Upload
will
View
35
Download
5
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Node-to-Network Interface in Scalable Multiprocessors. CS 258, Spring 99 David E. Culler Computer Science Division U.C. Berkeley. Racap: Common Challenges. Input buffer overflow N-1 queue over-commitment => must slow sources reserve space per source(credit) when available for reuse? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Node-to-Network Interfacein Scalable Multiprocessors
CS 258, Spring 99
David E. Culler
Computer Science Division
U.C. Berkeley
3/10/99 CS258 S99 2
Racap: Common Challenges
• Input buffer overflow– N-1 queue over-commitment => must slow sources
– reserve space per source (credit)
» when available for reuse? • Ack or Higher level
– Refuse input when full
» backpressure in reliable network
» tree saturation
» deadlock free
» what happens to traffic not bound for congested dest?
– Reserve ack back channel
– drop packets
– Utilize higher-level semantics of programming model
3/10/99 CS258 S99 3
Racap: Challenges (cont)
• Fetch Deadlock– For network to remain deadlock free, nodes must continue
accepting messages, even when cannot source msgs
– what if incoming transaction is a request?
» Each may generate a response, which cannot be sent!
» What happens when internal buffering is full?
• logically independent request/reply networks – physical networks
– virtual channels with separate input/output queues
• bound requests and reserve input buffer space– K(P-1) requests + K responses per node
– service discipline to avoid fetch deadlock?
• NACK on input buffer full– NACK delivery?
3/10/99 CS258 S99 4
Network Transaction Processing
• Key Design Issue:
• How much interpretation of the message?
• How much dedicated processing in the Comm. Assist?
PM
CA
PM
CA° ° °
Scalable Network
Node Architecture
Communication Assist
Message
Output Processing – checks – translation – formating – scheduling
Input Processing – checks – translation – buffering – action
3/10/99 CS258 S99 5
Spectrum of Designs
• None: Physical bit stream– blind, physical DMA nCUBE, iPSC, . . .
• User/System– User-level port CM-5, *T
– User-level handler J-Machine, Monsoon, . . .
• Remote virtual address– Processing, translation Paragon, Meiko
CS-2
• Global physical address– Proc + Memory controller RP3, BBN, T3D
• Cache-to-cache– Cache controller Dash, KSR, FlashIncreasing HW Support, Specialization, Intrusiveness, Performance (???)
3/10/99 CS258 S99 6
Net Transactions: Physical DMA
• DMA controlled by regs, generates interrupts
• Physical => OS initiates transfers
• Send-side– construct system “envelope” around user data in kernel area
• Receive– must receive into system buffer, since no interpretation inCA
PMemory
Cmd
DestData
Addr
Length
Rdy
PMemory
DMAchannels
Status,interrupt
Addr
Length
Rdy
sender auth
dest addr
3/10/99 CS258 S99 7
nCUBE Network Interface
• independent DMA channel per link direction– leave input buffers always open
– segmented messages
• routing interprets envelope– dimension-order routing on hypercube
– bit-serial with 36 bit cut-through
Processor
Switch
Input ports
Output ports
Memory
Addr AddrLength
Addr Addr AddrLength
AddrLength
DMAchannels
Memorybus
Os 16 ins 260 cy13 us
Or 18 200 cy15 us
- includes interrupt
3/10/99 CS258 S99 8
Conventional LAN NI
NIC Controller
DMAaddr
len
trncv
TX
RX
Addr LenStatusNext
Addr LenStatusNext
Addr LenStatusNext
Addr LenStatusNext
Addr LenStatusNext
Addr LenStatusNext
Data
Host Memory NIC
IO Busmem bus
Proc
3/10/99 CS258 S99 9
User Level Ports
• initiate transaction at user level
• deliver to user without OS intervention
• network port in user space
• User/system flag in envelope– protection check, translation, routing, media access in src CA
– user/sys check in dest CA, interrupt on system
PMem
DestData
User/system
PMemStatus,interrupt
3/10/99 CS258 S99 10
User Level Network ports
• Appears to user as logical message queues plus status
• What happens if no user pop?
Virtual address space
Status
Net outputport
Net inputport
Program counter
Registers
Processor
3/10/99 CS258 S99 11
Example: CM-5
• Input and output FIFO for each network
• 2 data networks
• tag per message– index NI mapping
table
• context switching?
