Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Noise Oversight Committee
November 20, 2013
1
Item 1
Review and Approve Draft Meeting Minutes
– Item 1: Minutes from September 18, 2013
2
Item 2
Review of Operations Report Summary
– September 2013
– October 2013
3
September October2013 8,894 7,321
2012 3,528 3,496
MSP Complaints
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
2010 2011 2012 2013
Complaina
nts
Complaints
Complaints
Complainants
Total Aircraft OperationsSeptember October
2013 35,167 36,734
2012 33,698 34,725
32,90231,787
36,520
34,50435,362
37,53039,068 38,961
33,69834,725
33,031 33,065
33,239
30,980
37,118
35,02336,377
37,85539,856 39,930
35,16736,734
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
Ope
ratio
ns
2012 2013
Air Carrier Jet OperationsSeptember October
2013 30,763 32,439
2012 29,972 30,824
September October
Regional Jet
ModifiedStage 3 Other Regional
JetModifiedStage 3 Other
2013 51.5% 0% 48.5% 52.9% 0% 47.1%
2012 51.3% 0% 48.7% 52.6% 0% 47.4%
Air Carrier Jet Fleet Composition
Source: Metropolitan Airports Commission’s Finance Department Monthly Passenger and Operations Reports
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Ope
ratio
ns
Passen
gers
Regional Air Carrier Operations and PassengersPassengers Operations
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
3000000
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Ope
ratio
ns
Passen
gers
Major Air Carrier Operations and Passengers Passengers Operations
Nighttime Operations(10:30pm - 6:00 am)
Runway September2013
October2013
Departures 4 0% 0%
12L 18.1% 12.7%
12R 40% 33.8%
17 20% 18.6%
22 0% 0.4%
30L 12.4% 22.8%
30R 9.5% 11.8%
35 0% 0%
Runway September2013
October2013
Arrivals 4 0% 0%
12L 18.8% 12.5%
12R 43.1% 29.4%
17 0% 1%
22 0% 0.1%
30L 27.8% 38.1%
30R 10.3% 17.7%
35 0% 1.2%
September2013
September2012
October2013
October2012
Total 1,090 1,075 1,179 1,136
Carrier Jet 930 981 1,027 1,042
Runway Use Percentages - Nighttime All Operations
September2013
October2013
Runway 17 Carrier Jet Departures 5,540 4,979
Compliance with Runway 17 Carrier Jet Departure Procedure 99.9% 98.4%
September2013
October2013
Runways 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departures 3,678 3,035
Carrier Jets Remaining in Corridor 96.2% 93%
September2013
October2013
Carrier Jet Departures Crossing‐in‐the‐Corridor Nighttime (23:00‐06:00)
45(59%)
31(50%)
Carrier Jet DeparturesCrossing‐in‐the‐Corridor Daytime (06:00‐23:00)
1,013(28%)
752(25%)
Item 32014 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Projects
CIP Projects can be divided into two broad categories:
1. Landside: those projects involving parking ramps, roadways, terminal buildings, grounds, signage and utility infrastructure2. Airside: those projects involving the airfield, runways, the Aircraft Operations Area, ramps, taxiways, striping, pavement maintenance, signage, lighting, grounds and navigational aids
The MAC CIP is the planning and budgeting method that the MAC utilizes for sufficient analysis of scope, cost and timing of projects including an Assessment of Environmental Effects.
12
Item 4
Fleet Mix Trends at MSP
The Annual MSP Aircraft Fleet Mix Assessment evaluates all carrier jet operations at MSP from October 2011 through September 2013, using three aircraft groups: Manufactured Stage 3 Aircraft, Regional Jet Aircraft and Hushkit Aircraft.
