Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Nonequilibrium quantum field theoryand the lattice
Jürgen BergesDarmstadt University of Technology
Content
I. Motivation fast thermalization in heavy ion collisionsearly universe instabilities and prethermalizationstrongly coupled quantum gases
II. Nonequilibrium dynamicstwo-particle irreducible expansionslimitations of (semi-)classical descriptions
III. Real-time quantum fields on a latticereal-time stochastic quantizationnonabelian gauge theory
I. Motivation
Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research (GSI)
Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (BNL)
Large Hadron Collider (CERN)
Heavy ion collisions
Phasediagramm
(schematic)
QCD critical point in the universality class of the Ising model!Berges, Rajagopal; Halasz et al.; Stephanov et al. `99 ... ; Lattice-QCD: Fodor, Katz `02; ...
Far-from-equilibrium dynamics
Heavy-ion collisions (BNL,CERN,GSI) explore strong interaction matter starting from a transient nonequilibrium state
• Thermalization ?Properties of the equilibriumphase diagram of QCD ?Braun-Munzinger, Redlich, Stachel,
QGP3 (2004) 491; ...
• Theoretical justification of earlylocal thermal equilibrium? Hydrodynamics after .1 fm/c?
Kolb, Heinz, QGP3 (2004) 634; ...
Fast thermalization?
Xu, Greiner, Phys. Rev. C 71 (2005) 064901; ...
Shuryak, Zahed, Phys. Rev. C70 (2004) 021901; ...
Mrowczynski, Phys. Lett. B 314 (1993) 118 Arnold, Moore, Yaffe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 072302;Rebhan, Romatschke, Strickland, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2005) 102303;Romatschke, Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 062302; ...
Berges, Borsanyi, Wetterich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 142002
New properties (sQGP)?
Plasma instabilities:
Prethermalization? Different quantities effectively thermalizeon different time scales: Early equation of state → Hydrodynamics
Fast thermalization from kinetic theory?
...
Early Universe
End of Inflation reheating CMB
`entropy´ production
thermal spectrumwith fluctuations
far-from-equilibrium`initial´ state
time
Reheating• Explosive particle production from nonequilibrium instabilities
Vergleiche: Parametrische Resonanz in der klassischen Mechanik
CLASSICAL: Traschen, Brandenberger, PRD 42 (1990) 2491; Kofman, Linde, Starobinsky, PRL 73 (1994) 3195;Khlebnikov, Tkachev, PRL 77 (1996) 219; ...
QUANTUM: Berges, Serreau, PRL 91 (2003) 111601 Arrizabalaga, Smit, Tranberg, JHEP 0410 (2004) 017
quasistationaryevolution
explosive particleproduction
Parametric resonance reheating:
• Quasistationary evolution leads to extremely slow thermal equilibration→ non-thermal fixed points
• Prethermalization Berges, Borsanyi, Wetterich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 142002Podolsky, Felder, Kofman, Peloso, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 023501;…
SU(2)×SU(2) ‘quark-meson‘ model (2PI 1/NF to NLO):
Prerequisite for hydrodynamics!
tdamp teqtpt
tpt
Approximatively thermal equation of state after tpt ¿ trelax ¿ teq!
Ultra-cold quantum gases
B-field
Attract Repel• Tunable BEC self-interaction!Strong coupling (Feshbach resonance)
⇒ Measure BEC size, shape: ⇒ B(t) faster than atom motion:
OD
0
1
OD
0
1
OD
0
1
550 a0
3000 a0
a = 70 a0
In trap focussed burst atoms
BEC remnant
480 µmCornish et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 1795
Ultracold atomic gas dynamics of 23Na in 1D
Gasenzer, Berges, Schmidt, Seco, PRA 72 (2005) 063604
t
Method: 2PI 1/N expansionBerges, NPA 699 (2002) 847
II. Nonequilibrium quantum fields
Standard QFT techniques fail out of equilibrium
`Secularity´ `Universality´
• nonlinear dynamics necessaryfor late-time thermalization
• uniform approximations in timerequire infinite pert. orders
2-particle irreducible generating functionals
⇒ systematic 2PI loop-, coupling- or 1/N-expansions available
⇒ far-from-equilibrium dynamics as well as late-time thermalization in QFT
Berges, Cox ´01; Aarts, Berges ´01; Berges ´02; Cooper, Dawson, Mihaila ´03; Berges, Serreau ´03; Berges, Borsányi, Serreau ´03; Cassing, Greiner, Juchem ´03; Arrizabalaga, Smit, Tranberg ´04 ...
Luttinger, Ward ´60; Baym ´62; Cornwall, Jackiw, Tomboulis ´74
E.g. scalar N-component field theory to NLO in 2PI 1/N-expansion:
includesNLO 1PI !
Berges ´02 ; Aarts, Ahrensmeier, Baier, Berges, Serreau ´02
Time evolution equations
statistical propagator ∼ h{Φ,Φ}i
spectral function ∼ h[Φ,Φ]i
Nonequilibrium:
Equilibrium/Vacuum: (fluct.-diss. relation)
Nonequilibrium instability:(parametric resonance)
Nonperturbative!
III. Quantum fields on a lattice
Real time:
non-positive definite probability measure!
Euclidean stochastic quantization• Classical Hamiltonian in (d+1)-dimensional space-time
• Expectation values for quantum theory with action :
,
• Replace canonical ensemble averages by micro-canonical:
Classical dynamics in ‘fifth‘-time (t5) to compute quantum averages!