• *T integrated NI on chip
• iWARP also
Diagnostics network
Control network
Data network
Processingpartition
Processingpartition
Controlprocessors
I/O partition
PM PM
SPARC
MBUS
DRAMctrl
DRAM DRAM DRAM DRAM
DRAMctrl
Vectorunit DRAM
ctrlDRAM
ctrl
Vectorunit
FPU Datanetworks
Controlnetwork
$ctrl
$SRAM
NI
Os 50 cy 1.5 us
Or 53 cy 1.6 us
interrupt 10us
3/10/99 CS258 S99 12
User Level Handlers
• Hardware support to vector to address specified in message
– message ports in registers
U ser /sy s te m
PM e m
D e stD ata A d dress
PM e m
3/10/99 CS258 S99 13
J-Machine: Msg-Driven Processor
• Each node a small msg driven processor
• HW support to queue msgs and dispatch to msg handler task
3/10/99 CS258 S99 14
Monsoon Explicit Token-Store
3/10/99 CS258 S99 15
*T: Network Co-Processor
3/10/99 CS258 S99 16
iWARP: Systolic Computation
• Nodes integrate communication with computation on systolic basis
• Msg data direct to register
• Stream into memory
Interface unit
Host
3/10/99 CS258 S99 17
Dedicated processing without dedicated hardware design
3/10/99 CS258 S99 18
Dedicated Message Processor
• General Purpose processor performs arbitrary output processing (at system level)
• General Purpose processor interprets incoming network transactions (at system level)
• User Processor <–> Msg Processor share memory
• Msg Processor <–> Msg Processor via system network transaction
Network
° ° °
dest
Mem
P M P
NI
User System
Mem
P M P
NI
User System
3/10/99 CS258 S99 19
Levels of Network Transaction
• User Processor stores cmd / msg / data into shared output queue– must still check for output queue full (or make elastic)
• Communication assists make transaction happen– checking, translation, scheduling, transport, interpretation
• Effect observed on destination address space and/or events
• Protocol divided between two layers
Network
° ° °
dest
Mem
P M P
NI
User System
Mem
PM P
NI
3/10/99 CS258 S99 20
Example: Intel Paragon
Network
° ° ° Mem
P M P
NIi860xp50 MHz16 KB $4-way32B BlockMESI
sDMArDMA
64400 MB/s
$ $
16 175 MB/s Duplex
I/ONodes
rteMP handler
Var dataEOP
I/ONodes
Service
Devices
Devices
2048 B
3/10/99 CS258 S99 21
User Level Abstraction (Lok Liu)
• Any user process can post a transaction for any other in protection domain
– communication layer moves OQsrc –> IQdest
– may involve indirection: VASsrc –> VASdest
ProcOQ
IQ
VAS
ProcOQ
IQ
VAS
ProcOQ
IQ
VAS
ProcOQ
IQ
VAS
3/10/99 CS258 S99 22
Msg Processor Events
Dispatcher
User OutputQueues
Send FIFO~Empty
Rcv FIFO~Full
Send DMA
Rcv DMA
DMA done
ComputeProcessorKernel
SystemEvent
3/10/99 CS258 S99 23
Basic Implementation Costs: Scalar
• Cache-to-cache transfer (two 32B lines, quad word ops)– producer: read(miss,S), chk, write(S,WT), write(I,WT),write(S,WT)
– consumer: read(miss,S), chk, read(H), read(miss,S), read(H),write(S,WT)
• to NI FIFO: read status, chk, write, . . .
• from NI FIFO: read status, chk, dispatch, read, read, . . .
CP
User OQ
MP
Registers
Cache
Net FIFO
UserIQ
MP CP Net
2 1.5 2
4.4 µs 5.4 µs
10.5 µs
7 wds
2 2 2
250ns + H*40ns
3/10/99 CS258 S99 24
Virtual DMA -> Virtual DMA
• Send MP segments into 8K pages and does VA –> PA
• Recv MP reassembles, does dispatch and VA –> PA per page
CP
User OQ
MP
Registers
Cache
Net FIFO
UserIQ
MP CP Net
2 1.5 2
7 wds
2 2 2
Memory
sDMA
hdr
rDMA
MP
20482048
400 MB/s
175 MB/s
400 MB/s
3/10/99 CS258 S99 25
Single Page Transfer Rate
Transfer Size (B)
MB
/s
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
Total MB/s
Burst MB/s
Actual Buffer Size: 2048Effective Buffer Size: 3232
3/10/99 CS258 S99 26
Msg Processor Assessment
• Concurrency Intensive– Need to keep inbound flows moving while outbound flows stalled
– Large transfers segmented
• Reduces overhead but adds latency
User OutputQueues
Send FIFO~Empty
Rcv FIFO~Full
Send DMA
Rcv DMA
DMA done
ComputeProcessorKernel
SystemEvent
User InputQueues
VAS
Dispatcher
3/10/99 CS258 S99 27
Case Study: Meiko CS2 Concept
• Circuit-switched Network Transaction– source-dest circuit held open for request response
– limited cmd set executed directly on NI
• Dedicated communication processor for each step in flow
Network
Dest
P P
Mem Mem
Pout Pin Preply
Pcmd V P Pevent
Pout Pin Preply
Pcmd V P Pevent
3/10/99 CS258 S99 28
Case Study: Meiko CS2 Organization
Set-event
Generatesset-event3 x write_word
SWAP:CMD, AddrAccept
