as required U/S 202-C of DMC Act amended till date.

[ 7 (N) ]

Item No. 54 :— Imp. Dev. of parking in back side of commercial complex by pdg. RMC from inWazirpur Industrial Area, Ward C-68, MRZ-II in Ashok Vihar.


A detailed estimate amounting to Rs. 48,27,100/- has been administratively approved andexpenditure sanctioned by the Ward Committee vide its Resolution No. 38 dated 17-2-2012, under H/AXL-VIII-ZA (Annexure ‘A’). Accordingly, detailed estimate amounting to Rs. 48,27,100/- based on DSR2007 and approved rate of MCD was technically sanctioned and draft NIT amounting to Rs. 30,85,335/-approved by the competent Authority.

Tenders amounting, to Rs. 30,85,335/- for the said work were called on % rates basis videNIT No. EE(M-II)RZ/TC/2011-12/40 and Item No.1 dated 17-2-2012, due for opening 29-2-2012, aftercirculating the copies of NIT in various offices and through tendering, press publicity in the followingnewspapers :—

S. No. Name of Newspapers Language Date of Publicity

1. The pioneer English 23-2-2012

2. Punjab Kesri Hindi 23-2-2012

3. Rashtiya Sahara Hindi 23-2-2012

4. Jathedar Punjabi 23-2-2012

Twelve tenders were sold and received. The rates offered by the tender are a under :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

S. No. Name of tenderer Rates received Remarks––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1. M/s. Devinder & Co. @ Rs. 3.11% below Earnest money of Rs. 61,800/-deposited vid.e G-8 Receipt No.032527 dated 12-3-2012

2. M/s Rajeev Const. Co. @ Rs. 5.68% above Earnest money deposited throughDD/Pay Order and refunded.

3. M/s Pradeep Kumar @ Rs. 5.90% above Earnest money deposited throughDD/Pay Order and refunded.

4. M/s. Vinod Kumar @ Rs. 11.48% above Earnest money deposited throughDD/Pay Order and refunded.

5. M/s. Kanhiya Lal @ Rs. 11.71% above Earnest money deposited throughDD/Pay Order and refunded.

6. M/s. S. Kumar & Bros. @ Rs. 13.47% above Earnest money deposited throughDD/Pay Order and refunded.

7. M/s. Friends Const. and @ Rs. 18.01% above Earnest money deposited throughBuilding Material Supplier DD/Pay Order and refunded.

8. M/s. Rajeev Kumar @ Rs. 34.89% above Earnest money deposited throughDD/Pay Order and refunded.

9. M/s. Satish Chand @ Rs. 38.38% above Earnest money deposited throughRajesh Kumar DD/Pay Order and refunded.

[ 8 (N) ]

10. Shri Mange Ram Gupta @ Rs. 42.00% above Earnest money deposited throughDD/Pay Order and refunded.

11. M/s. Anil Kumar @ Rs. 43.43% above Earnest money deposited throughDD/Pay Order and refunded.

12. M/s. Naresh Kumar Garg @ Rs. 60.00% above Earnest money deposited throughDD/Pay Order and refunded.

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Justification of rates has been worked out by the deptt. @ 44.24% above the lowest tendererM/s. Devinder & Co. has quoted the rates @ 3.11% below the quoted rates of the lowest tendererM/s. Devinder & Co. @ 3.11% below were considered reasonable as the same are abnormally below andwell within the justification of rates hence recommended for acceptance. The rate received for similarkind of works in the recent past are similar.

M/s. Devinder & Co. is a registered contractor under Class-III, MCD and is eligible to tenderfor this work. There financial as the technical capability has been found to be satisfactory in the recentpast. The firm is not blacklisted/debarred at the time of tendering the contractual amount of the workcomes to Rs. 29,89,369/- the time of completion of the work 5 month to be reckoned from the 10th dayafter issue of the work order. The validity of rates is available upto 31-12-2012, the expenditure isproposed to be charged under H/A XL-VIII-ZA.

The finance has seen and concurred in the proposal.

The case may be placed before the Standing Committee for approval of rates and agencyunder Section 202 (C) of DMC Act, 1957 (Amended upto date in favour of M/s. Devinder & Co. at hisquoted Rs. @ 3.11% below against the justification of rates 44.24% above the estimated rates with acontractual amount of Rs. 29,89,369/- under H/A XL-VIII-ZA for the above said work and to authorisethe Commissioner to enter into contract agreement with the lowest tenderer as per NIT conditions.

Item No. 55 :— Re-construction of M & CW Central at ‘D’ Block, Sant Ravidass Nagar (Jahangirpuri)in C-5/CLZ.


Addl. DHA (M & CW) vide letter dated 19-5-2011 has requested for the above saidwork after demolition of old existing structure. Scheme for the above said work was approved by theCorporation vide Resolution No. 835 dated 22-12-2011 for an amount of Rs. 1,67,64,700/-.

Accordingly a detailed estimate amounting to Rs. 1,78,85,000/- based on DSR 2007 andapproved rates of MCD was prepared and technically sanctioned by the competent authority. Draft NITamounting to Rs. 1,16,53,785/- for Part ‘A’ & Part ‘B’ Reserve Price Rs. 52,665/- for the cost of the oldstructure required to be demolished was also approved by the competent authority. Accordingly tenderswere called vide NIT No. EE(Pr.)-II/CLZ/TC/2011-12/16 dated 30-1-2012 due on 17-2-2012 throughE-tendering having tender Reference No. 155587.

[ 9 (N) ]

Due publicity was given through Notice Board and also through Press as per details givenbelow :—

S. No. Newspaper Name Language Date of Advt.

1. Times of India English 5-2-2012

2. Nav Bharat Times Hindi 5-2-2012

3. Economic Times (Delhi) English 5-2-2012

4. Shah Times Hindi 5-2-2012

5. Pratap Urdu 5-2-2012

Two tenders were received online on the due date as per details given below :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

S. No. Name of Firm Rates Remarks––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1. M/s. Ram Niwal Goel Part ‘A’ @ 32.22% above E.M. Rs. 2,33,500/- deposited vide(MCD Class-II) Part ‘B’ Reserve Price G-8 No. 1177745 dated 21-2-2012

Rs. 5,000/-

2. M/s. Sharwan Kumar Part ‘A’ @ 36.00% aboveAggarwal (MCD Class-I) Part ‘B’ Reserve Price

Rs. 5,000/-––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

The justification of rates has been checked by the Planning Department as 43.83% above forPart ‘A’ and Part ‘B’ i.e. Reserve Price @ Rs. 52,665/-. The rates quoted by the lowest tendererM/s. Ram Niwas Goel @ 32.22% above for Part ‘A’ is well within the justification and Part ‘B’ i.e.Reserve Price for demolition of existing structure @ Rs. 5,000/- is lower than the Reserve Price.Accordingly, negotiation were fixed on 26-3-2012 in which M/s. Ram Niwas Goel has reduced his ratesfor Part ‘A’ @ 32.22% above and Part ‘B’ i.e. Reserve Price @ Rs. 53,000/-. The negotiated rates ofM/s. Ram Niwas Goel are justified, reasonable as compared to the prevailing market rates and well withinthe justification, hence recommended for acceptance.

M/s. Ram Niwas Goel is a registered contractor with MCD in Class-II and entitled forworks upto Rs. 3.00 crores. The financial and technical performance of the contractor is stated to besatisfactory.

The total cost of this work comes to Rs. 1,54,08,635/- chargeable to Head of AccountXL-IX-Medical (Plan). The time of completion is sixteen months and the validity of rates has beenextended by the contractor upto 31-10-2012. The yearwise likely expenditure are as under :—

2012-13 10.00 lacs

2013-14 144.09 lacs

Finance has seen and concurred in the proposal for placing it before the competent authority.

The case may be placed before the Standing Committee for approval of rates and agency infavour of M/s. Ram Niwas Goel @ Part ‘A’ 32.22% above & Part ‘B’ Reserve Price i.e. Rs. 53,000/-which will be deducted from the first running bill against the justification worked out by the PlanningDepartment for Part ‘A’ @ 43.83% above & Part ‘B’ Reserve Price i.e. Rs. 52,665/- with contractualamount of Rs. 1,54,08,635/- under Head of Account XL-IX-Medical (Plan) and to authorizethe Commissioner to enter into the agreement with lowest tenderer as per NIT condition as requiredU/s 202 (c) of D.M.C. Act, 1957 (amended to date).

[ 10 (N) ]

Item No. 56 :— Improvement of internal lanes by P/L RMC and drainage system in A & B Block,Ashok Vihar, Phase-I in C-68, Rohini Zone.


The administrative approval & expenditure sanction was accorded by the Corporation vide itsResolution No. 1156 dated 23-2-2011 for the work of “Improvement of internal lanes by RMC & drainagesystem in A-Block, Ashok Vihar, Phase-I in C-68, Rohini Zone” for Rs. 2,57,95,600/- and vide ResolutionNo. 1127 dated 28-3-2011 for the work of improvement of internal lanes by RMC and drainage system inB-Block, Ashok Vihar, Phase-I in C-68, Rohini Zone for Rs. 2,93,10,700/-. The approval to call the tendersafter clubbing both the estimates was obtained from the competent authority.

Accordingly, a detailed estimate amounting to Rs. 5,71,11,000/- based on DSR 2007 &approved rates of MCD was got technically sanctioned from the competent authority. Draft NITamounting to Rs. 3,72,13,132/- has been prepared and sanctioned by the competent authority. Tenderswere called vide NIT No. EE(Pr.)-I/Rohini/TC/2011-12/3/1 dated 8-6-2011 due on 1-7-2011 throughE-tendering having tender Reference No. 129946.




2. Economic Times English 13-6-2011


4. Milap Urdu 13-6-2011

5. Hari Bhoomi Hindi 13-6-2011

Six tenders were received online on the due date as per details given below :———————————————————————————————————————————

S. No. Name of Firm Rate Remarks——————————————————————————————————————————

1. M/s. Amar Const. Co. @ 4.42% above E.M. Rs. 7,44,250/- deposited vide(MCD Class-I) G-8 No. 69912 dated 1-7-2011

2. M/s. Manohar Lal @ 5.00% above(MCD Class-I)

3. M/s. Satya Construction @ 5.89% above(MCD Class-I)

4. M/s. R.P. Singhal & Co. @ 9.39% above(MCD Class-I)

5. M/s. Vijay & Co. @ 18.00% above(MCD Class-I)

6. M/s. Manmohan Singh Wadhwa @ 31.90% above(MCD Class-I)

——————————————————————————————————————————

[ 11 (N) ]

The justification of rates has been checked by the Planning Department comes to @ 44.56%above. The rates quoted by the lowest tenderer M/s. Amar Const. Co. @ 4.42% above are abnormallybelow when compared with the justification. Due to ALR case to ensure quality, the instruction followedas per circular issued in this regard.

M/s. Amar Const. Co. is a registered contractor with MCD in Class-I and entitled totender upto Rs. 15.00 crores. The financial and technical performance of the contractor is stated to besatisfactory.

The total cost of this work comes to Rs. 3,88,57,951/- chargeable Head of AccuntXL-VIII-Z-a (Plan). The time of completion is nine months and the validity of rates has been extend bythe contractor upto 31-10-2012. The likely year wise expenditure are as under :—

2012-13 50.00 lacs

2013-14 338.58 lacs


The case may be placed before the Standing Committee for approval of rates and agencyfavour of M/s. Amar Const. Co. @ 4.42% above against the justification worked out by the PlanningDepartment @ 44.56% above with contractual amount of Rs. 3,88,57,951/- under Head of AccountXL-VIII-Z-a (Plan) and to authorize the Commissioner to enter into the agrecment with lowe tenderer asper NIT condition as required U/s 202 (C) of D.M.C. Act, 1957 (amended to date).

Item No. 57 :— Promotion of Senior Auditors in Pay Band 2 : 9300-34800 with Grade Pay ofRs. 4,200/- to the post of Supervisor (Audit) in PB 2 : Rs. 9300-34800 with Grade Payof Rs. 4,800/- on ad hoc basis.

MCA’s letter No. MCA/Admn./PCA/3-33/Vol.-I/595 dated 11-10-2012.

There are 5 posts of Supervisor (Audit) in the Pay Band 2 : Rs. 9300-34800 with Grade Payof Rs. 4,800/-. Out of which 3 posts have already been filled up and 2 posts are available for filling upfrom amongst eligible Sr. Auditors/Auditors. As approved by the Corporation vide Resolution No. 686dated 26-2-2001, Sr. Auditors/Auditors with five years regular services in the grade who have passed theDepartmental Confirmatory Examination or Part-I of SOG Examination are eligible for the post ofSupervisor (Audit).

The following 8 Senior Auditors are in zone of consideration :—

S/Sh./Smt.

1. A.K. Saxena, Sr. Auditor

2. Kiran Pant, Sr. Ar.

3. Pawanjeet Singh, Sr. Ar.

4. Prem Lata Rajouriya, Sr. Ar.

5. Meenakshi Joneja, Sr. Ar.

6. Jasvir Singh Mehra, Sr. Ar.

7. Brij Mohan Bahl, Sr. Ar.

8. Shashi Ahuja, Sr. Ar.

[ 12 (N) ]

As per this office record no RDA case is pending against any of the above officials and noneis going under currency of punishment.

The DPC in the meeting held on 24-9-2012 after considering the Annual Confidential Reportsand other relevant record of Sr. Auditors in the consideration zone has recommended the names of thefollowing 2 Sr. Auditors for promotion to the post of Supervisor (Audit) in the Pay Band 2 : Rs. 9300-34800 with Grade Pay of Rs. 4,800/- on ad hoc basis :—

S/Sh./Smt.

1. Kiran Pant, Sr. Ar. (UR)

2. Pawanjeet Singh, Sr. Ar. (SC)

The office of the Chief Auditor is still functioning as combined Audit Office for North, Southand East Delhi Municipal Corporations. Therefore, being the lead Corporation, the Standing Committee ofNorth Delhi Municipal Corporation is requested to approve the promotion of following two Sr. Auditors asSupervisor (Audit) in PB 2 : Rs. 9300-34800 with Grade Pay of Rs. 4,800/- on ad-hoc basis for a period ofone year or till the posts are filled up on regular basis or till further orders, whichever is earliest :—

S/Sh./Smt.

1. Kiran Pant, Sr. Ar.

2. Pawanjeet Singh, Sr. Ar.

Item No. 58 :— Construction of 35 Nos. classrooms, 1 store, 1 computer room, 1 office, 1 staff room,1 science lab. room, toIlet block (Eighteen Seats) and Raising of Boundary Wall inM.C. Pry. School, Bhalaswa Dairy in CLZ.


Education Department vide letter No. 3501 dated 21-1-2010 requesting to construction ofabove school building. Schemes for the above said works were approved by the Corporation videResolution No. 643 dated 12-12-2011 for an amount of Rs. 754.95 lacs.

Detailed estimate amounting to Rs. 4,06,60,700/- based on DSR 2007 was prepared for const.of main building and technically sanctioned by the competent authority. The draft NIT amounting toRs. 2,64,94,255/- for Part ‘A’ & Part ‘B’ Reserve Price Rs. 1,39,047/- for the costl of the old structurerequired to be demolished was also approved by the competent authority. Accordingly tenders were calledvide NIT No. EE(Pr.)-II/CLZ/TC/2011-12/10 Item No. 2 dated 11-11-2011 due on 30-11-2011 throughE-tendering having tender reference No. 146021.





3. Economic Times (Delhi) English 19-11-2011

4. Punjab Kesari Hindi 19-11-2011

5. Pratap Urdu 19-11-2011

[ 13 (N) ]

Two tenders were received online on the due date as per details given below :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––S. No. Name of Firm Rates Remarks––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1. M/s. Ramesh Const. Co. Part ‘A’ @ 43.50% above (G-8 No. 1177718(MCD Class-I) Part ‘B’ Reserve Price Rs. 1.40 lac dated 8-12-11)

2. M/s. Aggarwal Const. Co. Part ‘A’ 45.45% above(MCD Class-I) Part ‘B’ Reserve Price Rs. 1,39,950/-

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

The justification of rates has been checked by the Planning Department as 46.89% above.The rates quoted by the lowest tenderer M/s. Ramesh Const. Co. @ 43.50% above are justified,reasonable as compared to the prevailing market rates and is well within the justification, hencerecommended for acceptance.

M/s. Ramesh Const. Co. is a registered contractor with MCD in Class-I and entitled to tenderfor works upto Rs. 15.00 crores. The financial and technical performance of the contractor is stated to besatisfactory.

The total cost of this work comes to Rs. 3,80,19,255/- chargeable to Head of AccountXL-VII-Edu. (Plan). The time of completion is twelve months and the validity of rates has been extendedby the contractor upto 31-10-2012.

The year-wise likely expenditure is as under :—

2012-13 20.00 lacs

2013-14 360.19 lacs


The case may be placed before the Standing Committee for approval of rates and agency infavour of M/s. Ramesh Const. Co. for Part ‘A’ @ 43.50% above & Part ‘B’ Reserve Price i.e.Rs. 1,40,000/- which will be deducted from the first running bill against the justification for Part ‘A’ @44.88% above & Part ‘B’ Reserve Price i.e. Rs. 1,39,047/- with contractual amount of Rs. 3,80,19,255/-under Head of Account XL-VII-Edu. (Plan) and to authorize the Commissioner to enter into theagreement with lowest tenderer as per NIT condition as required u/s 202 (c) of D.M.C. Act, 1957(amended to date).

Item No. 59 :— Re-construction of Community Hall at D-Block, Sultanpuri W. No. 39 in Rohini Zone.


The Community Services Department has requested for the construction of Community Hallat D-Block, Sultanpuri in Rohini Zone vide letter No. 1347/CSD/HQ/2008 dated 1-10-2008. Accordingly, apreliminary estimate amounting to Rs. 2,64,30,800/- for above cited work was prepared. Theadministrative approval & expenditure sanction has been accorded by the Corporation vide ResolutionNo. 187 dated 15-6-2011 for Rs. 2,64,30,800/- under Head of Account XL-VIII-M (Annexure ‘A’). TheCommunity Hall will be constructed after demolishing the existing structure. The proposal has alreadybeen included in the Annual Action Plan 2012-13 under Head of Account XL-VIII-M.

[ 14 (N) ]

Accordingly, a detailed estimate amounting to Rs. 2,53,37,000/- based on DSR’ 2007 andapproved rates of MCD was got tecnmcaliy sanctioned from the competent authority. Subsequently adraft NIT for Rs. 1,65,09,500/- for Part ‘A’ and Item Rate for Part ‘B’ was also got approved from thecompetent authority. The tenders were called vide NIT No. EE(Pr.)-II/Rohini/TC/2011-12/07/1 dated17-1-2012 due on 6-2-2012 after giving due publicity in following Newspapers and also by E-tenderingthrough websites of MCD :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

S Name of Newspaper Language Date of Place ofNo. publication publication

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––1. Times of India English 25-1-2012 Delhi

2. Economic Times English 25-1-2012 Delhi

3. Nav Bharat Times Hindi 25-1-2012 Delhi

4. Rashtriya Sahara Hindi 25-1-2012 Delhi

5. Hari Bhoomi Hindi 25-1-2012 Delhi

6. Milap Urdu 25-1-2012 Delhi––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Seven tenderers started tender purchase process out of which four tenderers have submittedtheir bids. The comparative statement is given below :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Sl. Name of Agency Rate (Rs.) G-8 No. & Amount ContractualNo. date (Rs.) amount (Rs.)

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––1. M/s. Pushpa Builders, @ 32.19% above 025426 dated 3,30,200/- 2,18,25,181/-

Regd with MCD in for Part ‘A’ & 6-2-12Class-II Rs. 2,000/- for

Part ‘B’

2. M/s. Sushil Constn. Co. @ 33.30% above Refunded — 2,20,08,447/-Regd. with MCD in for Part ‘A’ &Class-I Rs.10,000/- for

Part ‘B’

3. M/s. Amar Constn. Co. @ 42.42% above Refunded — 2,35,14,201/-Regd with MCD in for Part ‘A’ &Class-I Rs. 50,000/- for

Part ‘B’

4. M/s. Rashpal Aggarwal @ 44.42% above Refunded — 2,38,44,410/-Regd. with MCD in for Part ‘A’ & nil forClass -I Part ‘B’

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Justification of rates worked out by the Planning Department comes to Rs. 41.52% above(i/c 1% labour cess). The rates quoted by the lowest tenderer M/s. Pushpa Builders @ 32.19% above forPart ‘A’ and Rs. 2,000/- for Part ‘B’ are well within the justification of rates. As per NIT condition thereserve price for demolition of existing structure i.e. Rs. 58,245/- for Part ‘B’ will be recovered from thefirst running bill of contractor. Hence the case is recommended for acceptance.

