34
Richard Wang, D.O. Organic Analytical Toxicology Branch Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Use and Misuse of Metal Chelation Therapy ACMT Conference, February 2012 “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory Test Results National Center for Environmental Health Division of Laboratory Sciences

“Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

Richard Wang, D.O. Organic Analytical Toxicology Branch

Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Use and Misuse of Metal Chelation Therapy

ACMT Conference, February 2012

“Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal”

Laboratory Test Results

National Center for Environmental Health Division of Laboratory Sciences

Page 2: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

Environmental Health Laboratory * National Center for Environmental Health

  At the forefront of efforts to assess people’s exposure to environmental chemicals by using advanced laboratory science and innovative techniques.

  Measuring chemicals directly in people’s blood or urine is a process known as BIOMONITORING.

  Biomonitoring measurements --- most health-relevant assessments of exposure; measure the total amount of the chemical that actually gets into people from all environmental sources (e.g., air, soil, water, dust, or food).

*Division of Laboratory Sciences

Page 3: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

Outline

  What are reference values and interval?

  Why are reference values important?

  What type of reference values are available?

  What factors to consider when developing reference values and intervals?

  What factors to consider when interpreting laboratory values?

Page 4: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

What are reference values and interval?

  Reference values and interval are to provide comparison data for the interpretation of a person’s laboratory results.

  Reference values and interval have replaced “normal” values and interval because the latter term is ambiguous.

  Conventional reference values and interval

International Federation of Clinical Chemistry

Page 5: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

Conventional reference values and interval

International Federation of Clinical Chemistry

95% 2.5% 2.5%

Upper reference limit Lower reference limit

Reference interval

Page 6: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

Why are reference values important?

  Reference values can be used in medicine and epidemiology to assist in the diagnosis and prevention of disease.

Page 7: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

What types of reference values are available?

  Population-based reference values   Locally agreed upon clinical action levels   Expert panel determinations   Values based on health outcomes and risks   Multiples of the upper reference limit   Prior values from the same individual

Page 8: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

What factors should be considered when developing reference values?

  Pre-analytical

  Analytical

  Post-analytical

  Biological variation

Page 9: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

National Report on Human

Exposure to Environmental

Chemicals

http://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/

Page 10: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals

Metals •  Antimony, arsenic •  Barium, beryllium •  Cadmium, cesium, cobalt •  Lead •  Mercury, molybdenum •  Platinum •  Thallium, tungsten •  Uranium

Pesticides •  Carbamate insecticides •  Fungicides, herbicides •  Organochlorine pesticides •  Organophosphorus insecticides •  Pyrethroid pesticides

Acrylamide, Cotinine / NNAL, DEET Disinfectant by-products Environmental phenols PCBs/PCDDs/PCDFs/PBDEs Perchlorate, perfluorochemicals Phthalates, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Volatile organic compounds

Page 11: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

National Report on Biochemical

Indicators of Diet and Nutrition

http://www.cdc.gov/nutritionreport/

Page 12: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

National Report on Biochemical Indicators of Diet and Nutrition

Water-soluble vitamins & metabolites •  Folate, vitamin B12 •  Homocysteine, methylmalonic acid

Iron-status indicators

Trace elements •  Iodine, selenium

Fat-soluble vitamins & nutrients •  Vitamin A, vitamin E, carotenoids •  Vitamin D

Phytoestrogens

http://www.cdc.gov/nutritionreport/

Page 13: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

13

U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys

NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys)

Page 14: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

NHANES Only nationally representative survey

that collects biological samples •  Conducted by the National Center for

Health Statistics, CDC

•  Designed to collect information about the health status, health-related behavior, and nutrition of the U.S. population

•  Unique in that it combines a home interview with health tests that are done in a Mobile Examination Center

14 NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys)

Page 15: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

Stage 4 SPs

Stage 1 Counties

Stage 2 Segments

Stage 3 Households

NHANES Cross-sectional nationally representative survey

15

•  Civilian, non-institutionalized population of the United States •  Ages 2 months and older for selected analytes •  Residents of all 50 states and DC •  5,000 persons examined each year at 15 locations •  Survey design determines which populations are over-sampled

NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys)

Page 16: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

NHANES Information available

•  Demographic: Age, sex, race/ethnicity

•  Socio-economic: Education, income, profession

•  Life-style: Smoking, exercise, supplement use

•  Dietary: 24-h recall, food frequency questionnaire

•  Health condition: Diseases (e.g., diabetes, CAD, cancer)

•  Anthropometric: Height, weight, BMI, skin fold

•  Laboratory: Hematology, clinical chemistry, nutritional indices, environmental chemicals, infectious disease markers

•  Physical examination: BP, hearing/eye/dental, bone densitometry, muscle strength, balance, skin disease, cognitive testing, cardio-respiratory fitness, peripheral vascular disease, peripheral neuropathy

16

NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys)

Page 17: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

Continuous NHANES survey started in 1999

•  Survey is run continuously in two-year survey cycles •  Each cycle (2 years) is a representative sample of the U.S.

population •  No more “breaks” between surveys to develop and implement

new analytical methods, survey components, or to conduct data analyses

•  Over 200 environmental and nutritional analytes reported by several environmental health laboratories at CDC

•  Banking of biological samples (e.g., serum, plasma, urine, WBCs) for future research

NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys)

Page 18: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals

Table. Total blood mercury

http://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/

Page 19: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

http://www.cdc.gov/nutritionreport/

National Report on Biochemical Indicators of Diet and Nutrition Table. Urinary iodine

Page 20: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

What factors should be considered when interpreting laboratory values?