• discretization to second order in
• conjugate momenta have Gaussian distribution; randomly refreshafter every single step → Langevin dynamics
,
Parisi, Wu ’81; …
,with white noise
Real-time stochastic quantizationKlauder ’83; Parisi ’83; Hüffel, Rumpf ’84; Okano, Schülke, Zheng ’91 …
Replace embedded d-dimensional Euclidean by Minkowskian action:
with d‘Alembertian
for Euclidean stochastic quantization⇒
for real-time stochastic quantization⇒
Langevin dynamics:
i.e. , in general complex!
Simulating nonequilibrium quantum fieldsBerges, Stamatescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 202003
t at-1
t at-1
Scalar λφ4-theory:
classical starting configuration (t5 = 0), Langevinupdating takes into account quantum corrections
λ = 0
λ ≠ 0
Convergence:
t at-1
Langevin time
apparently good convergence properties
• same initial (t = 0) conditions
’null’ starting configuration (t5 = 0)
‘run-away’ trajectoriesmuch suppressed by smaller step-size
⇒
⇒
Precision tests
Berges, Borsanyi, Sexty, Stamatescu, in preparation
Anharmonic quantum oscillator:
• real-time thermal equilibrium
• comparison with solutionof Schrödinger equation weak coupling
strong coupling
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
<ϕ(
0)ϕ(
t)>
t
stochastic Schrödinger: (real contour)
(complex contour)
−0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
<ϕ(
0)ϕ(
t)>
t
stochasticSchrödinger
• short real-time contour:
⇒ good agreement of stochasticquantization and `exact´ results
Fixed points of the Langevin flowStationary solutions at late t5 fulfill:
⇒
, , …similarly for
⇒
⇒
⇒
...
infinite set of Dyson-Schwinger equations for n-point functions!
-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Langevin time
t=0.375
tfinal=2
LHS (0,0)RHS (0,0)LHS (0,t)RHS (0,t)LHS (t,t)RHS (t,t)
-0.1
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Langevin time
t=0.375
tfinal=1
LHS (0,0)RHS (0,0)LHS (0,t)RHS (0,t)LHS (t,t)RHS (t,t)
thermal fixed point
LHS RHS
non-unitary fixed point
Dyson-Schwinger equation:
• fulfilled by both thermal as well as non-unitary fixed point (symmetrized)
-0.2-0.1
0 0.1 0.2
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Im G
(t,t)
contour point index
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Re
G(t
,t)
tfinal=1tfinal=2
Nonabelian gauge theoryReal-time lattice action: (plaquette)
with anisotropic couplings
Langevin dynamics:
, ,
,
(not ∼ gµν for Minkowski theory!)
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0 1 2 3 4 5
spat
ial p
laqu
ette
ave
rage
Langevin time
Euclideancontour tilt tan(α)=2.2
tan(α)=1.1tan(α)=0.6
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.1 1 10
ϑ cro
ssov
er
Contour tilt: tan(α)
τ+=0.125τ+=0.25
τ+=2 , symmetric
τ+
SU(2) gauge theoryon a contour:
• thermal fixed point only approximate(intermediate Langevintimes) !
,( )Dyson-Schwinger equation for plaquette:
µ
N2(N − 1)2
βµγ iN
1N
γµ
γµ
γ
µ
γ
µ
γ+−
}
{=
−
Σ −
−
LHS RHS
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Sch
win
ger-
Dys
on e
quat
ions
Langevin time
LHSRHS
thermal
crossover
non-unitary
Conclusions• Loop-, or 1/N-expansions of 2PI effective action suitable to resolve secularity and universality
⇒ Limited range of validity of kinetic approaches⇒ Far-from-equilibrium dynamics & thermalization in QFT
• 2PI 1/N-expansion provides quantitative description of nonperturbative dynamics as instabilities or critical phenomena ⇒ 2PI 1/N for SU(N) gauge theories?
• Nonperturbative lattice simulations of real-time quantum fields:
⇒ Stochastic quantization solves hierarchy of real-timeDyson-Schwinger equations, however, solutions not unique
⇒ Short-time evolution of scalar fields⇒ Thermal fixed point unstable for SU(2) gauge theory
Nonequilibrium Dynamics in Particle Physics and Cosmology
Jan. 14 to March 28, 2008Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, Santa Barbara
Organizers: J. Berges (Darmstadt), L. Kofman (CITA), L. Yaffe (U. of Washington)
Limitations of kinetic theory
• gradient expansion in
• memory loss (t0 →∞, s0 ∈ (-∞,∞) with X0 finite)
• (quasiparticle picture)
Based on Berges, Borsányi, Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 045022
,
Lowest-order gradient expansion:
Imaginary part real partof self-energy
NLO gradient expansion:
withand Poisson brackets
Quantitative example• weak-coupling g2φ4-model, 2PI three-loop
occupationnumber
⇒
p tra
nsve
rse
plongitudinal
• characteristic anisotropy measure: (isotropy → ∆F ≡ 0)
:
tdamp
valid kinetic description
• LO/NLO results only quantitative after tdamp (memory loss)→ not suitable for studying fast thermalization (t ¿ tdamp )
tdamp
valid kinetic description
tdamp
valid kinetic description
: :
• NLO gradient corrections insignificant for ∆F (cf. isotropization)
• NLO gradient corrections significant for F (cf. thermalization)
• NLO results quantitative for t & tdamp