[ 15 (N) ]

M/s. Pushpa Builders is registered under Class-II category with MCD and is eligible to tenderfor this work. The financial as well as technical capability of the firm is satisfactory. The contractor is notblack listed/debarred at the time of purchase of tenders. The contractual amount of the work comes toRs. 2,18,25,181/-. The expenditure of the work will be charged from Head of Account XL-VIII-M. Thetime of completion of the work is 16 months reckoned from the 10th day of issue of work order. The ratesare valid upto 15-11-2012.

The likely year-wise expenditure is as under :—

SI. No. Year Expenditure (Rs.)

1. 2012-13 5.00 lacs

2. 2013-14 213.25 lacs—————

Total 218.25 lacs—————


The case is placed before the Standing Committee for approval of rates and agency in favorof M/s. Pushpa Builders @ 32.19% above for Part ‘A’ for a contractual amount of Rs. 2,18,25,181/- andPart ‘B’ as per reserve price i.e. Rs. 58,245/- will be recovered from the first running bill of contractor asper NIT conditions and to authorise the Commissioner to enter into agreement with the lowest tenderer asrequired under DMC Act, 1957 (amended to date).

ANNEXURE ‘A’

Copy of Resolution No. 187 of the Ordinary June (2010) Meeting of the Corporationheld on 15-6-2010

Item No. 75 :— Re-construction of Community Hall at D-Block, Sultanpuri in Rohini Zone.

(i) Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/Engg./2595/C&C dated 25-2-2010.

Community Services Department has requested for re-construction of a Community Hall atD-Block, Sultanpuri in Rohini Zone vide letter No. 1347 /CSD/HQ/2008 dated 1-10-2008 (Annexure ‘A’).Accordingly, a preliminary estimate as per standard drawing for fe-construction of Community Hall atD-Block, Sultanpuri has been prepared for the probable cost of Rs. 2,64,30,800/- (Annexure ‘B’). TheCommunity Hall will be constructed after demolishing the existing structure. The reserve price amountingto Rs. 58,245/- for the existing structure has been worked out and checked by the Planning Department(Annexure ‘C’). The proposal will be included in the Annual Action Plan 2009-10 under Head of AccountXL-VIII-M.

Provision for resistance for seismic and earthquake as per IS code has been taken in theestimate.

The expenditure of the work is chargeable under Head of Account XL-VIII-M. In the currentfinancial year an expenditure of Rs. 5.00 lacs is likely to be incurred. The balance expenditure will beincurred in the next financial year 2010-11.

Finance has seen and concurred the proposal.

[ 16 (N) ]

The case may please be placed before the Corporation through the Works Committee foraccord of administrative approval/expenditure sanction to the estimate amounting to Rs. 2,64,30,800/- forre-construction of Community Hall at D-Block, Sultanpuri in Rohini Zone as required under DMC Act,1957 amended till date.

ANNEXURE ‘A’MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHICOMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT

7th Floor, 16, Rajpur Road, Civil Lines, Delhi-54No. 1347/CSD/HQ/2008 Dated : 1-10-2008

Subject :— NOC for re-construction of the Community Hall, D-4, Block, Sultanpuri.On the request of this department, the Community Hall, A- Block, Sultan Puri was inspected

by the Engineering Department and it was reported that existing building will have to be demolished toaccommodate a new multi-storey Community Hall. The new community hall can be constructed as perlatest specification. The ground floor can be used for stilt parking in view of the parking problem beingfaced these days.

It is therefore requested that the Community Hall may be re-constructed after demolishing theexisting structure subject to availability of funds. The Community Hall may be constructed on the followingpattern :—

Ground Floor :Rooms : Two (one for Office and one for Chowkidar)Toilet Block : TwoKitchen Shed : Two (For first floor and second floor)

: Remaining space may be provided for stilt parking

First Floor :Hall : OneRooms : TwoToilet Block : Two (Ladies and Gents)

Second Floor :Hall : OneRooms : TwoToilet Block : Two (Ladies and Gents)

It is further requested that Channel Gate at the main doors, grill on all the windows andseparate entries for first floor and second floor also be provided.

Sd/-1-10-2008

Asstt. Director (HQ)CSD/MCD

E.E.(Pr.), Rohini ZoneCopy to :—

CO/Najafgarh Zone.Copy for kind information to :—

Ms. Nafeesa Khatun, Mpl. Councillor, Ward No. 39.

[ 17 (N) ]

ANNEXURE ‘B’

Name of Work :— Construction of Community Hall at D-Block, Sultanpuri, Rohini Zone.

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE——————————————————————————————————————————

S. Qty. Description of Item Rate Unit AmountNo. (in Rs.)

——————————————————————————————————————————Part (A) Structure :

1. 1131.90 RCC framed structure up to six storeys flooring 13200.00 Sqm. 1,49,41,080/-height 3.35 M

2. Extra for every 0.30 m additional height of 150.00 Sqm. 0/-flooring above normal floor height of 3.35

3. 1131.90 Resisting earthquake forces 630.00 Sqm. 7,13,097/-

4. For RCC Raft Foundation 3560.00 Sqm. 0/-

5. 1131.90 Fire fighting arrangements 300.00 Sqm. 3,39,570/-—————

Total (A) 1,59,93,747/-—————

Part (B) Services :

1. Internal water supply & sanitary installation 5,97,643/-@ 4% of Rs.

2. Internal Electric Installation @ 12.5% of Rs. 18,67,635/-

3. External Service Connection @ 5% of Rs. 7,47,054/-

4. 20000.00 Underground sump 9.00 Litre 1,80,000/-

5. 15000.00 Water storage tank 9.00 Litre 1,35,000/-—————

Total (B) 35,27,332/-

Part (C) Development of Site :

1. 930.70 Levelling 55.00 Sqm. 51,189/-

2. 930.70 Sewer 63.00 Sqm. 58,634/-

3. 930.70 Filter water supply distribution line 46.00 Sqm. 42,812/-100mm dia & below

4. 930.70 Storm water drains 50.00 Sqm. 46,535/-

5. 930.70 Horticulture operations 47.00 Sqm. 43,743/-

6. 930.70 Street lighting with HPSV Lamps 95.00 Sqm. 88,417/-————

Total (C) = 3,31,329/-

[ 18 (N) ]

Part (D) Lump Sum Provision :

1. For external peermanent finish 4,00,000/-

2. For providing non-glazed files in dado 2,00,000/-

3. For water harvesting 5,00,000/-

4. For development of open compound 4,00,000/-and parking area

5. For providing interlocking pavers in 4,00,000/-kutcha portion

6. For providing lift

7. For boundary wall with grill 4,00,000/-

8. For soil testing 1,49,410/-9. For consultancy charges

—————Total (D) = 24,49,410/-

Total A + B + C + D = 2,00,01,819/-

Add 14% enhancement due to rise in cost index : 28,00,255/-—————2,28,02,074/-

3% Contingency : 6,84,062/-—————2,34,86,136/-

Add Lump Sum : 23,00,000/-—————2,57,86,136/-

Add 2.50% (QC + TP) : 6,44,653/-—————

Total : 2,64,30,789/-—————

Say Rs. 2,64,30,800/-.

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

E.E. (Project), Rohini A.E. J.E.

The preliminary estimate has been checked for Rs. 2,64,30,800/-.

Sd/- Sd/-

E.E. (P) A.E. (P)

[ 19 (N) ]


PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE

Total site area = 1308.00 Sqm.

Permissible ground coverage = 392.00 Sqm.

Permissible F.A.R. = 120.00 Sqm.

Proposed ground coverage area = 377.30 Sqm.

Coverage area for G.F. = 377.30 Sqm.

Coverage area for 1st F = 377.30 Sqm.

Coverage area for IInd F = 377.30 Sqm.

Total 1131.00 Sqm.

Area for development = 930.70 Sqm.

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

E.E. (Pr.), Rohini A.E. (Pr.) J.E. (Pr.)

ANNEXURE ‘C’


Sub-Head :— Dismantling of Community Hall, D-Block, Sultanpuri.

EVALUATION OF OLD EXISTING STRUCTURE

Reserve Price on the basis of salvage value

Reserve Price = Salvage value – cost of dismantling

125000 – 66755 = 58245

(dismantling value) (salvage value) (Rs. fifty eight thousands two hundred forty five only)

Certified that :—

(i) The market rate taken are highest prevailing market rate.

(ii) Old structure is necessary to demolish to accommodate the new structure.

(iii) The existing structure is more than 20 years old.

(iv) Electric fittings will be removed by Elect. Deptt. and there is no sanitary fittings.

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

E.E. (Pr.), Rohini A.E. J.E.

Reserve price checked for Rs. 58,245/- (-ve) (Rs fifty eight thousands two hundred forty fiveonly) based on the details supplied by the concerned division. The rates taken for the salvage value areadopted the same of the concerned division has verified that the rates taken for salvage value are thehighest in the market.

Sd/- Sd/-

E.E. (P), Rohini A.E. (P)

[ 20 (N) ]


Sub-Head :— Dismantling of old existing structure, D-Block, Sultanpuri Community Hall.

COST OF DISMANTLING

1. 15.12.1 Dismantling of doors & Window :

Door’s 18.00 Nos.Window 4.00 Nos.

—————Total 22.00 Nos. @ 54.60 Rs. 1,201/-

2. 15.3 Dismantling of RCC Road :

16.50 × 16.00 × 0.11 29.04 CumLess 5.80 × 4.60 × 0.11 – 2.93 Cum

—————26.11 Cum @ 537.55 Rs. 14,035/-

3. 15.5 Extra for cutting of reinforcement :

1 × 16.50 × 16.00 264.00 Sqm.Less open 5.80 × 4.60 – 26.93 Sqm.

—————— 237.32 Sqm. @ 176.35 Rs. 41,851/-

4. 15.7.4 Dismantling of Brick Work :

1 × 3.55 × 3.96 × 0.23 3.23 Cum2 × 16.50 × 3.96 × 0.23 30.05 Cum2 × 16.00 × 3.96 × 0.23 29.15 Cum2 × 4.10 × 3.96 × 0.23 7.47 Cum1 × 4.60 × 3.96 × 0.23 4.18 Cum1 × 5.80 × 3.96 × 0.23 5.28 Cum1 × 3.70 × 3.96 × 0.23 3.37 Cum2 × 5.35 × 3.96 × 0.23 9.75 Cum2 × 4.10 × 3.96 × 0.23 7.46 Cum1 × 6.60 × 3.96 × 0.23 6.01 Cum1 × 6.35 × 3.96 × 0.23 5.78 Cum

—————111.73 Cum

Add 20% for foundation 22.35 Cum

Less for window and doors 1×18×2.10×1.20×0.23 –10.43 Cum1×4.00×1.20×1.00×0.23 –1.10 Cum

—————122.54 Cum @ 310.75 Rs. 3,807/-

[ 21 (N) ]

5. 15.23.1 Dismantling of Flooring

1 × 3.55 × 4.10 14.55 Sqm.1 × 3.00 × 3.70 11.10 Sqm.1 × 4.10 × 6.35 26.03 Sqm.1 × 4.10 × 6.60 27.06 Sqm.1 × 4.10 × 5.35 21.93 Sqm.1 × 4.60 × 5.80 26.68 Sqm.1 × 7.80 × 8.80 68.64 Sqm.

—————195.99 Sqm. @ 10.90 Rs. 2,136/-

6. 15.2.2 Dismantling of C.C. (1:4:8)

Same Qty as Item No. 5195.99 × 0.10 —————

19.599 Sqm. @ 226.90 Rs. 4,447/-

7. 1.1.1 Carriage of Materials

50% of Item No. 5 97.99Add Item No. 2 26.11Add Item No. 6 19.60

————143.70 @ 61.91 Rs. 88.97110646

Add 13% 14384————

125030————

Say Rs. 1,25,000/-.Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

E.E. (Pr.), Rohini A.E. J.E.Name of Work :— Construction of Community Hall at D-Block, Sultanpuri, Rohini Zone.

Sub-Head :— Dismantling of old existing structure, D-Block Sultanpuri, Community Hall.SALVAGE VALUE

1. Doors Window :Ply doors 9 Nos. @ 600 each Rs. 5,400/-Steel doors 9 Nos. @ 1000 each Rs. 9,000/-Window 4 Nos. @ 300 each Rs. 1,200/-

2. Bricks (50% Serviceable) :50% of 122.54 61.27 30267 Nos.

30267 Nos. @ 1000 Rs. 30,267/-3. Steel

Same Qty. as Item No. 2 26.11 × 80 Kg. 2088.8 Kg. @ 2088820888 @ 14.00 Rs. 20,888/-

—————Total : Rs. 66,755/-

—————Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

E.E. (Pr.), Rohini A.E. J.E.

[ 22 (N) ]

(ii) Resolution No. 215 of the Works Committee dated 15-3-2010.

Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that the proposal of the Commissioner ascontained in his letter No. F. 33/Engg./2595/C&C dated 25-2-2010, be approved.

Resolution No. 187 Resolved that as proposed by the Commissioner in his letter No. F. 33/Engg./2595/C&C dated 25-2-2010 and recommended by the Works Committee vide itsResolution No. 215 dated 15-3-2010, administrative approval and expenditure sanctionto the estimate amounting to Rs. 2,64,30,800/- for re-construction of Community Hallat D-Block, Sultanpuri in Rohini Zone, be accorded.

Item No. 60 :— Improvement & Strengthening of 13.5 m & 18 m ROW Road of Sector-19, Rohini.

Sub-Head :— Strengthening of Carriageway.


The scheme of improvement & strengthening of 13.5m & 18m ROW Road Sector 19, Rohiniin Rohini Zone was administratively approved by Hon’ble L.G. on 15-11-2011. The expenditure sanctionwas accorded by the Corporation for Rs. 181.30 lacs vide Resolution No.120 dated 2-6-2008. Incompliance of the Circular No. F. No. 13(62)/UD/MB/2011/593-599 dated 10-1-2012 where by roads of60 ft. ROW and above were transferred to the PWD/GNCTD, the roads of 60 ft ROW were deletedfrom the scheme. Accordingly, the amount of the scheme with following provisions is as under :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

S. No. Description of Item Amount (Rs.)––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1. Strengthening of carriageway 27,94,000/-

2. Constn. of drain & imp. of side berms 67,84,000/-

3. Lump sum provision for street light 10,00,000/-

4. Lump sum Provision for horticulture 5,00,000/-

5. Lump sum provision for sign-board 2,00,000/-––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Total 1,12,78,000/-––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Say Rs.112.78 lacs.

An estimate amounting to Rs. 27,25,400/- only for strengthening of carriageway of 13.5mROW roads based on DSR-2007 and approved rates was got technically sanctioned from the competentauthority. Subsequently a draft NIT for Item Rate was also got approved from the competent authoritythrough EDIS. The tenders were called vide NIT No. EE(Prj.)-1/RohiniITC/2012-13/3/1 dated 16-7-12due on 3-8-12, but due to technical error the dates were re-scheduled and the tenders were opened on

[ 23 (N) ]

31-8-2012 after giving due publicity in following newspapers and also by e-tendering through website ofMCD :—

S. No. Name of Newspapers Language Place Dated

1. Indian Express Enqlish Delhi 20-7-2012

2. Jansatta Hindi Delhi 20-7-2012

3. Financial Express Enqlish Delhi 20-7-2012

4. Hari Bhoomi Hindi Delhi 20-7-2012

5. Daily Tej Urdu Delhi 20-7-2012

Six tenders were sold out of which six tenderers have offered their rates as per comparativestatement given below :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

S. Name of Rate G-8 No. & Earnest ContractualNo. Agency Date Money Amount

(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1. M/s. Radhey Shyam 7,189/m3 (BM) 036537 dated 41,550/- 32,43,411/-Regd. with MCD in Class-I 9,189/m3 (AC) 31-8-2012

14. 891/m2 (TC)

2. M/s. Vinod Kumar 7,200/m3 (BM) Refunded — 32,56,788/-Regd. with MCD in Class-I 9,200/m3 (AC)

16.00/m2 (TC)

3. M/s. Satya Parkash & Bros. 7,272/m3 (BM) Refunded — 34,21,876/-Pvt. Ltd. 9,999/m3 (AC)Regd. with MCD in Class-I 18.18/m2 (TC)

4. M/s. R.P. Singal & Co. 7,290/m3 (BM) Refunded — 34,51,503/-Regd. with MCD in Class-I 10,299/m3 (AC)

15.30/m2 (TC)

5. M/s. C. Parkashan & Co. 7,400/m3 (BM) Refunded — 34,73,907/-Regd. with MCD in Class-I 10,200/m3 (AC)

17.00/m2 (TC)

6. M/s. Ram Karan Goel, 7,550/m3 (BM) Refunded — 35,05,947/-Regd. with MCD in Class-I 10,240/m3 (AC)

18.00/m2 (TC)––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Justification of rates worked out by the Planning Department comes to @ Rs. 8,328.60/m3

(BM), Rs. 11,273.00/m3 (AC) & Rs. 19.20/m2 (TC) (including 1% Labour Cess). The rates quoted by thelowest tenderer M/s. Radhey Shyam Rs. 7,189/m3 (BM), Rs. 9,189/m3 (AC) & Rs. 14.89/m2 (TC) arewell within the justification of rates. Hence the case is recommended for acceptance.

M/s. Radhey Shyam is registered under Class-I category in MCD and is eligible to tender forthis work. The financial/technical capability of the firms is satisfactory. The firm is not blacklisted ordebarred as on date. The contractual amount of the work comes to Rs. 32,43,411/- under Head ofAccount L.A. Road. The rates are valid upto 30-1-2013 and the time of completion of the work is2 months reckoned from the 10th day of issue of work order.

[ 24 (N) ]


The case is placed before the Standing Committee for approval of rates and agency in favorof M/s. Radhey Shyam Rs. 7,189/m3 (BM), Rs. 9,189/m3 (AC) & Rs. 14.89/m2 (TC) for a contractualamount of Rs. 32,43,411/- under Head of Account L.A. Road as per NIT conditions and to authoriseCommissioner to enter into agreement with the lowest tenderer as required under DMC Act, 1957(amended to date).

Item No. 61 :— Improvement & Strengthening of 13.5m & 18m ROW Road of Sector-15, Rohini.

Sub-Head :— Strengthening of Carriageway of 13.5m ROW.


The scheme of improvement & strengthening of 13.5m & 18m ROW Road Sector 15, Rohiniin Rohini Zone was administratively approved by Hon’ble L.G. on 18-11-2011. The expenditure sanctionwas accorded by the Corporation for Rs. 1,080.35 lacs vide Resolution No. 1124 dated 28-3-2011. Incompliance of the Circular No. F. No. 13(62)/UD/MB/2011/593-599 dated 10-1-2012 where by roads of60 ft. ROW and above were transferred to the PWD/GNCTD, the roads of 60 ft ROW were deletedfrom the scheme. Accordingly, the amount of the scheme with following provisions is as under :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

S. No. Description of Item Amount (Rs.)––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1 Strengthening of carriageway 2,02,03,000/-

2 Constn. of drain & footpath 2,83,28,700/-

3 Imp. of side berms 93,94,600/-

4 Lump sum provision for street light 20,00,000/-

5 Lump sum provision for horticulture 10,00,000/-

6. Lump sum provision for sign-board 30,00,000/-––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Total 6,39,26,300/-––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Say Rs. 639.26 lacs.