13
14
Annual MSP Aircraft Fleet Mix Assessment
October 2011 - September 2013
15
16
17
18
19
Item 4
Since 2001– Aircraft with FAR Part 36 takeoff noise levels greater than 90 dB decreased 77%
– Aircraft with FAR Part 36 takeoff noise levels between 80 dB and 90dB increased 117%
– Aircraft with FAR Part 36 takeoff noise levels types less than 80 dB increased 989%
• Airlines are using and buying new aircraft, decreasing noise, emissions and saving fuel
Item 5Aircraft Density Color Gradients
21
22
23
Item 6Review Status of Federal Aviation Noise Research Initiatives• Partnership for AiR Transportation Noise and Emissions Reduction
(PARTNER)– FAA/NASA/Transport Canada Center of Excellence; PARTNER is based at MIT
• Transportation Research Board (TRB)– Reports for the National Academies
• Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP)– Sponsored by FAA and managed by the National Academies
• Federal Interagency Committee on Aircraft Noise (FICAN)Agencies include DoD, Interior, USDOT, EPA, NASA, and HUD
24
Item 6Updated PARTNER Research
Project 3: “Valuation and Trade‐offs of Policy Options”Project 11: “Health Impacts of Aviation‐Related Air Pollutants”Project 12: “Emissions’ Atmospheric Impacts”Project 15: “Aircraft Impact on U.S. Local and Regional Air Quality”Project 16: “Investigation of Aviation Emissions Air Quality Impacts”Project 22: “Objective Measures to Support Airspace Management” Project 26: “Sound Transmission Indoors – Integrated Windows”Project 35: “Open Rotor Noise Impact on Airport Communities”Project 41: “Aircraft Black Carbon Emissions”Project 44: “Aviation‐Related Noise Effects on the Elderly”Project 45: “Aviation System Air Quality Performance Analysis”
25
Item 6Updated TRB ACRP Research
TRB ACRP 02‐03: “Aircraft and Airport‐Related Hazardous Air Pollutants: Research Needs and Analysis”
TRB ACRP 02‐12: “Environmental Optimization of Aircraft Departures: Fuel Burn, Emissions, and Noise”
TRB ACRP 02‐24: “Guidelines for Airport Sound Insulation Programs”TRB ACRP 02‐27: “Aircraft Taxi Noise Database for Airport Noise Modeling”TRB ACRP 02‐31: “Assessment of Sound Insulation Treatments”TRB ACRP 02‐48 : “Assessing Annoyance of Helicopter Noise compared with Jet Aircraft
Noise” TRB ACRP 02‐51 : “Evaluating Noise Level Reduction Test Methods for Dwellings”TRB ACRP 02‐52: “Hard and Soft Ground Absorption Methodology”TRB ACRP 02‐55: “Modeling Noise for Non‐standard Aircraft Profiles”TRB ACRP 02‐57: “Understanding Lead Emissions Reductions at Airports”TRB ACRP 03‐01 : “Fair Disclosure of Airport Impacts in Real Estate Transfers ”
26
Item 7Review of October 22, 2013 Public Input Meeting• Meeting was held at the MAC General Offices• 54 attendees signed in and 20 individuals made comments; topics
included:– RNAV departures to the north and northwest– Effects of noise on outdoor recreational uses of nearby lakes and parklands– Frequency of overflights– Property taxes and airspace use fees– Noise complaints processing and use by the MAC
27
Item 8
NOC 2014 Work Plan and 2013 Accomplishments
28
Item 7
29
Item 82013 MSP NOC Accomplishments• Reviewed and supported the First Amendment to the Consent Decree
extending noise mitigation eligibility• Reviewed the status of the 2007 64 to 60 DNL noise mitigation program
implementation, which is in its final phase• Completed a Nighttime Operations Assessment finding that the nighttime use
of hushkitted aircraft is minimal• Completed two Runway 30R/30L Departure studies examining flight patterns,
altitude, density and direction• Completed the Annual Runway Use Analysis and Fleet Mix Reports• Added improved flight density cartography to monthly Technical Advisor’s
Report• Amended By‐Laws to add the City of Edina as an At‐Large Member
30
Item 9
Public Comment Period
31
Item 10
Adjourn*
*Notice: The next NOC meeting is January 15, 2014MAC General Offices1:30 p.m.
32