Interrupt
Run-thread
Start-DMA
Pinput
P
Mem interface
Threads
DMAdescriptorsUser
data Mem
Output controlExecute net transactions
· requests from Pthread· write_blocks from PDMA· set-event and write_word
from Preply
DMA from memoryIssue write_block transactions(50-s limit)
RISC instruction set64-K nonpreemptive threadsConstruct arbitrary net transactionsOutput protocol
Preply
Pcmd
Pthread PDMA
Network
3/10/99 CS258 S99 29
Shared Physical Address Space
• NI emulates memory controller at source
• NI emulates processor at dest– must be deadlock free
Scalable network
P$
Memory management unit
Data
Ld R Addr
Pseudomemory
Pseudo-processor
DestReadAddrSrcTag
DataTagRrspSrc
Output processing· Mem access· Response
CommmunicationInput processing
· Parse· Complete read
P$
MMU
Mem
Pseudo-memory
Pseudo-processor
Mem
assist
3/10/99 CS258 S99 30
Case Study: Cray T3D
• Build up info in ‘shell’
• Remote memory operations encoded in address
DRAM
Reqout
P$
MMU
150-MHz DEC Alpha (64 bit)
8-KB instruction + 8-KB data
43-bit virtual address
Prefetch
Load-lock, store-conditional
32-bit
DTB
Prefetch queue· 16 64
Message queue
· 4,080 4 64
Special registers
· swaperand · fetch&add · barrier
PE# + FC
DMA
Resp
in 3D torus of pairs of PEs· share net and BLT
· up to 2,048
· 64 MB each
Req
in
Respout
Block transfer
32- and 64-bit memory and byte operations
Nonblocking stores and memory barrier
engine
physical address
3/10/99 CS258 S99 31
Case Study: NOW
• General purpose processor embedded in NIC
L2 $
Bus adapterSBUS (25 MHz)Mem
UltraSparc
s DMA
Host DMA
SRAM
Myrinet
X-bar
r DMA
Bus interface
Mainprocessor
LinkInterface
160-MB/sbidirectionallinks
MyricomLanai NIC(37.5-MHz processor,256-MB SRAM3 DMA units)
Eight-portwormholeswitches
3/10/99 CS258 S99 32
Message Time Breakdown
• Communication pipeline
Ma
ch
ine
r
es
ou
rc
e
T im e o f th e m e s s ag e
S o u rce p ro ce sso r
C o m m u n ic a tion a ss is t
D e s tin a t io n p ro c es so r
To ta l co m m u n ic a tion la te nc y
O bs e rve d ne tw o r k
la te nc y
C o m m u n ic a tion a ss is t
N e tw o rk
Os
OrL
3/10/99 CS258 S99 33
Message Time Comparison
Mic
rose
cond
s
CM
-5
Par
ago
n
Mei
ko C
S-2
NO
W U
ltra
T3
D
CM
-5
Par
ago
n
Mei
ko C
S-2
NO
W U
ltra
T3
D
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Processing overhead,receiving side (Or)
Processing overhead,sending side (Os)
Communicationlatency (L)
Time per message, pipelinedsequence of request-response operations (g)
3/10/99 CS258 S99 34
SAS Time Comparison
Mic
rose
cond
s
CM
-5
Pa
rago
n
Me
iko
CS
-2
NO
W U
ltra
T3
D
CM
-5
Pa
rago
n
Me
iko
CS
-2
NO
W U
ltra
T3
D
0
5
10
15
20
25
Gap
Issue
Latency
3/10/99 CS258 S99 35
Message-Passing Time vs Size
Tim
e (
s)
1 10 100 1,000
Message size
10,000 100,000 1,000,000
*Sunmos operating systemis used for the benchmark.
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
100,000
1,000,000
iPSC/860
IBM SP-2
Meiko CS-2
Paragon/Sunmos*
Cray T3D
SGI Challenge
NOW
Sun E5000
3/10/99 CS258 S99 36
Message-Passing Bandwidth vs Size
1 10 100 1,000
Message size
10,000 100,000 1,000,0000
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180B
and
wid
th (
MB
/s)
iPSC/860
IBM SP-2
Meiko CS-2
Paragon/Sunmos
Cray T3D
SGI Challenge
NOW
Sun E6000
3/10/99 CS258 S99 37
Application Performance on LUS
pee
dup
on
LU
-A
0 25 50 75 100 125
T3D
SP
-2
NO
W
0
25
50
75
100
125
NOW
SP-2
Ideal
T3D
0
50
100
150
200
250
MFLOPS on LU-Ausing four processors
Number of processors
3/10/99 CS258 S99 38
Application Performance on BT
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Sp
eedu
p o
n B
T-A NOW
Ideal
SP-2
T3D
BT MFLOPSusing 25
processors
Number of processors
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
T3D
SP
-2
NO
W
3/10/99 CS258 S99 39
Message Profile on BT
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,5000
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Me
ssa
ge s
ize
(KB
)
Time (ms)
3/10/99 CS258 S99 40
Reflective Memory
• Writes to local region reflected to remote
T1
T2
R1
R2
T3
R3
VA0
VA2
Nodei
T0
T2
R0
R2
VANodej
T0
T1
R1
R0
VA
Nodek
T1
T2
T3
R1
R2
R3
Physicaladdress
I/O
3/10/99 CS258 S99 41
Case Study: DEC Memory Channel
• See also Shrimp
PCI (33 MHz)
Receive DMA
Bus interface
PCTtxctrl
rxctrl
AlphaServerSMP
Memory Channel interconnect
100 MB/s
Linkinterface
Bus adapter
MemAlphaP - $