An estimate amounting to Rs. 1,97,24,300/- only for strengthening of carriageway based onDSR-2007 and approved rates was got technically sanctioned and draft NIT for Item Rate was alsoapproved. The tenders were called vide NIT No. EE(Prj.)-1/RohiniITC/2012-13/5/1 dated 23-7-2012 dueon 16-8-2012 but due to technical error on MCD e-tenders website the dates were re-scheduled andtenders were opened on 31-8-2012 after giving due publicity in following Newspapers and also bye-tendering through website of MCD :—

S. No. Name of Newspapers Language Place Dated

1. The Hindu English Delhi 26-7-2012

2. Dainik Jagran Hindi Delhi 26-7-2012

3. Hindustan Times English Delhi 26-7-2012

4. Punjab Kesari Hindi Delhi 26-7-2012

5. Roznama Rashtriya Sahara Urdu Delhi 26-7-2012

[ 25 (N) ]

Nine tenders were sold, out of which seven have submitted their bids as per comparativestatement given below :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

S. Name of Rate G-8 No. & Earnest ContractualNo. Agency Date Money Amount

(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1. M/s. Vinod Kumar 5,415/m3 (BM) 036545 dated 3,06,400/- 2,00,00,001/-Regd. with MCD in Class-I 8,415/m3 (AC) 31-8-2012

14.05/m2 (TC)

2. M/s. Satya Parkash & Bros. 5,757/m3 (BM) Refunded — 2,03,22,663/-Pvt. Ltd. 8,157/m3 (AC)Regd. with MCD in Class-I 15.15/m2 (TC)

3. M/s. Radhey Shyam 6,029/m3 (BM) Refunded — 2,09,48,148/-Regd. with MCD in Class-I 8,389/m3 (AC)

13.39/m2 (TC)

4. M/s. R.K. Goel Abhay Kr. Jain 6,499/m3 (BM) Refunded — 2,10,82,481/-Regd. with MCD in Class-I 7,899/m3 (AC)

12.49/m2 (TC)

5. M/s. R.P. Singal & Co. 6,669/m3 (BM) Refunded — 2,36,40,871/-Regd. with MCD in Class-I 9,639/m3 (AC)

15.39/m2 (TC)

6. M/s. Ram Karan Goel, 7,000/m3 (BM) Refunded — 2,36,97,170/-Regd. with MCD in Class-I 9,200/m3 (AC)

16.00/m2 (TC)7. M/s. C. Parkashan & Co. 7,395/m3 (BM) Refunded — 2,39,21,311/-

Regd. with MCD in Class-I 8,895/m3 (AC)14.95/m2 (TC)

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Justification of rates worked out by the Planning Department comes @ Rs. 18.55/m2 (TC),Rs. 8,132.15/m3 (BM) & Rs. 11,146.75/m3 (AC) (i/c labour cess ). The rates quoted by the lowesttenderer M/s. Vinod Kumar Rs. 14.05/m2 (TC), Rs. 5,415/m3 (BM) & Rs. 8,415/m3 (AC) are well withinthe justification of rates. Hence the case is recommended for acceptance. Being abnormally low rates inBM item, 100% test check by AE & 50% test check by EE is required.

M/s. Vinod Kumar is registered under Class-I category in MCD and is eligible to tender forthis work. The financial/technical capability of the firms is satisfactory. The firm is not blacklisted nordebarred as on date. The contractual amount of the work comes to Rs. 2,00,00,001/- under Head ofAccount L.A. Road. The rates are valid upto 30-1-2013 and the time of completion of the work is6 months reckoned from the 10th day of issue of work order.


The case is placed before the Standing Committee for approval of rates and agency in favorof M/s. Vinod Kumar Rs. 5,415/m3 (BM), Rs. 8,415/m3 (AC) & Rs. 14.05/m2 (TC) for a contractualamount of Rs. 2,00,00,001/- under Head of Account L.A. Road. Being abnormally low rates in BM item,100% test check by AE & 50% test check by EE is required as per NIT conditions and to authoriseCommissioner to enter into agreement with the lowest tenderer as required under DMC Act, 1957(amended to date).

[ 26 (N) ]

Item No. 62 :— Imp./Dev. of drainage system in 7-Block, Ramesh Nagar [7/83-80' Road] by pdg.B/W from and RCC in C-98/KBZ in Mansarovar Garden.

Sub-Head :—1. Imp./Dev. of drainage system in 7-Block, Ramesh Nagar [7/153-7/213] by pdg.B/W from and RCC in C-98/KBZ in Mansarover Garden.

2. Imp./Dev. of drainage system in 7-Block, Ramesh Nagar [7/99-7/142] by pdg.B/W from and Precast Slab in C-98/KBZ in Mansarover Garden.


A detailed estimate amounting to Rs. 50,39,700/- was framed and got checked by the S.W. forImp./Dev. of drainage system in 7-Block, Ramesh Nagar [7/83-80' Road] by pdg. B/W from and RCC inC-98/KBZ in Mansarovar Garden. SH :— 1. Imp./Dev. of drainage system in 7-Block, Ramesh Nagar[7/153-7/213] by pdg. B/W from and RCC in C-98/KBZ in Mansarover Garden. SH :— 2. Imp./Dev. ofdrainage system in 7-Block, Ramesh Nagar [7/99-7/142] by pdg. B/W from and Precast Slab in C-98/KBZ in Mansarover Garden. The proposal for A/A and E/S has been consequently approved by the ZonalWard Committee, West Zone, vide Resolution No. 50 dated 12-1-2012 (copy of the resolution is placed atPage 130/C-131/C),

Subsequently online tenders were invited vide NIT No. 110 dated 18-1-2012 due on 7-2 -2012with due publicity in the following Newspapers :—

S. No. Name of Newspapers Medium Dated

1. The Indian Express Enqlish 20-1-2012

2. The Financial Express English 20-1-2012

3. Jansatta Hindi 20-1-2012


5. Daily Pratap Urdu 20-1-2012

Fourteen contractors downloaded the tender documents and only eleven could submitted theirbids successfully as detailed below :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

S. No. Agency Rate Quoted Total Amount Remarks––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1. M/s. Rajeev Gupta 15.00% above 37,04,466.57 L1

2. M/s. Essco Traders 16.77% above 37,61,483.14

3. M/s. Raj Const. Co. 19.89% above 38,61,986.93

4. M/s. Satbir Const. Company 24.50% above 40,10,487.72

5. M/s. Naresh Rai 28.60% above 41,42,560.01

6. M/s. Shanti Enterprises 29.99% above 41,87,335.74

7. M/s. Bansal Construction Co. 41 .00% above 45,41,998.14

8. M/s. Satpaul 45.00% above 46,70,849.16

9. M/s. Puia Const. Co. 46.65% above 47,24,000.20

10. M/s. R.P. Singh & Co. Pvt. Ltd. 49.00% above 47,99,700.17

11. M/s. Ashish Cons. Company 52.52% above 49,13,089.06––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

[ 27 (N) ]

The lowest bid received by M/s. Rajeev Gupta @ 15.00% above the estimated rates. TheJustification of the rates worked out by S.E.(Plg.) @ 49.64% above the estimate.

The lowest rates M/s. Rajeev Gupta @ 15.00% above the estimated rates are verycompetitive, as compared with the justification of rates and prevailing market rates and as such recom-mended for acceptance the rate and agency by the competent authority.

The contractual cost of the work comes to Rs. 37,04,467/- and expenditure will be chargedunder Head of Account XL-III-D-IV wherein budget provision exists. The time of completion of the workis six months and rates are hold goods up to six months i.e. 6-8-2012/extended up to 30-9-2012.

M/s. Rajeev Gupta is registered with MCD in Class 3rd and eligible to tenders upto Rs. 90lacs. M/s. Rajeev Gupta is neither blacklisted & nor debarred from the MCD at present.


The case may be placed before the Standing Committee for acceptance of rate & agency infavor of lowest the bidder M/s. Rajeev Gupta and also to authorize the Commissioner to enter in tocontract agreement with M/s. Rajeev Gupta @ 15.00% above the estimated rates for contractual cost ofwork comes to Rs. 37,04,467/- for “lmp./Dev. of drainage system in 7-Block, Ramesh Nagar [7/83-80'Road] by pdg. B/W from and RCC in C-98/KBZ in Mansarovar Garden, SH :— 1. Imp./Dev. of drainagesystem in 7-Block, Ramesh Nagar [7/153- 7/213] by pdg. B/W from and RCC in C-98/KBZ in MansaroverGarden. SH :— 2. Imp./Dev. of drainage system in 7-Block, Ramesh Nagar [7/99-7/142] by pdg. B/Wfrom and Precast Slab in C-98/KBZ in Mansarover Garden” under the provision of DMC Act, 1957(amended to date).

Item No. 63 :— Construction of footpath and platform in Municipal Park opposite Veterinary Hospitalin Nizampur Village in C-30 (Narela Zone) (Dr. Sahib Singh Verma Park).


Based on the requisition of Horticulture Department, North Delhi Municipal Corporation videNo. ADH/NRZ/2012-13/116 dated 18-6-2012, a detailed estimate amounting to Rs. 59,90,700/- has beenprepared and got checked from the office of S.W. (Narela). Horticulture Department has booked theestimate under Head of Account 77/3084 for Rs. 59,90,700/- Item No. 06 dated 2-7-2012.

It has been proposed to construct the footpath/walkway all around the park by pdg. CC laidhaving gaps to percolate the water in the ground. As desired by the Horticulture Department, a platform isalso be required to be constructed in the park for beautification and for the resting of morning walkers. Ithas been further proposed to provide a gate in the boundary wall of park for restriction the entry foranimals in the park.

Ward Committee (Narela Zone) has been accorded the administrative approval & expendituresanction for amounting to Rs. 50,90,700/- under Head of Account 77/3084 on dated 17-8-2012. Draft NITamounting to Rs. 38,29,125/- has already been approved by the competent authority.

Tenders for the above cited work were invited vide NIT No. EE(N)M-I/TC/2012-13/13 dated28-8-2012 due on 18-9-2012 but tenders were opened on 22-9-2012 due to not proper function E-tendering

[ 28 (N) ]

website i.e. www.mcdetenders.com. Due publicity as required was made by circulating the NIT to variousoffices, through E-tendering and by publishing in the following Newspapers :—

1. Hindi (Dainik Jagran) Dated 1-9-2012

2. English (The Pioneer) Dated 1-9-2012

3. Hindi (Punjab Kesari) Dated 1-9-2012

4. Urdu (Daily Milap) Dated 1-9-2012

Thirteen nos. of tender sold and four numbers of tenderers were submitted their bids, whosecomparative statement is as under :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

S. No. Name of Contractor Rates E/M G-8 No. & Date––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1. M/s. Karambir Singh Khatri 35.38% above 76,600/- 047764 dated 24-9-2012

2. M/s. Surender Kumar Vats 59.42% above

3. M/s. Sona Construction Co. 69.69% above

4. M/s. Satbir Vats 75.00% above––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

The lowest tenderer M/s. Karambir Singh Khatri has quoted their rate @ 35.38% aboveagainst the departmental justification of rates which comes to 84.12% above. These rates are reasonableand justified as compared to the departmental justification of rates. Rates are abnormally below thereforethe condition of 100% test check by A.E. and 50% by E.E. concerned will be adhered to.

The total cost of the proposed work after calculating the contractual enhancement @ 35.38%above comes to Rs. 51,83,869/- only against the departmental justification @ 84.12% above. Rates arevalid upto 17-2-2013 and time of completion of this work is five months from the 10th day of issue of workorder.

Budget provision exist under Head of Account 77/3084 during the financial year 2012-2013.


The case may please be placed before Standing Committee for the approval of Rates &Agency in favour of M/s. Karambir Singh Khatri @ 35.38% above against the departmental justificationof 84.12% above for Rs. 51,83,869/- under Head of Account 77/3084 as per NIT Condition and toauthorise the Commissioner to enter into the agreement with lowest tenderer as required under DMC Act(amended up to date).

Item No. 64 :— Remodelling and covering of drain at Archana Apptt. DDA Mkt. in Paschim Vihar bypdg. RCC Item from Archana Apartment to DDA Market in Paschim Vihar in WestZone.


The administrative approval & expenditure sanction has been accorded by the Corporationvide Resolution No. 1363 dated 9-3-2012 for Rs. 1026.50 lacs under Head of Account XL-III-D-IV(Annexure ‘A’) in respect of above cited work.

[ 29 (N) ]

Accordingly, a detailed estimate amounting to Rs. 10,26,50,200/- based on DSR-2007 andapproved rates of MCD was got technically sanctioned from the competent authority. Subsequently a draftNIT for Rs. 6,68,86,104/- was also got approved from the competent authority. The percentage ratetenders were called vide NIT No. EE (Project)-II/WZ/TC/2011-12/54 dated 7-2-2012 due on 6-3-2012.Permission was also obtained for inviting e-tenders from MCD contractors and manual tenders fromeligible contractors not registered with MCD. Due to Administrative reasons NIT was postponed videCorrigendum No. EE (Pr.)/WZ/2011-12/1656 dated 27-2-2012 and tender were opened on 9-3-2012 aftergiving publicity in following Newspapers and E-tendering through websites on MCD :—

S. No. Name of Newspaper Language Place Dated

1. Times of India English Delhi 12-2-2012

2. Nav Bharat Times Hindi Delhi 12-2-2012

3. Economic Times English Delhi 12-2-2012

4. Hindustan Times Hindi Delhi 12-2-2012

5. Pubjab Kesari Hindi Delhi 12-2-2012

6 Dainik Jagran Hindi Delhi 12-2-2012

7. Roznama Rastriya Sahara Urdu Delhi 12-2-2012

Two tenders were sold manually out of which none was received. Fifteen tenders were gotdownloaded online by MCD registered contractors out of which eight tenders were received. Thecomparative statement is given below :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

S. Name of Agency Rate (Rs.) G-8 No. & date/EarnestNo. Money

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––1. M/s. S.K. & Co. @ 19.70% above 023089 dated 12-3-12

Regd. with MCD in Class-I contractual amount Rs. 16,73,000/-Rs. 8,00,62,680/-

2. M/s. D.K.K. Promoters & @ 27.98% above RefundedBuilders Pvt. Ltd.Regd. with MCD in Class-I

3. M/s. Satya Constn. @ 32.82% above RefundedRegd. with MCD in Class-I

4. M/s. RP. Singh & Co. Pvt. Ltd. @ 33.32% above RefundedRegd with MCD in Class-I

5. M/s. Sushil Constn. Co. @ 35.01% above RefundedRegd. with MCD in Class-I

6: M/s. Abhishek Enterprises @ 36.36% above RefundedRegd. with MCD in Class-I

7. M/s. M.C. Constn. Co. @ 39.34% above RefundedRegd. with MCD in Class-I

8. M/s. Puja Constn. Co. @ 43.19% above RefundedRegd. with MCD in Class-I

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

[ 30 (N) ]

Justification of rates worked out by the Planning Department comes @ Rs. 44.76% above (i/clabour cess). The rates quoted by the lowest tenderer M/s. S.K. & Co. @ Rs. 19.70% above are wellwithin the justification of rates & hence the case is recommended for acceptance.

M/s. S.K. & Co. is registered Contractor under Class-I category with MCD and is eligible totender for this work. The contractor is not blacklisted/debarred at the time of purchase of tenders. Thecontractual amount of the work comes to Rs. 8,00,62,666/-. The expenditure of the work will be chargedunder Head of Account XL-III-D-IV. The time of completion of the work is 18 months reckoned from the10th day of issue of work order. The rate are valid upto 30-11-12.

S. No. Year Expenditure (Rs. in lacs)

1. 2012-13 20.00 lacs

2. 2013-14 780.63 lacs—————

Total 800.63 lacs—————


The case is placed before the Standing Committee for approval of rate and agency infavour of M/s. S.K. & Co. at his quoted rates @ Rs. 19.70% above for a contractual amount ofRs. 8,00,62,666/- under Head of Account XL-III-D-IV as per NIT conditions and to authorize theCommissioner to enter into agreement with the lowest tenderer as required under DMC Act, 1957(amended to date).

ANNEXURE ‘A’

Copy of Resolution No. 1363 of the Ordinary March (2012) Meeting of the Corporationheld on 9-3-2012

Item No. 28 :— Remodelling and covering of drain at Archana Apptt. DDA Mkt. in Paschim Vihar bypdg. RCC Item from Archana Apartment to DDA Market in Paschim Vihar in WestZone.


The above mentioned drain is one of the major drain of Paschim Vihar area in West Zonecovering the catchments area of Archana Apartment, A-I Block, A-1B Block. A-2B Block, IFCI colony,B-3 Block, BG-8 block etc. up to the reach of Najafgarh drain. The starting point of Drain is near ArchanaApartment. The length of the drain from starting point to end point of this proposal i.e. Archana Apartmentto Najafgarh drain is 1833 Mtr.

Due to increase in the population in adjoining colonies of this drain, it has been observed thatthis drain is being used as a garbage dumping point by the nearby residents of drain. This dumping ofgarbage in open drain is the only reason for blockage of the flow, silting of the drain, reduction in capacityof the drain during the rainy season and due to blockage of the flow during the dry whether period resultsthe breeding of the mosquitoes. All these factors, lead to creation of very unhealthy environment includingstinking smell coming out for all nearby colonies to this drain.

This drain takes the storm water discharge during the rainy season and during dry weatherperiod. it also takes the partly discharge of the overflowing sewerage system. Although, this discharge ofsewerage system is negligible as compare to discharge capacity of the drain. At presently this drain is anopen drain and is in trapezoidal section with deteriorated condition. The length of the drain which is to beremodeled is 1833 mtrs. with RCC Box is proposed to be constructed.

[ 31 (N) ]

According, the section of the drain was got approved from the drainage department and onthe basis of the section as approved by S.W.(DEMS), a detailed estimates has been framed on EDIS,based on DSR 2007/Approved Rates and duly got checked by the Planning Department for amounting toRs. 10,26,50,200/-.

The expenditure will be charged under Head of A/c : XL-III-D-IV wherein, sufficient budgetprovision exists, The schedule of expenditure is as under :—

Year Expenditure

2011-12 : Rs. 10.00 lacs

2012-13 : Rs. 1016.50 lacs———————Rs. 1026.50 lacs———————


The case may be placed before the Corporation through Works Committee for accord ofAdministrative Approval and Expenditure sanction to the estimate amounting to Rs. 1026.50 lacs forRemodeling and covering of drain at Archana Apptt. DDA Mkt. in Paschim Vihar by pdg. RCCItem from Archana Apartment to DDA Market in Paschim Vihar in West Zone under Head ofA/c : XL-III-D-IV, as required under Section 202 (C) of the DMC Act, 1957 (Amended to date).

(ii) Resolution No. 212 of the Works Committee dated 14-2-2012.

Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that the proposal as contained in theCommissioner’s letter No. F. 33/Engg./2702/C&C dated 5-1-2012, be approved.

Resolution No. 1363 Resolved that as recommended by the Works Committee vide its ResolutionNo. 212 dated 14-2-2012, the proposal of the Commissioner as contained in his letterNo. F.33/Engg./2702/C&C dated 05-01-2012, be approved.

Item No. 65 :— Strengthening of road in the jurisdiction of Ward No. C-58/RZ.

Sub-Head :—(1) Stg. of road from Balbir Singh Road to Major Ashwani Marg in A-1 Block in C-58/RZby pdg. Dense Carpeting from Paschim Vihar North.

(2) Stg. of road from JK Apartment to Road No. 30 in A-3 Block Paschim Vihar inC-58/RZ by pdg. Dense Carpeting from in Paschim Vihar North.

(3) Stg. of road from H. No. 274 to Road No. 30 and Triveni Apptt. to Rohtak Road inC-4 Block Paschim Vihar in C-58/RZ by pdg. Dense Carpeting from in PaschimVihar North.

(4) Stg. of road from A-1 Lal Market to A-5B SFS Flats and Vishal Bharti School toRohtak Road (Atma Ram Marg) in C-58/RZ by pdg. Dense Carpeting from A-1,Paschim Vihar Lal Mkt. to A-5B SFS Flats and Vishal Bharti School to Rohtak Road(Atma Ram Marg or Jain Sthanak Road) in Paschim Vihar North.


A detailed estimates amounting to Rs. 85,54,700/- has been administratively approval andexpenditure sanctioned by the Ward Committee under H/A : XL-VIII-Z-a (Annexure ‘A’). Accordingly,

[ 32 (N) ]

the detailed estimate amounting to Rs. 85,54,700/- Based on DSR-2007 and approved rate of MCD and adraft NIT amounting on Item Rate has been got technically sanctioned by the competent authority.

