1
Please cite this article in press as: Mendoza N, Sánchez-Borrego R. Non-contraceptive benefits of hormonal contraceptive use during perimenopause? Maturitas (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.02.003 ARTICLE IN PRESS G Model MAT-6116; No. of Pages 1 Maturitas xxx (2014) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Maturitas jo u r n al hom ep age: www.elsevier.com/locate/maturitas Letter to the Editor Non-contraceptive benefits of hormonal contra- ceptive use during perimenopause? Dear Editor, We enthusiastically read Baldwin and Jensen’s review of contra- ceptive use during perimenopause [1]. In the section dedicated to hormonal contraceptives (HCs), the authors meticulously describe the indications for HC use, the potential risks, and when/how to discontinue use. However, we feel that this review lacks a sec- tion dedicated to the potential non-contraceptive benefits of HC use among perimenopausal women. While there is strong evidence showing that HC use is associated with reductions in menstrual bleeding, menstrual cramping, and gynaecological cancers in young women, data among perimenopausal women are lacking. Indeed, the large majority of studies evaluating these benefits have been conducted on women younger than 40, commonly those less than 35. HCs have been successfully used to treat menstrual disorders in women of all ages. Some guidelines have even suggested that the use of HCs in healthy women over 40 without menstrual dis- orders may reduce gynaecological cancers, bone mass loss, and cardiovascular disease (CD). Although there is little controversy regarding the use of HCs among perimenopausal women due to the above-mentioned benefits, we also know that some gynaecological cancers increase with age and menstrual irregularity and that these conditions are reduced with HC use. Perimenopause is a period of increased bone remodelling, and we know that HCs can maintain bone mass density. However, the effect of HCs on CD requires fur- ther study, as strategies once thought to reduce disease risk were shown to increase this risk if the hormone type, dose, or timing were not appropriate; specifically, this was the lesson learned from hormone therapy (HT).[2] Recently, the importance of ovarian function cessation in depression and CD risk was assessed, and a bi-directional relation- ship between these two conditions seems to exist, with both of these conditions also associated with the possibility of menstrual cycle alteration. Various neuroendocrine mechanisms are involved in this process, although the link that unites these conditions is the ovarian dysfunction. From this perspective, women in the menopausal transition period experience greater mood changes, even more than during the subsequent period, which is when the CD risk increases [3]. Similar to what was proposed for hormone treatment, where a “window of opportunity” exists in which the benefits of HT (fundamentally cardiovascular) outweigh the risks, a “window of vulnerability” for CD and depression during perimenopause could exist [4]. Could HC mitigate these risks and be consid- ered a protective factor during this window of vulnerability? Indeed, current studies have recently begun to publish positive results in postmenopausal women (ELITE, KEEPS, etc.). How- ever, further studies are required to investigate these and other possible beneficial effects of HCs in perimenopausal women. References [1] Baldwin MK, Jensen JT. Contraception during the perimenopause. Maturitas 2013;76:235–42. [2] de Villiers TJ, Gass ML, Haines CJ, et al. Global consensus statement on menopausal hormone therapy. Maturitas 2013;74:391–2. [3] Bleil ME, Bromberger JT, Latham MD, et al. Disruptions in ovarian function are related to depression and cardiometabolic risk during premenopause. Menopause 2013;20:631–9. [4] Mendoza N, Sanchez-Borrego R, Cancelo MJ, et al. Position of the Spanish Menopause Society regarding the management of perimenopause. Maturitas 2013;74:283–90. Nicolás Mendoza Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain Rafael Sánchez-Borrego Clínica Diatros, Barcelona, Spain Corresponding author at: Maestro Montero, 21, 18004 Granada, Spain. Tel.: +34 958120206; fax: +34 958120206. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (N. Mendoza), [email protected] (R. Sánchez-Borrego) 7 February 2014 Available online xxx http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.02.003 0378-5122/© 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Non-contraceptive benefits of hormonal contraceptive use during perimenopause?