  Endogenous   Age, sex, genetics (inherent to the individual)

  Exogenous   Diet, exercise, smoking, alcohol, medications

  Laboratory   Analytical method, storage and transport of sample,

collection of sample

  Mathematical method used to report results

Page 21: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

Conventional reference values and intervals

Fraser CG. Biological Variation. AACC Press, 2001.

Subj

ects

Laboratory value

Lower reference limit

Upper reference limit

Subj

ects

Laboratory value

Lower reference limit

Upper reference limit

Healthy population

Page 22: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

Conventional reference values and intervals

Fraser CG. Biological Variation. AACC Press, 2001.

Subj

ects

Laboratory value

Lower reference limit

Upper reference limit

Subj

ects

Laboratory value

Lower reference limit

Upper reference limit

Diseased population

Page 23: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

Individuality and reference values

  Intra-individual and inter-individual variations can significantly differ for certain laboratory results.

  Individuality can affect the use of reference values for laboratory tests and the interpretation of laboratory results.

Page 24: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

Individuality

Biological variation of cystatin C and creatinine. Reinhard M, Erlandsen EJ, Randers E. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2009;69(8):8316.

Figure. Mean and range values for serum creatinine in healthy subjects.

Females (open circles) and males (filled circles).

The dotted lines mark the upper limits of the population –based reference interval of creatinine for females (90 umol/L) and for males (105 umol/L).

Page 25: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

Individuality

Gowans EM, Fraser CG. Biological variation of serum and urine creatinine and creatinine clearance: ramifications for interpretation of results and patient care. Ann Clin Biochem. 1988 May;25 ( Pt 3):259-63.

Figure. Means and non-parametric ranges for serum creatinine.

Page 26: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

Individuality

Gowans EM, Fraser CG. Biological variation of serum and urine creatinine and creatinine clearance: ramifications for interpretation of results and patient care. Ann Clin Biochem. 1988 May;25 ( Pt 3):259-63.

Table. Means and non-parametric ranges for serum creatinine from healthy volunteers.

Group (n) Mean CV i (%) CV g (%) Index of individuality *

All (15) 77.9 4.1 14.1 0.29 Women (8) 71.4 4.9 11.8 0.41 Men (7) 83.9 3.4 6.8 0.54

•  Index of individuality = CV i / CV g

•  CV = (Σ d 2 / 2n)1/2

Serum creatinine (umol/L)

Page 27: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

Individuality

  Index of individuality (II)

  = (CVa2 + CVi

2) ½ / CVg

  where CVa, CVi, and CVg are analytical, within-subject, and between-subject coefficients of variations, respectively

  = CV i / CV g (simplified)

Reinhard M, Erlandsen EJ, Randers E. Biological variation of cystatin C and creatinine. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2009;69(8):831-6.

Page 28: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

Index of

Individuality

Lacher DA, Hughes JP, Carroll MD. Biological variation of laboratory analytes based on the 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Natl Health Stat Report. 2010 Mar 1;(21):1-7.

Page 29: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

Individuality and reference values

  Index of Individuality (II) = CV i / CV g

  Low II (<0.6) = marked individuality

  High II (>1.4) = little individuality   Useful for conventional reference values

  Thus, consider the individual variability of the laboratory test when using reference values

Fraser CG. Biological Variation. AACC Press, 2001.

Page 30: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

Individuality and reference values Stratification

Gowans EM, Fraser CG. Biological variation of serum and urine creatinine and creatinine clearance: ramifications for interpretation of results and patient care. Ann Clin Biochem. 1988 May;25 ( Pt 3):259-63.

Table. Means and coefficient variations for urine creatinine from healthy volunteers.

Group (n) Mean CV i (%) CV g (%) Index of individuality *

All (15) 10.7 13.0 28.2 0.46 Women (8) 8.0 15.7 11.0 1.42 Men (7) 13.9 11.0 6.0 1.83

•  Index of individuality = CV i / CV g

•  CV = (Σ d 2 / 2n)1/2

Urine creatinine (mmol/day)

Page 31: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

Monitoring changes in serial results for an individual

  Compare with clinical fixed criteria or cutoffs   Locally agreed upon clinical action levels   Expert panel determinations   Values based on health outcomes and risks   Multiples of the upper reference limit

  Reference change values (RCV)   =1.414 x Z x (CVa

2 + CVi2) ½

Fraser CG. Biological Variation. AACC Press, 2001.

Page 32: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

“Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory Test Results

Conclusions   Reference value and interval are preferred

terminology to “normal”

  Laboratory values are affected by pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical factors

  Biological variations can affect the applicability of reference values and intervals to individual results

Page 33: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values
Page 34: “Normal” vs. “Clinically Relevant Abnormal” Laboratory ... · PDF fileLaboratory value Lower reference limit Upper reference ... terminology to “normal” Laboratory values

For more information please contact Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

ATSDR: 4770 Buford Highway NE, Chamblee, GA 30341 Telephone: 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)/TTY: 1-888-232-6348 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov

CDC: 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333 Telephone: 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)/TTY: 1-888-232-6348 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.cdc.gov

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry

Thank you!

National Center for Environmental Health Division of Laboratory Sciences