Tenders amounting Item Rate for the said work were called on Item rates basis vide NITNo. 48/EE(M-WZ)-II/WZ/TC/2011-2012 Item No. 01 dated 21-2-2012 and due for opening on 12-3-2012after circulating the copies of NIT in various offices and through e-tendering. Press publicity in thefollowing Newspapers :—

Sr. No. Name of Newspaper Language Dated of Publicity

1. The India Express English 2-3-2012

2. Jansatta Hindi 2-3-2012

3. Financial Express English 2-3-2012

4. Punjab Kesari Hindi 2-3-2012


6. Daily Tej Urdu 2-3-2012

7. Milap Hindi 2-3-2012

Four tenders were sold received. The rates offered by the tenderer is as under :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––Sr. No. Name of Tenderer Rate Received Remarks––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1. M/s. M.C. Construction Co. T.C. @ Rs. 13.99/m2 Earnest Money of Rs.B.M. @ Rs. 6,500.00/m3 Deposited vide G-8 No.D.B.C. @ Rs. 8,500.00/m3 Dated

2. M/s. Vinod Kumar T.C. @ Rs. 15.45/m2 Earnest money deposited throughB.M. @ Rs. 6,785.00/m3 DD/ pay order and refunded.D.B.C. @ Rs. 9,485.00/m3

3. M/s. C. Parkashan & Co. T.C. @ Rs. 16.00/m2 Earnest money deposited throughB.M. @ Rs. 7,200.00/m3 DD/ pay order and refunded.D.B.C.@ Rs. 9,300.00/m3

4. M/s. Radhey Shyam T.C. @ Rs. 14.75/m2 Earnest money deposited throughB.M. @ Rs. 7,019.00/m3 DD/ pay order and refunded.D.B.C. @ Rs. 9,035.00/m3

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Justification of rates has been worked out by the Department, which comes to (i) Tack Coat(0.225 kg./sqm.) @ Rs. 18.55/m2, (ii) B.M. (60/70) @ Rs. 7,946.50/m3 (iii) D.B.C. (Dense BituminousConcrete) @ Rs. 10,926.05/m3. The lowest tenderer, M/s. M.C. Construction Co.

The lowest tenderer, M/s. M.C. Construction Co. has quoted the (i) Tack Coat (0.225 kg./sqm.) @ Rs. 13.99/m2, (ii) B.M. (60/70) @ Rs. 6,500.00/m3, (iii) D.B.C. (Dense Bituminous Concrete)@ Rs. 8,500.00/m3. The quoted rates of the lowest tenderer, M/s. M.C. Construction Co. @ (i) Tack Coat(0.225 kg./sqm.) @ Rs. 13.99/m2, (ii) B.M. (60/70) @ Rs. 6,500.00/m3 (iii) D.B.C. (Dense BituminousConcrete) @ Rs. 8,500.00/m3 were considered reasonable & well within the justification of rates. Hence,recommended for acceptance.

[ 33 (N) ]

M/s. M.C. Construction Co. is a registered contractor under Class-I/M.C.D. and is eligible totender for this work. Their financial as well as technical capability has been found to be satisfactory in therecent past. The firm is not blacklisted/debarred as on date. The contractual amount of the work comes toRs. 77,45,603/-. The time of completion of the work is 04 months to be reckoned from the 10th day afterissue of the work order. The extended validity of rates are available upto 31-12-12. The expenditure isproposed to be charged under Head of Account XL-VIII-Z-a.


The case may be placed before the Standing Committee for approval of rates & agencyunder Section 202 (C) of DMC Act, 1957 (amended upto dated) in favour of M/s. M.C. ConstructionCo. at his quoted rates the (i) Tack Coat (0.225 kg./sqm.) @ Rs. 13.99/m2, (ii) B.M. (60/70)@ Rs. 6,500.00/m3 (iii) D.B.C. (Dense Bituminous Concrete) @ Rs. 8,500.00/m3 against the justificationof rates (i) Tack Coat (0.225 kg./sqm.) @ Rs. 18.55/m2, (ii) B.M. (60/70) @ Rs. 7,946.50/m3

(iii) D.B.C. (Dense Bituminous Concrete) @ Rs. 10,926.05/m3 the estimate rates with a contractualamount of Rs. 77,45,603/- under H/A : XL-VIII-Z-a and to authorized the Commissioner to enter in tocontract with the lowest tenderer as per terms of NIT.

Item No. 66 :— Empanelment of advertising agencies for preparation, designing and release of NorthDelhi Municipal Corporation advertisements in newspapers, broadcasting throughradio channels and telecasting through television channels and other related works.

Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/Dir.(P&I)/NDMC/221/C&C dated 15-10-2012.

The case pertains to empanelment of advertising agencies for designing, preparation andrelease of NDMC’s advertisements of all types/categories in newspapers, broadcasting through radiochannels and telecasting through television channels and other related works undertaken by theadvertising agencies such as quality printing jobs where creative designing is required, preparation of shortfilms, power point presentation and other forms audio-visual communication. As approved by thecompetent authority/Finance, the following terms and conditions were stipulated for eligibility :—

1. The advertising agency should be fully accredited with Indian Newspaper Services (INS)and registered/accredited with All India Radio/Doordarshan.

2. It must have an independent, adequate and proven Delhi based infrastructure for carryingout jobs relating to Newspapers/Radio/TV Channels/advertising and designing for qualityprinting jobs.

3. It must have aleast 3 years proven track record during last 5 years of doing governmentjobs of similar nature, attached Release Order/Bills in support.

4. It must have minimum turnover of Rs. 25 crores during the last 3 financial year i.e.2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12.

5. It must have independent, complete and sufficient Infrastructure regarding to manpowerand professional facilities, copy writing, designing, script writing, recording and productionof films etc.

6. It must provide the latest Income Tax Return.

7. It must be registered with P.F./ESIC authorities.

8. It must have Service Tax and PAN numbers.

[ 34 (N) ]

Incorporating the above-mentioned terms and conditions, a public notice advertisement wasgot published in the following newspapers on 21st July, 2012 & Corrigendum dated 29th July, 2012 forextension of dates inviting eligible advertising agencies to apply for empanelment :—

1. Hindustan Times (English)

2. Navbharat Times (Hindi)

3. The Economic Times

4. Daily Milap (Urdu)

In response to the advertisement published in the newspapers, the following 44 advertisingagencies collected the documents for filing the applications :—

S. No. Name of the Agency

1. M/s. Prabhatam Advt. Pvt.Ltd.

2. M/s. Airads Limited

3. M/s. Shalini Publicity & Creative Pvt. Ltd.

4. M/s. Sharad Advertising Pvt. Ltd.

5. M/s. Pressman Advertising Limited

6. M/s. Adman Advertising

7. M/s. Perfect 10 Advertising

8. M/s. Pamm Advertising & Marketing

9. M/s. Interads Pvt. Ltd.

10. M/s. Square Communication Pvt.Ltd.

11. M/s. Ocean Advt.

12. M/s. Astal Advertising & Marketing India Pvt.Ltd.

13. M/s. Percept Advt. Ltd.

14. M/s. Vermillion Communication Pvt. Ltd.

15. M/s. Snappers Advt. & Mktg. Pvt.Ltd.

16. M/s. George John Advertising Pvt.Ltd.

17. M/s. Surya Adsystems Pvt. Ltd.

18. M/s. Adfactor’s Advt.

19. M/s. Current Advt. Pvt. Ltd.

20. M/s. Associated Advertising

21. M/s. Graphisads Pvt. Ltd.

22. M/s. Lalit Advt.

23. M/s. Centum Advt. Makt. Pvt. Ltd.

[ 35 (N) ]

24. M/s. Span Communication

25. M/s. Advit (India) Pvt. Ltd.

26. M/s. Mercantile Advt.

27. M/s. Mode Advt. & Mkt. Pvt. Ltd.

28. M/s. Pehachan Advt. & Mkt. Pvt. Ltd.

29. M/s. Infinity Advt. Services

30. M/s. Degree 360 Solution Pvt. Ltd.

31. M/s. OPAL Advt. & Mkt.

32. M/s. Dentsu Comm. Pvt. Ltd.

33. M/s. Adsyno-Adsyndicate Services Pvt. Ltd.

34. M/s. Arihant Advt. Ltd.

35. M/s. Impact Advt. Pvt. Ltd.

36. M/s. Goldmune Advt. Ltd.

37. M/s. Bubna Advt.

38. M/s. Nidhie Ads Consultancy Service

39. M/s. Alakhnanda Advt. Pvt. Ltd.

40. M/s. Crayons Communication Group

41. M/s. Nirman Advt. Pvt. Ltd.

42. M/s. Magnum Intergrafiks (P) Ltd.

43. M/s. Akar Advt. & Mkt. Pvt. Ltd.

44. M/s. Lehar Advertising.

Out of the above 44 applicant advertising agencies, the following 33 advertising agenciessubmitted applications as per the prescribed format alongwith the requisite documents :—

S. No. Name of the Agency


2. M/s. Adfactor’s Advt.

3. M/s. Adsyno-Adsyndicate Services Pvt. Ltd.

4. M/s. Advit (India) Pvt. Ltd.

5. M/s. Alakhnanda Advt. Pvt. Ltd.

6. M/s. Astal Advertising & Marketing India Pvt. Ltd.

7. M/s. Bubna Advt.

8. M/s. Centum Advt. & Markt. Pvt. Ltd.

[ 36 (N) ]

9. M/s. Crayons Communication Group.



12. M/s. Goldmine Advt. Ltd.

13. M/s. Graphisads Pvt. Ltd.

14. M/s. Impact Advt. Pvt. Ltd.

15. M/s. Infinity Advt. Services.


17. M/s. Lehar Advertising.

18. M/s. Mercantile Advt. Pvt. Ltd.

19. M/s. Mode Advt. & Mkt. (P) Ltd.

20. M/s. Nirman Advt. Pvt. Ltd.

21. M/s. OPAL Advt. & Mkt.

22. M/s. Pamm Advertising & Marketing.

23. M/s. Pehachan Advt & Mkt.


25. M/s. Perfect 10 Advertising.

26. M/s. Prabhatam Advt. Pvt. Ltd.

27. M/s. Pressman Advertising Limited.

28. M/s. Shalini Publicity & Creative Pvt. Ltd.


30. M/s. SPAN Communication.

31. M/s. Square Communication Pvt. Ltd.


33. M/s. Vermillion Communication Pvt. Ltd.

The Screening Committee comprising the following officials held its meeting on 28-8-2012 :—

1. Director (Press & Information)

2. Director (Printing & Stationery)

3. Asstt. Director (Press & Information)

4. Accounts Officer (HQ)

5. Office Incharge, Directorate of Press & Information.

[ 37 (N) ]

The Screening Committee evaluated the applicant advertising agencies on the basis of thefollowing parameters :—

1. Accreditation with Indian Newspapapers Society (INS)

2. Accreditation with Doordarshan

3. Accreditation with All India Radio

4. Whether Demand Draft enclosed

5. Turnover (minimum 25 crores) for the year 2009-2010



8. Job Experience with Government Bodies

9. Job Experience of similar nature.

10. Whether have Delhi based independent infrastructure

11. Terms and conditions agreed or not

12. Whether Registered with ESIC/PF

13. Whether Registered for Service Tax

14. Whether Registered for PAN

15. Whether Income Tax Return for 2011-2012 filed.

The following seventeen advertising agencies, which fulfilled all the above criteria wereshortlisted by the Screening Committee for making presentation before the Empanelment Board :—

S. No. Name of the Advertising Agencies


2. M/s. Bubna Advt.

3. M/s. Centum Advt. & Markt. Pvt. Ltd.

4. M/s. Crayons Communication Group.



7. M/s. Goldmine Advt. Ltd.


9. M/s. Mode Advt. & Mkt. (P) Ltd.

10. M/s. Pamm Advertising & Marketing.


12. M/s. Perfect 10 Advertising.

13. M/s. Pressman Advertising Limited.

[ 38 (N) ]


15. M/s. SPAN Communication.

16. M/s. Square Communication Pvt. Ltd.


The competent administrative authority i.e. Commissioner, North Delhi Municipal Corporationaccepted the report of the Screening Committee on 20-9-2012.

As per the subsequent procedure for evaluation, all the above advertising agencies wererequired to make presentation before the Empanelment Board. The following parameter and evaluationcriteria were adopted :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Parameter Evaluation Criteria––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1. All the advertising agencies will be asked toprepare advertising campaign for newspaperson any of the following two subjects :—

(i) Creating awareness amongst citizensfor taking preventive measures withregard to the major public health issuessuch as dengue,cholera, gastroenteritis,meningococcal infection.

(ii) Developing civic sense for creating acleaner Delhi. How citizens can keeptheir city clean from litter and solidwaste ? How can we help civicauthorities in maintaining public parksand gardens.

(iii) Becoming enlightened property taxpayer. An appeal to citizens to fileproperty returns and pay property taxin time.

Awarding Points—30(15 each campaign)

Out of the two campaigns, one should be inEnglish and Hindi each.

(ii) The capability of understanding the subjectsrelating to the Municipal Corporation of Delhiand their projection keeping in view the groundrealities.

(iii) The capability of the designs to influence andmotivate the citizens to rightful civic actionwith regard to keeping the city clean, payingthe property taxes in time, adoptingpreventive health measures etc.

(iv) The quality of copywriting with its potentialto achieve the desired objectives in motivat-ing, educating and informing the target groups.

(v) The quality, appropriateness and suitability ofvisuals with regard to subject and their link-age with the text.

(vi) The mass appeal of designs in terms of sim-plicity, directness and impact on readers basedon visuals, copywriting, typography and over-all presentation.

(vii) Economy and optimum utilisation of space inpresentation of designs.

(viii) The quality of adaptation of the text in Hindi.The appeal of the language and its potentialand appropriateness for educating and inform-ing the common men.

2. All the agencies will be given commontext of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) andPublic Notice running into about one pageeach. They will be required to set the matter

Evaluation will be based on the agency’s capabilityto follow the NDMC’s instructions. They will alsobe evaluated on the basis of their capacity to

[ 39 (N) ]

translate the text into Hindi. The followinginstructions must be followed :—

(i) Advertisements are to be published in theminimum possible space exercising optimumeconomy.

(ii) The type face of main text of the advertise-ment in English must be Helvetica in 7 pointsize with maximum of 8.5 point leading.

(iii) The type face of main text of advertisementin Hindi must be Walkman/ WalkmanChanakya in 9 point size with maximum lead-ing of 10.5 point.

(iv) The standardized format must be practiced.The width of the masthead must not exceed1 cm.

(v) The information regarding availability ofwebsite must be given as per standing stand-ard in running format.

(vi) For single tender, standard format must beused. No serial number is required in thiscase.

(vii) In case of more than one item of tender,there are a number of clauses such as ear-nest money, time of completion, rate hold goodfor, tender cost etc., which are common to allitems. In case of repeating vertically all theitems, a note must be used.

(viii) The text be prepared in two-column format.In special case, where number of columnsare more than six, three-column format shouldbe used.

3. All the agencies will be required to submitcomputer printed dummy of CIVIC GUIDEin English consisting of front and back coverplus eight inside pages having photographsand relevant write-ups.

Awarding Points—15

Evaluation will be based on design concept, typo-graphic selection, layout, colour scheme, contentand credit.

4. All the agencies will be required to producepublic awareness radio spots in Hindi of 60seconds duration on any two of the followingsubjects :—

(i) Prevention & Control of Dengue andMalaria

(i) The capability of understanding the subjects.

(ii) The capability of the audio communicationincluding music, voice, innotations etc. toinfluence and motivate the citizens.

as per NDMC’s instructions. They will berequired to translate the matter intoHindi and submit separate designs inboth the languages.

Awarding PointsNIT—8

Public Notice—7

[ 40 (N) ]

(ii) Prevention & Control of Gastroenteritisand Cholera

(iii) Pay Your Property Tax in Time for yourand City’s benefit

(iv) Developing Civic Sense with Regard toSanitation and Cleanliness.

The agencies will be provided basic text. They willbe free to create spots with additional information.

Awarding Points—20

(10 each subject)

Total Marks of above parameters—80

(iii) The quality of copywriting with its potentialto achieve the desired objectives in motivat-ing, educating and informing the target groups.

(iv) The quality, appropriateness and suitability ofaudio with regard to subject.

(v) The mass appeal of message in terms ofsimplicity, directness and impact on listeners.

(vi) Economy and optimum utilisation of words.

(vii) The quality and appeal of the language andits potential and appropriateness for educat-ing and informing the common men.

——————————————————————————————————————————

The agencies were called for to make a presentation before the Empanelment Board. Theparameter and criteria for evaluation were as follows :———————————————————————————————————————————

PARAMETER EVALUATION——————————————————————————————————————————The agencies will be asked to bring hard and soft The creatives submitted by the advertisingcopies of their creatives. They will be required agencies will be considered by the Empanelmentto submit the creatives and make a presentation Board on the basis of their suitability to NDMC’sabout them. They will also be required to make purpose, economy of space, designing, copy-writing,presentation about their agency as well as its visualisation, translation, presentation and overallsuitability for NDMC’s requirement. standing of the agencies in the field and in context

Awarding Points—20 of the aforesaid essential requirements and theparameters laid down in terms and conditions.Special emphasis will be laid on the agency havingindependent, adequate and proven Delhi basedinfrastructure for carrying out jobs relating toNDMC’s requirements. Their infrastructure withregard to manpower and professional facilities willbe evaluated. However, preference will be given tothe advertising agencies who have been workingfor government offices/local bodies undertakingsimilar nature of work on similar topics.

——————————————————————————————————————————

In order to provide background information for developing creatives, all the agencies wereprovided with photocopies of cover of Civic Guide and sixteen inside pages in English. In addition, theywere also provided with some additional text for developing creatives, advertising campaigns. The actualtext of NIT and public notice was given for designing and translation.

The Empanelment Board comprised the following members/officials met on 6th October,2012 :—

1. Director (P&I) —Chairman

2. Director (Printing & Stationery) —Member

[ 41 (N) ]

3. Representative of the Fin. Deptt. —Member

4. Independent Expert —Member

5. Asstt. Commissioner (Esstt.) —Member

6. Asstt. Director (Press & Information) —Member

The designs submitted by advertising agencies were considered by the Empanelment Boardon the basis of their suitability to NDMC’s purpose, economy of space, designing, copy-writing,visualisation, translation, presentation and overall standing of the agencies in the field and in context of theaforesaid essential requirements and the parameters laid down in terms and conditions. Preference wasgiven to the advertising agencies who have been working for government offices/local bodies undertakingsimilar nature of work on similar topics.

The shortlisted agencies also made presentation before the Empanelment Board about theirsuitability for NDMC’s requirement. Each member made evaluation of different aspects of presentation asdetailed above and awarded marks out of 100.

Out of the maximum award points of 600, the total of award points given by individualmembers of the Empanelment Board are as follows :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

S.No. Name of the Advertising Agencies Award Points Rank––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1. M/s. Airads Limited 460 I

2. M/s. Bubna Advt. 366 V

3. M/s. Centum Advt. & Markt. Pvt. Ltd. 248 XV

4. M/s. Crayons Communication Group. 244 XVI

5. M/s. Current Advt. Pvt. Ltd. 423 II

6. M/s. Dentsu Comm. Pvt. Ltd. 288 IX

7. M/s. Goldmine Advt. Ltd. 277 X

8. M/s. Interads Pvt. Ltd. 271 XII

9. M/s. Mode Advt. & Mkt. (P) Ltd. 300 VII

10. M/s. Pamm Advertising & Marketing. 296 VIII

11. M/s. Percept Advt. Ltd. 264 XIII

12. M/s. Perfect 10 Advertising. 401 IV

13. M/s. Pressman Advertising Limited. 181 XVII

14. M/s. Sharad Advertising Pvt. Ltd. 249 XIV

15. M/s. SPAN Communication. 340 VI

16. M/s. Square Communication Pvt. Ltd. 273 XI

17. M/s. Surya Adsystems Pvt. Ltd. 417 III––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

[ 42 (N) ]

It is proposed to empanel seven advertising agencies having the maximum total marks, it isproposed that the following agencies falling in the rank from I to VII be approved for empanelment :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

S.No. Name of the Advertising Agencies Award Points Rank––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1. M/s. Airads Limited 460 I

2. M/s. Current Advt. Pvt. Ltd. 423 II

3. M/s. Surya Adsystems Pvt. Ltd. 417 III

4. M/s. Perfect 10 Advertising. 401 IV

5. M/s. Bubna Advt. 366 V

6. M/s. SPAN Communication. 340 VI

7. M/s. Mode Advt. & Mkt. (P) Ltd. 300 VII––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

It is proposed to follow the undermentioned hitherto approved terms & conditions approved bythe Standing Committee for the earlier empanelment :—

1. The Panel of advertising agencies will be constituted for a period of three yearsextendable by another two years subject to satisfactory performance and approval of thecompetent authority i.e. Standing Committee.