  • Upload
    rafael

  • View
    219

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

M

L

Nc

D

chtdtusbwtc3

itocraccibtswh

dstciim

h0

ARTICLE IN PRESSG ModelAT-6116; No. of Pages 1

Maturitas xxx (2014) xxx–xxx

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Maturitas

jo u r n al hom ep age: www.elsev ier .com/ locate /matur i tas

[

[

[

[

etter to the Editor

on-contraceptive benefits of hormonal contra-eptive use during perimenopause?

ear Editor,

We enthusiastically read Baldwin and Jensen’s review of contra-eptive use during perimenopause [1]. In the section dedicated toormonal contraceptives (HCs), the authors meticulously describehe indications for HC use, the potential risks, and when/how toiscontinue use. However, we feel that this review lacks a sec-ion dedicated to the potential non-contraceptive benefits of HCse among perimenopausal women. While there is strong evidencehowing that HC use is associated with reductions in menstrualleeding, menstrual cramping, and gynaecological cancers in youngomen, data among perimenopausal women are lacking. Indeed,

he large majority of studies evaluating these benefits have beenonducted on women younger than 40, commonly those less than5.

HCs have been successfully used to treat menstrual disordersn women of all ages. Some guidelines have even suggested thathe use of HCs in healthy women over 40 without menstrual dis-rders may reduce gynaecological cancers, bone mass loss, andardiovascular disease (CD). Although there is little controversyegarding the use of HCs among perimenopausal women due to thebove-mentioned benefits, we also know that some gynaecologicalancers increase with age and menstrual irregularity and that theseonditions are reduced with HC use. Perimenopause is a period ofncreased bone remodelling, and we know that HCs can maintainone mass density. However, the effect of HCs on CD requires fur-her study, as strategies once thought to reduce disease risk werehown to increase this risk if the hormone type, dose, or timingere not appropriate; specifically, this was the lesson learned fromormone therapy (HT).[2]

Recently, the importance of ovarian function cessation inepression and CD risk was assessed, and a bi-directional relation-hip between these two conditions seems to exist, with both ofhese conditions also associated with the possibility of menstrual

Please cite this article in press as: Mendoza N, Sánchez-Borrego R. Nperimenopause? Maturitas (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.maturi

ycle alteration. Various neuroendocrine mechanisms are involvedn this process, although the link that unites these conditionss the ovarian dysfunction. From this perspective, women in the

enopausal transition period experience greater mood changes,

ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.02.003378-5122/© 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

even more than during the subsequent period, which is when theCD risk increases [3].

Similar to what was proposed for hormone treatment, wherea “window of opportunity” exists in which the benefits of HT(fundamentally cardiovascular) outweigh the risks, a “windowof vulnerability” for CD and depression during perimenopausecould exist [4]. Could HC mitigate these risks and be consid-ered a protective factor during this window of vulnerability?Indeed, current studies have recently begun to publish positiveresults in postmenopausal women (ELITE, KEEPS, etc.). How-ever, further studies are required to investigate these – andother possible beneficial effects – of HCs in perimenopausalwomen.

References

1] Baldwin MK, Jensen JT. Contraception during the perimenopause. Maturitas2013;76:235–42.

2] de Villiers TJ, Gass ML, Haines CJ, et al. Global consensus statement onmenopausal hormone therapy. Maturitas 2013;74:391–2.

3] Bleil ME, Bromberger JT, Latham MD, et al. Disruptions in ovarian functionare related to depression and cardiometabolic risk during premenopause.Menopause 2013;20:631–9.

4] Mendoza N, Sanchez-Borrego R, Cancelo MJ, et al. Position of the SpanishMenopause Society regarding the management of perimenopause. Maturitas2013;74:283–90.

Nicolás Mendoza ∗

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universityof Granada, Granada, Spain

Rafael Sánchez-BorregoClínica Diatros, Barcelona, Spain

∗ Corresponding author at: Maestro Montero, 21,18004 Granada, Spain. Tel.: +34 958120206; fax:

+34 958120206.E-mail addresses: [email protected] (N.

Mendoza), [email protected] (R.

on-contraceptive benefits of hormonal contraceptive use duringtas.2014.02.003

Sánchez-Borrego)

7 February 2014Available online xxx