2. NDMC does not accept any term or condition or time period for making payment for theadvertisements released by it and does not make any commitment about the time taken inmaking payment to the agency for release of its advertisements.

3. The empanelled agencies will be required to submit designs at a very short notice also.The entire work including space booking etc. will have to be ensured accordingly.

4. The agencies would be paid at the rate and tariff approved by the Standing Committee,NDMC.

5. Display Advertisements (educational, informative, revenue earning advertisements etc.involving design work, copy writing etc.) :—

(i) All the empanelled agencies would normally be asked to prepare advertisements. Thedesign finally approved by NDMC will be released through the agency to mediaempanelled with NDMC.

(ii) In case, when the time period is too short to get the design prepared from all theempanelled agencies or in any other exigency, the job may be entrusted to any of theempanelled agencies to meet the deadline and the design so approved will be releasedto media.

(iii) Advertisements released earlier by the approved advertising agency, if foundappropriate by the authorities, can be released to the same agency with suitablemodifications if any.

6. Tender/Auction Notices etc.:—All empanelled agencies will normally be given work onday-to-day rotation basis subject to the following instructions.

(i) Advertisements are to be published in the minimum possible space exercising optimumeconomy.

[ 43 (N) ]

(ii) The type face of main text of the advertisement in English must be Helvetica in7 point size with maximum of 8.5 point leading.

(iii) The type face of main text of advertisement in Hindi must be Walkman/WalkmanChanakya in 9 point size with maximum leading of 10.5 point.

(iv) The advertisements in Punjabi must occupy the same space as the advertisements inHindi occupy as per above instructions.

(v) The advertisement in Urdu must occupy space not additional to 50% of the spaceoccupied by advertisement in English/Hindi.

(vi) The standardized format must be practiced. The width of the masthead must notexceed 1 cm. However, in case of single column advertisements for corrigendum etc.,the width of masthead and baseline must be proportionately reduced.

(vii) The information regarding availability of website must be given as per standingstandard in running format as and when asked.

(viii) For single tender, standard format must be used. No serial number is required in thiscase.

(ix) In case of more than one item of tender, there are a number of clauses such asearnest money, time of completion, rate hold good for, tender cost etc., which arecommon to all items. In case of repeating vertically all the items, a note must be used.

(x) All the tender advertisements will be released into two-column format. In specialcase, where number of columns are more than six, three-column format should beused.

(xi) It is the abundant duty of the advertising agency to ensure that all advertisements inEnglish, Hindu, Urdu and Punjabi are invariably published without any error or printingmistake. The agency must immediately go through the advertisement on publicationand ensure that any error or printing mistake is immediately published free of chargein the form of corrigendum.

(xii) The agency must enclose a certificate alongwith the bill that the published matter hasbeen thoroughly checked and no mistake has been found. In case any error ormistake has been detected by the agency and a corrigendum has been issued thereofby the agency, the published corrigendum must be enclosed alongwith the bill and theaforesaid certificate.

(xiii) If the agency fails to issue corrigendum, and any mistake is subsequently found, 2½%deduction per mistake will be made in the bill on the amount payable to the newspaperconcerned.

7. NDMC has a right to discontinue the services of the agency and to take appropriateaction against the agency, in case it is not satisfied with the work or service.

8. NDMC reserves right to release advertisements directly to any media or to any one of theempanelled advertising agencies.

9. No extra amount/payment over and above the approved tariff would be made fordesigning, photography, typesetting, drawing, preparation, artworks, translation,copywriting of advertisement etc.

[ 44 (N) ]

10. The Service Tax levied by the Government on the Advertising Agency would be paid bythe NDMC.

11. T.D.S. deductions on the bill will be made as per prevailing rules of the Income Tax.

12. The security deposit of Rs. 1 lacs of the empanelled agencies shall be retained during theperiod of their empanelment and will be returned to them after completion of theirempanelment without any interest on it. This deposit will be forfeited in case the agencywithdraws from the panel during the period of empanelment or if its performance is foundto be unsatisfactory or deliberately derelict.

The last panel of advertising agencies as approved by the Standing Committee expired on 31stJuly, 2012. Since, the publication of advertisements is a continuous process and cannot be withheld inpublic interest on expiry of the panels, the approval of the Chairman, Standing Committee was obtained forcontinuation of the earlier panel, terms and conditions till 31st October, 2012.

The proposal may be placed before the Standing Committee for approval of freshempanelment of the advertising agencies, terms and conditions as detailed in the proposal.

Item No. 67 :— Construction of Pucca School Building at M.C. Pry. School, C-1, Ashok Vihar,Phase-I, Rohini Zone.

Sub-Head :— Development of site by providing storm water drains, water supply distribution line,main gate etc.


The administrative approval & expenditure sanction for the scheme was accorded by theCorporation vide Resolution No. 224 dated 19-7-2010 amounting to Rs. 367.44 lacs for the above citedwork (Annexure ‘A’).

Accordingly, a detailed estimate amounting to Rs. 43,43,100/- only on DSR’ 2007 andapproved rates of MCD was got technically sanctioned and draft NIT for Rs. 27,76,1016/- was also gotapproved from the Competent Authority. Tender were called vide NIT No. EE(Pr.)-I/Rohini/TC/2012-13/02 dated 3-7-2012 due on 24-7-2012 after giving due publicity in following newspapers and also byE-tendering through websites of MCD :—

S. No. Name of Newspaper Language Date of Publication Place of Publication

1. The Hindu English 6-7-2012 Delhi

2. Panjab Kesari Hindi 6-7-2012 Delhi

3. Milap Urdu 6-7-2012 Delhi

[ 45 (N) ]

Twelve tenderers started tender purchase process out of which ten tenderers have submittedtheir bids as per comparative statement given below :———————————————————————————————————————————

S. Name of Agency Rate Cheque Amount ContractualNo. (Rs.) No. & Date (Rs.) Amount (Rs.)

——————————————————————————————————————————1 M/s. Pal Brothers, @ 1.11% below 036507 dt. 55,500/- 27,44,735/-

Regd. with MCD in Class-I 24-7-2012

2. M/s. M.K. Gupta, @ 8.88% above Refunded 30,22,011/-Regd with MCD in Class-III

3. M/s. Kaustav Builders, @ 11.42% above Refunded 30,92,510/-Regd. with MCD in Class-IV

4. M/s. Parveen Kumar Const. Co., @ 20.00% above Refunded 33,30,652/-Regd. with MCD in Class-IV

5. M/s. Shri Vinayak Enterprises, @ 27.27% above Refunded 35,32,434/-Regd. with MCD in Class-III

6. M/s. S.S. Builders, @ 29.21% above Refunded 35,86,279/-Regd.. with MCD in Class-I

7. M/s. Rajeev Gupta, @ 35.99% above Refunded 37,74,461/-Regd. with MCD in Class-IV

8 M/s. Deepak Associates, @ 40% above Refunded 38,85,760/-Regd. with MCD in Class-I

9. M/s. A and T Constn., @ 41% above Refunded 39,13,516/-Regd. with MCD in Class-IV

10. M/s. Gupta Brothers, @ 43.43% above Refunded 39,80,961/-Regd. with MCD in Class-I

——————————————————————————————————————————

Justification of rates worked out by the Planning Department comes to Rs. 51.02% above (i/clabour cess). The rates quoted by the lowest tenderer M/s. Pal Brothers @ 1.11% below are well withinthe justification of rates. Hence the case is recommended for acceptance. Being abnormally low rates100% test check by AE and 50% test check by EE is required.

M/s. Pal Brothers is registered under Class-I category with MCD and is eligible to tender forthis work and the financial as well as technical capability of the firm is satisfactory. The contractor is notblacklisted/debarred at the tirne of purchase of tenders. The contractual amount of the work comes toRs. 27,44,735/- under Head of Account XL-VII-Education. The time of completion of the work is 3months reckoned from the 10th day of issue of work order. The rates are valid upto 23-12-2012.


The case is placed before the Standing Committee for approval of rates and agency in favorof M/s. Pal Brothers @ 1.11% below for a contractual amount of Rs. 27,44,735/- under Head of AccountXL-VII-Education. Being abnormally low rates 100% test check by AE and 50% test check by EE isrequired as per NIT conditions and to authorise the Commissioner to enter into agreement with the lowesttenderer as required under DMC Act, 1957 (Amended to date).

[ 46 (N) ]

ANNEXURE ‘A’

Copy of Resolution No. 224 of the Ordinary July (2010) Meeting of the Corporationheld on 19-7-2010

Item No. 28 :— Construction of pucca school building at M.C. Pry. School, C-I Block, Ashok Vihar,Phase-I in Rohini Zone.


The Education Department has requested for construction of school building consisting of20 classrooms, 1 store room, I computer room, 1 office room, 1 library room, 3 toilet blocks, 1 hall and1 science room in M.C. Pry. School at C-1, Ashok Vihar, Phase-I in Rohini Zone vide their requisitionNo. D/1067/DEO/CW/2009 dated 26-9-2009 (Annexure ‘A’). Accordingly a preliminary estimate as perrequisition has been prepared and checked by the Planning Department amounting to Rs. 367.44 lacs(Annexure ‘B’). The school building will be constructed after demolishing the existing structure. Thereserve price amounting to Rs. 4,44,256/- for the existing structure has been worked out and checked bythe Planning Department. The proposal has already been included in the Annual Action Plan 2009-2010under Head of Account XL-VII-Education (Capital).

Provision for resistance of seismic forces and earthquake as per IS Code has been taken inthe estimate.

The expenditure of the work is chargeable under Head of A/c XL-VII-Education (Capital).The expenditure in this financial year i.e. 2009-10 will be Rs. 1.00 lacs and the balance expenditure will beincurred in the next financial year 2010-2011.


The case may be placed before the Corporation through the Works Committee for accord ofAdministrative Approval and Expenditure Sanction to the estimate amounting to Rs. 367.44 lacs forconstruction of pucca school building at M.C. Pry. School, C-1 Block, Ashok Vihar, Phase-I in Rohini Zoneand to dispose of the existing structure for reserve price of Rs. 4,44,256/- as on wherein basis as requiredunder DMC Act, 1957 (amended to date).

ANNEXURE ‘A’

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHIEDUCATION DEPARTMENT (H.Q.)

NIGAM BHAWAN, KASHMERE GATE,DELHI-110006

No. D/1067/DEO/CW/2009 Dated : 26-6-2009

OFFICE ORDER

Director (PE) vide her order dated 10-6-2009 has approved the construction at M.C.Primary School, C-I, Ashok Vihar under Rohini Zone as detailed hereunder :—

1. Classrooms 20 Nos.

2. Store room 01

3. Computer room 01

4. Office room 01

[ 47 (N) ]

5. Library room 01

6. Toilet Blocks 3 Nos. Seat : 1 (Boys), 1 (Girls), 1 (Staff)

7. Boundary wall ×

8. Room for sports material ×

9. Hall 01

10. Science Lab./room 01

After the demolished the old structures

The above work will be executed/done under the Head of A/c XL-VII-Capital on prioritybasis.

Sd/-

Dy. Education Officer(Capital Branch)

Sudtt. Engineer (Pr.)Rohini Zone

Copy to :

1. Director (Edn.).

2. Addl. Director-I.

3. DEO/Rohini.

4. Principal, M.C. Pry. School, C-I, Ashok Vihar, (Rohini).

ANNEXURE ‘B’

Name of Work :— Construction of pucca school building at M.C. Pry. School, C-I, Ashok Vihar, Phase-I,Rohini Zone.

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE——————————————————————————————————————————

S. Description of Item Qty. Rate Unit AmountNo. (in Rs.) (in Rs.)

——————————————————————————————————————————Part A Structure :

1. RCC framed structure upto six story flooring 2303.42 9150.00 Sqm. 2,10,76,293/-height 3.35M

2. Extra for every 0.30M additional height of 2437.24 150.00 Sqm. 3,65,586/-flooring above normal floor height of 3.35

3. Resisting earthquake forces 2303.42 630.00 Sqm. 14,51,155/-

4. Fire fighting arrangments 2303.42 300.00 Sqm. 6,91,026/-—————

Total ‘A’ : 2,35,84,060/-

Total Cost of Civil Structure = 2,14,41,879/-

[ 48 (N) ]

Part B Services :1. Internal water supply & sanitary installation 10,72,094/-

@ 5% of Rs. 2,14,41,879/-2. Internal Electric Installation 26,80,235/-

@ 12.5% of Rs. 2,14,41,879/-3. External Service Connection 10,72,094/-

@ 5% of Rs. 2,14,41,879/-4. Underground sump 30,000.00 9.00 Ltr. 2,70,000/-5. Water storage tank 20,000.00 9.00 Ltr. 1,80,000/-

—————Total ‘B’ 52,74,423/-

Part C Development of Site :

1. Levelling 4612.96 55.00 Sqm. 2,53,713/-

2. Filter water supply distribution line 4612.96 46.00 Sqm. 2,12,196/-100mm dia & below

3. Storm water drains 4612.96 50.00 Sqm. 2,30,648/-

4. Horticulture operations 4612.96 47.00 Sqm. 2,16,809/-

5. Street lighting with HPSV Lamps 4612.96 75.00 Sqm. 3,45,972/-————

Total ‘C’ : 12,59,338/-

Part D Lump Sum Provision :

1. For external permanent finish 3,00,000/-

2. For water harvesting 2,00,000/-

3. For soil testing 1,00,000/-

4. For consultancy charges 2,15,000/-

5. For boundary wall/gate 10,00,000/-—————

Total ‘D’ : 18,15,000/-

Total (A+B+C+D) : 3,19,32,820/-

Add 13% Enhancement on A, B & C 39,15,316/-—————3,58,48,136/-

Add 2.5% (Q.C. + TP) : 8,96,203/-—————3,67,44,340/-—————

Say Rs. 3,67,44,000/-.

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-E.E. (Pr.)/Rohini A.E. J.E.

The Preliminary estimate has been checked for Rs. 3,67,44,000/-.Sd/- Sd/-

E.E. (P) A.E. (P)

[ 49 (N) ]

ANNEXURE ‘C’

Name of work :— Construction of pucca school building at M.C. Pry. School, C-1 Block, Ashok Vihar,Phase-I, Rohini Zone.

Sub-Head :— Dismantling of existing old structure.

1. Book value of structure = Not Available

2. Salvage Value = Cost of Dismantling Value – Demolishing Cost 720156 – 275900 = 4,44,256/-

The electric fitting will be handed over for demolishing and there is no water supply & sanitary fitting.

The book value of the structure is not available because as per local enquiry the structure is old.

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

E.E. (Pr.)/Rohini A.E. J.E.

The resorve price worked out by EE(Pr.)-I Rohini & checked by Planning Deptt. is Rs. 4,44,256/-.

Sd/- Sd/-

E.E. (P) A.E. (P)

(ii) Resolution No. 28 of the Standing Committee dated 31-5-2010.

Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that the proposal of the Commissioner ascontained in his letter No. F. 33/Engg./2934/C&C dated 23-3-2010, be approved.

Resolution No. 224 Resolved that as proposed by the Commissioner in his letter No. F. 33/Engg./2934/C&C dated 23-3-2010 and recommended by the Standing Committee vide itsResolution No. 28 dated 31-5-2010, administrative approval and expenditure sanctionto the estimate amounting to Rs. 367.44 lacs for construction of Pucca SchoolBuilding at M.C. Pry. School, C-I Block, Ashok Vihar, Phase-I in Rohini Zone andalso approval to dispose of the existing structure at a reserve price of Rs. 4,44,256/-on “as is where is” basis, be accorded.

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION LAND & ESTATE DEPARTMENT

7TH FLOOR, CIVIC CENTRE, MINTO ROAD, NEW DELHI

No. L&E/2012-13/D- 263 Dated:-2/11/12 From: Commissioner, North Delhi Municipal Corporation To, Municipal Secretary North Delhi Municipal Corporation Sub: Report in response to the Standing Committee Resolution No. 872

01.02.2012 regarding grant of ownership rights to the Class III and IV employees of the MCD residing in the Municipal Colony in Azadpur and Dhaka under LIG Scheme.

Shri Mehak Singh, the Councilor of erstwhile Corporation has presented the

proposal to the Standing Committee on the above subject which was sent to the Commissioner, NDMC for report.

In this connection, it is submitted that the ownership of the Municipal Flats at Azadpur and Dhaka Colony vest with the erstwhile unified MCD and upon trifurcation, the same has come within the jurisdiction of the North Delhi Municipal Corporation. The flats located at the aforesaid colonies are being allotted to the respective municipal employees by virtue of their services under the Government Accommodation (General pool), Rules framed by the Government of India and being adopted by the erstwhile MCD (Now NDMC). These flats are not amenable for conferment of ownership rights.It is settled proporition that the retired municipal officials must surrender these flats to the Corporation.

It is pertinent to mention that the reference of the alleged low income group housing scheme/resolutions/minutes in the Standing Committee resolution are inapplicable and the same has undergone judicial scrutiny upto the level of the Supreme Court of India. It is submitted that the these flats cannot be permitted to be retained by the retirees after his retirement either as a tenant or on ownership basis in the light of the judgment dated 20/11/2000 in the matter of , “Nigam Colony Dhakka Quarters Karamchari Parishad (Regd.) Vs MCD and Ors.” bearing SLP Civil No. 17454/2000 read with an order dated 04/02/2001 in Contempt Petition No. 293/2001 in SLP 17454/2000 pronounced by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Needless to mention, in the former order dated 20/11/2000, the apex court has observed as under:-

“......... the learned Counsel for the petitioner further submitted that in the case of Nimri Colony, the Corporation has passed the resolution and on the basis of the said resolution the High court has given direction in favour of the residents of the said colony, therefore, in the case of the

present petitioners, who are residents of Azadpur and Dhakka Colonies, High Court ought to have followed the said decision. In our view, because of some special facts if High Court has directed transfer of the said quarter in favour of residents of the said colony it would not mean that corporation can be compelled to transfer the ownership of the quarter in violation of statutory provisions. Further, High Court passed the order on the basis of the fact that resolution No. 937 of 1979 passed by the corporation was restricted only to the Nimri Colony and in favour of non-municipal employees. No such benefit was given by the said resolution for the residents of Azadpur and Dhakka Colonies. Hence, in such cases there is no question of discrimination.”

Further, it is stated that in the subsequent order dated 04/02/2001 in Contempt

Petition No. 293/2001 in SLP 17454/2000, it has been held as under:-

“ It is admitted that most of the respondents have vacated the premises. In this view of the matter, if anyone still has not vacated the premises, it will be open to the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi to take physical possession of the disputed property by use of force”

It is, thus relevant to mention that Standing Committee Resolution No. 872 dated

01/02/2012 & Resolution No. 55 dated 16-8-2012 relied upon is the private resolution and cannot be acted upon in the facts and circumstances of the case unless backed by statutory provisions. Referring to the system of checks and balances as incorporated in the relevant statute, i.e., section 200(d) of the DMC Act, the department intends to rely upon decisions rendered in “B.S. Khurana & Ors. V/s. MCD & Ors”. 87 (2000) DLT 557 (SC) and “Nirmal Kumar Jain & Ors. vs. MCD & Anr”. 39 (1989) DLT 517. In B.S. Khurana's case (supra), wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court while examining the scheme of the Act and the checks and balances for disposal of immovable property contemplated thereunder held as follows:-

“ The scheme of the aforesaid Sections makes it abundantly clear that the entire executive power for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of the Municipal Corporation Act vests in the Commissioner. His functions and duties are statutorily prescribed. His appointment is also to be made by the Central Government by notification in the Official Gazette. Similarly, the functions of the Standing Committee and other committees are also prescribed. In the light of the aforesaid statutory provisions, we have to consider the scheme of Section 200 which empowers the Commissioner to dispose of the moveable property or grant lease of any immovable property or to sell the same subject to the conditions provided thereunder. On the condition of obtaining sanction of the Corporation, the power to transfer immovable property, the value of which exceeds fifty thousand rupees vests in the Commissioner. Result is the Commissioner can transfer such immovable property only after obtaining sanction of the Corporation. Obtaining of sanction by the Commissioner is mandatory. The effect of the non-observance of the statutory prescription would vitiate the transfer. This would also mean that the power to dispose of the property would vest in the Commissioner and not in the Corporation. No specific power is conferred upon the Corporation for such transfer. The scheme envisages checks and balances for disposal of immovable property on the power of the Commissioner. In the light of the aforesaid interpretation of Section 200, it is not necessary for us to deal with other contentions raised and dealt with by the High Court. In the facts and circumstances of the case, at no point of time, Municipal Commissioner has decided or agreed to transfer the Municipal quarters in favour of its employees/allottees. There is no legal right to

claim ownership on the basis of the resolutions passed by the Corporation as the said resolutions are without any power or authority. Hence, there is no substance in these petitions.”

It is further stated that in Nirmal Kumar Jain's case (supra), the Hon’ble Supreme Court while examining the scheme of the Act envisaged the distinct, separate and significant roles played by the Corporation, the Standing Committee and the Commissioner as assigned to them by the legislature in its wisdom. The relevant portion of the judgment in the Nirmal Kumar Jain case (supra) reads as follows:-

“(13) Whereas with regard to acquisition of immovable property decision in respect thereof can be taken by the Corporation alone, under Section 198 of the Act, immovable property can only be disposed of with the concurrence of two entities, one of which must be the Commissioner. While the assent of the Commissioner is not necessary for exercise of power under Section 198 of the Act, Section 200, on the other hand, does not contemplate immovable property being sold without the concurrence or agreement of the Commissioner. In fact the use of the words in Section 200(c) that “the Commissioner may, with the sanction of the Corporation, lease, sell ..........” give the indication that the initiative or the proposal for the sale of the property should ordinarily arise from the Commissioner. Even if this be not so, Section 200(c) makes it quite clear that sale of immovable property cannot take place without the concurrence of the Commissioner of the Corporation.

(14) The Legislature, in its wisdom, perhaps thought that there should be a greater safeguard provided in the Act with regard to holding or selling of the property belonging to the Corporation, it is, perhaps, for this reason that power to sell the immovable property was not given exclusively either to the Corporation or to the Standing Committee or to the Commissioner. Furthermore, Section 200 does not contemplate a joint decision to sell the immovable property being taken by the Corporation and the Standing Committee. The Commissioner, in regard to the sale of immovable property, cannot be by-passed. Immovable property can be sold only by the Commissioner either with the consent of the Standing Committee or, under Section 200(c), with the consent of the Corporation. (32) It may also be noted that under Section 200 of the Act the authority, who is empowered to sell immovable property is the Commissioner after having obtained sanction of the Standing Committee or the Corporation. No representation for the sale of the property had, any time been made by the Commissioner to any of the petitioners. In other words the alleged representation for sale of the immovable property to the petitioner was not made by the proper authority, namely, the Commissioner. The Principles of promissory estoppel can, therefore, not apply in the instant case for this reason as well.”

Therefore, such Class III and IV employees allotted and in possession of the

municipal flats in Azadpur and Dhaka cannot be extended any benefit in view of the private resolution of the Standing Committee bearing No. 872 dated 02/02/2012 & Resolution No. 55 dated 16/08/2012 aforesaid judicial pronouncements and also in view of the fact that at present there is a waiting list of around 1500 employees seeking allotment of flats under the general pool accommodation, thereby, having shortage of the flats . As such, these retired officials are not entitled for the benefit as per the Low Income Group Housing scheme as no such scheme was ever envisaged by the MCD in respect of the colonies. The Corporation Resolution No. 1310 dated 25-03-1955,

937 dated 09/02/1979, are not applicable and the retired employees are bent upon to project their claim for tenant or for ownership right of the Municipal premises by misinterpreting the orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. In case, if the proposal is entertained, the same will re-open the settled issues and will further un-settle the administrative issues which may cause serious repercussion and administrative problems.

In view of the above, the proposal for grant of tenancy or ownership rights in the

said MCD colonies can not be considered and hence, the proposal may be rejected. The matter may be placed before Standing Committee for consideration of the

above report in response to its Resolution No. 872 dated 01.02.2012 & Resolution No. 55 dated 16/08/2012 and settle it accordingly.

Addl. Commissioner(Estt.) North DMC

For Commissioner

PART ‘C’

Item No. 2 :— Incorporation of Plot No. 19-B, Block-UA in the layout plan of Northern City Extn.,Scheme No. 1, Kamla Nagar, Jawahar Nagar.

Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/CTP/NDMC/204/C&C dated 1-10-2012.

1. Proposal :

The case of Plot No. 19-B, Block-UA, Jawahar Nagar has been submitted by Sh. VijayChand Jain for rectification in the approved layout plan of Northern City Extn. Scheme No. 1, KamlaNagar, Jawahar Nagar.

2. Area and Loacation :

The area of the plot is 183.33 sq. yards and the plot is bounded as per sale deed as under :—

North — Plot No.19-C, 20A.

South — Plot No.19-A owned by vendor.

East — MaIka Ganj Road.

West — Common Gali 15' wide.

3. Land Use :

The landuse of the plot in question is Residential as per the approved layout plan of NorthernCity Extn., Scheme No. 1, Kamla Nagar, Jawahar Nagar. However, as per the layout plan, the site underreference is sub-divided and on the layout plan only a single plot UA-19 is shown.

4. Background :

Earlier the Building Plan of the plot under reference i.e. 19-B, Jawahar Nagar was approvedby the erstwhile Delhi Municipal Committee in the year 1938 and 1944. Again in the year 2010, theapplicant Shri Vijay Chand Jain applied to the Building Deptt./HQ for sanction of building plan. TheBuilding Deptt./HQ rejected the application for sanction of building plan since in the approved layout planof Northern City Extn. Scheme No. 1, the site under reference is shown as single plot i.e. UA-19. Thesub-division of plot is not permissible as per MPD-2021. The Building Deptt./HQ rejected the applicationof building plan and communicated the same to the applicant on 22-12-10.

The applicant approached the ATM-MCD (Appeal No. 47/AT/MCD/2011) and the Hon’bleATM-MCD vide orders dated 13-2-12 passed an order, the relevant portion of which is reproduced asunder :—

“Accordingly, the present appeal is allowed. Impugned order of rejection ofsanctioned plan bearing No. 482/BHQ/2010/368/VI dated 22-12-2010 is set aside andquashed. MCD is directed to release the sanctioned plan of the property of theappellant bearing No. 19-B, Block No. UA, Jawahar Nagar, Delhi subject to fulfillmentof other requirements as per Building Bye-Laws within 15 days by treating it as aseparate independent plot”.

[ 2 (N) ]

As per the orders of the Hon’ble ATM-MCD the case was placed in the BPC by the BuildingDeptt./HQ and vide Item No. 18 dated 14-3-2012, it was decided to sanction the building plan subject torectification in the layout plan and accordingly the applicant shall apply to Town Planning Deptt. forrectification of the layout plan and the Town Planning Deptt. shall thereafter process the case as per thelaw and guidelines. It was also decided that an appeal be filed against the orders of AT-MCD.

5. Ownership :

The Building Department/HQ has sought the opinion of DLO (Engg.) on building file which isreproduced as under :—

“With regard to above I have gone through the photocopies of documents as placed in thefile. Froth the registered Sale Deed dated 17-2-1937 revealed that samshul Ulma SyedAhmed, Imam Shahi Masjid Delhi etc. sold the various lands including the land in questioni.e. Plot No. 19-B, Block-UA (183.33 Sq. yds) Jawahar Nagar, Subzi Mandi, Delhi to SethBeni Pershad Son of Seth Behari Lal and Lal Pratap Singh Son of Sh. Raghbir Singh inequal share. Lala Partap Singh given GPA dated 4-4-1938 in respect of said property toLala Nand Kishore Son of Lala Sukh Chand. They further sold it to Smt. Mehtab Devidaughter of Sheikh Dhonkal Chand vide registered Sale Deed dated 27-10-1938 and shefurther gifted it to Sh. Phool Chand Jain Son of Sh. Milap Chand Jain and Smt. ChameliDevi wife of Late Sh. Phool Chand Jain vide regd. Gift Deed dated 14-7-1956. Sh. PhoolChand Jain died intestate on 2-2-1997 and his Wife Smt. Chameli Devi Jain also diedintestate on dated 24-8-1980 leaving behind following legal heirs :—

1. Sh. Vijay Chand Jain—Son

2. Sh. Lakshmi Chand Jain—Son

3. Smt. Deep Mala Jain—Daughter

4. Smt. Gun Mala Navlakha—Daughter

The above Lrs No. 2 to 4 relinquished their respective shares in the said property in favour ofabove LRs no. vide regd. Relinquishment deed dated 29-7-1997. Now Sh. Vijay Chand Jain (applicant)has applied for sanction of plan in respect of said property in question.

“Keeping in view of the above, ownership of the applicant can be taken in order subject tofurnishing an Indemnity bond and Undertaking on an affidavit by the applicants that he isonly legal owner of the said plot in question and there is no other legal heirs”.

6. Site Report/ROW :

The A.E. (B) HQ has verified the site in question on the part layout plan. The existing widthof abutting roads i.e A-93’0" and B-15’0". As per the layout plan the width of road A is not mentioned. Asper the Zonal Development Plan (Zone C) of MPD-2021,the width is shown as 24 mt. The width of roadB is shown as 15' in the layout plan.

7. Observations :

(i) As per Clause 4.4.3(iv) of MPD-2021, the following is stated :—

“Sub-division of plots is not permitted. However, if there are more than one buildings inone residential plot, the sum of the built up area and ground coverage of all such buildings,shall not exceed the built up area and ground coverage permissible in that plot”.

(ii) The erstwhile Municipal Committee had earlier sanctioned the Building Plan of this plot inthe year 1938 and 1944. As per the comments of DLO (Engg.), the site under referencei.e. 19-B measuring 183.33 sq. yds has been existing since the year 1938.

[ 3 (N) ]

8. LOSC consideration :

The case was considered in LOSC on 3-8-12 and following decision was taken :—

The case was again discussed in view of the orders of the Hon’ble ATMCD dated 4-7-12.It was informed by the representatives of the Law Deptt. that an appeal has been filedand the previous advocate has been replaced with a new one. It was also informed that ifMCD does not release the building plan before 31-7-2012, it may become contempt of theHon’ble Court’s order dated 4-7-2012.

It was also observed that building plan sanction has already been accorded for the propertyunder reference on two occasions i.e. 1938 and 1944 i.e. before formation of the Corporation, thus,dividing the overall plot into three parts as the instant case is the middle part. This infers that theSub-division of the plot under reference was recognized by the Municipal Committee while grantingaforesaid sanctions. It was also observed that since the building plan of adjacent Plot No. 19-C -20A hasalready been sanctioned vide File No. 166/B/75 dated 26-12-1975 and completion certificate issued videFile No. 4CC/CL/78-79 dated 5-4-1978 and also sanction was granted for addition/alteration vide File No.1459/B/CLZ/88 dated 2-12-1988 by the Zonal Building Department. Although while referring to theLayout Plan available in the record of T.P. Department, this sub-division is not being reflected, yet thisSub-division being an existence prior to the formation of Corporation, the same needs to be acknowledgedin the Layout Plan.

It was also pointed out by the representatives of the Building Deptt. (HQ) that building planhas already been sanctioned by B.P.C on 16-3-2012. The decision of the BPC is reproduced as below :—

(a) The building plans of the Plot No. 19-B, UA, Jawahar Nagar is sanctioned, subject toother compliance as per BBLs, 1983 and compliances/corrections as per file. However,the building plan shall be released only after rectification in the layout plan.

(b) The applicant shall apply to Town Planning Deptt. for rectification in the layout plan andT.P. Deptt. shall thereafter process the case as per Law and guidelines on the subject.

(c) Appeal be filed against the orders of ATMCD bringing the above facts in the notice ofHon’ble Court.

The applicant has since made an application in the Town Planning Deptt. for incorporation ofsub-division of plot which is under process.

In view of order of Hon’ble ATMCD dated 4-7-2012 to avoid contempt proceedings andkeeping in view the fact that plans for the plot under reference were sanctioned by the authority earlier in1938 an in 1944, it has been decided that the aforesaid sub-division of the plot in question be taken in orderand hence the building plan so sanctioned by the BPC on 16-3-2012 in respect of Plot No. 19-B, JawaharNagar be released and the proposal of incorporation of the sub-division be placed before the StandingCommittee for its approval”.

9. Recommendations :

In view of above and as required u/s 313 of DMC Act (amended-to-date) Plot No. 19-BJawahar Nagar, New Delhi is placed before Standing Committee for incorporation in the Layout Plan ofNorthern City Extn. Scheme No. 1, Kamla Nagar Jawahar Nagar.


Minutes of the meeting of the Standing Committee (North Delhi) held on

Wednesday, the 7th November, 2012 at 2.15 P.M. at Satya Narayan Bansal Sabhagaar,

2nd Floor, A-Wing, Dr. S.P. Mukherjee Civic Centre, New Delhi.

PRESENT

1. Shri Yogender Chandolia Chairman 2. Shri Vijay Prakash Pandey Dy. Chairman 3. Shri Khurram Iqbal

4. Shri Mukesh Goyal

5. Ms. Neelam Dhiman

6. Shri Prithvi Singh Rathore

7. Shri Ram Kishan Singhal

8. Ms. Renu Gupta

Shri P.K.Gupta, Commissioner and Shri Jagdeep Chiller, Municipal Secretary.

lHkk ds vkjEHk esas usrk foi{k Jh eqds’k xks;y us vkt dh cSBd ds fy, MsUxw vkSj eysfj;k fo”k; ij muds vYidkfyd iz’u dks u fy, tkus ij jks”k izdV djrs gq, dgk fd D;k dkj.k gS tks muds vYidkfyd iz’u dk mRrj vf/kdkfj;ksa }kjk le; ij miyC/k ugha djk;k tk ldk gS A mUgksaus vkxs dgk fd ,dhd`r fuxe ds le; mRrj igys Hkh miyC/k djk;s tkrs Fks] ysfdu fuxe foHkktu ds i'pkr~ dk;Z tcfd igys dh vis{kkd`r de gks x;k gS rks fQj le; ij mRRkj miyC/k D;ksa ugha djok;s tk jgs gSa A

bl ij v/;{k us dgk fd Hkys gh vYidkfyd iz’u dk mRrj le; ij miyC/k ugha djk;k tk ldk gS ysfdu vf/kdkjhx.k ;FkklEHko muds iz’uksa dk mRrj miyC/k djok;sxsa A mUgksaus Jh xks;y ls Msaxw ,oa eysfj;k ls lEcfU/kr vius vYidkfyd iz’u ij ppkZ vkjEHk djus dk vuqjks/k fd;k A

Msaxw ,oa eysfj;k ls lEcfU/kr vYidkfyd iz’u Jh eqds’k xks;y us Msaxw ,oa eysfj;k ls lEcfU/kr vius vYidkfyd iz’u ij ppkZ vkjEHk djrs gq, dgk fd vkt fnYyh esa eysfj;k vkSj Msaxw dh tks fLFkfr gS og fdlh ls fNih ugha gS A vf/kdkfj;ksa }kjk tks vkadM+s fn;s tk jgs gSa og lHkh ds le{k gSa vkSj lUrks”ktud ugha gSaA vf/kdkfj;ksa }kjk Msaxw vkSj eysfj;k ls ihfM+r ejhtksa dh la[;k ek= 1200 crkbZ x;h gS tcfd okLrfod la[;k bl la[;k ls dgha vf/kd gSA ;g la[;k 20 gtkj ds djhc gks ldrh gS A dksbZ Hkh okMZ ,slk ugha gS tgka 5&7 yksxksa dh

&2& e`R;q Msaxw ,oa eysfj;k ls uk gqbZ gks A mUgksaus tkuuk pkgk fd muds {ks= ds /khjiqj xkao esa MsUxw ds dkj.k ,d e`R;q gqbZ gS D;k bl e`R;q dks fuxe fjdkMZ esa lfEefyr fd;k x;k gS A mUgksaus vkjksi yxk;k fd vkadM+ksa dks Nqik;k tk jgk gS rFkk e`R;q ds okLrfod ekeyksa rFkk jksfx;ksa dh la[;k dks de djdss n’kkZ;k tk jgk gS A vLirkyksa esa Msaxw ls ihfM+r yksxksa dks [kkyh fcLrj miyC/k ugha gks jgs gSa A lSdM+ksa dh la[;k esa yksxksa dh MsUxw ls e`R;q gks pqdh gS exj fuxe fjdkMZ esa ek= 3 yksxksa dh e`R;q fn[kkbZ xbZ gS A

Msaxw vkSj eysfj;k dh jksdFkke esa fuxe dh vleFkZrk ds ckjs esa cksyrs gq, mUgksaus

dgk fd bldk dkj.k i;kZIr la[;k esa Mh-ch-lh- deZpkfj;ksa ,oa LVkQ dk uk gksuk rFkk eysfj;k fujh{kdksa ds inksa dk fjDr gksuk gS A lekpkj i=ksa esa ePNj dh ,d ubZ iztkfr dh mRifRr ds lekpkj dk ftdz djrs gq, mUgksaus dgk fd ;fn foHkkx }kjk le; ij ePNjekj nokbZ dk fNM+dko fd;k x;k gksrk rks bl u;s ePNj dh mRifRr lEHko ugha Fkh A fnYyh dh turk dks ;fn le; ij nokbZ ,oa bykt miyC/k ugha djk;k tk ldrk gS rks fuxe ds fy, ;g ,d ‘keZukd fLFkfr gS vkSj bls xEHkhjrk ls fy;k tkuk pkfg, A mUgksaus fuxe ds ikl miyC/k lalk/kuksa ij iz’ufpUg yxkrs gq, dgk fd ;fn fuxe ds ikl i;kZIr ek=k esa lalk/ku miyC/k gS rks fgUnqjko tSls vLirky esa ,d cSM ij rhu&rhu ejht ugha feyus pkfg, A ek= fgUnqjko vLirky dh ckr dh tk, rks ogka ls gtkjksa yksx Msaxw dk bykt djok pqds gksaxs exj iwjh fnYyh esa MsUxw ds dqy 1200 ekeys crk;s tk jgs gSa ftuesa ls 400 ekeys mRrjh fnYyh uxj fuxe ds gSaA mUgksaus iqu% bl ekeys dks xEHkhjrk ls fy, tkus dk vkxzg fd;k A

Jh i`Foh flag jkBkSj us ihjkx<+h xkao ds fo|ky; ds ckjs esa dgk fd ;gka iqjkus

fo|ky; Hkou dks rksM+ fn;k x;k gS rFkk u;s fo|ky; Hkou dk fuekZ.k dk;Z vHkh rd vkjEHk ugha fd;k x;k gS A Nk= ckgj cSBdj [kqys esa i<+ jgs gSa A ;gka iksVkZ&dsfcu rd dh O;oLFkk ugha dh x;h gS A fo|ky; ds fiazfliy }kjk ePNjksa ds dkj.k cPpksa ds chekj gksus dh f’kdk;rsa dh tk jgh gS A chekjh ds Hk; ls vfHkHkkodksa us vius cPpksa dks fo|ky; Hkstuk cUn dj fn;k gS A mUgksaus ljLorh fogkj esa iM+s 6 iksVkZ dsfcu dks ihjkx<+h fo|ky; esa LFkkukUrfjr djus dk vkxzg fd;k A

v/;{k ds vkns’k ij lEcfU/kr vf/kdkjh us crk;k fd ;g fo|ky; igys if’peh {ks= esa Fkk rFkk fuxe foHkktu ds i'pkr jksfg.kh {ks= esa vk;k gS A bldk ,LVhesV cuk fy;k x;k gS rFkk ‘kh?kz gh VS.Mj djokdj bldk fuekZ.k dk;Z vkjEHk dj fn;k tk,xk A

izeq[k vfHk;Urk us iksVkZ dsfcu LFkkukUrfjr djokus ds dk;Z dks ,d lIrkg esa djokus dk vk’oklu fn;k A

&3& lqJh js.kq xqIrk us viuk er O;Dr djrs gq, dgk fd fuxe MsUxw ,oa eysfj;k dh jksdFkke esa l{ke gS vkSj HkyhHkakfr jksdFkke dj jgk gSA ysfdu dbZ ckj tks lM+dsa ih-MCY;w-Mh ds ikl gSa ogka lhoj cUn gks tkrs gSa ftlls ogka ePNj iuirs gS vkSj chekjh QSyrh gSA mUgksaus lq>ko fn;k fd ih-MCY;w-Mh dh lM+dksa ij bl vk’k; ds cksMZ yxok;s tkus pkfg, ftlls irk pys fd ;g lM+d m-fn-u-fu- dh ugha gS A Jh fot; izdk’k ik.Ms; us ppkZ esa Hkkx ysrs gq, dgk fd ftl izdkj Msaxw ds ejhtksa dh la[;k esa o`f) gks jgh gS og fpUrk dk fo”k; gS A Msaxw ds ,sls cgqr ls ekeys gS tks fjiksVZ ugha fd;s tk jgs gSa A ysfdu tks ekeys fjiksVZ fd;s tk jgs gSa mudh la[;k esa Hkh fnu&izfrfnu yxkrkj o`f) gks jgh gS A e`R;q ds ekeyksa esa Hkh o`f) gks jgh gS tks fd fuf’pr gh ,d fpUrk dk fo”k; gS A mUgksaus bl fo”k; ij tkudkjh pkgh fd fuxe esa ,sls fdrus vf/kdkjh ik;s x;s gS ftUgksaus vius drZO; fuoZgu esa ykijokgh cjrh gS vkSj foHkkx us muds fo:) dkjZokbZ dh gS A blds vfrfjDr tks ekeys fjiksVZ ugha gks jgs gSa mudks usV esa ykus ds fy, foHkkx }kjk D;k iz;kl fd;s tk jgs gSa rFkk foHkkx }kjk ,sls dkSu ls dne mBk;s tk jgs gSa ftlls Msaxw ij iw.kZ :Ik ls fu;U=.k ik;k tk lds A v/;{k ds vkns’k ij fuxe LokLF; vf/kdkjh us lfefr dks crk;k fd fjiksVZ ds vuqlkj Msaxw ds dqy 1238 ekeys fjiksVZ gq, gS ftuesa ls 416] 468] 309] 28] 6 ,oa 9 ekeys dze’k% mRrjh]nf{k.kh]iwohZ fnYyh uxj fuxe] ubZ fnYyh uxj ikfydk] fnYyh Nkouh] ,oa jsyos ds gSa A mRrjh fnYyh uxj fuxe ds 6 tksuksa esa Msaxw ds ekeyksa dh tkudkjh nsrs gq, mUgksaus crk;k fd ;gka flfoy ykbZUl {ks= esa 70 ] jksfg.kh esa 131] flVh esa 24] igkM+xat esa 19 ] djksyckx esa 98 rFkk ujsyk esa 74 ekeys ntZ gq, gSa A mUgksaus vfrfjDr tkudkjh nsrs gq, crk;k fd bl jksx ds nks cSDVj gSa ,d vcZu oSDVj ,fMt ,ftIVkby rFkk nwljk :jy oSDVj ,fMt ,Ycks fiDVl A vHkh rd ,fMt ,ftIVkby gh feyrk Fkk ysfdu tSls&tSls xzkeh.k {ks= esa xfrfof/k;ka c<+ jgh gS ,fMt ,Ycks fiDVl Hkh c<+ jgk gS vkSj Msaxw rFkk fpduxqfu;ka dks c<+kok ns jgk gS A Msaxw dh jksdFkke ds ckjs esa mBk;s x;s dneksa dh tkudkjh nsrs gq, mUgksaus crk;k fd 1439 Mh-ch-lh- deZpkfj;ksa dks j[kk x;k gS rFkk lHkh Mh-ch-lh- deZpkjh dk;Z ij vk x;s gSa A lSUVªy lfoZySUl gkLihVy ds eSfMdy lqifjuVsUMsUV ds lkFk ehfVax dh xbZ gS A lekpkj i=ksa] cSuj] gksfMZXal] equknh vkfn ds ek/;e ls turk dks tkx:d fd;k x;k gS A v/;kidksa dks Vªsfuax nsdj muds ek/;e ls Nk=ksa dks tkudkjh nh xbZ gS A VsesQkl xszU;qYl miyC/k djok;s x;s gSa A QkWfxax djokbZ tkrh gS rFkk ePNj czhfMax dh pSfdax dh tkrh gS A cMs+ ukyksa esa ikoj Lizs e’khu ls ykokZlkbM dk Lizs fd;k tkrk gS A tgka ykokZlkbM dk iz;ksx ugha fd;k tk ldrk ogka ykokZ Hk{kh eNfy;ksa dks NksM+k tkrk gS A

&4& foHkkx us LVkQ dh lHkh NqfV~V;ka jn~n dj nh gSa A Msaxw ds ejhtksa ds fy, fgUnqjko vLirky ,oa dLrwjck vLirky esa IysVySV~l dh O;oLFkk gSs A bu nksuksa vLirkyksa esa fo’ks”k Qhoj Dyhfud pyk;s tk jgs gSa A fgUnqjko vLirky esa Msaxw ds xEHkhj jksfx;ksa ds fy, 70 cSM dk fo’ks”k okMZ cuk;k x;k gS rFkk dLrwjck vLirky esa fo’ks”k 12 cSM dk izcU/k fd;k x;k gS A lHkh vLirkyksa esa t:jr vuqlkj cSM c<+kus ,oa deZpkfj;ksa dh NqfV~V;ka jn~n djus ds funsZ’k ns fn;s x;s gSa A mUgksaus crk;k fd 1]28]00000 ?kjksa dk foftV fd;k x;k gS A tgka ePNj ik;k x;k mu ?kjksa dh l[a;k 21]793 gS A tkjh fd;s x;s uksfVl dh la[;k 23459 A ftu ?kjksa esa Lizs fd;k x;k mudh l[a;k 3]95771 gS A blds vfrfjDr mUgksaus crk;k fd vHkh Hkh cgqr ls ?kjksa esa ePNj dh czhfMax fey jgh gS A Msyh fjiksVZ ds vuqlkj 188 ?kj vHkh Hkh ikWftfVo fey jgs gSa rFkk ,d fnu esa 11895 ?kjksa esa QkWfxax djokbZ tk jgh gS A

Jh eqds’k xks;y }kjk ;g tkudkjh ekaxus ij fd ,e-vkbZ-] ,-,e-vkbZ rFkk ,-,e-

vks- ds fdrus in fjDr gSa]fdrus in Lohd`r gSa] vfrfjDr vk;qDr¼laLFkk-½ us tkudkjh nh fd bl le; 869 eysfj;k csynkj] 1439 Mh-ch-lh-] 246 ,-,e-vkbZ rFkk 10 ,e-vkbZ- dk;Zjr gSa A blds vfrfjDr vk;qDr ,d dks&vkfMZusfVax ehfVax ys jgs gSaA bathfu;lZ csynkjksa dh enn ls Lo;a Vadh vkfn dks pSd dj jgs gSa A fo|ky;ksa dks funsZ’k ns fn;s x;s gS fd izR;sd cPpk vius fuokl ds nksuksa rjQ ds 10&10 edkuksa dks pSd djsxk rFkk ikuh Hkjus ,oa xUnxh dh fjiksVZ djsxk A

Jh eqds’k xks;y us bl ckr ij vlarks”k izdV fd;k fd vfrfjDr vk;qDr ¼laLFkk-½,oa fuxe LokLF; vf/kdkjh nksuksa ds ikl iwjs vkadM+s miyC/k ugha gS A mUgksaus vius ikl miYkC/k tkudkjh ds vuqlkj crk;k fd 362 in lgk;d eysfj;k fujh{kd ds gS ftuesa ls 73 in vkt Hkh fjDr iM+s gq, gSa A 99 in eysfj;k fujh{kd ds gS ftuesa ls 41 in fjDr gS rFkk 11 in lhfu;j eysfj;k fujh{kd ds gS ftuesa ls 4 in fjDr gSa A tc foHkkx ds ikl i;kZIr la[;k esa eysfj;k fujh{kd gh miyC/k ugha gS rks LVkQ ,oa vU; pSfdax fdl izdkj lEHko gS A mUgksaus fjDr inksa dks vHkh rd ugha Hkjus dk dkj.k tkuuk pkgk A

Jh fot; izdk’k ik.Ms; us dgk fd jksfg.kh tksu esa 34 okMZ gS rFkk bu esa izpkj ds fy, ,d vkWVks gS A ;fn ;g ,d fnu esa ,d okMZ dks doj djrk gS rks fLFkfr dks HkyhHkkafr le>k tk ldrk gS A izR;sd okMZ esa nks NksVh vkSj nks cM+h QkWfxax e’khus crk;h xbZ gSa A buesa 2 NksVh e’khusa ,d fnu esa ek= 200&250 ?kjksa dks doj dj ikrh gSa A tc i;kZIr ek=k esa Q.M rFkk i;kZIr la[;k esa Mh-ch-lh-deZpkjh miyC/k gS rks e’khuksa dh la[;k esa c<+ksrjh D;ksa ugha dh tk jgh A fuxe LokLF; vf/kdkjh us mRrjh fnYyh uxj fuxe esa Msaxw ejhtksa dh la[;k 416 crk;h gS ftuesa ls flfoy ykbZUl {ks=

&5& esa ejhtksa dh la[;k 70 gSA ysfdu fLFkfr ,slh ugha gS tSlh crkbZ tk jgh gS A LVkQ dks ikWftfVo dsl fjiksVZ u djus ds funsZ’k fn;s x;s gS rFkk vf/kd dsl fjiksVZ djus okys LVkQ ds fo:) dkjZokbZ dh tkrh gS A fnYyh dh turk ds fgr esa foHkkx dks ejhtksa dh okLrfod la[;k dks Lohdkj djuk pkfg, vkSj bldh jksdFkke djuh pkfg, A Jh ik.Ms; us bl tkudkjh dh iqu% ekax dh fd fdruh NksVh vkSj cM+h QkWfxax e’khusa gSA fdrus vf/kdkfj;ksa ;k Mh-ch-lh- deZpkfj;ksa ij dkjZokbZ dh xbZ rFkk tks ekeys fjiksVZ ugha gks ikrs oks fjiksVZ gksa bl ckjs esa foHkkx }kjk D;k dkjZokbZ dh tk jgh gS A

bl ij vfrfjDr vk;qDr us tkudkjh nh fd foHkkx ds ikl 976 fiVBw iEi] 456 x.ks’k iEi] 319 NksVh QkWfxax e’khusa rFkk 12 cM+h e’khusa gSaA blds vfrfjDr 52 eysfj;k Dyhfud py jgs gSa A LVkQ ij dh xbZ dkjZokbZ ds ckjs esa mUgksaus crk;k fd 5 Mh-ch-lh- deZpkfj;ksa dh lsokvksa dks lekIr fd;k x;k gS A

Jh jkefd’ku fla?ky us Mh-ch-lh- deZpkfj;ksa dh lsok lekIr fd;s tkus ij vius fopkj O;Dr djrs gq, dgk fd fupys Lrj ds vf/kdkfj;ksa ij rks dkjZokbZ dh tkrh gS exj mPpkf/kdkfj;ksa ds fo:) dkjZokbZ D;ksa ugha dh tkrh tcfd mudh vf/kd ftEesnkjh curh gS A fjfDr;ka Hkjus ds fo”k; esa mUgksaus dgk fd ;s fjfDr;ka vc Hkjh xbZ gSa tcfd Msaxw lekfIr dh vksj gS A ;s fjfDr;ka 4&6 eghus igys Hkjh tkuh pkfg, Fkh A mUgksaus bl ekeys esa ftEesnkjh r; djus dk vkxzg fd;k A

lqJh uhye /kheku us Msaxw ds fo”k; esa cksyrs gq, dgk fd muds {ks= ds eysfj;k bUliSDVj us tkudkjh nh gS fd muds ikl 5 eysfj;k csynkj gSa ftuesaa ls ,d LoLFk gS ‘ks”k fofHkUu chekfj;ksa ls xzLr gSa A QkWfxax e’khu vf/kdka’k le; [kjkc jgrh gSa A ;fn {ks= esa fdlh O;fDr dks Msaxw gksrk gS rks ges vijk/k cks/k gksrk fd ;g gekjh otg ls gqvk gS A

fuxe LokLF; vf/kdkjh }kjk ;g crkus ij fd izpkj&izlkj ds fy, izR;sd tksu esa ,d vkWVks dh O;oLFkk gS] Jh fot; izdk’k ik.Ms; us iz’ufpg~u yxk;k fd ;g fdl izdkj dh forj.k fof/k gS fd ;fn ,d tksu esa 34 okMZ gSa rks Hkh ,d xkM+h vkSj ;fn ,d tksu esa 8 okMZ gSa rks Hkh ,d xkM+h dh O;oLFkk gS A

v/;{k us Msaxw fo”k; ij ppkZ dk lekiu djrs gq, dgk fd i{k gks ;k foi{k dksbZ Hkh LokLF; foHkkx dh dk;Z&iz.kkyh ls lUrq”V ugha gS A lekpkj i=ksa }kjk Hkh turk esa dkQh Hk; O;kIr gS A Mh-ch-lh-deZpkfj;ksa dks ;fn igys yxk;k gksrk rks bldk ykHk igqaprk A Mh-,l-,l-ch- }kjk tks fjfDr;ka Hkjh tkuh Fkh oks Hkjh ugha tk jgha gSa A gkykafd Msaxw dh jksdFkke dh ftEesnkjh fuxe dh gS exj fnYyh dh tula[;k ds eqdkcys deZpkfj;ksa dh la[;k dks ns[krs gq, Msaxw ij iwjh rjg ls fu;U=.k ikuk lEHko ugha gS A Msaxw ds izfr tkx:drk iSnk djus ds fy, izfr tksu ,d xkM+h vi;kZIr gS A

&6& Msaxw dh jksdFkke ds fy, le; ij ,d ;kstuk cuuh pkfg, A tks deZpkjh dk;Z djus esa vleFkZ gSa mudks LoSfPNd lsokfuo`fRr nsuh pkfg, A mUgksaus lHkh fjfDr;ksa dks Hkjus rFkk izR;sd okMZ esa ,e-vkbZ- yxkus dk vkns’k fn;k A lkFk gh mUgksaus lfefr dh vkxkeh cSBd esa bl fo”k; ij foLr`r ppkZ djkus rFkk vf/kdkfj;ksa dks iwjh rS;kjh ds lkFk vkus dk vkns’k Hkh fn;k A rnksijkUr Jh eqds’k xks;y us deZpkfj;ksa ds vHkko ds ckjs esa dgk fd o”kZ 2002 ds ckn prqFkZ Js.kh deZpkfj;ksa dh HkrhZ ugha dh xbZ gS A deZpkjh yxkrkj lsokfuo`Rr gksrs tk jgs gS ftlls deZpkfj;ksa dk vHkko gS A {ks= ds vuqikr esa deZpkfj;ksa dh la[;k cgqr de gS ftlls {ks= esa fodkl dk;Z ugha gks ik jgs gSA v/;{k us vkxkeh cSBd esa okMZ vuqlkj ekfy;ksa ,oa pkS/kfj;ksa rFkk fefL=;ksa ,oa csynkjksa dh lwph izLrqr djus dk vkns’k fn;k A

Jh i`Foh flag jkBkSj us bZ-lh-,l- }kjk cSadksa ds ek/;e ls iSa’ku nsus dk ekeyk mBkrs gq, dgk fd bZ-lh-,l- ds vkns’k gksus ds rqjUr ckn ls tksuksa esa pSd ls iSa’ku dk Hkqxrku jksd fn;k x;k gS A mUgksaus orZeku iSa’ku dk Hkqxrku iwoZ dh Hkkafr djus rFkk vizSy ekg ls bZ-lh-,l- }kjk iSa’ku nsus dk vkxzg fd;k A

eq- ys-,oa fo-l- us lfefr dks tkudkjh nh fd fnYyh ljdkj ls dBksj vkns’k vk;s gSa fd iSa’ku dk Hkqxrku bZ-lh-,l- }kjk gh gksxk vkSj dksbZ pSd ugha fn;s tk,axs A ysfdu tks ekeys izfdz;k/khu gS mudks ugha jksdk tk, bl vk’k; ds funsZ’k tksuksa dks ns fn;s tk,axsa A mUgksaus blds fy, 30 uoEcj dh rkjh[k dks dV vkWQ MsV j[kus dk lq>ko fn;k A

v/;{k us dgk fd fuxe ;fn iSa’ku/kkfj;ksa ds [kkrs esa ;Fkkle; iSa’ku Mkyus esa l{ke gS rHkh bZ-lh-,l- iz.kkyh dks viukuk mfpr gksxk vU;Fkk leL;k,a mRiUu gksaxh A

Jh fot; izdk’k ik.Ms; us dgk fd bZ-lh-,l- ds ek/;e ls Hkqxrku ds vkns’k djds fnYyh ljdkj fuxe ds dk;Z esa vukf/kdkj ps”Vk dj jgh gS A bZ-lh-,l- ds ek/;e ls Hkqxrku dh dfe;ksa dh vksj /;ku vkd`”V djrs gq, mUgksaus dgk fd blls ;g irk yxuk eqf’dy gS fd O;fDr dh eR;q gks xbZ gS ;k mlus okMZ cny fy;k gS tcfd pSd ds ek/;e ls Hkqxrku ij ;g irk yx tkrk gS A

bl ij eq- ys- ,oa fo-l- us dgk fd bZ-lh-,l- }kjk Hkqxrku djuk fotySal deh’ku ,oa Hkkjr ljdkj }kjk ,d vPNk dne ekuk x;k gS A fuxe esa osru rFkk vU; Hkqxrku bZ-lh-,l- ds ek/;e ls fd;s tk jgs vkSj fdlh izdkj dh fnDdr dk lkeuk ugha djuk iM+ jgk gS A iSa’ku/kkjh ds fQftdy oSfjfQds’ku ds ckjs es mUgksaus lq>ko fn;k fd izR;sd frekgh esa iSa’ku/kkjh ds gLrk{kj djokus ds i'pkr mlds [kkrs esa bZ-lh-,l- fd;k tk ldrk gS A lkFk gh mUgksaus dgk fd leLr iSa’ku ,d lkFk nsuk lEHko ugha gS vr% bls pj.kksa esa vkjEHk fd;k tk ldrk gS A

&7& Jh jkefd’ku fla?ky us dgk fd gj ckj ,sls cgqr ls pSd gksrs gSa ftUgsa yksx

ysus ugha vkrs A ,slh fLFkfr esa ;g iSlk fuxe ds ikl jgrk gS exj bZ-lh-,l- djus ls ;g iSlk fuxe ds ikl ugha jgsxk A pSd ij iSa’ku/kkjh dk [kkrk ua0 gksrk gS ftlls iSlk mlh ds [kkrs esa tk;sxk A bZ-lh-,l- ls Hkh iSlk mlh [kkrs esa tk,xk A vr% iSa’ku pSd ds ek/;e ls nh tkuh pkfg, A

Jh fot; izdk’k ik.Ms; us bZ-lh-,l-iz.kkyh dk fojks/k djrs gq, dgk fd blls dkQh iSlk cSadksa ds ikl iM+k jg tk,xk ftls okil ysuk cgqr eqf’dy gksxk A

Jh eqds’k xks;y us Hkh Jh ik.Ms; ls lgefr trkrs gq, bl iz.kkyh dk fojks/k fd;k A

bl iz.kkyh esa deh crkrs gq, Jh i`Foh flag jkBkSj us dgk fd blls nh tkus okyh iSa’ku ds ckjs esa ik”kZnksa dks Bhd&Bhd tkudkjh miyC/k ugha jgsxh A

iSa’ku ds 50 vfrfjDr QkeksZ ds ckjs esa v/;{k }kjk tkudkjh ekaxus ij vfrfjDr vk;qDr ¼vfHk-½ us crk;k fd bl lUnHkZ esa Qkby rS;kj gks xbZ gS A ;fn lEHko gqvk vkxkeh ,d ;k nks fnu esa vU;Fkk vxys lIrkg QkeZ vo’; miyC/k djok fn;s tk,axas A

Jh eqds’k xks;y us lfefr dh fiNyh cSBd esa mBk;s QSDVªh ykbZlSal vkSj VªsM ykbZlSal ds ekeys ds ckjs esa dgk fd fiNyh cSBd esa bl fo”k; ij ppkZ gqbZ Fkh rFkk vk;qDr us vxyh cSBd esa VªsM ikWfylh ykus dk vk’oklu fn;k Fkk A ysfdu yxHkx ,d eghus ds ckn gksus okyh LFkk;h lfefr dh cSBd dh dk;Zlwph esa ;g en lfEefyr ugha gS A

bl ij vfrfjDr vk;qDr ¼vfHk-½ us lfefr dks tkudkjh nh fd ;g VªsM ikWfylh rS;kj gks xbZ gS ysfdu blesa dqN v’kqf);ka Fkh tks Bhd dh tk jgh gSa A mUgksaus bls vkxkeh ,d&nks fnuksa esa izLrqr djus dk vk’oklu fn;k A Jh jkefd’ku fla?ky us QSDVªh ykbZlSal dh orZeku fLFkfr rFkk ijekusaV ykbZlSal ds uohuhdj.k ds ckjs esa tkuuk pkgk A mRrj nsus ds fy, fdlh Hkh vf/kdkjh ds mifLFkr u gksus ij jks”k izdV djrs gq, mUgksaus dgk fd fuxe dh vk; dh rjQ vf/kdkfj;ksa dk /;ku ugha gS A ,d ykbZlSal ls ;fn 10&12 gtkj :0 Hkh izkIr gksa rks djksM+ksa :Ik;s jktLo ds :i esa izkIr gks ldrs gSa A ykbZlSal uohuhdj.k ds ckjs esa lEcfU/kr vf/kdkjh us crk;k fd uSV dh xM+cM+ ds dkj.k 250 QthZ ykbZlSal cu x;s Fks A bl ekeys esaa dqN yksxksa o lEcfU/kr dEiuh ds fo:) ,Q-vkbZ-vkj- ntZ djk nh xbZ gSA bl ij Jh jkefd’ku fla?ky us dgk fd tc QthZ ykbZlSal cus gSa rks dkjZokbZ djrs gq, fdlh Hkh vf/kdkjh dh lsok,a vHkh rd lekIr D;ksa ugha dh xbZ A

&8& Jh fot; izdk’k ik.Ms; us dgk fd O;kikjh oxZ Qhl nsuk pkgrk gS] ykbZlSal fjU;q djokuk pkgrk rks muds ykbZlSal D;ksa ugha cuk;s tk jgs A mUgksaus ekax dh fd tc rd flLVe Bhd u gks fdlh Hkh bUliSDVj dks foftV djus ls jksdk tk, A

v/;{k ds vkns’k ij vfrfjDr vk;qDr ¼vfHk-½ us lfefr dks crk;k fd tc QthZ ykbZlSal dh ckr irk pyh Fkh rks flLVe dks jksd fn;k x;k Fkk ysfdu vc flLVe pkyw gS A tks QthZ ykbZlSal fudys Fks mudks dkj.k crkvks uksfVl tkjh fd;k x;k Fkk A dkQh le; rd flLVe cUn jgus ds dkj.k dkQh vkosnu ,df=r gks x;s Fks blfy, lHkh mik;qDrksa] vf/kdkfj;ksa ,oa bUliSDVjksa dks funsZ’k fn;s x;s Fks fd O;kikjh dk vkosnu fuxe ds ikl yfEcr gS ogka dksbZ bUliSDVj foftV ugha djsxk vkSj rc rd foftV ugha djsxk tc rd fd vkosnu fujLr uk gks A vxj dksbZ bUliSDVj x;k gS rks dkjZokbZ dh tk,xh A

Jh fla?ky us vkosnuksa dh lwph vxyh cSBd esa izLrqr djus dk vkxzg fd;k A Jh i`Foh flag jkBkSj us xzqi gkmflax lkslk;Vh esa fuxe }kjk lsok iznku djus ds

ckjs esa tkuuk pkgk A bl ij eq[; uxj fu;kstd us lfefr dks crk;k fd LFkk;h lfefr }kjk lu~ 1970 es ,d uhfr cukbZ Fkh ftlds vUrxZr fuxe vkj-MCY;w-,- dh izkFkZuk ij dkyksfu;ksa dks Vsdvksoj djrk gS A pwafd xzqi gkmflax ,d ckmafMM Iysl gksrk gS ;g ifCyd Iysl ugha gksrk A blfy, ckgj dh lsok,a fuxe nsrk gS vUnj dh lsok,a fuxe ugha nsrk A

rRi’pkr~ fu/kkZfjr dk;Zlwph ij fuEukuqlkj fopkj fd;k x;k %&

PART-A Item No.46 Audit Comments on the Annual Account pertaining to erstwhile Municipal

Corporation of Delhi for the Year 2002-03. Reso. No. 116 Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that the

proposal of MCA as contained in his letter No. MCA/RS./Annual Accounts-2002-03/Misc-21/1236 dated 3.10.2012 regarding Audit Comments on the Annual Account pertaining to erstwhile Municipal

Corporation of Delhi for the Year 2002-03, observations made by the Municipal Chief Auditor be referred to Commissioner for para-wise comments within three months for placing the same before the Municipal Accounts Committee.

-9- Item No.47 Award of works costing upto Rs. 5.00 lacs under Unit Rate System during

2012-13. Reso. No. 117 Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that the proposal of the Commissioner as contained in his letter No. F.33/Engg./ NDMC/214/C&C dated 9.10.2012, be approved with the modification that

observation of the Finance Department at S.No. 1 will not be applicable. Item No.48 Finalization of Rate Contract and Agency for Diet Articles for all MCD

Hospitals and Dispensaries of all three Mpl. Corporation for the year, 2012-2013 & 2013-2014.

Reso. No. 118 Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that as

proposed by the Commissioner in his letter No. F.33/Health/NDMC/217/ C&C dated 10.10.2012, approval of expenditure sanction for Rs. 4,69,18,956.00 per annum for purchase of diet articles for all the hospitals and dispensaries of all three Municipal Corporations for a period of two years i.e. 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 as detailed in the aforesaid letter, be accorded. Resolved further that as proposed by the Commissioner in his letter No. F.33/Health/NDMC/217/C&C dated 10.10.2012 approval of rate and agency as detailed in the aforesaid letter, be accorded.

Item No.49 Revision of rates of wages of Daily Wagers. Reso. No. 119 Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that proposal

of the Commissioner as contained in his letter No. .33/CLWO/NDMC/247/ C&C dated 22.10.2012, be approved.

Item No.50 Regarding enhancement of remuneration of Kashmiri Migrant Contractual

Teachers. Reso. No. 120 Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that as

recommended by the Education Committee vide its resolution No. 22 dated 16.10.2012, proposal of the Commissioner as contained in his letter No. F.33/Edu./NDMC/206/C&C dated 1.10.2012, be approved .

Item No.51 Appointment and payment of salary to the employees against the post for

which they are working. Reso. No. 121 Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that the resolution moved by Shri Vijay Prakash Pandey and seconded by

Shri Ram kishan Singhal regarding appointment and payment of salary to the employees against the post for which they are working, be approved.

-10-


Item No.52 Implementation of policy of conversion of commercial properties transferred from GOI (L&DO/Dte.of Estates) to Erstwhile MCD.

Consideration postponed.

PART ‘B’ Item No.49 Restoration of cut by pdg. cement concrete in C-96/KBZ [-] by pdg. RMC

from R/R Charges for laying of Natural gas Pipeline under Dig and Deposit Policy in South Patel Nagar and West Patel Nagar by I.G.L. in Ranjit Nagar. Restoration/ Improvement to lanes and by lanes from Cottage No. 1A to 15 A, Cottage No. 24 A to 1, Cottage No. 24 to 37 in West Patel Nagar and its in South Patel Nagar and West Patel Nagar in C-96/ KBZ.

Reso. No. 122 Resolved that the proposal of the Commissioner as contained in

his letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/203/C&C dated 28.9.2012,be approved.

Item No.50 Strengthening of 9m ROW internal lanes of ND-11 to ND-19, ND-31 to

ND-44, ND-61 to ND-69, UU-9 to UU-79-A and Shiv Mandir CD Block to GD-109 and GP-107 to GP-119, GP-14 to GP-88, GP-57 to GP-71, GP-13 to GP-25, NP-1 to NP-61, NP-30 to NP-127 and NP-51 to NP-98 and CP-107 to CP-132, CP-201 to CP-213, CP-183 to CP-197, CP-13 to CP-25, CP-42 to CP-56, CP-74 to CP-88 and QP-63 to QP-136 and SD-1 to SD-154, SD-114 to SD-153, SD-161 to SD-314 with parking, SD-378 to SD-449 with parking and SD-297 to main road Pitampura by providing dense carpeting in ward No 53 in Rohini Zone

Reso. No. 123 Resolved that as recommended by the Wards Committee (Rohini)

vide its resolution N0. 14 dated 21-9-2012 and the proposal of the Commissioner as contained in his letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/146/C&C dated 5.9.2012 regarding approval of rate and agency as detailed in the aforesaid letter, be accorded.

Item No.51 Grant of Earned Leave to Sh. Nand Kishore, IA & AS, Municipal Chief

Auditor. Reso. No. 124 Resolved that as proposed by Municipal Chief Auditor in his

letter No. MCA/Admn./PF/Ch.Ar./1-5/555 dated 3.10.2012, sanction of Earned Leave w.e.f. 25.09.2012 to 01.10.2012 ( suffixing 2nd October, 2012) in favour of Shri Nand Kishore, IA&AS, be accorded.

-11-

Item No. 52 Development works in approved colony.

SH:- (1) Imp. Dev. to lane by pdg. RCC Box Drain from 36 A to 112A (LHS) in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ.

(2) Imp. Dev. to lane by pdg. RCC Box Drain from 36A to 112A (RHS) in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ.


his letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/208/C&C dated 5.10.2012, be pproved. Item No.53 Development works in approved colony.

SH:- (1) Strengthening of road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from 98 E to 120 E in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ. (2) Strengthening of road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from

Banglow Road to Mandelia Chowk in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ.

(3) Strengthening of road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from Satyawati Road to Aggarsen Chowk in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ.

(4) Strengthening of road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from Aggarsen Chowk to Mandelia Chowk in Kamla Nagar in

C-69/CLZ. (5) Strengthening of road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from Mandelia Chowk to Chandrawal Road (Kohlapur Road) in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ.


his letter No. F.33/Engg./ NDMC/209/C&C dated 5.10.2012,be approved. Item No.54 Imp. Dev. of parking in back side of commercial complex by pdg. RMC

from in Wazirpur Industrial Area, Ward C-68, MRZ-II in Ashok Vihar. Reso. No. 127 Resolved that the proposal of the Commissioner as contained in

his letter No. F.33/Engg./ NDMC/210/C&C dated 5.10.2012,be approved. Item No.55 Re-construction of M&CW Centre at ‘D’ Block Sant Ravidass Nagar

(Jahangirpuri) in C-5/CLZ. Reso. No. 128 Resolved that the proposal of the Commissioner as contained in

his letter No. F.33/Engg./ NDMC/215/C&C dated 9.10.2012,be approved.

Item No.56 Improvement of internal lanes by P/L RMC and drainage system in A&B Block, Ashok Vihar, Phase-I in C-68, Rohini Zone.


his letter No. F.33/Engg./ NDMC/216/C&C dated 9.10.2012,be approved.

-12-

Item No.57 Promotion of Senior Auditors in Pay Band 2 : 9300-34800 with Grade Pay

of Rs. 4,200/- to the post of Supervisor (Audit) in PB 2: Rs. 93000-34800 with Grade Pay of Rs.4,800/- on ad hoc basis.

Reso. No. 130 Resolved that as proposed by MCA in his letter No. A/Admn.PCA/

3-33/Vol-I/595 dated 11.10.2012, approval for promotion of Sh./Smt Kiran Pant, Sr. Ar. and Sh./Smt. Pawanjeet Singh, Sr.Ar. to the post of Supervisor (Audit) in Pay Band 2: Rs. 9300-34800 with Grade Pay Rs. 4800/- on adhoc basis for a period of one year or till the posts are filled up on regular basis or till further orders, whichever is earliest as detailed in the aforesaid letter, be accoded.

Item No.58 Construction of 35 Nos. classrooms, 1 store, 1 computer room, 1 office, 1

staff room, 1 science lab. room, toilet block (Eighteen seats) and Raising of Boundary Wall in M.C.Pry. School, Bhalaswa Dairy in CLZ.



Item No.59 Re-construction of Community Hall at D-Block, Sultanpuri W.No. 39 in Rohini Zone.


his letter No. F.33/Engg./NDMC/242/C&C dated 17.10.2012,be approved. Item No. 60 Improvement & Strengthening of 13.5 m & 18 m ROW Road of Sector-

19, Rohini. SH:- Strengthening of Carriageway.



Item No.61 Improvement & Strengthening of 13.5 m & 18 m ROW Road of Sector-15,

Rohini. SH:- Strengthening of Carriageway of 13.5m ROW.


his letter No.F.33/Engg./NDMC/237/C&C dated 16.10.2012,be approved.

-13- Item No.62 Imp./Dev. of drainage system in 7 Block, Ramesh Nagar [7/83-80’ Road]

by pdg. B/W from and RCC in C-98/KBZ in Mansarovar Garden. SH:- (1) Imp./Dev. of drainage system in 7 Block ,Ramesh Nagar

[7/153-7/213] by pdg. B/W from and RCC in C-98/KBZ in Mansarovar Garden.

(2) Imp./Dev. of drainage system in 7 Block Ramesh Nagar [7/99-7/142] by pdg. B/W from and Precast Slab in C-98/KBZ in C-98/KBZ in Mansarovar Garden.


his letter No.F.33/Engg./NDMC/244/C&C dated 17.10.2012,be approved. Item No.63 Construction of footpath and platform in Municipal Park opposite

Veterinary Hospital in Nizampur village in C-30 (Narela Zone) (Dr. Sahib Singh Verma Park)


his letter No.F.33/Engg./NDMC/245/C&C dated 17.10.2012,be approved. Item No.64 Remodelling and covering of drain at Archana Apptt. DDA Mkt. in

Paschim Vihar by pdg. RCC item from Archana Apartment to DDA Market in Paschim Vihar in West Zone.


his letter No.F.33/Engg./NDMC/246/C&C dated 18.10.2012,be approved. Item No.65 Strengthening of road in the jurisdiction of Ward No. C-58/RZ.

SH:- (1) Stg. of road from Balbir Singh Road to Major Ashwani Marg in A-1 Block in C-58/RZ by pdg. Dense Carpeting from Paschim Vihar North.

(2) Stg. of road from JK Apartment to Road No. 30 in A-3 Block Paschim Vihar in C-58/RZ by pdg. Dense Carpeting from in Paschim Vihar North.

(3) Stg. of road from H.No. 274 to Road No. 30 and Triveni Apartment to Rohtak Road in C-4 Block Paschim Vihar in C-58/RZ by pdg. Dense Carpeting from Paschim Vihar North.

(4) Stg. of road from A-1 Lal Market to A-5B SFS Flats and Vishal Bharti School to Rohtak Road (Atama Ram Marg) in

C-58/RZ by pdg. Dense Carpeting from A-1,Paschim Vihar Lal Market to A-5B SFS Flats and Vishal Bharti School to Rohtak Road (Atma Ram Marg or Jain Sthanak Road) in Paschim Vihar North.



-14- Item No.66 Empanelment of advertising agencies for preparation, designing and

release of North Delhi Municipal Corporation advertisements in newspapers, broadcasting through radio channels and telecasting through television channels and other related works.

Reso. No. 139 Resolved that as proposed by the Commissioner in his letter

No. F.33/Dir.(P&I)/NDMC/221/C&C dated 15.10.2012, approval of fresh empanelment of the advertising agencies,terms and conditions as detailed in the aforesaid letter, be accorded.

Item No.67 Construction of pucca school building at M.C.Pry.School C-1, Ashok

Vihar, Phase-I, Rohini Zone. SH:- Development of site by providing storm water drains, water supply distribution line, main gate etc. Reso. No. 140 Resolved that the proposal of the Commissioner as contained in



Item No.68 Report in response to the Standing Committee Resolution No. 872 1.2.2012 Regarding grant of ownership rights to the Class III and IV employees of the MCD residing in the Municipal Colony in Azadpur and Dhaka under LIG Scheme.

Reso. No. 141 Resolved that the case be referred back to the commissioner.

PLACED ON TABLE

Item No.69 Improvement & strengthening of 13-5m & 18m ROW road of Sector-15, Rohini. Sub Head: Construction of drain & Imp. of side berms of 13.5m ROW road. Reso. No. 142 Resolved that the proposal of the Commissioner as contained in


Item No.70 v/;{k] LFkk;h lfefr ds dk;kZy; esa o”kZ 2012&2013 ds fy, fo’ks”k dk;Z vf/kdkjh dh fu;qfDr A

iz-la 143 ladYi fd;k x;k fd Jh fot; izdk’k ik.Ms; }kjk izLrqr rFkk Jh jkefd’ku fla?ky }kjk vuqeksfnr v/;{k] LFkk;h lfefr ds dk;kZy; esa o”kZ 2012&2013 ds fy, fo’ks”k dk;kZf/kdkjh dh fu;qfDr lEcU/kh izLrko dks ikfjr dj vko’;d dk;Zokgh gsrq vk;qDr dks Hkstk tk, %&

&15& pwafd v/;{k] LFkk;h lfefr mRrjh fnYyh uxj fuxe ds dk;kZy;

esaa foRrh;] iz’kklu vkSj uhfrxr ekeyksa esa fu.kZ; ysus ds ekeys vkrs gSa A pwafd turk ds izfrosnu ftuesa fd fodkl dk;Z ls lEcfU/kr

ekax gksrh gS] dk ijh{k.k djus ds ckn lEcfU/kr foHkkxksa dks dk;Zokgh djus ds fy, Hksts tkrs gSa A

vr% v/;{k&LFkk;h lfefr dk;kZy; esa fnYyh uxj fuxe rFkk nwljs ljdkjh foHkkx ds fu;e ,oa dk;Ziz.kkyh ds fo”k; esa vuqHkoh O;fDr dk gksuk tufgr esa gS A blds fy, Jh vejukFk dks fnukad 1-5-2012ls 25000 :i;s izfrekg ds vuqcU/k ds vk/kkj ij fo’ks”k vf/kdkjh ds in ij fu;qDr dj fn;k x;k gS A

vr% LFkk;h lfefr dh ;g lHkk ladYi djrh gS fd v/;{k LFkk;h lfefr ds dk;kZy; esa esa fnukad 1-5-2012 ls 31-3-2013 rd :i;s 25000@& izfrekg dh vuqcU/k jkf’k ij fo’ks”k dk;Z vf/kdkjh dk in l`tu fd;k tk, vkSj bl ij in Jh vejukFk dh fu;qfDr fnukad 1-5-2012 ls dh tk, A

PART ‘C’ Item No.2 Incorporation of Plot No. 19-B, Block-UA in the layout plan of Northern

City Extn., Scheme No. 1, Kamla Nagar, Jawahar Nagar. Consideration postponed. Reso. No. 144 Resolved that the minutes of the Standing Committee be deemed

as confirmed and the Chairman be authorized to sign the minutes later on.

Sd/- Sd/- Municipal Secretary Chairman

Standing Committee (North Delhi)